Best of our wild blogs: 11 Apr 10


Rollarcoasters vs. Rocky Shores
from Ecological observations in Singapore

Spawn of coral on video!
from wild shores of singapore

Shield-backed Bug with Kids
from Macro Photography in Singapore

Life History of the Grey Sailor
from Butterflies of Singapore

A Short Outing to Dairy Farm Nature Park
from Beauty of Fauna and Flora in Nature

MacRitchie and Admiralty park
from Singapore Nature

Durian knife
from Ubin.sgkopi

Trees of Pulau Ubin - a talk by Ali Ibrahim
from wild shores of singapore

Pulau Ubin quickly: hornbills and more
from wild shores of singapore

Singapore is home to the rarest mangrove in the world!
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

Birds learning from one another
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Christmas Island: crabs and other curious creatures
from wild shores of singapore


Read more!

SM warns of green protectionism

Pressure may be put on emerging economies in future
David Yeo, Straits Times 11 Apr 10;

Boao (Hainan): 'Green' protectionism is a worrying future trend, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said yesterday.

Speaking at a panel discussion on trade protectionism on the second day of the Boao Forum for Asia, he said green protectionism - or the erection of trade barriers against economies with inadequate environment-protection policies - might not be discernible now but was likely to emerge in international trade.

'Countries with green technologies producing a certain product may find themselves unable to compete against an emerging economy using old processes to produce the same product cheaper, because (the latter) doesn't have to worry about the environment,' Mr Goh said.

He said the green-technology countries might therefore exert pressure on emerging economies to engage in more environment- friendly production, resulting in green protectionism.

One solution, he said, would be the transfer of green technology from developed to emerging economies.

'The question is, at what price?' said Mr Goh. 'So it (green protectionism) is a critical problem which has got to be discussed in totality.'

The panel discussion came after the official opening ceremony of the annual conference of the Boao forum, which is held on China's Hainan island.

The forum, which was started in 2001, aims to promote regional economic integration. The theme for this year's meeting is green and sustainable economic development in Asia.

Chinese Vice-President Xi Jinping, speaking at the opening ceremony, called on Asian nations to further open up their markets and resist protectionism.

He also urged Asia to step up cooperation in energy conservation and environmental protection, and stressed that China was 'actively and seriously' dealing with climate change.

China aimed to forge a new industrialisation path with Chinese characteristics, Mr Xi said, with emphasis on technology, energy efficiency and low pollution, among other things.

About 1,000 government leaders, businessmen and academics are attending the forum.

The other speakers at yesterday's panel discussion were Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen, Mitsubishi Corporation chairman Mikio Sasaki and Chinese Vice-Commerce Minister Yi Xiao- zhun.

Mr Yi also expressed concern over protectionism amid the economic recovery. 'We are very much concerned that global demand is still weak, and protectionism is still rising,' he said, according to Reuters.

Mr Goh said the key message from the session was the existence of what he termed 'political protection'.

'If a large number of workers are displaced or unemployed, of course there will be pressure for the government on protectionism,' he said.

'So the key for us, so far as Singapore is concerned, is to... make sure workers have the proper education, the skills, and should they lose their jobs, they are given some kind of safety net and, more importantly, trained and retrained.'

Mr Goh, who met Mr Xi on Friday, will return to Singapore today after visiting Hainan's second-largest city, Sanya.


Read more!

Illegal logging in Indonesia ‘must end’ before REDD takes effect

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 10 Apr 10;

The government should work out how to stamp out long-standing illegal logging within two years if the country wants to secure funding from carbon trading in the forestry sector, say environment activists.

They warned that failure to tackle illegal logging would also jeopardize the government’s pledge to implement the UN system of measurable, reportable and verifiable (MRV) scheme on emissions cuts.

“It will be difficult for Indonesia to claim the emission cuts if illegal logging persists after REDD takes effect after 2012,” Jatna Supriatna, director of International Conservation told reporters on the sidelines of an international conference on Muslim action against climate change on Friday.

The reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradations (REDD) schemes are expected to be an alternative to emission cuts from forestry, which contributes about 20 percent of global emissions.

Under the program, countries that protect their forests can receive financial incentives through carbon trading with rich nations.

