Encyclopedia of Life catalogues more than one-third of Earth's species

The field guide for citizen scientists, which aims at bringing all species on the planet together, has reached the 750,000 milestone
Damian Carrington guardian.co.uk 5 Sep 11;

An ambitious attempt to create an encyclopedia of every known species on Earth has reached a major new milestone.

The Encyclopedia of Life (EoL), a free and collaborative website, said on Monday it now has pages for each of 750,000 species, meaning more than one-third of all the planet's 1.9m species are now covered.

"EoL is the ultimate online field guide for citizen scientists," said Jennifer Preece, dean of the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland. "There are many online sites dedicated to specific groups of species such as insects, birds or mammals. Not since Noah, however, has there been an effort like this to bring all the world's species together."

The site uses content from 180 partners to bring together images, videos and scientific information, including 35m pages of scanned literature created by the Biodiversity Heritage Library. The new site allows members to create their own collection of species.

"The virtual collections put life into meaningful contexts from scholarly ones such as Invasive Insects of North America or Endangered Birds of Ecuador to personal collections such as A Checklist of Trees in My Backyard. Only imagination and energy limit the possibilities," said Jesse Ausubel, vice president of the Alfred P Sloan Foundation which helps fund the EoL.

The EoL's directors say they want it to become a microscope in reverse, or "macroscope", helping users discern large-scale patterns. By aggregating information for analysis, they say the EoL could, for example, help map vectors of human disease, reveal mysteries behind longevity, suggest substitute plant pollinators for a growing list of places where honeybees no longer provide that service, and foster strategies to slow the spread of invasive species.

Founded in 2007, the EoL had 30,000 species pages by the beginning of 2008, making the new version a huge expansion. Renowned the Harvard University biologist Edward O Wilson, one of the driving forces behind the EoL, said the new site "opens EoL's vast and growing storehouse of knowledge to a much larger range of users, including medicine, biotechnology, ecology, and now increasingly the general public".

The EoL has more than 1m more pages in place awaiting content from partners and members. But a recent estimate concluded that there are a total of 8.7m species on Earth, excluding bacteria and viruses, suggesting many more pages will need to be added to EoL in the future.


Read more!

Healthy ecosystems essential for future food security: global report

ECOS Magazine Science Alert 6 Sep 11;

A major global report co-authored by an Australian academic highlights the need for healthy ecosystems as the basis for sustainable water resources and stable food security for people around the world, including Australia.

According to Charles Sturt University’s Professor Max Finlayson, healthy ecosystems help produce more food per hectare of agricultural land, are more resilient to climate change and produce more economic benefits for poor communities.

Professor Finlayson says the main message of the report, An Ecosystems Services Approach to Water and Food Security, is that the way the world manages the connections between ecosystems, water and food could help us prevent water scarcity and meet the food demands of a global population tipped to reach nine billion by 2050.

‘Diversifying our crops, planting trees on farms and improving rainwater collection are important practical steps we can take to improve these connections,’ he adds.

The report urges policymakers to consider farmland, fisheries and other agricultural areas as ‘agroecosystems’ that provide sources for food and services, such as purifying water and regulating floods.

‘The degradation of these other services has already caused the loss of soil nutrients and an increase of soil salinity, which in turn has decreased food production in many major cropping areas, including the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia,’ says Professor Finlayson.

‘This decline may also be exacerbated by climate change.’

A major challenge to increasing food production is access to sufficient water for livestock, irrigation and fisheries, as well as domestic and industrial uses, says Professor Finlayson.

‘Maintaining healthy, resilient ecosystems to ensure water is available for agriculture and other ecosystem services is essential for long-term food security. Groundwater reserves are already in decline in such major breadbaskets as the North China plains, the Indian Punjab and western USA.’

The report shows how an ecosystems-based approach to agriculture could result in more efficient water use, a reduction in the annual loss of up 10 million hectares of degraded agricultural land, and fewer crop losses due to pests and diseases.

Lead scientific editor, Eline Boelee of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) – which partnered with the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) in publishing the report – commented that agriculture is ‘both a major cause and victim of ecosystem degradation’.

‘And it is not clear whether we can continue to increase yields with the present practices. Sustainable intensification of agriculture is a priority for future food security, but we need to take a more holistic “landscape” approach.’


Read more!

Patchy reefs ‘good for fish’

Vital clues to coral reef recovery have been identified in a remarkable research project in which three scientists laboured to hand-build 30 coral reefs from hundreds of tonnes of rock and gravel.
James Cook University Science Alert 6 Sep 11;

Working in a shallow, sandy area of Kimbe Bay in Papua New Guinea, the team constructed their artificial reefs over several weeks, with just a boat and their bare hands, to find out whether it is possible to rescue a damaged coral reef from obliteration and restore its richness.

“When a reef suffers a heavy impact— such as a storm or outbreak of coral bleaching—there are two different effects on the coral habitat,” Dr Mary Bonin of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (CoECRS) and James Cook University said.

“First, a lot of the habitat that was once available to fish is totally lost. And second, the habitat that still remains is often fragmented, or broken up into smaller patches.

“We wanted to figure out if the increased habitat patchiness is actually a problem for coral reef fishes, or whether it is really the loss of habitat that causes fish to decline following an impact.”

With JCU and CoECRS colleagues Professor Geoff Jones and Dr Glenn Almany, Dr Bonin set out to construct 30 real-life coral reefs in an open sandy area where there were no natural reefs nearby.

Each ‘reef’ was constructed from boulders and coral debris, carted manually from the shore in a 6m boat, crowned with a square metre of living bottlebrush coral and stocked with 20 small blue and yellow damselfish. After a time it acquired richer diversity, as baby fish came in on the current and settled.

The scientists then simulated the effects of habitat loss – the sort of colossal damage that reefs suffer during a bad bleaching event or cyclone – habitat fragmentation, where the existing reef is broken into smaller fragments, and a combination of the two.

“As you’d expect, the effects of a loss of 75 per cent of the habitat were awful. With most of their home gone, the fish just disappeared,” Dr Bonin said. “But when we divided some of the reefs into three separate parts we found that fish survival and diversity actually improved for a time.

