Best of our wild blogs: 1 Nov 09


Naval Diving Unit Project Eco-Frog @ Semakau, 30 Oct 2009
from News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore

Andy Ho shares his greater knowledge on climate change
from Green Drinks Singapore

Of Saws and Teeth
from Butterflies of Singapore

Blue Winged Pitta found dead
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Stork-billed Kingfisher catches crayfish
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Cool day for nature trip to Chek Jawa Boardwalk
from Adventures with the Naked Hermit Crabs

New tame wild boar at Chek Jawa?
from wild shores of singapore


Read more!

Climate change: Singapore looks to do more

Straits Times 1 Nov 09;

In addition to the national blueprint rolled out this year to reduce carbon emissions, Singapore is now carefully studying whether more can be done to tackle climate change.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said this last Friday when he identified climate change as one of the biggest challenges ahead for Singapore.

Both he and Environment and Water Resources Minister Yaacob Ibrahim spoke about the country's commitment to do its part if a global agreement is reached, in comments made to mark the start of the Clean and Green 2010 Campaign.

PM Lee said Singapore would do so even though its carbon emissions are a negligible part of global output, and it is not among nations which were obliged to make specific cuts in greenhouse gas emission levels.

'But as a responsible member of the international community, we have to bear our fair share of the collective global effort to reduce carbon emissions,' he said.

'Therefore, provided other countries also commit to do their part in a global deal, we will reduce emissions from 'business-as-usual' levels and do what we need to do with other countries to reduce humankind's carbon dioxide emissions.'

The Sustainable Singapore Blueprint, drawn up by the private and people sectors together with the Government, calls for long-term carbon emission cuts in households, businesses and industries.

Achieving these targets will require changes in lifestyles, consumption habits and industry practices. Households, for example, can contribute through good conservation habits like buying energy-efficient appliances, using a fan instead of an air-conditioner and switching off appliances not in use.

In addition to this major national effort to reduce emissions, PM Lee also launched a new Energy Efficiency National Partnership programme last Friday to help companies be more energy-efficient.

The main draw for companies to join the new initiative is the electricity cost savings they will get to enjoy.


Read more!

Eagles at Changi Airport: Don't gun them down

Straits Times Forum 30 Oct 09;

I REFER to Monday's report, 'Gun Club roped in to keep birds out of airport'.

Shooting the white-bellied sea eagles is not the answer to forestall bird strikes at Changi Airport. It is simply not justified. They are not migratory but are in fact a resident species numbering fewer than 50 in the wild in Singapore, not thousands.

As the largest bird of prey here, the white-bellied sea eagle was chosen to front our $10,000 Bird Series note to symbolise Singapore's strength, adaptability and independence.

They are more often seen fishing in the Strait of Johor and soaring above Pulau Ubin. Changi Airport, with its open grasslands, does not offer food for them and there are no tall trees there for them to perch.

We have recorded smaller migratory kestrels hovering at the perimeter of the airport and the odd common buzzard during the migration period, but none of the resident raptor species gathers in large numbers there.

If this shooting is, as reported, the last resort and a case of need-to shooting, why has this become a regular assignment for the Singapore Gun Club?

The Republic of Singapore Air Force has successfully used a remote toy truck to scare away birds in its airfields by broadcasting loud noises and calls of birds in distress.

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) should at least consult other stakeholders before giving clearance to the shooting of non-pest bird species.

The Nature Society (Singapore) and other organisations are more than ready to help discuss solutions, once the true nature of problems is identified, but we feel there is much that needs to be clarified to the public by the Singapore Gun Club, Changi Airport Group and AVA if the report was accurate.

Alan OwYong
Chairman
Bird Group
Nature Society (Singapore)

Heavy-handed
Straits Times Forum 30 Oct 09;

'First World countries would not even suggest engaging gun club members.''

MISS MICHELLE ELIZABETH YIN: 'The authorities in other First World countries would not even suggest engaging gun club members to shoot their way out of a bird problem as Changi Airport is doing, not only because of pressure from animal activists but also because of the values of their public. We can never match up if we do not give priority to humanitarian rights over practicality in our attitude towards animals. Airports with much worse bird strikes did not take the 'last resort' but instead took the trouble to station a wildlife biologist. I hope the airport's measure was taken not merely to prevent inconvenience, as in the culling of strays by town councils ahead of a VIP function to enhance the estate's clean and neat environment. Just because birds are animals should not be a reason not to invest resources to find the most humane and effective way to solve the problem.'


Read more!

Keeping Singapore clean: 40 years on

Shuli Sudderuddin, Straits Times 1 Nov 09;

Cleaner Nadaison Govindasmy had to clear drains for about 70 homes in Punggol, as part of his work in the 1960s.

Then, households treated drains as rubbish dumps - they were clogged with waste and even animal carcasses.

'People had nowhere to throw their dead animals so there would be bloated bodies of cats and dogs covered with flies. I had to clear them with a spade and rattan basket. It made me nauseous,' said Mr Nadaison, now 56.

Four decades on, he remains in the same job - but dead animals are now unlikely to spoil his day at work.

Mr Nadaison, who covers a 3.5sq km area in Buangkok Road East, now has his work made easier with mechanised road sweepers.

The story of how Singapore became clean and green is told in an exhibition held by the National Environment Agency (NEA), which opened last Friday at HortPark.

The event marks the 40th anniversary of the first Keep Singapore Clean campaign.

Said Mr Tan Wee Hock, director for NEA's 3P Network Division: 'In the 1960s, there was a lack of key infrastructure such as a comprehensive sewage system or good solid- waste management.'

He cited the manual collection of human waste with a bucket in peripheral areas of Singapore.

Things changed for the better when various government agencies took action to revamp the system in 1968.

'We developed our water catchment policy in the 1970s to ensure that water from catchment areas was free of chemicals and pollutants,' said Mr Tan.

The quest to improve sanitation was made even more urgent from the 1970s to 2000, when waste generated rose sixfold due to industrialisation and a growing population.

In the 1980s, the big Singapore River clean-up took place and hawkers by the banks were resettled in purpose-built buildings.

In the 1990s, efforts turned to engaging the community with the introduction of Clean and Green Week.

The exhibition at the HortPark, which ends today, is from 9.30am to 9pm. Admission is free.


Read more!

YOG athletes to get involved in environmental initiatives

Dylan Loh, Channel NewsAsia 31 Oct 09;

SINGAPORE: The Singapore organisers of the inaugural Youth Olympics Games (YOG) in 2010 are planning for the event to be environmentally-friendly.

