ADB to invest 1 billion dollars a year for 'clean energy' in Asia

Yahoo News 3 Jun 08;

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is to invest one billion dollars annually in "clean energy" projects as part of an effort to encourage their use, the Manila-based bank said Tuesday.

ADB vice-president for sustainable development Ursula Schafer-Preuss made the announcement at a special forum sponsored by the ADB and the US Agency for International Development (USAID) on finding cleaner energy sources for Asia.

"We launched our energy efficiency initiative about three years ago and set targets for increasing our investments in clean energy to one billion dollars per year starting 2008," she said at the ADB headquarters in Manila.

The ADB is also working to increase "access to energy for all," while promoting reforms such as transparent tariff rates, appropriate regulations and forming long-term policies, she said.

Among the projects to be financed by the new ADB investment is the installation and operation of energy efficient heating systems in China, Schafer-Preuss said.

ADB sources said an energy efficiency project in Guandong was also being considered by the board of the multilateral agency.

ADB senior energy specialist Sohail Hasnie said in the short-term, the investments would likely go to projects that boost energy efficiency. However, viable long-term projects such solar, wind or ocean wave power plants, are also being looked at.

Hasnie said the viability of "clean energy" projects largely depended on locations and power charges.

As an example, he said "the Philippines has high (power) tariffs so a lot of (renewable energy) projects would be viable here which would not be viable in Indonesia," which has low power tariffs.

Speaking at the same forum, various industry leaders said energy efficiency could be increased simply by adopting existing technologies instead of using new techniques.

Enrique Penalosa, former mayor of Bogota, Colombia cited the success his city enjoyed by opening it up to pedestrians, bicycles and buses rather than building new highways or parking spaces for cars.

"A citizen on a 30-dollar bicycle is equally important as a citizen in a 30,000-dollar car," he said to wide applause.

Marten Williamsen, director for China of industry leader Philips Lighting, remarked that two-thirds of all lighting in the world is still using "older, less efficient technology developed before the 1970s," like incandescent bulbs even though more efficient bulbs were available.


Read more!

Food Crisis May Open Door To Genetically Modified Rice

Carmel Crimmins, PlanetArk 4 Jun 08;

LOS BANOS, Philippines - Some rice-producing nations may drop their reluctance to use genetically modified (GM) seeds in the next few years to help offset a crisis that has forced millions to go hungry, a top expert said.

"If we consider the challenges that face us, I think we would be very foolish and actually irresponsible to not invest in the development of GM crops," said Robert Zeigler, director general of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).

"I think that governments will take a hard look and say why again are we dragging our feet in adopting GM technology,?" he told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.

World leaders may discuss GM organisms at this week's food crisis summit in Rome but they are unlikely to be presented as part of the solution to soaring food prices amid opposition by some environmental groups to what they see as "Frankenfoods".

GM crops, which use genes from other plants and other organisms to effect special traits, are widely grown in North America and parts of South America, including cotton, a source of vegetable cooking oil, as well as corn and soybeans.

But European and Asian states have largely held off embracing GM technology for food amid scepticism about its safety.

As yet, no GM rice is grown commercially but Zeigler said that could change, at the earliest two years from now, with the world's top two producers, China and India, likely leading the charge.

"I will be very interested in seeing how China reacts over the next year. They have a transgenic insect-resistant rice that's ready for release. They have been delaying that because of pressures from the anti-GM lobby. I will be interested to see how they respond," he said.

"There are also a number of transgenic crops coming up in India. The furthest along is the eggplant. Rice is also coming along."

China and India have already adopted biotech cotton, which is engineered to resist certain insects and earlier this year, South Korea started purchasing GM corn for food.

Zeigler dismissed anti-GM groups' arguments about safety.

"We have seen no adverse effects on human health or the environment anywhere that have been demonstrated with any scientific credibility."


NO SILVER BULLET

The Philippines-based IRRI hopes to make its own GM Golden Rice, enriched with Vitamin A, available to farmers by 2011.

IRRI kick-started the so-called Green Revolution in the late 1960s with the development of high-yielding rice seeds which multiplied harvests of Asia's food staple and enabled countries such as Thailand and China to industrialise.

With international rice prices nearly tripling this year due to rising demand and export curbs by producer nations, Zeigler believes a second Green Revolution is necessary.

Nearly half the world's population depend on rice to survive and demand for the grain, which is eaten for breakfast, lunch and dinner in parts of Asia, is expected to jump 50 percent by 2030.

In addition to improving crop management, post-harvest technologies and irrigation, Zeigler also believes that GM technology is part of the solution.

He admits, however, that like others in the scientific community, he has been reluctant to sing GM's praises too loudly for fear of a backlash from anti-GM groups.

"We are all very wary of being misquoted as saying that GM is a single bullet magic solution for all the world's food ills. None of us believe that."

(Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)


Read more!

Biotechnology seen as a key to solving food crisis

Alister Doyle, Reuters 3 Jun 08;

ROME (Reuters) - Biotechnology can help solve the world's food crisis with benefits such as flood-resistant rice in Bangladesh or higher cotton yields in Burkina Faso, a senior U.S. official said at a U.N. food summit on Tuesday.

"Biotechnology is one of the most promising tools for improving the productivity of agriculture and increasing the incomes of the rural poor," U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said.

"We are convinced of the benefits it offers to developing countries and small farmers," he told a U.S.-led briefing on the sidelines of the June 3-5 summit seeking ways to combat high food prices when climate change may aggravate shortages.

Some green groups say genetically-engineered crops threaten biodiversity while many European consumers are wary of eating products dubbed by critics as "Frankenfoods".

Schafer said biotechnology, including genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), could help produce more food by raising yields and producing crops in developing nations that are resistant to disease and pests.

"Genetic engineering offers long-term solutions to some of our major crop production problems," said Philippine Agriculture Minister Arthur Yap. But he said that it was not a panacea for all of his country's agricultural problems.

Progress being made in the Philippines included research into rice and coconuts resistant to disease, he said.

"We're also working on virus-resistant papaya, papaya hybrids with a longer shelf life that should be ready for market in 2009," he said.

Climate change could aggravate production around the world with more droughts, floods, disruptions to monsoons and rising sea levels, says the U.N. Climate Panel. In Africa alone, 250 million people could face extra stress on water supplies by 2020.

COTTON

Burkina Faso Agriculture Minister Laurent Sedogo said the African country had worked with U.S. agriculture group Monsanto to battle pests that blighted the cotton crop.

"We are about to plant 15,000 hectares" of a new crop that was resistant to pests, he said. That would also cut down on the use of pesticides that could damage the health of farmers.

The World Bank and aid agencies estimate that soaring food prices could push as many as 100 million more people into hunger. About 850 million are already hungry.

Bangladesh said that it was going ahead with efforts to make crops able to survive floods and more salinity in the soil.

A cyclone last year "is a wake-up call for all of us", said C.S. Karim, an adviser to Bangladesh's agriculture ministry. "It shows the vulnerability of Bangladesh. "


Read more!

UN Food Summit Blames Trade Barriers, Queries Biofuel

Stephen Brown and Robin Pomeroy, PlanetArk 4 Jun 08;

ROME - A United Nations summit on the global food crisis called on Tuesday for trade barriers to be reduced and food export bans scrapped to help stop the spread of hunger that threatens nearly one billion people.

