Showing posts with label wind-energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wind-energy. Show all posts

Wind farm 'predator' effect hits ecosystems: study

Patrick GALEY AFP Yahoo News 6 Nov 18;

Paris (AFP) - Wind farms act as a top "predator" in some ecosystems, harming birds at the top of the food chain and triggering a knock-on effect overlooked by green energy advocates, scientists said Monday.

Wind is the fastest-growing renewable energy sector, supplying around four percent of global electricity demand.

Close to 17 million hectares -- an area roughly the size of Tunisia -- is currently used for generating wind energy worldwide, and researchers warned that developers had "greatly underestimated" the impact the technology has on wildlife.


Read more!

Singapore's first long-span wind turbine installed at Semakau Landfill

Channel NewsAsia 20 Oct 17;

SINGAPORE: Singapore's first long-span wind turbine was installed at Semakau Landfill on Friday (Oct 20).

At 14 storeys high and with three 10.5-metre long-span rotor blades, the turbine can produce enough energy to power 45 four-room HDB units a year, the Nanyang Technological University (NTU) said in a press release.

The wind turbine is also sensitive enough to generate power with wind speeds as low as 3 metres per second and up to a maximum of 20 metres per second.

“The deployment of Singapore’s first wind turbine is a big milestone in the nation’s commitment in developing clean energy technologies for the region," said Professor Lam Khin Yong, NTU’s acting provost, chief of staff and vice president for research.

The new turbine is part of NTU's Renewable Energy Integration Demonstrator – Singapore (REIDS) initiative at Semakau Landfill, in partnership with French multinational electric utility company ENGIE.

Under this initiative, "hybrid microgrids" will also be developed in the next few years, producing enough energy to power 100 four-room HDB flats for a whole year according to NTU.

Hybrid microgrids combine renewable energy with conventional diesel- or gas-fuelled generation and energy storage capabilities, and aim to deliver clean, cost-effective electricity. These microgrids will integrate with various renewable energy sources such as solar, tidal, diesel and power-to-gas technologies, said NTU.

Each of the microgrids is expected to produce "stable and consistent power in the half-megawatt range, suitable for small islands, isolated residential areas, and emergency power supplies", the varsity added.

The first phase of the project saw the installation of a microgrid facility with more than 4,500 sq m of photovoltaic panels and a large-scale energy storage system.

This lithium-ion energy storage system can store up to 200kWh, similar to the monthly energy consumption of a two-room HDB unit, and will serve as a medium-term energy storage system.

The microgrids will eventually occupy more than 64,000 sq m - roughly nine soccer fields - of land. They can either be operated separately or function as a single power facility.

Managed by NTU’s Energy Research Institute, the REIDS initiative is expected to attract S$20 million worth of projects over the next four years, in addition to the initial S$10 million investment in infrastructure at the landfill.

Twelve new partners will be signing memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with REIDS during the 2017 Singapore International Energy Week, which will be held from Oct 23 to Oct 27, to advance the development and eventual deployment of microgrid solutions in the region, said NTU.

These include strong industry representation from both technology providers Emerson, EDF and Keppel, as well as technology adopters such as Medco, an Indonesian power conglomerate, Adaro, an Indonesian coal mining company and Nortis, a Thai independent power producer, it added.


Standing tall at 14 storeys, wind turbine at Pulau Semakau is Singapore's largest
Lim Min Zhang Straits Times 20 Oct 17;

SINGAPORE - The Republic's largest wind turbine was unveiled at Semakau Island on Friday (Oct 20), marking the first time the renewable energy source is connected to the island's power grid.

The turbine comes with three 10.5m long-span roto blades that produce an electrical output rating of 100 kilowatts, which is enough to power 45 four-room HDB flats.

It is part of the region's first large-scale, offshore power grid system, called the Renewable Energy Integration Demonstrator (Reids), an initiative by Nanyang Technological University.

The turbine is one of up to seven which will generate power for hybrid microgrids on the landfill south of Singapore, together with other sources such as photovoltaic (solar) panels, as part of Singapore's drive towards developing sustainable energy.

Said Professor Choo Fook Hoong of NTU's Energy Research Institute, which manages the initiative: "The role here is to look at renewable energy, integrating them into microgrids, so that it can benefit not only remote islands and villages (in the region), but also urban microgrids that will benefit Singapore in the longer term in terms of a more stable and resilient power supply."

The project, now in its second phase, is supported by the Economic Development Board (EDB) and the National Environment Agency (NEA).

The first phase, which consisted of installing more than 4,500 sq m of photovoltaic panels, large-scale lithium-ion energy storage systems and a hydrogen refuelling station, has been completed.

NTU deploys Singapore’s first long-span wind turbine at Semakau Landfill

Although there is limited potential for wind turbines on the mainland, developing a mix of renewable energy sources is important because they each have their own advantages, said Prof Choo.

"When we look at renewable energy integration, we cannot rely entirely on photovoltaics because that will only work when the sun is out. Wind is different - you have wind at night as well... this allows us to have continuous power supply without having to increase the storage capacity, which is not that cheap today."

The turbine can generate power even with wind speeds as low as three metres per second, up to a maximum of 20 metres per second.

Several of the microgrids, which will eventually cover more than 64,000 sq m or about the size of nine football fields, will be built, and will produce enough energy each year to power 100 blocks of four-room HDB flats for the same period.

Long-span wind turbine at Semakau Landfill

International interest in the project has been growing, with 12 new partners expected to sign agreements with Reids at the Singapore International Energy Week next week (Oct23-27) to develop and eventually deploy microgrids in the region.

This means more than 20 companies that would have come on board, including founding members Engie, General Electric Grid Solutions and Schneider Electric.

Mr Goh Chee Kiong, executive director for cleantech at the Economic Development Board, said: "The strong presence of leading energy providers and adopters is testament to Reids' success in developing an ecosystem, to pilot and develop microgrid innovations from Singapore."


Read more!

UK wind electricity cheaper than nuclear: data

Roland JACKSON AFP Yahoo News 12 Sep 17;

London (AFP) - The price of electricity from offshore wind in Britain has dipped below the level guaranteed to Hinkley Point, raising questions about the construction of the vast nuclear power station.

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy disclosed Monday the results of auctions for state subsidies for three new wind offshore farms.

Denmark's DONG Energy won the auction to build Hornsea Two, which will become the world's biggest offshore wind farm off the coast of Yorkshire in northern England.

Germany's Innogy and Norway's Statkraft won the auction for Triton Knoll off Lincolnshire in eastern England, while Moray in Scotland was won by a consortium comprising EDP Renovaveis of Portugal and ENGIE of France.

"The projects, which are set to generate over three gigawatts of electricity, enough to power 3.6 million homes, demonstrate that the UK continues to be an attractive place to invest in clean energy," the department said in a statement.

The companies lodged bids for the so-called "strike price" they will be paid by the state for electricity generated, with the lowest amounts securing the deals.

Those prices have tumbled to £74.75 (82.36 euros, $98.52) per megawatt hour for projects deliverable in 2021/2022, and to £57.50 for projects due in 2022/2023.

- 'Nail in the coffin' -

The price of offshore wind has fallen far below that of nuclear, with the planned Hinkley Point C power plant in southwestern England having secured subsidies of £92.50 per megawatt hour.

The gigantic Hinkley project was awarded to a French-Chinese consortium -- led by French giant EDF -- last year but has been plagued by long delays and cost overruns.

"Today's results mean that both onshore and offshore wind are cheaper than gas and nuclear," noted trade body RenewableUK in a statement on Monday.

However, the Nuclear Industry Association cautioned in another statement that "one technology alone can't solve the UK's power challenge".

Wind and solar production have the drawback of being unpredictable, with countries needing to call on gas, coal or nuclear plants to raise output if there is no breeze or sun.

British government wind power subsidies have now halved since the last auction was held in 2015.

Environmentalists have long urged the government to focus on renewable sources like wind and solar power to meet Britain's energy needs.

Opponents have criticised the high guaranteed Hinkley price level, which is fixed over 35 years and rises with inflation.

Lawmaker Caroline Lucas, co-leader of the Green Party, said the massive price drop for offshore wind should be the "nail in the coffin" for new nuclear power.

"The government's undying commitment to new nuclear risks locking us into sky-high prices for years to come," Lucas warned.

- 'Big step forward' -

Meanwhile, Michael Ware, partner at BDO's corporate finance division, said Monday's announcement raised questions over the future of tidal and wave energy -- which are more costly.

“We were pleasantly surprised by the low price bids in the latest auction," Ware told AFP, describing it a "vindication" of government policy.

"However, it does beg the obvious question of where a £57.50 strike price leaves other nascent technologies, such as tidal and wave, which are probably not economically viable at that level.

"It also puts the (price) being paid for Hinkley Point into sharp perspective."

Nevertheless, Ware added it was "a big step forward in the transition to a renewable (energy) grid".


Read more!

Consolidating solar, wind and tidal energy on Semakau Landfill

Channel NewsAsia 25 Oct 16;

SINGAPORE: The region’s first large-scale offshore power grid system is being built on Semakau Landfill, consolidating power generated from multiple renewable energy sources – solar, wind and tidal – as well as diesel and power-to-gas technologies, to ensure that these energy sources work well together.

The deployment of the offshore system’s first hybrid microgrid was announced on Tuesday (Oct 25) by Environment and Water Resources Minister Masagos Zulkifli at the Asia Clean Energy Summit held at the Sands Expo and Convention Centre.

The power grid system, which will have four hybrid microgrids occupying over 64,000 sq metres of land or about eight football fields, is being built by scientists from the Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

The offshore microgrid system will occupy over 64,000 sq metres of land or about eight soccer fields. (Photo: NTU)

Once all four microgrids are built by the end of 2017, they are expected to produce enough energy to power the equivalent of 250 four-room HDB flats for a year, NTU said. Fish hatcheries and nurseries at Semakau Landfill will be among the first to be powered.

Singapore is taking the lead in developing renewable energy solutions in Southeast Asia. “The deployment of this first hybrid microgrid is a big leap towards low-carbon electricity production for the nation and the region,” said NTU Chief of Staff and Vice-President (Research) Prof Lam Khin.

Such a hybrid microgrid system could be used to provide electricity on islands, remote villages, or in emergency situations, said NTU.

The hybrid microgrids at Semakau Landfill will be implemented in two phases.

The first phase, which has been completed, involved installing a microgrid facility with more than 3,000 metre square of photovoltaic (PV) panels as well as a large-scale energy storage system.

Work to build the other three microgrids will start at the end of this year.

- CNA/gs


Read more!

Indonesia: After solar, now wind power

Jakarta Post 21 Sep 16;

Indonesia surpassed another milestone in generating power from renewable energy after Singapore’s energy development company Equis signed a contract with Vestas, the wind power technology leader in Denmark, for the construction of a 65-megawatt wind power generation plant on a 30-hectare wind farm in Jeneponto, South Sulawesi.

Equis will invest up to US$150 million in the country’s first wind power project, which is scheduled to start operations in early 2018 under a 30-year build-operate-transfer system. State electricity company PLN will pay 10.89 US cents/Kilowatt hour.

