Melt-pools 'accelerating Arctic ice loss'

Pools of melted ice and snow that form on the surface of the Arctic sea ice explain why it is melting faster than predicted, scientists say

Gwladys Fouché, guardian.co.uk 18 Feb 09;

New research has revealed that melt-water pooling on the Arctic sea ice is causing it to melt at a faster rate than computer models had previously predicted.

Scientists have been struggling to understand why the northern sea ice has been retreating at a faster rate than estimated by the most recent assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in 2007.

The IPCC's computer models had simulated an average loss of 2.5% in sea ice extent per decade from 1953 to 2006. But in reality the Arctic sea ice had declined at a rate of about 7.8% per decade.

Arctic sea ice has retreated so much that in September 2007 it covered an all-time low area of 4.14m km sq, surpassing by 23% the previous all-time record set in September 2005.

And during the summer of 2008, the north-west and north-east passages - the sea routes running along the Arctic coastlines of northern America and northern Russia, normally perilously clogged with thick ice – were ice-free for the first time since records began in 1972.

Part of the reasons for the discrepancy has to do with melt ponds, which are pools of melted ice and snow that form on the sea ice when it is warmed in spring and summer. As they are darker than ice and snow, they absorb solar radiation rather than reflect it, which accelerates the melting process.

"Melt ponds were not taken into consideration by global climate models as sea-ice albedo [the ratio of reflected to incident solar radiation] is a complex process that is poorly described in these models," explains Christina Alsvik Pedersen from the Norwegian Polar Institute, the first author of the research which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Geophysical Research.

"The inclusion of the melt ponds in the models goes towards explaining why the sea ice in the Arctic melts faster than the models can predict," she says.

Melt ponds may play a growing role in the melting of the Arctic sea ice in future, Pedersen adds, as first-year ice - which melts in summer and freezes in autumn – is replacing the old multi-year ice – which stays frozen regardless of the seasons.

"First-year ice has normally a smoother surface than multi-year ice, which tends to have rougher, ridged surfaces," says Pedersen. "That allows melt ponds to cover a wider area on first-year ice, which extends the surface on which the solar radiation is absorbed, and that will accelerate the melting process."

The research helps our understanding of the physical processes behind the melting of the Arctic, according to Pål Prestrud, author of a 2007 UN report on the melting of the ice and snow and the director of the Centre for international climate and environmental research in Oslo.

"The global climate models have been good at predicting temperature, but when it comes to sea ice, they are not good enough," he said. "This research is one piece of the puzzle that will help us understand the physical process involved in the melting of the Arctic and predict better what will happen in future."

"Another piece of the puzzle we need to understand better is what happens with oceans currents in the Arctic Ocean and the warming of the oceans as a whole," he said.

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg and the SINTEF institute in Trondheim were also part of the team.


Read more!

Wrapping Greenland in reflective blankets

Rising sea levels are threatening the planet but a glaciologist has devised a way to prevent glaciers from melting further - by wrapping them in a reflective blanket.

Jessica Salter, The Telegraph 18 Feb 09;

Glaciers cover just 10 per cent of the earth’s surface but 75 per cent of the world’s fresh water are locked beneath the ice.

Jason Box, from Ohio State University, says the way to combat melting glaciers is to cover them with blankets that will reflect the sun’s rays.

Dr Box said: “We’re in the midst of a climate catastrophe and glaciers are the epicentre of that problem.

“Glaciers around the planted are decanting into the oceans at shocking rates and I want to stop that.”

Dr Box, who has conducted climate research expeditions to the Greenland ice sheet every year since 1994, has set out with a team of three others to test his idea on a real glacier in Greenland and prove the technology works.

The bulk of their cargo is 31 giant rolls of uniquely designed white polypropylene blankets. These blankets, which are used in the Alps to preserve ski hills in the summer, will cover a total surface area of 10,000 square meters and are designed to reflect sunlight and block out Greenland’s winds.

The team have to endure a hurricane-force ice storm to test how resilient the material is and test whether it would survive in the Arctic.

Dr Box said: “It’s going to be expensive but when you consider the cost of reengineering our coastlines – this may actually be cheaper.”


Read more!

Emissions Trading: Asian Airlines' Friend Or Foe?

David Fogarty, PlanetArk 19 Feb 09;

SINGAPORE - Already trapped in a tailspin as earnings plunge and a global recession curtails passenger and freight traffic, Asian airlines face yet another challenge -- figuring out how to pay for their greenhouse gas emissions.

Green groups, governments and passenger bodies are piling on the pressure for airlines to rein in carbon pollution, and to have their emissions included in a broader U.N. climate pact.

