Biofuels 200 times more expensive than forest conservation for global warming mitigation

mongabay.com 27 Aug 08;

The British government should end subsidies for biofuels and instead use the funds to slow destruction of rainforests and tropical peatlands argues a new report issued by a U.K.-based think tank.

The study, titled "The Root of the Matter" and published by Policy Exchange, says that "avoided deforestation" would be a more cost-effective way to address climate change, since land use change generates more emissions than the entire global transport sector and offers ancillary benefits including important ecosystem services.

"Preventing deforestation, promoting afforestation/reforestation and stopping peatland destruction are some of the cheapest and most effective ways of reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions," the authors write. "We propose the introduction of market mechanisms that can ensure investment is directed into these areas and a strategy to make this happen as quickly as possible."

"The prevention of deforestation and peatland destruction requires no technological development and little capital investment. This method of reducing GHG emissions is dramatically cheaper than all other mitigation technologies currently available—as low as US$0.1 per tonne of CO2," they continue.

"The economics is startling — if developed countries spent the same amount of money on preventing deforestation and the destruction of peatlands as they do on biofuel subsidies (US$15 billion), this would halve the total costs of tackling climate change. In addition to this, the protection of these habitats yields a plethora of valuable eco-system services, particularly in the poorest countries."

The report says that despite the benefits and the low costs, British government policy does not place any value on protecting forests and peatlands. Arguing that this is a mistake, the authors recommend a series of policy actions.

First and foremost, the report urges the British government to abandon its targets and subsidies for biofuels. Not only do biofuels distort food markets, they promote destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, resulting in greenhouse emissions. Further, biofuels are a costly and ineffective means for fighting climate change. The authors demonstrate this by comparing the cost and the emissions savings between potential avoided deforestation mechanisms and the U.K. government's Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation. They find that the biofuel initiative will save 2.6-3 million tons of carbon dioxide per year at a cost of £550 million ($1 billion), while a similar investment in preventing deforestation and peatland destruction could result in avoided emissions of 40-200 million tons of CO2 per year or a 50 times greater amount of avoided emissions. The savings would be equivalent to 37 percent of all UK carbon dioxide emissions for 2005.

Beyond a moratorium on incentives for biofuels, the authors recommend supporting efforts to reduce peatland destruction in Southeast Asia, especially Indonesia, where large tracts of peatlands are being drained and cleared for the establishment of oil palm plantations. The authors say that because of the high levels of carbon storage in peatlands, reducing their destruction is "one of the lowest-hanging fruits of climate change mitigation." The U.K. should exert political pressure on the drivers of deforestation while simultaneously offering financial carrots for reducing destruction. The report calls on the government to support capacity building — through financial support and technology transfer — in developing countries to prepare for avoided deforestation as well as seed-funding for pilot projects. The authors urge the establishment of a forest carbon market that would provide a "realistic price" for carbon that fully values the ecosystem services provided by healthy forests and provides a financing mechanism for conservation measures. The authors say credits should be generated both by reforestation and reducing deforestation and degradation and asks the British government to push for an international agreement that recognizes the role of avoided deforestation in future climate change mitigation.

"In the UK we can dramatically increase funding for forest and peatland projects domestically and with key partners, especially in Southeast Asia, as well as lobbying at an international level for the right global policies," Ben Caldecott, editor of the report, was quoted as saying by BBC News. "All this can be done within our current budget, by ending wasteful and damaging biofuel subsidies."


Read more!

Community project convincing builders to recycle waste

Construction waste makes up a much larger proportion of landfill than household rubbish. Is it time the drive to recycle shifted its focus?

Mel Poluck, The Guardian 27 Aug 08;

Richard Simpson's daily challenge is to persuade foremen on building sites to separate waste. The former architect is co-founder of the Brighton & Hove Wood Recycling Project, which has recycled nearly 6,000 tonnes of timber since it opened in 1998. All would otherwise have been buried or chipped.

The initiative was one of the first in Britain to take waste wood from building sites to be reused. From humble beginnings when he and a colleague lugged wood across town in a clapped-out camper van, the project has since become a model for community recycling.

"To building firms we were just a bunch of hippies," says Simpson. "But we were the first in the country to go to commercial building sites. The trick is to win over the foreman." And to have a steady stream of volunteers and staff, who between them have collected lab tables from Roedean school, stage sets, and timber from Brighton pier and English Heritage sites.

Grassroots projects such as this are playing an underrated but important role in diverting materials produced by construction from landfill. Simpson provides timber to customers as diverse as the Chelsea Flower Show, students and home improvers.

The project has become a model for community recycling nationwide. Simpson's co-founder, Richard Mehmed, has gone on to help establish 21 wood recycling projects in Cambridge, east London, Glasgow, Llandudno and Manchester, among others, using Brighton as a template.

These kinds of projects are making an impact but the task is herculean. Last week, the House of Lords science committee reported that householders account for 9% of the UK's waste annually. The construction industry, by contrast, generates 90m tonnes of waste a year, producing about 32% of the UK's total waste. Up to a third of construction materials end up in landfill and nearly 13% of materials delivered to building sites never get used.

The Lords called for councils to prioritise reducing waste from businesses, and argued that companies should be made responsible for the waste associated with their products. "We would like to see the VAT regime reformed so that products that have a long life-cycle, or can be easily and cheaply repaired rather than replaced, are made economically more attractive," said Lord O'Neill, who chaired the waste reduction sub-committee.