We are confident the Equis-Vestas project can be a good business model for the development of wind power on other islands across the archipelago as Denmark and Vestas are both seen as leaders in developing wind power technology.

In fact, Denmark claims to have sourced 40 percent of its total commercial energy from wind power. Even more encouraging is the commitment, made by Equis and Vestas in Copenhagen while the contract was signed on Monday, to explore other areas in Indonesia for wind power projects.

Last December, President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo launched a photovoltaic power plant project of state-owned PT LEN Industri as an independent power producer in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara province. Wind and solar programs as well as hydropower and geothermal endeavors will support the government plan to source
23 percent of the country’s power from renewable energy by 2025.

As solar and wind power generation relies more on technology rather than fuel, the price of this type of technology should continue to fall.

In many countries, notably in the tropical region, solar power is being adopted rapidly, even in places where there is no grid — it is cheaper and quicker to stick panels on the roofs of huts in villages than to build a centralized power station.

The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry and PLN should initiate a nationwide campaign to enhance the development of solar and wind power, notably in rural areas where the the rate of electrification is still less than 60 percent.

However, a well-structured incentive package would be needed in order to encourage small independent producers to harness hydro, wind and solar power for electricity. The government should expedite the licensing bureaucracy and offer generous tax incentives to attract global companies to use Indonesia as a base to grow their ASEAN markets.

As a source of energy that constantly requires new technology, investors in wind and solar power should receive all the support they need including a reasonable level of feed-in tariffs so that their power can be transmitted to the national grid.

In several places throughout the tropical region, wind turbines and solar cells are now a cheaper way of generating electricity than fossil fuels with subsidies to encourage their use.


Read more!

From bacteria to wind power: NTU leads charge in developing renewable energy sources

Nanyang Technological University researchers use bacteria that causes food poisoning to generate electricity and have come up with different designs for wind and tidal turbines to suit Singapore's climate.
Alice Chia Channel NewsAsia 24 Dec 15;

SINGAPORE: Wind farms seen in countries such as the United States are not feasible in Singapore due to space constraints and low wind speeds. That is why Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers have come up with designs for wind turbines specially adapted to Singapore's climate.

The blades of their turbines are made of a lighter material and are angled in such a way that they spin fast even at low wind speeds. The capacity of each turbine is 50 kilowatts of electricity - enough for the daily power consumption of 70 households.

Researchers are also working to improve the designs of tidal turbines to address challenges in deployment. Waters around Singapore are warmer, which means more marine organisms will grow on the turbines and slow them down.

"We used new types of paints, and new types of chemistries, that will prevent both bio-fouling as well as corrosion,” said Subodh Mhaisalkar, executive director at NTU’s Energy Research Institute. “We are designing new forms of blades that will again be more efficient at low tidal flows. And finally, we're also coming up with different mechanisms that will allow the turbines to function without weed entanglement."

The wind turbines will be deployed on Semakau landfill by July 2016, and the tidal turbines by July 2017. It is part of a project to build a power grid that integrates renewable energy sources.

The initiative is known as Renewable Energy Integration Demonstrator - Singapore. The grid will cost an initial S$8 million, and is expected to attract S$20 million more in project investments from industry participants.

"Singapore is renewable energy disadvantaged,” said Prof Mhaisalkar. “We have really very limited wind resources on the main island itself, but the southern parts of Singapore, the islands around Singapore, have significant wind resource. We have measured the wind speeds of up to 6 metres per second on Semakau and adjacent regions."

However, he noted that Singapore's status as a very important shipping hub poses a challenge for it to harvest energy in the southern part of the country. "The entire shipping channels really would limit the deployment of a number of these wind turbines close to the shore.

“So the best opportunity Singapore has is to deploy some of these turbines on our islands, but the greater opportunity is in the ASEAN region, where we have tens and thousands of islands without electrification. And if we can deploy these turbines on these islands, that represents the ideal situation where we can really harvest energy from the region."

So far, the region has only focused on harvesting energy from the sun he said. "The main issue with photovoltaics is you really can harvest energy only during the daytime. The opportunity we have by combining solar with wind as well as with tidal, is that we have the potential for 24-hour coverage of renewables," the professor added.

POWER FROM BACTERIA

In a separate project, NTU researchers have found an eco-friendly way to produce hydrogen gas, which can be used as fuel.

First, a chemical is added to a culture of E coli bacteria to produce electricity. Such bacteria are commonly found in the environment, in the intestines of people and animals and some strains that can cause diarrhoea and food poisoning.

Under sunlight, the electricity helps to break up water into its components of hydrogen and oxygen.

"Not only are we able to use bacteria to clean water and to break down waste, we can also use the electrons that are produced by the bacteria to feed into a system that can help us to produce 70 times more hydrogen gas,” said Associate Professor Joachim Loo from NTU’s Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering. “Currently there are actually products out there that use bacteria to produce electricity, but these are all stand-alone systems.

“At the same time, we are also working in the area of solar fuels, where we actually use sunlight to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, but these have always been stand-alone systems. So for the first time, we are showing that a hybrid system of combining both together, we get a more efficient production of hydrogen gas."

Professor Loo also said using hydrogen gas can help reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The team hopes to develop the idea into a commercial product in the coming years.

- CNA/ek


Read more!

Nothing can compete with renewable energy, says top climate scientist

Prof John Schellnhuber says that if countries implement their pledges made for Paris climate summit it will give huge boost to wind, tidal and solar power
Damian Carrington The Guardian 9 Nov 15;

Catastrophic global warming can be avoided with a deal at a crunch UN climate change summit in Paris this December because “ultimately nothing can compete with renewables”, according to one of the world’s most influential climate scientists.

Most countries have already made voluntary pledges to roll out clean energy and cut carbon emissions, and Prof John Schellnhuber said the best hope of making nations keep their promises was moral pressure.

Schellnhuber is a key member of the German delegation attending the Paris summit and has advised Angela Merkel and Pope Francis on climate change.

He said there was reason for optimism about the Paris talks, where at least 80 heads of state are expected. “That is a very telling thing - a sign of hope - because people at the top level do not want to be tainted by failure,” he said.

If a critical mass of big countries implement their pledges, he said in an interview with the Guardian, the move towards a global low-carbon economy would gain unstoppable momentum.

“If some countries really honour their pledges, including China, Brazil, South Africa, US and Europe, I think we will get a dynamic that will transform the development of the century. This is not sheer optimism – it is based on analysis of how incumbent systems implode.”

In July, Schellnhuber told a science conference in Paris that the world needed “an induced implosion of the carbon economy over the next 20-30 years. Otherwise we have no chance of avoiding dangerous, perhaps disastrous, climate change.”

“The avalanche will start because ultimately nothing can compete with renewables,” he told the Guardian. “If you invest at [large] scale, inevitably we will end up with much cheaper, much more reliable, much safer technologies in the energy system: wind, solar, biomass, tidal, hydropower. It is really a no-brainer, if you take away all the ideological debris and lobbying.”

India, for example, aims to deliver 350GW of renewable energy in the next 10 years, the equivalent to 300 nuclear power stations, he said. “That is mind boggling and would be the final nail in the coffin of coal-fired power stations,” Schellnhuber said. “If India delivers on that pledge, it will be a tipping point for that country.”

He said the approach taken for the Paris talks, asking each nation to put forward a pledge, had resulted in half the emissions cuts needed to avoid more than 2C in warming, the level widely considered as dangerous. “These are pledges only, but nevertheless this bottom-up approach is driving change, and that is amazing as it is the weakest approach,” Schellnhuber said.

The key, he said, was that these pledges are honoured and future reviews deliver the rest of the cuts needed. But he warned there will be no international force to check and enforce carbon cuts, as nations would not allow such a challenge to their sovereignty.

“The verification will not be delivered by an international scheme,” he said. “You will not send in emissions inspectors like people wanted to send to Iran [for nuclear technology inspections].” Instead, he said: “It is prestige, it is image, it is a moral issue, it is how you appear to the world. If the Chinese, for example, make a pledge, they want to keep it. They do not want to lose face.”

Public pressure is “really holding the key to this”, said Schellnhuber, who has attended most of the 20 previous UN climate summits. “The last, best hope we have is moral argument.” He said that Germany’s aim to cut carbon emissions by 40% by 2020 was a tall order, because dealing with its lignite coal-fired power stations will be “very expensive and difficult”. But he said: “Merkel will do everything to achieve this or it will be seen as a national failure.”

The biggest danger for the Paris summit, he said, was the $100bn a year from 2020 promised by rich nations help poorer countries cope with climate change, which has yet to be delivered. He said the sum was “peanuts” in the context of global investment flows, but that a failure to deliver would “make countries in the global south very angry”.

“We can afford $100bn across the world, but it seems the OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] countries are still very reluctant,” Schellnhuber said. “It will divert attention from the serious work – making sure the pledges are honoured.”


Read more!

Wind turbine manufacturer opens new facility in Singapore

Lynn Kan Business Times 8 Apr 11;

LEADING wind turbine manufacturer, Spain's Gamesa, launched its new R&D centre and commercialisation office here yesterday - despite Singapore's lack of a wind energy market.

Rather, Gamesa chairman Jorge Calvet chose Singapore to tap on its 'intellectual and engineering capabilities' in materials and coatings, a research area of importance because composite materials are used in turbines.

The Gamesa Advanced Materials Research Centre, currently housed at Nanyang Technological University's (NTU) Research Techno Plaza, will employ more than 30 engineers by 2014.

The centre will move to CleanTech Park when the 50-hectare eco-business facility in Jurong is completed.

It will soon kick-start collaborations with researchers from NTU, the National University of Singapore (NUS), and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star).

Mr Calvet said there is every likelihood that the research will start commercialisation within the next 18 to 24 months.

NTU has agreed to work on two projects with Gamesa to work on blade coatings and how to incorporate these materials into Gamesa's manufacturing line.

NUS will develop methods to monitor embedded smart sensors in turbine blades, that can relay any detected damage to the blade to engineers off-site.

The technology will be useful because turbines can be in far- flung, inaccessible areas, and currently require inspection by engineers.

Furthermore, damage - harder to detect in composite materials than metals - occurs due to exposure to harsh environments.

Said NUS' vice-dean (research) in the faculty of engineering, Tay Tong Earn: 'If you can detect damage, then you would need to repair only when necessary. It saves on manpower and time that translates into cost.'

Mr Calvet stressed that wind energy has an increasingly significant role within the energy market, in light of the disruptions to oil supply caused by unrest in the Middle East and North Africa, and complications with nuclear power in Japan following the 9.0-scale earthquake.

Gamesa's new commercial office, says Mr Calvet, will look after markets in South-east Asia. Recently, Gamesa opened a wind farm in Sri Lanka and also sold turbines to New Zealand.

Mr Calvet expects Gamesa's Asian derived revenue to burgeon further. In 2010, between 42 and 45 per cent of its revenue came from India and China.

'South-east Asia is a promising market,' said Mr Calvet. 'Any country keen to have wind (energy), we will look at, no matter how big or small.'

Spanish wind giant Gamesa sets up research lab in NTU
Jessica Cheam Straits Times 8 Apr 11;

SINGAPORE may not have high wind speeds to speak of but that is not stopping high-flying wind firms from setting up here.

