David Attenborough supports effort to save orangutan from extinction

Conservationists aim to raise £1m in two weeks to protect key patches of forest that provide lifeline for the endangered species
Lewis Smith theguardian.com 30 Sep 13;

Sir David Attenborough, Bill Oddie and Chris Packham are supporting an effort to save the orangutan from extinction by raising £1m in just two weeks.

Orangutans in their natural environment live in undisturbed ancient forests and for many years it was believed they shunned any other habitats. But researchers have discovered they can survive just as well and perhaps even better in forests that have been intensively thinned out by loggers, giving renewed hope for the species.

Conservationists have now devised a project that they hope will ensure the long-term survival of orangutans by protecting key patches of secondary forest – areas that have been stripped of the biggest trees but are still wooded – from being chopped down for palm oil and other types of agriculture.

By aiming for £1m in donations in a two-week campaign from 2 October to 16 October, they hope to raise enough money to buy and protect small lots of secondary forest that will link different populations of the primate. Three wealthy backers of the charity behind the project, the World Land Trust, have promised to double any donation made during the fortnight up to a maximum of £500,000.

Sir David Attenborough said: "Every bit of the rainforest that is knocked down is less space for orangutans. They have been reduced very seriously in the past decade, and we must do all we can to reverse this devastation. I fully support World Land Trust in its bid to save this important land."

Bill Oddie, the conservationist and broadcaster, visited Borneo recently and was struck by the sight of palm oil plantations, which have replaced much of the original forest and orangutan habitat.

He said the sight emphasised the need to protect "wildlife corridors", which allow orangutans and other animals to travel between sections of forest that are otherwise surrounded by cultivated land. "These corridors have got to be as good as the forest. The palm oil plantations are useless to them," he added.

Asked why effort should be put into saving orangutans, he said: "Wildlife does add immensely to the human experience, quite apart from what you might think of the morality of welfare of animals. It's a better world with them."

Chris Packham, the BBC wildlife presenter, welcomed the project as a means of saving not just the orangutan but other rare animals such as pygmy elephants.

He said orangutans are "absolutely extraordinary animals", adding: "When you look into their eyes it's like a reflection in a not so distant mirror."

The campaign has been boosted by the support of advertising executives who have designed an advertisement for free and plan to run it without charge, starting last Saturday in Condé Nast magazines, including Vanity Fair, and the Independent.

While there are 54,000 orangutans estimated to live in Borneo, and a further 6,600 in Sumatra, the species is under threat of extinction because its habitat has become fragmented by the encroachment of agriculture.

The project is led by Isabelle Lackman, a French biologist who has devoted her life to studying orangutans since the 1990s when she moved from Paris to Borneo.

Dr Lackman, the president of Hutan and director of KOCP, dismissed warnings by some conservationists that orangutans could disappear in 20 to 30 years as ridiculous but said the threat was nonetheless serious: "If things don't improve orangutans will disappear in the medium term – probably in a couple of hundred years."

"A total of 54,000 would seem a lot but it's fragmented. There are hundreds of smaller populations. That's the main problem for the survival of the species. That's what we are trying to address with the World Land Trust."


Read more!

Indonesian Park refuses transfer of sumatran rhinoceros to US

Antara 1 Oct 13;

East Lampung, Lampung (ANTARA News) - The administrator of Way Kambas National Park (TNWK) has refused the transfer of several Sumatran rhinoceros from the Rhino Preservation Area (SRS) to Cincinnati Zoo, the United States.

"We are not supporting the transfer of several rhinoceros to a foreign country," said Chief of Public Relations at TNWK Sukatmoko on Tuesday.

According to TNWK officials, the transfer plan arose after the breeding centre successfully bred a baby rhino called Andatu and the discovery of a wild baby rhino in the area of TNWK, Lampung.

SRS in TNWK is a natural habitat of Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) and proven as a creature that can breed naturally.

"Indonesia should learn from the bad experience in the 1980s when at least 18 Sumatran rhinoceri died in England and the US as they could not adapt to the new habitat," Sukatmoko said.

He urged the Indonesian government to evaluate the transfer programme of Sumatran rhinoceros to the US.

