Best of our wild blogs: 17 Feb 08


Embracing nature conservation: how?
Is it elist to prefer wild shores to aquariums on the flying fish friends blog

Skink Snack
Amazing photo sequence of yellow bittern swallowing a skink on the bird ecology blog

Kusu Island: Isle of shrines
on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

The Common Red Flash
Butterfly of the month on the butterflies of singapore blog

Suffused Flash
an elegant little butt on the butterflies of singapore blog

Chek Jawa boardwalk with Crabs
on the wildfilms blog

Ang Moh Kio Lotus Pond
dragonflies and more on the tidechaser blog


Read more!

9 in 10 find Singapore an expensive place to live in

Tan Dawn Wei, Straits Times 17 Feb 08;

Respondents in Sunday Times poll blame higher cost of housing, transport, food and utilities

HOUSEWIFE Goh Lay Leng has seen her monthly grocery bills go up by 10 per cent, and that has prompted the mother of four to look for cheaper alternatives.

'Everything is increasing and we're spending more. My husband says there's hardly any money left at the end of the month,' said Madam Goh, 44.

Her engineer husband brings home about $5,000 a month and the family lives in a four-room flat in Pasir Ris.

A total of 91 per cent of the 353 respondents in a Sunday Times survey agreed with Madam Goh, saying that Singapore had become an expensive place to live in.

The survey had been conducted in late December to understand Singaporeans' attitude to money.

Nine in 10 also felt that Singapore was an expensive place to raise a family. Less than half were confident that their living standard would improve in the next two years.

They blamed the higher cost of housing, transport and basic necessities such as food, water and power.

Almost half said that they felt the financial strain of servicing mortgages or rents, although 36 per cent were contented.

Nearly half felt that a family of four needed between $50,000 and $70,000 a year - or $4,167 to $5,833 a month - to live comfortably.

The latest figures from the Department of Statistics show that the average household's income went up by 9.6 per cent last year, the biggest increase in at least a decade.

It rose to $6,280, up from $5,730 the year before. Families with higher incomes also had bigger pay hikes than those in lower-income households, widening the rich-poor gap.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said recently that he expected inflation this year to be 5 per cent or more. It was about 2 per cent last year.

MP Halimah Yacob said that the public's mood may have been dampened by the continuing prospect of high inflation. But she was also heartened that Singaporeans were practical and prudent.

'They think of investing in their children's education and old age and that reflects that they do recognise the need to plan for the long term,' she said.

Take 41-year-old Madam Zaina Mohammad. The part-time cashier and her Cisco officer husband's combined monthly income is just $2,000, but the couple make sure they deposit $50 every month into each of their three children's bank accounts for their education fund.

Like her, the priority for most Singaporeans is their children's future. If they had a million dollars, 27 per cent said that they would spend most of the money on education.

One possible indication as to why their children's education reigned supreme: More than half of those surveyed said that they were either not sure, or did not think that their children would be able to improve upon or afford their present lifestyle as adults.

Another indication of Singaporeans' prudent and practical traits: More than four in five chose to save their surplus income every month.

Despite rising prices, nearly all the people polled had no plans to pack up for greener pastures.

Ninety per cent agreed that Singapore was still a place worth living in. Also, two in five were glad that Singapore had become one of the richest countries in the world, because it meant better public amenities, a more cosmopolitan society and a vibrant nightlife and cultural scene.

Despite having to scrimp and save, Madam Zaina isn't going anywhere. 'It's peaceful here and it is our home after all,' she said.


Read more!

Replacing Ah Meng

Who should be the next?
Nur Dianah Suhaimi, Straits Times 17 Feb 08

A zoo's icon must first be an exotic creature, not something common like a cat or dog. Secondly, the animal should be able to interact with people. That, he said, rules out 'passive' creatures such as tortoises. Thirdly, it has to be good-natured.

Six popular residents are shortlisted but it's not easy replacing the Singapore Zoo icon

AH MENG left big shoes to fill.

The 48-year-old orang utan died suddenly during breakfast on Feb 8 and it has not been easy for the Singapore Zoo to find itself another icon.

Ah Meng was used in many of the zoo's promotional materials and had been the animal most associated with it.

The zoo has since shortlisted six of its more popular residents - an orang utan, a bull elephant, a polar bear, a white tiger, a sealion and an otter.

Branding experts say not all animals can qualify as a zoo icon.

Mr Mike Liew, managing director of branding firm Upstream Asia (Singapore and South-east Asia), said a zoo's icon must first be an exotic creature, not something common like a cat or dog.

Secondly, the animal should be able to interact with people. That, he said, rules out 'passive' creatures such as tortoises.

Thirdly, it has to be good-natured because there will be problems if the animal turns violent.

'That's why Ah Meng was such a hit. She was friendly, comfortable with crowds. These appealed to visitors,' he said.

Of the 20 Singaporeans The Sunday Times polled, more than half felt that Inuka, the Singapore-born polar bear, deserves to be the new mascot.

Said corporate relations officer Premadevi Perumal, 25: 'People would never associate the polar bear with Singapore's humid weather, yet Inuka has survived here. In a way, Inuka is a true Singaporean, a real survivor.'

However, Nature Society president Geh Min felt that the next icon should not just be cute but should fit into the zoo's mission to educate and conserve.

'Although many of us are fond of Inuka, there are concerns about how it is inappropriate to have a polar bear in the tropics,' she said. 'So an icon should be native to this region, like a tiger or an elephant.'

Dr Prem Shamdasani, an associate professor of marketing at the National University of Singapore, said it was time for a new animal species to take over.