Indonesia, the world’s third largest forested nation with 120 million hectares of forest, is a supporter of the REDD schemes, which are expected take effect after the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2013.

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono made a promise to implement the MRV system during last year’s Copenhagen climate talks to ensure international communities that all emission cuts in Indonesia would be verifiable.

The government is currently debating how to implement MRV amid poor forestry data.

On Wednesday, the President ordered his taskforce to probe illegal logging and forestry corruption before a visit to Vietnam for an ASEAN summit to discuss climate change.

Jatna, who is also a lecturer at the University of Indonesia, welcomed Yudhoyono’s gesture but also warned the President against treating the issue as lip service for a political agenda. “The most important thing now is how to stop illegal logging within two years,” he said.

Executive director of the Indonesian Environmental Forum (Walhi) Berry Furqon agreed that tackling illegal logging should aim to protect the forest and not be used for political gain.

“We still doubt the effectiveness of action against illegal logging as long as the current gap between timber demands and production levels remains unresolved,” he said.

Indonesia has so far received funding from Australia and Norway to prepare for REDD in the field.
Indonesia secured an US$80 million grant from the Multilateral Development Bank (MDB) last month to be used to mitigate emissions from the forestry sector.

“The money will be used to ready the implementation of REDD schemes,” Ismet Hadad, chairman of the working group on financing at the National Council on Climate Change (DNPI) said.

A list of five countries eligible to receive the grants, which included Indonesia, was announced at an MDB meeting in the Philippines.

Some 48 countries, including Brazil and Papua New Guinea, applied for the funds. Indonesia was the largest forest nation to win the funds.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 10 Apr 10


Earth Day movie screening: TAPPED!
from Green Drinks Singapore

16 Apr (Fri): A series of talks "Zoological Explorations in Singapore" from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

Sungei Buloh, the Heritage Park
from Life's Indulgences

The Fourth Tooth
from My Itchy Fingers

Nesting behaviour of the Long-Tailed Shrike
from Bird Ecology Study Group

The moving is all done. Now a new life begins
from Bornean Sun Bear Conservation

Reading Food Labels: Food Additives
from EcoWalkthetalk

Climate: How we got here
from BBC NEWS blog by Richard Black


Read more!

Bats, Birds and Lizards Can Fight Climate Change

Jennifer Welsh Wired Science 9 Apr 10;

Birds, bats and lizards may play an important role in Earth’s climate by protecting plants from insects that forage on foliage. A new study suggests that preserving these animals could be a low-tech way to fight climate change.

“The presence, abundance and diversity of birds, bats and lizards, the top predators in the insect world, has impacts on the growth of plants,” said ecologist Daniel Gruner of the University of Maryland, co-author of the paper published April 5 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. “If you don’t have plants, you don’t have organisms that are recapturing carbon.”

Because these animals feed on both plant-eating and insect-eating bugs in equal numbers, it was believed they wouldn’t have a net effect on plant growth: When the animals gobble up the plant-eating insects, the population of these harmful insects decreases. But, when the animals feed on insect-eating insects, there are fewer predators to eat the herbivores.

The new meta-analysis indicates this is not the case. The presence of insect-eating animals has a positive effect on the growth of plants.

Gruner’s team analyzed the results of 113 studies removing birds, bats and lizards from habitats on four continents and quantified the effect of removing the animals on the population levels of insects and on plant growth.

Things like habitat loss, disease and climate change are affecting the future of these insectivore species. Some of them are thought of as vermin and are killed off by humans. Preserving these creatures will be an important part of keeping ecosystems in check, Gruner said. He also stresses the need for larger, more comprehensive studies of these ecosystems to determine the precise mechanism of how these animals play their protective role.


Read more!

Rare Singapore monkey species in better shape than thought

Study finds number of banded leaf monkeys 3 times greater than previously believed
Victoria Vaughan, Straits Times 10 Apr 10;

ONCE feared to be on the brink of extinction, data has surfaced to suggest that Singapore's banded leaf monkey population is healthy and is, in fact, growing.

A student from the National University of Singapore (NUS) who spent 11/2 years tracking the black monkeys in the Central Catchment Area has concluded that the number is roughly treble of what was previously thought to exist.