"We urge the related ministry to evaluate the transfer plan," Sukatmoko said.

Director of the Indonesia Rhinoceros Foundation (Yabi) Widodo S Ramono said the Sumatran rhinoceros is an endangered species, although the agency has found two new baby rhinos.

"We should maintain that the baby rhino will not be transferred to the US as its natural habitat is in TNWK," Ramono said.

Although the translocation has been reasonably made by several institutions, Ramono said efforts should be made to increase its population in Indonesia.

He said mating of a rhinoceros and single offspring should not occur to avoid problems at a later stage.

However, Ramono appreciated the efforts of Cincinnati Zoo, which shared its knowledge on rhino breeding.

"But it does not mean that we have agreed to give one Sumatran rhinoceros to them," he said.

He added that if the international community is concerned about the Sumatran Rhinoceros, it should step up efforts to build the SRS.

(B019/INE)
EDITED BY INE
(KR-BSR/F001)

Editor: Jafar M Sidik


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 1 Oct 13



Butterfly Behaviour
from Midnight Monkey Monitor

Love unplugged
from The annotated budak

Little Heron and its uropygial or preen glands
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Coal railway could cause 'ecological disaster' in Indonesian Borneo, warn environmentalists
from Mongabay.com news


Read more!

School design tweaked after Pasir Ris residents' objections

But some still concerned about traffic woes at Pasir Ris international school
Grace Chua Straits Times 1 Oct 13;

A GROUP of residents in Pasir Ris have lost a long-running battle to stop the Government from giving approval for a new international school close to their homes.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) informed the residents recently that the Overseas Family School (OFS) will proceed, but with a design addressing some concerns they had raised.

Some residents were concerned that the school's 12-storey buildings would loom over their homes, while others were keen to preserve a forested area.

Some were also worried that transport for its 4,800 pupils would affect traffic flow.

The $261 million campus on the 4ha plot is at the corner of Pasir Ris Drive 3 and Elias Road.

Until last month, when it was cleared, the plot boasted woodland that some residents had fought to save. They aired their concerns with the authorities.

Last weekend, about 300 residents of the Pasir Ris Heights area got a URA letter showing the campus layout and detailing measures to assuage some concerns.

These include a new road off Pasir Ris Drive 3 and opposite Pasir Ris Drive 10, providing more planting at the site's edges than the standard 2m requirement, and putting the car and bus parks beneath the school field.

"We have approved the layout of the school campus based on the following major considerations to mitigate your concerns," it said.

Another design feature is that the air-conditioned 12-storey academic buildings are to tilted at an angle to reduce the sense they will tower over homes, mostly terrace or semi-detached homes.

Still, some residents are concerned about traffic congestion and parents of OFS pupils parking their cars in front of their homes.

The Pasir Ris Greenbelt residents' group is still hoping for a townhall-style meeting with the school, URA and the Ministry of National Development to reiterate concerns before piling starts and the layout of the campus is set.

But OFS has a deadline as it must move out of its Paterson Road campus by 2015 to make way for the Thomson MRT Line.

Asked if his views might be considered "not in my backyard" or Nimby entitlement, Pasir Ris Heights resident Oliver Foo, 49, said: "Would we prefer to have a green belt? Yes."

"But do we accept that the school is coming? Yes, we do," said the leadership consultant.

National University of Singapore geographer Harvey Neo, who studies nature and society, said while the authorities have factored in some of the residents' concerns, "fundamentally, the residents are questioning the need and inevitability of building an overseas school in the green belt".

But some have pointed out that some give-and-take is necessary.

There have been incidents of residents opposing developments, like nursing homes, being built near their homes.

MP Lim Biow Chuan, who has dealt with such cases, said: "I always hesitate to use the term Nimby. Although strictly speaking the land does not belong to the residents... we should see if these are legitimate concerns.

"Planning for land use is a complicated affair, and like it or not, some things have to be built. Sometimes residents are concerned because they can't see the whole picture. So communication is important."

