Dynamite eyed in dolphin stranding

Alcuin Papa, Philippine Daily Inquirer 11 Feb 09;

MANILA, Philippines -- Experts are looking at dynamite fishing as a possible reason for the beaching of some 250 dolphins in Pilar, Bataan, on Tuesday.

Environment Secretary Jose “Lito” Atienza said he asked Bataan Gov. Enrique “Tet” Garcia in a meeting at the Department of Environment and Natural Resources offices in Quezon City on Wednesday whether there was dynamite fishing in his province.

“I asked him [Garcia] and he confirmed it. He also said he was battling this illegal activity,” Atienza told reporters.

Dr. Lem Aragones of the University of the Philippines Institute of Environmental Science and Meteorology, told reporters the melon-headed whales of the dolphin family could have been led astray by the leader of their pod.

In turn, the leader’s acoustic system, which serves as its guidance system, might have been impaired.

“The causes of the acoustic trauma could have been sound waves caused by dynamite fishing or sounds emitted by passing ships or seaquakes,” he said. But he said they had ruled out a seaquake as the cause.

Dr. Theresa Mundita Lim, director of the DENR’s Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB), said they found no lesions or other physical manifestations that the ears of the four dolphins that died had been injured.

“There were no injuries to their ears, like visible lesions, but the possibility of an acoustic problem or trauma is still there,” Lim said.

But she also said more tests, like analysis of tissue samples and MRI tests will have to be done to see if there were other injuries to the animals not visible externally. Lim also said they are sending tissue samples to the University of Philippines in Los BaƱos, Laguna for analysis.

She said dolphins usually venture into shallow waters to feed.

Joel Palma of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said dynamite fishing is usually done in shallow waters.

According to Lim, Atienza reiterated his directive to remove stationary fishnets and other obstructions in the sea off Pilar after one of the dolphins was found tangled in nets.

Lim added they are looking at the whole environment in Pilar to determine what might have caused the dolphins to beach.

“If it was something like climate change, then it would be a bigger environmental problem,” she said.

Malcolm Sarmiento, director of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) said the dolphins would not leave their leader or any member of their pod behind due to their strong social instincts.

But for now, Sarmiento said they had yet to determine who was the leader of the pod that beached in Pilar.

“Usually, it would be male, the biggest among the animals, and the most battle-scarred. He would be swimming in the middle part of the pod,” he told the Philippine Daily Inquirer (parent company of INQUIRER.net).

Aragones said the cause of beaching of marine mammals is not usually discovered. Around the country, there are 12 to 15 incidents of beached marine mammals every year, he said.

Lim also said that a protocol and guidelines for incidents of beaching by marine mammals would be drafted soon.

“In general, what we saw was good cooperation between various stakeholders in a stranding incident. In the past, those animals would have been slaughtered,” Palma said.

Melon-headed whales are considered threatened by the International Union for Conservation for Nature (IUCN) and are protected under Philippine laws.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 11 Feb


Job: Sustainability Executive with NUS Office of Environmental Sustainability
on the AsiaIsGreen blog

To see Labrador for myself
on the wonderful creation blog

Exploring Pulau Ubin and Chek Jawa
on the Running with the Wind blog

Cool and quiet at Tanah Merah
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Parasitic worm on sea urchin?
on the Urban Forest blog

Oriental Pied Hornbill in courtship feeding?
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Pitta watching at the Singapore Botanic Gardens
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Seen on STOMP: Why so many dead fish in Rochor River?
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Salticid stare
on the annotated budak blog

Eco Warriors Undercover: Bear bile farming
on the Bornean Sun Bear Conservation blog

I’d like to ring their necks
on the MarineBio Blog

FOEI - International Biodiversity Photo Competition
on the Pulau Hantu blog


Read more!

Haze blankets Riau

The Jakarta Post 11 Feb 09;

Thick haze from forest fires has blanketed a number of cities in Riau province on Wednesday morning, while local weather agency has predicted for worse haze in the coming days.

Riau Natural Resource Conservation Agency said Wednesday that the haze, that has hit the province during the past several weeks, thickened in the morning following increasing number of hot spots in the province.

“Satellite observation record 41 hot spots in Riau, an increase from 11 a day earlier, and 32 of them are in peat lands,” the agency head Rachman Sidik, as quoted by tempointeraktif.com.

Haze has hit Pekanbaru, Pangkalan Kerinci, Bagan Siapi Api, Pasir Pengaraian, Dumai, Duri and Bengkalis. The agency warns that considering the width and thickness of burning peat swamps, haze may get worse in two days time.

Separately, the local Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency said thickening haze may disturb air and river transportation in the coming days.

“Based on wind pattern observation and low chances of rain in the area, the haze is predicted to worse,” said Blutcher Doloksaribu, head of the weather agency. (dre)


Read more!

Government agencies spend millions cleaning up Singapore's public areas

This has to stop
Teh Jen Lee, The New Paper 11 Feb 09;

MR LITTERBUG, if you're caught, you pay a fine of $200.

But do you know that other taxpayers are paying a higher price to clean up your mess?

$37 million, to be precise.

That's the annual cleaning bill of the National Environment Agency (NEA) over the last three years, its spokesman said.

The issue of littering was raised by Minister for Environment and Water Resources (MEWR) Yaacob Ibrahim in Parliament yesterday.

The $37 million is chalked up by just cleaning our roads, pavements, expressways, pedestrian overhead bridges and underpasses, and emptying public litter bins.

It does not include the cost of cleaning public parks, public estates, town centres and state land, as they come under the jurisdiction of other agencies such as PUB and HDB.

Imagine how much higher the figure would be then.

Over the years, NEA has stepped up enforcement efforts against littering - the number of litterbugs caught rose from 4,000 in 2005 to 33,000 last year.

Dr Yaacob said: 'The increase clearly shows that littering remains a concern in Singapore, and we should work harder to tackle it.

'We are mindful of our enforcement limitations, but NEA will continue to focus its enforcement efforts at littering hotspots to achieve maximum effectiveness.'

From 1 Apr, harsher penalties will kick in, Dr Yaacob said. The fines for littering were last revised 10 years ago.

Higher fine

For instance, the composition fine for first-time minor-littering offenders will be raised from $200 to $300.

Dr Yaacob said: 'Apart from sustained enforcement, our penalties must act as effective deterrents.'

He said public areas must be kept clean 'not only to protect public health... (but also) to ensure that Singapore develops sustainably and remains a clean and green city of gardens and water'.

'Each of us must play our part. For instance, while the Government can invest in infrastructure to transform our waterways, residents must keep the waters clean.'

He added that the Government adopts a 'multi-pronged approach' to keeping public areas clean - an 'effective cleaning regime, public engagement, and penalties and enforcement to deter littering behaviour'.

But as the population grows, public cleanliness will become a bigger challenge.

Dr Yaacob said: 'NEA has already committed additional resources to clean up littering hotspot areas such as Little India, Chinatown and Geylang. This cannot continue indefinitely. We must tackle the source of the problem - littering.'

He also announced a new anti-littering campaign for later this year.

'Four decades have passed since the first 'Keep Singapore Clean' campaign was launched by then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew,' he said.

'(The) new campaign will be driven by activities involving key stakeholders such as the grassroots, schools, the youth and businesses.'

To better understand the efforts behind the clean-up of litter, The New Paper team followed a cleaning contractor hired by PUB on their litter patrols last Tuesday.

The contractor, Tong Shing, has nine boats and about 20 cleaners dedicated to retrieving trash from the Marina Reservoir alone.

Between 7am and 6pm daily, rain or shine, they pick up trash washed downstream from the drains into the rivers.

Mr See Ban Seng, 55, Tong Shing's cleaning supervisor, said in Mandarin: 'Sometimes we pick up chairs or tables thrown from thepubs and restaurants along the Singapore River.'

More common items include tissue paper, drink cups, cans and bottles.

