ADB backs China wind farm project

Yahoo News 7 Jul 09;

MANILA (AFP) – The Asian Development Bank is helping to finance a pioneering private-sector wind farm in China's Inner Mongolia that will help the fast-growing nation fight climate change, officials said.

The Manila-based ADB is lending about 24 million dollars towards the overall cost of 73 million dollars for the facility, China's first wind farm to be built as a joint venture between Chinese and Japanese companies.

"The lack of finance on reasonable terms has held back the development of clean energy projects in (China)," ADB investment specialist Hisaka Kimura said in a statement.

"This project could become a model for future collaborations between state-owned enterprises and foreign investors in renewable energy projects, and may encourage (China's) private sector to invest in wind power projects."

The 12-square-kilometre (4.5-square-mile) wind farm in Inner Mongolia will produce about 133 gigawatt-hours of electricity a year, and will cut China's carbon dioxide emissions by 140,000 tonnes annually, the statement said.

The development at Chifeng City is a joint venture between the state-owned China Datang Corp. and three Japanese firms -- Kyushu Electric Power Co., Sumitomo Corp. and Sumitomo Corp. (CHINA) Holdings.


Read more!

A dollar a day could keep climate change away: EPA

Jasmin Melvin, Reuters 7 Jul 09;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The average American family would pay at most $1 a day more to fight climate change, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told a Senate committee on Tuesday.

EPA head Lisa Jackson said carbon-cutting legislation would, on average, amount to a 50-cent per day cost per household in 2020 and edge up for wealthier families, people who drive long distances and those living in states dependent on coal for electricity.

But even a doubling of the national average would only cost families $1 per day, Jackson said.

"Can anyone honestly say that the head of an American household would not spend a dollar a day to safeguard the well being of his or her children?" Jackson asked the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

But the committee's top Republican Senator, James Inhofe, pointed to a July 1 poll by Rasmussen indicating that "56 percent of Americans are not willing to pay anything to fight global warming."

The Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed a climate change bill last month that aims to slash greenhouse gases. Now the Senate is considering its own legislation, a top priority for the Obama administration.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu told the hearing that meeting the greenhouse gas targets in the House bill would cost households in 2020 about the same as buying a postage stamp each day. A first class stamp costs 44 cents.

"History suggests that the actual costs could be even lower," Chu said, noting that sulfur dioxide emission cuts will cost a quarter of the original estimates.

Chu backs energy efficiency for achieving short-term emissions cuts, and emphasized the need for clean energy incentives to spur the research and development needed for long-term goals.

Jackson said she was "not concerned at this moment" that carbon offsets would dilute the effectiveness of proposed legislation.

Offsets allow companies' investments in emission-cutting efforts around the world to nullify some of their own emissions. Some environmental groups say this measure, which is in the House bill, would provide a loophole for polluters to not change their practices.

"We are confident that we are going to get an energy and climate change bill that is good for our country," said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

"There are ways in which we can bridge the gaps between Democrats and Republicans," he said.

(Reporting by Jasmin Melvin; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)


Read more!

Scientists urge G8 to cut greenhouse gas emissions

Yahoo News 7 Jul 09;

L'AQUILA, Italy (AFP) – International scientists on Tuesday urged the leaders of the world's biggest polluters meeting this week at the Group of Eight summit to cut their greenhouse gas emissions.

The 27-strong group of Australian, European, Indian, Japanese and US scientists wrote an open letter calling on the leaders to ensure that global greenhouse gas emissions reach peak levels "by no later than 2020."

Intervening on the eve of the G8 summit in L'Aquila, central Italy, the group also said leaders should commit to cutting emissions "by at least 50 percent relative to 1990 levels by 2050."

Negotiators struggling to reach an agreement on cutting emissions in time for a conference in Denmark by the end of the year regard the three-day summit as a golden opportunity to haul the process out of a rut.

The scientists said developed countries should make the deepest cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, "at least 80 percent relative to 1990 by 2050 with appropriate intermediate targets set in time for Copenhagen."

They said that developing countries should commit "by Copenhagen to significant gains in energy efficiency, reductions in carbon intensity, and cuts in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions over the next two decades."

G8 leaders are to discuss climate change among other subjects on Thursday at the summit with their counterparts from other major economies such as China, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa and South Korea.

While G8 countries generate 40 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, the broader group accounts for 80 percent of the total.

The scientists warned that "warming exceeding two degrees Celsius predicted for later this century would create great risks and have irreversible consequences."


Read more!

G8 struggles to persuade China, India on climate

Alister Doyle and Krittivas Mukherjee, Reuters 7 Jul 09;

ROME (Reuters) - Rich nations sought to persuade China and India on Tuesday to agree to a goal of halving world greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 at a summit of major economies in Italy later this week.

Environment ministers or senior officials from the 17-member Major Economies Forum (MEF) met in Rome, trying to end deadlock over a declaration that could be a step toward a new U.N. climate pact due to be agreed in Copenhagen in December.

