Going M.A.D. with Cicada Tree
for the Nightlife! and about butterflies and moths on the Cicada Tree Eco-Place blog
More Hantu Dive photos
on a sunny Sunday on the Hantu Blog with more about about nudis and acoel flatworms
Tuas Power is building Singapore’s first ‘clean coal’ power plant
on the AsiaIsGreen blog
Full text of parliamentary discussion on rising sea levels and impact on Singapore on the wild shores of singapore blog
Bad times may actually help
Do you think the opening of the first Integrated Resort will be affected by the current economic environment, and if so, how?
Business Times 30 Sep 08;
Annie Sun
CEO
Dynaforce International Pte Ltd
'THERE'S too much at stake for the first IR not to open as planned. They may have to intensify their marketing efforts and rework their entrance and attraction fees to attract customers. On the bright side, for their sake, I hope it will be easier for them to recruit employees and manage their costs.'
Jackie Cheng Ee Lieng
CEO
HISAKA Holdings Ltd
'I DON'T think the IR opening will be affected by the bleaker environment. On the contrary, I think the IR will be an 'escapade' for many who are drowning in the negativity of the environment. I believe the IR will still attract a lot of people who desire some entertainment to overcome their stress and depression. I look forward to the IR and trust that it will emit a sparkle to attract others to Singapore.'
Kenny Yap
Managing Director
Qian Hu Corporation
'WE can answer that by looking at the number of people buying Toto or 4D in a bleak economic environment. If they tend to bet the same - or even more - during bad times, then the IR should be all right. Also, the IR is not all about the casino; it has a theme park element too, and if Singaporeans travel less to other countries due to the poor economic situation, they might stay back more in Singapore - and the IR should indirectly benefit from that. I live for tomorrow and always want to be a bit more optimistic when times are bleak. That gives hope - and the drive to move on!'
S.Ramesh, Channel NewsAsia 29 Sep 08;
SINGAPORE: Singaporeans will see an increase of 21 per cent in their electricity bills in the last quarter of this year.
The average electricity tariffs from October to December would go up by 5.38 cents per kilowatt per hour. The Energy Market Authority (EMA) said the increase is due to higher fuel oil prices.
For the last quarter of this year, oil prices were nearly S$155 per barrel, 38 per cent more than the third quarter.
So average monthly electricity bills look set to rise by S$5.70 to S$22.92 for those living in one- to five-room public housing flats.
For those living in the one- to three-room flats, this works out to an increase of between S$90 and S$223 in electricity bills for this year.
"I am jobless, so burden for me also," one individual said.
"Even though I don't pay the bill, my son does so I still feel the pinch for him," said another.
Seah Choon Seng, executive director, Consumers Association of Singapore, said: "The 20 per cent adjustment in tariff price is quite hefty for consumers to bear and I suppose one of those very high adjustments we see in many years. We feel that the companies involved in the utilities business should work harder in improving their efficiency to bring down the costs for consumers."
The EMA said the government's U-save rebates of S$310 to S$330 to help offset increases in utilities bills is more than enough to cover this year's electricity price increase for one-, two- and three-room HDB flats.
For four-room HDB households, the increase to the bill size for this year would be marginally higher than the U-save rebate given. These homes received S$295 in U-save rebates. But the total bill size for 2008 is estimated at S$316.
The EMA feels there is more room for Singaporeans to conserve and use less energy. That's because the EMA's surveys and findings show that nearly 40 per cent of Singapore homes are using more energy than they require to. And the air conditioner is one of the largest energy guzzlers in homes here.
Khoo Chin Hean, chief executive, EMA, said: "There is a lot of use which can be curtailed. There is probably quite a bit of wasteful usage. It is this kind of usage we can be more mindful of and take measures to manage our consumption."
The authority said if the forward fuel prices come down next month, the electricity tariff from January to March 2009 will be reduced accordingly. - CNA/vm
Electricity bills to go up 21%
Families in smaller flats will get relief from Government rebates
Liaw Wy-Cin, Straits Times 30 Sep 08;
ELECTRICITY bills will go up about 21 per cent tomorrow, the highest one-time increase in about seven years, according to the Energy Market Authority (EMA).
Those living in three-room Housing Board flats, for example, will see their average monthly power bills rise by $14, while five-roomers will pay $23 more a month.
Over the year, three-roomers will see their average utilities bill for power, water, gas and refuse collection rise by $223.
But there is relief for them. The Government's U-Save or Utilities-Save rebates of $310 for three-roomers and $330 for those in smaller flats - given in three instalments in January, July and November - will more than cover the increase.
Households in larger public housing apartments will have to pay for some of the increase out of their own pockets as the rebates, provided on a sliding scale, are meant to help the lower- and middle- income families.
Electricity tariffs, which are reviewed every quarter, have gone up for five straight quarters since July last year, because of rising oil prices.
With the latest round of increases, electricity tariffs go up from about 25 cents per kilowatt-hour to just over 30 cents.
EMA, the electricity and gas industry regulator, said that since 2004, electricity tariffs have been pegged to the price of fuel oil delivered to power generation companies for the next three months.
Known as 'forward fuel oil' prices, it is less volatile than the 'spot oil' prices quoted for immediate deliveries, explained EMA chief executive Khoo Chin Hean.
Petrol and diesel pump prices, which have come down in recent weeks, are also not an indicator of how much power generation companies have to pay, he added.
Mr Khoo said the forward fuel oil prices for the next three months is $155.14 per barrel, up 38 per cent from $112.35 per barrel for the current quarter.
But he held out hope that if oil prices continue to soften in the coming months, electricity tariffs could come down in the next quarterly revision, due in January.
Households can also do their part to trim their bills.
The scope for savings is high considering that power consumption patterns show that 40 per cent of households, from one-room flats to landed properties, use more than the monthly average, said Mr Khoo.
Private school lecturer Sally Chew, 47, and her family of five will see their monthly bill of $290 going up to about $350 with the new tariffs.
To keep the bill for their five-room flat below $300, 'we will switch to the fan instead of running the two air-conditioners the whole night as we do now'.
Some families have switched to a prepaid metering scheme after they had their power supply cut off or were in danger of having the supply disconnected.
Up to June this year, 13,700 households are on the Payu, or Pay As You Use, scheme which replaces conventional power meters with meters that work only if an account has sufficient credit in it.
Community development councils also offer vouchers to needy residents who have problems keeping up with payments.
Given that social workers have found about 35 per cent of those who have trouble paying their electricity bills live in four- and five-room flats, one MP suggested more flexibility in deciding who gets help, instead of looking only at housing type.
Mr Charles Chong (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) said: 'I have residents living in five-room flats coming to me for help, because they have lost the breadwinner. There are also retirees in private property living off their savings. Any increase will have an impact on them.'
Biggest hike in 8 years
Oil prices may be falling, but energy authority says tariffs based on market’s projections
Neo Chai Chin, Today Online 30 Sep 08;
EXPECT to pay an average of 21.5 per cent more on your monthly electricity bill until the year’s end, consumers have been told. The question on the minds of those who have watched oil prices decline since July would be: So why are tariffs rising?
As SP Services announced the biggest jump in quarterly electricity tariffs since the market began opening up in 2001, the Energy Market Authority (EMA) anticipated this question with a readyexplanation backed up with charts and figures.
Power tariffs, it said at a press briefing, are pegged to forward oil prices, which is the price agreed between the buyer and the seller for delivery of the oil at a specified future date — say, three months down the road.
This is based on how the market expects oil prices to behave in future. This is different from spot oil prices which are for immediate or near-term delivery.
Charts comparing spot and forward prices over four years show that the latter fluctuate less drastically.
“In a market where oil prices are relentlessly moving up, by pegging to three-month forward fuel price, we have been better off by and large,” said EMA chief executive Khoo Chin Hean, referring to how oil prices have surged over the last year.
For example, from April to July, spot prices varied between $115 and $155 per barrel; forward prices saw a smaller increase, from about $106 to $112.
