Best of our wild blogs: 7 May 09


Wildfacts updates: Rare snails!
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Tekukor Coastline
on the God's wonderful creation blog

Monkey See, Monkey Do
on the My Itchy Fingers blog

“The most dangerous species in the Mediterranean”
on the News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore blog

Who's paying for this bill?
on the annotated budak blog and Ephemeral slugs

Scaly-breasted Munia taking a leaf bath
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

The Raffles Museum of Biodiversity and Research
on the My Itchy Fingers blog

The Story of Stuff & Missoula: Update
on the Story of Stuff blog


Read more!

No more fireflies in six months?

Christina Tan, The Star 7 May 09;

SHAH ALAM: The entire firefly population in Kampung Kuantan and Kampung Bukit Belimbing in Kuala Selangor is facing wipe-out in six months.

“All the fireflies there will be gone for good by the end of this year if no measures are taken to protect them,” said Selangor Tourism, Consumer Affairs and Environment Committee chairman Elizabeth Wong.

The Selangor Government had issued a stop-work order for all activities in firefly sanctuaries along Sungai Selangor yesterday, she said.

She said the decline of the firefly colonies in the two popular tourist spots was at a very serious stage, with half of them already disappeared.

“We have identified seven critical areas in the two villages where the firefly colonies in four spots are already gone,” she said after the weekly exco meeting here yesterday.

Last month, The Star reported that the days of firefly watching would be over because of land clearing which has damaged the habitat.

Wong said that massive cutting of trees and improper development along the river were the main reasons the fireflies were dying.

Furthermore, some areas along the river bank had been turned into oil palm plantations, she said, adding that there were also factories and restaurants operating too close to the river.

“A total of 38ha of land along the river has also been cleared,” she added.

Wong said the fireflies, whose lifespan is only three months, could not survive in such an environment where there was only polluted water.

She also said that there was no river reserve along the river and part of the land had been sold to individuals.

The state government, she said, would gazette the land along the 20km river into a buffer zone.

It had also identified 52 landowners along the river and would take over the land from them as soon as possible, she said.

Wong said that the state government would also start to replant trees such as sagu, berembang, nipah and rembau immediately to rebuild the habitat of the fireflies at the critical areas.

The state government was establishing a fund to get the private and public sectors involved in preserving the firefly sanctuaries.

Fears of 'lights out' for fireflies in Malaysia
M. Jegathesan Yahoo News 7 May 09;

KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) – A dazzling firefly population that is one of Malaysia's top tourist attractions faces destruction within months because of large-scale land clearing, a lawmaker warned Thursday.

"If we do not do anything, the lights will go out for the fireflies by the end of the year," said Elizabeth Wong, who heads tourism and environmental affairs in the state of Selangor, which surrounds Malaysia's capital.

Wong said environmental groups had alerted the state government to the "impending destruction" of the riverside firefly colony, which lies about 90 minutes' drive from Kuala Lumpur.

Tourists flock to the area to watch the fireflies, which cluster in riverside trees and produce a magical light display as males and females communicate.

Tour operators say the number of insects has fallen sharply because of development in the area.

Wong said that despite the region's being declared a firefly sanctuary, almost 95 acres (38 hectares) of land along the Selangor river had been cleared of the trees in which fireflies live.

"Four out of the seven critical spots which the fireflies depend on has been cleared bare of vegetation. This is the place where they get their food and lay their eggs to sustain their three-month life cycle," she told AFP.

Wong said felling in the area, which is destined to become palm oil plantations, had also polluted the river.

The Selangor state government, won in elections last year by the Pakatan Rakyat opposition alliance, is to impose an immediate stop-work order along the river to save the insects, she said.

"We will also begin immediate planting of sagu, berembang, nipah and rembau (trees) which are frequented by the fireflies, to boost their population," Wong said.

"The numbers of fireflies have gone down drastically. They are dying out. We are not going to wait until there are just one or two fireflies before we act. We need to save the insects before it is too late."

Bert Che, senior executive with Firefly Park Resort in Kuala Selangor, which organises the river tours, called for swift action to protect the fireflies.

"I hope everyone will treasure our fireflies. If we don't, our next generation will not be able to see the insects," she said.

Related article
Habitat loss in Kuala Selangor's firefly colony Hilary Chiew The Star 21 Apr 09;


Read more!

Black marks on green blueprint

Bold action, flexibility needed to turn S'pore into environmental hub
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 7 May 09;

AFTER more than a year in the making, Singapore's $1 billion blueprint on how to become a greener, more sustainable nation was finally unveiled by an inter-ministerial committee two Mondays ago.

Coincidentally, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) launched a landmark report the same day on the economics of climate change in South-east Asia, highlighting the damage the region will suffer if this goes unaddressed.

In that sense, the launch of Singapore's blueprint could not have been more timely.

Leaving aside the ongoing economic crisis, climate change is arguably the most important item now on the international agenda.

A landmark global deal on curbing greenhouse gas emissions is expected to be brokered at Copenhagen in December as a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.

The United Nations is also calling on governments across the globe to integrate climate change concerns into their sustainable development policies, and to put their economies on the 'low-carbon, high-growth' path with a focus on greening infrastructure.

So in the midst of all this buzz over going green, how does the Singapore blueprint stack up?

It is clear that some of the plan's more aggressive targets, such as reducing energy intensity (energy consumption per GDP dollar) by 35 per cent from 2005 levels, and certifying 80 per cent of all our buildings Green Mark by 2030, are commendable.

But from a wider perspective, some critics are saying the report lacks punch.

The most obvious gap in the plan is its failure to discuss or make any provisions for curbs on greenhouse gas emissions, the chief culprit behind climate change.

Many other countries, such as those in Europe, have gone much further than Singapore in this regard, putting in place measures like 'cap-and-trade' systems where polluting industries have to buy carbon credits for the right to pollute.

True, it would have been silly for Singapore to stick its neck out to take on cuts in carbon emissions even before the Copenhagen negotiations, but critics say strategies for such a possible outcome could have been more clearly articulated.

Another key argument for not going big on curbing carbon emissions is that it could send members of an already nervous business community fleeing to places with lower costs and less regulation.

This is a valid concern, but it is one that will recede over time. This is because many forward-looking companies are already anticipating such regulation and making adjustments to their business models, given the rising importance of climate change in recent years.

In fact, being a location with high environmental standards is increasingly becoming a competitive edge.

A second aspect of the blueprint that critics have jumped on is the size of the Government's commitment to going green. The entire plan will cost $1 billion to implement over the next five years. In comparison, the Jobs Credit Scheme introduced in the Budget costs $4.5 billion. Even the Marina Coastal Expressway, work on which began one day after the blueprint was launched, costs more than $4 billion.

Seen another way, the plan amounts to a very conservative 0.3 per cent of gross domestic product. In comparison, South Korea and Japan have pledged at least 2 per cent to 3 per cent of GDP, costing tens of billions of dollars, to invest in environmental projects to help stimulate their flagging economies.

Ministers at the launch of the blueprint asserted that $1 billion in absolute terms is a big amount and 'not to be sniffed at'. Singapore does not want to simply spend some 'headline-grabbing' amount, but to do a proper 'bottom-up' assessment of how much needs to be spent to achieve cost-effective results, they said.

But the signal that the number sends, in comparison to others, is that Singapore is going slow and staying cautious.

Finally, the blueprint favours a 'light touch' approach, which works largely through voluntary action and incentives instead of punitive disincentives such as taxes or legislation.

Some experts are not so convinced that this type of persuasion works to alter the behaviour of companies and people who generally love their plastic bags and resist the idea of paying for them.

In China, the government has put its foot down and banned the manufacture and distribution of thin plastic bags - 'white pollution' littering water bodies, beaches and streets all over the country.

This is why environmental leaders like Nominated MP Edwin Khew have called for more legislation to be introduced, not less, if the blueprint is to be successfully implemented.

To be sure, there has been positive feedback on Singapore's green blueprint. The blueprint is itself a study in efficiency, careful in identifying problem areas and proposing solutions.

But ultimately, what does such a finely honed approach do for Singapore in terms of impact and international image?

Singapore has ambitions to be an environmental hub in Asia, where cutting-edge clean energy technologies are developed and manufactured. It also desires to position itself as a carbon trading hub in Asia.

So it needs, in a sense, to walk the talk. While it is well-known for keeping the country 'clean and green', it is also gaining a reputation for being conservative about certain key green policies.

Its insistence on being classified as a 'Non-Annex I' country under the Kyoto Protocol has come under pressure in recent times. Non-Annex I nations are typically developing countries and do not have to cut emissions by 5 per cent from their 1990 levels by 2012. This is a target which 'Annex I' or developed countries need to adhere to.

Many argue that Singapore is a First World, developed nation and should be more of a leader, especially in emerging Asia, in addressing climate change.

If Singapore truly wants to be a global model for sustainable development, there are some hard decisions it needs to make.

It needs to be bolder, or at least more nimble, as the global conversation on climate change continues. It will need to change its position or even boost its plans in the years to come.

The flexibility of this blueprint, an 'evolving document' as its authors call it, will be vital to delivering on its green ambitions.