Timeline of events
April 2012: Land on either side of a forest patch at the intersection of Pasir Ris Drive 3 and Elias Road is earmarked for development.
June 2012: Residents form the Pasir Ris Greenbelt Committee to protect the 4ha patch.
July 2012: They petition to protect the woodland.
Aug 2012: They hold talks with their MP, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean.
Oct 2012: The Ministry of National Development (MND) and Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) send the group a letter saying the site is to make way for a school.
Nov 2012: The group meets DPM Teo, URA, MND and the National Parks Board.
Dec 2012-Jan 2013: Residents are alarmed to see workers about to cut down a large tree, but MND says the tree is being felled for safety reasons.
June 2013: The lease for the land is awarded to Overseas Family School for $28 million for 30 years.
Sept 2013: The school pays an extra $9.1 million for intensified land use.
Sept 19: Pasir Ris residents meet the school and URA representatives and their MP.
Sept 29: URA sends residents a letter detailing campus plans, to mitigate concerns.

Related link
Pasir Ris Greenbelt on facebook.


Read more!

Bukit Brown, development and possibilities for Singapore’s future

Chong Ja Ian Today Online 30 Sep 13;

Recent events should give pause to the proposed construction of the dual four-lane carriageway across Bukit Brown.

Surveys for Our Singapore Conversation indicate that 62 per cent of Singaporeans prefer preserving green spaces over constructing roads and other infrastructure, while 53 per cent prefer heritage preservation over infrastructure building.

Staying road construction in Bukit Brown, before exhumations begin next month, would demonstrate responsiveness to public needs, giving Singaporeans a last opportunity to consider the consequences of altering an important part of our nation’s natural and cultural landscape.

Heavy rush-hour traffic on Lornie Road comes from vehicles filtering on and off a congested Pan-Island Expressway, an issue a road through Bukit Brown cannot solve. In fact, Singapore can probably never build enough roads.

What are the fundamentals behind congestion? Professor Kishore Mahbubani, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, has observed that the main challenge is sub-optimal public transport, which heightens car demand.

Recent steps to raise Electronic Road Pricing rates and introduce new Certificate of Entitlement restrictions underscore the fact that controlling vehicle population is key to addressing traffic concerns.

The Prime Minister’s National Day Rally speech should provide impetus for maintaining Bukit Brown in its current form, as new plans mean that “we don’t have to worry about running out of space or possibilities for Singapore”.

I hope this means space for a Bukit Brown heritage park in our future. As physical changes become more prevalent, tangible markers of our heritage grow in importance in ways that digitisation can never fully replicate.

Singapore is no longer in the 1960s, when infrastructure development was imperative. Constructing the road, and other developments, over Bukit Brown may even be counterproductive. Floods earlier this month serve as a reminder of the need for cautious development.

As the National Environment Agency noted, the significant factors that may explain the trend of “Changing weather patterns causing more flash floods” (Sept 13) are likely to be “rapid development and urbanisation, as well as global warming”.

The Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Prevention Measures has likewise noted that urbanisation contributes “undoubtedly” to increased surface run-off and flooding. So, would building the road over Bukit Brown potentially create complications?

The authorities should suspend construction until there are more comprehensive and appropriate ways to address the environmental, heritage, traffic and development issues that intersect at Bukit Brown. Is the environmental impact assessment available?

At a minimum, a rigorous study should be made public, the first step towards a more sustainable approach. Halting construction comes with costs, but these may be lower than those from building the road. Singapore is worth the extra effort.


Read more!

Hazy skies but air quality healthy

Vimita Mohandas Channel NewsAsia 30 Sep 13;

SINGAPORE: Singapore experienced slightly hazy conditions on Monday.

Its Pollutant Standard Index (PSI), which is a measure of air quality, rose to a three-hour average of 48 at 4pm which is still in the "good range".

The moderate range starts at 51.

Providing an update on his Facebook page, Environment and Water Resources Minister Dr Vivian Balakrishnan said the hazy condition was due to the southwest winds blowing from hotspots in Riau and local accumulation of particulate matter over Singapore.

He added that the situation should improve as rain is forecast over the next few days which could help put out the fires in Riau.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) says the 24-hour PSI for the next 24 hours is expected to be in the good range.

