Green groups unveil ideal 'Copenhagen Climate Treaty'

Yahoo News 8 Jun 09;

The proposals would also widen binding cuts in greenhouse gas emissions to newly industrialized countries -- such as Singapore, South Korea and Saudi Arabia. They are exempt from caps under the existing Kyoto Protocol

PARIS (AFP) – An alliance of green groups on Monday unveiled their ideal for a new climate treaty, calling on rich nations to slash their carbon pollution by more than 40 percent by 2020 and by 95 percent by 2050.

Their envisioned "Copenhagen Climate Treaty" was released at the latest staging post in UN talks towards a real-life pact, designed to be completed in the Danish capital in December.

"Industrialised countries, as a group, should commit to an emissions pathway that includes targets for industrial greenhouse gases of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020," the 50-page text said.

Written by 50 climate experts working with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) such as Greenpeace and WWF International, the mock treaty challenges all 192 countries -- especially rich economies -- to set more ambitious goals for cutting CO2 output.

It also calls on rich nations to cough up at least 160 billion dollars (115 billion euros) per year from 2013 through 2017 to help poor countries to cut their own emissions and adapt to the warming already underway.

It says developing countries -- including major carbon polluters China and India -- should slow the growth of their CO2 emissions through national policies, but does not set any firm targets.

The goal of a 40-percent cut by rich nations goes far beyond what any advanced economy has offered.

The European Union has committed to a 20-percent reduction by 2020, deepened to 30 percent if others follow suit.

The United States, under President Barack Obama, has proposed a reduction of 14 percent by 2020, but uses a less ambitious benchmark year of 2005, which translates into a cut of around four percent compared with 1990.

It has also called prospects for a 40-percent cut by the US "unrealistic."

The greens' long-term target of a 95-percent cut by 2050 compares with a goal of 80 percent set by the EU and the United States.

Damien Demailly of WWF International said the NGOs' "treaty" was feasible and hoped it would speed up negotiations, with less than six months left on the clock.

"Every country will find things (in the text) they don't like but which are compensated by other things," he said.

The proposals are entirely within the existing format of talks and do not seek to "revolutionise" negotiations, he said.

More than 4,000 delegates are gathered in Bonn until June 12 to hammer out the parameters for a negotiation blueprint.

In its current state, the text on the table is little more than a compilation of positions, which vary widely on almost every key point.

There is no consensus among climate scientists about what is a safe level of warming, but many have urged policymakers to peg the rise to no more than two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

This would require cuts of between 25 and 40 percent by rich countries by 2020, but would also require a brake in the growth of emissions by the emerging giants, according the the UN's panel of climate scientists.

Greens' U.N. climate advice: slash CO2, pay $160 billion
Alister Doyle, Reuters 8 Jun 09;

OSLO (Reuters) - Environmental activists called on Monday for deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and for developed nations to pay $160 billion a year to help the poor as part of a radical new U.N. climate treaty.

"It's going to be unpopular with almost everyone," said Tasneem Essop, of WWF International, of the blueprint issued on the sidelines of 181-nation U.N. talks in Bonn about a U.N. pact to be agreed in December in Copenhagen.

"But we need more ambitious targets," she told Reuters of the draft, written by almost 50 leading environmentalists and with the backing of groups including WWF, Greenpeace, Germanwatch and the David Suzuki Foundation.

The suggested treaty would impose a peak on fast-rising world emissions of heat-trapping gases by about 2015 and then oblige cuts to limit a rise in temperatures to less than 2 Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times.

"Climate change is the most important issue facing the planet and its people today," the text begins. Curbs outlined in the 42-page draft are much tougher than those on offer at the June 1-12 meeting, by either rich and poor countries.

And it called on industrialized countries to raise at least $160 billion a year from 2013-2017, mainly via auctioning of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions allowances, to help developing nations cope with climate change.

"It could be motivating to delegates to give them a vision," said Bill Hare of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research who worked for many years for Greenpeace. "There are quite heavy commitments required of the major emitters."

The text said the world should agree a "global carbon budget" -- the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted each year -- and cut global emissions back to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 80 percent below 1990 by 2050.

CARBON MARKETS

It also suggested creation of a "Copenhagen Climate Facility" to oversee everything from plans to curb emissions to preservation of forests that soak up greenhouse gases. It also called for a new authority to oversee carbon markets.

The proposal said that all rich nations should work out zero carbon action plans, or "z-caps" to cut emissions, relative to 1990 levels, by 40 percent by 2020 and by at least 95 percent by 2050. Developing nations' emissions should peak before 2020.

By contrast, U.S. President Barack Obama's goals are less ambitious -- he wants to cut U.S. emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and by 80 percent below by 2050. U.S. emissions were 14 percent above 1990 levels in 2007.

China and many developing nations have not set a peak year for emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels that are blamed by a U.N. panel of scientists for stoking warming set to cause more heat waves, droughts, floods and more powerful storms.

The proposals would also widen binding cuts in greenhouse gas emissions to newly industrialized countries -- such as Singapore, South Korea and Saudi Arabia. They are exempt from caps under the existing Kyoto Protocol.