Malaysia: NGOs burn over plan for coal-fired power plant

Stephanie Lee The Star 19 Sep 13;

KOTA KINABALU: The Government must stick to its word and permanently scrap any plan to build a coal-fired power plant in Sabah.

According to Land Empowerment Animals People (LEAP) executive director Cynthia Ong, the Malaysian Government must not be seen as flip-flopping over the plant, especially after it gained accolades from the international community for agreeing to scrap the plant two years ago.

She said that Sabah cannot risk having a polluting source of energy while telling the world that the state is a front runner in biodiversity and conservation efforts.

Ong was responding to the Energy, Green Technology and Water Dep­uty Minister Datuk Seri Mahdzir Khalid’s revelation that the Federal Go­­vernment was seriously considering the reintroduction of the project in Lahad Datu in order to boost the availability of electricity in Sabah, which is currently suffering a shortfall in supply on the eastern side.

She said five NGOs had formed Green SURF (Sabah Unite to Re-Power the Future) in October 2009 to oppose the project, which at that point had been proposed for a third time.

Read more!

Study Suggests Overfishing of Sharks Is Harming Coral Reefs

Science Daiily 18 Sep 13;

A team of scientists from Canada and Australia has discovered that a decline in shark populations is detrimental to coral reefs.

"Where shark numbers are reduced due to commercial fishing, there is also a decrease in the herbivorous fishes which play a key role in promoting reef health," said Jonathan Ruppert, a recent University of Toronto PhD graduate. Ruppert was part of a team engaged in long-term monitoring of reefs off Australia's northwest coast.

Team leader Mark Meekan, of the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), said that the results might, at first glance, seem strange.

"However our analysis suggests that where shark numbers are reduced, we see a fundamental change in the structure of food chains on reefs," Meekan said.

"We saw increasing numbers of mid-level predators -- such as snappers -- and a reduction in the number of herbivores such as parrotfishes," said Meekan. "The parrotfishes are very important to coral reef health because they eat the algae that would otherwise overwhelm young corals on reefs recovering from natural disturbances."

According to Ruppert, the study comes at an opportune time -- coral reefs are facing a number of pressures both from direct human activity, such as over-fishing, as well as from climate change.

The reefs studied are about 300 kilometres off the coast of northwest Australia where Indonesian fishers target sharks -- a practice stretching back several centuries and which continues under an Australian-Indonesian memorandum of understanding.

"The reefs provided us with a unique opportunity to isolate the impact of over-fishing of sharks on reef resilience, and assess that impact in the broader context of climate change pressures threatening coral reefs," said Ruppert. "Shark fishing appears to have quite dramatic effects on coral reef ecosystems.

"Given that sharks are in decline on reefs worldwide, largely due to the shark fin trade, this information may prove integral to restoration and conservation efforts."

Tracking studies show that, in many cases, individual reef sharks are closely attached to certain coral reefs. This means that even relatively small marine-protected areas could be effective in protecting the top-level predators and allowing coral reefs to more fully recover from coral bleaching or large cyclones which are increasing in frequency due to the warming of the oceans as a result of climate change.

The study will appear in the September 28 issue of journal PLOS One.

Journal Reference:
Jonathan L. W. Ruppert, Michael J. Travers, Luke L. Smith, Marie-Josée Fortin, Mark G. Meekan. Caught in the Middle: Combined Impacts of Shark Removal and Coral Loss on the Fish Communities of Coral Reefs. PLoS ONE, 2013; 8 (9): e74648 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074648

Read more!

Food crisis fears prompt UN wake-up call to world leaders

United Nations urges governments to do more to support small farmers to curb hunger, poverty and climate change
Claire Provost theguardian.com 18 Sep 13;

Governments in rich and poor countries alike should renounce their focus on agribusiness and give more support to small-scale, local food production to achieve global food security and tackle climate change, according to a report from Unctad, the UN trade and development body.

The 2013 Trade and Environment Review, calls on governments to "wake up before it is too late" and shift rapidly towards farming models that promote a greater variety of crops, reduced fertiliser use and stronger links between small farms and local consumers.

Persistent rural poverty, global hunger, population growth and environmental concerns must be treated as a collective crisis, argues the report, which criticises the international response to the 2008 food-price crisis for focusing on technical "quick-fixes".