- CNA/ir

Rain should improve haze conditions: Vivian
Feng Zengkun Straits Times 1 Oct 13;

THE haze here yesterday was exacerbated by unfavourable winds, Environment and Water Resources Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said yesterday.

But rain over the next few days should improve the situation, he added.

The National Environment Agency said the air here should remain healthy today as the 24-hour Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) is expected to be in the "good" range.

"Singapore may experience slightly hazy conditions in the morning, but all people can continue with normal activities," the agency said in an advisory.

The three-hour PSI reading climbed to 48 at 3pm yesterday, just shy of the "moderate" range of 51-100, before falling again in the evening.

People around Singapore complained of hazy conditions and a burning smell in the air in the afternoon.

Dr Balakrishnan said in a Facebook post last night that the "visible haze" was partly due to south-westerly winds blowing from hot spots or fires in Riau province, Indonesia.

The number of hot spots in Sumatra had risen over the weekend from about 25 to 33, according to satellite maps, but some could have been obscured by cloud cover.

"Fortunately, the situation should improve as rain is forecasted over the next few days to douse the fires in Riau," he said.

Last week, Dr Balakrishnan and his Asean counterparts agreed to set up a task force comprising experts on fire and haze assessment and coordination.

This task force will review existing alert levels and formulate trigger points for action. This will help the authorities to act on haze sooner.

Haze in Singapore and Malaysia from forest fires in Riau broke a 16-year record in June, prompting demands for action.


Read more!

An idea to charge for plastic bags on weekends

Environment group hopes to spark national discourse on changing consumer behaviour
Neo Chai Chin Today Online 1 Oct 13;

SINGAPORE — Wading again into what it calls a “very polarising environmental issue” here, the Singapore Environment Council (SEC) yesterday floated the idea of charging for supermarket plastic bags on weekends after a six-month outreach and education effort next year.

Backed by survey findings on how households obtain and reuse plastic bags, the proposal was one of 10 made by the SEC, that also included bins with second-hand reusable bags placed near cashier counters for shoppers who have forgotten to take their own bags to the supermarket. One in three consumers here waste some or all the plastic bags they take for free at supermarkets, the SEC found from questions posed to 2,500 households that were tagged to a Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources survey last year.

This was derived from the percentage of respondents who threw bags away after taking them home (6.3 per cent) and those who store more than 20 plastic bags at home at a time.

Nine in 10 respondents said they use plastic bags to contain general waste. The top reasons for not using reusable bags were: That plastic bags were provided anyway; making purchases unplanned and not having reusable bags at hand; forgetting to take them when shopping; and needing plastic bags to dispose of waste.

The SEC’s position paper — consisting of survey findings and its recommendations to reduce wastage — hopes to spark a “national discourse on changing consumer behaviour” on the issue, said SEC Executive Director Jose Raymond.

Consumers here used about three billion plastic bags in 2011.

While it is mindful not to impose extra financial burden on low-income households, or compromise competitiveness of businesses, the council aims to roll out a “Bring Your Own Bag Every Day” education programme next year. Mr Raymond said supermarket chains were receptive to the idea of charging for plastic bags on weekends — when it is presumably less inconvenient to take one’s own bag along to shop — but wanted all major players to first be on board. Asked how much retailers could charge, he suggested 10 cents per plastic bag.

Consumers like Mr Irvin Tan, 31, said he was supportive of charging for plastic bags. “We have to figure out the best way to communicate the message. If this carrot/stick model is going to teach people that plastic bags are used at a price, then I’m for it,” said the entrepreneur.

But Consumers Association of Singapore Executive Director Seah Seng Choon called for more education, and said offering rebates is the “more friendly way”. “The effort to save the environment is commendable. It is better if an incentive is given, instead of imposing a charge,” he said.

Related link
Press release of the position paper can be found on SEC’s website at http://www.sec.org.sg/publication/SEC_Position_Paper_on_Reducing_Plastic_Bag_Wastage_in_Singapore.pdf.


Read more!

Study reveals volunteers more likely to be happy with life

Vimita Mohandas Channel NewsAsia 1 Oct 13;

SINGAPORE: A national study has found that Singaporeans who volunteer or donate are more likely to be satisfied and happy with their lives.

