Best of our wild blogs: 8 Apr 10


Butterfly of the Month April 2010 - Grass Demon
from Butterflies of Singapore

Orgy on Singapore Reefs: coral mass spawning
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

Student blogs on animal behaviour and ecology
from Otterman speaks

Highs and lows
from The annotated budak and unsharpened masks

6th Anniversary Dives for Hantu Bloggers!
from Psychedelic Nature

14 Apr (Wed): Charity Premier screening of "Earth"
from wild shores of singapore

16 Apr (Fri): Talk on "Volunteering for Mother Earth" by Grant Pereira from wild shores of singapore

Growing the native Tacca leontopetaloides
from Garden Voices

Toes, tails and tears
from The annotated budak

Nesting of the Little Grebe
from Bird Ecology Study Group

The vocalisation of the Indian Cuckoo
from Bird Ecology Study Group


Read more!

For Sydney's sea turtles, survival still hangs in the balance

Deborah Smith, Sydney Morning Herald 8 Apr 10;

THE green turtles of Sydney Harbour tell a tale of two cities.

That these endangered reptiles regularly visit to graze on seagrass meadows in the middle of a big city, and some have even made the harbour their home, attests to the improving health of Sydney's main waterway.

This week, the Herald delves into the state of our harbour, and its changing life both above and below the waterline.

The turtles - with the mussels that crowd on to channel markers and the seahorses that wrap themselves around shark nets - are a good sign the estuary is becoming cleaner.

Yet for a 13-year-old sea scout, Julia Spragg, her first encounter with a green turtle was far from a good experience.

With one flipper entangled in fishing line that had cut to the bone, another flipper severed, and deep tackle wounds to its neck, the animal had little chance of survival.

When fellow members of the 1st Sailors Bay Sea Scouts found its mangled body while kayaking in the beautiful reaches of Middle Harbour, they were sad to see how much it had suffered.

''It was not nice,'' said Julia.

This young guardian of the harbour wishes more people, particularly those fishing, could see the devastating results of leaving bottles, bait bags and tackle around.

''If you see rubbish, just pick it up. It's not a big job,'' she said.

Geoff Ross, a wildlife management officer with NSW National Parks, said the entangled turtle might have been a long-time harbour resident, and its recent death was a concern.

''The loss of just one breeding-sized individual can have an impact on the species,'' he said.

Although remedies such as waste-retention traps on stormwater outlets had significantly decreased the amount of debris entering the harbour, individuals could do more, he said.

The pollution we can see in the harbour is just one of the many man-made threats to the estuary. These range from an industrial legacy of dumping toxic metals in its sediments to the future effects of global warming.

An increase in sightings of sea turtles, which prefer warmer climes, could be a sign conservation strategies were having an effect but it could also be linked to climate change, Mr Ross said.

Archaeological material from middens at Balmoral Beach and Cammeray suggests Aborigines might have eaten turtles, although Val Attenbrow, of the Australian Museum, said the evidence was not conclusive, with only some bone fragments found. The East Australian Current, a conveyor belt from the tropics on which the turtles ride, is strengthening, with warmer, saltier water found 350 kilometres further south than 60 years ago.

An influx of tropical fish has made the harbour even more of a wonderland for underwater photographers, bringing rare species such as a pair of ornate ghost pipefish that were recently spotted in Chowder Bay.

While more than 570 kinds of fish have been identified - many more than the 350 types found in the whole of Europe - for fishing guide, Craig McGill, it is not the fish, or the the visiting dolphins and whales, or even the fairy penguins, that epitomise the big improvements he has seen in water quality in the past 20 years.

It is the filter feeders on the marinas, pylons and piers. Middle Harbour has an abundance of oysters, he said.

''And the channel markers in the main harbour have had a growth of mussels we've never seen before.''

A ban on anti-fouling paint containing tributyltin was a large contributor. And improvements in the management of sewage and stormwater have reduced other microscopic pollutants.

Twenty-four of 28 swimming sites in the harbour complied 100 per cent of the time with bacterial guidelines between October 2008 and April 2009.

But February this year was a very different story, as the sea scouts of Sailors Bay well know. When any of them fell into the water, they were quickly ushered out to have a shower.

The heavy rains washed debris and road run-off into the harbour, said scout leader, Adrian Spragg . ''It smelt and it was oily.''

In February, only three swimming sites - Redleaf Pool, Nielsen Park and Watsons Bay - passed safety tests, according to Harbourwatch.

This run-off is why the sediments in Sydney Harbour remain some of the most contaminated in the world.

Stuart Taylor, an expert on the harbour bed, said there are almost 21 million tonnes of contaminated sediments, containing thousands of tonnes of copper, lead and zinc, as well as pesticides and other chemicals.

