U.S. says rich nations likely to miss carbon targets

Alister Doyle, Reuters 29 May 09;

OSLO (Reuters) - Rich nations as a group are unlikely to reach the deep 2020 cuts in greenhouse gas emissions urged by developing nations as part of a new U.N. climate treaty, the top U.S. climate envoy said on Friday.

China, India and other developing nations say the rich must do most to fight global warming to encourage developing countries to sign up for more action as part of a new U.N. climate pact due to be agreed in Copenhagen in December.

"We...have been engaged in conversations with our European friends about how you might express an aggregate kind of goal," U.S. Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern said in a telephone briefing before a round of U.N. talks in Bonn from June 1-12.

"I don't think you are going to see a 25-to-40 percent aggregate number" for cuts by rich nations below 1990 levels by 2020, he said, adding: "It's possible when you add everything up that you won't be that far away from it."

In 2007, the U.N.'s Climate Panel outlined cuts by developed nations of between 25 and 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 as a scenario to avoid the worst of climate changes such as floods, droughts, more powerful storms and rising ocean levels.

France suggested this week that developed nations as a group should work out a way to guarantee overall cuts of 25-40 percent. Washington says such a goal is out of reach for its domestic emissions.

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

But China, India and others say the rich have benefited from use of fossil fuels since the industrial revolution and should cut by at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. They say the poor still need to use more energy to end poverty.

A key U.S. Congressional panel last week approved a plan that would cut U.S. emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and by 83 percent by 2050.

U.S. emissions have risen sharply in recent years so the 2020 goal works out as only a 4 percent cut relative to 1990. This week, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged the United States to do more.

The European Union has promised to cut emissions by 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, and by 30 percent if others rich nations follow suit.

EU emissions have fallen since 1990 so, expressed as cuts from 2005, the EU's 2020 goals work out as reductions of 14 and 24 percent respectively. Stern said that made the EU's planned effort comparable to that of the United States

He also said China, which has overtaken the United States as top emitter in recent years, and other developing antions would have to step up actions. "They are going to need to do more," he said.

(Editing by Michael Roddy)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 30 May 09


300 entangled horseshoe crabs rescued at Mandai Besar mangrove
on the Habitatnews blog

First public intertidal walk at St. John's island
on the Urban Forest blog and the wonderful creation blog

Lush seagrass meadows of Paris Ris
on the wild shores of singapore blog and Bruguiera hainesii and other surprises

White-bellied Sea Eagle: Nesting
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Chestnut-headed Bee-eater catching insects
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Saving Gaia is Back
on AsiaIsGreen


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 29 May 09


Job opportunity - TMSI, NUS: Outreach officer
deadline 04 Jul 2009 on ecotax

Solo at Changi
on the Psychedelic Nature blog

Of hermit and feather
on the wonderful creation blog

More on hornbills locking bills
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Crows robbing grains from lorry
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Creatures of the night
on talfryn.net

So many things to see at Kranji Reservoir Park!
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Mottephobia
on the Urban Forest blog

Putting garbage in the ocean on purpose?
on blogfish


Read more!

Unfair to compare disparity in fines: some lawyers say

For first-time offenders who feed monkeys
Andre Yeo, The New Paper 29 May 09;

FEED monkeys and you could be fined $3,000 - even if it's your first time.

Drink and drive, and if you're a first-time offender, you could be fined $1,000.

Why the disparity? Why is the seemingly lesser offence drawing a heavier fine?

Mr Wilson Choo, 53, wrote to The Straits Times Forum page on 15 May, pointing this out. He was referring to the recent case of a housewife, who was fined $3,000 for feeding sweets to monkeys at Old Upper Thomson Road last February.

But four of the five lawyers The New Paper spoke to said making such a comparison may be simplistic and unfair as the offences are different.

Feeding monkeys comes under the Parks & Trees Act with a maximum fine of $50,000 and a jail term of up to six months.

A first-time drink driver can be fined between $1,000 and $5,000 or be jailed up to six months. He would also be disqualified from driving all classes of vehicles for at least a year, which would mean he will have to re-take for his driver's licence.

But Mr Lim Kia Tong, 57, a lawyer for 29 years, said that under the Parks and Trees Act, the $50,000 fine for feeding monkeys is a maximum sum. Depending on the judge, a person can actually be fined only $1.

