A lone voice in China wins friends for environmental campaign

Verna Yu, Yahoo News 4 Dec 07;

From a spartan office in a humble brick building on a university campus, law professor Wang Canfa has gained fame for the legal battles he was waged for thousands of pollution victims across China.

"I feel I have the legal knowledge and should provide help for the underprivileged as best I can," said the diminutive academic at the China University of Political Science and Law in Beijing.

"This is also my ideal as a law scholar: to seek justice."

The 49-year-old runs the only non-government organisation in China that provides legal help to victims of widespread pollution -- many of whom are poor farmers whose livelihoods have been blighted by industrial waste.

China's impressive economic growth during the past two decades has created unprecedented wealth but has also exacted a monstrously heavy price on the nation's environment.

Those people who suffer the consequences tend to be at the bottom of the social spectrum and Wang, who grew up in rural China, feels a strong sense of empathy for them.

"I understand their helplessness. I know the difficulties they face and their need for help," he said.

Wang was born in 1958, the year that Mao Zedong launched the "Great Leap Forward" movement that resulted in about 30 million people starving to death, and he has painful memories of going hungry as a child.

"There was simply no food around. Once I told my mother I was hungry and she just broke down in tears," said Wang, showing the deep ridges in his fingernails which are the result of malnutrition.

Wang said he felt compelled to reach out to the helpless pollution victims since most of them had little money and few resources to help themselves.

"As a scholar, you have no power, no funding, the only thing you have is the knowledge of environmental law. So how do you make an impact?" he said.

Wang said the idea of setting up a help centre came after he read a press report in 1995 about a duck farmer whose business was ruined by industrial discharge.

The farmer had been denied justice because the local government was protecting a polluting brewery.

Wang contacted the farmer and, after bringing the case to court, the farmer eventually received 40,000 yuan (5,300 dollars) in compensation, not enough to cover his losses but something at least.

"If the victims have no professional help, they wouldn't have got any compensation at all," Wang said.

Nine years on, despite receiving no government or industry funding, the Centre for Legal Assistance to Pollution Victims has received more than 10,000 phone calls from people asking for help. He has advised many of them, and fought over 100 court cases.

Its work has won Wang international acclaim, with Time magazine among those to have honoured him, this year naming him one of its "Heroes of the Environment".

The centre also now receives funding from several international foundations, but it still faces a plethora of daily challenges and loses as many cases as it wins.

In most pollution disputes in China, local government tends to side with business, Wang said, because it cannot afford to lose investment.

In fact, fewer than 10 percent of China's environmental cases ever make their way to court because local judiciaries tend to simply refuse to hear those cases, Wang said.

Even for the cases which are heard, it is quite common for courts to consult local governments, which put pressure on judges to avoid paying out compensation to victims.

"We feel very helpless. There are legal channels but they won't let you use them. It's a very sad situation," he said.

Protests over environmental issues are becoming more common across China, with local residents often resorting to violent protests when they feel justice has been denied.

"We feel very angry about those cases where we should have won but didn't due to (government) intervention and the lack of justice," Wang said.

But unlike some activists who suffer harassment and intimidation, Wang said he and his volunteers managed to steer clear of controversy most of the time by maintaining low key tactics and strictly following legal procedures.

Wang remains optimistic because he has in recent years sensed a rise in public awareness about environmental health.

"People now realise that pollution is not normal -- 10 years ago they wouldn't have thought that," he said.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 4 Dec 07

Berlayar Creek
the sad state of our last Southern mangrove on the mainland
on the reddot blog

Naked Hermit Crabs at the Chek Jawa boardwalk
another fabulous day on the adventures of the naked hermit crabs blog

ReefFriends at sea
Sisters was not to be, but Semakau was fabulous
on the colourful clouds blog

Discovery @ Ubin Butterfly Garden
fluttery finds on the discovery blog

Our love for electronic things creates an e-waste problem
on the AsiaIsGreen blog

The Otters' Tale
a young reviewer on the flying fish friends blog

Daily Green Actions
real lights out at Ubin and other urban travails on the leafmonkey blog

How green is your website
on the reuters environmental blog

Making carbon emissions visual

a link to a great ad on the reuters environmental blog


Read more!

After Day of the Red Dye

After Day of the Red Dye, Mindef offers:
# Compensation for lost crops
# Stain removal tips and services
David Boey, Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

THE Defence Ministry has rolled out a battle plan to help the people and businesses affected by a plume of red dye released 10 days ago from Tengah Air Base.