"Nothing is more degrading than hunger, especially when man-made," UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told the Rome summit, where the United States and Brazil defended biofuel production from charges that it pushes up world food prices.

The head of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), hosting the summit, said wealthy nations spent billions of dollars on farm subsidies, excess food consumption and arms.

"The excess consumption by the world's obese costs $20 billion annually, to which must be added indirect costs of $100 billion resulting from premature death and related diseases," said FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf, who is from Senegal.

Humanitarian agencies estimate soaring food prices could push as many as 100 million more people into hunger. About 850 million are already going hungry.

Ban estimated the "global price tag" to overcome the food crisis would be $15-20 billion a year and that food supply had to rise 50 percent by the year 2030 to meet climbing demand.

"Some countries have taken action by limiting exports or by imposing draft controls," he said, referring to controls slapped on foods in emergency to guarantee domestic supply.

This "distorts markets and forces prices even higher. I call on nations to resist such measures and to immediately release exports designated for humanitarian purposes".

Aid agencies blame some Asian nations' export restrictions on rice, for example, for driving up prices, which led to riots as far abroad as Haiti in April, toppling the government.

ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT

The Rome summit will set the tone on food aid and subsidies for the Group of Eight summit in Japan in July and what is hoped to be the concluding stages of the stalled Doha talks under the World Trade Organisation aimed at reducing trade distortions.

WTO chief Pascal Lamy said a Doha deal "would reduce the trade-distorting subsidies that have stymied the developing world's production capacity". Of the 22 countries most affected by the food crisis, "some are amongst the world's least trade integrated economies in agriculture", he said in a speech.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said rich nations' "intolerable protectionism" was the main cause of food inflation while US Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer focused on export restrictions, blamed for restricting food supplies.

"We ask all countries to allow the free flow of food and the technologies that produce food," said Schafer.

Britain urged the European Union to cool prices by reforming farm policies that cost consumers over 40 billion euros ($62.4 billion) a year and said trade talks were at a "critical" stage.

"It is unacceptable that rich countries still subsidise farming by $1 billion a day, costing poor farmers in developing countries an estimated $100 billion a year in lost income," said British International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander.

The cost of major food commodities has doubled over the last couple of years, with rice, corn and wheat at record highs. This has provoked protests and riots in some developing countries where people may spend more than half their income on food.

The OECD sees prices retreating from their current peaks but still up to 50 percent higher in the coming decade.

DIRTY FINGERS

Rising fuel prices, as well as making agricultural supplies like seeds and fertilisers more costly, have raised interest in biofuels, blamed by many for competing with food output for grains and oilseed.

The United States and Brazil, the world's biggest producer of ethanol from sugar cane, defended their biofuels industries from such accusations in Rome. "It offends me to see fingers pointed against clean energy from biofuels, fingers soiled with oil and coal," da Silva told the summit.

The United States plans to channel a quarter of its maize crop into ethanol production by 2022 and the European Union plans to get 10 percent of auto fuel from bio-energy by 2020.

Washington says biofuels account for only three percent of the total food price rise while Oxfam puts it at 30 percent.

"The use of sustainable biofuels can increase energy security, foster economic development especially in rural areas and reduce greenhouse gas emissions without weighing heavily on food prices," said Schafer.

The summit was attended by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, both accused by their critics of contributing to food shortages at home.

Washington said Mugabe's presence could only serve as an example of "what not to do" on food security. A State Department spokesman said his "ruinous policies" had turned Zimbabwe from a food exporter into a net importer with many starving people.

Italian Jews protested against the Iranian leader's comments that Israel would disappear, chanting "Israel, Israel, Israel" on a hill by the ancient Roman Circus Maximus, near the summit.

UN sets out food crisis measures
BBC News 3 Jun 08;

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has urged nations to seize an "historic opportunity to revitalise agriculture" as a way of tackling the food crisis.

Mr Ban told a UN-sponsored summit in Rome that food production would have to rise by 50% by 2030 to meet demand.

Mr Ban said export restrictions and import tariffs ought to be minimised to alleviate the crisis.

The summit comes as food costs have reached a 30-year high in real terms, causing riots in several countries.

The host of the conference - the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) - has warned the industrialised countries that unless they increase yields, eliminate barriers and move food to where it is needed most, a global catastrophe could result.

The FAO is calling for $1.7bn of emergency funding to tackle the shortage in production.

The recent crisis is believed to have pushed 100 million people into hunger worldwide.

Poorer countries are faced with a 40% increase in their food imports bill this year, and experts say some countries' food bills have doubled in the past year.

In other developments at the summit:

* Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe said the two key issues were "global warming and the use of agricultural commodities for the reproduction of biofuels"
* Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a leading US critic, cited "certain powers" and "invisible hands" as trying "to control prices to achieve their political and economic aims"
* Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva defended his country's production of biofuels, saying that blaming ethanol production for food price rises was an "affront"

Access problem

In his speech Mr Ban said the instability caused by the price rises threatened progress made in countries like Afghanistan, Liberia and Haiti. He talked of people in Liberia who used to buy rice by the bag and now bought it by the cup.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Mr Mugabe said that climate change has contributed to a global food crisis

The taskforce Mr Ban created to target the food crisis is expected to present a 38-page report with measures that could cost up to $15bn (£7.5bn) to implement.

Announcing some of its findings, Mr Ban said high food prices offered a chance to finally address the ongoing problem of access to food for the world's poor.

"The threats are obvious to us all. Yet this crisis also presents us with an opportunity," he said.

"While we must respond immediately to high food prices, it is important that our longer term focus is on improving world food security," he said.

Measures to improve access to food for vulnerable people include expanding aid, boosting smallholder production and minimising export restriction and import tariffs, he added.

Global catastrophe if food riots spread
Straits Times 4 Jun 08;

As rights activists sound warning, UN chief calls for rise in production
ROME - AS WORLD leaders discuss the food crisis, human rights activists and the World Bank are warning of a looming global catastrophe which could plunge much of the planet into violence.

The United Nations food security summit yesterday heard UN chief Ban Ki Moon call for a 50per cent increase in food production to help deal with soaring food prices which have already provoked riots around the world.

But ahead of the meeting, human rights activists and the World Bank stressed that words would not be enough to help the world's poor, and warned of dire consequences if action was not taken.

Johannesburg-based poverty campaign group ActionAid said: 'The current food crisis amounts to a gross violation of human rights and could fuel a global catastrophe, as many of the world's poorest countries, particularly those forced into import dependency, struggle to feed their people.'

Poor harvests, low stocks and rising demand, especially from India and China, have caused huge food price spikes over the last two years, stoking protests, strikes and violence in Africa, Latin America and Asia.

The International Committee of the Red Cross is warning that increased hunger will exacerbate conflict in war zones, while experts say food riots could worsen if nothing is done.

'Our estimate is that higher food prices are pushing 30million Africans into poverty,' World Bank chief Robert Zoellick said, adding that the message he received from Africans is that they are tired of talk and want action.

'We have a lot of world leaders here; let's try to focus on what we can do in

real time to make a difference,' said Mr Zoellick, who last week announced US$1.2billion (S$1.6billion) in loans and grants to help poor countries cope with food and fuel costs.

He said immediate action was needed to deliver aid to the countries most at risk, to send seeds and fertilisers to poor farmers, and to lift export bans which are driving up prices.