The last reliable data, recorded in the 1990s, reported that there were 10 to 15 of these shy tree-dwelling monkeys left in Singapore.

But Miss Andie Ang, 25, has documented evidence to prove that there are at least 40 roaming the MacRitchie and Lower Peirce Reservoir areas.

From September 2008, she spent five days a week in the forest to gather data for her master's biology programme.

It took 13 dawn-till-dusk sorties before Miss Ang found the first monkey and she has since seen at least 40 individuals.

By carrying out simultaneous surveys with help from a National Parks Board (NParks) ranger, she could determine that she was seeing different monkeys and, therefore, had a good population count.

'I was pretty surprised to find 40. I don't want to stop this work, I hope to see what can be done to stabilise the population,' she said.

But it is unclear whether the increase in number is because the population is recovering or because previous surveys were not as comprehensive.

The data collected, which covers social, breeding and eating habits, will go into Miss Ang's master's thesis, to be completed in July and submitted to journals for potential publication.

Associate Professor Rudolf Meier, who is supervising the project, said this was a significant study but it was hard to predict if the number was big enough for the population to recover.

'There is a genetic bottleneck - the genetic diversity is low,' he said. This lack of diversity could lead to vulnerability to disease or reproductive problems.

'Also, the infant mortality rate is extremely high for these monkeys - probably more than 50 per cent.'

Deputy director of the NParks' National Biodiversity Centre, Dr Lena Chan, said more had to be done to boost future conservation measures.

'This species has special significance for Singapore as it was first described here in 1838. When we know what it likes to eat, we could look at planting more of those plants,' she said. She added that the soon-to-be built Eco-Link - set to cross the Bukit Timah Expressway and link Bukit Timah Nature Reserve to the Central Catchment Nature Reserve - could help extend their habitat.

There is also a possibility of using the leaf monkey, believed to be related, from Johor to help increase the genetic pool.

The banded leaf monkey is one of three primate populations here, along with long-tailed macaques, which number about 1,500, and the nocturnal slow loris, the population of which is unknown.

The study was the first to be supported by the Wildlife Reserves Singapore Conservation Fund, which committed $500,000 over five years to NUS' Ah Meng Memorial Conservation Fund, set up about a year ago to support this kind of work.

Related links
Hear more about the project and other studies of our wildlife at these talks next week: 16 Apr (Fri): A series of talks "Zoological Explorations in Singapore"
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!


Read more!

Tide turns in favour of saving sharks

Straits Times 10 Apr 10;

THE fight to take the ocean's top predator off Singapore dining tables was renewed at yesterday's opening of the Asia Dive Expo.

Shark Savers, an international conservation charity, said it will carry out an awareness campaign on the trade in shark's fin through billboards, television advertisements and digital signs in Singapore. Visitors to the expo at the Suntec City Convention Centre can also take a pledge not to eat shark's fin soup.

Although China is estimated to consume 90 per cent of the world's shark's fin, other countries, including those in the West such as Spain, are contributing to what is estimated to be a US$310 million (S$433 million) trade.

Underwater film-maker Shawn Heinrichs, 38, who is on the board of Shark Savers, said Singapore is a major trader and a consumer of shark's fin soup. But he has noticed a 'a shift in attitude', he added.

Indeed, shark lovers have launched campaigns before, such as local animal welfare group Animal Concerns Research and Education Society which spoke out on the plight of sharks at the Speakers' Corner in April last year.

But while there has been some improvement - Resorts World Sentosa, for example, has announced that it would not offer shark's fin on its banquet and restaurant menus - progress has been slow.

Observed Ms Ming Sassoon, 32, who stopped consuming shark's fin soup when she took up diving 10 years ago: 'People's attitudes have definitely changed in the last 10 years. There is hope people will stop eating it. But I don't think it'll happen in the next 20 years.'

An estimated 100 million sharks are killed each year, mostly for their fins. About a third of shark species are threatened with extinction - the hammerhead and the oceanic whitetip being two examples - with numbers down by 90 per cent in some waters.

'Sharks have been in the ocean for 450 million years, but in the last 20 years they have been driven towards extinction due to greed, apathy and ignorance. Attitudes must change if we want to save the sharks and the ocean's ecosystem,' said Mr Heinrichs.