The threat of rising landfill tax, set to reach £48 per tonne by 2011, will certainly force construction companies to take waste seriously. "It can be difficult to persuade people of the moral argument behind recycling [but] when a business realises that it will affect them financially, they are likely to respond," says Zoe Le Grand, project manager at industry body Constructing Excellence. "Legislation is getting tighter. If they want to prepare their business for the future, they should get arrangements in place for recycling as soon as possible."

Some contractors have started to act. Taylor Woodrow ran a pilot plasterboard recycling scheme in 2005 resulting in recycling rates of 72% from its housebuilding programmes. And like many construction companies, Persimmon Homes' Anglia branch segregates waste materials into separate skips on site, with 300 tonnes of recyclate distributed monthly to metal, plastics and woodchip companies.

Skanska, one of the contractors for the £1bn Bart's and the Royal London hospitals' redevelopment, has during the project reached recycling rates of 99.6% - 50,000 tonnes. "A waste volume is agreed before we sign the contract," explains James MacMillan, the programme's environment manager. "If the trade contractor goes over that, they pay for the waste. The key is to prevent waste from coming to site in the first place, [by] reducing packaging and working with trade contractors. Segregation and waste management should be the last link in the chain."

Reuse of recyclate brought in from elsewhere is becoming more common. BAA's Terminal 5 construction at Heathrow reused more than 80,000 tonnes of materials. Crushed glass from local recycling banks was used to make site roads and around 30% of the concrete mix used for buildings, taxiways and aircraft stands was from a power generation byproduct, pulverised fuel ash.

For smaller building firms that do not have the resources to employ an environment manager, help is at hand. Guidance has emerged from the Waste and Resources Action Programme (Wrap) and the Environment Agency's NetRegs website.

The government, it seems, has woken up to the construction waste problem. Last April, the Environment Agency mandated site waste management plans for construction projects in England worth more than £300,000, in which, from the pre-construction stage onwards, firms must declare waste materials and how they will be disposed of. The agency says this will cut 100m tonnes of waste annually.

Last June, the Strategic Forum for Construction, an industry-cum-government body, launched the strategy for sustainable construction, declaring aims for 50% reduction of construction, demolition and excavation waste to landfill by 2012 compared with this year. In May, the Construction Resources and Waste Roadmap was published by a public-private consortium, proposing 10 actions. The report was funded by a body of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

But the outlook for agencies created by the government to encourage sustainable practice among business is beginning to look gloomy. In the next tax year, the government plans to cut funding for environmental advisory agency Envirowise by more than 50%, and the Market Transformation Programme, National Industrial Symbiosis Programme and Wrap will all see their budgets slashed, something the waste reduction sub-committee expressed "extreme disappointment" over.


Read more!

Arctic Ice Second-Lowest Ever; Polar Bears Affected

Deborah Zabarenko, PlanetArk 28 Aug 08;

WASHINGTON - Arctic sea ice shrank to its second-lowest level ever, US scientists said on Wednesday, with particular melting in the Chukchi Sea, where polar bears were recently seen swimming far off the Alaskan coast.

This year's Arctic ice melt could surpass the extraordinary 2007 record low in the coming weeks. Last year's minimum ice level was reached on Sept. 16, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Even if no records are broken this year, the downward trend in summer sea ice in the Arctic continues, the Colorado-based center said. Last year's record was blamed squarely on human-spurred climate change.

"No matter where we stand at the end of the melt season it's just reinforcing this notion that Arctic ice is in its death spiral," said Mark Serreze, a scientist at the center. The Arctic could be free of summer ice by 2030, Serreze said by telephone.

This year's data "primarily reflects melt in the Chukchi Sea off the Alaskan coast and the East Siberian Seas off the coast of eastern Russia," the center said.

The Chukchi Sea is home to one of the world's largest polar bear populations and also includes a vast area where the United States sold oil and gas rights worth US$2.66 billion last year.

On Tuesday, Arctic sea ice stretched over 2.03 million square miles (5.26 million sq km), which is less than the 2005 mark of 2.05 million square miles (5.32 million sq km), set on Sept. 21 of that year, the center's analysis found.

The record drop in 2007 left a minimum ice cover of 1.59 million square miles (4.1 million sq km). The fabled Northwest Passage was open for the first time in memory.

Government scientists reported seeing at least nine polar bears swimming in open water over a six-hour period on Aug. 16, including one more than 50 miles (80 km) offshore, World Wildlife Fund officials said.


LONGER SWIMS FOR POLAR BEARS

That represents a huge increase over previous sightings, said Margaret Williams of the fund's Alaska office. A total of 12 polar bears were spotted in open water between 1987 and 2003, Williams said in a telephone interview.

In 2004, she said, four drowned bears were observed.

"Unfortunately it's what we might expect to see if bears are forced to swim longer distances," Williams said. "The Arctic is gigantic. When you have nine bears sighted in one transect (route) ... one can assume that there are likely a lot more bears swimming in open water."

She noted that bears are capable swimmers and rely on sea ice as platforms for hunting seals, their main prey. If relegated to land, bears have little to hunt and sometimes feed on carrion or garbage and can be a threat to humans.

As more Arctic ice melts, bears are forced to swim longer distances to find adequate platforms for hunting. Rescuing bears in distress in open water is problematic, Williams said: tranquilizing the bears sends them into the water to drown.