Related links
Sustainable Singapore and our shores on the wild shores of singapore blog.


Read more!

MM Lee says Singapore's green success gives investors confidence it can deliver

S Ramesh, Channel NewsAsia 6 May 09;

SINGAPORE : Singapore's success in building a garden city gives confidence to investors that the country can deliver, said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

He was speaking on the greening of a nation at a dialogue held to commemorate the Botanic Gardens' 150th anniversary on Wednesday.

He also touched on studies to build seawalls to guard Singapore against global warming. Mr Lee said Dutch consultants have been studying the problem for Singapore.

He added: "If the sea level rises one metre, we can cope. If the sea level rises two metres, which will happen if the ice cap begins to melt both at the Atlantic and Antarctic, it may go up to three, four metres. We will lose our harbour and our coastline.

"So we asked them (consultants) what can we do. Can we build a dyke? (They say) no, on this island, you cannot build a dyke; you will have to build a seawall. We have the resources, we will build a sea wall."

On the value of homes in Singapore, Mr Lee said much depends on how residents took ownership of their environment.

"You destroy the environment and you want to re-sell (your property), it goes down. At the same time, I remind them if you get a bum government, the whole thing comes apart," said MM Lee.

Mr Lee stressed that inculcating values to preserve the environment must begin in schools - something that is already being done. - CNA /ls

Make Singapore stand out with greenery: MM Lee
Show investors that it's a well-organised place, he says
Chuang Peck Ming, Business Times 7 May 09

THE greening of Singapore was the easiest and quickest way to differentiate Singapore from its neighbours - and show investors, especially those from the West, that this is a well-organised place, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said last night.

The man who kicked off the campaign to turn Singapore into a Garden City right from its independence - and has continued to be its driving force - told some 600 guests gathered at the Botanic Gardens to celebrate its 150th anniversary that the greening of Singapore was 'part of a bigger plan' to transform Singapore into 'a first world oasis in a third world region'.

'That cannot be done overnight,' Mr Lee said during a dialogue moderated by Ambassador-at-Large Tommy Koh. 'But what can immediately be done was to show investors that this is a well-organised place.'

When investors arrive at the airport, especially those coming to the Istana to see him who was then prime minister, Mr Lee said they would pass by greenery, 'which means maintenance'.

'When they enter the Istana, they see green lawns, shrubs, trees,' he said. 'The British had done the basics, but we polished it up. . . So without having to tell anything to the CEO, I knew that he would understand that when I say 'We will deliver', he knew that we can deliver - that this is a country where the administration works, where there's a system - because you just can't plant a tree and walk away - (it's) a very complex (maintenance) which all people who run big organisations will understand . . .'

Mr Lee said that the tougher part was to get Singaporeans to change their behaviour to one that was more in keeping with - and reinforce - a clean and green environment. He said that the government gradually got them to understand that if they keep their surroundings nice and green, their property values go up.

Mr Lee stressed that the green issue continues to be a key plank in 'the overall scheme of things - it's not a side issue'.

According to him, the issue has taken a life of its own - and Singaporeans have taken ownership of the greening campaign, ensuring its success.

'It has taken on a lot of people's interest. . . Without the commitment from the people - and most important, without the commitment of the people for whom it is made - the lesson of the various (housing) estates is if they had not taken ownership of it, it wouldn't succeed,' Mr Lee said.

National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan, who was at the celebration too, recalled the economic value of the Botanic Gardens, noting that the cultivation of rubber there in the late 19th century had 'laid the foundation of the rubber industry that brought tremendous growth to the region'.

Today, the Gardens is only one of Singapore's top tourist draws, he said, pointing out that the Michelin Green Guide last year gave it a 3-star rating - its highest award.

Mr Mah said that the success of Singapore's Garden City is affirmed by other countries copying it. But this also means Singapore has to reinvest in itself to keep its competitive edge.

'Our goal is to evolve Singapore from a 'Garden City' into a 'City in a Garden', where our entire island is transformed into one beautiful tropical garden, within which our homes, our workplaces, schools, indeed the whole urban infrastructure, is nestled,' he said.

Singapore's green trump card
Making Republic a 'First World oasis' helped woo investors, says MM Lee
Clarissa Oon, Straits Times 7 May 09;

SPRUCING up and greening Singapore with trees all over the island was a key economic strategy from Day One, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said last night.

In order to differentiate the country from its larger neighbours, one of his first tasks on becoming Prime Minister was to develop a Garden City with good infrastructure and telecommunications.

To woo investors from developed countries, 'we had to make this a First World oasis in a Third World region', he told some 600 guests from the public and private sectors, non-governmental organisations and the landscape and horticulture industry at a dinner marking the Botanic Gardens' 150th anniversary.

MM Lee took part in a dialogue at the event on the greening of Singapore, moderated by Ambassador-at-Large Tommy Koh.

Professor Koh asked him at the start of the hour-long dialogue why cleaning up 'dirty and smelly' Singapore was a priority when it faced numerous other challenges upon gaining independence in 1965.

'It was part of a bigger plan. After we were asked to leave Malaya, we had to work out a strategy which would allow a little island dependent on Malaya for its hinterland to survive,' MM Lee said.

What could be done immediately was 'to show investors that this was a well-organised place', he said of what was effectively Singapore's secret weapon.

Coming from the airport into town, they would pass by lush greenery, and when they visited him in the Istana, they would see well-maintained lawns and shrubs.

'So without having to tell anything to the chief executive officer, I knew he would understand that when I say we will deliver, he knows we can deliver; that this is a country where the administration works, where there is a system,' he said.

The fact is, he added with a laugh, 'you can't just plant a tree and walk away. The tree will die'.

'You need tree doctors, you need to understand what soil and how much sunlight it requires. You put it under a flyover and you got to get forest shrubs that grow in shaded areas,' he explained.

'It's a very complex thing that all people who run big organisations will understand,' said the man who personally oversaw the greening process here.

He credited the British colonial administration for having 'done the basics' which Singapore's landscape architects and park managers were able to build on.

Indeed, it was under British rule that the Botanic Gardens first started life in 1859, as a venue for flower shows and later where rubber was first cultivated.

Today it is one of Singapore's top tourist attractions and a premier institution for botanical research, said National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan at last night's event.

The dinner and dialogue with MM Lee raised $550,000 which will go towards scholarships for Singapore's future botanists and horticulturalists.

Guests last night also paid tribute to MM Lee's role in greening Singapore. Prof Koh said former National Parks chief executive Tan Wee Kiat, who was at the dinner, told him that he must have been 'the only gardener in the world who reports directly to the PM'.

MM Lee stressed that planting and maintaining trees and parks was 'the easy part'.

The tough part, once all the infrastructure was in place, was 'to get people to change from Third World to First World behaviour'.

This led to 'endless campaigns' to tell people 'not to bring chickens and pigs into high-rise (buildings), not to pee in elevators' and above all, he joked, 'not to steal the plants'.

It took 30 or 40 years, but finally Singapore has reached the stage where its people feel a sense of ownership for the environment, he said.

'It took some time to get them to understand (that) if you keep your environment nice and clean, your property values go up; if your environment is scruffy and dirty, then when you want to sell the flat, the price is down.'

MM Lee was so exercised by the 'Clean and Green' campaign that he told Mr Goh Chok Tong, upon handing over the reins as Prime Minister in 1990, that 'if you lose interest in this, (Singapore) will go back to the bad old days'.

Getting people to be eco-conscious
Straits Times 7 May 09;

Dr Geh Min, former president of the Nature Society: What do you see in the next 50 years from an environmental point of view that will keep us ahead in the competitive race?

I cannot predict what technologies will be discovered in the next 50 years, but I know that innovations that will take place will now move much faster than in the last 50 years.

We have sequenced the human genome. We could search for all kinds of fundamental cures. Life sciences promise a great future for anybody.

Transportation, communications will also be made easier.

I see societies having to change fundamentally in the way they live, work and are governed. So what we must have is a government with capable, imaginative leaders, dedicated people.

You need a Prime Minister who can persuade people, but you also need other ministers who might not be so persuasive but can get things done and foresee what will happen.

One thing beyond our control is global warming. We are going to change bulbs, phase out appliances that are too energy- intensive. But what can we do about the big countries' (environmental policies)?

Singapore Environment Council executive director Howard Shaw: The public has often been accused of being apathetic towards environmental issues....How do we cultivate a greater sense of appreciation, responsibility and ownership for the environment?

For the deeper, long-term imparting of values, you've got to start with the children. In school, like planting little shrubs, little plants and so on.

Over the generations, we'll breed large numbers of people who understand that human beings, if they destroy nature, they are putting themselves at risk.

For adults, it is too late. You can only appeal to their direct interests - 'If you do this, you'll be poorer.' Then they will do something about it.

To the younger children, you say, 'You owe a responsibility to yourself and future generations not to destroy this planet."

Henry Steed, president of the Singapore Institute of Landscape Architects: Singapore's public and private sectors have built a lot of expertise in urban greening. Can it be a world-class centre in this area?

I'm no longer in charge, you ought to put it to the Prime Minister.