The Ministry of Defence said yesterday that it is working out a 'compensation package' for the farmers who have been forced to destroy their vegetables, which were stained by tiny red droplets.

The spots were traced to a dye which was used in a test to create more visually striking red smoke for the Republic of Singapore Air Force's (RSAF) Black Knights aerobatics team, which is preparing for next year's inaugural Singapore Air Show.

Mindef is also tackling the problem on other fronts:

For property owners: A 24-hour toll-free number (1800-760-8844) links them to advice on how to get rid of the dye stains, which appear mostly as pinhead-size dots and cannot be dissolved in water.

For car owners: Mindef personnel will meet the owners of vehicles with 'stubborn stains', 'for an assessment before making the arrangements to have the stains removed'.

The Straits Times understands that roving teams of professional car polishers may be dispatched to remove the stains and buff cars.

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) has given an assurance that, while the 200 tonnes of leafy greens being junked are enough to fill some 10 lorries, it expects no impact on food prices.

This is because the amount being destroyed adds up to 'less than 1 per cent of the 350,000 tonnes of vegetables consumed' by Singaporeans in a year.

A farmer who was affected by the dye, Mr Wong Koh Fah, 45, said he is still tallying his losses.

'We'll plant again. I felt reassured when Mindef officers visited my farm to see how they could help,' he said.

Talk of a cash payout comes amid continuing efforts to uproot and destroy crops such as kai lan, kang kong and cabbage at the six affected farms in the Lorong Semangka area in Sungei Tengah.

The AVA said that workers began clearing vegetable plots last Saturday and work should be completed tomorrow.

Mindef has extended a helping hand to residents who live around the RSAF's largest fighter aircraft base, which is in Lim Chu Kang.

Colonel Darius Lim, Mindef's director of public affairs, said Mindef's hotline has received 27 calls since the incident. Most callers asked how the red spots could be removed.

The red dye was released on Nov 23 when, at around 2pm, the engine of an F-16C on the ground was left running for about 20 minutes, so that the effects of the red smoke could be seen.

The plume that emerged was blown south-east across the fenceline by strong winds.

Straits Times readers who live as far away as Dunearn Road in Bukit Timah and the Teck Whye area also complained of cars and clothes speckled with red spots.

A resident of Jalan Jambu Ayer, off Dunearn Road, was so alarmed that she called the police. This resulted in the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), togged up in air-tight suits designed to handle hazardous materials, showing up at her doorstep to check the mystery stains.

An SCDF spokesman confirmed the incident and said that investigations showed that the dye had come from the RSAF air base.

Addressing health concerns, Col Lim said that trials have been suspended. He assured the public that 'the amount of red dye deposited will not cause adverse health effects when inhaled or when in contact with the skin'.

Mr Jason Sia, 29, said the stains remained even after he had hand-washed his white Honda Civic twice. 'The spots are too many to count,' he said.

When told about Mindef's helpline for car owners, Mr Sia said: 'It's better than nothing.'

RELATED ARTICLES

Prices unlikely to rise after destruction of contaminated vegetables: AVA
Channel NewsAsia 2 Dec 07;

AVA says vegetables in markets safe to eat: following checks on vegie farms with 'red spots' Channel NewsAsia 1 Dec 07;

Farmers told to destroy 200 tonnes of greens after red dye from airbase falls on them
Mindef says dye was from an aircraft being tested on the ground last Friday
Jessica Jaganathan & David Boey, Straits Times 1 Dec 07;


Read more!

Singapore online barter to save money and market products

No cash, no sweat as firms swop goods online
More turning to online barter to save money and market products
Irene Tham, Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

BARTER, that age-old form of trade, is heating up here, with the Internet as a modern-day matchmaker.

A multimillion-dollar business has mushroomed online for mainly small businesses to exchange goods and services.

Two online brokerages here raked in close to $4 million in transactions this year and membership is booming.

One member is beauty salon owner Daisy Leng, who this year saved $2,800 on advertising and computer software, which she paid for with her beauty products instead of cash.

'The savings are very important to a small setup like mine,' said Ms Leng, now a regular barter trader.

Another local set-up, accounting software company A2000 Solutions, saved $10,000 on printing by redeeming credits earned from selling accounting software in a barter trade.

Bartering helps companies save money, as they can use their products to earn credits to pay for their purchases, rather than coming up with cash up front.

There are two online barter brokerages in Singapore: BarterXchange, set up in 2003, and Ozone Barter, founded two years ago.

This year, BarterXchange saw its membership rise by 47 per cent to 250, with transactions worth over $2.5 million, compared to $1.4 million last year. And at 300 members, Ozone Barter's current user base is more than triple last year's count. Its trade volume has reached almost $1 million, up from $180,000 last year.

