Gulf Dead Zone May Grow Larger Than Ever

LiveScience.com Yahoo News 15 Jul 08;

An annual dead zone that develops in the Gulf of Mexico could be larger than ever this summer, scientists said today.

The region, largely devoid of life, develops when an overgrowth of algae, fueled in part by agricultural runoff, robs the sea of oxygen, and other organisms can't survive.

The researchers are predicting the area could measure a record 8,800 square miles, or roughly the size of New Jersey. In 2007, the dead zone was 7,903 square miles. The largest dead zone on record was in 2002, when it measured 8,481 square miles. Researchers began taking regular measurements of the dead zone in 1985.

"The prediction of a large dead zone this summer is due to a combination of large influx of nitrogen and exceptionally high flows from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers," said Louisiana State University scientist R. Eugene Turner.

The low oxygen, or hypoxic, area is primarily caused by high nutrient levels, which stimulates an overgrowth of algae that sinks and decomposes. The decomposition process in turn depletes dissolved oxygen in the water. The dead zone is of particular concern because it threatens valuable commercial and recreational Gulf fisheries.

Research indicates that the nearly tripling of nitrogen levels into the Gulf over the past 50 years from human activities has led to a dramatic increase in the size of the dead zone, according to a statement released today by NOAA, parent of the National Weather Service.

"The strong link between nutrients and the dead zone indicates that excess nutrients from the Mississippi River watershed during the spring are the primary human-influenced factor behind the expansion of the dead zone," said Rob Magnien, director of the NOAA Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research. "This analysis will greatly inform the development of federal, state and local efforts to reduce the dead zone's size."


Read more!

China Gets Permission to Import Ivory From Africa

Laura MacInnis, PlanetArk 16 Jul 08;

GENEVA - China won the right at a UN wildlife meeting on Tuesday to import elephant ivory from Africa under strict conditions, a UN spokesman said.

Four countries -- Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe -- are permitted under a deal reached at The Hague last year to make one-off sales of registered ivory stocks.

"China was accepted as a trading partner to import ivory from the four authorised countries in southern Africa," said Juan Carlos Vasquez of CITES, or the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.

To gain permission, Beijing had to prove it had the capacity to fight illegal domestic trade in ivory, which is used mainly in jewellery and carvings.

The CITES committee agreed that the four countries would be allowed to sell a combined total of 108 tonnes of the raw ivory, which comes from elephants that died from natural causes or were killed in population-management programmes.

"That is the total that the four can sell, and they can sell that ivory to Japan or to China," Vasquez said, noting CITES members briefly considered then set aside the idea of reviewing Zimbabwe's allocation given the recent political turmoil there.

Japan had been previously approved as an importer of ivory from those government stockpiles.

Populations of elephants, the world's largest land mammals, are under pressure in many parts of Africa from poaching, loss of habitats to farms and towns, pollution and climate change.

But Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe and South Africa all say they have rising elephant populations, causing increasing conflicts with people in rural areas.

Under the CITES deal struck last year, the four are allowed to sell ivory from stockpiles that were registered on Jan. 31, 2007, and then are barred from seeking exports for nine years. The cash raised is used for conservation and local communities.

China has invested heavily in oil- and mineral-producing African countries in past years as its economic might has grown, and many Chinese companies are active on the continent.

Conservation groups WWF and TRAFFIC said China should pair its purchases with conservation awareness programmes to let Chinese nationals abroad know that it is illegal to buy and bring home ivory from Africa.

"The sight of ivory openly and illegally on sale in many African cities is likely to be a far more powerful encouragement to those contemplating poaching and smuggling, than a strictly controlled one-off sale," Susan Lieberman, director of WWF International's species programme, said in a statement.

"The only way to end elephant poaching is through an effective clampdown on illegal domestic ivory markets."

China gets ivory imports go-ahead
BBC News 15 Jul 08;

The UN has given China the green light to bid in a one-off sale of ivory.

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) voted in favour of China's request during a meeting being held in Geneva.

China joins Japan as approved buyers of government-owned ivory from South Africa, Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe.

In 2007, Cites authorised the four nations to sell off stockpiles of legally held elephant ivory.

In order to gain approval, China had to present evidence to members of the Cites standing committee that it had put in place measures to tackle any illegal domestic sales of ivory.

"China has acted rather successfully against its own illegal domestic ivory market," said Tom Milliken, a director for Traffic, the wildlife trade monitoring network.

"Now China should help other countries to do the same, especially in central Africa where elephant poaching is rampant."

But Robbie Marsland, UK director for the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw), condemned the decision, saying it could prove disastrous for the world's elephant populations.

"We are deeply disappointed that Cites has backed China as an ivory buyer, a decision that plays Russian roulette with wild elephants.

"Allowing new ivory to be imported into China will stimulate demand and create a smokescreen for illegal ivory to be laundered into the legal market, to be sold in stores or online to Chinese citizens or foreigners."

However, Mr Milliken said Cites monitoring systems would track whether the sale would lead to an increase in illegal ivory.