Read more!

NGOs: Better to teach people about Redang's beauty

The Star 10 Apr 10;

PETALING JAYA: Several non-profit environmental organisations have spoken out against the Terengganu government’s plan to turn Pulau Redang into a high-end, exclusive getaway for the rich, saying educating the people about preservation was more vital.

Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) said that educating the people on the importance of preserving the diving haven’s natural beauty and adhering to a strict enforcement of guidelines would be a better move.

“MNS is of the opinion that there should be no further development on the island except to improve and review certain amenities and introduce the best practices for the island,” it said in a statement yesterday.

The body expressed concern about over-development which had taken a toll on the island, especially in waste management and the health of corals in certain areas of the island.

“Having informed visitors to the island is one of the ways we can protect Redang’s national heritage,” MNS said.

MNS communications head Andrew Sebastian said he was worried that the “carrying capacity” of Pulau Redang may had been exceeded.

If there were too many visitors on the island, the fresh water supply may be used up sooner, he said.

“Also, if raising prices is to control the number of people going there, MNS supports the move if the money is used to help smaller operators put in the appropriate systems to prevent pollution,” he said.

On Thursday, Terengganu Mentri Besar Datuk Ahmad Said announced that the island would be turned into an exclusive getaway with rooms starting from US$500 (RM1,600) per night.

Ahmad said the move was to control the number of people who visited Pulau Redang in order to save the island’s rich marine life and prevent environmental destruction due to pollution and littering.

He added that only hotels rated five-star and above would be allowed to be built, adding that the state government would no longer approve the construction of chalet-type accommodations on the island. Existing chalets would also have to upgrade and raise their rates to match the high-end destination decision.

Reef Check Malaysia, another non-profit organisation that looks into coral conservation, said the Government should not waste money building new resorts but have stricter enforcement and policies instead.

Its Eco Action Programme manager Ummi Haslinda Mohd Rosli said a centralised sewage treatment should be built, adding that there should also be compost machines for solid waste to be shared by all resorts.

“These are some of the ways to improve the environment of the islands,” she said, adding: “We can also monitor the number of tourists visiting the island and impose strict fines on tourists and locals who fish at restricted areas. Enforcement officers need to be vigilant in punishing those who litter.”

Ummi Haslinda said it was just not enough to post signs to caution tourists and locals to not litter.

“It’s better to have a simple and improved eco-friendly environment than having islands swamped by big and expensive resorts that do not help conserve the marine environment,” she added.

Tourism Ministry gives the thumbs-up on high-end Redang
The Star 10 Apr 10;

PETALING JAYA: The Tourism Ministry has given the thumbs-up to the plan to turn Pulau Redang into a high-end destination as this is in line with the Government’s aim of increasing tourist spending.

Ministry secretary-general Datuk Ong Hong Peng said the Terengganu government’s plan was a good one, adding that it was also parallel to the objective of attracting high-end tourists.

“It will also be a measure to maintain sustainable tourist development on the island,” he said yesterday.

However, tourism organisations have expressed concern over the move as they believe it would adversely affect tourist arrivals.

Malaysian Association of Tour and Travel Agents (Matta) deputy president John Tan said the state should not take away what people had enjoyed for years.

“It is a good idea to have an island for the rich niche market but the approach is wrong,” he said in a telephone interview.

He said other islands near Pulau Redang could be developed as exclusive destinations instead of Pulau Redang which was immensely popular with both local and foreign tourists.

“How many people can afford to pay US$500 (RM1,600) per night? This will definitely affect tourism,” he said, pointing out that a big percentage of visitors to Pulau Redang were backpackers.

He said it was ironic that while the move was meant to protect the island’s surroundings, it turned out to be a slap in the Government’s face.

“The state government should not have approved the building of those budget chalets if they did not have a proper sewage system in the first place,” Tan said.

Malaysian Ecotourism Association secretary-general Lee Choon Loong said high prices for resorts did not necessarily mean high value.

“Visitors to Pulau Redang come to appreciate the marine flora and fauna. That is the value they want, not luxury hotels,” said Lee.

He said a high-value destination did not need to be expensive or branded, adding that Pulau Redang’s value came from its natural beauty.

