Canada's oil sands a massive disaster: green group

Reuters 15 Feb 08;

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's massive oil sands are "the most destructive project on earth" and the federal government must intervene to clean up the mess, a leading green group said on Friday.

Environmental Defence said excavation of the oil sands in the western province of Alberta -- home to the richest petroleum deposits outside the Middle East -- is producing vast amounts of greenhouse gases and poisoning local water supplies.

"This is Canada's problem -- our federal elected leaders need to clean it up or shut it down," said Aaron Freeman of Environmental Defence.

The group called on the Conservative government to impose a firm cap on emissions from the oil sands and enforce regulations designed to prevent pollution.

The process to strip the tar-like bitumen out of the sands and turn it into synthetic crude oil is very energy intensive.

Alberta is a Conservative Party stronghold and critics say the government does not want to alienate the powerful energy industry by clamping down. Ottawa denies the charge and says a plan it unveiled last year will cut overall emissions by 20 percent from 2006 levels by 2020.

"All the major polluters, emitters of greenhouse gas emissions, will have to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, and that includes the oil sands," said Mark Warawa, parliamentary secretary to the environment minister.

The Alberta provincial government says it has issued leases for 4,264 oil sands projects covering 25,065 square miles . New projects costing more than C$100 billion are on the books for the oil sands region and production is expected to triple to 3 million barrels a day by 2015.

($1=$1.01 Canadian)

(Reporting by David Ljunggren; Editing by Peter Galloway)


Read more!

U.N. leader Ban presses Bush on climate change

David Alexander, Reuters 15 Feb 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Friday pressed President George W. Bush to take more of a leadership role in negotiations on a new global pact to fight global warming.

The United States, which has been a reluctant partner in climate diplomacy under Bush, abruptly reversed course at climate change talks in Bali, Indonesia, in December and joined 190 nations in agreeing to negotiate a new accord by late 2009.

"It would be ... very much important for the international community to sustain the momentum established in Bali, December last year, in climate change," Ban told Bush after an Oval Office meeting.

He said the United States, with its innovative technologies and financial capabilities, had a critical role to play in advancing the globally accepted framework from the Bali summit.

"I count on your leadership and active participation," Ban told a nodding Bush. "I do appreciate your constructive engagement in this. ... I count on your leadership."

Bush pulled the United States out of the Kyoto climate protocol shortly after he took office, saying it was fundamentally flawed, and has been reluctant to agree to any deal that exempts developing nations from curbs on emissions of greenhouse gases believed to cause global warming.

The Kyoto agreement bound industrial countries to cut emissions of greenhouse gases between 2008 and 2012, but it exempted developing nations.

The negotiations agreed to at Bali seek to bind all countries to emission curbs from 2013. The United States initially opposed the agreement but reversed course at the last minute.

The United States is a leading emitter of greenhouse gases, along with developing nations like China and India.

(Editing by Vicki Allen)


Read more!

Internship Opportunities at ECO-Singapore

Environment Challenge Organisation (Singapore), or ECO Singapore, is a dynamic youth-driven non-governmental social enterprise focussed on promoting environmental awareness in youths to enable them to make sustainable lifestyle choices.

A leading member of several regional and international environmental groups, ECO Singapore has represented Singapore at United Nations conferences and other international events.

In recent years, ECO Singapore has grown in the type and number of national and international projects undertaken, and seeks like-minded dynamic individuals to join the team in order to continue our growth momentum.

Interns can expect to find themselves in a buzzing environment that promotes personal growth and learning.

Qualities we are looking for:
(i) Passionate about conservation and the environment
(ii) Proficient in researching
(iii) Proficient in Microsoft Office
(iv) Able to maintain grace and calm under challenging conditions
(v) Able to function independently and with initiative
(vi) Possess a good sense of humour, a healthy dose of common sense and understand the dynamics of operating within a closely knit team

Commitment Period (minimum):
Two full months

Interested applicants may convey their CV and interest via email to hr@eco-singapore.org.

Short-listed candidates will be invited to a unique interactive session to clarify expectations and discover if any symbiosis exists.


Read more!