Mr Lim said that the range of punishment for each offence had already been legislated, taking into account factors like the harm the offence could cause to others.

He said it was up to the judge to exercise his discretion to impose the fine that fit the offence.

Referring to another monkey-feeding case, Appeals Judge V K Rajah had said there was a need to send a clear message that feeding monkeys increased the risk of them behaving aggressively. He also said the fines could go higher or lower, depending on the circumstances of each case.

Lawyer Dennis Singham also pointed out that a first-time drink driving offender who injures or kills someone would not be charged with drink driving, but with dangerous driving.

That offence carries stiffer penalties including a fine of up to $3,000, and a jail sentence of up to a year.

Repeat offenders can be fined up to $5,000 and also be jailed up to two years. Anyone convicted of causing death by dangerous driving could be jailed up to five years.

Too easy on drink drivers

Lawyer Gloria James, 41, however, felt that a driver who kills someone might get off lightly if charged with causing death through a negligent or rash act under Section 304A of the Penal Code.

She said the offender would usually get a fine of $6,000 to $10,000 and would be disqualified from driving for three to five years.

She added: 'Here, a life is lost because of the offender's negligence and a fine seems too lenient to compensate the family. Though the offender would also be slapped with a civil suit (fatal accident claim), this payout is usually by the insurance company and the punishment would appear to be too lenient.'

Mr Choo told The New Paper he wrote to the media as he felt the punishments for drink driving were not effective.

In his letter, he had suggested confiscating the driver's vehicle, imposing a fine 10 times the list price of the car involved in the offence, immediate jail time until the case was heard in court, and a life ban on driving.

He also suggested increasing the prison term to a minimum of five years.

He said: 'If a person can buy a car for $50,000, what's a $5,000 fine for a third offence? There are more drink drivers than people feeding monkeys, so they should get a heavier fine.'

When asked about the perceived disparity between the punishments for drink driving and feeding monkeys, and to comment on Mr Choo's suggestions, all the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) would say was that sentencing was a prerogative of the courts.

Said a spokesman: 'The maximum is set by Parliament. Within the range set out in a statute, the trial judge has a discretion.'

Lawyer Mark Goh, 42, however, suggested the law may have to be reviewed. A lawyer for 15 years, he said drink driving offences were common in court and the tariffs and fines were reviewed very frequently.

But the monkeys were a separate matter.

He said: 'The feeding monkey legislation may be an old piece of law and may not have been reviewed recently. This was probably a case which came up suddenly and AGC did not review it to see how it compares with other statutes.'

He said there could be instances where crimes were not only found in the Penal Code but in obscure or little-used acts like the Parks and Trees Act, which could contain legislation which are not in sync with modern times.

He added: 'This is quite normal and that is why we have reviews to update these odd pieces of legislation.'

DIFFERENCES IN FINES

FEEDING MONKEYS

# $3,000 fine (starting point)

# 154 fined in '08

# 31 fined, so far, this year

DRINK DRIVING

# $1,000 min fine

# 3,586 arrested in '08

# 1,141 caught so far, this year


Read more!

NEA getting tougher on litterbugs

Stiffer penalties and more enforcement in place; public campaign to get message across
Amresh Gunasingham, Straits Times 29 May 09;

ENFORCEMENT is being stepped up here to tackle the rising problem of litterbugs.

The National Environment Agency (NEA), in a drive to improve public cleanliness standards here, has increased the number of man hours dedicated to targeting littering 'hot spots' by 150 per cent.

The worst spots are shopping malls, bus interchanges and popular food centres.

With more eyes in search of offenders, a record 4,463 litterbugs were nabbed by NEA enforcement officers last month, 33 per cent higher than the average of 3,363 recorded for each of the first three months of this year.

Also introduced last month, fines for first-time offenders who failed to dispose of small items such as cigarette butts, sweet wrappers and parking coupon tabs in litter bins were increased to $300 - a rise of $100.

And repeat offenders now get harsher penalties. In addition to serving Corrective Work Orders (CWO), they can also be hit with fines of up to $5,000.

Under the CWO scheme, which was introduced in November 1992, littering offenders can be made to complete up to 12 hours picking up rubbish, with each session capped at three hours. These are normally held at parks, beaches, town centres, shopping malls and around HDB estates.

The revisions are the first made in the past decade.

An NEA spokesman said the majority of litterbugs are male smokers aged between 21 and 30 years. Of the number caught this year, 4.5 per cent - or 655 - were repeat offenders.