Mr Noorazman Noor'ain, a PUB engineer in charge of hiring cleaning contractors, said: 'We work with the river taxi operators, asking them to remind passengers not to litter in the river.'

Serious litter: Cans, cups

In case you don't know, items such as cigarette packs, food waste, drink cans, cups and tissue paper are considered 'serious litter'.

An NEA spokesman said: 'Drink cups and drink cans can accumulate water that could lead to mosquito breeding.

'Improperly disposed food waste or wrappers and used tissue papers could lead to fly, cockroach and rodent infestation.

'Larger items like cigarette boxes and newspapers would choke up the drainage system if they are blown or thrown into drains, leading to water stagnation and mosquito-breeding.

'Such items may also provide harbourage for vermin.'


Read more!

More government buildings go green

Energy audits done on 22 of 48 buildings; the rest due by March 2010
Jalelah Abu Baker, Straits Times 11 Feb 09;

EMPLOYEES at the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) building probably breathe in fresher air than what their counterparts do in many other government buildings.

Since early last year, the building in Havelock Road has been using a chiller plant that has a pre-cooled fresh air unit which improves the quality of the air indoors, and also saves water.

This new chiller is just one of the many energy-efficient features that the building now boasts after it went through an energy audit arranged by the Environment and Water Resources Minister.

Under an initiative to encourage energy efficiency by March next year, audits are being conducted on all 48 government buildings that have over 15,000

sq m of air-conditioned area - a size nearly equivalent to four football fields.

Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim had updated Parliament on Monday on the progress of these audits.

Energy audits have been completed on 12 buildings. These buildings also implemented recommended changes that have resulted in savings totalling $3 million a year. Audits have also been done on another 10 buildings, and these are in the process of implementing recommended energy-saving changes.

Audits on the remaining 26 buildings will be completed by March next year.

The MOM building was the first to undergo the audit. The company which conducted the audit now guarantees that the ministry will enjoy energy and water savings for the next five years.

The MOM now saves $330,000 a year in energy and maintenance costs. The biggest savings came from having a more efficient chiller plant.

'The energy-saving strategy was to put in the right configuration, select higher-efficiency equipment and enhance the flexibility of the system,' said Mr Patrick Foong, an energy auditor from Chesterton International Property, which audited the building.

Previously, the building had three chillers that worked on settings from 20 years ago. These were no longer suitable for the building's current needs.

With the changes, there are now three big chillers and two small chillers that accommodate the different load and usage of the building at different times. Energy is also saved because of the variable speed at which the chillers can operate.

Other cost-saving features include more efficient cooling towers, and fittings in the restrooms that help save almost 1,000 cubic metres of water a month. This is the equivalent amount of water that about 214 people consume in a month.

Adjustments to the lightings in the offices also mean that only half the amount of electricity is now consumed.

New perimeter lights also save energy as sensors detect the level of brightness and can switch the lights off automatically.

A gadget installed in the lifts - which are the second-highest consumer of energy in the building - also helped halve the amount of energy consumed.


Read more!

Singapore Environment Council to help SMEs to go 'green'

Expert help for SMEs to go 'green'
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 11 Feb 09;

LOCAL small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) looking to make their businesses more environmentally sustainable are set to get a leg-up from the launch of a new partnership.

The Singapore Environment Council (SEC) yesterday unveiled an initiative with Washington-based World Environment Centre (WEC) that will allow local firms to tap WEC's extensive knowledge base to 'green' their supply chains.

WEC, an independent non-profit body founded in 1974 with a grant from the United Nations Environment Programme, has helped advance sustainable practices within businesses such as IBM, Shell, ABN Amro, General Motors and Ricoh.

It is this international network of companies that SEC is looking to access, following the signing of the memorandum of understanding between the two parties. The SEC plans to cull best sustainable business practices from multinational companies and use these to guide the free advice it will give local SMEs.

SEC executive director Howard Shaw told The Straits Times: 'We've found that SMEs don't get much help or advice in terms of greening their businesses, such as in resource or supply chain management, and we want to plug that gap.'

The first to benefit from the arrangement will be the electronics and food and beverage sectors, he said. SEC will focus on educating decision-makers on best business practices and the environmental standards they should demand from suppliers.

The SEC-WEC partnership will also see a series of roundtable discussions focused on engaging 'movers and shakers' within industry and government agencies, as well as international speakers, said Mr Shaw. The first will be held in August.

The SEC is also working closely with the Singapore Manufacturers' Federation in a separate sustainability initiative, which will help firms cut costs and improve resource and energy efficiency, he said.

Dr Terry Yosie, the WEC's chief executive, said yesterday that the crisis was 'a terrible thing to waste' and was the 'perfect opportunity' for firms to take a hard look at their models and practices and restructure to achieve better efficiency.

Greening businesses is not just about recycling, added the SEC's chairman, Ms Isabella Loh. 'It's about gaining a competitive edge by having a holistic approach to your business model, which considers factors such as energy, waste and water management to save costs. This, in turn, boosts the bottom line.'


Read more!

Companies at Sarimbun Recycling Park welcome 15% rental rebate

Channel NewsAsia 10 Feb 09;

SINGAPORE: Tenants of the Sarimbun Recycling Park have welcomed the government's 15 per cent monthly rental rebate to help green businesses there tide through the economic crisis.

The one-year rebate will translate into savings of S$187,000 for the businesses.

The park accounts for a fifth of all recycling done in Singapore.

Recycling volume there rose 36 per cent last year over 2007.

From only three tenants in 1995, the park now has 12, with the last two vacant plots to be taken up soon.

- CNA/yt


Read more!

Wanted: green thumb for the invisible hand

One option for governments to help clean-tech initiatives is to subsidise and invest in them
Carlos Nichloas Fernandes, Business Times 11 Feb 09;

DISRUPTIVE innovations are frequently driven by low-cost, good-enough solutions that change the economics of delivering a product or service. By delivering value in a more cost-effective manner than existing technologies, these innovations exploit the natural behaviour of free markets to rapidly build traction and enable the transformation or creation of an industry. It is this opportunity to economically capture the value of these innovations that excites entrepreneurs and venture capitalists alike.

In his 1776 book Wealth of Nations, the conceptual builder of free-market theory, Adam Smith, articulated that though human motives were driven by self-interest, the invisible hand of free-market competition would tend to benefit society as a whole by keeping prices low.

Free markets consequently form the pillar on which disruptive innovation stands. But what happens when a disruptive innovation has a substantial social component that cannot be captured by the entrepreneurial pioneers without government intervention to correct market inefficiencies?

Just about six months ago, as oil prices skyrocketed towards US$147 per barrel, venture capitalists were delighted at the prospect of clean technologies becoming a competitive alternative to fossil fuels.

However, with the price of oil today hovering at around US$45 per barrel, the prospects of clean technologies being a viable substitute to oil in the near to medium term have largely evaporated. This has resulted in a 25 per cent fall in investment in clean technology projects in the third quarter of 2008 to US$18 billion, according to New Energy Finance.

Market players today pay only US$45 per barrel of oil and externalise the social and environmental costs of each barrel. Free-market principles apply only if the market participants - producers and consumers - experience the consequences of their actions. In the case of polluting carbon emissions arising from the use of fossil fuels, future generations pay the cost for today's participants.

In order to prevent this massive market failure, governments have recognised that they need to intervene.

Government intervention can essentially take two forms - First, governments can implement policies that help consumers internalise the true costs of fossil fuels by introducing a Pigovian tax or a cap and trade system to allocate 'pollution rights' to correct the negative externalities of market activity.

Second, governments can take a more direct approach by subsidising and investing in clean technology initiatives to compensate for market failure, thus enabling innovators to financially capture some of the social value of their innovations.

Of the two forms of intervention, economists favour the former, with free-market fundamentalists opposing the latter.

