Eating sacred turtles in Guinea-Bissau

Integrated Regional Information Networks 11 Mar 08;

ETICOGA, ORANGO ISLAND, 11 March 2008 (IRIN) - Of the many species of wild birds and animals that inhabit the 88 Bijago islands spread over more than 10,000sqkm none is more sacred than the turtle.

“We Bajagoans see ourselves as the keepers of the turtles,” Domingo Alves, the head game warden at Eticoga, the main village on Orango island, told IRIN, adding that the animal is featured in many local ceremonies.

The problem is that Bajagoans also eat this most sacred of animals, and, with the nets from the now ever-present industrial fishing trawlers accidentally trapping more turtles than before, all five turtle species in the archipelago are nearing extinction.

So ecologists, together with donors and aid organisations, have come together to try to make the estimated 27,000 inhabitants of the islands aware that they could lose one of their most valued resources.

“It takes time and patience to get people to understand that something they have always had could one day disappear,” said Castro Barbosa, biologist and the director of João Vieira and Poilão National Marine Park, who is employed by the Institute for Biodiversity and Protected Areas (IBAP) headquartered in Guinea Bissau’s capital on the mainland. “Turtles have been a source of nutrition but there are plenty of substitutes available,” he added.

The institute is funded by the World Bank to help the government’s ailing national park system to protect fauna and flora in the islands. With many rare species of wildlife including gazelles, crocodiles, manatees (sea cows), and unusual hippopotami which live mostly in salt water, the area is currently under review by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for World Heritage Site status.

“Communities take part in the management of the national parks, so that they benefit from them while saving the biodiversity resources,” said Peter Kristensen, the World Bank taskforce team leader for the project.

Some funding goes to special primary schools on the islands that focus on environmental education. “The children are made aware of the species of mammals, fish and birds that are under threat,” said Alves, who sometimes teaches the children on the issues.

In November the World Food Programme started a trial school feeding programme in two of the schools. In the two months since then, attendance rates have doubled and officials expect that after a survey has been conducted the children’s nutritional levels will have increased.

Endangered species

Still a big question: Will the turtles survive. Even the most common of the five turtle species that inhabits the islands, the green turtle Chelonia mydas, is on the World Conservation Union (IUCN)’s “red list” of endangered species.

The species migrates along the West African coast as far north as Mauritania but according to IUCN Poilão Island in the outer Bijagos is the largest single nesting area anywhere in the eastern Atlantic Ocean.

Guinea Bissau’s government has a law banning the killing of turtles but the environmentalists IRIN spoke to all said the law only exists on paper.

Also IRIN talked with people on the islands who say they eat turtles. “It’s the most delicious meat I know,” Richardo de Pina, a young man resting on one of the many pristine beaches at Orango Island, told IRIN. “My mother cooks it so well; we all pester her with the question: ‘When are you going to cook it again?’”

The Green Turtle is considered particularly tasty. Its name comes not from the colour of its shell but its green fat which gives it a distinctive taste, according to turtle researcher and conservator Blair Witherington author of the 2006 book “An Extraordinary Natural History of Some Uncommon Turtles”.

Still, the young man in Orango seemed aware of a problem. “We used to eat turtle more when I was young but now when you look for the animals along the shore they’re harder to find.”

Barbosa, the IBAP biologist, said banning the killing of turtles would never work but that does not mean that efforts to conserve them are failing. “Conservation of rare species is possible as long as people eat them in moderation” he said.

He said IBAP’s message is that people should only kill a turtle when others are around and they should only kill one turtle at a time.

Alves, the head game warden, said people now only eat turtle on very special occasions. “It is part of some ceremonies here to eat turtles and that will never change, but the waters are teeming with all sorts of seafood that people can eat at other times. They now know that eating turtle any time is wrong.”

Industrial fishing threat

Experts agree that the main reason turtle populations are declining is that they are being killed by fishermen coming from elsewhere “An emerging threat [to the turtles] is the rapid development of fisheries in this region,” states the Marine Turtle Research Group at the Centre for Ecology and Conservation in the University of Exeter in the UK.

Big international fishing boats which often operate illegally are the main culprits, Barbosa said. “Every time they haul in their big nets at least two or three turtles die.”

Bijago fishermen do not use nets, only spears and fishing lines.

An added problem comes from fishermen from neighboring countries, particularly Senegal and Sierra Leone, who cut down the mangroves in the Bijagos to make fires to smoke and preserve fish they catch before transporting them home in their canoes. “They are destroying the natural habitats of turtles and other rare species at an alarming rate,” Barbosa said.

With locals becoming more aware of the fragility of their environment they are on the look-out for abusers. “People come to us all the time to report poaching, illegal fishing and the cutting down of mangroves,” said Barbosa. “The problem is that nobody here - not even the government - has the means to do anything about it.”


Read more!

India conducts night raids to contain bird flu

Bappa Majumdar, Yahoo News 11 Mar 08;

Authorities in India's east battling to contain a fresh outbreak of bird flu said they were raiding farms at night to catch chickens and ducks and counter unwilling villagers who have refused to hand over poultry.

Only a month after authorities in West Bengal declared that bird flu was under control, a fresh outbreak was reported from the state's Murshidabad district, where 900 backyard poultry died over the last two weeks.

Some villagers have also let their poultry loose during the day and hide them inside their homes at night, Subir Bhadra, a senior district official said from Murshidabad.

"These are problems we are facing and therefore we have decided to surprise the villagers by conducting night-time raids," Bhadra said by telephone.