"Positions have not shifted," a delegate said of the talks, called at the last minute to help leaders agree a united front on climate change on Thursday in L'Aquila, Italy, during a Group of Eight summit.

China and India have been opposed to a goal of halving world greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 as part of a declaration by MEF nations, which account for 80 percent of world greenhouse gas emissions.

The G8 countries -- the United States, Japan, Russia, Germany, Britain, France, Italy and Canada -- adopted a "vision" of a 50 percent cut in global emissions by 2050 last year and want major developing nations to sign up too.

But developing nations say the rich are to blame for most emissions from burning greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution and must set deep 2020 goals for cutting their own emissions before asking for help with 2050 goals.

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi also told a news conference that China was resisting progress on the climate.

VANGUARD

"Europe wants to be in the vanguard, the Obama administration is in the same position, but there is strong resistance that I have encountered with the Chinese presidency," said Berlusconi, referring to a meeting on Monday.

A June 30 MEF draft drawn up by the United States and Mexico said that: "We support an aspirational global goal of reducing global emissions by 50 percent by 2050, with developed countries reducing emissions by at least 80 percent by 2050."

China and Indian officials have said that poor nations need to be allowed to use more energy to end poverty. China has recently overtaken the United States as top world emitter and India is fourth behind Russia.

If the deadlock persists, U.S. President Barack Obama, who sees the MEF as a step toward a U.N. deal, would end the July 9 meeting with just a "chair's summary" rather than a statement agreed by all 17 MEF leaders.

"Only ambitious action by the G8 could break the deadlock in the negotiations," said Tobias Muenchmeyer of environmental group Greenpeace. He noted that China and India want rich nations to cut emissions by at least 40 percent by 2020 below 1990 levels and far higher climate investments.

A separate climate draft for the G8, dated June 24, indicated progress toward setting a target of limiting a rise in world temperatures to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) over pre-industrial times.

The European Union views 2C as a threshold for "dangerous" climate changes such as ever more heatwaves, floods, droughts and extinctions. The United States, Russia, Canada and Japan have not signed up for such a target at the G8.

The G8 draft said "global emissions should peak by 2020 and then be substantially reduced to limit the average increases in global temperature to 2 Celsius above pre-industrial levels."

(Editing by Stephen Brown)


Read more!

'Time to ditch climate policies'

Roger Harrabin, BBC News 7 Jul 09;

An international group of academics is urging world leaders to abandon their current policies on climate change.

The authors of How to Get Climate Policy Back on Course say the strategy based on overall emissions cuts has failed and will continue to fail.

They want G8 nations and emerging economies to focus on an approach based on improving energy efficiency and decarbonising energy supply.

Critics of the report's recommendations say they are a dangerous diversion.

The report is published by the London School of Economics' (LSE) Mackinder Programme and the University of Oxford's Institute for Science, Innovation & Society.

LSE Mackinder programme director Gwyn Prins said the current system of attempting to cap carbon emissions then allow trading in emissions permits had led to emissions continuing to rise.

He said world proposals to expand carbon trading schemes and channel billions of dollars into clean energy technologies would not work.

"The world has been recarbonising, not decarbonising," Professor Prins said.

"The evidence is that the Kyoto Protocol and its underlying approach have had and are having no meaningful effect whatsoever.

"Worthwhile policy builds upon what we know works and upon what is feasible rather than trying to deploy never-before implemented policies through complex institutions requiring a hitherto unprecedented and never achieved degree of global political alignment."

The report has drawn an angry response from some environmentalists, who acknowledge the problems it highlights but fear that the solutions it proposes will not work.

Tom Burke, from Imperial College London and a former government adviser, said: "The authors are right to be concerned about the lack of urgency in the political response to climate change.

"They are also right to identify significant weaknesses in the major policy instrument currently being negotiated.

"But nothing could be more harmful than to propose that the world stop what it is doing on climate change and start again working in a different way," Professor Burke contested.

"This is neither practical nor analytically defensible - and it seems to have been born more out of frustration than understanding of the nature of the political processes involved.

"This is a far more complex, and urgent, diplomatic task than the strategic arms control negotiations and will require an even more sophisticated and multi-channel approach to its solution. Stop-go is not sophisticated."

G8 leaders will discuss climate change on Wednesday before joining leaders of emerging economies on Thursday for a meeting chaired by President Obama.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/8138429.stm


Read more!

Gore says climate deal needs more public pressure

Peter Griffiths, Reuters 7 Jul 09;

OXFORD (Reuters) - Public awareness about the "catastrophe" of climate change is not high enough to pressure politicians into taking action, former Vice President Al Gore said on Tuesday.

Gore, who shared a Nobel Prize in 2007 for his environmental campaigning, said politicians will only do more once the people who elect them force the issue.

Voters need to tell leaders they must act on the environmental concerns if countries are to strike a new deal on global warming at U.N. climate talks in Denmark later this year.

"The only way we can get one is if politicians in each country act and the only way that can happen in turn is if awareness rises to the level to make them feel it is a necessity," Gore said in a speech.