Proponents of laissez-faire capitalism argue against the direct approach involving government investments and subsidies. Their views are bolstered by two examples: The US government's over-investment in ethanol that resulted in the bio-fuels bust and Germany's generous subsidisation of solar panels, despite receiving little sunlight relative to the rest of the world.

While it is true that government investments may distort market forces and the US and German governments may have made some bad bets on clean technology projects, this anecdotal evidence merely encourages a simplistic view of a complex problem.

There is an important variable to the cost-benefit analysis of the government's role that is not appropriately considered - that variable is the temporal dimension of the global warming crisis.

Fanatic free-market thinking is not the only reason for the opposition to direct government investment and subsidies in clean technologies. The thesis that global warming is real, caused primarily by humans, has catastrophic consequences, and needs to be fixed quickly has often been erroneously presented by the media as an idea that is still disputed in the scientific community.

In reality, a study of 1,000 articles in peer-reviewed journals published between 1988 and 2003 noted that not a single article questioned global warming, its causes and the necessity of immediate action. On the other hand, in a similar study of articles published in mainstream news media it was found that 53 per cent questioned these facts.

Open debate

The reason for unanimous consensus among scientists having been presented as an open debate in the media is the result of a herculean effort by oil companies to fund pseudo science and frame global warming as an uncertainty in an attempt to preserve the status quo and restrict new clean technologies and business models that may be disruptive to their entrenched interests. Deep pockets buy the best marketers and copywriters. Solid science does not.

One of the key word wizards behind these efforts was Frank Luntz, a corporate and political consultant who helps in the selection of words and language that helps his clients turn public opinion on an issue. Because 'global warming' and 'oil drilling' had alarmist or negative connotations, he suggested the use of terms such as 'climate change' and 'energy exploration' to replace them.

In a memo to former US president George W Bush, he stated: 'Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly. Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate.'

Scientists believe that global warming will reach a tipping point after which its catastrophic consequences will be irreversible, unless clean technology projects are implemented within the next decade. With credit being as tight as it is, many companies are focusing on cash preservation for the purposes of survival, and are simply unable to invest in greener and cleaner technologies.

Faced with the lofty choice of saving the planet tomorrow, against the goal of mere existence today, most companies will choose the latter.

The notion that carbon taxes and cap and trade systems are the only appropriate solution to global warming is naive. The world needs every tool at its disposal to fight global warming and one approach to the fight should not necessarily preclude another.

With the drop in private investment in clean technologies, governments must jump in to fill the gap in order to stall global warming. The cost of action is high, but the cost of inaction is higher.

The author is the CEO of RecordTV and occasionally teaches courses and seminars on Innovation at INSEAD and the National University of Singapore


Read more!

India firm in driver's seat at Island Power

Its interest is shown in bids for Tuas and Senoko Power in '08
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 11 Feb 09;

INDIA'S GMR Infrastructure - the new 50 per cent shareholder of Intergen - is understood to be spearheading the international power group's push to restart its long-stalled $1 billion Island Power project on Jurong Island, sources said.

GMR's interest in having a Singapore presence was clearly reflected in its bids last year for Tuas Power and Senoko Power, two of the biggest generating companies here that were eventually sold by Temasek Holdings to China Huaneng Group and Lion Power, a Japanese/French consortium, respectively.

'Island Power is still actively reviewing various options for taking the development opportunity forward. We still believe the Island Power project has merit and is important to Singapore's energy future,' a spokesman for US-headquartered Intergen told BT yesterday when asked about the latest project status.

His statement clearly reiterates that Intergen - now backed by GMR - is still keen to try to move forward its 785-megawatt cogeneration project here, stalled since 2002.

BT understands that Island is still trying to negotiate a new gas supply deal, while awaiting a response to its appeal made last October to Singapore's Trade and Industry Ministry.

This was regarding the decision - which unfortunately came too late for Island - by electricity and gas regulator Energy Market Authority that it cannot have access to the gas pipeline network here unless it has a natural gas deal in hand.

It was a Catch-22, as Island saw its earlier agreement to buy 110 million standard cubic feet of gas daily from a Sumatran gasfield being cancelled by BPMigas, Indonesia's oil and gas regulator, following its inability to gain Singapore pipeline access due to legal wrangles involving the incumbent parties here.

Sources said that GMR is now 'taking the lead' in the Island project, after completing late last year its US$1.1 billion acquisition of a 50 per cent stake in Intergen from AIG Highstar Capital II.

The deal marked the largest-ever acquisition of a global energy utility by an Indian company.

Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns the remaining half of Intergen, which has ownership interest in 12 power plants with a total net capacity of 12,766 megawatts.

GMR's leadership of the Island Power project also follows the resignation of Michael Reading, Island's former managing director, who has been involved with the project from the outset.

Island has since appointed a new project manager in Mark Iamonaco, a spokesman said.

The Island project has seen as many changes in its ownership as the numerous hurdles it has run into.

Malaysia's Sime Darby which had acquired a 50 per cent stake in Island Power itself in late-2003, withdrew from the delayed Island project in 2005.

When the Island project was first mooted, parent Intergen was originally owned by Shell and the Bechtel Group.

But they eventually sold out to the partnership of Ontario Teachers Pension Fund and US private equity fund AIG, with the latter recently selling its stake to GMR.


Read more!

Hundreds of whales rescued in Philippines

Cecil Morella Yahoo News 10 Feb 09;

BALANGA, Philippines (AFP) – Fishermen and volunteers in the Philippines managed to rescue more than 200 beached whales on Tuesday by guiding them back into deep water, officials said.Residents of seaside towns west of Manila raised the alarm early in the day when they saw a large pod of melon-headed whales in shallow water.

Three of the whales were later found dead and authorities feared others would die unless they could be guided into deeper water.

The head of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Malcolm Sarmiento initially said on local radio and television the stranded mammals were dolphins, but experts told AFP they were in fact melon-headed whales.

Mariel Flores, a veterinarian, said melon-headed whales were "easily mistaken for dolphins because of their size and their teeth, which resemble those of dolphins."

Government marine biologist Rizza Salinas said the mammals, which travel in pods of 100 or more, may have been disorientated by damage to their hearing caused by illegal dynamite fishing in the area.

Another theory was that they reacted to a major underwater earthquake.

Authorities said they had managed to guide most of the stranded mammals back into deeper water and away from the shore.

The whales were said late Tuesday to be heading back into open water, although one was taken to a nearby marine park for observation by veterinarians.

Senator wants probe into stranding of dolphins in Bataan
GMA News 11 Feb 09;

MANILA, Philippines – The Senate’s recent drift into doing probes on a wide range of anomalies may not spare the stranding off Bataan of hundreds of melon-headed whales – also known as many-toothed blackfish, or electra dolphin.

Senate Majority Leader Juan Miguel Zubiri on Tuesday asked experts to investigate the cause of the sudden appearance of more than 300 electra dolphins near the shores of Pilar town in Bataan province Tuesday morning.

Zubiri said the small whales must have acted abnormally for swimming in shallow water, as these are known to be deep-sea species.

The senator suspected the dolphins’ habitat must have been disrupted, forcing them to flee and seek refuge in shallow waters.

Zubiri wanted the experts to look into the possibility that an earthquake study in the South China Sea by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (L-DEO) - a collaborator of Columbia University in the US - caused the abnormal behavior of the small whales.

He said that the L-DEO undersea experiment involves blasting, which might have annoyed the dolphins.

“The earthquake study is a sea floor investigation project in the exclusive economic zone that includes Taiwan, China, Japan and the Philippines for its earthquake research," he said.

Washington-based animal rights group Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association (WaH) had been reported protesting to halt the L-DEO study as it is destructive to marine ecosystem.

Based on a statement of Robin Winkler, founder of WaH, the multi-beam echo sounder air gun, which will be used in the experiment, could produce a noise equivalent to 265 decibels (dB), almost as deafening as the atomic-bomb blast that could scale up to 300 dB.

