The Telegraph 8 Apr 08;
New forest people's alliance formed as Amazon deforestation continues to rage, Tim Hirsch reports from São Paulo, Brazil
A new global alliance of indigenous and traditional forest communities has been set up, aimed at ensuring they are included in financial incentives to slow deforestation and fight climate change.
The initiative was announced at a conference in Manaus in the heart of the Brazilian Amazon, as new satellite data showed no apparent respite in rainforest destruction in February, despite a major government crackdown.
The meeting of forest peoples from 13 countries, mostly in South and Central America, was a response to discussions under the UN Climate Change Convention to set up a system rewarding countries that succeed in reducing their rate of deforestation.
Scientists estimate that the loss of the carbon stored in forests accounts for at least 20 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming.
The indigenous and traditional groups such as fishing communities and rubber-tappers fear they will be left out of this process, even though they often play a key role in protecting forests, and feel the worst impacts of climate change.
"Indigenous people must understand exactly what is happening in their forests," said Yolanda Hernández, representing the Maya Kakchiquel people of Guatemala.
"They have always been left out when decisions are made, and the time has come for them to be taken into consideration - because their ancestral knowledge about nature enables them to make an important contribution in the debate about the climate."
The new alliance launched in Manaus aims to give forest communities a collective voice in the current debate over the mechanism that will channel cash into forest protection from international markets to reduce carbon emissions.
According to the Brazilian Socio-environmental Institute, it is an opportunity to change the economic balance of power that will help indigenous communities get recognition for their territorial rights.
As the meeting debated the issue of deforestation, news emerged from the Brazilian Space Research Agency (INPE) suggesting that Amazon destruction shows no sign of slowing, despite a major government enforcement effort announced in January.
Satellite images for February this year revealed the loss of 725 square kilometres of rainforest, at a time of heavy rains, which is usually associated with a let-up in deforestation.
The agency believes this figure is in fact a considerable under-estimate, as cloud cover prevented the satellite from photographing large parts of the Amazon.
Also, this quick-response system of detecting deforestation takes low-resolution images that ignore smaller losses.
Normally, INPE estimates that the initial survey must be at least doubled to get the true picture - if that is the case, then it would confirm the suggestion in January that the deforestation rate is accelerating after three years of decline.
This is a particular disappointment to the Brazilian government, as it suggests there is not yet any significant pay-off from the major package of anti-deforestation measures announced in January.
They included a crackdown on illegal logging companies, a requirement of landowners to re-register their property to avoid fraudulent land claims, and the cutting off of credit to rural businesses flouting environmental laws.
According to Brazil's environment minister Marina Silva, it will take time for the government efforts to show up in the deforestation statistics.
"It's clear that the response to these measures is not happening at the same pace as the dynamic of deforestation that is under way," said Mrs Silva. "They will definitely produce an effect, but not in just one or two months."
She said she was still hopeful that the annual deforestation figure, measured in August, would show a drop from the 11,000 square kilometres lost last year.
But according to Mario Menezes of Friends of the Earth, the figures confirmed the impact of high agricultural prices and upcoming municipal elections in driving deforestation, and suggested the targeting of specific areas by the government was simply shifting the problem elsewhere.
"You put pressure in one place, in one municipality or one State, and deforestation just leaks to another area," he said.