Carriers such as Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific and Qantas, which fly some of the world's longest routes, already plan to curb or offset pollution through emissions trading, more efficient planes and other measures.

But they worry that numerous domestic and regional emissions schemes now emerging could prove costly and unfair because not all airlines will be treated equally, crippling their competitiveness and their already shrinking earnings.

Despite only having a small share in global carbon emissions, at around 2 percent, the airlines are a high-profile target for regulators and environmentalists: their emissions are among the most intensive per kilometer of travel and the most damaging as they are released high in the atmosphere.

"What we don't want to see is a proliferation of regional schemes or regional and sectoral combinations or some weird and wonderful brainchild that applies in one country but not in others," Dominic Purvis, Cathay Pacific's general manager for environmental affairs, told Reuters.

The European Union plans to make the aviation industry subject to its emissions trading scheme from 2012, covering all airlines using EU airspace. Australia will have a domestic emissions trading scheme from 2010, while the U.S. government wants to introduce a cap-and-trade system as well.

For a graphic of global shipping emissions, please click on: here

Last Thursday, Air France/KLM, British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Virgin Atlantic and airport operator BAA said they wanted aviation emissions to be included in a broader global climate pact this year, the first time a group of airlines has made such a call.

Their aim is to shape the debate to avoid being saddled with a scheme not of their choosing.

"We are very concerned about the fragmented approach here. Aviation is a global business," said Stephen Forshaw, spokesman for Singapore Airlines.

"If we're flying aircraft from one emissions trading zone into another, and there's different schemes that apply, we run the very real risk of getting caught in the middle."

EARNINGS PRESSURE

The main aviation industry grouping, the International Air Transport Association, estimates the EU emissions trading scheme will cost airlines 2.4 billion euros ($3 billion) in 2012, but admits the figure is a fast-moving target.

A major variables is the price of European emission allowances, which now stand just above 8 euros, having fallen from a peak of more than 30 euros last year.

The EU scheme requires carriers in its airspace to offset emissions over their entire journey, a rule Asian airlines call unfair. Britain's separate air passenger duty has also woken concern among carriers, who fear a rash of aviation taxes.

"Emissions trading would be affordable and fair if applied across all airlines," said Andrew Herdman, director-general of the Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines, which groups 17 carriers.

"On the other hand, if there is unequal treatment then airlines will not be able to pass on the full cost, and will see margin erosion and/or loss of market share."

The aviation industry emits around 650 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually, Herdman estimated. Charged at $25 per tonne, this would cost the industry $16 billion, but even at $15 per tonne, the figure would work out to $10 billion.

That represents just a small percentage of global industry revenues of about $500 billion, however.

AIRLINE PACT

Airlines are already taking steps to cut emissions, such as buying newer aircraft and trying out biofuels. Air New Zealand, Virgin and Japan Airlines are among the carriers that have tested biofuel blends.

But these steps alone won't cut expected growth in emissions, which are expected to grow 3 to 4 percent annually, according to the U.N.'s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

That means tougher action may be necessary when world leaders meet at the end of the year in the Danish capital, Copenhagen, to try to agree on a replacement for the U.N. Kyoto Protocol.

Developing nations as well as aviation and shipping emissions are excluded from Kyoto's first commitment period, which runs from 2008 to 2012, but aren't expected to be so lucky again.

Among the numerous schemes under discussion to help airlines pay for emissions is a universal levy assessed at the point of purchase of fuel.

"Everybody pays a figure," said Purvis. "However, the regulator decides to set the figure, which represents the cost of taking the CO2 back out of the atmosphere when you burn that fuel."

For environmentalists, though, emissions trading and levies are not the complete answer.

"Currently aviation is a product that's underpriced because its full environmental costs are not factored in," said Peter Lockley, aviation analyst for global conservation group WWF.

"A global scheme is a fundamental part of the policy but emissions trading on its own is never going to be enough to drive the kind of reductions we need to see," he added.

"In the long term, aviation emissions are going to have to come down. Maybe that means less flying, using high-tech video conferencing. There are alternatives and the world doesn't revolve around the aviation industry."

(Editing by Clarence Fernandez)


Read more!

Hunt Begins For World's Most Polluted Places

Timothy Gardner, Yahoo News 19 Feb 09;

NEW YORK - Researchers will fan out across more than 80 developing countries beginning this month to hunt out and assess many of the world's dirtiest industrial waste sites.

The New York-based nonprofit Blacksmith Institute is training the researchers from local semi-government agencies, universities and nonprofit groups in the countries to create a database of the sites called the Global Inventory Project.