"Many people talk about energy, transport, etc, but agriculture only comes on to the agenda when there is an acute food-price crisis, or when there are conflicts at the national level over food," said Ulrich Hoffman, senior trade policy adviser at Unctad. "At the international scene most of the discussion is on technicalities, but the matter we have before us is far more complex."

The report warns that urgent and far-reaching action is needed before climate change begins to cause big disruptions to agriculture, particularly in vulnerable regions of poorer countries.

It says that while the 2008 crisis helped to reverse the long-term neglect of agriculture and its role in development, the focus has remained on increasing yields through industrial farming.

The report, which includes contributions from 60 international experts – covering topics from food prices and fertiliser use to international land deals and trade rules – demands a paradigm shift to focus efforts on making farming more sustainable and food more affordable through promoting local food production and consumption.

Several of the contributors call for a focus on food sovereignty, a concept introduced more than a decade ago by the international peasants' movement La Via Campesina. Unlike food security, often defined as ensuring people have enough to eat, food sovereignty focuses on questions of power and control. It puts the needs and interests of those who produce and consume food at the heart of agricultural systems and policies.

The report argues that industrial, monoculture agriculture has failed to provide enough affordable food where it is needed, while the damage caused to the environment is "mounting and unsustainable". It echoes the work of Nobel prize-winner Amartya Sen in arguing that the real causes of hunger – poverty and the lack of access to good, affordable food – are being overlooked.

Agricultural trade rules must be reformed, it says, to give countries more opportunity to promote policies that encourage local and regional food systems.

The report follows last week's publication of Unctad's annual trade and development report, which urged governments to focus more on domestic demand and inter-regional trade and rely less on exports to rich countries to fuel growth.

"Export-led growth is not the only viable development path," said Nikolai Fuchs, president of the Geneva-based Nexus Foundation and a contributor to the trade and environment report. "We don't say 'no trade', but … trade regimes should secure level playing fields for regional and local products, and allow for local and regional preference schemes, for example in public procurement.

"Highly specialised agriculture does not create enough jobs in rural areas where most of the poor are." He argued that industrial, export-oriented farming typically offers a few highly skilled and specialised jobs, or low-skill, seasonal and precarious employment.

The report says governments should acknowledge and reward farmers for the work they do to preserve water sources, soil, landscapes and biodiversity.

Hoffman acknowledged it would be difficult to implement the agenda the report was suggesting. "Subsidies are a key hurdle … at a national level but also [in terms of] dealing with subsidies in the context of the WTO [World Trade Organisation]," he said. There must be more scrutiny of agricultural subsidies, he argued, including those that appear to promote environmentally sustainable farming, as there were "ample opportunities for abuse or misuse".

Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 18 Sep 13

Save MacRitchie Forest: 19. Would Singapore’s most beautiful damselfly species be extinct by the construction of Cross Island Line? from Bird Ecology Study Group

THREE DAYS to the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore!
from News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore

Missnakes
from The annotated budak

Butterflies Galore! : Branded Imperial
from Butterflies of Singapore

Read more!

Sky lantern restrictions spark creativity: helium balloons and LED lights released instead

Vimita Mohandas Channel NewsAsia 17 Sep 13;

SINGAPORE: Restrictions on the release of sky lanterns in Singapore put in place last December have encouraged some people to think out of the box.

The restrictions follow a review of regulations on the conduct of aerial activities last year.

Sky lanterns are usually released during the Mid-Autumn festival but they are a fire hazard and also pose a hazard to aircraft in the vicinity.

With enhanced restrictions on the release of sky lanterns, some vendors said they have seen a drop in business.

In previous years, they could sell about ten a week while now it's fewer than two.

However, at the Ang Mo Kio-Hougang Mid-Autumn celebration last week, some opted to get creative by putting helium balloons inside the sky lantern and replacing the flame with LED lights.

MP of Ang Mo Kio GRC Yeo Guat Kwang, said: “We overcome the restrictions by looking at some of the safety aspects as well as choosing a location that we assure the authorities that we will not cause any problems."

- CNA/ec

Read more!

Malaysia: Kelantan implants chips in snakes to keep track of snake smugglers

New Straits Times 17 Sep 13;

KOTA BARU: The Kelantan Wildlife and Natural Parks Department (Perhilitan) is implanting microchips in captured snakes to keep track of the reptile population in the state.

Its director, Rahmat Topani, said the move was also aimed at helping the department keep track of snake smugglers.

He said microchips would be implanted in captured snakes before they were released back into the wild.