'Primates are good but it is time for a change. After all, the zoo is home to many animals,' he said.

His choice? Chawang the elephant because it is indigenous to Asia and a popular animal in Asian folklore.

Meanwhile, people are still paying homage to Ah Meng, who died at the age of 48, with many visitors heading for her grave in the zoo in Mandai.

Said deputy head keeper Jackson Raj: 'Each day, people would leave flowers, drawings and orang utan stuffed toys at the statue near her grave.' He said one elderly woman wept as she recalled visiting Ah Meng in the 1980s.

Ah Meng's brood has apparently not got over her death. When The Sunday Times visited the zoo last Thursday, the orang utans were still subdued. Chomel, aged 11, said to be Ah Meng's favourite granddaughter, seemed the most affected.

Said Mr Raj: 'Ah Meng and the other orang utans spend a lot of time together. It will take a few weeks for them to get over this loss.'

Another tragedy at the zoo last Wednesday - a freak accident in which 21/2-year-old orang utan Atina died after her neck was dislocated when it was stuck in a noose - did not help lift the sombre mood among the keepers.


Meet the six contenders
Straits Times 17 Feb 08;

Inuka the polar bear, 17

Pros

# He is Singapore-born and famous for being the first and only polar bear to be born in the tropics.

# Already a household name among Singaporeans. After all, his name was decided after a nationwide contest.

Cons

# Animal rights groups Acres claims he is unsuitable for Singapore's tropical climate, and that the weather causes his fur to turn green from algae growth. In fact, the zoo considered moving him to a temperate-climate zoo last year but decided otherwise after its studies showed Inuka will likely be stressed out by such a move.


Chomel the orang utan, 11

Pros

# Ah Meng's granddaughter and said to be the late matriarch's favourite grandchild.

# Has clearly made an impression with visitors, with many writing about her in their blogs.

# Cheeky and cute, she likes to tease her keepers by fishing dollar bills out of their pockets.

Cons

# Will always be compared to Ah Meng since they are both orang utans.


Chawang the elephant, 31

Pros

# The only adult Asian bull elephant at the Singapore Zoo and Night Safari.

# Has rare, impressive tusks that measure almost 1.2m long.

# He is one of the main attractions at the Night Safari.

Cons

# In 2001, he attacked and almost killed his keeper.

# He was not allowed direct human contact after the accident.

Pedro the Asian small-clawed otter, 17

Pros

# Famous for being able to sort recyclable material and place them in the right bins.

# The star of the otter show at the Night Safari.

# Lovable creature who likes to cuddle up with his long-term otter girlfriend, Felix.

Cons

# Considered quite old since otters live to about 18 to 20 years.


Omar the white tiger, 9

Pros

# A rare and beautiful animal. Only one in 10,000 tigers is white.

# He always draws a crowd during feeding time.

# He loves to play in the water, even during feeding time, providing lots of photo opportunities.

Cons

# He cannot physically interact with humans, for obvious reasons.


-- ST PHOTOS: MUGILAN RAJASEGERAN

Randall the sealion, 18

Pros

# The main star of the Singapore Zoo's 'Splash Safari' show.

# Quite a randy fellow, he will kiss his keepers for treats, does handstands, and salutes and waves to the crowd.

Cons

# Already quite old for a sealion and not as active as he once was.

# Given his age, makes rather brief appearances during the show.


Zoo can be a Singapore global brand: New CEO
Tan Dawn Wei, Straits Times 17 Feb 08;

SHE spoke her mind in the corporate jungle. But in delivering a eulogy for Ah Meng, Singapore Zoo chief Fanny Lai spoke from her heart and shed tears.

Ah Meng, the zoo's iconic orang utan mascot, was 'very special, like a part of our management team', Ms Lai, 50, said in a recent interview, when recalling the eulogy a week ago.

Ah Meng died on Feb 8.

Ms Lai, the recently promoted head of the zoo's corporate parent - and who used to sell hamburgers - wants it to be as world famous as Singapore Airlines.

In 2004, Ms Lai had joined the zoo's parent group after 14 years in marketing at McDonald's.

She was recently promoted to group chief executive of Wildlife Reserves Singapore, which oversees the Singapore Zoo and Night Safari, and Jurong BirdPark.

Wildlife Reserves itself had recent 'losses'.

Dr Wong Hon Mun, 53, the BirdPark's executive director, had resigned amid major changes at the parent company - all within two months. These included the retirement of Wildlife Reserves' executive chairman Robert Kwan.

Following Ms Lai's promotion - from executive director of the zoo and Night Safari - Dr Wong quit.

Some observers speculated that Dr Wong may not be the only one leaving the BirdPark.

Asked if Dr Wong's resignation had anything to do with her promotion, she said:

'I don't know. I'm sure when we make a decision, many aspects come into play. I hope not.'

The group had wanted Dr Wong, who has been with the BirdPark for over 20 years, to take on a new job as division head of life science, conservation, research and education for the three parks.

He said no.

The group, 88 per cent owned by Temasek Holdings and 12 per cent by Singapore Tourism Board, was formed in 2000, bringing together the zoo, Night Safari and Jurong BirdPark.

It now has the world's largest animal collection with over 1,000 species.

Ms Lai joined the group as its marketing and communications director in 2004 and was appointed head of Singapore Zoo and Night Safari within a year.

She had her detractors. One former zoo staff said: 'She knows next to nothing about animal husbandry. She sells hamburgers.'

But Ms Lai turned that to advantage. Customers' expectations took top billing. 'I think that's what we do quite well,' she said. The statistics showed it.