Members of the public pledged their commitment towards cultivating environmentally-friendly habits, by leaving their footprints on clay to form an art piece.

The art piece will be on display during the 2010 YOG, and is part of a programme to encourage athletes to learn about environmental sustainability.

The organising committee is partnering with HortPark to promote
environmentally-friendly practices among athletes taking part in the Games.

This is part of its Culture and Education Programme, and will see athletes exploring HortPark's gardens to learn more about human impact on the ecosystem.

Dr Amy Khor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Environment and Water Resources, said: "Youths, you know, are the future leaders and in fact, the owners of this world. It is really important to promote greater awareness about such environmental issues and challenges in them from as early as possible, and to get them to adopt green and clean habits and lifestyles so that these become part of their DNA."

- CNA/sc


Read more!

Southeast Asian Nations Conference on Biodiversity 2009

Saving the web of life
Perry Gil S. Mallari, Manila Times 1 Nov 09;

SINGAPORE: The issue of climate change has now hit home. No longer a scientific debate of esoteric terminology, it is now a fact of life that citizens can see and feel. It hurts and it kills. From floodwaters submerging homes to the price of vegetables skyrocketing due to crop damages wrought by changing weather patterns, climate change is manifesting itself as a clear and present danger.

Closely associated with climate change but largely misunderstood by the public is the loss of biodiversity. Climate change affects the degradation of biodiversity. By its simplest definition, biodiversity is the sum total of the variety of life on earth.

Already, generations have grown up not even knowing what they are missing: from the majesty of towering rainforests to the brilliance of coral reefs. The world people live in now is one of trash, smog, congested streets, overcrowded malls and teeming slums. Philippine eagles, tarsiers, dugongs and whale sharks are, for the majority, not personal experiences but rather cable television specials. Yet there is much beauty in this world still worth saving.

At the recent Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) Conference on Biodiversity held at the Republic Polytechnic in Singapore from October 21 to 23, experts from all over the world have come into a unanimous agreement that preservation of biodiversity is crucial if the world is to survive climate change.

The ACB mandate

The event, with the theme “Biodiversity in Focus: 2010 and Beyond,” was hosted by the Asean Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) based in Los Baños, Laguna, and the National Parks Board, Singapore. Some 300 key stakeholders from the Asean region and other parts of the world took part. The chief aim of the conference is to assess how humanity is faring against the 2010 Biodiversity Target of significantly reducing the loss of biological diversity. The year 2010 was declared the International Year of Biodiversity.

Rodrigo Fuentes, executive director of the ACB in his welcome remarks emphasized the crucial importance of the preservation of biodiversity, “Biodiversity loss is beyond losing plants and animals. It’s an issue of human survival with the greatest impact on the poor,” he said. Fuentes pointed out that for over the past 50 years, humans have changed ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than in any comparable period of human history. And while he admits that the changes in ecosystems have contributed to human well-being and economic prosperity, these resulted to the substantial and largely irreversible loss in diversity of life on earth. “The collective wisdom to address the conservation and protection of the natural resources of the Asean region was very well justified in the minds of the 10 Asean Member States.

Although the Asean Member States occupy only 3 percent of the earth’s total surface, its diverse landscape, seascapes and ecosystems are home to over 20 percent of all known plant, animal and marine species,” he explained.
Fuentes also announced that after four years of existence, the ACB is now a full-pledged international organization. In July of this year, the ACB’s Establishment Agreement received the required ratification by six Asean Member States. This was followed by the ratification of the Host Country Agreement between ACB and the Philippines concurred by the Philippine Senate in September.
The ACB wields the mandate to coordinate the efforts of Asean Member States in conserving and managing biodiversity, link the Asean with the international community, nongovernment organizations and the private sector as well as strengthen the capacity of Asean Member States in meeting their obligations and commitments to various multilateral environmental agreements.

Biodiversity and human health

Dr. Aaron Bernstein, faculty member of the Harvard Medical School and its Center for Health and the Global Environment delivered one of the most profound and hard-hitting lectures of the conference defining the connection between human health and biodiversity. Bernstein, along with Nobel Prize winner Eric Chivian, co-authored the widely acclaimed book Sustaining Life: How Human Health Depends on Biodiversity. The book, which was named best biology book of 2008 by Library Journal received accolades from such personalities as Al Gore, Kofi Annan and Gro Brundtland.

Bernstein emphasized that just like nutrition, access to health care and clean water, biodiversity is indispensable to maintaining human health. He cautions that the current rate of extinction of various species in the planet is unseen in 65 million years. Bernstein highlighted various connections between biodiversity and human health among them is the fact that natural products are sources of new drugs (including potent cancer medication). One good example he mentioned was the horseshoe crab. Now rapidly diminishing, the horseshoe crab is a vital source of an ingredient used in determining the presence of contaminants in human vaccines. On the importance of the specie, Bernstein cautioned, “We can’t ill-afford to lose the horseshoe crab.”

But most astonishing is his discourse on the ecology of infectious diseases. Bernstein stated that the threat of emerging infectious diseases (infections that are rapidly increasing in incidence or geographic spread) holds a strong connection with biodiversity loss. He cited that HIV/AIDS is a manifestation of this phenomenon. Bernstein narrated that studies revealed that depletion of fishes due to over-fishing in seas and ocean of Africa resulted to the increased consumption of bush meat (meat from slaughtered apes).

This is most probably the missing link explaining how humans got exposed to simians infected with the deadly virus.

He said that the same could be told of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), avian flu, swine flu and the Nipah virus (a recently emergent deadly paramyxovirus). “Bats are a reservoir for SARS,” Bernstein said, adding, “With deforestation, migratory birds and vampire bats have nowhere to go and therefore are brought in close contact with humans and animals humans domesticate such as pigs.” He also revealed that 75 percent of emerging diseases today are zoonotic or transmitted from animals.

On the urgency of preserving biodiversity, Bernstein has a sublime advice, “Ultimately, we have no choice when it comes to protecting biodiversity. We must protect the natural order if we are to protect ourselves. As our health and the health of the future generation is entirely dependent on it.”

Paradigms from the Philippines

Dr. Rodel Lasco, senior scientist and country program coordinator for the World Agroforestry Centre reported on the unique ecosystem rehabilitation initiatives in the Philippines. Lasco first mentioned the gains of initiatives in Albay province, which is known as an entry point of most tropical cyclones visiting the country. He said that maintaining and restoring the natural infrastructure of the province is a good ecosystem rehabilitation strategy. The rehabilitation initiative encompasses water recharge, clean up of rivers as well as planting of mangrove forests as safety barriers and coastal defense.