The microchips, which cost about RM20 each, would be implanted only in the bigger and more dangerous types of snakes, such as cobras and pythons.

Rahmat said the latest exercise to implant the microchips was held on Sunday, which saw five wildlife officers, led by the department assistant director Shaary Awang Besar, involved in the exercise. He added that 20 snakes were implanted with the microchips.

"The snakes will be released into jungles near Pasir Putih, Machang and Tanah Merah."

He said if the project proved to be a success, the department would extend it to other endangered species.

Read more!

Malaysia: A refuge for displaced and injured elephants

Kristy Inus New Straits Times 18 Sep 13;

KOTA KINABALU: Displaced and injured elephants will have a new place to call home in the Bornean Elephant Sanctuary (BES) which will be officially launched tomorrow.

The first phase of the project, which started in October last year, was completed on June 28, and a juvenile female elephant has become the first "guest".

Sabah Wildlife Department (SWD) director Datuk Dr Laurentius Ambu said it would not have been possible without the assistance of the Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC), the project's main sponsor, and Japanese partners led by Borneo Conservation Trust (BCT) Japan.

Besides funding from the state government, MPOC has pledged RM5.2 million for the project, of which RM500,000 was used in phase one. BCT Japan and its 12 corporate partners, including Asahiyama Zoo and Saraya Corporation, have provided RM1.6 million in funds for the first phase.

BES, located at Lot 8 of the Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary, covers 1,214ha with a built-up area of 25 ha. The development is expected to be completed in the next two to three years.

"The total infrastructure cost is about RM30 million, while the overall master plan, which includes the setting up of the ecological corridor between Segaliud Lokan Forest Reserve and Batu Putih, costs between RM50 million to RM60 million," he told a press conference here yesterday.

He said staff for the first phase comprised six keepers with two each from BCT, Wildlife Rescue Unit, which is funded by MPOC and SWD. They are led by a senior ranger.

"In the long run, BES will also house other wildlife affected by human conflict."

MPOC deputy chief executive officer Dr Kalyana Sundram said they had started collaborating with SWD on several projects under the council's Wildlife Conservation Fund formed six years ago. These included the orang utan and rescue unit.

He said the BES project fitted with their conservation programme as elephants tend to wander into plantations and they wanted the animals to be safely translocated.

Saraya Corp president Yusuke Saraya, who represented BCT Japan, said the company, which produces eco-friendly solvents and detergents using palm kernel, was proud to be involved in the project to show a balance in taking care of conservation while benefiting from the oil palm industry.

Laurentius estimated that there were 60 to 200 elephants currently displaced in different pockets of areas in Tawau, Sandakan and other remote areas in Sabah, while 30 or more could be injured due to trapping devices like snares and pest control activities by plantations.

"Once BES starts moving, we expect a lot of calls for us to help with displaced and injured animals," he said, adding that the public could call any Wildlife Department office.

On the 10 Borneo pygmy elephants found dead near Gunung Rara Forest Reserve, Tawau, between last December and January, he said they were still working with the police to identify the culprits.

Sanctuary to help protect Borneo pygmy elephants
The Star 18 Sep 13;

KOTA KINABALU: The Borneo Elephant Sanctuary, which is set to open tomorrow, will have a key role in protecting and conserving endangered Borneo pygmy elephants in Sabah.

While helping to rehabilitate displaced and orphaned elephants and releasing them back into the wild, the first and only sanctuary in Sabah will be the hub for the conservation of the species and will create public awareness.

Sabah Wildlife Department director Datuk Laurentius Ambu said the sanctuary in the Kinabatangan district in Sabah’s east coast was in a natural habitat and specifically designed to rescue elephants that were injured by humans or in an elephant fight.

“It will also be home to orphaned elephants,” he added.

Ambu said the sanctuary had become a reality because of major funding from the Malaysian Palm Oil Council.

The council, through its conservation fund, had pledged RM5.2mil for the sanctuary and the department is looking forward to more funding once it starts operating.

Ambu also thanked the Borneo Conservation Trust Japan which provided some RM1.6mil for the construction of the first phase of the sanctuary.

Read more!

Indonesia: April Accused of ‘Greenwashing’ With Riau Conservation Project

Erwida Maulia & Jonathan Vit Jakarta Globe 17 Sep 13;

Environmental groups accused Indonesia’s second-largest pulp and paper company Asia Pacific Resources International Ltd. (April) of using a $17 million peatland restoration project in Riau’s heavily degraded Kampar Peninsula to “greenwash” the continued cutting of old-growth forests on Tuesday.