NEA is also tackling the litter issue through a public education campaign that targets schools, businesses, grassroots organisations and major outdoor events such as the National Day Parade.

The effort will be given a boost later this year when a new national cleanliness campaign is launched to promote a cleaner living environment.

But Mr Wilson Ang, founder of environmental group Eco Singapore, which promotes more sustainable lifestyles among youth here, feels harsher penalties for littering will bring about only 'short-term success'.

'As with any habit, it takes an individual time to change a personal habit,' he said.

He added that the key to bringing about change to this perennial problem starts in school: 'Education is the long-term strategy to groom Singapore into being a more socially gracious society.'

He said more people need to take ownership of their environment.

NEA said it was too early to judge whether the increase in fines last month has had the desired effect of cleaning up the mess.

'We believe that penalties such as fines are strong deterrents against littering and are still necessary against the minority who continue to litter,' the spokesman said.

But ultimately, it is personal responsibility that matters when it comes to keeping Singapore clean and litter free, she added.

Laws a must to curb littering: Expert
WHO adviser lauds Singapore's efforts but notes problems with smokers, foreign workers
Maria Almenoar, Straits Times 29 May 09;

SINGAPORE'S ongoing issue with litter was openly debated at a liveable cities forum hosted by Singapore's Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) yesterday.

The event, attended by 200 guests at the Suntec convention centre, was organised by the CLC as well as the Health Promotion Board and the National Environment Agency (NEA).

Dr Everold Hosein, senior communication adviser-consultant with the World Health Organisation (WHO), spoke on social change and community engagement for health and liveable cities.

He said education and persuasion alone are not enough when it comes to changing people's mindsets about health and cleanliness.

'Enforcement and coercion are key to getting people to be better behaved,' he said.

The question of Singapore's own battle with cleanliness was raised during Dr Hosein's talk. He said Singapore had done a 'spectacular job' in curbing the problem and said it was a good example for other cities.

'When you have 80per cent of your population following the rules and the country looks this clean, that is a good job,' he said.

But Singapore could still work on some 'problem areas' - among them, Little India and getting Singaporeans to stop throwing their cigarette butts on the floor.

Dr Hosein has been working with the NEA since last month on a study about Singapore's litter issue. He likened Little India to New Year's Eve in New York - only in Singapore it is a weekly affair in which foreign workers come to enjoy the 'carnival' in Serangoon Road.

'To put it bluntly, you cannot expect people who have been living around a mess for 10, 15 years of their life, to come here for two years to work and change their mentality,' he said.

He added that when it comes to foreign workers, enforcement is the only way to make sure cleanliness is adhered to.

'Even if you are not meting out a fine, you must have officers patrolling the area to give the appearance of enforcement,' he said.

As for cigarette butts, he said Singaporeans tended to give the excuse that there were not enough rubbish bins in sight.

In Japan, however, smokers carry a container in which to put their cigarette stubs before emptying them into a dustbin.

One audience member asked if Singaporeans tended to litter because they are used to maids cleaning up after them.

Dr Geh Min, former Nature Society president and a panellist at the event, related a story about a mother who wanted her son taken out of a school project which involved weighing the amount of litter the school produced. 'She offered her maid to do her son's part,' she said.

Relating her own experience at home, panellist and guest of honour Dr Amy Khor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary (Environment and Water Resources), said: 'When my family eats, everyone just gets up and leaves the table without clearing the table unless I remind them. I can only imagine when I'm not at home.'

Other panellists said that while some parents were not good role models for their children, there were occasions when children managed to convince their parents to change their bad behaviour.


Read more!

Don’t Despair, Repair

Nature recovers from damage sooner than expected
Journal Watch Online 29 May 09;

Be skeptical of frequent claims that humans are doing irreparable harm to our environment that will take centuries or millennia to repair. Two Yale University researchers compiled 240 independent studies of polluted or damaged ecosystems and came to what they call a startling conclusion: once humans committed to their restoration, most ecosystems healed within a matter of decades.

Eighty-three of the ecosystems analyzed by these studies showed full recovery for variables representing ecosystem function, animal community and plant community health; 90 had mixed results, 67 showed no recovery, the PLoS ONE study found.