The Subjective Well-being Survey was done as part of the National Volunteer & Philanthropy Centre's (NVPC) Individual Giving Survey in 2012. It is also the first time this large-scale national study was conducted to establish the link between giving and happiness in Singapore.

The study found that two-thirds of people who volunteered and or donated had high levels of subjective well-being, while less than half of non-givers had a high level of satisfaction.

It also highlighted that among volunteers who were satisfied with their experience with their non-profit organisations they volunteered in, 88 per cent intend to volunteer again in the future. This compared with 70 per cent for those with low satisfaction.

Meanwhile, for donors who were satisfied with their experience donating to non-profit organisations, 92 per cent intend to donate in future, compared to 78 per cent for donors who had low satisfaction.

The NVPC hopes that these findings will spur more people to volunteer, donate or both.

The centre's CEO, Lawrence Lien, said: "It's important in our context because even though we think it's intuitive, there are still people who might not give it priority.

"People on the ground quite often would say 'well, let me settle everything else in my life. I'm so stressed out, I've got so little time', but that shows that they might not give giving a priority in their lives."

- CNA/ec

Happy people give and gain more with volunteer work: Singapore study
Siau Ming En Today Online 30 Sep 13;

SINGAPORE — Happy people are more likely to donate and to volunteer, and those who do so tend to become happier, according to results released today (Sept 30) from the first national study in Singapore on the relationship between giving and subjective well-being.

Conducted by the National Volunteer & Philanthropy Centre (NVPC) and Professor David Chan — a Lee Kuan Yew Fellow and Professor of Psychology and Director of the Behavioural Sciences Institute at Singapore Management University — the study covered 1,512 individuals aged 15 and above and is part of NVPC’s Individual Giving Survey 2012.

Mr Laurence Lien, the Chief Executive Officer of NVPC, said today that many do not have time, nor see the act of giving as something that is “personally meaningful” to them. He added that with the survey results, chances are, people will now place volunteering and donating higher on their list of priorities.

Likewise, Professor Chan noted that the survey results are “not obvious” as some people will see it from a standard economic perspective, where giving involves losing time and money. He explained this is why it is “important” to establish the relationship between giving and subjective well-being.

The study showed that 66 per cent of those who volunteered and/or donated were satisfied and happy with their lives as compared to the 45 per cent figure among non-givers.

On top of that, the study also examined the relationship between givers’ intention to give in future and their experience with non-profit organisations.

About 88 per cent of volunteers who said that they were satisfied with their experience with the non-profit organisations they worked with indicated their intention to continue volunteering in the future. By comparison, only 70 per cent of those who were less satisfied said that they would continue to do so.

Me Lien noted that the results showed that it is important for non-profit organisations to manage volunteers and donors effectively, to develop “a positive giving experience” which would then increase the likelihood for volunteers and donors to continue giving.

Charitable people 'tend to be happier'
Janice Tai Straits Times 1 Oct 13;

SINGAPORE residents who volunteer or donate money to help others are more likely to be satisfied or happy with their lives, a national study has found.

Those who give more, whether of time or money, and more frequently, also tend to rate higher on satisfaction and happiness.

This is because people who give derive a sense of personal meaning from helping others and become more grateful for what they have, said Professor David Chan, director of the Behavioural Sciences Institute and professor of psychology at the Singapore Management University.

Prof Chan was the consultant for the survey commissioned by the National Volunteer and Philanthropy Centre (NVPC).

Another motivating factor is the sense of community created through interaction with the people they help, he added.

This is the first time a national study has established the link between giving and happiness.

It was done as part of NVPC's Individual Giving Survey last year, which interviewed 1,512 Singapore residents.

The bi-yearly survey tracks volunteerism and philanthropy trends in Singapore. It found that two-thirds of those who volunteered or donated in the past year were satisfied and happy with their lives. In contrast, 45 per cent of those who did not volunteer or donate were satisfied.

And more than 70 per cent of those who served 12 or more volunteer hours, or gave $100 or more in the last 12 months registered high levels of well-being compared to 63 per cent of those who gave less time and 59 per cent who gave less money.