''This is where the detritus of civilisation ends up. Everyone living in the catchment contributes,'' Dr Taylor said.

When there is low rainfall, the contaminants settle quickly and when the sediments are disturbed, they tend to fall back in much the same area, rather than spread.

About 1.5 centimetres of sediments are deposited each year, but rather than providing a fresh top layer, worms and shrimps burrow into the mud and mix it up, he said.

More than 90 per cent of the harbour contains contaminants in surface sediments that exceed guidelines based on US studies. This could be having adverse ecological effects, said Dr Taylor of Geochemical Assessments, who carried out his studies with Associate Professor Gavin Birch at the University of Sydney's School of Geosciences.

Some hot spots, like Homebush Bay, have undergone remediation, but others, where there is no industrial culprit to pay for a risk assessment and clean-up, and where any evidence of effects on human health is lacking, remain untouched.

One of the first studies on the effects of the sediments has been done by Nathan Knott and Emma Johnston of the University of NSW and Sydney Institute of Marine Science.

Surprisingly, being repeatedly doused in heavily contaminated sediments from Rozelle Bay for 10 days had no effect on a range of creatures, including sea squirts and sponges.

But ''further research is required to assess the potential impacts of long-term exposure,'' the scientists said.


Read more!

Rarest of Rare Species Make New Endangered List

livescience.com Yahoo News 7 Apr 10;

Green-eyed frogs and a Cuban crocodile are among the rarest of rare species, based on a new list of critically endangered species from the Wildlife Conservation Society.

The "Rarest of the Rare" list includes an eclectic collection of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Threats to each individual species vary widely, but all the animals on the list face real danger that could lead to their ultimate disappearance, WCS officials said.

A small porpoise called vaquita is getting trapped in fishermen's nets, which are inadvertently causing the animals to drown. The Grenada dove - the national bird of the island of Grenada - has been severely impacted by habitat loss. Other species suffer from illegal trade, as in the case of the ploughshare tortoise.

"The Rarest of the Rare provides a global snapshot of some of the world's most endangered animals," said Kent Redford, director of the Wildlife Conservation Society Institute. "While the news is dire for some species, it also shows that conservation measures can and do protect wildlife if given the chance to work."

The endangered species on the list include:

* Cuban crocodile: Currently restricted to two small areas in Cuba.
* Grenada dove: The national bird of Grenada is threatened by habitat loss.
* Florida bonneted bat: Thought to be extinct in 2002; a small colony has since been discovered.
* Green-eyed frog: Only a few hundred of these small amphibians are left.
* Hirola: Also called Hunter's hartebeest; the hirola is a highly threatened African antelope.
* Ploughshare tortoise: With only 400 left, the ploughshare tortoise is threatened by the illegal pet trade.
* Island gray fox: Living on the California Channel Islands, this is the smallest fox in the United States.
* Sumatran orangutan: The population has declined 80 percent during the past 75 years.
* Vaquita: This small ocean porpoise is drowning in fishing nets
* White-headed langur: Only 59 of these monkeys remain on a small island off Vietnam.

The list also highlights positive news, detailing two species that are on the road to recovery thanks to conservation efforts: Robert's tree frog whose population has grown due to captive breeding in zoos; and Przewalski's horse, which is starting to rebuild numbers after being re-introduced into the wild.

The 2010-2011 edition of State of the Wild also includes a special section devoted to the impact of human conflicts on wildlife and the surrounding environment. It considers how conservation can contribute to peace-building and reconstruction efforts in post-conflict areas.


Read more!

Congo troops poach hippos, elephants: environmental group

Yahoo News 7 Apr 10;

KINSHASA (AFP) – DR Congo troops last month illegally killed animals including seven hippos and five elephants in Virunga National Park, Africa's oldest, a Congolese environmental protection group said.

Innovation for the Development and Protection of the Environment (IDPE) said that from March 3-28 government troops killed the hippos and elephants as well as five antelopes, four baboons, three chimpanzees and two buffalo.

All hunting and fishing is banned in Virunga National Park, which is a UNESCO world heritage site covering an area of 790,000 hectares (1.95 million acres) in northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

The soldiers "use their wives and cousins to sell the meat" in villages near the park, the IDPE said in a report that included photos of decomposing elephant carcasses.

The troops resort to poaching, the IDPE quoted the commander of the army's 15th Brigade that is allegedly behind most of the killings as saying, because of the inadequacy of their food rations.

They have also developed an illegal ivory business in Nord-Kivu province, where Virunga is located, with traders buying ivory from troops in nearby Goma and Butembo which is then shipped to China or Dubai, the IDPE said.