Spanish wind giant Gamesa is the latest to set up a research and development (R&D) laboratory here.

At the opening ceremony yesterday, it signed a memorandum of understanding with Nanyang Technological University (NTU), National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research to develop cutting-edge wind-technology applications.

Speaking at the launch, Gamesa chairman Jorge Calvet said the advanced materials research centre, housed in NTU's Research Techno Plaza, is its first in South-east Asia.

'Being a technology company, we want to be at the forefront of our industry. Our partnership with Singapore's institutions will help us to achieve that, especially in advanced materials research,' he said.

In 18 to 24 months, Gamesa could start to see Singapore-developed applications put into its manufacturing process 'so customers can take advantage of the R&D we're doing here'.

Gamesa has so far pledged $1 million to NTU for projects that it is working on, with collaborations with the other institutions still being finalised.

The firm's scientists and engineers will be working on, for example, research into wind turbine blade coatings to withstand extreme conditions with NTU, and using smart sensors to monitor the performance of materials used in wind turbines with NUS.

It intends to employ more than 30 engineers in the R&D centre by 2014.

NTU president-designate Bertil Andersson said the collaboration 'will be instrumental in bringing valuable academic research' in sustainability to the wider market.

Economic Development Board assistant managing director Yeoh Keat Chuan said Gamesa's move 'reflects well on Singapore's strengths as a location for wind-energy research, namely, strong R&D infrastructure, skilled cosmopolitan workforce and favourable intellectual-property protection'.

Other investments here include Norwegian wind service firm DNV, which opened a clean-technology centre last year, and Danish wind-power firm Vestas investing $500 million in a research centre in 2008.


Read more!

Singapore: Whipping up fervour for wind energy

Tycoon wants the world to use turbines to reduce carbon footprint
Grace Ng, Straits Times 17 Nov 10;

MR TULSI Tanti, Time Magazine's Hero of the Environment, has an idea to make Singapore greener and draw more tourists at the same time.

Build a gigantic wind turbine the height of some 10 football fields in the sea. It would meet some of the island's electricity needs and double up as an offshore lookout tower for visitors.

'People can go by boat to the turbine, take the lift to the gallery and see Singapore from a 100m height,' said the chairman of Suzlon Energy, the world's third- largest wind energy player.

Having visited Singapore several times for family vacations as well as board meetings of SE Shipping, a family-owned company that handles logistics for Suzlon, Mr Tanti remembers it fondly as 'a very good tourist place'.

Since Singapore has limited land, the turbine can be put in the sea and double up as a tourist attraction, he said in a recent interview in his Beijing office.

This may seem like an unorthodox suggestion, since Singapore has relatively weak wind flows. But the entrepreneur, who has started 17 different businesses, is used to blowing old assumptions away with his forward-looking ideas.

'Entrepreneurship, going beyond what is (already) here, is in my DNA,' said the 52-year-old, who was in China to meet clients after attending September's World Economic Forum in the nearby city of Tianjin.

It was such out-of-the-box thinking that helped Mr Tanti, together with his three younger brothers, build the world's third-largest wind turbine maker Suzlon about 15 years ago.

In 1994, their textile business in Surat, western India, was plagued by frequent power blackouts and sky-high electricity bills.

Then Mr Tanti discovered the wonders of wind. 'We didn't have energy, so our first objective was to bring energy (security). The second thing was how we can do this at low cost. How can I hedge the power cost for the next 20 years?'

This was precisely what a wind turbine could do - and conventional electricity suppliers could not.

'If I go in and ask any power company, 'Can you give me the price in 20 years?', they won't know what the fuel price will be. But if anybody came to me and asked, 'What price will you give me in 2030?', I can give you a fixed price today.'

So he bought two wind turbines from the top manufacturer Vestas. At that time, he had little clue about how the machines worked - or that this would be the first step to starting a company in 1995 that would one day rival the Danish company.

All he knew was that to a customer, the system of having one company make a turbine, another install it and a third maintain it, was a mess.

So he devised a complete suite of wind services which would even allow customers to buy energy from a wind turbine they owned far away.

This concept was simple, and a big hit. By 1999, wind turbines were so popular in the Indian state of Maharashtra, where Mr Tanti and his brothers had set up Suzlon by scraping together US$600,000 (S$780,000), that a law was passed allowing companies to claim the costs of installing turbines as a tax deduction.

In 2001, Suzlon's sales crossed the US$100 million mark.

That set the stage for the company to pull off a successful US$340 million listing on the Indian stock exchange in 2005 and the largest acquisition by any Indian company in Germany in 2007.

But for Mr Tanti, 2001 was a turning point in a different way: He made it his mission to help save the world.

'I personally realised that the biggest challenge for the world is global warming and climate change...and we (Suzlon) can create a good impact on that,' he said.

With carbon emissions growing dangerously fast, the polar ice caps are melting, putting his favourite islands like the Maldives in danger of being submerged by rising sea levels.

'The sea level (is expected to) grow by 7m. This will hit Singapore too, not just the Maldives...Of course, it may take many years (before this happens), but we must ask ourselves, What are we giving to our grandchildren?'

Mr Tanti, whose son and daughter are both studying for their master's degrees in finance, does not have grandchildren yet.

But he can already imagine how they would react to his crusade: 'They will know... if I will do a good job, they will be very happy.'

His own grandfather had made a deep impression on him when he was a 21-year-old.

He had tried to sell surplus underground water sourced from beneath his father's cold storage factory during a water crisis in 1978, but was sternly rebuked.

'I sold water from a big tank, and within seven days, my grandfather came to know. Immediately, he said, 'You cannot sell water, give it free to the people.''

So while entrepreneurship is in the DNA of the Tanti family, the 16 members running Suzlon have grown up learning that doing business is about being a 'good human being'.

It is such family values of integrity and good humanity that Mr Tanti says drive him to travel as many as 300 days a year around the world persuading people to use more giant fans.

'I hope to communicate to the common people, the governments, the decision makers that we are growing the economy but at the same time our actions are destroying the environment.'

Sceptics may view this as a savvy plug for more wind turbines to help Suzlon - which took a hit during the global financial crisis - expand its 10 per cent global market share and reverse its net loss by the end of this year.

This time, Mr Tanti is in China pushing Suzlon's expansion in the world's largest wind energy market, which may include offshore wind projects using its 6MW turbines.

Still, Mr Tanti, named 'Champion of the Earth 2009' by the United Nations Environment Programme, would rather reduce his carbon footprint than live it up as the 69th richest man in India with more than US$1 billion in assets.

That includes having no private jet and no power-guzzling mansion. He lives in a three-bedroom rented apartment in Pune, a city in western India, and took the hour-long train ride from Tianjin to Beijing instead of driving.

He is also sticking to his 20-year vision for Suzlon that started in 2001 when he feared for the fate of sinking islands.

The first step was for Suzlon to expand its capacity rapidly. 'From 2002 to 2010, our growth was nearly 60 per cent because we believe we (must) put more wind turbines to reduce the world's carbon footprint.

'Today you ask me, what is the next level? By 2020, we want maximum geography.'

Suzlon is already in 25 markets. But with demand in the United States and Europe faltering, it is aggressively expanding in developing countries.

'We are concentrating heavily in the short term on emerging markets: India, China, South Africa and South America. These markets are growing, they have hunger for energy and are looking to more...(green) job creation,' he said.

'Maybe I can put some wind turbines offshore in Singapore too.'

The island, which houses key wind energy research centres for Vestas and Siemens, is already experimenting with vertical wind turbines on land. But the feasibility of offshore turbines is unclear.

But Mr Tanti seemed so taken by the idea that he continued talking even as he headed out of the door to his client meeting: 'Maybe we can recommend to the Singapore Government. Suzlon has the technology for it.'

After all, even small islands count in his 2020 vision. 'The more megawatts of wind power, the more energy security and green jobs,' he said.

Power to the people, minus the emissions
Straits Times 17 Nov 10;

# Why are you interested in wind energy?

Going forward, energy needs will increase considerably: The world has a population of six billion right now, of which 1.5 billion don't have access to electricity.

By 2030, the population will likely grow to around nine billion, and by that time, the world will need almost double the energy that it needs today.

So in this context, one thing is clear: We need to provide access to electricity for everybody, and this electricity should be low-cost and not damage the climate.

Wind energy players such as Suzlon can help meet this need and develop a low-carbon economy. At the same time, we are contributing to more green jobs.

# You attended the Copenhagen Summit in December last year. What is your take on global efforts to cut carbon emissions?

We have a great opportunity to reshape the world's energy consumption patterns of today, and to make energy cleaner, more accessible and more sustainable.

Acting now will mean a better world for us and for all of our children. At the Copenhagen summit, 192 countries agreed to keep the Earth's temperature increase below 2 deg C.

However, we still need to establish a global governance framework on climate change that ensures enforcement so that all countries will follow it strictly. Such a framework takes time to agree upon though, and maybe it would take one or two more years to get that established.


Read more!

Winds of change in clean energy in Singapore

JTC, HDB looking into use of turbines to harvest waste air flow to generate electricity
Victoria Vaughan Straits Times 3 Sep 10;

WIND may still be used to generate electricity in Singapore - just not Mother Nature's breeze.

Both JTC Corporation and the Housing Board are looking into the use of vertical axis wind turbines, where the blades spin around an upright shaft.

JTC has put out a tender for two such wind turbines to harvest waste air flow from lift exhausts - openings on the roof to ensure ventilation for lift shafts - at its CleanTech One building at CleanTech Park, currently under construction near Nanyang Technological University.

Contractors are yet to be confirmed, however, and the project is considered 'highly experimental', according to a spokesman.

HDB is also looking to test out the feasibility of wind energy and has purchased a 200-watt vertical axis wind turbine - just powerful enough to light up a bedroom, for example. It is currently looking at possible locations for testing the device using both natural and generated wind.

One manufacturer is hoping this will be the start of harnessing the potential of wind generated from cooling towers, lift shafts and bathroom ventilation systems, which populate the roofs of major buildings in Singapore and throughout the region.

Mr Ong Gin Keat, chief executive of Singapore company CygnusPower, which makes these turbines, said: 'Air is coming out of (air-conditioning) chillers for 10 to 12 hours a day at shopping centres and office blocks, and for 24 hours at industry sites.

'Our turbines can recover between 20 and 30 per cent of the power from a cooling tower, which will be fed back into the building and cut down on operating costs. It's not a big wind from the North Sea but if they were on all big buildings, it could mean at least a 20 per cent recoup of electricity for Singapore,' said Mr Ong, who has partners in Japan and South Korea.

For a 1 kilowatt (kw) turbine, costing about $12,500, this could mean savings of about $57 a day for buildings operating for 12 hours, and $20,805 annually. There are also environmental benefits as a

1 kilowatt-hour unit working at 20 per cent can save nearly a tonne of carbon dioxide a year.

Nanyang Polytechnic (NYP) bought a 2kw vertical axis turbine last November, which is now plugged into the grid and awaiting approval from Singapore Power - expected later this month.