“We think this is because a fragmented or patchy habitat reduces the competition between fishes, creating more room for the weaker ones or for newcomers to settle. When the habitat is just a single patch, the tough guys will tend to dominate the whole area and drive the others away.”

The researchers’ finding challenges a widely-held view that habitat fragmentation always leads to a dramatic loss of fish numbers and diversity.

“Habitat fragmentation has had a bad wrap,” Dr Bonin said. “Our findings suggest that it is actually habitat loss that is the major problem for coral reef fishes following an impact.

“It is certainly the case that in the small areas we created and studied, you get a positive effect on fish numbers and diversity from habitat fragmentation - whereas habitat loss of 75 per cent or more is a disaster.”

Because fragmentation can bring greater diversity, there may be things which reef managers can do to restore badly-damaged coral communities by mimicking its effects.

“The fact that habitat patchiness can have a positive effect on fish diversity is really exciting because it means that even if it isn’t possible for managers to restore an entire coral reef, it will still be highly beneficial to restore small patches of habitat” says Dr Bonin.

“We now want to investigate what happens over much larger areas, and examine how the degree of isolation of the remaining habitat fragments influences species’ responses to a disturbance.”

Even in Australia’s well-managed Great Barrier Reef zone most of the coastal fringing corals have been lost – so a tantalising question is whether they could gradually be restored over time, providing human impacts from the land are also reduced.

With coral reefs facing growing losses from global warming, ocean acidification (caused by humanity’s carbon emissions), storms and other human impacts like pesticides, sediment and nutrients, understanding how to bring them back is becoming critically important to the management of treasures such as Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, the team says.

“Whether the patch-scale patterns documented apply to the larger reef landscape is currently unknown, but should be emphasized in future research, given the increasing degradation of coral reef habitats worldwide,” they say.

Their paper, “Contrasting effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on coral-associated reef fishes” by Mary Bonin, Glenn Almany and Geoffrey Jones, appears in Ecology, the journal of the Ecological Society of America.


Read more!

Total Arctic sea ice at record low in 2010: study

Gerard Wynn Reuters Yahoo News 6 Sep 11;

500 MILES FROM THE NORTH POLE (Reuters) - The minimum summertime volume of Arctic sea ice fell to a record low last year, researchers said in a study to be published shortly, suggesting that thinning of the ice had outweighed a recovery in area.

The study estimated that last year broke the previous, 2007 record for the minimum volume of ice, which is calculated from a combination of sea ice area and thickness.

The research adds to a picture of rapid climate change at the top of the world that could see the Arctic Ocean ice-free within decades, spurring new oil exploration opportunities but possibly also disrupted weather patterns far afield and a faster rise in sea levels.

The authors developed a model predicting thickness across the Arctic Ocean based on actual observations of winds, air and ocean temperatures.

"The real worrisome fact is downward trend over the last 32 years," said Axel Schweiger, lead author of the paper, referring to a satellite record of changes in the Arctic.

He was emailing Reuters at the Greenpeace icebreaker Arctic Sunrise, in the Arctic Ocean between the Norwegian island of Svalbard and the North Pole.

"(It fell) by a large enough margin to establish a statistically significant new record," said the authors in their paper titled "Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume."

The researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle checked the model results against real readings of ice thickness using limited submarine and satellite data.

The approach has some detractors because it is focused is on modeling rather than direct observations of thickness, and therefore contains some uncertainty.

Sea ice area is easier to measure by satellite than ice thickness, and so has not needed a modeling approach.

Ice thickness is just as important or more so in helping understand what is happening in the far north. Some experts argue that part of the reason the ice area has dramatically fallen in recent years is because it has been thinning for decades.

The authors said their Pan-arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) in general agreed well with actual observations, although "modeling error" was possible.

The Arctic sea ice area fell below 4.6 million sq km last week with two weeks of the melt season still to go, compared with the record low of 4.13 million sq km in 2007.

By comparison, the minimum ice extent in the early 1970s was about 7 million square km. Ice melts every year during the summer and reaches a minimum extent in mid-September.

Most experts now agree that the Arctic Ocean will be ice-free in late summer at some point this century but disagree about exactly when.

While sea ice itself does not raise sea levels when it melts, a warmer Arctic could speed up melting of the Greenland ice sheet, which is freshwater ice trapped over land and contains enough water to raise world sea levels by 7 meters.

Arctic ice cover hits historic low: scientists
AFP Yahoo News 11 Sep 11;

The area covered by Arctic sea ice reached it lowest point this week since the start of satellite observations in 1972, German researchers announced on Saturday.

On September 8th, the North Pole's icy skull cap shrank to 4.24 million square kilometres (1.637 million square miles), about half-a-percent under the previous record low set in September 2007, according to the University of Bremen's Institute of Environmental Physics.

The Arctic's dwindling summer sea ice is described by scientists as both a measure and a driver of global warming, with negative impacts on a local and planetary scale.

It is also further evidence of a strong human imprint on climate patterns in recent decades, the researchers said.

"The sea ice retreat can no more be explained with the natural variability from one year to the next, caused by weather influence," Georg Heygster, head of the Institute's Physical Analysis of Remote Sensing Images unit, said in a statement.

"Climate models show, rather, that the reduction is related to the man-made global warming which, due to the albedo effect, is particularly pronounced in the Arctic."

Albedo increases when an area once covered by reflective snow or ice -- which bounces much of the Sun's radiative force back into space -- is replaced by deep blue sea, which absorbs the heat instead.

Temperatures in the Arctic region have risen more than twice as fast as the global average over the last half century.

The Arctic ice cover has also become significantly thinner in recent decades, though it is not possible to measure the shrinkage in thickness as precisely as for surface area, the statement said.

The US National Snow and Ice Data Center, which likewise tracks Arctic ice cover on a daily basis, has not announced a record low ice cover. Data posted on its website only covered the period through September 6.


Read more!

UN chief vows 'real results' on climate change

(AFP) Google News 5 Sep 11;

TARAWA, Kiribati — UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Monday vowed to the leader of Kiribati, a low-lying Pacific nation threatened by rising seas, to keep pressing for "real results" against climate change.

Ban described the small Pacific nation, where some villagers have already had to relocate to escape rising sea levels, as standing on "the frontlines" of the global warming debate.