"Following the last one-off ivory sale under CITES in 1999, it is encouraging to note that the illicit trade in ivory progressively declined over the next five years," he explained.

"We hope a similar result is achieved this time."

Under an agreement reached in 2007, Cites gave permission for the four nations to make a single sale of all government-owned stocks of ivory that have been registered by January of that year.

South Africa declared the largest amount, making 51 tonnes available, while Botswana's stockpile was almost 44 tonnes. The other two countries declared much smaller amounts; Namibia total was just under 10 tonnes, and Zimbabwe stockpile was almost four tonnes.

In March and April, the Cites secretariat conducted audits in each of the four nations to ensure the ivory had been properly registered and had been obtained legally.

The 2007 agreement also stipulated that once the one-off sale had been completed, no further sales from these countries would be considered during a "resting period" of nine years that would begin as soon as the new sales had been completed.

China allowed to buy ivory from Africa
Paul Eccleston, The Telegraph 15 Jul 08;

China is to be allowed to buy ivory from African countries in a move which has infuriated conservation groups.

They say granting China permission to import ivory amounted to a death sentence on African elephants because it would fuel demand and encourage poaching.

The UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) meeting in Geneva voted in favour of China becoming a licensed importer. Britain was one of nine countries which supported the move.

It will allow China to bid for more than 100 tonnes of ivory stockpiled in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe through culling and natural deaths.

The African states say they need to sell the stockpiles to finance the conservation and management of their elephant populations but critics say it will give illegal traders the opportunity to launder poached ivory.

The trade in ivory was banned by CITES after poachers decimated African elephant populations by more than half - from 1.3m to 625,000 - in 10 years.

But the block on trade was partially lifted in 1999 when the four countries were allowed to auction tusks from elephants that had died of natural causes.

However only Japan was given partner status and allowed to buy ivory because it was deemed to have enough safeguards in place to prevent illegal trading.

Now, with a second auction sanctioned, China will be allowed to bid against Japan after CITES decided that she had sufficiently tightened trading rules.

China has the world's largest illegal ivory market, and is the single major destination for illegal ivory, mostly from elephants slaughtered in Africa.

The growing demand for ivory has driven up black market prices from $200 per kilo to $850 per kilo in the past four years providing a big financial incentive for poachers.

The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) said the amount of ivory on sale represented the deaths of more than 10,000 African elephants.

UK Director Robbie Marsland said: "We are deeply disappointed that CITES has backed China as an ivory buyer, a decision that plays Russian roulette with wild elephants.

"Allowing new ivory to be imported into China will stimulate demand and create a smokescreen for illegal ivory to be laundered into the legal market, to be sold in stores or online to Chinese citizens or foreigners."

IFAW said China's ivory trade controls and enforcement were woefully inadequate to police the ever-growing trade within its borders and that 110 tonnes of their legal stockpile has been "lost" indicating it was sold on illegal ivory markets.

Michael Wamithi, programme director for IFAW's global elephants programme, and former director of the Kenya Wildlife Service, said: "An estimated 20,000 elephants are slaughtered annually for the trade in their tusks.

"Many African elephant range states clearly do not have the capacity or resources to combat these massive attacks on their countries' wildlife heritage and the burgeoning markets in China are only fuelling these attacks."

The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) which exposes environmental crimes, said CITES had ignored appeals from other African nations not to increase pressures on their elephant populations which were already struggling with wars, instability, droughts and poverty.

EIA chairman Allan Thornton said: "We are stunned that the UK and EU have voted to risk the future of the world's elephant populations to garner favour with China.

"Responsibility for the poaching of 20,000 elephants in Africa each year will now lie with those who supported China obtaining legal ivory trade even though they continue to be the world's biggest destination for poached ivory."


Read more!

Brazil Seeks to Rein in Foreign Influence in Amazon

Raymond Colitt, PlanetArk 15 Jul 08;

BRASILIA - With Amazon deforestation accelerating, Brazilian politicians and senior officials are increasingly portraying foreign groups working in the forest as a threat to national security that need to be reined in.

Invading armies, theft of medicinal plants, spying and land grabs are among the specters being raised by officials in Brasilia to justify tougher measures such as limits on land ownership and restrictions on environmental groups' activities.

Nationalists, especially in military and intelligence circles, have long harbored conspiracy theories that foreigners are scheming to take Amazon resources.

But in recent months -- a period that has coincided with a spike in destruction of the world's largest forest -- they have become louder and more public.

Some legislators are concerned about foreign businesses buying land in the Amazon.

"The growing acquisition of land by foreigners in the Amazon is a threat to our national security, we need to impose restrictions now," Sen. Joao Pedro told Reuters.

The government accuses some non-governmental organizations of biopiracy -- stealing medicinal plants for pharmaceutical purposes -- but has provided little evidence.

The government said this month it could shut down foreign NGOs that fail to provide detailed accounts of their operations. They must register with half a dozen authorities, including the Federal Police, and reveal the qualifications and residence of their directors.

"We want to separate the wheat from the chaff," said Secretary of Justice Romeu Tuma Junior.