The pulp company, a subsidiary of the Singapore-listed agribusiness RGE, partnered with Fauna & Flora International (FFI) to restore more than 20,000 hectares of damaged peatland in the Kampar Peninsula. The peninsula, once home to rich tropical forests, has been heavily depleted of natural tree cover by pulp and palm oil companies.

The project, dubbed Riau Ecosystem Restoration (RER), will create a conservation area where work can be done to restore the region’s peatland while cataloging and preserving the existing flora and fauna, the company said.

“We are pleased that the project is coming into clear focus,” said Bey Soo Khiang, head of April and founder of RER. “From this point forward, we anticipate steady progress toward our goal of reviving the land and protecting it for future generations.”

This recent push for peatland restoration caught the attention of the Pekanbaru-based Forest Rescue Network Riau (Jikalahari), a watchdog group focused on deforestation and land issues in the once-forest rich province. Jikalahari accused April of greenwashing efforts to continue the clearing of old-growth forest in Riau by subsidiary Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper (RAPP), including the cutting of forests in a disputed concession on the peat-heavy Padang Island.

“What we see is that this is no more than greenwashing as they are still cutting trees elsewhere, such as Pulau Padang,” Jikalahari coordinator Muslim Rasyid said. “We know RAPP’s track record of wood exploitation. Suddenly they’re [now] changing the direction of their business to restoration?”

More than half the wood processed by RAPP’s massive pulp mill in Riau has historically come from existing tropical forests, according to estimates by numerous environmental and forestry groups. According to Greenpeace, the company announced plans to convert an additional 60,000 hectares of existing forest into pulp and paper last year.

Jikalahari questioned the Ministry of Forestry’s quick response to April’s application to restore the peatlands. Several similar projects proposed by other organizations were declined or remained in limbo, Muslim said.

“[We] question the ministry’s fast response to RAPP’s application for the restoration project when applications from many other companies have been abandoned,” he said. “I’m sure [RAPP] will have two or three other [restoration] projects after this.”

Indonesia’s Forestry Ministry, the body tasked with both protecting and developing the nation’s shrinking rainforests, awarded the project a 60-year license in May.

“This ecosystem license granted by the ministry is significant as it is the first to be granted to an organization with a collaborative structure involving the private sector and civil society groups,” Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan said in the company’s press release. “I see this collaborative model working for a common purpose as an innovative boost to the government’s efforts to ensure a balance in responsible forest industry development with conservation of important forest areas.”

The project’s website championed April as a “pioneer in implementing sustainability practices in the pulp and paper industry in Indonesia.” The description is a stark departure from environmental groups’ assessments, which once called the company one of “Indonesia’s, and perhaps the world’s, most destructive corporations.”

While pulp and paper giant Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) recently made a commitment to sustainable pulping practices, April has gone the other way, opting for less external oversight in its operations. The company pulled out of the Forest Stewardship Council in June, ending a period of oversight by the coalition of environmental organizations. April said it ended the relationship over concerns with the council’s certification program, but environmental groups suspected other motives.

“Before an NGO-initiated FSC complaint process even had an opportunity to begin to investigate April’s deforestation practices, the company had effectively walked out on the FSC’s certification scheme,” Bustar Maitar, head of Indonesia Forest Campaign for Greenpeace Southeast Asia, wrote in a scathing blog post shortly after the announcement. “Seemingly, April did not want to risk the scrutiny of FSC’s Policy for Association complaints process.”

The latest allegations of greenwashing came on the heels of a highly publicized dispute between the forest minister and celebrity activist Harrison Ford. The Hollywood star came under fire after Zulkifli accused Ford of “attacking” with questions about the ministry’s patchy track record with curbing illegal logging.

Ford, who was in Indonesia making a Showtime documentary on climate change called “Years of Living Dangerously,” was then threatened in the press with deportation despite pre-existing plans to leave the country.

“There’s no privilege for him although he is a great a actor,” presidential adviser Andi Arief told Agence France-Presse. “His crew and those who were helping him in Indonesia must be questioned to find out their motives for harassing a state institution.

“If necessary, we will deport him.”

Indonesia’s rain forests have disappeared at an alarming rate as agribusiness companies ramped up operations to meet the demands of China’s commodity boom. More than 4 million hectares of forested land have vanished in Riau since 1982 as the province booked the fastest rate of deforestation in the world, according to the World Wildlife Fund.

