UN wildlife trade agency backs ban on bluefin tuna

Peter Capella Yahoo News 5 Feb 10;

GENEVA (AFP) – The UN-backed wildlife trade agency said Friday it supported a proposed ban on the international trade in bluefin tuna, a delicacy in Asia, which is due to be examined by 175 countries next month.

"We are recommending that the parties approve the proposals made by Monaco," said David Morgan, head of the scientific support unit at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

Japan has opposed the ban proposed by Monaco, which would classify the fish as a species threatened with extinction, CITES officials said.

France this week lent its support to the proposals under certain conditions despite strong opposition among its Mediterranean fishing fleets, paving the way for European Union backing, officials said.

EU, US and Palau proposals to limit international trade in some types of sharks are also due to be examined when CITES holds its three-yearly meeting in Qatar on March 13 to 25.

Tanzania and Zambia are meanwhile asking for a trade embargo on ivory to be eased, allowing them to sell controlled quantities of elephants' tusks, the agency said in a statement.

However, Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Rwanda and Sierra Leone want to take the opposite step, to reinforce a ban by imposing a 20-year moratorium on any proposals to relax trade in African elephants.

European Union states are seeking restrictions on the trade in red or pink corals, among some 40 proposals on the conservation of animal, reptiles, insects or plants that are due to be decided on by CITES member states in Qatar.

"The marine theme of this year's CITES conference is particularly striking," said the agency's Secretary General Willem Wijnstekers.

Morgan told journalists that bluefin tuna met the criteria for inclusion in the top grade appendix one -- which bans cross border trade of a species outright and classifies it as endangered -- notably because of a general 80 percent decline in its stocks.

Currently bluefin tuna, found in parts of the Atlantic and Mediterranean, is subject to fishing quotas of about 20,000 tonnes a year, but its stocks are highly prized.

A single fish, weighing about 650 kilogrammes, can currently fetch up to 120,000 dollars, according to CITES.

Morgan said CITES secretariat had carefully weighed up scientific evidence in making its recommendation on bluefin.

"Our opinion is that the criteria for including these species in appendix one are met and international trade should be prohibited," he explained.

Unusually, Monaco's proposals would also set up a special CITES committee that could recommend a quick change if stocks recover.

But Morgan said there had been little sign of a "rebound" in the species in West Atlantic, despite a broad halt to fishing there from the mid 1980s.

"It's not going to be instantaneous, the decline has occurred for the past 40 years or so," he added.

Species including vicuna, a type of lama prized for its furs, and some crocodiles, have been downgraded in recent years due to the success of conservation measures helped by trade restrictions, said CITES official Juan Carlos Vasquez.

Countries in the convention have to approve any changes in the listings of protected wildlife.

CITES currently regulates trade in some 34,000 species as well as ingredients or objects derived from them, including ivory carvings, substances added to lipsticks, hairs used in brushes.

Morgan said CITES secretariat had decided not to back a US proposal to ban any international trade in polar bears because scientific criteria had not been met. Washington argues that polar bears are threatened by climate change.

U.N. agency backs bluefin tuna ban, vote due in March
Stephanie Nebehay, Reuters 5 Feb 10;

GENEVA (Reuters) - A United Nations scientific agency backed on Friday a proposal to ban international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna, saying the species prized by sushi lovers needed to recover from commercial overfishing.

Monaco had proposed protecting bluefin tuna, which can fetch up to $100,000 in Japan, by listing it under appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

"In our opinion, the criteria for including the species in appendix 1 are met and international commercial trade in bluefin tuna should be prohibited," David Morgan, head of CITES scientific unit, told a news briefing.

Some 175 countries are due to vote on 40 proposals during the CITES triennial meeting in Doha, Qatar, from March 13-25.

The Swiss-based treaty body, which regulates international trade in wildlife, seeks consensus on its regulations to conserve and manage sustainably 34,000 animal and plant species.

Some 530 animals species -- including all the great apes, cheetahs, the snow leopard, the tiger, and all sea turtles -- as well as 300 plants are on its appendix I banning international commercial trade in species deemed under threat of extinction.

But Japan strongly opposes the bluefin ban and in order for it to be adopted, a two-thirds majority is required.

Atlantic or northern bluefin tuna is found throughout the North Atlantic and its adjacent seas, particularly the Mediterranean, but also in the Gulf of Mexico and Straits of Florida. It can reach a weight of more than 650 kilos.

France, Italy and Spain account for half of the world's total allowable catch of bluefin tuna. Japan imports some 80 percent of the total catch.

LUXURY TUNA

The tuna currently fetch $200-$300 per kilo, according to a CITES document prepared for the Doha meeting.

