Best of our wild blogs: 19 May 09


The Animal Protectors Grant 2009 is open for application
on the habitatnews blog

First trip by the new Labrador Seagrass team
on the Labrador blog

Lumnitzera Mangrove in Semakau
on the Urban Forest blog

Plover stalking marine worms I
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

A Weekend Of Spiders, Bugs & Flies
on the colourful clouds blog

Fluffy plant of the mangrove bund
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Chestnut Munia Bathing
on the Manta Blog

Scaly-breasted Munia nesting
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

New book by Richard Corlett, “The Ecology of Tropical East Asia” on the Biodiversity crew @ NUS blog


Read more!

Tanker catches fire off Pengerang, no major oil spill

Tanker catches fire, no spill say authorities
Gladys Tay and Desiree Tresa Gasper, The Star 18 May 09;

JOHOR BARU: A tanker carrying sludge caught fire off the waters of Pengerang here Monday, but authorities say the mishap has not caused any spill while damage to the ship was minimal.

The tanker had 17 crew members on board; most managed to save themselves by jumping off the burning vessel but two Indonesians are still unaccounted for.

The fire was extinguished by a heavy downpour at the time.

Kota Tinggi OCPD Supt Osman Mohamed Sebot said that marine police personnel rescued 10 of the ship’s crew members soon after the 11am fire.

“We are still carrying out a search and rescue operation to locate the missing two,” he said, adding that they have been identified only as “Mustakim” and “Slihuddin.”

The search and rescue operation was being conducted by the marine police, Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency Southern Region and the Marine Department, he added.

Two Singapore Police Coast Guard boats and the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore are also assisting in the search and rescue operation.

Supt Osman said that two of the crew members were Chinese nationals while the rest were Indonesians. At least five members of the crew suffered minor injuries and were fished out by a passing merchant ship on its way to Singapore.

He added that the tanker, which was carrying sludge from Indonesia to Singapore, had anchored five nautical miles off the shores of Pengerang four days ago.

The tanker, the Vertex, is registered in San Lorenzo Honolulu, Hawaii, and is owned by a company based in Singapore.

Johor Marine Police Squad 2 chief Asst Comm Mohd Khamsani Abdul Rahman said that so far, investigations showed that there was no leak on the tanker.

He said according to the vessel’s captain, the fire started in the kitchen area and was fanned by the windy weather.

This is the third sea tragedy in the area since April 28 when six Pakistanis drowned after their vessel capsized. On May 13, a fibreglass boat with about 30 people sank in the same waters on May 13, only seven bodies were recovered from that tragedy.

Tanker catches fire, 15 crew members rescued, 2 missing
Jassmine Shadiqe, New Straits Times 18 May 09;

A tanker, which was ferrying used oil from Indonesia to Singapore, caught fire some five nautical miles from Pengerang here today.
Fifteen of the 17 crew members, made up of Indonesians and Chinese nationals, jumped ship and were rescued. However two other crew members are still missing at Press time.

The tanker, named Vertex, is registered in San Lorenzo Honululu, Hawaii, and is owned by a company based in Singapore. It had anchored in Malaysian waters for the past four days.

In the 11am incident, it is learnt there was a small explosion prior to thick black smoke being emitted from the rear of the vessel.

District police chief Superintendent Osman Sebot said 10 of the Indonesians were rescued by the Marine Operations Force, while five others, including two Chinese nationals who sustained minor injures, were rescued by a passing merchant ship, which took them to Singapore.
"A search and rescue operation has been launched to find for the two missing Indonesian crew members identified as Mustakim and Slihuddin," Osman said.

He also said that the fire was doused by heavy rain shortly after it broke out. The tanker, which was damaged at its rear, would be towed back to Singapore soon.

"There is a slight oil spill but the situation is not critical or dangerous," Osman added.

Singapore Tanker Catches Fire, Five Injured, Two Missing
Bernama 18 May 09;

JOHOR BAHARU, May 18 (Bernama) -- A tanker carrying about 2,000 tonnes of used oil caught fire about 3.3 nautical miles off Pengerang, Kota Tinggi, near here Monday.

Region II Marine Operations Force Head of the Intelligence Division DSP Rosman Ismail said 15 of 17 crewmen were rescued in the 11am incident.

Five of them are seriously injured while two Indonesian crew identified only as Mustakim and Salehuddin, are still missing.

"The fire caused oil spill but it is not serious," Rosman said.

The crewmen, comprising 15 Indonesians and two Chinese nationals jumped into the sea when the tanker owned by a Singapore company caught fire.

Ten of them were rescued by the Marine Operations Force at about 11.10am while five others were rescued by the Singapore coast guard several minutes later.

Heavy rain doused the fire on the ship which was registered in San Lorenzo, Argentina.

The ship was carrying used oil from Indonesia to Singapore and had moored there since four days ago.

Explosions were heard during the fire.

-- BERNAMA

Tanker catches fire, two Indonesian crew missing
Gladys Tay and Desiree Tresa Gasper, The Star 19 May 09;

JOHOR BARU: A tanker carrying sludge caught fire forcing 17 of its crew members to jump overboard off the waters of Pengerang near here.

Most of the crew managed to save themselves from the burning vessel, but two Indonesian crew members are still missing.

The fire, which was put out from a downpour, did not cause excessive damage to the ship and so far no oil spill has been reported.

Kota Tinggi OCPD Supt Osman Mohamed Sebot said that marine police personnel rescued 10 of the crew soon after the 11am fire.

All of them are now at the Pengerang police station.

He added that the marine police, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency Southern Region and the Marine Department were carrying out the operation.

He said that two of the crew members were Chinese nationals while the rest were Indonesians.

Supt Osman said that five crew members suffered minor injuries and were fished out by a passing merchant ship on its way to Singapore.

He added that the tanker, mt Vertex, which was from Indonesia to Singapore, had anchored five nautical miles from Pengerang four days ago.

Supt Osman also said that it was registered in San Lorenzo Honolulu, Hawaii, and is owned by a company based in Singapore.

Johor Marine Police Squad 2 chief Asst Comm Mohd Khamsani Abdul Rahman said that according to the skipper, the fire started in the kitchen area and was fanned by strong winds.

He said that two Singapore Police Coast Guard boats and the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore assisted them in the search and rescue operation.


Read more!

More needs to be done for marine life conservation

Straits Times Forum 19 May 09;

THE good news that Resorts World at Sentosa is scrapping its plan to exhibit whale sharks ('No whale sharks at Sentosa IR', last Saturday) has given me tremendous relief. Knowing that such a beautiful wild creature can be spared from a lifetime of imprisonment is a triumphant moment for any animal lover.

This success could not have been achieved if not for the hard work of some animal welfare organisations. The online petition against the whale shark plan not only raised awareness among Singaporeans, but also made Resorts World realise that many Singaporeans are concerned about the treatment and welfare of animals. After all, how could anyone ignore the voices of 9,000 people?

However, it is worrying that Resorts World is proposing an alternative, which means other marine wildlife will live in captivity. This is on top of the possible 700,000 marine creatures included in the earlier plans.