Forests took the longest to recover, an average of 42 years, while many aquatic systems needed between 10 and 20 years. Meanwhile around a half a century was needed to mend ecosystems harmed by agriculture or a multiplicity of threats, whereas the effects of oil spills, trawling, invasive species, and mining were reversed in less than a decade.

The authors say their study redeems the value of restoration to those who would monger visions of doom and insist on chronicling ecosystem destruction in hopes of banning all human activity in “natural” areas. “Our results are not intended to give license to exploit ecosystems without regard to sustainability,” they write. “The message of our paper is that recovery is possible and can be rapid for many ecosystems, giving much hope for humankind to transition to sustainable management of global ecosystems.” – Jessica Leber

Source: Jones, H.P. and Schmitz, O.J. et al. 2009. Rapid Recovery of Damaged Ecosystems. PLoS ONE DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005653


Read more!

Call for support to end wildlife trade in Malaysia

Letter to the editor: More support needed from other agencies to prevent poaching and end wildlife trade
WWF 29 May 09;

TRAFFIC Southeast Asia and WWF-Malaysia applaud the Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), particularly the enforcement team in Perak, for nabbing poachers in the Bintang Hijau Forest Reserve in Perak (Poachers Nabbed in Perak Reserve, May 25).

Their efforts to safeguard protected areas and wildlife against poachers, is a clear commitment to tackling a problem that is an increasing concern for Malaysia.

Poaching is the first step in the chain of illegal wildlife trade and consumption that could leave us with empty forests one day. Areas like the Bintang Hijau Forest Reserve where the Cambodian poachers were nabbed are home to many threatened species such as the Sumatran rhinoceros, clouded leopard and Sambar deer. It is also an important tiger landscape as outlined in the National Tiger Action Plan.

As previous enforcement actions have shown, it is not the only area under threat.

WWF-Malaysia has also found signs of local and foreign encroachment and poaching along the Grik-Jeli highway which provides the access points into the Belum-Temengor forest complex. In these areas, some animals are specifically targeted by poachers, others are killed opportunistically by poachers searching for non-timber forest products such as gaharu (agarwood).

Therefore the department’s move to step up enforcement efforts in the Hulu Perak district, including the Gerik-Jeli highway, is an excellent and timely move.

TRAFFIC and WWF-Malaysia urge the department to continue its good work and not to stop at nabbing poachers, but to further follow the trail of the illegal wildlife traders they supply.

Stopping armed poachers is dangerous and difficult work that needs the support of many agencies. TRAFFIC and WWF-Malaysia call on other national enforcement agencies including the police, army, Customs Department and Forestry Department to join in the fight to stamp out poaching and cross-border encroachment.

The public can do their part by reporting wildlife crime to the Wildlife Crime Hotline, via SMS to
019-3564194.

From: Dato' Dr. Dionysius S.K. Sharma D.P.M.P., Executive Director/CEO, WWF-Malaysia and Noorainie Awang Anak, Senior Programme Officer, TRAFFIC Southeast Asia


Read more!

Rare Madagascan tortoises stolen

BBC News 28 May 09;

Four of the world's rarest tortoises have been stolen from a captive breeding programme in Madagascar.

The ploughshare tortoises were being raised by The Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust in a bid to bolster the wild population.

The species is so rare that less than 500 are thought to survive in the wild.

Unless they are recovered conservationists believe the stolen tortoises are destined for private collections in Europe, US or Asia.

The theft took place on the evening of the 6 May.

The thieved entered pre-release enclosures inside Baly Bay National Park, Madagascar, where eight ploughshare tortoises were being kept under quarantine prior to being released.

These enclosures were at a secret location and not accessible to the public.

All four stolen animals were nearly mature animals, which Durrell had spent years raising. The four were part of a group of 44 specimens that Durrell is attempting to release into the wild.

The ploughshare tortoise ( Astrochelys yniphora ) of North-western Madagascar is the largest of Madagascar's tortoises. Adults reach about 45cm in length. The entire wild population is found within the Baly Bay National Park, and the species is classified as Critically Endangered by IUCN.

Bush fires and bush pigs pose a threat to the future survival of the species, as does the illegal pet trade. Due to the tortoise's rarity individuals can change hands for thousands of dollars.

Local law enforcement agencies kept news of the theft quiet while enquires continued. They have since made arrests connected to the theft, but the missing animals have not yet been recovered.

"As with many other species around the world, greed is proving to be the major threat facing the ploughshare tortoise," says Andrew Terry, Durrell's Conservation Manager.