"It is working, although villagers are superstitious and seem closely attached to their poultry, which also puts them at a health risk."

There have been no reported human cases of bird flu. Experts fear the H5N1 strain could mutate into a form easily transmitted from person to person, leading to a pandemic that could kill millions worldwide.

During the earlier outbreak in January, the H5N1 virus hit 13 of the state's 19 districts, including Murshidabad, bringing down poultry sales by more than 70 percent in the state, but it had a limited impact in rest of the country.

They had then culled close to 4 million birds in the state after the World Health Organisation (WHO) described January's outbreak as the worst-ever in India.

Officials say smuggled poultry from bird-flu hit Bangladesh could have triggered the latest outbreak.

Bird flu spread to another district in Bangladesh last week, affecting 47 out of 64 districts in the country.

On the bordering villages of Murshidabad, over 350 veterinary workers, accompanied by policemen, were visiting farms trying to convince villagers to hand over chickens.

"I have asked the police not to use force, but we hope they at least agree to cooperate," Bhadra said.

Previous containment efforts in West Bengal were also hampered when villagers refused to hand over their chickens, saying they were disease-free.

Villagers have dumped dead poultry in wells and ponds, and many have even eaten undercooked dead chickens, officials said.

Officials said they were still collecting samples from other districts to see if bird flu was spreading to new areas.

"We are not taking any chances now," Anisur Rahaman, the state's animal resources minister said from the state capital, Kolkata.

(Editing by Alistair Scrutton)


Read more!

Bird flu shows signs of mutation: China expert

Yahoo News 11 Mar 08;

A Chinese expert on respiratory diseases says the H5N1 bird flu virus has shown signs of mutation and urged vigilance at a time when seasonal human influenza is at a peak, newspapers reported on Tuesday.

"When avian flu is around and human flu appears, this will raise the chances of avian flu turning into a human flu. We have to be very alert and careful in March," Zhong Nanshan was quoted by the Ming Pao newspaper as saying.

"People who were killed by bird flu last year and this year were too poor to seek treatment. If you happen to have high fever and pneumonia, you must seek treatment fast," said Zhong, director of the Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases in China's southern Guangdong province.

Experts are worried about seasonal flu, because it could get mixed up with a deadly novel strain, such as the H5N1 bird flu virus. Such a hybrid would not only become easily transmissible between people, but packed with great killing power.

"The bird flu virus has shown signs of mutation. If infected people don't get treatment in a timely manner, they can die easily," Zhong was quoted as telling reporters on the sidelines of the Chinese parliament's annual meeting.

Three Chinese have died this year of H5N1 bird flu and they were infected probably through contact with sick poultry. The World Health Organisation said there was no evidence of transmission between humans in all three cases.

In Hong Kong, the government shut a primary school early ahead of the Easter holidays after one of its students, a 7-year-old boy, died at noon on Tuesday. The boy was admitted to hospital last week with flu-like symptoms and authorities are still trying to determine the cause of his illness.

Thomas Tsang, controller of the Centre for Health Protection, said five other pupils at the school have been admitted to hospital for respiratory infection and their conditions were stable. Three samples have tested positive for influenza A, Tsang said, without specifying the strain.

"The school will close early for Easter from tomorrow ... to facilitate disinfection," Tsang told a news conference. But he said there was no reason to close all schools in Hong Kong, although they would monitor the situation closely.

Hong Kong, which lies at the south of China, is in the grip of a seasonal flu peak, with outbreaks reported in a growing number of schools.

A 3-year-old girl died last week of human H3N2 flu and authorities have ordered schools to conduct fever checks and advise those who are unwell to stay home.

Although the H5N1 virus has infected only 368 people around the world since 2003, its mortality rate has been high, killing 234 of them.

(Reporting by Tan Ee Lyn and Donny Kwok; Editing by Jeremy Laurence)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 11 Mar 08


On Pulau Hantu for Once Upon a Tree
filming for the series on the hantu blog, and online synopsis of tonight's episode on the wildfilms blog.

Controls over illegal landings on Pulau Sekudu
on the wildfilms blog

Dredging at Changi and other coastal works
MPA notices on the wildfilms blog

A talk on the history of Kusu Island
focusing on the temple and visitorship to the island on the leafmonkey blog

Managing The Tortoise Island:
Tua Pek Kong Temple, Pilgrimage, and Social Change in Pulau Kusu, 1965-2007

Black-naped oriole snacking on cicada
on the bird ecology blog

Turbo thoughts
on the budak blog and octopussing a clever way to outwit the octopus

So Simple 2
a TV programme about the simple life on the AsiaIsGreen blog


Read more!

Forgotten sister of Chek Jawa gets protection

Permits needed to visit Pulau Sekudu
Aditi Shivaramakrishnan, The New Paper 11 Mar 08;

WHY would Singapore, a bustling port city dependent on ships passing through, stop ships from anchoring at a secluded island off Pulau Ubin?

The island, called Pulau Sekudu, looks nondescript from afar.

However, it is teeming with marine wildlife because it is very close to the marine-protected area of Chek Jawa.

While Chek Jawa is known for its natural gems, Sekudu, its neglected sister, has been the victim of repeated illegal fishing, camping and harvesting of marine creatures such as oysters and clams.

Between July and September 2007, there were more than 20 landings on Pulau Sekudu, Mr Robert Teo said. He is the assistant director in charge of Pulau Ubin at the National Parks Board (NParks).

NParks has been managing the area since January 2002, implementing rules that restrict access to Chek Jawa's inter-tidal habitats. That protection is extended to Sekudu because it is found within the 100-ha Chek Jawa Wetlands.