"The state has the right to demand that those wanting to operate in an area of national interest open their books publicly," said Tuma.

Conservationists say they are being scapegoated and worry about potential censorship.

"It's a first step toward ideological control of foreigners acting here," said Raul Telles do Valle of the social and environmental think tank ISA.

"These non-government organizations are sometimes a front for economic interests of hegemonic nations. They are predators and spies, seeking the biodiversity of our Amazon," retired Col. Manoel Soriano Neto, a former Army intelligence officer, told the government news agency.


DEFORESTATION RATE RISING

Critics say the growing opposition to foreign influence is a reaction to calls for more international intervention to combat deforestation.

Since August, the rate of deforestation has risen sharply after three years of declines. Figures released on Tuesday showed 423 square miles (1,096 square km) of forest were lost in May.

"There are cycles of xenophobia in Brazil; this one follows a new international spotlight on the Amazon," said Adrian Garda, Amazon program director with Conservation International.

"I've heard many accusations of biopiracy but seen no proof," said Garda, adding that his group won't follow the government's foreign NGO registration request because it considers itself Brazilian.

Brazil considers a large-scale foreign invasion of the Amazon as a possible, albeit remote, security threat, Defense Minister Nelson Jobim said in April.

In May, the Army chief for the Amazon warned that Brazil's borders were vulnerable to foreign incursions through tribal Indian territories, which harbored foreign aid workers.

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that foreign concerns over Amazon destruction from beef, soybean and ethanol production were attempts by rivals to undermine Brazilian exports.

Blaming foreigners may stem from frustration with Brazil's inability to control vast areas of its territory, some say.

"It's a scandal that foreigners can buy land in the Amazon without any state control," said Sen. Jose Nery of the northeastern Amapa state.

Critics say a nationalistic stance is good for politicians' poll numbers too.

"They're being populists, that wins votes," Valle said.

(Editing by Eric Beech)


Read more!

Thousands oppose UK eco-town project

Arable land will be destroyed, roads congested, say villagers
Mark Rice-Oxley, Straits Times 16 Jul 08;

IN LONDON - AN UNPRECEDENTED British project to build 10 'eco-towns' in rural settings across England over the next decade is running into vehement opposition from thousands of villagers who live close to the sites earmarked for construction.

Beset by a chronic housing shortage and a growing population, the government has signalled it wants to build the first new towns in Britain in 40 years to create up to 100,000 new homes by 2020.

Yet, mindful of the perennial controversy of despoiling pristine countryside with bricks and mortar, it has stipulated that developments must be carbon-neutral. Futuristic development plans include windmills and solar power, biomass heating facilities, car-free streets, and subterranean recycling chutes.

These, however, have not been enough to assuage the ire of rural dwellers who warn that the new towns will increase congestion on country roads, cover green arable land with concrete and struggle to attract homebuyers because of their remote location.

'This is completely the wrong site,' says Mr Pete Seaward of Weston, a village in Oxfordshire that has been shortlisted for an eco-town. He holds up a scenic picture of a local lake. 'If they're saying that it is 'eco' to build on and fill in a lake like that, they are dreaming.'

Mr Ron Field, the chairman of the parish council at Ford, another site on the shortlist, adds there is a huge local concern that this is just another ruse to allow developers to make money. 'They're building it on 242ha of greenfield land which is used for growing food crops to feed the people who live in our area, and it's all done as far as we can see for money.'

MPs opposed to eco-towns say such towns will situate people in remote areas far from their place of work, meaning commuter miles will shoot up - hardly very 'eco'. They add that communities will take a long time to become self-sustaining, as developers build the houses first but take much longer to add the schools, shops and other infrastructure.

They also warn that legal challenges will mount up, slamming the brakes on the schemes.

'My view is that one or two should be built as pilot projects to see what lessons can be learned,' says Mr Peter Luff, a Conservative MP.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's eco-town plan is perhaps his boldest, most original domestic policy since coming to office last summer.

Britain not only has a population that is growing once again; it has more single-occupancy households. House prices have soared in the past decade, and though the market is currently falling, prices are still well beyond the budget of most first-time buyers.

The hope is that by expanding supply, a new stock of affordable housing will become available. At least 30 per cent of eco-town housing must be offered at 'affordable' prices.

'There is a fundamental mismatch between supply and demand in the housing market, and the government is committed to addressing this in the long term by building more homes,' said a government spokesman.


Read more!

First U.S. Town Powered Completely By Wind

Andrea Thompson, LiveScience.com Yahoo News 15 Jul 08;

Rock Port, Mo. has an unusual crop: wind turbines.

The four turbines that supply electricity to the small town of 1,300 residents make it the first community in the United States to operate solely on wind power.

"That's something to be very proud of, especially in a rural area like this - that we're doing our part for the environment," said Jim Crawford, a natural resource engineer at the University of Missouri Extension in Columbia.

A map published by the U.S. Department of Energy indicates that northwest Missouri has the state's highest concentrations of wind resources and contains a number of locations that are potentially suitable for utility-scale wind development. The four turbines that power Rock Port are part of a larger set of 75 turbines across three counties that are used to harvest the power of wind.