Meanwhile, The Times of London reported yesterday that the world leaders attending the summit would be enjoying a 'modest' lunch, with the lobster, goose and foie gras served at the last summit replaced by pasta, mozzarella, spinach and sweetcorn.

It quoted a Food and Agriculture Organisation official as saying: 'It does not look good if leaders discussing global starvation are seen to be dining lavishly.

'At the last summit in 2002, we did not give enough thought to the menu and were open - unfairly, in our view - to the charge of hypocrisy.'

REUTERS


Read more!

Rising ocean acidity threatens low-lying islands

Michael Perry, Reuters 2 Jun 08;

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Rising acidity in the ocean caused by seas absorbing greenhouse carbon dioxide could make low-lying island nations like Kiribati and the Maldives more vulnerable to storms as their coral reefs struggle to survive, say scientists.

Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is at its highest level in the past 650,000 years, possible 23 million years, and half has now been dissolved into the oceans making them more acidic.

Ocean acidification, which is projected to spread extensively north from the Antarctic by 2100, makes it difficult or impossible for some animals, like coral and starfish, to produce their shells and skeletons.

"If ocean acidification weakens the structure of reef-forming corals and algae, tropical systems (islands) will be more vulnerable to physical impacts from storms and cyclones," said a new report by some of the world's leading marine scientists.

"By 2100, it is expected that some reefs will become marginal and reef calcification will decline," said the report, by the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, released on Monday.

The report cited Kiribati in the South Pacific and the Maldives in the Indian Ocean as being more vulnerable to tropical storms if ocean acidification continues to rise.

"These impacts will also directly affect important commercial, recreational or subsistence reef fisheries where the target species depend on reef habitats," said the report, released at an ocean acidification conference in Hobart.

Ocean acidification is when carbon dioxide dissolves in the sea forming a weak acid, carbonic acid. Human-induced carbon dioxide has largely been produced by burning fossil fuels, agricultural practices and concrete production.

"The ocean is a major sink for CO2 emissions and has absorbed about 48 percent of the CO2 emitted by human activities since preindustrial times," said the report.

FOOD CHAIN THREATENED

Ocean acidification is already affecting the cold water marine life of the Southern Ocean where most carbon dioxide has dissolved and U.S. researchers said it was now appearing on the Pacific North American continental shelf.

"The Southern Ocean is a biogeochemical 'harbinger' for the impacts of acidification that will spread throughout the global ocean," said the report.

By 2060, Antarctic polar waters would experience carbonate ion concentrations so low that one form of calcium carbonate, aragonite, will not be available for organisms to build shells.

Ocean acidification may also interfere with the respiration of fish, the larval development of marine organisms and the ability of oceans to absorb nutrients and toxins.

"Ocean acidification is likely to have an ecological cascade effect right up to parts of the food web that are important to human beings, such as fish and shell fish," said research scientist Will Howard from the Antarctic research centre.

The report said ice cores showed that the current rate of increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 100 times greater than the most rapid increases experienced in the last 650,000 years. Sedimentary records suggest carbon dioxide levels were higher than at anytime in the last 23 million years.

It said atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are expected to reach about double pre-industrial levels within this century, resulting in an acidification of oceans three times the level experienced during the last major rise in carbon dioxide during the last glacial period 15,000 years ago.

"Many (marine) species have taken millennia to evolve and it is unknown whether they can (or will) be able to adapt to the relatively rapid rate of ocean acidification, in the order of decades not millennia," said the report.

(Editing by Valerie Lee)


Read more!

Australia completes controversial kangaroo cull

Yahoo News 3 Jun 08;

Australian officials have completed a cull of more than 500 kangaroos which animal activists had protested was an unjustified slaughter, the defence department said Tuesday.

Some 514 eastern grey kangaroos were killed at a former naval communications base in the national capital Canberra by lethal injection, a defence spokeswoman told AFP.

"The cull proceeded according to plan and the process was completed in 10 days," she told AFP.

The Australian Capital Territory government had backed the decision to kill the animals, saying the site was overcrowded with the hopping marsupials, which were threatening the area's flora and fauna.

The RSPCA had also supported the cull, saying it was the only option for the site and was conducted humanely.

But the decision attracted outcry from animal rights activists, who had asked former Beatle Paul McCartney for his help in saving the animals. Protesters wanted the kangaroos relocated to another area rather than killed, a process that the government had ruled out as too expensive.

Despite featuring on the nation's coat of arms, kangaroos are killed by the millions each year by private landowners to control their numbers.


Read more!

Iceland and Norway resume whale meat exports to Japan

Yahoo News 2 Jun 08;

Iceland and Norway resumed whale meat exports to Japan this year after an 18-year interruption, industry representatives from both Scandinavian countries said.

"Iceland and Norway resumed exporting whale meat to Japan," Gunnar Bergmann Jonsson, president of the Icelandic association representing Minke whale hunters, told AFP.

"We (Iceland) have exported to Japan 80 tonnes of fine whale's meat about two weeks ago. The meat is now in Japan. We got the authorization from the government in 2006. And the last exports (before those) were in 1990," said Jonsson.

Despite Japan being the largest market for whale meat, Norwegian whalers prior to now met with no uptake from Japanese buyers who worried mercury and dioxin levels were abnormally high in the Scandinavian product.

"Norway announced in 2001 that it would resume its exports. Up to now, our sales were limited to Iceland and the Faroe Islands but, this year, meat has also been exported to Japan," Halvard Johansen, an official with Norway's fishing ministry, told AFP.

"Ask the Japanese," replied Johansen when questioned why Japan had re-opened its doors to Norweigan products.

Norway once again began whale hunting in 1993 despite an international moratorium imposed since 1986 to protect the species. Iceland followed suit in 2006 and is now the only other country that allows commercial hunting of whales.

Jonsson said no future quotas on Icelandic whale meat exports to Japan have been set.

"But we hope to get more this season," he said.

Japan, Norway and Iceland are the only countries that continue to hunt whales, despite international condemnation.

Whalemeat traders 'defying ban'
Richard Black, BBC News 2 Jun 08;

Icelandic and Norwegian companies have begun exporting whalemeat to Japan.

About 60 tonnes of meat from fin whales caught in the 2006 Icelandic hunt was reportedly sent with a much smaller amount of minke meat from Norway.

Industry sources told the BBC that the meat had already arrived in Japan, although a Japanese official said no request to import it had been received.

Conservation groups say the trade will damage attempts to bridge the gap between pro- and anti-whaling nations.

The fin whale is listed as Endangered on the internationally recognised Red List of Threatened Species.

But Iceland maintains populations are high enough in the North Atlantic that a small annual kill, such as the seven caught in 2006, is sustainable.

This is Iceland's first whalemeat export to Japan in nearly 20 years.

Mutual benefit

Commercial whaling has been banned globally under the International Whaling Commission (IWC) since 1986, but Iceland and Norway lodged formal objections to the ban and their governments issue commercial quotas unilaterally.

The global trade in whalemeat is also prohibited under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), but again the three countries have exempted themselves by lodging formal "reservations".

"This trade will be mutually beneficial for the three main whaling countries," said Kristjan Loftsson, CEO of the Icelandic company Hvalur hf which catches fin whales.

"This trade is perfectly legal under the domestic legislation of the three countries as well as all relevant international law."

Iceland's Fisheries Ministry said it was not an issue that concerned the government.