PERMIT NEEDED

Since 1 Oct last year, vessels entering these wetlands have to get a permit from NParks.

Recently, The New Paper went to Chek Jawa to see what could be found there and at Sekudu.

Sea anemones, sand dollars, moon snails, crabs and tubeworms were spotted in the area.

In addition to the marine creatures, interesting plants can be seen, such as the seashore nutmeg (a species that can no longer be found on mainland), mangrove plants and many types of seagrass.

Explaining the reason for the permit system, Mr Teo said: 'Chek Jawa Wetlands, which includes Pulau Sekudu, is an important and unique area for the conservation of Singapore's marine life.

'Thus, NParks decided to manage public access to minimise damage to its fragile marine habitat.'

NParks approves permit applications only for activities such as research and coastal cleanups. These are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

It will not be easy for members of the public to sneak into the wetlands either.

NParks staff members and security guards stationed at Chek Jawa Wetlands are equipped with powerful binoculars to scan the area for illegal activities.

Mr Teo said: 'They will record the registration numbers of any boats landing or engaging in poaching.

'NParks will then check with the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore for the particulars of the boat owners for enforcement action.'

NParks has also started regular boat patrol and relies on volunteers to act as its eyes and ears.

The Police Coast Guard will tell boats without permits to leave Sekudu's shores.

Since the rules were implemented, there have been 27 cases of illegal landings. Warning letters are issued to first-time offenders.

There have also been four cases of poaching.

In the case of repeat offenders, NParks will carry out thorough investigations before taking action in accordance with the Parks and Trees Act.

These regulations are welcomed by nature lovers.

Botanist Joseph Lai said: 'It's very good for the boating and fishing community to know where to fish and anchor, and where not to.

'This gives people a chance to exercise their own stewardship over nature areas.'

Those who are granted permits should also exercise caution when on the island.

Mr Teo said: 'For applications that are approved, we seek the cooperation of permit holders to observe the Parks and Trees Act and Parks and Trees Regulations and avoid trampling on marine life while on the island.'

Links

Parks and Trees Act on the reddotbeachbum blog.

Poaching incidents encountered by volunteers:



Permit required for landing at Pulau Sekudu is on the NParks website (word doc)


Read more!

Science 'not a cure-all for society's ills'

Ho Ai Li, Straits Times 10 Mar 08;

To deal with problems like climate change, people must be taught to live in harmony with nature.

WHILE many East Asian leaders are armed with science degrees, those skills are not a cure-all for pressing social problems like terrorism and the growing gap between the rich and poor, Foreign Minister George Yeo said yesterday.

Educators across the region must focus on more than just science, which has increasingly been seen as a magic pill for society's ills.

'Science does not teach how members of different races and religions should live together. Science alone cannot defeat Al-Qaeda,' he said.

'Worse, scientific development has run so far ahead of human wisdom, we are becoming a danger to ourselves.'

Mr Yeo made these comments at the Raffles International Conference on Education, at Raffles Junior College.

The inaugural two-day gathering brings together almost 400 delegates from about 30 countries to talk about issues of curriculum and community.

Mr Yeo said education is crucial to a society's development and should take into account local needs - from the rugged steppes of northern Asia to the urban jungles of Singapore.

When it comes to analysing a society's strengths and weaknesses, one invariably finds them reflected deep in the education system, he said.

To deal with problems like climate change, people must be taught to live in harmony with nature.

'The moral sense that man is a part of nature also has to be instilled in students. Without that moral sense of man being a part of nature, we do great harm to ourselves.

'Science by itself cannot make us fully human - Spock in Star Trek is only half-human,' he said.


Read more!

Motorists will travel on brand new road into Sentosa


Channel NewsAsia 10 Mar 08;

SINGAPORE: Motorists driving into Sentosa from Tuesday will be travelling on a brand new road.

It will replace the current Gateway Avenue which will be closed to make way for the development of Universal Studios Singapore, a part of the Resorts World at Sentosa.

Sentosa Leisure Group said the 730-metre, four-lane road (marked out in red) will help improve traffic on the island.

The Resorts World at Sentosa is bearing the S$60 million construction cost for the road, along with new ramps that will lead to its future 4,100-lot basement car park.

For now, ticketing will continue at Sentosa Gateway before drivers cross the bridge to the island.

However, admission booths will be located further inland on the new road starting the second quarter of this year.

This relocation is expected to cost some S$3 million. - CNA/ac


Read more!

Abandoning a pet is an offence

Today Online 11 Mar 08;

Letter from GOH SHIH YONG
Assistant Director, Corporate Communications for Chief Executive Officer
Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority

I refer to the letters by Mr Tan Chek Wee and Ms Marianne Maes "Ban import of pets" (Feb 29) and by Ms Tan Ai Ling "A cute puppy is not just a status symbol" (March 4), on pet abandonment. We are heartened by their concern for animal welfare and would like to thank them for their suggestions on deterring pet abandonment.

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) agrees with the writers that to curb impulse buying and deter abandonment, it is important for potential pet owners to be aware of the responsibilities of ownership.

The AVA has been actively promoting responsible pet ownership through talks, demonstrations, road shows, mass media efforts and collaborations with animal welfare organisations. These efforts have spread the message to many potential owners that a pet is for life and to think carefully before getting a pet.

For existing owners, the AVA has been encouraging responsible care of their pets and also pet sterilisation to prevent indiscriminate breeding and abandonment of unwanted pets. The financial resources required for pet care are also discussed to prepare potential owners for the inherent expenses of pet ownership.