Ms Krist Boo from Resorts World said the change in plans was governed by 'conservation of this (whale shark) species', and that the replacement would be 'conservation-focused'. This is contradictory. It is senseless to link conservation with wildlife in captivity, since conservation refers to protecting species, their habitats and ecosystems from extinction. Taking marine wildlife from its natural habitat will only escalate its extinction rate and encourage exploitation of wildlife for profit.

Marine Life Park will bring visitors to Singapore, which is one reason why Singapore decided to have the integrated resorts. The park should also educate the public on marine conservation. But to develop the economy on the pain and suffering of animals is inhumane and cruel.

As Mr Grant Pereira from Sea Shepherd Conservation Society said at the Singapore Animal Welfare Symposium last Saturday: 'A person could learn more about whale sharks in an hour spent at the Omni-Theatre than spending 10 days in a casino.'

Well said, Mr Pereira.

Ong Lu Lus (Ms)


Read more!

Selangor's chief minister in S'pore to study river clean-up experience

Zaki Amrullah, Channel NewsAsia 18 May 09;

SINGAPORE: Selangor's chief minister is in Singapore to study how the republic cleans up its rivers.

After visiting the Marina Barrage and being briefed on the Singapore River Development Guide Plan, Mr Abdul Khalid Ibrahim called on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the Istana.

The two leaders discussed regional developments and opportunities for bilateral collaboration between Singapore and Selangor.

In particular, Mr Abdul Khalid said he looks forward to Singapore's help in Selangor's river clean-up project.

According to a statement from the Prime Minister's Office, the meeting is in line with Singapore's efforts to nurture friendly ties with Malaysia, both at the national level and also with Malaysian states.

Selangor keen to tap Singapore's river cleaning expertise
State officials led by Menteri Besar visit Marina Barrage
Reme Ahmad, Straits Times 19 May 09;

MALAYSIA'S Selangor state is embarking on a RM10 billion (S$4.1 billion) project to clean up its longest river and is keen to tap Singapore's experience in river cleaning, Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim said yesterday.

Several Selangor officials, including those from its state water authority, yesterday accompanied him on a visit to the Marina Barrage here.

They were also briefed by Singapore officials on the Singapore River Development Guide Plan.

Selangor wants to clean up its 120km Sungai Klang in a 20-year project to 2030.

Singapore has the experience to help Selangor in this after its success with the Singapore and Kallang rivers, Tan Sri Abdul Khalid told The Straits Times in an interview yesterday.

'The experience in Singapore showed that as a result of the cleaning up, they have developed high- end real estate projects surrounding the rivers. The river can also be a source of fresh water,' said Mr Abdul Khalid.

During his day-long visit, he also called on Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the Istana, and delivered a talk at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

The Menteri Besar and PM Lee discussed regional developments and opportunities for bilateral collaboration between Singapore and Selangor, a statement from the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts (Mica) said.

'In particular, Tan Sri Abdul Khalid said that he looked forward to Singapore's assistance in Selangor's river clean-up project,' the statement said.

The meeting is in line with Singapore's efforts to nurture friendly ties with Malaysia, both at the national level and also with the Malaysian states, Mica said.

Sungai Klang flows from the highlands in north-east Selangor, winds through Kuala Lumpur before meandering back into Selangor, and drains in the Strait of Malacca.

Mr Abdul Khalid said that once the clean-up is completed, sections of the river could be used to transport people to reduce vehicular traffic. Other parts could be used for recreational purposes.

A big challenge is to re-site illegal squatters, factories and animal farms by the riverbanks. Here again, he said, the Singapore experience is valuable.

He expects to announce the project's management team next month and tender documents will be out soon after that.

Asked about funding, he said Selangor has some funds available as it collects RM1.5 billion in revenues annually while expending RM700 million in wages and operational costs.

Officials are also mulling trading parcels of riverbank land for work done.

Asked whether the move to openly seek Singapore's expertise in a major project would be a politically sensitive issue in Malaysia, the Menteri Besar said: 'This is not political competition, this is a commercial effort.'

- CNA/yt


Read more!

A free AVA service that is unfair to taxpayers

Letter from Dr Tan Chek Wee, Today Online 18 May 09;

I know an expatriate who lives in a condominium in a prime district. She has several neighbours who think that the presence of cats devalues their properties. These neighbours request the loan free cat traps from the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA). Cats trapped, whether they are strays or free roaming pets, are euthanised free at AVA (www.ava.gov.sg). This does not resolve the problem as “new” cats will move in to fill the “vacuum” and hence an endless cycle of killing is perpetuated.

This is ironic as there are people like myself who have to borrow traps from the Cat Welfare Society (www.catwelfare.org) to trap cats in our estates, bring them to the vets for neutering and then release them back to the estate, all at our own expense.

However this T(rap)N(euter)R(elase) is an evidence-based method of controlling the cat population, humanely and effectively. Yet we fail repeatedly to get AVA to provide free sterilisation at its premises.

Would the AVA provide free service if the complaint is about rats or cockcroaches? If people who live in private estates feel that cats are “pests”, then they should pay for private pest controller services.

I appeal to the AVA to stop this free service that is unfair to taxpayers.


Read more!

Singapore should embrace biofuels

Straits Times Forum 19 May 09;

'Despite inviting foreign investors here to produce biofuels, Singapore itself is not using any.'

MR HENRI J. BARDON: 'It is deplorable that oil majors are looking only at options to introduce lower-octane (less oxygenated) fuel that cause more pollution to save the average user 5 cents per litre.

Singapore needs to quickly embrace biofuels to improve its carbon footprint. Singapore has four refineries and a carbon footprint that is one of the highest in the world. Despite inviting foreign investors here to build plants to produce biofuels, Singapore itself is not using any.

Singapore can mandate that all diesel fuels sold here are biodiesel as such fuel can be produced on Jurong Island. Indonesia and Malaysia already do so. Thailand and the Philippines have mandated ethanol blending for the past two years. At low blends of 5 per cent to 10 per cent, biofuels cut carbon dioxide emissions by the same amount. This would require no changes to pumps or cars as biofuel blends are used in many of the countries where cars Singaporeans drive are made.'

Renewable fuels already available to consumers here
Straits Times Forum 25 May 09;

I REFER to last Tuesday's letter, "Embrace biofuels", by Mr Henri J. Bardon.

Biodiesel is currently available to consumers in Singapore. This is supplied by Alpha Biofuels which has been providing renewable fuels locally for the past three years. Alpha biodiesel is made from waste oil collected from the communities here.

In the past year, many Singaporeans - from the public and the corporate world - have come forward to contribute waste oil for recycling into biodiesel. The South West Community Development Council has even started a waste oil recycling programme among its residents.

Contrary to what Mr Bardon mentioned, diesel vehicles as well as heavy machinery at construction sites here are already using Alpha biodiesel.

Moreover, the tropical climate in Singapore has made the use of high biodiesel blends possible. There are more than 400 vehicles and diesel equipment in Singapore now running on Alpha biodiesel and doing their part in reducing greenhouse gases.

