Call for detailed EIA on Pulau Upeh development

WWF-Malaysia Calls for Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment Study for Proposed Development on Pulau Upeh, Melaka
WWF 18 Aug 09;

The recent news that the development on Pulau Upeh by the State Government has been deferred pending the outcome of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Fisheries Impact Assessment, and possible establishment of a hatchery on the island by the Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Ministry offers only slight relief (State defers Pulau Upeh redevelopment, 7 August 2009 & Hatchery plan for Hawksbills, 13 August 2009).

The entire coastline of the mainland fronting Pulau Upeh has been reclaimed causing major changes to the coastal dynamics of the area. A project of this magnitude with the corresponding detrimental impacts to the hawksbill turtle and its habitat of Pulau Upeh justifies the preparation of a Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) and not merely an EIA.

This call is justified as WWF-Malaysia fears that the proposed development and any reclamation to accommodate the proposed development could be carried out in phases, thereby escaping the requirement to prepare a DEIA. WWF-Malaysia calls on the Chief Minister of Melaka to ensure the preparation of a DEIA for the proposed development project due to the extreme sensitivity of the area. Impact studies of the proposed development should take into account the cumulative impacts of all development in the area on the hawksbill turtles and their habitats. Additionally and more importantly, a DEIA will enable the study to be open to public review and allow transparency of the State Government’s development plans on and near the island.

The State Government, with the help of the Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Ministry and Department of Fisheries, must bear the ultimate responsibility for the care and protection of this critically endangered species. It takes more than setting-up a hatchery to ensure their survival. The viability of Pulau Upeh as a nesting home to the hawksbills is contingent upon the protection of the whole island and its surrounding waters. WWF-Malaysia stresses that only sustainable low-impact turtle-based ecotourism will ensure minimal disturbance to the turtles and its habitat.


Read more!

Social Marketing Techniques to Help End Fish Bombing

WWF Malaysia 18 Aug 09;

Kudat, 18 August 2009: The District Office of Banggi, RARE Pride and WWF-Malaysia successfully launched an Anti-Fish Bombing and Cyanide Fishing Campaign in Karakit, Banggi last Saturday (15 August 2009).

The campaign uses an innovative method of social marketing to change the behaviour of people to reduce fish-bombing and the use of cyanide, which are destructive fishing methods that threaten coral reefs, other marine life and the environment.

The year-long campaign will involve the participation of seven communities within the proposed Tun Mustapha Park; namely Kampung Sibogo, Kampung Perpaduan, Kampung Singgahmata, Kampung Maliangin and Kampung Karakit of Banggi; Kampung Berungus of Pitas; and Kampung Tanjung Kapur of Kudat.

“Support from communities, enforcement agencies and the general public is needed for the success of this campaign to reduce and ultimately stop fish bombing and cyanide fishing practices in the proposed Tun Mustapha Park,” said Encik Abdan Abdul Majid, Pemimpin Kemajuan Rakyat of Banggi in representing the Wakil Rakyat of Banggi to launch the campaign. “Maliangin and Berungus are role model communities that are already supporting the campaign to combat fish bombing and cyanide fishing, and they should be emulated”. Encik Abdan also stressed the important role played by a Ketua Kampung in leading a good example and ensuring that fish bomb and cyanide is not used in any kampung.

The event also marked the start of a three-day Reef Check Training in Karakit and nearby Maliangin Island right after the campaign launch. In collaboration with Reef Check Malaysia, WWF-Malaysia is conducting the training to build the capacity of local communities to monitor the status of coral reefs around their islands. Apart from monitoring and reporting destructive fishing methods, the communities will: 1) monitor the health of reefs to better understand the role of reefs in sustaining fish and marine habitat, and 2) participate directly in managing their coral reefs and marine environment.

“Active community participation in the management of marine resource is the foundation for the implementation of collaborative management. This is the key management approach recommended for the proposed Tun Mustapha Park,” said Dr Rahimatsah Amat, Chief Technical Officer of WWF-Malaysia.

Move to check destructive fishing
Jaswinder Kaur, New Straits Times 20 Aug 09;

KUDAT: Seven communities at the proposed Tun Mustapha Marine Park in northern Sabah are taking part in a year-long campaign to teach them about the dangers of fish bombing and cyanide fishing.

The campaign aims to change the way villagers relate to nature by explaining how destructive fishing threatens coral reefs, fish stocks and the environment.

The Anti-Fish Bombing and Cyanide Fishing Campaign in Pulau Banggi is being carried out by the Banggi district office, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)-Malaysia and conservation group Rare Pride.

Rare Pride provides training to communities on biodiversity conservation.

Pulau Banggi people's development leader Abdan Abdul Majid said cutting down on and eventually stopping destructive fishing needed the support of communities and enforcement agencies.

"Village heads must also play a role in making sure fish bombs and cyanide are no longer used," he said at the launch of the campaign during the weekend.

He said two villages -- Maliangin and Berungus -- are role models, as fishermen there are already supporting past efforts to stop fish bombing.