The US government in May listed polar bears as a threatened species because their icy habitat was disappearing, but offered no plans to address climate change or drilling in the Arctic for fossil fuels that spur the climate-warming greenhouse effect.

Summer ice melt in the Arctic is seen as a strong indicator of climate change, and feeds on itself in what scientists call a positive feedback loop where warming exposes dark sea water, which absorbs more solar radiation than the white ice.

Arctic sea ice is sometimes dubbed Earth's air conditioner for its ability to moderate world climate. In the last decade, this ice has declined by roughly 10 percent. (Editing by Sandra Maler)

Arctic sea ice drops to 2nd lowest level on record
Seth Borenstein and Dan JOling, Associated Press 28 Aug 08;

More ominous signs Wednesday have scientists saying that a global warming "tipping point" in the Arctic seems to be happening before their eyes: Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is at its second lowest level in about 30 years.

The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that sea ice in the Arctic now covers about 2.03 million square miles. The lowest point since satellite measurements began in 1979 was 1.65 million square miles set last September.

With about three weeks left in the Arctic summer, this year could wind up breaking that previous record, scientists said.

Arctic ice always melts in summer and refreezes in winter. But over the years, more of the ice is lost to the sea with less of it recovered in winter. While ice reflects the sun's heat, the open ocean absorbs more heat and the melting accelerates warming in other parts of the world.

Sea ice also serves as primary habitat for threatened polar bears.

"We could very well be in that quick slide downward in terms of passing a tipping point," said senior scientist Mark Serreze at the data center in Boulder, Colo. "It's tipping now. We're seeing it happen now."

Within "five to less than 10 years," the Arctic could be free of sea ice in the summer, said NASA ice scientist Jay Zwally.

"It also means that climate warming is also coming larger and faster than the models are predicting and nobody's really taken into account that change yet," he said.

Five climate scientists, four of them specialists on the Arctic, told The Associated Press that it is fair to call what is happening in the Arctic a "tipping point." NASA scientist James Hansen, who sounded the alarm about global warming 20 years ago before Congress, said the sea ice melt "is the best current example" of that.

Last year was an unusual year when wind currents and other weather conditions coincided with global warming to worsen sea ice melt, Serreze said. Scientists wondered if last year was an unusual event or the start of a new and disturbing trend.

This year's results suggest the latter because the ice had recovered a bit more than usual thanks to a somewhat cooler winter, Serreze said. Then this month, when the melting rate usually slows, it sped up instead, he said.

The most recent ice retreat primarily reflects melt in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska's northwest coast and the East Siberian Sea off the coast of eastern Russia, according to the center.

The Chukchi Sea is home to one of two populations of Alaska polar bears.

Federal observers flying for a whale survey on Aug. 16 spotted nine polar bears swimming in open ocean in the Chukchi. The bears were 15 to 65 miles off the Alaska shore. Some were swimming north, apparently trying to reach the polar ice edge, which on that day was 400 miles away.

Polar bears are powerful swimmers and have been recorded on swims of 100 miles but the ordeal can leave them exhausted and susceptible to drowning.

And the melt in sea ice has kicked in another effect, long predicted, called "Arctic amplification," Serreze said.

That's when the warming up north is increased in a feedback mechanism and the effects spill southward starting in autumn, he said. Over the last few years, the bigger melt has meant more warm water that releases more heat into the air during fall cooling, making the atmosphere warmer than normal.

On top of that, researchers were investigating "alarming" reports in the last few days of the release of methane from long frozen Arctic waters, possibly from the warming of the sea, said Greenpeace climate scientist Bill Hare, who was attending a climate conference in Ghana. Giant burps of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas, is a long feared effect of warming in the Arctic that would accelerate warming even more, according to scientists.

Overall, the picture of what's happening in the Arctic is getting worse, said Bob Corell, who headed a multinational scientific assessment of Arctic conditions a few years ago: "We're moving beyond a point of no return."

Science Writer Seth Borenstein reported from Washington and Dan Joling reported from Anchorage, Alaska. AP writer Arthur Max contributed from Accra, Ghana.


Read more!

Mystery of Greenland's Ice Lingers as Sheet Shrinks

Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience.com 27 Aug 08;

Scientists have cautioned that a warming planet could melt Greenland's vast ice sheet, a potentially catastrophic event that would raise sea levels and inundate coastal communities around the globe.

Yet while they puzzle over when and whether this might happen, they're also mystified over how the giant island formed so much ice in the first place. Greenland's ice sheet is the second largest in the world, behind only Antarctica.

Strangely, other parts of the globe at similar latitudes, including northern Canada and Siberia, don't have year-round patches of ice anywhere near as extensive or thick.

A new study finds that a mysterious drop in greenhouse gases around 3 million years ago allowed Greenland's ice to proliferate. The research could help with forecasts about the fate of the ice and the potential for rising seas.

Why it matters

If all of Greenland's ice were to melt, perhaps as quickly as in a few centuries, seas would rise 21 feet (6.5 meters) all around the planet, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. And already, an alarming melt is under way there, other studies find. In 2007, the ice melted at a rate of 150 percent of the average going back to 1988.

Recent studies have found that as the ice melts more rapidly, water pours through fissures and gets under glaciers, acting like a lubricant to allow the ice to race ever-faster toward the sea. In addition, when snow melts at high altitudes and then refreezes, it can absorb up to four times more sunlight, creating even more melting the next year.

Some scientists fear a snowball effect could exacerbate the ice sheet's disintegration in as little time as a matter of decades.

