Bangladesh fights for survival against climate change

William Wheeler, Anna-Katarina Gravgaard and Ashish Kumar Sen
The Washington Times 18 Oct 09;

NOAKHALI, Bangladesh | After his home slipped into the powerful currents of the Meghna River four years ago, Monoranjab Dus came looking for new land along this waterlogged stretch of coastline slowly emerging from the sea.

"I lost my home to river erosion," said Mr. Dus, 50, standing barefoot on a squishy riverbank where he was fishing crabs from gray-brown mud, with the consistency of wet plaster. Behind him stretched a field of bright green rice shoots. "I was bound to come here."

Good land is hard to come by in Bangladesh, a low-lying developing nation that is one of the most densely populated — and vulnerable to climate change — countries in the world. River erosion alone displaces more than 50,000 families each year.

But the swift currents that course down from the Himalayas also bring opportunity: a rich bath of fertile silt that, when it reaches the Bay of Bengal, settles along the coast, gradually forming new land called "chars." The district of Noakhali has actually gained more than 28 square miles of land in the past 50 years.

The Bangladeshi government is finishing up the largest phase of a decades-long effort to develop nearby chars as well as building a new dam to speed up the process of creating new land for settlers like Mr. Dus.

"The Bangladeshi rivers carry silt unlike any others and an intervention is all that is needed to create new land," said S.R. Khan, a government water engineer. "Bangladesh is the only country in the world that can physically grow."

That process begins when the silt from the swirling, tea-colored waters begins to gather in mud flats that gradually rise above the sea. Without intervention, the process takes more than 20 years, after which the forest department plants mangroves to hold the fragile land.

But often people can't wait that long. For decades settlers have been moving in early on their own. Mr. Dus had heard the government was distributing land in 1.5 acre allotments. So, like many settlers, he staked an appropriately sized parcel, cut down the 3-foot mangroves growing on the land and dug a small pond for bathing.

His life is a daily struggle with the elements. The coast is soaked by tidal surge and battered by seasonal cyclones like the one that killed more than 3,000 Bangladeshis in 2007 and one last spring that destroyed Mr. Dus' home.

"This is lowland," he explained. "People here are suffering a lot."

Bangladesh is extremely vulnerable to sea-level rise, as well as increased storm intensity, floods, droughts and other consequences of climate change. This environmental scenario illuminates the paradox confronting much of the developing world, in which nations that contribute few emissions are disproportionately burdened by climate change, without the money or technology that industrialized nations have to mitigate its impacts.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an organization created by the United Nations two decades ago to study the human impact on climate trends, predicts South Asia will be particularly hard hit.

For example, the IPCC says the region can expect an increase in monsoon rainfall, resulting in higher water levels in the rivers. The situation will be compounded by melting Himalayan glaciers. Eventually, sea levels will also rise.

Keya Chatterjee, U.S. acting director of the World Wildlife Fund's Climate Change Program, said low-lying countries such as Bangladesh are already experiencing devastating effects from climate change.

"They are terrified about what will happen when we begin to experience the additional warming that the planet is already locked into, based on previous and existing pollution," she said, adding, "They are even more terrified of what will happen if the world does not aggressively pursue a global clean-energy economy."

Bangladesh is among a group of nations that have been closely watching the U.S. Senate debate on climate change since 2005. These countries are counting on that debate to come out in favor of their survival before the Copenhagen climate summit in December.

About 190 nations will meet in the Danish capital for a final round of negotiations on a new climate treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

In the meantime, the government of Bangladesh is implementing a sophisticated climate adaptation program that helps local communities become more resilient to the effects of climate change and prioritizes interventions in the most vulnerable communities.

Bangladeshis are developing climate-resistant seed varieties for their crops, introducing state-of-the-art early-warning systems for extreme events and identifying the most vulnerable communities, but they lack the resources to fully implement these programs.

A government report, "Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan 2008," notes that the government has, over the past 35 years, invested more than $10 billion to make the country less vulnerable to natural disasters. These investments include flood-management schemes, coastal polders — low-lying reclaimed land protected by dikes — cyclone and flood shelters, and the raising of roads and highways above flood level.

In the worst-case scenario, the report said, unless existing coastal polders are strengthened and new ones built, sea-level rise could result in the displacement of millions of people from coastal regions, and have huge adverse impacts on the livelihoods and long-term health of a large proportion of the population.

Bangladeshi Foreign Minister Dipu Moni told editors and reporters of The Washington Times last month that rising oceans from climate change could swallow up to a third of her country and make 20 million people homeless without urgent action to reduce carbon emissions.

"We are working with very limited resources, and we need support from the international community. We do have expectations for Copenhagen," she said.

Silt accretion could provide some relief.

"Our understanding is that the process of siltation, particularly when you are supporting it through creating dams, that the process is much faster than the increase in sea levels," said Alphons Hennekens, the Netherlands' ambassador to Bangladesh. The Dutch, experienced in river management, support many of the river projects in Bangladesh.

With Dutch funding, the Bangladeshi government began to help develop older chars in the late 1970s, and the effort has since become a multiagency operation building roads, culverts, embankments, cyclone shelters, toilets and ponds, as well as distributing land to settlers. By fall 2010, the program will have allotted some 27,000 acres to 21,000 families.

Several months ago, 32-year-old Zhakia Begums was granted a deed to land on a higher char nearby, where she has been living for 12 years, since she lost her home to river erosion.

"Before we were always a little fearful," she said, "now we know this is our land."

Her property abuts a mud embankment on one side and a small pond on the other. Coconut trees grow in the sun-dappled yard where her husband raises chickens.

Together, they run a small restaurant for local fishermen. Behind their house sits a school on concrete stilts, which doubles as a cyclone shelter.

For his part, Mr. Dus and others want what Mrs. Begums has: shelter, wells, deeds, roads — so that he can get his crabs more easily to market — and an embankment to protect his crops.

But the char that Mr. Dus calls home is still young, not yet safely above the reach of the tides. On its own, it will take another six to seven years before it is eligible for the governments development program, said Zainal Abedin from the government's Char Development and Settlement Project.

Next year, work will begin on a dam expected to create 46 square miles of new land to the west. The most recent plans have also proposed a dam here in Noakhali that could create as much as 350 square miles in Mr. Dus' backyard. The proposed dam, said Mr. Abedin, could also speed up the maturation of Mr. Dus' land by three to four years.

The idea that silt accretion can provide at least a partial solution to the crisis has yet to convince all the critics.

"This deposition process is a very slow process," said Atiq Rahman, director of the Bangladeshi Center for Advanced Studies. "It's not that simple, it doesn't just happen automatically."

Mr. Rahman said more attention from the international community should go to the countrys immediate natural disaster needs and mitigating the increased cyclones, floods and erosions expected as the planet continues to warm.

Analysts say there are limits to the solutions Bangladeshis can engineer on their own, particularly on top of the food security and poverty crises they already face.

"We have a moral obligation to provide support to help them prepare for the effects of climate change that they are experiencing, as well as to stop the pollution that is making these impacts worse," said Ms. Chatterjee. "For countries like Bangladesh and the Marshall Islands this is not a climate change debate, but a debate about their survival."