WWF-Malaysia chief technical officer for the Borneo programme Dr Rahimatsah Amat said active community participation in caring for marine resources is the foundation of the collaborative management of the proposed Tun Mustapha Marine Park.

The launch of the campaign also saw the start of a three-day Reef Check Training programme by Reef Check Malaysia and WWF-Malaysia to get local residents to monitor the condition of coral reefs.


Read more!

Malaysia to export rice in two years’ time

The Star 20 Aug 09;

JOHOR BARU: Malaysia will able to export rice when the new padi cultivation areas in Sabah and Sarawak produce the crop within the next two years.

Infrastructure work on the 12,140ha in Kota Belud and 16,187ha in Setumbin-Bijat padi cultivation areas has already started, said Deputy Agriculture and Agro-based Industries Minister Datuk Rohani Abdul Karim.

“The country will be able to export the rice from the new padi hybrid that produces six tonnes of rice per hectare.

“Also, more Malaysians, especially the younger people, are reducing rice intake in their diet,” she said.

The additional rice production from Sabah and Sarawak would reduce dependency on traditional sources such as Thailand and Vietnam.

At present, Malaysia imports 30% of its rice. Under the National Guarantee Supply Policy 2008-2010, the country can be considered self-sufficient if it can produce 86% of its needs.

“However, the Government wants to bring the figure down to 80% by 2010,” Rohani said in a press conference here on Wednesday.

She added the Government lowered the target from 86% to 80% due to several factors - such as the hike in the crude oil prices last year and less land available in the peninsula for rice cultivation.

Rice bowl projects give hope of exports
Satiman Jamin, Straits Times 20 Aug 09;

JOHOR BARU: Malaysia will not only achieve complete self-sufficiency in rice production, but could even become a rice exporter once the rice bowl projects in Sabah and Sarawak are fully implemented.

The combined size of the rice bowls is l Larger than the area of Singapore, and is located in Setumbin-Bijat in Sarawak and Kota Belud in Sabah.

They would propel Malaysia into the league of global rice exporters.

Agriculture and Agro-based Industry deputy minister Datuk Rohani Abdul Karim said the country's rice self-sufficiency level (SSL) was currently at 76 per cent and the ministry was upbeat about increasing it to 80 per cent next year.

She said although the SSL fell to 72 per cent during the recent fuel price crisis, the government was able to improve the local rice production through the National Food Security Policy 2008-2010.

"We had focused on rice production as it is the staple food in the country.

"As the rice production areas in Peninsular Malaysia could not be expanded any more, the government had decided to develop new rice bowl areas in Sabah and Sarawak."

She said the new padi planting areas will cover a total of 70,000ha, which would translate into 420,000 tonnes of rice production per season based on the current national output of six tonnes per hectare.

"It shows that once the rice bowl projects in Sabah and Sarawak were in full production, we will produce more rice than we consume.

"This would enable us to be a net rice exporter instead of being an importer currently."

However, she declined to give a time frame for the projects' completion as many infrastructure and supporting projects need to be completed before the projects could get off the ground.

A check with the ministry website showed that next year, Malaysia will need to increase rice production by 305,000 tonnes to be 100 per cent self-sufficient because the projected rice production figure stood at 1.92 million tonnes compared to the consumption figure of 2.225 million tonnes.

If the new rice bowls were in full-production by then, it would mean a total of 115,000 tonnes of surplus rice that could be exported.


Read more!

Some Indonesian Prawn Breeders Struggle to Meet Demand as Stock Grows Rarer, Pricier

Arti Ekawati, Jakarta Globe 19 Aug 09;

Breeding stock for giant tiger prawns has become rarer and more expensive over the past 10 years due to a decline in the quality of seawater and overfishing, local government fisheries officials attending an aquaculture conference said.

Cultivators of giant tiger prawns now have to pay anywhere from Rp 150,000 ($15) to Rp 1 million for one high-quality breeding female prawn, compared with only Rp 75,000 as cultivation peaked in 1985-95.

“Environmental degradation and the increased exploitation of the oceans, such as overfishing, have badly affected the prawns,” said Murdjani, head of the Lampung Provincial Marine Aquaculture Agency.

“This has had a significant effect on the prawn breeding stock in the sea.”

Murdjani was speaking in Jakarta on the sidelines of a one-day seminar on shrimp cultivation on Tuesday.

Production has been gradually declining since 1995 because of white spot and other diseases.

Haerani Saleh, the head of the East Kalimantan Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Agency, who also attended the seminar, acknowledged that the province could no longer meet its own demand for prawn fry because of the lack of breeding stock.

In the past, the agency had fulfilled the demand for breeding stock by catching large tiger prawns from the waters of Balikpapan. During the 1990s, Haerani said they could catch about 500 female breeding prawns every month. But this has dropped by about 50 percent.

The province needs about four million prawn fry annually to produce about 6,700 tons of cultivated tiger prawns.

However, with the breeding stock available at the moment, the province can only produce one million annually.