"The selfish desires of foreign collectors could in the end send this species to extinction. We are doing what we can to protect and restore the ploughshare, but if the international demand remains this high we will end up fighting a losing battle."


Read more!

Beavers return to the UK after 400-year gap

BBC News 29 May 09;

A total of 11 beavers have been released into the wild in Argyll as part of a reintroduction programme.

Four more may join the Scottish Beaver Trial being run in Knapdale Forest.

The beavers have been brought to Scotland from Norway and their release marks a return to the UK after a 400-year absence.

The release will be studied to determine whether the trial should be extended and beavers reintroduced across Scotland.

Colin Galbraith, of Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), has been an enthusiastic backer of the scheme.

He said: "I think this is a hugely exciting move and one in which we've got to take people with us.

"There's never been a reintroduction of a mammal back to the UK.

"We've done the red kite and the sea eagle - they've gone pretty well - people are now behind that.

"We've got to try to do this reintroduction of a mammal in a very scientific careful and monitored way."

But not everyone has been behind the scheme.

Alan Kettlewhite is a biologist with Argyll Fisheries Trust: "Potentially they can alter the habitats of fish, restricting access to spawning grounds.

"I think the concerns are based on studies in other countries where sometimes dam-building can prevent fish access to their spawning grounds, particularly in dry years where you don't get much rain in the autumn time."

But SNH's Colin Galbraith said he felt a duty towards the beavers: "For me the argument is very simple.

"They were here - we killed them out.

"I think we've got the moral obligation to bring them back."

Continuously tested

Project officer Jenny Holden said: "The main things people are concerned about are giardia and cryptosporidium.

"They are bacteria that can infect the guts of humans and make you feel really quite unwell - food-poisoning type bugs.

"The beavers that are released will have been tested continuously for six months and then throughout the five year trial to make sure they are clear of these bacteria.

"So if we find a few years down the line that the beavers are infected, they won't have brought it in, they will have caught it out in the environment here."

Darren Dobson is from the Carinbaan Hotel near the release site.

He is delighted at the prospect of beavers, and hopes they will prove to be a major tourist attraction.

He said: "Generally speaking it's all positive. I haven't met anyone myself who is negative to the idea.

"It's going to bring more tourists - and this is just one more thing to add to what this area's got."

Scottish Natural Heritage, (SNH), will monitor the relationship between beavers and woodland, water plants, river habitat, water levels, otters, dragonflies, damselflies and freshwater fish.

The beavers themselves will also be under close scrutiny, using tracking data.

SNH will co-ordinate the scientific monitoring work with a range of independent bodies, including Oxford University Wildlife Conservation Research Unit and the Argyll Fisheries Trust.

SNH is contributing £275,000 to the cost of monitoring the trial.

It is claimed the trial will be a major contribution to Scotland's Species Action Framework, which identifies 32 species, including European beaver, as the focus of new management action.

Wild beavers return to British waters for first time in 200 years
• Release of native species a reintroduction victory
• Lodges built for family groups in Argyll forest
Severin Carrell, The Guardian 29 May 09;

It has been described as a "tubby spaniel" by its admirers and as a "destructive nocturnal rat" by its critics. Now, the beaver is officially back in the wild in Britain.

At least two centuries after the species was hunted to extinction in the UK, three beaver families have been released into three lochs in forest unpopulated by people near the Sound of Jura in Argyll.

The release marks the most ambitious mammal reintroduction programme to date in Britain.

The first two families were shepherded into man-made "lodges" in Knapdale forestry reserve today. The last family will be uncaged tomorrow by the Scottish environment minister ­Roseanna Cunningham. "Welcoming beavers back to Scotland marks a historic day for conservation," Cunningham said. "These charismatic creatures are not only likely to create interest in Scotland from further afield but crucially can play a key role in providing good habitat for a wide range of wetland species."

Allan Bantick, chairman of the Scottish Beaver Trial partnership, said: "Beavers are a native species made extinct by man and we are hoping our trial reintroduction is a step towards seeing this corrected."

However, it emerged today that the project has suffered problems. Five of the 17 beavers, which were imported from Norway last November, died while in quarantine at a Devon reserve – reportedly from unrelated causes. So the organisers, left with only three families and one adult, held back those remaining. They hope a family will later be produced for Knapdale. Meantime, the Royal ­Zoological Society of Scotland, a partner in the five-year pilot project, recruited instead two other beaver families, held in Scotland.