During her watch, the 35-yearold zoo and Night Safari saw 100,000 more visitors every year. She introduced and revamped two dozen exhibits.

Two years ago, a $3.6 million Wildlife Healthcare and Research Centre was set up to raise the zoo's profile as a world-class training centre for zoo veterinary and conservation work.

This financial year, the three parks will have a revenue of $88 million. Profits account for 20 per cent of that.

Last year, the three parks' turnover was $77 million.

Ms Lai admits that she is no zoology expert, unlike her predecessor Bernard Harrison. But she has brought in marketing, branding and sales savvy.

'Can we build another SIA in Singapore? Yes, I think Singapore Zoo, Night Safari and BirdPark can be Singapore's next global brand,' declared the mother of a 21-year-old daughter and 15-year-old son.

Her immediate challenge is to integrate the 37-year-old BirdPark's resources and up its current 850,000 a year visitorship. The other two parks attract over a million visitors each year.

She paid tribute to Mr Harrison for giving the zoo a face.

But she said: 'I prefer to focus more on the business than on personal brand. I believe in branding but not in personal branding.'


Read more!

SOS - save our Sumatran Tiger

With just 500 left, the tiger is heading for extinction in Indonesia
Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 17 Feb 08;

BANGKOK - NOT very far from Singapore in increasingly quiet jungles, a sad and lonely drama is being played out.

At the rate Sumatran tigers are being killed, skinned and butchered and sold part by body part, after the south China tiger, it is probably the most likely to disappear from the face of the Earth.

Seemingly inexorable, Asia is losing its tigers.

Refined census techniques show a sharp drop in the number of tigers left in the wild in India.

The south China tiger is probably functionally extinct - meaning that, in a genetic dead-end, the population is too small and scattered to breed.

Last week, from Jakarta to New Delhi, officials and conservation organisations have been struggling to catch up with the escalating crisis.

Indonesia has already lost two races of the tiger - the Javan and Balinese. Now, it is in the process of losing the last - the Sumatran.

In Sumatra, there are now only 400 to 500 tigers left.

'It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that the Sumatran tiger will disappear like the Javan and Bali tigers if the poaching and trade continues,' said Ms Julia Ng, programme officer with TRAFFIC South-east Asia, which monitors trade in illegal wildlife.

Habitat conversion - in short, the destruction of once-pristine forests to make way for highways, plantations, towns and industry - is the overall driver of the tiger's extinction across Asia. But what is proving the final straw is the direct removal of individual animals by poachers supplying the Chinese and other Far Eastern markets with tiger products.

A TRAFFIC report on trade in Sumatra released last Wednesday - co-authored by Ms Julia Ng - states:

'Tiger body parts, including canine teeth, claws, skin pieces, whiskers and bones, were on sale in 10 per cent of 326 retail outlets surveyed during 2006 in 28 cities and towns across Sumatra. Outlets included goldsmiths, souvenir and traditional Chinese medicine shops, and shops selling antique and precious stones.'

Based on the number of canines seen, the survey conservatively estimated that the products offered accounted for 23 tigers killed.

While this was down from an estimate of 52 killed in a previous study over 1999-2000, that is more a reflection of the difficulty of finding the increasingly rare tigers than to a decline in demand, Ms Ng said.

TRAFFIC's surveys have for several years pin-pointed Medan, the capital of North Sumatra province, and the smaller adjacent town of Pancur Batu, as the main hubs for the trade of tiger parts.

But 'despite TRAFFIC providing the authorities with details of traders involved, apart from awareness-raising activities, it is not clear whether any serious enforcement action has been taken'', the report states.

'We have to deal with the trade,' admits Dr Tonny Soehartono, director for Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia's Ministry of Forestry, in a press release issued with the report.

'Currently we are facing many other crucial problems which, unfortunately, are causing the decline of Sumatran tiger populations.' He cited land-use changes and habitat fragmentation, which often drive tigers closer to humans, and poverty, as problems which lead to human-tiger conflict.

Such conflict is the core of the problem.

Many scholars of human society and ecology have pointed out that from around the time of the Industrial Revolution, man has increasingly seen himself and his destiny as outside nature and controlling it, rather than of nature and part of it.

And nature is only valued in the short-term sense of its use for humans.

Tigers in particular have suffered from two mutually reinforcing factors: ignorance and fear. Thus they have more often than not been killed off by people when they have the means to destroy them.

But the ethical argument is only part of the picture. When tigers disappear, it is the clearest indication that the forest they inhabited is not what it once was. Our version of the Arctic's now-iconic polar bears, stranded by global warming on melting ice floes, is the tiger.

In India, the number of tigers - excluding in the Sunderbans delta which may have a few dozen - has sunk to just over 1,400, confirming the most pessimistic estimates of conservationists who have been struggling for years to challenge and assist a government in denial or paralysis.

In an echo of Sumatra, protection staff, where they exist at all, are middle-aged, under-funded, under-equipped and under-motivated - and often up against young poachers run by sophisticated international criminal syndicates.

India now has an ambitious, US$154 million (S$218 million) plan to move human habitation out of core tiger habitats and create eight new tiger reserves.

But most of the money will go to relocation of villages, potentially leaving protection again neglected. And there are still plans to build highways through tiger habitats. Indonesia launched a 'Conservation Strategy and Action Plan of Sumatran Tiger 2007-2017' at last year's Climate Change Convention in Bali.

But 'there is no effective enforcement on the ground', notes Kuala Lumpur- based Chris Shepherd of TRAFFIC.