Biodiesel was used exclusively to power the generator providing electricity for the main concert and stalls during Earth Hour at the Esplanade in March.

Though the biofuel plants built by foreign investors are exporting their biofuels overseas, Alpha Biofuels plays its part in the local green energy scene by producing biodiesel from recycled waste cooking oil collected from F&B outlets around Singapore and making the biodiesel available to the public.

This not only helps reduce Singapore's carbon footprint but also minimises concerns of biofuels competing with food crops.

Allan Lim
Chief Executive Officer
Alpha Synovate Pte Ltd
Alpha Biofuels Pte Ltd


Read more!

Sarawak yet to crack ‘turtle egg’ case

Sharon Ling, The Star 19 May 09;

KUCHING: There were no concrete evidence or facts that turtle eggs were con­sumed at a police function in Feb­ruary, initial investigations showed.

However, Second Minister of Plan­ning and Resource Management Da­­tuk Awang Tengah Ali Hasan told the state assembly yesterday a report of the investigation conducted by the Fo­­­­rest Department and the Sarawak Fo­­restry Corporation had been forwarded to the state Attorney-Gene­ral’s Chambers for legal advice.

He said the investigation was carried out following the publication in local newspapers of photographs showing the eggs on dinner tables on March 2 and a police report lodged by Violet Yong (DAP - Pending).

“Should any such case come to light in future, we urge the public to report it immediately to the Forestry Department and the corporation so concrete evidence can be obtained to facilitate investigations and further action,” he told the House when winding up the debate on points related to his ministry yesterday.

The sale and eating of turtle eggs is illegal.

On another matter, Awang Tengah said the entry of sawn timber or “batak” from Indonesia into Sarawak must be accompanied by official documents issued by the relevant Indonesian authorities as proof of their legality.

He said the Sarawak Timber Indus­try Development Corporation would seize any timber shipment that entered the state without the supporting documents.

He added the corporation had asked the relevant Indonesian autho­rities to undertake proper verification of these documents before the “batak” was taken out of Indonesia for enforcement to be effective.

Turtle eggs report sent to A-G
The New Straits Times 19 May 09;

KUCHING: A report on the incident in which turtle eggs were served at a police dinner function in February has been forwarded to the state Attorney-General's chambers for further action.
Planning and Resource Management Minister II Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hasan, who said this, added that the investigations were conducted by the Sarawak Forestry Corporation.

This followed reports in the local media in March and the police report lodged by the DAP assemblywoman for Pending Violet Yong on March 4.

"In such cases, it is best for the public to immediately report the matter to the authorities," he said in his winding-up speech for his ministry during the state assembly meeting here yesterday. -- Bernama

Related article
Sarawak Assembly: 'Eerie silence' on cops feasting on turtle eggs query Desmond Davidson, New Straits Times 14 May 09;


Read more!

Komodo Dragons Kill With Venom, Researchers Find

Carolyn Barry, National Geographic News 18 May 09;

Komodo dragons can kill slowly due to their venomous bites, scientists have confirmed for the first time.

The find dispels the common belief that toxic bacteria in the Komodos' mouths are responsible for ultimately killing the dragons' prey.

An animal that escapes a Komodo's initial attack soon weakens and dies. The fierce carnivore tracks the wounded creature and dines at its leisure once the prey collapses.

Researchers have long thought that the Komodo dragon, native to Indonesia, kills via blood poisoning caused by the multiple strains of bacteria in the dragon's saliva.

But "that whole bacteria stuff has been a scientific fairy tale," said Bryan Fry, a venom researcher at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

Fry and colleagues studied the biochemistry of Komodo venom after they dissected the heads of two dragons from zoos that both had to be put down due to terminal illnesses.

The team found that the dragon's venom rapidly decreases blood pressure, expedites blood loss, and sends a victim into shock, rendering it too weak to fight.

In the venom, some compounds that reduce blood pressure are as potent as those found in the word's most venomous snake, western Australia's inland Taipan.

Komodo Combo Attack

While his colleagues expressed surprise at the findings, Fry said he wasn't so shocked.

His earlier research had shown that other lizard species—such as iguanas, legless lizards, and monitor lizards—are also venomous.

In fact, Fry estimates that close to a hundred of the more than 5,000 known lizard species use venom.

What is surprising, Fry said, is Komodo dragons' elaborate venom-delivery system.

"It's the most complex duct system described in reptiles to date," he said.

Snakes typically have a single venom duct that leads to their fangs. But Komodos have multiple ducts located between their teeth.

However, this means Komodo dragons don't deliver their venom as efficiently as snakes, Fry said.

Rather than injecting venom directly via a forceful bite, the dragons use a specialized bite-and-pull motion to ooze the poison into wounds during a sustained, frenzied attack.

(Related: "Komodo Dragon's Bite Is 'Weaker Than a House Cat's.'")

The combination of venom and multiple lacerations from the lizards' sharp, serrated teeth is what makes the dragons so deadly.

"They're not like the cobra, where venom is the only game in town. Komodos have a combined arsenal," Fry said.

The findings suggest that the Komodo's ancient relative, the Megalania, used a similar venom-plus-wounding approach.

The giant lizard, which roamed Australia about 40,000 years ago, measured about 13 feet (4 meters) long.

Fry's work, published in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could mean that the Megalania was the largest venomous animal to have ever lived.

Scientists discover deadly secret of Komodo's bite
Yahoo News 19 May 09;

SYDNEY (AFP) – The world's largest lizard, the Komodo dragon, has a snake-like venom in its bite which sends victims into shock and stops their blood from clotting, according to Australian research.

It had been widely believed that deadly bacteria in the carnivorous lizard's mouth helped kill its prey.

But magnetic resonance imagery has for the first time uncovered venom glands containing a shock-inducing poison which increases blood flow and decreases blood pressure, scientists say.

Lead researcher Bryan Fry said three-dimensional computer imaging comparing the Komodo's bite with that of Australia's saltwater crocodile showed it used a "grip and rip" pulling manoeuvre to tear deep wounds, similar to a shark or sabre cat.

Fry surgically removed a venom gland from a terminally ill Komodo at Singapore Zoo for the study, and said it contained a highly toxic poison which would induce potent stomach cramps, hypothermia and a drop in blood pressure.

The venom also blocked the blood's clotting ability, he said.

"Such a fall in blood pressure would be debilitating in conjunction with blood loss and would render the envenomed prey unable to escape," he said.

"These results are congruent with the observed unusual quietness and apparent rapid shock of prey items."

Komodos are the world's heaviest lizard, typically weighing 70 kilograms (150 pounds) and growing up to three metres (10 feet) in length.

They are native to several Indonesian islands and are considered a vulnerable species, with only a few thousand left in the world.

They live on a diet of large mammals, reptiles and birds but have been known to attack humans.

An Indonesian fisherman was in March mauled to death by a Komodo dragon after he ventured into a remote island sanctuary for the giant killer lizards.


Read more!

Clues to the forest in Malaysia

Sharmilla Ganesan, The Star 19 May 09;

With the International Day for Biodiversity falling on Friday, it is timely to learn about a homegrown project that aims to create logging practices that preserve our forests’ biodiversity.