Mr Chan Yew Meng, senior director at NYP's school of engineering, said: 'We have been using natural wind to power the turbine. Using scavenged wind from exhausts is an interesting concept... We are going to do research in that area. We are also looking at the best way to harvest wind, whether from one big turbine or a cluster of smaller ones.'

Singapore Polytechnic's Dr Jiang Fan, manager of the Technology Centre of Energy Conservation, however, is not convinced that using salvaged wind to drive turbines will have an effect on energy efficiency.

'If you put a wind turbine in front of an air-conditioning exhaust fan, you block the air flow. But you want to keep the air flow speed the same to maintain the temperature level, so you may have to increase the power to the air-conditioning to drive the turbine,' he said, adding that he did not have any data to prove this theory, so it was still worth researching further.


Read more!

Australia turns to sun, wind and waves for clean energy

* Australia races to capitalise on clean energy sources
* Need to decide carbon price key to plan's success
* Cheap conventional energy may stymie renewable ambitions
Michael Perry Reuters Alernet 22 Aug 10;

SYDNEY, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Australia plans to build the southern hemisphere's biggest wind farm by 2013 as it scrambles to harness its abundance of clean energy sources, such as wind, solar, waves, geothermal and bioenergy, and fight climate change.

Renewable energy now supplies just 6 percent of power in Australia, because it has historically lacked the political and commercial will to pursue big renewable energy projects.

The very sources of its clean energy, its vast outback and 59,736 kms (37,120 miles) of coast, are major obstacles to linking new, remote power sources into the power grid.

Australia's problem is that it has too many energy resources, crucially too much cheap coal, making it the world's largest coal exporter and generating about 80 percent of its electricity through coal-fired power stations.

"It's a blessing and a curse," said Matthew Warren, head of the Clean Energy Council, which represents more than 350 companies in the renewable energy and energy efficiency fields.

"Australia is really at the top of the list, in the scale of the economy and the quality and scale of renewable resources. But the grid issues are significant because we run a very, very large, long and thin grid," said Warren.

"It's like running a grid from Paris to Moscow with sparsely distributed energy demand through that grid," he said.

But Australia has begun to tackle the problem.

Revised renewable energy target laws passed in June promise some A$20 billion of investment in clean energy technologies by 2020, creating an estimated 28,000 new jobs.

On Aug. 12, Australia's largest energy retailer AGL Energy Ltd and New Zealand's state-owned Meridan Energy Ltd announced they would build a A$1 billion wind farm in Macarthur, Victoria. Its 140 wind turbines would make it the largest wind farm in the southern hemisphere, generating enough power for 220,000 homes, abating 1.7 million tonnes of greenhouse gases annually or the equivalent of taking 420,000 cars off the road.

Wind generation is cheaper than other forms of renewable energy destined to feed a grid, says Meridan chief Tim Lusk.

"We expect wind farms, and Macarthur, in particular, to make a substantial contribution to Australian (power) retailers meeting commitments under the Renewable Energy Target."

LACK OF CARBON PRICE MAY HINDER CLEAN ENERGY

Australia has set itself a 20 percent renewable energy target by 2020 which the Clean Energy Council believes will be met, despite the lack of a carbon price.

In campaigning for an Aug. 21 election, the Labor government and the conservative opposition are divided over a carbon price, which would force coal power operators to invest in cleaner technology and make renewable energy more competitive.

The lack of a price on carbon could cost the Australian economy and consumers an extra A$2 billion ($1.75 billion) by 2020 due to investment in less energy efficient coal-fired power plants, the Climate Institute think-tank estimates.

"It would be better in the long run if we had a carbon price," said Warren of the Clean Energy Council. "It's the economic tool of choice (to develop clean energy) because it's seen as being the most efficient and most effective.

"Once introduced it creates a core signal to business to change their investment patterns. Without it we are in a second best market. We encourage a more co-operative approach to a carbon scheme as quickly as possible."

But the bipartisan agreement that drove through June's renewable laws does not exist for carbon.

To get the legislation past a hostile upper house Senate, Australia was forced to separate its renewable energy plans from its carbon trading scheme, just as U.S. President Barack Obama was forced to cleave his clean energy initiatives from sweeping climate change legislation to appease Congress.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard says she is still in favour of a market-based carbon scheme to tackle climate change, but has deferred a decision until 2012, while opposition leader Tony Abbott is opposed to a carbon price.

NO ENERGY SECURITY RISK FOR AUSTRALIA

Renewable energy investment worldwide has boomed in recent years, with some US$190 billion worth of new clean energy in 2008, according to the 2009 Renewables Global Status Report.

Large-scale solar plants have tripled from 2007 to total 1,800 in 2008, with the majority of new plants in Spain, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Korea and Portugal. The United States, the world's biggest wind energy generator, in 2008 installed five times Australia's total wind energy capacity.

In contrast, the Snowy Hydro Ltd complex in Australia's southeast, which consists of 16 dams and seven power stations and which contributes 77 percent of current renewable energy, was built back in the 1950s primarily as a symbol of nation building.

"We do not have energy security issues like the Europeans or even the U.S.," said Warren, referring to Russia cutting off gas to Europe and Washington's push to reduce its Middle East oil.

"That has made it far more attractive (for Europe and the U.S.) to take a more aggressive approach to renewable energy."

Australia did have an opportunity in the 1980s and 1990s to develop large scale renewable energy, but let it slip.

Australian scientists were in the vanguard of renewable energy technology, most notably Shi Zhengrong, who became known as the "Sun King", after leaving Australia to produce solar cells in China.

Shi's Suntech Power Holdings Co is now China's largest photovoltaic (PV) solar panel maker.

While Australia's scientists still work at the cutting edge of renewable technology there has remained an absence of market drivers to expand the country's renewable industry, said Iain MacGill, from the Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets at the University of New South Wales.

"We did have early leads, we were one of the world's larger PV manufacturers and deployers back in the 80s," said MacGill.

"The competition steepened, and it would have taken significant investment and risk to have stayed in the game. But we withdrew from the race and that's a shame."

Still, Australia could switch completely to renewable energy within 10 years by building 12 huge solar thermal power stations and 23 large-scale wind farms, under a "Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan" released in August.

The solar plants would generate 60 percent of the nation's power using Australian technology to store heat in molten salt, which allows them to operate 24 hours a day. The rest would come from 6,500 wind turbines dotted mainly around the coast.

The network would generate 325 TWh of power a year, said the plan produced by Melbourne University, Beyond Zero Emissions environment group and Sinclair Knight Merz engineers.

This ambitious clean energy network is not cheap, costing A$370 billion over the 10 years of the plan. But the plan says the extra power cost to households could be a mere A$8 a week.

"Our long-term global goal is to very substantially reduce our emissions, a goal that will require almost all of our stationary (fossil-fuel) energy to be produced from zero or near-zero emission sources. This report demonstrates we could already be technologically ready to do that," said former Australian environment minister Malcolm Turnbull.

For details of the plan: http://media.beyondzeroemissions.org

SOLAR POWER BARELY TAPPED

Australia, one of the world's highest carbon emitters per head, will be forced to decarbonise its economy as the world tackles climate change and eventually sets a price on carbon.

The new Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) laws will spur early development of clean energy, initially in the wind sector, analysts say. Wind now provides 16 percent of Australia's renewable energy.

"Wind power will produce 50-80 percent of the renewable energy certificates required under the LRET," said Jenny Cosgrove at Wilson HTM Investment Group.

Wilson HTM lists more than 70 wind farm projects with a total capacity of 11,000 MW on the planning boards and expects wind farm growth to average 16 percent a year.

Austalia has the highest average solar radiation of any continent, yet it has barely tapped into solar power, with its largest solar thermal plant producing only 1.5 MW of power.

The government's A$1.5-billion Solar Flagship Programme aims to develop the sector by help funding building and development of large 1,000-MW solar power stations. It has also pledged A$100 million in renewable energy venture capital.

The small Greens party, which is expected to control the balance of power in the Senate after the election, has proposed A$5 billion worth of loan guarantees and a feed-in tariff for large-scale renewable energy developments, similar to the U.S. model which provides a 100 percent guarantee.

"In the context of the global financial crisis, loan guarantees are essential to help renewable energy developers access the finance they need to build baseload power stations," said Greens Senator Christine Milne. (Editing by Clarence Fernandez)


Read more!

Offshore wind farms – green energy or biodiversity threat?

IUCN 24 Jun 10;

In the rush to find new sources of energy and reduce our dependency on fossil fuels, offshore wind farms are increasingly seen as an attractive solution, but their potential impact on marine biodiversity should not be overlooked.

Greening blue energy, written in collaboration with E.ON and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, is the most comprehensive guide to date for assessing the impact of offshore wind energy installations on marine ecosystems and biodiversity. It gives governments, policy makers and industry the tools to enhance the environmental performance of offshore renewable energy.

“Moving away from oil, gas and coal is vital to avoid the worse impacts of climate change, in this context on marine ecosystems,” says Dan Wilhelmsson, Scientific Coordinator at IUCN's Global Marine Programme and first author of the report. “At the same time, we need to make sure that what we call blue energy, which includes the offshore renewable sources, is also green and doesn’t exacerbate existing stresses on the marine environment.”

Offshore wind energy development in the European Union is accelerating and could potentially supply between 12 and 16 percent of the EU’s electricity by 2030, the equivalent of 25,000 wind turbines. Other countries and regions, such as the US, Japan, India and Eastern Africa are also exploring the possibility of adding offshore renewable energy to their energy mix.

Electricity produced from wind farms helps combat climate change by avoiding greenhouse gas emissions and toxic pollutants associated with fossil fuels. Offshore wind farms can also provide advantages for local wildlife through the establishment of 'no fishing zones' and the creation of artificial reefs where marine species can thrive.

But if not properly planned and managed, the installations can adversely affect marine biodiversity. The report highlights issues such as habitat loss for birds and sea creatures, potential collisions with wind turbines, deviation of the migratory routes of birds and whales, noise and electromagnetic disturbance and navigational hazards for ships.

The report reviewed over a thousand scientific sources to provide the most up-to-date knowledge on the possible impacts of offshore wind farms on the marine environment and animals, from the planning phase through to the construction, operation and decommissioning of the farm.

Avoiding sensitive sites, integrating the development of wind farms in marine management decisions, using clever designs and offsetting residual impacts will minimize adverse impacts and maximize the benefits for biodiversity, the report says. It will also help reduce the time spent on consenting processes for wind farm development, which currently takes around five years.

“Continued careful monitoring of offshore wind energy developments and their actual impacts on marine wildlife will be vital to generate reliable data and help ensure that offshore wind energy fulfils its sustainable potential”, says Nadine McCormick, IUCN’s Energy Network Coordinator.

Download the report at http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2010-014.pdf


Read more!

Keppel unit bags deal for German wind farm

Harsha Jethnani, Straits Times 24 Mar 10;

A KEPPEL Corp unit has won a $117.6 million contract to build a vessel that will be used to erect a wind farm off the German coast.

Keppel Verolme, which is based in the Netherlands, will partner German firm Areva Energietechnik to undertake the project.

It is Keppel Verolme's first contract to build a vessel for the wind energy sector.