The group proposed demilitarising the park which lies on the Ugandan border.

According to UNESCO, the park comprises an outstanding diversity of habitats, ranging from swamps and steppes to the snowfields of Rwenzori at an altitude of over 5,000 metres (16,400 feet), and from lava plains to savannahs on the slopes of volcanoes.

Around 200 of the world's last 750 mountain gorillas are found in the park, some 20,000 hippopotamuses live in the rivers and birds from Siberia spend the winter there, the United Nations organisation says on its website.


Read more!

Unilever to resume buying CPO if Sinar Mas cleared

Reuters 7 Apr 10;

JAKARTA, April 7 (Reuters) - Unilever (ULVR.L) (UNc.AS), the world's top palm oil buyer, will resume palm oil purchases from Indonesia's PT SMART (SMAR.JK) if independent auditors clear the firm over alleged forest destruction, a company spokesman said on Wednesday.

Unilever, which uses palm oil in such products as Dove soap and Ben & Jerry ice cream, cancelled its annual 20 million pound ($32 million) contract with PT SMART, which is part of Sinar Mas, in December unless the group could provide proof that none of its plantations were contributing to the destruction of rain forests.

"We will resume buying palm oil from Sinar Mas if studies by independent auditors show that Greenpeace's allegation against Sinar Mas is false," said Sancoyo Antarikso, corporate secretary of PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk (UNVR.JK).

Greenpeace alleges that Sinar Mas, Indonesia's biggest palm oil producer and the second biggest in the world, has been responsible for widespread deforestation and peatland clearance, practices which release vast amounts of carbon dioxide.

Unilever could also resume buying palm oil from Sinar Mas, even if the audit supported Greenpeace's allegations, if Sinar Mas showed it was addressing the environmental complaints, Antarikso said.

Unilever consumes around 1.9 million tonnes of palm oil each year and has pledged to buy only from certified sustainable plantations from 2015, while around 90 percent of worldwide supply comes from Indonesia and neighbouring Malaysia.

PT SMART and PT Unilever Indonesia agreed to appoint two independent auditors -- Netherland-based Control Union Certification (CUC) and British Standard institute -- early this month to investigate the environmental allegations.

The independent auditors were due to begin work on April 20 and complete their study by the end of June, Daud Dharsono, SMART's president director, said.

Other top palm oil buyer Nestle (NESN.VX) had also joined Unilever to stop buying palm oil from Sinar Mas after Greenpeace released a report alleging the planter cleared rainforests.

Agribusiness giant Cargill Inc [CARG.UL] has also recently threatened to remove Sinar Mas as a palm oil supplier over allegations of illegal logging.

Analysts said top palm oil buyers halting supply contracts with Sinar Mas and other planters in the future could limit plantation expansion as global food and fuel demand grows.

But Green campaigners and consumers have turned up the heat on multinationals buying palm oil, saying these companies' palm oil suppliers are responsible for deforestation and peatland clearance.

(Reporting by Yayat Supriatna; Writing by Fitri Wulandari; Editing by Ed Davies)

Unilever Indonesia Says it May Resume Buying Sinar Mas Palm Oil
Arti Ekawati, Jakarta Globe 7 Apr 10;

PT Unilever Indonesia said on Wednesday it would consider resuming purchases of crude palm oil from the Sinar Mas Group after reviewing the conclusions of two studies of the producer’s environmental practices.

“If the [assessment] teams say there was no evidence of deforestation by Smart [PT Sinar Mas Agro Resources and Technology] in producing its CPO, or if there was indeed evidence of deforestation but Smart has already made the necessary improvements, we will consider buying from Smart again,” said Sancoyo Antarikso, corporate secretary and general manager for external relations at Unilever Indonesia, after a meeting with Smart executives at the Ministry of Trade.

Sinar Mas last week announced it had appointed Netherlands-based Control Union Certification and London-based British Standards Institution Group to verify allegations by Greenpeace that Sinar Mas destroyed tropical rainforests to create palm oil plantations.

In an August 2008 report called “Burning up Borneo,” Greenpeace accused Sinar Mas of destroying rainforests, the habitat of orangutans, in the production of crude palm oil. Unilever announced in December that it would stop buying palm oil from the group and Nestle followed suit last month. US food giant Cargill said it would do the same if Greenpeace’s claims prove true.

Sinar Mas has denied the Greenpeace allegations.

Speaking after the meeting at the Trade Ministry, Smart president director Daud Dharsono said the two assessment bodies were expected to complete their work by the end of June.

He added that the bodies were recognized by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, a trade body of producers and buyers formed “with the objective of promoting the growth and use of sustainable oil palm products,” according to its Web site.