"I will bring your concerns back to the world, to the United Nations General Assembly (this month) and to the climate change negotiations in Durban later this year," he told an audience including Kiribati President Anote Tong.

"I will keep pressing for progress until we get real results," the UN chief said on a visit to the tiny nation.

The November 28-December 9 Durban climate summit aims to kickstart talks on how to address the issue of global warming, before the binding emissions targets of the Kyoto Protocol expire next year.

However, a range of powers including the United States and European Union have already said it will not result in a binding deal on carbon emissions.

The Kiribati leader applauded Ban for his political commitment, but remained pessimistic after past climate summits which have dashed the hopes of low-lying nations such as his own.

"It is most unfortunate, but perhaps correct, to say that any further significant progress on climate change negotiations is highly unlikely in the near future," Tong said.

Ban headed from Kiribati to New Zealand later Monday to attend the Pacific Islands Forum, a summit of 16 regional nations beginning Tuesday where climate change is expected to dominate the agenda.

U.N. Chief Urges World To Redouble Efforts On Climate Talks
Pauline Askin PlanetArk 8 Sep 11;

U.N. Chief Urges World To Redouble Efforts On Climate Talks Photo: Reuters/Truth Leem
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon speaks during a forum organized by the Korea Broadcasting Journalists Club in Seoul August 11, 2011.
Photo: Reuters/Truth Leem

The world needs to redouble efforts to fight climate change ahead of global talks in Durban, with time running out to save millions of lives in countries to be hit hardest, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday.

Ban, winding up a visit to Australia and small Pacific nations including several likely to be swamped by rising sea levels, said critics of climate change science were wrong.

"The facts are clear. Global greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. Millions of people are suffering today from climate impacts. Climate change is very real," Ban said in a speech at Sydney University.

"Environmental migrants are starting to reshape the human geography of the planet. This will only increase as sea-levels rise and deserts advance. We cannot burn our way to the future," he said.

Hopes have dimmed for a new global climate pact to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires at the end of 2012, after U.S. President Barack Obama and other leaders failed to agree in Copenhagen in 2009 on a new deal limiting global warming.

Leaders of 193 countries are set to meet for the next annual U.N. climate summit in November in Durban, where talks could stall again if rich and poor nations renew squabbling over how to share out emissions cuts and whether to extend the existing protocol.

Ban rejected criticism that little progress had been made so far in several rounds of global climate talks, most recently in Mexico, which he said had delivered climate adaptation measures to protect vulnerable people.

The Durban conference must keep building on that progress, he said, and agree to ambitious mitigation targets that would ensure any increase in global average temperature remained below 2 degrees Centigrade.

"Moreover, given that the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol expires next year, a political formula must be found to ensure that a robust, post 2012 climate regime is agreed upon, and is not delayed by negotiating gamesmanship," Ban said.

He said many countries were already taking steps to combat climate shift.

China had pledged to reduce carbon intensity by up to 45 percent and now led the United States in clean-energy capacity, he said, while India was planning to lift clean energy investment by more than 350 percent in this decade.

"These actions are vital on their own, but they can also inspire progress in the global negotiations, creating a virtuous cycle. My advice to you. Be bold. Be brave. Think big," he said.

Australian's government has also taken measures to fight climate change and unveiled plans two months ago to impose a tax on carbon emissions from July 2012, before moving to a carbon trading system from mid-2015.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said on Monday after talks with Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard that Europe and Australia aimed to link their trading schemes.

Ban said he had seen for himself this week in the tiny island nation of Kiribati how fears of rising seas and swamping tides were terrifying local people, while the drought crisis and conflict in the Horn of Africa had put 12 million lives at risk.

The U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres told Reuters last month governments were very much "on track" to deliver on the main commitments agreed at a Mexico summit last year, related to finance, technology and climate adaptation.

At the 2010 talks in Cancun, governments agreed to set up a Green Climate Fund to manage $100 billion a year by 2020 in aid to the poor nations most at risk of climate change.

(Editing by Ed Davies)


Read more!

Germany Keen To Join Hands With Malaysia To Curb Illegal Logging

Manik Mehta Bernama 5 Sep 11;

FRANKFURT, Sept 5 (Bernama) -- The German government is aggressively trying to curb illegal felling of trees in tropical countries, and is apparently willing to join hands with a number of countries, including Malaysia, to stop this practice which, it says, is an environmental hazard.

The German government has already put in place a so-called Timber Trade Safeguard Law after Federal President Christian Wulff signed a bill submitted by Agriculture Minister Ilse Aigner against the illegal felling of timber.

"This is the first step towards fighting the worldwide illegal timber felling and the destruction of the tropical forest.

"The second step will follow with the implementation of the timber trade ordinance in 2013. The worldwide destruction of forests can be stopped only if a legal and sustained use of the forests in all the countries is economically viable and, in effect, incentives are given for the sustenance of the forests.

"Then one would be able to say with a good conscience that timber products of all kinds can again be used," Aigner said recently in Berlin.

Environmental protection, along with climate change, is very close to Germans who are critical of environmental destruction.

According to German sources, some 13 million hectares of forests are destroyed worldwide each year, which is more than the entire size of forests in Germany.

Indeed, German environmental protection organisations claim that illegal felling of timber - the felling of trees in violation of laws in the country of production, has become a worldwide "problem of the highest magnitude".

The latest law introduced by Germany regulates national controls on imports of timber from countries that have concluded partnership agreements with the European Union against illegal felling of trees.

So far, such agreements have been negotiated with six tropical countries (Ghana, Republic of Congo, Republic of Cameroon, Central African Republic, Indonesia and Liberia).

With further countries such as Malaysia, the EU Commission is presently holding negotiations to finalise an agreement.

Under such agreements, the partner countries will set up a permit and licence system to ensure that only legally felled timber is exported to the European Union.

In return, these countries will also receive, if needed, direct assistance in improving their capabilities in areas such as forest management and law enforcement.

The law will arm the Federal German Agency for Agriculture and Food, as the responsible regulating authority, with all the necessary powers to intervene.

Furthermore, intervention by the Customs authorities in enforcing control measures at the external borders as well as prosecution and imposition of fines will be regulated.