Congestion carries environmental cost too: Singapore Transport minister

Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: Traffic congestion carries an environmental cost, not just an economic cost.

That is why evening Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) has to be implemented, said Transport Minister Raymond Lim.

He was responding to a call from MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, Lee Bee Wah, for the evening ERP on the Central Expressway (CTE) to be abolished.

According to the feedback she got, Ms Lee said as the work day is over, traffic speed is no longer a critical issue for commuters driving home to Ang Mo Kio and Yishun on the CTE.

Mr Lim, however, pointed out that there are others who want a congestion-free drive home as well as a better living environment.

"Congestion extracts an economic and environmental cost. So at anytime of the day, this is the cost you have," said the transport minister.

Mr Lim also pointed out that study trips have shown that some cities in Europe put restrictions on the entry of vehicles into residential estates to safeguard standards of living.- CNA/so

Singapore Government has no plans to lower petrol duty despite high oil prices
Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: The government has no plans to lower the rate of petrol duty despite higher oil prices.

Minister of State for Finance and Transport Lim Hwee Hua said this is because petrol duty is a vehicular usage tax aimed at discouraging the excessive use of cars and promoting the greater use of public transport, and these objectives remain relevant.

Mrs Lim was replying to a question posed by MP for Aljunied GRC, Mrs Cynthia Phua, in Parliament on Friday.

Mrs Phua had asked if the government would review its tax policy on petrol, diesel and natural gas to help reduce business costs for transport operators, businesses, as well as commuters.

Mrs Lim explained that higher pump prices does not mean the government gets to collect more petrol duties.

She said: "The excise duty on petroleum is imposed on volumetric bases of 41 cents a litre for 92 and 95-octane petrol, and 44 cents a litre for petrol rated 97-octane and above. The excise duty is therefore a fixed sum per litre of petrol."

There is no excise duty on diesel, fuel oil and natural gas used for generating power.- CNA/so

Gantries in heartland to make residential estates more liveable

Clarissa Oon, Straits Times 15 Feb 08;

TAKING the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) scheme into the heartland will ease an expected islandwide traffic gridlock and make residential estates more liveable, Transport Minister Raymond Lim said yesterday.

With 850,000 vehicles on the road and more intensive use of cars than in other major cities, Singapore's arterial roads will also soon face congestion, he said in response to queries on the planned expansion of ERP coverage.

Dr Lee Bee Wah (Ang Mo Kio GRC) questioned the point of evening ERP charges along the Central Expressway (CTE), which she said is the shortest route home for Ang Mo Kio and Yishun residents.

But Mr Lim replied: Imagine a situation where heartland roads are exempted from ERP charges and only the Central Business District and expressways leading there are affected.

Drivers would then use alternative roads, including detours through the heartland and other estates.

'If you're living in a residential estate, is that what you want - gridlock?' he asked.

He said his ministry studied many European cities such as those in Switzerland and Germany, which have measures to cut down vehicle traffic in residential areas.

Congestion exacts costs on both the economy and the environment and 'going ahead, the key thing here is to have a liveable city, a quality urban living environment', he said.

Singaporean drivers clock up 21,000km a year in their cars, more than Londoners (9,100km) and even those in Los Angeles (19,800km).

In response to other questions, he said that the 16 new ERP gantries coming up this year are part of a package of measures to manage gridlock on Singapore's roads.

The measures include road and rail upgrades totalling nearly $54 billion.

This means the Government is giving back to the public more than the projected increase in ERP revenue, he said.

The increase in the number of gantries will bring the total number to 71.

'I think it is worthwhile for us to realise that when we are dealing with congestion, we can't rely on any single measure. You need a whole suite of measures,' he said.

Anyone who says he has found a panacea or a single solution is 'selling you snake oil. Ignore the medicine man, it doesn't work that way', he said.

Madam Ho Geok Choo (West Coast GRC) asked him how the $168 million in ERP revenues will be accounted for following the rate hikes.

Mr Lim said the money would go towards funding various government programmes for Singaporeans, including public transport and road projects.

From now till 2020, some $14 billion will be spent on road developments, and around $40 billion on extensions to rail lines.