Plans also for a second pilot, testing beaver reintroduction in populated Highland areas, were dropped, partly after complaints from the salmon industry. That was to have started as early as next year.

The beavers project has identified Insh Marshes national nature reserve near Kingussie as their favoured site, but the Scottish government and Scottish Natural Heritage want this delayed until the Knapdale project has been properly tested.

In the next few months, naturalists in Wales are also hoping to name six possible beaver release sites, then reintroduce the animals in two to three years' time.

Natural England began its beaver re­lease consultation in March, identifying among areas the New Forest, Bodmin Moor in Cornwall, and the Forest of Bowland in Lancashire, as prime beaver habitat.

Naturalists in England and Wales hope to avoid the controversy that dogged the Scottish project. The first plan to release beavers in Knapdale was vetoed by ministers in 2005 after intense lobbying from lairds, farmers and fisheries who claimed the animals would damage salmon and trout rivers, as well as flood farmland and commercial forestry with their dams.

But, by felling trees, creating lakeside lagoons and opening up forest canopies, beavers create richer riverside habitats and help to prevent flooding by increasing the size of wetlands.


Read more!

Everglades Swamped With Invading Pythons

Jim Loney, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

THE EVERGLADES - The population of Burmese pythons in Florida's Everglades may have grown to as many as 150,000 as the non-native snakes make a home and breed in the fragile wetlands, officials said Thursday.

Wildlife biologists say the troublesome invaders -- dumped in the Everglades by pet owners who no longer want them -- have become a pest and pose a significant threat to endangered species like the wood stork and Key Largo woodrat.

"They eat things that we care about," said Skip Snow, an Everglades National Park biologist, as he showed a captured, 15-foot (4.6-meter) Burmese python to U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who was on his first fact-finding mission to the Everglades since the Obama administration took office.

With Snow maintaining a strong grip on its head, the massive snake hissed angrily at Salazar and the other federal officials who gathered around it at a recreation area off Alligator Alley in the vast saw grass prairie. It took two other snake wranglers to control the python's body.

"A snake this size could eat a small deer or a bobcat without too much trouble," Snow told Salazar before the secretary boarded an airboat for a tour of the Everglades.

Everglades biologists have been grappling with the growing python problem for a decade. The snakes are one of the largest species in the world and natives of Southeast Asia, but they found a home to their liking in the Everglades when pet owners started using the wetland as a convenient dumping ground.

"They're fine when they're small but they can live 25 to 30 years. When they get bigger you have to feed them small animals like rabbits, and cleaning up after them, it's like cleaning up after a horse," Snow said. "People don't want big snakes."

TRAPPERS AND HUNTERS

Pythons captured in the Everglades are often killed. Wildlife officials are trying trapping and other eradication methods, and are considering offering bounties to hunters. Scientists are experimenting with ways to lure the snakes into traps, including the use of pheromones -- chemicals that serve as sexual attractants -- as bait.

"They are estimating there are 150,000 of these snakes. They proliferate so quickly," said Florida Senator Bill Nelson, who accompanied Salazar on the airboat tour of the Everglades. "They've already found grown deer, they've found full sized bobcats inside them. It's just a matter of time before one gets the highly endangered Florida panther."

But biologists played down the risk to the panther, the most endangered species in the Everglades. There are believed to be only about 100 left, but they range over a territory of some 2 million acres.

"It would take some awfully unique circumstances for a python and a panther to meet up," said Darrell Land, a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission biologist. "And the cats are very wary and they have very quick reaction times."

Pythons are not the only invader troubling the Everglades.

New fish and rodent species have also become pests, and two thriving colonies of the Nile monitor lizard, an Africa native that can grow to 7 feet in length, have established themselves on opposite sides of the state.

Nelson, a Democrat, said the Obama administration had committed $200 million, including $100 million of stimulus money, so far this year to Everglades restoration, a 35-year project valued at $8 billion when it was started nearly a decade ago.

The project is designed to restore natural water flow and native wildlife populations to the shallow, slow-moving river that dominates the interior of southern Florida.

(Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Mohammad Zargham)


Read more!

Noisy ecotourists get wild birds in a flap
Bob Holmes, New Scientist 28 May 09;

Ecotourists who "ooh" and "aah" over the marvels of nature may be doing more harm than if they appreciated the animals silently. Some species, it turns out, become significantly more stressed by even quiet conversation.

