Reactions to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate scientists and investors

Climate scientists underwhelmed by Copenhagen Accord
Marlowe Hood Yahoo News 19 Dec 09;

COPENHAGEN (AFP) – Top climate scientists said Saturday that the eleventh-hour political deal hammered out at UN talks in Copenhagen falls perilously short of what is needed to stave off catastrophic global warming.

What many had hoped would be a planet-saving treaty locking major economies into strong commitments to shrink their carbon footprints came out as a three-page political accord with key numbers yet to be filled in.

"The easiest yardstick to evaluate is the two degree target," said Andrew Watson, a professor at the University of East Anglia in Britain.

"This agreement will almost certainly not be sufficient to enable that target to be met -- legally-binding tough limits in place over the next few years would be needed for that," he told AFP by email.

The Nobel-winning UN science panel warned in a benchmark 2007 report that if average temperatures increase by more than 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) on pre-industrial levels, it could lead to runaway climate change and severe impact.

We have already travelled 0.7 C along that path.

More recent studies suggest the planet could hot up by a devastating 6.0 C (10.8 F), and that sea levels could rise by more than a metre (3.25 feet) by 2100 unless we slash CO2 concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere.

Such a hothouse scenario would create hundreds of millions of environmental refugees.

"Strictly speaking, it is a disappointment. We expected more," French climate scientist Herve Le Treut said of the new accord.

"What we have seen is the diverging interests of nation states and the planet."

Part of the problem is that most of the key mitigation targets have yet to be finalised.

"There is not much here to analyse. The accord doesn't have specific emissions targets for industrial countries, it doesn't have deviation from 'business as usual' goals for developing countries," said Alden Meyer of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists.

"If you look at what is likely going to be listed in the annexes, you are going to be well over a 3.0 C," he told AFP. "The accord also fails to set a target for 'peak year' for global CO2 emissions, ideally around 2015.

"It is very critical that you get a peak and a decline starting soon," he added.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer made much the same point in closing out the 13-day marathon meeting: "The opportunity to actually make it into the scientific window of opportunity is getting smaller and smaller."

The deal does contain a few silver linings, the scientists said.

"At least it may signal that there is some willingness to take action, so that we might have a hope of limiting the rise to 3.0 C - 4.0 C, and avoid the really unknown territory that lies beyond that," Watson said.

Le Treut agreed.

"It is too early to say it is a failure," he told AFP. "The scientific community had set the bar very high: halving global CO2 emissions by mid-century will be very tough."

That goal, embraced by rich nations, was dropped from early drafts of the accord due to objections from China and India, the world's number one and number three carbon emitters.

"From the evidence of the last two weeks, I would say we have a heck of a long way still to go if, as a species, we are to avoid the fate that usually afflicts populations that outgrow their resources," said Watson.


Investors give cautious thumbs up to climate deal
Gerard Wynn and Michael Szabo - Analysis, Reuters 19 Dec 09;

COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - Businesses and investment analysts cautiously welcomed a climate deal struck in Copenhagen on Friday, but complained that it was unclear how its commitments would be translated into law.

The private sector is expected to supply most capital to drive a global shift to a greener economy away from burning fossil fuels.

Businesses and in particular the energy sector say they need clear carbon targets so that they can invest appropriately -- for example in power plants which may last for more than 40 years.

The world's biggest carbon emitters agreed on Friday in the Danish capital that the world should limit warming to no more than 2 degrees Celsius, and raise $100 billion annually by 2020 to help developing countries fight climate change.

Business analysts applauded how the agreement involved the major economies for the first time in making commitments to curb emissions -- cementing a global shift to a low-carbon world.

The present Kyoto Protocol only binds industrialized countries, with the exception of the United States.

"The implications for investment flows is very clear, we're irreversibly on a low-carbon path," said Abyd Karmali, head of emissions trading at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

"That should give comfort to people who are investing in low-carbon technology." "For the first time you've got all the major economies making real commitments to reducing their emissions," said Mark Kenber, policy director at the Climate Group.

"While expectations were low for a binding agreement to come out of Copenhagen, today's deal marks a promising milestone by major countries coming together to form an agreement," said Amit Chatterjee, CEO and founder of environmental software company Hara.

But the new agreement was not legally binding, and left unclear the status of any future agreement.

"Businesses will now look to national governments to put their pledges into law to give them the certainty to invest in a low-carbon future," said Kenber.

"I think business will be happy with the content but will want it put in national law and international treaty."

CARBON MARKET

Friday's agreement said that global warming should be limited to 2 degrees, but its pledges wouldn't deliver that commitment, European Union negotiators said.

Strong carbon cuts drive demand for emissions permits -- the currency of carbon markets.

Friday's agreement was just enough to drive continuing demand for such permits, and healthy carbon prices, analysts said. "It's just enough ambition to develop an adequate carbon price," said Kenber.

But the accord wasn't ambitious enough to persuade the European Union to increase its carbon cutting target to a 30 percent cut by 2020 versus 1990 levels from a 20 percent cut.

Strong carbon commitments discourage energy companies from emitting greenhouse gases, for example from burning coal in power plants.

"This allows us to fight another day," said Steve Sawyer, Secretary-General of the Global Wind Energy Council, responding to the Copenhagen Accord.

"It doesn't say how it would facilitate private financing under the agreement. It may alter the landscape, but not in a way we can quantify at this time."

And the deal was too vague to assure continuation of trade in carbon emissions permits between countries -- where rich nations pay for carbon cuts in developing countries and get carbon offsets in return.

"Business has been looking for more clarity on climate policy and carbon pricing but it hasn't got it from Copenhagen," said Jonathan Grant, from financial advisory firm PwC.

Carbon offsets, also called certified emissions reductions (CERs), are traded under a Kyoto Protocol scheme called the clean development mechanism (CDM).

"For the CER market there's much more uncertainty given the question marks over the reform of CDM. It's not mentioned in this text," said Karmali, referring to the Copenhagen Accord.

However the United States has given strong support for carbon offsets in draft climate bills, he added, giving some assurance to the future of those markets.