"Blacksmith is doing what no other governmental organization, NGO or nonprofit has ever even attempted," said Jack Caravanos, a professor of environmental health at Hunter College of City University of New York.

Caravanos said the inventory is a "first step" to help governments and international organizations prioritize the clean up of waste sites that pose health threats to people including cancer risks to adults and learning disability risks to children. Asthma and other respiratory ailments are other problems millions of locals suffer at sites like abandoned metal mines in Africa and factories that made weapons or industrial chemicals in former Soviet Union states.

Concern about polluted places is growing as the world's population swells and people in developing countries like China and India buy more goods like cars and electronics, habits that were once mostly limited to rich places like the United States and Europe.

Blacksmith director Richard Fuller said the rich countries have mostly already cleaned up their contaminated places because they have strong anti-pollution laws. But in many industrializing countries, "the cost of life in the politician's mind is much lower what we are used to," he said.

The European Commission and Green Cross Switzerland funded the inventory for the next 18 months with $1.5 million, and the U.N. Industrial Development Organization has partnered with Blacksmith on a database that could list 1,200 to 2,000 sites.

Blacksmith has developed a nonconfrontational approach over the last several years. It attempts to encourage the companies that made the messes and the nearby communities to work together to clean up sites, instead of bogging down the process with lawsuits. A key to the technique has been Blacksmith's publishing of lists of the world's top polluted sites. In some cases that has pushed companies that were responsible for the mess to act.

"The companies get embarrassed and they say 'what can we do to get off the list?'" Caravanos said.

Some of the worst polluted sites involve lead battery recycling, which takes place in almost every urban center in developing countries, said Fuller.

Blacksmith recently lead a $200,000 clean up of a battery site in Haina in the Dominican Republic, in which much of the underlying soil was 35 percent lead, a pollutant that leads to severe learning disabilities in children.

Blacksmith hopes to establish a $500 million Health and Pollution Fund to help clean up sites. Cleanup costs can range from $10 million for sites that involve polluted rivers, to $20,000 for cleaning up rusty containers of toxic chemicals that face the risk of exploding.

(Editing by David Wiessler)


Read more!

Nigeria dumping ground for TVs, mobiles: Greenpeace

Yahoo News 18 Feb 09;

LAGOS (AFP) – Nigeria has become a dumping ground for potentially toxic electronic waste such as televisions disguised as second-hand goods from developed countries, Greenpeace said Wednesday.

"Nigeria is just one of many destinations for the developed world's toxic e-waste," the global environmental group said in a statement.

The group said its finding was based on an undercover operation it carried out with Sky television in the United Kingdom.

Greenpeace said the operation highlighted how the failure of electronic companies to take responsibility for recycling their products was expanding the trade in hazardous waste from Europe to the developing world.

"Companies can stop this illegal toxic trade now by ensuring their goods are free from hazardous components," it said.

"It is critical they take full responsibility for the safe recycling of their products and put an end to the growing e-waste dumps that are poisoning people and the environment across the developing world," said Martin Hojsik, Greenpeace international toxics campaigner.

Greenpeace said children often break apart television sets, mobile phones, game consoles and other electronic items that arrive in their tonnes across the developing world.

"With no safety measures, they are exposed to highly toxic chemicals, including mercury, which damages the brain; lead, which can damage reproductive systems; and cadmium, which causes kidney damage," it said.

Greenpeace said it launched the operation by taking an irreparably broken television, fitted with a tracking device, to the United Kingdom's Hampshire County council for recycling.

"Instead of being safely dismantled in the UK or Europe, as required by law, the council's 'recycling' company BJ Electronics passed it on as 'second-hand goods' after which it ended up in Nigeria," it added.

In 2007, an American NGO, Basel Action Network, published a report in which it said that some 500 containers with 400,000 second-hand computers were unloaded every month in Lagos, Nigeria's most populous city with some 15 million people.

Dumped in Africa: Britain’s toxic waste
Children exposed to poisonous material in defiance of UK law
Cahal Milmo, The Independent 18 Feb 09;

Tonnes of toxic waste collected from British municipal dumps is being sent illegally to Africa in flagrant breach of this country’s obligation to ensure its rapidly growing mountain of defunct televisions, computers and gadgets are disposed of safely.

Hundreds of thousands of discarded items, which under British law must be dismantled or recycled by specialist contractors, are being packaged into cargo containers and shipped to countries such as Nigeria and Ghana, where they are stripped of their raw metals by young men and children working on poisoned waste dumps.