The first controlled timber is expected to start in 2011, the international year of the forest.

-- BERNAMA


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 5 Sep 11

Help build the Encyclopedia of Life
from Protists in Singapore

Crows and oil palm fruits: A call for more observations
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Sentosa rocks with special crab
from wild shores of singapore and Nature rambles

Asian Honeybee from Monday Morgue


Read more!

Quenching Singapore's thirst

A water pact with Malaysia upon which Singapore used to depend expired this week. Its end was marked by a cordial handover of a water catchment area in Johor and treatment facilities - a powerful testament of Singapore's progress towards greater self-sufficiency in water. Insight tells the story of that quest.
Elgin Toh Straits Times 3 Sep 11;

A SIMPLE turn of the tap did not guarantee water if you happened to be in Singapore on April 24, 1963.

It was the first day of a water rationing exercise that would last 10 months.

An unusually dry spell both in Singapore and in the Tebrau River area in Johor - a primary water source for the island - caused water stocks to plunge dramatically, leaving the authorities with little choice but to impose restrictions.

For four days a week, depending on which area you lived in, you were either deprived of water between 8am and 2pm or between 2pm and 8pm.

People who did not ordinarily read the newspapers or listen to the radio suddenly found themselves having to scan headlines or turn knobs at least once a week - to stay informed about rationing schedules.

Those who forgot to store water in pails at home during the allocated timings had to stand in queues to use public taps.

The cost of food went up.

A government advisory that called for the washing of cars and watering of gardens to be 'kept to a minimum' clearly did not stop some. A forum letter in The Straits Times on May 3 had one reader wondering 'why the gentleman living opposite me still finds it necessary to water his lawn non-stop for 14 minutes' a day.

Eerily, the spying on neighbours went further than that.

Another letter on May 17 read: 'At a time when the state is facing an acute water shortage, is it proper for a person to bathe three times a day? That is exactly what my neighbour and his six children are doing every day of the week.'

Eventually, the rain returned and the reservoirs filled up. Curbs were finally lifted on Feb 28, 1964 - ironically, on a day when heavy rainfall caused an 11-year- old boy to drown.

Singaporeans who lived through that angsty period learnt a lesson they never forgot: that water, or the lack thereof, was a major source of weakness for the island-state.

This week, a no less momentous milestone in Singapore's aquatic history was crossed, but with far less public interest. A 50-year water agreement signed in 1961 - one of just two between Singapore and Malaysia - drew to a close.

As a result, a catchment area in Johor more than five times the size of Singapore's Central Catchment Nature Reserve ceased to serve Singapore's water needs, but with nary an eyebrow raised.

Public indifference, however, can be seen in a positive light. It is arguably a testament to Singapore's success in overcoming its water vulnerabilities.

What has happened since 1963?

In the words of Dr Joey Long of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 'the tables have turned'.

'While in the initial years Singapore's access to adequate water was viewed through the lens of security and survival, Singapore's present circumstances should be viewed with more optimism,' he said.

In 50 years, a virtuous mix of visionary leadership, meticulous groundwork and scientific advancements has helped Singapore exorcise her hydro-demons.

A tiny island-state ranked 170th out of a list of 190 nations in fresh water availability appears to be leapfrogging its way into water independence.

A matter of life and death

BUT there was a time when the situation was a lot more tense - and not just because people had to line up at public taps and tolerate dirty cars.

In 1970, seven years after that depressing drought, water security continued to keep Singapore's leaders awake at night.

'If these chaps do not observe the agreements, it will be a very serious matter for us,' said then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, referring to the two Singapore-Malaysia water agreements, in a meeting with Professor S. Jayakumar before he took over as Singapore's permanent representative to the United Nations.

'It is a matter of life and death... it can lead to war,' he added.

Never far from Mr Lee's mind was the threat from Malaysian premier Tunku Abdul Rahman, relayed to him by the British, that 'if Singapore doesn't do what I want, I'll switch off the water supply'.

Coming just days after independence, the threat - though never acted upon - convinced him that 'as long as I was totally dependent on Malaysia's water supply, we would always be a satellite'.

That, combined with the Japanese blowing up water pipes that carried water across the strait from Johor in 1942, was what drove him to seek water self-sufficiency from the get-go, he later revealed.

The cards dealt to Singapore in 1965 were not promising.

The bulk of its water came from Johor. Two agreements signed in 1961 and 1962 allowed Singapore to buy water for 3 sen per 1,000 gallons (4,546 litres), excluding land rental costs in the catchment areas.

The expiry dates of the two water pacts were 2011 and 2061 respectively.

The 1961 agreement gave Singapore full and exclusive rights to draw water from Gunung Pulai, Pontian, Skudai and Tebrau. The 1962 agreement allowed Singapore to collect up to 250 million gallons of water a day from Johor River.

In exchange, treated water was sold back to Johor at the price of 50 sen per 1,000 gallons, which was below cost.

The two agreements were confirmed by both Singapore and Malaysia in their separation agreement and promptly lodged with the UN.

The British also left behind three reservoirs - MacRitchie, Peirce and Seletar.

At once, Mr Lee and his Government swung into action. One of his first initiatives: forming a unit under the Prime Minister's Office to coordinate water policy.

Singapore lacked natural aquifers and groundwater. But it did not lack rainfall, per se, receiving from the heavens 2,400mm annually, comfortably higher than the global average of 1,050mm.

Rather, what could not be found in abundance were water bodies and land that could 'catch' the rain.

In 1969, the capacity of Seletar Reservoir was enlarged and its catchment scope broadened.

The 1970s saw a flurry of activity.

The Government began studying the feasibility of various conventional and not-so-conventional water sources, and published in 1972 the Water Master Plan. This is seen by water experts as the first long-term blueprint for water resource development here.

Upper Peirce Reservoir was completed in 1975. That same year, Kranji River was dammed to separate seawater from freshwater. This created Kranji Reservoir - one of the first of several reservoirs formed this way.

But the Government also took chances with the not-so-likely. It constructed an experimental plant to recycle used water - a predecessor to Newater.