Greenpeace has said it doubts the assessments will be neutral, according to a Bloomberg report last week.

Deputy Trade Minister Mahendra Siregar said the ministry was facilitating talks between the two companies because crude palm oil is one of the country’s major export commodities.

“The case may not have a significant impact on Sinar Mas but we consider palm oil an important strategic commodity for boosting our economy,” Mahendra said, saying 4 million people were directly employed in the palm oil sector.

Mahendra added that other palm oil producers should learn from Sinar Mas’s experience.

Daud said Unilever, the world’s biggest buyer of crude palm oil, accounted for about 3 percent of Smart’s sales of the commodity, while Nestle made up 0.2 percent.

Verification over forest destruction claims to be completed in June
Mustaqim Adamrah, The Jakarta Post 7 Apr 10;

Publicly listed crude palm oil (CPO) producer PT Sinar Mas Agro Resources and Technology (SMART) expects to have a verification work over forest destruction claims finished by June’s end.

“We have delivered the term of reference (part of the verification work) to the two consulting (firms) … we still need to arrange some details,” SMART president Daud Dharsono told reporters on Wednesday after a meeting with Trade Ministry officials and the Netherlands-based consumer goods producer Unilever executives.

“We hope the verification will complete within the next eight to 12 weeks – by the end of June.”

For the verification, SMART has appointed the Netherlands-based Control Union Certification (CUC) and British Standards Institute Group (BSI) headquartered in London through their representative offices in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and in Singapore, respectively.

Results of the verification are expected to, as SMART says, “clarify” issues raised by environmental non-governmental organization Greenpeace in the latter’s report.

Meanwhile, Unilever Indonesia corporate secretary Sancoyo Antarikso said Unilever would wait for the results before deciding to whether resume buying CPO from SMART or not.

In a 2008 Greenpeace report, the organization indicated that CPO producers, including SMART, had converted peat lands, natural forests and habitats of Indonesia’s indigenous Orangutan into oil palm plantations. The report was later supported by a field investigation and satellite data.


Read more!

ASEAN to urge for legally binding climate change pact

Yahoo News 7 Apr 10;

HANOI (AFP) – Southeast Asian leaders will call for a legally binding global pact on climate change, according to a draft summit statement seen by AFP on Wednesday.

The statement said the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) leaders meeting in Vietnam on Thursday and Friday will also urge rich countries to continue taking the lead in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

All parties under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change should "work together to secure a legally binding agreement, particularly to limit the increase in average global temperature to below two degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial level," the draft said.

Developed countries should also "continue taking the lead by making more ambitious commitments and setting out specific and equitable binding targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the mid-term and long-term."

An 11th-hour climate change deal reached in Copenhagen in December does not legally bind countries to their commitments to cutting carbon dioxide emissions blamed for climate change.

The Copenhagen Accord calls for limiting global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), the threshold set by many scientists.

However, critics have complained that the actions are only voluntary and lacking in vital details on how to achieve the goal.

The agreement also commits rich countries to paying out around 30 billion dollars in total over the next three years and sets a potential figure of 100 billion dollars annually by 2020, to help poor nations fight climate change.

In the draft statement, the ASEAN leaders say they will also consider "the possibility of developing an ASEAN action plan to better understand and respond to climate change".

They will continue to exchange views to come up with a common ASEAN position in the next climate change talks in Mexico this year.

ASEAN to take stock of economic integration & climate change response
S Ramesh Channel NewsAsia 7 Apr 10;

SINGAPORE: ASEAN leaders meet in Hanoi this week for their mid-year summit under new chair Vietnam.

The leaders will take stock of the 10-member grouping's economic integration process and discuss how to ensure economic recovery stay on track.

They are also expected to issue a statement on "Sustainability of Regional Economic Recovery".

2009 was a challenging year for ASEAN as the grouping battled the economic downturn and stayed relevant amidst internal problems faced by the last chair, Thailand.

Observers said it is now time for the grouping to consolidate and focus on the tasks ahead.

Professor Simon Tay, chairman of Singapore Institute of International Affairs, said: ".....the growth rates in India and China are still much higher than in ASEAN and ASEAN would need to raise its game, otherwise its relevance in the future is really in question."

ASEAN leaders are also expected to take stock of the member countries' efforts to tackle the global challenge of climate change. They are expected to issue a joint response on how ASEAN intends to address this issue.

ASEAN will also emphasise its resolve to deal with climate change and expects the global community to do the same.

Professor Tay said: "In terms of Indonesia, particularly, the deforestation and land use changes would make its climate-change emissions one of the highest in the world.

