Global collective action is the key to solving climate change

We cannot accept a 'climate apartheid', where the rich can buy their way out of the problem
John Sauven, The Guardian 16 Feb 10;

Ian Katz says "it is hard to see where the political leadership for a global [climate] deal will come from" (The case for climate action must be remade from the ground upwards, 9 February). With climate science under siege and climate politics in disarray he's absolutely right that "anyone who cares about this issue must fight to keep it alive". I believe that pressure will need to come from a new and much broader global grassroots movement. It will need cross-party political support and must engage the business community.

With Copenhagen behind us, it's time for a new discourse, one which acknowledges the majority view on climate science, accepts uncertainties, and encourages debate among scientists over their observations of the world. A debate framed in the language of risk and uncertainty in which economics and societal values will play a central role.

We have to recognise that a global climate deal will be unlike any other previous international agreement. What we are seeking is a radical transformation of the global economy. If we view it as just another agreement that can be achieved with a bit of lobbying and mass mobilisation it won't work. The world generally needs to be shown that the transition to a low-carbon economy can really happen. And to achieve that requires real leadership from politicians and an unprecedented engagement with the public.

Katz suggests that the consequences (and causes) of the Copenhagen failings may take some time to divine. But it's clear that the policies presented by governments in Copenhagen failed to transcend short-term national interests for the greater global good.

In a carbon-constrained world it is going to be necessary to decouple human development from climate pollution. At Copenhagen world leaders could have signed an agreement that would have meant, in short, a radical transformation in the way we provide transport, energy, food, shelter, and other basic needs for all of the world's population. The opponents of action to tackle climate change talk about the costs. If we are to engage the public in the transition to a new economy we need to talk about the benefits, which will always outweigh the costs because of the catastrophic nature of climate change.

Katz says "there is a strong case for more radical reforms", but adds: "Those who want action on climate change will meanwhile have to accept a more incremental approach." Maybe. But we cannot accept a "climate apartheid", where only the rich can buy their way out of the problem. Gandhi taught us that peaceful movements can win, but you need a common cause and mass mobilisation. Climate change is a global public "bad". To solve it requires global collective action.

Perhaps a more global conscience is a distant dream. But dream we must. We have no alternative but to build a global grassroots movement, move politicians forward, and force large corporations and banks to change direction. Civil society needs to sharpen its teeth if it is to win the battle to save the climate.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 16 Feb 10


To Big Sisters With The Dukes
from colourful clouds and singapore nature and wild shores of singapore

SeaMoth and Baby @ Chek Jawa
from sgbeachbum

Two Dukes @ Lornie Trail
from Beauty of Fauna and Flora in Nature

Sponging away
from Psychedelic Nature

Feeding behaviour of the Blue-tailed Bee-eater
from Bird Ecology Study Group

PrawnWatch at Sungei Buloh: fun way to learn about mangroves!
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

建自然历史博物馆还差2500万
(Lianhe Zaobao, 10 February 2010) from Raffles Museum News

Wild animals found at police post: Someone must have kept them illegally from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Halophila beccarii: IUCN's Species of the Day!
from teamseagrass

Dung kicking
from Rhinomania


Read more!

Grumpy in Singapore

It may be true that everything in Singapore happens for a reason but it doesn't necessarily mean that you have to enjoy it.
Robert Leveson, The Telegraph 15 Feb 10;

More than once have I walked into walls in Singapore. I am not an idiot – well, at least I don’t think so, but then I suppose that most idiots don’t – and I have a valid reason. They were artificial ones: the kind of flimsy, freshly painted cardboard jobs that signal a change in the built environment of some kind and I wasn't expecting them to be there.

Usually it happens when I am out to eat. In Asia, most people eat out. The late evening rush hour – 6.45 to 7.20, I can be that precise within the CBD (or central business district, to those of us who prefer words) – combines a simple abundance of establishments to allow for dining at someone else’s table. I bought a wok when I arrived here over two years ago – but I have yet to unwrap it. I digress. On many sultry evenings, while swimming through the clean but heavy air, I have had to change my dinner plans because my restaurant has gone without even saying goodbye.