Along Bangladeshs uncertain coastline, survival seems a day-to-day affair. With more development, however, Mr. Dus said he thinks he can do more than just survive. With some help, he said, he can build a life on the land hes found.

"If the government builds an embankment," Mr. Dus said, "this land will sustain us."

• Ashish Kumar Sen contributed to this report from Washington.

• This story was reported in part with a grant from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.


Read more!

Maldives government dives for climate change

Olivia Lang, Associated Press Yahoo News 18 Oct 09;

GIRIFUSHI, Maldives – Members of the Maldives' Cabinet donned scuba gear and used hand signals Saturday at an underwater meeting staged to highlight the threat of global warming to the lowest-lying nation on earth.
President Mohammed Nasheed and 13 other government officials submerged and took their seats at a table on the sea floor — 20 feet (6 meters) below the surface of a lagoon off Girifushi, an island usually used for military training.

With a backdrop of coral, the meeting was a bid to draw attention to fears that rising sea levels caused by the melting of polar ice caps could swamp this Indian Ocean archipelago within a century. Its islands average 7 feet (2.1 meters) above sea level.

"What we are trying to make people realize is that the Maldives is a frontline state. This is not merely an issue for the Maldives but for the world," Nasheed said.

As bubbles floated up from their face masks, the president, vice president, Cabinet secretary and 11 ministers signed a document calling on all countries to cut their carbon dioxide emissions.

The issue has taken on urgency ahead of a major U.N. climate change conference scheduled for December in Copenhagen. At that meeting countries will negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol with aims to cut the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that scientists blame for causing global warming by trapping heat in the atmosphere.

Wealthy nations want broad emissions cuts from all countries, while poorer ones say industrialized countries should carry most of the burden.

Dozens of Maldives soldiers guarded the event Saturday, but the only intruders were groupers and other fish.

Nasheed had already announced plans for a fund to buy a new homeland for his people if the 1,192 low-lying coral islands are submerged. He has promised to make the Maldives, with a population of 350,000, the world's first carbon-neutral nation within a decade.

"We have to get the message across by being more imaginative, more creative and so this is what we are doing," he said in an interview on a boat en route to the dive site.

Nasheed, who has emerged as a key, and colorful, voice on climate change, is a certified diver, but the others had to take diving lessons in recent weeks.

Three ministers missed the underwater meeting because two were not given medical permission and another was abroad.

Maldives cabinet flags climate crisis at undersea meet
Mohamed Shahyb Yahoo News 17 Oct 09;

MALE (AFP) – The Maldives' government held an underwater cabinet meeting on Saturday in a bid to focus global attention on rising sea levels that threaten to submerge the low-lying atoll nation.

President Mohamed Nasheed plunged first into the Indian Ocean followed by his ministers, all clad in scuba gear, for the nationally televised meeting in this archipelago known as an idyllic holiday getaway for the rich.

Nasheed and his deputy, Mohamed Waheed, and a dozen ministers sat behind tables arranged in a horseshoe at a depth of six metres (20 feet) and approved a resolution urging global action to cut carbon emissions.

Tropical reef fish swam among the ministers and the nation's red and green flag with white crescent moon was planted in the seabed behind Nasheed.

After surfacing, he called for the UN's climate summit in Copenhagen in December to forge a deal to reduce carbon emissions blamed for rising sea levels that experts say could swamp the Maldives by the century's end.

"We should come out of Copenhagen with a deal that will ensure that everyone will survive," said the 42-year-old president as he bobbed in the shimmering turquoise waters.

He said there was "less talk" during the half-hour underwater meeting, but he had managed to get more work done.

"The Maldives is a frontline state and what happens to us today will happen to others tomorrow," Nasheed said.

Asked how he felt about taking the cabinet for a splash, he replied they had all enjoyed the plunge into the clear, warm waters.

"The president, vice president, and the cabinet signed a declaration calling for concerted global action on climate change, ahead of the UN climate conference," the president's office said in a statement.

The ministers signed the resolution, printed on a white board, using water-proof markers.

They had taken diving lessons for the last two months and were accompanied by their trainers at the unprecedented underwater meeting off the islet of Girifushi.

The dive was the latest publicity stunt by the media-savvy Nasheed to focus world attention on climate change and its effects on the Maldives ahead of the Copenhagen meeting.

In 2007, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that an increase in sea levels of just 18 to 59 centimetres (seven to 24 inches) would make the country virtually uninhabitable by 2100.

Nasheed, the archipelago's first democratically elected president, stunned the world last year when he announced he wanted to buy a homeland to relocate the threatened Maldives.

More than 80 percent of the the tiny nation, famed as a tourist paradise due to its coral reefs and white-sand beaches, is less than a metre (3.3 feet) above sea level.

Only Nasheed and his defence minister Ameen Faisel had any diving experience before the president came up with the plan for the underwater meeting, officials said.

Government spokeswoman Aminath Shauna said the ministers had signed their wetsuits and these would be auctioned on a protectmaldives.com website due to be launched at the weekend to raise money for coral reef protection.

"All the arrangements went ahead well," she said, adding the ministers would ride bicycles around the capital island, Male, next week as a further sign of their commitment to cutting emissions.

Maldives sends climate SOS with undersea cabinet
Maryam Omidi, Reuters 17 Oct 09;

MALE (Reuters) - The Maldivian president and ministers held the world's first underwater cabinet meeting on Saturday, in a symbolic cry for help over rising sea levels that threaten the tropical archipelago's existence.

Aiming for another attention-grabbing event to bring the risks of climate change into relief before a landmark U.N. climate change meeting in December, President Mohamed Nasheed's cabinet headed to the bottom of a turquoise lagoon.

Clad in black diving suits and masks, Nasheed, 11 ministers the vice president and cabinet secretary dove 3.8 meters (12 feet, 8 inches) to gather at tables under the crystalline waters that draw thousands of tourists to $1,000-a-night luxury resorts.

As black-and-white striped Humbug Damselfish darted around a backdrop of white coral, Nasheed gestured with his hands to start the 30-minute meeting, state TV showed.

"We are trying to send our message to let the world know what is happening and what will happen to the Maldives if climate change isn't checked," a dripping Nasheed told reporters as soon as he re-emerged from the water.

The archipelago nation off the tip of India, best-known for

luxury tropical hideaways and unspoiled beaches, is among the most threatened by rising seas. If U.N. predictions are correct, most of the low-lying Maldives will be submerged by 2100.

"SOS" MESSAGE

Nasheed and the ministers used a white plastic slate and waterproof pencils to sign an "SOS" message from the Maldives during the 30-minute meeting.

"We must unite in a world war effort to halt further temperature rises," the message said. "Climate change is happening and it threatens the rights and security of everyone on Earth."

World leaders will meet in Copenhagen to hammer out a successor agreement to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and industrialized nations want all countries to impose sharp emissions cuts.

"We have to have a better deal. We should be able to come out with an amicable understanding that everyone survives. If Maldives can't be saved today, we do not feel that there is much of a chance for the rest of the world," he said.

The developing world wants rich countries to shoulder most of the burden, on the grounds they contributed most to the problem.

Nasheed and the cabinet trained for two weeks and were assisted by professional divers to pull off his latest eye-catching move related to climate change.