"It's been clear since 2006 that our position was that those who were engaged in [the hunt] could export the products," said Stefan Asmundsson, a senior official in the ministry and Iceland's commissioner to the IWC.

"Then it's up to them to do that; and as far as I know they have shipped some product to Japan," he told BBC News.

An official in Norway's Directorate of Nature Management confirmed that his government had issued export permits for minke meat totalling 5.3 tonnes to two companies.

A spokesman for one of the companies, Myklebust Trading, said the consignment - sent by air - had reached Japan.

However, an official in Japan's Fisheries Agency told BBC News that no request for permission to import the meat had been lodged with the government - and such a request was needed, he said.

Domestic issue?

Sue Lieberman, director of the global species programme at the conservation charity WWF, agreed that the trade was legal, but said it went against the principles of these international treaties.

"It undermines the effectiveness of CITES if countries are trading under their reservations, and it also undermines the IWC," she said.

"There's supposed to be a ban on commercial whaling; and Iceland and Norway keep saying they need to hunt because there's a demand in their own countries, but the trade shows it's not true.

"[The Icelandic hunters] killed the fins just because they could get more money for fin than minke meat in Japan."

The fin whale meat has been in cold storage since the 2006 season, and Mr Loftsson acknowlededges there is no domestic market.

For the last year, IWC chairman William Hogarth has been trying to set in train a mechanism that could heal the damaging breach betwen pro- and anti-whaling countries within the commission.

Japan and some anti-whaling countries such as The Netherlands and New Zealand are actively engaged with the initiative, though there is still deep suspicion between opposing camps.

"What this decision means is that Iceland, or at least Loftsson, is trying to strangle the effort to find a compromise," said Arni Finnsson from the Iceland Nature Conservation Association (Inca).

Mr Finnsson argues, as do other environmentalists, that the continuation of whaling and the decision not to interfere in the whalemeat exports may damage Iceland's economy - already reeling from the international banking crisis - and its candidacy for a seat on the UN Security Council.

Following last month's decision to issue a minke quota for 2008, foreign minister Ingibjorg Solrun Gisladottir said Iceland was sacrificing its long-term interests for short-term gain, while the UK was one of the nations criticising the decision.


Read more!

Last flight of the honeybee?

A bee-less world wouldn't just mean the end of honey - Einstein said that if the honeybee became extinct, then so would mankind. Alison Benjamin reports on a very real threat

Alison Benjamin, The Guardian 31 May 08;

Dave Hackenberg's bees have been on the road for four days. To reach the almond orchards of California's Central Valley, they pass through the fertile plains of the Mississippi, huge cattle ranches and oilfields in Texas, and the dusty towns of New Mexico on their 2,600-mile journey from Florida.

The bees will have seen little of the dramatic landscape, being cooped up in hives stacked four high on the back of trucks. Each truck carries close to 500 hives, tethered with strong harnesses and covered with black netting to prevent the millions of passengers from escaping.

When the drivers pull over to sleep, the bees have a break from the constant movement and wind speed, but there's no opportunity to look around and stretch their wings.

Their final destination is some two hours north of Los Angeles. As the sun begins to fade over the vast, flat terrain, the convoy slowly snakes through orchards filled with row upon row of almond trees stretching as far as the eye can see. Every February, the valley plays host to billions of honeybees as trees burst into blossom, blanketing the landscape in a soft, pinkish hue which extends to the horizon.

The sandy loam and Mediterranean climate are perfect for the cultivation of almonds, but that's where any comparisons to picturesque orchards of Spain or Italy end. Here, there are no verdant weeds, wild flowers or grass verges to please the eye, just never-ending trees that form what looks like an outdoor production line.

In the cool hours after sunset and before sunrise, more than one million hives are unloaded at regular intervals between the trees by commercial beekeepers such as Dave Hackenberg, who have travelled from the far corners of the US to take part in the world's largest managed pollination event. The mammoth orchards of Central Valley stretch the distance from London to Aberdeen, and the 60 million almond trees planted with monotonous uniformity along the 400-mile route require half of all the honeybees in the US to pollinate them - a staggering 40 billion.

By February 16, National Almond Day in the US, the trees are usually covered in flowers and humming with the sound of busy bees. Attracted by the sweet nectar that each flower offers, the bees crawl around on the petals to find the perfect sucking position. As they do so, their furry bodies are dusted with beads of pollen. As they fly from blossom to blossom in search of more of the sweet energy drink, they transfer pollen from the male part of the flower to the female part, and so fertilise it. Not long afterwards, the plant's ovaries swell into fruit, which by late August turn into precious, oval-shaped nuts.

Without this army of migrant pollinators paying a visit for three weeks every year, the trees would fail to bear the almonds that are California's most valuable horticultural export. Last year, they earned the state more than $1.9bn, double the revenue from its Napa Valley vineyards. Moreover, 80% of the world's almonds now come from this pocket of the planet. But the supply of almonds in confectionery, cakes and packets of nuts is now threatened by a mysterious malady that is causing honeybees to disappear.

Hackenberg was the first beekeeper to report that his bees had vanished. On a November day 18 months ago, he checked the hives in his Florida bee yard to find they were empty. "They weren't dead, they were just gone," he recalls.

Since then, close on two million colonies of honeybees across the US have been wiped out. The strange phenomenon, dubbed colony collapse disorder (CCD), is also thought to have claimed the lives of billions of honeybees around the world. In Taiwan, 10 million honeybees were reported to have disappeared in just two weeks, and throughout Europe honeybees are in peril.

In Britain, John Chapple was the first to raise the alarm. In January 2007, he lost all of the 14 colonies in his garden in west London. "It's too cold at that time of year to open the hives," he says, "so I always check on the bees by giving the hive a thump and waiting for what sounds like a roaring sound to come back. But there was nothing, just silence." When he opened the hives to see what had happened, he found them practically empty. Examination of a further 26 hives scattered across the capital revealed that two-thirds had perished.

"I was completely shocked," says Chapple, who chairs the London Beekeepers' Association. "I could attribute some losses to a failing queen bee or wax moths, but there were a few I could find no reason for. There was a healthy queen and a few bees, but nothing else." Chapple's inquiries as to whether the parks where he kept some of his hives had sprayed new pesticides also drew a blank.

He was not alone. Beekeepers in north-west London also reported strange losses. Chapple calls the disappearance the "Mary Celeste syndrome". A year later, a survey of hives by government bee inspectors across Britain has found that one in five colonies has perished this winter.

There are some 270,000 honeybee hives in Britain run by 44,000 keepers, more than 90% of them amateurs. According to estimates by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), bees contribute £165m a year to the economy through their pollination of fruit trees, field beans and other crops. In addition, the 5,000 tonnes of British honey sold in UK stores generates a further £12m.

UK farming minister Lord Rooker, however, warned last year that honeybees are in acute danger: "If nothing is done about it, the honeybee population could be wiped out in 10 years," he said. Last month, he launched a consultation on a national strategy to improve and protect honeybee health.

People's initial response to the idea of a bee-less world is often either, "That's a shame, I'll have no honey to spread on my toast" or, "Good - one less insect that can sting me." In fact, honeybees are vital for the pollination of around 90 crops worldwide. In addition to almonds, most fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds are dependent on honeybees. Crops that are used as cattle and pig feed also rely on honeybee pollination, as does the cotton plant. So if all the honeybees disappeared, we would have to switch our diet to cereals and grain, and give our wardrobes a drastic makeover.