Another interesting feature of Lasco’s report is his mentioning of the unique examples of indigenous tribes in the rehabilitation and management of the ecosystem. He revealed that the Ikalahans of Northern Luzon has a food-processing center established since the 1980s. The facility processes products from the wild and has been a regular source of livelihood for the tribe through the years. Lasco also cited the role of policy making in the harvesting of resources, land use classification and the declaration of sanctuary areas in protecting the ecosystem of the location.

The scientist was equally impressed with the muyong, a traditional Ifugao way of tending the forest. A muyong, is a forest holding, which is a source of water for the rice fields. Besides irrigating crops, the muyong prevents soil erosion and is an important source of food, lumber and medicine for the Ifugaos.

The muyong was said to be the secret behind the longevity of the Banawe Rice Terraces.

Finally, Lasco cited Mount Kitanlad in Bukidnon, which is the home of three indigenous tribes namely the Bukidnon, the Higaonon and the Talaandig. He emphasized that Mount Kitanlad is one of the most important biodiversity reserves in the Philippines. Lasco said that the three tribes mentioned are instrumental in maintaining the connectivity of the ecosystems in the area. This was accomplished by enabling indigenous and local communities to look after their own interest regarding access to genetic resources and the integrity of their traditional knowledge systems.

Biodiversity and climate change

The connection between climate change and biodiversity can be summed up simply in the words of Ambassador Holger Standertskjöld, head of the European Commission delegation in Singapore, he said, “Coral reefs and mangroves provide natural shoreline protection from storm and flooding. Marine and terrestrial ecosystems currently absorb half of the anthropogenic carbon-dioxide emissions. This means climate change will accelerate further if biodiversity and ecosystems are not effectively protected.”

Amid the debates and deliberations on climate change and the loss of biodiversity, Dr. Balakkrishna Pisupati of the Division of Environmental Law and Conventions of the United Nations Environment Programme said that it is essential at this point in time to make people understand the relevance of scientific statistics in their lives.

Crucial to saving biodiversity is the creation of appropriate policies and policy makers are influenced by public opinion. Therefore, an informed public is the key to creating right policies. On this matter, Dr. Cielito Habito, a professor of the Ateneo Center for Economic Research and Development commented that the loss of biodiversity persists because of lack of awareness. Professor Zakri Hamid, Tuanku chancellor chair of the University Sains Malaysia, gave the following guiding points in facing the challenges of crafting the right policies, he said, “We have the problem. We have the science. What do we need to do?”

Grace Fu, senior minister of State for National Development and Education of Singapore ended her opening speech in the conference with a sobering anecdote. She narrated that her 12-year-old son asked what would happen to them if global warming destroyed the world. After briefly pondering, she replied that mankind has the creativity and intelligence to act on it. The boy asked another question, which Fu hopes the conference participants and the rest of the world would answer. Her son said, “What if we didn’t act fast enough?”


Read more!

Environmental groups to push for green energy for Sabah

Muguntan Vanar, The Star 31 Oct 09;

KOTA KINABALU: Five environmental groups have united to push for the use of ''green energy for Sabah.

The group of non-governmental organisations dubbing themselves as ''Sabah Unite to Re-power the Future or Green Surf is opposed to the use of dirty energy like proposed coal powered plant planned for the east coast of the state.

The NGOs involved are Land Enpowerment Animals and people (LEAP), Partners of Community Organisations (Pacos Trust), Sabah Environmental Protection Associatio (SEPA), the Malayan Nature Socieity (Sabah branch) and Sabah office of WWF Malaysia.

The Green Surf group, which was launched at Tanjung Aru beach here, said that the coalition aims to present positive solutions to current energy situation in Sabah.

''It is time to promote and provoke a paradigm shift in thinking about the future energy in Sabah, Cynthia Ong, a member of the coalition who is pushing for the government not to allow the controversial coal plant in Tungku, Lahad Datu.

''It is not a question of no coal plant, we want to present to the leadership that there was alternatives in renewable energy.

“We are not against the government, we want to work with them,” she said.

Green Surf is calling on Sabahans to sign a petition to show their support about their concerns over climate change with emphasis on the planned Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd’s coal fired power plant.

Green Surf has set up a web page in Facebook and already has some 1,000 members and are urging more to visit www.nocoalsabah.blogspot.com to sign the online petition against the coal plant.

The group claimed that a coal plant was not in line with Sabah shoreline management and Sabah development Corridor to make it one of Asia’s most liveable places by 2025.

Green Surf also welcomed Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razaks 2010 budget that plans to set up green pioneer townships and they hoped that Sabah as a regional leader in conservation would be considered for the townships.


Read more!

Indonesia's largest coconut production center on brink of collapse

Rizal Harahap, The Jakarta Post 31 Oct 09;

Coconut production in Indragiri Hilir regency, Riau, the country's biggest production center for the commodity, is on the brink of collapse as hundreds of hectares of plantation are being destroyed by either pests or erosion.

The Indragiri Hilir Horticulture Agency horticulture product processing and marketing division chief, Abdul Rosyid, said of the total 450 hectares of coconut plantations in the regency, up to 337.5 hectares were no longer productive.

"Unless we replant soon, coconut plantations in the regency will be history," he said Thursday, calling for an intervention from the central government to save the regency's status as the country's largest coconut production center.

Rosyid said the palm trees were destroyed by erosion caused by the nearby coast and insects such as beetles.

Coconut and its derivative products, including copra and coconut powder, according to Rosyid, have long been a commodity in the regency with strong demand.

Many coconut-based products have been exported to Germany and Malaysia.

Most of the plantations, Rosyid added, were local varieties.

He said there was only one company that managed a 100-hectare coconut plantation of hybrid variety.

He also said the damage caused by insects had threatened the livelihood of about 650 families, as the plantation damage had decreased the value of copra for the past month.

Copra products with an oil content of 75 percent, he said, were only worth Rp 1.4 million per ton. Previously they were worth Rp 2.5 million per ton.

"We fear people will be reluctant to maintain their coconut plantations."

He added the regional administration had tried to reduce the damage and save the remaining plantations. It also built wave breakers by the coast.

"But the problem continues as most farmers lack the finances needed to replant their fields," Rosyid said.

He said the local administration had asked the banking sector to help fund the replanting effort, but it refused because it did not consider coconut a profitable commodity.

"The Indragiri Hilir administration is expecting the central government to do something about the problem and to include coconut in the national horticulture revitalization program, which includes palm oil, cacao and rubber," Rosyid said.

He added each region had its own horticulture facilities but Indragiri Hilir needed a coconut revitalization program to revive the damaged plantations.