The deal was awarded by Wetfeet Offshore, which will build and operate the wind farm in the North Sea, according to a Keppel Corp statement yesterday.

'This marks Keppel's entry into the offshore wind energy business, and affirms Wetfeet Offshore's confidence in our ability with Areva to deliver the best solution for the job,' said Keppel Verolme managing director Harold Linssen.

The barge will serve as a platform to carry the transformers and high voltage switchgear for the wind turbines, which will eventually deliver electricity to Germany's power grid.

'Germany aims to raise its percentage of electricity generated from renewable sources to at least 20 per cent by 2020 and 50 per cent by 2050,' said Mr Linssen.

'A major element in achieving this target is to further develop the capacity of its offshore wind sector.'

The wind farm will be able to generate about 1.4 billion kilowatt hours of electricity once it is fully operational in 2013.

It could power nearly 134,000 average American homes a year, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

The farm will supply one million people with clean energy and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by about 1.2 million tonnes each year.

Keppel Verolme will handle the engineering and construction work for the barge while Areva Energietechnik will fabricate and install special equipment. The vessel should be completed later next year.

Areva Energietechnik is a German subsidiary of French energy company Areva.

Keppel Verolme is in a strategic position to add value to the offshore wind industry, given its proximity to the European and North Sea markets, Mr Linssen said.

The project 'augments our strong track record and expertise in delivering a variety of advanced offshore rigs and vessels on time, within budget and without incidents', he added.

Keppel Corp closed 19 cents higher at $9.16 yesterday.

Keppel bags first contract for German wind farm
Georgina Joseph Channel NewsAsia 23 Mar 10;

SINGAPORE: Keppel Verolme and consortium partner AREVA have secured a S$117.6 million contract to build a barge for a new offshore wind farm in the German Zone of the North Sea.

Mr Harold Linssen, managing director of Keppel Verolme in The Netherlands, said this latest contract marks Keppel's successful entry into the offshore wind energy business.

When fully operational in 2013, the wind farm will be able to generate some 1.4 billion kilowatt hours of electrical energy annually. This will supply one million people with clean energy. It is also expected to help cut some 1.2 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year.

Keppel Verolme will carry out the detailed engineering and construction work on this new platform design, while AREVA will design, fabricate and install the transformers and other equipment.

The vessel is targeted for completion in the fourth quarter of 2011.

The contract is not expected to have material impact on the earnings per share of Keppel Corporation for the current financial year.

- CNA/sc


Read more!

U.S. to protect bird, oil drilling likely restricted

Ed Stoddard and Tom Doggett, Reuters 5 Mar 10;

DALLAS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The iconic sage grouse that once roamed the western U.S. plains in great numbers needs protection, a move that will still curtail some energy development, the U.S. Interior Department said on Friday.

The bird will not be listed under the Endangered Species Act, but the department will put special emphasis on preserving the chicken-sized bird on lands where oil companies want to drill and wind companies want to erect their massive turbines.

The bird which feeds off the sage brush in states such as Wyoming has lost about half of its habitat over the past several decades, with its numbers slashed by 90 percent to between 200,000 and 300,000.

Bob Abbey, director of the Bureau of Land Management, said the agency will review drilling permits that have already been approved.

"Certainly, we would be reviewing those applications with a lot more scrutiny in areas where we have determined they are major populations of sage grouse and as a result of that determination...we would likely attach some additional stipulations on that drilling," he said.

It was not immediately clear which projects will be affected, but efforts to protect the bird have already thrown some projects into uncertainty, including a 198-turbine, $600 million wind farm in Wyoming proposed by Horizon Wind Energy.

The Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States said it was concerned about how energy development would be affected but was relieved that a full listing of the bird was avoided.

"We're concerned that land managers will nevertheless implement this decision by introducing very restrictive policies that prevent companies from investing and creating high-paying jobs in local communities," the group said.

U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said he wanted to move ahead with energy development while working with the states and private landowners to ensure the sage grouse thrives.

POLITICAL FLAP?

Republicans, who have branded President Barack Obama's attempts to pass a climate change bill as a job killer, said efforts to protect the sage grouse was another example of a green agenda that was bad for workers.

"Wyoming is still left with a black cloud over our job market," said the state's U.S. senator, John Barrasso.

With an unemployment rate of 9.7 percent, the economy will be a politically charged issue in a congressional election year where Democrats are seen in trouble in many districts.

The bird did not attain full endangered status but as a candidate species, federal and state government agencies will be expected to work harder to protect its habitat, so industry could still face restrictions.

Wyoming had already taken steps to protect the bird in a bid to stave off an endangered species listing, which the sage grouse could still attain down the road.

The Bureau of Land Management in early January issued guidelines to protect the bird, which Wyoming officials and environmentalists say will effectively preclude wind power development in about 20 percent of the sprawling state.

According to National Geographic, the bird's range is spread over 11 western states but is concentrated in Wyoming, Montana, Idaho and Nevada.

(Editing by Jim Marshall and Rebekah Kebede)

Energy groups relieved sage grouse won't be listed
Mead Gruver, Associated Press Yahoo News 5 Mar 10;

CHEYENNE, Wyo. – An Interior Department announcement Friday that it won't list sage grouse as an endangered or threatened species opens the way for continued development of the West's wind energy and oil and gas industries.

Those industries will still face scrutiny in sage grouse habitat but much less so than if the bird were listed.

The government concluded that listing the chicken-sized brown bird as threatened or endangered is warranted but precluded by higher priorities — other species considered in greater danger.

But Interior will classify the bird among species that are candidates for federal protection, which are assigned a priority number between one and 12. The sage grouse has been given an eight, putting it two-thirds of the way down the scale as a priority for federal protection.

Sage grouse have experienced a 90 percent decline in their numbers and a 50 percent decline in their sagebrush habitat from a century ago, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said at a news conference.

But the bird populations have been relatively stable over the last decade thanks to efforts by states such as Wyoming, Idaho and Montana to protect the species and its habitat, he said.

"Frankly, it is the states in the Western part of the United States that have developed the right kind of strategies to confront this challenge," Salazar said.

Sage grouse inhabit large portions of Wyoming, Nevada, Montana, Oregon and Idaho, and smaller areas of Colorado, Utah, California, Washington, South Dakota, North Dakota and western Canada.

Especially in Wyoming, large areas of sage grouse habitat also are prime spots for natural gas development that has boomed in recent years. In Nevada, the birds are challenged by an invasive species, cheatgrass, which is prone to frequent wildfires that burn up native sagebrush.

Wyoming, home to an estimated one-half of North America's sage grouse, has been mapping the bird's habitat, studying it and taking other steps to better understand how to protect the species and avoid an endangered listing — efforts that Gov. Dave Freudenthal said have paid off.

"The candidate listing gives us a fighting chance, while an endangered or threatened listing would have taken the wind out of our sails," he said in a release.

Some environmentalists were less pleased.

The finding shows the government is willing to protect sage grouse but not willing to do what's necessary, said Jon Marvel, executive director of the Hailey, Idaho-based Western Watersheds Project.

"None of the actions proposed to date are mandatory, and that undermines the commitment for improving conditions for sage grouse," Marvel said.

Friday's announcement results from a lawsuit that Western Watersheds filed in 2006. A federal judge in Boise, Idaho, ruled the following year that political pressure tainted an earlier decision not to list the sage grouse.

The finding effectively ends the group's lawsuit, Marvel said.

Other groups expressing disappointment included the Biodiversity Conservation Alliance and the American Bird Conservancy.

Laurie Milford, executive director of the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said the finding "makes a certain amount of sense," while Frank Gill, president and CEO of the National Audubon Society, said Interior is "on the right path."

The Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States worries the finding could inhibit oil and gas development on public lands in the West, said the group's director of government affairs, Kathleen Sgamma.

"But it appears that Interior plans to balance implementation so that restrictions on energy development do not apply with a broad brush across the entire region," she said.

The Interior Department recognizes the need to develop the nation's energy resources, said Assistant Interior Secretary for Fish, Wildlife and Parks Tom Strickland.

"We know that without good planning, energy activities can impact the sage grouse," he said. "The emphasis here is on smart from the start. We plan in advance."

For the wind energy industry, sage grouse are a concern because the birds don't nest near tall structures such as wind turbines and power lines for fear they could be perches for eagles and other predators.

The Interior announcement is a relief and offers more certainty for wind power, said Craig Cox, executive director of the Interwest Energy Alliance, a wind energy industry group.

"I do hope that as we gain more experience with the impact of wind on sage grouse, that we can develop plans accordingly," Cox added.

The oil and gas industry has been backing important sage grouse research and will continue to do that to help ensure that the species isn't listed, said Cheryl Sorenson, vice president of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming.

"For us, it's not like, `Whew, we've won one.' It's like, `OK, we need to keep rolling on this,'" Sorenson said.

___

Associated Press Writer Todd Dvorak contributed to this report from Boise, Idaho.

US stops short of protection for western sage grouse
Yahoo News 5 Mar 10;

WASHINGTON (AFP) – US officials Friday stopped short of giving endangered species status to the sage grouse, an iconic bird that is at the center of a dispute over oil drilling in the western United States.

The Interior Department said the bird merits protection but will not receive it for now because of a backlog of other species which are a higher priority, a move that is expected to allow oil drilling to continue.

The agency "will expand efforts with state, local and tribal partners to map lands that are vital to the survival of the greater sage grouse... while guiding and managing new conventional and renewable energy projects to reduce impacts on the species," a statement from Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said.

"The sage grouse's decline reflects the extent to which open land in the West has been developed in the last century," Salazar said.

"We must find common-sense ways of protecting, restoring and reconnecting the Western lands that are most important to the species' survival while responsibly developing much-needed energy resources."

Environmentalists lamented the decision.

"These magnificent birds need Endangered Species Act protection now," said Michael Connor, California Director for Western Watersheds Project.

"Without this added protection the Mona Basin sage grouse will continue to decline."

Sage grouse have dwindled to about half of their historic range due to habitat destruction, and some scientists warn that the birds could disappear within the next 100 years or less.

The Environmental Defense Fund said the decision "is a wake-up call for landowners, industry, and conservationists to work together to reverse the decline of the bird and the land it inhabits."

"An endangered species listing is no one's first choice as a tool to fix broken landscapes," said Ted Toombs, a spokesman for the fund. "It is really a last resort option to keep species from going extinct.

"The first, best option to protect species is for conservationists, farmers, ranchers, energy companies, the recreation industry, and other stakeholders to work together on habitat conservation and restoration, so that an endangered species listing can be avoided."

The greater sage grouse currently live in only 11 western states: California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.

Oil and gas companies have said a designation could freeze drilling in areas of Wyoming and other states that are also sage grouse habitat.


Read more!

UN Panel Approves 32 China Wind Farms, Blocks Six

Nina Chestney and Michael Szabo, PlanetArk 16 Feb 10;

LONDON - A United Nations climate panel approved 32 Chinese wind farms for carbon financing under the Kyoto Protocol late last week, but blocked another six after rejecting eight similar projects in December.

The approved wind farms will cut greenhouse gas emissions by some 11.3 million metric tones by the end of 2012, the year the current Kyoto pact expires, according to UN data.