According to Albert Einstein, our very existence is inextricably linked to bees - he is reputed to have said: "If the bee disappears off the surface of the globe, then man would only have four years of life left."

Bees are a barometer of what man is doing to the environment, say beekeepers; the canary in the coalmine. Just as animals behave weirdly before an earthquake or a hurricane, cowering in a corner or howling in the wind, so the silent, empty hives are a harbinger of a looming ecological crisis. But what is causing them to vanish - pesticides, parasites, pests, viruses? No one knows for sure. The more fanciful theories when CCD was first detected included an al-Qaida plot to wreck US agriculture, radiation from mobile phones and even celestial intervention in the form of honeybee rapture.

Scientists around the world are trying to pinpoint the culprit, but it is proving elusive. They have even set up an international network to monitor honeybee losses - a sort of Interpol for bees - which is operating out of Switzerland. Its coordinator, bee pathologist Dr Peter Neumann, blames a bloodsucking mite called varroa. Little bigger than a pinhead, it has preyed on honeybees in Europe and the US since its arrival 30 years ago. Under a microscope, the reddish-brown mite looks like a cross between a jellyfish and a Frisbee. It activates lethal viruses in honeybees and carries them from bee to bee when it feeds on their blood, like a dirty syringe spreading HIV/Aids. "It has to be the backbone of the problem," Neumann says. "But it is probably not acting alone."

In the US, where the genetic code of the honeybee was unravelled by scientists two years ago, they have been employing advanced technology to discover if a new virus is responsible for killing the bees. Genome sequencing techniques uncovered the DNA of a virus called Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV) that was found in almost all of the hives suffering from CCD. The discovery, published in Science, was hailed as a major breakthrough in the investigation. But honeybees are riddled with latent viruses. They become a problem and cause disease only when the bee's immune system is shot. Like humans, they are prone to illness when they are stressed and run-down. So the real question is, what is making the bees too weak to fight a virus?

The answer is probably overwork, coupled with various environmental factors that are the flipside of pollination on an industrial scale and intensified food production. After Hackenberg's bees have pollinated the almonds in California, they head north to the apple orchards of Washington State, then east for the cranberries and pumpkins, before reaching Maine in May to pollinate blueberries. In a year, they can cover 11,000 miles. It's a well-worn route that's travelled by many of the 1,000 commercial beekeepers in America who between them own 90% of the country's 2.4 million honeybee colonies. It is pollination, rather than honey production, that keeps US beekeepers in business. In 2007, honey production was worth $160m to the US economy, compared with pollination services that have been estimated at $15bn.

Joe Traynor is a California bee broker. From a small office in a quiet side street in downtown Bakersfield, on the southern tip of Central Valley, he runs a lucrative business matching almond growers with beekeepers. I put to him that surely all this moving around of bees, confined to their hives for long periods, must be stressful for them. He admits that too much travel is not good for their health: "When you're trucking bees, they need sleep, just as humans do, and the bumping around in the truck for two to three days keeps them awake, and this lowers their resistance to pests and disease."

Hackenberg, however, disagrees: "I've been doing this 40-odd years. We've done all the same things, but the rules have changed. Something's messing up."

Hackenberg, 59, wears cowboy boots, a checked shirt and blue jeans. He even has a hard hat in the shape of a Stetson, with netting attached that he wears when unloading beehives. He began his own investigations into what killed 2,000 of his honeybees at the end of 2006, by talking to growers and reading up on pesticide use and research into their effects on bees. "It's those new neonicotinoid pesticides that growers are using," he says. "That's what's messing up the bees' navigation system so they can't find their way home."

Honeybees have a sophisticated dance language they use to communicate with each other in the hive. Until Karl von Frisch unlocked the mysteries of this dance - his discovery won him a Nobel prize in 1973 - we didn't fully appreciate that bees returning to the hive laden with nectar and pollen will tell their sisters (all worker bees are female) where they got their supplies by doing a dance that points to the location of the flowers in relation to the sun's position.

Tests have shown that the pesticides Hackenberg refers to can interfere with the bees' communication and orientation skills, and also impair memory.

With innocuous brand names such as Gaucho, Assail and Merit, these pesticides are used worldwide, from sunflower fields to apple orchards, lawns to golf courses. The chemicals they contain are an artificial type of nicotine that acts as a neurotoxin that attacks insects' nervous systems on contact or ingestion. Because it is systemic, the chemical moves throughout a plant, so if it is applied as a seed dressing, it will travel to the shoots, stem, leaves and flowers where bees can come into contact with small doses. Many of these widely used pesticides are classified by the US Environmental Protection Agency as "highly toxic to bees" and come with a warning label intended to help prevent their exposure to the pollinators.

"It's in such small print that the growers don't see it," Hackenberg says. He accuses farmers of "stacking" - or mixing - pesticides, herbicides and fungicides. "No one has ever tested what happens to the toxicity if they do mix, simply because the chemical companies are not required to by law, but this combination could be a thousand times more lethal than if the chemicals are applied separately."

In Britain, beekeeping is very small-scale compared with the US. There are a few hundred professional beekeepers, who run an average of 100 hives each; only around 50 of them transport bees to orchards, usually over distances of 25 or so miles, rather than across a continent. Many orchards provide a year-round home for hives kept by amateur beekeepers, so there is no need for migratory beekeepers. But in this country, as in the rest of Europe, it is hard to escape pesticides and the varroa mite.

In France, beekeepers have for more than a decade waged a war against the chemical giant Bayer CropScience. They hold responsible the company's bestselling pesticide, imidacloprid, trade name Gaucho, for killing a third of the country's 1.5 million colonies. In 1999, the French government banned the use of Gaucho on sunflower crops after thousands took to the streets in protest. Two further pesticides were banned because of their potential link to bee deaths. It appeared to stem the massive bee die-offs for a time, even though the manufacturers' own tests demonstrated there is no correlation, and a long-term study by the French food safety agency revealed no significant differences in death rates before and after pesticides were banned. This winter, bee deaths across France are reported to have shot up again to 60%.

Bayer is also being blamed by German beekeepers for the eerie silence along the Rhine valley, where the buzzing of bees is a common sound at this time of year. They say two-thirds of honeybees have been killed this month by the pesticide clothianidin, sold under the trade name Poncho, which has been widely applied on sweet corn. As a result of the bee deaths, eight pesticides, including clothianidin, have been temporarily suspended in Germany. Anecdotal evidence of pesticide-related bee deaths in Italy and Holland is also piling up.

European beekeepers accuse scientists and government agencies of being in the pocket of the chemical companies. It's a similar story in the US, where scientists maintain that there is no correlation between the bees' disappearance and pesticide use. According to Hackenberg: "Big Ag has control of the USDA [the US Department of Agriculture] from the secretary right down to the lowest guy on the totem pole."

Jeff Pettis is not sure where he comes on the pole. The senior manager at the federal bee laboratory in Maryland, he's the man responsible for coordinating the US government's response to CCD. Pettis advises some beekeepers may do well to forgo the almond pollination and rest their bees. "You are getting them ready for February when the sunlight hours and the temperature are telling them it's too early in the year to be foraging at full strength," he says.