"The central government will hopefully turn its attention to coconut farmers in Indragiri Hilir," he said.

Riau provincial horticulture agency chief M Yafiz said the proposal to include coconut in the national agriculture revitalization program had been submitted to the central government but no approval had been granted yet.

"We hope the central government will give us a 'thumbs up'," Yafiz said.

"Having a coconut revitalization program will ensure the banking sector provides loans to farmers.

"The government can then subsidize the commodity," he added.


Read more!

Australian oil spill 'putting animals at risk'

Amy Coopes Yahoo News 31 Oct 09;

SYDNEY (AFP) – A massive oil leak off Australia's northwest coast poses an "immediate risk" to dozens of marine species, with untold numbers possibly dying and sinking to the Timor Sea floor, a report has said.

Biologist James Watson was commissioned to carry out a government survey of the West Atlas drilling rig, where at least 400 barrels of oil have gushed daily into the ocean since August 21.

He found about 20 dead seabirds and a dead sea snake among 23 species, and said the oil appeared to be drawing certain species into the toxic area, where they were at grave risk.

"The presence of dying birds and dead sea snakes suggest that there is an immediate risk to species utilising the water that has been affected by the oil slick," Watson wrote in his report, which was released late Friday.

"It is possible that species that are dying or dead and lying in oil-affected water may not stay afloat for long periods of time, making it unlikely that we would find large numbers of dead animals," he added.

There was a "significant risk" that a change in conditions could push the oil into deeper waters further west and north, where large numbers of endangered cetaceans lived, he added.

"Moreover, as the breeding seasons ends... more juvenile birds will be feeding throughout the region. As such, we believe that over the upcoming months the oil slick -- if uncontained -- may have an increasing impact on these species," he said.

Watson said the spill appeared to have changed the feeding and breeding behaviour of some animals, and long-term studies were needed to determine how severe the impact was.

"I am amazed at how little Australia cares about this," he told the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper.

"This is a huge oil slick."

The rig's Thai-based operator PTTEP Australasia failed in a fourth attempt to plug the leak, now entering its 10th week, and said it could be months before the operation was successful.

More than 2,000 barrels of oil have been recovered from the ocean surface in clean up efforts to date.

Environment Minister Peter Garrett said he remained very concerned about the long-term impact and was "certainly very anxious to see this spill stopped quickly and safely."

"While acknowledging the difficulty of the task at hand, I share the frustrations that efforts to get this spill stopped have so far not been successful," he said.

"However, I am determined that the environmental impacts of this spill are properly assessed and the long term monitoring plan I have commissioned will help ensure that happens."

The World Wide Fund for Nature warned that wildlife was dying and "hundreds if not thousands of dolphins, seabirds and sea-snakes are being exposed to toxic oil" after surveying the spill area, 250 kilometres (155 miles) offshore.

PTTEP Australasia has agreed to pay for environmental monitoring of the area for at least two years.


Read more!

For the tiger, a year closer to extinction

Deepesh Shrestha Yahoo News 31 Oct 09;

KATHMANDU (AFP) – Next year, according to the Chinese calendar, is the Year of the Tiger but conservationists say the omens are inauspicious for an animal on the brink of extinction.

If anything, the tiger's year in the Chinese zodiac may hasten its demise, conservationists fear, with festive demand for its skin and body parts encouraging poachers to hunt the few animals that still remain in the wild.

"The Year of the Tiger will put more pressure on wild tigers," Michael Baltzer, head of the WWF Tiger Initiative, told AFP during a tiger conservation conference held in Kathmandu which wound up on Friday.

"The use of tiger parts in traditional Chinese medicine has fallen, but the trend of giving tiger parts as gifts and souvenirs is growing," Baltzer said, adding that he expected this demand to increase next year.

"There is a certain consumer group who want to use tiger parts to show how wealthy they are, as a status symbol, and this group of people is increasing."

Experts from the lobby group Save the Tiger Fund estimate that only 3,200 tigers survive in the wild, down from 100,000 a century ago, mainly due to poaching and loss of habitat in south and southeast Asia.

Although tiger hunting is illegal worldwide and the international trade in tiger parts is banned under a treaty binding 167 countries -- including China -- experts say the illicit trade is still flourishing.

Despite officially banning the trade in tiger body parts in 1993, China has 6,000 tigers on 14 farms across the country, said Li Zhang, programme director of Conservation International in Beijing.

These farms are able to produce around 1,000 cubs annually.

China has been pushing for an agreement to resume trade in tiger products and delegates at Kathmandu conference say its officials raised the issue at the conference.

Chinese officials at the conference, which was organised by the Global Tiger Initiative, an alliance of governments, NGOs and the private sector, declined to comment to the media.

Tiger skins, which fetch high prices in China and elsewhere in Asia, are used for furniture and decoration, while body parts are used in traditional medicine and aphrodisiacs. In China, the animal is also a symbol of power, energy and bravery, as well as good luck.

Huang Lixin, president of the American College of Traditional Chinese Medicine in San Francisco, told AFP in Kathmandu that the threat to tigers posed by the Year of the Tiger, which will start on February 14, was real.

"Owning tiger skins in China is becoming a status symbol, a luxury item," she said. "Chinese consumers will want tiger bones or tiger wine and liquor, or tiger skins, to celebrate the year."

At last week's conference, which drew more than 200 delegates from 20 countries, delegates said Chinese officials had argued that tiger farming could reduce pressure on the wild population, which in China is a mere 50 animals.

The idea is that body parts from captive tigers would satisfy domestic demand and reduce the market for poachers who hunt wild tigers.

But conservationists opposed to this say it would send the wrong signal by suggesting that the use of tiger parts is acceptable.

"The tiger farms in China pose a grave danger to the last remaining wild tigers. Every day there are more tigers on the farms and fewer in the wild," Judy Mills, coordinator of the International Tiger Coalition, told AFP.

"Their mere existence encourages demand for tiger parts. It is causing poachers and traders to stockpile skins and bones of wild tigers," she said.

"If China ever decides to lift the ban, it will stimulate market demand and the world will lose all the tigers in the wild," said Mahendra Shrestha, programme director of Save the Tiger Fund.

"If you commercialise tigers, it will create bigger demand. That's the end of wild tigers because we simply don't have the resources to protect them," said John Seidensticker, a scientist from the Smithsonian Institution's National Zoological Park.

"China holds the key to tiger conservation. If China cracks down on illegal trade, they will save wild tigers and we know they have the capacity to do that."


Read more!