“We must buy another 3 million fry from other areas, such as Situbondo and Makassar,” Haerani said.

In 2008, the country produced 540,000 tons of prawns, including 162,355 tons of tiger prawns and 377,645 tons of vannamei prawns.

Some 124,835 hectares of aquaculture ponds across the country are devoted to the cultivation of tiger prawns, and 102,581 hectares to vannamei prawns.


Read more!

Chinese city aims for greener growth

Guy Newey Yahoo News 19 Aug 09;

HUIZHOU, China (AFP) – The mayor of Huizhou, Li Ruqiu, likes to tell a story that he believes highlights the southern Chinese city's environmental credentials.

A 4.3 billion dollar petrochemical joint venture between Chinese energy giant CNOOC and Anglo-Dutch firm Shell -- one of the largest ever foreign deals in China -- was halted suddenly when developers found a bird's nest.

"The company would rather postpone the construction process, wait for the two eggs to be hatched and for the birds to fly away, before they resumed construction," he said. The tree was, of course, later destroyed.

The question of whether China can move beyond such nods to environmental protection and create a genuinely green model is a huge challenge for the country, amid increasing worries growth is being stifled by terrible pollution.

The southern province of Guangdong -- for many years the centrepeice of China's no-holds-barred, heavily-polluting growth model -- is a crucial testing ground for this upgrade and this city of 3.6 million is at the forefront.

Huizhou's city centre is full of beautifully maintained lakes and a tree-lined river more like a European capital than the hastily constructed nearby cities of Shenzhen and Guangzhou.

The city even organises fish-releasing ceremonies into the main river to promote a culture of conservation.

Alongside such measures, Huizhou is also becoming one of China's petrochemical and energy hubs, with ambitious plans for several refineries at Daya Bay, a coastal area about 50 kilometres (31 miles) from downtown.

Li is adamant such expansion, which will see huge areas of the sea reclaimed, would not compromise the city's environment.

"Petrochemicals are generally considered a highly polluting industry, but as long as you use new technologies and new materials, the problem can absolutely be solved," he told foreign reporters on a recent visit.

Li said the city has rejected 700 proposals for new business in the last two years over pollution worries.

The Shell-CNOOC plant is a state-of-the-art facility, processing 800,000 tonnes of ethylene a year, a crucial chemical for making packaging that is used in the endless toy, clothes and electronics factories that populate Guangdong.

When announced, the project drew criticism from green groups in nearby Hong Kong, but much of it has tapered off. Li said the air quality in Daya Bay is better that in Huizhou's city centre.

Southern China's manufacturing boom over the last 30 years has left a dreadful environmental legacy.

The endless rows of factories throughout Guangdong's Pearl River Delta have often operated without strict supervision and now the region's air and water quality are dire.

This has become a major problem in Hong Kong, where the city is shrouded in a haze for large chunks of the year, much of it caused by Guangdong factories.

Governments on both sides of the border -- Hong Kong and mainland China operate separate political and legal systems -- have pledged to take measures to clean up the filthy air.

State media have reported improvement in the past year in Guangdong's air quality, but much of that could be a result of factories shuttered because of the global economic downturn.

However, there are tentative signs that tough decisions -- such as those already made by Li -- are being made by senior leaders.

Last month, officials confirmed that a nine billion dollar joint venture between Sinopec, one of the China's most powerful firms, and Kuwait Petroleum Corporation would be moved from the original site.

The site, in Nansha district, was close to heavily built-up areas near the regional capital of Guangzhou and just 37 kilometres from Hong Kong.

The refinery will still go ahead, but Guangdong's Communist Party chief, Wang Yang, made an unusual admission that pressure from environmental groups in China and Hong Kong had forced the relocation.

"The question of balancing economic growth with environmental protection is indeed a very challenging one," said Wang, who is often touted as a future top leader.

To highlight how difficult the relocation would be, Wang pointed out the original Nansha site had already received approval from the state council, one of China's top decision-making bodies.

Edward Chan, Greenpeace's China campaign manager, said the decision showed a tentative step forward in the thorny struggle between balancing growth and environmental fears.

"It shows that Chinese leaders are responding to concerns from the community both from mainland China and from Hong Kong," he told AFP.

Zhou Yongzhang, director of Sun Yat-sen University's Environment research centre in Guangzhou, said officials were now prepared to take tough decisions rather than simply gesturing to the green lobby, even if it meant slowing growth in the short-term.

"Because the province's environment is limited, officials now take more precautions when it comes to mega projects, and their attitudes are more serious," he told AFP.


Read more!

Scientists discover 18 new species of invertebrates in Africa

Scientists have discovered 18 new species of invertebrates, including spiders, snails, millipedes, earthworms and centipedes.
Ben Leach, The Telegraph 19 Aug 09;

The discoveries were made over eight days by researches for the environmental charity Earthwatch at the Mkhambathi nature reserve on the Wild Coast in the Eastern Cape.

But scientists have warned that the ecosystem there could be threatened by proposed developments for a toll road and titanium mining – denying them the chance to identify other species in the area.