Deceiving bees is an essential part of the business. Beekeepers dupe them into thinking it's already summer by moving them to warm locations in winter and feeding them an array of protein and energy supplements. The more food that comes into the hive, the more eggs the queen lays, to create more of the worker bees to go out and pollinate.

The bee broker Joe Traynor says the deception goes much further than trucking bees south. "We're interfering with their natural cycle because we want strong colonies for almond pollination. We're stimulating hives in August, September and October, and making the queens do a lot more laying. As a result the queens are suffering burnout. It used to be that a beekeeper could pretty much leave his bees alone during winter. That's no longer the case."

Moreover, scientists funded by the Almond Board of California are now experimenting with artificial pheromones that trick bees into thinking there are more larvae in the hive that need feeding, so they forage more, and in the process pollinate more almond blossom.

This is the Almond Board's profit-driven response to a potential shortfall of honeybees: to work even harder those that remain. Bees are being treated as a machine with no consideration for their life cycle and downtimes. And any machine pushed to its limits and not well maintained will break.

Environmentalists argue for conservation measures on land planted with single crops that will both improve honeybee nutrition and attract wild pollinators that could shoulder some of the honeybees' workload. Monoculture, the hallmark of modern agriculture, covers much of the world's 1.5bn hectares of arable land. Single-crop plantations and orchards can stretch for hundreds of kilometres. The advantages for the farmer are manifold: the crop blooms at the same time, can be treated with the same pesticides and can be harvested together for maximum efficiency. But for honeybees, pollen collected from one crop does not provide a balanced, nutritious diet. Scientists agree that malnourished bees are more susceptible to disease and pesticide poisoning, while the best-fed are the hardiest.

Planting hedgerows of wild flowers would give honeybees a more varied menu. While this has happened in Europe, US almond growers have proved resistant to the idea, concerned that the bees would make fewer visits to the almond blossom if they had a choice. But hedgerows would also provide food and habitat for other pollinators such as butterflies, bumblebees and solitary bees. There are 4,500 wild bee species in North America that are capable of pollinating myriad fruits and vegetables - some more efficiently than honeybees.

Could they prevent a pollination crisis if honeybees become extinct? Only if they have somewhere to make a home in the orchards and fields, and something to eat after the single crop has bloomed. Monoculture deprives them on both counts.

The Xerces Society runs a pollinator conservation project in northern California. Farms in Yolo County receive a mixture of plants that flower throughout the year and nest blocks for wild bees, and they keep large areas of soil untilled for native bees to live on. They say they have seen the return of native bees and benefited from their pollination services. But final details being hammered out in a farm bill on Capitol Hill look like trimming conservation budgets and reducing financial incentives for farmers to manage their land in a more pollinator-friendly way.

So growers will continue to be increasingly reliant on honeybees to do a job once performed by a host of different insects. Their profits now hinge as much on honeybees' availability to pollinate fields as they do on the sun and rain. This is why there is such urgency in solving the mystery of disappearing and dying bees.

This is not the first time that honeybees have disappeared. The first recorded unexplained loss was in the US 150 years ago and ever since large numbers have vanished at intervals throughout North America, Europe and Australia. An epidemic first reported on the Isle of Wight wiped out 90% of honeybee colonies in the UK at the beginning of the 20th century. Then, as now, the main suspects were deficiencies in the bees' diet, pollution in the environment, pests and parasites and mismanagement by beekeepers, but the killer was never identified.

When bees die, beekeepers can restock their hives quickly by buying a new queen who lays 2,000 eggs a day at her peak. Across the world, most have chosen to fill their apiaries with a type of honeybee renowned for its gentle nature and prodigious honey production skills. This race of bee, originally from Italy, now dominates beekeeping. The downside is that the honeybee gene pool has been diminished and with it traits that may have helped bees fend off mites and other parasites, such as a new fungal bacteria, Nosema ceranae, that attacks its gut.

There are fears that mites are becoming increasingly resistant to chemicals administered by beekeepers to kill them. Pettis says we are controlling too many bee ailments with drugs and a more organic approach is needed that includes stocking apiaries with locally reared bees better adapted to local climate and environmental conditions.

Meanwhile scientists are hoping to use the mapping of the honeybee genome to engineer in the laboratory a super bee that has the resilience to withstand varroa but retains all the qualities of the Italian bee. Biologists will tell you, however, that it will be only a matter of time before a super bee breeds a super parasite. Geneticists also discovered that honeybees have fewer genes providing resistance to disease than other insects. In particular, the number of genes responsible for detoxification appear to be smaller, making it unusually sensitive to pesticides and poisons. Its large-scale disappearance across the US and high death rates in Europe are signalling that industrialised farming makes demands on honeybees that are not sustainable.

Central Valley has been described as a big brothel where billions of honeybees from all over the US can pick up a contagious illness and take it home. It's spread by mites from infected to healthy colonies. And there are plans to expand Central Valley's almond orchards to the point where, by 2011, they will require 1.6 million honeybee colonies for pollination.

Despite around a third of all US honeybees being wiped out last year, and again this year after beekeepers had restocked their hives, the almond pollination has yet to suffer. Why?

There are two answers. The shortage of honeybees has pushed up the price of hive rentals for almond pollination to an all-time high of $140 per hive, so more and more beekeepers are making the trip west, and the Almond Board's requirement of two hives each containing 20,000-30,000 bees per acre to pollinate the almonds is excessive, but provides a buffer should some of the hives be empty.

As the sun rises over the almond orchards after another nocturnal delivery of east coast hives, Hackenberg says it's only the money that brings him and his waning bees to California each year. "I'd rather be back in Florida with my bees. They'd be feeding on the maple and willow. It's paradise down there. Why would anyone come to this godforsaken place? But something's got to pay the bills. I'm here for a $150,000 cheque."

· A World Without Bees, by Alison Benjamin and Brian McCallum, is published by Guardian Books at £8.99 plus p&p. To order a copy with free UK mainland p&p, call 0845 606 4232, or go to guardianbooks.co.uk


Read more!

Eat more insects, scientists say

Graham Tibbetts, The Telegraph 2 Jun 08;

Eating insects such as wasps and grasshoppers has health benefits and should be encouraged in the Western diet, scientists have said.

The bugs are rich in protein and some minerals and are lower in cholesterol than beef or pork.

Research carried out at the National Autonomous University of Mexico found that 1,700 species are eaten in at least 113 countries across the world, usually as a substitute for meat.

In Mexico, grasshoppers are sold by the pound in markets and fried before being eaten while the larvae of giant butterfly sell for the equivalent of £12.50-a-plate in some restaurants.

Colombians eat ants, which they grind and spread on bread, and termites while Filipinos are partial to grasshoppers, crickets and locusts.

In Papua New Guinea, moths, dragonflies and beetles are popular when boiled or roasted over an open fire and the late Emperor Hirohito of Japan's favourite dish was wasps with rice.

Grasshoppers have 20 grams of protein and just 6 g of fat per 100g while fire ants have 13.9g of protein and 3.5g of fat. Crickets are sources of iron, zinc and calcium.

Eating insects also keep puts less strain on the environment because cultivating insects requires forest to be preserved rather than felled.

David George Gordon, a Seattle-based naturalist and author, says: "Insects are the most valuable, underused and delicious animals in the world.

"Maybe we in the West are the weirdos."

In February, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation staged a special conference on the benefits of eating insects - known as entomophagy.

Patrick Durst of the FAO admitted that Westerners will take some persuading before tucking in to insects.