“But the corals there are damaged and nobody will want to pay to see that. It will be like a scam,” he said.

Former Deputy Tourism Minister Datuk Donald Lim said there was no reason to restrict Pulau Redang to wealthy tourists.

He proposed a quota for high-end and budget tourists instead, if the reason was to control the number of tourists going to the island.

Decision on Redang does not go down well with divers
The Star 10 Apr 10;

PETALING JAYA: Divers gave the thumbs-down to the move to make Pulau Redang an exclusive getaway, saying that for half the RM1,599 a night accommodation proposed by the Terengganu government, a diver can now get a four-day trip including accommodation, food and diving activities.

They said budget travellers and divers would not be able go to the diving haven if it was made a high-end destination.

Diver Angeline Goh, 29, believed that the plan would not only turn divers away but also cause chalet operators to go bust.

“Diving operators look for cheap packages to take their clients. If it is expensive, they will move to other places like Tioman,” she said yesterday.

Another diver, Sean Phoon, 30, agreed that there was a need for conservation efforts but noted that hiking prices and making it an exclusive getaway was not the solution.

“The corals have deteriorated and there is a need to preserve the environment.

“You can preserve the environment by following Pulau Sipadan’s measures – limiting the number of people on the island. You cannot force existing chalets to hike up their prices and kill off these chalets by insisting on a ridiculous price tag,” he said.

Reconsider move on Redang, says Terengganu PAS
The Star 10 Apr 10;

KUALA TERENGGANU: Teren-gganu PAS is not in favour of Pulau Redang being turned into an exclusive island for affluent tourists while limiting budget travellers who now make up the bulk of tourists to the island.

The party’s state deputy commissioner Mohd Abdul Wahid Endut urged the state to reconsider the move as it would have a negative impact rather than being a boon for the island.

Eventually, Redang would end up like Monaco which was commonly referred to as the Las Vegas of Europe as such exclusivity normally encouraged gambling and vice-related activities, he said here yesterday.

Mohd Abdul Wahid said the state government could designate one stretch of the island as a gateway for affluent holidaymakers without disregarding tourists on shoestring budgets.

He said the state should also consider the welfare of the locals who depended on budget travellers for a livelihood.

He said locals rented out chalets to holidaymakers on limited budgets to make ends meet and they would not be able to do so if only the rich went to the island.

Pulau Redang Petty Traders Association spokesman Mohd Idrus Mohd Amin, 46, said the state government should outline a mechanism to assist them before enforcing the move.


Read more!

Plantation firms to produce biodiesel for Pertamina

Nani Afrida, The Jakarta Post 9 Apr 10;

Three state plantation firms – PT Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) III, IV and V — will begin the construction of three biodiesel plants in Dumai, Riau province, before the second half of the year starts.

The three plants are expected to absorb Rp 400 billion in total investment.

“The plants will be finished in the next 18 months. In 2012 the plants will start producing biodiesel,” PTPN IV president director Dahlan Harahap said on the sidelines of the signing of an MoU between the three firms with state oil and gas producer PT Pertamina on Thursday.

Pertamina has agreed to purchase the biodiesel from the plants and to prepare a storage facility for the biodiesel at the port in Dumai.

Dahlan said each of the plants has a capacity to process 100,000 tons of oil palm fruit bunches (TBS) annually. The capacity is expected to be doubled by 2014.

“If the demand keeps increasing, the capacity may jump to 1 million tons of TBS every year,” he said.
Dahlan said about 30 percent of the investment needed to construct the plants would come from the companies’ internal cash flow and the rest from bank loans.

Biofuel is currently being sold to retail customers. In 2008, Pertamina had 279 petrol stations selling biofuel while PLN has also used biofuel to help power nine of its power stations. These nine stations have a total capacity of 96 megawatts (MW).

Currently Indonesia has produced two types of biofuel: bioethanol — made from cassava, sugarcane and sweet sorghum, and biodiesel — made from castor, crude palm oil and jatropha.

By 2015, Indonesia plans to have 10 million hectares of palm oil plantations, up from 7.9 million today.

According to studies by state plantation companies, there are 44 million hectares of land in the country ideal for palm oil plantation. Using conservative yield estimates, this area of oil palm plantation could produce 145 billion liters per year of biodiesel, or 10 percent of current fossil diesel demand.