Yes, we ought to develop a consultancy and make something out of the expertise we have gathered. We are doing it in many fields - port management, airport management, housing, and water and waste management.

But there will be many competitors in this field. You take China for instance. They have large numbers of farmers with green fingers. They came here to see our greening...We showed them how we did it...

They learnt very quickly.For the Beijing Olympics, from the airport to the city and throughout the city, it was one splash of colour.

We go for shrubs that flower, they go for flowers that need to be replaced every three weeks. Because they got the manpower. And they made 40 million flowerpots bloom at the same time.


MM Lee’s message in a tree
Alicia Wong, Today Online 7 May 09;

HE HAD proposed various improvements to the greening of Singapore to no avail – until then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew stepped in with firm words.

After three to four years of effort and submitting 10 pages of justifications, Singapore’s first Commissioner of Parks and Recreation Wong Yew Kwan recalled: “All I got was one paragraph, four lines, from the Treasury, (saying) you’ve done your job, don’t worry about recruitment, expansion,”

So in 1978, according to Mr Wong’s account, Mr Lee called for a meeting and spent two hours lecturing those present, which included Ministers, the Treasury and Permanent Secretary for finance – whomMr Lee finally pointed at and said,”Look George, give them the money.”

After all, greening the country was part of the survival strategy for a young nation that had just left Malaysia, said the Minister Mentor last night, at the celebration of the Singapore Botanic Gardens’ 150th anniversary.

Being “clean” and “green”, in addition to being modernised and safe, differentiated Singapore from her neighbours. And, greenery that needed maintenance showed investors “when I say we will deliver, we can deliver”. “(It proved) this is a country where administration works, where there is a system, because you can’t just plant a tree and not grow it,” he said.

The difficult part, he joked, was to ensure people did not steal the plants. He also recalled with some amusement how he tried to have creepers on every wall, but caterpillars got in the way.

It took time to get people to understand that it would be financially beneficial to keep Singapore green, as their property prices would go up, said Mr Lee. Green is also soothing to the eyes and cooling he said, noting how Hong Kong, being all “tarmac, bricks and building”, was “stiffling”.

While Mr Lee’s personal attention to the greening drive – he even used the Istana as an “experimental ground” to study the effect on the bird population – is the reason Singapore bears the Garden City tag today, the campaign has “taken on life of its own”, in Mr Lee’s words. He now gives comments on the side, while people take it “to a further stage without my intervention”.

With the success in greening Singapore – resulting perhaps in “environmentally pampered” Singaporeans disconnected to environmental issues, noted executive director of Singapore Environment Council Howard Shaw – should the Republic sell its expertise in urban design and greening to other countries, asked one participant.

Yes but she must hurry up, responded Mr Lee, who suggested targetting Gulf cities and semi-desert places.

‘Humans are too clever’
Today Online 7 May 09;

MM LEE: I read an analysis ... This man said, for thousands of years of agricultural societies, the only source of energy was the sun which limits what they can grow, what animals can feed on the grass, what population you can sustain. Then came the industrial revolution ... (driven by) fire and coal. Coal is stored solar energy. Then they found oil; also stored solar energy.

Now ... they got this experiment to make two atoms collide and see whether they can generate power like the sun. So man is trying to generate mini suns, that can go on forever. But when you switch it on the whole thing burns up. So man has not found a way ...

And if we do find out what’s the way, will that solve it? I don’t think so. We’ve become too clever by far. If we find a solution to energy, the world will be overpopulated ... In 50 years, we are expecting 9.5 billion people from 6.3 billion now. You find a new energy source, we’ll become 80 billion people in the next century. Then what?

So I think sooner or later, the human being must come to terms with the fact that this planet called earth can only sustain so much. You go beyond that, you destroy your habitat.

MODERATOR TOMMY KOH: Haven’t they learnt that already?

MM LEE: If we’ve learnt that, why are we still doing these stupid things?


Read more!

EMA leads study to put electric vehicles on Singapore roads

Channel NewsAsia 6 May 09;

SINGAPORE: A multi-agency taskforce chaired by the Energy Market Authority and Land Transport Authority has been set up to lead tests and research into the introduction of electric vehicles (EVs)in Singapore from 2010.

The programme will see $20 million set aside to support infrastructure development and tests for electric vehicles.

The test-bed is expected to run for three years, between 2010 and 2012 and based on the results gathered, the taskforce will evaluate the scope for larger scale adoption of EVs in future.

The task-force will see the involvement of the Land Transport Authority (LTA), and members across different ministries and statutory boards, including the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), the Economic Development Board (EDB), and the National Environment Agency (NEA).

Also involved are key industry players such as auto manufacturers and technology companies who will be able to help examine infrastructure requirements and new business models arising from EVs, as well as to identify industry and R&D opportunities.

In terms of transport, Mr Lawrence Wong, Chief Executive of EMA said Singapore is well-positioned for the deployment of EVs because of its compact urban
environment, and robust electrical grid and IT infrastructure.

He addded that the test bed will also provide a platform for companies to test out different EV prototypes and charging technologies as well as allow Singaoure to do more research in the area of vehicle-to-grid power.

"In particular, if EVs are able to provide power to the grid during peak periods, and draw power from the grid during off-peak periods, they will help to level the demand (load) on the grid, thereby enabling our power system to operate more efficiently” said the EMA head.

The EV test-bed offers potential economic benefits for manufacturing and R&D, such as in areas like battery technology, power electronics and electric drive systems, which could generate new and high-value investments.

So far, two groups Renault-Nissan and Keppel Energy have signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the EV taskforce.

Renault-Nissan will supply EVs to the Singapore market and share its knowledge of such vehicles to develop common standards, while Keppel Energy will focus on developing charging stations and other infrastructure to support the test-bedding of EVs.

A $20m joltfor electric cars
New taskforce to look at introducing them in Singapore
Today Online 7 May 09;

A MULTI-AGENCY taskforce has been set up to lead tests and research into the introduction of electric vehicles (EVs) in Singapore from next year.

Some $20 million has been set aside to get the Republic plugged into such vehicles. The programme is expected to last until 2012 and based on the results gathered, the taskforce will evaluate the scope for large-scale adoption of EVs in future.

The taskforce, to be chaired by the Energy Market Authority (EMA) and Land Transport Authority (LTA), will see the involvement of different ministries and statutory boards, including the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, the Economic Development Board, and the National Environment Agency.

Also involved will be key industry players such as auto manufacturers and technology companies, who will be able to help examine infrastructure requirements and new business models arising from EVs, as well as to identify industry and research and development (R&D) opportunities.

Mr Lawrence Wong, chief executive of EMA said Singapore is well-positioned for the deployment of EVs because of its compact urban environment and robust electrical grid and IT infrastructure.

He added that the EV test-bed will also provide a platform for companies to gauge different vehicle prototypes and charging technologies, allowing EV owners to sell unused power back to the Republic’s electricity grid.

“In particular, if EVs are able to provide power to the grid during peak periods, and draw power from the grid during off-peak periods, they will help to level the demand (load) on the grid, thereby enabling our power system to operate more efficiently,” said the EMA head.

The EV test-bed offers potential economic benefits for manufacturing and R&D in areas such as battery technology, power electronics and electric drive systems, which could generate new and high-value investments.

So far, two groups — Renault-Nissan and Keppel Energy — have signed a memorandum of understanding with the EV taskforce. Renault-Nissan will supply EVs to the Singapore market and share its knowledge of such vehicles to develop common standards, while Keppel Energy will focus on developing charging stations and other infrastructure to support the test-bedding of EVs.

In January, the LTA gave approval for a new electric scooter to be brought to Singapore by local company Zeco Scooters.

Test-bedding of electric vehicles from 2010
Taskforce led by EMA, LTA to identify infrastructure needs, R&D opportunities
Samuel Ee, Business Times 7 May 09;

THE Energy Market Authority (EMA) and Land Transport Authority (LTA) will lead a multi-agency taskforce to spearhead the test-bedding of electric vehicles (EVs) in Singapore from 2010.

Under the programme, infrastructure requirements and new business models for EVs will be identified, as well as industry and research and development opportunities.

The taskforce will include different ministries and statutory boards, including the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star), the Economic Development Board and the National Environment Agency (NEA). Key industry players will also be involved in the $20 million programme to shape the future of electric transport in Singapore.

All automotive manufacturers and technology companies interested in shaping the future of electric transport are also welcome, EMA said yesterday at an MOU signing ceremony with Renault-Nissan and Keppel Energy.

Under the MOUs, Renault-Nissan will supply EVs to the Singapore market and share its know- ledge of them to develop common standards, while Keppel Energy will focus on developing charging stations and other infrastructure to support the test-bedding of EVs.

EMA chief executive Lawrence Wong said the increase in the vehicle population worldwide and growing evidence of climate change require significant changes in transport to bring about a more sustainable future.

'One promising way forward is the electrification of land transport,' he said. 'Electric motors are inherently more efficient than internal combustion engines, effectively utilising more than 90 per cent of the energy provided, compared with 37 per cent for today's conventional car engine.'

Mr Wong said the advantages are significant, with the zero emissions of electric vehicles improving urban air quality.