"We're not going to convince Europeans and Americans to go out in big numbers and start eating insects."

But he held out hope that insects would catch on with the more adventurous, especially if they "don't have to look the bug in the eye as they're eating it."

Eating insects: save the planet and munch a moth
The Telegraph 4 Jun 08;

Eating insects could help the world's problems. Don't knock it till you've tried it, says Adam Edwards

A new wheeze from left field has been proposed this week to help solve the big issues of climate change and mass starvation - eating insects.

Scientists from Mexico, where grasshoppers are sold by the pound, have reported that the human consumption of creepy-crawlies could "contribute to sustainable development" because cultivating the small invertebrate would require forests to be preserved rather than felled and, furthermore, would also reduce the world consumption of meat.

While we must applaud these singular findings by the researchers from the National Autonomous University of Mexico - which also unearthed the fact that 1,700 species of bug are eaten in at least 113 countries across the globe - it should be noted that a solitary Englishman came to a remarkably similar conclusion some 120 years earlier.

In 1885 the entomologist Vincent M Holt published his only known work, entitled 'Why Not Eat Insects?' His skinny book, which included a comprehensive history of those who had feasted on the winged and multi-legged creatures, made the then radical proposal that insects should supplement the diet of the English peasant.

"How can the farmer most successfully battle with the insect devourers of his crops?" wrote Holt. "I suggest they be collected by the poor as food, thus pleasantly and wholesomely varying their present diet while, at the same time, conferring a great benefit on the agricultural world."

According to Holt, the Victorian yokel was already using woodlice pills, snails and slugs as cures for various ills and, he added: "I myself knew a labourer in the west of England who was in the habit of picking up and eating small white slugs as titbits, just as he would have picked wild strawberries."

This enthusiasm extolling the epicurean delights of insects was not new. The book claimed that Moses encouraged the people of Israel to eat locusts, beetles and grasshoppers (Leviticus, Chapter XI, Verse 22); Aristotle wrote that the "most polished of Greeks enjoyed cicadas"; while "Aelian tells us that in his time an Indian king served up as dessert a dish of roasted grubs".

The Romans fattened the larvae of the stag beetle for the table; the French astronomer Jerome Lalande spread spiders on bread, while the author of The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin, declared the larvae of the sphinx moth "delicious".

Since the publication of Holt's book, 20th-century scientists subsequently discovered that insects are the equal of shellfish in providing high-quality protein and are an excellent source of nutrients such as iron, calcium and vitamin B.

Their nutritious worth is proven by the Australian Aborigines, who still feast on bogong moths, witchetty grubs and the honeybag bee. Meanwhile, Japanese restaurants serve boiled wasp larvae, Nigerians eat roast termites (and even have termite stock cubes), and dragonflies are chucked on the barbie in Bali.

Closer to home, chef Lars Scheuble at the Soda restaurant in Berlin offers his customers cockroach pasta and sautéed maggots with green leaves.

Our own celebrity chef, Heston Blumenthal, serves snail porridge, while in Bristol the exotic food supplier Osgrow sells crickets (smoky bacon and Thai green curry flavours), locusts (in packs of 10), chocolate ants and BBQ-flavoured worm crisps.

I have to admit I am not an enthusiast of such delicacies. I once ate a fried locust, which tasted like whitebait stuffed with buttered toast, and got the legs stuck in my teeth.

My father, who found Holt's tome in a second-hand bookshop, insisted after reading it that the family tried caterpillar. My mother refused point blank, my sister was sick and I spat mine out before it had touched the sides of my mouth.

But perhaps I was too hasty. I notice at the end of 'Why Not Eat Insects?' that there are some interesting seasonal menus. They not only feature boiled neck of mutton with wire-worm sauce, stag beetle larvae on toast and slug soup but also braised beef with caterpillar.

Perhaps if my crawling larvae had been presented to me in such grand gastronomic fashion I would have gobbled it down with much more gusto - particularly if I had known that I was saving the planet.


Read more!

Mangrove forest areas in North Sumatra degrading

Antara 3 Jun 08;

Medan, North Sumatra (ANTARA News) - Around 60 percent of the total 85,393 hectares of mangrove forest areas in North Sumatra, were damaged seriously.

"Most of the mangrove areas have been damaged due to the opening of shrimp ponds and human encroachment," Director of Sumatra Rain forest Institute (SRI) Rasyid As`saf Dongoran said here on Tuesday.

The worst damaged areas were in the districts of Langkat, Serdang Bedagai, Asahan, Deli Serdang and Labuhan Batu, he said.

People living in coastal areas must be involved in the rehabilitation programs of mangrove because they had direct interests in the mangrove forest ecosystem, he said.

The quantity of fauna such as crabs, shrimp, and fish would significantly decrease when their habitat, namely mangrove forest, was damaged. And it would affect the economy of people living in coastal areas, he said.

"Therefore, the people living in coastal areas must be involved in the mangrove tree replanting program," he said.

Of 64,439 villages existing in Indonesia currently, around 4,735 villages are located in coastal lines. And about 60 percent of the country`s population are living in coastal areas.

"The number is quite potential to support the mangrove rehabilitation activities," he said. (*)


Read more!

Satellite images reveal Papua forest destruction

Michael Perry, Reuters 2 Jun 08;

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Thirty years of satellite imagery of Papua New Guinea's rainforests has revealed destruction on such a rapid scale that by 2021 most accessible forest will be destroyed or degraded, a study released on Monday said.

Papua New Guinea has the world's third largest tropical rainforest, after the Amazon and the Congo, and its government is seeking compensation for conserving its forests as carbon-traps to help reduce global greenhouse gases.

Papua New Guinea has allowed widespread logging of its forests and the new report, by the University of Papua New Guinea and the Australian National University, questions its commitment to saving rainforests in the mountainous South Pacific nation.

"Forests in Papua New Guinea are being logged repeatedly and wastefully with little regard for the environmental consequences and with at least the passive complicity of government authorities," said Phil Shearman, director of the University of Papua New Guinea's Remote Sensing Centre.

"Government officials may claim that they wish rich countries to pay them for conserving their forests, but if they are allowing multinational timber companies to take everything that's accessible, all that will be left will be lands that are physically inaccessible to exploitation and would never have been logged anyway," said Shearman.

Destruction of forests produces about 20 percent of man-made carbon dioxide emissions, so their conservation is vital to limiting rises in global temperatures.

The report, which measured PNG's forests from 1972 to 2002, found that accessible forests were being cleared at a rate of 362,000 hectares (895,000 acres) a year in 2001, or about 1.41 percent of the country's forests annually.

In 1972, PNG had 38 million hectares (94 million acres), of rainforest covering 82 percent of the country. Between 1972 and 2002, around 15 percent of its rainforests had been cleared.

In 2002, PNG's forests covered 33 million hectares (81.5 million acres), or 71 percent of the country's land mass, and supported 6 to 7 percent of the world's animal and plant species.

By 2021 an estimated 83 percent of accessible forest and 53 percent of PNG's total forests would be destroyed or severely damaged, said the report.

FORESTS NOT LIMITLESS

"Papua New Guinea is still one of the most heavily forested countries in the world," Shearman said in a statement.

"For the first time, we have evidence of what's happening in the PNG forests. The government could make a significant contribution to global efforts to combat climate change. It is in its own interest to do so, as this nation is particularly susceptible to negative effects due to loss of the forest cover."