Living in Britain for most of my life, a nation that prides itself on the preservation and incremental change of its institutions, I am unused to continuous change. Not only do I work in one of those stable professions – teaching – and consider history a passion but I am also rather conservative by nature. I had an image of orderly Singaporeans quietly going about their fixed daily lives in my mind when I accepted my job here, flying out soon after on Boxing Day, 2007.

Since I arrived, though, I have seen the place transform. It’s a nation in perpetual motion. I live on the 12th floor of what was once the tallest apartment block in Asia. It is regarded as ancient – but it ain’t, unless 1972 is viewed as a part of the medieval period – and unique. Its horse-shoe shaped construction provides a perfect funnel for rising winds, cleverly air-conditioning the building. It will soon be up for sale and is almost inevitably going to be replaced.

In common with the billion and a half people of the great, red motherland to the north – the population is ethnically around three quarters Chinese – Singaporeans seem to view most things as transitory or dispensable. And why shouldn’t they? This dot on the map (my students were most perturbed when they failed to spot it at all on a map recently) supports 5 million souls, most of whom appear to be constantly standing in front of me. But with no natural resources, this nation has made its location and convenience its badge. It is change or die.

In 1819, when Raffles strode confidently onto the shores of a tiny island hugged by the equator, the place was a jungle. There was an exhibition recently at the National Museum that documented the history of Singapore in paintings and pictures and I realised how colonial eyes must have widened at the lush greenery before them. A few huts here and there, more than a few tigers crouching in the undergrowth, an island 25 per cent smaller than it is now (thanks to the wonders of reclaimed land). The greenery remains and this is truly a garden city. I go to sleep at night to the sound of the jungle (the park next door helps). But it is managed and orderly now, placed conveniently where it is needed. Nothing in Singapore happens by accident.

Change has its upside – convenience. You’re never too far from air-conditioning here, or somewhere to eat, or a taxi or an escalator, or a helpful citizen ready to assist you if you stand around looking stupid for long enough (there’s that idiot thing, again). If something’s too much trouble, it’s soon made easier. In some ways, it’s a revolutionary place. Plans are constantly drawn up and followed.

As Raffles did, so Singaporeans do. He had everything grouped, labelled and organised. The mouth of the river has changed beyond recognition. Three towers now reach for the sky in Marina bay, apparently balancing some sort of giant surfboard on their tips. They weren’t there when I arrived. Nor was the Formula 1 track – well, it was but it was and still is my bus route. The view from the Esplanade Theatre and Concert Hall (those twin durians were only finished in 2005) now takes in a flourishing new quay. I won’t even begin to describe what has happened to Orchard Road.

Similarly there was a huge food court (a staple here) outside my apartment complex when I moved in. Last year it disappeared while I was on holiday. I was most distressed to see the dumper trucks and diggers arrive soon after but overjoyed when they left a vast expanse of grass in their wake. They had put the park land back.

Shops have changed bi-monthly on occasions, in part I am sure due to uncertain economic climates. But, as Lee Kuan Yew (ex-PM, mentor and "father" of the nation) said to Singapore Airlines in the 1970s – "You’re on your own; sink or swim". People get chances here and they have to grab them quickly.

Much has been preserved too. I have never been anywhere with such shiny buildings. The heritage constructs are either painted bright pastel colours or as white as meringue. You could almost eat the Asian Civilisations Museum. Streets, trees and homes, all are beautifully maintained and mess is eliminated – in Singapore, you’re never more than a few feet from a mop. It is perhaps a glimpse of the future.

For someone brought up to think of change as not having pasta on a Wednesday night, it’s a lot to get used to.


Read more!

Nuclear power a key source of energy in region soon?

Green drive will see widespread use of renewable energy sources: Expert
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

RENEWABLE sources of energy such as wind, solar and biomass are expanding rapidly in Asia but the region could eventually see nuclear power emerge as a key source, said a visiting industry leader.

Mr Kenji Uenishi, president of energy giant GE Energy Asia Pacific, told The Straits Times last week that there is 'massive potential for nuclear energy in this region', noting that Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore have all announced feasibility studies on the issue.

The next decade could see the spread of technology from northern Asian places such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, which already use nuclear energy, towards countries in South-east Asia.

'These places have been using nuclear for a long time and that experience can be shared,' said Mr Uenishi.