"As for the ASEAN economies, the Asian Development Bank report showed that all of them would be impacted, (and) not just Singapore, (it being) a low-lying island.

"It is important for ASEAN to stand up and say to the world that we as a group of countries expect the global community to move ahead. We want a good outcome, we are not afraid of dealing with climate change. In fact, we are more concerned if climate change is not addressed by the global community including ASEAN."

ASEAN leaders will also be briefed on the progress on enhancing the group's inter-connectivity through the different modes of transportation.

- CNA/ir


Read more!

Exactly Whose Language Is REDD Talking?

Fidelis E Satriastanti, Jakarta Globe 7 Apr 10;

Yuriun, a 67-year-old native of Aceh, knows best when it comes to the traditional ways of protecting forests and preserving local ecosystems in his home province. This wisdom has been handed down from his ancestors, from one generation to the next.

But these days, this knowledge may not be of much use as the fate of the forests is discussed at high-level forums and conferences where people such as Yuriun are often excluded.

Yuriun, coordinator of the Indigenous Community Network of Aceh, said he had heard about a thing called REDD, but was unsure what it was all about.

“This REDD shows up and is heard everywhere but nobody can really explain to us how it works, who’s doing it, what kind of incentives we can get out of it,” he said.

“I only know that it’s a program to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation. But those are the words of smart people, the words of academics — us villagers don’t really understand the meaning of it.”

But indigenous people around the world need to understand REDD, the United Nations’ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation initiative to protect forests in developing countries. In fact, the key to REDD’s ultimate success lies with local communities and indigenous groups, said Harry Alexander, assistant director for law and policy at the Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia Program.

Essentially, REDD — which was first proposed five years ago — is a way to protect forests by providing incentives to developing countries, such as Indonesia, to do so. While it has not yet been formally adopted, REDD is included in the 2009 Copenhagen Accord, the nonbinding agreement hammered out during the UN climate talks in Denmark last December.

But Yuriun is wary of the initiative, saying it could just be another way to expel indigenous people from their lands.

“It’ll be our enemy if more traditional lands are occupied, casting us out from the source of our livelihoods,” he said.

Some proposals for REDD’s implementation do involve fencing off large tracts of forest and declaring them completely off-limits, which could potentially overlap with lands that have been inhabited for generations.

But WCS-IP’s Alexander said REDD should not be written off by indigenous groups. He said these groups should instead use the initiative to fight for acknowledgement of their rights.

“All this time, indigenous issues have never been addressed by the government and have been neglected for a long time,” he said. “REDD won’t work without their help, so it’s a good opportunity to remind the government of this.”

But there is also the question of who benefits from the incentives REDD will supposedly provide.

“Before everyone starts talking about REDD, it would be better to talk about who will receive the benefits and to make sure that everybody is invited to discuss this,” Yuruin said.

Alexander acknowledged that this was a complicated matter.

The idea behind REDD is to assign monetary value to the carbon dioxide — the main greenhouse gas driving climate change — that is not released into the atmosphere through conservation efforts. But who exactly owns the carbon and, therefore, who will benefit from the incentives?

“Is it the state, local government or the people? Can landowners automatically be called carbon owners or not?” Alexander said, adding that carbon ownership issues were being overshadowed by discussions of money.

“REDD will only attract investors if there is clarity on these issues. You cannot sell something if you don’t have the product.”

Furthermore, these issues should be covered by a strong legal framework, Alexander added. In other words, the government should prepare laws and regulations to prevent confusion and conflict over the issue.

“All natural resources in this country are protected by laws, such as mining, water and forestry laws, but we don’t have a law on carbon,” he said. “We have ministerial regulations from the forestry minister about REDD, but this issue does not solely belong to one sector and it’s not enough to be controlled by ministerial regulation as it also concerns money and people’s prosperity.”

Yuyun Indradi, a forest campaigner for Greenpeace Southeast Asia, said REDD would only work in Indonesia if other forestry issues were addressed.

“We have never really tried to resolve the real threats from deforestation,” he said. “Deforestation is more than just illegal logging, because now we have more legal logging. For example, the government issued more logging permits in Riau back in 2005, where they only have less than 35 percent of their forests left.”


Read more!

Protecting Forests is ‘All About the Economy,’ Experts Say

Fidelis E Satriastanti, Jakarta Globe 7 Apr 10;

The concept of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation seems quite simple at first: Wealthy countries give incentives to developing countries that have vast forests in return for not cutting down their trees. In reality, however, it is not that simple.

Experts are still grappling for a common understanding of the REDD initiative. Is it about the economy or the environment?