"We're farming the wind, which is something that we have up here," Crawford said. "The payback on a per-acre basis is generally quite good when compared to a lot of other crops, and it's as simple as getting a cup of coffee and watching the blades spin."

And the turbines have another benefit besides produces clean energy: MU Extension specialists said that the Missouri wind farms will bring in more than $1.1 million annually in county real estate taxes, to be paid by Wind Capital Group, a wind energy developer based in St. Louis.

"This is a unique situation because in rural areas it is quite uncommon to have this increase in taxation revenues," said Jerry Baker, and MU Extension community development specialist.

Landowners can also benefit by leasing part of their property for wind turbines.

The turbines will also provide savings to rural electric companies and will provide electric service for at least 20 years, the anticipated lifetime of the turbines.

"Anybody who is currently using Rock Port utilities can expect no increase in rates for the next 15 to 20 years," Crawford said.

Baker added that the turbines could also attract tourists to the area.


Read more!

Unexpected consequences of global warming: kidney stones

Paul Simons, Times Online 16 Jul 08;

Climate change is having some unexpected consequences all over the world. In the Arctic, Inuit communities are seeing their first wasps, and radio broadcasts have been needed to caution about the hazards of trying to touch the wasps, which are flying farther north as the Arctic warms.

European brewers are facing a crisis as their traditional hops are wilting from drought and heat, and a programme has begun to make them more drought-tolerant.

The famous geysers of Yellowstone Park, Wyoming, are slowing down; Old Faithful’s regular eruptions have shifted by an extra 16 minutes in eight years. The reason is that the geysers’ water supplies are dwindling as the climate turns drier.

Perhaps the most unexpected impact of global warming is a rise in the number of kidney stones. These painful stones result from salts crystallising in the kidneys, often caused by dehydration.

The hotter the climate, the more cases of kidney stones occur and the southern US regions get around 50 per cent more cases than northern states. The number of cases has been rising since temperatures began to warm noticeably from the late 1970s. As the climate warms, the zone of high risk for kidney stones is expected to push northwards, and by 2050 an estimated 1.6 million new cases are predicted.

Climate change: Warming may cause increase in kidney stone cases, say US scientists
Elana Schor, The Guardian 15 Jul 08;

Endangered species. Economic decay. Extreme weather. The list of climate change's destructive costs is long, but US scientists today proposed adding one more: millions of new kidney stone cases.

The proven link between kidney stones and warm temperatures means that climate change could dramatically increase the number of US cases in the coming years, according to a study published today in the renowned journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The increased risk of kidney stones -- which come from painful mineral deposits in the urine -- could lead to as much as $1.3bn in increased medical bills by the year 2050, the team of Texas urologists behind the study estimated.

The study used two competing models to estimate the reach of new kidney stones brought on by global warming, using data from the UN intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC).

One model predicted a steady growth in new cases as global temperatures rise, and another predicted that new cases would plateau after temperatures reached 15 degrees Celsius.

The first model projected that stones would become more prevalent in the states of Texas, Florida, California, and the east coast of the US. The second model yielded the bulk of its new cases in the mid-west US, including 100,000 in Chicago alone.

The US would experience between 1.6m and 2.2m new kidney stone afflictions by 2050 under both scenarios.

Kidney stones will afflict 10% to 15% of the US population at a total treatment cost of about $2bn per year, according to previous scientific studies. Nearly double that number of cases has been reported in the Middle East, where temperatures are uniformly balmy.

The famously unbearable pain caused by passing a kidney stone through the body can cause nausea, vomiting, and blood in the urine.

But there is an easy way to decrease the risk of climate-induced stones, according to Dr Mark Litwin, a professor of urology and public health at the University of California in Los Angeles.

"The irony is, the cure is fairly simple," Litwin told Science News magazine. "Just drink more water."

Climate change to cause rise in kidney stones
Catherine Elsworth, The Telegraph 15 Jul 08;

Global warming could lay waste to vast tracts of the earth - and may also lead to more Americans suffering kidney stones, scientists have warned.

Kidney stones, which can be extremely painful, are often caused by dehydration as the body is unable to flush minerals out of the system.

Researchers say that as temperatures rise, the driest parts of the US could see a 30 per cent increase in kidney stone disease.

The study by University of Texas researchers predicts that warmer temperatures could extend America's existing "kidney stone belt", an area of the South East where men have been found to be twice as likely to develop kidney stones as in the North East.

The claims, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are based on existing data on kidney stone incidence and climate change projections made by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007.

The increase would represent between 1.6 million and 2.2 million cases by 2050, according to the study, potentially pushing annual treatment costs up to around one billion dollars.

"This study is one of the first examples of global warming causing a direct medical consequence for humans," said Margaret Pearle, professor of urology at University of Texas Southwestern and senior author of the paper.

"When people relocate from areas of moderate temperature to areas with warmer climates, a rapid increase in stone risk has been observed. This has been shown in military deployments to the Middle East for instance."