Based on the results of the test bed, the taskforce will evaluate the scope for larger scale adoption of EVs as the technology matures.

According to EMA, electric-drive vehicles have two other efficiency advantages: no energy is consumed while the car is at rest or coasting, and energy normally lost when braking is captured and used. Currently, several electric-drive vehicles are available, from petrol-electric hybrids like the Toyota Prius and Honda Insight, to plug-in electric hybrids and all-electric vehicles.

'Singapore is well-positioned for the deployment of EVs because of our compact urban environment, and robust electrical grid and IT infrastructure,' Mr Wong said.

He said the test bed will provide an open platform for companies to test different EV prototypes and charging technologies.

'At the same time, we would like to do more research in the concept of vehicle-to-grid power,' he said.

'In particular, if EVs are able to provide power to the grid during peak periods, and draw power from the grid during off-peak periods, they will help level the demand (load) on the grid, thereby enabling our power system to operate more efficiently.'

Government plugs $20m into electric car trial
Money to be used for research and setting up public charging stations
Christopher Tan, Straits Times 7 May 09;

THE Government is investing $20 million to help roll out electric vehicles (EVs) in Singapore from next year.

The fund will be used largely to set up charging infrastructure for a test fleet of electric cars due here from mid-2010.

An initial fleet of about 50 cars will be from the Renault-Nissan alliance, which is among several carmakers working to launch battery-powered cars worldwide.

'Singapore is an ideal location for electric vehicles,' said Mr Lawrence Wong, chief executive of Energy Market Authority (EMA), which is chairing a multi-agency team involved in the trial.

'Our small geographical size and high-density urban setting mean that driving distances are short. The average passenger vehicle mileage is less than 60km a day, well within the electric driving range.'

Mr Wong was speaking yesterday at a ceremony to formalise the trial that involves the Economic Development Board; Agency for Science, Technology & Research; National Environment Agency; Land Transport Authority; Renault-Nissan; and Keppel Energy, which will help set up public charging stations.

The test-bedding, expected to last till 2012, is the first government-funded initiative to help pave the way for EVs to run here. The move mirrors similar plans in various other cities. London has been testing a fleet of 100 electric Smarts since December; California opened its first quick-charge station last month; and in Paris, a new online map shows the location of charging points in the city.

In Singapore, several other carmakers are expected to join the three-year evaluation programme. These could include BMW, which is producing more than 500 electric Minis for tests in cities from New York to Berlin; and Volkswagen, which recently stated that it would be the first to produce an affordable electric car.

Part of the $20 million set aside will go towards research, particularly on how EV owners can sell unused power back to Singapore's electricity grid.

Mr Wong said: 'If EVs are able to provide power to the grid during peak periods and draw power from the grid during off-peak periods, they will help to level demand...enabling our power system to operate more efficiently.'

He said this would make economic sense to EV owners if peak and off-peak electricity tariffs are differentiated when the power market is fully liberalised.

Singapore has been studying the feasibility of introducing EVs here for over 10 years now.

Mr Wong said 'at this stage, it is too early to tell whether electric vehicles will take off commercially, or whether they will be superseded by other technologies'. But he pointed out that EVs are cleaner and more efficient than internal combustion vehicles as they can convert up to 90 per cent of energy used to motion, versus 37 per cent for a petrol-run car.

Mr Wong added that even if EVs are recharged by electricity from gas-fired power plants, 'it is still possible to reduce emissions because such plants generate energy far more efficiently than an internal combustion engine'.

The test in Singapore is believed to be the first where EVs are subjected perennially to hot and humid conditions, which observers say could sap battery power and shorten the range of an electric car.

But Renault electric vehicle programme director Thierry Koskas is confident that the company's first electric car will be able to run for 160km on a full charge. 'That includes air-conditioning,' he said, adding that the batteries' lifespan is '10 years or 200,000km'.

The greatest hurdle for EVs remains cost, with models expected to cost 1.5 times more than petrol equivalents. Singapore's green vehicle rebate, which grants a 40 per cent cut in the main car tax, will offset only part of the price premium.

Mr Koskas said one way around this could be to sell the car and lease the batteries separately. An EV without batteries costs about the same as a petrol model, he said. The batteries can be leased at around $140 per month.

'This will still be cheaper than running a petrol car because the cost of recharging is peanuts,' he added.

EVs are expected to be available at showrooms here from 2011.

Will electric cars create buzz?
Government annnounces $20 million programme for 'green' vehicles
COME next year, our roads will be abuzz with the purr of electric vehicles under a new Government initiative to test their feasibility.
Desmond Ng, The New Paper 8 May 09

COME next year, our roads will be abuzz with the purr of electric vehicles under a new Government initiative to test their feasibility.

A taskforce chaired by the Energy Market Authority (EMA) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) was announced yesterday to examine the infrastructure and business models for such vehicles.

This $20 million programme is expected to last till 2012 and will involve about 50 electric vehicles.

Does this herald the beginning of the end for petrol cars here?

Not quite. The road bumps are daunting. Other 'green' cars here - hybrid and compressed natural gas (CNG) - have not exactly been sterling performers.

There are just over 2,100 hybrid and 2,600 CNG cars here, according to a Straits Times report last month.

That's less than 1 per cent of the total local car population of about 550,500 .

The common grouses: Hybrids are more expensive than petrol-driven cars, the CNG infrastructure is inadequate and there's a lack of awareness about such cars. Never mind the smaller carbon footprint and petrol savings.

Even the first commercially available electric vehicles launched here in March have not exactly flown out of the showrooms.

There have only been 10 orders so far for the LTA-approved E-Max scooter, distributor Zeco said last month.

Its low speed - it has a top speed of 50kmh - and its exclusion from the expressways are major turn-offs, said some.

These scooters retail between $6,999 and $7,399 each.

EMA chief executive Mr Lawrence Wong said it's still too early to tell if electric vehicles will take off commercially or even overtake petrol cars here.

He said: 'It may be a situation where a few markets exist. But there will definitely be more diversity in the industry.'

Renault-Nissan will be supplying electric vehicles under this initiative.

Mr Thierry Koskas, Renault's electric vehicles programme director, said: 'With more and more pressure on carbon emissions, we believe electric vehicles are the answer.'

He estimated that an electric car here will likely cost about the same as a petrol car, but car owners will have to rent the battery.

This is because batteries may be replaced by the car manufacturer every few years with technological advances, so it's more cost-effective for consumers to rent them, Mr Koskas said.

It is not known how much the rent will be, but in Europe, an electric car-owner pays about 70 euros ($140) a month to rent the battery and about 20 euros for electricity charges.

Batteries can be charged at stations similar to petrol stations.

Price-sensitive

Associate professor Lee Der-Horng, a transport researcher at the National University of Singapore, said industry players have to make electric vehicles financially attractive.

He explained: 'Singaporeans are very price- sensitive. For electric vehicles to be popular, the price has to be competitive.

'The uncertainty will also be there. It's idealistic to imagine that the majority of vehicles here will be electric ones because of the variety of petrol cars in the market.'

For those who drive frequently to Malaysia, electric vehicles may not be practical unless the infrastructure there is good.

Added Dr Lee: 'Electric vehicles will only take off in a big way if the infrastructure here is comprehensive and car manufacturers start to make more of such vehicles.

'It's more likely we'll see a mixture of petrol, electric and hybrid cars on our roads.'

He added that in countries like the US, the concept of electric vehicles may not take off in a big way because of the travel distance and driving patterns.

But it can be achieved in Singapore due to our small size and well-planned infrastructure, he said.

Dr Michael Li, a transport economist from Nanyang Technological University's business school, said there must be incentives, along with Government support, for people to switch to electric vehicles.

He reckoned that petrol cars will be here to stay - at least for the next five to 10 years.

He said: 'A joint task force will work to create an environment friendly to electric cars owners. But it's not something that will happen overnight.

'Car makers are not ready and it's still cheaper to own a petrol car. But if the Government starts taxing carbon dioxide emissions, car owners will be forced to make some hard choices.'

Business development manager James Lam, who drives a Honda Stream, said he would only switch to an electric car if the petrol cost savings are significant.

Said the 38-year-old: 'Price is the most important consideration. If the ownership cost of an electric car is similar to a petrol one, I may just switch cars to be more environmentally friendly.

'But the electric car must also look good.'


Read more!

Public transport can be better than cars if...

Straits Times 7 May 09;

Experts presented ideas on how transport networks can make cities more 'liveable' at a forum organised by Singapore's Centre for Liveable Cities on Tuesday. Maria Almenoar looks at some of the suggestions

# BUSES AND TRAINS

Experts' suggestions: Each road here should have no more than two bus services, and commuters should be encouraged to make transfers even if it is a 'pain'.

This will increase the connectivity and frequency of buses, said Dr Paul Barter, Assistant Professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.

The transport policy expert is also in favour of fewer direct bus services, a move that probably will not go down well with commuters here.

'If you have three start and three end points, a direct system would need nine bus services. But with a central node where commuters transfer, you need only three services,' he pointed out.

In Bogota, Colombia, commuters prefer buses to trains.