Advertising and printing services and restaurant vouchers are the hottest items on the two exchanges. Other goods in demand include computer software, executive training and Web hosting.

Buyers and sellers use a medium of exchange called barter points. With each transaction, points are debited against the buyer's account and credited to the seller's account. Each point is equivalent to one Singapore dollar.

To earn points, Ms Leng sells beauty products and spa vouchers, which are often given away as corporate gifts. She recently acquired $2,000 worth of computer software from technology company NextLogic. Both firms met on Ozone Barter.

Ms Leng, who has 'sold' $5,000 worth of goods so far, admitted she was sceptical about online trading at first. But her fears of being cheated were allayed after networking sessions with fellow members, she said.

She added that bartering has also widened her reach, allowing people to sample her products without paying cash at first.

'When customers are happy, they will come to my shop and pay cash for more services,' she said.

NextLogic, which offers technology that allows companies to manage customer data, has had the same experience.

Said Mrs Dagmar Alexyova, founder of NextLogic: 'It is an excellent way for small companies to try out my product.

'When they buy an upgrade later, they can pay cash.'

Making a trade
Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

TO START, locally registered companies sign up on the websites of the two online brokerages here - BarterXchange and Ozone Barter.

To minimise fraud and scam, members' details are checked against the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority's records.

One-time membership fees range from about $200 to $1,500. BarterXchange members pay a monthly fee of $35 and a 6 per cent cut in cash on goods traded.

Ozone Barter members do not have to fork out monthly fees but have to pay a 5 per cent commission in cash for each transaction.

Each trader gets a webpage for product listing on the sites. Companies can find one another by performing a simple product search.

Transactions on both exchanges are mainly within Singapore, although one member of BarterXchange managed to offload $100,000 worth of outdated iPod accessories to a firm in Nigeria in October.

The onus, however, is on the trader to check the company it is dealing with before it makes a transaction.

Both BarterXchange and Ozone Barter have maintained they are not liable for traders' loss from bad deals.


Read more!

Vote for Orchard Road's best dustbin design

Electric New Paper 4 Dec 07;

CHANGING the image of a 'fine city' while passing on the message of saving the environment.

And what better way to do it than to have 'happy, attractive dustbins' that will encourage people to use them.

That is the aim of a group of youths who spent yesterday painting the dustbins.

A total of 88 cheery dustbins would be placed along Orchard Road for the public to vote for the best design.

The dustbins, provided by the National Environment Agency, will be placed from the Orchard/Scotts Road junction to Le Meridien Orchard for three months.

Supported by the Singapore Press Holdings and Paragon Shopping Centre, the event is organised by an informal group of youth leaders comprising polytechnic, university as well as national servicemen.

Called Creative Home, the project is led by Temasek Polytechnic's hospitality and tourism student, Faris Abdulkadir Basharahil.

Referring to the image of Singapore as a country known for its fines for littering, the 19-year-old said: 'We hope to soften the image of a 'fine city' by encouraging the happy use of dustbins when they see attractive artwork on them.

'We believe that a soft and cheerful approach in encouraging people to keep Singapore clean, and to cultivate a sense of ownership and care towards the city, would go down better with the public.

'It may be easy to paint a dustbin, but to turn it into a work of art and a vehicle to promote social change would be something challenging and refreshing.'

And using art as a tool for a social message was what Raffles Junior College student Ng Jia Hui did best.

Calling her piece 'embrace the new, remember the old', the 18-year-old said her aim was 'to create an awareness of the importance of the environment'.

Mr Poh Sze Ying, 20, and a maths undergraduate at NTU, was keen on using traffic lights as his symbols.

Called 'Daisy Traffic Light', the idea of the green lights signalling the go-ahead was his way of 'sending the go green' message.

To vote for your favourite dustbin, you can go to SPH social networking portals www.stomp.com.sg or www.omy.sg from 15 Dec to 15 Feb.


Read more!

People power in climate change: making a difference

People power the way to go
By Thomas L. Friedman, New York Time, Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

I love their tag line. It's what gives me hope: 'We are the people we have been waiting for.'


IT WAS 15 deg C last Thursday in Washington, well above normal for this time of the year, and as I slipped away for some pre-Christmas golf, I found myself thinking of a wickedly funny story that The Onion, the satirical newspaper, ran the other day: Fall Cancelled After Three Billion Seasons.

'Fall, the long-running series of shorter days and cooler nights, was cancelled earlier this week after nearly three billion seasons on earth, sources reported Tuesday.