While his ministry expects the additional revenue from the upcoming ERP changes to be about $70 million annually, the reduction in road tax will cost the Government about $110 million every year. It will also collect $200 million less annually due to a reduction in the Additional Registration Fee (ARF) for cars, he said.

The point of the ERP, he told Madam Ho, 'is to address congestion and is not a revenue measure'.


Read more!

China weather forecasters 10 years behind foreigners

Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

BEIJING : China's meteorologists have admitted being 10 years behind world standards, a report said Friday, after a surprise spell of freezing winter weather paralysed the country and killed more than 100 people.

"There is a 10-year gap between the Chinese (weather forecasting) model and advanced foreign models," National Meteorological Centre deputy director Duan Yihong said, according to the China Daily newspaper.

A lack of equipment also hindered meteorologists' forecasting skills, with the problem especially acute in remote mountainous areas, Duan said.

China's weather forecasters have come under scrutiny in recent weeks after large swathes of the country were hit with the coldest temperatures in decades.

The nation was unprepared for the weather, which was particularly severe in southern China, and led to the deaths of at least 107 people and more than 15 billion dollars in economic losses, according to official figures.

The three weeks of ice and snow storms, which occurred as the nation was preparing for the week-long Lunar New Year holiday early this month, crippled power and transport supplies.

This prevented millions of rural migrant workers from returning home for the festivities, which for many was their only opportunity for the year to see their families, causing much social tension.- AFP


Read more!

Business chiefs vow to lead fight against global warming

Daniel Rook, Yahoo News 15 Feb 08;

Some of the world's top companies vowed Friday to step up their efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions, saying governments were failing to show sufficient leadership in the fight against global warming.

The declaration reflects a growing trend by global corporations waging war on climate change by taking steps to reduce or offset the amount of carbon dioxide belched out by their offices and factories.

A dozen corporations including Sony Corp., Nokia Corp., Nike Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. issued an urgent call for firms around the world to reduce the damage they inflict on the planet and to promote a "low-carbon lifestyle".

"There is no doubt that climate change is one of the most important issues of our time," Sony chief executive Howard Stringer told a meeting hosted by the Japanese electronics giant and the WWF environmental group.

"Governments are more easily distracted by the crisis of today than the crisis of tomorrow," he said. "We need to act now."

The companies, which describe themselves as "Climate Savers", did not announce any new goals for reducing their carbon dioxide emissions as they have already committed to individual targets.

Instead they pledged to urge their business partners and other companies to follow their lead, to develop energy efficient products and to encourage their customers to lead an environmentally friendly lifestyle.

"We are moving into a carbon-constrained world, a low carbon economy -- a new economy," said James Leape, director general of WWF International, which is supporting the initiative.

"We need champions. There are precious few political leaders in this world yet who are stepping up to the level of action that is required.

"Climate change would wreak havoc in natural systems of all kinds, from coral reefs to mountain forests, and it could cause -- if unchecked -- upheaval in all of our lives, and in the economies on which we depend," said Leape.

Companies that fail to embrace the green revolution may struggle in the future, business leaders said.

"I don't think ... any company is going to be able to survive if it is not working in a sustainable way," said Jaime Santafe, an environment advisor at Swiss-based packaging giant Tetra Pak.

The captains of industry issued their call as officials from the United Nations and 21 countries held a second day of talks in Tokyo as part of efforts to forge a new deal on fighting global warming by the end of next year.

The closed-door talks came ahead of negotiations in Bangkok from March 31 to April 4 on reaching a deal to succeed the landmark Kyoto Protocol, whose obligations on slashing gas emissions expire in 2012.

The world's second biggest economy after the United States, Japan is the home of the Kyoto Protocol, the landmark 1997 treaty that mandated cuts in greenhouse gas emissions heating up the planet.

But Japan is far behind in meeting its Kyoto commitments. The government has refused to legally bind companies to cap gas emissions, fearing that it could jeopardise the economy's slow recovery from recession in the 1990s.

The WWF urged Japan to do more.

"I am struck that we're not yet seeing Japan leading this issue the way one would expect, and I say that because Japan has been a leader in energy efficiency historically," Leape told reporters.