One component of electricity tariffs, however, will decrease — transmission charges. From tomorrow, they will make up only 16 per cent of households’ tariffs, down from 20 to 25 per cent. The new rate will hold for the next five years.
Transmission charges are set by the EMA for SP to recover costs from buying, installing and maintaining transmission equipment. Over the years, SP has become more efficient, hence profiting more from transmission charges. EMA is lowering transmission charges to “make them share some of this profit with consumers”, said Mr Khoo.
How TO cope with the hike
This reduction in transmission charges to some extent offsets the increase in fuel costs. Still, it would mean that from next month, a five-room flat household would pay $22.90 more than the previous average $106.80 bill.
With EMA and the National Environment Agency advising consumers to cut back on electricity by using less air-conditioning, switching off lights and opening refrigerator doors less often, consumers told Today they have been practising good habits in recent months.
“This increase is very siong (hard-hitting). But the market is a monopoly, we can ’t do anything about it,” said Mr Liao Ching Hing, 61, who lives in a four-room flat and is between jobs. He now spends $70 to $80 monthly on electricity, lower than the average four-room flat’s expenditure of $91.76.
Secretary Christina Choo, 48, said public education is still necessary, especially for the tech-savvy younger set. “Some surf the Net for the whole day as they have unlimited usage subscriptions. But they have to understand their computers still use up electricity. In our days, we would shower with cold water and use manual fans,” said Mdm Choo, whose family of four lives in a condominium and pays about $150 monthly for electricity.
As for the lower-income, the EMA said that Utilities-Save rebates – meant to offset the GST hike and inflation – disbursed this year will more than make up for the increase in utilities bills for the lower-income.
The five Community Development Councils also help the low-income with measures such as organising money-saving workshops and handing out utilities vouchers.
SUBHD: Looking ahead to next year...
Going forward, can Singaporeans hope for lower tariffs in the first three months of next year, come the next tariff revision by SP Services?
Mr Khoo said this is “difficult for me to answer”.
But he observed that historically, forward prices drop if there is sustained decrease of spot oil prices. Market sentiment “isn’t that great” currently, he added.
In the longer term, could having many retailers selling electricity to households bring tariffs down?
The EMA is likely to announce, end-2009, if it will introduce an electronic vending system aimed at liberalising the consumer electricity market.
Mr Khoo said that with a competitive market, retailers would fight harder to attract customers, but this may not lead to lower prices. Instead it could lead to more “innovative” packages such as a free air-con when a contract is inked.
“So long as the consumer finds value-add, why not?” he said.
More products are claiming to be 'green', but are they really?
Tania Tan, Jessica Lim, Straits Times 30 Sep 08;
BROWSE through supermarket shelves here and you'll find a buffet of product labels making green claims.
But are they true blue?
A Straits Times check of about 150 necessities, including detergents, toiletries and canned foods, found 50 which claimed to be environmentally friendly.
One in four of those boasts, though, was clearly dubious and the majority could not be proven.
They are part of a trend experts call greenwashing. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, companies are increasingly gunning for their 'green dollars', said Associate Professor Bob Fleming from the National University of Singapore's (NUS) business school.
And often, their claims are little more than marketing tools.
In Singapore, trusted 'green-mark' labels come from the Singapore Environment Council. These products undergo strict testing to certify that their claims are accurate. Over 500 products from 200 companies bear the Singapore Green Label, most bound for export.
But some companies are touting self-proclaimed green labels on their packaging.
Two such companies told The Straits Times they had internal processes that certified their products as environmentally friendly. Others did not reply to queries.
One local pesticide manufacturer said that a circular green label on its product meant it was recyclable.
The logo was actually developed by a German consortium and has little environmental significance.
The National Environment Agency does not have any regulations for household product labelling, aside from a mandatory scheme for refrigerators and air-conditioners.
As a result, some customers are left to do their own research when it comes to going green.
Teacher Cynthia Chow, 40, is trying to do her part by buying eco-friendly products such as biodegradable plastic bags, despite the fact that they cost 20 to 40 per cent more than their non-green counterparts.
Though she tries to do her own label checks online, she concedes that she may not always be getting her money's worth. 'There is no way of tracking down (these labels). For consumers like me, it's just a matter of trust,' she said.
Greenwashing is not just for supermarket shelves, though.
Early this year, Compass Point shopping mall called for shoppers to 'spend more to save the environment'. Their green contributions would ultimately be rewarded with a car.
The advertisement went against the environmental edicts of 'reduce, reuse and recycle', said Mr Loo Deliang, vice-president of an NUS green group, which alerted this paper to the ad.
After penning a letter of complaint to the contest organiser, the ad was changed.
Lax regulations and a lack of proper standards here mean that the problem will only get worse before it gets better, said Prof Fleming.
'There just aren't enough regulations to stop false claims from reaching consumers.'
But the problem is not restricted to Singapore.
Last year, a survey of 1,018 products in the United States that made green claims threw up startling results - all but one boast was false or misleading.
According to the study, most claims turned out to be half-truths.
A paper product which claimed to be bleach-free, for example, might indeed have forsaken bleach, but broke environmental guidelines by using other equally-harmful chemicals.
'Outrageous claims' like recyclable polystyrene cups are a prime example of greenwashing, said Prof Fleming.
It is technically possible to recycle polystyrene containers. But what companies do not say is that recycling is too costly to be feasible, he explained.
The California Department of Conservation estimates that a tonne of polystyrene would cost a whopping US$3,000 (S$4,285) to recycle. A tonne of glass costs just US$89 to convert into new products.
'Companies will take advantage of any loophole,' said Prof Fleming.
But consumers are not totally defenceless. There are some green claims that should throw up a red flag.
Phrases like 'planet safe' and 'earth friendly' are 'fluff words', said Prof Fleming, because they reveal little concrete information about how green the product is, and how it was made.
Non-accredited symbols are another consumer booby trap, said Singapore Environment Council executive director Howard Shaw.
The ubiquitous recycling logo - the Mobius loop - is one such renegade mark.
'You could stick it on the back of a bus, and no one's liable,' said Mr Shaw.
Compared with those in countries such as Japan, labels here are still rudimentary, he added.
Hopefully, products here will eventually carry labels similar to Japanese ones, with detailed information on recycled contents, and soon, carbon footprint data, said Mr Shaw.
Public awareness is the best counter for errant labels, said NUS' Prof Fleming.
Websites like www.sourcewatch.org and www.corpwatch.org help highlight greenwash cases, he noted.
Product websites are another helpful tool for consumers to check the environmental claims of their purchases.
Ms Chow, a green shopper, visits product websites to check if labels are verifiable.
'Sometimes, you have to read beyond the labels,' she said.
Additional reporting by Daryl Tan & Lim Heng Liang
Going green: Firms can do a lot more
Tania Tan, Straits Times 30 Sep 08;
BUSINESSES here are getting greener, but the results of a new survey suggest firms still have some way to go before they can be considered truly eco-friendly.
While many have adopted policies to protect the earth - like using energy-efficient lightbulbs and printing on both sides of office paper - few have gone beyond measures that also help them cut costs.
'Going green still hasn't taken root yet,' said Mr Leon Perera, managing director of Spire Research and Consulting, which surveyed 106 firms. 'Green measures are still skin-deep for most companies.'
Spire conducted phone interviews with firms in seven countries in the Asia-Pacific region, including China, Korea and Vietnam.
The companies were either large or multinational corporations, said Mr Perera.
At least one was a Fortune 500 company, he said, declining to reveal their names.
Eight in 10 companies here have adopted environmental conservation measures, the survey found.
This puts the Singapore ahead their counterparts in neighbouring countries, where only about 67 per cent have adopted green measures.
Results of the inaugural survey were encouraging, said Mr Perera but he stopped short of calling local businesses 'green'.
'A truly green business is one that practises environmental consciousness from top management right down to the janitor,' he said.