Besides planning to produce biodiesel, the state plantation firms also plan to produce electricity from biomass-generated power plants and sell it to state electricity company PT PLN.

To produce electricity power in the CPO factories, one factory will require between Rp 30 billion and Rp 40 billion in investment. Dahlan said PTPN IV currently operates 50 factories, with each one potentially able to generate 3 MW of power from biomass, mostly from the Empty Fruit Bunches (EFB) and any other available biomass waste.

PLN will be obtaining electric power from CPO plantations from power generated from biomass (EFBs) while Pertamina will obtain biofuel processed from the CPO itself.

“At the present, only two factories are ready to produce 6 MW in total of electricity power,” he said.
CPO is playing an increasingly important role in Indonesia today with the demand for the product increasing which not only for food consumption and other uses but also as an energy supply crop.

The Indonesian Palm Oil Producers Association (GAPKI), consists of about 370 CPO producer firms making use of about 2.4 million hectares of oil palm plantations. They, along with many smaller farmers, are aiming to produce at least 25 million tons of CPO this year, up by 25 percent from last year’s production target of 20 million tons.


Read more!

NGOs collect data for Indonesian President’s taskforce on illegal logging

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 9 Apr 10;

Several environmental NGOs met Thursday to compile data on illegal logging activities at the request of the President, who has ordered sterner action against the environmental threat.

The NGOs included Greenpeace Indonesia, WWF Indonesia, Forest Watch Indonesia, Sawit Watch Indonesia, Conservation International, Tropenbos Indonesia, the Nature Conservancy and the Center for International Forestry Research.

“We asked them to supply data on illegal logging. This will be a good chance for the activists to help the government battle illegal logging,” Agus Purnomo, special assistant on climate change to President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, told The Jakarta Post on Thursday.

Agus said he would compile a list of measures to combat illegal logging and hand it to Yudhoyono when the President returned home from his trip to Vietnam.

President Yudhoyono ordered the presidential taskforce against judiciary corruption to launch an in-
vestigation into illegal logging syndicates before he left on his visit to Vietnam for the ASEAN Summit, which will discuss climate change issues.

The President said illegal logging was still rampant due to corruption within the forestry sector.
Indonesia, the world’s third-largest forest nation, home to about 120 million hectares of rainforest, has never passed a special law on illegal logging.

In 2005, the President issued an instruction tasking 18 departments under the Coordinating Political, Legal and Security Affairs Ministry to combat illegal logging.

A working group was then set up to monitor and evaluate illegal logging, but it has yet to publicly announce the names of any major perpetrators.

The Forestry Ministry has repeatedly claimed the number of illegal logging cases has dropped since former minister M.S. Kaban left office.

Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan said his office had set a target of reducing illegal logging cases to 12 or less per year. The latest data shows 700 cases were reported in 2008.

The ministry predicted the country suffers financial losses of at least Rp 30 trillion (US$3 billion) per year due to the crime.

US-based Human Rights Watch said Indonesia had suffered $2 billion in potential tax losses between 2003 and 2006 due to illegal logging
Indonesia Corruption Watch together with other activists from Walhi and Sawit Watch Indonesia earlier asked the Corruption Eradication Commission to investigate corruption in the forestry industry.

Environment Minister Gusti Muhammad Hatta agreed illegal logging remained rife in the country, adding that some forest concession holders were allegedly involved in illegal logging activities.

“Before taking office, I found a number of concessionaires conducting illegal logging on their own land. They cut down big trees even though this violated their annual working plan,” he said.
He said concessionaires were allowed to cut down a maximum of 80 percent of trees in their concession areas.

The 2009 Environmental Law invests the Environment Ministry with the power to revoke business permits for companies seen to be damaging the environment.

Executive director of Greenomics Indonesia, Elfian Effendi, said that Yudhoyono’s recent order to tackle illegal logging proved that the 2005 presidential instruction had accomplished little in the last five years.


Read more!

Malaysian Loggers Try to Improve Their Image

Liz Gooch, New York Times 9 Apr 10;

TEMERLOH, MALAYSIA — Huge meranti tree trunks, many of them destined for faraway shores, are piled up high along the road in this town about a two-hour drive northeast of Kuala Lumpur, awaiting their date with the saw.