A community tourism venture in the Sunderbans

A balancing act
Leong Siok Hui, The Star 31 Oct 09;

Home to the rare Bengal tigers, India’s Sunderbans unveils a community tourism venture that protects the endangered man-eaters whilst giving locals an alternative livelihood.

Singing in Bengali, the young boy’s voice pierced the balmy evening air, accompanied by the soothing rhythms of the harmonium and tabla. His singing was so heartrending, I got goose-pimples.

This performance tells the story of Bonobibi, the goddess of the forest, who protects the honey and wood gatherers from the ferocious half-tiger demon Dokkhin Rai. But the “law of the forest” stipulates that you have to go into the forest empty-handed and with a pure heart, and not take out too much.

It’s a classic tale about the tenuous co-existence between the settlers and man-eaters set on a grand stage — the Sunderbans in India’s West Bengal region.

Tourism and conservation

Wild Asia’s Dr Reza Azmi, videographer Emran Taib and I enjoyed this performance at the Sunderbans Jungle Camp (SJC) during a four-day stay. SJC, a community tourism project on Sunderbans’ Bali Island, is one of the winners of Wild Asia’s Responsible Tourism Awards 2009.

The SJC provides room-and-board plus river cruise packages for tourists visiting the Sunderbans National Park.

Opened in 2003, the SJC is a collaboration between local NGO Bali Nature & Wildlife Conservation Society (BNWCS) and Siliguri-based outdoor operator Help Tourism. Help Tourism funds the project and trains the guides and staff. BNWCS helps co-manage the lodge and community programmes.

Locals cook and maintain the 10 cottages while local boatmen take guests on daily cruises. Tourism income also supports social and community projects like free kindergarten, college scholarships, free healthcare and mangrove replanting projects.

The mighty rivers of Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna flow into the Bay of Bengal to form the largest delta in the world and carve out this vast archipelago of islands called the Sunderbans. Straddling the India-Bangladesh border, the Sunderbans is a Unesco World Heritage Site. Forty percent of the Sunderbans sits in India while the rest is in Bangladesh.

Cloaked by impassably dense mangrove forests, the uninhabited islands make up the largest mangrove forest in the world. Locals believe the name “Sunderbans” (or Sundarbans) is derived from the mangrove species, Sundari (Heriteria minor).

The big cats

Taking up about one third of the Sunderbans (2,585 sq km), 10 times the size of Kuala Lumpur, is the Tiger Reserve, home to the largest population of Royal Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in India. The last census estimated about 270 tigers are still found in the Indian Sunderbans. To date, the tiger population in India’s 27 tiger reserves stands at about 1,411, making it home to the world’s largest tiger population in the wild (National Tiger Conservation Authority).

The Sunderbans’ big cats are adept swimmers and live on Chital deer, wild boar, rhesus macaque, fish and crabs.

But their penchant for pouncing on local fishermen and honey gatherers or straying into villages results in an uneasy relationship between man and cats.

People began settling in the Sunderbans in the early 1900s and after the Partition of India in 1947. Today, about 4.5 million inhabit 54 islands on the fringes of the tiger reserve and national park.

Bali Island is a lovely quilt of emerald-green padi fields dotted with thatched mud houses. Four-metre high, man-made mud dykes border the island and hold back the tide. There’s no electricity, piped water or paved roads.

The bucolic setting belies the precarious existence of the people’s lives.

“Before tourism, your choices were either farming, fishing or hunting,” says Bali-born Anil Krisha Mistry, a poacher-turned-conservationist and the founder of BNWCS.

“Farmers rely on rainwater and the sturdy embankment to protect their crops. Honey gatherers and hunters are exposed to tigers, cobras and crocodiles when they forage in the forest,” explains Mistry, 41.

The islanders are also subjected to nature’s wrath a few times a year when cyclones pummel the Sunderbans and inundate the islands with seawater.

In the worst disaster in recent memory, Cyclone Aila pounded the delta last May. Millions of people were made homeless, thousands of cattle drowned and farms were flooded. In some of the remote islands, medical and food relief didn’t arrive until days later.

Yet, the people’s resilience was amazing. They picked up the pieces and rebuilt their lives.

The Camp experience

On our visit, four months after the cyclone, Bali Island looked as good as new. The wide smiles were a heart-warming sign.

The camp is smack in the middle of the village and it’s hard to discern where the lodge starts and ends. Mud-finished cottages look out onto a landscaped garden where butterflies hover above red and pink blooms and birds flit from tree to tree.

A “public” pathway passes the dining hall, an open-air thatched wooden hut, making it perfect for people watching. In the mornings, kids on their way to school shuffle past. Local women in their Technicolour sari with empty water on their waists, sashay to the lodge’s tube well. The tube wells scattered around the village are the main source of water.

Powered by a generator and solar panels, the lodge’s electricity supply is restricted to a few hours a day. Fans keep the room cool and guests can request for a bucket of hot water for a bath. Biodegradable, Ayurvedic soaps and lightweight, traditional homespun cotton towels are supplied to guests. Locals believe the quick-dry towels are good for blood circulation.

Drinking water comes from a large jar to minimise usage of plastic bottles. Waste is segregated, reused or recycled, and organic wastes are turned into compost. A ladies’ self-help group provides laundry service for a small fee.

One of the highlights of our stay was the delectable home-cooked Bengali dishes served by local cook, Prankrishna Mandal.

Using the region’s specialities — fish, crab and prawns — Mandal whipped up tasty crab curries, fried fish marinated in a blend of turmeric, onion and ginger paste, and scrumptious dhal, capati and stir-fries. Other than coffee, tea and condensed milk, most of the food is sourced locally.

The locally farmed organic rice is delicious. An initiative by Help Tourism, the rice is produced, harvested and packaged by self-help groups and farmers. It is priced higher than the regular rice, and the premium goes back to a community development fund. The organic practice also helps reduce chemical pollution and improve the environment.

Grey skies and downpours accompanied us throughout our stay.

But on our third day, the sun peeked out and we set out for a half-day river cruise. As we glided along the lush mangrove forest, we spotted chital deer, a crocodile sunbathing on the mud bank and a monitor lizard scurrying away.

About 230-odd bird species have been sighted in the Sunderbans. We were lucky to spot the Brown-winged, Collared and Common Kingfisher, Black-headed tern and Lesser adjutant among others.

We looked hard and long, hoping to glimpse the orange and brown-striped creature lurking behind the dense mangrove.

But alas, the mighty Bengal tigers eluded us.

On our final evening, the local cultural troupe enthralled us with their interpretation of Bonobibi’s legend.