Korean corporations best fit the definition of 'green firms', with regular participation and donations to environmental causes, as well as carbon-trading, said Mr Perera.
The president of non-profit group Environmental Challenge Organisation, Mr Wilson Ang, said businesses understand that 'going green helps to boost their bottom line'.
'The next challenge is turning awareness into action,' he said.
The environment has been moving up on the national agenda, with an inter-ministry committee recently pledging to balance economic growth with environmental sustainability.
But some companies are hoping for a more aggressive approach by the public sector.
'If China can ban plastic bags, why not Singapore?' said Mr Harold Kloeden, general manager of waste management company Veolia Environmental Services Singapore.
He was referring to a measure Beijing put in place during the Olympics.
Polystyrene cups and plates are a big no-no at his company headquarters in Tuas.
Employees use non-disposable crockery instead.
'Being a little bit more green is sometimes a little bit less convenient but it's necessary and it feels good,' said Mr Kloeden. 
Full PDF on the Straits Times website.
Making waves in the water industry
Business Times 30 Sep 08;
Candid Water Cooler is determined to prove that distilled bottled water is better choice, reports MELISSA YEO
WHETHER it's mineral or distilled, glacial or spring water - to the average Singaporean, bottled water is bottled water. But in truth, not all bottles of water are alike. And Candid Water Cooler is determined to prove that. Eighteen years ago, Candid Water Cooler entered the water processing industry as the only manufacturer and bottler of distilled pure drinking water in Singapore, retailing its bottled water under the brand name Alpheus.
According to Candid Water Cooler, drinking distilled water provides health benefits that drinking mineral water does not.
In the distillation process, the water is heated till it boils, removing impurities from the water. The steam is then condensed into liquid form, leaving it free of minerals, chemicals and other contaminants.
'In distilled water, the water is devoid of any minerals,' said Nick Lim, managing director. 'The water that we provide is completely pure. It even tastes better.'
There exists a common misconception that minerals are always beneficial, said Mr Lim. Consumers often lack the knowledge to determine whether the minerals in mineral water are truly needed or not.
'Water should only be replenishment for your daily water loss through dehydration,' he said. 'As long as you maintain a balanced diet, you do not need to drink water with minerals in it.' However, distilled water has not always been perceived as the healthier choice.
'Initially, people were so used to drinking mineral or tap water,' said Mr Lim. 'They'd seldom heard of distilled water for drinking. It was quite an uphill task, going door-to-door, slowly trying to educate people on the differences in water and the availability of distilled drinking water.'
Even now, there is much debate on whether drinking distilled water is healthiest. Analysts have suggested that distilled water leaches beneficial minerals from the human body, which can be useful for detoxification regimens, but harmful in the long run.
However, Candid Water Cooler maintains that this belief is mistaken. Rather, it supports the view that distilled water collects and removes inorganic minerals that have been rejected by the body, thus evacuating them and preventing their harmful effects.
Education is thus an essential component of Candid Water Cooler's business strategy. Mr Lim said: 'It's important to continue bringing forth this message: that there is a health benefit to drinking distilled water which many are not aware of.'
Branding has also taken on great importance to Candid Water Cooler's success. In August, the company launched a rebranding campaign for Alpheus - its first move to rebrand since its establishment in 1990.
'This is a new milestone for us,' said Mr Lim of the campaign, a $1 million investment. 'We are pulling ourselves away from what we have always done, in order to compete.'
Conceptualised over a year ago, the campaign introduces a new bottle and label, as well as a fresh tagline: 'Be good to yourself.'
'Branding is very important, even if you're in a different line of business,' said Mr Lim. 'It must have a message: what is it about your product that you want consumers to appreciate?'
However, aside from increasing the appeal and visibility of one's product, rebranding has a further purpose for Candid Water Cooler.
'Most people focus on the end result of rebranding: how much sales it will generate,' said Mr Lim. 'But it also helps to garner the support of the company's staff.'
Rebranding helps to assure staff members of their company's direction and viability, said Mr Lim.
'When a company that has been around for so long can undergo a major change, it reinforces the staff members' confidence,' he said. 'It assures them that the company is not stagnant or unprogressive. If your staff don't believe in their own company or product, you will not succeed.'
In addition to bottled water, Candid Water Cooler also produces and provides commercial bottled dispensers and pressure water coolers, such as those found in offices and schools.
'A significant portion of our yearly turnover is invested in upgrading our equipment,' said Mr Lim. 'We want to make sure we are consistent in providing a quality product.' They also provide customised OEM water bottle labels for organisations or events, and are the only local operators to provide this service.
'With this rebranding campaign, I think we can go further,' said Mr Lim. 'In the future, we might establish production plants overseas, but nothing is concrete yet. Our focus is on producing distilled water in Singapore, and see good prospects for Candid Water Cooler.'
In an industry where product differentiation is largely lost on consumers, particular effort must be made to retain a strong market position. And with a high quality product, backed by a revamped brand image, it's clear that this bottled water producer is willing to go the distance.
It will examine policies, practices on green building promotion and rules
Jamie Lee, Business Times 30 Sep 08;
THE Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has engaged five international players to review its green building plans and 'accelerate Singapore's green building movement'.
The panel, which includes researchers from Singapore universities and design experts from overseas, will look at Singapore's policies and practices on green building promotion and regulation.
It has already started work, will wind up on Oct 2 and present its report at the end of this week.
It will examine how other countries develop green buildings, look at the challenges and potential involved in promoting environmental sustainability for existing buildings, and recommend new directions for Singapore's green building efforts.
BCA chief executive John Keung said yesterday that the focus will be on 'greening existing buildings', after the first masterplan in 2006 and the Green Mark scheme in 2005 brought about 130 green building projects, with another 200 awaiting assessment.
'We will draw fresh perspectives from the experts, especially in promoting environmental sustainability for existing buildings which are in need of upgrading to improve their energy efficiency,' Mr Keung said.
For the panel, BCA has engaged Professor Joachim Luther, chief executive of Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore and former director of Europe's Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems.
Joining him are Professor Kazuo Iwamura, a Japanese architect who focuses on urban and architectural research; Kevin Hydes, chairman of the World Green Building Council; Maria Atkinson, global head of sustainability for Australian property group Lend Lease; and Peter Head, director of global design, engineering, planning and business consultancy Arup.
The panel will work with Dr Nirmal Kishnani, senior lecturer at the National University of Singapore, and Associate Professor Raymond Wong from Nanyang Technological University's School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Rivals are 'neck and neck' in race for global trading role, says expert
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 30 Sep 08;
SINGAPORE and close rival Hong Kong are 'neck and neck' to claim the title of Asia's first carbon trading hub, said an industry expert.
While Singapore was ahead a year ago, Hong Kong is fast catching up and might clinch the title, said Mr Shane Spurway, head of carbon banking at Fortis Bank.
Hong Kong's location gives it an advantage as it is so close to China, said Mr Spurway. And although Singapore has been more pro-active in setting up carbon trading infrastructure, Hong Kong is rapidly beefing up its own.
Hong Kong announced in June that it had established the legal framework to allow projects that could sell on their reductions in carbon emissions, added Mr Spurway.
Singapore had already put this in place as it ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2006.
Recently, a new trading platform called the Singapore Mercantile Exchange (SMX) was also announced. This will allow local investors to buy and sell carbon credits for the first time when it is operational next year.
Hong Kong's growing interest is due to its search for other revenue streams to support its financial industry, said Mr Spurway. But it is difficult to say who will emerge in the lead, he added.
Mr Spurway, who was speaking to The Straits Times last week on a range of carbon issues, also touched on eco-financing in Asia.
These are projects, regulated by the United Nations under a Clean Development Mechanism set up under the Kyoto Protocol, that generate carbon credits. One credit is one less tonne of carbon dioxide emission produced.
The credits are then traded and bought by firms, normally from Europe, which have to comply with reduction targets on greenhouse gas emissions.
Industry leaders such as Mr Edwin Khew, chief executive of waste-recycler IUT Global, have noted that banks - especially local ones - do not have a good understanding of carbon projects.