Unfortunately, the requisite technologies, such as reverse osmosis, were still premature. The tests failed to persuade policymakers that the idea was sufficiently economical or reliable and no permanent plant was built.

As the economy grew rapidly, it soon also became clear that Singapore could not simply expand reservoirs indefinitely. Industry was competing for land use.

A concerted effort at promoting conservation began. The first 'Water is precious' campaign, launched in 1971, reduced water consumption by 5 per cent.

Four decades on, the public education drive continues in schools, factories and the media, whether it is exemplifying 'water efficient homes' with toilets that use cistern water-saving bags or mandating self-shutting delayed action taps in buildings. To drive home the message, a water conservation tax was later introduced. It is levied today at a rate of 30 per cent for the first 40 litres per month. Beyond that, the tax rises to 45 per cent. The Government's aim is to cut per capita consumption from 155 litres today to 140 litres by 2030.

The 1980s and 1990s

THE 1980s saw both bright spots and dark ones in bilateral ties. From time to time, threats to fiddle with Singapore's water supply, whether serious or not, emanated from Malaysian society or officialdom or both.

In 1986, for instance, the visit of Israeli President Chaim Herzog to Singapore stoked anger across the causeway, prompting some to call for the treaties to be revoked or at least re-negotiated.

There was good reason for optimism in the late 1980s, when the two sides penned an agreement supplementing the 1962 one. Singapore was given the go-ahead to build a dam across Johor River and to buy water over and above the original limit of 250 million gallons a day.

A decade passed. As it considered its long-term water needs, Singapore's leaders decided to negotiate supplementary agreements to extend the supply of water from Johor beyond 2061.

In 1998, in the wake of the Asian financial crisis, the two sides came close to an agreement on a 'water-for-funds' deal, which was later called off.

Another round of talks took place in 2000 but differences remained over the sale price of raw water from Johor. There was initial agreement to raise the price from 3 sen per 1,000 gallons to 45 sen, and later to 60 sen.

Malaysia then said it wanted to unilaterally revise the price to RM6.25 per thousand gallons, a move Singapore insisted was not legally sound. After rounds of strongly worded exchanges in various forms, the matter quietened.

Ambitious new strategy to add two big taps

Four big taps

THE Singapore Government had been hard at work exploring alternative sources of water.

Even as talks with Malaysia ran into an impasse, efforts on another front were headed for a breakthrough that would 'change the whole equation', in the words of Dr Lee Poh Onn, a fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

After the failed 1974 experiment, Singapore decided to give recycled water another shot, sending two engineers to the United States in 1998 for a study trip.

Upon their return, they reported findings that suggested recycling had become viable, thanks to, among other things, advances in membrane technology. Subsequent studies corroborated the findings, prompting the Government to construct the first demo plant in Bedok in 2000.

The three-step process eventually adopted for the production of Newater involved filtration and reverse osmosis, removing particles as small as 0.001 microns before disinfecting the water under ultraviolet light. The water met US and UN standards and was, indeed, purer than tap water.

By May 2002, the Government was finally ready to go public with its bold new water strategy.

It was an ambitious plan to double the different types of water sources Singapore relied upon from two to four by 2011, the year the 1961 agreement with Malaysia expired.

Instead of relying only on water collected in reservoirs here and bought from Johor, there would be 'four big national taps' within 10 years. The two new 'taps' were desalination plants and Newater or water-reclamation plants.

In his speech to Parliament, then Environment Minister Lim Swee Say declared: 'Singapore certainly can become completely self-sufficient after 2061, if need be.'

The year 2061 was significant as it was when the 1962 water agreement with Malaysia would expire.

A toast to the future

FOR Newater to succeed, the public had to be willing to drink water that was previously sewage.

'Public acceptance is not guaranteed at the start. Recycled water has been rejected in Australia, where people term it 'yuck' water,' said Dr Eduardo Araral, assistant dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

'Singaporeans accepted it both because they are are pragmatic and because they trust the Government's promise that Newater is safe to drink,' he added.

Some 60,000 'toasted' with bottled Newater during the 2002 National Day Parade, including Mr Goh Chok Tong, who was then Prime Minister. Singapore now has five Newater plants, the largest of which is at Changi. Newater is used both in industries and indirectly for households, after it is mixed into reservoirs.

The next significant breakthrough came in desalination technology, although some call this success story a work in progress.

As the cost of desalting seawater fell by more than half in the decade leading up to 2002, PUB called for and received tenders to build a plant. In 2005, a desalination facility using reverse osmosis membranes was commissioned in Tuas. It was built by SingSpring, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hyflux. A second desalination plant in Tuas should be ready by 2013.

Of the current daily consumption of 380 million gallons, Newater and desalination now make up 40 per cent. PUB aims to raise that to 80 per cent by 2061, when all agreements with Johor expire.

Meanwhile, work on other fronts continue.

The completion of Marina Barrage in 2008 increased Singapore's water catchment area from half of its total land area to more than two-thirds. Studies are under way on the possibility of increasing this in future to 90 per cent through the use of treatment plants that handle both salt water and fresh water. There are now 17 reservoirs - up from three in 1965 - including Marina, Punggol and Serangoon.

Less visible upgrades may not be any less important. PUB has an ongoing programme to replace leaky asbestos cement water pipes with more corrosion-resistant ones. Also, an underground system of pumps and pipes connecting Singapore's reservoirs was completed in 2007 to prevent wastage by transferring water from full reservoirs to less full ones.

Turning weakness to strength

'I NEVER imagined we could progress from a situation of crisis to the situation of opportunity today,' said Dr Lee.

A dramatic turn of events, which he ultimately puts down to political will, means the water issue is now more likely to evoke hope than anxiety.

Research and development projects are creating jobs and expertise that can be exported. The PUB expects the GDP contribution from the water sector to grow from $0.5 billion in 2003 to $1.7 billion in 2015, with the number of jobs doubling to 11,000 by 2015.

To be sure, some latent risks remain.

Dr Araral warns, for instance, that skyrocketing energy prices in the future may yet cause problems for the much-vaunted but relatively fuel-guzzling desalination project, although that may in turn spur the development of other sources of water.

Terrorism, too, could derail the most carefully constructed of systems.

'Security experts note that water reservoirs are attractive targets of terrorists,' he said.