Under Kyoto's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), companies can invest in clean energy projects in emerging economies, and in return receive offset credits, only if they can show the projects would not have gone ahead without the prospect of revenues from selling those credits.

After noting a drop in financial support from Beijing in the form of tariffs, the CDM's executive board rejected 10 wind farms in December, saying they were profitable and capable of cutting emissions without receiving the offsets, called Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs).

The board on Friday said two of those were rejected by mistake, bringing the total rejected in December to eight.

At its latest meeting, the board fully registered 13 Chinese wind farms while conditionally approving another 19 subject to minor corrections in their applications.

The latest six rejected Chinese wind farms, five of which were in the province of Heilongjiang, would have generated 2.1 million metric tones of CERs by 2012. The panel also rejected six other clean energy projects, four of which were in China.

According to UN data, the 12 rejected projects would have generated around 3.8 million CERs before 2012, worth 44 million euros ($59.91 million) based on Friday's closing spot CER price of 11.58 euros a tonne.

The projects' investors included U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs, Japanese government agency NEDO, Dutch firm Essent Energy Trading and UK-based Climate Change Capital.

Companies participating in the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme rely on a steady flow of offsets to help them meet emissions cut targets, and disruptions to the CER supply can cause carbon prices to rise.

The board also fully registered 17 hydro projects including 15 from China, which will generate 8.2 million CERs by 2012.

Experts had said the projects faced similar registration risks to those plaguing the Chinese wind projects.

DEFERS REGISTRATION FEES

In an effort to extend the reach of the CDM, the board agreed to defer registration fees for projects in countries that are home to less than 10 registered projects. Registration fees are due only after the projects have been issued their first CERs, the board said.

Of the 80 developing countries participating in the CDM, 53 nations, or two thirds, fall into this category, UN data showed.

The CDM's board also said it is waiving registration fees for projects in the world's least developed countries (LDCs).

The UN made $56.6 million in CDM revenues in 2009 including $17.1 million in registration fees, the board said in its meeting report.

At its last meeting in December, the board said it would conduct spot checks on emissions auditors TUV-Sud and TUV-Nord.

On Friday it said it would review the outcome of these spot checks at its next meeting in Bonn, Germany on March 22-26.

(Editing by Michael Urquhart)


Read more!

Norway plans the world's most powerful wind turbine

Yahoo News 12 Feb 10;

OSLO (AFP) – Norway plans to build the world's most powerful wind turbine, hoping the new technology will increase the profitability of costly offshore wind farms, partners behind the project said Friday.

With a rotor diametre of 145 metres (475 feet), the 10-megawatt protype will be roughly three times more powerful than ordinary wind turbines currently in place, Enova, a public agency owned by Norway's petroleum and oil industry ministry, said.

The world's largest wind turbine, 162.5 metres (533 feet) tall, will be built by Norwegian company Sway with the objective of developing a technology that will result in higher energy generation for offshore wind power.

It will first be tested on land in Oeygarden, southwestern Norway, for two years.

The gain in power over current turbines will be obtained partly by reducing the weight and the number of moving parts in the turbine.

According to the NTB news agency, the prototype will cost 400 million kroner to build and could supply power to 2,000 homes.

"We are aiming to install it in 2011," Enova's head of new technology Kjell Olav Skoelsvik told AFP.

Enova pledged 137 million Norwegian kroner (17 million euros, 23 million dollars) to build the prototype.

"It is milestone in the efforts to develop the future's wind power," Norway's energy minister Terje Riis-Johansen said in a statement.

Environmental groups have been highly critical of Norway's government for not having invested enough in wind power.

The Scandinavian country is one of the world's top oil and gas producers but obtains most of its own energy through hydroelectric power.


Read more!

China to be third biggest wind power producer: media

Yahoo News 31 Dec 09;

BEIJING (AFP) – China is set to become the world's third largest wind power producer in 2009, state media reported, as the Asian giant seeks various ways to expand energy supply to power its economic boom.

The country's installed wind power capacity will reach 20 gigawatts this year, said Shi Lishan, vice director of the National Energy Administration's New Energy Department, the Xinhua news agency said Wednesday.

That will lift China to surpass Spain and become the world's third biggest wind power producer after the United States and Germany, the report said.

The United States had 25.2 gigawatts in installed capacity of wind power in 2008, or 20.8 percent of the world's total, compared with China's capacity of 12.2 gigawatts, figures from the Global Wind Energy Council showed.

At the end of last year, Spain had 16.8 gigawatts of installed wind power, the council said.

China, which relies on coal for more than 70 percent of its energy, is the world's largest emitter of the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

But it has set a target of generating 15 percent of its energy from renewable sources -- mainly wind and water -- by 2020.

The country was criticised for obstructing the adoption of a treaty on climate change during an international summit in Copenhagen earlier this month.

However, in a move signalling its commitment to cutting emissions, the nation last week adopted a law supporting the renewable energy industry by obliging electricity grid firms to buy all the power produced from renewable sources.


Read more!

A carbon-neutral island: The answer is blowing in the wind

Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 17 Dec 09;

UNDER leaden skies on a frigid winter morning, Mr Soren Hermansen is hard at work - as usual.

More people have made the journey to Samsoe to see for themselves the small but stunning miracle that is the windswept Danish island. As director of the Samsoe Energy Academy, Mr Hermansen shows the visitors around. The academy receives about 5,000 visitors each year, including schoolchildren.

For a world in grave danger from the overuse of fossil fuels, the island - some five hours west of Copenhagen by train and ferry - represents a signpost to a better future.

�The 4,000 people living on the 114 sq km island of rolling green fields and big skies can boast of being the world's first totally self-sufficient and carbon-neutral community, whose energy needs are all met by renewable sources. Samsoe even exports its surplus electricity to the mainland, which brings in around $1 million in revenue a year.

The Samsoe project had its seeds in the oil price shock of the 1970s, which got the Danish government thinking about how to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels.

Plans to build nuclear power plants were dropped after they were met with widespread public apprehension. The government looked at renewable energy and the next two decades were marked by spectacular progress in renewable technology. Environmental funds were set up, which, together with policy incentives, catalysed investments. The wind energy industry alone has created 30,000 jobs in Denmark.

Samsoe was chosen in 1997 in a nationwide competition to become a model community for sustainable energy. A non-governmental organisation was formed to run the project but residents were also involved as decision-makers and shareholders.

In 2003 and 2004, a wind farm with 10 turbines was set up offshore. It was the biggest project of its kind in the world at the time, and its stakeholders were the residents, not big corporations. Another 11 land-based wind turbines were added later. Some houses now have their own turbines.

Residents learnt how to improve home insulation, cutting their heating needs by 10 per cent. Four heating plants - using straw from the fields or wood chips from the forests - as well as 2,500 sq m of solar photovoltaic panels produce enough energy to meet 60 per cent of Samsoe's needs.

At one dairy plant, water warmed as it cools the milk is then used in the shower.

All these renewable energy schemes have made Samsoe and its inhabitants not just carbon-neutral but carbon-negative.

There has been a 140 per cent reduction in carbon emissions on the island since 1998. While the Danes on average have a per capita carbon footprint of around 10 tonnes, Samsoe residents' per capita carbon footprint is minus 3.7 tonnes because they produce surplus energy.

Mr Hermansen is something of a celebrity. He makes trips abroad to tell countries from China to Morocco about the Samsoe success story.

Hailed as an environmental hero, he downplays the accolade, saying: 'The real heroes are the local guys.'

Samsoe, he says, is not unlike communities elsewhere: It too has its share of issues that need to be grappled with.

At one time, it was the survival of the island community itself. An agricultural community, Samsoe supplies tonnes of produce to the mainland. But its young men and women were leaving the island to study and work on the mainland. The closure of a slaughterhouse created a ripple effect, throwing 100 local people out of work - and sparking a mini depression on the island.

The renewable energy project that then came along fired up the locals, especially as the model promised money in the bank after the initial investment of €60 million (S$120 million). It also gave the people energy independence and jobs.

Ironically, Samsoe is surrounded by some of the country's biggest coal-fired plants, whose smokestacks can be seen on the far horizon.

Nevertheless, the residents can take pride in the fact that the island is today an icon of renewable energy.

To Mr Hermansen, the key to its success lies in the local community.

'Those people at the (Copenhagen conference on climate change) don't know local conditions,' he said.

'We should stop thinking globally, and act locally.'


Read more!

EU grants 1.5 billion euros for wind farms, carbon capture

Yahoo News 9 Dec 09;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – The EU commission on Wednesday granted 1.5 billion euros (2.2 billion dollars) to offshore wind farms and carbon capture and storage schemes to help relaunch Europe's economy and cut greenhouse gas emissions.

"With this decision the commission has laid the foundation for the development of two key sustainable technologies that will be essential in our fight against climate change," EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs said, adding that it would also "give a push to the economy and employment."

Six carbon capture and storage schemes (CCS) -- in Britain, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain -- will share a billion euros of the money.

These schemes to bury polluting carbon emissions "will be the first six CCS projects in the world," Piebalgs added proudly of the technology which is in its infancy.

Individual European nations and the private sector are also welcome to help fund such schemes which the European Union hopes will become viable propositions by 2020.

"It's important to start," said Piebalgs. A successful conclusion to UN climate talks ongoing in Copenhagen will help make carbon capture and storage development "much, much faster," he added.

The nine offshore wind power projects, in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, will share 562 million euros.

Several of these are German projects with Belgian, British, Danish and Swedish interests also involved.

Some of the projects cross sea borders, such as the interconnection of German, Swedish and Danish wind farms in the Baltic, linking up the national grids.

The money comes from a four billion euro EU reserve fund set up in May for energy projects to help relaunch Europe's economy.

The EU has also pledged to cut its carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent by 2020 from 1990 levels.

Many other candidate projects failed to secure funding on Friday.


Read more!

Singapore to pledge 16% cut in gas emissions

Government throws its weight behind global summit on climate
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 3 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE'S leaders yesterday put on the table the country's first target to curb greenhouse gas emissions, throwing their political weight behind next week's climate change meetings in Copenhagen.

Senior Minister S. Jayakumar said that even though it is not obliged to make cuts, the city-state will undertake voluntary and domestically funded action to reduce its emissions growth to 16 per cent below 'business as usual' levels by 2020.

This level refers to how much Singapore would emit if the economy continued to grow, but nothing was done to curb emissions.

There is a caveat, however.

Singapore will only commit to this if there is a legally binding global deal that obliges all countries to cut emissions, and if other countries offer significant pledges, said Professor Jayakumar.

'Without a global agreement by all to address climate change, our efforts alone will be meaningless,' he said.

As a low-lying country vulnerable to any rise in sea-levels, Singapore has an interest in acting with others to tackle climate change, he added.

Like other leaders, he thinks Copenhagen is likely to result in an agreed political framework, with key elements for a legally binding deal further negotiated next year.

This means Singaporeans will not feel the effects of any cuts until next year or later, and this is also dependent on the outcome of the talks, he said.

National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan, who was also at the media interview, said the Government will use a combination of regulatory and fiscal measures to achieve the targeted cut.