Zubiri also cited an International Union for Conservation of Nature study saying that the melon-headed whales may have been distracted by the South China Sea study, forcing the dolphins to wander in the shallow waters.

“On top of saving stranded dolphins, we should find the cause for the tragedy in order to avoid them in the future and to be prepared when it occurs again," Zubiri said.

According to Wikipedia, the Melon-headed Whale [Peponocephala electra; other names are many-toothed blackfish and electra dolphin] is a cetacean of the oceanic dolphin family [Delphinidae]. It is closely related to the Pygmy Killer Whale and Pilot Whale, and collectively these dolphin species are known by the common name blackfish. The Melon-headed Whale is widespread throughout the world's tropical waters, although not often seen by humans on account of its preference for deep water. - GMANews.TV


Read more!

Australian bushfires: when two degrees is the difference between life and death

Scientist Tim Flannery recalls the long, wet Victorian winters now replaced by a drier and dangerous climate
Comments (71)

Tim Flannery, guardian.co.uk 10 Feb 09;

The day after the great fire burned through central Victoria, I drove from Sydney to Melbourne. For much of the way – indeed for hundreds of miles north of the scorched ground - smoke obscured the horizon, entering my air conditioned car and carrying with it that distinctive scent so strongly signifying death, or to Aboriginal people, cleansing.

It was as if a great cremation had taken place. I didn't know then how many people had died in their cars and homes, or while fleeing the flames, but by the time I reached the scorched ground just north of Melbourne, the dreadful news was trickling in. At first I heard that 70 people had died, then 108. Then 170. While the precise number of victims is yet to be ascertained, the overall situation at least is now clear. Australia has suffered its worst recorded peacetime loss of life. And the trauma will be with us forever.

I was born in Victoria, and over five decades I've watched as the state has changed. The long, wet and cold winters that seemed so insufferable to me as a young boy wishing to play outside vanished decades ago, and for the past 12 years a new, drier climate has established itself. I could measure its progress whenever I flew into Melbourne airport. Over the years the farm dams under the flight path filled ever less frequently, while the suburbs crept ever further into the countryside, their swimming pools seemingly oblivious to the great drying.

Climate modelling has clearly established that the decline of southern Australia's winter rainfall is being caused by a build-up of greenhouse gas, much of it from the burning of coal. Ironically, Victoria has the most polluting coal-fed power plant on Earth, while another of its coal plants was threatened by the fire. There's evidence that the stream of global pollution caused a step-change in climate following the huge El NiƱo event of 1998. Along with the dwindling rainfall has come a desiccation of the soil, and more extreme summer temperatures.

This February, at the zenith of a record-breaking heatwave with several days over 40C, Melbourne recorded its hottest day ever – a suffocating 46.1C, with even higher temperatures occurring in rural Victoria. This extreme coincided with exceptionally strong northerly winds, which were followed by an abrupt southerly change. This brought a cooling, but it was the shift in wind direction that caught so many in a deadly trap. Such conditions have occurred before. In 1939 and 1983 they led to dangerous fires. But this time the conditions were more extreme than ever before, and the 12-year "drought" meant that plant tissues were almost bone dry.

Despite narrowly missing the 1983 Victorian fires, and then losing a house to the 1994 Sydney bushfires, I had not previously appreciated the difference a degree or two of additional heat, and a dry soil, can make to the ferocity of a fire. This fire was quantatively different from anything seen before. Strategies that are sensible in less extreme conditions, such as staying to defend your home or fleeing in a car when you see flames, become fatal options under such oven-like circumstances. Indeed, there are few safe options indeed in such conditions, except to flee at the first sign of smoke.

My country is still in shock at the loss of so many lives. But inevitably we will look for lessons from this natural tragedy. The first such lesson I fear is that we must anticipate more such terrible blazes in future, for the world's addiction to burning fossil fuels goes on unabated, with 10 billion tonnes being released last year alone. And there is now no doubt that the pollution is laying the preconditions necessary for more such blazes.

When he ratified the Kyoto protocol, Australia's prime minister Kevin Rudd called climate change the greatest threat facing humanity. Shaken, and clearly a man who has seen things none of us should see, he has now had the eye-witness proof of his words. We can only hope now that Australia's climate policy, which is weak, is significantly strengthened.

After ignoring the Kyoto protocol for years, just months ago we committed to a reduction in pollution of a mere 5% by 2020 over 2000 levels, with the possibility of increasing that to 15% if a successful treaty comes out at Copenhagen later this year. Our national goal is a 60% reduction in emissions by 2050, but such targets are easy to articulate if the bulk of the work must be done by future governments.

As the worst greenhouse polluters, per capita, of any developed nation, there is an urgent need for Australians to reduce our dependency on coal. I believe that if we want to give ourselves the best chance of avoiding truly dangerous climate change, we should cease burning coal conventionally by around 2030. No such policy is currently being contemplated. Instead, as perhaps anyone would, Australians have been focusing on the immediate cause of some of the fires.

Rudd has said that the arsonists suspected of lighting some fires are guilty of mass murder, and the police are busy chasing down these malefactors. But there's an old saying among Australian fire fighters — "whoever owns the fuel, owns the fire". Let's hope that Australians ponder the deeper causes of this horrible tragedy, and change our polluting ways before it's too late.

Tim Flannery is a scientist at the University of Macquarie and author of The Weather Makers: The History and Future Impact of Climate Change


Read more!

Australia Fires A Climate Wake-Up Call: Experts

David Fogarty, PlanetArk 11 Feb 09;

SINGAPORE - Weekend bushfires in Australia that killed 173 people are a climate change wake-up call for the public and politicians and a window to the future, experts said on Tuesday.

With the death toll still growing from the nation's deadliest fires, some analysts say the sheer scale of the tragedy might prompt industry to back-off calls to weaken the government's emissions targets or delay a carbon-trading scheme set for 2010.

"What the bushfires might do is suck the oxygen out of the debate. I think public awareness has been focused now on climate change again. We knew what the scientists had predicted and we've actually seen it in action," said Matthew Clarke of Deakin University in Melbourne.

"It may be very difficult for those who want weaker carbon reduction scheme targets or those who want to see it delayed to put those arguments into the public sphere. The atmosphere might be more hostile to those arguments," said Clarke, associate professor at the School of International and Political Studies.

The fires tore through communities on the outskirts of Melbourne, fueled by heatwave conditions and strong winds. Melbourne's temperature on Saturday hit 46.4 degrees Celsius (115.5 degrees Fahrenheit), a record for the city.

The Australian government released a policy document, or White Paper, in December outlining its plans for carbon trading as part of its strategy to fight climate change.

Under the scheme, the government set a target to cut carbon emissions by 5 percent in 2020 from 2000 levels and 15 percent if there is global agreement at the end of this year on a broader pact to fight climate change.

But the Greens, citing the fires and severe flooding in northern Australia, are calling for tougher targets.

The Greens and two independents hold the balance of power in the Senate and the government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is expected to face a tough time getting the emissions trading legislation passed by the Upper House later this year.

BIG AGENDA

Industry and particularly big coal-fired power generation firms, say the trading scheme will be too costly. The liquefied natural gas industry, which earns billion of dollars in exports, has said the scheme could force them to move offshore.

"Climate Change is a big agenda that should be considered in its own space and it would be irresponsible to find cover for a climate change argument in the bushfires," Heather Ridout, Chief Executive of the Australian Industry Group, told Reuters in a statement.

Some analysts say the fires were predictable and that climate scientists have been warning for years about Australia's vulnerability to rising temperatures and declining rainfall across much of the nation's south.

"I would compare this current bushfire event to one of the ghosts in Dickens' Christmas Carol that visits Scrooge and showed him what his future would be like if he didn't change his ways," said professor Barry Brook, director of the Research Institute for Climate Change and Sustainability at the University of Adelaide.