"It is a very small part of the overall market of overall trade in tuna. It is the top end of the market, the luxury tuna," Morgan said.

"A great majority goes to Japan because prices are higher there. The Japanese are by far the biggest consumers, they have a key role in trade in these species."

Atlantic bluefin tuna stocks have declined by more than 80 percent since 1970, according to CITES, which estimates current stocks at 3.17 million.

The official quota for 2009 was 19,950 tonnes, set by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, but the true annual catch is estimated at around 50,000 tonnes.

France said on Wednesday it would support a ban on global trade in bluefin tuna, but only after an 18-month delay.

CITES rejected a separate proposal from the United States to impose a ban on international trade in polar bears and their skins due to their shrinking numbers and the threat posed by climate change to their ice platforms in many regions of the Arctic.

"There will be quite a controversy, this is an iconic species and there are lots of pressures from both sides. This has livelihood implications for indigenous people in Canada," said CITES spokesman Juan Carlos Vasquez.

(Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Noah Barkin)

Bluefin tuna main course of CITES world conference
UNEP 5 Feb 10;

175 Governments will also discuss urgent measures to tackle illegal wildlife trade and protect the livelihoods of the rural poor

Geneva, 5 February 2010 – New measures to conserve and manage sustainably the bluefin tuna, elephant populations and a wide range of sharks, corals, reptiles, insects and plants are being proposed by governments attending the next triennial world conference of the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

Over 40 proposals will be decided on in Doha, Qatar, from 13 to 25 March. Importantly, some governments propose to lift CITES regulations on some species, underlining the success of CITES in key areas 35 years after its entry into force.

Many of these proposals reflect growing international concern about the accelerating destruction of the world's marine and forest ecosystems through overfishing and excessive logging, and the potential impacts of climate change on the biological resources of the planet. The UN General Assembly has declared 2010 the international year of biodiversity and the CITES Conference will be one of the key occasions governments will have this year to take action to protect biodiversity.

Other issues on the agenda include the adoption of urgent measures to: tackle illegal trade in the tiger, rhinos and other species that are on the brink of extinction; address the potential impacts of CITES measures on the livelihoods of the rural poor, who are often on the frontlines of using and managing wildlife; and allocate sufficient financial resources to ensure that CITES goals are fully achieved. A substantial budget increase will be necessary to ensure proper implementation of the measures proposed for adoption in Doha. The current annual budget of the CITES Secretariat is about USD 5 million.

"2010 is a key year for biological diversity. It is the year when the world was supposed to have reversed the rate of loss of our biodiversity—this has not happened. The international community must re-engage and renew its efforts to meet this goal. CITES is an important part of this response. By ensuring that the international trade in wildlife is properly regulated, CITES can assist in conserving the planet's wild fauna and flora from overexploitation and thus contribute to the improved, sustainable management of these key natural assets", said Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, which administers the CITES Secretariat.

"The marine theme of this year's CITES conference is particularly striking", said CITES Secretary-General Willem Wijnstekers. "It confirms a trend that began in 2002. CITES is increasingly seen as a valuable tool to achieve the target of restoring depleted fish stocks by 2015 to levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield, as agreed at the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development".

Bluefin tuna and sharks

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the world's capture (non-aquaculture) fisheries produced 92 million tonnes of fish in 2006, of which 81.9 million came from the sea. The value of the total marine and freshwater catch at the first point of sale was around USD 91.2 billion. As a result, it is estimated that some 52 % of marine fish stocks or species groups are fully exploited, 19 % overexploited and 9 % depleted or recovering from depletion. The maximum wild capture fishing potential from the world's oceans has probably been reached, and a more closely controlled approach to fisheries is required (See ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0250e/i0250e.pdf)

A growing number of commercially exploited fish have come under CITES controls in recent years, for example: the basking and whale sharks were included in Appendix II in 2002, the great white shark and the humphead wrasse in 2004, and the European eel and sawfishes in 2007.

At the forthcoming conference, proposals will be made to bring eight commercially fished species under the purview of CITES.

Monaco is proposing a complete ban on international commercial trade in the bluefin tuna. (proposal 19). This iconic species can reach 3 metres in length and over 650 kg in weight. It can swim at nearly 40 km per hour and dive to 1,000 metres deep. It is highly sought after as a delicacy: in January 2010, a single fish was reportedly sold for over USD 120,000. Although it has been fished for many centuries, its populations in the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea have undergone very substantial declines in the last 40 years. Repeated efforts have been made to ensure more sustainable fishing, but now Monaco claims that it is time to bring the international trade to a halt to allow time for the species to recover.