The AVA also enforces regulations such as pet shop licensing and dog licensing to safeguard animal welfare and instill responsible pet ownership.

Ms Tan may be pleased to know that pet shops are already required to submit particulars of buyers to the AVA and to ensure microchipping of all dogs for sale. Pet shops are also required to provide customers with advice on the care of the pet.

In addition, with the recent revision of the Animals and Birds (Licensing and Control) rule in September last year, it is now compulsory for all owners to microchip their dogs, providing a greater traceability in cases of pet abandonment.

It would not be appropriate to ban import of dogs as long as the business is legitimate and complies with the rules and regulations as Singapore operates on a free-market system. Moreover, such an import ban may not necessarily resolve the problem of irresponsible pet ownership and may even promote illegal pet smuggling and breeding to meet demand.

We would also like to take this opportunity to emphasise that abandoning a pet should never be an option as it is cruel and an offence. Under the Animals and Birds Act, anyone convicted of pet abandonment can be fined up to $10,000 and/or jailed for up to 12 months.

The AVA will continue its public education efforts and stress to pet shops the need to promote responsible pet ownership. Although we may not be able to adopt all the writers' suggestions, we will take them into consideration when we review the animal welfare regulations and programmes.


Read more!

Fleshing out the problem of eating meat

Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 11 Mar 08;

# Poor hygiene at slaughterhouses
# Damage to environment
# Growing obesity problem

BANGKOK - BANGKOK-BASED Gunter Heinz has seen for himself, up close, compelling reasons to either not eat meat at all, or be very careful where you do.

In an upcoming report, the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) expert on animal production notes 'severe shortcomings' in the region's slaughterhouses.

These range from animal welfare malpractices to bacterial contamination from 'lack of proper slaughtering and by-product handling facilities and careless slaughtering by workers'.

'Slaughterhouse waste disposal and effluent treatment, which is organised in an unsatisfactory way or not at all...contributes to the poor quality of slaughterhouse hygiene,' the report says.

In most Asian countries, there is an increasing tendency towards producing good quality chilled meat for domestic sales, Mr Heinz notes.

But such production accounts for, at the most, around 15 per cent of the overall meat market in some countries.

The rest is still provided by small- and medium-scale private-sector abattoirs, which supply 'warm' meat to markets without refrigeration.

Some of this meat even finds its way to modern supermarkets after being chilled - a dangerous practice because, after being contaminated to begin with by appalling hygiene at its origin, it undergoes prolonged storage.

'This is the sector where profound technical and hygienic improvements are needed in order to supply clean meat to consumers,' says Mr Heinz in his report.

Slaughterhouse standards in Myanmar, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand appear relatively acceptable in terms of hygiene and slaughtering practices.

But conditions can range from acceptable to downright dangerous in Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, India, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Vietnam.

Singapore was not part of the study.

The argument against meat consumption goes well beyond the immediate hazards.

The large-scale, commercial livestock industry today accounts for 18 per cent of greenhouse gases, including methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by land use change and the livestock's own gaseous emissions.

That is more than the amount produced by the transport sector, which accounts for about 12 per cent of greenhouse gases emitted worldwide. And it is growing.

Eating commercially produced and processed meat has created a recognised and growing obesity problem, which in some countries is already killing people prematurely and will soon overload public health-care systems with related illnesses like heart disease and cancer.

Yet more and more people are eating meat, especially in some formerly poor countries with vibrant economies and millions experiencing a new affluence.

Between the 1960s and the current decade, worldwide meat production has approximately quadrupled.

In the same period, per capita meat consumption has doubled - and will double again by 2050.

'Livestock's Long Shadow' - an extensive study of the livestock industry released last year by the FAO - concludes that the sector 'emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global'.

Livestock accounts for 40 per cent of the agricultural sector's gross domestic product and provides livelihood to upwards of a billion people worldwide.

But it has also taken over crop and forest land, destroying biodiversity and the ability of natural forests to absorb CO2.

Across the world, livestock is one of the greatest threats to natural forests and biodiversity. Some 70 per cent of previously forested land in South America's Amazon basin is now occupied by pastures.

The industry not only uses up increasingly scarce and precious fresh water in vast quantities, but is also a major polluter of fresh-water systems.

In the United States, where per capita meat consumption is roughly twice the global average, livestock accounts for an estimated 37 per cent of pesticide use, 50 per cent of antibiotic use, and a third of the nitrogen and phosphorus in fresh water resources.

The FAO has been calling for measures to reduce the environmental footprint of the industry. It may even be possible to reduce it by half - but the industry has to be willing or be forced to do it.

The alternative is grim.

The University of California at Irvine's Nathan Fiala, in a 2006 paper, noted: 'To produce 1kg of beef in the Netherlands requires 20.9 sq m of land just for feed and other inputs.

'If every person on the planet were to have the same level of meat consumption as the average (American), and all land was used at the same technological level as in the Netherlands, meat production alone would account for 30 per cent of all of the world's potentially arable land, at least four times as much as is currently used.'


Read more!

Singapore more prepared to face infectious disease outbreak

Channel NewsAsia 10 Mar 08;

SINGAPORE: Five years after a deadly SARS outbreak, Singapore has put in place a robust surveillance system as well as an infectious disease response plan to counter any possible outbreak in future.

The respiratory disease first surfaced in Singapore's Tan Tock Seng Hospital when a woman, who came back from a holiday in Hong Kong, came down with flu-like symptoms and sought treatment at the hospital's emergency department.