The cutting of the nation’s rain forests will likely continue despite international condemnation. The Forestry Ministry announced plans last year to significantly expand the nation’s pulp capacity in the next decade. The expansion would include the construction of seven new pulp mills and the awarding of concessions in previously untouched forests in eastern Indonesia, according to the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

April Prepares New Forest Restoration Project in Riau
Anushka Shahjahan Jakarta Globe 17 Sep 13;

An aerial picture made available on 10 May 2013 shows deforested land in Indragiri Hulu, Riau province on May 4, 2013. According to Greenpeace, Indonesia is implementing a forest moratorium, but in fact the deforestation is still happening, with customary forests, community forests, protected forests and national parks also being slated. This not only impacts the emission of Green House Gases, and natural disasters, but also social conflict and poverty as the community lost their access to the forest resources and livelihood. (EPA Photo/Bagus Indahono)

An aerial picture made available on 10 May 2013 shows deforested land in Indragiri Hulu, Riau province on May 4, 2013. According to Greenpeace, Indonesia is implementing a forest moratorium, but in fact the deforestation is still happening, with customary forests, community forests, protected forests and national parks also being slated. This not only impacts the emission of Green House Gases, and natural disasters, but also social conflict and poverty as the community lost their access to the forest resources and livelihood. (EPA Photo/Bagus Indahono)

Indonesia’s second largest pulp and paper company is preparing to start work on a project to restore a degraded peat forest in Sumatra, marking a new direction for the company that has left some skeptical.

Restorasi Ekosistem Riau (RER), a non-profit organization started by Asia Pacific Resources International Limited (April), will carry out the project, which aims to rehabilitate 20,265 hectares of land in the southeastern part of Riau’s Kampar Peninsula. RER secured the ecosystem restoration license from the Ministry of Forestry last May, one of just a handful of such licenses the ministry has granted since launching the program in 2004.

RER announced on Saturday that the work plan for the project had been approved and the organization would begin working in the forest within two months.

The announcement comes at a time when deforestation in Sumatra is in the international spotlight. After a highly-publicized meeting last week, Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan accused actor Harrison Ford, who was in Indonesia filming a documentary, of “attacking” him with questions about Indonesia’s forest policy. The brutal killing of a 22-year-old Sumatran elephant in Aceh also grabbed national and international attention, highlighting the consequences of Indonesia’s rapid industrialization and its toll on the environment.

April has been widely criticized by environmental groups such as Greenpeace, who accuse the paper giant of cutting down natural forests in Sumatra to feed its paper mills. When the company announced its Kampar Peninsula project, local environmental groups such as the Forest Rescue Network Riau (Jikalahari) called the project “greenwashing” and said the company was continuing to destroy forests in other parts of the province.

RER said the project aims to restore the ecosystem, conserve biodiversity, prevent greenhouse gas emissions and improve the well-being of local communities.

Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 17 Sep 13

Shelter from the Storm
from Pulau Hantu

malayan water monitor holed up @ pasir ris mangrove 14Sep2013
from sgbeachbum

Read more!

Paya Lebar land will be ‘worth billions’ in positive returns

Defence Minister says benefits far outweigh cost of move; also reveals plans to boost air-defence capabilities
Xue Jian Yue Today Online 17 Sep 13;

SINGAPORE — The planned relocation of Paya Lebar Air Base may prove costly as it requires highly skilled expertise, but Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said yesterday the redevelopment of the area could reap benefits that far outweigh the move.

Described by Dr Ng as a “long-term and complex undertaking” requiring “fairly intense and highly skilled engineering”, the relocation involves building a new military air base and fourth runway at Changi East at around 2030.

The Defence Ministry (Mindef) will be working closely with the Ministry of National Development (MND) for the relocation, which will free up an area bigger than Bishan and Toa Payoh for new homes, offices and factories.

“In coming in to this decision, we have worked together with MND to calculate the trade-offs,” he said.

“It all balances because the space that is released … including the height templates around it, on a net basis, it is many billions dollars’ worth of positive returns to the people of Singapore.”

The minister was replying to Member of Parliament (Nee Soon GRC) Lim Wee Kiak’s questions on the cost of the planned relocation of the air base, and how the Government will maintain the Republic of Singapore Air Force’s (RSAF) operational readiness in light of the move.

Dr Ng did not, however, say how much the planned relocation, which was announced last month, would cost.