The report said deforestation was occurring at the same rate in protected and unprotected areas and justified a significant reduction in logging in PNG.

Any new forestry programmes should involve small and medium-scale, locally-owned and managed operations where commercial activities are more likely to be environmentally sustainable, it said.

Minister for Forests Belden Namah said economic development had taken precedence over conservation in PNG, a developing nation that has struggled to prosper from its vast mineral wealth. Most of its 6 million population live subsistence lives in villages.

"Over the past decades we have imagined that our forests are limitless. If this report is the bitter pill that we need to swallow to ensure that we maintain our forests into the foreseeable future, so be it," Namah said in the report.

"If in 50 years, PNG is left only with scraps of forest inside national parks then we have all failed."

(Editing by Alex Richardson)

Half of Papua New Guinea's forests gone by 2021: study
Yahoo News 2 Jun 08;

Half of Papua New Guinea's forests will be lost or damaged in just over a decade, speeding up local climate change, unless logging is dramatically reduced, a study released Monday found.

The University of Papua New Guinea report, which used satellite images to show the loss in forest cover between 1972 and 2002, found that at current rates, 53 percent of forest was at risk of being destroyed by 2021.

The study, conducted in conjunction with the Australian National University, found that even in so-called conservation areas, trees were being logged or cut down by local subsistence farmers unabated.

"The unfortunate reality is that forests in Papua New Guinea are being logged repeatedly and wastefully with little regard for the environmental consequences and with at least the passive complicity of government authorities," the report's lead author Phil Shearman said in a statement.

Papua New Guinea has the world's third largest tropical forest but it was being cleared or degraded at a rate of 362,000 hectares (895,000 acres) a year in 2001, the report said.

Shearman said it was internationally recognised that tropical forests were "sink holes of jaw-droppingly large amounts of carbon".

"So the destruction of forest... releases that carbon into the atmosphere," he told AFP, adding raising carbon levels in the atmosphere had an impact on global warming.

"Papua New Guinea's forests are... of national and regional significance because of their carbon storage factors, they are critically important for the regional stability of our climate," he said.

"And they also hold probably somewhere between six and 10 percent of the world's biodiversity."

The report calls for a dramatic drop in logging -- or the consequences could be significant, Shearman said.

"If these trends are allowed to continue for the next 10 or 15 years it will result in significant major proportions of Papua New Guinea's forest being cleared or logged," he said.

Forests Minister Belden Namah said the government was already taking steps to review its policies towards the country's greatest natural resource.

"There's a need for rapid action to replace trees that have been cut," he said.

"And I believe for every tree that has been cut, we should plant three more new trees. That is one major policy I am looking at."

Namah acknowledged that commercial logging contributed 176 million US dollars to the national purse each year.

"But at the same time we understand that there needs to be control as to the logging activities in the country, there's a call for sustainable forest management," he told reporters via a telephone link.

The report said Papua New Guinea was still one of the most heavily forested countries in the world and it was not too late to act.

"For the first time, we have evidence of what's happening in the PNG forests," Shearman said.

"The government could make a significant contribution to global efforts to combat climate change. It is in its own interest to do so, as this nation is particularly susceptible to negative effects due to loss of the forest cover."

Papua New Guinea rainforest destruction
Nick Squires, The Telegraph 2 Jun 08;

The chopping down of Papua New Guinea's rainforests is happening much more quickly than previously thought, driven by Asia's insatiable demand for timber and one of the world's fastest growing populations.

Satellite imagery has revealed destruction on such a large scale that within 12 years most of the accessible forest in the south-east Asian nation will be destroyed or degraded, a study said.

Logging companies have been operating in the country for years but the exact extent of their encroachment on virgin forests was unknown.

Satellite monitoring now shows that the rate of deforestation is comparable to that in the Amazon and in the Congo Basin, said scientists from the University of Papua New Guinea and the Australian National University.

"The bad news is that it was previously thought that PNG had a very low or non-existent rate of deforestation and degradation," said Phil Shearman, director of the University of Papua New Guinea's Remote Sensing Centre.

"Our study is making it reasonably clear that's not the case - indeed PNG is losing its rainforest at rates comparable to that of the Congo and to that of the Amazon.

"Government officials may claim that they wish rich countries to pay them for conserving their forests, but if they are allowing multinational timber companies to take everything that's accessible, all that will be left will be lands that are physically inaccessible to exploitation and would never have been logged anyway."

Papua New Guinea's tropical rainforest - the world's third largest - is not only being logged by timber firms but also cleared for subsistence farming, in a country of 6m people with one of the highest population growth rates in the world.

In 1972, the former British colony's rainforests covered 94m acres, or 82 per cent of the country, satellite monitoring showed.

By 2002, that had fallen to 81m acres, or 71 per cent of the country's land mass.

At the current rate of deforestation, 83 per cent of accessible forest and 53 per cent of the country's total forests will be destroyed or severely damaged by 2021.

"So there's a much shorter time frame than anyone has previously realised," said Julian Ash, from the Australian National University, a co-author of the report.

The country's minister for forests, Belden Namah, said economic development had taken precedence over conservation and the report was a wake-up call.

"Over the past decades we have imagined that our forests are limitless.

"If this report is the bitter pill that we need to swallow to ensure that we maintain our forests into the forseeable future, so be it.

"If in 50 years, PNG is left only with scraps of forest inside national parks, then we have all failed."


Read more!

Indonesian military chief urges nature conservation authority to overcome man-elephant conflict

Antara 3 Jun 08;

Tapaktuan, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (ANTARA News) - A continuing conflict between rural farmers and wild elephants in two regions in South Aceh district has prompted the regional military commander to address an urgent request to the Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA) to send a team to the two places to overcome the problem.

"I have contacted the chief of the NAD provincial BKSDA and asked him to assign a team to deal with the wild elephant problem in Truman and East Trumon sub districts as soon as possible," Lt Col Erwin Septiansyah, commander of Military District 0107, said here on Monday.

He said the conflict between man and the protected animals could not be allowed to drag on as the elephants had already damaged or destroyed crops on tens of hectares of local farmers` cultivation fields and plantations, and even threatened local residents` safety.

"If the elephants` destructive activity is not stopped, the local communities will continue to suffer losses," he said.

The same request was made to NAD`s BKSDA by South Aceh District Chief Tgk Husen Yusuf who specifically asked the agency also to set up command posts in the two regions to monitor the wild animals` activity and even a wild life reserve in Trumon district.

"The behavior of a herd of elephants estimated to number 12 is causing great anxiety among the local people. The conflict between man and wild elephants in the region has existed for decades but it was never resolved conclusively," he said.

Meanwhile, according to a report from Alue Lhok village in East Trumon sub district, a few wild elephants on Sunday night almost harmed a 14-year-old elementary school student who was tending to his familiy`s durian plantation.

"The boy, Muyan, `was about to be attacked by the animals but fortunately he was able to escape by outrunning them," an East Trumon community leader, Jamadi, said.

Wild elephants recently also destroyed oil-palm trees and secondary crops in Naca, Ie Jeurneh, Pinto Rimba and Ladang Rimba villages in East Trumon sub district.

"What puzzles me is that the elephants have been living in areas where people reside for more than a month now but nobody among the local authorities seems to care," Jumadi said. (*)


Read more!