'It boils down to lack of resources. Wildlife crime isn't viewed as a high priority in Indonesia or anywhere in South- east Asia.'

There is an ongoing attempt by China's State Forestry Administration to open up the trade in tiger parts.

The rationale offered is that a flood of supplies from farmed tigers - of which China has upwards of 5,000 - will drive prices down and eliminate incentives for poachers.

But the push to open the trade has more to do with making money for farmers than saving wild tigers.

It costs around US$4,000 to raise a tiger to adulthood in a farm, but less than US$20 to have one killed by a poacher in the wild. The price differential, which is impossible to bridge, is only one reason why the propaganda of the farmers collapses.

But scientists of the US-based Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and the British-based Panthera Foundation tabled plans in New Delhi last Thursday - and in effect challenged governments - to create an 8,000-km corridor extending from Bhutan through India, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam for tigers.

It is a grand scheme strewn with obstacles, but it is possible - and could save the tiger on the Asian mainland.

Noted Dr Alan Rabinowatz, director of science and exploration at the WCS: 'We're not asking countries to set aside new parks to make this corridor a success.

'This is more about changing regional zoning in tiger range countries to allow tigers to move more freely between areas of good habitat.'


Read more!

Mystery deaths halt Bengal tiger tracking plan

Yahoo News 16 Feb 08;

Wildlife rangers in Bangladesh said Saturday they have stopped tracking Royal Bengal tigers due to the mystery death of two of the critically endangered big cats who were fitted with radio transmitters.

The first tiger was found dead in 2006, while the second is missing but reported to have "become frail after the fitting of a radio collar," according to top forest official A.K.M Shamsuddin.

"We have ordered a probe into the deaths. But in the meantime, we have suspended the project as some experts said the fitting of the radio collar could have hastened their deaths," he said.

The deaths and halting of the project, supported by the United States, is a major blow to efforts to learn more about the animals.

Little is known about the habits of an estimated 668 Royal Bengal tigers living in the Sunderbans, the world's largest mangrove forest and a United Nations heritage site that stretches along India's eastern coast to Bangladesh.

Experts have estimated that only 5,000 to 6,000 Royal Bengal tigers are left in the world, down from about 100,000 in 1900.


Read more!

Bottom Trawling Impacts Visible From Space

Environmental Newswire Service 15 Feb 08;

BOSTON, Massachusetts, February 15, 2008 (ENS) - Bottom trawling, an industrial fishing method that drags large, heavy nets across the seafloor, stirs up huge, billowing plumes of sediment on shallow seafloors that can be seen from space.

As a result of scientific studies showing that bottom trawling kills vast numbers of corals, sponges, fishes and other animals, this fishing method has been banned in a growing number of places.

Now satellite images show that spreading clouds of mud remain suspended in the sea long after the trawler has passed.

There are tens of thousands of trawlers worldwide. They fish for shrimp and finfishes. Some bottom trawling operations catch 20 pounds of "bykill" or "bycatch" for every pound of targeted species.

What satellites can see is only the "tip of the iceberg," because most trawling happens in waters too deep to detect sediment plumes at the surface, say scientists speaking at the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2008 Annual Meeting here today.

The symposium session, "Dragnet: Bottom Trawling, the World's Most Severe and Extensive Seafloor Disturbance," was organized by the Marine Conservation Biology Institute.

Speakers at the session included Dr. Elliott Norse, president of Marine Conservation Biology Institute in Bellevue Washington; John Amos, president of SkyTruth in Shepherdstown West Virginia, Dr. Les Watling, professor of zoology at the University of Hawaii-Manoa; and Susanna Fuller, PhD candidate in biology at Dalhousie University, Halifax Nova Scotia.

"Bottom trawling is the most destructive of any actions that humans conduct in the ocean," said Dr. Watling. "Ten years ago, Elliott Norse and I calculated that, each year, worldwide, bottom trawlers drag an area equivalent to twice the lower 48 states.

"Most of that trawling happens in deep waters, out of sight. But now we can more clearly envision what trawling impacts down there by looking at the sediment plumes that are shallow enough for us to see from satellites," he said.

"Bottom trawling repeatedly plows up the seafloor over large areas of the ocean" said Amos. "Until recently, the impact was basically hidden from view. But new tools - especially Internet-based image sites, like Google Earth - allow everyone to see for themselves what's happening. In shallow waters with muddy bottoms, trawlers leave long, persistent trails of sediment in their wake."

To see a gallery of satellite images, and take a Google Earth "virtual tour" of trawl-caused sediment plumes, go to www.skytruth.org and navigate to the "Trawling Impacts" image gallery.

"Seafloor animals such as glass sponges are particularly vulnerable to bottom trawling," said Susanna Fuller, a graduate student of Professor Ransom Myers who died last year. He had published a series of papers showing that overfishing has eliminated 90 percent of the world's large predatory fishes and is devastating marine ecosystems.

"What is amazing is the level of damage these types of animals have suffered, after the cod fishery in Canada was closed [in 1992]. We immediately started trawling deeper with no restrictions, and continue to do so," Fuller said.

"There are ways to catch fish that are less harmful to the world's vanishing marine life. We need to start protecting the seafloor by using fishing gear, besides bottom trawls, especially in the deep sea. It's the only thing left," she said.

"For years marine scientists have been telling the world that fishing has harmed marine biodiversity more than anything else," said Dr. Norse. "And it's clear that trawling causes more damage to marine ecosystems than any other kind of fishing. Now, as the threats of ocean acidification and melting sea ice are adding insult to injury, we have to reduce harm from trawling to have any hope of saving marine ecosystems."