Businesses, households and the Government will all have to play a part, he said, explaining: 'It will require us to make conscious decisions, to change behaviour, to have different choices, to cut down on wastage at home and at the workplace.'

But he gave an assurance that whatever the eventual measures, the Government will do what it can to buffer the impact for businesses and households.

Prof Jayakumar said details of the measures are being worked out carefully and will be announced after the outcome of the negotiations.

Singapore's move follows closely behind recent pledges by countries such as the United States, China, Brazil and Indonesia to curb their carbon emissions in the run up to the Copenhagen negotiations.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who will be attending the conference in Copenhagen, said recently that Singapore was looking at what else it could do to tackle climate change.

Given the country's dense population and small size, Mr Mah stressed that 16 per cent was a 'stretch target', but achievable.

The target is derived from numbers in the Sustainable Singapore Blueprint.

Launched in April, this is a national plan including domestic targets such as reducing energy intensity by 35 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030.

The new pledge to the global community now goes beyond these figures.

Mr Mah said Singapore had already done a lot to support sustainable development. And because it was starting from a high base, additional cuts require tremendous effort, he said.

Past efforts include increasing Singapore's green cover, transport policies to limit vehicle growth, and switching energy sources from oil to natural gas.

Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim also underlined Singapore's limitations in converting to alternative forms of energy, because of its small size and geographical location.

For example, wind speeds in Singapore are too low to be harnessed as a source of power. And while solar energy has potential, it would not be sufficient for the country's energy needs at the current technology levels, he said.

Singapore's target means it will cut roughly 12 million tonnes of CO2 by 2020, said Dr Yaacob.

This is based on a projection that the country's emissions would reach 75 million tonnes of CO2 by 2020 if no measures were taken.

This is calculated by taking into account several factors such as economic and population growth and rate of investments.

Industry and grassroots leaders yesterday endorsed Singapore's latest move.

'This step is commendable, it's time we set a target. It sends a signal that Singapore is serious about acting on climate change,' said Singapore Environment Council executive director Howard Shaw.

Former NMP Edwin Khew agreed, adding: 'When the Government makes a commitment, we know they will do it.'

However, Singapore's absolute emissions will still rise with this target, noted Mr Khew, who is also chief executive of waste recycling firm IUT Global.

'Perhaps we could do better in the future,' he added.

North East District Mayor Teo Ser Luck said the move was encouraging, but that Singaporeans would be concerned about how it would affect their daily lives.

'I think it will take a while before everyone understands why we are acting on this important issue, that's why continued effort in education is key,' he said.

Adjusting to a low-carbon environment
Straits Times 3 Dec 09;

BELOW is an edited excerpt from a media interview yesterday when Senior Minister S. Jayakumar, National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan and Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim announced Singapore's commitment to cut carbon emissions.

# With the 16 per cent reduction, how will the economy be affected?

Dr Yaacob: As we define sustainable development, we cannot compromise economic growth. If we do this at the expense of our economic competitiveness, then we are shooting ourselves in the foot. We must do it in conjunction with economic growth.

We have to look at the total package: which are the sectors we have to ban, do we have to restructure some sectors in the economy? These are being studied intensely because obviously there will be some changes. It will require adjustments, but we think over a long-term period, it is possible.

# Why is Singapore's offer contingent on others?

Professor Jayakumar: It does not make sense for us to take these drastic measures if other countries do not do it or if there's no global commitment. Some of the measures obviously may be in our own interest to do as we have been doing, for our own national interest. But doing more makes sense only if there's a global agreement and other countries do so. Otherwise if other countries are not doing it, it will be meaningless, it doesn't have an impact.

# What do you say to climate change sceptics who argue that the science is not definitive and question why the Government would want to commit to costly emission cuts?

Dr Yaacob: I think we must recognise that IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has been working very hard. There's a wealth of knowledge out there, about the various changes, the weather pattern, the temperature over the next century. I think we cannot ignore this. These are credible scientists. They've worked very very hard. They've taken all the weather patterns into account.

I'm aware of some of the sceptics. Frankly speaking if we were asked to wait until the sceptics are proven right or wrong before we act...I don't think we can do that, right?

If this thing happens, we should be ready and therefore let's put those measures in place, and we should do it in a manner that does not compromise our competitiveness.

So there will be some cost, some trade-offs but overall we aim for what's sustainable over the long run.

If climate change is really happening, we're ready. If climate change is not happening, what we do is also good for Singapore in terms of the way we use resources which are very limited.

Prof Jayakumar: We've to take note of the different schools of thought. But as a low-lying island state I don't think we've the luxury of waiting for the day - I don't know when it will be - when it is put beyond doubt which school of thought is right.

So for the time being, we've to accept the consensus of opinion which has over the last decade become quite overwhelming although not unanimous.

# The measures to achieve the 16 per cent will have a cost. Who will bear the brunt of the cuts?

Mr Mah: To achieve that target requires the input, the efforts, the contribution of all sectors. Businesses obviously are one of the major players. Households, another major player. And it's actually every individual - you discourage people from using more energy than they should.

So one practical and efficient way to do that would be to use market price signals to reflect the cost of these externalities due to the target that we have set. So if we were to do that, then obviously we will have to look at some of the measures - marketplace measures, fiscal measures, regulations, a combination of these - to achieve this particular target.

We will study various options, and announce measures only after we have studied all the options.

Prof Jayakumar: The Government will do what is necessary to buffer the impact, and to help them adjust to the new low-carbon environment.

Singapore wants to help bring about a deal
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 3 Dec 09

MINISTER for the Environment and Water Resources Yaacob Ibrahim said yesterday that Singapore's move to pledge a cut in emissions growth was to help contribute to a successful deal at Copenhagen.

'If I may say, I think the Danes want every country to put something on the table,' said Dr Yaacob. 'My sense is that it's going very well, so by the time we get to Copenhagen we want to have at least a target. And they can tell the other countries, hey, Singapore can do it, can you put something at this table?'

Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change will meet for two weeks in the Danish capital starting on Monday to work out a global deal on climate change.

Dr Yaacob also acknowledged that there has been a degree of pressure recently on Singapore to take on cuts due to its relatively advanced stage of development compared to other developing nations.

'But I think other nations appreciate what we've done in the past. They know the efforts we've put in place... But they also recognise that we can do more,' said Dr Yaacob. '(The) pressure is not high, it's subtle...and (our target) shows that we're responsible.'

Dr Yaacob said he hopes committing to a target despite Singapore being a small country without natural resources, and contributing only 0.2 per cent to global carbon emissions, will help the negotiations and inspire other nations to follow suit.

'When we attend the meetings, we're not going to block (the talks), we're not a spoiler, and we want to contribute to the process,' he said.

Dr Yaacob also said that besides steps to mitigate carbon emissions, Singapore is also looking at adaptation means.

The findings of a study on the effects of sea level rise on Singapore will be released next year, along with some measures to ensure Singapore is protected from climate change.





Singapore to reduce emissions growth by 16% below projected 2020 level
May Wong, Channel NewsAsia 2 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE: It will no longer be "business as usual" for Singapore, as the country commits to reduce carbon emissions growth by 16 per cent below the projected 2020 level - if a global agreement is reached and other countries implement significant targets of their own.

Senior Minister S Jayakumar, who chairs the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Climate Change, announced this at a news conference on Wednesday.

Singapore needs to come up with measures for reducing emissions growth, in order to prevent low-lying parts of the country from submerging due to adverse effects of climate change.

Professor Jayakumar said: "We are not starting off with a low base because despite all of our constraints, all our difficulties, we have done a lot.

"In fact, long before climate change became a global issue, Singapore has taken considerable efforts - increasing of green cover, transport policies, fuel switch to natural gas, enhancing of energy efficiency, recycling our waste. And the significant efforts have led to considerable reductions of our emissions."

The government said that 16 per cent is a stretch target, but it can be reached.

Mah Bow Tan, Singapore National Development Minister and Co-Chair, Inter-Ministerial Committee on Sustainable Development said: "When we mention the figure of 16 per cent, this is not like opening a gambit in a chess game or part of a negotiation.

"No, this is derived at, based on fundamental evaluation of what we have done and what we can realistically do. Eventually, government will have to come up with a set of measures in order to incentivise as well as to encourage behaviour to achieve this target.

"Our commitment is done in good faith; it is something we believe is achievable. It is not something that we just throw up on the table for negotiation."

Measures on how the government intends to reduce emissions growth will be announced after the Copenhagen climate talks next week. It will mean additional costs, but the government will buffer the impact.

Professor Jayakumar said: "The measures which we will take to reduce our emissions growth will entail both economic and social costs and will require considerable domestic adjustments.

"There will be impact on industries and households. The government will do what is necessary to buffer this impact and to help them adjust to the new low carbon environment.

"We will do our best to keep the cost to the minimum and to achieve the emissions growth reduction in the best possible efficient way."

Besides looking at costs, the government will also ensure that economic growth is not compromised.

Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Singapore Environment and Water Resources Minister and Co-Chair, Inter-Ministerial Committee on Sustainable Development said: "It must grow. The question is at what rate? How fast and how big it will be - that is what is being studied at this point in time.

"If we do this at the expense of our economic competitiveness, then we are shooting ourselves in the foot. We must do it in conjunction with economic growth.

"But how that growth will be, as mentioned by Minister Mah, we have to look at the total package. Which are the sectors we have to bear? Is there a need to restructure some sectors of the economy? These are being studied intensely."

Professor Jayakumar said Singapore has no historical responsibility for climate change and it contributes less than 0.2 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions. In spite of this, he said that Singapore is making a major effort to tackle climate change.

He added that this is because Singapore is a responsible member of the international community, and wants to play its part in reducing emissions.

- CNA/sc


Singapore's carbon reduction dependent on legally binding deal
Channel NewsAsia 2 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE: Singapore is committed to reducing carbon emissions growth by 16 per cent below the 2020 "business as usual" level.

This will refer to the level of emissions reached if nothing is done to mitigate emissions.

But Singapore's actions are contingent on a legally binding global deal being reached.

Senior Minister S Jayakumar announced this ahead of next week's UN climate change talks in Copenhagen.

He said that other countries must adopt significant targets and implement their commitments in good faith.

Professor Jayakumar added that Singapore's efforts alone will be meaningless especially since its contribution to global emissions is negligible.

Professor Jayakumar said the exact details of the measures are being worked out and will be announced after the Copenhagen talks.

- CNA/yb

Cutting emissions growth, if the world does the same
Government will do its best to buffer Singaporeans from the costs
Lin Yan Qin, Today Online 3 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE - Households will have to change lifestyle habits, while businesses have to become more efficient in how they use energy, if Singapore is to fulfil a pledge on reduced carbon emissions growth.

The newly-revealed target to reduce the Republic's emissions growth by 16 per cent below "business as usual" (BAU) levels by 2020 will rest on whether a global and legally-binding pact on climate change is reached at the Copenhagen negotiations beginning next week.

BAU refers to projected emission levels without any mitigating measures, including those already announced this year. The new target would mean a drop in 2020's carbon dioxide emissions by 12 tonnes.

It would be meaningless to implement measures to achieve this without a global agreement, Senior Minister S Jayakumar said when he made the announcement yesterday, as it would impose cost and sacrifices on Singaporeans without any real effect on global climate change.