Jan Venter, an ecologist working for Eastern Cape Parks, which manages the reserve, said the team suspects that another 18 species might be discovered.

"To get so many species in one survey shows the importance of the reserve. It's a very special area, conservation-wise. If we do another survey, we'll find just as many.".

Experts predict that the 2 million identified species on the planet could represent only 2 per cent of all those that exist. Many of these are likely to be in South Africa, one of the most biodiverse countries in the world.

Michelle Hamer, a scientist at the South African National Biodiversity Institute, said: "These discoveries are important because they highlight just how little we know about our biodiversity, even in a relatively well-studied country like South Africa … many of the species we collected seem to be unique to a small area in or around Mkhambathi."

"There is also a lot of pressure to develop tourism infrastructure inside the reserve. This means that many of these species could have disappeared before even being discovered. If we understand the importance of the area in terms of its invertebrate fauna, then we can try to protect it.

"Will it make a difference … if these species go extinct? We don't know for sure, but we do know that every species that is removed … results in some weakening of the ecosystem."

The freshly discovered species are now being named and described in South African research institutes.


Read more!

Scientists uncover new ocean threat from plastics

Steve Connor, The Independent 20 Aug 09;

Scientists have identified a new source of chemical pollution released by the huge amounts of plastic rubbish found floating in the oceans of the world. A study has found that as plastics break down in the sea they release potentially toxic substances not found in nature and which could affect the growth and development of marine organisms.

Until now it was thought that plastic rubbish is relatively stable chemically and, apart from being unsightly, its principle threat to living creatures came from its ability to choke or strangle any animals that either got caught in it or ingested it thinking it was food.

But the latest research suggests that plastic is also a source of dissolved substances that can easily become widely dispersed in the marine environment. Many of these chemicals are believed to toxic to humans and animals, the scientists said.

The scale of plastic pollution in the sea has only been widely recognised in recent years when sailing yachts reported vast areas of ocean, such as an area estimated to be twice the size of Texas in the North Pacific, that seem to be permanently covered in a layer of floating marine litter caught up in swirling ocean currents or gyres.

Some of the items were found to be many decades old, suggesting that the plastic took a long time to degrade. However, a study by Katsuhiko Saido at Nihon University in Chiba, Japan, has found that plastics degrade relatively quickly in the conditions and temperatures that were designed to simulate the environment of the open ocean.

“Plastics in daily use are generally assumed to be quite stable. We found that plastic in the ocean actually decomposes as it is exposed to the rain and sun and other environmental conditions, giving rise to yet another source of global contamination that will continue into the future,” Dr Saido said.

“To date, no studies have been conducted on plastic decomposition at low temperature in the environment owing to the mistaken conception that plastic does not decompose. The present study was conducted to clarify that drift plastic does indeed decompose to give rise to hazardous chemicals in the ocean,” he said.

The scientists found that when plastics decompose in the ocean they release a range of chemicals, such as bisphenol A and substances known as polystyrene-based (PS) oligomers, which are not found naturally. Bisphenol A has been implicated in disrupting the hormonal system of animals.

A common form of plastic rubbish is styrofoam, which soon gets crushed into small pieces in the sea. However, it also releases substantial quantities of a toxic substances called styrene monomer, which is known to cause cancer, as well as styrene dimers and trimer, which are suspected of being carcinogenic. The trimer also breaks down into the toxic monomer form.

Findings from the study were released yesterday at the American Chemical Society meeting in Washington. Dr Saido said that samples of seawater collected from the Pacific Ocean were found to be contaminated with up to 150 parts per million of some of these components of plastic decomposition.

“This study clearly shows new micro-pollution by compounds generated by plastic decomposition to be taking place out of sight in the ocean. Thus, marine debris plastics in the ocean will certainly give rise to new sources of global contamination that will persist long into the future,” he said.

It is estimated that there could be hundreds of millions of tons of plastic rubbish floating in the world’s oceans. In Japan alone, it is calculated that 150,000 tons of plastic is washed up on its shores each year.

Study says plastic decomposes at sea
Yahoo News 19 Aug 09;

WASHINGTON – Environmentalists have long denounced plastic as a long-lasting pollutant that doesn't break down. A new study indicates that, in the oceans, plastic does decompose, but says that's not a good thing either.

Thousands of tons of plastic debris wind up in the oceans every year, some of it washing up on coasts, some being swirled by currents into the Great Pacific Garbage Patch between California and Hawaii, said to be larger than Texas.

"Plastics in daily use are generally assumed to be quite stable," Katsuhiko Saido, a chemist at Nihon University, Chiba, Japan, said in a statement.

"We found that plastic in the ocean actually decomposes as it is exposed to the rain and sun and other environmental conditions, giving rise to yet another source of global contamination that will continue into the future," said Saido, who presented his findings at the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society on Wednesday.

Saido reported that the decomposing plastics release potentially toxic chemicals such as bisphenol A and PS oligomer, which can disrupt the functioning of hormones in animals.