“It has to be about the economy, because otherwise people will not be able to appreciate the value of the trees,” said Agus Sari, chief executive officer of PT Pelangi Energi Abadi Citra Enviro. The company is a consulting arm of Yayasan Pelangi Indonesia, a research institute in natural resources and the environment.

Agus said the idea of REDD was to protect forests, but if people did not know about the incentives for not cutting down trees, they would continue to do so to earn money. He said people would only comply with the REDD campaign if they knew there was money in it for them.

Eka Ginting, the director of PT Rimba Raya Conservation, said environmental issues could not be separated from economic issues.

“Who says that when we’re talking about the environment, we don’t talk about the economy? It’s all about the economy,” he said.

“If we’re talking about forests, then we need to calculate which is more feasible: Is it conservation, mining or palm oil? It’s just the same measurement.”

Alex Heikens, climate change program manager for the United Nations Development Program, said it was not that easy to go into a forest, place a fence around it, get money from carbon buyers and disburse it.

“First, you need to put the systems in place, lots of safeguards, social safeguards, environmental safeguards, and make sure they are all accountable and transparent,” he said. “You should be careful with that process before we actually talk about disbursement and funds, or buying the carbon” out of the forest.

“The carbon itself has been considered a new gold mine. Well, potentially it can provide some economic benefits, but only if you’re doing it in the right way, meaning taking actions with considerable effort.”

REDD is not about earmarking benefit but about meeting obligations, he said.

“For instance, if you have already received annual payment for protecting some areas, sold the carbon credits and gotten the money, but your neighbor is cutting down your trees, meaning that carbon is released, what will you say to that? So it is not only about receiving, but you need to make sure that the carbon stays at the same amount as you have received money for,” he said. 


Read more!

Cows Absolved Of Stoking Warming With Nitrous Oxide

Alister Doyle, PlanetArk 8 Apr 10;

Cows Absolved Of Stoking Warming With Nitrous Oxide Photo: Ricardo Moraes
Cows graze in the Embrapa pasture in Porto Velho northern Brazil November 19, 2009.
Photo: Ricardo Moraes

Grazing by cows or sheep can cut emissions of nitrous oxide -- a powerful greenhouse gas -- in grasslands from China to the United States, according to a study that overturns past belief that farm animals stoke releases.

Adding to understanding of links between agriculture and global warming, the report in Thursday's edition of the journal Nature said livestock can help to limit microbes in the soil that generate the gas, also known as laughing gas.

"It's been generally assumed that if you increase livestock numbers you get a rise in emissions of nitrous oxide. This is not the case," said Klaus Butterbach-Bahl of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany who was among the authors.

Laughing gas is one of several heat-trapping gases linked to farm animals and the scientists said there was a need for more study to see how far their findings would affect agriculture's total impact on climate change.

Emissions of the gas account for 6-8 percent of global warming from human activities, making it the third most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide and methane, he said. Estimated nitrous oxide emissions from temperate grasslands account for 1-2 percent of the total.

The study, focused on Inner Mongolia in China, said most nitrous oxide emissions from grasslands in places prone to frosts -- including swathes of the United States, Canada, Russia and China -- came in spring when snow melt saturates the soil.

MICROBES

On ungrazed land, snow builds up in winter between grasses, creating an insulating blanket on the ground and aiding growth of microbes that emit nitrous oxide when the spring thaw comes.

On grazed land, more of the microbes get killed by frost since vegetation is sparser and so accumulates less snow.

The study, by scientists in China, Britain and Germany, said emissions were low at other times of the year despite past belief that manure from livestock helps spur releases of nitrous oxide.

Grasslands subject to winter frosts where such gas emissions may have been overestimated make up an area the size of India, or about a third of the world's temperate grasslands that cover about 10 million square kms (3.9 million sq miles).

But the study did not look, for instance, at other damaging climate impacts of livestock. Goats, buffalo, cows and sheep also release heat-trapping methane as they digest food.

The authors said that one way of curbing nitrous oxide emissions was to mow grasslands in the autumn to keep vegetation low and so reduce spring emissions.

"Such simple management practices could have a significant role in reducing nitrous oxide emissions from temperate grasslands on a global scale," they wrote.

But a side-effect of mowing could be the release of more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The U.N. panel of climate scientists says global warming may cause more heatwaves, desertification, more powerful storms and rising seas.


Read more!

Two more glaciers gone from Glacier National Park

Matthew Brown, Associated Press Yahoo News 8 Apr 10;

BILLINGS, Mont. – Glacier National Park has lost two more of its namesake moving icefields to climate change, which is shrinking the rivers of ice until they grind to a halt, the U.S. Geological Survey said Wednesday.

Warmer temperatures have reduced the number of named glaciers in the northwestern Montana park to 25, said Dan Fagre, an ecologist with the agency.