Tom Brikowski, the study's lead author, compared kidney stone rates with UN forecasts of temperature increases and created two mathematical models to predict the impact on future populations.

According to one set of data, the existing "kidney stone belt" comprising southeastern states such as Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee would grow to encompass over half the US population by 2050.

The other model predicts the increase would be concentrated in the upper Midwest.

The study adds that "similar climate-related changes in the prevalence of kidney-stone disease can be expected in other stone belts worldwide."


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 15 Jul 08


Seagrass monitoring on Labrador
more adventures on the labrador blog

International Coastal Cleanup Singapore workshop
on the Toddycats! blog

Yellow-vented Bulbul: A courtship behaviour
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Spitter
a rude but cute spider on the budak blog

Studying seagrasses in the US
on the teamseagrass blog


Read more!

Life at sea for KL-bred turtles

Sean Augustin, New Straits Times 15 Jul 08;

KUALA TERENGGANU: The green turtles carefully threaded their way down the beach before racing out to sea. Some were a little disoriented but not surprising, since it was their first experience in open waters.

The twelve 2-year-olds were raised in captivity at Aquaria KLCC, in Kuala Lumpur, along with 18 others, including hawksbill turtles, under a headstart project in 2006.

The marine turtle conservation project, called Turtles Can Fly, was developed by Aquaria KLCC and Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), with the BodyShop and Media Prima as official partners.

Aquaria KLCC managing director and chief executive officer Datuk Simon Foong said the project was to study the effects of raising turtles in captivity for the first two years.

"Will the turtles return to the same island where they were released? It is known they return to the beaches where they hatched. If this experiment works, we will consider releasing turtles at other sites, especially where there used to be recorded landings," he said after releasing the first batch of turtles in Chagar Hutang on Pulau Redang recently.

He said the next course of action would be determined by the data from the first batch of turtles. The next phase of the project is the satellite tracking of green turtles.

Foong also handed RM50,000 worth of Ultrasonic and American veterinary identification devices to UMT, used to track and identify turtles.

UMT Turtle and rehabilitation group project leader Professor Chan Eng Heng said: "Raising awareness of turtles is one of the most important aspects of conservation. People need to know what they need to protect.

"We will be distributing posters of turtles at dive centres so when divers spot them, they can report to us. This way, we will have an idea of where they are and how long they remain in the vicinity."


Read more!

Don’t worry, all plastic turtles have been retrieved

Letter from Ravindaran K P M
Chairperson, Parent Support Group,St Patrick’s School
Today Online 15 Jul 08;

I REFER to “Plastic turtles will do no one any good” (July 5), and would like to assure the writer that his concerns had been taken care of, prior to the Carnival By The Canal.

A net was placed across the canal to recover the turtle floats so that they can be reused for the next race. The floats are numbered and all 5,700 launched have been retrieved and accounted for.

St Patrick’s School (SPS) also conducted lessons emphasising the need to care for the environment weeks before the carnival.

The school has done its part in educating its students about the need to take care of the environment, especially turtles.

The money raised by the Parent Support Group (PSG) and the students of SPS, will be used to upgrade school facilities.

Air-conditioning the hall is necessary, as it is hot and uncomfortable.

The PSG agrees with the school that the air-conditioner should only be used for mass events and national examinations.

Returfing the field with artificial grass saves money and benefits students. Using natural grass means having to close the field anually to returf and costs thousands. Given proper maintenance, the field will last a long time without affecting the environment.


Read more!

First elephant life study takes off in Borneo

Yahoo News 14 Jul 08;

Wildlife researchers have fitted three Bornean elephants with satellite collars in Malaysia's Sabah state, marking the beginning of the first study of their "virtually unknown" social structure.

A conservation biologist in charge of the project said studies on the genetic aspects of the Bornean elephant have been carried out in the past but "we have yet to study their social structure which is virtually unknown."

"The collaring of the elephants is to enhance our access to them," said Nurzhafarina Othman, of the Danau Girang Field Centre.

"We will carry out actual observation and collect DNA information via the faeces of particular individuals," she said in a statement over the weekend.

But Nurzhafarina said the bulk of the four-year study in the Kinabatangan floodplain will be done with the Elephant Conservation Unit (ECU).

The ECU, founded to address the issue of human-elephant conflict in 2002, will spend hundreds of man-hours tracking these specific elephants for this landmark study, she said.

Sulaiman Ismail who heads the ECU said the study on the elephants would include ascertaining their mating system, assessing paternity within elephant groups and identifying alpha males.

This data in turn will assist the Sabah Wildlife Department (SWD) in managing the Kinabatangan elephant population.

"We are wildlife managers, the more information we have, the more efficiently we can manage the elephants," said Senthilvel Nathan, the department's chief field veterinarian.


Read more!

One-off ivory sale to China condemned as 'poaching smokescreen'

Jo Adetunji, The Guardian 14 Jul 08;

A controversial decision to allow China to buy stockpiles of African elephant ivory looks set to go ahead this week after monitors from the group Traffic said the country had cracked down on its illegal domestic trade.