Dr Ng also briefed the House on Singapore’s plans to upgrade its air-defence capabilities, which includes the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) buying a new missile defence system “many times more potent” than the current I-HAWK ground-based air defence system, he said.

Called the ASTER-30 Surface-to-Air Missile System, it will allow Singapore to engage multiple air-borne threats simultaneously and from a longer distance, Dr Ng explained.

The RSAF is also building a multi-layered Island Air Defence System to provide a “comprehensive shield” against airborne threats.

“This includes at the outer perimeter, our existing Gulfstream-550 Airborne Early Warning aircraft, which replaced the E2C in 2012, and significantly enhanced our early warning and air defence capabilities through its better endurance and longer range of detection,” Dr Ng said.

Together with a shorter-range air defence system called SPYDER, the long-range ASTER-30 Surface-to-Air Missile System will contribute to Singapore’s air defence shield.

The RSAF also plans to upgrade its F-16 fighters and is evaluating whether the multi-role F-35 fighter can meet Singapore’s security needs, said the Defence Minister.

Wrapping up his parliamentary reply, Dr Ng said that Mindef and the SAF had in 2011 conducted a “thorough” assessment of Singapore’s capabilities and security threats.

“We satisfied ourselves that our security would not be compromised and that relocation of Paya Lebar Air Base could take place after existing air bases at Changi East and Tengah Air Base have been expanded to accommodate relocated assets and facilities,” he added.

Read more!

Claims under Govt’s haze subsidy scheme exceed 10,000

Today Online 17 Sep 13;

SINGAPORE — Over 10,000 claims have been made for the haze subsidy scheme introduced in June — when air quality plummeted. The scheme is aimed at helping Singaporeans cope with medical ailments resulting from the haze.

In a written reply to a parliamentary question from Dr Fatimah Lateef, Marine Parade GRC Member of Parliament, asking for an update on the scheme, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said, under the scheme, participating general practitioner (GP) clinics have seen around 8,200 attendances for haze-related conditions, with another 2,600 at the polyclinics.

Under the scheme, Singaporeans who are elderly, children or in the lower-income group pay S$10 to see a doctor from participating GP clinics or the polyclinics, for respiratory or eye conditions due to the haze.

The rest of the bill is subsidised by the Government.

Mr Gan also said the number of participating GP clinics has steadily increased, from 200 at the inception of the scheme to more than 650 clinics today.

Read more!

AVA: Seafood imports safe for consumption

Straits Times 17 Sep 13;

THE Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) has in place an integrated and comprehensive food safety system based on science and risk analysis ("How safe is Pacific Ocean seafood?" by Mr Michael Loh; last Tuesday).

All food imports have to comply with our safety standards and requirements. They are subjected to regular inspections and sampling to test for a wide range of hazards known to be associated with food.

For example, wild-caught seafood products are routinely tested for a wide range of food-borne hazards such as heavy metals and radioactive contaminants.

As for the recent developments in Fukushima that Mr Loh highlighted, food products from the prefecture remain suspended.

Products such as fruits and vegetables, seafood, meat, milk and milk products imported from other prefectures are subjected to the AVA's sampling and testing to ensure they are not contaminated with radiation.

Any contaminated product will not be allowed for import into Singapore.

We have also been working closely with the Japanese authorities to ensure that only food products that are free from radionuclide contamination are allowed for export to Singapore, and that the source of the food products is traceable. For example, food products must be accompanied by a certificate of origin to identify the prefecture of origin.

The AVA is committed to ensuring that all food imported into Singapore is safe.

We reassure consumers that all seafood imports available in the Singapore market are safe for consumption, and we will continue to monitor the development and situation in Japan.

Yap Him Hoo (Dr)
Group Director, Quarantine and Inspection Group
For Chief Executive Officer
Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority


How safe is Pacific Ocean seafood?
Straits Times Forum 10 Sep 13;

RECENTLY, there has been news about how the Japanese are having difficulty preventing the radiation leak at Fukushima from entering the sea ("Seoul ban on fish from Japan"; last Saturday).

I have also read online articles of Pacific Ocean seafood being found with mild to hazardous levels of radiation. Though I am uncertain about the scientific basis of these articles, I am getting concerned.

What is the allowable level of radioactivity in seafood? Does imported seafood from the Pacific Ocean get checked for radiation?

Can the relevant authorities comment on this?

Michael Loh

Read more!