In a joint investigation by The Independent, Sky News, and Greenpeace, a television that had been broken beyond repair was tracked to an electronics market in Lagos, Nigeria, after being left at a civic amenity site in Basingstoke run by Hampshire Country Council. Under environmental protection laws It was classified as hazardous waste and should never have left the UK.

The television, fitted with a satellite tracking device, was bought by a London-based dealer, one of dozens of operators buying up a significant proportion of the estimated 940,000 tonnes of domestic electronic waste, or e-waste, produced in the UK each year and sending it for export.

Investigators bought back the television after a 4,500-mile journey from Tilbury Docks in Essex to the giant Alaba electronics market in Lagos, where up to 15 shipping containers of discarded electronics from Europe and Asia arrive every day. At least a third of the contents of each container is broken beyond use and transferred to dumps where waste pickers scavenge amid a cocktail of burning heavy metals and dioxins. The television is just one example of a broader problem with the enforcement of the legislation, which permits the export of functioning equipment but prohibits broken electronic goods from being sent outside the EU to a country with a developing economy.

Such is the confused state of the recycling industry, with some local authorities collating figures on the amount of waste being exported and others simply handing the task to sub-contractors, that the e-waste body representing the electronics industry admits abuse is widespread.

Claire Snow, the director of the Industry Council for Equipment Recycling (ICER), told The Independent: “It is clear that the system for collecting equipment which UK householders have thrown away is not working as well as it should.

“On the pretext of re-use, equipment which is clearly not suitable for any type of re-use is effectively being dumped in developing countries.”

Government figures show that 450,000 tonnes of e-waste is currently being treated in accordance with Britain’s waste electronic and electrical equipment laws, which place a responsibility on manufacturers to meet the environmental cost. But with the average Briton throwing away four pieces of e-waste every year, approximately 500,000 tonnes is going unaccounted for. Industry research seen by The Independent estimates that at least 10,000 tonnes of waste televisions and 23,000 tonnes of computers classified as hazardous waste are being illegally exported as part of a wider e-waste market worth “tens of millions of pounds”.

Campaigners say dealers offering around £3 for a television and £1 for a computer monitor to waste sites are undercutting specialist recycling companies, creating a “grey market”.

Britain is responsible for around 15 per cent of the EU’s total e-waste, which is growing three times faster than any other muncipal waste stream.

Martin Hojsik, toxics campaigner for Greenpeace International, said: "Companies can stop this illegal toxic trade now by ensuring their goods are free from hazardous components. It is critical they and governments take full responsibility for the safe recycling of their products and put an end to the growing e-waste dumps that are poisoning people."

Bosses at Hampshire County Council last night launched an inquiry into its waste sites but insisted it and its household waste site contractor, Hopkins Recycling, only used dealers who exported functional equipment.

A spokesman for Consumers International, which is campaigning for tightened e-waste controls, said: “The sight of children scavenging toxic wastelands overflowing with the West’s unwanted computers and televisions makes a mockery of international bans to prevent the dumping of e-waste. Western governments, including the UK, have shown little desire to deal with the root cause of this problem.”


Read more!

Tough to raise awareness about rising sea levels

Jennifer Smith, Newsday 18 Feb 09;

It's hard to whip up concern for a creeping threat whose predicted advance can be compared to "being attacked by a giant snail."

That's how environmental advocate Sarah Newkirk of the Nature Conservancy, at a recent forum in Upton, described sea level rise.

Her phrase was a rueful nod to empty seats at the meeting, convened by state planners to seek public input on rising oceans. Just a few dozen residents had shown up, though the turnout was more than in Nassau the day before, when organizers outnumbered audience members.

This despite new predictions that global sea level rise - already pegged at 2 feet by 2100 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - could come decades sooner. The changes would worsen flooding and erosion on Long Island's low-lying South Shore, home to half a million people, key roads and the region's largest sewage plants.

But the wide range of possible outcomes makes sea level rise a tricky thing to plan for, much less a popular public meeting topic. Local governments are still adjusting to revised federal flood maps that recalculated the risks coastal communities face now. Planners walk a tightrope: They could underestimate the ocean's advance, or overspend to protect buildings and shorelines that might face a relatively low risk of damage.

"No one is good enough to say, 'In 50 years, this is what it's going to look like,'" said Joseph Vietri, chief of planning and policy for the North Atlantic Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Looking ahead

Despite the uncertainty, a New York State task force that is readying recommendations on the best way to adapt to sea level rise soldiers on. That work comes as a federal report released last month by the Environmental Protection Agency said coastal regions "need to rigorously assess vulnerability" to sea level rise and plan strategies to protect property, wetlands and barrier islands.