Scientific findings about trawling impacts have led to increasing restrictions on this industrial fishing method.

In 2005, the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean banned trawling in the Mediterranean Sea below depths of 1,000 meters, and the United States closed deep sea areas off Alaska to bottom trawling.

In 2006, South Pacific nations effectively put an end to trawling in an area amounting to 14 percent of the Earth's surface.

The UN General Assembly has begun deliberations on a trawling moratorium on the high seas, which cover 45 percent of the Earth's surface.

Devastation of Trawling Visible from Space
Andrea Thompson, LiveScience Yahoo News 20 Feb 08;

Bottom trawling for fish stirs up billowing plumes of sediment that can be seen from space and destroys entire seafloor ecosystems, new imagery reveals.

The technique, used all over the world, is a way to catch fish in deeper parts of the ocean with huge, deep nets, now that many near-shore fish populations have been virtually wiped out from over-fishing. Several studies have shown the significant impact that trawling has on ecosystems, killing corals, sponges, fish and other animals.

New and previously released satellite images show the extent of the plumes of material kicked up. And a video of the seafloor reveals how trawling denudes an underwater world.

"Bottom trawling is the most destructive of any actions that humans conduct in the ocean," said zoologist Les Watling of the University of Hawaii. "Ten years ago, Elliott Norse [of the Marine Conservation Biology Institute] and I calculated that, each year, worldwide, bottom trawlers drag an area equivalent to twice the lower 48 states. Most of that trawling happens in deep waters, out of sight. But now we can more clearly envision what trawling impacts down there by looking at the sediment plumes that are shallow enough for us to see from satellites."

Watling presented his findings Friday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston.

Persistent plumes

As nets are dragged across the seafloor, they can crush coral reefs, drag boulders across the bottom, and trap fish and animals not intended to be caught, called bycatch. All this activity stirs up sediments from the seafloor, which create the persistent plumes in the wake of the fishing ships.

Watling and his colleagues say that the plumes visible in satellite images are likely just the "tip of the iceberg" as most trawling is in waters that are deep enough that the plume remains hidden by the water above.

"Bottom trawling repeatedly plows up the seafloor over large areas of the ocean," said fellow presenter John Amos of SkyTruth, a digital mapping non-profit group aimed at environment issues based in West Virginia. (Images of these plumes can be seen on the group's website.)

Bans and restrictions

Scientific studies showing the impacts that trawling has on ecosystems have led to increasing restrictions on the practice.

In 2005, the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean banned trawling there below depths of 1,000 meters (3, 289 feet). The United States closed large deep-sea areas off the coast of Alaska to bottom trawling in 2006. Many South Pacific nations have also put a stop to the practice, and the United Nations began deliberations on a trawling moratorium in the high seas in 2006.

But there are still tens of thousands of trawlers operating in the Gulf of Mexico, off the coast of many Latin American countries, off the west coast of Africa, in Chinese waters, and the North Sea.

"We're a long way from protecting the ocean floor from bottom trawling," Norse told LiveScience.


Read more!

Mysterious Compound Seen as Key to Ocean Life

Cassandra Lopez, University of Miami, SPACE.com, Yahoo News 16 Feb 08;

This Behind the Scenes article was provided to LiveScience in partnership with the National Science Foundation.

When bits of natural organic matter from leaves and other sources break down, they can enter rivers and ponds and cause a buildup of yellow-brown organic matter that amasses as the tiny plants die.

The drab material is known as chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and while its origin is fairly well known in coastal and inland waterways, scientists know far less about the origin and chemical composition of the material in the oceans.

Scientists believe heterotrophs, organisms that cannot produce their own food-such as bacteria-produce and release the mysterious group of organic chemical compounds into their surrounding environment as they decay and new studies are now focusing on understanding CDOM in the oceans.

Researchers know that CDOM, when struck by sunlight, plays a critical role in ocean chemistry, impacting reactions that can effect greenhouse gas emissions that can in turn warm the planet, sulfur compounds that can cause cloud formation that can cool the planet, and iron concentrations that are critical to ocean plants.

By understanding marine CDOM, scientists will better understand life in the oceans and how organisms and compounds in the seas are affected by light.

One group of U.S. scientists has been studying CDOM since 2003, with several members recently traveling aboard the research vessel Roger Revelle to look at the material both at and below the ocean's surface.

According to University of California at Santa Barbara researcher Norm Nelson, nobody's done this before. Few have looked at oceanic CDOM anywhere except in the surface layer of the ocean where it's illuminated by the sun. That's why researchers are grateful for the chance to go to sea.

"It's a great opportunity to go to sea to test our hypotheses and discover new things," said Nelson. "It's worth all the long hours, and the weather, and all the difficulties of travel."

Because it is an emerging area of study, the CLIVAR/CO2 Steering Committee selected the researchers to participate in selected CLIVAR cruises. The CDOM group has received renewed funding from NSF for some of these cruises and NASA has recently granted funding for the optics work.

So how exactly does a researcher get involved in studying matter of such mysterious origins? Often it starts out simply as curiosity.

"We got into the study of CDOM by accident," said Nelson. "My colleagues discovered the presence of an unknown factor that controlled the color of the Sargasso Sea off Bermuda that wasn't phytoplankton [tiny marine plants], which we'd always assumed was the most important. I made some measurements that demonstrated it was CDOM, and a whole new area of research opened up for us."

By studying the amount of light going into the ocean and the amount of light coming out of the ocean, scientists can validate ocean-color remote-sensing measurements and quantify the light available for photochemistry and photobiology. All of these are related directly or indirectly to CDOM.