Well-being was measured using a 10-item index, which asked individuals the extent to which they feel satisfied or happy.

Prof Chan said the results of this survey were consistent with other research. "Happy people are more likely to give, but people who give also tend to become happier. This leads to a positive spiral in which both givers and recipients benefit," he said.

NVPC chief executive Laurence Lien said he hopes the survey results will encourage people to give back to society more regularly.

Madam Tay Hui Chan, 70, embodies the sentiment. She cooks every week for 20 to 30 elderly folks in her neighbourhood.

"When they are happy, I am also happy," she said. "We are a family."


Read more!

Malaysia: Pulau Perhentian reefs under attack from algae

Tan Cheng Li The Star 1 Oct 13;

Sewage pollution is slowly marring the coral reefs of Pulau Perhentian in Terengganu.

THE coral reefs of Pulau Perhentian are slowly losing their hues. Instead of a riot of colours that come from healthy coral polyps, they are now increasingly being covered by dull, brown algae.

These marine plants occur naturally on reefs but if there are excessive nutrients in the water, such as from fertiliser and sewage, they will proliferate and crowd out other reef organisms.

A report by Reef Check Malaysia (RCM) says the average algae cover of 10.6% over the last five years at Perhentian is far higher than the national average, which in 2010 was 3.3%.

Once widespread, the algae cover can no longer be kept under control by algae-grazing fish (and other herbivorous organisms). It then takes over the reef, smothering and killing corals. It also reduces the clean surface available for recruitment of new corals on rock and old dead corals, hindering the recovery of reefs. Algae-dominated reefs are less diverse and less productive than coral-dominated reefs, and they lose much of their value, particularly for tourism.

RCM says there has been a marked decline in the area of hard corals in Perhentian since 2009, to just 36% (“fair” condition) in 2011. The decline coincides with a period of consistently high (though fluctuating) levels of algae on the reefs.

Given the absence of other sources of nutrient – there are no industries or farms on the island, plus it is 20km from the nearest river on the mainland – the likely trigger of the algae growth is sewage pollution.

A study by Environmental Resources Management (which was engaged by RCM) has indicated sewage pollution around Perhentian. Of the 13 resorts surveyed, only two were found to have adequate sewage treatment systems that operate according to discharge limits. Eight resorts have systems that require maintenance and refurbishment (generally involving desludging), while three have systems that require complete upgrades.

However, the ERM study discovered poor maintenance of septic tanks, with only one resort reporting that sludge is transported back to the mainland for treatment. Some operators have never desludged their septic tanks. Those which do, routinely discharge sludge directly to sea or land.

“It is considered highly likely that this is contributing to the spread of algae on the coral reefs, which, if not reversed, could significantly damage the reefs in the next few years,” says RCM.

It, however, does not support the plan for a central sewage plant for the island. The reasons: there is limited water and electricity supply to run the facility; the lack of flat land for a large installation; resorts are far apart and to connect them to the plant, sewage pipes will have to traverse the channel between the islands; and the considerable disruptions to terrestrial ecosystems during installation of pipework as the islands are hilly. Also, many resorts are located on rented land with very short rental terms (usually only two years). There would be significant difficulties in negotiating between land owner and resort operator regarding costs of installation.

As an alternative to a large, centralised sewage treatment plant, RCM proposes improving the existing septic tank systems by regular desludging and better maintenance. It says septic tanks, if properly designed and maintained, can be adequate in preventing sewage pollution. Representatives of Indah Water Konsortium (IWK), who visited the island in February 2012, agreed too that a desludging operation is a better option than constructing a full-scale plant.

Other East Coast islands are suffering from sewage pollution similar to Perhentian’s. No detailed survey of sewage treatment systems is available for the islands but RCM personnel, who regularly visit these places for surveys and other programmes, have observed poor sewage infrastructure. In Pulau Tioman, owners of two resorts more than 20 years old said they have never desludged their septic tanks. Water quality sampling by RCM in 2009 at 11 sites in Tioman found several sites to be highly contaminated with coliform bacteria, indicative of sewage pollution. Levels were particularly high at Salang village, which has several large resorts, but lacks adequate sewage treatment facilities. In Pulau Redang, a stream in a resort area regularly has odours related to sewage pollution. In Pulau Aur, reefs near three resorts are covered with algae.