Locals still pray to Bonobibi before they venture into the wild. But the traditional theatre is no longer performed in public, except during the annual Bonobibi puja (ritual). Help Tourism encouraged the villagers to revive the tradition by funding the costumes and musical instruments.

It was a fitting end to our stay in the intriguing Sunderbans. Perhaps, we’ll have better luck with the big cats next time.


Read more!

What lies beneath the rainforest

The Independent 31 Oct 09;

You want the Amazon to survive? Then pay us not to pump the oil, says Ecuador. Huw Hennessy in Quito reports on a bold initiative

The tropical rainforest in the eastern lowlands of Ecuador assaults the senses: the sunlight dazzles the eyes, the heat is so fierce that within seconds one's clothes are soaked in sweat. Then there are the sounds: a hypnotic symphony of frogs, crickets and other insects and birds which continues unabated day and night. There are sudden glimpses of the jungle's abundant wildlife: a spectacular flash of a blue morpho butterfly at the river's edge, a flock of green parakeets screeching.

This stunning region, which covers more than a third of Ecuador's area, almost the size of England, and which is one of the world's richest biospheres, with a huge diversity of animals and plants, some found nowhere else on Earth, faces a double threat: from the logging industry, which would strip it bare, and from the oil industry, which for nearly 40 years has been exploiting the huge resources of crude beneath the soil. Now, however, Ecuador is betting it can keep what is left of the oil in the ground and hang onto its biosphere into the bargain.

The South American country has learned the hard way that oil brings human misery and environmental devastation along with billions in export earnings. Every new oil field is an invasion that brings tens of thousands of outsiders into the forest's heart, polluting the air, soil and water, destroying wildlife, and assaulting the support systems of indigenous tribes, which can lead to their extermination. And the damage is not confined to the immediate vicinity of the wells.

The Via Auca is the main highway cutting through the Ecuadorean Amazonia region, and it has been a lifeline of the oil industry for nearly 40 years, slicing through the countryside like a badly healed wound, the roadside lined with hellish flares, murky waste pits and corroded pipelines. Accidents involving the pipelines are frequent, and their consequences harrowing. On the far side of the town of Dayuma, which sprang up as an oil workers' shantytown and is still riddled with crime and prostitution, one of the ageing pipelines has ruptured, sending a jet of oil shooting 30 metres into the air, staining the vegetation black all around.

The sickly stench of crude oil is overwhelming in the midday tropical heat. A house and a field across the road have also been soaked by the filthy gusher. Sebastian Ortiz, whose elderly father owns the simple wooden house by the roadside on the edge of the jungle, points out where the oil has drenched the field and seeped into the ground. Petrobel, one of many oil companies now operating in the region, has said it will pay his father US$5,000 (£3,000) towards the clean-up costs. But Ortiz says: "I don't know when he will be paid, or even if it is still safe for him to carry on living here."

Pollution is only one of the many ills that the oil business brings with it. Fernando Moreno, an anthropologist with the Ministry of the Environment, has been monitoring the oil industry's effect on the local community for years. "The people have become beggars" he says. "They have become accustomed to demanding whatever they need and more from the oil companies, just because they are in the same territory. Weighing up the benefits and drawbacks of the oil companies, I think it would be better not to have them. They lead to many bad habits, they make people avaricious, they increase the differences between people – and they are a source of contamination: for the land, the water and the people themselves."

For the last 16 years Ecuador has been embroiled in a bitter battle over a huge $27.3 billion environmental damages claim brought against US oil giant Chevron by 30,000 Amazonian inhabitants. The plaintiffs accuse Texaco (which Chevron acquired in 1993) of dumping more than 18 billion gallons of toxic waste into the rainforest between 1964 and 1990, and claim that 1,400 deaths occurred in the region as a result of the contaminated soil and water, which brought unaccountably high levels of cancer, skin and breathing conditions. The Amazon Defence Coalition, which represents the plaintiffs, says the scale of the pollution makes it the biggest environmental disaster in the world, dwarfing the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill and leading some experts to dub it "South America's Chernobyl". It is certainly shaping up to become the world's biggest environmental lawsuit.

Chevron robustly refutes the allegations. It says Texaco spent US$40 million on a clean-up before it handed over operations to the state oil company in 1992. Ecuador's government then signed a release freeing Chevron from any liability for subsequent damages from potential oil contamination.

Whatever the outcome of the legal battle Ecuador is now banking on a new idea to help it shed its poisonous dependency on oil. The Yasuni-ITT Initiative aims to keep the region's remaining oil reserves untapped and underground, in return for financial compensation from the international community and carbon offsets from the carbon markets.

The crux of the scheme is simple: to keep the oil beneath the Yasuni National Park where it is, in perpetuity. Covering nearly 2.5 million acres of primary tropical rainforest, Yasuni is the ancestral territory of the Waorani people and two other tribes, the Tagaeri and the Taromenane. It was named a Unesco biosphere reserve in 1989, and scientists regard it one of the most biodiverse places on earth.

It is also the home of Ecuador's largest oil reserve. But by not extracting the estimated 846 million barrels of oil in the reserve, Ecuador will keep an estimated 410 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere, making a big contribution to the fight against global warming.

It will also pledge to respect the territories of the indigenous cultures living in the national park, as well as protecting its flora and fauna. In return, the Ecuadorean Government has asked for compensation of $350 million a year for 10 years, which would be invested in environmental and social development programmes, helping the country move towards a sustainable economy.

After a slow start the plan has begun to attract serious promises of commitment. Amazon Watch, an organisation dedicated to protecting the rainforest and its indigenous inhabitants, calls it "a landmark proposal ... a precedent-setting effort by an oil-exporting nation to preserve a global biodiversity hotspot, protect indigenous rights and set the stage for its own economic and energetic shift away from fossil fuels".

Some big international players agree: Germany has offered $50 million on condition that other nations stump up similar sums. Ecuador's President Rafael Correa, and Yolanda Kakabadse, a senior member of the Yasuni commission, have been in London and continental European capitals this week spreading the word. And in December Ecuador's former chancellor Francisco Carrión, the Government's envoy on the initiative, will present it at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.

Among Ecuadoreans themselves, the initiative is welcomed particularly by the flourishing tourist industry. With a spectacular range of natural attractions, from the Galapagos Islands to the snow-peaked Andes, Ecuador has long been a pioneer in ecotourism.

Fander Falconi the foreign minister and one of the founders of the initiative, says the scheme will work on the basis of shared responsibility, locally and globally. "What we are aiming for is global sustainability, but with a distinction drawn between those who harm the environment and those who suffer the consequences of this harm."