But there are still hurdles to cross before nuclear energy is adopted on a massive scale, primarily due to public concerns over safety and security, added the 57-year-old.

He said that while there may not be a global deal on climate change yet, GE Energy believes the pressure on companies to reduce their carbon footprint is here to stay.

The urge to be greener and the recovering global economy are set to give the clean energy industry a boost this year.

While investments in the sector had suffered in the financial crisis, clean power remains the company's fastest growing business unit, said MrUenishi.

GE Energy, part of the General Electric conglomerate, has spent about US$850 million (S$1.2 billion) on research and development in renewable energy since it went into the business in 2002.

The company, which supplies technology for power generation and energy delivery, generated a global revenue of US$37.1 billion last year.

It set up an Asia-Pacific headquarters for commercial decision-making in Singapore in 2007, and counts Sembcorp, Singapore Power and PUB among its local clients.

It employs 5,000 staff in the region, and more than 900 in Singapore.

Tokyo-based Mr Uenishi, who was in Singapore for a regional meeting last week, said electricity demand is set to increase this year as economies recover, and so will demand for energy-related products and services.

GE Energy is aggressively expanding into 'smart grids', which monitor and distribute electricity more efficiently.

The company is in talks to participate in the Energy Market Authority's multimillion-dollar pilot project on smart grids, said Mr Uenishi, who took over the reins of GE Energy Asia Pacific in 2008.

GE Energy manufactures smart meters, which provide detailed information on energy usage, and software systems that help companies monitor the distribution of electricity in the grid.

Mr Uenishi, a 20-year veteran of the company, said GE Energy is committed to driving down the costs of cleaner, more efficient technologies so that it can be adopted on a wider scale.

The company is also focused on developing a new technology that will allow countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines to tap geothermal energy on a commercial scale, he added.

Such a project could enable Singapore to access renewable energy sources in the region - a possible area of exploration recently suggested by the Economic Strategies Committee.

'With Asia's emerging economies and growing energy demand, there are so many opportunities to develop new technologies which can contribute to society. This is what makes it exciting to be in this region now,' he said.


Read more!

Pilot project to shrink carbon footprints

Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

SIX local organisations - including two listed companies, a law firm and a university - are leading the way in measuring and managing the environmental impact of their activities.

They are doing this through an innovative online tool launched last week under a pilot project by British carbon-management consultancy The Carbon Neutral Company.

The programme, the first of its kind in Singapore, enables the organisations to specify their activities on Internet-based software, which then computes their carbon footprints.

The tool lets companies check their carbon emissions in real time, as well as helps them identify ways to reduce energy usage and save money, said Carbon Neutral's Asia Pacific managing director Rani Virdee.

The pilot programme combines CarbonView, a Web-based carbon management software tool developed by supply chain consultancy Viewlocity, with the carbon reduction expertise of The Carbon Neutral Company, said Ms Virdee.

A build-up of greenhouse gases has been widely blamed for climate change, a growing concern and a key global agenda item in recent years.

Companies have increasingly come under pressure to account for and reduce their environmental impact.

The six entities involved in the latest project are: mainboard-listed property developer City Developments and Pan-United Concrete, law firm WongPartnership, trading firm Jebsen & Jessen (SEA), ship repair firm Drydocks World Singapore and the National University of Singapore.

All except NUS paid to join the programme, with the fee based on the organisation's size.

WongPartnership managing director Dilhan Pillay Sandrasegara said the firm, which has a 'green force' to brainstorm ways to reduce its carbon footprint, was excited about being the first law firm in the pilot programme.

Carbon Neutral's pilot project is supported by the Economic Development Board, under its urban solutions programme.

EDB's director for clean-tech and urban solutions Goh Chee Kiong noted that, as a small and highly urbanised nation, Singapore needs carbon management to enhance its competitiveness in an increasingly carbon-constrained global economy.

'This pilot programme not only has the potential to address Singapore's emission reduction needs but can also be scaled up for use in other cities and countries,' said Mr Goh.

Singapore Environment Council executive director Howard Shaw said the pilot was 'a move in the right direction, as we're moving into a new era where carbon disclosure will become a necessary part of business reporting'.