WALKING into the forest early in the morning on a humid day, it is difficult to get excited at the prospect of seeing ants, bats and dung beetles. After all, they are hardly the most glamorous denizens of our forests.

The young biodiversity scientists accompanying us, however, are bursting with enthusiasm; after all, as part of the Conservation of Biodiversity Project (CBioD), these researchers have been living and breathing these fauna since 2007, and they know that there is more than meets the eye to these forest critters.

As an integral part of our forests’ ecosystem, these and other animals provide information on the general well-being of the forest itself. Dung beetles, for example, are good indicators of the presence of larger mammals in the area, while the presence of certain species of moth indicate whether the canopy cover of the forest has been adversely affected.

Implemented as a five-year project by Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), CBioD aims to come up with methods to integrate biodiversity concerns into forest planning, in order to reduce the loss of biodiversity when forests are logged. It is co-funded by the Global Environmental Facility (through the United Nations Development Programme) and the International Tropical Timber Organisation.

According to CBioD national project director Dr Shamsudin Ibrahim, the strength of the project lies in its team of young biodiversity scientists, who are all aged 33 and below.

“We want vibrant, outspoken scientists who are passionate about our mission,” he says. “We are looking to the next generation for people who will push for environmental issues to the forefront.”

Discovering the relationships between the forest and its inhabitants is the key task of the scientists attached to FRIM. Their enthusiasm for the project is apparent from their willingness to endure difficult terrains, harsh living conditions and unpredictable weather. While many people turn their noses up at trawling through the forest and scrabbling in the dirt for specimens (not to mention enduring insect bites!), it is all in a day’s work for this intrepid team.

“We’re always belakang tabir (behind the curtains),” says team co-ordinator Dr Christine Fletcher, 33. “But we do play an important role in feeding information to the Government on the best ways to preserve forests and biodiversity.”

She adds that people are generally happy to look at the more “charismatic” animals. “However, we’re looking at the unseen characters that play important roles, both within the forest’s ecosystem and in showing us how healthy the forest is.”

To date, the team has completed pre-timber harvesting activities with the Perak ITC Concession in the Temenggor Forest Reserve, as well as the assessment of five virgin jungle reserves (VJRs) in Peninsular Malaysia. This forms the core of the CBioD project, as VJRs are created within production forests as a way for disturbed forests to regenerate themselves. The team’s researchwill allow them to propose the optimum size a VJR in order to encourage regeneration and preserve the forest’s biodiversity.

Bio-indicators

The scientists have been studying eight species of flora and fauna in order to identify key bio-indicators that reflect the health of the forest and the speed at which it regenerates after logging. By doing so, they aim to provide foresters with simple and cost-effective ways of monitoring the health of forests. The selected species are: ants, aquatic macro invertebrates, bats, birds, dung beetles, moths, stingless bees; and plants or trees.

The wealth of information available from them is amazing. Take moths, for example. Anthony Gonzaga, 32, explains that moths serve two purposes in the forest: to pollinate flowers and defoliate leaves (in their caterpillar form). “So, there is an exchange between moths and plants in the forest. They depend on each other for survival,” he says.

Moths, Gonzaga further explains, provide insight into preserving the vertical structure of a production forest. “A certain level of canopy cover is removed when logging is carried out. As some moths prefer a dense canopy cover, there will be effects on the moth population if there is too much disturbance. For example, we might see a decrease in the number of moths that require dense coverage and an increase in those that prefer more light. Therefore, moths can be one of the indicators of the forest’s vertical structure, which can be a big part of forest planning.”

Another method of assessing disturbances to the forest is by studying moths’ antennae. Gonzaga says observation has shown that moths in the thicker, inner parts of the forest possess more complex antennae to assist in navigation. When the forest is thinned due to logging, however, the population of moths with simpler antennae would increase.

Tales from bats

The well-known but often misunderstood bat is no less useful. Joann Christina Luruthusamy, 25, stands beside what looks like a very big harp. Aptly enough, it is called the harp trap, and is used to capture bats for measuring and tagging. The bats fly into the taut strings of the trap and are unable to fly through, thereby falling into a bag at the bottom.

Bats, particularly the insectivorous ones, provide a unique way to study the forest due to their use of sonar to establish location.

“Different bats have different kinds of sonar, so they live in different parts of the forest,” says Joann. “Some roost under leaves while others, inside big caves.”

Therefore, when very dense foliage is opened up by logging, the bat species that is used to navigating there will not be able to survive. Fruit bats, on the other hand, feed on nectar from flowers at the canopy level; so, when the canopy cover is removed extensively, their numbers will drop, too.

While not the most appealing member of the forest community, the dung beetle is an important bio-indicator nonetheless, providing a simple way to gauge the presence of larger mammals in the forest.

Elizabeth Butod, 25, says studying dung beetles is cheaper and easier than attempting to trap and study larger mammals.

“As dung beetles feed solely on the dung of mammals, their presence shows that there are mammals around,” she says. “They are also very easy to catch, all you need is a pitfall trap with dung as bait.”

Christine emphasises that the project aims to get a complete picture of the biodiversity in forests. “We are interested in the richness and interactions of the plants and fauna within the forest. This is more important than the specific number of species or populations,” she says.

As the sampling portion of the project nears its end, Shamsudin says more effort will now be put into analysing the data, in order to come up with specific tools. “We want to be able to say, if you want to assess a forest’s ecosystem, these are the species to use.”

The aim, he adds, is to make biodiversity part of the decision-making process.

“We want to find out what is the best way to harvest timber and yet save our biodiversity. Ultimately, we want to impress on the Government that if we want to save the environment, we’d better change the way we manage our forests,” he says.


Read more!

Pulp giant APP set to assault Sumatra orangutan sanctuary

WWF 18 May 09;

Jambi, INDONESIA: A massive logging operation planned by Asian Pulp & Paper and the Sinar Mas Group (APP/SMG) and associated companies is to include large portions of the only areas that Sumatran orangutans have ever successfully been re-introduced into the wild, conservation groups active in Jambi province have learned.

Also threatened in natural forest areas around the Bukit Tigapuluh National Park are a quarter of the last critically endangered Sumatran tigers left in the wild, the Talang Mamak and Orang Rimba indigenous peoples and a significant population of endangered Sumatran elephants.

Conservation groups WARSI, the Sumatran Tiger Conservation and Protection Foundation, the Frankfurt Zoological Society, the Zoological Society of London and WWF-Indonesia learned last week that an APP/SMG joint venture had acquired the largest of the former and inactive ex PT IPA selective logging concessions in the Bukit Tigapuluh forest area - covering the orangutan reintroduction area and areas recording the most frequent sightings of tigers.

The groups have been highly critical of an APP/SMG environmental impact assessment for the neighbouring and also critically important PT Dalek Hutani Esa concession, saying it takes no account of key wildlife and indigenous peoples’ needs and should be rejected.