"The government should be taking an international leadership role. They are not listening to the ghost whispering in their ear saying this is your future," said Brook, who called for an emissions cut target of 40 percent by 2020 if there is a global climate agreement.

"The real danger in the White Paper is not the 5 percent target, it's the 15 percent target. So that's what the Greens should be advocating, changing the international negotiating target and make it as hard as possible."

But there was also a risk to investors if the government kept changing the targets because of financial or climate shocks.

"The fundamental flaw with the policy of the White Paper is that it's a political compromise, not a clear plan. And a political compromise will be blown in the wind, depending on what shock comes along," said leading climate change policy analyst Warwick McKibbin.

"It's very important to have a clear, transparent plan that builds constituencies and clarity about the future so that when something comes along, the policy doesn't fall over," said McKibbin, executive director of the Center for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis in Canberra.

(Editing by Bill Tarrant)


Read more!

Australian wildlife devastated by fires, say carers

Stephen Coates Yahoo News 10 Feb 09;

SYDNEY (AFP) – Cuddly Australian icons such as kangaroos and koalas have been "devastated" by the bushfires that have razed swathes of native habitat and destroyed animal shelters, wildlife experts said Tuesday.

As the human toll climbed above 170, animal rescue workers said the cost to the region's unique wildlife may never be known.

"We're not seeing a lot of injured animals yet because the fires were so hot the animals were just killed on the spot," Wildlife Protection Association of Australia president Pat O'Brien told AFP.

"We do know that a lot of the wildlife carers in that area have lost their homes and facilities and in some cases they have lost their lives."

He said rare and endangered animals unique to the region northeast of the city of Melbourne, such as the ground-dwelling lyrebird, which is famous for its vocal mimicry, had little chance of escape from the flames.

"It's just absolutely horrific. A lot of the wildlife that is endemic to that area is endangered, like the lyrebirds. There's no way they could have escaped because the fires were just too fast," he said.

Fanned by strong winds and fed by a highly combustible fuel of tinder-dry ground litter and eucalyptus trees oozing flammable natural oils, the fires leapt gullies and creeks and climbed hillsides at terrifying speeds.

"The koalas in those trees will be dead. Normally they would climb higher to escape a fire but with this fire whole trees were going at once," O'Brien said.

Native animal care group Wildlife Victoria said on its website that at least two of its animal shelters had been destroyed in the fires which have burned out an area larger than Luxembourg since Saturday.

"Wildlife rescuers are preparing for one of the largest operations in our history once we can safely enter the fire grounds," it said.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Animals (RSPCA) said it was bracing for an influx of burnt and wounded animals.

RSPCA chief executive Maria Mercurio said that as the areas razed by bushfire open up, the full brunt of the impact on native animals will become clearer.

She said RSPCA shelters and inspectors have been working around the clock to be ready to provide emergency assistance.

"Some of our regional shelters have been assisting with emergency accommodation since Saturday," she said.

Many animals which managed to survive the fires have been without food or water since the weekend.

"Wombats would have survived the fire in their burrows but when they come out there'll be nothing to eat, so they'll just die a slow death," O'Brien said.

"It will be ages before we can get into some of these affected areas and by the time we do that any of the injured animals will be dead anyway."

Firefighters and survivors said the blaze moved with frightening speed and many of the victims were burned alive in their cars as they tried to flee.

"I don't think you can compare it to other fires. The sheer intensity and speed it travelled was amazing," volunteer firefighter Tim Bennett said.


Read more!

S.O.S. - Save Our Seas

Dan Laffoley and Sylvia Earle, International Herald Tribune 10 Feb 09;

Could the oceans become the place where humanity finally gets its act together? Or will we become the victim of the many environmental threats now coming together?

Already over-fished and used as a garbage dump, the oceans now face all the risks posed by climate change - rising water levels, coral bleaching, ocean acidification, to name a few. If the oceans were a human patient, we'd be saying that it is suffering from a severe burn-out.

As a species, we have a seemingly endless quest for knowledge, which builds generation upon generation. Yet we appear at times to be incapable of acting on that information.

Despite hundreds of years of map-making and more recent advances - increasingly good acoustic mapping at affordable prices, for example - which have improved our knowledge of the oceans, today the ocean area mapped by humans still stands at only about 5 percent of the total.

If we act only where we have ample data, our actions will always be too little too late when viewed against the vastness of the ocean realm and the dire consequences of human abuse. Countless species and habitats will be lost before they are even discovered and described.

Part of the challenge is to connect the population at large to the fate of the seas. The oceans and marine conservation must become much more visible on the digital media of our age - the ubiquitous laptops, Blackberries and cell phones - much as Jacques-Yves Cousteau awakened earlier generations to the sea's marvels on film and television.

That is why we believe that the recent announcement of Ocean in Google Earth, which extends Google Earth by allowing users to navigate through the Ocean beneath the surface of the sea - a program for which we were both advisers - is an important step.

This new tool can open up the wonders of our marine world, and it can also show the impact we are having on it. With Ocean, every Internet surfer now has the capability to be an armchair ocean explorer.

Knowledge can have an impact. In 2004, an expedition of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to the Marianas region in the Pacific Ocean used a robotic system to bring pictures of amazing undersea volcanoes and smoking chimneys rising from the inky depths.

One beneficial consequence was that the data from that study contributed information that resulted in the declaration of new marine national monuments by the outgoing President George W. Bush, pushing the scale of maritime protection up a notch.

The declaration encapsulates the approach developing in several areas around the globe. "Going large," either with large individual marine protected areas or large networks of smaller ones, is the most efficient way to secure the wildlife and a renewed stream of benefits for people, be it tourism or sustaining local communities and industries. While we have more than 4,500 individual marine protected areas across our oceans, it is striking that 10 of these comprise three quarters of the area under protection.

The U.S. declaration on marine national monuments is a significant step in the right direction. But it is still striking that after so many decades of effort to protect the seas, the areas under protection amount only to 0.80 percent of the total ocean area.

Three years ago, almost 200 countries made a commitment to increase the protected area of the oceans by 700 percent by 2012. That would cover 10 percent of all ocean areas that fall under national jurisdictions.

The total global marine protected area has increased since 2005 from 2.2 to 2.9 million square kilometers - a huge achievement, representing a 30 percent increase, but simply not enough. Another 28 countries need to do what the United States did over the next three years if we are to meet our modest target.

In short, the network of marine protected areas - both large and small - needs to grow, and it needs to grow fast. Protecting our ocean world for the future requires a rapid evolution in thinking and action.

As we consider how to increase the protection of our oceans, we need to move beyond individual habitats and species to large-scale protection of ecosystems and marine "landscapes."

We need to increase interest in large-scale marine mapping, and to start making the best use of new technologies to help us decide where and what to protect, especially on the High Seas.

We also need expeditions to study and document new habitats and species. We need to make oceans and what we know about them much more "visible" to the public. More and better information about our oceans can only help us make better decisions about their future.

However disconnected you may feel from the oceans, remember this - that every breath you take, every sip of water you drink and even the very balance of salt in your blood ties you and every one of us to the fate of our oceans and seas.

Dan Laffoley is marine vice-chairman of IUCN's World Commission on Protected Areas, marine adviser for the Chief Scientist's Team at Natural England, and one of the advisers for Ocean in Google Earth. Sylvia Earle is explorer-in-residence at the National Geographical Society, founder of the Deep Search Foundation and lead adviser for Ocean in Google Earth.


Read more!

Tigers terrorising Indonesian village: official

Yahoo News 10 Feb 09;

JAKARTA (AFP) – Indonesian authorities are setting off blasts and may use traps to stop tigers terrorising a forest village in West Sumatra province, an official said Tuesday.

Three endangered Sumatran tigers have been devouring livestock in the village of Halaban since last week, provincial conservation agency head Indra Arinal told AFP.