But given a lack of understanding about the mechanisms, and questions about how warm the planet will get and how much ice will melt, scientists' estimates for the extent of sea-level rise by the end of this century range from just inches to perhaps 6 feet or so.

The new study

Around 3 million years ago, there was an increase in the amount of rock and debris deposited on the ocean floor around Greenland. The stuff must have been deposited by ice that had originated on land and then become icebergs, indicating that large amounts of ice on Greenland only began to form around that time, scientists say.

"Prior to that, Greenland was largely ice-free and probably covered in grass and forest," said Dan Lunt of the University of Bristol in England. "Furthermore, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were relatively high. So the question we wanted to answer was why did Greenland become covered in an ice-sheet?"

Theories abound, from changes in ocean circulation to changes in the Earth's orbit or tectonic uplift of the planet's surface. Another idea is that atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations changed. Lunt and his colleagues used computer models of climate and ice sheets to test the theories.

Each theory got some support. But the only one producing effects large enough to explain the current reality was that carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that acts like a blanket to keep heat in and warm our world, fell to levels closer to those of pre-industrial times.

The research, funded by the British Antarctic Survey, is detailed in the Aug. 28 issue of the journal Nature.

What it means

Here's the really interesting part: When Greenland was ice-free, carbon dioxide was at 400 parts per million by volume in the atmosphere, Lunt explained via email. The level was 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution. Now it has climbed back to 385 ppm.

Next year, Lunt and colleagues plan to publish a study that applies their finding to the question of what this means for the future of the ice and the potential for higher sea levels. For now, he told LiveScience, "The work does certainly indicate that the ice sheet is sensitive to changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations."

The study does not answer why Greenland got covered in ice but other northern locales did not. Lunt has an idea, however:

"The answer is most likely related to the fact that underneath the ice on Greenland are some high-altitude mountains on the east coast, which are high enough to be cold enough that ice can form, which then flows slowly down the slopes and eventually covers the entire island," Lunt explained. "In certain time periods [for example about 20,000 years ago], when the Earth's orbit is aligned in a certain way, ice does start to form in Canada and Siberia - for example in the last Ice Age."

Yet another big question has now been raised: Why did elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations fall so dramatically 3 million years ago?

Lunt's colleague, Alan Haywood of the University of Leeds, tackles that one: "That is the million dollar question which researchers will no doubt be trying to answer during the next few years."


Read more!

Poor Nations Need US$130 Bln a Year On Climate - WWF

Alister Doyle, PlanetArk 28 Aug 08;

ACCRA - Rich nations will need to provide about US$130 billion a year by 2030 to help developing countries cope with climate change, or about five times current flows, the WWF conservation group said on Wednesday.

A WWF study showed that there were 16 funds, run by UN agencies, the World Bank and others, channelling money to poor nations to help them curb rising greenhouse gases and adapt to effects of warming such as droughts, floods and rising seas.

But a big worry was that Africa, the poorest continent and among the most vulnerable to a changing climate, was getting only fractional amounts. Africa might get further left behind with a trend towards funds managed outside the UN system.

"Currently there is something like US$25 billion available for developing countries," said Donald Pols, head of international finance for the Geneva-based WWF group.

"The estimated need in 2030 would be about US$130 billion a year. So there is still a gap of US$105 billion," he told Reuters. "Only a small fraction is going to Africa," he said.

The data in Pols' study was based on calculations by Germany's Wuppertal Institute think-tank.

Most finance now comes from the UN's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), under which rich nations can invest in cutting greenhouse gases in poor nations and claim credits back home.

That is generating billions of dollars in carbon dioxide credits from projects such as wind farms in India or refrigerant factories in China which are destroying powerful greenhouse gases.

"Most money is going to the large developing countries, China, India and Brazil," Pols said, adding it was good in many ways that funds were diversifying from the United Nation.

"But there is a danger that the UN process will be sidelined by hard cash," he said. Companies have so far found few market opportunities in Africa, partly because poor countries emit the least greenhouse gases.

"Africa has a voice in the UN system. Africa does not have a voice in the market," he said. Of the 16 funds, 14 were set up in the past 18 months alone.

Pols also said that for every 24 dollars going to help curb greenhouse gas emissions only one dollar was going to help countries adapt to impacts of climate change, ranging from heatwaves that disrupt farming to rising seas.

"In Africa, the type of projects that need to be funded is access to water, agriculture, so you can produce food with less water," he said.(Editing by Dina Kyriakidou)


Read more!

Baltic states failing to protect most damaged sea

WWF 27 Aug 08;

Nine Baltic sea states all scored failing grades in an annual WWF evaluation of their performance in protecting and restoring the world’s most damaged sea.

The assessment, presented today at the Baltic Sea Festival, graded the countries on how well they are doing in six separate areas - biodiversity, fisheries, hazardous substances, marine transport and eutrophication - and on how they have succeeded in developing an integrated sea-use management system.

The best grade (an F for just 46 per cent) was received by Germany, followed by Denmark (41 per cent) and the worst were Poland (25 per cent) and Russia (26 per cent).

“It is a shame no country could be given a satisfactory total score,” said Lasse Gustavsson, CEO of WWF Sweden. “The Baltic Sea is influenced by a multitude of human activities, regulated by a patchwork of international and national regulations and authorities.

“What the Baltic Sea needs now is political leadership that can look beyond national or sectoral interests and take an integrated approach to solving the problems.”