The result is that good projects cannot get kick-started without seed money.
Mr Spurway acknowledged the problem but said that banks needed to have their 'checks in place'. 'They need track records and proven balance sheets to grant funding, so as to protect themselves,' he said.
He foresees that 'carbon specialists' will emerge to bridge companies' ideas with financial institutions.
The carbon market also 'really needs entrepreneurs and investors to come in', as there are many good ideas being generated, but these need to be commercialised and brought to market, he said.
Ultimately, the carbon market will go into full swing only when 'America joins the party', he said.
It is likely that whoever wins the upcoming presidential election will set up a cap-and-trade system, like those in Europe, to impose industry targets, he said.
Asia's role is extremely crucial as it is a major supplier of carbon credits.
Considering that the bulk of emissions until 2030 will be coming from Asia, 'it's even more important to make industries more efficient. And that's where carbon trading comes in', he said.
An interview with Rebecca Klein of Cheetah Conservation Botswana
Rhett A. Butler, mongabay.com 30 Sep 08;
The planet's fastest land animal is falling behind in its race for survival against habitat encroachment, loss of prey, the illegal wildlife trade, and disease.
Once found widely across the African continent to Kazakhstan in the north to Burma in the East, the cheetah has seen a dramatic reduction of its range and numbers in recent centuries as livestock holders have relentlessly killed off the cat as a threat to their livelihoods. Today the cheetah clings to strongholds in only a few African nations. Among these is the southern African country of Botswana, which harbors large expanses of prime cheetah habitat.
Still even in Bostwana, the cheetah faces challenges. Despite having one of the world's lowest population densities (3 people per sq km), over the past generation Botswana has seen a sharp rise in cattle ranching and industrial agriculture.
These activities — fueled by the drilling of deep boreholes that provide water in an otherwise water-limited landscape — have put typical cheetah prey in direct competition with livestock, reducing their numbers and driving increased conflict between cheetah and domestic animals. The change in land-use has also concentrated lands holdings in the hands of a privileged few and deprived hunter-gather communities of their traditional livelihoods.
With this as a backdrop, Cheetah Conservation Botswana (CCB) is working to preserve the country's cheetah population through scientific research and community outreach and education. CCB monitors wild cheetah to gain critical insight into their ecology, health and behavior; rehabilitates orphaned cheetah cubs; and is establishing programs to help farmers more effectively protect their livestock from predators. CCB is also looking at ways to promote wildlife conservation through economic incentive programs, including "Predator Friendly Beef" and alternative livelihood initiatives for rural communities.
In an interview ahead of an upcoming appearance in the U.S., CCB co-founder Rebecca Klein spoke about her organization's work and its efforts to conserve cheetahs while delivering benefits to local communities. CCB is partially supported by the Wildlife Conservation Network (WCN), an innovative group that uses a venture capital model to protect some of the world's most endangered species. WCN will be hosting Klein at its upcoming Wildlife Conservation Expo in San Francisco, California on October 4th. Expo attendees will be able to meet Klein and learn more about CCB firsthand. The event, which is open to the public and costs $25-50 per person, also features 16 other conservationists working to protect wildlife around the world.
AN INTERVIEW WITH REBECCA KLEIN OF CHEETAH CONSERVATION BOTSWANA
Mongabay: What led you to cheetahs in Botswana?
Rebecca Klein: I grew up in Africa and Asia in remote places so I grew to love the wilderness. I decided I wanted to work in conservation at a young age and was particularly drawn to endangered species and threatened habitats. I'd always wanted to visit Botswana as it sounded wild and beautiful. So found a voluntary job at Mokolodi Nature Reserve, part of which involved looking after 2 orphaned cheetah brothers. I fell in love with the species and decided I'd found my niche, to work towards their conservation and the Kalahari ecosystems.
Mongabay: What methods do you use to study cheetahs?
Rebecca Klein: Track surveys, camera trap surveys, satellite telemetry, community surveys, scat collection, disease and genetic sampling.
Mongabay: Why are cheetahs at risk in Botswana?
Rebecca Klein: Mainly from human-wildlife conflict and illegal trade.
Mongabay: How well protected are cheetah?
Rebecca Klein: They are protected and cannot be hunted. However, they can be lethally removed if they are considered to be causing a threat to human life and property.
Mongabay: Do you know if the cheetah situation in Botswana representative of that for other parts of the continent?
Rebecca Klein: Botswana's cheetahs are doing well in comparison to many other African countries. Botswana still has wilderness areas and good prey populations. However, conflict due to human encroachment is increasing and the cheetah is under threat as throughout Africa.
Mongabay: In report you mention boreholes as a significant development in Botswana. How are these affecting wildlife in general in Botswana?
Rebecca Klein: Deep boreholes open up areas of wilderness that could not be used for permanent livestock pastures in the past due to low rainfall. Now these boreholes bring up underground water and make it possible for livestock and people to move into these areas. Now livestock compete for the grazing and water and wildlife gradually decreases.
Mongabay: Is industrial agriculture displacing hunter-gathers and rural populations?
Rebecca Klein: Yes, more commercial ranches have been designated over the last 20 years. The population is becoming increasingly sedentary.
Mongabay: Do these farms offer less employment compared to small-holder plots and traditional livelihoods?
Rebecca Klein: They give ownership of the land over to a few, whereas previously this land was available for use by the whole tribe and managed by the chiefs. So yes it decreases the number of people which benefit from the resources of these areas.
Mongabay: How significant is the illegal trade in cheetah? Who is buying?
Rebecca Klein: Its estimated about 100 cheetahs leave Botswana each year. They go to supply the canned hunting trade and the illegal international wildlife trade.
Mongabay: How big a risk are disease outbreaks among cheetah? If they are a significant risk, is vaccination an option, either of cheetah or domestic animals?
Rebecca Klein: There have been no major disease outbreaks in cheetah in Botswana. Anthrax is a particular concern and we vaccinate against this in cheetahs that CCB captures and releases.
Mongabay: Can cheetah recover quickly if provided with suitable habitat and prey?
Rebecca Klein: Yes, they do well in the absence of stronger predators such as lion and hyena, often raising litters of 5 cubs which grow to adulthood.
Mongabay: Some research seems to suggest a higher density of cheetah in agricultural areas. Is peaceful co-existence between cheetah and farmers possible?
Rebecca Klein: Yes if people take responsibility to manage their farms and livestock well using appropriate grazing management strategies, livestock husbandry and non-lethal methods of predator control.
Mongabay: Are there compensation programs for livestock killed by cheetah?
Rebecca Klein: Yes in Botswana cheetah losses are compensated.
Mongabay: How is your work received by local communities?
Rebecca Klein: Communities appreciate our approach which is to promote coexistence for the benefit of both rural community welfare and biodiversity conservation.
Mongabay: What are ways local people can benefit from cheetah conservation?
Rebecca Klein: Ecotourism is the most achievable option. Also, through the eco-labeling of products form natural resources as wildlife friendly. Predator friendly beef is a potential opportunity.
Mongabay: Can tourism compete as a form of land use relative to beef?
Rebecca Klein: It is much more sustainable and less reliant on rainfall.
Mongabay: How productive is cattle ranching?
Rebecca Klein: In the Kalahari is can be very productive with good rainfall years but as rainfall is variable this is not assured. Overstocking and overgrazing are causing land degradation and bush encroachment and causing potential long term damage to this sensitive environment. Wildlife based initiatives will be a much more sustainable form of land use.
Mongabay: Is beef a major source of employment or just a powerful lobby?
Rebecca Klein: Both and it is also a strong part of the Tswana culture to keep herds of cattle.
Mongabay: What's your outlook for the cheetah and more generally the wild lands of Botswana?
Rebecca Klein: At the moment it is good. There is a national move towards empowering communities to sustainably utilize their natural resources through alternative livelihoods. If this can be successful wildlife will begin to have more value at individual and community level. This will encourage the conservation of habitats and biodiversity.