"The issue that all of us have to deal with is the reality that the projections contain some uncertainty," said Alan Belensz, a climate scientist with the state Department of Environmental Conservation, which is leading the task force. "So how do we plan given that fact?"

Among the advice the task force could deliver: direct development away from coastal areas; elevate roads and other infrastructure; or change wetlands regulations to increase no-development zones so marshes threatened by sea level rise have room to migrate upland.

"If we're building an outfall pipe for a sewage treatment plant, obviously sea level rise is going to be a serious consideration," said task force member Brad Tito, Nassau's deputy director of environmental coordination. "But if we're going to build a new basketball court at a park on Long Beach, we're not going to build a big wall around it to protect it."

More evidence

At the recent Long Island forums, Newkirk, Belensz and others on the task force made an aggressive case for action.

Exhibit A: Tide gauge records showing sea level rising at faster rates at Montauk, Port Jefferson, Willets Point in Queens and New York City than the 20th century average.

Exhibit B: Before and after pictures of drowning wetlands at Goose Island in South Oyster Bay, where nearly one-fourth of the marsh was submerged between 1974 and 1998.

Exhibit C: New projections that sea level along Long Island's South Shore could rise 2 to 5 inches in the 2020s - and a worst-case scenario of an almost 4-feet rise in the 2080s.

Those numbers were developed for the Nature Conservancy by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the Columbia University Earth Institute. The advocacy group is using the information to build inundation maps that will show the range of future risk faced by South Shore communities.

The Columbia estimates are based on seven global climate models and three scenarios assuming low, medium and high greenhouse gas emissions. The high-end numbers factor in rapid ice melt in Greenland and the Antarctic.

Message reaches few

"We're not trying to scare anybody," said the DEC's Mark Lowery. "Sea level rise is very real, and it's important to understand the magnitude of the risk that these coastal communities face."

But few people heard the message that week. Organizers attributed low attendance to a winter storm and scheduling conflicts for local officials, including Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy's state of the county address.

And those who did show - mostly academics, environmental and civic advocates, and a handful of town staffers - seemed to be those least in need of philosophical conversion.

"You guys need to get Joe the Plumber to understand what this is all about," said Michael Bilecki, chief of natural resources at Fire Island National Seashore, at the Jan. 29 task force presentation at Brookhaven National Labs.

Some voiced concern that the task force's recommendations - due to the legislature at the end of the year - would be ignored by state lawmakers preoccupied with other matters.

Others wondered if local planners, who often have the final say on coastal projects, would heed state advice given Long Island's customary resistance to regional planning.

"It's kind of hard when you've got developers on a board making decision in favor of what they do," Walter Bundy, Southampton Town's storm water manager, said later. "It's a problem."

Robert Wieboldt, a consultant for the Long Island Builders Institute, said New York needs a comprehensive plan for sea level rise and erosion, but that it's too early to make hard decisions.

"It may well be that within the next few years we decide that we're going to assume a 2-foot rise in the ocean, and we'll deal with it," Wieboldt said. "But we need a few more years of ice-cap measurement to really know what we're going to be dealing with here."

How high could it go?

Researchers have projected how high sea levels might rise along the South Shore, using global climate and greenhouse gas emissions models. Graph below shows the middle range of water under those scenarios, as well as a worst-case situation that factors in faster rates of ice melt in Greenland and Antarctica.

2020s

Middle range: 2 inches - 5 inches

Worst-case scenario: 7 inches

2050s

Middle range: 7 inches - 12 inches

Worst-case scenario: 22 inches

2080s

Middle range: 12 inches - 23 inches

Worst-case scenario: 45 inches

SOURCES: Projections were developed for the nature conservancy by the goddard institute for space studies and the Columbia University earth institute


Read more!

Protected mangroves face petroleum threat

New Scientist 18 Feb 09;

THE world's largest surviving mangrove ecosystem - home to the endangered royal Bengal tiger - faces a new threat: petrochemicals.

On 3 February, the state government of West Bengal along with an Indian government committee approved plans for a petrochemicals hub on the island of Nayachar. A final national decision about the plant, which will refine crude oil and produce petroleum by-products, is expected within weeks.

Environmental groups in India are gearing up for the worst. The island is barely 10 kilometres from the Sunderbans, a biodiversity hotspot containing a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

"Setting up a petrochemical cluster in that region is tantamount to ecocide," says Santanu Chacraverti of the Society for Direct Initiative for Social and Health Action, a Kolkata-based NGO. "Noxious effluents will flow into the coastal waters and spread into the vast network of rivers and creeks. Sunderban, the nursery of a range of marine, coastal, and estuarine lifeforms, will be subjected to pollution," he adds.

