Swedish town prides itself as environmental role model

Sophie Mongalvy, Yahoo News 30 Mar 08;

The Swedish town of Vaexjoe will be "green" or will not be at all. That's the slogan in this town that has become a world leader in environmental protection and has even loftier goals.

While the European Union (EU) aims to raise its share of renewable energy consumption to 20 percent by 2020, Vaexjoe, a town of 80,000 people nestled between lakes and forests in Sweden's south, can boast of already exceeding 50 percent -- and 90 percent when it comes to heating.

Carbon dioxide emissions per inhabitant dropped by 30 percent between 1993 and 2006.

"It's a lot but we're not satisfied, we want to reduce them further," says Henrik Johansson, an environmental expert at city hall.

In fact, Vaexjoe, which in 1996 set the ambitious goal of ultimately reducing its consumption of fossil fuels to zero, wants to halve its CO2 emissions by 2010 and reduce them by 70 percent by 2050.

Those goals exceed by far the EU's objectives, which call for a reduction of 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020.

Vaexjoe's efforts have been lauded by the European Commission, which in 2007 awarded it the Sustainable Energy for Europe award.

"We try to influence people's behaviour. It's not easy, in fact it's actually quite hard," says Johansson.

But their efforts are paying off, with people adapting to a new way of life thanks to bicycle lanes, tax breaks and free parking for "green" cars, and calendars that provide useful tips on how to protect the environment.

-- 'Today we can swim, fish and eat the fish' --

Since winning the European Commission prize, Vaexjoe has played host to numerous foreign delegations, led by China, who have come to tour the area and seek inspiration from the local initiatives.

According to the town's conservative mayor Bo Frank, Vaexjoe owes its "green" success to a longstanding commitment to the environment as well as to a tradition of political consensus on the issue.

It all began in the early 1970s, when the town agreed to clean up its heavily polluted lakes.

"Today we can swim, fish and eat the fish" from the local waters, Johansson triumphs.

Then, in 1980, following the second international oil crisis, the local heating plant which had been running on oil introduced a new fuel based on wood -- an abundant raw material in Vaexjoe's surroundings and able to provide the town with an independent source of energy.

Today, the wood fuel accounts for 98.7 percent of the fuel used at the plant, which heats the homes of 50,000 habitants in Vaexjoe and whose network continues to grow, explains Lars Ehrlen of the plant's energy unit.

In order to convince residents to change their living habits in the fight against climate change Mayor Frank believes in using both "the carrot and the stick."

He recalls that some of the measures that have been introduced have been unwelcome, but adds: "Nothing is ever popular in the beginning but people get used to everything."

For example, when the town announced some six months ago that it would only hold its conferences in cafes or restaurants that had obtained a special environmental certificate, Mats Pettersson, the co-owner of a small chain of restaurants, was disgruntled.

"I found that pretty bothersome at the beginning ... but now I think it's a good idea. The problem ... was that it was hard to find organic products," he says.

"But suppliers increasingly have what we need," he adds.

Despite the criticism, Mayor Frank remains philosophical and confident of the path he has chosen for the town.

"No one is a prophet in his own country," he says.

"It's up to Vaexjoe to lead by example," he insists, noting that he walks to work, owns a "green" car and uses low energy consumption lightbulbs in his own home.


Read more!

UN climate chief critical of changing base year for emissions cuts

Yahoo News 31 Mar 08;

The UN climate chief was critical Monday of Japanese-led calls to change the 1990 base year for cuts in gas emissions, saying the real issue was how much nations would do to fight global warming.

Japan, whose economy is steadily recovering from recession, is far behind in its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol to slash gas emissions blamed for global warming by six percent by 2012 from 1990 levels.

Ahead of global negotiations that opened Monday in Bangkok on setting post-Kyoto obligations, Japan proposed shifting the base year for future emissions cuts from 1990 to 2005.

But Yvo de Boer, head of UN climate body leading the Bangkok talks, said that changing the base year only made sense if it came with "much more ambitious" measures to curb global warming.

"To me it's like talking about a starting line of a marathon but not knowing how long the marathon is going to be," de Boer told a news conference.

"If the countries were to decide to change the base from the current base year, 1990, it means that we would be ... measuring the length of a marathon from a different starting point," he said.

"Yes, it's very interesting what base year will be chosen," he said. "But the toughest question -- the most important question, at least to me -- is by how much are rich countries willing to reduce their emissions by 2020."

The week-long talks in Bangkok are meant to sort out practicalities of meeting a UN-backed goal of finishing by the end of next year a new climate change treaty that covers obligations up to 2020.

Japan argues that the 1990 base year is biased towards the European Union, which has been pushing for further steep binding cuts from 1990 levels.

In 1990, some European Union countries were then heavily polluting members of the Soviet bloc. The base year also comes before the full privatisation of Britain's coal industry.

Chief US negotiator Harlan Watson called the Japanese proposal "an interesting idea."

"We're looking into it. There are some people to think that 1990 was advantageous to some parties," Watson told AFP.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 31 Mar 08


Getting Naked on national TV!
the crabs are interviewed on Rouge, a talk show hosted by Eunice Olsen on the adventures with the naked hermit crabs blog

Story of Stuff inspired clips

and responses on You Tube on the story of stuff blog

Singapore F1 tests mega-watt lights during Earth Hour
on the f1 underground blog

Chek Jawa extravaganza
Double trip to the boardwalk on the wildfilms blog and more about sightings during the trip on the naked hermit crab blog with fabulous guestbook entries by Outward Bound Singapore and by participants in the public walk.

Malayan Whistling Thrush: Nesting observations
on the bird ecology blog


Read more!

Singapore to consider returning cash for scrapped cars

Policy change may help people switch to public transport, says Transport Minister
Christopher Tan, Straits Times 31 Mar 08;

FOR years, the answer has been no.

Now Transport Minister Raymond Lim wants to know if it can be yes.

He has asked the Land Transport Authority (LTA) to see if motorists can get back cash when they scrap their cars.

By scrutinising this sacred cow, he is showing how serious he is about finding ways to persuade people to give up their cars.

He hopes that some who get their money back - and the amount could run to thousands of dollars per motorist - would choose not to buy a new car and switch to public transport instead.

Since 2003, around 80,000 passenger cars have been scrapped each year before turning 10 years old, with the Government refunding the so-called unused portions of the Additional Registration Fee and Certificate of Entitlement.

People have been known to scrap cars as new as two years old, though most do so only after the vehicles turn five years old.

At present, the refunds come as paper rebates which can be used only to buy another vehicle.

Given the number of vehicles scrapped and the youthfulness of many of the vehicles, a change in policy could see the Government refunding $2 billion each year.

Mr Lim said that the LTA would work with the Finance Ministry to see if the change could be made.

'You have to look at our overall objective - to have a decisive shift towards public transport,' he said. 'So we should look at whether we can have any incentive to help people make the shift.'

He was speaking at the launch of the Land Transport Masterplan, a 101-page paper outlining the Land Transport Review which he announced in January. It called for an overhaul of the bus and train systems as well as major changes aimed at car owners.

'As I said when we launched the Land Transport Review, we will leave no stone unturned,' he said. 'So this is one more stone that I'm turning up to have a look at, to see if it can be done.'

Motorists have long asked for rebates to be paid in cash, but the answer always been no. The reason usually given: The rebate is a discount on taxes paid upfront and not meant as a cash refund.

Mr Lim expects a decision on the change within six months.

Among motorists who welcomed the possible change was engineer Shreejit Changaroth, 51, who said: 'I know people with old cars who are not scrapping them simply because they can't use the rebates for anything else but to buy another car.'

Motor traders however, may lose a source of income, because they rake in a significant amount from trading the rebates between those who scrap and those who buy cars.

Mr Raymond Tang, managing director of used car trader Yong Lee Seng, said that this has been a 'business opportunity' for traders for years.

Singapore Vehicle Traders Association president Neo Nam Heng said that cash rebates would be 'fair to car owners', but the impact on traders would be clear only when details are out.

Cash incentive to give up your car?

Lin Yanqin, Today Online 31 Mar 08;

APART from increasing the number of Electronic Road Pricing gantries and reducing Certificate Of Entitlement (COE) quotas, a cash incentive could soon be introduced to encourage motorists to give up their cars.

The Ministry of Transport is studying the possibility of offering COE and Preferential Additional Registration Fee (PARF) rebates in cash instead of credit, to encourage greater use of public transport and manage vehicle population growth.

The idea of giving cash rebates was first raised during the recent Budget debate by MP Inderjit Singh. Over the next four to six months, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) will work with the Ministry of Finance to see if this is feasible, said Transport Minister Raymond Lim at the launch of the Land Transport Masterplan report yesterday.

Pointing out that COE and PARF rebates were currently paid in credits that could only be used when buying another car, Mr Lim said: "The principle motivation behind this review is to provide incentives for someone who says 'I want to give up my car and I'm switching to public transport'".

In spite of past efforts to curb the vehicle population, the rate of increase has outstripped road development. The total vehicle population currently stands at 850,000.

When asked what would stop a person from using the cash rebate to buy another car, Mr Lim responded: "That can happen, I agree. That's why we need to study this carefully to see how best to do this."

Currently, PARF and COE rebates can be used to offset upfront vehicle taxes and fees when one registers a car, such as the PARF, the COE quota premium, the registration fee, and the $10,000 used-car surcharge.

A driver who deregisters his car before the COE expires will get a rebate on the quota premium paid, pegged to the number of months and day remaining on the COE, while PARF is computed based on the age of the car.

For example, a car deregistered nine years before the COE expires will receive $15,221, based on a paid premium of $16,897.

Most motorists opt to buy another car so they don't lose out on these credits.

LTA chief executive Yam Ah Mee said that the suggestion of cash rebates came up frequently during the LTA's feedback sessions with some 4,500 motorists over the past few months.

"If the rebate only used for buying another car, in terms of the number of cars on the road, it may still be the same or even more," he said.

Also launched yesterday was LTA's Community Outreach Programme, which will involve 14 dialogue sessions with grassroots leaders from all constituencies over the next six months to discuss land transport policies and plans that could affect their communities.

Other outreach efforts include site visits and roadshows, as well as a community guide that will outline the initiatives detailed in the Masterplan.

LTA may give cash rebates to persuade more to switch to public transport
Channel NewsAsia 30 Mar 08;

SINGAPORE: The Land Transport Authority (LTA) is considering giving cash instead of credits when one gives up his or her car to persuade more people to opt for public transport.

Transport Minister Raymond Lim said he has asked LTA to work with the Finance Ministry to see if Certificate of Entitlement (COE) and Additional Registration Fee (ARF) rebates can be given in cash when motorists decide to give up their cars.

This study should take about four to six months.

A whole slew of measures was announced from late January on improving bus and rail services to get more people to use public transport. A more extensive ERP system was also set up as part of the deal to keep traffic smooth.

But what kind of push do people actually need to give up their cars?