Behind the bad overall scores there were some rays of hope. Germany received an A on the biodiversity score for their protection of marine areas with around 40 per cent of the country’s sea areas protected.

Latvia and Lithuania have taken measures to combat illegal fishing of cod, partly by giving inspectors the mandate to impose sanctions on site. Estonia has a narrow lead in lowering the impact of hazardous substances.

Also at the festival WWF awarded Tarja Halonen, president of the Republic of Finland, with the Baltic Sea Leadership Award for “her persistent efforts to unite groups and encourage cross-border discussions on the future of the Baltic Sea”.

Finland is the only country in the region that has developpoed a cross-sectoral marine policy and several other countries are now taking steps to review their marine management.

“We now have an opportunity in the area of sea-use management with two current processes on the European level,” said Vicki Lee Wallgren, programme manager for WWF’s Baltic Ecoregion Programme.

She said initiatives such as the EU’s Maritime Policy and the EU Baltic Sea Strategy meant that “there is hope for the Baltic Sea”.

The poor state of the Baltic Sea environment has received attention this summer because of the extensive algal blooms caused by eutrophication and for recent scientific reports on the vast “dead zones” on the sea bottom. Seven of the world’s 10 biggest dead zones, where nothing can survive due to lack of oxygen, are found in the Baltic Sea.


Read more!

California officials planning to harvest ocean's fishing litter

300 pounds of discards snared near 3 county piers
By Michael Gardner, signonsandiego.com 26 Aug 08;

SACRAMENTO – The state is preparing to launch a fishing expedition, but it's not angling for tuna, squid or flounder.

In this case, the catch is tons of fishing equipment lost or discarded in the ocean every season, posing serious danger to marine life.

“I know what we have out there. I cannot dive without seeing abandoned gear. It's everywhere,” said Richard Rogers, president of the California Fish and Game Commission.

The fishing lines, hooks, nets, crab pots and lobster traps are blamed for killing or maiming whales, dolphins, otters, pelicans and other wildlife.

Limited pilot programs in the last few years netted 11 tons of fishing equipment from around the Channel Islands and a combined 300 pounds off the Oceanside, Ocean Beach and Imperial Beach piers.

Those numbers convinced the state that more aggressive action is needed, starting with a $400,000 collection program off the coast from Point Conception near Santa Barbara to Pigeon Point south of Half Moon Bay.

State officials hope to broaden the recovery program to take in the entire coast, target more piers and move inland to retrieve equipment from recreational fishing lakes.

In a demonstration of the danger posed by the gear, officials this month were forced to temporarily ban fishing from piers in the Capitola area when 90 endangered brown pelicans suffered injuries after becoming entangled in fishing lines while feasting on anchovies.

The Wildlife Conservation Board, a project-financing arm of the state Department of Fish and Game, is set to award funding for the fishing gear retrieval program today. If approved as expected, it will mark the first time in at least a half-century that the board has extended its reach into ocean waters, said Dave Means, assistant executive director of the board.

“We're just dipping our toes in,” Means said.

The SeaDoc Society, which is affiliated with the University of California Davis, will take the lead as part of its program to protect marine life in the Pacific Northwest.

The SeaDoc Society conducted a smaller project off the Channel Islands in 2006 and 2007, using volunteer divers to retrieve 552 pieces of gear, including 248 commercial lobster traps and three purse seine nets – large walls of netting that encircle schools of fish.

Commercial gear is not the only threat. Over those two years, SeaDoc divers salvaged 1,400 pounds of recreational fishing equipment, including more than 1 million feet of line off 15 public piers statewide. At San Diego County piers, the catch of discarded equipment yielded 131 pounds at Oceanside, 112 pounds at Imperial Beach and 60 pounds at Ocean Beach.

“It's like a jungle of fishing line around those piers,” Means said.

To encourage proper disposal, the SeaDoc Society is planning to install recycling bins on selected wharves so anglers have a convenient place to discard tangled line.

The dangers posed by lost or dumped equipment are well-documented, according to Kirsten Gilardi, executive director of the SeaDoc Society and a UC Davis veterinarian.

On average, she said, one in 10 of the pelicans and shorebirds brought into wildlife rehabilitation centers are treated after becoming entangled in lines, swallowing hooks or otherwise being injured by fishing gear. Last year, there were several confirmed cases of humpback and gray whales tangled in lines or nets.

From 2001 to 2006, more than 250 endangered brown pelicans were admitted to San Diego-area rehabilitation centers with fishing gear-related injuries, Gilardi said.

In her annual report and in an interview, Gilardi detailed the threats.

“Abandoned nets drown marine mammals. Hundreds of coastal birds suffer injury when they become entangled in fishing line or when they ingest hooks,” she said in the report. “Marine mammals, including the federally threatened southern sea otter, (are injured or killed) with wounds from entanglement, or with obstructed or perforated intestines from swallowed hooks and line.”

Additionally, many abandoned lobster traps contain bait, luring animals to their deaths, she said.

Wildlife species are not the only victims; boaters, surfers and anglers are also at risk, Gilardi said.

“Boaters catch ropes attached to lost traps and pots or discarded monofilament line around their propellers; surfers are injured running into lost gear underwater that 'reefs' up in breaking waves. As well, lost gear clutters legal fishing grounds, affecting fishermen's ability to safely and efficiently deploy their own gear, and in some cases damaging their nets,” she said.