"We can berate politicians for not doing enough and for compromising too much and for not being bold in addressing this existential threat to civilization.

"But the reason that they don't is because the level of awareness and concern among populations still has not risen to cross the threshold that makes the political leaders feel they must address it."

Countries will meet in the Danish capital Copenhagen in December to try to agree a new global deal to restrict manmade climate change. Scientists say global warming is taking place at a quicker pace than previously thought and will lead to more diseases, flooding, extreme weather and crop failures.

Preparatory talks on planned emissions cuts have stumbled on rows between rich countries and poor states, who say they did least to contribute to global warming and will suffer the most.

However, Gore said there were some optimistic signs in the run-up to the talks. China, the United States and Australia have made good progress on the issue, young people are increasingly aware of the dangers of inaction and countries have all the technology needed to fix the problem.

"We have the tools available to us to solve three climate crises," Gore told an environment conference at the University of Oxford, southern England. "We only have to solve one."

Energy efficiency and more use of renewable energy will help cut emissions from coal-fired power plants, he added.

Geothermal power alone could meet the world's current energy needs for the next 30,000 years, Gore said. Geothermal projects involve drilling wells deep into the earth to tap steam or hot water to power turbines.

Halting deforestation, building more efficient buildings and making transport networks less reliant on fossil fuels will also help to cut emissions dramatically, he said.

(Editing by Tim Castle; Editing by Matthew Jones)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 7 Jul 09


Tanah Merah - Cyanobacteria and sea hares
from Singapore Nature and wild shores of singapore

Living sea structures in Singapore
from wild shores of singapore

Xiao Gui Lin: They will see us waving from Such Great Heights.
from You run, we GEOG

The moorhen the merrier
from The annotated budak and not a duck and masked menaces and cuke or not?

Eyelashes of the Crested Caracara
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Oriental Pied Hornbill catches caterpillar
from Bird Ecology Study Group by BESG

Squirrels jump from tree to tree at Bukit Timah Nature Reserve
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Can Artificial Lifeforms Capture Carbon to Create New Fuels?
Craig Venter Says "Yes" from The Daily Galaxy: News from Planet Earth & Beyond

On cheerleaders and watchdogs - the role of science journalism
from Not Exactly Rocket Science


Read more!

Contractor falls into wild-boar trap in Lim Chu Kang forest and breaks leg

He says: 'If there were metal stakes planted...'
Zaihan Mohamed Yusof, The New Paper 7 Jul 09;

HE WAS walking and talking with his friend in the forest, looking for durians and herbs.

Suddenly, there was silence from his friend.

Mr Jian Xin, who is in his 50s, turned around. His friend was nowhere to be seen.

Then he heard muffled shouts for help.

Mr Jian ran over and realised, to his horror, that his friend had fallen into a 3m-deep pit.

The impact shattered a bone in his left foot.

His friend, a sub-contractor who wanted to be known only as Mr Loh, told The New Paper in Mandarin: 'There was no way I could tell I was walking into a trap. Leaves and branches had been placed over the hole.

'If there had been metal stakes planted into the ground, I would have been in serious trouble.'

The two friends had gone to the forest off Murai Farmway in Lim Chu Kang in the afternoon on 3Jun, when Mr Loh fell into the pit, believed to have been dug to trap wild boars.

Recently a dog had to have one of its hind legs amputated after it was believed to have been caught in a wild boar trap in the Lim Chu Kang area.

Its picture, with a bloody bone sticking out from what was left of its hind leg, has horrified many over the past week.

The dog, called Kiwi, may have stepped on a 'bear trap' (see report below), which, when triggered, clamps a jaw of metal teeth around the trapped limb.

Fortunately, Mr Loh's injuries were less severe, although he did require surgery to insert metal screws and a plate into his left foot.

An X-ray showed that the bone near his left ankle had been broken.

Mr Loh said the depth of the pit he fell into was roughly the height of two men, which would make it more than 3m.

If a child fell

He said in a telephone interview: 'A child could have been seriously injured if he fell from that height. I'm angry that irresponsible people still insist on trapping wild boars.

'I grew up in this area (Lim Chu Kang) and I do not see any wild boars any more.'

So why do people still set traps in the area?

They do so because they believe that the price of exotic meat like wild boar or monitor lizard can get them a hefty profit, Mr Ben Lee of Nature Trekkers Singapore told The New Paper last July.

While some aim for profit, others simply eat the meat themselves.

Said Mr Lee: 'It's hard to find wild boar meat in the market. But if it's rare and exotic, it will always be sought after.'

Mr Loh told The New Paper that the herbs he intended to collect that afternoon were to help control his diabetes and cholesterol levels.

His friend, MrJian, told Shin Min Daily News: 'We were walking and talking, and suddenly I didn't hear his (MrLoh's) voice any more. When I turned around, I saw him in a deep hole.'

Unable to pull himself out, MrLoh shouted to MrJian for help.