The bus system, called the TransMilenio, consists of numerous elevated stations in the centre of a main avenue.

A dedicated bus lane on each side of the station allows express buses to pass through on one side without stopping, while regular bus services stop on the other side of the station.

Speaking at yesterday's forum, former mayor of Bogota Enrique Penalosa said buses can serve commuters as efficiently as trains. In some cases, buses may even be more efficient and operate at a fraction of the cost of a subway system.

Singapore's plan for trains and buses: The Government will double the rail network from 138km now to 278km by 2020.

Improvements in bus services are planned too, with the Land Transport Authority (LTA) taking over the central planning of bus routes from the two rival operators later this year.

By next year, the penalty for making transfers will also be completely removed to encourage commuters to make more bus-train-bus connections to get to their destinations.

# BICYCLES

Experts' suggestions: Pedestrian and bicycle paths form the backbone of Bogota's transport network. Since building these paths, the number of cyclists in the city has shot up tremendously.

To encourage more people to cycle, Mr Penalosa suggested that bicycles be given priority and protection on the roads. He added that bicycle spaces should be made available in carparks.

Dr Barter believes that Singapore 'does not know what it is doing when it comes to bicycles' and should ask for help from experts in the Netherlands where there is an extensive network of cycling tracks and many cyclists.

'If we do this well, people in suits will ride bicycles,' he said, adding that the weather here is not a deterrent to cycling as he sees 'hundreds' of bicycles parked outside the MRT station in Tampines.

This is why he believes that the Park and Ride scheme, which encourages car owners to park near an MRT station and hop on a train, should be scrapped in favour of one that promotes cycling.

Singapore's plan for bicycles: Pasir Ris, Sembawang, Taman Jurong, Tampines and Yishun will get about 10km of cycling tracks each. More bicycle parking facilities will also be built at selected MRT stations.

# CARS

Experts' suggestions: Certificates of Entitlement (COEs) should be valid for a fixed distance, say 50,000km, rather than for 10 years, suggested Dr Barter. This 'pay as you use' approach would discourage car ownership in Singapore.

'When motorists pay such high prices for their cars, they will instinctively want to use them as much as possible till their COEs expire,' he explained.

A distance-based charge would remove the urge to maximise the use of their cars.

He also suggested increasing parking charges to reflect the value of real estate in the area rather than having flat rates for public parking, regardless of whether the lot is in the city centre or suburb.

Singapore's approach to cars: To control the vehicle population, the number of COEs available is linked to the number of cars scrapped.

Recently, the Government cut the COE supply in a bid to slow down the growth of the vehicle population.

There is also a gradual move away from ownership taxes towards more usage charges, as can be seen in the extension of the Electronic Road Pricing network.


Read more!

Asia Construction Frenzy Needs Green Injection

Ralph Jennings, Planet Ark 7 May 09;

TAIPEI - Powered by solar energy generated on its roof, Taipei 101, the world's tallest completed building, is not only a leader for its breathtaking height but also for its eco-friendly features.

Finished in 2004, the skyscraper is a rare example of green design in Asia, a region with the world's busiest construction sector yet one of the poorest records for eco-friendly building.

China alone is said to be building half of the world's new floor space, but the vast majority of these new projects will be energy guzzlers. Environmentalists worry that these buildings will produce high carbon emissions for decades to come.

"Energy efficiency is fast becoming one of the defining issues of our times, and buildings are that issue's 'elephant in the room'," Bjorn Stigson, president of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, said in a statement.

"Buildings use more energy than any other sector and as such are a major contributor to climate change," he added.

In China, 80 percent of the nearly one billion square meters (10.7 billion square feet) of new buildings constructed every year are high-energy buildings that consume 2 to 3 times more energy per unit of floor-space than buildings in developed countries, according to a report by the Asia Business Council.

Beijing and other governments in the region are trying to encourage green construction, but Asia lags far behind Europe which has a 2019 deadline for all new buildings to produce the same amount of energy they consume.

COST CUTTING

Office buildings use at least 30 percent of an average country's total energy consumption and produce a similar proportion of their greenhouse gas emissions.

Turning buildings green could reduce carbon emissions by 1.8 billion metric tons per year worldwide, according to the United Nations Environment program. That is easier said than done, especially in Asia, where the bottom line is often all that counts.

Asia's price-sensitive builders baulk at the steeper materials and construction costs for green buildings, about 5 percent higher, for features ranging from alternative energy systems to fixtures such as low-energy lights and reinforced glass that cuts down on heating and air-conditioning costs.

Despite the initial higher cost of environmentally friendly construction, architects say that it pays for itself after 5 or 10 years due to lower energy and water bills.

Apart from the energy savings, developers usually get higher rent yields if their buildings are 'green'.

"Asia is the latecomer," said Peter Halliday, vice-president of Siemens Ltd Taiwan. "It's true that the developers are (still) holding back on green buildings, though over the life of a building you get your money back."

Experts hope that pressure from Western firms for 'green' office space that includes features ranging from low-energy lights to waste recycling, might change that in the coming years.

"There are an increasing number of multinationals and large overseas corporations that require green-rated buildings," said Tan Loke Man, head of the Malaysian Architects Association.

"This will be the case as more and more companies become more environmentally concerned."

China aims to reduce energy use by 60 percent in new buildings, offering tax rebates as incentives. But "enforcement is always an issue in China," said Janet Pau, from the Asia Business Council, which monitors green construction.

"China needs to do more. They need a more coordinated building policy," Pau added. "Buildings last for decades and just by being there, they will slowly be damaging to the environment."

The government's efforts, as well as demand from foreign firms for green office space, has spurred several high profile projects that may kindle interest in low-energy buildings across the region.

The Shanghai Tower, in China's commercial capital, will minimize wind resistance and energy consumption when it is completed in 2014 at a cost of $2.2 billion.

The building will house 54 wind turbines to power heating and air-conditioning, along with a rainwater collection system.

GREEN BUILDINGS

China has 166 projects registered by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). By contrast, India has LEED certificates for 56 building projects and South Korea 49.

LEED criteria include bike storage, low-water landscaping, recycled materials in new construction and waste reduction.

Other energy efficiency measures includes simple improvements such as window insulation. Windows, for example, are the greatest sources of heat loss and air leakage, accounting for 11 percent of total losses of energy in buildings.

Developers can reduce the carbon footprint of buildings by using zero-carbon materials, such as recycled wood, bricks and metal. Opting for local materials rather than those that require transportation also helps reduce the environmental impact.

The message is slowly seeping in, helped by corporate responsibility programs and government aid.

Taiwan's Chinatrust Bank broke ground this year on a super-green T$15 billion ($450 million) new headquarters in Taipei. Of that, T$852 million was for eco-friendly features.

The complex, due to open in 2012, will include low-power air-conditioning, site selection designed to reduce car trips and a campus that's 52 percent open space including a public park, said Chinatrust Secretary General Thomas Chen.

Chinatrust will offset the costs of making the complex green in three to four years and rent out a third of the space, likely to multinationals.

"As far as I know, no space in Taiwan is as green as this one will be," Chen said.

The Southeast Asian city-state of Singapore offers incentives of up to about $4 per square meter for new energy-efficient buildings. It, too, hopes to win multinational tenants.

"Once a government gives more incentives, things get done," said Kendrew Leung, a managing director with Savills Property Management in Hong Kong. "Now green building is a trend but not a must ... It takes time to make it a habit."

(Editing by Megan Goldin)


Read more!

Will Interests Collide in Anambas?

Jakarta Globe 6 May 09;

Anambas Islands, a new district carved out of the better-known Natuna region, is an area tremendously rich in biological diversity: rare species of primates, nearly-extinct species of fish and turtles and many varieties of trees.

It is an environmentalist’s idea of paradise and one they are keen to preserve.

But there are others who have an interest in Anambas — in the province of Riau Islands — and the new administration will have the task of finding a sustainable balance between these sometimes incompatible interests.

The first of these interests is the oil and gas industry, not always the best of bedfellows with the environmental movement.

Tourism also has a foot in the door in Anambas, now mostly coral reef divers from Singapore, but the biodiversity offers the promise of eco-tourism, and perhaps, if managed properly, one of the keys to conserving the ecological wealth.

The third, and not the least, is the local population, about 40,000 people believed descended from the famous seafaring Bugis of Sulawesi. The marine biodiversity of the islands has long been the foundation of their traditional economy, which mostly involves fishing.

The islands lie on the borders of Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand, not far off the busy sea route that runs through the Malacca Strait.

The oil and natural gas industry has had a presence in Anambas Islands dating back to 1976 through two foreign oil companies, the American ConocoPhillips and Britain’s Premier Oil in cooperation with Indonesia’s Star Energy.

Because the area’s gas reserves are still abundant, more companies are destined to come.

Idris Zaini, a member of the Regional Representative Council (DPD), said the D-Alpha block alone holds a gas potential of 46 trillion cubic feet — the largest gas deposit in the Asia-Pacific region. The D-Alpha block, which is being developed by ExxonMobil to the tune of $350 million, is expected to start production in 2018.

Syarifuddin, head of the Anambas Regional Development Body, said foreign investors were still lining up for mining oil and gas concession in the islands, but he could not reveal any names.