One idea that has been tossed about and was recently brought up by MP Inderjit Singh during the Budget debate is to give cash incentives.

The current situation is that when a motorist gives up his or her car, ARF and COE rebates are given in terms of credits. In order not to lose out, motorists usually end up using these credits to purchase another car.

Many people have given the feedback that if these rebates are given to them in cash, it would be more of an incentive for them not to buy another car.

But by that same token, motorists could – just as easily – take the cash rebate and purchase another vehicle.

Mr Lim said: "That can happen – I agree. That is why I said we have to study this very carefully. If we are going to do this, how best are we going to do it?"

The transport minister was speaking at the release of the detailed Masterplan report on Sunday, which marks out in detail the announcements made recently and the plans on the road map for the next 15 years, with a simpler illustrated version for the community at large.

The Community Outreach Programme to solve day-to-day problems like parking was also launched on the same day.

Over the next six months, LTA will hold 14 dialogue sessions with grassroots leaders from all constituencies. Efforts like site visits and road shows will also be stepped up at locations where there are major projects like the construction of the Downtown Line.- CNA/so


Read more!

Think hard before going green: investors told

Business Times 31 Mar 08;

Investors must consider the theme's risks and weigh a firm's impact on the environment before taking the plunge, says SERENE CHEONG

THE spiralling costs of food and raw materials today may be more than just a passing phase, particularly with the concerns over erratic environmental impact in China, rise in global temperatures and decreasing agricultural crop output.

But amidst the gloom and doom, there is a silver lining.

It comes in the form of 'green investments', and it promises to allow the pursuit of economic progress against the backdrop of sustainability: by consciously aligning investment choices with concern for the environment.

Green investment, as its name implies, can be loosely defined as investments in products or services that help companies cope with their negative environmental impact.

While the media limelight has been focused on green assets for some time now, the increasingly mainstream concept is often mistaken for environmentally responsible investing (ERI). In reality, while the two investment approaches may overlap, ERI mainly focuses on sifting out companies with poor practices while green investments concentrate on companies that improve the environment.

So what exactly qualifies as a green investment?

The answer is not clear-cut. Though much controversy surrounds the debate as to what can be considered truly green, a green firm is widely accepted as one that does good for the environment, within its financial goals, and focuses on the bottom line. Some examples include companies that practise water purification and anti-pollution activities, or produce clean energy and biofuels.

Now, going green seems to be a good way forward with the European Union and China's increased emphasis on greener and cleaner practices. Opportunities to cash in on green assets abound locally, with easily accessible products that cater to investors of differing sophistication and risk-return appetites.

Still, as attractive as the sector might be, investors should tread cautiously and familiarise himself with the relatively new investment theme to avoid pitfalls.

Green equity
To some, investing in green equities enables the shareholders to support a firm's financial pursuits while being conscious of their carbon footprint.

Many green companies are listed on the Singapore Exchange. One such example is Wilmar International, an Asian palmoil firm providing the oil used in food products and for biodiesel feedstock. The company recently posted a fourth-quarter profit of $394.2 million, a nearly four-fold increase from $98.8 million a year ago.

Investors should also pay attention to concern that high demand for crude palm oil could push plantation owners to carry out illegal clearance of rainforests to make way for new agricultural land.

In addition, global activists are rallying against the use of food crops as biofuel feedstock for fear of skyrocketing food prices and possibly widespread starvation among the poor.

A firm's overall positive and negative impact on the environment must be weighed before coming to a conclusion.

Investors who wish to jump onto the green bandwagon should consider the theme's inherent risks, especially since green firms tend to be in the early stages of development with high outlays for technology and infrastructure.

Green funds

A fund is a convenient vehicle as it offers exposure to a basket of stocks across a number of industries, locations and market capitalisation.

In the case of funds that focus on climate change, the underlying investments may comprise companies in sustainable energy (solar, wind or hydro), energy efficiency, waste management or greenhouse gas emission reduction.

In theory, climate change funds are supposed to provide a more stable investment approach than individual equity as they invest in companies from all over the world, thus reducing unique sectoral and geographical risks.

So far, investor response, however, is understood to be lukewarm.

Two climate change funds are currently offered locally - the DWS Global Climate Change Fund by Deutsche Bank and Schroder Global Climate Change Fund.

Feedback from several personal financial consultants is that climate change funds are unpopular with local investors as the funds are too thinly traded and lack fluctuations in fund value during market boom or bust periods.

'Despite all the hype about green investments, investors ultimately park their assets in a product with the goal of reaping the highest profits possible, regardless of its social and environmental impact,' said a personal wealth manager with a local bank.

To make matters worse, green funds have been providing comparatively lower returns for the high level of risk compared to other funds that focus on China, India or small and mid-cap firms, he added.

Both DWS Global Climate Change Fund and Schroder Global Climate Change Fund are currently rated nine out of 10 for level of risk on fundsupermart.com.

'Domestic investors are treading very carefully as equity markets took a beating in recent months, so the last thing they would do is to plunge straight into an unfamiliar green sector,' said a private wealth associate with a German bank.

He added: 'Investors will naturally zoom in on the profit-making funds, and from historical prices you can see that green funds do not fulfil that. They are investing to make the most money, not do an act of charity.'


Read more!

Thai farmers keep vigil over rice stocks

Reports of thieves have growers alarmed as grain price soars in world markets
Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 31 Mar 08;

BANGKOK - FOR the first time ever in memory, some Thai farmers are staying up at night to watch their fields - worried that thieves will raid their standing crops or loot their stored rice.

Since the middle of the month, rumours of rice being stolen have spread across the fields in provinces from Lop Buri to Sing Buri and Ang Thong.

Although the rumours have yet to be confirmed, there is one reported case of a farmer in Ayutthaya province, near the capital Bangkok, who was robbed of 20 sacks of rice seeds worth 8,000 baht (S$350), which he had stocked ready for planting.

In response, the province's police chief has recommended that farmers work in shifts to guard their fields at night.

'I'm so scared now that thieves will steal my rice. If they really do that, it is like they are killing me because everything in my life - my money, my efforts and my hopes - have been put into it,' said farmer Somnuek Meechana, whose rice fields are almost ready for harvest, the Bangkok Post reported.

The rumours are as unprecedented as the soaring price of rice in the world markets.

The grain's price has risen to record-high levels across the world - including in rice bowl countries such as Thailand, where premium Thai rice has spiralled in price from about 9,600 baht a tonne last December to 10,500 baht a tonne today.

In January in the Philippines, a standard sack of rice was selling for 720 pesos (S$24). By this month, it had risen to 1,100 pesos.

Several rice producers and exporters in Asia have already curbed or halted exports to safeguard domestic supplies, mindful that rice is a politically sensitive commodity.

In recent weeks Cambodia and China have suspended their rice exports while India has stopped exporting its non-basmati varieties.

Meanwhile, importers, worried about shortages, have cut tariffs on rice.

Indonesia, Mongolia, Sri Lanka and South Korea have already dropped or reduced import tariffs on the grain.

The Philippines has signed a deal with Vietnam to import 1.5 million tonnes of rice.

Manila is trying to crack down on hoarders who are making the crisis worse by stockpiling rice until prices climb even further.

At the weekend, the Philippines' National Food Authority in Central Visayas suspended the operations of at least six retailers in Cebu for violations ranging from unreasonable depletion of stocks to non-display and refusal to sell rice even though they had enough stocks.

Asia is not the only region affected by a rise in food prices spawned not just by a shortage of rice, but of wheat as well.

From Africa to the United States, the cost of food has been rising. Egypt - the world's highest consumer of bread - has banned rice exports for six months on the back of worries over wheat.

The drivers of the price rises are a complex range of local and global factors including adverse weather; yields reaching a plateau; the higher cost of fertiliser; the high price of fuel; the policy neglect and decline of the agricultural sector in general; and the conversion of vast areas of farmland into areas for livestock industry and biofuels production.


Read more!

Gray wolf hunts planned after de-listing

Jessie Bonner, Associated Press Yahoo News 29 Mar 08;

Good news for gray wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains: They no longer need federal protection. The bad news for the animals? Plans are already in the works to hunt them.

Federal Endangered Species Act protection of the wolves was lifted Friday in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, giving those states management of the estimated 1,500 gray wolves in the region.

Even though environmentalists plan to sue the federal government next month to restore wolf protections, hunts are already being scheduled by state wildlife agencies to reduce the wolf population to between 900 and 1,250.

Idaho hunters will be allowed to kill between 100-300 of the animals this fall under a plan approved by the Idaho Fish and Game Commission. The hunts are partly in response to increasing numbers of livestock being killed as the predators' population has grown.

"We manage big game for a living, we're good at it," said Steve Nadeau, who oversees large carnivores for the Idaho Fish and Game Department. "The world is watching and we know it."

Fish and Game estimates Idaho now has 800 gray wolves. Should the number of breeding pairs in Idaho fall below a target number, the animals could be brought back under federal protection.

After a series of public shouting matches between wolf advocates and opponents, comments from Idaho Department Fish and Game officials on Friday seemed largely designed to reassure both ends of the debate.

Cal Groen, director of the department, told reporters that his agency has already proven its ability to recover and maintain Idaho wolf populations. "We've exceeded all the goals the federal government set," Groen said.

But Doug Honnold, a managing attorney for the nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice, disagrees. Honnold said the wolf populations won't be fully recovered in Idaho and the northern Rockies until the animals number between 2,000 and 3,000.

Earthjustice, which represents 12 local and national environmental groups, plans to sue the federal government next month to continue wolf protections.

All three state plans to manage the wolves call for a reduction in their numbers, which will eventually lead to weaker breeding, Honnold said in a telephone interview from Bozeman, Mont.

"We think that would be a disaster," he said. "We've spent a lot of time, money and effort to promote wolf recovery."

Gray wolves were listed as endangered in 1973 after being hunted into near extinction, but the population has rebounded dramatically after restoration efforts began in 1995. The wolves were recently de-listed in the western Great Lakes, while the wolf population in the Southwest remains endangered.

Wildlife biologists estimate there are now 41 breeding pairs in Idaho, in 72 packs. If that number falls below 10 breeding pairs, or 15 during a three-year period, the wolves could be brought back under federal protection.

On Friday, Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter signed a bill to allow ranchers, outfitters and pet owners to kill wolves harassing livestock. The law gives owners up to 72 hours to report wolves they've killed after catching them annoying, disturbing or stalking animals or livestock.


Read more!

Antelope in Mongolia under threat

Michael Casey, Associated Press Yahoo News 29 Mar 08;

A rare antelope species already under threat from poaching in Mongolia is facing a new danger — worsening traffic.

As affluent residents acquire motorbikes and cars in parts of western Mongolia, they are clogging roads that run along a key migration route for the saiga which, if not addressed, could reduce their already low numbers, Kim Murray Berger, an ecologist with the Wildlife Conservation Society, said Saturday.