The scalloped hammerhead shark (proposal 15) occurs widely in coastal warm temperate and tropical seas and is exploited extensively for its fins. Significant declines in the population of the species have been reported in many areas where it is caught. Two other species of hammerhead shark (great hammerhead and smooth hammerhead) and two further sharks (sandbar shark and dusky shark) have similar shaped fins, and the proponents, Palau and the United States of America, recommend that all these species be subject to CITES trade controls.

The same two countries are also proposing that trade CITES controls be applied to another shark, the oceanic whitetip (proposal 16), which, in spite of its wide range in tropical and subtropical waters, has declined in numbers wherever it has been harvested for its fins.

In total, several million sharks of these two species are estimated to be fished annually to supply the demand for fins.

The porbeagle shark (proposal 17) has equally experienced population declines, notably in the northern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, owing to unsustainable fishing for its high-value meat and fins. Palau and Sweden, on behalf of the European Community Member States, note the lack of consistent data on the global catch of this species. They argues that requiring CITES export permits will ensure that international markets are supplied by fish from sustainably managed fisheries that keep accurate records.

The spiny dogfish (proposal 18) is a small shark that was once abundant in temperate waters. It is now overexploited for its meat, which is highly valued in Europe (often sold in 'fish and chips' shops in the British Isles) and elsewhere. As many other sharks, it is particularly vulnerable to excessive fishing because of its slow reproductive rate. It also tends to travel in large schools of hundreds or thousands, which are easier for fishing boats to harvest them in large quantities. Palau and Sweden, on behalf of the European Community Member States , propose listing the spiny dogfish in Appendix II (which manages trade through a permit system) and establishing a sustainable fishery management programme for the species.

Corals

The most valuable of all the precious corals, red or pink corals (proposal 21) have been harvested for over 5,000 years and used for jewellery and other decorative items. These tiny marine animals (known as polyps) build vast colonies in the tropical, subtropical and temperate oceans. The resulting reefs and colonies create extremely valuable habitat for innumerable other species. But overharvesting and the destruction of entire colonies by bottom trawls and dredges have led to major population declines. The United States and Sweden, on behalf of the European Community Member States, propose adding the red or pink corals to Appendix II to control the trade therein.

The long-running debate on elephants and ivory

The long-running global debate over the African elephant has focused on the benefits that income from ivory sales may bring to conservation and to local communities living side by side with these large and potentially dangerous animals versus concerns that such sales may encourage poaching. This year's proposals (proposal 4, proposal 5 and proposal 6) again reflect opposing views on how best to improve the conservation and sustainable use of the world's largest land animal.

CITES banned the international commercial ivory trade in 1989. In 1997 and 2002, recognizing that some southern African elephant populations were healthy and well managed, it permitted Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe to sell some stocks of ivory to Japan totalling over 150 tons. The sales took place in 1999 and 2008 and earned some USD 20 million for elephant conservation and community development programmes within or adjacent to the elephant range.

At this year's conference, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia are seeking similar approval to sell government-owned stocks that have accumulated over the years. The United Republic of Tanzania has nearly 90 tons of such stock, and Zambia just over 21 tons.

Taking the opposite view, the Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Rwanda and Sierra Leone are proposing a halt to the limited international trade in African elephant ivory currently permitted and a 20-year moratorium on any proposals to relax international trade controls on African elephants.

Polar bear and other proposals

The potential threat to the polar bear from climate change has been much discussed recently, and the United States is seeking to increase its protection in CITES by completely prohibiting international commercial trade in the species (proposal 3). Mexico and Egypt are seeking to reduce CITES controls on the Morelet's crocodile and the Nile crocodile, respectively, as they believe that the status of these species in the wild has improved (proposal 8 and proposal 9). In contrast, Honduras and Guatemala are seeking to apply CITES controls to four species of spiny-tailed iguanas that are increasingly sought by hobbyists in other countries. (proposal 11 and proposal 12). The Plurinational State of Bolivia proposes that similar measures be adopted for the spectacular Satanas beetle (proposal 20), which is also sought by collectors.

Madagascar is seeking to include 12 endemic plants in Appendix II (proposals 22-24, 26, 27, 30, 32-36 and 39-41), while Brazil and Argentina propose the the same listing for the Brazilian rosewood (proposal 29) and the Palo Santo (proposal 42), respectively, two tree species that produce essential oils extensively used in perfumery and cosmetics.

Other proposals call for lifting all trade restrictions on certain species on the grounds that they no longer require such protection. These include the Marsh rose (proposal 37) and the Swartland sugarbush (proposal 38) from South Africa, and the North American bobcat or lynx (proposal 2).

