EU fails to pledge climate aid to poor nations

Yahoo News 3 Mar 09;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – EU environment ministers on Monday failed to agree on how to support poorer nations to fund the fight against climate change, and kicked the problem upstairs to the heads of state and government.

"We were not quite able to reach consensus on the financing mechanism. This is an issue where the (EU) council (of nations) will need more discussion time," EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas, said after an elongated meeting of EU environment ministers in Brussels.

Czech deputy environment minister Jan Dursik said that "one nation wanted to keep all the options open", without naming it.

It emerged that the dissenting nation was Poland, which continued talks with the EU presidency long after some other delegations had already left the talks.

The unresolved matter will now go to EU finance ministers at their March 10 meeting before ending up in the laps of the 27 heads of state and government at the next European Union summit on March 19-20.

The EU ministers agreed that it would take 175 billion euros per year in 2020.

EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said half of that amount would need to be found for developing nations.

Greenpeace slammed the EU's failure to help out.

"Environment ministers have ducked and passed the climate funding hot potato to finance ministers," said Greenpeace EU climate and energy policy director Joris den Blanken.

"While billions of taxpayers' money is being used to prop up failed banks and carmakers, not one euro cent is being pledged to help the developing world tackle a problem that Europeans helped create," he added.

Greenpeace and other NGOs have said the European Union should be contributing around 35 billion euros.

EU Inches Towards Climate Funding For Poor Nations
Pete Harrison, PlanetArk 3 Mar 09;

BRUSSELS - European environment ministers inched towards agreeing how to raise billions of dollars to help poor countries prepare for global warming and to coax them into a global deal to tackle the problem.

But cracks started to emerge on Monday among the European Union's 27 nations on how to split the burden of finance, and whether it would be wise to name a figure early in the game.

Success at global talks in December in Copenhagen to find a successor to the Kyoto protocol will largely hinge on whether developing nations can be persuaded to try to curb emissions of greenhouse gases to alleviate a problem they say has been caused by industrialised nations.

Europe and the United States are seen as the main donors.

"It makes no sense to say now how much the EU is willing to transfer," Germany's Sigmar Gabriel told reporters. "We will negotiate that in Copenhagen. We are creeping towards a number."

Global investment to fight climate change will need to rise to around 175 billion euros ($220 billion) per year by 2020, with over 90 billion of that spent in developing countries, says an EU report.

Campaign group Greenpeace says Europe's nineteenth century industrial revolution was a major contributor to global warming and has called on the EU to contribute around 35 billion euros a year by 2020.

Some EU countries, including Italy, are pushing to have the numbers dropped from the EU's negotiating position, documents show. Others, including Germany, feel they are necessary to win the backing of poor nations.

Greenpeace campaigner Joris den Blanken warned: "This could again paralyse UN climate negotiations. Last year, it became clear negotiations didn't move forward because the EU hadn't done its homework on financial support."

Two funding routes were considered on Monday: money raised through the auction of pollution permits in carbon markets around the world, or a mechanism whereby funds are levied according to a country's economic strength, population growth and emissions.

Countries that rely on highly-polluting coal, like Poland, will reject any attempt to link contributions to the level of emissions, a Polish diplomat said.

Martin Bursik, environment minister for the EU's Czech presidency, said nothing could be certain without knowing the position of the United States.

"We are still waiting on the United States, that they provide us the mid-term targets and that they will adopt the cap-and-trade system and talk about their money," he said.

(Additional reporting by Ilona Wissenbach; editing by Andrew Roche)