"As we get more and more traffic through the corridor, it would potentially discourage the saiga from using it," she said, adding that could lead to the reproductive isolation of the species, reducing its genetic diversity.

The saiga — an odd animal which has a deer's body, a camel's head and a bulbous nose — has seen its numbers drop from 1 million in the 1980s to as low as 50,000 in its range, which includes Mongolia, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and the Russian Republic of Kalmykia.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the saiga in Mongolia have come under threat from poachers who were encouraged to substitute rhino horns with those of the saiga for medicinal purposes, said Berger. The animals, which number around 5,000 in the country, have also faced competition from herders for good grazing areas and seen their numbers decimated by as much as 70 percent since the 1980s by droughts.

Berger set out in 2005 with her WCS colleagues and researchers from the Mongolian Academy of Sciences to better understand the movements of the saiga. Using radio collars equipped with global positioning system on adult females, the researchers were able to determine that the animals frequently traveled along a 3-mile-wide corridor through a narrow valley. The route is also the location for a dirt road that serves as the only link villagers in the valley have with the outside world.

Berger said she hoped the study, which has been accepted for publication by the peer-reviewed publication The Open Conservation Biology Journal, would spur authorities to consider incorporating the saiga into any development plans for the area.

L. Undes, the deputy chairman of the Sustainable Development and Strategic Planning department in Mongolia's Ministry of Natural Environment, said authorities planned to expand a nature reserve for saiga, limit herders use of the corridor and step up efforts to ban hunting of the saiga.

Berger previously helped identify a key migration route for the antelope-like pronghorn in and out of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming.


Read more!

Bromeliads for Gardens at Marina South arrive in Singapore

Channel NewsAsia 31 Mar 08;

Anton van der Schans, Assistant Director of Horticulture, Gardens by the Bay, said: "One of the things we are trying to do is to introduce more colour. Not just because it looks more attractive, it also helps to capture people's attention and imagination, and hopefully that will encourage them to learn more about the environmental messages which are behind the collection as well." These messages include how some bromeliads are endangered species because of deforestation and climate change.

SINGAPORE: Some 50,000 bromeliads have arrived in Singapore all the way from Florida to be part of the Gardens at Marina South.

Similar to the pineapple plant, about 35 percent of more than 3,475 species of bromeliads are rare. These plants can remove water pollutants and play an important role in energy conservation.

One of the species of bromeliads is the Tillandsia. It does not need soil or water because it takes what it needs from the air by converting nitrogen into nitrates.

Another bromeliad species is the Billbergia Strawberry which blooms for just one week every year.

These species are native to North and South America and they are known for their unique features.

Anton van der Schans, Assistant Director of Horticulture, Gardens by the Bay, said: "One of the things we are trying to do is to introduce more colour. Not just because it looks more attractive, it also helps to capture people's attention and imagination, and hopefully that will encourage them to learn more about the environmental messages which are behind the collection as well."

These messages include how some bromeliads are endangered species because of deforestation and climate change.

To help these plants, the experts have erected artificial trees known as 'super trees'. These trees, some of which are up to 50 metres tall, not only support the plants but are also ecologically friendly.

Kenneth Er, General Manager, Gardens by the Bay, said: "The super trees, like real trees, would also photosynthesise using photovoltaic cells - converting solar energy into electricity to run some of the functions within the trees such as lighting. We are also exploring the possibility of the trees collecting rain water."

Another environmentally friendly feature is a conservatory which will use cooling technologies that can save up to 40 percent of the amount of energy used.

"Typically, some of these species require cooler temperatures for best foliage colour and flowering, so that's where our cool glass houses come in, to help provide the conditions to really display them at their best," said Mr van der Schans.

These plants will also absorb pollutants by cleaning the water that flows into three freshwater lakes – Kallang Basin, Marina Bay and Marina Channel.

When combined, the three lakes will be Singapore's 15th reservoir which will supply 10 percent of drinking water.

Another 150,000 bromeliads will be coming to Singapore over the next two years. In all, the plants cost S$2 million.

When they have all arrived, they will be available for public viewing by 2011.

The Gardens at Marina South – situated right beside the Marina Bay Sands Integrated Resort – will open 24 hours daily.

Together with Gardens at Marina East and Gardens at Marina Central, they form Gardens by the Bay, spanning over 155 football fields.- CNA/so

A $2 milion start to a $900 million garden
Hong Xinyi, Straits Times 1 Apr 08;

IT HAS been described as a visual feast in the making, and the $893 million Gardens By The Bay project just got the first shipment of one of its main courses.

When it opens in 2011, visitors to the 54ha Marina South garden will be able to view a $2 million anchor plant collection of bromeliads, which are plants native to the tropical and subtropical regions of North and South America.

Bromeliads are resilient plants, often visually striking due to the patterned foliage and colourful blooms of some species.

More than 3,000 varieties comprising 210,000 bromeliads will be supplied by Florida nursery Tropiflora. About three shipments - 50,500 plants - have already arrived at the Gardens By The Bay site office in Marina Way. The rest will arrive over the next 18 months.

'It will be the first time that these plants are being used in such a large-scale way in a landscaped garden in South-east Asia,' said Mr Anton van Der Schans, assistant director of horticulture for Gardens By The Bay.

The plant was chosen, he said, because it was relatively low-maintenance and also provided a wide range of attractive textures, foliage and flowers.

Being built by the National Parks Board, the Gardens By The Bay - which also includes a 32ha Marina East garden and a 15ha Marina Centre garden - is expected to attract 2.7 million people every year.

Non-native flora and fauna like roses and tulips will make up much of the gardens' greenery and will be part of the main attractions.


Read more!

Thai temple fights off encroaching tide as world sea levels rise

Charlie McDonald-Gibson Yahoo News 30 Mar 08;

Crabs scuttle across the wet floor of the near-deserted Khun Samut temple, the only building left in a Thai village that has disappeared beneath the rising and advancing sea.

Waging a battle against an encroaching tide that has sent all the villagers fleeing inland, a monk in orange robes and faded tattoos meant to ward off evil spirits stalks the newly-built sea wall, planting mangrove shoots.

Somnuek Atipanya points 20 metres (65 feet) out to sea, where electricity pylons poke out of the water, now useful only for resting marine birds.

"The waves attacked here and they will destroy everything," says Somnuek, chief abbot of this Buddhist temple south of Bangkok which is surrounded by water and accessible only by a concrete walkway.

"I don't know what happened, but when the experts came they told me it was global warning and melting ice in the North Pole."

Over 30 years, the sea around Khun Samut Chin village has engulfed more than one kilometre (0.6 miles) of land, World Bank figures show, mostly because fishermen have cut down mangrove forests -- the Earth's natural sea barrier.

Tourism development, sand mining and damming rivers upstream have also taken their toll in an area naturally prone to coastal erosion.

The community have realised their errors and are trying to replant the mangroves, but the situation may soon be out of their hands as global warming sends sea levels rising and powerful storms lashing the coast.

"The process has been occurring over some time and accelerating with land use changes and local human activity," says Jitendra Shah, the World Bank's environmental coordinator in Thailand.

"Climate change impacts are likely to accelerate the pace and make things worse in the future."

Coastal erosion of varying degrees affects 21 percent of Thailand's coastline, says Greenpeace climate campaigner Tara Buakamsri, citing figures from Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.

Along the Gulf of Thailand, seaside areas seriously affected by erosion are receding at a rate of five to 20 metres per year.

Climate scientists say that as global warming heats the Earth up, glaciers and polar ice caps will melt and sea waters will expand, sending oceans rising by at least 18 centimetres (7.2 inches), or possibly a great deal more by 2100.

World sea levels rose 3.1 millimetres per year from 1993 to 2003, the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says.

This is not good news for the five monks who remain at Khun Samut temple. Despite their best efforts, they may not be able to save the site from the same fate that befell Khun Samut Chin's sunken school and homes.

Visanu Kengsamut, 26, has already moved three times in his life, while his mother -- the village chief -- has fled the crumbling coast and rebuilt her home eight times, and each time the village has paid for its own relocation.

Khun Samut Chin now sits about one kilometre inland from the temple.

"We know that the cause of this is the effects of global warming," says Visanu.

"This problem, everybody should take responsibility and the government should help. If possible, the international community should come to help because they started the problem."

As the world tries to work out a new pact to battle the threat posed by global warming, poorer countries -- who the IPCC says will suffer the most from climate change -- are battling to have their voices heard.

They argue that because the industrialised world was historically most responsible for global warming, they should contribute generously to a fund to help poor countries adapt to the changing world.

The so-called adaptation and mitigation fund will likely be discussed at key United Nations climate change talks in Bangkok from March 31 to April 4.

"Whether or not it is a small contribution or major contribution related to climate change in the past, this community needs to be taken into account when they discuss about the mitigation measure or adaptation fund," says Greenpeace's Tara.

"Because they are facing the impact -- they are one of the first groups in Thailand that is facing the impact."


Read more!

Berlin zoo accused of profiting from slaughter

Kate Connolly, The Guardian 28 Mar 08;

· Bodies sold for traditional medicines, MP alleges
· Director denies surplus animals bred for income

Berlin zoo is under pressure to explain the fate of hundreds of its animals which allegedly have disappeared without trace amid accusations that they have been slaughtered and in some cases turned into potency-boosting drugs.

Claudia Hämmerling, a Green party politician, backed by several animal rights organisations, alleges that the zoo's director, Bernhard Blaszkiewitz, sold the animals to traders.

She claims to hold evidence on four Asian black bears and a hippopotamus, which were taken from Berlin, officially to go to a new home. They were transported to the Belgian town of Wortel, which has no zoo, but which does have an abattoir.

According to Hämmerling these animals were slaughtered at the abattoir. She said the systematic "overproduction of animals" at zoos, designed to attract more visitors, was to blame.

Hämmerling said she also knew of several tigers and leopards from Berlin that ended up in a tiger breeding farm in China that promoted itself as a purveyor of traditional potency-boosting medicines made from the bodies of big cats. She alleges the animals' remains were pulverised and turned into drugs.

Blaszkiewitz, who became something of a personality after the polar bear Knut was born at his zoo in December 2006, has strongly denied the charges. The bear's popularity bumped up visitor numbers and sent shares in the company soaring.

Responsible for 23,000 animals and credited with turning Berlin zoo into the city's most popular tourist attraction, Blaszkiewitz believes his detractors are spreading "untruths, half-truths and lies". He said: "The stories of slaughter have been invented. We only work with respectable zoo dealers."

He added that while animals were sent to China in the 1990s, their transfer was approved by the Federal Office for Nature Protection. Rearing animals, he said, was central to his work. He denied claims that money making was the motivating factor. "It's good for the animals, and of course our visitors should also have the chance to observe the rearing process," he said.

A spokeswoman for Hämmerling said yesterday the MP was prepared to press charges. State prosecutors will soon announce whether the case goes to court.