APP/SMG pushed a legally questionable logging road through both areas last year, opening up access for rampant illegal logging and clearing linked with increased fatalities as tigers are driven into closer contact with humans.

With the latest acquisition, APP/SMG now holds the majority of the buffer areas to the national park , including large areas the Forestry Service of Jambi and the National Park management authority agreed in 2008 to designate as the Bukit Tigapuluh Ecosystem which would be sustainably managed as natural forest.

Less than one third of the 2007 forest cover is within the National Park, with the areas most preferred by animals and indigenous peoples lying in the surrounding lowland forests now vulnerable to clearing.

“It took scientists decades to discover how to successfully reintroduce critically endangered orangutans from captivity into the wild. It could take APP just months to destroy an important part of their new habitat,” said Peter Pratje of the Frankfurt Zoological Society.

“These lowland forests are excellent habitat for orangutans, which is why we got government permission to release them here beginning in 2002. The apes are thriving now, breeding and establishing new family groups.”

Between 1985 and 2007, Sumatra island lost 12 million hectares of natural forest, a 48 percent loss in 22 years, with the accelerating rampage provoking international concern over the loss of biodiversity, smoke hazards from forest fires and peat swamp and soil degradation from clearing that made Indonesia one of the largest sources of the emissions causing climate change.

The Indonesian Ministries of Forestry, Environment, Public Works and Interior, as well as the governors of all 10 Sumatran provinces, including Jambi, announced at the World Conservation Congress in Spain last year that they were committed to protecting areas of the island with “high conservation values.”

The Bukit Tigapuluh landscape is widely regarded as one of Indonesia’s key areas of biodiversity..

“These NGOs are ready to support the Jambi governor to implement his public commitment to protecting Sumatra’s high conservation value areas and halt APP/SMG’s plan and identify alternative financing that would provide money and still save the forests, such as credits in the emerging forest carbon market,” said Ian Kosasih of WWF Indonesia.

“Bukit Tigapuluh’s forest have great potential for earning avoided deforestation credits, due to the high co-benefits of biodiversity and an indigenous community, as well as high avoidable emissions.”

Indonesia to turn ape rescue forest to pulp
Yahoo News 18 May 09;

JAKARTA (AFP) – An Indonesian paper company is planning to log an area of unprotected jungle which is being used as a reintroduction site for about 100 critically endangered orangutans, activists said Tuesday.

A coalition of environmental groups said a joint venture between Asia Pulp & Paper and Sinar Mas Group had received a licence to clear the largest portion of natural forest remaining outside Bukit Tigapuluh national park on Sumatra.

The area is home to about 100 great apes that are part of the only successful reintroduction programme for Sumatran orangutans, the sub-species most at risk of extinction, the coalition said in a statement.

It is also a crucial habitat for the last remaining Sumatran tigers and elephants left in the wild, it said.

"It took scientists decades to discover how to successfully reintroduce critically endangered orangutans from captivity into the wild. It could take APP just months to destroy an important part of their new habitat," said Peter Pratje of the Frankfurt Zoological Society, which is part of the coalition.

"These lowland forests are excellent habitat for orangutans, which is why we got government permission to release them here beginning in 2002. The apes are thriving now, breeding and establishing new family groups."

The unprotected forest is also considered essential habitat for around 100 of the last 400 critically endangered wild Sumatran tigers, as well as around 40 to 60 endangered Sumatran elephants, the activists said.

"APP's plan is devastating," said Dolly Priatna of the Zoological Society of London.

"It will almost certainly lead to more fatalities since tigers and people will be forced into closer contact with each other as the tigers? forest disappears."

At least nine people have been killed by tigers on Sumatra this year, while villagers have killed four tigers.

The coalition, which includes the Sumatran Tiger Conservation and Protection Foundation and WWF, said almost half of Sumatra's natural forest -- or 12 million hectares (29.65 million acres) -- had been cleared from 1985 to 2007.

APP has said its plans to log forest areas around Bukit Tigapuluh would actually help the orangutans, not harm them.

"Well managed pulpwood plantations act as buffer zones, which have been proven to deter illegal logging -- this ensures that protected areas remain protected," APP sustainability director Aida Greenbury said.

The government of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has allowed 1.8 million hectares of forest to be cleared annually since 2004, according to environmental group Greenpeace.

Indonesia's greenhouse gas emissions are the third highest globally and deforestation is the largest contributor.

Paper company threatens Indonesian orangutans
Robin McDowell, Associated Press 19 May 09;

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) — One of the world's largest paper companies plans to clear a large swath of unprotected forest in Indonesia being used as a sanctuary for critically endangered orangutans, according to environmental groups working in the area.

Singapore-based Asia Pulp & Paper has received a license to clear hundreds of acres (hectares) of trees just outside the Bukit Tigapuluh National Park on Sumatra island, WWF-Indonesia and four other groups said Tuesday.

Though not protected, the plush, lowland forests are considered an important area for biodiversity and have been used since 2002 as a release point for around 100 Sumatran rehabilitated orangutans — some orphaned when their mothers were allegedly killed by workers on nearby palm oil plantations.

"It took scientists decades to discover how to successfully reintroduce critically endangered orangutans from captivity into the wild," said Peter Pratje of the Frankfurt Zoological Society. "It could take APP just months to destroy an important part of their new habitat."

Asia Pulp & Paper acknowledged that one of its suppliers had applied for a license in the area. It made no mention of the proposed plantation's impact on orangutans, but said it would be creating a buffer between the site and Bukit Tingapuluh National Park, and a corridor linking the park with Taman Raja Reserve located east of the park.

"Because of the business APP is in, and the fact that we operate in an environmentally sensitive part of the world, we understand that we may be an easy public relations target," the company said in a statement. "Despite that, we urge stakeholders to be responsible and considered in their approach to long term sustainable development in Indonesia."

The company said last month that the government had officially allocated the forest for plantation use and that it would follow all legal procedures — including carrying out an independent, third party assessment about potential conservation threats.

There are an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 orangutans left in the wild, around 10 percent of them on Sumatra, and the rest on the nearby island of Borneo, which is divided largely between Indonesia and Malaysia. Their numbers have dropped dramatically as rain forests have been cleared and burned on both islands.

Logging drove much of the destruction in the last few decades and now palm oil plantations have emerged as the biggest threat. Indonesia is the world's top palm oil producer with some 15 million acres covered by plantations and is likely to grow amid an Indonesian policy that requires biofuels to account for 5 percent of the country's energy mix by 2025.

Along with biofuels, palm is used in everything from cosmetics to cooking oil.

The forests around Bukit Tigapuluh National Park are also home to 100 of the last 400 critically endangered Sumatran tigers left in the wild, said Dolly Priatna of Zoological Society of London, and roughly 50 endangered elephants.

The groups protesting the APP's plans — which include WARSI and the Sumatran Tiger Conservation and Protection Foundation — have written an official letter of complaint to the government.

Logging threat to Indonesia orangutans, tigers: report
Aloysius Bhui, Reuters 19 May 09;

JAKARTA (Reuters) - A logging operation planned by Asia's biggest pulp producer in Indonesia's Sumatra island threatens the habitat of rare orangutans, tigers and elephants, a joint report by five conservation groups said on Tuesday.