Daniel Karp, of Stanford University in California, studied three colonies of hoatzins, a large primitive bird popular with tourists, near several ecotourism lodges in the Peruvian Amazon.

Karp and his colleagues approached individual hoatzins by canoe either silently or while playing recordings of tourist conversation at different levels.

These started at a volume of 50 decibels, which is just a little louder than the hushed conversation of a library and typical of ecotourists' "don't scare them" chat; and rose to 60 and 70 dB, which equal and exceed the loudest conversations of actual tourists. On each approach, the researchers recorded the distance at which the bird became visibly agitated, and the distance at which it took flight.

The sound of even a quiet conversation caused the birds to begin clucking and defecating – a common defence response – at longer approach distances than for quiet approaches. The noisiest approaches also caused the birds to fly off more readily. Previous studies have shown that stressed hoatzins are less likely to rear chicks successfully.
'Zipped lips'

As time passed during Karp's month-long study, the hoatzins gradually allowed silent people to approach more closely before becoming agitated, indicating that the birds were becoming accustomed to the people. In contrast, the hoatzins showed no such adaptation to approaches that included playback of conversation.

Karp's results show that ecotourism is not as benign as many people think, says Dan Blumstein, a behavioural ecologist and conservation biologist at the University of California at Los Angeles. "We all want to pat ourselves on the back and say ecotourism is good for the environment, but we ignore the fact that there may be deleterious consequences."

Karp takes a more sanguine view. If tourists learn to keep their lips zipped and maintain a safe distance, they can get closer to the birds without agitating them, he says.

Journal reference: Biodiversity and Conservation (DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9675-6)


Read more!

Cuckoo's call becomes rarer in UK

BBC News 27 May 09;

The cuckoo - known for its springtime song - has joined a "red list" of the UK's most threatened bird species.

The lapwing, yellow wagtail and herring gull are also deemed to be urgently in need of conservation action. In the latest assessment of the UK's bird population, the number red-listed has risen by 5% since 2002, to more than one in five.

The RSPB said the growing number of charismatic, widespread and familiar birds now on the list was "scandalous".

RSPB conservation director Mark Avery said the "most shocking" decline was that of summer-visiting birds, like the cuckoo, which has seen numbers fall by 37% in the last 15 years.

Experts are not yet certain why migrant birds are in decline in the UK.

The number of red-listed species has risen to 52 (21%) out of 246 birds assessed, which is up from 40 species (16%) when the last assessment was done in 2002.

Most birds on the red list have seen their range or populations decline by more than half in recent years, or have undergone historical declines since 1800, from which they have not fully recovered.

The house sparrow, starling and song thrush are among the once-common British birds now on the list.

Some 21 red-listed bird species are summer visitors, most of which spend the winter in sub-Saharan Africa.

Missing song

In the latest assessment, there was good news for the bullfinch, quail, reed bunting, Scottish crossbill, stone curlew and woodlark - which were all downgraded from the red list to "amber".

They had either increased their populations or range - mainly as a result of improvements in management of farmland for the stone curlew, and heathland for the woodlark - or more had been discovered about their numbers, as with the Scottish crossbill.

The assessment results will be published in the June edition of British Birds.

Andy Clements, director of the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), said: "A gap all of us will notice is the lack of the cuckoo's familiar song. Their decline is emblematic of downward trends in many long-distance migrants from Africa."

He said BTO and its partners were working on research to try to understand why migrant birds are in decline.

"As this report shows, when we know what to do, and there are funds to do it, we can improve the fortunes of birds such as stone curlew and woodlark."

Although the cause of the cuckoo's decline is not known, a number of theories have been discussed, said the RSPB's Grahame Madge.

Research will look at whether there are problems with habitat, either in the UK or in Africa, or on their migration route, he said.

The species relies heavily on hairy moth caterpillars for food and, with many species of butterfly and moth are also suffering declines, a diminishing food supply could be having an impact.

In addition, with cuckoos laying their eggs in other birds nests, there may be issues with their key hosts, such as the meadow pipit and dunnock, being in decline.

While no link to climate change has been proved, there are concerns that, with European temperatures rising, migratory birds are losing their ecological advantage over birds which over-winter in Europe.

The addition of five species to the red list - Temminck's stint, ruff, whimbrel, redwing and fieldfare - which are at the southern edge of their spread in the British Isles, could suggest a shift in range brought on by a changing climate.