From the way the pit had been dug, Mr Loh said he believed it was done using an excavator.

At the entrance of the trail leading to where the incident had occurred, this reporter saw an excavator parked beside a mound of soil.

Mr Loh, who frequents the area at least once a month, said his friend had pulled him out using fallen logs and branches.

But it was not easy. Mr Loh had trouble clambering out because of the excruciating pain in his leg.

He was also afraid that the branches would break under his weight.

But he clung on by his hands and was finally pulled to safety.

He also suffered bruises to his back and head, said MrLoh.

Once out of the hole, MrLoh hobbled away, supported by MrJian.

He was then taken to a hospital, where he underwent surgery and spent the next four days under observation.

Said Mr Loh: 'I have diabetes and high cholesterol. I was worried that the operation will bring about more health issues.

'But the doctor said that if I don't do the operation immediately, I might not be able to walk ever again. So, I had no choice.'

After the surgery, MrLoh started to worry about money and how to support his family.

The hospital bill came close to $10,000, he said.

Mr Loh said: 'I can't work or walk, and this means no income for two months. The people who set the traps have no conscience. They should be dealt with according to the law.'

Poaching is illegal in Singapore and under the law, any person who kills or keeps any wild animal or bird without a licence, can be fined up to $1,000.

Trapping animals in nature reserves carries a more severe penalty - you can be jailed up to six months and fined up to $50,000, or both.

Mr Loh said he has heard of other cases of people falling into traps.

In the same area, eight traps were found, Shin Min Daily News reported.

Mr Loh, a father of two, said he himself had made two police reports.

One report was lodged a day after his fall and another in the middle of the month, after a woman fell into the trap, added Mr Loh.

Mr Jian claimed that a few days after Mr Loh's incident, a woman in her 50s fell into the same wild boar trap.

He said the woman suffered minor injuries and had to use her handphone to call for help.

Covered up

When Shin Min Daily News visited the site recently, the pit had been covered up.

Another man interviewed by the paper said wild boars have been spotted in the area.

Yet, their numbers had fallen significantly after the traps began appearing, said the man, who gave his name only as Mr Tang.

On weekends, the area where the incident happened is popular with fruit-pickers, herb-gatherers and birdwatchers.

The road leading to the trail is home to several businesses exporting tropical fish.

Now recuperating at home, Mr Loh said his painful experience will not stop him from returning to the Lim Chu Kang forest.

He said: 'From now on, I have to be more careful and watch every step I take. I grew up in a kampung, naturally I'm going to return to a place like the forest where I feel free.'

Additional reporting by Benita Aw, newsroom intern

WATCH YOUR STEP

BE CAREFUL when you walk in the forested areas off Lim Chu Kang.

The trails could be lined with traps meant for wild animals like boars or monitor lizards.

In July last year, The New Paper published a report on traps discovered near Turut Track off Neo Tiew Road in Lim Chu Kang.

We explained and exposed two kinds of common traps - the tension snare and drop cage. A third trap, which we could not find, was a bear trap, believed to be what maimed Kiwi the dog.

Here's an explanation of how the traps work and what to look out for.

The False Bottom

This is the trap which injured Mr Loh.

It consists of a large, deep pit camouflaged by leaves or branches.

A victim stepping on the branches will fall in.

This way, the animal will be kept fresh as it will remain alive after the fall.

Tell-tale signs of the trap include dead leaves or branches which do not fit the surrounding vegetation.

Prodding the ground in front of you using a stick may help you detect the false bottom.

Also practise taking the same route as the person ahead of you.

The tensioned wire snare

This trap is harder to locate.

Its wire noose and tension cables can be cleverly hidden from view.

When a foot or paw steps into a hole in the trap, a small wooden stake in the ground is lifted, causing a wire noose to tighten around the limb.

At the same time, the tension from a rope or cable pull tight against a branch, lifting the trapped limb skywards.

A small animal can be lifted off the ground, while an adult's leg can be hurt by the jolt.

To spot the trap, look for ropes or cables which appear out of place on trees and the ground.

The Drop Cage

This contraption uses a large cage to trap animals.

Bits of rotting food or fruit are used as bait.

When an animal tries to pull the food away, the cage drops and traps it.

The drop cage is easily recognisable by the bait and the sight of the cage itself.

The Bear Trap

This is by far the most dangerous trap. It can maim you.

Last July, a man who gave his name only as MrTeng, told The New Paper that his friend had seen a bear trap near Turut Track.

The trap, placed beneath the surface of the ground, is activated when the victim steps on a trigger plate.

Sharp jaws then clamp shut on the victim's limb.

To release the trap, the jaws have to be pried open.

The trap would be hard to spot when hidden among rotting leaves.

Perhaps the only way to avoid stepping on a bear trap is to use a stick to poke the way in front of you.


Read more!

Singapore LNG Corporation swings into action

It was incorporated on June 30; EMA's deputy CEO listed as director
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 7 Jul 09;

THE new Singapore LNG Corporation (SLNG) taking over the $1 billion-1.5 billion liquefied natural gas terminal project was incorporated on June 30 - the very day the government announced the move, reflecting its determination to get on with the crucial project.