She then became a super-infector, with more than 100 cases - including family members, visitors and hospital staff - traced back to her.

Back then, all patients who went to the emergency department were put in the same waiting area, regardless of their conditions.

But today, a triage station is a permanent fixture, and anyone with fever - the first symptom of flu or any other infectious diseases - will be asked to wait in a separate area.

Patients are then classified as high- or low-risk, depending on their travel history and background, such as whether they had any contact with a possible infectious person or even poultry. This also aims to facilitate contact tracing if there is a need for it.

An isolation area has also been purpose-built at the emergency department. Consultation rooms in the isolation area have one-way air flow to minimise the risk of contamination, and the air is also filtered before it is released into the environment.

In fact, the isolation area can be completely sealed off into a self-contained facility if there is an outbreak. It has its own consultation rooms, x-ray rooms, separate toilets and even separate entrance and exit points to ensure that patients who are potentially infectious can be moved to a nearby isolation facility without putting other patients at risk.

Among healthcare workers, a sick leave tracking system has been implemented to track any possible infection among them. Any spike in the number of fellow healthcare workers falling ill with similar symptoms will trigger off an alarm.

Director of Communicable Diseases Centre, Associate Professor Leo Yee Sin, said: "This system, in my mind, proves to be a useful tool for the hospital... (It) could give us an early warning that (there) could potentially be some unusual transmission going on among the healthcare workers."

Despite these measures, concerns remain as to when and how the next outbreak will be.

"The challenge will come in terms of what is the mode of transmission, and the mode of transmission will determine as to the impact of the outbreak and also the transmissibility of the disease," said Associate Professor Leo.

Therefore, the Infectious Diseases Act is up for amendment to allow authorities to respond more effectively to public health emergencies. This includes empowering authorities to declare a public health emergency during an outbreak, and allowing the health minister to designate the whole or parts of Singapore as a restricted zone.

Singapore also had numerous exercises simulating an infectious disease outbreak.

Dr Lyn James, director of the Health Ministry's communicable diseases division, said: "By these exercises, we are able to identify gaps, put in measures to strengthen our plans. We are definitely more vigilant and more prepared than we were before the SARS outbreak."

The robustness of this surveillance system was put to the test recently when Singapore experienced a spate of food poisoning and chikungunya virus outbreaks.

With the looming threat of an avian flu pandemic, these measures will definitely put the city-state in good stead. - CNA/ac


Read more!

Global warming: Time now for ruthless measures, not compromise

Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 11 Mar 08;

INFORMATION that emerged last year set off alarm bells on global warming, but we may still be oversleeping. Some of the world's foremost climate scientists now say that global warming is far more advanced than was believed at last year's Bali conference on the Kyoto Protocol.

Proposed targets for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases - the main drivers of global warming - under the Kyoto Protocol and beyond, they say, are looking outdated. The impact of climate change is happening at lower temperature increases and more quickly than projected.

The most striking symptom of this is the Arctic's floating sea ice. It is headed towards summer disintegration as early as 2013, a century ahead of the projections of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

In what scientists describe as 'positive feedback', the warmer the planet gets, the faster it warms.

For instance, a warmer planet sparks more forest fires - which in turn pump more carbon dioxide (CO2) into the air, warming the planet further. When the Arctic region's frozen peat known as permafrost melts, it releases methane - a greenhouse gas 21 times more powerful than CO2 - which again further drives global warming.

In fact, the data shows that we are now producing more CO2 at the same time as the ability of the planet's surface to absorb it is falling - mainly because of deforestation.

The combination of these factors creates 'positive feedback', accelerating global warming.

In the words of the Climate Code Red report released this month in Australia: 'We have already created the conditions for extremely dangerous climate change...that will induce further, and possibly uncontrollable, feedback.'

The report was done for Friends of the Earth by the think tanks Carbon Equity and Green Leap Strategic Institute.

It is almost too hot for many in the government and corporate sectors to handle. They remain locked in what the report calls 'failure-inducing compromise'.

The Australian report brings together a far more up-to-date picture than the IPCC report did. Because of time lags, the IPCC report contained data which in many cases was already outdated by the time the report was published.

Code Red brings together views from a range of scientists involved in climate change research, including some of the world's foremost thinkers on the subject like Dr James Hansen of Nasa's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.

Dr Hansen told an Australian radio station last week: 'As it stands now, we will lose the Arctic sea ice without any more greenhouse gases, because there is (already) additional warming in the pipeline.'

He added: 'Talking about a date (by which we should reduce greenhouse gases) which is quite a distance in the future is...a way for politicians to get out of doing something now. They put off the target to a date when they'll be out of office.'

The 101-page Code Red report concludes that the climate 'will not respond to incremental modification of the business-as-usual model'.

The summer melting of the Arctic's floating ice - supplemented soon by melting in western Antarctica - will trigger a sea level rise of 5m or more by 2100.

Meanwhile, many coastal cities and their fresh-water supplies will be compromised by salt water. Marine life will be affected by acidification.

The report warns that if the acceleration is too rapid, humanity will no longer have the power to reverse the processes it has set in motion. The planet will look very different from now - and the changes will come within the lifetimes of most adults alive today.

Warning against 'trading off thousands if not millions of species, and perhaps hundreds of millions of people, by opting for compromised goals', the report's authors, Mr Philip Sutton of Green Leap and Mr David Spratt of Carbon Equity, say global warming demands an emergency response beyond 'business as usual' and 'politics as usual'.