'The classic period of the year, which once occupied a coveted slot between summer and winter, will be replaced by new, stifling humidity levels, near-constant sunshine and almost no precipitation for months.

' 'As much as we'd like to see it stay, fall will not be returning for another season,' said National Weather Service president John Hayes during a muggy press conference. 'Fall had a great run, but sadly, times have changed.'

'The cancellation was not without its share of warning signs. In recent years, fall had been reduced from three months to a meagre two-week stint, and its scheduled start time had been pushed back later and later each year.'

You should never extrapolate about global warming from your own weather, but it is becoming hard not to.

Consider the final report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which was just issued and has had far too little attention. It concluded that since the IPCC began its study five years ago, scientists have discovered much stronger climate-change trends than previously realised, like far more extensive melting of Arctic ice, and so global efforts to reverse the growth of greenhouse gas emissions have to begin immediately.

'What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future,' said IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri.

And sweet-sounding 'global warming' doesn't really capture what's likely to happen. I prefer 'global weirding', coined by Mr Hunter Lovins, co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, because the rise in average global temperature is going to lead to all sorts of crazy things - from hotter heat spells and droughts in some places, to colder cold spells and more violent storms, more intense flooding, forest fires and species loss in other places.

While the Bush team will leave office with a perfect record of having done nothing significant to mitigate climate change, I'm heartened that America is increasingly alive on this challenge.

First, Google said last week it was going to invest millions in developing its own energy business. Google described its goal as 'RE

Its focus, said Google.org's energy expert Dan Reicher, will be to advance new solar thermal, geothermal and wind solutions 'across the valley of death'. That is, so many good ideas work in the lab but never get a chance to scale up because they are swallowed by a lack of financing or difficulties in implementation. Do not underestimate these people.

Last week, I met two groups of MIT students who blew me away. One was the MIT Energy Club, founded in 2004 by a few graduate students discussing energy over beer at a campus bar. Today it has 600-plus members who have put on scores of events focused on building energy expertise among MIT students and faculty, and 'fact-based analysis', including a trip to Saudi Arabia.

Then I got together with three engineering undergraduates who helped launch the Vehicle Design Summit - a global, open-source collaborative effort managed by MIT students that has 25 college teams worldwide working together to build a plug-in electric hybrid within three years.

Each team contributes a different set of parts or designs. I thought writing for my college newspaper was cool. These kids are building a hyper-efficient car which, they hope, 'will demonstrate a 95 per cent reduction in embodied energy, materials and toxicity from cradle to grave' and provide '200 mpg energy equivalency or better'. The Linux of cars!

They're not waiting for GM. Their goal, they explain on their website - vds.mit.edu - is 'to identify the key characteristics of events like the race to the moon and then transpose this energy, passion, focus and urgency' on catalysing a global team to build a clean car.

I love their tag line. It's what gives me hope: 'We are the people we have been waiting for.'

THE NEW YORK TIMES


Read more!

Singapore social enterprise: When business and welfare mix

Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

Social enterprises can be for-profit companies with a social mission or welfare agencies with separate business arms designed to generate money in support of their programmes. Arlina Arshad looks at two such ventures

Gaming cafe offers after-school care

THREE years ago, Mr Anderson Tan, 34, opened a cafe where children could hang out and study at after school.

The venture prospered until two gaming centres sprouted up nearby and drove it out of business.

Mr Tan, principal education planner for EduPaths, which provides leadership and life skills to primary school to junior college students, resisted joining the shootem'up bandwagon.

Gaming centres, in general, have bad reputations and may have a negative influence on children, he felt.

But his stance changed one day when a father asked for help installing a video game in a bid to better understand his child.

'After the talk, there was a shift in mindset. If I wanted to reach out to youths at risk, then I must be able to speak their lingo,' said Mr Tan.

So, he introduced the gaming component at the Fun and Educational Cafe in Tampines in March last year. The venture's two void deck shop units have sealed-off classrooms for training, alongside gaming computers.

The concept of marrying an education centre, a cafe and gaming centre was so popular that three more branches have been opened in Potong Pasir, Bedok and Redhill since then.

The for-profit centres get 200 to 300 customers daily, from children to young adults.

Mr Tan said: 'I must know what they like. I can provide games too but in a measured environment.'

He does not get any government funding. Revenue comes from course fees and computer use, which is $2 an hour.

He said he wanted a safe place for youths to hang out at after school, without them milling around the mall.

He said: 'It's not like gaming centres people expect. Here, I can befriend the kids, and counsel those who need advice.'