But campaigners are vehemently opposed to the sale, saying it would provide a "smokescreen" for increased poaching.

The 108 tonnes of ivory have been collected from culls in overpopulated areas, natural deaths and seizures and are being offered for sale by Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe.

International trade in ivory has been illegal since 1989, but in 2006 the Convention for International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites), which oversees the ban, agreed a one-off sale.

Only Japan has been approved as a buyer so far and a sale date is yet to be determined. But there is consensus that the four African countries are holding out for China to be approved, a move that will lead to competition and hence higher prices.

China also has the recommendation of the Cites Secretariat which says that anti-smuggling initiatives by China, the largest blackmarket for illegal ivory, have been effective. Cites's standing committee, meeting in Geneva, will decide if China's controls on the illegal trade are stringent enough to prevent illegal ivory being laundered with stock from the sale or it being re-exported.

"In 2002, China was the principal driver of the illegal trade and made very few seizures," said Tom Milliken, director of eastern and southern African operations for Traffic, which monitors the trade and advises Cites.

"Now it has been making seizures left, right and centre. They've added 100 seizures this year alone. On the domestic front China has moved aggressively."

'Big problem'

The increase in seizures in the past six years has been dramatic. According to the Elephant Trade Information System (Etis), the world's largest database of elephant ivory seizures compiled by Traffic, China is now involved in around 63% of seizures. In 2002 the figure was 6%. Milliken said the contrast with some central African countries is stark: Nigeria has made 12 seizures in 20 years.

Milliken said that China was also cracking down on retailers and had developed systems of certification. "When we go back to stores we flagged up as having illegal ivory they aren't selling it anymore or have been closed down. Product identification cards come with items legally sold and for items over a certain amount you get a photo ID."

Dr Meng Xianlin, head of the Chinese delegation to the Cites meeting in Geneva, said China needed legal ivory to maintain ancient carving traditions. He accepted that Chinese demand for ivory presents a "big problem" for elephant conservation, but argues that "the stockpiles are a positive way to solve this problem."

He added: "There is high pressure to control the illegal trade and we have the mechanism to prohibit illegal ivory going into the legal channel." However, he conceded "we cannot guarantee 100%" effectiveness.

While those supporting approval of the sale believe that linking legal ivory supplies with China's huge demand will reduce poaching and illegal trade, wildlife conservation groups say it still stimulates demand and will have the opposite effect.

A spokeswoman for the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw) said that only a total ban on China's domestic trade would stem demand. "Any legal trade creates a smokescreen. Any allowance gives a chance for unscrupulous dealers. It's very difficult to know how old ivory is or where it comes from. [Controls] don't solve the problem," she said.

Illegal trade

Michael Wamithi, director of the global Elephants Programme at Ifaw added: "China is the single largest destination for illegal ivory and to accept them as an importer for these legal stocks will only sustain the rampant poaching that African nations are faced with today. We hope Cites puts the brakes on these sales which will undoubtedly prompt even further slaughter."

Mary Rice, head of campaigns for the Environmental Investigation Agency, which carries out undercover investigations into illegal wildlife trading, said it was admirable that China was making seizures. But she said that while the increased activity might satisfy the requirements for approval as a buyer of the stockpiled ivory, it was not enough to stop all illegal trade.

"We think [China] is making headway but it's still not sufficient," she said. "When a sweep of a market is made there are often announcements in advance. Lower end items have certificates but no pictures – there's no way of matching them to the product.

"It's open to abuse. The Secretariat say China has met all the demands but based on the market place we don't see that."

Milliken said the chances of a sale are high: "There's real motivation for this sale. Last July a nine-year rest period after the sale was agreed by Cites so the southern African countries are keen to get this done. I think a sale will go ahead within months of this decision."


Read more!

Leatherback turtles tagged to track movements

Paul Eccleston, The Telegraph 15 Jul 08;

New light has been shed on the mysterious lifestyle of the critically endangered Leatherback turtle.

Once they have entered the water minutes after hatching, male leatherbacks never set foot on land again and females come ashore only to lay eggs.

They are ocean voyagers who spend their lives on epic journeys of thousands of miles either in search of a mate or in pursuit of their jellyfish prey.

Now marine scientists have succeeded in tagging female turtles using satellite technology to track them across vast distances over a three year period.

It is hoped the insight into their nesting sites and their favourite sea routes will help conserve a species that has seen a 90 per cent population decline in two decades in the eastern Pacific.

The leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) is the world's largest living turtle and can grow to a monstrous size. The largest ever found was washed up dead on a beach in Wales and was more than three metres long and weighed 900 kilos.

But from the moment of birth the leatherback, which has a tough, oily skin rather than a hard shell, faces a battle for survival.

Eggs laid by females, normally on the same beach where she was born, often fall victim to collection before they hatch.

If the eggs hatch successfully the baby turtles are immediately involved in a life-or-death race to the ocean before they are picked off by predatory birds.

As tiny creatures swimming in vast oceans most fall prey to birds and other sea creatures. Only a handful of the hatchlings will survive to maturity when their biggest threat comes from man. Many drown as by product caught up in long-line fishing nets.