___

On the Net:

American Chemical Society: http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content

Plastic Breaks Down in Ocean, After All -- And Fast
Carolyn Barry, National Geographic News 20 Aug 09;

Though ocean-borne plastic trash has a reputation as an indestructible, immortal environmental villain, scientists announced yesterday that some plastics actually decompose rapidly in the ocean. And, the researchers say, that's not a good thing.

The team's new study is the first to show that degrading plastics are leaching potentially toxic chemicals such as bisphenol A into the seas, possibly threatening ocean animals, and us.

Scientists had previously thought plastics broke down only at very high temperatures and over hundreds of years.

The researchers behind a new study, however, found that plastic breaks down at cooler temperatures than expected, and within a year of the trash hitting the water.

The Japan-based team collected samples in waters from the U.S., Europe, India, Japan, and elsewhere, lead researcher Katsuhiko Saido, a chemist with the College of Pharmacy at Nihon University in Japan, said via email.

All the water samples were found to contain derivatives of polystyrene, a common plastic used in disposable cutlery, Styrofoam, and DVD cases, among other things, said Saido, who presented the findings at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Washington, D.C., today.

Plastic, he said, should be considered a new source of chemical pollution in the ocean.

Cooking Up Plastic Soup in the Seas

The toxic compounds the team found don't occur naturally in the ocean, and the researchers thought plastic was the culprit.

The scientists later simulated the decomposition of polystyrene in the sea and found that it degraded at temperatures of 86 degrees Fahrenheit (30 degrees Celsius).

Left behind in the water were the same compounds detected in the ocean samples, such as styrene trimer, a polystyrene by-product, and bisphenol A, a chemical used in hard plastics such as reusable water bottles and the linings of aluminum cans.

Bisphenol A (BPA) has been shown to interfere with the reproductive systems of animals, while styrene monomer, a derivative of styrene trimer, is a known carcinogen.

The pollutants are likely to be more concentrated in areas heavily littered with plastic debris, such as ocean vortices, which occur where currents meet.

Plastic Breaks Down Fast

About 44 percent of all seabirds eat plastic, apparently by mistake, sometimes with fatal effects. And 267 marine species are affected by plastic garbage—animals are known to swallow plastic bags, which resemble jellyfish in mid-ocean, for example—according to a 2008 study in the journal Environmental Research by oceanographer and chemist Charles Moore, of the Algalita Marine Research Foundation.

Now, it seems, they also face the invisible threat of toxic, plastic-derived chemicals.

Once Styrofoam, for example, breaks down, the tiny polystyrene components start to sink, because they're heavier than water, Moore said. "So it's likely that this styrene pollutant is prevalent throughout the water column and not just at the surface."

Along with Moore, David Barnes, a marine ecologist from the British Antarctic Survey, doesn't think the Japanese team's lab results can be applied uniformly across the ocean, however. Water temperatures are typically much cooler than the 86 degrees Fahrenheit in the study, he said.

"We're talking about, effectively, what happens in [zones] of tropical and some subtropical coasts. And there, [the] study may be very important," Barnes said.

Ocean as "Plastic Soup"

Plastic hits marine creatures with a double whammy, Moore said. Along with the toxic chemicals released from the breakdown of plastic, animals also take in other chemicals that the plastic has accumulated from outside sources in the water.

"We knew ten years ago that plastic could be a million times more toxic than the seawater itself," because plastic items tend to accumulate a surface layer of chemicals from seawater, Moore said. "They're sponges."

Moore worries about the plastic-derived chemicals' potential damage to wildlife. The chemicals can potentially cause cancer in humans, he said, and simpler life-forms "may be more susceptible then we are."

Pollutants also become more concentrated as animals eat other contaminated animals—which could be bad news for us, the animals at the top of the food chain. (Read National Geographic magazine's "The Pollution Within.")

Moore estimates plastic debris—most of it smaller than a fifth of an inch (five millimeters)—is "dispersed over millions of square miles of ocean and miles' deep in the water column.

"The plastic soup we've made of the ocean is pretty universal—it's just a matter of degree," he said. "All these effects we're worried about are happening throughout the ocean as a unity."


Read more!

Gene experts see high-yield rice in flood zones

Reuters 19 Aug 09;

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Researchers in Japan have identified two genes that make rice plants grow longer stems and survive floods, and hope this will enable farmers to grow high-yielding rice species in flood-prone areas.

The long-stemmed deepwater rice varieties grown at present in areas of frequent flooding have very low yields.

"In southeast Asia, there are floods in the rainy season and deepwater rice is planted in these regions. But they have yields that are only one third or one quarter that of high-yielding rice. This is a big problem," said Motoyuki Ashikari at Nagoya University's Bioscience and Biotechnology Center.

"If we combine the deepwater genes with high-yielding rice, we can have the best combination," he said in a phone interview.

In their experiment, Ashikari's team analyzed the genes of a deepwater rice variety and found two genes that were unique to the plant.