Consultancy services bring in $130,000

IT WAS getting tougher and tougher to raise money the charity needed from grants and donations.

So, a group of volunteers from the non-profit Retired and Senior Volunteer Programme - or RSVP - hit on the idea of offering their skills.

As former company chief executives, business development directors and strategic planners, they had a wealth of experience to offer.

Said Mr Nat Natarajan, RSVP board member and ProGuide chairman: 'These are people with years of professional expertise, and they could use that knowledge to help others.'

So ProGuide was formed in 2004 as the social enterprise arm of RSVP.

The profit goes back to RSVP to run its own research projects, IT courses and programmes for seniors, mentoring schemes for latchkey children, and rehabilitation and job placements for former mentally-disadvantaged patients.

Currently, it has about 50 RSVP volunteers who regularly offer consultancy services, which include IT, marketing and business advice, to other voluntary welfare organisations which need some help.

According to Mr Natarajan, they charge about what a competing small- or medium-sized company would charge.

For instance, in the last three years, about a dozen welfare organisations had engaged them in projects - each of which cost $15,000 to $35,000.

As a bonus, ProGuide offers a free review of the client's current working system, and even helps list recommendations on how the welfare organisation can be more efficient.

All, but one VWO, engaged ProGuide on a paying basis - evidence that their services were up to par and valuable, said Mr Natarajan with a smile. The one VWO just used their free review.

He reckons that ProGuide makes an average of about $130,000 in gross income a year. At least half of it would go to supporting its programmes.

Mr Natarajan said despite being a social enterprise, the business is run professionally - volunteers will stick to schedules and will come in on time.

And this, he hoped, would help RSVP wean itself off government grants and become self-funding in a few years.

The biggest challenge? Getting the ex-directors and CEOs to work together as team players.

'Once we sort out the egos, the wealth of experience is very valuable. Plus, we have found that they are all professional. Once a boss is appointed, they will all listen to him or her.'


Read more!

Key proposals unveiled to stimulate social entrepreneurship

Funding extended to 2 years, profit sharing after a specified period
Lynette Khoo,
Business Times
4 Dec 07;

(SINGAPORE) The Social Enterprise (SE) Committee chaired by Spring Singapore chairman Philip Yeo released a set of recommendations yesterday, which if adopted, will see the current government funding for social enterprises extended from one year to two years, and enable profit sharing after a specified time period.

The Comcare Enterprise Fund (CEF) under the Ministry of Community, Youth and Sports (MCYS) provides seed funding to social enterprise start-ups with up to 80 per cent of the capital spending and one year's operating costs, capped at $300,000. The average funding is between $100,000 and $150,000 for each successful application.

The SE Committee proposed an extension of the funding period to two years as it recognises that SEs need time to establish and mature as businesses.

To encourage business-savvy entrepreneurs to set up, run and invest in SEs, the SE Committee recommended that CEF-funded enterprises be allowed to take profit after four to five years, while keeping its commitment to a social purpose.

The SE Committee was formed in August last year to find ways to invigorate the local SE sector and came up with a set of recommendations which it released in a report yesterday.

Unlike charities that depend on public funds, SEs are self-reliant revenue-generating businesses that meet social needs. They could be small, medium or large businesses, privately owned cooperatives or business arms of charities.

The number of active SEs in Singapore is estimated to be 150, of which 60 per cent are set up by non-profit or voluntary welfare organisations (VWOs). Sixty-six SEs are funded by the Ministry of Community, Youth and Sports and 46 of them are still active. These are small businesses with an average annual revenue of less than $100,000.

'The underlying work is really how to create economic opportunities and jobs for the needy and disadvantaged,' Mr Yeo said at a briefing yesterday. 'It is to give the needy and disadvantaged a permanent employment for income so that they can be independent.'

Mr Yeo noted that some start-ups have the social passion but lack a viable business model. To provide business support and training to new SEs, the SE Committee proposed the formation of a Social Enterprise Association and a Social Enterprise Development Centre (SEDC).

Through the association, SEs can pool resources, network and collaborate to promote the SE sector while the SEDC increases access to services and builds capability. The proposed capability development fund is estimated to cost $500,000 a year.

A key recommendation of the SE Committee is also to encourage diversified sources of funding beyond grants, from private companies, venture capitalists and banks.

With the charity dollar harder to come by these days, VWOs and charities that set up SEs can reduce their dependency on public funds. But NKF chairman Gerald Ee noted that there has not been many success stories seen over the past few years as these organisations lack business expertise.