Mongabay: Have you looked at the potential impact of climate change on wildlife in the region?
Rebecca Klein: Yes and this if rainfall declines in the Kalahari cattle farming will not be a feasible land use. It is already leading to reduced grazing, bush encroachment and desertification.
Mongabay: How can in the U.S. people help?
Rebecca Klein: By raising awareness for global conservation and supporting programs both locally and internationally through giving assistance through time, energy and funds. Whatever you have most of!
Mongabay: Any tips for aspiring conservationists?
Rebecca Klein: Keep focused and dedicated. Get your degree, preferably a Masters or PhD. Be prepared to volunteer to get experience. Dont give up! There's a lot of competition everywhere these days but there is so much that needs to be done!
Cheetah Conservation Botswana
http://cheetahbotswana.com/
Wildlife Conservation Expo
http://wildlifeconservationnetwork.org/events/expo2008sat.html
Richard Black, BBC News 29 Sep 08;
Most articles about scientific subjects start by telling you what people have discovered about something.
This one is mainly about what people have not discovered about something.
"There's not much known about these creatures - where they live, their lifestyle," says Ted Cranford from San Diego State University in California, US.
"In fact, they might be the least understood group of large mammals on Earth."
The creatures in question are beaked whales - rarely seen, elusive, private, yet the subject of some attention in recent years because of the damage that military sonar systems appear to inflict on them.
This summer, the research vessel Song of the Whale is attempting to fill in some of the gaps in our understanding as it sails in and around the Canary Islands, home to several beaked whale species.
Operated by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw), the yacht's main research tools are hydrophones - underwater microphones - that listen for and track the whales' characteristic high-frequency clicks.
And there is much to discover.
Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
Scientist Oliver Boisseau explains how to listen out for beaked whales
"Some species have never been seen alive, and these are animals as big as an elephant," says Vassili Papastavrou, a whale biologist with Ifaw who is on board Song of the Whale.
Just about the most obvious question you could ask about any kind of animal is "how many of them are there?".
Well, we have no idea - for any of the beaked whale species.
So let us take another obvious question: how many species are there?
Once again, the answer is unclear.
The 2002 reference work Sea Mammals of the World book, written by leading lights in the cetacean academic world, lists 21.
But, it says, Arnoux's beaked whale may actually be the same as Baird's, while DNA analysis suggests the apparently single species of southern bottlenose whale could be two.
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), in its Red List of Threatened Species, lists 17.
And, to drive the point home, the list says that for 15 of those species, there is simply not enough data to know whether they are threatened with extinction to any degree or not.
Fat bodies
The kind of data gathered by Song of the Whale and other missions around the world gives snapshots of how the animals behave.
But for most beaked whale species, more data has come down the years from examination of dead animals - for some species, corpses are the only source, as they have never been seen alive.
Sea Mammals of the World notes dryly that the northern bottlenose whale is the best understood of all the species because it used to be commercially hunted; and some hunters kept good records of what they caught and what they found.
From a well-preserved corpse - even better, from many corpses - scientists can determine an animal's size, gain clues to its diet and longevity and take DNA samples for analysis.
They can also look at how species have adapted to the environment they live in.
And perhaps the best understood and most fascinating adaptation of beaked whales is in their heads.
Head gear
Over millennia of evolution, this family has developed an acoustic echo-location system that uses windpipes to generate sound, fat to focus it and bone structures that help channel reflections back to the ears.
The basic structure has been known for decades; but last year Ted Cranford had a unique opportunity to get a closer view.
A Cuvier's beaked whale washed up on the shores of Oregon. The people who found it managed to get the head quickly frozen; and Dr Cranford persuaded those in charge of Hill Air Force Base nearby to let him put it through a scanner routinely used for examining rocket motors.
The scan, which took several days, showed that the conventional view of sound production was about right.
Clicks are generated when a structure just below the blowhole known as "monkey's lips" smacks together.
That generates a wave radiating spherically outwards, which is transformed into a directionally forward-focussed plane wave as it passes through a fat "melon" - an acoustic lens.
So the sound - too high-pitched for a human to hear - shoots out in front of the whale, and if it hits food, such as a squid, a portion is reflected.
The reflection was thought to travel to the whale's ears, via its lower jawbone. But the scan suggested a more important route is under the bone.
Top of head for transmitting, bottom of head for receiving; a neat system.
The sound reception part appears to be very complex, involving fat bodies that focus sound and air sacs that reflect it.
"Air sacs are perfect acoustic mirrors," says Ted Cranford.
"The whales need to be able to isolate their ears from each other in order to maintain their directional sense, and one of the best ways to do that is through air sacs."
The use of air sacs is almost incredible when you think that the whales are diving as deep as 2km (1.2 miles), where the pressure equates to 20 megapascals (about 200 atmospheres).
The whales' lungs collapse as they dive, a defensive mechanism against damage from the huge disparity of water pressure outside and air pressure inside; yet somehow the air sacs channelling sound, which appears to be key to the whales' hunting success, stay operational.
First light?
What we know about beaked whales may be fascinating; but it is dwarfed by our ignorance.
Ifaw believes its line of research, concentrating on observing animals in the wild, can answer questions about their behaviour that autopsies of dead whales cannot address.
"This kind of work led to the beginning of our understanding of social structures, such as with the sperm whale," says Mr Papastavrou.
"But then, sperm whales are incredibly loud. Beaked whales use such high frequencies that you can't even hear them without specialised equipment."
As I sit in Song of the Whale's cabin, the specialised equipment is deployed behind the boat, and sounds of beaked whales are being registered.
Scientists now understand the clicks well enough to distinguish between the various species seen here, such as Cuvier's and Blainville's beaked whales and the northern bottlenose whale.
But that is a far cry from what we perhaps ought to know - how they live, where they go, how many there are and what threats they face.
I wonder how much luck we will have filling in the gaps.
John Flesher, Associated Press Yahoo News 30 Sep 08;
A federal court Monday overturned the Bush administration's decision to remove gray wolves in the western Great Lakes region from the endangered species list.
U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington sided with environmental groups that accused the government of misreading the law last year when it lifted protections for about 4,000 wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
It was the second setback in a week for the administration's campaign to return management authority to state officials in the two regions where the wolf has rebounded after being driven to the brink of extinction in the lower 48 states.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Sept. 23 asked a judge in Montana to return gray wolves in the Northern Rockies to the endangered list, reversing a proposal to drop them earlier this year. That followed the judge's order in July barring plans for public wolf hunts in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.
"The Bush administration's repeated attempts to push the limits of the Endangered Species Act have been decidedly rejected by the courts," said Amy Atwood, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity.
The biggest practical effect of Friedman's ruling is to nullify newly established state policies allowing people in the Great Lakes area to kill wolves attacking livestock or pets. It also bars the states from permitting hunting or trapping of wolves, although none had done so.
"In our judgment, this is an animal that deserves protection," said Howard Goldman, central states regional director for The Humane Society of the United States. "It has taken so long for their numbers to recover, we've got to be very careful before removing any protections from them."
Jason Holm, spokesman for the Fish and Wildlife Service, said its attorneys were studying the ruling to determine the next step.
"We are disappointed," he said. "The service and our partners worked toward recovery of the gray wolf in the western Great Lakes for more than three decades" and considered the population "robust enough that it no longer needed Endangered Species Act protection."
The wolf occupies only about 5 percent of its historical range, which once took in most of the continental U.S.
But the animal has recovered steadily in the western Great Lakes region since the late 1970s, migrating from Minnesota into Wisconsin and Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Surveys this year turned up 2,921 wolves in Minnesota, at least 537 in Wisconsin and 520 in Michigan.
In a lawsuit challenging the Fish and Wildlife Service's 2007 decision, The Humane Society and several other groups claimed the government had acted illegally by designating Great Lakes wolves as a "distinct population segment" that could be bumped from the endangered list without regard to the species' nationwide standing.