SLNG's shareholder is the Energy Market Authority - now spearheading the project - with its only listed director at the moment being David Tan, EMA's deputy chief executive officer, a check with the Registry of Companies and Businesses showed.

But SLNG's ranks - currently comprising about 20 staff seconded from the original developer PowerGas and also EMA - will swell, even potentially tripling, very soon, and will include foreign LNG talent currently lacking here.

Announcing the government's takeover of the LNG terminal last week, Senior Minister of State (Trade & Industry) S Iswaran stressed that the immediate priority was to effect a smooth project transition so that it goes on 'without any further slippage in time'.

'PowerGas will continue to be involved by seconding staff to this new company, as they've invested time and built up some level of capability . . . and the new company will tap on this,' he added.

As is, the terminal will now start up in 2013, a year later than originally scheduled.

EMA CEO Lawrence Wong said that building on its initial 20 seconded personnel, including the entire PowerGas team which had worked on the project, 'we will recruit more, including potentially a new person to head the company'.

'We need engineers, we need people with LNG expertise, which won't be easy to find here as we don't have an LNG terminal at the moment. So we will be bringing them in from outside. It will be a challenge to find the right people who have done such projects, and the timeline is quite challenging,' he added.

Ultimately, SLNG hopes to employ between 40 and 60 people to handle the specialised, high-skill jobs.

'Some of these will be filled by Singaporeans as we want to bring them on board to learn the craft as we are building up a new industry . . . and we will also bring in, selectively, people who have done such LNG projects overseas, so there can be technology transfer.'

Mr Iswaran said that one of SLNG's immediate tasks will also be to vet the bids by three competing contractors for the main EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) contract for the terminal, and finalise this.

'Once we've seen the offers, we will have better sense of the investment numbers,' when asked about the cost of the LNG terminal, which he said was typically in the $1 billion-1.5 billion range, although costs of materials such as steel and other components have come down, he added.

SLNG, together with MTI and the Finance Ministry will also study various options and work out the form government financing for the terminal will eventually take.

'We will be able to work out a financing model and give some details in the coming months,' EMA's Mr Wong earlier told media.

SLNG will also work out the appropriate compensation terms with PowerGas to cover the latter's earlier preparatory work, such as front-end engineering design and consultancy undertaken.


Read more!

Hard work ahead at Jurong cavern

Business Times 7 Jul 09;

Hyundai unit has its work cut out in this large and challenging project, which will ease oil storage shortage, reports EMILYN YAP

IN four years, Jurong Island will be home to Southeast Asia's first underground oil storage facility - Jurong Rock Cavern. Marking a milestone in the project's progress, industrial landlord JTC Corporation awarded an $890 million 'design-and-build' contract to South Korea's Hyundai Engineering and Construction in April.

The contractor - which has experience with underground projects in Taiwan and South Korea, and is involved in other projects in Singapore - will design the caverns and begin construction of the first phase at the end of this year.

The facility, under the Banyan Basin, will be completed in stages. By the first half of 2013, it will have two caverns providing 480,000 cu metres of storage. And by 2014, there will be five caverns offering 1.47 million cu m of storage in all.

The project will free about 60 hectares of surface land for higher-value manufacturing operations. It will also 'provide strategic storage for better fuel security' and give Singapore 'a competitive advantage to attract more investors', a JTC spokesman said in April.

The development will be welcomed by the oil industry, which has been looking forward to more storage.

The Jurong Rock Cavern project broke ground in early 2007 but ran into delays early on because of its complexity.

Safe storage

As a major oil refining and distribution centre, Singapore has about 4.6 million cu m of independent petroleum storage, and the private sector is constructing a further 3.5 million cu m. But even then, industry feedback points to a shortage of at least 3 million cu m, which would occupy more than 100 hectares of surface land.

Sites at Jurong Island, in particular, are typically reserved for companies that carry out higher value-added activities such as oil refining and petrochemical production. It would be hard to secure land for more above-ground oil terminals.

Today, the island is home to more than 94 petroleum, petrochemical, specialty chemical and supporting companies, including big names such as Chevron Philips, ExxonMobil and Shell.

Jurong Rock Cavern will not only solve the island's space crunch but provide safe and secure storage for liquid hydrocarbons such as crude oil, condensate, naphtha and gasoil. But the project is large and challenging, and Hyundai Engineering and Construction - which beat fellow South Korean bidder SK Engineering - will have its work cut out.

The cavern will be more than 100 metres below the seabed. Workers will have to drill and blast through layers of reclaimed sand, marine clay, residual soil, weathered rocks and fresh rocks such as sandstone, siltstone and limestone to build it.

Mega project

Phase one will involve 8km of tunnels and five caverns comprising nine storage galleries. Each gallery will be 340m long, 20m wide and 27m high. Put another way, each gallery will be about nine stories high and could hold the water from more than 64 Olympic-size pools.