The agency is trying to scare off the animals by setting off explosions in gunpowder-filled metal pipes, but may have to resort to trapping them, Arinal said.

"If the tigers keep creating conflict to the village, then we have to use traps and relocate them," Arinal said.

Such conflicts are a rising problem in Indonesia, an archipelago nation with some of the world's largest remaining tropical forests, as human settlements encroach on natural habitats.

In January, two women were trampled to death by a pair of elephants in Aceh province after the animals entered an illegally cleared field from nearby jungle. A man was also reportedly killed by two tigers on Sumatra island last month.

There are fewer than 400 Sumatran tigers left in the wild, acccording to environmental group WWF.


Read more!

Great squirrel cull launches in Scotland

Yahoo News 10 Feb 09;

LONDON (AFP) – They may be cute and cuddly but that won't be enough to save grey squirrels in northern Scotland after the launch on Tuesday of Britain?s largest ever culling campaign of a mammal.

Naturalists and landowners are joining forces to rid northern Scotland of the squirrels, arguing they carry a deadly pox virus and threaten the smaller native red squirrel.

Scotland is one of the few safe havens left for the red squirrel whose numbers have been in slow decline throughout Britain since the arrival of its stronger, disease-carrying cousin from North America in the 1870s.

"The red squirrel is the UK's only native squirrel but it is in danger of becoming extinct on mainland Scotland if action is not taken to protect it," said Mel Tonkin, manager of the Saving Scotland's Red Squirrels campaign.

"Our project aims to stop the decline of Scotland's red squirrels and help them expand across the country in the future, but we have a huge task ahead of us."

Estimates put the number of red squirrels in Scotland at around 120,000 and the number of greys at between 200,000 and 300,000.

Tens of thousands of greys are expected to be trapped and killed under the three-year, £1.3 million campaign sponsored by the Scottish government, the Guardian said.

Landowners will legally be allowed to shoot the grey animals as part of the culling set to start this spring, the newspaper said.

The culling has sparked alarm from some animal lovers. But Stuart Brooks, director of conservation at the Scottish Wildlife Trust, insisted the campaign was essential.

"I can understand and empathise with those people who do not like the prospect of killing wild animals, but it is disingenuous to say that there are viable alternative solutions to saving the red squirrel in Scotland," he said.


Read more!

Climate Change Nudges American Birds Northward

Deborah Zabarenko, PlanetArk 11 Feb 09;

WASHINGTON - Climate change is pushing American birds northward, with some finches and chickadees moving hundreds of miles (km) into Canada, an Audubon Society study reported on Tuesday.

Drawing on citizen observations over a 40-year period, the society's scientists found that 58 percent of 305 widespread bird species found in the contiguous United States shifted significantly to the north.

While there are many factors that can make birds move, there's no question this is caused by human-spurred global warming, according to report co-author Greg Butcher.

"There's a thousand things that cause birds to change their range, and so if you do a study of a whole bunch of birds, you'll see some moving north, some moving south, some moving west," Butcher said in a telephone interview.

"What was real surprising about this study is ... to see the birds moving so uniformly in one direction," Butcher said.

Scientists were able to relate this movement with temperature changes from 1966 through 2005.

"That uniformity of movement and then a whole bunch of different tests we were able to take to correlate those movements with temperature change that make it so obvious that it's global warming is what we're dealing with here," he said.

All kinds of birds moved north, but more of the highly adaptable forest and feeder birds -- upward of 70 percent -- made the move, compared with only 38 percent of grassland species, the study found.

The Purple Finch, Pine Siskin and Boreal Chickadee moved deep into the Canadian Boreal Forest, shifting their ranges 313, 246 and 211 miles, respectively.

Southern-dwelling water birds including the Red-breasted Merganser, Ring-necked Duck and American Black Duck shifted their ranges northward by lesser distances.

Only 10 of 26 grassland species made significant moves north. Birds including the Eastern Meadowlark, Vesper Sparrow and Burrowing Owl may have been unable to despite more moderate northern temperatures because grassland habitats have been converted to human uses such as row crops, pasture and hayfields.

There will be fewer of these grassland birds as global warming and pressure on grasslands increases, the report said.

These changes in the bird world are an indicator of the impact of climate change on humans, Butcher said.

"This isn't something that's going to happen in the Arctic or the Antarctic and it isn't something that's going to happen way off in the future," he said. "It's something that has been occurring over 40 years and it is disrupting the lives of birds and it's going to disrupt the lives of people as well."

Butcher said the key to combating global warming is to pass a law to cap and trade climate-warming greenhouse emissions.

More information is available online at www.audubon.org.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

Study: Birds shifting north; global warming cited
Dina Cappiello, Associated Press Yahoo News 10 Feb 09;

WASHINGTON – When it comes to global warming, the canary in the coal mine isn't a canary at all. It's a purple finch.

As the temperature across the U.S. has gotten warmer, the purple finch has been spending its winters more than 400 miles farther north than it used to.

And it's not alone.

An Audubon Society study to be released Tuesday found that more than half of 305 birds species in North America, a hodgepodge that includes robins, gulls, chickadees and owls, are spending the winter about 35 miles farther north than they did 40 years ago.

The purple finch was the biggest northward mover. Its wintering grounds are now more along the latitude of Milwaukee, Wis., instead of Springfield, Mo.

Bird ranges can expand and shift for many reasons, among them urban sprawl, deforestation and the supplemental diet provided by backyard feeders. But researchers say the only explanation for why so many birds over such a broad area are wintering in more northern locales is global warming.

Over the 40 years covered by the study, the average January temperature in the United States climbed by about 5 degrees Fahrenheit. That warming was most pronounced in northern states, which have already recorded an influx of more southern species and could see some northern species retreat into Canada as ranges shift.

"This is as close as science at this scale gets to proof," said Greg Butcher, the lead scientist on the study and the director of bird conservation at the Audubon Society. "It is not what each of these individual birds did. It is the wide diversity of birds that suggests it has something to do with temperature, rather than ecology."

The study provides compelling evidence for what many birders across the country have long recognized — that many birds are responding to climate change by shifting farther north.

Previous studies of breeding birds in Great Britain and the eastern U.S. have detected similar trends. But the Audubon study covers a broader area and includes many more species.

The study of migration habits from 1966 through 2005 found about one-fourth of the species have moved farther south. But the number moving northward — 177 species — is twice that.

The study "shows a very, very large fraction of the wintering birds are shifting" northward, said Terry Root, a biologist at Stanford University. "We don't know for a fact that it is warming. But when one keeps finding the same thing over and over ... we know it is not just a figment of our imagination."

The research is based on data collected during the Audubon Society's Christmas Bird Count in early winter. At that time of year, temperature is the primary driver for where birds go and whether they live or die. To survive the cold, birds need to eat enough during the day to have the energy needed to shiver throughout the night.

Milder winters mean the birds don't need to expend as much energy shivering, and can get by eating less food in the day.

General biology aside, the research can't explain why particular species are moving. That's because changes in temperature affect different birds in different ways.

Some birds will expand their range farther north. For example, the Carolina wren — the state bird of South Carolina — has turned into a Yankee, based on Audubon's calculations. It is now commonly seen in the winter well into New England, as well as its namesake state of South Carolina.

"Twenty years ago, I remember people driving hours to see the one Carolina wren in the state," said Jeff Wells, an ornithologist based in southern Maine. "Now, every year I get two or three just in my area," he said. "Obviously, things have changed."

Other species, such as the purple finch and boreal chickadee, spend their summers in the forests of Canada and fly south into the U.S. for the winter. Climate change could be playing a role in why they are not flying as far south as they used to, and are no longer as common as they were in states like Maine, Vermont and Wisconsin.

For other species, global warming may not be a major factor in the movements measured by Audubon at all. The wild turkey was second only to the purple finch in miles moved north — about 400. But it's likely due to efforts by hunters and state wildlife managers to boost its population.