Such tools, however, should be rigorously tested to ensure accuracy and standards, he added.

'There still needs to be a degree of standardisation in terms of carbon emission measurement,' he said.

Ever since the pilot programme was launched, Carbon Neutral has seen more interest from local companies, said Ms Virdee.

'Our experience shows us that organisations that implement carbon reduction programmes benefit from reducing operational costs, winning more business and enhancing their corporate reputation,' she added.

JESSICA CHEAM


Read more!

Not your typical tiger

Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

Among insects from butterflies to beetles, fish and flora and fauna, some have taken on the name 'tiger' because of their appearance or ferocious personalities. And a number can be found right here.





Read more!

Teams to survey Australia's biodiversity

Adam Bennett, AAP The Sydney Morning Herald 15 Feb 10;

Scientists and volunteers will spend the next three years surveying the far-flung corners of the continent to find the missing pieces of Australia's animal and plant diversity.

The $10 million Bush Blitz program will send research teams to remote national reserves throughout the country in a search for new species, and to better document those already known.

Groups of 10 to 12 scientists, together with volunteer "citizen scientists" and support staff, will conduct six major surveys each year.

In the process the teams will be building a better snapshot of the plant and animal life in the national reserves, which make up 11 per cent of Australia's land mass.

Launching the program at a national reserve in Darkwood in northern NSW, Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the surveys would help uncover some of the thousands of native species that have yet to be documented.

"Bush Blitz is nature discovery on a huge scale - teams of scientists will scour hundreds of reserves and expect to find hundreds of species that are completely new to science," he said.

"Australia is home to more than 560,000 native species, many found nowhere else on earth, yet only one quarter of this biodiversity has been scientifically documented."

Mr Garrett toured a survey camp at Darkwood, in the New England National Park, where he was introduced to a recently caught barred frog, a swain's leaf-tailed gecko, a golden crown snake and a brown tree snake.

"Quite often we have a sense that the environment is under some pressure and threat and that's true," and at times squeamish Mr Garrett said.

"But what we don't have as much of a sense of is the already great expanse of species there. That is becoming filled in with this type of scientific effort."

The program has been jointly funded by the federal government, which chipped in $6 million, and miner BHP Billiton, who has made a $4 million contribution.

International conservation group Earthwatch will help manage the research sites, and co-ordinate the volunteer "citizen scientists".

Earthwatch Australia's Executive Director, Richard Gilmore, said it was those volunteers, and links with government and business, that made such a large project possible.

"The national reserve system is larger in area than Germany, England and New Zealand combined," Mr Gilmore said.

"(Bush Blitz is) bringing together business, and community groups, and government, and volunteers, in a way that probably hasn't been done before. This is an important large-scale project that just couldn't be done by one group, or by scientists alone."

Scientist Frank Lemckert, from the NSW government body Industry and Investment NSW, said Bush Blitz would travel to areas usually ignored by researchers.

"This program is going to go to a whole lot of areas you wouldn't usually go to, and it is not just going to look at the charismatic, fluffy, furry things," he said.

"These surveyors will look at everything."

Dr Lemckert said the information gathered would help future conservation efforts.

"It's really about knowing about the environment that we have and that we came here with is being protected, so our children have what we have," he said.

"If we don't know it's there, we're not going to be able to save it. Until we actually understand them we can't conserve them, so this survey will be a chance to do that, so we can leave behind for our children and their children the same legacy that we have ourselves. I don't want to say, "Sorry kids, I saw it, but you didn't."


Read more!

Wetlands not wastelands: Setiu Wetlands in Terengganu

Harban Singh, Johor Baru
Letter to the New Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

THE east coast states of the peninsula are home to some of the finest coastlines, national parks and serene islands in Malaysia.

These coastlines have a rich heritage and beautiful natural attractions. Tourism is a potential earner in these states, and more can be done to lure avid nature lovers.

One of the many potential sites in the east coast is the Setiu Wetlands in Terengganu, which has both freshwater and marine species. The Setiu Wetlands supplies between 50 and 60 per cent of Peninsular Malaysia's grouper (Epinephelus spp) juveniles and oyster seeds.