After using divers at depths to 105 feet, SeaDoc is looking to deploy remote-operated vehicles in deep waters, Gilardi said. The specially designed craft would be outfitted with cutting instruments to remove lines and nets from the seabed.

Rogers, the fish and game commissioner, said abandoned traps, lines and hooks in ocean waters or on the seabed remain a long-term threat until they become encrusted.

“Until then,” he said, “the gear will continue fishing and the fish will continue to die needlessly.”


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 27 Aug 08


White-winged Tern: Hunting technique
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Kampong Buangkok Videos
from Singapore's Heritage, Museums & Nostalgia blog

Fruit trees at Yishun Park
on the seen this scene that blog

Clown anemonefishes need rainforests
on the wild shores of singapore blog

How do parasitic clams get into a fish?
a scary alien invasion move on the other 95% blog

How to photograph jellyfishes for identification
jellyfishes are not just blobs (apparently) on the wild shores of singapore blog


Read more!

Cut greenhouse gases to save coral reefs: scientists

Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters 27 Aug 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - To keep coral reefs from being eaten away by increasingly acidic oceans, humans need to limit the amount of climate-warming greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, a panel of marine scientists said on Wednesday.

"The most logical and critical action to address the impacts of ocean acidification on coral reefs is to stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration," the scientists said in a document called the Honolulu Declaration, for release at a U.S. conference on coral reefs in Hawaii.

Ocean acidification is another threat to corals caused by global warming, along with rising sea levels, higher sea surface temperatures and coral bleaching, the scientists said.

Coral reefs are a "sentinel ecosystem," a sign that the environment is changing, said one of the experts, Billy Causey of the U.S. National Marine Sanctuary Program.

"Although ocean acidification is affecting the health of our oceans, the same thing -- increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere -- is going to in fact be affecting terrestrial environments also," Causey said by telephone from Hawaii.

Coral reefs offer economic and environmental benefits to millions of people, including coastal protection from waves and storms and as sources of food, pharmaceuticals, jobs and revenue, the declaration said.

But corals are increasingly threatened by warming sea surface temperatures as well as ocean acidification.

Oceans are getting more acidic because they have been absorbing some 525 billion tons of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide over the last two centuries, about one-third of all human-generated carbon dioxide for that period.

The carbon dioxide combines with sea water to form carbonic acid.

Marine researchers have long recognized acidification in deep ocean water far from land, but a study published this year in the journal Science found this same damaging phenomenon on the Pacific North American continental shelf from Mexico to Canada, and quite likely elsewhere around the globe.

The water became so corrosive that it started dissolving the shells and skeletons of starfish, clams and corals.

Stabilizing carbon dioxide emissions was the Honolulu Declaration's top long-term recommendation. The key short-term recommendation was to nurture coral reefs that seem to have natural resilience against acidification.

This could be adopted immediately by managers of protected marine areas, Causey said.

The Honolulu Declaration will be presented to the United Nations and to other global, regional and national forums.


Read more!

Haze risk returns as fires increase in Indonesia

mongabay.com 26 Aug 08;

The number of forest fires burning in Indonesia is increasing, raising concerns for the potential return of choking haze to the region.

NASA satellite imagery released Tuesday reveals hundreds of "hot spots" burning in Sumatra, Kalimantan (on the island of Borneo), and southern Papua (on the island of New Guinea). The fires are set annually by landowners seeking to clear scrub and forest for the establishment of plantation crops, especially oil palm, which is used for making palm oil. In dry years the fires can burn for months, spreading into pristine rainforest areas and releasing large volumes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

AFP reports the number and intensity of fires this month has led authorities to declare the official start of the fire season in Indonesia. Officials are worried that fires could be worse than average this season due to the unusually dry year.

The fires will be closely monitored by Indonesia, its neighbors, and environmentalists due to the wide-ranging impacts of previous burning seasons. Fires in some years have caused tens of billions in health and economic damages while releasing as much as two billion tons of carbon dioxide. Fires in peat swamps are a particularly large source of emissions.

Under an agreement with Singapore and Malaysia, Indonesia has pledged to reduce the number of hotspots by 50 percent by 2009, 75 percent by 2012, and 95 percent by 2025. 144,000 hotspots were recorded in Sumatra in 2006, although the number feel to 35,000 in 2007 due to wetter conditions.

NASA reports that the environmental group WWF will be using MODIS satellite data to track the Indonesian government's progress in controlling fires. MODIS data will be provided via the University of Maryland's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS), an alert system that tracks hot spots in real time.

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors flying on both the Terra and Aqua satellites detect fires by the heat they produce. Fire locations from MODIS for the week of August 4, 2008, are marked with red dots in the image above. The fire locations are overlaid on the NASA Blue Marble background.

Officials were concerned that fires during the 2008 season could be more intense than normal because the dry season had been especially dry. The lower image confirms the drought. Made with data collected by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite, the image shows rainfall measurements for July 2008 compared to average measurements. Areas that received more rain than average are blue, while regions that received less rain are brown. Sumatra and southern Borneo were dry through the month.

NASA images created by Jesse Allen, using fire data provided courtesy of the MODIS Rapid Response team, and TRMM rainfall data from the TRMM Science Data and Information System at Goddard Space Flight Center. Caption text by Holli Riebeek.


Read more!

NEA conducting study on specific sources of pollution of beaches

Julia Ng, Channel NewsAsia 26 Aug 08;

SINGAPORE: The National Environment Agency (NEA) is undertaking a detailed consultancy study to better understand the specific sources of pollution affecting beaches in Singapore.