Each cavern will be able to operate independently, to accommodate differing user needs concurrently.

Hyundai Engineering & Construction will also have to continue building two access shafts to the caverns. These shafts are 1.1km apart and extend 132m below ground. Their diameter ranges from 18m at the bottom to 24m at the top.

To facilitate construction, Japanese firm Sato-Kogyo built the shafts, with start-up galleries, at a cost of about $50 million.

The total investment committed to Jurong Rock Cavern is $940 million - up more than 30 per cent from an earlier estimate of $700 million.

But the price will be well worth it, as the project will be crucial to Singapore's development as an oil hub. There are already plans for a second phase, which will add a further 1.3 million cu metres of storage.

However, the current downturn has affected the project's momentum. Because potential users have pushed their plans back, JTC Corporation has called off its tender for an operator to run the facility. A spokeswoman said the agency will revive the tender nearer completion of the first two caverns in the first half of 2013.

Bidders to operate the project include Royal Vopak of Holland and Emirates National Oil Company, both of which run above-ground oil terminals on Jurong Island.

Delays aside, the facility will be much needed when economic recovery comes - and this is something JTC recognises.

Besides Jurong Rock Cavern, it is exploring the use of Very Large Floating Structures for storing oil products and petrochemicals. A few months back, the agency started looking for a consultant to explore and identify sites for these structures in Singapore waters.

The government has not only expressed its commitment to developing Jurong Rock Cavern, but also to exploring other creative solutions to resolve land shortage issues on Jurong Island.


Read more!

Coral reefs in danger of dying out in next 20 years

The world's coral reefs are in danger of dying in the next 20 years unless the world drastically cuts carbon emissions, a coalition of scientists led by Sir David Attenborough has warned.
Louise Gray, The Telegraph 7 Jul 09;

The delicate eco systems, known as the "rainforests of the sea", support huge amounts of marine life.

But as oceans absorb carbon dioxide, they become more acidic, making it impossible for coral reefs like the Great Barrier Reef in Australia to survive. Reefs are also at greater danger of bleaching as sea temperatures warm.

Scientists gathered at the Royal Society in London yesterday to call for tougher targets for the world to cut emissions.

Sir David Attenborough, who co-chaired the meeting, said that the collapse of coral reefs meant the death of marine ecosystems.

"We must do all that is necessary to protect the key components of the life of our planet as the consequences of decisions made now will likely be forever as far as humanity is concerned," he said.

Open water absorbs around a third of the carbon dioxide in the air. At present, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 387 parts per million (ppm).

According to Alex Rogers, the scientific director of the International Programme on the State of the Oceans, the figure will reach 450 ppm in the next 20 years if the world continues to burn fossil fuels at the current rate. Once that figure is reached, the ocean will become too acidic for corals to survive.

"The kitchen is on fire and it's spreading round the house. If we act quickly and decisively we may be able to put it out before the damage becomes irreversible. That is where corals are now," he said.

Coral reefs are living organisms that rely on calcium minerals called aragonite in the water to build and maintain their external skeletons.

But when the oceans absorb carbon dioxide, it mixes with the seawater to make carbonic acid, upsetting their and reducing aragonite levels needed by corals.

Mr Rogers said that once carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere reach the 600 ppm mark, other organisms like plankton and sea snails will start to die and whole marine ecosystems could collapse.

"Five hundred million people are dependent on coral reefs for livelihoods, food and culture," he added. "The economic implications of the loss of coral reefs are absolutely huge."

Alongside other scientists from the Royal Society and Zoological Society of London, Mr Rogers is calling for world leaders to agree much tougher targets to cut emissions as part of any climate change deal decided in Copenhagen at the end of this year.

"Essentially coral reefs are on death row and Copenhagen is one of the last opportunities for a reprieve," he said. "Because if we carry on business as usual collapse is inevitable whereas if we decide to do something about it we can make a difference to the current trajectory."

Great Barrier Reef will be gone in 20 years, says Charlie Veron
Frank Pope, Times Online 6 Jul 09;

The Great Barrier Reef will be so degraded by warming waters that it will be unrecognisable within 20 years, an eminent marine scientist has said.

Charlie Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, told The Times: “There is no way out, no loopholes. The Great Barrier Reef will be over within 20 years or so.”

Once carbon dioxide had hit the levels predicted for between 2030 and 2060, all coral reefs were doomed to extinction, he said. “They would be the world’s first global ecosystem to collapse. I have the backing of every coral reef scientist, every research organisation. I’ve spoken to them all. This is critical. This is reality.”

Dr Veron’s comments came as the Institute of Zoology, the Royal Society and the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) held a crucial meeting on the future of coral reefs in London yesterday. In a joint statement they warned that by mid-century extinctions of coral reefs around the world would be inevitable.