It is, therefore, most disappointing to hear that a 1,000ha aquaculture development project has been approved in Setiu for an integrated shrimp project. This is in total disregard to the vital role of the wetlands to human habitats and livelihoods. Aquaculture projects have destroyed much of the wetlands, especially mangroves, in Thailand and Indonesia. It has led to environmental degradation, ecological damage and caused much pain to the socio-economic position of the local communities. Malaysia must learn from it.

We must preserve these important ecosystems where Malaysian Nature Society and World Wide Fund for Nature have done tremendous field and research work and accumulated valuable data as well as inventories to justify protection. The wetlands qualify to be designated as Ramsar (wetlands of international importance) sites by virtue of their distinctive habitats. Nature lovers are expecting this area to join Tasek Bera, Kinabatangan, Kuching wetlands, Tanjung Piai, Sungai Pulai and Pulau Kukup as the seventh Ramsar site in Malaysia.

The East Coast Economic Region (ECER) authorities, the custodians of this area, have a moral obligation to ensure that all green habitats are protected, through sustainable approaches. It is never too late to rectify a mistake and consult the experts. Setiu should be gazetted as a state park and a Ramsar site, as was done with Pulau Kukup and Tanjung Piai wetlands sites in Johor. Perhaps the ECER could learn from the Iskandar Regional Development Authority how to work with stakeholders to preserve and enhance wetlands. The proposed aquaculture project must be shelved. We don't need more white elephants in Terengganu. We must learn from our past mistakes and recognise that wetlands are not wastelands, but form one of the most productive ecosystems in the world.


Read more!

"Firefly colonies in Malaysia are disappearing even before they are identified"

Keeping the lights on
Sharmilla Ganesa, The Star 16 Feb 10;

Some firefly colonies are disappearing even before they are identified, alongside destruction of their habitats by pollution and riverine development.

THE sight of several thousand fireflies twinkling along a riverbank is a magical experience, one that draws in tourists, both local and foreign. Malaysia is one of the few South-East Asian countries with fireflies that congregate on “display trees” along both sides of mangrove-lined rivers. The insects can even be found congregating up to 100m inland from the riverbank where they breed.

As Malaysia is at the centre of the firefly region that stretches from India to Papua New Guinea, we are fortunate to have a relatively high diversity of the insect. Of the over 20 species of fireflies, Malaysia hosts seven.

Of these, the most familiar would be the Pteroptyx tener, also known as the congregating or synchronous firefly. These fireflies typically congregate in groups along riverbanks and synchronise their flashes, thereby creating the light display that so many people gather to witness.

Places like Kuala Selangor have made firefly-watching a lucrative tourist attraction since the 1980s. What most people don’t know is that many other congregating firefly habitats in Malaysia are slowly being wiped out, both by ignorance and irresponsible development.

The preliminary findings of a six-month study of firefly habitats in peninsular Malaysia by the Malaysian Nature Society (funded by the Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund) paints a rather alarming picture.

While there are still many intact mangrove-lined rivers in Pahang, Terengganu, Perak and Johor that support congregating firefly populations, the localities in Selangor, Kedah, Kelantan, Perlis and Penang have been reduced to just one or two. In the states of Negeri Sembilan and Malacca, most of the fireflies’ habitats have been eliminated, due to the clearing and bunding of rivers.

According to MNS senior conservation officer Sonny Wong, the firefly habitats are primarily threatened by riverbank clearing, strong light sources along the rivers, and pollution of the river itself.

“Riverbank vegetation is often cleared and bunds erected to establish shrimp farms and oil palm plantations,” Wong explains. “Unregulated dumping of chemicals used in these activities often end up in the rivers. Besides that, light pollution along the rivers in the form of spotlights from aquaculture farms, fish farms, sand mining dredges, ports and factories creates additional negative impact, as fireflies are driven away by these strong lights. All these activities threaten the congregating fireflies’ life cycle and survival.”

The riverbanks of Sungai Sitiawan in Perak, which used to be the habitat of fireflies, have been disturbed by the presence of shrimp farms.

Even the healthy rivers that support congregating fireflies in the states mentioned above, however, are not completely safe – they face potential harm from flood mitigation measures that are being implemented by the Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID). This was seen after the floods at Kota Tinggi, Johor, in 2007, when the river was deepened to prevent future flooding.