RCM suggests that IWK investigate the possibility of providing a mobile septic tank desludging facility to service the resorts on all East Coast islands. It says providing such a facility should be viewed not as a cost but as an investment in protecting coral reefs, which are the foundation of the economies on the islands, bringing in an estimated revenue of RM360mil annually.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 29 Sep 13



Latest Green Jobs in Singapore [23 - 29 Sep 2013]
from Green Business Times

Fish farm trash on northern Ubin
from wild shores of singapore

Enchanting Forests
from lekowala!

Discussing a Sustainable Singaporean Future
The Independent Singapore News

Morning Walk At Upper Seletar Reservoir (29 Sep 2013)
from Beetles@SG BLOG

mama spider creating web @ SBWR - 29Sep2013
from sgbeachbum

Bar-tailed Godwit @ Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Luke Gibson et al.: forest fragments suffer small mammal community loss in just 5-25 years; invasive rat monoculture dominates from The Biodiversity crew @ NUS

The ghost monkeys of Bukit Brown
from Two Girls and Some Monkeys

Slender Duskdarter
from Monday Morgue


Read more!

Marine heritage needs protection

Straits Times Forum 30 Sep 13;

I MADE a visit to St John's Island recently. After an interview with a local fisherman, I discovered that the fishing stocks there are dwindling.

The inter-tidal pools next to the jetty are filled with weed at this time of the year. The waters are murky due to sedimentation and fishing catches are small and unsustainable throughout the year.

This fisherman told me that waters were pristine and large sharks and lobsters were abundant previously.

Anthropogenic activities and a busy shipping industry have also caused the decline of the ecosystem. As a result, species may be endangered or extinct.

Development has taken a toll on the marine ecosystem. In Singapore, there are environmental protection laws on the control of silty water discharge into the sea; control on air and noise pollution; and protection from felling for heritage trees in Singapore.

However, we do not have laws on the protection of minimum fish-catch sizes, and actions to gazette St John's Island as a marine reserve.

These actions will ensure that valuable marine heritage is preserved in order for generations to enjoy.

Reggie Koh (Dr)


Read more!

IPCC Climate Change Report: Experts React

Denise Chow LiveScience.com Yahoo News 28 Sep 13;

Scientists and other experts all over the world are reacting today (Sept. 27) to the report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stating that scientists are more certain than ever of the link between human activities and global warming.

In the report, climate scientists now say they are at least 95 percent certain that people are responsible for majority of the climate change effects seen since the 1950s, including warming oceans, melting ice and rising sea levels.

Thomas Stocker, co-chair of the report, called climate change "the greatest challenge of our time," and warned that without decisive action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, many of the impacts of global warming will not only continue, but accelerate.

Today's report is the first of four that will make up the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report. The remaining parts, which will examine the socioeconomic impacts of climate change and ways to mitigate its effects, will be released in 2014. [See how the 2013 IPCC report compares to previous predictions]

LiveScience reached out and asked scientists and other experts about their reactions to the report (published statements were also used). Here's what they said:

David Vaughan, IPCC author and climate scientist at the British Antarctic Survey

"Somebody said, what's the point? Actually I think it's a very good opportunity for the public, politicians and policymakers to reflect on climate change, and to just take a little while, while it's in the news, to absorb the new science and to reflect on what we might do about it.

"There's no right or wrong answer, and some countries may be more enthusiastic to cut carbon emissions, others to develop renewable energy, and developing countries may feel they must develop as fast as possible, but all of those strategies have impacts.

"The IPCC reports are really good times for society to reflect on the issues. We scientists are trying to bring everything up into public awareness in a way that it can be understood, and just put it on the map again. I think climate change, as an issue, has somewhat gone off the back burner. We've had a lot of international issues to deal with; maybe it's time to go back and reflect on what more we know. [Video - Climate Change Impact: NASA's 21st Century Predictions]

"I am really pleased that the sea level projections are made complete, that they have an Antarctica and Greenland dynamic contribution. We're really honing in on the amounts of sea level rise we're going to get.