The zoo has been unable to shake off the charge that it has been encouraging animal births so as to boost visitors keen on "cute offspring". The phenomenon has been labelled "Knut-mania", after the cub became one of the the biggest money-spinning animals in history, thanks largely to marketing offshoots, which benefited the zoo. Knut products range from cuddly toys to credit cards.

It is believed standard practice for zoos to kill "surplus" animals. Nuremberg zoo's deputy director, Helmut Mägdefrau, was reported as saying: "If we cannot find good homes for the animals, we kill them and use them as feed." Recently an antelope in Nuremberg was fed to caged lions in front of visitors, causing outrage.

Related articles

Berlin Zoo director accused of selling animals for Chinese medicine

The Telegraph 21 Mar 08;


Read more!

Climate negotiators start work on "Kyoto II"

Ed Cropley, Reuters 29 Mar 08;

BANGKOK (Reuters) - Scientists and officials from across the world meet in Thailand this week for the first formal talks in the long process of drawing up a replacement for the Kyoto climate change pact by the end of 2009.

Around 190 nations agreed in Bali last year to start the two-year negotiations to replace Kyoto, which only binds 37 rich nations to cut emissions of greenhouse gases by an average of five percent from 1990 levels by 2012.

U.N. climate experts want the new pact to impose curbs on all countries, although there is wide disagreement about how to share out the burden between rich nations led by the United States and developing countries such as China and India.

No major decisions are likely from the Bangkok talks, which are intended mainly to establish a timetable for more rounds of negotiations culminating in a United Nations Climate Change conference in Copenhagen at the end of next year.

"The challenge is to design a future agreement that will significantly step up action on adaptation, successfully halt the increase in global emissions within the next 10-15 years and dramatically cut back emissions by 2050," said Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N.'s Climate Change Secretariat.

Although the negotiations are likely to be tough and tortuous, a series of U.N. climate change reports last year highlighted the need to curb emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that are driving global warming.

One report in particular said it was more than 90 percent certain that human actions -- mainly burning fossil fuels -- were to blame for changes to the weather system that will bring more heatwaves, droughts, storms and rising seas.

RAPID INDUSTRIALISATION

One major issue to be tackled is the reluctance of big developing nations such as India and China to agree to any measures that might curb their rapid industrialization.

Negotiators will also have to work out how to deal with the United States -- the only rich nation not to have signed up to Kyoto -- given that President George W. Bush will be leaving the White House after November's election.

Bush pulled the United States out of Kyoto in 2001, saying the pact would hurt the U.S. economy and was unfair since it excluded big developing nations from committing to emissions cuts.

The White House has since moderated its stance by saying the Bush administration would accept emissions targets if all other big emitters do as well based on their individual circumstances.

This has tempered the criticism of the Bush administration but green groups and many poorer nations say they don't expect much progress on a replacement climate pact until a new U.S. administration takes office in January 2009.

"I think the U.S. really has changed," de Boer told Reuters.

All three main presidential candidates are greener than Bush and back a cap-and-trade system to encourage business to curb carbon emissions.

The United Nations wants the new treaty to be in place by the end of 2009 to give companies and investors as much advance knowledge as possible of coming changes, and national parliaments time to ratify it before 2012, when Kyoto expires.

(Additional reporting by Alister Doyle in Oslo; Editing by Michael Battye and David Fogarty)

Negotiators gather to push new UN climate treaty
Charlie McDonald-Gibson Yahoo News 30 Mar 08;

Negotiators from up to 180 countries began gathering here on Sunday for talks aimed at reaching the most ambitious treaty yet for sparing the Earth from the worst ravages of global warming.

The five-day talks, starting Monday, follow marathon negotiations in December on the Indonesian island of Bali where the world set a 2009 deadline for thrashing out a landmark pact to battle climate change.

The Bangkok meeting is the first step toward reaching that new agreement, which should take effect when commitments on cutting harmful greenhouse gas emissions under the existing Kyoto Protocol expire in 2012.

Even the United States, which pulled out of the Kyoto deal, is taking part despite its reputation as a naysayer in efforts to cut emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, which trap the sun's heat and warm the planet.

The talks "are critical in the sense that the conference in Bali last year formally agreed to launch negotiations, which have to be concluded at the end of 2009," said Yvo de Boer, head of the UN climate body tasked with hammering out the treaty.

"I don't expect many sticking points at this meeting. What this meeting has to do is agree a work programme and agree what is going to be discussed so that we know that we can meet the deadline in a year-and-a-half's time," de Boer told AFP.

He urged countries to stay focused on the task at hand, and not get bogged down in the kind of details that almost derailed the Bali talks.

"If you look at the amount of time available in Bangkok ... there is an awful amount of work to be done in very little time," he cautioned.

Talks in Bali almost fell apart as nations fought over who was historically responsible for climate change, who should foot the bill, and whether both rich and poor nations should have binding targets on cutting carbon emissions.

Europe and developing countries want rich nations to set a binding target for 2020, requiring them to slash greenhouse gas emissions to 25 to 40 percent below their levels in 1990.

Under US pressure the final Bali Roadmap did not include explicit goals. Frustration with the US stance grew so great in Bali that American delegates were booed during the conference's closing hours.

However, with the US presidential elections later this year, President George W. Bush's administration may not want to leave the White House with a legacy as holdouts against environmental progress, activists said.

"There is a kind of a legacy issue at play here for the Bush administration, I think they want to be viewed as constructive in its last year," said Angela Anderson, director of the global warming programme at the Washington-based Pew Environment Group.

No one expects a major breakthrough at the Bangkok talks, which are designed to allow countries to stake their starting positions in negotiations that will continue through next year.

"Every country comes at this now trying to figure out what's in their individual interests as well as the global interests," said Anderson.

But activists around the world have kept up the pressure by keeping the issue in the spotlight, sometimes by turning the spotlight off.

At least 26 cities across the globe joined an "Earth Hour" campaign on Saturday evening, dimming their lights for one hour to demonstrate how the planet can save energy.

The human risks of climate change were also highlighted Friday when the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution declaring the problem a human rights issue, noting that the poor are more vulnerable to the effects of global warming.

Global scientists last year delivered their starkest warning yet -- that without action, global warming could have an irreversible impact on the world, bringing hunger, floods, drought and the extinction of many plants and animals.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is holding the Bangkok talks, has 192 member nations.

World governments in Bangkok to start talks on climate change treaty
Business Times 31 Mar 08;

(BANGKOK) Governments from nearly 200 countries will begin discussions today on forging a global warming agreement, a process that is expected to be fraught with disagreements over how much to reduce greenhouse gases and which nations should adhere to binding targets.

The week-long, United Nations climate meeting in Bangkok comes on the heels of a historic agreement reached in December to draft a new accord on global warming by 2009.

Without a pact to rein in rising greenhouse gases in the next two decades, scientist say warming weather will lead to widespread drought, floods, higher sea levels and worsening storms.

'The challenge is to design a future agreement that will significantly step up action on adaptation, successfully halt the increase in global emissions within the next 10 to 15 years, dramatically cut back emissions by 2050, and do so in a way that is economically viable and politically equitable worldwide,' said Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is hosting the meeting.

The European Union Environment Commissioner, Stavros Dimas, said that the Bangkok meeting would determine the willingness of all parties to act quickly.

In an e-mail interview, he stressed that the need for an aggressive, long-term agreement 'to prevent climate change from reaching dangerous levels that could put billions of people at risk later this century'.

All governments, including the United States, agree emissions need to be reduced to avert an environmental catastrophe. But the major polluters remain far apart over how best to achieve these goals.

Adding to the complexity of negotiations will be disputes over how best to help poor countries adapt to environmental changes by speeding up the transfer of technology and financial assistance from rich nations.

The EU has proposed that industrialised countries slash emissions by 25 to 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020. The US, which is one of the world's top polluters, has repeatedly rejected mandatory national reduction targets of the kind agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol a decade ago.

Japan, which is struggling to meet its emissions-cut obligations under the Kyoto pact, is looking for less stringent conditions this time around. It has talked of using 2005 rather than 1990 as the baseline for reductions and is campaigning for industry-based emission caps.

Under its plan, global industries such as steel or cement would set international guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions.

Proponents, including the US, say that would help set a level playing field for competitive industries.

Critics, however, worry sectoral caps could be used to favour industries in richer countries with access to more advanced technology, while those in less developed nations would suffer.

Another contentious issue will be which countries will be required to make cuts under the new pact and how best to determine the level of reductions.

While the EU says the West has to take the lead in reducing emissions, the US argued it should not have to make cuts that would hurt the US economy unless China and India agreed to the same.

'We're willing to take on international binding targets as long as other major economies - both developed and developing - do so,' said US negotiator Harlan Watson.

'The primary concern is the so-called leakage issue,' Mr Watson said. 'If you take commitments and you have energy intensive industries, they might want to move to other countries which don't have commitments.' China has argued that developed countries should be required to take the lead in reducing pollution because their unrestrained emissions over the past century contributed significantly to global warming.

Mr De Boer has said that requiring China and other developing countries like India and Brazil to take on binding targets 'is not realistic.'

'Developing countries see that as problematic,' he said. 'The problem of climate change as we see it today is a result of rich countries' emissions, not the result of poor countries' emissions\. \-- AP

FACTBOX: What are the U.N. Bangkok climate talks?
Reuters 31 Mar 08;

(Reuters) - Delegates from up to 190 nations will meet in Bangkok from March 31-April 4 for the first round of U.N. talks on a sweeping new pact to fight climate change.

The Bangkok meeting, totalling about 1,000 delegates led by senior government officials, will be the first formal U.N. negotiations on a U.N. climate treaty since the Kyoto Protocol was negotiated from 1995-97.

* WHY IS A NEW TREATY NEEDED?

-- The U.N. Climate Panel last year blamed human activities, led by burning fossil fuels, for a warming that it said would bring ever more droughts, heatwaves, floods and rising seas.

The panel said that world emissions of greenhouse gases -- now rising fast -- would have to peak by about 2015 and then fall sharply to limit a rise in global temperatures to no more than 2 Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times.

Spurred by the panel's findings, governments agreed in Bali, Indonesia, in December 2007 to work out a new climate treaty by the end of 2009 to succeed Kyoto. Bangkok will be the first stop on the "Bali roadmap".

* SO WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

-- Kyoto obliges 37 developed nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions by an average of at least 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. The Bangkok talks will be about widening action to all nations.

Every rich country except the United States has ratified Kyoto. President George W. Bush rejected the pact in 2001, saying it would cost U.S. jobs and unfairly omitted 2012 emissions targets for developing nations such as China and India.

The Bush administration has agreed to take part in talks on a long-term treaty even though many details will be agreed after Bush steps down in January 2009. The main U.S. presidential candidates say they are committed to stepping up U.S. action.

Developing nations say they are willing to do more to curb the growth of their emissions -- but reject Kyoto-style caps because they need to use more energy to reduce poverty.

* WHAT WILL BE ACHIEVED IN BANGKOK?