Luz Coloma, Yasuni-ITT's press officer, added, "Ecuador has had sad experiences with the exploitation of oil and no one wants any more environmental disasters like the Chevron-Texaco case."

On the banks of the Shiripuno river, to the west of the Yasuni National Park, is the Huaorani Ecolodge run and owned by formerly nomadic hunters who only came into contact with the outside world 50 years ago. Omene Paa, a tour guide at the lodge, tells how oil has been a curse for his people from the time "the path-cutters" first arrived. The "petrolera" companies brought disease and contaminated the water, he claims. One of his cousins died of a lung infection. Now Omene says his people, who first fought off the US oilmen with axes, just want to be allowed to live in peace. "Our battle should continue; we the Huaorani must look after our territory."


Read more!

'I hate whale meat,' Japan's PM confides: report

Yahoo News 31 Oct 09;

TOKYO (AFP) – Japan's Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has revealed he dislikes whale meat, a newspaper reported Saturday, in an unusual confession for the prime minister of a country that defies Western criticism of whaling.

"I hate whale meat," Hatoyama said during a meeting with his visiting Dutch counterpart Jan Peter Balkenende on Monday at the prime minister's office, the Sankei Shimbun reported.

The Netherlands is one of several anti-whaling countries that allows the radical environmental group Sea Shepherd Conservation Society to register a vessel in the country.

The group's activists have repeatedly harassed Japanese whaling vessels in Antarctic waters. During the last hunt a Sea Shepherd vessel collided with a whaling ship, sparking allegations that the group was behaving irresponsibly.

Despite Hatoyama's reported dislike of whale meat, however, he urged Balkenende to take action against the group over its attacks on Japanese whalers in the Antarctic, government officials said.

Japan hunts whales by using a loophole in the 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling that allows "lethal research" on the creatures, but makes no secret of the fact that the meat often ends up on dining tables.

Tokyo often accuses Western critics of insensitivity toward its culture and heritage.

Hatoyama's centre-left government, which took office in October, has deviated little from the pro-whaling policies adopted by the previous administration, which had traditionally close ties with farmers and fishermen.


Read more!

Wildlife crime: Britain's killing fields

They call us a nation of animal lovers, yet attacks on creatures in their natural habitats have more than doubled in a year

Jonathan Owen, The Independent 1 Nov 09;

Crimes against wildlife, including badger baiting with dogs, hare coursing, poisoning of protected birds and even trapping them to sell as caged pets have soared to unprecedented heights. New figures from the police show that the number of wildlife crimes more than doubled in the last year, from 2,177 to 5,854.

Incidents are now being recorded at a rate of 120 a week. They cover not only the slaughtering of badgers and rare birds of prey, but also egg thefts, bird trapping, deer poaching and habitat destruction. Rural areas are where most incidents occur, with Northumbria a conspicuous target for wildlife criminals. More than 500 incidents have been recorded there, with Grampian (244), Humberside (195), and North Wales (188) also wildlife crime hotspots.

What make the statistics even more remarkable is that they do not include crimes against domestic and farm animals. In 2008, the RSPCA investigated 140,000 cases of animal cruelty in England and Wales, a steep rise from the 2003 figure of 105,000. The charity has seen dog fighting rise tenfold since 2004, with nearly 300 incidents last year. Airgun attacks on animals and rustling of sheep and cattle also appear to be on the rise.

One of the sharpest rises has been in what police call "badger persecution", a term that includes badgers being dug out of their setts, pitted against terrier dogs in fights, and being shot by farmers, landowners or their agents. Between February and July this year, the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU) recorded 241 incidents of badger persecution – a total that in just six months almost exceeded the 280 reported incidents in 2008.

Criminals are travelling hundreds of miles to baiting "events", according to Ian Hutchison, a species protection officer for Scottish Badgers. "Badger baiting is taking place throughout the country. It used to be an urban myth that badger baiters would travel all over the countryside. Well, it's not an urban myth any more – they are travelling far and wide to commit offences," he said.

People are betting on the outcomes of fights, he added, and live badgers can fetch a high price. "We have been told that in the Liverpool area, a live badger is worth £1,000 so that it can be fought with a dog."

Mike Butcher, chief inspector of the RSPCA special operations unit, said: "Digging badgers out is very common, and there is a rise in the calls about badgers that we are getting."

Police now plan a major crackdown, Operation Meles, against the resurgence in badger persecution that they say is being driven, in part, by the perceived threat to livestock from bovine tuberculosis. Another police project, Operation Galileo, against hare coursing, was launched by police in Lincolnshire last month. Between September 2008 and March 2009 there were more than 900 reports of hare coursing to the local force.

The rural crimewave is threatening the very survival of some species. Crimes against bats have increased by 10 per cent a year since 2007, and the loss of one roost can be a severe blow to populations that are already vulnerable, according to the Bat Conservation Trust. Last year, the RSPB received 1,206 reports of shooting, poisoning, trapping and disturbance of birds and their eggs – the second highest they have ever recorded.

The theft of wild flowers is also taking its toll on Britain's biodiversity. In May this year, Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust had to issue a warning to visitors to its nature reserve near Sapperton after a spate of bluebell thefts.

Detective Inspector Brian Stuart, head of the NWCU, said: "There is an increase in wildlife crime in general. We are seeking to use wider policing powers, such as the Proceeds of Crime Act, to target criminals where it hurts them most – in their pocket."

Dr Mark Avery, the RSPB's conservation director, said: "There is far too much wildlife crime going on in the countryside. The scale of it is unacceptable in the modern age."

He added: "The hen harrier is pretty close to being extinct in England, in large part down to wildlife crime."

But conservationists, including the RSPB and the Wildlife Trusts, are calling for a radical shake-up of wildlife policing, and claim that an inconsistent response to crime by police means criminals are able to break the law with little fear of being caught. The NWCU has seen its staff slashed from 14 to nine since it was set up three years ago, and there were just 51 convictions in 2008-09 – accounting for just 3 per cent of the cases dealt with.

Huw Irranca-Davies, a Defra minister, said that a government review into the way wildlife crime is being tackled is currently under way and will report in spring 2010.

A breakdown of the latest figures from the NWCU shows that Northumbria is Britain's wildlife crime capital, with 525 incidents, including the highest number of shootings of wildlife, according to the statistics from the latest tactical assessment for the period between February and July 2009. Humberside came top for poaching – with 119 incidents – and the Grampian region had the highest number of reports of wildlife being trapped or snared, as well as being a centre, along with Tayside and Lancashire, for crimes against birds of prey.