Nevertheless, most agree that whatever happens in the future, the achievements as they stand today already exceed the wildest of expectations - not least among them those of the water rationing generation.

Singaporeans can rest with the firm assurance that their secure access to this life-giving commodity is no longer in the hands of others.

Background story

Reservoirs: There are now 17 reservoirs, up from three in 1965. The completion of Marina Barrage in 2008 increased Singapore's water catchment area from half of its total land area to over two-thirds.

Newater and desalination: Of the current daily consumption of 380 million gallons, Newater and desalination now make up 40 per cent. PUB aims to raise that to 80 per cent by 2061, when all agreements with Johor expire. Singapore now has five Newater plants. A second desalination plant in Tuas should be ready by 2013.

Imported water: In the 1980s, Singapore was given the go-ahead to build a dam across Johor River and to buy water over the original limit of 250 million gallons a day.


Background story

SECURE FUTURE

'While in the initial years Singapore's access to adequate water was viewed through the lens of security and survival, Singapore's present circumstances should be viewed with more optimism.'

Dr Joey Long of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies

The water story
Straits Times 3 Sep 11;

1857: Philanthropist Tan Kim Seng donated $13,000 to construct Singapore's first waterworks and piped water supply.

1867: Singapore's first reservoir, MacRitchie, completed.

1927: Water agreement signed between British-controlled Singapore and Johor Sultan. This agreement is superseded by the 1961 agreement.

1961: First water agreement signed between Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore gets full, exclusive rights to draw water from Gunung Pulai and three other areas for 3 sen per 1,000 gallons.

1962: Second Singapore-Malaysia water agreement signed, allowing Singapore to buy water from Johor River at the same price.

1963: Public Utilities Board (PUB) set up to take charge of water supply. Also, start of 10-month-long water rationing due to drought.

1965: Singapore separated from Malaysia. Both countries agree to abide by 1961 and 1962 agreements.

1971: First water conservation campaign launched.

1977: Start of 10-year-long Clean Singapore River campaign.

1990: Signing of supplement to 1962 agreement, allowing Singapore to build a dam across Johor River and to buy water over and above original quota of 250 million gallons a day.

2000: The beginning of Singapore- Malaysia water talks that end in stalemate in 2003. The two sides could not agree on price.

2001: Restructuring of PUB so it took charge of not only water supply, but also drainage, water reclamation plants and sewerage systems.

2002: Launch of Newater - or recycled water - technology, which decisively paves the way towards water independence for Singapore.

2005: First desalination plant completed in Tuas. A second plant, also in Tuas, is expected by 2013.

2008: Inaugural International Water Week, which became an annual conference on water solutions. Also, Marina Barrage was completed, the first reservoir here in the heart of the city.

2011: 1961 water agreement with Malaysia lapsed. Singapore returns all land and facilities, saying handover does not affect adequacy of water supply.

ELGIN TOH


Read more!

Indonesia: Jambi Villagers Fight to Save Their Forests

Fawziah Selamat - Straits Times Indonesia Jakarta Globe 3 Sep 11;

Jambi. The green and seemingly boundless landscape of Jambi province has tempted oil palm and logging companies for years. Some of them have already acquired large swathes of the province, leasing them out in parcels to smallholders who burn the land illegally before planting, as it is the cheapest and easiest way to clear vegetation.

During Indonesia's dry season from May to September, thick smoke from the fires blow into neighboring Singapore and Malaysia.

But now, villagers in Merangin regency are fighting back. Worried that their forests will be wiped out, 17 villages in the regency are seeking central government approval for the green areas to be recognized as hutan desa, or village forests, under a 2008 law.

If they succeed, they will secure rights to manage the forest for up to 35 years.

Applying for hutan desa status essentially pits villagers against large firms, and throws them into a tedious and complicated process. The villagers have to use their own funds to map out the exact perimeters of their forest, and the boundaries have to be approved by the local, provincial and central governments.

Once approval is given, they must then submit reports on their management plans and the state of forest cover to the government every five years.

So far, only one village - Lubuk Beringin, also in Jambi province - has been awarded hutan desa status.

The founder of a Jambi-based conservation group, Eko Waskito, says this is because the big companies with “million-dollar investment plans” wield more influence with government officials.

“The onus is on the villagers to prove that their plan will provide a greater net benefit than a concessionaire,” he says. “The difficult part is in convincing people that that benefit should not just be measured in financial terms.”

One benefit is obvious. In Indonesia, violent and sometimes deadly conflict is rife due to overlapping land ownership rights and unclear boundaries. The hutan desa scheme allows rural communities to map out their territories and gives them a stake in managing their land while warding off competing claims from companies and illegal migrants.

Rosidi, the village chief of Durian Rambun, one of the 17 villages, is leading the campaign to win hutan desa status.

Last year, he fought back an attempt by plantation company PT Duta Alam Makmur to seek provincial government approval to convert 85,000 ha of forest into an acacia plantation. PT Duta is a subsidiary of Sinar Mas Forestry, the sole supplier of pulpwood fiber to Asia Pulp & Paper, one of the world's largest paper companies.

The 41-year-old said the benefits from plantation ventures never last long.

“What lasts are the environmental and social damages the companies inflict on the community,” he says.

Indeed, the Merangin villagers still remember with dread the environmental fallout from a timber concession on 50,000ha of forest between 1987 and 2004.

SaysMr Rahmany, the chief of Lubuk Birah, another of the band of 17 villages: “Rivers ran dry, fish were hard to come by and it was difficult to find timber to build our houses.”

The company that got the concession, PT Injapsin, had received it during the 30-year regime of former president Suharto, when Indonesia's rich forest resources came under complete control of the central government. Forest-edge villages were not consulted on concessions or compensated for any damages incurred.

By the time Suharto fell from power in 1998, deforestation across the archipelago had reached a peak of 1.7 million ha a year, according to a World Bank report released in 2005.

With power devolved to the regions, Jakarta and provincial governments now share responsibility for approving forest usage licenses.

But with big money to be made in the sector - the Forestry Ministry reportedly earns $15 billion   a year in land permit fees from investors - illegal logging and violations in issuing forest-use permits are rampant. According to estimates from private watchdog Indonesia Corruption Watch, ill-gotten gains total 20 trillion rupiah each year.