On the I8S CLIVAR/CO2 cruise aboard the Roger Revelle, scientists measured CDOM levels below the surface using a suite of instruments such as a hand-held profiler that principally contains light sensors, a spectrophotometer that measures how much light is absorbed by CDOM at different wavelengths (colors) of light, instruments that face upward and measure light coming from the sun, and instruments that face downward to measure the radiance spectrum ( a measure of light color bouncing back). The hand-held profiler also contains a fluorometer to measure chlorophyll in plants and a sensor to measure turbidity - the amount of tiny debris particles floating in the water.

The researchers also used an innovative instrument called the CTD (Conductivity, Temperature, Depth recorder) rosette, a system of specialized bottles attached to a metal framework that travels deep into the water column to gather samples. As one of the primary instruments for the CLIVAR cruise, it collects water that researchers later analyze for a range of information and also houses additional sensors. In addition to the sensor data, the researchers collect actual CDOM specimens and phytoplankton, as well as information about the impact of bacteria.

The detailed study of CDOM will help researchers bring Earth-based data to bear on years of satellite measurements of phytoplankton. CDOM plays an important role in controlling the color of the ocean as observed by satellites, absorbing ultraviolet and blue light and making the ocean appear more yellow. Scientists estimate the amount of chlorophyll present in seawater by measuring how green the water appears to satellites, and CDOM (in concert with the blue color reflected by ocean water) helps make the ocean appear greener than it is, throwing off estimates of how much phytoplankton is in the seas.

In addition to providing fundamental information about the nature of CDOM, the new studies will allow scientists to validate remote sensing estimates of marine plant biomass and productivity and may open new possibilities for using ocean-color remote sensing with studies in areas such as photochemistry, the photobiology of ultraviolet radiation and even ocean circulation.


Read more!

The spineless menace: Jellyfish overwhelm the sea

Elizabeth Nash, The Independent 16 Feb 08;

Overfishing is the main cause, the scientist insists. The other traditional predator of jellyfish – the leatherback turtle, Caretta caretta – has been driven to the point of extinction.

For years, Mediterranean beaches have been plagued by jellyfish. Now scientists are reporting that the problem is far worse than they had feared – and that a new generation of the poisonous creatures is poised to overwhelm the sea

Jellyfish are now active throughout the winter too, building up strength for their annual assault upon the Mediterranean's northern shore. What's more, they won't be going away. Jellyfish, says Spain's top scientist who specialises in these glutinous stinging creatures from the deep, are here to stay.

"We think of jellyfish as a worrying summer problem, particularly here in Spain, where we are so dependent on the tourist industry, says Josep Maria Gili, research professor at Barcelona's Institute of Marine Sciences. "But we have found that they come ashore just as frequently in the winter months, although no one notices. We've established that they proliferate off our shores all year round. It means the situation is much more serious than we thought."

Last November, the institute launched for the first time a pioneering research programme to monitor jellyfish movements off the Costa Brava all year round. Scientists were alarmed to discover that large groups ("blooms") of Pelagia noctiluca – the ubiquitous mauve stinger familiar to many holidaymakers who have been brushed by its poisonous tentacles – were assembling in large numbers throughout the winter months.

Between last November and January, 30 separate colonies of mauve stinger were detected in concentrations of between four and 10 creatures per cubic metre of water. One day last January, thousands of jellyfish were detected off the coast near Girona, north of Barcelona. A few days later, a similar sighting was reported near the Balearic island of Ibiza and, within a week, hundreds more jellyfish were spotted around the popular Mediterranean port of Valencia.

This generation was formed last autumn; they will themselves reproduce in the spring in readiness for what Professor Gili predicts will be another massive summer invasion.

"They mostly live 10 miles or more off shore. Conditions in recent years have been ideal: very mild and with little rain, with none of the winter rainstorms and icy blasts we usually experience, and with unusually warm sea temperatures. People have been really enjoying it," he adds with a laugh, swiftly curtailed. "But these are ideal conditions for jellyfish, and they've become a continuously present phenomenon, not just a seasonal one."

Alarmed by the intensity of and frequency of jellyfish invasions over the past three years, Spain's environmental authorities financed the study. Now they need to put money into preventative measures, Professor Gili says.

Last summer, amateur mariners were mobilised for the first time the length of Spain's southern coast as jellyfish scouts, to operate as an informal early warning system to alert authorities on shore when an invasion was imminent.

This year, Professor Gili wants the initiative put on a much more professional footing. "We must take measures, and the government must provide the finance, for a flotilla of small boats to patrol the shoreline, ready to scoop up the jellyfish as they head for land, when they are about 100m from the shore."

There's no point pursuing jellyfish when they are out to sea, he says. They sink beneath the surface, and you risk netting fish and other marine life, and breaking the tentacles. Those that are swept into shore are usually dead or dying, although their sting remains intact.

"Those floating on the surface can be easily caught in small nets called "pelicanes" if spotted in time. Removed from the sea and dropped into fresh water, their poison drains away within 48 hours. "They no longer pose a health risk and can then be recycled as protein-rich fertiliser," says Professor Gili.

"The important thing is to catch them whole without causing them damage, because the tentacles remain poisonous even if broken off, and even if the creature is dead."

But these are short-term measures and they offer no solution to the wider problem of why jellyfish have become so prevalent. Last year, jellyfish were frequently found in concentrations as high as 100 per cubic metre.

Millions of jellyfish washed up on Spanish beaches last year, and tens of thousands of holidaymakers were treated for painful allergic reactions to their stings.