Nasheed, barely a month after entering office last year, declared he would establish a sovereign fund to relocate his country's 350,000 people if sea levels rise, but later admitted it was not feasible given the state of the Maldivian economy.

Earlier this year, he vowed to make the Maldives carbon neutral within a decade by switching to renewable energy and offsetting carbon emissions caused by tourists flying to the Maldives.

(Writing by Shihar Aneez; Editing by Bryson Hull and Alex Richardson)


Read more!

Pesticide endosulfan considered for global ban

Reuters 16 Oct 09;

GENEVA (Reuters) - Scientists took a step closer on Friday to banning the pesticide endosulfan, widely used on crops like cocoa and cotton, despite objections from India which is a major producer and consumer of the toxic chemical.

Endosulfan is under consideration for inclusion on the list of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under the 166-member Stockholm Convention -- a treaty to protect human health and the environment from chemicals.

The Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee decided to draw up a risk management evaluation for endosulfan, the penultimate step to putting it on the banned list, the convention secretariat said in a statement.

Once the committee has produced the evaluation it can propose to the next meeting of the convention in May 2011 that endosulfan should be banned.

"Endosulfan is a pesticide that is still widely used on many crops such as soy, cotton, rice, and tea. It is highly toxic to humans and many other animals and has been found in the environment, including the Arctic," the statement said.

India voted against the proposal to draw up the evaluation at the meeting of the 31-member committee.

Substances are listed as POPs if they are shown to persist for long periods in the atmosphere, soil and water, increase in concentration up the food chain, travel over long distances around the globe, and are toxic.

The convention currently lists 21 chemicals as POPs, including the pesticide DDT, which can damage reproduction, mental capacity and growth, and cause cancer.

The committee also decided to prepare a risk profile of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), a flame retardant, for possible listing under the convention.

But it postponed a decision on short-chained chlorinated paraffins (SCCP), used in metalworking and paint, to gather more information on how toxic it actually is.

(Reporting by Jonathan Lynn; Editing by Dominic Evans)


Read more!

Agribusiness readies technology to fight hunger

Christine Stebbins Reuters 17 Oct 09;

DES MOINES, Iowa (Reuters) - Agribusiness leaders are stepping up investment and technology to tackle world hunger and climate problems tied to agriculture, but they see no quick solution to hunger, which kills 25,000 people a day around the world.

"I'm not much of magic bullet guy and I really do believe in a multiplicity of approaches," Mark Cackler, who overseas rural poverty and agriculture programs for The World Bank, said in an interview at the World Food Prize forum on Friday.

"Each of us in our own way have the capacity, the potential and the duty to be leaders," he said.

Jeffrey Sachs, head of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, confronted Cackler and others at the annual gathering of world food industry leaders here with a challenge "in which the food sector of the world, which is the single largest sector of the world economy, is really at the heart of multiple intersecting crises."

"While there is discussion on each of these issues, I don't think we're on a trajectory of solution right now," Sachs said.

Sachs later told Reuters: "Pepsi or Monsanto or the big grain trading companies -- I want them to come to the forefront and to the lead of solving some of these problems."

"We cannot go on the way we're going and we need the food industry to say it first and foremost because we can't do this without the food industry's leadership to solve the problems."

Cackler said many participants at the forum had been discussing Sachs's critique and challenge.

"Jeff is absolutely right when he talks about the severity and the magnitude of the problem and how it's insufficiently recognized. God bless him for reminding us fervently about how serious these problems are," Cackler said.

"The fact that 25,000 people die every day of hunger and malnutrition, the fact over a billion go to bed hungry tonight is shameful," Cackler said.

But he added: "There are no magic bullets."

A FEW MORE GREEN SHOOTS?

Cackler and executives at the three-day conference pointed out areas of progress such as increases in public and private investment in areas of Africa, which along with South Asia dominates world hunger concerns.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announced $120 million in grants to boost self-help efforts in agriculture in Africa and South Asia. Microsoft founder Gates told forum participants they must work together better.

"This global effort to help small farmers is endangered by an ideological wedge that threatens to split the movement in two," Gates said, citing a fight over gene-altered crops.

J.B. Penn, chief economist at equipment giant John Deere, called for more research and development funding from both the public and private sectors as well as "more investment in infrastructure around the world in rural areas like ports, storage, farm-to-market roads."

Penn also urged policy changes such as "better incentives for farmers to produce and for people to transport and process the food."

Cackler said the private sector should do more on crops and cropping systems for poor farmers in poor countries and that governments need to improve trading systems.

"Often it's not a question of direction. The direction is largely good, which is why I'm optimistic. It's the pace, and that's where I get very impatient," he said.

Indra Nooyi, chief executive of PepsiCo Inc, the world's second-largest soft drinks maker, told the conference: "It is within our power and not beyond our expertise to consign this suffering to history. We must do what we can."

Climate change complicates efforts to fight hunger.

Carl Hausmann, chief executive of global agribusiness giant Bunge's North American operations, said agriculture will need to double food production in 40 years even as it reduces its big environmental impacts on a changing climate.

"We have doubled production before but in ways that use more water, more land, more fertilizer," Hausmann said, adding that it "hasn't always been as soft on the environment as we will need to be in the future. Doubling again while using less water, less land, less crop inputs, might be an issue."

(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by David Gregorio)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 17 Oct 09


Singapore International Energy Week
from AsiaIsGreen

Human Tidal Wave for Global Day of Climate Action
from AsiaIsGreen

Blasting next to Labrador, Oct 09 - Apr 10
from wild shores of singapore

Oriental Pied Hornbill interlocking bills
from Bird Ecology Study Group


Read more!

Third attempt to cap leaking Timor Sea oil well fails

AAP, Brisbane Times 17 Oct 09;

A third attempt to plug a well that has been leaking oil for more than eight weeks into the Timor Sea off Australia's northwest coastline has failed.

The leak at PTTEP Australasia's Montara well-head platform, more than 200km off the Kimberley coast, began on August 21.

A spokeswoman for the Thai-based firm said a third attempt to plug the well with mud failed on Saturday.

Experts on board the West Triton drilling rig will now assess when the next attempt can be made.

The well casing being targeted is 25 centimetres in diameter and data gathered during the three previous attempts will be used to fine-tune the next effort.

"Setting up for each pass sequence takes between three and four days," the PTTEP spokeswoman said in a statement.

"Implementing the pass sequence must then be undertaken during daylight hours for safety reasons.

"Once the leaking well is successfully intercepted, heavy mud will be pumped from the West Triton down into the relief well, displacing the oil, gas and water and stopping the flow."

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett on October 15 announced that a deal had been struck with PTTEP for it to pay for environmental monitoring in the Timor Sea for at least two years.

PTTEP has appointed Australian environmental scientist John Wardrop to manage the immediate and long-term monitoring programs.

The immediate impact on wildlife from the oil spill is unknown.

Third attempt to plug Australia oil leak fails
AFP Google News 17 Oct 09;

SYDNEY — A Thai-based oil company on Saturday failed in its third attempt to plug a leaking rig that has spilled thousands of barrels of crude into seas off Australia, alarming environmentalists.