Waskito, however, remains positive despite having to contend with vested interests and bureaucratic red tape.

“Ten years ago, it would have been unheard of for villagers to demand the right to manage and conserve the forests. Now we have one hutan desa, and hopefully 17 more in the making. The tide is changing,” he says.

Boosting the villagers' chances in this David versus Goliath battle is the fact that Jambi is one of nine provinces taking part in an international scheme that has developed countries paying forest-rich ones to protect their trees.

With funds coming in under the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation scheme, the financial cost of forgoing the conversion of forests into large plantation estates does not have to be a big issue for Indonesia.

The Merangin villagers, meanwhile, are committed to the hutan desa scheme. Those who want to clear the forest or build homes there need to get approval. If they flout this rule, they face a fine of two buffaloes - which could cost them US$1,200, a hefty sum considering the average villager earns US$3 a day.

The villagers have also formed monthly patrol teams to ward off illegal occupation and land clearing by outsiders.

Durian Rambun's chief, Rosidi, says migrants from provinces near Jambi, like Bengkulu and South Sumatra, used to arrive by the truckloads to take over the land left by the timber concession.

“Like the plantation companies, they come to take what they can, with little regard for how their actions impact the environment, as they can leave when things get bad,” he says.

“But this is our home and we have lived here for generations; we want to make sure that our forests and our way of life exist for our children and their children.”


Read more!

Thailand: Small bite of victory in bid to save sharks

60 captive sharks set free last Saturday in an area with very few left to excite divers
Nirmal Ghosh Straits Times 5 Sep 11;

IT WAS 7am, long before opening time at Under-water World in Pattaya, Thailand, but already activity was stirring in the cavernous attraction.

Inside, a young Thai man in a black wet suit and boots stood in about half a metre of water in a large tank, with 60 young sharks swirling about his legs.

A pipe siphoned water out of the tank into large, strong, clear plastic bags held by two other Thai volunteers. Once there was enough water in a bag, the man in the tank would scoop up a shark with a net and quickly dump it into one of the bags, which was then pumped with oxygen from a large cylinder and firmly tied.
Background story

RAISING AWARENESS

'It is a drop in the ocean... But we need to raise awareness. It's just not possible to remove the apex predator and think everything will be okay.'

Dive Tribe's founder Gwyn Mills on the shark release

Once done, the dozens of bags were carefully placed in the back of two pickup trucks, which headed for one of Pattaya's crowded piers.

Fifteen minutes later, the bags were transferred onto two boats which set off and eventually moored at a reef some 26km off Pattaya.

There, under a sunny sky on Saturday morning, six divers went into the water and were handed the bags one by one. They opened the bags, submerging them carefully before letting the sharks swim free.

The black-tipped sharks, which are swift swimmers, shot away; the bamboo sharks which prefer lying quietly among corals and rocks, swam away almost cautiously, as if in awe of their sudden freedom.

This was Dive Tribe's 'great shark release' - probably the largest ever release of captive sharks into the wild in Thailand and possibly Asia.

Most of the released fish were bamboo sharks, but there were also five black-tipped sharks with their distinctive dorsal fins. The sharks' ages ranged from a few months to three years. The black-tipped sharks were each about half a metre long; fully grown, they can reach 1.5m and live up to 25 years in the wild.

All the sharks had been bought with donations from across the world, from restaurants in Bangkok, Phuket and Pattaya, and dealers in Bangkok's Chatuchak weekend market, by Mr Gwyn Mills, who founded Dive Tribe two years ago.

Dive Tribe combines diving for paying customers, with marine conservation. Mr Mills, 43, who is British and now a resident of Pattaya, said that in recent years it was clear that Thailand, once one of the best dive destinations in the region, had lost its cachet to other countries, notably Indonesia. Furthermore, what excites divers most is spotting a shark - and there were very few left in the waters off Pattaya.

'Diving is Thailand's second largest sporting activity after golf. A study in Palau in the Pacific Ocean estimated that the tourism value of a single reef shark was US$1.9 million (S$2.2 million) over its lifetime,' he said.

But there are no regulations protecting sharks in Thailand, and they are much sought after for their fins and increasingly for their meat. Mr Mills reckoned most Thai fish balls are made with cheap shark meat.

'Thailand is taking 22,000 tonnes of sharks from the sea every year,' Mr Mills said.

Last Saturday's shark release took place at two sites. As the boat forged through a choppy sea on the way to the first release site at the small island of Ko Rinn, the black-tipped sharks swam in circles in their plastic bags. In half an hour, they would be free.

The owner of the boat, seafarer Robert Camp, said that in his 10 years of diving in the area, he had seen some bamboo sharks, 'occasional' black-tipped sharks, and no hammerhead sharks at all - though they used to be present in the area some years back.

Estimates vary, but hunting for sharks - for their fins, driven by the market for shark's-fin soup - removes up to 100 million sharks a year, big and small, from the seas in the region.

The market is oblivious to the growing evidence that shark's fin is high in mercury content.

Sharks, as long-lived creatures, accumulate more mercury in their systems than other fish with shorter life spans.

Moreover, the removal of sharks, which have been the top predator in the oceans for 400 million years, on this colossal scale has been proven to upset the balance of the marine ecosystem.

In parts of the North Atlantic, a growth in a species of ray normally eaten by sharks has seen a crash in scallops, oysters and clams which are the preferred food of the rays.

Some attempts have been made to curb the slaughter.

The Malaysian state of Sabah, for instance, where diving brought in RM190 million (S$77 million) last year, intends to ban all shark fishing by the end of the year. On the other side of the world, California is debating legislation to ban the sale of shark's fin.

But the concern is these actions will be token. Other countries have been slow to take action. Neither Indonesia nor India, first and second respectively on the list of the world's top 20 shark-fishing nations, has effective regulations on shark fishing.

Sceptics also say events like last Saturday's shark release fuel the trade because traders will hunt more sharks so people like Mr Mills can buy them.

'It is a one-off activity,' Mr Mills said in defence of the event. 'You cannot fuel a trade in just one day a year. And these sharks were as good as dead.'