Overfishing is the main cause, the scientist insists. And the only solution is to change the fishing practices of countries that have stripped the world's seas of big fish such as swordfish and red tuna which feast upon jellyfish.

The other traditional predator of jellyfish – the leatherback turtle, Caretta caretta – has been driven to the point of extinction. The beaches where it lays its eggs have been lost to tourism. It's not just a Mediterranean problem. Increases in the populations of jellyfish have been "spectacular" from Japan to Africa, from Alaska to Australia, Professor Gili says. "Every time we are swamped with jellyfish, the sea is sending us the message that it is sick and we are mistreating it. We face a huge problem of ecological imbalance."

Overfishing on a global scale has left jellyfish without the big fish and crustaceans that are their natural predators, and without small fish, such as sardines and whitebait, that compete with them for minute marine creatures and plankton. "Jellyfish are left with all the food they want, so they can reproduce without limit," says Professor Gili.

To make matters worse, jellyfish gorge voraciously on fish eggs and larvae. The common Aurelia species, for example, whose variant Aurelia Aurita or "moon jellyfish" is common in the Mediterranean, can hoover up to 10 young herrings an hour. Jellyfish, as a result, are taking the place of fish in the global ecosystem.

Apart from the ubiquitous mauve stinger, various other species thrive in the Mediterranean. One regular visitor is Cortylorhiza tuberculata, known as "fried egg", which luxuriates in the warm, salty lagoons of the Mar Menor, near the fashionable Murcian resort of La Manga. These lagoons are rich in nutrients from fertilisers drained from the region's intensive plastic-greenhouse agriculture. The fried egg's sting is mild, but its sheer numbers transform the water into a milky gloop.The Mar Menor is so infested that latterly 1,000 tonnes of "fried egg" have been cleared from it every year.

The Rhizostoma pulpo, or octopus jellyfish, named for its eight long tentacles, is also on the increase.

The fearsome Portuguese Man o' War (Physalia physalis), whose sting can be fatal, is increasingly swept towards Europe's Atlantic coasts, in "blooms" resembling a sea of plastic bags. Isolated examples sometimes reach the British Isles, but currents have yet to drag them through the Gibraltar Strait into the Mediterranean.

For all their undulant mobility, jellyfish have little control of their movements. They are not actually fish, but a kind of giant plankton that cannot swim, driven this way and that by winds and currents. In an extreme demonstration of imminent ecological breakdown, they come ashore to die. "Jellyfish are a natural part of the marine environment, but the scale of what's happening now is a warning that something's going very wrong," says Dr David Santilo, a marine biologist for the Greenpeace research laboratories at Exeter University.

Do we then face a return to primeval slime? "A lot of pressures are pushing in that direction," says Dr Santilo. "The mechanisms are there to make that happen. Ecosystems are flexible up to a point, but no one knows when elasticity breaks into a different sort of ecosystem and you get an irreversible shift. This plague of jellyfish is a like hazard warning light. It's a wake-up call."

Jellyfish plagues have happened before, in cycles of seven to 10 years. But recent cycles are shorter, and every year for the last two decades, the blooms have become bigger, denser and longer lasting.

Until three years ago, no one thought to take special measures other than to provide first-aid to bathers suffering painfully swollen limbs, and to close infested beaches. Now that the glaucous visitors arrive en masse every year alarm bells are ringing amid hard evidence suggesting they will be with us for the foreseeable future.

The Mediterranean's temperature is now two to three degrees warmer than its usual winter minimum, in a clear symptom of global warming, while lack of rainfall has caused a drop in the volume of cooler fresh water entering it from the sky, and from rivers. As a result, the Mediterranean is turning into a warmer, saltier soup that puts off larger creatures, but in which jellyfish thrive

Prodded by Spain's mighty tourist industry, the environmental authorities are expected to support scientists' anti-jellyfish recommendations.

The Environment minister, Cristina Narbona, admits more effort is needed. Even with preventive measures in place, "we cannot guarantee in any way the complete absence of these organisms in bathing areas," she says.

Professor Gili insists that the year-round programme of monitoring jellyfish movements must be continued. He proposes a list of specific measures: to station jellyfish-hunting boats in beaches under threat; provide locals and holidaymakers with information on how to protect themselves; and to close beaches to bathers when necessary.

But far more essential, he says, is to face up to the global ecological crisis highlighted by the uncontrolled proliferation of this spineless, brainless creature, and change the way we manage fish stocks worldwide.


Read more!

US scientists pinpoint 14 top technological challenges

Jean-Louis Santini, Yahoo News 16 Feb 08;

The final choices fall into four themes that are essential for humanity to flourish: sustainability, health, reducing vulnerability, and joy of living.

The US National Academy of Engineering has announced the grand challenges for engineering in the 21st century that, if met, would improve people's lives.

The list of 14 tasks was unveiled Friday by a diverse committee of experts from around the world, convened at the request of the US National Science Foundation.

"Tremendous advances in quality of life have come from improved technology in areas such as farming and manufacturing," said committee member and Google co-founder Larry Page. "If we focus our effort on the important grand challenges of our age, we can hugely improve the future."

The panel, some of the most accomplished engineers and scientists of their generation, was established in 2006 and met several times to discuss and develop the list of challenges.

Through an interactive Web site, the effort received worldwide input from prominent engineers and scientists, as well as from the general public, over a one-year period.

The panel's conclusions were reviewed by more than 50 subject-matter experts.

The final choices fall into four themes that are essential for humanity to flourish: sustainability, health, reducing vulnerability, and joy of living.