Warming water causes coral polyps to eject the symbiotic algae that provide them with nutrients. These “bleaching events” were widespread during the El Niño of 1997-98, and localised occurrences are becoming more frequent. (During an El Niño, much of the tropical Pacific becomes unusually warm.) Reefs take decades to recover but by 2030 to 2050, depending on emissions and feedback effects, bleaching will be occurring annually or biannually.

Although surface sea temperatures are rising fastest in tropical regions the other big threat to coral reefs comes from the higher latitudes. The cold water there absorbs atmospheric carbon dioxide more readily than warm water and acidifies more easily.

When carbon dioxide concentrations reach between 480 and 500 parts per million warm water is no barrier to acidification, and the pH in equatorial regions will have dropped so far, meaning higher acidity, that coral reef growth becomes impossible anywhere in the ocean.

“Coral reefs are the most sensitive of marine ecosystems,” said Alex Rogers, scientific director of IPSO.

“Increased temperature and decreased pH will have a double-whammy effect. Reefs were safe at CO2 levels of 350 parts per million. We are at 387ppm today. Beyond 450 the fate of corals is sealed.”

In the five mass extinction events in geological history, key was the carbon cycle, in which carbon dioxide is the primary currency. Its concentration in the atmosphere is higher than it has been for 20 million years. In the Permian extinction, as in all the big extinctions, tropical marine life was the hardest hit. Reef-building corals took more than ten million years to return.

The Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest and most diverse marine ecosystem, is worth $4.5 billion (£2.8 billion) a year to Australia. Worldwide, reefs are worth $300 billion. “But that is trivial compared with the costs if coral reefs fail,” Dr Veron said. “Then it won’t be a matter of no income, it will be a matter of damage to livelihoods, economies and ecosystems.”

Yesterday’s meeting renewed calls for networks of marine conservation zones to boost the resilience of reefs.

Scientists warn carbon dioxide may soon make coral reefs extinct
Alok Jha, guardian.co.uk 6 Jul 09;

David Attenborough joined scientists today to warn that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is already above the level which condemns coral reefs to extinction, with catastrophic effects for the oceans and the people who depend upon them.

Coral reefs support a quarter of all marine life, including more than 4,000 species of fish. They also provide spawning, nursery, refuge and feeding areas for creatures such as lobsters, crabs, starfish and sea turtles.

This makes them crucial in supporting a healthy marine ecosystem upon which more than a billion people depend for food. Reefs also play a crucial role as natural breakwaters, protecting coastlines from storms.

Attenborough said the world had a "moral responsibility" to save corals. The naturalist was speaking at the Royal Society in London, following a meeting of marine biologists.

"A coral reef is the canary in the cage as far as the oceans are concerned," said Attenborough. "They are the places where the damage is most easily and quickly seen. It is more difficult for us to see what is happening in, for example, the deep ocean or the central expanses of ocean."

Global warming means warmer seas, which causes the corals to bleach, where the creatures lose the symbiotic algae they need to survive. Carbon dioxide also makes seas more acidic, which means the corals find it difficult to prevent their exoskeletons from dissolving.

"We've already passed a safe threshold for coral reef ecosystems in terms of climate change; we believe that a safe level for CO2 is below 350 parts per million," said Alex Rogers of the Zoological Society of London and International Programme on the State of the Ocean, who helped organise today's meeting.

Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen from 280ppm before the industrial revolution to around 387ppm today. Environmentalists say that any new global deal on climate must restrict the growth of CO2 levels to 450ppm, though more pessimistic scientists say that the world is heading for 550ppm or even 650ppm.

"When we get up to and above 450ppm, that really means we're into the realms of catastrophic destruction of coral reefs and we'll be moving into a planetary-wide global extinction," said Rogers.

"The only way to get to 350ppm or below is not only to have major cuts in CO2 emissions but also to draw CO2 out of the atmosphere through measures such as geo-engineering."

Coral Reefs Exposed To Imminent Destruction From Climate Change
ScienceDaily 6 Jul 09;

Coral reef survival is balancing on a knife edge as the combined effects of ocean acidification and ocean warming events threaten to push reefs to the brink of extinction this century, warned a meeting of leading scientists.

Organised by ZSL, the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) and the Royal Society, the meeting identified the level of atmospheric CO2 predicted to result in the demise of coral reefs.

At anticipated rates of emission increase, it is expected that 450 ppm CO2 will be reached before 2050. At that point, corals may be on a path to extinction within a matter of decades.

By 2050, the remaining coral reefs could fall victim to ocean acidification. Such a catastrophe would not be confined to reefs, but could start of a domino-like sequence of the fall of other marine ecosystems.

Sir David Attenborough who co-chaired the meeting said “We must do all that is necessary to protect the key components of the life of our planet as the consequences of decisions made now will likely be forever as far as humanity is concerned”.

Scientific evidence shows that we have long passed the point at which the marine environment offers reefs a guaranteed future.

“The kitchen is on fire and it’s spreading round the house. If we act quickly and decisively we may be able to put it out before the damage becomes irreversible. That is where corals are now.” said Dr Alex Rogers of ZSL and IPSO.