While well-intended, such measures have already affected several congregating firefly rivers such as Sungai Linggi-Rembau, Sungai Sedili Kecil, Sungai Johor, and parts of Sungai Perak.

“The DID does have guidelines on how to clear rivers. The problem is that the jobs are given to contractors, who perhaps don’t follow these guidelines,” says Wong.

He further explains how the Linggi-Rembau river is one of the most affected ones, with its firefly watching area almost completely destroyed.

The problem is compounded by the fact that very little is known about the life cycle of the firefly itself. It spends the first three months of its life in the larvae stage, and less than a week as an adult, during which time, it will try to mate. For the synchronous fireflies, the mating occurs on the riverbank of mangrove-lined rivers. The mating, however, is a competitive process as the ratio of females is lower.

“The problem is that hardly anyone studies fireflies in this region,” says Wong, who has been surveying firefly populations in Malaysia for more than 10 years. “No one knows the complete life cycle; the Forest Research Institute Malaysia has studied it in the lab, but the details are still disjointed. Without this information, it isn’t easy to restore or restore the populations that have been lost.”

As always, it comes down to a matter of finances, and currently, more funding is needed to carry out these studies.

Wong hopes that the survey he is working on will initiate positive response from the Government.

“The idea behind the study is to find out how many rivers (in Malaysia) have congregating firefly populations. We estimate that there are about 70 sites, of which we have surveyed 20, and plan to do five more. Then, we will compile the information in a directory as future reference for research, education, awareness, and most importantly, for Government action,” says Wong.

MNS plans to approach DID and other relevant Government agencies with the survey’s results, to encourage them to re-examine their methods in executing flood mitigation projects and protect the remaining rivers that support congregating fireflies.

Wong plans to have a preliminary meeting with the various Government agencies later this month and nurses hopes of long-term solutions as well. Among these is the passing of a river reserve act that will prevent irresponsible clearing and polluting of rivers and riverbanks.

“The Government also needs to think again about how to mitigate floods, instead of simply clearing and bunding rivers. The Economic Planning Unit plays an important part too, as it should be convinced that floodplains like these areas should not be developed.”

He also hopes to develop more of the congregating firefly rivers into eco-tourism sites, specifically by getting the locals in the area involved.

“While there are currently about 14 firefly-watching sites in Malaysia (other than Kuala Selangor), the operators there are not locals, and they aren’t regulars. Therefore, they don’t practice ethical firefly-watching,” says Wong. For example, he explains how many of these operators shine bright lights into the riverbank trees to force the fireflies to come out, which then disrupts the insects’ mating and behaviour patterns.

“From a conservation point of view, it is better to use locals. We (MNS) will teach them the ethics of firefly-watching, and it will provide them with a means of livelihood. They can also feel a sense of ownership over the area, and be the “eyes” of the site, so to speak,” says Wong.


Read more!

Save the tiger: WWF Malaysia campaign

Tan Cheng Li, The Star 16 Feb 10;

The tiger may become the stuff of myths if we don’t act now to preserve the species.

DON’T just celebrate the Year of the Tiger. Act to save this iconic species, whose numbers have plunged in the wild. Tiger experts have warned that the big cat will be extinct across 13 range countries if nothing is done to stop its hunting, loss of habitat and deprivation of prey.

In Malaysia, only some 500 Malayan tigers are believed to roam our forests – down from 3,000 some 50 years ago. For the species to rebound to a sustainable level, tiger conservationists calculated that we have to double the existing tiger population in 10 years.

As part of efforts to boost tiger numbers, World Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF) is kicking off the Tx2 Campaign: Double or Nothing. This is a call to governments to put measures in place as part of a global effort to double the number of wild tigers in 13 range countries. There is an urgency as the global popu­lation of wild tigers is at an all-time low, but given the chance, support and opportunities, tiger numbers can recover.

The Tx2 campaign aims to initiate actions towards having 1,000 wild tigers in penin­sular Malaysia by 2020 through a two-pronged approach: raising public awareness on the tiger’s plight to garner more support for their conservation, and raising funds to increase tiger monitoring and protection efforts in and around the Belum-Temengor forest in Perak.