It is not that the IPCC did not warn of this. But the IPCC's data had by late 2007 been outstripped by growth in greenhouse gases - not only from countries like India and China but also from developed nations such as Australia.

Another problem, the Code Red authors contend, is scientific reticence. Many whose work centres on climate change have struggled to gain recognition on the issue and remain concerned about being dismissed as 'alarmist' and 'crazy'.

'Now that the science is showing that the situation is far worse than most scientists expected only a short while ago, this ingrained reticence is adding to the problem,' they said.

There is also pressure - mainly from industry and countries heavily reliant on fossil fuels - to dilute worst-case estimates.

The report does not include the views of professors Steve Rayner of Oxford's James Martin Institute of Science and Civilisation, and Gwyn Prins of the Mackinder Centre for the Study of Long Wave Events at the London School of Economics. But it echoes what they wrote at the time of last year's Bali conference: 'Kyoto has given only an illusion of action. It has become the sole focus of our efforts and, as a result, we have wasted 15 years.'

What do the scientists and the authors of the Climate Code Red report advocate? They draw on the example of World War II to show that human society can indeed change.

After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour in December 1941, America's military imperatives demanded 'a rapid conversion of great swathes of economic capacity from civil to military purposes'.

'Within weeks, car production lines became tank lines and manufacture of passenger cars ceased for the duration of the war, new methods to mass- produce military aircraft were devised, and consumer spending was dampened by selling 'war bonds' to fund the cost of rapidly expanding military production and control inflation,' they say.

'Price controls were introduced and rationing of key goods was mandated. Yet the economy, real wages and profits all grew, though civil rights were significantly curtailed.'

It is just such a response that is needed to deal with global warming. Humanity will have to change the way its societies and economies are structured - both by using new technologies and ruthlessly eliminating or taxing greenhouse gas emissions.

That means fundamental changes - but not intolerable ones compared to the ravages of global warming. As Mr Sutton and Mr Spratt write: 'We can do without jet-transported Californian spring cherries at our fresh food markets in the middle of a cold Melbourne winter.'


Read more!

US corn biofuels will expand Gulf of Mexico 'dead zone': scientists

Yahoo News 10 Mar 08;

A planned increase in US ethanol production from corn would spell environmental "disaster" for marine species in the Gulf of Mexico, said a co-author of a science study published Monday.

A boost in corn production will worsen the Gulf's so-called "dead zone," an area with so little oxygen that sealife suffocates, said Simon Donner, a geographer at the University of British Columbia in Western Canada.

"Most organisms are not able to survive without enough oxygen," Donner told AFP. "All the bottom-dwelling organisms that can't move away are probably going to die, while fish will migrate if they can."

Donner and Chris Kucharik of the University of Wisconsin used computer models to conclude that growing enough corn to meet US biofuel goals set for 2022 would cause a boost of 10 to 34 percent in nitrogen pollution in the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers, which run into the Gulf of Mexico.

In turn, the study said, there will be more than a 95 percent probability of failure in American targets to reduce the Gulf dead zone.

The study is published Monday in the online Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Journal of Sciences.

The Gulf's dead zone, first measured about three decades ago, has grown to cover an area as large as 20,000 square kilometers (12,400 square miles) each summer in the Gulf, which is ringed by the southern United States, Mexico and Cuba.

The zone is caused indirectly by nitrogen fertilizers used on cornfields in states like Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska and Wisconsin. Excess nitrogen runs into the Mississippi River, becomes nitrate, and feeds algae growth. When the algae eventually dies it sinks to the bottom and rots, a process that sucks oxygen out of the water and kills all other life forms.

Donner noted the continental United States already produces about half of the world's corn, in part for human consumption but mostly to feed livestock or make ethanol.

The authors predict the only way nitrate pollution could be controlled and ethanol targets met would be if American farmers stop raising meat animals on corn and dramatically change agricultural management techniques.

With oxygen levels in the Gulf's dead zone already as low as two parts per million or less, all commercial and sport fishing in the zone has been wiped out, said Donner.

But the fishery "doesn't have the economic value that corn production does," he noted. "You can think of it as an equity problem in a way. It's pollution from one part of the US damaging another part of the US."

Corn-based ethanol could worsen "dead zone": study
Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters 10 Mar 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Growing more corn to meet the projected U.S. demand for ethanol could worsen an expanding "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico that is bad for crawfish, shrimp and local fisheries, researchers reported on Monday.

The dead zone is a huge area of water -- some 7,700 square miles -- that forms above the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico every summer. It contains very low levels of oxygen.

The dead zone starts in Midwestern corn country when farmers fertilize their fields with nitrogen. The fertilizer run-off flows down the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico, making algae bloom on the surface and cutting oxygen to creatures that live on the bottom.

The low levels of oxygen in the zone make it difficult for crustaceans and bottom-feeding fish to survive, said Simon Donner, who worked on the study published the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Crustaceans will likely struggle to stay alive, Donner said by telephone. Fish will swim out of the zone, potentially devastating local fisheries, he said.

"We're already at a point where recommendations have been made that nitrogen levels in the Mississippi River have to decrease by up to ... 55 percent in order to shrink the dead zone," said Donner, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

"And now with this incentive to produce more corn and use more fertilizer, we're pushing in the other direction," Donner said. "The two policies are just completely incongruous."

A recent U.S. Senate energy policy proposal recommended the manufacture of 15 billion to 36 billion gallons (68 to 164 billion liters) of renewable fuels by the year 2022, Donner's team found.