Japan aims to take a lead in the debate over measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions when it hosts this year's summit of leaders from the Group of Eight industrialised nations in July at the northern lakeside resort of Toyako.

"There's a great opportunity here for Japan to lead over the next year because the G8 is so important as a political lever," said Leape.


Read more!

US Investors pledge $10 billion for renewable energy

Timothy Gardner, Reuters 14 Feb 08;

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - U.S. institutional investors pledged at a U.N. summit on Thursday to invest $10 billion over two years in technologies that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to pressure companies to disclose their risks associated with climate change.

The plan "reflects the many investment opportunities that exist today to put a dent in global warming pollution, build profits and benefit the global economy," said Mindy Lubber, the president of Ceres, a coalition of investors and environmental leaders, and director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk.

The California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. pension fund, and the state treasurers or comptrollers of 11 U.S. states and other players agreed at the investor summit on climate risk to invest the money in green technologies like solar and wind power.

The INCR has been joined by a growing number of investors as the United States, the only major industrialized country that has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions by an average 5 percent from 1990 levels by 2012, has become increasingly isolated on climate change policy.

The group also urges companies to divulge such emissions and warns them that climate change could hurt them through shareholder activism.

Florida's chief financial officer, Alex Sink, was one of the new players to embrace the green investments. Florida's Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, pledged last year to cut carbon emissions. Sink told reporters that some companies in Florida, a low-lying state at risk from flooding induced by climate change, were happy the state was joining the efforts. "Others were stunned and didn't know how to react."

John Sweeney, the president of the AFL-CIO, a federation of unions, told the summit that some of the $5 trillion of union workers' retirement funds should be invested in ways that help fight climate change. "These deferred wages of working people are the capital that can fuel the energy economy of the future," he said.

Some analysts have said green technologies like solar power, ethanol and biodiesel are forming an investment bubble that could soon pop.

Lubber said it was up to individual investors to make the right choices in green investing. "Calpers has some of the best money managers out there," she said. "Without question they are calculating those kinds of consequences."

(Editing by Eric Walsh)


Read more!

Time is up for coal: environmental analyst

Steve James, Reuters 14 Feb 08;

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The United States should leave its estimated 200 years' supply of coal in the ground and invest in wind farms and solar technology for its power-generating needs, a leading environmental analyst said on Thursday.

Wall Street, politicians and public opinion have all turned so dramatically against coal in the last year over climate concerns that it is probably "the beginning of the end of the coal industry," said Lester Brown.

He claimed in a conference call with reporters that efforts to clean up coal and develop carbon sequestration technology to prevent emissions from coal-fired power plants were too far off and would be more expensive than investing in energy efficiency and alternative power sources.

"Carbon sequestration has been something the coal industry has leaned on to avoid facing the full force of the climate concerns and will probably not be a viable option," said Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, a nonprofit environmental organization.

The coal industry shot back, accusing Brown of exaggerating coal's contribution to climate change and ignoring the economic necessity of power generation.

"This is part of a concerted effort to grossly exaggerate opposition to coal-based electricity generation," said Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association (NMA), which groups together coal and other mining companies.

"The NGO's (nongovernmental organizations) are on a jihad, exaggerating anecdotal evidence to conclude that coal is on the way out. Demand for coal in the world, let alone the United States, continues to set records, despite what they say.

"Affordable power is critical for the U.S. economy," said Popovich. According to NMA figures, U.S. electricity utilities consumed 1.05 billion tons of coal last year, up from 859.3 million tons in 2000.

"KISS OF DEATH"

Brown noted that a Department of Energy report last year listed 151 coal-fired power plants in the planning stages and talked about "a resurgence in coal-fired electricity."

But during 2007, 59 of those proposed plants were either refused licenses by state governments or quietly abandoned. Almost 50 more are being contested in the courts, and the remaining plants will likely be challenged as they reach the permitting stage, he said.

"The public at large is turning against coal," he said, citing a 2007 national poll by the Opinion Research Corp in which only 3 percent of people chose coal as their preferred source for electricity.