The WWF Wildlife Monitoring Unit con­­ducts field surveys to determine the conservation status and population trends of tigers and tiger prey in the forest. Ultimately, the group hopes to formulate tiger-friendly manage­­­­ment recommendations for incorporation into relevant forestry policies and management plans.

The WWF Wildlife Protection Unit (WPU) conducts patrols in the Royal Belum State Park and along the East-West Highway (also known as the Gerik-Jeli Highway) to keep poaching and other wildlife crimes at bay. Since the WPU’s establishment in December 2008, the unit has provided intelligence to the Department of Wildlife and National Parks, the police and the army. It has also helped remove 102 snares set by illegal hunters and aided the authorities in arresting 10 illegal hunters and traders.

Tigers are emblematic of environmental health. When wild tigers have the food and shelter they need to survive and thrive, the ecosystems they inhabit remain healthy, and provide numerous benefits to humans and other animals.

To launch the Tx2 campaign, various activities pertaining to tigers are now taking place at the Fo Guang Shan Dong Zen temple in Jenjarom, Selangor:

Exhibition and merchandise booths (Feb 14 to 21) – Visitors can learn more about tiger conservation efforts by WWF and partner orga­­ni­­­­­­­sations the Malaysian Conservation Allian­­­­ce for Tigers (MYCAT) and TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade and monitoring network. They can sym­­bolically adopt tigers to help protect them.

Making The Tiger Mark (Feb 16) – Make a tiger print plaster cast, a method used by wildlife biologists in the earlier days to count tigers in the forest, and bring it home with you.

Tx2 launch (Feb 20) – See 1,000 faces being painted with tiger stripes and colours, to symbolise the goal of achieving 1,000 tigers by the next Year of the Tiger in 2022.

Tiger Trail (Feb 21) – Just like in the Amazing Race, participants will race from one station to another to complete various tasks and get their “tiger report card” stamped. A souvenir awaits those who complete the race.

In April, WWF will start a search for a Tx2 Campaign ambassador, in which the public can vote for their favourite personalities to champion the cause.

For more information, go to wwf.org.my or e-mail tx2campaign@gmail.com

Major threat to big cats
The Star 16 Feb 10;

POACHING and illegal trade are the most urgent threats to tigers, having the greatest potential to cause colossal damage in a short time. With improved surveillance, detection of wildlife crimes has grown in recent years.

Tiger seizures in Malaysia

2008

* Nineteen dead tiger cubs and on another occasion, three dead tiger cubs from Saleng Zoo in Johor.

* Two live tigers in the home of a wanted robber in Sungai Petani, Kedah.

2009

* A snared tiger was rescued in Belum forest in Perak but it did not survive.

* A tiger skin from a man in Pahang.

* Five tiger skins from two Thais at the Bukit Kayu Hitam border crossing in Kedah.

* Three kgs of tiger bones along the East-West Highway.

Tiger seizures in Thailand

2008

* The Navy seized six tigers and five leopards being smuggled across the Thai-Lao border.

* Carcasses of two tigers and a leopard in a truck coming from Sungai Golok on the Malaysia-Thailand border.

2009

* Four tiger carcasses in the central Thai province of Prachuap Kiri Khan.

* Two tiger carcasses in the north-eastern Thai province of Nongkai.

* Of 12 meat samples tested from the seizures in Thailand, five were confirmed to be Malayan tigers.

Source: Malaysian Conservation Alliance for Tigers and Department of Wildlife and National Parks

Do your part
The Star 16 Feb 10;

YOU can ensure that there will still be tigers roaming our forests, and not just in tiny cages in zoos and theme parks, in the next Year of the Tiger in 2022, by:

* Reporting suspected crimes involving tigers and tiger prey to the Wildlife Crime Hotline at 019-356 4194.

* Learning about tigers and tiger prey and sharing this with friends and family.

* Not consuming traditional medicines containing parts of tigers and other endangered species.

* Not eating the meat of tigers, other endangered species and tiger prey (wild deer and wild boar).

* Boycotting wild meat restaurants.

* Supporti ng the protection of forests which are tiger habitats.

* Voicing your opinion on issues like indiscriminate development, illegal logging and poaching.

* Not supporting zoos or theme parks which display illegally acquired or endangered wildlife or which ill-treat wildlife.