The results of the latest leatherback study by marine biologist Barbara Block and colleagues are revealed in PLoS Biology,

Forty-six females were electronically tagged during three field seasons at Playa Grande in Costa Rica, the largest known nesting colony in the eastern Pacific.

The leatherback is found in all tropical and subtropical oceans and its and its range extends well into the Arctic Circle. There are three major, genetically-distinct populations - the Atlantic Dermochelys population, often seen in British waters, is separate from the Eastern and Western Pacific versions.

The turtles who were tagged at their breeding ground were monitored heading south into the open ocean in search of food. They followed a migration corridor from Costa Rica, past the warm waters of the equator, and into the South Pacific Gyre, a vast, low-energy, low-productivity region.

The study, carried out from 2004 to 2007, revealed that the turtles were at the mercy of the ocean's power and their migration routes were influenced by the ocean's currents. But the scientists were able to identify the areas they used most.

The females only mate every two to three years and while protecting the nest sites is important it is also vital that their movement at sea is known so international management agreements can be put in place to protect them.

More information can be found at http://biology.plosjournals.org/

Leatherback Turtles' Newly Discovered Migration Route May Be Roadmap To Salvation
ScienceDaily 15 Jul 08;

With a name like "Leatherback Turtle" you might think the sea turtles could stand up to just about anything the ocean can throw at them, and for more than a hundred million years, they have. But tough, long-lived critters though they are, the population of leatherbacks in the eastern Pacific Ocean has plummeted by over 90 percent in the last 20 years.

Like many species that migrate across a vast ocean, pinpointing all the possible causes of their decline is difficult and figuring out where conservationists might be able to intervene on their behalf is hugely challenging. But a major effort to tag and track leatherbacks that nest on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica has yielded unprecedented insight into their behavior. While most sea turtles, including other populations of leatherbacks, have widely varied dispersal patterns as they fan out across the ocean from the beaches where they nest, the leatherbacks from the beaches at Playa Grande have been found to consistently follow a relatively narrow corridor out into the sea, past the Galapagos Islands and across the equator to an area in the South Pacific where they linger at length. This discovery could be the key to the leatherbacks' salvation.

"Given that the turtles seem to move in a predictable way from the nesting beach through the equatorial region from roughly February through April, we could potentially suspend fishing in certain areas while the leatherbacks are passing through that part of the eastern Pacific," said George Shillinger, doctoral candidate in biology at Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station.

By taking the new data correlating turtle movements with various environmental features along their route and comparing that with the timing of fishing activity in the different areas the turtles travel through, the researchers can pinpoint the times and places where turtles are at the highest risk-thus providing new opportunities for improved management of the leatherback population.

Shillinger is the first author of a paper published in PLoS Biology and part of a large team of biologists and physical and biological oceanographers from the United States, France and Costa Rica who worked on the multiyear study.

The leatherback tagging study is part of the Tagging of Pacific Predators (TOPP) program, which has tagged other animals including the white shark, bluefin tuna, black-footed albatross and elephant seal. TOPP is part of the Census of Marine Life, a global network of researchers in more than 80 nations engaged in a 10-year scientific initiative to assess and explain the diversity, distribution and abundance of life in the oceans.

Over three field seasons, from 2004 to 2007, Shillinger, co-author Bryan Wallace (Duke University and Conservation International) and a team from Playa Grande National Park outfitted 46 females on the beach with small tags that emitted signals that were picked up by satellites, enabling the team to track the turtles' location.

Shillinger and his colleagues worked with research oceanographers and co-authors Steve Bograd and Helen Bailey at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Daniel Palacios, also at NOAA but from the University of Hawaii. They examined turtle speeds and movements in relation to the distribution and strength of the equatorial current system and found that the turtles increased their speeds as they moved through high-energy areas.

But how much of the turtles' trajectory was from being pushed around by the currents and how much was the result of their own free will, they couldn't tell until French oceanographer and co-author Philippe Gaspar analyzed the data using a method he had developed to make that distinction. Once the effect of the currents had been factored out, the turtles were found to be consistently heading in a south-southwesterly direction.

Year after year, the track was remaining the same. Not only were the turtles heading in the same direction, they were actually trying to follow an even narrower path than the raw data showed. As Bograd put it, "They definitely had a place they wanted to go."

That place is the South Pacific Gyre, a vast region considered a relative desert among the world's oceans. So why go there if it's so barren?

"That's still a big puzzle as to why they choose to go to this region," Palacios said.

The only data available are satellite images showing the color of the sea. Researchers interpret greener water to be richer in chlorophyll, which is considered the foundation for the ocean food chain. Thus, the relative abundance of chlorophyll is inferred to indicate the relative richness of a fishery. Satellite images show very little green in the South Pacific Gyre.

But, satellites can only penetrate about 25 meters below the surface in the gyre. "Maybe the turtles are targeting something that is deeper in the water column," Palacios said.