PTTEP Australasia said it had missed its target for a relief well some 2.6 kilometres (1.6 miles) below the seabed for the third time this month, and would try again in the coming days.

The leaking wellhead, some 25 centimetres (10 inches) wide, has been gushing off Australia's northwest since August 21 with estimates putting the discharge at 400 barrels a day.

"Setting up for each pass sequence takes between three and four days," PTTEP said in a statement.

"Implementing the pass sequence must then be undertaken during daylight hours for safety reasons.

"Once the leaking well is successfully intercepted, heavy mud will be pumped from the West Triton down into the relief well, displacing the oil, gas and water and stopping the flow."

The spill is reportedly Australia's worst since offshore drilling began more than 40 years ago, and ecologists fear the toxic cocktail of oil and dispersant chemicals could threaten marine and coastal species.

Environment Minister Peter Garrett, ex-frontman of rock band Midnight Oil, this week said PTTEP had agreed to pay for environmental monitoring of the area for at least two years.


Read more!

Reef Ecosystem Services Worth Up To $1.2M Annually - Report

Reuters 16 Oct 09;

Experts concluding the global DIVERSITAS biodiversity conference today in Cape Town described preliminary research revealing jaw-dropping dollar values of the "ecosystem services" of biomes like forests and coral reefs--including food, pollution treatment and climate regulation.

Undertaken to help societies make better-informed choices, the economic research shows a single hectare of coral reef, for example, provides annual services to humans valued at US $130,000 on average, rising to as much as $1.2 million.

The work provides insights into the worth of ecosystems in human economic terms, says economist Pavan Sukhdev of UNEP, head of a Cambridge, England-based project called The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).

Based on analysis of more than 80 coral reef valuation studies, the worth of services per hectare of coral reef breaks down as follows:

* Food, raw materials, ornamental resources: average $1,100 (up to $6,000)

* Climate regulation, moderation of extreme events, waste treatment / water purification, biological control: average $26,000 (up to $35,000)

* Cultural services (eg. recreation / tourism): average $88,700 (up to $1.1 million)

Maintenance of genetic diversity: average $13,500 (up to $57,000)

Taken together, coral reef services worldwide have an average annual value estimated at $172 billion, says Mr. Sukhdev.

He notes the growing scientific agreement that coral reefs are unlikely to survive if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels exceed 350 parts per million. Negotiators of a new climate change deal in Copenhagen in December, however, "would be proud" to achieve an agreement that limits atmospheric carbon to 450 parts per million, he says, calling that "a death sentence on the world's coral reefs."

Halving the destruction of tropical forests, meanwhile, would allow them to continue absorbing roughly 4.8 gigatonnes of carbon per year, slow the rise of atmospheric carbon levels and forestall anticipated climate change damage. Halving deforestation has a net present value estimated at $3.7 trillion, according to research.

The economic choice of turning such forests into timber or clearing them to make way for agriculture is "not very clever," says Mr. Sukhdev. "Stopping deforestation offers an excellent cost-benefit ratio."

"Investment in protected areas holds exceptional high returns," he says. Previous studies have shown that investing $45 billion "could secure nature-based services worth some $4.5 to 5.2 trillion annually." Among the specific examples cited: planting mangroves along a coastline in Vietnam cost $1.1 million but saved $ 7.3 million annually in dyke maintenance.

Examples of a rate of return on investments in ecosystem restoration:

* Coral reefs: 7%, (with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.8)

* Rivers: 27%, (cost-benefit ratio 15.5)

* Tropical forests: 50% (cost-benefit ratio 37.3)

* Mangroves: 40%, (cost-benefit ratio 26.4)

* Grasslands: 79%, (cost-benefit ratio 75.1).

Over 600 scientists attending the international 2nd Open Science Conference Oct. 13-16 hosted by DIVERSITAS, a Paris-based NGO, issued a concluding statement confirming that, "as we approach the 2010 Year of Biodiversity ... the fabric out of which the Earth system is woven is unravelling at an accelerating rate."

At the opening of the conference earlier this week, experts said the world would fail to hit its agreed target to stem biodiversity loss by 2010.

Website: www.diversitas-osc.org

What are Coral Reef Services Worth?
Press Release Diversitas blog 16 Oct 09;
Contacts: Mr. Terry Collins +1-416-538-8712; +1-416-878-8712 (m), tc@tca.tc
Ms. Marina Joubert, +27 83 409 4254, marina@southernscience.co.za

$130,000 to $1.2 million / ht / yr: Experts

Economists, Assigning Values to “Ecosystem Services,” Report Staggering Totals and Rates of Return on Investment

600 biodiversity experts from 70 countries issue Cape Town declaration

Risks of Importing Disease Grow with Rising Pet Trade

Experts concluding the global DIVERSITAS biodiversity conference today in Cape Town described preliminary research revealing jaw-dropping dollar values of the “ecosystem services” of biomes like forests and coral reefs – including food, pollution treatment and climate regulation.

Undertaken to help societies make better-informed choices, the economic research shows a single hectare of coral reef, for example, provides annual services to humans valued at US $130,000 on average, rising to as much as $1.2 million.

The work provides insights into the worth of ecosystems in human economic terms, says economist Pavan Sukhdev of UNEP, head of a Cambridge, England-based project called The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).

Based on analysis of more than 80 coral reef valuation studies, the worth of services per hectare of coral reef breaks down as follows:

* Food, raw materials, ornamental resources: average $1,100 (up to $6,000);
* Climate regulation, moderation of extreme events, waste treatment / water purification, biological control: average $26,000 (up to $35,000);
* Cultural services (eg. recreation / tourism): average $88,700 (up to $1.1 million)
* Maintenance of genetic diversity: average $13,500 (up to $57,000)

Taken together, coral reef services worldwide have an average annual value estimated at $172 billion, says Mr. Sukhdev.

He notes the growing scientific agreement that coral reefs are unlikely to survive if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels exceed 350 parts per million. Negotiators of a new climate change deal in Copenhagen in December, however, “would be proud” to achieve an agreement that limits atmospheric carbon to 450 parts per million, he says, calling that “a death sentence on the world’s coral reefs.”

Halving the destruction of tropical forests, meanwhile, would allow them to continue absorbing roughly 4.8 gigatonnes of carbon per year, slow the rise of atmospheric carbon levels and forestall anticipated climate change damage. Halving deforestation has a net present value estimated at $3.7 trillion, according to research.

The economic choice of turning such forests into timber or clearing them to make way for agriculture is “not very clever,” says Mr. Sukhdev. “Stopping deforestation offers an excellent cost-benefit ratio.”

“Investment in protected areas holds exceptional high returns,” he says. Previous studies have shown that investing $45 billion “could secure nature-based services worth some $4.5 to 5.2 trillion annually.” Among the specific examples cited: planting mangroves along a coastline in Vietnam cost $1.1 million but saved $ 7.3 million annually in dyke maintenance.