India has a history of industrialising with little regard for the environment. The most notable example in recent times has been the building of over 3000 dams across the Narmada river, which devastated the river's ecosystem and displaced hundreds of thousands of people.


Read more!

Green Revolution with a Capital G is Needed to Feed the World

Cutting Food Losses from Farm to Kitchen and Converting Wastes into Animal Feeds a Key Opportunity
UNEP 17 Feb 09;

Nairobi, 17 February 2009 - A seven point plan to reduce the risk of hunger and rising food insecurity in the 21st century is outlined in new report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

Changing the ways in which food is produced, handled and disposed of across the globe- from farm to store and from fridge to landfill - can both feed the world's rising population and help the environmental services that are the foundation of agricultural productivity in the first place.

Unless more intelligent and creative management is brought to the world's agricultural systems, the 2008 food crisis - which plunged millions back into hunger - may foreshadow an even bigger crisis in the years to come, says the rapid assessment study.

The report, entitled 'The Environmental Food crises: Environment's role in averting future food crises', has been compiled by a wide group of experts from both within and outside UNEP. It supports UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's task force on the world food crisis.

Major findings:

- The one hundred year trend of falling food prices may be at an end, and food prices may increase by 30-50 per cent within decades with critical impacts for those living in extreme poverty spending up to 90 per cent of their income on food. These findings are supported by a recent report from the World Bank stating that if agricultural production is depressed further, food prices may rise.

- Up to 25 per cent of the worlds food production may become lost due to 'environmental breakdowns' by 2050 unless action is taken. Already, cereal yields have stagnated worldwide and fish landings are declining.

- Today, over one third of the world's cereals are being used as animal feed, rising to 50 per cent by 2050. Continuing to feed cereals to growing numbers of livestock will aggravate poverty and environmental degradation.

- The report instead suggests that recycling food wastes and deploying new technologies, aimed at producing biofuels, to produce sugars from discards such as straw and even nutshells could be a key environmentally-friendly alternative to increased use of cereals for livestock.

- The amount of fish currently discarded at sea - estimated at 30 million tonnes annually - could alone sustain more than a 50 per cent increase in fish farming and aquaculture production, which is needed to maintain per capita fish consumption at current levels by 2050 without increasing pressure on an already stressed marine environment.

The report shows that many of the factors blamed for the current food crisis - drought, biofuels, high oil prices, low grain stocks and especially speculation in food stocks may worsen substantially in the coming decades.

Climate change emerges as one of the key factors that may undermine the chances of feeding over nine billion people by 2050. Increasing water scarcities and a rise and spread of invasive pests such as insects, diseases and weeds - may substantially depress yields in the future.

This underlines yet another reason why governments at the UN climate convention meeting in Copenhagen in some 300 days' time must agreed a deep and decisive new global deal.

Other actions under the seven point plan include:

- Re-organizing the food market infrastructure to regulate prices and generate food safety nets for those at risk backed by a global, micro-financing fund to boost small-scale farmer productivity in developing countries.

- Removal of agricultural subsidies and the promotion of second generation biofuels based on wastes rather than on primary crops - this could reduce pressure on fertile lands and critical ecosystems such as forests.

Medium to long term measures include managing and better harvesting extreme rainfall on Continents such as Africa, alongside support to farmers for adopting more diversified and ecologically-friendly farming systems - ones that enhance the 'nature-based' inputs from pollinators such as bees as well as water supplies and genetic diversity.

A recent report by UNEP and the UN Conference on Trade and Development surveyed 114 small-scale farms in 24 African countries, publishing our findings in late 2008.

- Yields had more than doubled where organic, or near-organic practices had been used, with the in yield jumping to 128 per cent in east Africa.

- The study found that organic practices outperformed traditional methods and chemical-intensive conventional farming and also found strong environmental benefits such as improved soil fertility, better retention of water and resistance to drought.

The research also highlighted the role that adapting organic practices could have in improving local education and community cooperation.

A report launched by the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in April 2007 also highlighted the key role of ecosystems in food production. The Rapid Food Assessment also follows the IAASTD report on sustainable agricultural production, which was co-produced by UNEP in 2008.

Only last week UNCTAD reported that, despite the economic crisis, organic agriculture would continue to grow, representing an opportunity for developing country farmers including those in Africa.

It estimated that sales of certified organic produce could reach close to $70 billion in 2012, up from $23 billion in 2002.

"We need a Green revolution in a Green Economy but one with a capital G", says UN Under-Secretary-General and UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner. "We need to deal with not only the way the world produces food but the way it is distributed, sold and consumed, and we need a revolution that can boost yields by working with rather than against nature."