In a written reply to a parliamentary question filed by Pasir Ris Punggol GRC MP Charles Chong, Minister for Environment and Water Resources Yaacob Ibrahim said the study is expected to be completed early next year.

The NEA introduced new guidelines for recreational water quality at the end of July. Based on these guidelines, Pasir Ris beach was assessed to be unsuitable for primary contact activities such as swimming, water-skiing and wakeboarding.

Dr Yaacob explained that some of the causes behind the high enterococcus microbial indicator include storm water runoff, riverine activities, indiscriminate discharges from industries and construction sites, and even non-domestic activities in the open seas.

He said the NEA will regularly collect and analyse water samples at popular recreational beaches.

The grading of beaches will be reviewed annually with advisories updated as necessary on their suitability for swimming and other primary contact activities. - CNA/vm


Read more!

The man who saw the future

In the 1970s, visionary architect Paolo Soleri built an extraordinary eco-city in the Arizona desert. Did it work? Steve Rose tracks down a guru who now finds himself back in demand

Steve Rose, The Guardian 25 Aug 08;

The round window in the Crafts III building at Arcosanti, the eco-city that Paolo Soleri built in the Arizona desert in the 1970s

The round window in the Crafts III building at Arcosanti, the eco-city that Paolo Soleri built in the Arizona desert in the 1970s. Photograph: GE Kidder Smith/Corbis

Wind-bells tinkle and cypresses sway in the breeze. The sun casts sharp shadows across an undulating landscape. There are strange concrete forms everywhere: giant open vaults, painted half-domes with strange crests, an amphitheatre ringed by buildings with giant circular openings, little houses sunk into the hillside. Healthy-looking, vaguely hippy-ish people, young and old, stride about in dusty jeans and T-shirts. Beyond are the scrub-covered hills of the Sonoran desert.

This not your typical American settlement. In fact, it's not your typical Earth settlement. For one thing, there are no cars or roads. Everything is connected by winding footpaths. Nor are there shops, billboards, or any other garish commercial intrusion. It looks like the set of a sci-fi movie designed by Le Corbusier. Round the next corner, you might expect to bump into Luke Skywalker, or Socrates, or a troupe of dancers doing Aquarius.

This is Arcosanti, 70 miles from Phoenix, Arizona. It's a curious taste of what an environmentally friendly US town could look like, but probably never will. It was designed by Paolo Soleri, an Italian-born architect, who originally came to Arizona to work for Frank Lloyd Wright, but soon set off on his own idiosyncratic path.

Soleri is a genuine visionary architect. In the early 1970s, his designs and fantastical writings made him a big-hitter in architectural circles, up there with other postwar sci-fi modernists such as Buckminster Fuller. Then he all but disappeared, becoming, for the past 30 years, little more than an obscure curiosity. Yet today, as the world wakes up to the grim realities of climate change, peak oil and sustainability, Soleri's path looks less idiosyncratic. In fact, he's now something of a guru: in demand on the lecture circuit and, recently, offering sage advice in Leonardo DiCaprio's "how can we save the world?" documentary The 11th Hour.

Soleri invented "ecotecture" before the word even existed. In the 1960s, he derived a similar term, "arcology", to describe low-impact, environmentally oriented design. But Soleri's arcology went beyond mere architecture. He developed an entire philosophy of civilisation, laid out in his 1969 book, The City in the Image of Man. It is a wondrous tome, full of lucid rhetoric, almost impenetrable diagrams and spectacular drawings of "arcologies": fantasy cities of the future intricately rendered. Rather than inefficient, land-hungry, low-rise, car-dependent cities (like nearby Phoenix), Soleri's arcologies are dense, compact, car-free, and low-energy. Their gigantic structures leave nature unspoilt and readily accessible. Some are hundreds of metres high, designed to accommodate six million people; others are built on top of dams, or form artificial canyons, or float in the open sea.

Four decades on, Soleri is still happy to expound on the state and the fate of the city. He welcomes me to Arcosanti, then gets straight down to business, explaining what he tried to set up here by first rounding on his old mentor Frank Lloyd Wright for glamorising suburbia. This, says Soleri, actually leads to the breakdown of the city, as what he calls "the hermitage" begins: "Instead of people gathering to develop a culture, they want to escape from other people. Individuals believe they can reach a level of self-sufficiency that can isolate them - or their family - in an ideal place. Then they somehow expect the civilisation that has made them to serve them. It's a parasitic kind of life."

In the 1970s, Soleri's vision of an alternative drew hundreds of student volunteers from all over the world to build Arcosanti, a prototype arcology with a projected population of 5,000. They worked for free in the sweltering heat, sleeping outside and learning from the master - who, judging by the photos, was usually to be found in swimming trunks and a short-sleeved shirt, digging alongside them. "It was not a community for community's sake, eating tofu and giving each other back rubs," says Roger Tolman, who oversaw construction. "It was the opposite of the hippy scene: a community of construction workers. If you were going to be here, you were going to work - harder than you'd ever worked in your life."

In the 1950s, Soleri built a base in Scottsdale, a desert town that has since been engulfed by Phoenix. He still lives there now. Named Cosanti, it was the prototype for Arcosanti: a complex of experimental, sculptural buildings born of low-energy construction methods such as "earthcasting": build a mound of earth, pour a layer of concrete over it, take away the earth and, hey presto, you've got a dome. Curiously, Soleri's main source of income was not architecture but windbells. Soleri wind-bells, cast from ceramic and bronze, still sell well. The windbell money, combined with lecture circuit cash, meant Soleri could buy the land for Arcosanti outright.