Examples of a rate of return on investments in ecosystem restoration:
* Coral reefs: 7%, (with a cost-benefit ratio of 2.8);
* Rivers: 27%, (cost-benefit ratio 15.5);
* Tropical forests: 50% (cost-benefit ratio 37.3);
* Mangroves: 40%, (cost-benefit ratio 26.4);
* Grasslands: 79%, (cost-benefit ratio 75.1).
(see full graph online at: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi32xtfKZSdeqPlv6ynbtJbp3aSzkuyvKeqNqkVxvW_k0m4Ok6xV1kQaf1YsPhHBT7P97kRvkLjuZWzoFU7c2b6hOmUQpTSbgnp5SDCQg6J0b6tIyoa-mI66eHBsprjOP46IOm5ZKAdi0g/s1600-h/TTB+Graph.jpg)

TEEB is a UNEP-led project supported by the European Commission, German Federal Ministry for the Environment, and the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Biodiversity and society: understanding connections, adapting to change.

Over 600 scientists attending the international 2nd Open Science Conference Oct. 13-16 hosted by DIVERSITAS, a Paris-based NGO, issued a concluding statement confirming that, “as we approach the 2010 Year of Biodiversity … the fabric out of which the Earth system is woven is unravelling at an accelerating rate.”

“At the same time, we are discovering ever more about biodiversity and the benefits it provides to people. It is clear that biodiversity loss erodes the integrity of ecosystems and their capacity to adapt in a changing world. It represents a serious risk to human wellbeing and a squandering of current assets and future opportunities.

“The biodiversity scientists gathered here commit themselves to finding practical solutions to this problem. They will do so by: increasing shared knowledge of biodiversity and its functions; helping to develop systems for monitoring the biodiversity of the planet; and being responsive to the knowledge needs of society with clear communication of findings.

“The proposed mechanism for the ongoing evaluation and communication of scientific evidence on these issues is an Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We call on governments and non-governmental organisations to join us in establishing IPBES as soon as possible. We urge policy-makers to act swiftly and effectively on the already-established and future findings relating to ways of limiting further biodiversity loss and restoring ecosystem services.”

“Meeting current and future human needs must make adequate provision for the complex web of life of which people are an integral part. People everywhere must give effect to their shared desire for a biologically-rich and productive planet through their individual decisions and political voices.”

Growth of global pet trade risks health

Among dozens of conference presentations, US experts warned that the risk of importing diseases is rising in tandem with growth of the multi-billion dollar pet animal trade.

The US alone imports some 200 million such animals annually from 194 countries. Most were captured from the wild and most arrived from Southeast Asia, a hotspot incubator of emerging diseases.

A study lead by Katherine Smith of Brown University found just 13% of animal shipments allowed in were classified by species – most were admitted with vague labels like “live vertebrate” or “fish,” raising concerns about not just disease but potentially introducing invasive species that could harm native ecosystems, wildlife and domestic animals.

She estimated 2,241 non-native species were imported to the U.S. between 2000 and 2006 and says there have been 335 outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases since 1940, 75% of which had animal origins. Among the outbreaks: a 2003 US outbreak of monkeypox traced to African rodents imported for pets, SARS in 2002, West Nile Virus in 1999, smallpox in the 1500s and syphilis in the 1400s.

“The threat to public health is real, as the majority of emerging diseases come from wildlife,” says Dr. Smith, who listed dozens of fevers, encephalitis, Leishmaniasis, and schistosomiasis among the health threats.

Just 100 inspectors at US borders are tasked with inspecting the shipments, she adds. From 2000 through 2006, the U.S. imported more than 1.5 billion live animals, roughly equal to five animals for every citizen.

Pet shops could face tighter restrictions if the controversial Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act gets voted into law.

The researchers call for:
• Stricter record keeping to help assess risk on animal imports.
• Third-party surveillance and testing for both known and unknown pathogens at the exportation points in foreign countries.
• Greater education of citizens, importers, veterinarians and pet industry advocates about the dangers of diseases that emerge from wildlife and that can make their way to domesticated animals and humans.
The conference concluded with a major plenary, chaired by leading expert Lijbert Brussaard, of Wageningen University, The Netherlands, on ways to reconcile the competing Millennium Development Goals of protecting biodiversity, reducing world hunger and alleviating poverty.

Among other measures, the experts called for a reduction in the estimated 30 to 40% of food lost through spoilage and waste.

* * * * *

DIVERSITAS (the Latin word for diversity) brings together biological, ecological and social sciences to address key questions that underlie our limited understanding of the current situation.
• How much biodiversity exists and how does its change or loss affect the system as a whole?
• How does biodiversity correspond to the delivery of ecosystem functions and services, and what is the true value of these commodities?
• How can scientific investigation support policy and decision making to encourage more sustainable use of biodiversity?
Armed with a broader, deeper knowledge of biodiversity, we will be better equipped to safeguard the future of Earth’s natural resources.

For more information: www.diversitas-osc.org

We will be billions of dollars poorer when coral dies
Shanta Barley, New Scientist 19 Oct 09;

The world's coral reefs save us $172 billion every year, but they're on the brink of collapse (PDF) because of political inertia, an ecological economist has told the global Diversitas biodiversity conference in Cape Town, South Africa.

The claim was made by Pavan Sukhdev, an economist based at United Nations Environment Programme's World Conservation Monitoring Centre in Cambridge, UK. Sukhdev is head of a European Commission study called The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), an international project to raise awareness about the economic benefits of biodiversity.

Previously, it had been estimated that coral reefs "earn" nearly $30 billion a year (PDF) by attracting tourists, protecting commercial fish species and protecting coasts from storm surges.

To investigate the economic value of coral reefs further, Sukhdev and his colleagues reviewed 80 studies carried out between 1995 to 2009. Their work suggests that a single hectare of coral reef can be worth from $130,000 to $1.2 million a year.
Pretty bleak

However, discussing the economic value of coral reefs is like fiddling while Rome burns, says Sukhdev. "The entire ecosystem is on the point of collapse," he says. "Unless negotiators in Copenhagen [in Denmark, at the UN climate talks in December] agree to limit atmospheric carbon dioxide to 350 parts per million, they will sentence the world's coral reefs to death." Politicians are currently hoping to limit CO2 to 450 parts per million, he says. "Frankly, it does look pretty bleak."

"The most cost-effective and easiest way to save our coral reefs is to reduce deforestation and boost reforestation," says Sukhdev. "I hope that politicians going to Copenhagen give the proposals to cut deforestation put forward by REDD-Plus the attention they deserve." REDD-Plus is a scheme supported by the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries.

Stephen Mangi, an environmental economist based at Plymouth Marine Laboratory in the UK, says that it's crucial that researchers start placing economic values on the ecosystem services they study.

"In terms of policy implications, I think it is crucial for science to link directly into policy, and the provision of monetary values is one way to achieve this," says Mangi. "Money is universally understood by policy makers, economists, scientists and politicians, hence it would help policy makers make sensible and defendable decisions when weighing up alternative and competing management options for marine ecosystems."

If we do lose our coral reefs, we'll never be able to recreate the services they provide free of charge, says Sukhdev. "How could we afford to feed the 500 million people who depend on coral reefs for the fish they eat?" he asks. "And how do you recreate the joy of diving on a coral reef?"


Read more!

Mangroves disappearing fast with global appetite for shrimp

Oyos Saroso H.N., The Jakarta Post 16 Oct 09;

A large area of mangrove forests in Lampung, which acts as a buffer for coastal residents from tidal waves, has been depleted rapidly over the past year, especially in South Lampung, East Lampung and Tanggamus regencies, where only 25 percent of the original forests remain.