'While we encourage VWOs and charities to consider this path, we have to also tell them that they need to have a viable business model,' he added.

This is where the SEDC can fill up the gap for consultancy and training and Mr Ee said that he believed that over time, there will be more than one such centre set up to meet such needs.

Besides stimulating the social enterprises, the Committee is also encouraging commercial companies to become socially responsible enterprises (SRE) by employing needy and disadvantaged workers, and modifying the workplace, job or work systems to accommodate and integrate them.

To encourage SREs, the SE Committee is proposing a Caring Companies Initiative with an annual fund of $1 million to help cushion the costs of training, job redesign and integration programmes that companies incur when hiring disadvantaged workers.

The SE Committee also proposed that the Caring Companies Initiative give out high profile awards to recognise employers who have hired a significant number of disadvantaged workers and helped them to be financially independent through training.

These recommendations are being reviewed by the government and its decisions will be announced in March 2008.


Read more!

Energy conservation - do away with suits and ties

Letter from Francis Wong Tai Yin, Straits Times Forum 4 Dec 07;

DESPITE numerous articles and discussions regarding the low temperature setting of air-conditioners in Singapore, we still observe waste of such energy.

Last week, at the opening event of the Energex 2007 conference in Suntec, various distinguished speakers highlighted the point of energy conservation. It was ironical that the room in which the participants were gathered was uncomfortably cold.

While I am sure that the National Environment Agency is trying to educate (why not enforce?) those in building and facilities management roles, I feel that changes are not happening fast enough. This issue is not new as Minister Lim Swee Say's inspiring speech on April 28, 2001, at an American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (Singapore Chapter) event already highlighted this challenge.

Perhaps the reluctance to change stems from the fact that Singapore has adopted the Western dress-code (for men) of the tie and long-sleeved shirt. Is this practical for our climate?

I have not met a single person who was unhappy to remove his tie when the opportunity arose. Because we, in Singapore, have set a social decorum on 'business' dress-code, on top of the culture of 'giving face', we have created an impractical fashion in business.

It could be that the air-cons are set so cold to accommodate those in ties (and suits). Well, that looks like a problem that could be solved.

Boldly, I suggest two possibilities:

1. The Singapore Government sets a rule that it is absolutely acceptable if participants of their meetings (with vendors, corporate companies, international visitors and also internal) need only dress smart (that is, neat). Do away with ties and long-sleeved shirts, and I'm sure that the private commercial organisations will follow. Essentially, donning a suit and tie is voluntary, and at the wearer's own risk of discomfort. Is this too radical? Check out the Japanese government which introduced the 'no tie' summer look, breaking decades of tradition. They have removed the fear of 'not giving face'.

2. Create a new Singapore business dress-code. Each time I travel to the Philippines, I am always impressed with how the barong shirt is accepted as business attire. Yes, we have the batik shirt - but how many of us truly accept this as normal day-to-day business wear?

If we dress right, we eliminate another reason for setting low air-con temperatures unnecessarily. Coupled with the increased awareness and education programmes regarding energy conservation, I believe that Singapore will be seen as a nation that 'walks the talk'.



Read more!

Who pays the bill for a clean, green world?

Joergen Oerstroem Moeller, Today Online 4 Dec 07;

IT could be one of the most pitiless brawls about global burden-sharing since the advent of globalisation in the late '40s.

At its heart is the question of who is going to fund the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions — a topic now on the agenda for a host of meetings to find a replacement or amended extension to the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

The Kyoto protocol was forged in the mould of yesterday's world — one dominated by the nation-state. Quotas were specified for countries, accompanied by a mechanism that allowed them to trade certificates. In principle, this should have led to higher efficiency, as those who were able to pay could buy quotas from countries that did not require them.

The reality was that rich countries had capital, while poor and newly industrialised countries did not. The result — established producers purchased certificates to 'monopolise' production, crowding out potential competitors in less-developed countries.

This is probably why countries such as China argue that rich nation-states, having enjoyed a free ride in their industrialisation process many years ago, should now bear the burden of halting and hopefully reversing climate change.

Many industrialised nation-states may not necessarily reject that argument, but are cool towards the second proposition — that they assume the lion's share of the burden in addressing climate change. They maintain that while they may have been polluting in their rise to power, the environment was not the problem it is today.

The current dispute seems to overlook an analogous debate when environmental policies took off in some industrialised countries in the '60s and '70s.

Then, consumers and industry were at each other's throats, trying to pass the burden around in the hopes it would lead to a stalemate, so everybody could be let off cheaply in the short term.