-- Bangkok's main task is to agree a work programme for the next two years -- the details may show how urgently governments want to tackle climate change. After Bangkok, negotiators will meet in Bonn in June, again in August in a city yet to be decided and environment ministers will meet in Poznan, Poland, in December. Bangkok is symbolically important as the first step on the road to a deal to be agreed in Copenhagen in late 2009.

* BUT KYOTO RUNS TO 2012: WHAT'S THE HURRY?

-- The United Nations says that a new treaty needs to be in place by the end of 2009 to give national parliaments time to ratify before Kyoto runs out. A big worry is that it took two years to negotiate Kyoto and then eight to get it ratified.

And investors need time -- a power company trying to decide whether to build a coal-fired plant or a wind farm wants to know the rules on greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible.

* WHAT ARE THE STUMBLING BLOCKS TO A NEW TREATY?

-- A main issue will be how to ensure a fair share-out of the burden of curbs on greenhouse gases between rich and poor.

Developing nations want more green technologies, credits for slowing deforestation and far more aid to help them adapt to the impact of climate change such as droughts and rising seas.

(Writing by Alister Doyle; Editing by David Fogarty)

FACTBOX: What is the Kyoto Protocol?
Reuters 31 Mar 08;

(Reuters) - Delegates from up to 190 nations will meet in Bangkok from March 31-April 4 to start work on a new U.N. pact to fight climate change and succeed the Kyoto Protocol.

Here are some frequently asked questions about Kyoto:

* WHAT IS THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

-- It is a pact agreed by governments at a 1997 U.N. conference in Kyoto, Japan, to reduce greenhouse gases emitted by developed countries to at least 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12. More than 170 nations have ratified the pact.

* IS IT THE FIRST AGREEMENT OF ITS KIND?

-- Governments agreed to tackle climate change at an "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 with non-binding targets. Kyoto is the follow-up.

* SO IT IS LEGALLY BINDING?

-- Kyoto has legal force from February 16, 2005. The United States, long the world's biggest source of emissions but which is being surpassed by China, came out against the pact in 2001. President George W. Bush reckoned it would be too expensive and wrongly omits 2012 emissions targets for developing nations.

* HOW WILL IT BE ENFORCED?

-- Countries overshooting their targets in 2012 will have to make both the promised cuts and 30 percent more in a second period from 2013.

* DO ALL COUNTRIES HAVE TO CUT EMISSIONS BY 5 PERCENT?

-- No, only 37 relatively developed countries have agreed to targets for 2008-12 under a principle that richer countries are most to blame. They range from an 8 percent cut for the European Union from 1990 levels to a 10 percent rise for Iceland.

* WHAT ARE 'GREENHOUSE GASES'?

-- Greenhouse gases trap heat in the earth's atmosphere. The main culprit from human activities is carbon dioxide, produced largely from burning fossil fuels. The protocol also covers methane, much of which comes from agriculture, and nitrous oxide, mostly from fertilizer use. Three industrial gases are also included.

* HOW WILL COUNTRIES COMPLY?

-- The European Union set up a market in January 2005 under which about 12,000 factories and power stations are given carbon dioxide quotas. If they overshoot they can buy extra allowances in the market or pay a financial penalty; if they undershoot they can sell them.

* WHAT OTHER MECHANISMS ARE THERE?

-- Developed countries can earn credits to offset against their targets by funding clean technologies, such as solar power, in poorer countries. They can also have joint investments in former Soviet bloc nations.

-- For Reuters latest environment blogs click on: here

(Editing by David Fogarty)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 30 Mar 08


Wild Animals of Singapore book launch
a fabulous book on the wildfilms blog

Nature Watch features our reefs and shores
a gorgeous issue packed with photos and stories of our marine heritage on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

Chek Jawa boardwalk with OBS
a great team with fabulous observations on the naked hermit crabs blog and wildfilms blog and wonderful thoughts shared on the adventures with the naked hermit crab blog

Courtship of the Black-naped oriole
amazing photos on the bird ecology blog

Exploring Marina East
a marshland with dragonflies on the tidechaser blog and mountain and sea blog

Three Posies
stunning little creatures on the butterflies of singapore blog


Read more!

Singapore noodle hawkers feel pinch as cost of flour goes up and up and up

Shree Ann Mathavan, The New Paper 30 Mar 08;

30 March 2008

YOU can no longer get the famous bak chor mee (minced pork noodles) at Fengshan Market and Food Centre in Bedok North for $2

Mr Sim Chee Huat, 56, co-owner of the stall, said only the $2.50 and $3 versions are now available.

The reason the price of noodles has jumped about 50 per cent this month, from $1.30 to $2 per kg.

Mr Sim said the business, which typically sells 400 to 500 bowls a day, saw a 10 per cent drop in profit after he stopped selling the $2 version.

He sighed: 'It's hard to make a living because the noodle prices keep jumping and jumping.'

Mr Sim explained he had to strike off the $2 option, because he would be running at a loss otherwise.

The cost of each bowl of his noodles, excluding labour, is about $1.30, he said.

Still, he plans to resist raising prices again, despite the upward trend of noodle prices.

'If we keep increasing prices, people won't want to come anymore,' he said with a sigh.

INCREASE AGAIN

But his noodle supplier has already warned him that prices will increase again next month - although he's not certain yet by how much.

Which means profit margins aren't likely to improve any time soon, Mr Sim noted glumly.

Noodle costs are linked to climbing wheat prices, which is also pushing up the prices of other flour-based products like bread.

Mr Png Geo Lian, 70, chairman of the Association of Chinese Wheat Flour Merchants of Singapore, said the price of flour has increased four times since September last year.

This is due to a world-wide wheat shortage, he said.

According to him, a 25kg bag of flour cost $20.40 early last year, but now it costs $35, a 75 per cent increase.

This paints a bleak scenario for Mr Lim Yu Gee, 64, who sells Hokkien mee in the same food centre as Mr Sim.

He has had to increase the price of his noodles from $2.50 to $3 because of rising costs.

The increase saw his business drop by about 30 per cent, he said.

Now, Mr Lim sells about a hundred odd plates of noodles each day.

Each month, his profits hover around $900.

He feels there should be price controls to help small-time businesses like his.

Moreover as Mr Lim pointed out: 'This is a hawker centre, it's not a very high-class setting, so people won't be willing to pay very much.'

Still, if the price of noodles keeps climbing, he said he will have to increase prices again.

'I have to eat, I have to make money - if not I will close shop,' he said.

While some hawkers might have made price adjustments, others, like the bak chor mee stall at Seng Huat Eating House on North Bridge Road, don't have any plans to do so - yet.

Hawker Tan Kim Hock, 47, said the price of noodles at the stall has been maintained at $3, during the three years he has worked there.

Perhaps, what helps is the volume of business.

On any given day, the stall sells 'at least 500 bowls of noodles'.

Mr Tan explained: 'We have business, but we still worry that if we raise prices, our customers may not want to come back.'

Mrs Loo Siok Hwa, 30, a worker at Parklane Zha Yun Tun Mee House in Sunshine Plazaon Bencoolen Street said her shop increased the price of a plate of noodles by 50 cents to $3.50 last year.

Business then dropped by about 10 per cent to about 200 plates of noodles daily.

She summed up the hawkers' predicament by saying in Mandarin: 'We increase by 50 cents and customers complain a lot.

'If we increase again, we will be finished.'

And what do customers have to say?

Miss Frances Wu, 27, an administrator, said that if the hawker fare is good, it warrants going back.

She said: 'We still have to eat. I won't stop patronising the hawkers just because there's a slight increase.'

However, she added: 'If hawker food increases to $3, I think that's still acceptable, but if it goes up to $4, then perhaps not.'


Read more!

Adequate rice supply, so no fear of shortage in Singapore: Iswaran

Singapore gets its rice from various countries, so if one source is affected, there are alternatives
By Nur Dianah Suhaimi, Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

SINGAPOREANS need not worry about that next bowl of rice despite export cutbacks amid a global shortage and demand spike.

The country's rice supply is adequate, said Minister of State for Trade and Industry S. Iswaran last night.

Importers have enough in their inventories to ensure that there is no disruption in supply.

Singapore gets its rice from various countries. This ensures that if one source is affected, there will be alternatives.

Singaporeans 'should not be unduly concerned...The main thing for us is to just carry on with life as normal', Mr Iswaran told reporters at a lighting demonstration for the Formula One night race near the Padang.

His assurance came after the country's largest supermarket chain, FairPrice, upped prices of rice for three of its house brands on Friday. It has held back on raising prices since the middle of last year when the goods and services tax (GST) went up.

Recent global grain prices have shot up by 30 per cent but FairPrice is increasing its rice prices only by 10 to 15 per cent.

Its managing director, Mr Seah Kian Peng, said it was able to moderate price rises because it imports directly from producer countries, thus eliminating middleman costs. It has also set aside sufficient stock for national emergencies and was able to draw on this.

The Dairy Farm Group, which owns the Cold Storage supermarket chain, told The Sunday Times it is also working with suppliers to ensure an adequate rice supply.

Mr Iswaran said the Government will not impose price controls as these will hurt importers.

The Minister of State, who will be promoted to the senior grade on Tuesday, noted that if there are sharp price adjustments, 'we should have measures in place'' to help, especially those in the lower-income group.

He said growth dividends - the first instalment will be paid next week and the second in October - and the second instalment of the GST offsets in the middle of the year should help many lower-income families cope.

'And if there is a need for help beyond that, we also have specific measures...We should be able to help most, if not all, Singaporeans meet any kind of short-term increase in prices.'


Read more!

Swop & Save: Singapore teens taking up barter

Teens are taking to the old-fashioned practice of barter by trading unwanted items online
Alex Liam, Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

WE MAY be living in a 'throwaway' world but the Internet has helped revive an old-fashioned practice, even among the young: barter.

YouSwop, a Singapore-based website set up in August last year to allow people to swop things they did not want for something else, is proving to be a hit.

The website has been gaining popularity, with some 6,000 members joining in just the past six months. Teenagers make up 35 per cent of the crowd.

Membership is free.

'This idea works because people want to barter away things they bought on impulse which others might find more useful,' says Mr Patrick Lim, 32, co-founder and manager of the website.

Members put up notices informing others about items they want to swop. The site is popular because of its flexibility: There can be a direct swop between two parties.

Or, a member can 'sell' an item to someone else for You-

Swop dollars (YS$). The value of any item is up to the seller.

The virtual credit earned can then be used to buy other items on the 'swopping board'.

The actual exchange of items takes place through postal delivery or a direct meeting at a location agreeable to both parties. Postage charges are usually borne by the seller.

Young adults and teenagers who spoke to The Sunday Times like the website.

Ms Ivy Tan, 21, is one such fan. The undergraduate from Nanyang Technological University usually swops clothes, vouchers and books for bags and collectibles.

She joined YouSwop in January, after a friend told her about the site.