A license has been given to a joint venture between Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) and the Sinar Mas Group to clear 50,000 hectares (123,600 acres) of forest near the Bukit Tigapuluh National Park in Jambi to supply a nearby pulp mill, according to the report.

Peter Pratje of the Frankfurt Zoological Society said the project would destroy the forest home of 100 orangutans successfully reintroduced into the wild.

"It took scientists decades to discover how to successfully reintroduce critically endangered orangutans from captivity into the wild. It could take APP just months to destroy an important part of their new habitat," he said.

Another conservationist said the plan would also devastate the habitat of critically endangered Sumatran tigers and increase conflict with humans.

"Tigers struggling to survive as Jambi's forests shrink have already killed nine people in the area this year," said Dolly Pratna of the Zoological Society of London.

The forests are home to an estimated 100 of the last 400 Sumatran tigers left in the wild, the report said.

Up to 60 endangered Sumatran elephants also used the forest area slated for clearing, the report said.

A Sinar Mas Group spokeswoman defended the plan and said the site was already earmarked for development and was not a protected forest.

"We think our presence is good to help prevent any illegal logging, and reduce trespassing of animals that could destroy crops of local farmers," said Joice Budisusanto, adding that the firm normally allocated around 30 to 40 percent of its forest concession for conservation purposes.

The five green groups -- the Sumatran Tiger Conservation and Protection Foundation, Frankfurt Zoological Society, Zoological Society of London, WWF-Indonesia and WARSI -- have sent a letter to the ministry of forestry asking it to protect the area.

Forestry ministry officials could not immediately be reached.

APP, which is part of Sinar Mas, has a combined pulp, paper and packaging capacity in Indonesia of more than 7 million tonnes, according to its web site.

Green groups have frequently accused APP of destroying natural forest in Indonesia, accusations denied by the firm.

Separately, the Center for Orangutan Protection said in a report this week that the 2002 construction of a road through the Kutai National Park in West Kalimantan had led to a 90 percent drop in orangutan numbers from an estimated 600 to between 30 to 60 in the area since 2004.

(Additional reporting by Telly Nathalia; Writing by Sunanda Creagh; Editing by Ed Davies and Sugita Katyal)


Read more!

Palm oil exports at risk from overseas buyers boycott

The Jakarta Post 18 May 09;

Indonesia's palm oil business, already hit by lower prices, risks an overseas buyers boycott, with NGOs saying government plans for huge plantations in Kalimantan may mean big environmental damage.

The Indonesian Palm Oil Board (DMSI) said last week that fears about the government's proposed palm oil expansion program for north Kalimantan - which ironically has been postponed - has triggered calls for a boycott of Indonesian crude palm oil (CPO), particulary in European Union countries.

DMSI is a grouping of palm oil stakeholders including the palm oil farmers, palm oil corporations, biodiesel producers and associoated food oil corporations.

Derom Bangun, DMSI deputy chairman, said that the calls -- largely initiated by non-governmental organizations (NGO) -- have undermined the image of the Indonesian palm oil business by claiming that the palm oil companies will destroy 1.8 million hectares of forest in Kalimantan.

"This black *publicity* campaign has caused a decline in palm oil exports to Europe since 2006," added another chief deputy of DMSI, Sahat Siahaan.

In 2006, the palm oil export volume to the Netherlands, the main importer in Europe, reached 1.5 millions ton. However, the figure only reached 1.3 million tons last year.

"European palm oil exports actually only made 15 percent of the country's total *CPO* export. However, Europe has high political influence and other countries may follow its example," said Sahat.

The claim about the danger of destruction to Kalimantan's forests was made referring to a statement from Agriculture Ministry Anton Apriyantono in 2005 about a proposed program to develop massive oil palm plantation developments across Northern Kalimantan.

At that time, the Minister said that the government planned to build an oil palm plantation zone along the 840-kilometer Malaysia-Indonesia border in northern Kalimantan. He said the plantations would be built to raise the level of economic development in the border area and to promote a belt of development alongside the border. This was to improve security for local residents and to help improve border supervision, along the land border between Malaysia and Indonesia. .

"However, the program proposal was never implemented but the industry is still feeling the damage *from the fall-out* even until now," said Derom.

After doing further research, the Agriculture Ministry found that the geographic and soil conditions of the borderline less suitable for the establishment of palm oil plantantions than first thought, and eventually the government decided to stop the plan, according to Derom.

Though the plan was called off, many people in foreign countries thought that the Kalimantan proposal was still to be implemented. Foreign media have still been questioning DMSI officials regarding the proposal, said Derom.

In addition to the potential negative impact on the proposed expansion of export volume, fears that the program might still go ahead may make it more difficut for Indonesian companies to obtain required Sustainable Palm Oil certificates which are needed to acquire permission to import into countries with high environmental protection standards.

The certificate is given by the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), a multi-stakeholder international organization aiming to ensure that the palm oil industry meets environmental standards.

"Last month a Malaysian company application for an SPO *certificate* was rejected because RSPO thought the company involved in the Kalimantan program," said Dorum. Malaysia and Indonesisa share Borneo island also known as Kalimantan to Indonesians.

He added DMSI was worried the same thing could happen to Indonesian companies in future, blocking their exports to the EU. (mrs)


Read more!

Growth Industry: Honeybee Numbers Expand Worldwide as U.S. Decline Continues

Despite serious losses to colonies in the U.S. and Europe, honeybees are on the rise in other parts of the world--although hardly keeping pace with growing demand

Katherine Harmon, Scientific American 18 May 09;

Even as U.S. honeybee populations have been hit hard by colony collapse disorder in recent years, domesticated beehives have been thriving elsewhere.

In an analysis of nearly 50 years of data on bees from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, researchers found that domesticated honeybee populations have increased about 45 percent, thanks in large part to expansion of the bees into areas such as South America, eastern Asia and Africa. The results appear in the latest issue Current Biology.

The overall increase, however, is not what surprised Marcelo Aizen, a professor at the National University of Comahue in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and lead author of the study. Instead, he was taken aback by the sixfold increase in the growth rate of crops that depend on domesticated bees for pollination.

Booming demand for honey and a rise in foods that depend on bees for pollination are fueling the increase in bee colonies.

Many food staples, such as wheat, corn and rice, don't need bees. But plenty of fruits and vegetables that are now mainstays—from apples to zucchini—need help from pollinators like bees.

Demand for royal jelly, bee pollen and propolis (bee glue) has also contributed to the rise in beekeeping in some places, notes Eric Mussen, an apiculturist at the University of California, Davis, who wasn't involved in the study. But it is honey that accounts for most of the growth for bees across the globe.

The common domestic honeybee (Apis mellifera) was brought to the New World from Europe in the 17th century. Since then it has been responsible for keeping many crops (which were also imported) bountiful.

As the mysterious collapse disorder continues to claim hives by the hundreds—threatening, in particular, the almond industry—more attention is being paid other pollinators, including other types of bees such as solitary bees and feral honeybees.