The Gordian knot was cut — more or less — by the Polluter Pays Principle, which stated that the ultimate polluter was the consumer. The result was a number of taxes and levies designed to be passed to the ultimate polluter. Many industrialised countries have water levies, taxes on solid waste and petrol taxes.

And apparently, it has worked.

A dramatic improvement in environmental standards and energy efficiency has occurred in countries such as Japan and many European countries. This improvement can only be ascribed to the change in price structure — one that penalises polluters and rewards more environmentally friendly goods or production processes, mainly by way of levies and subsidies.

This hard-won experience teaches that one can only go some way with declarations and regulation. In the final analysis, what matters is to make the ultimate polluter feel the pinch.

As long as the discussion revolves around quotas or regulations allocated to nation-states, the chance for an effective agreement is remote. The circus of accusations and counter-accusations is likely to continue. Having committed themselves so clearly to incompatible policies, it is almost inconceivable that many countries will have a change of heart on how to engender positive climate change.

A seismic policy shift is needed before the impending environmental crisis can be addressed. Negotiations have to target the ultimate polluter: The consumer. This will make it clear that it is not the producer in China, the United States, Europe or Singapore that is ultimately responsible, but the consumer, wherever he or she is.

Such a policy would also be consistent with globalisation. Outsourcing from the US or Europe to China would cause Chinese emission levels to rise. With a system based on national quotas, China would have to "pay" more. But this makes no sense.

A national quota model places newly industrialising countries between the devil and the deep blue sea. Either they absorb the cost, they risk that rich countries will move towards a "coalition of the willing" ready to impose levies. And if newly industralising countries try to pass on the cost to the consumer by increasing prices, they might undermine their own competitiveness.

All three options appear problematic — hence the call to develop an agreement that allows costs to be passed to the ultimate polluter/emitter, in such a way that does not distort competitive advantages and influence relative production costs.

If such a road is not found, two rather unpalatable outcomes may haunt the global economy.

The first is a complete breakdown, leaving an international agreement on climate change hanging. The second is a mix of political compromises that will probably force a cost increase on rising nation-states, introducing global inflation as those states increase their export prices. That would be the last thing the world needs now, what with high oil prices, a sub-prime crisis and falling growth in the US.

We should not forget that cheap production from countries like China has kept global inflation low for the last 15 years. If global inflation starts to rise now, the world economy is likely to jump from the frying pan into the fire.

The writer is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, and an Adjunct Professor at the Copenhagen Business School. The full version of this commentary is at www.opinionasia.com.


Read more!

Proposal to pay poor countries to save forests moving ahead

A decision on the initial phases of action could come soon
Arti Mulchand, Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

BALI - A DECISION on a proposal from developing countries to be paid to protect their forests could come soon.

Representatives of the more than 190 countries at the climate change talks were yesterday urged to reach an agreement on the initial phases of action before ministers arrive in Bali next week.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer said pilot projects and payment systems should be taken up, and representatives should also decide on a method to measure avoided emissions.

Negotiations on these issues have been going on for a while.

The Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation plan was initiated by Indonesia and is backed by developing countries with the largest remaining tropical forests, including Brazil and Malaysia.

Indonesian Environment Minister Rachmat Witoelar, who is presiding over the talks, said: 'It is vital not just that we take action now, but also that this issue forms a central element of the future climate regime.'

Reaching agreement on issues like this before top ministers arrive would also 'free up negotiating space needed for the post-2012 process', said Mr de Boer, who is the United Nations Framework Convention executive secretary.

The meetings in Bali are aimed at jump-starting talks to find a successor to the emissions-curbing Kyoto Protocol, which ends in 2012.

Deforestation accounts for almost a fifth of all global carbon dioxide (C02) emissions and is the leading cause of biodiversity loss. Forests are also carbon sinks as they soak up CO2 and temporarily store the carbon. Hence, getting deforestation under control is central to combating climate change.

That is particularly important for Indonesia, where deforestation accounts for about two-thirds of its greenhouse gas emissions, making it the world's third largest CO2 polluter.

Indonesia is, in fact, the world's fastest forest destroyer. Between 2000 and 2005, an area of forest equivalent to 300 soccer pitches was destroyed every hour.

Jakarta's clearing of forests has other environmental implications: The slash-and-burn technique of land-clearing causes the annual haze that has the region - and its economies - in a chokehold.

The current problem is that the forests have no 'value', Indonesia's delegation head, economist and former minister Emil Salim, said at a media briefing here yesterday. It is the reason why forests get cleared for agriculture and ravaged by loggers, he said.