Legislators in Texas and Florida have refused to license new coal-fired plants, and last August coal "took a heavy political hit" when U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said he was against building coal-fired power plants anywhere in the world.

Coal's future is also suffering as Wall Street turns its back on the industry, Brown said. Citigroup and Merrill Lynch have both downgraded coal company stocks across the board.

This month, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America said lending for coal-fired power plants will be contingent on utilities demonstrating they would be economically viable under future federal rules on emissions.

"This appears to be the kiss of death for the industry," Brown said, especially if a national moratorium on coal-fired plants is passed by Congress.

Asked by Reuters what the U.S. should do with its vast coal reserves, given the growing demand for electricity, Brown said: "I'm in favor of leaving it right where it is."

And he dismissed coal-to-liquid technology, in which coal can be converted into vehicle fuels, as "too carbon-intensive."

"The cheapest alternative is investing in efficiency," he said, claiming that if the U.S. shifted to long-life compact florescent light bulbs, it would save enough power to close 80 coal-fired power plants.

(Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 15 Feb 08


Shorebirds of Singapore
the most numerous birds in Singapore and other fascinating details in a special article for International Year of the Reef on the budak blog

A new Plover for Singapore and Malaysia?
on the bird ecology blog

Hermit crabs
by a young blogger inspired by Uncle Joe, with a poll about shell collecting! on the natural sea blog

Two young writers share about the shores
on the flying fish friends blog

Insensitivity towards Ah Meng
from Singaporean Attitudes to Biological Conservation

Eco-driving
how to reduce the CO2 even with a conventional car on the reuters environment blog

Nobody loves invertebrates
Invertebrates are the big losers in the palm oil gold rush, on the journal watch online blog


Read more!

Making Singapore a test bed for products of the future

EDB's plan involves developing ideas in areas like health care, urban living
Nicholas Fang, Business Times 15 Feb 08;

THE long-running programme to entice overseas businesses to locate their regional bases in Singapore is receiving a strategic boost.

A new initiative developed by the Economic Development Board (EDB) builds on the work of the past 20 years but encompasses an approach that could bring double the benefits.

Called Future.Singapore, it will focus on business themes in which Singapore is seeking solutions, allowing the country itself to be used as a working model and test bed.

This added benefit will come on top of the traditional foreign investment flows into the country, said EDB chairman Lim Siong Guan.

He identified three new business themes under the new initiative: urban solutions; wellness, ageing and health care; and lifestyle products and services.

Mr Lim said in an interview yesterday that the initiative's tagline would be: The Future In Singapore - Singapore In The Future.

'We will seek to produce new products and services that the world will want in the future which are first produced here, hence, The Future In Singapore.

'We will also develop and test new ideas where we will be at the forefront in the use of technology for urban liveability, health care and quality living, which is where Singapore In The Future comes in.'

The EDB's assistant managing director for industry development, Ms Aw Kah Peng, said the three business themes were identified after wider global trends were analysed.

'There are certain mega trends that are affecting the world and Singapore, and we are looking at how these work and how we can benefit from them,' she said.

Mr Lim said this contrasted with the EDB's earlier strategy of focusing on attracting businesses that could be grouped into clusters according to industry.

'That was more supply-driven, where we would look at what businesses companies were engaged in, and then create an attractive and conducive environment for them here in Singapore,' he said.

'While we will continue to do that, we are now also looking at what is being demanded by the marketplace and seeing how we can develop solutions here.'

The new industries the EDB is hoping to develop under the latest initiative range across a wide spectrum. They include clean water and energy; waste management; urban planning; wellness and health services; products for an ageing population; and business opportunities targeting the rising middle class in Singapore and in the region.

Mr Lim said foreign companies would not consider investing in Singapore in these sectors unless there were competent local companies already operating.

'A good example is clean water. We started Newater to meet a need for supplies of clean water in Singapore, and now it has become a draw for a high level of research and development activities in that field here,' he said.

The new sectors are also expected to appeal to young Singaporeans looking for exciting careers.

'Many young people are passionate about issues such as clean energy, or are interested in products such as interactive games,' said Mr Lim.