"The thing we really need to do next is hone in on where that water will go — honing in on regional patterns of sea level rise. Really, not everybody is going to see sea level rise in the same way."

Camilla Toulmin, director of the International Institute for Environment and Development

"The latest IPCC report confirms much of what we know already — that human activities are responsible for rising temperatures and increased climate instability across the world. Continued greenhouse gas emissions will unleash a wild mix of dangerous impacts.

"But there is also value in what the IPCC report does not say, such as how the climate will change from place to place. Climate models are not yet robust enough to predict impacts at local and regional scales, but it is clear from the experience of the many people with whom we work, who have faced loss and damage this year alone, that everybody is vulnerable in some way.

"This uncertainty about local impacts, coupled with the certainty that impacts will come, is a stark warning that everyone needs to get ready. Citizens and business leaders worldwide need to press governments to act, both at home and on the international stage."

Al Gore, environmentalist and former vice president of the United States (Gore shared a Nobel Peace Prize with the IPCC in 2007)

"The latest report by the IPCC is an important milestone in the study of climate science."

Gregory Johnson, IPCC author and oceanographer at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

"What this report has done is a careful analysis of all the signals we're observing in [the] changing climate — melting sea ice in the Arctic, melting glaciers, changes in the water cycles, changes in extreme events — and basically looked at the fingerprints of all those events and managed to attribute all those phenomena to a greater or lesser extent to climate change.

"The important thing to take away from this is there are multiple lines of evidence now that make us confident to the level of extremely likely that climate is changing." [8 Ways Global Warming is Already Changing the World]

Gerald Meehl, IPCC lead author and senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research

"The main message is the planet's warming. We're more certain now that humans are responsible — we're the dominant factor to affecting climate — we have this certainty. The certainty is extremely likely, which translates into 95 percent sure that's the case, we have better estimate of sea level rise, we now have ways to account to contributions for melting of Greenland and melting of west Antarctic ice sheets. [Image Gallery: Greenland's Melting Glaciers]

"There's much stronger evidence connecting human activity to changes in temperature, melting glaciers and ocean warming. There's a lot more evidence that connects human activity to changes in the climate system.

"I think when you look at the future projections and you look at these different scenarios, and you see the very high scenario when you don't do anything — as an example, we would have a nearly ice-free Arctic in [the] summer by near midcentury — you get those kind of fairly dramatic changes.

"But, we can choose a different future. We have a choice right now. We can choose what kind of future we have by the choices we make right now."

Michael Oppenheimer, professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University and contributor to previous IPCC reports

"The important messages are that Earth has warmed significantly, most of the warming has to do with humans, Earth is going to keep warming under almost all future scenarios, and the chances of avoiding the 2-degree danger limits that governments have chosen is small, unless we get out there and develop and implement focused plans to start reducing emissions immediately.

"IPCC reports have been influential in getting governments' attention, even though they lag way behind where they should be. I expect this report to remind governments that they had better find a way to act together and act soon, although it's also true that a lot of governments are going at it on their own. Still, it would be better if they were more coordinated."

Saleemul Huq, senior fellow in the International Institute for Environment and Development's climate change group, and coordinating lead author of the IPCC's Working Group II report

"The IPCC has confirmed what many millions of people in the developing world are already well aware of, namely that the weather patterns have already changed for the worse. People in richer countries are vulnerable too, as recent floods, droughts and storms in Europe, North America and Australia have shown, but because of political inertia and powerful vested interests that have dominated media narratives for decades, they are less aware of the links between these impacts and their carbon emissions.

"Climate change affects us all and we must tackle it together. The time has come for global solidarity. This would enable the individual polluter (be they in a rich country or poor country) to recognize his or her personal responsibility and to try to connect with the victims of their pollution.

"Climate change ignores borders, but so do friendship and solidarity. It is time for national interests to give way to the global good. I hope the strong message from IPCC will galvanize actions by politicians and publics around the world."

LiveScience Staff Writer Becky Oskin contributed reporting.


Read more!