To reach that goal with corn-based ethanol would increase nitrogen pollution in the Mississippi River by 10 to 18 percent, Donner said.

(Editing by Eric Beech)


Read more!

Environmental groups sue U.S. over polar bears

Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters 10 Mar 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A trio of environmental groups sued the U.S. government on Monday for failing to meet a legal deadline to decide if polar bears should be considered threatened by climate change under the Endangered Species Act.

"It's up to a federal court to throw this incredible animal a lifeline," said Andrew Wetzler of the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the plaintiffs. "We need urgent action from this administration to protect the polar bear and reduce greenhouse gas pollution, not continued delay."

Polar bears live only in the Arctic and depend on sea ice as a platform for hunting seals. A report by the U.S. Geological Survey said that two-thirds of the world's polar bears -- some 16,000 -- could be gone by 2050 if predictions about melting sea ice hold true.

This is the first time global warming has been a factor in proposing a threatened status for any U.S. species.

The Bush administration was originally supposed to issue a final decision on the polar bear case on January 9, but requested a delay of a month or so. This past Sunday was the latest final deadline for a decision.

In announcing the January delay, Dale Hall, head of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the notion of climate change as a cause added to the complexity of the decision.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, Greenpeace and the Center for Biological Diversity filed their lawsuit in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, seeking to compel the administration to issue a final decision immediately.

The decision rests with the U.S. Interior Department. There was no immediate response on Monday to phone calls to the department after the suit was filed, but a spokesman said beforehand that the lawsuit was expected.

"We were put on notice about 60 days ago that certain organizations intended to file a lawsuit and we've obviously not published a decision ... so a lawsuit is not a surprise to us," Interior spokesman Shane Wolf said by telephone.

Wolf said on Friday that the department would respond to the suit "in a timely manner."

While the decision on the polar bears' possible protected status was postponed, the Interior Department went ahead on February 6 with a sale of oil and gas leases in the Chukchi Sea off the Alaskan coast, which includes large swaths of polar bear habitat.

Also on Friday, the Interior Department's inspector general's office launched an investigation into the actions surrounding the listing of the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

Conservation groups sue over polar bears
Dan Joling, Associated Press Yahoo News 11 Mar 08;

Three conservation groups sued the Department of the Interior on Monday for missing a deadline on a decision to list polar bears as threatened because of the loss of Arctic sea ice. A decision was due Jan. 9, one year after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing the animals as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

Agency Director Dale Hall said in January that officials needed a few more weeks to make a decision. But two months later, no decision has been announced.

Polar bears depend on sea ice for hunting seals, denning and giving birth. Conservation groups claim the loss of sea ice due to global warming is accelerating.

"Doing nothing means extinction for the polar bear. That's what the administration is doing — nothing," said Kassie Siegel, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity and the lead author of the 2005 petition that sought the listing.

Her group, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Greenpeace Inc. asked the federal court in San Francisco to order administration officials to make the decision.

Hall said in January he did not like missing the deadline but, "It is far more important to us to do it right and have it explained properly to the public."

Bruce Woods, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife spokesman in Anchorage, said he could not comment on pending legal action. "We are still working as fast as we can to get the decision announced," he said.

Alaska has the only two polar bear populations in the United States: the Beaufort Sea group off the state's north coast and the Chukchi Sea group, shared with Russia, off Alaska's northwest coast.

Summer sea ice in Alaska last year shrunk to about 1.65 million square miles last year, the lowest level in 38 years of satellite record-keeping and nearly 40 percent less ice than the long-term average between 1979 and 2000. Some climate models have predicted the Arctic will be free of summer sea ice by 2030. A U.S. Geological Survey study predicted polar bears in Alaska could be wiped out by 2050.

A decision to list polar bears due to global warming could trigger consequences beyond Alaska.

Opponents fear a recovery plan would subject projects such as new power plants to review if they generate greenhouse gases that add to warming in the Arctic. Conservation groups hope that's the case.

"We believe if and when the polar bear is listed, all federal agencies approving major sources of greenhouse gas emissions will have to look at ways to reduce those emissions to protect polar bears," Siegel said.

Last week, the Interior Department's inspector general said it was beginning a preliminary investigation into why the department had not made a decision.

The inquiry was opened in response to environmental groups and would determine whether a full-fledged investigation was warranted, the department said.


Read more!

Seal cubs threatened by global warming, WWF warns

Yahoo News 10 Mar 08;

Hundreds of newborn seal cubs risk dying of hunger and cold because global warming is making ice in the Arctic Circle melt too fast, the World Wide Fund for Nature in Germany warned Monday.

"In some parts perhaps not a single one of the seal cubs born in the past few weeks will survive," the WWF said in a statement.

It said hundreds of the roughly 1,500 ringed seal cubs born this month and last month were in danger.

Seal cubs spend the first weeks of their lives in burrows dug in the ice sheet but if that melts, they find themselves in the ocean before they have built up a fat layer that will enable them to survive, WWF's Cathrin Muenster said.

"When the ice melts too fast, the cubs end up in the ice water before they have their insulating fat layer, and they die painfully of hunger and cold."

The WWF said there was less ice in the Arctic this winter than at any point in the past 300 years.

It said the seal cubs most at risk were those along the southwest coast of Finland, the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Riga, but warned that the layer of pack ice in the Gulf of Bothnia between Sweden and Finland is also thinner than usual.

WWF estimates that there are between 7,000 and 10,000 ringed seals in the Arctic, compared to 180,000 a century ago.

Scientists say the Arctic is heating up twice as fast as the rest of the planet. The phenomenon also puts at risk polar bears who could become extinct as their natural habitat melts away.