"It was very exciting," says Tolman. "Paolo was central to everything. He was an unbelievably dynamic speaker. Everywhere he went, his energy was obvious. Through word of mouth, a steady stream of people came. We had to send people away in the end. The kitchen couldn't cook more than 1,000 meals a day." Many of these people are still here. Tolman's wife, Mary, for example, is Soleri's assistant; there's Kerry, who does the guided tours; and Sue, who manages the archive, which contains vast scroll paintings by Soleri, one chronicling the intellectual evolution of mankind. It's 170ft long. Here, too, are sketchbooks, masterplans, essays, photos and press cuttings. One clipping is from the Guardian, recording Soleri's 1973 visit to London. "It may all sound impossibly utopian," the reporter writes of his arcological doctrine, "but at least Soleri is having a try."

Unfortunately, Arcosanti doesn't seem to have got much further since. Only 3% of the original design has been built; the rest doesn't look likely to spring out of the desert any time soon. Arcosanti never quite achieved the critical mass it needed. Its population reached a peak of about 200 in the mid-1970s, but today is lower than 60. That 1970s idealism gave way to 1980s "me generation" priorities and people moved on to "proper jobs", Tolman says. A regular flow of students still passes through, but they treat it more as a five-week work experience than an open-ended lifestyle experiment.

Soleri has slowed as well. Already in his 50s when he started Arcosanti, he is now 89, still fit and articulate, but that once hypnotic voice is now a hushed murmur, barely audible above the desert wind. "The main fault is me," he says when I ask him why Arcosanti has not been completed. "I don't have the gift of proselytising. For years and years, they responded to me like, 'That crazy guy, what is he doing out there?'"

Inevitably, the real reason for Arcosanti's incomplete state is money. Visionary he might be, but Soleri never seems too bothered with finance. Did he really expect to be able to build a city by selling wind-bells? Soleri laughs. "I was driven by emotions. I never sat down and said, 'What am I going to do now?' I was too busy." But, I ask, is it possible to build a utopia without money?

"Uh-oh," says Mary. Soleri mimes a curtain coming down and a bell chiming, as if the interview has ended. I've said the u-word, clearly in breach of house rules. But wouldn't Soleri describe himself as a utopian? "Oh Jesus!" he says, as if affronted that I've repeated the word. "Utopia is a pretty stupid notion. It says if any group anywhere develops some ideal condition, this condition is legitimate. And I say, 'Forget it!' If you are surrounded by all sorts of demeaning or painful conditions, then 'utopia' is just an arrogant notion that has no room for evolution."

But is Soleri guilty of a little arrogance himself? Utopian or not, his vision was never particularly practicable. Rather than addressing the problems of the existing urban realm, Soleri wants to build a new world, to his masterplan. This was always going to be a challenge, especially with limited cash.

The tragedy is that, judging by the buildings completed at Arcosanti, Soleri was a terrific architect. These are mostly bare-faced concrete, but they incorporate wood, murals, tiles and intricate details that lend them a homely, handbuilt quality, like the best of Le Corbusier's later work. They might have taken a long time to build, but they possess a spatial richness and geometric coherence that most modern boxes lack, both inside and out. And they are exemplary in their incorporation of simple, low-tech environmental principles.

Concrete apses are oriented to capture the heat and light of the low winter sun, yet also provide shade when it is at its highest in summer. And the roads, of course, are relegated to the perimeter. Later phases in Arcosanti's design would have called for 25-storey towers, transforming the village-like settlement into a dense city. They wouldn't be difficult to construct. If this was China, you could probably complete Arcosanti in about a year. But what exists there already is rather compelling - a persuasive alternative to current urbanism. In fact, it could represent the kind of sustainable, low-energy lives we are belatedly coming to realise we should have been living all along.

Rather than a "crazy guy" ranting in the wilderness, Soleri has proved to be a voice of reason. Nobody wanted to hear his diagnosis of the ills of US society, but it has been proved right - the car-centric, inefficient, horizontal suburban model has left us in poor shape to cope with climate-change problems. Yet Soleri is sceptical of new-found admirers of his philosophy. "They take a very shallow understanding of it," he says. In Soleri's view, we need to reformulate, rather than simply reform, our strategy for civilisation. His outlook is not hopeful. "Materialism is, by definition, the antithesis of green," he says. "We have this unstoppable, energetic, self-righteous drive that's innate in us, but which has been reoriented by limitless consumption. Per se, it doesn't have anything evil about it. It's a hindrance. But multiply that hindrance by billions, and you've got catastrophe."

Soleri long ago came to terms with the fact that Arcosanti will not be completed in his lifetime. What will happen after his death is up for debate. Some trustees of the Arcosanti Foundation want to see it completed to his original vision; others think it should be opened up to other architects, or even turned into a health spa to generate revenue. Soleri suggests it could be sold to a university or architectural research organisation. Whatever happens, Soleri's ideas could well be of benefit to future architects, if not as a wholesale solution, then at least as a source of inspiration.

Perhaps Soleri was simply too far ahead of his time. "I've put quite a lot of work into this," he says, looking out over his domain. "But there's no point in sitting and moaning".


Read more!