'It's novel, and the fact that it's virtually cashless helps me to keep tabs on my spending. I get a fresh supply of items I want to use without shelling out any cash,' she says.

The swopping facility has since evolved to include contests in which members can win movie tickets.

Members like this feature too.

'This site totally feeds my need for a great bargain,' Ivy says with a laugh.

Another member who is fast becoming a regular YouSwop user is 16-year-old Hazel Tan. The Methodist Girls' Secondary student joined the website in December last year.

She admits that she is a shopper who buys things 'on impulse' quite often.

Hazel feels that the concept of passing on unwanted but still useful items to someone else is sensible.

'Just throwing away such items is wasteful. Giving them to those who want or need them makes sense.

'Besides, doing this earns me credits to get other items I want, which is good for people with limited cash like me,' she says.

The website even has a feedback system which allows people to find out who are the reliable swoppers.

Site manager Mr Lim, a business consultant, admits that he had not expected YouSwop to become so successful.

He had started it with two friends simply as a nifty way to get rid of excess goods on their hands.

However, they soon realised it was a great way of helping the green movement - as the website's popularity increased, mainly by word of mouth.

'It became clear that we were doing something similar to recycling, basically helping the environment while leaving everyone satisfied,' he says.

Mr Lim hopes that the young people who use his website will one day bring swopping to a greater level.

He says with a grin: 'In future, these young people will influence others about swopping. It might become a popular culture, even a norm.'

Still, the swopping website has its share of problems.

There have been cases, for example, where one person has not kept to his part of the bargain in the swop. Mr Lim and his ever vigilant team will then swoop in to mediate.

Besides YouSwop, another site, sgfreecycle.com, works on a different model - no barter trade is involved here.

Members dispose of items they no longer want. Other members indicate their interest on a first come, first served basis.

Teen stuff takes up a significant proportion of items on offer on this website, ranging from Playstation games to arcade tokens.

University student Lim MayAnn, 27, managed to satisfy her craving for her favourite movies through the website.

'I was thinking of watching old movies like A Time To Kill, but I didn't want to have to spend money and go around hunting for them,' she says.

'So when someone said he was giving his copy away, I headed down to his place in Bishan, which is pretty near my home in Upper Thomson, to collect the movie.'

An online check revealed that there are more websites which offer teens in Singapore the chance to swop items.

They include Swapace and Bookmooch, with the former offering quirky items such as a pet spider and hair-styling clay and the latter focusing on books.


Read more!

Aquarium furniture: fish tanks in Singapore

Water world
Fish tanks are no longer the rectangular glass affairs of the past. Now, they come in the form of coffee tables, bar counters and slim, wall-mounted ones
Sandra Leong, Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

But the somewhat worrying news for fish lovers is that some customers are not enthusiastic aquarists and are just charmed by the unique aesthetics of the products.

SINGAPOREAN real estate agent Nancy Hawkes wanted an aquarium in her Sentosa Cove condominium to house her beloved arowana fish. Her Irish husband, Mr Noel Hawkes, who is vice-president of hotel planning of the Resorts World at Sentosa integrated resort on the island, would have nothing of that sort.

Pointing to the unobstructed sea view from the balcony of the master bedroom, he tells LifeStyle in mock despair: 'She wanted to put a fish tank right in the middle of this. I said, that is not happening.'

The couple finally compromised: an aquarium cum bar counter that now sits pretty in the corner of the balcony.

This piece of 'aquarium furniture' is a glass fish tank with a two-tier counter top where bottles of wine and champagne can be displayed.

Says Mr Hawkes, 55: 'My wife is the fish woman. I'm the wine man. With this, I'm happy, she's happy. The fish is happy.'

Adds 49-year-old Mrs Hawkes: 'We often sit here at night and have wine while looking out at the sky and sea.'

If you think fish tanks are bulky, algae-infested glass boxes best hidden in the kitchen or backyard of the house, well, you probably haven't been keeping up with the tide of things.

From fishy bar counters like the Hawkes' to coffee table aquariums to slimmer-than-slim wall-mounted ones that resemble plasma televisions, novel fish tanks are winning over house- proud Singaporeans.

Custom built to blend in with a home's interior, they are popping up anywhere from humble HDB flats to luxe landed properties, giving the long-time hobby of fish-keeping a glossy new spin.

Apart from adding a splash of fengshui - fish are traditionally seen as harbingers of wealth - and marine-inspired decor to one's abode, another apparent attraction of such 'designer' aquariums is that they are easy to maintain.

Depending on a customer's preference, the tanks can be sold as a package, complete with a self-sustainable ecosystem of aquatic plants and fish.

Owners need only feed their fish, top up the water level once or twice a month and check occasionally to see if the tank's filters and pumps are working.

In general, marine tanks, which house fish found in salt water, are a little harder to upkeep than freshwater tanks as their environments are harder to mimic.

Expect however to fork out well into the thousands for these conversation pieces. The Hawkes, for instance, paid $8,000 for their bar counter aquarium. And depending on size and sophistication, a novelty tank could cost anything from $1,000 to $30,000, according to LifeStyle's checks with aquarium specialists.

There are as many as 10 such businesses in Singapore catering to a mix of homes and commercial properties, say industry players.

The majority set up shop over the past five years, an indication that demand, while small, is certainly burgeoning.

The impetus behind this growing interest, explains co-owner of Atlantis Aquatic Design Tan Lye Hee, is that with Singaporeans becoming more design-savvy, few want a fish tank that 'sticks out like a sore thumb'.

Mr Tan, a former interior designer who saw potential in the market, registered Atlantis in 2002 and calls himself one of the local pioneers in aquarium design. He has incorporated aquariums into partitions, feature walls and storage cabinets.

Demand, he says, has increased steadily by about 5 to 10 per cent each year since the company was founded.

He has had customers as young as 15. Secondary 3 student Nigel Lim 'earned' a $3,000 fish tank cum storage cabinet from his father, a technical executive in a luxury car company, when he scored well in his Primary School Leaving Examination three years ago.

The tank also acts as a partition in the family's five-room HDB flat, dividing the living room from the main corridor.

Michael Aquatic Design's Michael Lee, a former financial planner and avid fish lover, set up his company about three years ago with his first product: a coffee table aquarium.

Doing his own carpentry work, he had designed a prototype of this - similar to the bar counter at the Hawkes' apartment except lower in height - which he displayed at a furniture exhibition at Park Mall. To his surprise, a passer-by bought the piece for $2,500.

Besides the coffee table and bar counter designs, he also has television consoles and dining tables - all with aquariums within - in his showroom. His coffee table aquarium is the best-seller, with over 100 sets sold since 2004.

'It's an evolution of a hobby,' he reasons. 'Just like TV sets, we went from black-and-white to colour to plasma. The same for fish tanks.'

Singaporean sales coordinator Lynn Weegenhausen, 48, walked past Mr Lee's shop in Park Mall when she was renovating her condominium apartment last July. She spotted one of his coffee table designs and immediately imagined the $3,500 piece taking centrestage in her living room.

'It's so relaxing to have this. When I come home after a day's work, I lie down next to the tank and look at the fish for a few hours,' she says.

Over at Aquatic Style, over 3,000 pieces of a slim, wall-mounted fish tank designed to resemble a picture frame have flown off the shelves since the product was launched in 2002, says owner Jackson Tan.

Its selling point: The tank is 14 cm thick.

One of his customers, lecturer Rebecca Chan, 43, who bought a 1.5m-long wall-mounted tank for her five-room HDB flat for $1,200, says her purchase gives her a 'sense of well-being'.

'Look,' she says. 'I don't even have a TV in my living room.'

Other names in the high-end aquarium design business include The Glass Box in Bukit Timah Shopping Centre, Aquatechnic in Kallang, Geo Aquatic Design in Clifford Centre and Bio Aquaristik at Tampines Mall.

But the somewhat worrying news for fish lovers is that some customers are not enthusiastic aquarists and are just charmed by the unique aesthetics of the products.

Despite the hassle-free design of such tanks, The Glass Box's co-owner Kelvin Lim has seen owners 'overfeed their fish by more than 10 times' before learning the tricks and tools of keeping fish.

But there are others like Mrs Weegenhausen who eventually fall in love with their fish and become hobbyists. She says: 'When I first got the tank, I had only goldfish. Now I have 59 fish, including torpedos, tetras and skeleton fish.'

And then there's the question of whether some designs - like the coffee table and super-slim tanks - are gimmicky and cruel to the fish.

Asks engineer Wilfred Tan, who has two 'normal' tanks of freshwater fish in his five-room HDB flat: 'I wonder if the fish in the coffee table get scared whenever someone slams a cup down on its surface, or if those in the slim wall tanks feel claustrophobic.'

To this, Michael Aquatic Design's Mr Lee says he believes the fish get used to the shock after some time. Likening the situation to people who live next to an MRT track, he adds: 'After a while, you don't notice the noise.'

Mr Jackson Tan says: 'Fish usually don't have a sense of space so it doesn't matter how big the tank is. After all, you also put fighting fish in jars, right?'


Read more!

Singapore power hikes: Low-income families to feel pinch most

Unlike middle-income earners, they have fewer options to cut energy use as they use basic appliances
Mavis Toh & Jamie Ee Wen Wei, Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

THE air-conditioner is the top energy guzzler in the home. But while middle-income earners can reduce the usage of such power-hungry appliances to cope with rising electricity bills, there is less room for low-income earners to do so since they are already using very basic appliances.

This is the view of Madam Halimah Yacob, an MP for Jurong GRC, when The Sunday Times spoke to her and other MPs about the impact on households of electricity tariffs going up this week. 'What they are using now is already so basic, you can't ask them to cut any more,' said Madam Halimah.

From Tuesday, electricity will cost 23.88 cents per kilowatt-hour (kwh) for the next three months. This is a rise of about 5 per cent from the 22.62 cents per kwh charged this quarter.

A family living in a four-room HDB flat, using an average of 355kwh a month, will pay $85 monthly, or $12 more.

The MPs, noting that the tariff hike follows a string of increases in food and transport costs, said the lower-income group will feel the pinch most.

As Madam Halimah said: 'For families operating on a very tight budget, every cent counts.'

With the higher cost of living, the MPs said an average of three residents weekly seek their help for unpaid power bills.

Mr Charles Chong, an MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, has also observed a slight increase in the number of cases where people are unable to cope with inflation. 'In the past, we had one case or even none. Now, with costs going up, we can get up to five cases a week,' he said.

MPs say they will help residents who run into arrears to negotiate instalment payment plans with Singapore Power. Vouchers are also available to help them pay their bills.

Electricity tariffs are reviewed quarterly and revised mainly according to fluctuations in fuel-oil prices. The latest adjustment has pushed the rate to its highest level in eight years.

The National Environment Agency said that besides the air-conditioner, the other energy guzzlers in a typical home are the refrigerator, lighting items, water heater and computer. Its advice: Set the thermostat as high as comfortably possible, use one large refrigerator instead of two small ones, and use fluorescent tubes instead of the regular bulb.