He said the report also shone a light on perhaps one of the least discussed areas - food waste, from the farm and the seas to the supermarket and the kitchen.

"Over half of the food produced today is either lost, wasted or discarded as a result of inefficiency in the human-managed food chain. There is evidence within the report that the world could feed the entire projected population growth alone by becoming more efficient while also ensuring the survival of wild animals, birds and fish on this planet," he added.

- Losses and food waste in the United States could be as high as 40-50 per cent, according to some recent estimates. Up to one quarter of all fresh fruits and vegetables in the US is lost between the field and the table.

- In Australia it is estimated that food waste makes up half of that country's landfill. Almost one-third of all food purchased in the United Kingdom every year is not eaten.

- Food losses in the developing world are also considerable, mainly due to spoilage and pests. For instance, in Africa, the total amount of fish lost through discards, post-harvest loss and spoilage may be around 30 per cent of landings.

- Food losses in the field between planting and harvesting could be as high as 20-40 per cent of the potential harvest in developing countries due to factors such as pests and pathogens.

This underlines the need for greater agricultural research and development which in Africa amounts to just 13 per cent of global investment, versus over 33 per cent in Latin America and over 40 per cent in Asia.

Innovative solutions are also required. A case in point is Niger where an estimated 60 per cent of the national onion crop, or some 3,000 tonnes a year, can be lost. The losses also lead to emissions of the greenhouse gas methane as the vegetables rot. Experts are looking at using solar dryers and other systems to preserve the onions so they do not rot in storage or on the way to market.

Environmental degradation poses a major risk to food production. For instance:

- The melting and disappearing glaciers of the mighty Himalayas, linked to climate change, supply water for irrigation for near half of Asia's cereal production or a quarter of the world production.

- Globally, water scarcity may reduce crop yields by up to 12 per cent. Climate change may also accelerate invasive pests of insects, diseases and weeds, reducing yields by an additional 2-6 per cent worldwide.

- Continuing land degradation, particularly in Africa, may reduce yields by another 1-8 per cent. Croplands may be swallowed up by urban sprawl, biofuels, cotton and land degradation by 8-20 per cent by 2050, and yields may become depressed by 5-25 per cent due to pests, water scarcity and land degradation.

- In Sub-Saharan Africa, population growth is projected to increase from the current 770 million to over 1.7 billion in less than 40 years, while also being the Continent on the front-line in terms of climate change, land degradation, water scarcity - and conflicts. Unless a major economic, agricultural and investment boom takes place, the situation may become very serious indeed.

- Increased use of artificial fertilizers, pesticides, increased water use and cutting down of forests will result in massive decline in biodiversity.

Already, nearly 80 per cent of all endangered species are threatened due to agricultural expansion, and Europe has lost over 50 per cent of its farmland birds during the last 25 years of intensification of European farmlands.

"Simply ratcheting up the fertilizer and pesticide-led production methods of the 20th Century is unlikely to address the challenge", says Achim Steiner. "It will increasingly undermine the critical natural inputs and nature-based services for agriculture such as healthy and productive soils, the water and nutrient recycling of forests, and pollinators such as bees and bats."

Notes to editors

The report 'The environmental food crisis: Environments role in averting future food crises' can be accessed at at www.unep.org or at www.grida.no including high and low resolution graphics for free use in publications.

The report is released during the 25th session of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum taking place in Nairobi, Kenya from 16-20 February. The meeting's main focus is on finding solutions to the current environmental, financial, food and energy crisis through the emerging concept of Green Economy.

More information can be found online at: www.unep.org/gc/gc25


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 18 Feb 09


First record of some marine fishes in Singapore!
on the wild shores of singapore blog

New Facebook group: "Bad Idea for Whale Shark in Sentosa IR"
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Plant Magic: Auspicious and Inauspicious Plants from Around the World on the Biodiversity crew @ NUS blog

nemos & giant carpet anemone at terumbu raya
video clip on the sgbeachbum blog

Barn Owl asleep on highway
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Craig Robson revised
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Seen on STOMP: lots of fiery posts
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Voluntourism – A more rewarding travel experience?
on Wild Asia


Read more!

City light-up: tiered electricity charges fairer

One bright idea on charging for electricity usage
Straits Times Forum 18 Feb 09;

I REFER to "Let there be light, bright ideas for the city" in Saturday's Life! section, on the trend of integrating lights into architectural design.

The article mentioned that the glittery facades in architectural design were in line with the Urban Redevelopment Authority's (URA) Lighting Masterplan.

I find that the masterplan contradicts the Government's aim to conserve electricity.