Of the 160,000 hectares of mangrove wetlands that previously covered these regencies, only 20,000 ha remains.

A large portion of these has been turned into traditional shrimp farms, many of which are owned privately.

The shrimp farm operators, who generally come from Jakarta, Tangerang and as far away as Central Java, now own land titles, having bought the land from coastal residents.

"Two years ago, up to 136,000 ha of the 160,000 ha of mangrove forest was badly damaged, indicating that 20,000 ha had been subject to clearing ... Surprisingly, the provincial and regency administrations have not taken any action against *the destruction*," Indonesian Forum for the Environment (Walhi) Lampung chapter director Hendrawan said recently.

A number or regency administrations and Lampung provincial administration had initiated a mangrove replanting programs, Hendrawan said.

"The central government has even provided funds from the state budget worth billions of rupiah for the purpose, but most of the mangrove seedlings have died because of a lack of maintenance and supervision, such as in Sragi and Ketapang districts in South Lampung," Hendrawan said.

Lampung Walhi data shows that of Lampung's mangrove forests converted into large-scale commercial shrimp farms, most were in South Lampung and East Lampung regencies.

"A large portion of these areas is believed to have been cleared by two large-scale hatchery companies," added Hendrawan, who declined to name the companies.

The presence of the large-scale shrimp farms in Lampung had led traditional fish farmers to clear more mangrove forests to make way for shrimp farms, he said.

Ketapang resident Sumarno, 45, said many coastal residents had sold their rice paddies to newcomers in the past two years. Sumarno, who owns 2.5 ha of rice paddies, sold his land last year because it could no longer be used to grow rice.

"We were forced to sell our *land* because it was no longer productive and sea water had permeated the groundwater because of severe coastal abrasion," Sumarno said.

South Lampung Environmental Office head Hasanuri said the regency had virtually no mangrove forests left, and many areas of its remnant mangrove wetlands were in a critical condition.

"Of the 505 ha of mangrove area in Ketapang village, South Lampung, no more than 10 ha remains, spanning at a width of only four meters from the coastline," he said.

Lampung is recognized as a windu shrimp exporter. Each year the province exports between 60,000 and 70,000 tons of shrimp to the United States, Canada, Australia and a number of European and Asian countries.


Read more!

Endangered Sea Turtles Return To Mexico's Beaches

Jason Beaubien, NPR 16 Oct 09;

Mexico has deployed its navy to several beaches in the Pacific Coast state of Oaxaca. Its mission isn't to fight the drug cartels or protect European tourists, but to guard the nesting grounds of an endangered sea turtle.

In the 1970s and '80s, Olive Ridley turtles were harvested to the brink of extinction. But the Mexican government has orchestrated a remarkable comeback for the sea creatures.

This time of year, along a solitary sandy beach in southern Oaxaca, turtles bob in the waves just offshore. And then based on some signal — exactly what isn't entirely clear to scientists — the females come ashore by the thousands to lay their eggs.

On a recent day, Erika Peralta Buendia, a biologist with the Mexican government, stands amid a mass of female turtles at La Escobilla, one of the most important nesting grounds in the world for the Olive Ridley turtle.

"Practically the whole beach is full," she says, "It's 3 or 4 kilometers full of turtles, one right next to another."

The females are gray and weigh roughly 100 pounds. Each shell is about the size of a tire on a Honda Civic.

Prior to 1990, this beach was a slaughter ground for the Olive Ridley.

Sea turtles can't retract their heads into their shells. People would bludgeon them to death and then haul them to Mexico's largest turtle processing plant just up the coast.

Prior to 1950, an estimated 10 million Olive Ridley turtles nested each year on Mexico's southern coast. By 1988 — shortly before Mexico banned their harvest — the population had dropped to just 40,000.

In 1990, Mexico declared a total ban on killing sea turtles, Peralta says, outlawing the harvest of turtles and turtle eggs.

At the time, turtle byproducts — the meat, the shells, the skins, the eggs — were the second-largest industry for this impoverished region, after shrimp.

This part of Mexico still doesn't have land-line phones and only recently got electricity. The slaughterhouse used to employ 200 people at the height of the season. But while it was offering jobs, it was decimating the sea turtle population.

The Mexican government shut down the plant in 1990 and replaced it with an aquarium, the Mexican Turtle Center.

Marta Harfush, a biologist at the center, says during the peak of the season, which is taking place now, 100,000 turtles come ashore in Oaxaca in a span of three or four days.

She says Olive Ridley turtles are extremely vulnerable for several reasons. They only nest in significant numbers on a few select beaches in Mexico, Costa Rica and India. The turtles are on land only when they are born and when they lay eggs — consequently, they are sitting ducks on the beach. Vultures pluck the soft-shelled babies out of the sand soon after they hatch, while a type of beetle has been destroying their eggshells.

Despite the legal protections for the turtle population, people still covet their meat and eggs. Harfush says turtle fat is sold as a cure for the common cold. Turtle meat is still a traditional meal at some weddings. And the eggs are supposed to heighten sexual powers.

"They are used in bars and restaurants, not for food, but as a complement to the beer; they say they're aphrodisiac. That's why many people sell them," she says.

Harfush says the temperature on the beach can also dramatically affect the turtle population. If the sand during the third week of incubation is 86 degrees Fahrenheit, half the hatchlings will be female and half will be male.

But if the average temperature rises 2 or more degrees during this period, all the babies will be females, she says. And if it falls 2 or more degrees, all the babies will be males.

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service still categorizes the Olive Ridley turtles that breed in the Pacific as "endangered."

But Harfush says the turtles' population has rebounded significantly: Now, just shy of 1 million Olive Ridleys nest each year, primarily on three beaches in Oaxaca.


Read more!

Trade curbs sought for sharks, corals, bluefin tuna

Laura MacInnis, Reuters 16 Oct 09;

GENEVA (Reuters) - Tuna popular in sushi, colorful corals used in jewelry and sharks whose fins make soup have been proposed for international trade restrictions overseen by the United Nations, a spokesman for the treaty said on Thursday.

Juan-Carlos Vasquez of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) said countries had submitted 40 requests for trade curbs and controls that will be reviewed at a conference in Qatar in March.

African elephants, some plants from Madagascar, the skins of certain snakes and crocodiles, and a range of waxes and oils used in cosmetics were also suggested for the regulation which aims to encourage conservation, Vasquez said.

"We check that the trade is sustainable, is legal and is traceable," he explained. CITES registration gives protection to endangered species carrying high economic or commercial value.

Most of the plants and animals proposed for the 2010 Doha conference would, if approved by CITES' 175 member states, be regulated in a government permit system certifying their trade.

But Monaco proposed that Atlantic bluefin tuna be subjected to a full ban, which could cause big losses for Mediterranean countries who have resisted European Union calls to stop fishing the over-exploited population.

PRIZED

Atlantic bluefin commands high prices in Asia, particularly in Japan where it is prized for sushi. A single fish can weigh more than 600 kg (1,300 pounds) and fetch up to $100,000.