Marketing manager Leonard Chia, 45, whose family of four live in a three-bedroom condominium unit, is already figuring out how to reduce his power bill ahead of the tariff hike.

Since January, his monthly power bill has been $300. It usually hovers around $250. He will disconnect one of the two fridges in the kitchen and stuff all the food into one. As for the five-bulb lamp in his living room, it will be replaced with a lamp with a single energy-saving bulb.

But the MPs noted there are also Singaporeans - including those who do not earn much - who are unwilling to adjust their habits.

Housewife Lam Sow Xing, 45, thinks her monthly bill of $250 is too high but finds it hard to trim it. She lives in a five-room flat in

Sengkang with her husband and two teenage children.

They have three air-conditioners, four TV sets and two computers. Each of these is used for up to 10 hours a day.

'When the kids are at home, the TV sets and computers are on,' she said. 'And my husband can't live without the air-con.'

Ms Lee Bee Wah, an MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, said she has come across families living in four-room flats and complaining of a $400 power bill. 'They keep all the air-cons on all night, have a plasma TV set and a big fridge. And they say they can't sleep without the air-con,' she said.

North West District Mayor Teo Ho Pin reminded Singaporeans to choose appliances that meet their needs. 'Ask yourself, do you really need a big fridge?' he said. But he added that habits take time and discipline to change.

Meanwhile, town councils and private estates are in a hurry to manage rising costs.

North West District, for instance, is looking at using solar energy to light up the parks and landscaped areas.

A 699-unit condominium in Choa Chu Kang has gone for energy-saving bulbs, and shorter operating hours for water features and motion-detector lights.

How one family of five is cutting back on power consumption
Jamie Ee Wen Wei, Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

THEIR utility bill was over $300, twice that of the national average for a four-room HDB flat.

So when electricity tariffs began to inch up last year, Madam Siti Aminah Bakar, 34, came up with an action plan.

Every day, the clerk, who lives in Pasir Ris with her building manager husband and three children, would check the reading on the electricity meter.

To keep their bill under $300, their power consumption should not exceed 35kwh each day.

They replaced a window-unit air-con in the master bedroom with an energy-efficient multi-split unit.

They now set the air-con on timer mode - it cuts off at 5am. They switch it on only at 11pm.

The water heater in the bathroom is used only between 5.30am and 8am daily.

They do not shower at night.

Other measures adopted include doing the laundry when the machine has a full load, and limiting ironing to work clothes.

'We don't iron T-shirts or bedsheets. I know some families even iron their underwear,' said Madam Siti.

But they have kept some creature comforts, such as three TV sets to watch different programmes. Each is switched on for up to nine hours a day.

Two desktop computers - one for work and one for the children - are used for four hours a day.

'If you want the comfort and convenience, you just have to pay for it,' she said.

Six energy-guzzling appliances
Straits Times 30 Mar 08;

AIR-CONDITIONERS

Energy consumed: A single split-unit air-con consumes about 252kwh a month if used for seven hours every day.

Cost: $60.18 a month

How to save energy:

# Consider a multi-split system if you require more than one room to be cooled.

# Ensure that the unit is the right capacity to match the amount of cooling required.

# Clean the air-con filter regularly and have the unit inspected annually. Poorly maintained equipment can waste a lot of energy.

# Set the thermostat at 25 deg C. It is a comfortable temperature for most, yet will not consume that much energy.


REFRIGERATORS

Energy consumed: A 300 litre frost-free unit will consume about 115kwh a month if switched on year round.

Cost: $27.51 a month

How to save energy:

# Choose a model with an energy-saver switch which will allow you to determine the setting that provides maximum energy savings without causing condensation.

# Adjust the thermostat to the recommended settings.

# Allow hot food to cool before putting it in the fridge and cover all food and liquids to prevent moisture from being released. Moisture increases the amount of energy that will be used during the fridge's defrosting cycle.

# Do not open the door unnecessarily as the cool air will escape.


WATER HEATERS

Energy consumed: A 1,000 watt instantaneous or tankless unit uses 60kwh if used for a total of two hours daily.

Cost: $14.33 a month

How to save energy:

# Use an instantaneous water heater instead of one with a storage tank. The former provides hot water only when needed.

# If you prefer a storage water heater, choose one with a capacity of 23 litres to 27 litres, which is enough for a family of four to six. The bigger the capacity, the more energy consumed.

# Switch on the storage water heater just 20 minutes before taking a bath. Switch it off after that.


WASHING MACHINES

Energy consumed: A 450 watt unit without heater consumes 13.5kwh if used for an hour each day.

Cost: $3.22 a month

How to save energy:

# Wash a full load of laundry each time.

# Don't use hot water to wash clothes as heating up the water sucks up more energy. If you must have hot water, using cold water during the rinse cycle will cut energy use by half.

# Do not put too much detergent to avoid having to wash or rinse the load again.

# Pre-soak or use a soak cycle when washing heavily soiled items to avoid two washings.


TELEVISION SETS

Energy consumed: A 26-inch conventional TV set consumes about 30kwh a month if used for five hours a day.

Cost: $7.16 a month

How to save energy:

# When watching television, keep the lights in the room low. This saves electricity and reduces glare from your screen.

# Switch off the set when not in use, including the main switch.

# Choose a conventional CRT TV set instead of a plasma set. The latter consumes about four times more energy.

# Alternatively, choose an LCD set instead of a plasma set as it consumes less energy.


COMPUTERS

Energy consumed: A 300 watt unit - about the maximum power of a 24-inch iMac - consumes about 36kwh a month if used for four hours a day.

Cost: $8.60 a month

How to save energy:

# Set the power to automatically go into sleep or stand-by mode after 15 minutes or so of inactivity.

# Switch off the computer when not in use for long periods. This applies to the main switch too.

# Use liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors as they consume half to two-thirds what cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitors do.

# A laptop uses up to 50 per cent less energy than a desktop.

SOURCE: SINGAPORE POWER AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AGENCY


Read more!

Earth Hour blackout highlights global warming

Madeleine Coorey, Yahoo News 29 Mar 08;

Australia's largest city was shrouded in darkness on Saturday night as it launched a worldwide campaign stretching from Sydney to San Francisco to highlight global warming.

Sydney was the first major metropolis to mark Saturday's 'Earth Hour', a self-imposed 60-minute black-out, with the lights on landmark buildings, corporate skyscrapers, businesses and homes switched off from 8:00 pm (0900 GMT).

From there the initiative, which aims to engage the community in combatting global warming, will see lights dimmed or turned off at 8:00 pm local time in Asian cities such as Bangkok and Manila, before spreading further to Europe and the Americas. Tel Aviv marked the event on March 27 for religious reasons.

'Earth Hour' founder Andy Ridley, who has said up to 30 million people could participate this year, said he was amazed at how far the initiative had spread since it was launched by environmental group WWF in Sydney a year ago.

"When we first talked about it, right at the beginning, our dream was to come up with something that made sense to a lot of people to do," he told AFP.

"And what seems to have happened is that it does seem to make sense to a lot of people to do it."

'Earth Hour' encourages governments, companies and homeowners to voluntarily switch off power to non-essential appliances for one hour to illustrate how, by working together, people can make a difference by using less energy, thereby producing fewer greenhouse gas emissions.

About 2.2 million people are estimated to have participated in the 2007 Sydney event which left the city's iconic harbourside Opera House and nearby Harbour Bridge bathed in moonlight as restaurant diners ate by candlelight and company logos on office buildings were dimmed.

'Earth Hour' Australia chief executive Greg Bourne said with 370 cities, towns and local governments across 35 countries taking part, he expected tens of millions of people to participate in 2008.

"I'm putting my neck on the line but my hope is that we top 100 million people," he said.

He said 'Earth Hour' carried "a message of hope and optimism... (that) we, the citizens of the world, are prepared to take action and we want to defeat climate change."

At 8:00 pm, Sydney's Harbour Bridge and Opera House dimmed as the floodlights were turned off, leaving only security lighting on. Elsewhere in the central business district, office lights were turned off.

Twenty-six cities around the world are officially signed on to turn off their lights on Saturday night, including Chicago and Atlanta in the US and the Irish capital Dublin, but hundreds more towns and local governments are expected to be involved in the 60-minute shutdown.

In Bangkok, the lights on some of the Thai capital's most famous landmarks, including the riverside Temple of the Dawn, the Rama 8 Cable Bridge across the Chao Phraya River and the main boulevard in the city's historic core will be turned off.

Sawaeng Tankam, 50, a motorcycle taxi driver, said authorities should expand the campaign to more areas.

"Why do they switch off the lights only in a few areas? That doesn't do enough to save energy. They should do this in every district in the city or even better, in every province," he said.

Some people in the Thai capital said they didn't know about the campaign.

"Switch off the lights? Where?" said Prapunpong Kaewyaem, 28, a vendor selling brass statues on Rajdamri Road, one of the thoroughfares set to turn off its street lamps.

Others voiced concern about the city plunging into darkness.

"I don't like it. This doesn't help anything. It is going to be dark," said Supoj Jaidee, a self-employed 30 year old.

Meanwhile in Manila, several major thoroughfares will go dark as street lights and billboards are switched off on the designated hour, Philippine Energy Secretary Angelo Reyes said.

Cities involved in 'Earth Hour' include Aalborg, Aarhus, Adelaide, Atlanta, Bangkok, Brisbane, Canberra, Chicago, Christchurch, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dublin, Hobart, Manila, Melbourne, Montreal, Odense, Ottawa, Perth, Phoenix, San Francisco, Suva, Sydney, Tel Aviv, Toronto and Vancouver.

Sydney goes dark for Earth Hour
Tanalee Smith, Associated Press Yahoo News 29 Mar 08;

Sydney's iconic Opera House and Harbour Bridge went dark Saturday night as the world's first major city turned off its lights for this year's Earth Hour, a global campaign to raise awareness of climate change.

A lightning show was the brightest part of Sydney's skyline during Earth Hour, which began at 8 p.m. when the lights were turned off at the city's landmarks. Most businesses and homes were already dark as Sydney residents embraced their second annual Earth Hour with candlelight dinners, beach bonfires and even a green-powered outdoor movie.

"This provides an extraordinary symbol and an indication that we can be part of the solution" to global warming, Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett told Sky News television, standing across the harbor from the dark silhouette of the Opera House.

Garrett said government offices and national monuments around the country participated in Earth Hour.

"We're not only talking the talk, we're walking the walk," he said as the hour ended. "Whatever your view is about the magnitude of the problem ... we can save money by using energy wisely and efficiently, and that gives us the added bonus of reduced greenhouse gas emissions."

During the one-hour event, Sydney was noticeably darker, though it was not a complete blackout. The business district was mostly dark; organizers said 250 of the 350 commercial buildings there had pledged to shut off their lights completely, and 94 of the top 100 companies on the Australian stock exchange were also participating.