"The genes Snorkel 1 and Snorkel 2 are only in the deepwater variety but not in the non-deepwater variety," he said.

They discovered that rice plants begin producing a lot of the plant hormone ethylene when grown in deep water.

"As water levels rise, accumulation of the plant hormone ethylene triggers expression of the Snorkel genes, which in turn switches on rapid stem growth," they wrote.

They later tested their findings by inserting the two genes into a non-deepwater variety of rice and found that it grew longer stems, enabling it to survive in deep water.

"It's hoped that the findings will help researchers to breed rice that can be grown in lowland areas that are frequently flooded during the rainy season," they wrote in a statement.

(Reporting by Tan Ee Lyn, editing by Tim Pearce)

Scientists develop high-yield deep water rice
Eric Talmadge, Associated Press Yahoo News 20 Aug 09;

TOKYO – A team of Japanese scientists has discovered genes that enable rice to survive high water, providing hope for better rice production in lowland areas that are affected by flooding.

The team, primarily from the University of Nagoya, reported their findings in Thursday's issue of Nature, the science magazine.

The genes, called SNORKEL genes, help rice grow longer stems to deal with higher water levels. Deep-water rice generally produces lower-yield rice plants. But the researchers report they have succeeded in introducing the genes to rice varieties that are higher-yield.

According to the report, as water levels rise, accumulation of the plant hormone ethylene activates the SNORKEL genes, making stem growth more rapid. When the researchers introduced the genes into rice that does not normally survive in deep water, they were able to rescue the plants from drowning.

Motoyuki Ashikari, who headed the project, said his team is hoping to use the gene on long grain rice widely used in Southeast Asia to help stabilize production in flood-prone areas where rice with the flood-resistant gene is low in production — about one-third to one-quarter that of regular rice.

"Scientifically, the gene that we found is rare but clear proof of a biological ability to adapt to a harsh environment," he said. "It's a genetic strategy specifically to survive flooding."

Ashikari said his team already successfully tested the gene on a Japanese "Japonica" rice, and his team now plans to create a flood-resistant long grain rice in three to four years for use in countries such as Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Cambodia.

High water levels in paddies can be a serious problem. In some areas, rains can cause water levels to rise dangerously high during the growing season and flash flooding can fully submerge plants for days or even weeks.

Rice is a staple food for billions, and while productivity has increased dramatically since the 1960s, yields must be doubled to meet projected requirements by 2050. More than 30 percent of Asian and 40 percent of African rice acreage is cultivated in either lowland paddies or deepwater paddies.

Laurentius A. C. J. Voesenek, at the Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, who was not part of the research team, said the study is significant because high-yield rice varieties cannot survive extremes of inundation.

"The introduction of (these genes) into high-yielding varieties, using advanced breeding strategies, promises to improve the quality and quantity of rice produced in marginal farmlands," he said in a review of the paper, also published in Nature.

Snorkel rice could feed millions
Sudeep Chand, BBC News 19 Aug 09;

A new rice plant has been developed which grows "snorkels" when exposed to floods.

A paper in the journal Nature, describes how the plant elongates rapidly in response to being submerged.

One of the scientists, Motoyaki Ashikari from Nagoya University in Japan, said "the impact is huge".

It could also boost the production of rice in Asia and Africa, where up to 40% of crops are subject to flash floods or deep water.

"People cannot plant any crops in the rainy season, because the crops drown and die in the floods," said Mr Ashikari.

Writing in Nature, Laurentius Voesenek describes how the Japanese scientists discovered the "snorkel" genes in flood-tolerant rice, and introduced them to more sensitive high-yield rice.

"Snorkels" grow as hollow tubes from parts of the plant called internodes, preventing it from drowning.

When the floods arrive, the super rice plants can grow up to 25cm per day.


Read more!

Deep-fried locust, anyone?

Insects may be the answer to our looming food crisis
Gaia Vince, The Guardian 19 Aug 09;

Sustainable and nutritious, it's time insects were seen as another source of protein. The problem is how to make them desirable

As with gingerbread men and gummy bears, the dilemma when served a locust is whether to begin eating it head or legs first. I choose to start with the six little legs (sometimes you need to fold them in a bit because they tend to trail out of your mouth otherwise), then the abdomen and finally (gulp) the head. Crunch, crunch, swallow. Think: bbq prawns, but unshelled.

I'll be honest, deep-fried locust is not the most delicious snack I've ever had. But on a long road trip through Cambodia, it was cheap, filling and tasty enough – more than can be said for most motorway service station food in Britain and less frightening than other menu options in the region. Goat-scrotum hotpot, anyone?

In south-east Asia, insects are an important part of the daily diet for millions of people. Crickets, cockroaches and other bugs and grubs are sold across the region by roadside vendors and in smart restaurants. They are harvested commercially and by home producers, providing vital income for struggling farmers. Often, insects are the only source of income for women earners, who rig polythene awnings above a fluorescent tube-light to trap flying insects after dark.