"This would be a huge change for that industry," Vasquez said of the proposed "Appendix I" listing, which is more strict than the standard "Appendix II" registration. "You will see meetings taking place on this from now until March."

Conservation campaigners with the slogan "Too Precious To Wear" celebrated the request from Washington and Brussels to protect red and pink coral through the CITES convention.

A finished necklace made from the corals can fetch up to tens of thousands of dollars, and they are also increasingly used in home decor. Some leading retailers including Tiffany & Co. and Pottery Barn have stopped using them due to sustainability concerns.

"An Appendix II listing for red and pink coral would not prohibit trade, but would ensure international trade in these long-lived, slow-growing species is carefully monitored via a system of export permits, which will help to reduce trade in illegally fished coral," the group SeaWeb said in a statement.

The fisheries conservation group Oceana said the proposals to shield eight species of sharks -- entered by the United States and European Union -- represented "a huge victory" that may help change consumption patterns in Asia where shark fins are in worryingly high demand.

"An Appendix II listing would limit trade to sustainable levels by requiring export permits, thus protecting the future health of the species," said Courtney Sakai, Oceana's senior campaign director who said "shark fins are today's ivory tusks."

"If countries join together now we can promote the sustainable trade of sharks worldwide," she said.

The full listing of species proposed for CITES consideration in March will be posted within several days on www.cites.org.

Asia demand for ivory, sharks' fins set for scrutiny
Hui Min Neo Yahoo News 21 Oct 09;

GENEVA (AFP) – Proposals to restrict or ban international trade in those three products are due to be studied when the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) holds its next triennial meeting in Qatar next year.

Monaco has tabled a ban for trade in tuna, while the European Union and the United States have proposed limits on the global trade of several shark species, the documents showed.

Meanwhile, Tanzania and Zambia are asking for a trade embargo on ivory to be lifted, allowing them to sell controlled quantities of elephants' tusks.

The consumption of sharks' fins -- a Chinese culinary delicacy -- is expected to be among key issues on the table at the Qatar meeting, officials said.

The United States and Palau had put in proposals to restrict international trade in white tip sharks and hammerhead sharks, while the European Union has proposed protecting porbeagle sharks, also known as Lamna nasus.

White tips and hammerheads have been "over-exploited" for their fins, said Washington in its submission.

Likewise, the EU warned: "Unsustainable target fisheries for Lamna nasus in parts of its range have been driven by international trade demand for its high value meat."

For environmental group Oceana, the moves marked a "realistic first step" in the promotion of sustainable trade in sharks.

"This could be the turning point for sharks. If countries join together now we can promote the sustainable trade of sharks worldwide," Courtney Sakai, Oceana senior campaign director told AFP.

Oceana also pointed to Monaco's request for a ban in bluefin tuna trade.

"This is the last chance for fisheries managers to show they are competent to manage these magnificent and valuable fish. If they fail, Asia may see its supply cut off, perhaps for years," said Michael Hirshfield, Oceana?s chief scientist.

According to the proposal put to CITES, bluefin tuna stocks are so fragile that the species should be classified as being at threat of extinction.

Monaco argued that tuna spawning stock in the Mediterranean has declined by more than 74 percent between 1957 to 2007, the bulk of it in the last decade.

Tuna stock in the west Atlantic has also plunged by 83 percent between 1970 to 2007, it added.

Meanwhile, some African states want a trade ban on ivory -- used in East Asian traditional handicraft -- to be lifted.

Tanzania argued in its proposal that its elephant population has "considerably increased" from 55,000 in 1989 to 136,753 in 2006, and said that a one-time sale of its ivory stocks could fund anti-poaching activities.

"In recent years, the government treasury allocated less money to anti-poaching activities mainly due to the economic crisis which is also affecting Tanzania.

"The adoption of this proposal would therefore be crucial for improving financial support to the Wildlife Protection Fund to further control poaching and other illegal activities in the country," it added.

Last November, a one-off auction of stockpiled ivory in four southern African countries raised 15,4 million dollars (12 million euros) for elephant conservation.

The sale of 102 tonnes of government-owned ivory stocks in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe fetched an average of 157 dollars per kilogramme.

Chinese buyers bought the bulk of the tusks, which fetched the highest price per kilogramme in Botswana.


Read more!

EU eyes cutting cod fishing by a quarter in 2010

Pete Harrison, Reuters 16 Oct 09;

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Europe's overexploited cod fisheries are still at risk and catches must be cut by a quarter next year in all zones except the North Sea where measures have yet to be decided, the European Union executive said on Friday.

Northern cod populations have fallen from 250,000 tonnes in the 1970s to around 50,000 tonnes today following decades of overfishing and quota-busting.

"In the case of cod in the North Sea, eastern channel and Skagerrak...things took a turn for the worse in 2008, when a greater proportion of the stock was caught than in any year since 1999," the European Commission said in a statement.

No decision can be made on North Sea cod until the end of talks with Norway, which jointly manages the fishery.

If the plan is approved by European fisheries ministers in December, fishermen in west Scotland would also face a 54 percent cut to their haddock quota and a 25 percent cut to the amount of whiting they can land.

But west Scotland fishermen, who often object to intervention from Brussels, would be able to catch 12 percent more herring.

"We're conscious they face hardship," Commission fisheries expert Maria de la Fuensanta Candela Castillo told reporters. "This is an area that has been mismanaged to the detriment of these communities."

"We have to try to conciliate their need for survival with the need for some day having again a fishery that way back produced 60,000 tonnes of fish and today produces not even 3,000 tonnes," she added. "It's about trying to convince them of the need to conserve for the future."

Irish fishermen would be able to land 30 percent less Norway Lobster -- a type of prawn with large claws -- 25 percent less Irish Sea sole and 25 percent less herring from the west and north.

But to the south of Ireland, they will be able to catch 72 percent more herring, 7 percent more plaice and 15 percent more monkfish.

Europe's fisheries chief this year called for sweeping policy reform after chronic overfishing for decades pushed 90 percent of stocks beyond sustainable levels.

Fishing fleets have grown too large, fines are too low to deter quota-busters, and fishermen are forced to put ever-increasing effort into locating and catching the dwindling European stocks.

(Reporting by Pete Harrison)

EU officials warn of disappearing cod
Raf Casert, Associated Press Yahoo News 16 Oct 09;

BRUSSELS – Cod is slipping closer to disappearing from key European fishing grounds, officials warned Friday, saying that only steep catch cuts will prevent the disappearance of a species prized for centuries for its flaky white flesh.

The European Union's executive body called for sharp cuts in the amount of cod fisherman can catch next year — up to 25 percent in some areas. The European Commission said recent studies showed cod catches in some areas are far outstripping the rate of reproduction.

Scientists estimated that in the 1970s there were more than 250,000 tons of cod in fishing grounds in the North Sea, eastern English Channel and Scandinavia's Skagerrak strait. In recent years, however, stocks have dropped to 50,000 tons.

"We are not that far away from a situation of complete collapse," said Jose Rodriguez, a marine biologist with the environmental group Oceana. He and other environmentalists said pressure from the fishing industry had kept quotas at levels too high to sustain a viable populations around Europe, while lack of enforcement meant illegal fishing made the problem worse.