“I do not know which companies will invest here. I was only told that more investment in gas and oil would flow into this place soon,” Syarifuddin said.

How these developments will affect the area’s biodiversity and the other industries on the islands is still uncertain, especially as the new local government, in power for just six months, has not yet played a significant role in managing the local economy.

Fishing, given the sea makes up 98.65 percent of the new district, remains the main source of income for local people.

The issue for environmentalists is how to conserve the region’s vast biodiversity in the face of growing commercial pressure.

The local fishing economy, because it remains mostly traditional, and tourism, which is not yet developed, are not an immediate threat to the biodiversity, but in the face of increasing foreign investment, what will happen in the future is not certain.

Hoek Hui Tan and Kelvin K.P. Lim, researchers from the National University of Singapore, surveyed Anambas Islands in 2002 and can testify to the variety of life in the area.

The two researchers discovered at least 11 new species, including a new species of blue-ringed octopus, a new species of coral symbiont crab, four species of fish — two saltwater and two freshwater — and a new species of freshwater crab.

The most exciting find was the venomous blue-ringed octopus, which was discovered late at night during a trawling exercise.

In an effort to safeguard the biological treasure, Conservation International Indonesia, the National University of Singapore and the Anambas regional administration are working together to conserve the islands’ flora and fauna. Last month, the three organizations met in Jakarta to lay the groundwork for sustainable development.

“The basic idea is that there should be specific areas — on sea and land — put aside for biodiversity conservation,” said Fachruddin Mangunjaya, a CI executive, adding that the conservation should provide economical and social benefits to residents.

Fachruddin said the most feasible sector would be marine ecotourism. “Foreign tourists would be eager to see the unique biological richness here,” he said, adding that was one reason for “keeping the natural wealth in good shape.”

The joint cooperation plans also propose the whole region become a conservation area. “If we can get both national and international support, Anambas could become a place of a sustainable biodiversity,” he said.

But whether all parties can be accommodated is for the future to decide.


Read more!

Nargis Anniversary: Will the Mangrove Forests be Rebuilt?

Kyi Wai, The Irrawady 6 May 09;

BOGALAY, Irrawaddy Delta — Before Cyclone Nargis struck Burma's Irrawaddy delta, the island known as Mein Ma Hla (in Burmese "pretty woman") was beautiful, the home of dense mangrove forests and bamboo.

Now, the island remains badly scarred, the mangrove forests devastated, and large fallen trees still testify to the cyclone’s wrath.

Cyclone Nargis destroyed 16,800 hectares of mangrove forest (about 30 percent) and 20,999 hectares of forest plantations in Rangoon and the Irrawaddy delta, according to the Post-Nargis Joint Assessment (PONJA) report.

At one time, mangrove forests formed impenetrable areas along the delta coastline. Large kanazo and beau trees towered toward the sky. One local resident recalled it was like living in a big tree house.

Traditionally, local villagers cut down trees on Pretty Woman Island and nearby Kyun Nyo Gyi for firewood and charcoal.

But more rapid changes started in 1990s, when investors began to develop the area into prawn farms. Vast stretches of mangrove forests were cleared for the farms, which reaped investors big profits.

Fortunately, much of Pretty Woman Island itself was protected by law and escaped deforestation and prawn farm development, while continuing to provide local resources to residents and offer shelter for numerous animals including crocodiles, monkeys, samburs, birds, squirrels and fish.

The one Hundred Monkeys Pagoda and other religious sites located in the area also gave many residents a feeling of sacredness and tradition, say local residents.

A forest ranger on the island recalled, "In the past, villagers who came into the forest didn't bring along meat to eat. To pay respect the spirits, they even spoke politely. They chopped a few trees for their own use, not a lot, and maintained a tradition which paid respect to the spirits." According to a local belief, a greedy tree-cutter who didn’t honor the spirits would be eaten by a crocodile.

While Cyclone Nargis destroyed most of the villages along the costal area and killed nearly 140,000 people, residents on Pretty Woman escaped unharmed.

"That night, me and my wife were illegally cutting trees on the island,” said a man from Lama village. “Those big trees in the mangrove forest saved our lives. Not only us, all the villagers who were on the island that night escaped from the storm.”

Most of the bigger trees were broken or toppled down. Smaller trees and bushes survived.

"The bushes were there even after the cyclone,” said a resident of Padaekaw village. “But many dead bodies from the villages were floating in the water and were caught up in the bushes. After about a week, the army burned the dead bodies. They used a flame-thrower. That's why many trees and bushes are also burned.”

Following the cyclone, many crocodiles, monkeys, samburs and squirrels were killed or have since left the area.

"The crocs are moving,” said a resident of Sitsalong village. “After Nargis, the crocs got a chance to eat dead bodies. They are now human-eating crocs. Recently, a man in our village was attacked and eaten by a croc while he was setting his fishing net. And a child from Ngethu village was taken by a croc. That time, the little boy was sitting on the back of a boat. The croc first hit the boy with its tail, then the boy fell into the water and the croc took him away. The villagers in this area are now very afraid of croc attacks."

A forest ranger estimated that there were about 1,000 crocodiles on Pretty Woman Island and in the nearby area. A crocodile farm was located on the island, and the animals were protected by law.

Conservationists have warned that deforestation plays a key role in climate change, and Burma has lost large portions of forests in the delta and throughout the country since 1990, largely due to timber cutting.

The mangrove forest in the delta at one time served as a natural barrier against storms. Environmentalists had warmed of the consequences of deforestation and the loss of animal habitat, but their pleas largely went unheeded.

An environmental conservationist in Rangoon said, “When the cyclone hit, thousand of people lost their life. It's a direct consequence of the deforestation of mangroves. Prawn farms should not be allowed in those areas.

The government should consider the interest of local people and the habitat."

Initial plans call for 750 hectares of mangrove forest to be replanted in Irrawaddy Division over a five-year period, according to an officer with the Forest Resource Environment Development and Conservation Association.

Additionally, UN Development Programme plans to replant 30,000 coconut and palm trees in five townships of the Irrawaddy delta, but that represents only a small portion of the trees destroyed.

Many aid organizations and other groups are working to replant the mangrove forests, Following Nargis the attitude of local people toward the forest has changed.

"Before Nargis, I was selling firewood in Bogalay,” said a villager from Lamu. “When the cyclone hit, I was on Pretty Woman. The trees saved my life. The other thing is that some people from rescue organizations talked about the importance of the mangrove forests. I don't want to cut the trees for a living anymore. I changed my mind. Instead, I am going to work as a fisherman."

He said villagers have also reassessed the role of prawn farms in the area

"In our village, prawn farms were everywhere. We had no place to hide. If we had mangrove forests, most people would have survived. Many of us are now ready to help replant the mangrove forests"

Lamu village, where the man lives, was home to about 700 people before Cyclone Nargis. About 100 survived.


Read more!

Black band disease hits Great Barrier Reef

Helen Carter, ABC Net 6 May 09;

An epizootic - the wildlife equivalent of a human epidemic - of black band disease has appeared in the Great Barrier Reef, say Australian researchers.

Scientists, who have been monitoring the progress of the disease, say this the first time an epizootic of this type has been documented in Australian waters.

Black band disease has decimated coral populations in the Caribbean and researchers are concerned it could spread here.

Black band disease infecting on a Montipora coral colony. The disease forms a thin black band that kills coral as it eats through tissue, exposing the fragile skeleton (Source: Yui Sato)

Marine biologist Yui Sato of James Cook University in Townsville and colleagues report their findings in the latest issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Sato, who is a research student with the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef, says the black band disease flourishes in warm seawater, killing coral as it eats through tissue, exposing the fragile skeleton.

He is concerned that predicted warmer ocean conditions caused by global warming will lead to longer outbreaks and faster tissue loss.
Increased prevalence

The researchers compared photos of 485 colonies of Montipora species - a hard, plate-like coral - with photos from two previous surveys to track coral death and infection.

Sato says infectious diseases in reef building corals have emerged at an increasing rate throughout the last few decades.

He says sporadic occurrence or low prevalence had been documented in the Reef since 1993, but this is the first time big outbreaks had been found.

"It has not previously been documented like this with such a big impact on the coral assemblage," says Sato. "It shows impacts of the disease are greater than previously reported on the Great Barrier Reef and likely to escalate with ocean warming."

The researchers found that at least 10% of Montipora corals in the Great Barrier Reef were infected during summer with about 5% of those dying.

They also found that surviving coral were three times more likely to be reinfected than uninfected coral. This may be due to bacterial pathogens remaining in the colony or due to a compromised immune system.

Sato says infection occurs after a bacterial mat forms a black band, which migrates across healthy coral colonies. The mat is comprised of multiple species of bacteria, mainly cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and bacteria associated with the sulfur-cycle.

"We don't really know where they come from or how they make such a complicated bacterial community, but once formed it can kill coral quickly," eating through 4 millimetres a day, he says.

The study area had been disease-free during the past 15 years; therefore the sudden appearance of multiple infections since 2006 is being considered an epizootic.
Factors

The researchers also examined whether new infections were influenced by water temperature and light intensity. They found high temperatures stressed the coral hosts and increased susceptibility to infections.