The article mentioned that developers and architects used light-emitting diodes on building facades, which consume less power than conventional fluorescent lights. However, brightening up entire facades still involves large amounts of electricity consumption.

Singapore may be nowhere near the brash neon lights of Hong Kong and Japan, or Paris. However, the URA, developers and architects ought to bear in mind that electricity tariffs here are generally very much higher than these countries.

Whenever the Government announces that electricity usage has gone up, I believe that it has taken into account usage by commercial and public buildings, as well as private dwellings. Ultimately, electricity charges will increase and apply across the board to all.

Developers would not feel the pinch from the increase of electricity tariffs as the cost would have been factored into the construction costs, and it would also be included in the tenancy or sale of the units.

Ultimately, home owners are the ones that would be badly affected whenever electricity tariffs increase.

To be fair to home owners, I would like to suggest to the Government to implement two different charges: One for commercial/public buildings, as these account for the bulk of electricity consumption, and the other for home owners.

Michael Yeo


Read more!

Bukit Batok bush fires keep firemen busy

Sujin Thomas & Kimberly Spykerman, Straits Times 18 Feb 09;

FIREFIGHTERS have been virtually camped out in a vegetated area along Bukit Batok West Avenue 3, where pockets of fire have been breaking out over the last 11/2 days.

Soon after one blaze is brought under control, another springs up.

The fires have been breaking out atop a hill, which sits on land about the size of five football fields. It is a steep slope, rising on a 70-degree incline to a height of between 50m and 60m.

Officers from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) have been taking 45 minutes to clamber up it using long retractable ladders.

The incline aside, they have had to carry tools to cut through the undergrowth.

The first fire broke out at around 4.45pm on Monday in two areas there, each the size of half a basketball court.

Fifty officers brought the blaze under control in half an hour, but they ended up being on standby for the next 17 hours on the chance that embers, fanned by winds, would re-ignite.

The SCDF officers left the area at 9.35am, but barely five hours later, twice the number of firefighters were back battling flames in four fresh areas, each about the size of two basketball courts.

Between Jan 1 and Monday, a record 292 fires had erupted in bushland and forested areas. The spate of fires in Bukit Batok is believed to be one of the longest bush-fire operations in recent years.

Those living nearby have been finding ways to cope with the choking cloud of thick smoke. Many have kept their windows and doors shut to keep out the fine white ash.

Some have had breathing difficulties.

Canteen helper Fauzlinda Tahir, 44, who lives on the ground floor of Block 123 in Bukit Batok Central, said: 'My husband has even joked that it is snowing outside. His asthma started acting up on Monday evening too.'

A minor traffic jam built up along Bukit Batok West Avenue 3. Thick water hoses were lying on the streets, some as far as 30m from fire hydrants.

Republic Polytechnic student Ganesh Murusamy, 20, said he had not seen bush fires this big in his 12 years living there. 'From my flat on the fourth floor, I saw a tree on fire. The flames were huge.'

For some residents, it is business as usual. They have been jogging and walking their dogs amid the smoky haze.

Sales engineer S. S. Chua, 52, was not unduly worried: 'There is nothing for us to be scared about as there have been many firemen in the area trying to put out the fire.'


Read more!

BCA launches green award

Ananya Roy, Straits Times 18 Feb 09;

A NEW green award designed to spur builders to adopt green practices has been launched by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA).

The Green and Gracious Builders' Award - the first of its kind in Singapore - seeks to encourage builders to use more recycled materials in construction. It also wants them to put public access high on their agendas.

The award uses three assessment criteria - green practices, what it terms 'gracious' practices and innovation - and is supported by most builders, according to the BCA.

'Our efforts at developing a sustainable built environment have so far been accepted by developers and consultants,' said BCA chief executive John Keung. 'Given the high visibility and impact of construction works, it is important for builders to go green and adopt friendlier construction site management and practices.'

Key features of the award include a two-tier rating system to quantify performance and enable the differentiation of performance standards between builders.

Mr Pek Lian Guan, director of Tiong Seng Contractors, welcomed the launch, which he said provided 'an excellent platform to recognise the efforts of builders in adopting environmentally friendlier and considerate best practices on the site'.

The inaugural Green and Gracious Builders Award is open for nomination till March 14 and will be presented at the annual BCA Awards ceremony in May.

Apart from this latest launch, BCA also distributes awards under the Construction Excellence, Green Mark and Universal Design for the Built Environment banners. It launched the Design and Engineering Safety Excellence award last year.

'Together with the BCA Green Mark Scheme, the Green and Gracious Builders Award will form part of the holistic framework to shape a sustainable built environment,' added Dr Keung.


Read more!