The European Commission said Friday it would seek in 2010 to cut the catch in some fishing grounds around Britain, France, Spain and much of Scandinavia from 5,700 tons to 4,250 tons.

In the Mediterranean, bluefin tuna has been overfished for years to satisfy increasing world demand for sushi and sashimi. The tuna population is now a fraction of what it was a few decades ago, but the EU's Mediterranean nations last month refused to impose even a temporary ban.

Oceana estimated that illegal fishing doubled the amount of tuna caught.

Meanwhile Cod, which once sustained vibrant fishing communities from Portugal to Britain to Canada, is increasingly consumed by the ton as salt cod and fish-and-chips.

"People don't ask for fish and chips, they ask for cod and chips," said Mike Guo, a manager at Great Fish and Chips in Essex, England. "It's a traditional dish."

The depletion of the species has caused the decay and disappearance of hundreds of fishing villages on both sides of the Atlantic.

Overfishing off Canada's maritime provinces exhausted the world's richest cod grounds and forced the government to impose a fishing moratorium. The collapse wiped out more than 42,000 jobs, and 18 years later the fish have still not returned.

"It was devastating," said Tom Hedderson, minister of fisheries in Newfoundland. "This affected whole communities ... all up and down the coast here in Newfoundland and Labrador."

He welcomed the EU call to cut catches by 25 percent, but suggested more drastic cuts may be needed.

Some Canadian scientists believe the collapse of cod stocks off Newfoundland and Nova Scotia changed the marine ecosystem so dramatically that it may be impossible for cod to recover. Off Newfoundland alone, cod stocks once exceeded more than 400,000 tons but now scale only 5,500 tons, Hedderson said.

There are signs of recovery of Atlantic cod off New England, however, after years of conservation efforts. And international regulators have reopened some areas off Canada for limited fishing, Canada's Fisheries and Oceans Department spokesman Scott Cantin said.

The fishing industry in Europe, however, is in decline. The number of vessels in the 15 nations that were part of the EU in 1995 has dropped from 104,000 then to 81,000 in 2006. In Britain, employment in the fishing sector sank from 21,600 in 1990 to 16,100 in 2006.

The EU Commission's demand for cod cuts will be discussed by the bloc's 27-member states in a Dec. 14-15 meeting, when the fishing quotas for 2010 will be finalized.

"The scientific prognosis for most stocks is not encouraging, with many in a worse state than last year," Britain's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said Friday. "This, combined with the difficult economic climate, will mean that the negotiations will be even more challenging this time around."

Keeping fishermen in port with excessive quotas will add to their economic woes, said Bertie Armstrong of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation.

Norway and the EU jointly oversee cod stocks in North Sea, with each party regulating the stocks in its waters.

Norway and the EU will begin annual negotiations on cod stock management in November. Ann Kristin Westberg, deputy director-general of Norway's Fishery Ministry, said her country was unlikely to accept a 25 percent quota.

"We probably want to have it lower," she said. "We would like to point out that stock the EU are involved in managing are in terrible shape."

The cod harvest from the Georges Bank and Gulf of Maine fishing grounds, the two primary New England fishing grounds, in 2007 totaled 3,868 metric tons, the biggest catch since 2003 but far under the landings of the 1980s when fishermen often caught more than 20,000 tons annually.

"The Gulf of Maine stock is responding to the recovery plan, and the Georges Bank stock is recovering but not as much," said Teri Frady of NOAA's Northeast Fisheries Science Center in Woods Hole, Massachussets.

___

Associated Press writers Clarke Canfield in Portland, Maine, Rob Gillies in Toronto, Karl Ritter in Stockholm and Rachel Leamon and Maresa Patience in London contributed to this report.


Read more!

New analysis sounds alarm over scale of bushmeat trade in Central Africa

Traffic 16 Oct 09;

Cambridge, UK, 16 October 2009 — New analytical techniques have revealed that the scale of bushmeat trade in Central Africa may be much larger than originally thought, according to a study published today by TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network.

The study, based on an analysis of food balance sheets provided by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s statistical database FAOSTAT, strongly supports the view that the current situation surrounding bushmeat hunting in Central African rainforests is precarious. According to the analysis, bushmeat extraction rose considerably in the Congo Basin between 1990 and 2005, despite the overall decrease in forest cover in Central Africa.

Cameroon appears to be exceeding—by more than 100%—an estimated sustainable offtake of 150 kg of game meat per square kilometre of forest, and Gabon and the Republic of Congo are both close to this limit. The greatest rise in bushmeat production was in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where the yield rose from 78,000 tonnes in 1990 to 90,000 tonnes in 2005. In the Republic of Congo, production almost doubled, from 11,000 to 20,000 tonnes per year in the same time period.

“While the FAOSTAT bushmeat data are probably underestimates and should be regarded with caution, the data are the most readily available official sources of information on production of wild meat in the Congo Basin and are valuable indicators of bushmeat production and consumption trends,” says Stefan Ziegler, Programme Officer with WWF Germany, and author of the report.

Wildlife is a significant and direct source of protein for more than 34 million people living in the Congo Basin and bushmeat hunting is a key component of many peoples’ livelihoods in Central Africa.

Earlier studies have demonstrated that bushmeat extraction increases with human population growth. However, the latest study finds that bushmeat consumption increases significantly with personal wealth too.

“Bushmeat consumption is higher in countries with large urban populations, and the increasing urbanization in the Congo region is likely to place even greater pressure on wild animal populations there,” says Ziegler,

“The danger is unsustainable offtake of wild game will lead to a collapse in wild animal populations and widespread human hunger in the region,” says Ziegler.

Unsustainable harvest levels are widely believed to be the most immediate threat to the region’s forest mammals.

“Local people have hunted for centuries, for food and for barter, but the last 20 years have seen the emergence of a commercial bushmeat market due to rural people being increasingly drawn into the cash economy,” says Nathalie van Vliet, TRAFFIC Bushmeat Strategic Advisor.

“The impacts of subsistence hunting was previously balanced by the fact of the hunting was done on a rotation basis on alternate tracts of forest areas. However, shifts in human population dynamics and socio-economic factors are leading to rising, and increasingly unsustainable demands on wild animal populations.”

An earlier WCS study found that offtake by commercial hunters in south-eastern Cameroon was ten times more per immigrant hunter than for local subsistence hunters.

“What is clear is that management strategies to prevent over-harvesting need to be implemented and measures put in place to provide alternative sources of protein for the inhabitants of the region.”

However, the study also indicated that the development of animal husbandry may not be an ideal solution to provide substitute protein for game meat.

The study, Application of food balance sheets to assess the scale of the bushmeat trade in Central Africa, was launched today at the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Bushmeat Liaison Group Meeting, currently taking place in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Further to the results of the study, TRAFFIC is encouraging countries in Central Africa to enhance enforcement efforts and establish concrete law enforcement mechanisms targeted at curbing commercial bushmeat poaching. “Central African countries can cooperate in addressing this growing problem through the development of a regional enforcement plan and creating the political will to combat commercial bushmeat poaching in regional fora such as the upcoming Yaounde +10 Summit." says Germain Ngandjui, TRAFFIC's representative in Central Africa.

Full report (PDF)


Read more!