"None of this is going to be cost-free. The measures we'll take to reduce our emissions will entail both economic and social costs and will require considerable domestic adjustments," said Professor Jayakumar, the Inter-Ministerial Committee of Climate Change chairman. "The Goverment will do what's necessary to buffer this impact and to help them adjust to this new carbon environment."

Steps will come in the form of regulatory and fiscal measures, he said without elaborating, as the possible measures were still under study.

Whether reducing emissions growth would change Singapore's economic strategies was also being worked out, he said.

The reduced level took into account the impact on the country's growth and competitiveness. "This is derived based on a fundamental evaluation of what we have done and what we realistically can do," said National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan, who described 16 per cent as a "stretched target".

Some measures could build on existing policies, added Mr Mah, the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Sustainable Development (IMCSD) co-chair.

For example, while the current aim is for 80 per cent of Singapore's buildings to achieve a Green Mark Certified rating, the bar may need to be raised to the more stringent Gold Plus or Platinum rating, he said.

A substantial commitment, all things considered

Singapore International Chamber of Commerce chief executive Phillip Overmyer said companies will look at whether the limits implemented here would be in line with worldwide standards, so that those based here do not bear more cost than competitors elsewhere.

Prof Jayakumar stressed that Singapore will not agree to "unreasonable pressures" to reduce emissions solely because of its high Gross Domestic Product per capita, or graduate to Annex One status, which will mean mandatory economy-wide emission cuts.

Still, the commitment on the table is "substantial", given that Singapore faces "severe constraints" in employing renewable energy sources due to its physical size, and that its absolute greenhouse gas emissions are less than 0.2 per cent of the global total.

Singapore's pledge will be appreciated by the international community, he added. "In order to get the major emitters from the developing countries on board, they would like to see other developing countries, also in good faith, putting something on the table."

CAN SINGAPORE DO MORE?

The range of reduced emissions recommended for Non-Annex One countries such as Singapore is between 15 to 30 per cent, and there are those in the international community who question if Singapore is doing enough, said Singapore Institute of International Affairs chairman Simon Tay.

"There's not that much that Singapore has done fiscally (to encourage mitigation efforts)," he said. "Singapore's rationale will need to be internationally acceptable."

World Wildlife Fund Singapore managing director Amy Ho said that while Singapore's pledge was encouraging, the Republic was in a position to be a "leader". "We're asking countries to go for a 15- to 30-per-cent reduction and 16 per cent is on the lower band of that, so we urge Singapore to do better," she said.

But she admitted that Singapore may be disadvantaged in its ability to implement substantial renewable energy. She suggested that the Republic make up for this by tapping the region for these sources, or support the development of a regional grid.

Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaccob Ibrahim, the other IMCSD co-chair, acknowledged there was international pressure on Singapore to do more.

"What we've done is recognise that the world expects us to do something ... and if we have the means, I think we should tell the world we're able to do so, and I think that shows we're responsible."

Singapore on fast train to cutting carbon emissions
16% reduction by 2020 if pact is reached; key role for public transport, no compromise on growth
Lee U-Wen, Business Times 3 Dec 09

(SINGAPORE) With just days before a major climate change summit kicks off in Denmark, Singapore has announced that it is ready to voluntarily slash its carbon emissions growth by 16 per cent below 'business as usual' levels by 2020.

This refers to the projected level of 74 million tonnes of emissions that would be reached if there are no proactive measures taken to mitigate such emissions. This latest target - which will reduce that amount by 12 million tonnes - is what the Singapore delegation will put on the table when world leaders and officials meet in Copenhagen next week.

Singapore will be represented at the negotiations by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security S Jayakumar and Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim.

Professor Jayakumar, however, stressed that Singapore's commitment is dependent on a legally-binding deal being reached after the Copenhagen talks. Other countries, too, must put forth significant targets to cut carbon emissions and actually carry out their commitments in good faith.

'Ours is a substantial commitment that will require a major effort, bearing in mind our severe constraints and that these will be on top of the significant measures we have already taken in the past, and much more than what we have planned to achieve under the Sustainable Singapore blueprint,' Prof Jayakumar told reporters at a press conference yesterday.

The blueprint, a national plan on how Singapore could further reduce carbon emissions, was released in April. Among the aims are to reduce energy intensity by 35 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030 and to lower energy consumption in new and mature housing estates by 20 per cent and 30 per cent respectively by 2030.

Transport is one of the sectors in which the government is looking to introduce new measures and beef up existing ones. For instance, it wants to see 70 per cent of the population take public transport by 2020, up from the 59 per cent recorded in 2006.

This will be done by improving the public transport system and imposing further restraints on vehicle population and usage. Other measures include an enhanced off-peak car scheme, improving the fuel efficiency of vehicles, using bio-fuels and promoting electric vehicles.

'We have no historical responsibility for climate change. Our absolute greenhouse gas emissions are very low, less than 0.2 per cent of the global total,' said Prof Jayakumar, who also chairs the government's inter-ministerial committee on climate change. The committee, formed in 2007, comprises the ministers for foreign affairs, trade and industry, environment and water resources, national development, finance and transport.

He added that all of Singapore's measures will be 'domestically funded and unilaterally implemented'.

As a low-lying island with hardly any alternative energy sources, any rise in sea levels can have 'serious consequences' for Singapore, he said. The exact details of the measures are still being studied by the committee and will be announced at a later stage.

While businesses will be one of the key players in this national effort, it also means that Singaporeans might need to adopt a change in lifestyle, said National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan, who was also present at the press conference.

'(It) will require us to change behaviour, to have different choices, cut down on wastage at home and the workplace,' he said. 'The question now is: how do you effect that change? How do you incentivise people and discourage them from using more energy than they should? One practical and efficient way is to use market price signals to reflect the cost of these externalities due to the target that we have set.'

Dr Yaacob, however, assured Singaporeans that the country's efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change would not compromise economic growth.

'If we do this at the expense of our economic competitiveness, then we are shooting ourselves in the foot,' he said. 'We have to look at the total package. Do we have to restructure some sectors in the economy? Obviously, there will be changes . . . we are looking at making adjustments over a long-term period.'

Meanwhile, all eyes are now firmly set on the outcome of the Copenhagen summit, which will take place from Dec 7-18. With nearly 100 world leaders - including US President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao - confirming their attendance, hopes have been raised that a new United Nations deal could be reached.

Prof Jayakumar, however, chose to play down expectations slightly. 'Most countries are resigned to the reality that there may not be a binding agreement. Of course, nobody wants the conference to be a failure. There is a strong push by governments to achieve at least a political framework or agreement.'

Singapore can't bank on the wind or sun
It is disadvantaged when it comes to alternative energy sources: Jayakumar
Teh Shi Ning, Business Times 3 Dec 09;

(SINGAPORE) The extent to which Singapore can further reduce carbon emissions will be limited by an inherent inability to tap alternative energy sources and past actions, which have already gone a long way to conserve energy, said Senior Minister S Jayakumar.

Singapore is an 'alternative-energy disadvantaged country', Prof Jayakumar said as he announced yesterday that Singapore is prepared to cut emissions growth by 16 per cent by 2020. Being a small island-state imposes constraints on its ability to switch to alternative renewable energies such as geothermal, wind or hydropower to curb dependence on fossil fuels.

Ambassador-at-large Chew Tai Soo, Singapore's chief negotiator at the climate change talks, has had discussions with other 'alternative-energy disadvantaged' countries such as the United Arab Emirates and Trinidad & Tobago, as well as the US, some of whose states face similar constraints.

Elaborating on these challenges, Prof Jayakumar said solar technology is at present 'uneconomic and intermittent' for Singapore, though it holds potential and investments have been made in solar R&D. High urban density here makes deploying solar panels difficult, and the current technology cannot generate a significant proportion of Singapore's electricity needs even if all easily accessible roof top and reservoir space was covered, he said.

Wind is an unlikely source too, as the wind speed here of two metres per second falls below the lowest commercially viable speed of four metres per second. Wind farms require land Singapore can scarce spare too. Nuclear energy has not been ruled out yet, Prof Jayakumar said. But, Singapore's size again makes this a 'complex undertaking' as issues of safety, waste disposal and economic viability need addressing before it can be a valid alternative.

At yesterday's briefing, Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim said the Copenhagen talks would allow Singapore to highlight what it has already done and that 'we're not starting from zero when we speak of further targets'. National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan added that Singapore has taken the initiative to reduce emissions growth, such as with the Sustainable Singapore Blueprint unveiled in April, and prior to that, reaped results from other past steps too.

These include a 30 per cent reduction in carbon intensity by 2006 from 1990s levels thanks to energy efficiency measures, and a 5 per cent reduction in emissions from stringent policies limiting the number and usage of vehicles. Switching from fuel oil to natural gas, which now generates 80 per cent of Singapore's electricity, also cut the power sector's emissions by 25 per cent.

'This means that there is less potential for us to do more in terms of reducing emissions. But it doesn't mean we'll rest on our laurels and not do anything,' said Mr Mah. The newly announced target of a 16 per cent reduction in emissions growth, contingent on a global deal at Copenhagen, will further stretch targets announced in April's blueprint, he said.

Agreeing that Singapore lacks the option to use renewable energies due to both physical constraints and expensive existing technologies, Nanyang Technological University's head of economics and environmental economics professor Euston Quah thinks the key lies in investing in green technologies and implementing a carbon tax on both consumers and industry.

Singapore to pledge 16 percent cut in emissions
Reuters 2 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Singapore, a Southeast Asian city-state with high per-capita emissions of greenhouse gases, will pledge to slash those emissions by 16 percent by 2020 versus current levels, local media reported on Thursday.

This is the target Singapore will put on the table at talks in Copenhagen starting next week aimed at agreeing a broader climate pact to combat global warming, Singapore's Business Times newspaper quoted a government minister as saying.

"Ours is a substantial commitment that will require a major effort, bearing in mind our severe constraints," the newspaper quoted the government's Coordinating Minister for National Security, S Jayakumar, as telling local media on Wednesday.

China and other big developing nations rejected core targets for a climate deal such as halving world greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 just days before the Copenhagen talks start, diplomats said on Wednesday.

The dispute underscores a rich-poor rift which has haunted the two-year talks to agree a new global climate deal to succeed the Kyoto Protocol in 2013 and dampens hopes of rescuing the December 7-18 Copenhagen summit.

A legally binding target is already out of reach for the U.N. talks, with only a political deal possible.

Jayakumar said that Singapore's commitment was dependent on a legally-binding deal being reached after the Copenhagen talks, and that other countries needed to put forward significant targets to cut carbon emissions.

He said Singapore's emissions accounted for less than 0.2 percent of the world's total. As an oil refining and manufacturing hub, its per capita emissions are high.

The country, a low-lying group of islands at risk of rising sea levels, seeks to cut emissions through increased use of public transport, improved fuel efficiency, biofuels and electric vehicles.

National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan said that given the country's small size and dense population, 16 percent was a "stretch target" but achievable, the Straits Times newspaper said.

(Writing by Neil Chatterjee; Editing by Ron Popeski)


Read more!