The meeting was held to identify tipping points for corals and to expose the issues raised by the plight of coral reefs. A statement detailing these concerns will be submitted to the UN FCCC process currently underway.

Until now, world leaders negotiating emissions reductions have not taken the ocean into serious account, but with so much at risk, the oceans can no longer be ignored.

Now, there is every reason to believe that the oceans may in fact be the most vulnerable sector of our planet to climate change – with dire consequences for us all.

Adapted from materials provided by Zoological Society of London (ZSL).

Reefs could perish by end of century, experts warn
Michael Kahn, Reuters 7 Jul 09;

LONDON (Reuters) - Increasingly acidic oceans and warming water temperatures due to carbon dioxide emissions could kill off the world's ocean reefs by the end of this century, scientists warned on Monday.

The experts told a meeting in London the predicted pace of emissions means a level of 450 parts per million of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere will be reached by 2050, putting corals on a path to extinction in the following decades.

The two dozen coral reef specialists and climate change exerts represented universities, government research offices and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

"The kitchen is on fire and it's spreading around the house," Alex Rogers of the Zoological Society of London and the International Program on the State of the Ocean, said in a statement.

"If we act quickly and decisively we may be able to put it out before the damage becomes irreversible."

Oceans absorb large amounts of CO2 emitted by the burning of fossil fuels. But scientists say the oceans are acidifying as they absorb more carbon, disrupting the process of calcification used by sea creatures to build shells as well as coral reefs.

Researchers around the world have been urging governments to take more account of such threats to the oceans in a new U.N. treaty on fighting global warming due to be agreed in Copenhagen in December.

Coral reefs -- delicate undersea structures resembling rocky gardens made by tiny animals called coral polyps -- are important nurseries and shelters for fish and other sea life.

They also protect coastlines, provide a critical source of food for millions of people, attract tourists and are potential storehouse of medicines for cancer and other diseases.

PATH TO MAJOR DEGRADATION

"If CO2 is allowed to reach 450 ppm, as is currently widely regarded as being the most optimistic threshold target for world leaders to agree at Copenhagen, we will have put the world's reefs on a path to major degradation and ultimate extinction," John Veron, the former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, told the meeting.

"Such a catastrophe poses a dire threat to the future wellbeing of all humanity."

The scientists agreed that governments should strive for a level of 320 parts per million of carbon dioxide, saying 360 was a breaking point for reefs to survive.

At the current level of 387 parts per million of carbon dioxide, reefs are in serious decline, they said. This will have a future knock-effect that threatens other marine and coastal ecosystems.

Coral covers about 400,000 square km of tropical ocean floor, but needs sustained sunlight, warmer waters and high levels of carbonate to flourish.

The biggest is the Great Barrier Reef, a collection of 2,900 reefs along 2,100 km of Australia's north east coast in a marine park the size of Germany.

(Reporting by Michael Kahn; editing by Anthony Barker)


Read more!

"End of the Line" film rings alarm on fish supply

Richard Leong, Reuters 6 Jul 09;

NEW YORK (Reuters) - If sushi lovers think the price of their favorite raw fish is too high already, then the new documentary "The End of the Line" may shock them with its argument that the real cost may be some species' extinction.

The film from director Rupert Murray, which is playing in art houses in the United States and United Kingdom, makes the case that consumer ignorance, clout of the fishing industry, and rising sushi demand in the West are causing "crashes" of numerous fish populations, leading to their "collapse."

"Food is one of the ways we have a massive impact on the planet," Murray told Reuters about his movie, which is based on the book of the same name by U.K. journalist Charles Clover.

A dire prediction cited in the film is most seafood will disappear in 40 years if current fishing practices persist -- a forecast the fishing industry and officials dispute.

"All the federal (fish) stocks are trending in the right direction. Very few will be considered overfished," said Dan Furlong, executive director of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

Indeed, U.S. fish stocks are better managed, such as those in Alaska, whose fishery program is shown in Murray's film.

But others species like the bluefin tuna and the Chilean sea bass -- have not been so lucky. Huge demand, plus questionable hunting practices, for these fish are pushing them near extinction, according to Murray.

"An industrial fleet can wipe out a species in about 10 years," he said.

Ironically, fewer big fish like bluefin tuna have led to increased supply of lobsters and shrimps, which big fish feast on. Scientists in the Murray's films, however, cautioned this rise in shellfish is temporary because they will eventually be overfished too.

"The food chain is the eco-system. I don't think we understand the impact of it (all)," Murray said.

Murray said seafood restaurants and celebrity chefs can play vital roles to promote responsible fishing.

In the film, Clover pursues Nobu, a well-known high-end sushi chain, to stop serving bluefin.

"We are not advocating giving up eating fish," Murray said. "If we fish it properly, it will be there forever. It's really a no-brainer really."

Despite his concerns, Murray said the tide may be turning.

"I'm very hopeful actually," he said. "We are just at the beginning of the line."

(Reporting by Richard Leong; Editing by Bob Tourtellotte)


Read more!