EDB assistant managing director Kenneth Tan, who heads the board's New Business Group, said the EDB itself had received strong responses from prospective employees.

'There have been many people applying at the EDB for jobs that deal specifically with the business sectors under the new initiative, such as urban solutions,' he said.

Mr Lim said it is an encouraging sign that the EDB is targeting industries that will have a wide appeal for Singaporeans looking for jobs, as this is a key objective for the board when bringing in foreign investment projects.


Read more!

Singapore: Venice of the East?

Make use of our waterways to ease transport woes
Letter from Kenneth Ong Hin Leong, Today Online 15 Feb 08;

THERE has been much discussion on improving Singapore's public transport recently, culminating with the announcement that the electronic road-pricing network will be widened.

I would like Transport Minister Raymond Lim to revisit the idea of moving people via the waterways, instead of just increasing the number of buses and trains, and extending the MRT lines.

Shenton Way and the soon to be built Marina Bay financial centre are all located close to a pier or the sea. The Singapore River also runs along several areas where population density is quite heavy.

Since the infrastructure is already available, why not encourage Singaporeans to travel by boat from the east to the Central Business District (CBD)?

We have the Bedok and Tanah Merah jetties with ample car parks nearby. They can be used to service residents in Marine Parade, Siglap, Bedok, Pasir Ris and Tampines.

We can also build jetties in the Kallang area, not to mention possibility of including new piers in the development plans for Ponggol, where water is featured prominently.

We can also integrate the MRT trains and buses to the jetties such that switching between the different modes of transport would be seamless.

If the idea does take root, it would make Singapore quite a place to live in, a la Venice of the East, perhaps?


Read more!

No Pristine Oceans Left, New Map Shows

Coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangroves, rocky reefs and shelves are among the most seriously altered ecosystems.



Mason Inman, National Geographic News 14 Feb 08;

No areas of the world's oceans remain completely untouched by humanity's influence, according to a new study.

Every area of the oceans is feeling the effects of fishing, pollution, or human-caused global warming, the study says, and some regions are being affected by all of these factors and more.

A team led by Ben Halpern of the University of California, Santa Barbara, created the first global map that shows the various kinds of damage being done to marine ecosystems.

The team assigned scores to 17 human impacts and tallied them up for every ocean region to reveal the overall effect people are having on marine life.

"The ocean is so big, I figured there would be a lot of areas that we hadn't gotten to or that people rarely get to," Halpern said.

"But when you look at the map, there are huge areas that are being impacted by multiple human activities," he said. "It was certainly a surprise to me."

The project revealed that more than 40 percent of the world's marine ecosystems are heavily affected.

Major hot spots include the North Sea off the northern coast of Europe and Asia's South China Sea and East China Sea.

The study will be published tomorrow in the journal Science.

Acid Oceans, Melting ice

Of all the human effects on marine ecosystems, climate change is having by far the largest overall impact, the researchers estimate.

Greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide are warming up the atmosphere and, more slowly, the oceans, the scientists explain.

Also, carbon dioxide dissolves into ocean waters, turning them more acidic, which makes it harder for corals, shellfish, and other animals to grow their protective skeletons or shells.

Remote, ice-bound areas in Antarctica and the Arctic are feeling the least impact, the study found, mostly because few people live there and those regions are hard to reach.

But global warming is still affecting those places.

The impacts of warming will continue to get worse, the study notes.

"Projections of future polar ice loss suggest that the impact on these regions will increase substantially," the study authors write.

The second biggest factor affecting marine life is fishing, they add.

Trawl-fishing for animals on the ocean floor, such as groundfish and shrimp, is especially damaging because the rest of the seafloor habitat is destroyed in the process, Halpern says.

The habitats that are suffering the worst impacts, rated "very high" in the study, are continental shelves, the shallow areas off the coasts of continents that are 200 to 750 feet (60 to 200 meters) deep.

Other areas with very high impacts include the northeastern U.S., where pollution, commercial shipping, and fishing are the major causes of harm.

The North Sea and Chinese coasts are hit by almost every kind of impact, Halpern said.

"It's a perfect storm."