North Wales had the most cases of badger persecution and habitat destruction. In terms of bats being killed or their roosts destroyed, Gwent had the highest number of incidents. Hare coursing was greatest in Lincolnshire, and fox-hunting incidents were most commonly reported in Devon and Cornwall. The greatest concentration of birds' nests being destroyed was in Northern Ireland.


Read more!

Debate Flares on Limits of Nature and Commerce in U.S. Parks

Leslie Kaufman, New York Times 31 Oct 09;

POINT REYES STATION, Calif. — It seems a perfect marriage of nature and commerce. As boats ferry oysters to the shore, pelicans swoop by and seals pop their heads out of the water.

But this spot on the Point Reyes National Seashore has become a flashpoint for a bitter debate over the limits of wilderness and commercial interest within America’s national parks.

The National Park Service has said it cannot renew the permit to farm oysters in a tidal estuary here, which lapses in 2012, because federal law requires it to return the area to wilderness by eliminating intrusive commercial activity.

Kevin Lunny, the owner of the Drakes Bay Oyster Company, says he feels persecuted by the National Park Service and has sought legislation that could allow him to continue operating.

He argues that the 70-year-old oyster farm, which predates the park, is part of the historical working landscape of the area — and every bit as in need of protection as the harbor seals and eelgrass that share the bay.

Mr. Lunny and his allies also accuse the park service’s regional office of issuing faulty scientific reports exaggerating the threat that the oyster farm poses to baby seals and flora in the estuary — accusations given credence last spring by the National Academy of Sciences.

The battle has split the local towns into passionately opposed camps: The Point Reyes Light, a local newspaper, has been critical of the park service, as have many sympathetic ranchers. But other residents and environmental groups cast Mr. Lunny as a savvy businessman manipulating public opinion to win favored status at the expense of the estuary.

The furor over the oyster lease has also drawn in partisans across the country because it plays into an old debate: Are the national parks primarily for preserving untouched wilderness, or for preserving the historic human imprint on the land, too?

Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, has thrown her support behind the oyster farm. A provision she attached to the fiscal year 2010 appropriations bill for the Interior Department, passed by Congress recently, would give Interior Secretary Ken Salazar the option to extend the oyster farm’s lease for 10 more years.

Some environmental groups worry that the provision could set a precedent for hundreds of other private leaseholders in the national parks looking to extend their stay. For example, some owners of fishing cabins and other vacation properties in the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in Wisconsin want to stay on in perpetuity for similar historical reasons. And federal legislation has been introduced several times to allow the private herds of a hunting club in the Channel Islands National Park in Southern California to remain on the land.

Ms. Feinstein included language in the provision saying that it should not be seen as a precedent, but the environmentalists say those words could prove meaningless.

“This exception is not just about the slippery slope,” said Jerry Meral, vice chairman of the Environmental Action Committee of West Marin, which has helped organize opposition to the lease extension. “It’s the beginning of the end of wilderness.”

Foes of the provision also include the Sierra Club, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Point Reyes National Seashore Association here.

By siding with the oyster farm, Ms. Feinstein has symbolically crossed swords with the Obama administration: Jon Jarvis, President Obama’s new director of the National Park Service, supported ending Mr. Lunny’s lease when he oversaw Point Reyes as a regional parks official.

Many people concerned with protecting the commercial tradition in parks see Mr. Jarvis’s desire to end the lease as evidence that he will usher in an era of antagonism.

“Half the parks have farms or working orchards,” said Gary Paul Nabhan, who served on the National Park System Advisory Board in the early 1990s. “This isn’t a side issue — it is fully as important as wilderness.”

Mr. Jarvis declined to be interviewed about Drakes Bay. Aides at the park service said he saw no benefit in discussing the issue with reporters.

The Drakes Bay farm is a collection of low-lying shacks, residential trailers and piles of shucked oyster shells. Like many of the cattle ranches that surround it within the park, it predated by many decades the creation of the Point Reyes National Seashore in 1962.

In a common arrangement, the federal government bought the land from the owners, who kept the right for occupancy and use until 2012. Unlike the parkland, however, the tidal bay was designated “potential wilderness” — the highest level of protection in a national park — by Congress in 1976. The Interior Department’s solicitor general has interpreted Congress’s action to mean that the park service must get rid of any commercial operations that extract wildlife as soon as it can.

Mr. Lunny, a rancher whose cattle land is in the park just up the hill from the oyster farm, bought the farm’s lease in 2005, although at the time the park service warned him that it intended not to renew.

He contends that the original lease included a clause that allows him to renew and has hired a lobbyist to promote his view in Washington. The park service says that the clause has been superseded by the wilderness legislation. Mr. Lunny also says that he produces roughly 40 percent of the oysters grown in California. Without him, he adds, oysters would be imported from overseas, costing consumers more and taxing the environment through fuel emissions. And he says he is providing environmental services like cleaning the bay of debris and replenishing the native oyster population that filtered the bay before it was overfished by native Indians.

The park service counters that there is no evidence native oysters were ever there in large numbers.

The fight might have been cast as a simple matter of abiding by a wilderness designation, but after the park service worried that Mr. Lunny was beginning to lobby to extend his lease, they moved to counter him.

Managers at Point Reyes produced their own documents saying that the oyster operation’s motorboats were thrashing the eelgrass. The oyster operations, the documents said, were spooking the mother seals off the sandbars and disrupting the birthing season, reducing the number of seals at one site by 80 percent in two years.

The findings were furiously contested by Mr. Lunny, and Ms. Feinstein asked the National Academy of Sciences to review the documents and produce its own report. Issued in May, it found insufficient data to determine whether the seals or other wildlife were being significantly harmed. And it criticized the park service’s reports, saying they had “exaggerated the negative and overlooked potentially beneficial effects of the oyster culture operation.”

Corey Goodman, an academy biologist who studied the science separately for the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a letter to Secretary Salazar that “Jon Jarvis participated by steadfastly defending the use of distorted science by his subordinate.”

But Mr. Jarvis, while acknowledging some problems with the science, vigorously stood up for his staff members.

Tom Strickland, the assistant secretary of Fish and Wildlife and Parks, emphasized that Mr. Jarvis was simply seeking to abide by the law. He said that if Ms. Feinstein’s provision became law, Mr. Salazar would review the issue again.

But many residents of Point Reyes say this will just bring a new round of conflict.

“Rather than heal a rift, this legislation arms everyone with howitzers,” said Mark Bartolini, executive director of the Point Reyes National Seashore Association. “It is a lose-lose decision, and this is a fight that can go one for years.”


Read more!