But they believe light might be the more important facilitator of disease, with most infections occurring two months before water temperature peaked when light levels were greatest.

The researchers believe the bacteria responsible for the disease are transported by water movement. Fish may also be responsible, eating and then spitting out bacteria as they move from colony to colony.

Humans could also be contributing to the spread of the disease.

"Black band disease is possibly impacted by sewage in the sea. The more nutrients around the disease mat, the faster it grows," says Sato.

"Past studies show that diseased areas are common around where people live but it's not always the case on the Great Barrier Reef as it has been found in remote areas too."


Read more!

Ghost fishing' major sea threat: UN report

Yahoo News 6 May 09;

NAIROBI (AFP) – Lost or discarded fishing nets can continue to catch fish for years and are a growing threat to the planet's marine ecosystem, according to a United Nations report released Wednesday.

"The report estimates that abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear in the oceans makes up around 10 percent, (640,000 tonnes) of all marine litter," said a statement from the UN Environment Programme.

The study, co-authored by the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), said the problem was getting worse due to the growing scale of global fishing and the use of fishing gear made of increasingly durable materials.

Among the main culprits are bottom set gill nets, which are anchored to the sea floor and fitted with floats, forming an undersea wall of netting that can stretch several thousand metres.

"If a gill net is abandoned or lost, it can continue to fish on its own for months -- and sometimes years -- indiscriminately killing fish and other animals," the UNEP statement said.

The report also cited the case of devices such as crab traps, which in some regions are lost by hundreds of thousands with each hurricane season.

The UN study listed a number of measures to curb the trend such as financial incentives for fishermen to report lost gear, marking technology, improved disposal schemes and the use of bio-degradable elements in fishing gear.

The report urged leaders gathering in Indonesia on May 11-15 for the World Oceans Conference to address the problem urgently.

"The amount of fishing gear remaining in the marine environment will continue to accumulate and the impacts on marine ecosystems will continue to get worse if the international community doesn't take effective steps to deal with the problem of marine debris as a whole," warned Ichiro Nomura, a senior FAO official for fisheries and aquaculture.

UNEP executive director Achim Steiner said ghost fishing was just one of a myriad of the other "ghosts" haunting the marine environment such as acidification linked to greenhouse gases and rising de-oxygenated "dead zones" due to run-off and land-based pollution.

"Abandoned and lost fishing is part of this suite of challenges that must be urgently addressed collectively if the productivity of our oceans and seas is to be maintained for this and future generations," said Steiner.

Ghost nets hurting marine environment
UNEP 6 May 09;

Rome/Nairobi, 6 May 2009 - Large amounts of fishing gear lost at sea or abandoned by fishers are hurting the marine environment, impacting fish stocks through "ghost fishing" and posing a hazard to ships, according to a new report jointly produced by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and UN Environment Programme (UNEP).

According to the study, the problem of abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) is getting worse due to the increased scale of global fishing operations and the introduction of highly durable fishing gear made of long-lasting synthetic materials.

The report estimates that abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear in the oceans makes up around 10 percent (640 000 tonnes) of all marine litter. Merchant shipping is the primary source on the open sea, land-based sources are the predominate cause of marine debris in coastal areas.

Most fishing gear is not deliberately discarded but is lost in storms or strong currents or results from "gear conflicts," for example, fishing with nets in areas where bottom-traps that can entangle them are already deployed.

The main impacts of abandoned or lost fishing gear are:

- continued catches of fish - known as "ghost fishing" - and other animals such as turtles, seabirds, and marine mammals, who are trapped and die;

- alterations of the sea-floor environment; and

- the creation of navigation hazards that can cause accidents at sea and damage boats.

Gill nets, fishing pots and traps are most likely to "ghost fish," while longlines, are more likely to ensnare other marine organisms and trawls most likely to damage sub-sea habitats.

Ghost fishing

In the past, poorly operated drift nets were the prime culprits, but a 1992 ban on their use in many areas has reduced their contribution to ghost fishing.

Today, bottom set gill nets are more often-cited as a problem. The bottom edge of these nets is anchored to the sea floor and floats are attached to their top, so that they form a vertical undersea wall of netting that can run anywhere from 600 to 10 000 meters in length. If a gillnet is abandoned or lost, it can continue to fish on its own for months - and sometimes years - indiscriminately killing fish and other animals.

Traps and pots are another major ghost fisher. In the Chesapeake Bay of the United States, an estimated 150 000 crab traps are lost each year out of an estimated 500 000 total deployed. On just the single Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, about 20 000 of all traps set each year are lost each hurricane season - a loss rate of 50 percent. Like gill nets, these traps can continue to fish on their own for long periods of time.

Solutions

"The amount of fishing gear remaining in the marine environment will continue to accumulate and the impacts on marine ecosystems will continue to get worse if the international community doesn't take effective steps to deal with the problem of marine debris as a whole. Strategies for addressing the problem must occur on multiple fronts, including prevention, mitigation, and curative measures," said Ichiro Nomura, FAO Assistant Director-General for Fisheries and Aquaculture. He also noted that FAO is working closely with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in its ongoing review of Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) as regards fishing gear and shore side reception facilities.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said:" There are many 'ghosts in the marine environment machine' from overfishing and acidification linked with greenhouse gases to the rise in de-oxygenated 'dead zones' as a result of run off and land-based source of pollution. Abandoned and lost fishing is part of this suite of challenges that must be urgently addressed collectively if the productivity of our oceans and seas is to be maintained for this and future generations, not least for achievement of the UN Millennium Development Goals".

The FAO/UNEP report makes a number of recommendations for tackling the problem of ghost nets:

Financial incentives. Economic incentives could encourage fishers to report lost gear or bring to port old and damaged gear, as well as any ghost nets they might recover accidentally while fishing.

Marking gear. Not all trash gear is deliberately dumped, so marking should not be used to "identify offenders" but rather better understand the reasons for gear loss and identify appropriate, fishery-specific preventative measures.

New technologies. New technologies offer new possibilities for reducing the probability of ghost fishing. Sea-bed imaging can be used to avoid undersea snags and obstacles. Fishing equipment can be expensive, and many fishers often go to great lengths to retrieve lost gear. Technology that makes doing so easier can help. Using GPS, vessels can mark locations where gear has been lost, facilitating retrieval, and transponders can be fitted to gear in order to do the same. Similarly, improvements in weather monitoring technology can be used to help skippers avoid deploying nets when very bad weather is imminent.

Just as new synthetic and other materials used in fishing gears have contributed to the ADLFG problem, they can also help solve it. Work is underway to speed up the commercial adoption of durable gear components that incorporate bio-degradable elements. For example, in some countries fish traps and pots are constructed with a biodegradable "escape hatch" that disintegrates when left under water too long, rendering the trap harmless. As this would not necessarily reduce the levels of debris, a reporting and retrieval system should also be adopted.

Improving collection, disposal and recycling schemes. It is necessary to facilitate proper disposal of all old, damaged and retrieved fishing gears, according to the report. Most ports do not have facilities on site that allow for this. Putting disposal bins on docks and providing boats with oversized, high-strength disposal bags for old fishing gear or parts thereof can help remedy this.

Better reporting of lost gear. A key recommendation of the report is that vessels should be required to log gear losses as a matter of course. However a "no-blame" approach should be followed with respect to liability for losses, their impacts, and any recovery efforts, it says. The goal should be to improve awareness of potential hazards and increase the opportunity for gear recovery.

The report discusses a number of other measures that could help, as well.

"Clearly solutions to this problem do exist, and our hope is that this report will prompt industry and governments to take action to significantly reduce the amount of lost or abandoned fishing gear in the marine environment," said Nomura.

The new report comes as nations are set to gather in for the World Oceans Conference in Manado, Indonesia (11-15 May 2009), where the issue of realizing healthy marine environments will figure high on the agenda.

Note to editors

Islands of garbage

The total input of marine litter into the oceans per year has been estimated at approximately 6.4 million tonnes annually, of which nearly 5.6 million tonnes (88 percent) comes from merchant shipping.

Some 8 million items of marine litter are thought to enter the oceans and seas every day, about 5 million (63 percent) of which are solid waste thrown overboard or lost from ships.

It has been estimated that currently over 13 000 pieces of plastic litter are floating on every square kilometre of ocean. In 2002, 6 kg of plastic was found for every kilogram of plankton near the surface of a gyre point in the central Pacific, where debris collects.

Mass concentrations of marine debris in high seas accumulation areas, such as the equatorial convergence zone, are of particular concern. In some such areas, rafts of assorted debris, including various plastics; ropes; fishing nets; and cargo-associated wastes such as dunnage, pallets, wires and plastic covers, drums and shipping containers, along with accumulated slicks of various oils, often extend for many kilometres.

Inventing "smarter" gear

Work is underway to explore durable gear that incorporates bio-degradable elements. This approach is already used in some countries for fish traps and pots, which are constructed with a biodegradable "escape hatch" that disintegrates when left under water too long, rendering the trap harmless. Fledgling efforts are under way to develop biodegradable and oxy-degradable plastics for wider using in the fishing industry.