Friedman said it was unclear whether the 1973 Endangered Species Act permits such a move. He ordered the agency to provide a better explanation of its interpretation and respond to concerns that its policy could undermine the goal of protecting the wolf. In the meantime, he returned the wolf to the federal endangered list.
"Little confusion or inefficiency will result from reinstating a regulatory regime that was in place from 1978 to 2007, particularly given the fact that state and federal wolf management authorities have been working in tandem for years," the judge said in his opinion.
But wildlife officials in the three states said the ruling would be disruptive.
"A lot of things are unknown right now," said Brian Roell, wolf coordinator for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. "This really takes away our ability to implement our management plan."
Wisconsin will revoke permits it had issued to seven farmers allowing them to shoot wolves attacking livestock, natural resources spokeswoman Laurel Steffes said.
Until the lawsuit is resolved, state officials said they probably would seek federal permits allowing non-lethal methods to deal with wolves that continually harass livestock.
"We hope it can be resolved and we can get an answer from the Fish and Wildlife Service about what the next steps will be," said Dan Stark, spokesman for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Brian Skoloff, Associated Press Yahoo News 29 Sep 08;
A multibillion-dollar effort to restore Florida's Everglades has made little progress amid funding shortfalls, bureaucratic red tape and disagreements, according to a congressionally mandated report that warns the vast wetland is in peril.
The National Research Council, in findings Monday, warned that degradation of the Everglades could become irreversible if action isn't taken quickly.
"The Everglades ecosystem is continuing to decline. It's our estimate that we're losing the battle to save this thing," said William Graf, the report's committee chairman and head of the department of geography at the University of South Carolina at Columbia.
The South Florida Water Management District, which oversees restoration for the state, said in a statement that it agrees with the report's findings "that restoration progress is hampered by limited federal funding and a complex and lengthy federal planning process."
Approved by Congress in 2000, the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan was originally estimated to cost about $7.8 billion and expected to take 30 years to complete — a price tag that has since ballooned due to construction costs and other inflation.
The intent is to help restore some natural water flow after decades of dikes and diversions for development and agriculture, which have shrunk the Everglades to half its historical 4 million acres.
The 2000 plan made the federal government and Florida 50-50 partners. To date, the state has committed more than $2 billion and pushed ahead alone with a few projects. Congress has only appropriated several hundred million dollars.
Lake Okeechobee, the liquid heart of the Everglades, remains heavily polluted with phosphorous mostly from fertilizer runoff. Wildlife habitat is disappearing and the report noted that at least 67 threatened or endangered species face extreme peril.
"Unless near-term progress is achieved on major restoration initiatives, the Everglades will likely face further loss of species and habitat deterioration, which could be difficult or impossible to reverse," the report said.
Meanwhile, the NRC committee commended Florida for its ambitious land acquisition, including a $1.75 billion proposal to buy some 300 square miles of farmland from U.S. Sugar Corp. that has long been a hindrance to water flow. However, much of that land may remain in agriculture, and the committee noted effects of such a deal may be more than a decade away.
Dexter Lehtinen, a Miami attorney who represents the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians living in the Everglades, has consistently fought for restoration. He said the entire effort has been mired in talk and not enough action.
"That's going to kill the Everglades," he said.
Gregoire Pourtier, Yahoo News 29 Sep 08;
Elisabeth's 13 children were born by candlelight. Her daughter, who has just become a mother for the first time, was more "fortunate".
Now, in Antasahadinta hospital in rural Madagascar, the use of solar energy means stories like Elisabeth's have been consigned to history -- a small success for a power source so abundant yet so hard to tap on a continent fraught with poverty, lacking infrastructures and prone to instability.
Still unconnected to the national network, several rural hospitals were equipped with solar technology four years ago to produce their own electricity.
Antsahadinta is a small village 20 kilometers (12 miles) to the west of the capital Antananarivo. The village health centre is responsible for 12,000 people and can see up to 400 patients a month.
"My 13 children were born in the old hospital by candlelight; my daughter is fortunate to have given birth in these conditions," said Elisabeth Razafindrataka, a 53-year-old grandmother, accompanying her daughter after giving birth to her first child.
Not that long ago, you had to bring your own candles with you if went into labour at night, she said.
And despite its close proximity to the capital, Antsahadinta will not be connected to the electricity supply for some years yet.
This Indian Ocean island state is one of the world's poorest countries, and its electricity grid is limited: just 43 percent of Madagascar is covered by the national water and electricity company, JIRAMA.
According to a 2006 United Nations report, only three percent of the rural population is connected to the network. Yet 85 percent of Madagascar's 17 million people live in the countryside, and most below the poverty line.
The poor financial health of JIRAMA, which struggles to maintain good supplies even in some large towns, and Madagascar's rampant poverty explain delays in fitting equipment and connecting people -- a scenario all too common in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa.
When Antsahadinta's health centre was rebuilt in 2004, the Development Intervention Fund (FID), a private association in part financed by the government, installed three large solar panels. The three panels can produce up to 400 watts of electricity.
"This really makes our work easier, especially since 80 percent of births take place at night," said Mamy Rakotondrainibe, the head doctor at the centre.
From now on, each room is equipped with light bulbs. The centre has also been able to get rid of the generator that it used to power a refrigerator that stores vaccinations and medicines. The generator used 30 litres (quarts) of fuel a month and was very noisy.
"The beneficiaries have said they are really satisfied and the tendency is to research alternative energy," said Rasendra Ratsima, FID's managing director.
With the help of financing from the World Bank, FID decided to launch a new wave of solar installations in 27 health centres at the cost of 1.3 billion ariary (739,000 dollars, 520,000 euros).
The initiative appears to be a success -- a way of tackling the problem of the remoteness of the majority of Madagascar's health centres.
The Antsahadinta centre still faces one major difficulty: the lack of running water. The staff are left with the only option of boiling water from a nearby well.
"The problem, as always, is water. There are no taps throughout the whole health centre. We only have a well, which is 20 meters (65 feet) deep," said Rakotondrainibe.
Gerard Wynn, PlanetArk 29 Sep 08;
LONDON - A global pull-back from bank lending may dent the commercialisation of biofuel technologies to replace conventional gasoline, said the chief executive of US cellulosic ethanol firm BlueFire Ethanol.
A credit crisis which claimed more bank victims on Monday has raised project finance costs and made ambitious targets to replace replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources look less achievable.
"Longer term, yes... the issue of capital may slow us down," Arnold Klann told Reuters on Monday. BlueFire Ethanol was hoping alternative investors including hedge funds may bridge any shortfall in bank lending, he added.
A global transition to renewable sources of energy, including waste, to replace gasoline and wind and solar power to replace gas and coal-fired power generation, is meant to cut carbon emissions and improve security of energy supply.
The credit crisis could slow that transition both through more costly finance and by diverting subsidies from renewables, which are often more expensive than conventional fossil fuels.
US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday said that he may have to scale back his US energy investment plans, if elected, in order to help pay for a planned US$700 billion financial market bailout.
Obama did not detail which aspect of his plans may be trimmed. He has previously promised to invest US$150 billion over the next decade to develop affordable, renewable energy sources and clean coal, touting these as a long-term energy solution rather than new, off-shore oil drilling.
BlueFire Ethanol is targeting up to 84 plants by 2022 producing more than 4 billion gallons annually of second generation biofuels, which consume waste rather than crops and so do not stoke food prices as corn and oil seed-based biofuels.
The United States has mandated 16 billion gallons a year of such cellulosic ethanol production by 2022, to ease the pressure of biofuels on agricultural land struggling to feed a growing, more prosperous world population.
That compares with about 150 billion gallons annual gasoline consumption in the United States now, Klann said.
MANDATE
Cellulosic ethanol producers use enzymes or acid to convert waste from plants, including grass, wood chips and cardboard, to produce sugar and ethanol, but the infant industry so far is producing next to nothing on a commercial scale.