Read more!

Rising seas threaten Nile Delta starting 2020: minister

Reuters 10 Mar 08;

CAIRO (Reuters) - Rising sea levels will threaten 15 percent of the Nile Delta by 2020, the rich agricultural area which is home to about half of the 75 million Egyptians, Environment Minister George Maged said on Monday.

"Many of the towns and urban areas in the north of the Delta will suffer from the rise in the level of the Mediterranean with effect from 2020 and about 15 percent of Delta land is under threat from the rising sea level and the seepage into the ground water," he told a parliamentary committee.

The minister quoted technical studies by his ministry, in conjunction with the United Nations, for his assessment of the danger and said he was asking the foreign ministry to start an international campaign to seek urgent solutions.

Egyptian newspapers have quoted foreign reports on the potential threat to the Nile Delta, an alluvial plain much of which lies only a few meters (feet) above sea level, but the government has said little to alert people to the problem.

A study by the U.N. Environment Programme says that a rise of 0.5 meters (20 inches) would displace 3.8 million people and damage 1,800 square km (700 square miles) in the Delta.

A rise of one meter (39 inches) would displace 6.1 million people and damage 4,500 square km (1,700 square miles) of farmland, the study added.

(Writing by Jonathan Wright; Editing by Elizabeth Piper)


Read more!

Canada emission rules target new oil sands plants

Allan Dowd, Reuters 10 Mar 08;

VANCOUVER, British Columbia (Reuters) - Canada announced new rules to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Monday, targeting future oil sands facilities and power plants, in a plan immediately derided by environmentalists as too little too late.

Oil sands facilities that go into operation starting in 2012 will be required to capture and store the bulk of their emissions of carbon dioxide, which is blamed for climate change, the Conservative government said.

Existing facilities -- which process the tar-like bitumen from Alberta's massive oil sands into refinery-ready light crude -- and those that start operating before the end of 2011 will have to reduce emissions using cleaner fuels according to the rules that will be finalized next year.

"The oils sands (are) an important national resource but we we've got to expand (them) in an environmentally friendly way," Environment Minister John Baird told reporters in Ottawa.

The rules are needed for Canada to meet its target for reducing greenhouse gases by 20 percent below 2006 levels by 2020 -- a plan that has been panned as inadequate by many green groups.

The government also said it will ban the building of new "dirty" coal fired power plants starting in 2012, with new generating stations required to have carbon capture and storage capacity ready and deployed.

"There is no future for dirty coal," Baird said.

The new plan also confirmed last year's announcement that Ottawa will establish a carbon emissions trading market, including a carbon offset system to help establish a market price for carbon.

The regulations, which will go into force at the start of 2010, will apply to 16 industrial sectors ranging from energy to forestry. "Our regulations will apply to all big industry," Baird said.

Canada has signed the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, but the Conservative government has said the country cannot meet those commitments without harming the economy.

Environmentalists panned Monday's plan as doing little to cut actual emissions because most of the oil sands facilities now in the works will already be operating by 2012.

"They're closing the barn doors and the horse is already gone," said John Bennett of ClimateforChange.

Environmentalists want Ottawa to put hard caps on carbon emissions, but the government plans to use "intensity-based" caps that have producers cut a percentage of emission increases.

The announcement also received a tepid response from the province of Alberta, where Canada's oil and gas industry is centered. The Alberta government said it supports fighting climate change but reminded Ottawa that it was attempting to regulate a provincially owned resource.

"My response is to stand up for Albertans and we will," Premier Ed Stelmach said.

The new rules follow a government study that was released quietly on Friday and warned that Canada is already suffering the effects of climate change, with more problems coming from devastating storms, droughts and melting permafrost.

"The economic costs resulting from extreme weather events in Canada in the past decade have been greater than for all previous years combined," said the study, which involved work by more than 140 scientists.

(Additional reporting by Scott Haggett, Jeffrey Jones and David Ljunggren; editing by Rob Wilson)


Read more!

Electric Vehicles Could Strain Water Supplies

Charles Q. Choi, LiveScience Yahoo News 10 Mar 08;

As environmentally friendly as hybrid and fully electric cars are, it turns out replacing normal vehicles with them might dangerously strain already scarce water reserves.

Hybrid electric vehicles run on electric mode for a limited distance before they switch to an internal combustion engine for longer trips, while fully electric vehicles operate solely off batteries. Both are presumed to be better for the planet than normal vehicles, because they release fewer emissions into the air.

But hybrid and fully electric cars rely in part on water. Specifically, the power plants that produce the electricity typically use water primarily to cool down the systems.

Such water consumption might be especially of concern in the United States "in the Southwest and Southeast and the West, where water resources are definitely strained," said researcher Michael Webber, a mechanical engineer at the University of Texas at Austin.

Webber and colleague Carey King compared the amount of water used, withdrawn and consumed during petroleum refining and electricity generation in the United States. They estimate that hybrid and fully electric vehicles could sharply increase the country's water consumption, with each mile driven with electricity demanding roughly three times more water than gasoline.

The researchers note these concerns do not necessarily mean electric cars are undesirable. "It just means there might be some tradeoffs," Webber said.

Policymakers may want to move to less water-intensive cooling technologies, such as air cooling. Seawater or recycled former wastewater unsuitable for drinking might also help cool power generators. Power generators that use little to no water, such as wind or solar technology, might also find use, Webber noted.

Webber and King are scheduled to detail their findings in the June 1 issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.


Read more!