He warned the rest of the glaciers may be gone by the end of the decade.

"When we're measuring glacier margins, by the time we go home the glacier is already smaller than what we've measured," Fagre said.

The latest two to fall below the 25 acre threshold were Miche Wabun and Shepard. Each had shrunk by roughly 55 percent since the mid-1960s. The largest remaining glacier in the park is Harrison Glacier, at about 465 acres.

On a local scale, fewer glaciers means less water in streams for fish and a higher risk for forest fires. More broadly, Fagre said the fate of the glaciers offers a climate barometer, indicating dramatic changes to some ecosystems already under way.

While the meltoff shows the climate is changing, it does not show exactly what is causing temperatures to rise.

In alpine regions around the world, glacier melting has accelerated in recent decades as temperatures increased. Most scientists tie that warming directly to higher atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

Some glaciers, such as in the Himalayas, could hold out for centuries in a warmer world. But more than 90 percent of glaciers worldwide are in retreat, with major losses already seen across much of Alaska, the Alps, the Andes and numerous other ranges, according to researchers in the United States and Europe.

In some areas of the Alps, ski resorts set atop glaciers have taken drastic measures to stave off the decline, such as draping glaciers in plastic sheeting to keep them cooler.

It could prove a losing battle: Scientists working for the United Nations say the last period of widespread glacial growth was more than three decades ago, lasting only for a few years.

Since about 1850, when the Little Ice Age ended, the trend has been steadily downward.

The area of the Rocky Mountains now within Glacier National Park once boasted about 150 glaciers, of which 37 were eventually named.

Fagre said a handful of the park's largest glaciers could survive past 2020 or even 2030, but by that point the ecosystem would already be irreversibly altered.

Fagre said geological evidence points to the continual presence of glaciers in the area since at least 5000 B.C.

"They've been on this landscape continually for 7,000 years, and we're looking at them disappear in a couple of decades," he said.

A glacier needs to be 25 acres to qualify for the title. If it shrinks more, it does not always stop moving right away. A smaller mass of ice on a steep slope would continue to grind its way through the mountains, but eventually could disappear completely.

Smaller glaciers and warmer temperatures could lower stream flows, which in turn prompt fishing restrictions and hobble whitewater rafting businesses, said Denny Gignoux, who runs an outfitting business in West Glacier. Tourism is a $1 billion-a-year industry in the area.

"What happens when all these threats increase?" Gignoux asked. "We're losing a draw to Glacier."

A report released Wednesday by two environmental groups highlighted the threat to tourism of fewer glaciers. The study by the Rocky Mountain Climate Organization and Natural Resources Defense Council included an analysis of weather records that showed Glacier was 2 degrees hotter on average from 2000 to 2009, compared with 1950 to 1979.


Read more!

Peak Oil Man Shifts Focus To Peak Price, Demand

Barbara Lewis, PlanetArk 7 Apr 10;

The economic shock of global recession has led a prime exponent of the theory conventional oil output has peaked to shift his view of the consequences, but he still thinks the world has to go green.

Retired petroleum geologist Colin Campbell, who worked for major oil companies as well as smaller firms, has long been associated with the belief the world's oil supplies are dwindling.

He does not waver from that and dismisses the argument of the so-called optimists that technology will manage to keep eking out more and more oil to keep pace with rising demand.

What has changed is his opinion of the price impact and implications for fuel consumption after the spike of July 2008 to nearly $150 a barrel was followed by world economic recession, a deep drop in fuel use and a crash in oil futures to just above $30 in December 2008.

"I have changed my point of view about future prices," said Campbell, who used to think the peak in conventional oil production, which he believes happened in 2005, would lead to a relentless price surge.

Instead, the record rally led to a peak in demand in the developed world.

"Peak oil drives prices up in the first place. It has its own mechanism. We're sort of at peak demand right now," Campbell told Reuters from his home in the village of Ballydehob, West Cork. "I think presently the price limit is about $100."

For those who have painted alarming pictures of civil unrest as the world economy is forced to move away from conventional fuel and pay high prices for it in the interim, an inbuilt price mechanism to limit demand and move the world to other forms of energy should be a good thing.

"We have no alternative but to go green," Campbell said.

But he does not think reduced demand is enough to offset the gravity of peaking supply. He still sees a possibility of social anger as millions are forced to change their lifestyles in a too-sudden structural shift from economic growth driven by cheap conventional fuel.

CONVENTIONAL VERSUS UNCONVENTIONAL

Campbell's theory, which he developed from studying first Colombia's oil reserves and then analyzing global data on the world's oilfields, applies to conventional oil.