Steps away, inside the Maran Road Sawmill workers nimbly slice lengths of timber into thinner strips, adding to the blanket of ochre dust beneath them.

All the logs have numbers scrawled on their ends, indicating the area they came from, plus the sawmill’s license number — assuring buyers that the wood was harvested legally and could be traced to its source.

As band saws droned on a recent Friday, the mill director, Ng Kay Yip, ushered a potential customer from the Netherlands around the facility, explaining how the trees had been harvested and showing him the nearby factory, where the timber is planed into semifinished pieces for windows and doors.

Europe is already an important export market for the company, but Mr. Ng and others in the timber industry here are hoping that even more traders from Europe will soon knock on their doors. Malaysia is working to become the first country in Asia to sign a voluntary agreement with the European Union guaranteeing that all timber exports to the bloc have been harvested legally.

The Union says the agreement is likely to give Malaysia, and other countries that sign similar pacts, a competitive advantage as the bloc pushes for tighter regulation of timber imports because of environmental concerns. Last year, countries in the 27-member Union imported wood, wood charcoal and cork worth an estimated €8.5 billion, or $11.4 billion, 4.6 percent of it from Malaysia.

Uncontrolled logging can destroy animal habitats, cause erosion and increase the risk of natural disasters like floods and landslides, contribute to deforestation and climate change, and deprive governments of tax revenue. A report by the World Wide Fund For Nature estimated that illegally harvested timber accounted for as much as 19 percent of the Union’s wood imports in 2006, with Russia and Indonesia the main culprits.

The Union has no region-wide law preventing the importation of illegally logged wood products, although in response to consumer demand, some companies voluntarily buy timber from sources certified by various groups as sustainable. The Union is considering legislation that would require all importers in the bloc — from furniture companies to those buying raw materials like boards — to conduct due diligence to show that the timber they bought had been legally harvested.

A draft of the measure being negotiated in Brussels says importers would have to know the origin of timber and take steps to minimize the risk that it was illegally harvested.

Companies importing from countries that have signed a voluntary partnership agreement, like the one being negotiated with Malaysia, would be given a “green lane” for entry into E.U. markets and would be exempt from further checks. “There’s no doubt that this will create an advantage for the timber traders on the E.U. market,” said Vincent Piket, head of the Union’s delegation to Malaysia.

Under its Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade action plan, the bloc has already signed agreements with Ghana, the Republic of Congo and Cameroon. In addition to Malaysia, negotiations are under way with Indonesia, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon and Liberia. The Union has not begun negotiations on an agreement with China — the biggest exporter of timber to the Union — but the two sides signed a cooperation pact last year that was intended to reduce unlawful logging and trade in illegal timber.

Under the voluntary partnership agreements, source countries are responsible for determining that the timber has been harvested according to their national laws and the criteria in the E.U. agreements. While the agreements may vary among countries, requirements typically include that trees not be cut from protected forests, that endangered species not be logged and that companies comply with trade and customs regulations.

A third-party monitor, like an independent auditing company, would conduct spot checks to ensure compliance.

Whether such agreements will significantly decrease illegal logging, however, remains to be seen.

“It’s a very positive step, the idea of introducing these structural changes by requiring companies to use control systems, but we believe that it’s not enough,” Sebastien Risso, forest policy director at Greenpeace’s European Unit, said by telephone from Brussels.

Companies should be compelled to show a product’s complete chain of custody, he said, documenting its journey from the forest to its final destination.

Rupert Oliver, director of Forest Industries Intelligence, a British consulting company, said the proposed Union legislation could result in the sale of illegal timber to other countries that lack strict rules on timber imports, like China and India.

“It doesn’t really get to the root cause of the problem,” he said. “It shifts the problem elsewhere.”

Mr. Oliver added that the proposed Union legislation was not as tough as the U.S. law known as the Lacey Act, under which companies can be criminally prosecuted for importing illegal timber. The draft E.U. law does not stipulate the level of penalties to be imposed on those involved in importing illegal timber, leaving it to the member states to determine the penalties.