"What are they doing there is a big question," Shillinger said. "Perhaps the tremendous water clarity may work to the advantage of these leatherbacks because they are visual predators," he said. "They can spot little specks of white out in the deep blue sea." Leatherbacks dine exclusively on gelatinous zooplankton, such as jellyfish.

Shillinger also said that there is a substantial longline fishery in that area, for bigeye and yellowfin tuna. "Obviously, the fish are eating something and it's something we're not picking up in chlorophyll signatures from satellite imagery," he said.

Given that leatherbacks have been recorded diving as deeply as 1,280 meters, they have ample choice as far as where in the water column they choose to feed. And considering that they can grow to over 6 feet in length and weigh up to 2,000 pounds, it seems like a safe bet that they're feeding on something.

The presence of the longline fishery in the South Pacific Gyre may be one of the reasons for the steep decline of the leatherbacks, according to Shillinger. Longliners going after fish such as tuna sometimes hook turtles. This unintentional bycatch can take a heavy toll on a species.

"What often happens with longliners is that it is just inconvenient to hassle with a turtle and they don't want to lose the hook, either, so what people will do is just cut the flipper off with a machete and just send the turtle away to die," he said. "A turtle without a front flipper is a dead turtle."

Shillinger said there may also be another reason for the leatherbacks' population crash, one not so obvious from their data.

There was one turtle that didn't follow the migration route to the South Pacific Gyre. Instead, it swam south along the coast of Central America, where it stayed for the entire time the tag was working, 588 days.

"It seems logical that turtles would want to move along the coast, because these are highly productive regions, where they don't have to work as hard to find food," Shillinger said. Even though only one of the 46 subjects of the study cruised the coastal areas, he said it might be a rare survivor of a larger population that used to swim in the coastal area, but could have been hit hard by human fishing pressure in the near shore areas. Gillnets and longlines are major threats to turtles in these areas.

Shillinger says they won't be able to answer that question until they have gathered more data, since very little current data exists about bycatch in these coastal fisheries. As the tags are designed to degrade and fall off, the researchers haven't been able to capture the turtles' movements beyond about two years. He suggests that turtles returning to Costa Rica from the South Pacific Gyre may turn out to be using the near shore habitats on their return.

Some progress in helping the leatherback population on the beaches of Playa Grande has already been made. Local villagers used to harvest the turtle eggs quite heavily, but owing to efforts on the part of pioneering leatherback researcher and coauthor Jim Spotila (Drexel University), the Leatherback Trust, and staff and volunteers from the Costa Rican Ministry of Environment and Energy, that practice has been halted locally. People who once collected eggs are now paid to protect them and tourists have been coming to see the turtles. "Turtle tourism has emerged as an alternative economy and now there is a real focus on protecting this beach," Shillinger said.

But, noting that there is still intense pressure to develop Playa Grande and that some illegal development is ongoing, Shillinger added, "This beach is more or less the last stand for nesting leatherbacks in the eastern Pacific, so if this beach goes, it's going to be a real blow."

Shillinger and his colleagues are cautiously optimistic about the impact their new data about the migration routes could have on bolstering the leatherbacks' survival rate.

"Being able to see these migratory corridors is something we only dreamed of when we started the project," said co-author Barbara Block, the Charles and Elizabeth Prothro Professor in Marine Sciences at Hopkins Marine Station. Block is one of the researchers on the TOPP team and is Shillinger's doctoral adviser.

The level of detail the researchers obtained about when the turtles are in a particular area along their route means it could be possible to have a major impact on reducing turtles lost at sea to bycatch just by temporary closures of certain areas. Temporary closures are likely to be much more palatable than long-term ones to the various nations and regulatory agencies that would have to agree on any closures for them to be effective.

And because the turtles' migration route crosses international boundaries, it is vital to have international cooperation.

"It is still at the early stage globally, putting together large transboundary, transnational plans for protecting highly migratory species like turtles," Shillinger said. "First and foremost, you need political will and a framework in which to operate." International conventions have produced agreements on the need to protect many endangered ocean species, and Shillinger said that as constituents become aware of the situation and lobby their politicians, governments slowly begin to take action. But the critical part is having solid science to serve as a basis for developing any agreements.

In his efforts to bring the plight of the leatherback populations in the Pacific Ocean to people's attention, Shillinger teamed up with Stanford MBA graduate Mark Breier to create and launch the Great Turtle Race, largely facilitated by TOPP and coordinated by the Leatherback Trust. In this educational project, a race among leatherback turtles across the Pacific Ocean is simulated using real data from the tagging project. This year's race, the second annual, ended in June and for the first time included data from leatherbacks that started from Indonesia, in addition to those starting from the Americas.

"I wouldn't write these turtles off. If we can inform and change fisheries practices with sound science and policy, then hopefully there will be a chance to conserve turtles and the ecosystems that they occupy," Shillinger said. "These turtles could be a really awesome flagship for conservation."

Major funding for this research was from support for the TOPP program (a field program of the Census of Marine Life), UNESCO and the Global Conservation Fund of Conservation International. Additional funding came from Drexel University, Goldring Biology Station, the Leatherback Trust and the supporters of the Great Turtle Race.


Read more!