The peak for difficult-to-extract, non-conventional sources, including oil sands and polar oil -- for instance, in Arctic regions of Russia -- is three years later, in 2008. The problem is non-conventional oil only "ameliorates the decline" and relies on high oil prices to be viable.

"They are no substitutes for what we have built the economy on so far," said Campbell, whose oil depletion theory has been published in books and through the Association for the Study of Peak Oil, which gave its first workshop in 2002.

Since then, the peak oil theory has nudged its way further into the mainstream and was widely publicized around the 2008 price spike, but it is hotly contested by many in the oil industry, including OPEC, which argues the world will rely on fossil fuels for decades to come.

Campbell's analysis of data questioned reporting of reserves by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, whose members' upward revisions, he said, were not credible.

"It's absolutely implausible new discoveries would absolutely match that produced," he said.

He takes the view the reporting of higher reserves was designed to ensure higher output targets for individual OPEC members -- targets, he said, were increasingly irrelevant.

As OPEC heads toward its 50th anniversary in September this year, for Campbell the producer club has lost its "raison d'etre."

Prices, he argued, were likely to stay sufficiently high as supplies dwindled naturally and the danger for OPEC was the market would embark on another rally that could further focus attention on the pursuit of alternatives to oil.

"OPEC's purpose is to limit production to hold prices up. It no longer has any need to do so," he said.

The counter argument is OPEC's output discipline helped to drive the market higher from its low-point in December 2008 to prices around $85 a barrel now, although the group's compliance with agreed limits has dwindled to only around 50 percent.

(Editing by Sue Thomas)


Read more!

US scientist Hansen awarded for climate work

Yahoo News 7 Apr 10;

OSLO (AFP) – US scientist James Hansen has won the Sophie Prize for environmental work for his efforts to educate the world on climate change and its effects, the award's foundation announced on Wednesday.

Hanson "has played a key role for the development of our understanding of human-induced climate change," the foundation said.

The foundation noted that Hansen had as early as 1988 "presented results for the American Congress testifying to the probability that human-induced climate change was a threat to the planet."

Hansen would later say that president George W. Bush's administration sought to censor him on the issue.

"Hansen is the person that has made it impossible for us to tell our grandchildren that we did not know what we were doing," said prize chair Nina Drange.

The Sophie Prize, which includes an award of 100,000 dollars (75,000 euros), is an annual environment and sustainable development prize.

This year marks the 13th time it has been awarded. It was founded by Norwegian writer Jostein Gaarder, author of the novel "Sophie's World," and his wife.

Climate Scientist Hansen Wins $100,000 Prize
PlanetArk 8 Apr 10;

Climate Scientist Hansen Wins $100,000 Prize Photo: Norgaard Larsen
James Hansen, director of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, smiles before the Climate Change Copenhagen Congress March 11, 2009.
Photo: Norgaard Larsen

U.S. climate scientist James Hansen won a $100,000 environmental prize Wednesday for decades of work trying to alert politicians to what he called an unsolved emergency of global warming.

Hansen, born in 1941, will visit Oslo in June to collect the Sophie Prize, set up in 1997 by Norwegian Jostein Gaarder, the author of the 1991 best-selling novel and teenagers' guide to philosophy "Sophie's World."

"Hansen has played a key role for the development of our understanding of human-induced climate change," the prize citation said.

Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies since 1981, testified to the U.S. Congress as long ago as 1988 about the risks of global warming from human activities led by the burning of fossil fuels.

"We really have an emergency," Hansen said in a video link with the prize panel in Oslo about feared climate changes such as a thaw of ice sheets on Greenland or Antarctica or a loss of species of animals and plants in a warming world.

"The United States is not taking a path which is going to solve the problem," he said, adding that other nations were also doing too little. Legislation to cap U.S. greenhouse gas emissions is stalled in the Senate.

A Copenhagen Accord agreed at a U.N. climate summit in December fell short of many nations' hopes by setting a non-binding goal of limiting warming to below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit), without spelling out how.

Hansen said that world temperatures were on a rising trend despite what he called a "well orchestrated campaign" in the past year to discredit scientific findings about global warming. He did not say who he reckoned was behind the campaign.

Sceptics have cast doubt on the science after the U.N. panel of climate experts corrected an error in a 2007 report that exaggerated the thaw of Himalayan glaciers while e-mails hacked from a British university showed some climate experts were dismissive of alternative views.

Hansen said his granddaughter was called Sophie, a name directly inspired by Gaarder's book.

After years focused on science, he said he started speaking out more about risks of global warming in 2004, reckoning his grandchildren would not forgive him if he stayed silent. His latest book is called "Storms of My Grandchildren."


Read more!