The number of participants was not immediately available but organizers were hoping to beat last year's debut, when 2.2 million people and more than 2,000 businesses shut off lights and appliances, resulting in a 10.2 percent reduction in carbon emissions during that hour.

"I'm putting my neck on the line but my hope is that we top 100 million people," Earth Hour Australia chief executive Greg Bourne said.

The effect of last year's Earth Hour was infectious. This year 26 major world cities and more than 300 other cities and towns have signed up to participate.

New Zealand and Fiji kicked off the event this year. In Christchurch, New Zealand, more than 100 businesses and thousands of homes were plunged into darkness, computers and televisions were switched off and dinners delayed for the hour from 8 to 9 p.m. Suva, Fiji, in the same time zone, also turned off its lights.

Auckland's Langham Hotel switched from electric lights to candles as it joined the effort to reduce the use of electricity, which when generated creates greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.

Australians had their own unique ways to mark the blackout as the clock struck 8 across the nation; one bar was offering free beers to customers who arrived with a black balloon to signify their carbon footprint; staff at beach bar donned solar-powered caps; a bed and breakfast offered candlelight cooking lessons; a children's hospital hosted a pajama party for its patients.

Following Australia, lights will go out in major Asian cities including Manila and Bangkok before moving to Europe and North America as the clock ticks on. One of the last major cities to participate will be San Francisco — home to the soon-to-be dimmed Golden Gate Bridge.

Organizers see the event as a way to encourage the world to conserve energy. While all lights in participating cities are unlikely to be cut, it is the symbolic darkening of monuments, businesses and individual homes they are most eagerly anticipating.

Even popular search engine Google put its support behind Earth Hour, with a completely black page and the words: "We've turned the lights out. Now it's your turn."

"Earth Hour is a call to action," Sydney's Lord Mayor Clover Moore said at the official launch ceremony. "People have now responded and it's time to introduce some significant long-term changes."

Australians have embraced Earth Hour and other environmental initiatives. The nation of around 21 million people is ranked as the world's worst greenhouse gas emitter per capita, largely because of its heavy reliance on coal-fired power stations. New Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has made the environment one of his priorities, signing the Kyoto Protocol on fighting global warming soon after taking office late last year.

Switch off, save planet message goes global
Michael Perry and Jeremy Lovell, Reuters 29 Mar 08;

SYDNEY/LONDON (Reuters) - People switched off lights around the world on Saturday, dimming buildings, hotels, restaurants and bars to show concern at global warming.

Up to 30 million people were expected to have switched off their lights for 60 minutes by the time "Earth Hour" -- which started in Suva in Fiji and Christchurch in New Zealand -- has completed its cycle westwards against the sun.

More than 380 towns and cities and 3,500 businesses in 35 countries signed up for the campaign that is in its second year after it began in 2007 in Sydney alone.

"Earth Hour shows that everyday people are prepared to pull together to find a solution to climate change. It can be done," said James Leape of WWF International which was running the campaign.

Lights at Sydney's Opera House and Harbour Bridge were switched off and Australians held candle-lit beach parties, played poker by candle light and floated candles down rivers.

In Bangkok some of the city's business districts, shopping malls and billboards went dark, although street lights stayed on. One major hotel invited guests to dine by candle light and reported brisk business.

In Copenhagen, the Tivoli and the Royal Palace and the opera darkened for an hour, along with many street lights.

"In the central square a lot of people were standing looking at the stars," said Ida Thuesen, spokeswoman for WWF Denmark. "It's not often you can see the stars in a city."

In Norway, at the Kvitfjell ski resort that was host of the 1994 Winter Olympic downhill, some late-season parties were held by candle light as heavy snow fell outside.

BRIGHTON BLACKOUT

In Britain, 26 town and city councils signed up to switch off non-essential lights as did several historic buildings including Prince Charles' private residence Highgrove House, London City Hall, Winchester Cathedral and the Government Communication Headquarters radio monitoring station.

The south coast town of Brighton turned off the lights on its pier and pavilion to mark the event.

The British arm of Internet search engine Google turned its home page black and added the message: "We've turned the lights out. Now it's your turn."

Floodlights went out at landmarks in Budapest, including its castle, cathedral and parliament.

The movement will now cross the Atlantic to the United States and Canada,

San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge, Chicago's Sears Tower and Soldier Field Stadium football ground, as well as the 553-metre (1,815 ft) CN Tower in Toronto were due to be plunged into darkness. The lights at Niagara Falls were also to go out.

Buildings account for about one-third of the carbon emissions that scientists say will boost global average temperatures by between 1.4 and 4.0 degrees Celsius this century bringing floods and famines and putting millions of lives at risk.

Organizers of Earth Hour said that while switching off a light for one hour would have little impact on carbon emissions, the fact that so many people were taking part showed how much interest and concern at the climate crisis had taken hold.

(Additional reporting by James Thornhill in Sydney, Chisa Fujioka in Tokyo, Ploy Chitsomboon in Bangkok and Alister Doyle in Oslo; Editing by Giles Elgood)

Cities switch off lights for Earth Hour
Caryn Rousseau, Associated Press Yahoo News 30 Mar 08;

From the Sydney Opera House to Rome's Colosseum to the Sears Tower's famous antennas in Chicago, floodlit icons of civilization went dark Saturday for Earth Hour, a worldwide campaign to highlight the threat of climate change.

The environmental group WWF urged governments, businesses and households to turn back to candle power for at least 60 minutes starting at 8 p.m. wherever they were.

The campaign began last year in Australia, and traveled this year from the South Pacific to Europe to North America in cadence with the setting of the sun.

"What's amazing is that it's transcending political boundaries and happening in places like China, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea," said Andy Ridley, executive director of Earth Hour. "It really seems to have resonated with anybody and everybody."

Earth Hour officials hoped 100 million people would turn off their nonessential lights and electronic goods for the hour. Electricity plants produce greenhouse gases that fuel climate change.

In Chicago, lights on more than 200 downtown buildings were dimmed Saturday night, including the stripe of white light around the top of the John Hancock Center. The red-and-white marquee outside Wrigley Field also went dark.

"There's a widespread belief that somehow people in the United States don't understand that this is a problem that we're lazy and wedded to our lifestyles. (Earth Hour) demonstrates that that is wrong," Richard Moss, a member of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the climate change vice president for WWF, said in Chicago on Saturday.

Workers in Phoenix turned out the lights in all downtown city-owned buildings for one hour. Darkened restaurants glowed with candlelight in San Francisco while the Golden Gate Bridge, Coit Tower and other landmarks extinguished lights for an hour.

New Zealand and Fiji were first out of the starting blocks this year. And in Sydney, Australia — where an estimated 2.2 million observed the blackout last year — the city's two architectural icons, the Opera House and Harbour Bridge, faded to black against a dramatic backdrop of a lightning storm.

Lights also went out at the famed Wat Arun Buddhist temple in Bangkok, Thailand; shopping and cultural centers in Manila, Philippines; several castles in Sweden and Denmark; the parliament building in Budapest, Hungary; a string of landmarks in Warsaw, Poland; and both London City Hall and Canterbury Cathedral in England.

Greece, an hour ahead of most of Europe, was the first on the continent to mark Earth Hour. On the isle of Aegina, near Athens, much of its population marched by candlelight to the port. Parts of Athens itself, including the floodlit city hall, also turned to black.

In Ireland, where environmentalists are part of the coalition government, lights-out orders went out for scores of government buildings, bridges and monuments in more than a dozen cities and towns.

But the international banks and brokerages of Dublin's financial district blazed away with light, illuminating floor after empty floor of desks and idling computers.

"The banks should have embraced this wholeheartedly and they didn't. But it's a start. Maybe next year," said Cathy Flanagan, an Earth Hour organizer in Dublin.

Ireland's more than 7,000 pubs elected not to take part — in part because of the risk that Saturday night revelers could end up smashing glasses, falling down stairs, or setting themselves on fire with candles.

Likewise, much of Europe — including France, Germany, Spain and European Union institutions — planned nothing to mark Earth Hour.

Internet search engine Google lent its support to Earth Hour by blackening its normally white home page and challenging visitors: "We've turned the lights out. Now it's your turn."

Tens of millions switch off worldwide for 'Earth Hour': organisers
Madeleine Coorey Yahoo News 30 Mar 08;

Tens of millions of people switched off lightbulbs this weekend as part of a global campaign to throw the spotlight on climate change, organisers of the Australian-led 'Earth Hour' initiative said.

From Sydney to Asia, Europe, Canada and the US, "many tens of millions" of people flicked the switch on Saturday night, plunging cities, towns and homes into darkness, chief of environmental group WWF-Australia Greg Bourne said.

The event, which was first held in Sydney last year, saw the lights dimmed in major cities at 8:00 pm local time, with skyscrapers, public monuments and private homes plunged into darkness.

Bourne said the response from around the world had been astounding.

While 26 cities are officially signed up for 'Earth Hour', Bourne said the campaign had already stretched well beyond that and that the intention was for the voluntary, 60-minute blackout to be even bigger in 2009.

"In pretty much every country in the world, someone has signed up. Whether it be one, two, three or 3,000 individuals," he told AFP.

"Basically every continent including Antarctica had some involvement and what I think will happen next year is that we will get deeper and deeper involvement in Asia, in Russia.

"We're pretty certain, that when we do it next year, China will become very much more involved," he added.

Earth Hour organisers asked governments, businesses and individuals to switch off the power for one hour on Saturday to save energy and thereby produce fewer greenhouse gases.

Bourne said the campaign was less about making a real reduction in energy usage, and more about increasing public awareness about energy efficiency.

He said indications were that the event had been a success in not only Sydney, where the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Opera House faded into relative darkness, but around the world.

"We had 2.2 million last year; I reckon by the time we finally count it up, we will have about 100 million people involved around the world," he said.

Energy Australia, which supplies much of Sydney's electricity, said a drop of about 8.4 percent in energy usage had been recorded in the city during the hour, equivalent to 1.6 million light bulbs being switched off.

A national poll of some 3,400 people taken on Saturday and Sunday indicated that 58 percent of people living in major Australian cities had participated in the event by switching off lights or other appliances.

Meanwhile power consumption in Christchurch, the only New Zealand city participating in the global event, plummeted nearly 13 percent during the voluntary switch-off, figures released Sunday showed.

In Ireland, the initiative was led in the capital by the Dublin City Council, which turned off all non-street lighting on 13 of the 14 bridges in the city. It also turned off all the lights in City Hall and civic buildings.

Cities involved in 'Earth Hour' include Aalborg, Aarhus, Adelaide, Atlanta, Bangkok, Brisbane, Canberra, Chicago, Christchurch, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dublin, Hobart, Manila, Melbourne, Montreal, Odense, Ottawa, Perth, Phoenix, San Francisco, Suva, Sydney, Tel Aviv, Toronto and Vancouver.


Read more!