Insects are plentiful, multiply and grow to adulthood rapidly and require little food to sustain them. They are the perfect source of protein. As countries in the west and developing world wake up to the looming threat of food shortages, it's time that governments seriously considered an alternative source of protein. Could insects provide food security for the coming centuries?

Entomophagy (insect eating) is a growing industry with more than 1,400 insect species being gobbled in 90 countries. In terms of how much food insects require per gram of protein produced, they are twice as efficient as chickens and more than six times as efficient as cows. One reason for this is that insects are cold-blooded, so they don't need to eat food to keep warm.

Animal feed is an important consideration as agricultural costs soaring across the world, leaving millions of families unable to meet their basic rice needs. Meat is an unheard of luxury for many in the developing world, leading to protein deficiencies for populations across sub-Saharan Africa, south Asia and Latin America.

The nutritional benefits of insects and better ways of marketing them were probed during an international conference last year in Chiang Mai, Thailand, involving scientists from 15 different countries, but not enough progress has been made since then. Researchers, governments and international agencies such as the UN Food and Agriculture Organization need to look seriously at insect harvest and production to meet the world's food needs both in the poor world and the rich west. This doesn't necessarily mean a cockroach burger with grub fries, but it could mean using insect protein to replace soya bean protein in packaged foods. Insects are a far more environmentally sustainable source of protein, because they can be harvested without destruction of forests or food crops.

It's not the perfect food. People allergic to some seafood are likely also to suffer insect allergies. And insects exposed to pesticides retain high levels of toxins in their bodies.

There is a niche market for insects; there are cookbooks, websites, online recipe sites, suppliers and restaurants specialising in bug dishes. But insects need to follow the path of other exotic foods, such as sushi in the 1990s, and become desirable. As entomologist Gene DeFoliart, at UW-Madison, says: "If insects become more widely accepted as a respectable food item in the industrialised countries, the implications are obvious. They would form a whole new class of foods made to order for low-input small-business and small-farm production. International trade in edible insects would almost certainly increase."

Still grossed out by the yuck factor? It's worth realising that most of us do already eat insects. The US Food and Drug Administration allows, for example, up to 75 pieces of insect in 55mm of hot chocolate and up to 60 aphids in a portion of frozen broccoli.

• Gaia Vince is travelling around the developing world looking at the impacts of climate change


Read more!

Food supplies at risk from price speculation, warns expert

Global food markets must be regulated to avoid speculators creating panic with artificial prices rises, says the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute
Jonathan Watts, guardian.co.uk 19 Aug 09;

The world food market is still "seriously exposed" to speculators artificially driving up prices and worsening the risks of malnutrition, according to one of the world's leading agricultural researchers.

Linking the recent food and financial crises, Joachim von Braun, the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), warned that the world was at risk of a new panic over grain unless commodity markets were more tightly regulated and production expanded.

"The banking sector is in the process of being re-regulated worldwide, but the food market remains seriously exposed to short-term flows of indexed funds into commodity exchanges. That vulnerability needs to be addressed," he said in an interview with the Guardian.

Von Braun was one of the first to predict the sharp rise in food prices that peaked last year, when 13 nations halted cross-border trade amid fears of shortages.

The crisis, which escalated over four years, hit poor people hardest and saw pasta protests in Italy, tortilla rallies in Mexico and onion demonstrations in India.

During that period, the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation estimates the number of hungry people in the world rose from about 800 million to more than 1 billion.

At the time, most of the blame for the price spike centred on growing populations, climate change, biofuels, rising oil prices and increased demand from fast-growing economies like China and India that were running down food stocks.

But von Braum said recent research highlighted the role of commodity speculators: "What we didn't foresee two years ago is how speculation exacerbated the real market issues. It was not a primary cause but a second-round amplifier, which added seriously to the problem."

Daily trading volumes on the Chicago commodities exchange surged at the peak of the crisis between December 2007 and March 2008, boosted by the entry of non-commercial investors entering the market to speculate.

"When food supply is at risk, speculators are attracted, especially when trade barriers are put in place," he warned.

Exchanges in India and China were closed down to prevent similar speculative attacks.

The global credit crunch also hamstrung government efforts to boost food production by reducing the money available for investment in new technology and better irrigation.

With climate change expected to reduce yields by 15% by 2050 even as demand grows from a rising world population, von Braum said it was important for nations and international institutions to respond with more funds for agriculture.

China, Japan, South Korea and several Middle Eastern nations have begun buying up farmland in Africa and South America as a hedge against food shortage risks.

Global prices are down from their peak thanks partly to effective measures by the Chinese government to rebuild grain stocks, increased agricultural investment in India and a great focus on food production in the aid programmes of the UK and other donor nations.

But von Braun said prices remain high in many African countries because of trade constraints and foreign exchange rates, while an unusually dry Indian monsoon could affect harvests in Asia. A UN report published earlier this week warned that Asia faces dire food shortages unless hundreds of billions of dollars are invested in better irrigation systems to grow crops for its growing population.

"Fundamentally, the crisis of high food prices in the majority of poor countries is not over at all," said von Braun.