Aizen explains that although "honeybees are the most frequent pollinator, they're not necessarily the most efficient." He points to the proficiency of local pollinators, such as bumblebees, to take care of crops such as squash and cucumber.

Paradoxically, as more land around the globe is put to agricultural use for pollination-dependent crops, indigenous bee species get crowded out. And as the native pollinators go, so, too, might some local floras that need specialized pollination, the study authors note.

Both Aizen and Mussen see this as an important time to reevaluate global food needs and goals. If healthful, pollination-dependent fruits and vegetables are to remain an important constituent of human diets worldwide, Mussen notes, more land—and even more pollinators—will be necessarily.

And although the overall growth in the world honeybee population might sound an encouraging note, Aizen remains cautious. "I think that there is a problem," he says about areas where their populations are shrinking. "I'm not saying that there isn't a problem…. But I think that we should change the perspective of the problem so it's not a question of supply but a question of changing demand."


Read more!

Pay farmers to halt irrigation to ease water crisis, Chinese adviser urges

Freshwater ecosystem destroyed after 50 years of turning desert into farmland, says report commissioned by Chinese government
Jonathan Watts, guardian.co.uk 18 May 09;

China should pay farmers to halt irrigation in the environmentally degraded far west despite long-standing concerns about food security, a senior government adviser has told the Guardian.

After more than 50 years of converting desert to farmland, the expert says the water problems in Xinjiang are so acute that the vast region – bigger than two-thirds of the world's nations – cannot develop further unless it pulls people off the fields and into cities.

Ideas for a pilot project aimed at reducing water use intensity in the area have been submitted by the expert, who was dispatched by the prime minister last year to study the problem.

The report's findings, as told to the Guardian, suggest the dash to transform desert into farmland over the past 50 years has resulted in a massive waste of water resources and environmental damage.

"In Xinjiang, close to 96% of the water is used for agriculture. In the world, this is the highest share," said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. "This structure has already caused the destruction of the freshwater ecosystem. In some lower reaches of rivers, there is no longer any water. Some wetlands and lakes have degraded."

Last year, officials and farmers complained they were suffering from the most severe drought in 50 years and called for more water to be diverted from neighbouring Kazakhstan, but the adviser found the cause of the problem was over-expansion of farmland and the drilling of too many wells.

The team has advised officials in Turpan – one of the most affected areas – to introduce a "grain for water" policy that compensates local farmers with food for giving up river-exhausting cultivation. They suggest the area becomes more industrialised and urbanised to make more efficient use of water resources.

"Given the water problem, Xinjiang should only be required to supply sufficient food for its own use," the adviser said. "The environment is already degrading. They don't have enough water for agriculture. We found that only if they go for industry, can they save water."

The government has already spent billions of yuan on a "grain for green" scheme that pays farmers to halt cultivation of slopes and very dry areas so that the land can be used for reforestation and land recovery. The new proposal would potentially commit similarly large sums to make water use more efficient.

If adopted, it would be a U-turn. In the 1950s, Mao Zedong urged millions of pioneers to settle in and cultivate the Uighur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang to ease the country's food shortages.

They have produced mixed results. According to government figures, Xinjiang now has 1.4m hectares (3.5m acres) of farmland, accounting for 3.3% of the national total. Although much of it is used for cotton, the area produces an agricultural surplus and is particularly famous for fruit.

Any change in the balance of food production causes unease in a country where the elderly still remember the devastating famines of the early 1960s that killed between 15 million and 40 million people. The expert said China would have no difficulty feeding its people even if Xinjiang produced food only for itself.

Climate change is adding to uncertainties by making Xinjiang warmer and increasing rainfall levels. Of greatest concern is the shrinking of mountain glaciers on which the region depends for a quarter of its water.

The survey team found that the melt-water bonus would increase river volume until 2020, after which the region could even suffer greater shortages than today.

"We have to be responsible for future generations so we cannot start developing when water income is very big, because later when water declines we wont have enough to sustain things," said the adviser. "We need to take advantage of the extra meltwater by doing all we can to solve the problems of dried-up lakes and depleted ground water".

Allowing Xinjiang to shift away from agriculture will allow the region to utilise its rich coal and oil resources and improve the efficiency of water use, the report found.

It estimates that each person moved from the countryside to the city saves 1,800 cubic metres of water, worth 64,000 yuan (£6,400) a year.

The relocation would be cost-efficient, according to the adviser. "For the Three Gorges Project, moving one person cost 40,000 yuan. In Xinjiang they only need to move them very close to cities and provide housing. It will be easier."


Read more!

London bids to be world's greenest city

Yahoo News 18 May 09;

SEOUL (AFP) – Mayor Boris Johnson outlined plans to make London "the cleanest, greenest city on earth" by the 2012 Olympics and called for commitments from other world cities at a climate change conference.

Leaders of the world's 40 largest cities, plus 17 affiliate municipalities, are meeting in Seoul this week for a summit on combating global warming -- the third to be held since 2005.

"What we should do in Seoul is agree that we will stop the endless addiction of mankind to the internal combustion engine," said Johnson.

He told a press conference the world's cities consume 75 percent of its energy and produce 80 percent of the emissions which cause climate change.

"The problem of our planet is an urban problem," Johnson said, calling for "serious results" in Seoul.

"I don't want to walk away with a communique which contains nothing but warm words and hot air... it's important we agree some specific measures."

He said the capital wants to use the Olympics "to drive the greening and the improvement of our city" and noted that London is committed to reduce carbon emissions by 60 percent by 2025.

Johnson said the key measure was addressing the problems relating to domestic and commercial buildings, which accounted for 70 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in London.

This involved retrofitting -- installing lagging -- in large numbers of public buildings.

Johnson proclaimed himself a "passionate cyclist" and said he would push ahead with cycle super-highways around London.

He also called for "real progress" by cities worldwide towards the electrification of municipal fleets and other vehicles. "That's one of the things we are hoping to achieve in Seoul."

London's air quality problem, he said, was caused by vehicle emissions from 8,300 antiquated diesel buses which could be replaced by low-carbon vehicles.

There were also 32,000 taxis running on diesel fuel which could be replaced by electric vehicles.

Johnson said there would be a substantial programme in the next few years to produce a "cleaner, greener" bus for his city. "The age of the diesel-emitting bus has got to be over in London."


Read more!

Message in What We Buy, but Nobody’s Listening

John Tierney, The New York Times 18 May 09;

Why does a diploma from Harvard cost $100,000 more than a similar piece of paper from City College? Why might a BMW cost $25,000 more than a Subaru WRX with equally fast acceleration? Why do “sophisticated” consumers demand 16-gigabyte iPhones and “fair trade” coffee from Starbucks?
If you ask market researchers or advertising executives, you might hear about the difference between “rational” and “emotional” buying decisions, or about products falling into categories like “hedonic” or “utilitarian” or “positional.” But Geoffrey Miller, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of New Mexico, says that even the slickest minds on Madison Avenue are still in the prescientific dark ages.

