Best of our wild blogs: 26 Dec 10


First Chek Jawa Boardwalk trip for 2011
from Adventures with the Naked Hermit Crabs

Top Memorable Events
from Psychedelic Nature

Life History of the King Crow
from Butterflies of Singapore

decorator-velcro crab @ Big Sister's Island 24Dec2010
from sgbeachbum

The same old line
from The annotated budak

Why DIDN'T the chicken cross the road?
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!


Read more!

Environment review of 2010

The year started badly after the failure of the Copenhagen climate summit and got worse with the ‘climategate’ scandal and the largest oil spill in US history. But it was a good year for tigers and wildlife.
Louise Gray, The Telegraph 21 Dec 10;

• The Copenhagen fall-out: The failure of world leaders to agree a deal on climate change during a fraught United Nations meeting in Copenhagen at the end of 2009 left the environmental movement in a state of confusion. Much of 2010 was spent reassessing better ways to limit carbon emissions if it is not going to be through a global agreement. Non-governmental agencies started targeting businesses and individuals to reduce emissions instead, irrespective of what government is doing.

• Climategate: Emails stolen from the University of East Anglia (UEA) led to accusations scientists had exaggerated the evidence for global warming. Professor Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), claimed to have done nothing wrong. But it took three reviews for him to clear his name of any scientific wrong doing. However UEA was criticised for failing to share information correctly.

• Deepwater Horizon: The massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was described as one of the worst environmental disasters in history. Eleven workers were killed after an explosion sank the rig in late April and for three months gallons of oil poured in the ocean. BP, the British company in charge of the rig and its chief executive Tony Hayward, became figures of hate in the US. The company has been forced to pay out billions in compensation and no one knows what the lasting damage will be on the ecology of the area.

• The Greenest Government ever? In May the Tory/Lib Dem Coalition was sworn in promising to be the ‘greenest government ever’. However one of the first moves was to cut the budget for the Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) by a massive 30 per cent. Various quangoes were lost and funding for flooding and wildlife was slashed.

• Year of the Tiger: The world's first tiger summit ended with a pledge for £200 million and the goal of doubling the number of wild tigers by 2022. A meeting of the UN on biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan managed to be more successful than climate change talks. Governments agreed to at least halve the loss of natural habitats for wildlife by 2020. The Convention on Biological Diversity also agreed to expand nature reserves to 17 per cent of the world's land area by 2020, up from less than 10 per cent today


Read more!

Why biodiversity loss and climate change are equal threats

Our biggest ally will be lost if we do not protect and enhance biodiversity in forests and other systems
Robert Bloomfield guardian.co.uk 26 Dec 10;

Since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, the media and many organisations have pursued as separate narratives the issues of climate, biodiversity and sustainable development. One of the changes this year, at a UN level, has been recognition that this does not make sense.

Without protecting and enhancing biodiversity in forests and other systems we are losing our biggest ally. These living systems can lock away carbon at a fraction of the price that technical solutions for carbon storage could only do at huge cost and by expending even more energy.

Fortunately, over 2010 the International Year of Biodiversity involved 1,500 organisations across 90 governments, 388 NGOs and 21 UN agencies to help raise awarenessof the importance of biodiversity. The UN designated 2011-2020 the International Decade of Biodiversity. Among the agreements that came out of the UN's major biodiversity meeting in Nagoya in October were commitments from 191 nations to increase the amount of the planet set aside for biodiversity protection to 17% of the land surface and 10% of the oceans.

Perhaps more importantly came increasing recognition of the econimic and health cost to humanity of biodiversity loss; not the least being the $3-4bn losses per annum associated with deforestation alone. These are losses which are actually making the World Bank and government finance ministers pick up their ears, they are losses no government can sustain indefinitely.

For the most part, people have seen biodiversity as being about saving endangered species, or setting aside special natural habitats as national parks. However the truth is that biodiversity is an issue of mainstream economic importance, with consequences that are wide-ranging; from helping mitigate floods and droughts to providing a pharmacopeia of future medicines. It is as much about how we as consumers make informed choices about the products we purchase as it is about preserving exotic animals in far away places.

This fresh perspective is at the centre of the new international agreement. All governments are called to report on the condition of their country's "natural capital assets", alongside their reports to the UN and World Bank on their economic growth and GDP. The agreement calls on all private sector organisations to look at their activities and similarly report the biodiversity impact of their corporate activities.

Yet there is still a huge dislocation in the public discourse. While many scientists regard biodiversity loss as an even greater threat than climate change, when did you last hear it discussed on Channel 4 News, or see it featured on News Night or as the subject of a leader comment? (with the honourable exception of the Guardian)

The first target from Nagoya is the call for all people to understand the importance of biodiversity by 2020. Such an endeavour is no simple turning over of a new leaf, no easy New Year's resolution. The topic needs to be covered in our education curriculum at all levels. It will require the vision from responsible government and business to ensure this issue is placed at the heart of aspirations for a successful, emergent green economy. It will require a sea change of awareness among the majority of media editors and producers that this is not only of relevance to their audiences, but that it is a central news story that will run and run for the decade to come.

• Dr Robert Bloomfield is the UK co-ordinator for the International Year of Biodiversity And Head of Innovation The Natural History Museum, London


Read more!