The committee did not attempt to include every important challenge, members said, nor did it endorse particular approaches to meeting those selected. Rather than focusing on predictions or gadgets, the goal was to identify what needs to be done to help people and the planet thrive.

"We chose engineering challenges that we feel can, through creativity and commitment, be realistically met, most of them early in this century," said committee chair and former US secretary of defense William Perry.

"Some can be, and should be, achieved as soon as possible," he added.

The committee decided not to rank the challenges. But their list includes making solar energy affordable, providing energy from fusion, managing the nitrogen cycle, providing access to clean water around the world, reverse-engineering the human brain, preventing nuclear terror and securing cyberspace among others.

NAE is offering the public an opportunity to vote on which one they think is most important and to provide comments at the project Web site: www.engineeringchallenges.org.

"Meeting these challenges would be 'game changing,'" said NAE president Charles Vest. "Success with any one of them could dramatically improve life for everyone."


Read more!

Haiti's efforts to save trees falters

Jonathan M. Katz, Associated Press Yahoo News 16 Feb 08;

Far from the spreading slums of the Haitian capital, past barren dirt mountains and hillsides stripped to a chalky white core, two woodcutters bring down a towering oak tree in one of the few forested valleys left in the Caribbean country.

Fanel Cantave, 36, says he has little choice but to make his living in a way that is causing environmental disaster in Haiti. And these days, he and his 15-year-old son, Phillipe, must travel ever farther from their village to find trees to cut.

"There is no other way to get money," the father said, pushing his saw through splintering wood that will earn him as much as $12.50, depending on how many planks it produces.

Such raw economics explain the disappearance of Haiti's forests, a process that has led to erosion that has reduced scarce farm land and left the island vulnerable to deadly flooding.

U.N. experts say just 2 to 4 percent of forest cover remains in Haiti, down from 7 to 9 percent in 1981. And despite millions invested in reforestation, such efforts have mostly failed because of economic pressures and political turmoil.

For example, the U.S. Agency for International Development embarked on an ambitious $22.8 million project in the 1980s to plant some 30 million trees that could provide income for peasants. But the project focused on trees that can be made into charcoal for cooking, and nearly all were eventually cut down.

Environmental Minister Jean-Marie Claude Germain said reforestation projects and efforts to preserve trees in three protected zones were set back by the violent rebellion that ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 2004 and prompted the U.N. to send in thousands of peacekeepers to restore order.

"Even though there were agricultural laws, the laws were not respected," Germain said. "We are trying to create order now."

Stability returned with the 2006 election of President Rene Preval and U.N. military action against Port-au-Prince's powerful gangs. But in a nation where 80 percent of the 8.7 million people live on less than $2 a day, trees mean income for those lucky enough to have access to them.

Some groups say they've found success on a limited scale by planting fruit trees and protecting hardwoods through micro-loans and agricultural assistance. Floresta USA, based in San Diego, has been working in Haiti for the last decade and is now planting about 33,000 fruit and hardwood trees a year. The Organization for the Rehabilitation of the Environment, based in southern Haiti, has produced more than a million fruit trees since it began work in 1985.

Compared to the USAID's failed plan, smaller programs have had more luck by focusing on fruit trees, which farmers are more likely to preserve to sell the fruit. And smaller organizations are able to work with individual farmers and tailor planting to the needs of specific areas.

"People aren't excited about, 'Hey let's go plant trees.' They're excited about, 'How can I feed my family? How can I make ends meet?'" said Scott Sabin, executive director of Floresta.

But many who are dedicated to restoring Haiti's forests have grown pessimistic. Despite small successes, prospects are grim for implementing such programs on a grand scale.

"Everything has been studied and all the solutions are already known," said Mousson Finnigan, the head of the Organization for the Rehabilitation of the Environment. "But when it comes to implementation, it becomes a place where everybody's fighting for the money. They're not fighting for results."

Christopher Columbus found dense tropical forests in 1492 when he arrived on the island colonizers named Hispaniola, now shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

But the trees began falling quickly, first as the Spanish and French cleared forests for plantations and later as hardwoods were logged for U.S. and European markets. Peasants then burned and cut down what was left in desperate search of farmland.

While the Dominican Republic still has some of the most impressive forests in the Caribbean, parts of Haiti now resemble a moonscape of denuded mountains billowing dust. Hillsides are blasted away to make bricks for the capital of Port-au-Prince.

Without trees to anchor the soil, erosion has reduced Haiti's agricultural land, making the island more vulnerable to floods each hurricane season. More than 100 Haitians died in last year's floods, including dozens killed when a river jumped its banks during a gentle but steady rain unrelated to any tropical system. And in 2004, Tropical Storm Jeanne killed some 3,000 people in the coastal city of Gonaives alone.

And yet the trees keep falling. Orange fires can still be seen in the hills above the capital as farmers clear land at night. At the La Saline market, charcoal vendors arrive each day with mountains of bags, their faces coated with black dust.

"In Haiti we destroy instead of produce," acknowledges LeClaire Bocage, 38, who sells 110-pound sacks for $6.25. "They're going to tell the poor to stop cutting down trees. But what will we do to make a living?"

It may be too late to restore Haiti's lost forests, said John Horton, an environmental specialist who has overseen Haiti projects for the Washington-based Inter-American Development Bank. He suggested planting crops that can stabilize the soil and be sold or used for bio-fuels. Others promote raising money through carbon credits from overseas firms emitting greenhouse gases elsewhere.

"They need cash crops, they need food, they need energy immediately," Horton said.


Read more!