Ivy Wong Abdullah, forest conservation senior manager at WWF Malaysia, said that no statistics were available on the extent of illegal logging in Malaysia but that “sporadic instances” were still being detected. For example, just last month, the authorities discovered hundreds of fallen trees in a suspected case of illegal logging on the border of Perak and Pahang States, the Malaysian national news agency, Bernama, reported.

Ms. Wong Abdullah said that while Malaysia had strong laws against illegal logging, “there’s a need for more enforcement personnel on the ground.”

Malaysia’s timber industry already has several voluntary programs for certifying that timber is legally and sustainably harvested, with sawmills and other businesses participating to make their products more appealing to buyers concerned about environmental issues. Once the pact with the E.U. is signed, all timber companies will be compelled to comply with the criteria.

Saskia Ozinga, the campaign coordinator at FERN, a Brussels-based nongovernment organization that monitors E.U. forest policies, said there had been some resistance to the agreement from Sarawak State in Malaysia over a requirement that the land rights of indigenous people be respected.

While the Malaysian authorities say that the industry still has some concerns that need to be resolved, both the Union and Malaysia expect to sign the agreement this year.

Malaysian environmental groups have welcomed the proposed agreement but say sustainability issues as well as legal ones must be addressed.

Ms. Wong Abdullah said that while some of the current voluntary certification systems require operators to address sustainability issues, including assessment of an area’s conservation value, the draft E.U. agreement focused on the “bare legal minimum” requirements for logging in Malaysia.

Europe is Malaysia’s second-largest timber export market after Japan, with 2.67 billion ringgit, or $834 million, in sales of timber and timber products in 2009. Furniture, sawn timber, moldings, plywood, doors and flooring materials are among the main exports. Meranti, the timber at the Temerloh mill, is an important hardwood that grows in the tropical forests of Asia and is used in light construction and veneers

Jalaluddin Harun, director general of the Malaysian Timber Industry Board, said Malaysia was committed to fighting illegal logging and had decided to pursue the agreement with Europe to ensure that timber traders continue to have unhindered access to E.U. buyers.

“We want to ensure that our timber continues to be exported without having to be re-evaluated,” he said. “In Malaysia we would like to have the image of selling or trading in legal timber.”


Read more!

Message On Green Living Hits Home for Muslims in Indonesia

Fidelis E. Satriastanti, Jakarta Globe 9 Apr 10;

Are you sick of accords and protocols on fighting global warming that never produce anything tangible?

If you are Muslim, then you should take the issue into your own hands every day, Islamic scholars heard on Friday, as 120 participants from 14 countries met at an international Islamic conference on climate change, in Bogor, West Java.

Emil Salim, a presidential adviser on the environment and sustainable development, told the conference, titled Muslim Action for Climate Change, that the lack of awareness of environmental issues in Muslim countries was alarming.

The former environment minister said many Muslims live their lives only from a religious point of view, without considering other issues addressed by Islam, including maintaining one’s home and land well.

“One primary point of view is to embody friendliness toward ecology,” Emil said, adding that an Islamic boarding school in West Java had initiated programs like planting trees as a means of preserving fresh water, which Muslims use to wash before praying.

Emil was addressing conference attendees from Egypt, Britain and Jordan, as well as 90 Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. The two-day conference ends today and will see scholars discuss what Muslims can do to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

A meeting of leaders in Turkey in 2009 agreed to spend seven years coming up with ways to protect the environment, according to the Alliance of Religions and Conservation Web site.

The project is investigating every level of Muslim activity, from daily life to annual pilgrimages, from holy cities to the future training of imams, the Web site says.

The proposals include developing major Muslim cities as green models, building eco-friendly mosques and developing an Islamic labels for environmentally friendly goods.

The proposals will be managed through umbrella organization the Muslim Associations for Climate Change Action. There have been proposals to ban plastic bottles during the hajj and build mosques designed to conserve energy, but they have yet to be implemented on a major scale.

Fazlun Khalid, founder of the Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, slammed the failure of agreements on global warming.

“We have so many climate change negotiations and agreements. Not one of them gets very far. Remember the Copenhagen Accord or even the Kyoto Protocol? Not one turned into real action,” Fazlun said. “Real action is when you make it real in your own home.”


Read more!