Marine Parks

Elizabeth Babcock is a marine biologist at the University of Miami who was not involved in the new study.

"The most useful thing about this [study] is the ability to look at the big picture and to pick out areas that are particularly pristine that would be good places for having marine parks," she said.

The research could also be used to find "areas that are a lot more impacted than anyone thinks, that really need some conservation attention," she added.

"The map is useful for international groups to prioritize where they spend money for mitigation [of these problems] and conservation."

John Pandolfi of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, said the study "highlights the fact that ecosystems in the sea know no political boundaries. Hence an international, cooperative approach is the only way forward."

The team did not measure the effects of certain practices, such as illegal fishing and aquaculture, the farming of aquatic plants and animals.

"This makes their estimates of habitat decline conservative, and things are probably worse than they outline," Pandolfi said.

Including more local impacts would also paint a bleaker picture, he added.

"A closer look at the nearshore human footprints will probably show a greater degree of degradation," he said.

Yet Halpern remains optimistic.

"My hope is that our results serve as a wake-up call to better manage and protect our oceans rather than a reason to give up," he said.

"Our goal, and really our necessity, is to do this in a sustainable way so that our oceans remain in a healthy state and continue to provide us the resources we need and want."

Man's affect on world's oceans revealed
Nic Fleming, The Telegraph 14 Feb 08;

Almost half of the world's oceans have been seriously affected by over-fishing, pollution and climate change, according to a major study of Man's impact on marine life.

An international team of 19 scientists have published the first ever comprehensive map showing the combined impact of human activity on the planet's seas and oceans.

It shows that more than 40 per cent of marine regions have been significantly altered, while just four per cent remains in a pristine state.

Previous studies have largely focused on the impacts of specific activities such as pesticide runoff or fishing, or have looked at damage in certain areas.

The North Sea is one of the most heavily affected regions, along with the South and East China Seas, the Caribbean, the east coast of North America, the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. The least affected areas are near the poles.

Dr Ben Halpern, of the University of California, presented the new findings at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference in Boston.

Dr Halpern said: "This project allows us to finally start to see the big picture of how humans are affecting the oceans.

"The big picture looks much worse than I imagine most people expected. It was certainly a surprise to me."

Activities and impacts included in the study include fishing, ocean acidification caused by pollution, temperature change, species extinctions and invasions, and the shipping, oil and gas industries.

The researchers developed models to quantify and compare how 17 human activities affected marine ecosystems.

For example fertiliser runoff has been shown to cause significant damage to coral reefs but has less effect on kelp forests.

They gathered data from across the world and collated the results to give each area a score for man-made damage and changes.

The results, published in the journal Science, show that 41 per cent of the world's oceans and seas have been significantly affected by multiple human activities.

Coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangroves, rocky reefs and shelves are among the most seriously altered ecosystems.


Map shows toll on world's oceans
By Helen Briggs, BBC News 14 Feb 08;

Only about 4% of the world's oceans remain undamaged by human activity, according to the first detailed global map of human impacts on the seas.

A study in Science journal says climate change, fishing, pollution and other human factors have exacted a heavy toll on almost half of the marine waters.

Only remote icy areas near the poles are relatively pristine, but they face threats as ice sheets melt, it warns.

The authors say the data is a "wake-up call" to policymakers.

Lead scientist, Dr Benjamin Halpern, of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara, US, said humans were having a major impact on the oceans and the marine ecosystems within them.

"In the past, many studies have shown the impact of individual activities," he said. "But here for the first time we have produced a global map of all of these different activities layered on top of each other so that we can get this big picture of the overall impact that humans are having rather than just single impacts."

Co-author Dr Mark Spalding told BBC News that the map was the first attempt to describe and quantify the combined threats facing the world's oceans from human factors, ranging from commercial shipping to over-fishing.

"There's an element of wake-up call when you get maps like this," he said. "Human threats are all pervasive across the world's oceans.

"The map is an impetus for action, I think that it is a real signal to roll up our sleeves and start managing our coast and oceans."

Complex model

The international team of 20 scientists in the US, Canada and UK built a complex model to handle large amounts of information on 17 different human threats.