Instead of running focus groups and spinning theories, he says, marketers could learn more by administering scientifically calibrated tests of intelligence and personality traits. If marketers (or their customers) understood biologists’ new calculations about animals’ “costly signaling,” Dr. Miller says, they’d see that Harvard diplomas and iPhones send the same kind of signal as the ornate tail of a peacock.

Sometimes the message is as simple as “I’ve got resources to burn,” the classic conspicuous waste demonstrated by the energy expended to lift a peacock’s tail or the fuel guzzled by a Hummer. But brand-name products aren’t just about flaunting transient wealth. The audience for our signals — prospective mates, friends, rivals — care more about the permanent traits measured in tests of intelligence and personality, as Dr. Miller explains in his new book, “Spent: Sex, Evolution and Consumer Behavior.”

Suppose, during a date, you casually say, “The sugar maples in Harvard Yard were so beautiful every fall term.” Here’s what you’re signaling, as translated by Dr. Miller:

“My S.A.T. scores were sufficiently high (roughly 720 out of 800) that I could get admitted, so my I.Q. is above 135, and I had sufficient conscientiousness, emotional stability and intellectual openness to pass my classes. Plus, I can recognize a tree.”

Or suppose a young man, after listening to the specifications of the newest iPhone or hearing about a BMW’s “Servotronic variable-ratio power steering,” says to himself, “Those features sound awesome.” Here’s Dr. Miller’s translation:

“Those features can be talked about in ways that will display my general intelligence to potential mates and friends, who will bow down before my godlike technopowers, which rival those of Iron Man himself.”

Most of us will insist there are other reasons for going to Harvard or buying a BMW or an iPhone — and there are, of course. The education and the products can yield many kinds of rewards. But Dr. Miller says that much of the pleasure we derive from products stems from the unconscious instinct that they will either enhance or signal our fitness by demonstrating intelligence or some of the Big Five personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, stability and extraversion.

In a series of experiments, Dr. Miller and other researchers found that people were more likely to expend money and effort on products and activities if they were first primed with photographs of the opposite sex or stories about dating.

After this priming, men were more willing to splurge on designer sunglasses, expensive watches and European vacations. Women became more willing to do volunteer work and perform other acts of conspicuous charity — a signal of high conscientiousness and agreeableness, like demonstrating your concern for third world farmers by spending extra for Starbucks’s “fair trade” coffee.

These signals can be finely nuanced, as Dr. Miller parses them in his book. The “conspicuous precision” of a BMW or a Lexus helps signal the intelligence of all the owners, but the BMW’s “conspicuous reputation” also marks its owner as more extraverted and less agreeable (i.e., more aggressive). Owners of Toyotas and Hondas are signaling high conscientiousness by driving reliable and economical cars.

But once you’ve spent the money, once you’ve got the personality-appropriate appliance or watch or handbag, how much good are these signals actually doing you? Not much, Dr. Miller says. The fundamental consumerist delusion, as he calls it, is that purchases affect the way we’re treated.

The grand edifice of brand-name consumerism rests on the narcissistic fantasy that everyone else cares about what we buy. (It’s no accident that narcissistic teenagers are the most brand-obsessed consumers.) But who else even notices? Can you remember what your partner or your best friend was wearing the day before yesterday? Or what kind of watch your boss has?

A Harvard diploma might help get you a date or a job interview, but what you say during the date or conversation will make the difference. An elegantly thin Skagen watch might send a signal to a stranger at a cocktail party or in an airport lounge, but even if it were noticed, anyone who talked to you for just a few minutes would get a much better gauge of your intelligence and personality.

To get over your consuming obsessions, Dr. Miller suggests exercises like comparing the relative costs and pleasures of the stuff you’ve bought. (You can try the exercise at nytimes.com/tierneylab.) It may seem odd that we need these exercises — why would natural selection leave us with such unproductive fetishes? — but Dr. Miller says it’s not surprising.

“Evolution is good at getting us to avoid death, desperation and celibacy, but it’s not that good at getting us to feel happy,” he says, calling our desire to impress strangers a quirky evolutionary byproduct of a smaller social world.

“We evolved as social primates who hardly ever encountered strangers in prehistory,” Dr. Miller says. “So we instinctively treat all strangers as if they’re potential mates or friends or enemies. But your happiness and survival today don’t depend on your relationships with strangers. It doesn’t matter whether you get a nanosecond of deference from a shopkeeper or a stranger in an airport.”


Read more!

Shipping would profit cutting emissions by one fifth

WWF 18 May 09;

London, UK - Shipping – responsible for almost three percent of global emissions but not so far covered by any emissions reduction agreements – could reduce its climate impact by at least one fifth at a negative cost to the industry, a new International Maritime Organisation (IMO) report has shown.

“The shipping industry, currently responsible for more greenhouse emissions than the UK or Canada, now has no excuses for remaining outside international emissions reductions frameworks,” said Peter Lockley, Head of Transport Policy at WWF-UK.

WWF has welcomed The Second IMO GHG Study (2009) which was prepared for a meeting in London today where shipping industry representatives are to consider ways of incorporating shipping emissions into the new global climate deal due to be settled at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December.

“Until now the shipping industry has managed to avoid the high levels of public scrutiny that the aviation sector has faced,” said Lockley. “This report confirms that shipping is a substantial source of emissions, but also demonstrates that the industry has nothing to fear from joining the global climate regime, and could actually make financial gains if it gets serious about addressing its carbon emissions.”

Shipping emissions could double or even triple by 2050 under Business as Usual scenarios according to the new IMO analysis. “Mid-range emissions scenarios show that, by 2050, in the absence of policies, ship emissions may grow by 150% to 250% (compared to the emissions in 2007) as a result of the growth in shipping,” the report said.

On the other hand, there is major potential for shipping to cut its emissions through fuel saving technologies and practices.

“A significant potential for reduction of GHG through technical and operational measures has been identified,” the report says. “Together, if implemented, these measures could increase efficiency and reduce the emissions rate by 25% to 75%.”

Most immediately promising are “a range of measures whose cost efficiency is negative. That means that these measures are profitable even when CO2 emissions have no price”.

“The range of the maximum abatement potential of these measures is 135 to 365 Mt (Million tonnes) of CO2 and lies, for the central estimate, at about 255 Mt,” the report said.

The report, which considered a whole range of measures, including towing kites, speed reductions, and upgrades to hulls, engines and propellers, also found that Emissions Trading or a Bunker Fuel Levy are efficient and cost-effective policies to tackle shipping emissions
At this week’s conference the industry will aim to decide its position on whether shipping should be included in the global climate deal through emissions trading or a levy. Many national shipping associations support one or other of these measures, but some still think they can escape regulation.

Shipping schemes will be discussed further at an IMO meeting in July, which will report what progress IMO has made before the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change conference at Copenhagen. Consensus support within the shipping industry for a global scheme that sets an overall cap on their sector would give a major boost to the IMO meeting in July.

“WWF believes it is vital that shipping emissions come within an overall cap under the post-2012 climate regime, as they are projected to rise even if gains in efficiency are taken into consideration,” Lockley said.


Read more!