BlueFire Ethanol is targeting two demonstration-scale plants using concentrated acid to convert municipal waste into a little over 3 million and 17 million gallons of ethanol annually, to come on line in 2009 and 2010 respectively.
"We're good on these, I think," said Klann, referring to those deadlines.
The capital costs of the two plants would be US$30 million and US$150 million respectively, and would produce cellulosic ethanol at a cost of US$1.4 and $1 per gallon, which compares with ethanol prices of over US$2.20 a gallon.
Some analysts already doubt the practicality of ambitious European Union goals to get a fifth of all energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020.
The EU renewable energy sector faced an annual 21 billion euros shortfall in debt finance to meet that goal by 2020, both because of the credit crisis and the pace of growth of the sector, a Rabobank banker said earlier this month.
Timothy Gardner, PlanetArk 29 Sep 08;
NEW YORK - The first auction in the United States of permits allowing power plants to emit a greenhouse gas raised nearly US$39 million, which states plan to use to protect consumers from any higher energy bills that could result from capping the pollution.
The auction kicked off the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, an agreement by ten states to begin regulating carbon dioxide emissions from more than 230 power plants in January. The states, from Maryland to Maine, are taking action in the absence of guidance from the Bush Administration on how to regulate the gases widely blamed for warming the planet.
The permits sold for for US$3.07 per ton, RGGI said on Monday.
The price was lower than the US$4.50 to $4.00 per ton that contracts on the permits had been fetching in recent weeks on futures markets. It is also lower than carbon prices in the European Union, where they were trading for about US$34 dollars per tonne (1.1 ton) on Monday. The EU, where countries have national carbon limits under the Kyoto Protocol, has had a greenhouse gas allowance market since 2005.
Still, all of the more than 12.5 million permits that had been offered in the RGGI auction sold. RGGI said 59 participants from the energy, financial and environment sectors had bid to buy nearly 52 million permits.
"I think the volumes exceeded the market's expectations," said Evan Ard, a spokesman for energy brokers Evolution Markets, LLC.
The price had been expected to be low in part because the cap RGGI set on emissions of 188 million tons per year was above pollution levels from last year. Emissions have fallen on mild weather and as power plants switched to cleaner natural gas amid falling prices for that fuel.
Among the players keeping an eye on the auction were states in the US West and Canadian provinces which hope to establish a broader cap-and-trade market by 2012. US lawmakers who hope to form a federal market on the gases were also watching after legislation to do so died in June.
President Bush walked away from the Kyoto Protocol in his first term saying it would raise costs and that it unfairly left rapidly developing countries like China and India without emissions limits.
The nearly US$39 million raised by the single-price auction will go to Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Vermont. The states say they will invest those funds in energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies and in shield energy consumers from any higher energy bills as a result of the carbon caps.
Several other states, including New York and New Jersey, did not finalize rules in time to participate in the first auction.
RGGI aims to cap carbon emissions from power plants at current levels for several years and then reduce them 10 percent by 2018. The next auction will be held on Dec. 17 and quarterly ones will be held after that. (Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Marguerita Choy)
Rob Taylor, PlanetArk 29 Sep 08;
CANBERRA - Top Australian climate scientists on Monday wrote to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd calling for courageous moves to tackle global warming, as a poll showed economic upheaval sapping public support for the climate fight.
The centre-left government's climate change adviser, Ross Garnaut, will on Tuesday deliver his final report to Rudd on how the government should introduce a planned emissions trading scheme slashing Australia's carbon output by 2050.
But with Garnaut having already suggested middle-of-the-road options for a 10 percent emission cut by 2020, protecting the US$1 trillion energy-reliant economy from much upheaval, climate scientists said deeper reductions were needed.
"It's just a message of 'take the deepest cuts possible' because the science tells us that anything less than that will commit us to dangerous climate change," said Matthew England, a spokesman for the group of 16 scientists.
Australia, already the world's driest inhabited continent, is expected to be among the rich nations hardest-hit by climate change, with scientists warning storms, long-running droughts and water shortages will become more frequent and intense.
But Garnaut's cautious approach and signs the government is preparing to compensate big-polluting companies to protect them from the immediate impact of emissions trade pointed to Rudd's favouring of a less ambitious scheme, England said.
"There's deep concern. We are not seeing the rate of change in government and government policy that we need to address the problem," he said.
The carbon trading system will cover 75 percent of the economy, and 1,000 of Australia's biggest companies, with hefty initial subsidies for big polluting power generators and cement companies to help them adapt.
In an interim report this month, Garnaut recommended carbon be sold for an initial A$20 (US$16) a tonne from 2010, with only marginal increases for two years to help business adjust.
His final report, based on official Treasury modelling, will spell out the economic impact of doing nothing, as well as practical emission cuts of 10 percent versus "aspirational" 25 percent cuts by 2020.
Most environment groups favour a tougher target to help curb Australia's emissions, which are the world's fourth highest in per capita terms.
A new poll, meanwhile, showed Australians were becoming less concerned about climate change after a fortnight of international financial market ructions and steep stock market declines.
Taking action to stop climate change itself dropped from first place to fifth as a foreign policy goal, overtaken by action to strengthen the economy and guard jobs, the respected Lowy Institute poll found.
While respondents still considered global warming and drought as threats, just over half were unwilling to pay an extra A$10 a month for greener electricity not based on burning dirty coal.
"Concern over economic issues has risen at the expense of the environment," Lowy Executive Director Allan Gyngell said. (US$1=A$1.20)
(Editing by Michael Perry)
PlanetArk 29 Sep 08;
Europe is warming faster than the world average and governments need to invest to help citizens adapt to a global warming, according to a study on Monday.
Following are highlights of the report by the European Environment Agency and branches of the World Health Organisation and the European Commission:
- European average temperatures have risen by 1.0 Celsius (1.8 F) above pre-industrial levels, faster than an average global rise of almost 0.8 degrees.
- Shifts in precipitation are worsening differences between a wet northern Europe and a dry south, with some Mediterranean regions receiving 20 percent less rain than a century ago and could get steadily more arid.
- Global sea level rise could place 4 million Europeans at risk of flooding by 2100 along with 2 trillion euros (US$2,926 billion) of assets, from London to Athens.
- The reduction in Arctic sea ice has accelerated: in September 2007 the minimum surface was only half the normal minimum measured in the 1950s.
- Glacier retreat in Europe's mountains, and changes in temperature and precipitation, will affect river flows and farming. Two-thirds of Alpine glaciers had vanished since 1850.
- A northward movement of some fish species, by 1,000 km in the past 40 years, can have adverse effects on fisheries.
-- Plants, birds, insects and mammals are moving further north and uphill. By the end of this century, plant species may have shifted several hundred kilometres to the north and up to 60 percent of mountain plant species may face extinction.
- The agricultural growing season is now longer, especially in the north. Although this may favour the introduction of new crops, crop yields will become more variable because extreme weather events are projected to increase.
- Increasing water demand for agriculture in the Mediterranean region will lead to unsustainable competition for water with tourism and households.
- The growing season of forests is also changing and the danger of forest fires will increase in southern Europe.
- Human health is also significantly affected by climate change. The 70,000 excess deaths reported from 12 European countries in a 2003 heatwave could be an example of health impacts to come. Health systems will need to be strengthened.
(Source: European Environment Agency (EEA) --Editing by Angus MacSwan)
Europe Warms Fast: Med Drier, North Ever Wetter
Alister Doyle, PlanetArk 29 Sep 08;
OSLO - Europe is warming faster than the world average and governments need to invest to adapt to a changing climate set to turn the Mediterranean region arid and the north ever wetter, a study showed on Monday.
Europe's mountains, coasts, the Mediterranean and the Arctic were most at risk from global warming, according to the report by the European Environment Agency and branches of the World Health Organisation and the European Commission.
"Global average temperature has increased almost 0.8 C (1.4 F) above pre-industrial levels, with even higher temperature increases in Europe and northern latitudes," it said.