The use of passive acoustic pingers on nets can help prevent cetacean entanglement when fishing and remain active if gear is lost. Experimentation is also underway in the addition of sound-reflecting substances to netting material, with the same goal.

And designs are being developed that incorporate pieces of cord to nets that function normally during fishing but which break when trapped large animals begin to thrash, freeing them.

The addition of magnets to gear can deter sharks from approaching too closely.

Ghost nets hurting marine environment
FAO 6 May 0;

Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear is impacting fish stocks and poses a hazard to boats

6 May 2009, Rome - Large amounts of fishing gear lost at sea or abandoned by fishers are hurting the marine environment, impacting fish stocks through "ghost fishing" and posing a hazard to ships, according to a new report jointly produced by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and UN Environment Programme (UNEP).

According to the study, the problem of abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) is getting worse due to the increased scale of global fishing operations and the introduction of highly durable fishing gear made of long-lasting synthetic materials.

The report estimates that abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear in the oceans makes up around 10 percent (640 000 tonnes) of all marine litter. Merchant shipping is the primary source on the open sea, land-based sources are the predominate cause of marine debris in coastal areas.

Most fishing gear is not deliberately discarded but is lost in storms or strong currents or results from "gear conflicts," for example, fishing with nets in areas where bottom-traps that can entangle them are already deployed.

The main impacts of abandoned or lost fishing gear are:

* continued catches of fish -- known as "ghost fishing" -- and other animals such as turtles, seabirds, and marine mammals, who are trapped and die;
* alterations of the sea-floor environment; and
* the creation of navigation hazards that can cause accidents at sea and damage boats.


Gill nets, fishing pots and traps are most likely to "ghost fish," while longlines, are more likely to ensnare other marine organisms and trawls most likely to damage sub-sea habitats.

Ghost fishing

In the past, poorly operated drift nets were the prime culprits, but a 1992 ban on their use in many areas has reduced their contribution to ghost fishing.

Today, bottom set gill nets are more often-cited as a problem. The bottom edge of these nets is anchored to the sea floor and floats are attached to their top, so that they form a vertical undersea wall of netting that can run anywhere from 600 to 10 000 meters in length. If a gillnet is abandoned or lost, it can continue to fish on its own for months - and sometimes years - indiscriminately killing fish and other animals.

Traps and pots are another major ghost fisher. In the Chesapeake Bay of the United States, an estimated 150 000 crab traps are lost each year out of an estimated 500 000 total deployed. On just the single Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, about 20 000 of all traps set each year are lost each hurricane season - a loss rate of 50 percent. Like gill nets, these traps can continue to fish on their own for long periods of time.

Solutions

"The amount of fishing gear remaining in the marine environment will continue to accumulate and the impacts on marine ecosystems will continue to get worse if the international community doesn't take effective steps to deal with the problem of marine debris as a whole. Strategies for addressing the problem must occur on multiple fronts, including prevention, mitigation, and curative measures," said Ichiro Nomura, FAO Assistant Director-General for Fisheries and Aquaculture. He also noted that FAO is working closely with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in its ongoing review of Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) as regards fishing gear and shore side reception facilities.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said:" There are many ‘ghosts in the marine environment machine' from overfishing and acidification linked with greenhouse gases to the rise in de-oxygenated ‘dead zones' as a result of run off and land-based source of pollution. Abandoned and lost fishing is part of this suite of challenges that must be urgently addressed collectively if the productivity of our oceans and seas is to be maintained for this and future generations, not least for achievement of the UN Millennium Development Goals".

The FAO/UNEP report makes a number of recommendations for tackling the problem of ghost nets:

Financial incentives. Economic incentives could encourage fishers to report lost gear or bring to port old and damaged gear, as well as any ghost nets they might recover accidentally while fishing.

Marking gear. Not all trash gear is deliberately dumped, so marking should not be used to "identify offenders" but rather better understand the reasons for gear loss and identify appropriate, fishery-specific preventative measures.

New technologies. New technologies offer new possibilities for reducing the probability of ghost fishing. Sea-bed imaging can be used to avoid undersea snags and obstacles. Fishing equipment can be expensive, and many fishers often go to great lengths to retrieve lost gear. Technology that makes doing so easier can help. Using GPS, vessels can mark locations where gear has been lost, facilitating retrieval, and transponders can be fitted to gear in order to do the same. Similarly, improvements in weather monitoring technology can be used to help skippers avoid deploying nets when very bad weather is imminent.

Just as new synthetic and other materials used in fishing gears have contributed to the ADLFG problem, they can also help solve it. Work is underway to speed up the commercial adoption of durable gear components that incorporate bio-degradable elements. For example, in some countries fish traps and pots are constructed with a biodegradable "escape hatch" that disintegrates when left under water too long, rendering the trap harmless. As this would not necessarily reduce the levels of debris, a reporting and retrieval system should also be adopted.

Improving collection, disposal and recycling schemes. It is necessary to facilitate proper disposal of all old, damaged and retrieved fishing gears, according to the report. Most ports do not have facilities on site that allow for this. Putting disposal bins on docks and providing boats with oversized, high-strength disposal bags for old fishing gear or parts thereof can help remedy this.

Better reporting of lost gear. A key recommendation of the report is that vessels should be required to log gear losses as a matter of course. However a "no-blame" approach should be followed with respect to liability for losses, their impacts, and any recovery efforts, it says. The goal should be to improve awareness of potential hazards and increase the opportunity for gear recovery.

The report discusses a number of other measures that could help, as well.

"Clearly solutions to this problem do exist, and our hope is that this report will prompt industry and governments to take action to significantly reduce the amount of lost or abandoned fishing gear in the marine environment," said Nomura.

The new report comes as nations are set to gather in for the World Oceans Conference in Manado, Indonesia (11-15 May 2009), where the issue of realizing healthy marine environments will figure high on the agenda.


Read more!

Origin of giant seaweed bloom in Beijing discovered

Matt Walker, BBC News 6 May 09;

Scientists have discovered the source of the gigantic green tide of algae that almost derailed the Beijing Olympics sailing regatta.

The huge algal bloom was triggered by a rapid expansion of farmed seaweed almost 200km down the coast, satellite images reveal. The green tide then grew and grew as it moved closer to the regatta city of Qingdao. At one point, it became the largest ever recorded anywhere in the world.

Initially, the international media and many scientists suggested that excess nutrients (eutrophication) in coastal waters caused the algal bloom.

The new finding, published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, disproves that idea and suggests that similar tides could happen again.

In late June 2008, the waters and shores at the Qingdao venue hosting the Olympic sailing regatta experienced a massive green tide covering about 600 sq km. Lasting over two weeks, it took more than 10,000 people to clean up, removing over one million tonnes of algae from the beach and coast.

The algae responsible is called Enteromorpha prolifera .

Satellites saw the algae appearing off Yancheng and moving north.

"It's not a dominant or common species in the local area," says Dongyan Liu, a marine biologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Yantai, Shandong.

"The rapid appearance and sheer scale made us suspect it had accumulated offshore and been transported in."

E. prolifera pollutes aquaculture farms that grow Porphyra seaweed on semi-floating rafts made of bamboo and net curtain.

The seaweed is mainly sold as food and also grown to prevent eutrophication, as the seaweed takes up nutrients that might otherwise pollute the water, allowing weeds to grow, staving other plants of oxygen.

Photos passed to Liu and John Keesing of the Australian research organisation CSIRO showed the Qingdao green tide contained bamboo poles used in Porphyra aquaculture.

The researchers then spoke to farmers growing the seaweed across the Yellow Sea on the coast of Jianngsu province. The timing of their harvest suggested the bloom could have originated there.

To investigate further, Liu, Keesing and colleagues examined photos of China's north-eastern coast taken by instruments on board Nasa's Terra and Aqua satellites, which view the entire Earth's surface every one to two days.

On the 15 May 2008, small green patches of algae, covering around 80 sq km, appeared off the coasts of Yancheng and Lianyungang in Jianngsu province, the images reveal.
The bloom (in red circles) grows as it heads towards Qingdao.

Within 10 days, these patches had moved away from the coast and into the Yellow Sea, covering 1,200 sq km, and impacting about 40,000 sq km of ocean, making it the largest algal boom, or green tide, ever recorded.

On the 18 June, algae patches began to move towards the coast at Qingdao, landing on the shore on 28 June.

Further satellite data confirmed that the right temperatures, wind speeds and oceanographic conditions existed at the time to favour the rapid growth of the algae, and transport it across the Yellow Sea.

"We suspect that the reason the bloom had not occurred previously was that the growth of aquaculture in this region has been so rapid," said Keesing.

From 2003 to 2008, the coastal area used for seaweed aquaculture off the coast of Jianngsu has more than doubled to 23,000 hectares.

"It has now reached a critical size where it has the capacity to produce enough Enteromorpha to cause the problems we saw in 2008," the CSIRO researcher said.

To prevent a reoccurrence "we should carefully manage the distribution and production of coastal aquaculture and educate farmers not to discard unwanted Enteromorpha into the water."


Read more!