In other cases, the range shifts are prompting calls to cull some bird populations.

The sandhill crane, a large gray bird that migrates to the southern U.S. for the winter, has a range that expanded about 40 miles north in the last 40 years. This small movement has likely contributed to the bird's population explosion in Tennessee. The sandhill population has grown to a point that state wildlife officials are considering allowing the bird to be hunted.

"You are seeing it all across the state," said Richard Connors, president of the Tennessee Ornithological Society. "As it increases, there is going to be pressure to hunt it. The bird watchers of Tennessee don't want that."


Read more!

New nuclear plants will produce far more radiation

Industry documents reveal modern reactors more dangerous in an accident than the ones they replace

Geoffrey Lean, The Independent 8 Feb 09;

New nuclear reactors planned for Britain will produce many times more radiation than previous reactors that could be rapidly released in an accident, The Independent on Sunday can reveal.

The revelations – based on information buried deep in documents produced by the nuclear industry itself – calls into doubt repeated assertions that the new European Pressurised Reactors (EPRs) will be safer than the old atomic power stations they replace.

Instead they suggest that a reactor or nuclear waste accident, althouguh less likely to happen, could have even more devastating consequences in future; one study suggests that nearly twice as many people could die.

The EPR is the most advanced of the new generation of nuclear reactors. One is already being built in Finland and one in Normandy, France. And last week President Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to build another in Normandy, while India signed a draft accord to buy between two and six of them. The French company EDF has said that it plans to build four in Britain. Two are expected for each of two existing nuclear power station sites, Hinkley Point in Somerset and Sizewell in Suffolk.

Until now the reactors have been widely thought to be less dangerous than those already in operation, largely because they contain more safety features and produce less waste. But the information in the documents shows that they produce very much more of the radioactive isotopes technically known as the "immediate release fraction" of the nuclear waste, because they could get out rapidly after an accident.

Data in one report, produced by EDF, suggests that they would produce four times as much radioactive bromine, rubidium, iodine and caesium as a present-day reactor. Information in another – by Posiva Oy, a nuclear waste company owned by two Finnish reactor builders – indicates that seven times as much iodine 129 is produced. And material in a third, by the Swiss National Co-operative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, implies that they will give rise to 11 times as much caesium 135 and 137.

This happens because the reactors are designed to burn their nuclear fuel almost twice as thoroughly as normal ones. Independent nuclear consultant, John Large, says that this "changes the physical characteristics of the fuel" and increases the immediate danger if the radiation should escape. After comparing the consequences of an accident at the new EPR being built at Flamanville, Normandy with one at an existing reactor nearby, he found that, in the worst case, it would increase the number of deaths from 16,000 to over 28,000.

Areva, the French firm that designs the reactor, says that the total radioactivity of the waste is only slightly increased, but Mr Large points out that it is the very much greater part that can easily escape that is of most concern. Areva adds that the reactors are specially designed to stop radioactivity escaping, but Mr Large argues no system can be foolproof. And in an accident during the transport of waste such protection would be irrelevant.

EDF said: "We are confident that new plants can be built and run safely."


Read more!

"Smart Cities" Mean Rivalry In Power, Construction

Pete Harrison, PlanetArk 11 Feb 09;

BRUSSELS - In the city of the future, could power suppliers be rivaled by construction firms? An embryonic movement is growing in Europe to build "smart cities" that will challenge the status quo.

The vision is fueled by the fear of climate change and the need to find green alternatives to dirty coal, unpopular nuclear power and unreliable gas imports from Russia.

Such cities would become self-contained units, their buildings gleaning energy from the powerful weather systems sweeping across their roofs and feeding it down to homes below and vehicles in the streets.

Electric cars in the garages would double up as battery packs for when energy supplies are scarce. Every scrap of waste food, garden trimmings and even sewage would be used to ferment gas.

Facing up to the end of their traditional business model, utilities are mapping a long-term survival strategy.

"A very different business model will emerge over time," said Gearoid Lane, managing director of British Gas New Energy, the UK utility's green division. "If any energy company ignores the long-term impact on future fossil-fuel backed energy sales, they will be in for a shock."

The idea of self-sufficient cities is gaining currency in the European Union, which has set itself the ambitious task of cutting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to a fifth below 1990 levels by 2020 -- the biggest cuts anywhere in the world.

"In 25 years from now, millions of buildings...will be constructed to serve as both 'power plants' and habitats," says writer and economist Jeremy Rifkin, who has advised governments and corporations on tackling climate change and energy security.

At the hub of the system would be a "smart electricity grid" that allows electricity to flow where it is needed most and dissipates the energy spikes as weather systems sweep through.

"The more fluctuating energy you have from renewables, the more it makes sense to have a smart grid," Markus Ewert from the new technologies team of German utility E.ON told Reuters. "It would help stabilize the energy flows, so you don't come up against the limits of the grid.

"Electric vehicles could be connected to the grid and could store energy at times when too much is produced -- and they could feed it back into the grid when there's not enough."

SUSPICION

While utilities such as E.ON are looking for opportunities, there is also strong suspicion that others are trying to preserve their vested interests and slow the pace of change in Brussels, the main driver of European climate regulation.

That was fueled last month when a plan to put 500 million euros ($645.5 million) into researching smart cities was scrapped.

"It's stunning that funding was kicked out, and it's pretty clear the big electricity utilities were not innocent," said Green party member Claude Turmes who last year helped draft EU green energy policy.

"Their influence on policy-making is tremendous," he added.

The reason the funding was dropped is not clear, but the challenge facing Europe's big power generators is obvious -- insulating or rebuilding Europe's rickety housing stock could cut heating bills any where between 30 and 80 percent, which would slash demand for their product.

Not only would smart cities slowly reduce energy needs, they would also start producing their own over time.

Much of the technology needed is still a distant dream -- but not all of it.

French construction company Bouygues is working on an office in Meudon, western Paris, which uses 4,000 square meters of solar panels to meet not only its own energy needs but also to export surplus energy back to the power grid.

"We have entered an era of breakthroughs and of a technological revolution in the construction sector," said Eric Mazoyer, deputy managing director of Bouygues Immobilier.

"Because tenants will pay 60 percent less in electricity bills, we can charge higher rents and we will sell the surplus of electricity back to (French utility) EDF," he added.

OUTSIDE THE BOX

Myriad other examples exist throughout Europe, but at the heart of the plan is the philosophy that energy, ideas and enthusiasm are most easily shared in densely populated areas.

"Cities are a perfect for promoting change and renewable energies," said the politician, Turmes. "Cities can serve as innovation platforms, creating clusters of businesses around green energy, and they control urban planning and parking slots, so they can promote electric transport systems."

Environmentalists see another advantage to local entities -- they have a degree of autonomy beyond the reach of federal government and can often make tough decisions: for example, California's climate goals and London's congestion charging.

This week, the mayors and deputies of more than 300 mainly European cities are due in Brussels to sign a covenant pledging to cut their cities' greenhouse gas emissions above and beyond the EU targets.

"It's a very new way of doing things," said Gerard Magnin of Energie-Cites, a group of green local authorities. "It's about giving power to society, so society can put pressure on the institutions. By demonstrating people are ready for change, the cities will help the governments."

European Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs estimates the cities involved will together save $10 billion a year in fuel.

So how do energy companies cope with such upheaval?

Much can be learned from other sectors undergoing similar revolution, such as telecoms which suddenly hit fierce competition from cable and internet providers, or the music industry which is struggling to cope with digital MP3 uploads.

"The MP3 was the first open platform that the music industry couldn't control," said Tim Hole of Audio Authority Management, a London music manager who is trying to keep pace with change.

"It took a company from a completely different sector to step in and take control of things -- Apple coming from the computer industry to deliver iTunes and the iPod," he added. "You may see that start to happen in the energy sector."