Read more!

Massive river water transfers lacking scrutiny

WWF 20 Aug 09;

Stockholm, Sweden - Large scale transfers of water from one river basin to another are generally occurring without adequate scrutiny of their economic, environmental and social impacts, according to an analysis released to World Water Week by WWF.

“With the number of large water transfer schemes possibly nearly tripling by 2020 and the amount of water transferred expected to double, poorly assessed mega-transfers have the potential to inflict immense harm on both the communities donating the water and the communities receiving it,” said WWF-Germany Freshwater Director, Martin Geiger.
w
Pipe dreams? looked at existing and proposed large water transfer schemes in Spain, Australia, Lesotho and South Africa, Greece, Brazil, Peru and China and found the schemes to be high cost, high risk solutions to water problems “with the benefits much less, or likely to be much less, than the sales pitch,” Geiger said.

By 2020, large scale water transfers from one river basin to another are expected to reach around 800 cubic kilometres a year - around half a Lake Ontario or more than eight Lake Genevas. With problems evident in many of the 360 schemes implemented since 1950, the total number of schemes is predicted to reach between 760 and 1240 by 2020.

Australia’s Snowy Mountains Scheme took 99 per cent of the iconic Snowy River’s flows to produce power and provide for distant irrigation, causing generations of conflict. Despite expensive re-engineering and irrigation efficiency schemes, implementation of a decision to return a forth of the Snowy River flows is well behind schedule while climate change impacts are threatening to seriously reduce power generation.

Both donating and receiving basins experienced depletion and damage as Spain’s 282 km Tagus-Segura transfer provoked a unrestrained expansion of irrigated land, much now watered illegally. Planners were wildly optimistic about the water available and while users of the transferred water were to pay for the scheme and its operations only around 30 per cent of these payments have been collected.

Greece’s proposed diversion of the Acheloos River, mainly an economically questionable US$ 3.9-5.9 billion (€ 2.9 – 4.4 billion) prop to thirsty cotton farming heavily subsidised by the EU on the Thessaly Plains, is likely to go ahead following government circumvention of a Supreme Court declaration it was illegal and would be in violation of local, European and international laws on issues including water management, environmental assessment procedures and cultural heritage protection.

The report finds that in many cases there was little examination of alternatives to massive schemes, particularly in managing demand and promoting efficient water use in the mostly water scarce regions.
“Often it is going to make much greater sense to import water in extra food grown in wetter areas than to import water to grow food in a drier area,” said Geiger. “However, non-technical solutions such as this trade in virtual water, less water intensive farming or more water efficient industries and cities tend to be neglected in planning directed at just supplying more water continually.”

Water planning in isolation is also likely to lead to unforeseen problems. The report details the numerous examples of poor integration with land use planning, particularly for agriculture and inadequate consultation on schemes leading to often severe local and regional conflict.

“Don’t venture into interbasin transfers unless you have done your homework on impacts and alternatives,” Geiger said.

“Otherwise you could face serious planning deadlocks, operational shortfalls, unforeseen economic and environmental disruption, and expensive follow-up works that will only partly remedy the damage. If trends in water tables through climate change are not properly taken into account, the water planned for transfer might not be there any more in future.”


Read more!

Green power safer for workers than fossil fuels

Ewen Callaway, New Scientist 19 Aug 09;

As if helping to save the world from the worst effects of climate change were not enough, renewable energy may also curb workplace injuries and deaths.

That's because fossil fuels – as the term suggests – have to be dug or drained from underground, and mining is one of the deadliest of industries. Oil and gas extraction account for 100 deaths each year in the US alone, coal another 30, not to mention many more non-fatal injuries.

Carbon-sparing energy sources such as solar panels and windmills, on the other hand, are unlikely to take such a toll on the workers who build and maintain them, argues Steven Sumner, a physician at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. "Extracting the fuel, generating the power and distributing the power are more dangerous in fossil fuel energy than renewable energy."

That sounds like common sense, but there's little hard data on the health costs of producing green energy compared with extracting fossil fuels. One study, a 2005 European Union assessment of the external costs of different energies, found working with wind power was safer than working with coal or oil. And US Department of Energy researchers put solar's occupational health costs in the same ballpark as nuclear, though they ignored the potential for long-term harm from nuclear radiation and catastrophes such as meltdowns.

"We don't know very much," Sumner admits. But as green energy make up a ever-larger chunk of global power supplies, firmer data on workers' health should follow.
Beware biofuels

Vasilis Fthenakis, a photovoltaic researcher at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, agrees that greener energies are generally safer to produce than fossil fuels. Increased demand should make that difference even starker, as renewable energy manufacturing become more efficient and automated. "The picture keeps improving because the technology keeps improving," he says.

Not all green energies are inherently safer for workers than fossil fuels, though. "Rates of injury in agriculture are high, therefore we suspect that biomass energy that comes from crop production is likely to have high risks," Sumner says.

Journal reference: Journal of the American Medical Association, vol 302, p 787


Read more!