* Paying more for wildlife-friendly products.

* Supporting conservation organisations.


Read more!

Plant-A-Tree area included in proposed land development project in Malaysia

Include trees in building plans, developer urged
The Star 16 Feb 10;

WILD Asia has recently heard that a new development project has started at the area near the Kota Damansara Community Forest (KDCF).

We are shocked to learn that the area proposed for development includes a small parcel of land that hundreds of people, including the residents and major media companies joined hands during our 2009 Plant-A-Tree event to plant seedlings on what was barren land.

The 2009 Plant-A-Tree event garnered extensive publicity and was broadcasted on TV, radio, and published in two dailies. The event was jointly organised by Wild Asia, AMP Radio Networks and Friends of Kota Damansara (FOKD), and attended by the Selangor state representative Sivarasa Rasiah.

The tree-planting was done in good faith with the support of the residents to help raise awareness of natural areas and the importance of the community forest.

Individuals and the corporate sector donated the tree saplings and hoped these would grow into mature trees that would extend the forest boundary or form a buffer zone between the forest proper and developed areas in Kota Damansara.

But more importantly, the event was a rare green moment when several hundred people were brought together to do something for the environment.

In the act of planting trees that will grow into a forest, we built a real connection to the environment. That indeed, was the value of the Plant-a-Tree event.

We do not deny the right of the developer to develop the area, but we hope that they will see the trees as an asset to their development rather than a liability.

We think it is worthwhile for the developers to see the wide interest in the area and work with people who have a stake in it.

Wild Asia urges the developer to incorporate those trees into their development plans. We believe that protecting the natural areas will not only be an asset to their development plans but help them establish connection to the community which will be a boost to the company’s corporate social responsibility.

We urge the developer to see this as an opportunity to “stand up for a tree” and create goodwill in the community by joining hands with residents and the community at large.

Dr Reza Azmi
Founder and executive director of
Wild Asia (Malaysia)


Read more!

Palm estate is forest, says Indonesian ministry

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 16 Feb 10;

The Forestry Ministry is drafting a decree to include oil palm plantations in the forest sector to comply with international standards in mitigating climate change.

The ministry said it believed the policy would not lead to massive forest conversion into palm oil plantations as many critics feared.

“By definition, oil palm plantations will be defined as forest, but its management will be under the Agriculture Ministry,” head of research and development at the ministry, Tachrir Fathoni told The Jakarta Post on Monday.

He argued that many countries such as Malaysia, the world’s second biggest palm oil producer after Indonesia, had included oil palm plantations in its forest sector.

“By doing so, Malaysia can reap financial incentives from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of carbon trade,” he said.

He said that the UN only categorized trees with a certain height as forest trees, without identifying their species.

“It is to anticipate the implementation of the REDD scheme,” he said.

Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) allows forestry countries to receive financial benefits by stopping tree lopping.

Indonesia is home to the world’s third largest forest nation after Brazil and the Republic of Congo.

But the deforestation rate in Indonesia is the highest on the planet with more than 1 million hectares cleared per year due to illegal logging and massive forest conversion, including creating oil palm plantations.

Activists have said poor environmental management of oil palm plantations in Indonesia has led to the increase of greenhouse gas emissions.

But the Agriculture Ministry, managing the sector, insisted that the oil palm industry did not relate to deforestation.

It said that palm oil trees covered only 7 million hectares or 6 percent of the country’s total forest area.

Agriculture Minister Suswono earlier claimed that oil palm plantations utilized critical or marginal land into productive land.

The Agriculture Ministry issued a 2009 decree to allow oil palm plantations to be developed in Indonesia’s peat land.

The Greenomics Indonesia urged the Forestry Ministry to focus on its core business including managing industrial forest concessions (HTI) and forest concession holders.

“The ministry’s much-promoted sustainable forest management also remains in question. The Forestry Ministry should focus on its main core business,” Greenomics executive director Elfian Effendi told the Post.

He said that the Forestry Ministry should also resolve its different opinion of plantations to the Environment Ministry.

Greenpeace Indonesia media campaigner Hikmat Soeriatanuwijaya warned that the policy involving converting palm oil plantations into forest could lead to massive forest conversion.


Read more!