As the divers emerged from the water and high-fived each other, they spoke of their feelings of elation at seeing the sharks swim away.

'It is a drop in the ocean,' said Mr Mills. 'But we need to raise awareness. It's just not possible to remove the apex predator and think everything will be okay.'


Read more!

'Stemcell zoo' could save endangered species: study

Marlowe Hood AFP Yahoo News 5 Sep 11;

Scientists said Sunday they had produced the first stemcells from endangered species, a breakthrough that could potentially save dozens of animals teetering on the brink of extinction.

"The best way to manage extinction is to preserve species and habitats but that is not always working," Oliver Ryder, director of genetics at the San Diego Zoo and co-leader of the study, said in a statement.

"Stemcell technology provides some level of hope that they won't have to become extinct even though they have been completely eliminated from their habitat."

That is the case for the northern white rhinoceros, one of the first two animals included in Ryder's new "stemcell zoo."

Only seven specimens remain in existence, all in captivity and two in San Diego.

The researchers also isolated stemcells from a critically threatened primate called a drill, genetically a close cousin to humans.

In captivity, drills often suffer from diabetes, a disease scientists are seeking to treat in humans using stemcell-based therapies.

Ryder's team had already collected skin cells and other tissue samples from more than 800 species -- stored in a "Frozen Zoo" -- by 2006.

That is when he contacted Jeanne Loring, a professor at the Scripps Research Institute in nearby La Jolla and the study's other lead researcher, about the possibility of using the bank to generate and store stemcells.

At the time, scientists seeking to use stemcells to cure human disease had not yet found a reliable technique for turning normal adult cells into stemcells that can give rise to nearly any type of tissue or cell in the body.

Today, however, this process -- called induced pluripotency -- is routinely achieved by inserting certain genes into normal cells.

At first, Ryder and Loring tried to use genes from animals closely related to the target species in order to trigger the transformation, but the experiments failed.

Through trial and error, however, they discovered to their amazement that the same genes that induce pluripotency in humans also worked for the drill and the rhino.

The process in inefficient, only producing a few stemcells at a time, according to the study, published in Nature Methods. But it was still enough to start the "stemcell zoo".

Perhaps the greatest potential for helping endangered species -- beyond disease treatment -- is new reproductive stategies.

If adult stemcells can become a sperm or egg cell, for example, scientists could then use skin cells from long-dead animals in the Frozen Zoo to produce the male and female starter kit for new life.

Induced sperm cells could be combined with the eggs from living animals through in vitro fertilisation.

Alternatively, both eggs and sperm might be generated from stemcells, with the resulting embryos implanted in live host animals, a process the researchers said would likely be much more reliable that cloning techniques.

"I think that work would be a lot easier ethically with endangered species than with humans," Loring said in a statement.

"I suspect some people working in this area would love to have our cells for experiments."

Such techniques would also help boost genetic diversity by reaching beyond the small number of living individuals of a dwindling species, she explained.

Even if the remaining northern white rhinos reproduced -- which hasn't happened in many years -- the tiny gene pool could easily lead to unhealthy animals.

'Stem Cell Zoo' May Aid Endangered Species
Jennifer Welsh LiveScience.com Yahoo News 5 Sep 11;

Stem cells are quickly becoming an important tool for human medical treatments, and researchers are betting they will also be a useful tool for zoo animals. They are working to create stem cell lines from zoo animals, for use in treating animal diabetes and other ailments as well as helping the animals reproduce.

The scientists have already created a "frozen zoo," which contains different types of cells from every animal there, and now they are putting together a "stem cell zoo."

"There are only two animals in it," study researcher Inbar Friedrich Ben-Nun, of The Scripps Research Institute, said in a statement, "but we have the start of a new zoo, the stem cell zoo."

Stem cells are prized, because they can be turned into any type of cell in the body, a characteristic called pluripotency. The cells can even be turned into sperm or egg cells, and used in assisted reproduction to make more individuals of the species.

"The most important thing is to provide these stem cells as a resource for other people taking some of the next steps," said Jeanne Loring, also of The Scripps Research Institute.

Endangered stem cells

The researchers started with two species: the drill primate, a highly endangered primate genetically close to humans, and the northern white rhinoceros, which is genetically far from humans and also incredibly endangered.

To create the stem cells, the researchers used the same genes that are used to turn human cells pluripotent; they inserted those genes into the animals' skin cells. They had originally tried to use genes from the animals themselves and their close relatives, but after more than a year of trying they were having little success.

The new technique isn't very efficient yet, transforming just a few cells into stem cells at a time, but that's enough, the researchers said.

Stem cell therapies

Both animals, the researchers said, were chosen because they could benefit from stem cells now. For instance, the drill primate suffers from diabetes when in captivity, and stem cell-based treatments for diabetes being researched in humans suggest the same may work in these primates.

The rhinoceros was chosen because it is one of the most highly endangered species on the planet, with only seven animals, all in captivity, in existence (two of which are in the San Diego Zoo Safari Park). They haven't reproduced in several years, and because the population is so small there is a lack of genetic diversity, which could affect their survival.

If the researchers can use the stem cells to make sperm and eggs from skin cells of deceased animals in the frozen zoo, they could reintroduce some genetic diversity into the population, while also increasing its size.

"The best way to manage extinctions is to preserve species and their habitats," study researcher Oliver Ryder, of the San Diego Zoo, said in a statement. "But that's not working all the time."

The rhinos are a perfect example, he said, because there are so few. "Stem cell technology provides some level of hope that they won't have to become extinct even though they've been completely eliminated from their habitats."

The study was published today (Sept. 4) in the journal Nature Methods.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 4 Sep 11


110901-02 Sultan Shoal
from Singapore Nature

Butterfly Photography at Our Local Parks
from Butterflies of Singapore

Speak up for our shores! Feedback on 'City in a Garden'
from wild shores of singapore

Exciting vertebrate night at Central Catchment
from wonderful creation

Swifts in the city
from The Biology Refugia

Chek Jawa in September
from Ubin.sgkopi

150 million years old dinosaur bone!! Night at the Museum
from Nature rambles

New phytoplankton guidebook from Science Centre
from Protists in Singapore


Read more!