"To survive, you have to get closer to your customers, so you can keep up with their changing expectations," he added.

Many in the energy sector already expect their new rivals to be constructors or property developers like Bouygues.

"We have had some interesting discussions with developers," said Lane of British Gas. "Whether they will develop the expertise in-house, or work in partnerships with energy companies remains to be seen."

"We have 10,000 engineers out there every day, installing and servicing boilers," he added. "There's a relationship of trust already. That model will become more and more valuable when it comes to selling renewables and microgeneration."

E.ON's Ewert says one winning technology could be biogas, which can be fermented from farm and domestic waste or even sewage and then be piped through existing gas networks.

"Biogas can be produced at a much smaller scale than natural gas, and without such huge investments," he said. "From our point of view it makes absolute sense to feed the biogas into the gas grid. The infrastructure is already there."

Rejecting suggestions utilities are slowing progress, he pointed to the Swedish city of Malmo, where E.ON already provides a cluster of 1,500 homes with renewable energy and Masdar City in Abu Dhabi where it is also involved.

"We want to understand where are the opportunities in smart cities and where are the limits," he said.

(Additional reporting by Muriel Boselli in Paris; Editing by Sara Ledwith)


Read more!

Eating less meat could cut climate costs

Jim Giles, New Scientist 10 Feb 09;

Cutting back on beefburgers and bacon could wipe $20 trillion off the cost of fighting climate change. That's the dramatic conclusion of a study that totted up the economic costs of modern meat-heavy diets.

The researchers involved say that reducing our intake of beef and pork would lead to the creation of a huge new carbon sink, as vegetation would thrive on unused farmland.

The model takes into account farmland that is used to grow extra food to make up for the lost meat, but that requires less area, so some will be abandoned. Millions of tonnes of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, would also be saved every year due to reduced emissions from farms.

These impacts would lessen the need for expensive carbon-saving technologies, such as "clean coal" power plants, and so save huge sums, say Elke Stehfest of the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and colleagues.
Flatulent feeders

Climate-change experts have warned of the high carbon cost of meat for several years.

Beef is particularly damaging. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is released from flatulent cows and by manure as it decays. Furthermore, to produce a kilogram of beef (2.2 pounds), farmers also have to feed a cow 15 kg of grain and 30 kg of forage. Grain requires fertiliser, which is energy intensive to produce.

Stehfest has now weighed the economic impact of beef and other meats against the cost of stabilising carbon dioxide levels at 450 parts per million – a level that some scientists say is needed to help prevent dangerous droughts and sea level rises.

If eating habits do not change, Stehfest estimates that emissions would have to be cut by two-thirds by 2050, which is likely to cost around $40 trillion.

If, however, the global population shifted to a low-meat diet – defined as 70 grams of beef and 325 grams of chicken and eggs per week – around 15 million square kilometres of farmland would be freed up. Vegetation growing on this land would mop up carbon dioxide. It could alternatively be used to grow bioenergy crops, which would displace fossil fuels.
Supermarket labels

Greenhouse gas emissions would also fall by 10% due to the drop in livestock numbers, she calculates. Together, these impacts would halve the costs of dealing with climate change by 2050.

To help consumers, the environmental cost of meat, in terms of carbon emissions per portion, could also be included in the purchase price, says Stehfest.

The costs sound about right, says Raymond Desjardins of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. However, it may be unfair to compare future farms to current ones, he adds.

Journal reference: Climatic Change (DOI: 10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6)


Read more!

Solution for the world's water woes

David Molden, BBC Green Room 10 Feb 09

Rising populations and growing demand is making the world a thirsty planet, says David Molden. In this week's Green Room, he says the solution lies in people reducing the size of their "water footprints".

Today, one-third of the world's population has to contend with water scarcity, and there are ominous signs that this proportion could quickly increase.

Up to twice as much water will be required to provide enough food to eliminate hunger and feed the additional 2.5 billion people that will soon join our ranks.

The demands will be particularly overwhelming as a wealthier, urbanised population demands a richer diet of more meat, fish, and milk.

The water required for a meat-eating diet is twice as much needed for a 2,000-litre-a-day vegetarian diet.

Cities and industries will also demand more water. Ironically, even new endeavours pursued in the cause of environmental preservation, such as producing biofuels, will place even more pressure on dwindling water supplies.

Clearly, we are heading toward a tipping point that could soon bring us to a day of reckoning when we will have literally made one too many trips to the planetary well.

Given the current rate of development, we will not be able to provide water for producers to grow enough food and sustain a healthy environment.

The only solution is to learn how to live with less water by making much better use of what we have.

Better water management is good for farmers, good for the environment and good for all of us. We already know many of the ingredients to make this happen; the big question is why isn't it happening?

Trickle effect

The good news is that it does happen.

People are reaching for tools - new and old - to produce more food with less water.

They are adopting more precise irrigation practices, such as drip and sprinkle irrigation.

For example, many farmers in Nepal and India now regularly use low-cost drip irrigation to grow vegetables.

In sub-Saharan Africa, just a little water - combined with improved crop varieties, fertiliser and soil management - can go a long way.

Farmers can double the yield per hectare they currently harvest, and double the amount of food produced per unit of water.

Over the last two decades in Asia, sales of pumps that allow farmers to more reliably and precisely apply water to their crops, have skyrocketed.

Rice farmers in the region are now also saving water by a practice known as "wet and dry" irrigation, rather than following the traditional practice of keeping rice fields constantly flooded.

Also, many farming communities are getting organised into associations for more effective irrigation management.

But the bad news is that change isn't happening fast enough.

For example, there are still far too many ill-maintained and poorly operated irrigation systems across Asia that use two times more water than is really needed.

In sub-Saharan Africa, the problem is not water being wasted, but the simple yet devastating issue of access.

Despite water being available in nature, many farmers routinely lack enough water to produce food to feed their families.

'Water miles'

Why is it that some areas use water so carelessly?

One problem lies with public policies that fail to connect the interests of different user groups.

For example, farmers may see little self-interest in being more conservative with water if the benefits flow to cities and not to them.

Although, broadly speaking, water is a precious commodity, for many users its costs are negligible, so there is no incentive to conserve.

Many countries do not invest enough in water to enable poor rural communities to grow more food.

In the US and Australia, annual per capita water storage is more than 4,000 cubic metres. Yet in much of sub-Saharan Africa it is less than 100 cubic metres; poor countries simply cannot afford investments in large hydraulic infrastructure.

Nonetheless, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and other research organisations have identified new and more affordable opportunities for low-cost water investment.

For example, resource-poor farmers can afford low-cost drip irrigation kits, whereas conventional irrigation, which costs more than $4,000 per hectare, is well beyond their means.

Unfortunately, while we think we know the answers, reality is more complex.

We have dramatically altered natural water systems in the quest for more water control.

Unwittingly, we have created salinity problems, dried up rivers and have caused groundwater tables to decline.

Institutions that govern water have not adapted to address these issues. Added to this is the fact that we don't fully understand what new water problems will result from climate change.

While we desperately need to know more about water resources, basic data and knowledge are hard to get because of a lack of investment.

The industrialised world is quick to point its finger at agricultural producers, blaming them for water woes, but it is our food habits that drive the problem.

When 50% of food is wasted after it leaves farmers' fields, it leads to an equivalent water waste of 50% because wasted food is also wasted water.

Action is urgently required on several fronts: we must continue to encourage the many local actions that are having a positive impact now; we must establish policies that create incentives for farming communities to invest in better water management; and we must invest in the infrastructure and the knowledge systems needed to manage complex water systems for the benefit of all.

Each of us can make a difference if we first consider the water implications of our lifestyles and the "water footprint" we are leaving behind.

Dr David Molden is deputy director of research for the International Water Management Institute (IWMI)

The Green Room is a series of opinion articles on environmental topics running weekly on the BBC News website


Read more!