The researchers divided the world's oceans into 1km-square sections and examined all real data available on how humankind is influencing the marine environment.

They then calculated "human impact scores" for each location, presenting this as a global map of the toll people have exacted on the seas.

The scientists say they were shocked by the findings.

"I think the big surprise from all of this was seeing what the complete coverage of human impacts was," said Dr Spalding, senior marine scientist at The Nature Conservancy, a conservation group in Newmarket, UK. "There's nowhere really that escaped. It's quite a shocking map to see."

He said the two biggest drivers in destroying marine habitats were climate change and over-fishing.

"Out on the high seas, climate change and fishing were far and away the strongest influences," he explained. "The least impacted areas are the polar regions but they are not untouched."

Clear message

The scientists hope the map will be used to prioritise marine conservation efforts.

Andrew Rosenberg, a professor of natural resources at the University of New Hampshire, US, who was not part of the study, said policymakers could no longer focus on fishing or pollution as if they were separate effects.

"These human impacts overlap in space and time, and in far too many cases the magnitude is frighteningly high," he said.

"The message for policymakers seems clear to me: conservation action that cuts across the whole set of human impacts is needed now in many places around the globe."

The findings of the study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Boston, US.

Oceans 40% Fouled By Pollution, Fishing, Warming, Study Says
Alex Morales, Bloomberg.com 14 Feb 08;

Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Fishing, pollution and climate change damaged more than two-fifths of the world's oceans, said scientists who produced a map of the human toll on marine life.

Every single square kilometer of the oceans is affected by something man-made, and 41 percent has a "medium high" or "high" impact, the scientists, led by Ben Halpern at the University of California, Santa Barbara, said in an article to be published in the journal Science Feb. 15.

The researchers examined 17 ways that humans affect oceans, including shipping lanes, oil and gas exploration, and invasive species, and mapped the effects across coral reefs, mangroves and continental shelves. The map will help world policymakers protect the oceans, Halpern said in a telephone interview.

"A lot of the past studies have looked at just a single activity -- fishing or climate change or land-based runoff pollution, and they looked at the impact of just one of those," Halpern said yesterday. "We've looked at the overlaying cumulative sum of all of these activities at once, so you can really get a big picture of how humans are affecting the oceans."

Oceans near the poles were unaffected by humans. The North Sea and the South and East China Seas were heavily impacted, said Halpern. The Mediterranean, east Caribbean, Persian Gulf, Norwegian Sea, Bering Sea, the east coast of North America and the waters around Sri Lanka were also among the worst, the article said.

`Degraded State'

"Those areas are definitely in a degraded state, and a state that if people went diving in, probably would not be too happy to be in," Halpern said.

Reefs and mangroves, coastal habitats that receive a lot of attention from conservationists, were heavily damaged by human activities, the study said. Worst were rocky reefs and continental shelves, where commercial fishing concentrates, Halpern said.

"Where you're in a very high impact situation, it's fairly heavily degraded, and the ecosystem is probably not something people would even recognize as a normal healthy ecosystem," Halpern said. "It probably means that most of the big fish and invertebrates are gone and that the plants and animals that live on the bottom are much less abundant than they used to be."

Climate change had the biggest impact on oceans, raising temperature, acid levels and ultraviolet radiation, Halpern said.

Worse Picture

"In coastal areas, you get everything from land-based pollution, and oil and gas development, invasive species as well as climate change and fishing causing problems," he said.

The map created by the scientists doesn't include fish farming or sediment runoff from dammed rivers, said Halpern, who said the group's estimates were conservative.

"There are going to be interactions among these different activities that makes the whole much greater than the parts," Halpern said. "The picture would probably look worse if you accounted for these interactions."

Effective ocean-management can stop the degradation, the study said. Climate change likely will intensify the damage, according to the scientists.

Policy makers should use the scientists' map to separate harmful ocean activities, so negative effects aren't magnified, Halpern said.

"We have business districts and residential districts, schools and churches. All these things are zoned into different places to create some cohesion to our communities that make sense. You don't have a strip club next to a school," the researcher said. "We can allow all these activities to go on, but just not in the same place."


Read more!