Europe had warmed by 1.0 C.
Northern Europe would get wetter this century while more of Europe's Mediterranean region might turn to desert, based on trends already under way, it said. European heatwaves like in 2003, during which 70,000 people died, could be more frequent.
"Annual precipitation changes are worsening differences between a wet northern part of Europe and a dry south," it said.
That meant a need to review everything from irrigation to the ability of southern rivers to help cool nuclear power plants.
Among other impacts, seas were rising in a threat to coasts, some fish stocks had moved 1,000 km north in the past 40 years -- pushing cod not caught by trawlers away from the North Sea -- and two-thirds of Alpine glaciers had vanished since 1850.
A few in Europe were getting benefits, such as northern farmers with longer growing seasons for crops.
The report urged Europe to do more to adapt to the impacts of climate change, such as protecting people from insect-borne diseases or safeguarding coasts from higher seas. So far, most adaptation has focused on easing more river floods.
"Implementation of adaptation actions has only just started," said Jacqueline McGlade, head of the Denmark-based European Environment Agency.
"We need to intensify such actions and improve information exchange on data, effectiveness and costs," McGlade said.
The report also said that Europe had a moral obligation to help people in developing nations adapt to a changing climate.
The world's governments have agreed to work by the end of 2009 a new treaty to fight climate change. But financial turmoil and economic slowdown may dampen willingness to invest in billion-dollar climate projects.
RISING SEAS
Seas are likely to rise by 18 to 59 cms (7 to 23 inches) by 2100, according to the UN Climate Panel, and could keep rising for centuries if ice sheets of Greenland or Antarctica thaw.
In Europe, 4 million people and 2 trillion euros (US$2.9 trillion) in assets would be at risk from flooding from higher seas by 2100, from the Baltic states to Greece, the report said.
Recent estimates indicated that losses from rising seas could total up to 18 billion euros a year by 2080 but spending of 1 billion a year -- on everything from dikes to raising beach levels -- could cut losses to about 1 bilion a year, it said.
Hurricane Katrina in the United States in 2005 caused about US$80 billion in losses.
The European Union aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, by 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, or by 30 percent if other big economies join in.
The report suggested setting up a new European Clearing House to help distribute information on impacts, vulnerability and impacts of climate change.(Editing by Angus MacSwan)
Climate change: Floods, drought, mosquito disease aim at Europe
Yahoo News 29 Sep 08;
Climate change will amplify the risk of flooding in northwestern Europe, water scarcity and forest fires on the northern Mediterranean rim and bring milder winters to Scandinavia, the European Environment Agency (EAA) said on Monday.
Higher temperatures will also extend the habitat range of virus-carrying mosquitoes, including the Asian tiger mosquito which carries the chikungunya virus and other pathogens, it said.
"Many regions and sectors across Europe are vulnerable to climate change impacts," Jacqueline McGlade, executive director of the Copenhagen-based EAA, said in a press release.
"Implementation of adaptation actions has only just started. We need to intensify such actions and improve information exchange on data, effectiveness and costs."
The report is an update of a 2004 assessment on Europe's exposure to climate change. It is an overview of data drawn mainly from the EAA's own resources and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The EAA said the warming trend in Europe was above the global average.
Since pre-industrial times, Europe's landmass has warmed by 1.0 degrees Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) and the seas around it by 1.2 C (2.16 F), compared with a global mean of 0.8 C (1.44 F) and 1.0 C (1.8 F) respectively, it said.
"Projections suggest further temperature increases in Europe between 1.0 and 5.5 C (1/8-9.9 F) by the end of the century," said the report.
"More frequent and more intense hot extremes and a decreasing number of cold extremes have occurred the past 50 years, and this trend is projected to continue."
In 2007, the IPCC gave an estimate of a global rise in temperature this century of 1.8-4.0 C (3.24-7.2 F).
The report said Europe's climate was already being affected by warming in several ways.
Snow cover has decreased by 1.3 percent per decade in the last 40 years, and Greenland is being affected by ice-sheet loss.
There have been several major droughts in the past few decades, including the catastrophic heatwave in 2003 that claimed tens of thousands of lives in continental Europe, and water shortages that gripped Spain and Portugal in 2005.
Among wildlife, some species of birds, insects and mammals are moving northwards and uphill to escape higher temperatures, and sub-tropical species of fish are showing up in European waters with increasing frequency.
On the plus side, more carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air is helping forests, which in most cases are growing faster now than a century ago, it said.
Looking to the future, the report also made these points:
-- STORMS: The strongest storms are likely to get stronger, but they will be slightly less frequent.
-- FLOODS: Flooding is projected to occur more frequently in many regions, particularly in winter and spring, with northwestern and central and eastern Europe most vulnerable.
-- HEALTH: Heatwaves, mosquito-borne viruses and water-borne diseases are among the panoply of challenges to health from warming. "The risk is very dependent on human behaviour and the quality of health care services and their ability to detect early and act," the report warns.
-- COSTS: Many costs are likely to be substantial, although an accurate figure cannot be placed upon them.
These include the bills from biodiversity loss, from the loss of hydropower and ski tourism as a result of changed rainfall and snowfall patterns, damage to agriculture from heatwaves and coastal erosion caused by rising sea levels.
Alister Doyle, Reuters 29 Sep 08;
OSLO - Rich nations' greenhouse gas emissions dipped for the first time in five years in 2006, easing 0.1 percent despite robust economic growth, a Reuters survey of the latest available information showed on Friday.
The figures were less gloomy than a report this week, based on scientist estimates to 2007, which said world emissions were surging, led by rocketing growth in poor countries such as China and India twinned with a tiny rise by industrialised nations.
The Reuters survey, of data submitted by 40 industrialised nations to the UN Climate Change Secretariat and against which the UN judges compliance on cutting emissions, indicated 2006 emissions fell to the equivalent of 18.01 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from 18.03 billion in 2005.
A mild US winter cut demand for energy for heating while rising oil prices were a possible factor restraining growth.
Most experts reckoned that a drive for energy efficiency by rich nations has stalled in recent years, despite programmes to fight global warming.
And economic growth, estimated at 3 percent for advanced economies in 2006 by the International Monetary Fund, had been expected to push up emissions.
"It's a bit surprising to find a fall for 2006," said Knut Alfsen, research director of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo.
Overall emissions by developing nations last declined in 2001, when the Sept. 11 suicide hijacker attacks on the United States aggravated an economic slowdown.
Current economic turmoil is likely to cut emissions in 2008. Governments are working on a new long-term treaty to cut emissions to avert heatwaves, floods, droughts and rising seas projected by the UN Climate Panel.
SMOKESTACK COLLAPSE
The government data, due to be compiled for official release in October, also showed that emissions were 4.7 percent below levels in 1990, the benchmark year for a UN assault on global warming, largely because of a collapse in smokestack industries in the former Soviet bloc.
The Reuters survey shows that Turkey's emissions have risen most since 1990 among industrialised nations, by 95 percent. Latvia's are down furthest, by 56 percent.
On Thursday, the Global Carbon Project of leading experts said that world emissions of carbon dioxide were growing four times faster since 2000 than in the 1990s. The surge was led by developing nations, which do not report to the United Nations.
"The rich countries' emissions (until 2007) are relatively flat...the numbers we have show a very slight increase," said Corinne Le Quere of the University fo East Anglia, one of the scientists leading the carbon project.
"Developing nations are emitting more, faster than we thought, and the rich nations' improvements in energy are not as quick as expected," she told Reuters.
Rising oil prices, which ranged from about US$60 to $75 a barrel in 2006, might have helped dampen emissions.
"The increasing oil price should give an impact on fossil fuel use," Alfsen said. "But some of that demand is shifting to coal" rather than going to energy savings or towards renewable energies such as wind or solar power.
More than 190 governments have agreed to work out a deal by the end of 2009 to succeed the UN's Kyoto Protocol, which obliges 37 rich nations to curb emissions until 2012.
Posts
visitors since Nov 07