Still, sceptics question the degree of success that a country such as Indonesia, where illegal logging and land-clearing fires are rampant, can achieve.

It is also not clear just how the burden of paying to protect forests should be shared by developed countries. Monitoring mechanisms will also need to be worked out.

But Mr Witoelar believes that the 'carrot-and-stick' approach of paying for forests will work to help solve Indonesia's problem of illegal logging, even as the country tries to put in place more 'pertinent and actual' laws and create incentives for alternative livelihoods.

'It is a matter of survival,' he said.

Climate talks Quickly
Straits Times 4 Dec 07;

TREES PLANTED TO SOAK UP CO2

BALI: Indonesia has planted millions of trees to soak up an estimated 50,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases to be emitted during UN-led climate talks in Bali, Environment Minister Rachmat Witoelar said yesterday.

Pines, acacia and meranti trees, a type of tropical hardwood, have been planted on about 4,500ha on the islands of Sumatra, Kalimantan and Java, Mr Witoelar said.

Trees absorb carbon as they grow, and those planted would eventually soak up about 900,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, far more than the emissions caused by conference delegates while staying in Bali and flying to and from the island, he said.

More than 10,000 politicians, officials, activists and journalists are attending the climate talks on the tropical resort island.

'The government of Indonesia is dedicating the carbon stock of the trees to offset the emissions produced by the UN meeting,' Mr Witoelar told a news conference.

'Apart from offsetting emissions, we would like to make this a carbon positive event,' he said.

REUTERS

A TUNE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

BALI: A song aimed at motivating people to work together to tackle climate change was launched at the Bali climate change conference yesterday.

The song Dunia Berbagilah (World, Let's Share Together), written by Indonesian musician Nugie, was jointly launched by Indonesian Environment Minister Rachmat Witoelar, the newly elected conference president, and Oxfam's Ari Margiono.

It was performed by the United Voices of Indonesia, a group of 50 singers and musicians from the country, according to anti-poverty group Oxfam's website.

XINHUA

SOW SEEDS FOR BETTER OR WORSE

JAKARTA: Couples wanting to get married or divorced now have to spare a bit of love for the earth under a compulsory tree-planting campaign in one Indonesian district, a report said yesterday.

People planning to marry in Sragen district, on the main Indonesian island of Java, must contribute to the planting of five tree seedlings, district head Untung Wiyono was reported as saying by the state-run Antara news agency.

They are required to hand over their own seedlings, or 25,000 rupiah (S$3.90) to buy some, to whoever officiates at their marriage.

Couples who are looking to divorce must donate 25 tree seedlings, or hand over 40,000 rupiah.

The seeds, of hardwood trees such as teak or mahogany, are handed to the government to be planted, Mr Wiyono reportedly said.

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE


Read more!

Investors seen as key in averting climate change

Business Times 4 Dec 07;

(BALI) Climate talks launched in Bali yesterday must assure investors of future government backing for climate-friendly energy and building projects, said the host of the meeting, Indonesia's Environment Minister Rachmat Witoelar.

The talks, attended by some 190 countries, will try and lay the foundations for a new climate change deal in time to replace or extend the Kyoto Protocol from 2013. A key challenge will be to entice business to invest in cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for climate change.

Investment is needed, for example, to re-direct the world's energy supply away from high carbon-emitting fossil fuels to cleaner sources. But that requires a new policy regime of carrots and sticks.

'The market is a key part of our effort against climate change,' Mr Witoelar told the opening session of the two-week conference. 'The market demands the certainty and predictability we need to offer them. We need to enhance our investments in technology. There are clean technologies available. There's lots of best practice.'

Governments hope the Bali talks will set the platform for agreement by 2009 on specific climate targets or policies, country by country, to succeed existing Kyoto Protocol commitments, which are considered too weak.

For example Kyoto created a carbon market that last year directed US$5 billion of investment into cutting greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. That compares with a needed US$200 billion invested annually by 2030, nearly half of that in developing countries, according to a United Nations report published in October.

'There are potential solutions on the scale needed, but they require international negotiation,' the UN report's lead author, Erik Haites, told a side event in Bali yesterday.

For example, Kyoto only runs until 2012, but investors in big energy projects need to plan returns over 20 years.

Government officials in Bali agreed that clean energy investment was key to the fight against climate change.

'We need to accelerate... technologies that can fundamentally alter (how) we use energy,' US delegation head Harlan Watson said, citing biofuels, renewable power and technology to bury greenhouse gases underground.

The private sector must supply 86 per cent of the investment needed to help adapt to global warming and cut emissions, the UN report said. - Reuters


Read more!