Seabirds join list

For the first time, two winter visitors, the dunlin and the scaup, have been added to the red list because of declines in their wintering populations.

Rich Hearn, the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust's head of species monitoring, said their inclusion highlighted an "increasingly widespread phenomenon of climate change-driven shifts in distribution".

Three seabirds have also joined the red list, the Balearic shearwater, which is at a higher risk of global extinction than the giant panda; the Arctic skua, the only bird to go straight from the low-concern "green list" straight to red; and the herring gull.

The assessment, Birds of Conservation Concern 3, is compiled by a group of organisations including the BTO, Countryside Council for Wales, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Natural England, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, RSPB, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust.

Society warns cuckoo bird in danger of extinction
Michael Bushnell, Associated Press Yahoo News 28 May 09;

LONDON – Britain's cuckoo bird, known for its distinctive call, is in danger of extinction along with 51 other species, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said in a new report Thursday.

It found that 21 percent of Britain's bird species face extinction unless steps are taken to protect them, spokesman Tim Webb said. He said the cuckoo and other birds that visit Britain in the summer have suffered population loss largely due to a decrease in food and water supply in sub-Saharan Africa, where many migrate from.

The problem is difficulty in finding food, he said.

"The Sahara desert is spreading and the birds are having a hard time flying out in good condition," Webb said. "There isn't just one single problem, there are a host."

The society said the cuckoo population in Britain has declined 37 percent since 1994.

The population declines were not limited to summer migratory birds like cuckoos. Native birds such as the herring gull also made the threatened list.

Six species did see a recovery in the past seven years, however. The report said the woodlark has seen a "dramatic" increase in population, as had the stone-curlew. Webb said these birds saw healthy gains thanks to an increased effort to maintain woodlands that would allow their numbers to grow.

Webb said the inclusion of such well-known birds as the cuckoo and herring gull on the list could serve as an eye-opener to people who are unaware of the decline in bird population.

"Everyone thinks they are always there," he said of the birds. "They didn't think that such common birds would be struggling, and if nothing changes we will see them disappear."

Cuckoo Becomes One Of UK's Most Threatened Birds
Stephen Addison, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

LONDON - The cuckoo, traditional harbinger of Spring, has become one of Britain's most threatened birds, joining a "red list" of the 52 most vulnerable species.

Numbers of the bird famous for laying its eggs in others' nests are down almost 40 percent in 15 years.

Others on the danger list, which now accounts for 21 percent of all Britain's bird species, include the lapwing, yellow wagtail, the house sparrow and the starling.

The 2009 list was published on Thursday by the RSPB charity on behalf of a range of conservation bodies like the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and the British Trust for Ornithology. The last survey was compiled in 2002.

The RSPB said the continued decline of widespread farmland and woodland birds is a theme which has developed since then.

Lapwing, a formerly widespread wading bird, and the hawfinch, a woodland bird largely confined to England, have both joined the red list in the latest assessment.

"An increasing number of charismatic, widespread and familiar birds are joining the list of those species most in need of help; this is scandalous," said Mark Avery, the RSPB's Conservation Director.

"When the RSPB was formed 120 years ago, few would have been concerned about the cuckoo, lapwing, starling or house sparrow.

"Now these birds are some of our greatest conservation priorities. Most shocking is the more recently observed and drastic decline of summer-visiting birds, typified by the cuckoo."

Other visitors at risk include the wood warbler, and tree pipit.

Their addition to the red list is highlighting the concern that many long-distance migratory birds nesting in Europe and wintering in Africa are increasingly in trouble, the RSPB said.

Three species of seabird join the list for the first time.

The Balearic shearwater -- a smaller relative of the albatross -- visits Britain from its Mediterranean breeding grounds regularly each autumn.

This seabird, which the RSPB said is thought to face a higher risk of global extinction even than the giant panda, is the rarest bird to regularly occur in the UK.

Highlighting concerns about the fortunes of seabirds around the northern coasts of the British Isles, the Arctic skua has joined the red list, as has the familiar herring gull.

However, six species: the stone-curlew, woodlark, quail, Scottish crossbill, bullfinch and reed bunting, have been removed from the 2002 red list, largely because of a recovery in their numbers or range, or a better understanding of their populations.

(Editing by Michael Holden)


Read more!