Backgrounder: understanding CITES

Thousands of species of wild fauna and flora are used by people in their daily lives for food, housing, health care, cosmetics or fashion. CITES recognizes that commercial trade in these plants and animals may be beneficial both to conservation and to the livelihoods of local people.

However, unregulated wildlife trade can seriously affect species populations, especially those that are already vulnerable as a result of other factors, such as habitat loss. Governments responded to this concern by adopting CITES in 1973 to regulate international wildlife trade and ensure that it remains at a sustainable level. With 175 Parties, CITES remains one of the world's most powerful tools for biodiversity conservation through the regulation of trade in wild fauna and flora.

Even setting aside commercial fishing and the timber industry, international trade in wildlife remains a very lucrative business, estimated to be worth billions of dollars annually and to involve more than 350 million plant and animal specimens every year. Unregulated international trade can push threatened and endangered species over the brink, especially when combined with habitat loss and other pressures.

CITES provides three regulatory options in the form of Appendices. Animals and plants listed in Appendix I are prohibited from international commercial trade except in very special circumstances. Appendix I contains about 530 animal species and a little more than 300 plant species, including all the great apes, various big cats such as cheetahs, the snow leopard and the tiger, numerous birds of prey, cranes and pheasants, all sea turtles, many species of crocodiles, tortoises and snakes, and some cacti and orchids.

Commercial international trade is permitted for species listed in Appendix II, but it is strictly controlled on the basis of CITES permits. This Appendix II covers over 4,460 animal species and 28,000 plant species, including all those primates, cats, cetaceans, parrots, crocodiles and orchids not listed in Appendix I.

Finally, Appendix III includes species that are protected within the borders of a member country. By including a species in Appendix III, a country calls on others to help it regulate trade in the said species by making the issuance of a certificate of origin necessary to enter into trade. This Appendix lists over 290 species.

CITES, then, does much more than regulating trade in large charismatic mammals. It sets up a green certification system for non-detrimental wildlife trade (based on CITES permits and certificates), combats illegal trade and related wildlife offences, promotes international cooperation, and helps establish management plans so that range States can monitor and manage sustainably CITES-listed species.

CITES requires each member State to adopt the necessary national legislation and to designate a Management Authority that issues permits to trade. Governments must also designate a Scientific Authority to provide scientific advice on imports and exports. These national authorities are responsible for implementing CITES in close cooperation with Customs, wildlife enforcement, police or similar agencies.

As the impact of trade on a population or a species increases or decreases, the species can be added to the CITES Appendices, transferred from one Appendix to another, or removed from them.

These decisions are taken at the triennial CITES conferences and must be based on the best biological information available and on an analysis of how different types of protection can affect specific populations.

It is worth noting that when a species is transferred from Appendix I to Appendix II, its protection has not necessarily been 'downgraded'. Rather, it can be a sign of success that a species population has grown to the point where trade may be possible with strict oversight. In addition, by allowing a species to be commercially traded at sustainable levels, an Appendix-II listing can actually improve protection by giving local people a greater incentive to ensure the species' survival.

The CITES Secretariat produces recommendations on the proposals described above after analysing them against the various listing criteria. These criteria relate to: trade (is the species being actively traded? Is trade really the problem rather than, say, habitat destruction?); biology (what is the scientific evidence that populations are declining or increasing?); and other technical matters (e.g. has the proponent consulted thoroughly other range States?). <

UN Agency Backs Bluefin Tuna Ban, Vote Due In March
Stephanie Nebehay, PlanetArk 10 Feb 10;

GENEVA - A United Nations scientific agency backed on Friday a proposal to ban international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna, saying the species prized by sushi lovers needed to recover from commercial overfishing.

Monaco had proposed protecting bluefin tuna, which can fetch up to $100,000 in Japan, by listing it under appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

"In our opinion, the criteria for including the species in appendix 1 are met and international commercial trade in bluefin tuna should be prohibited," David Morgan, head of CITES scientific unit, told a news briefing.

Some 175 countries are due to vote on 40 proposals during the CITES triennial meeting in Doha, Qatar, from March 13-25.

The Swiss-based treaty body, which regulates international trade in wildlife, seeks consensus on its regulations to conserve and manage sustainably 34,000 animal and plant species.

Some 530 animals species -- including all the great apes, cheetahs, the snow leopard, the tiger, and all sea turtles -- as well as 300 plants are on its appendix I banning international commercial trade in species deemed under threat of extinction.

But Japan strongly opposes the bluefin ban and in order for it to be adopted, a two-thirds majority is required.

Atlantic or northern bluefin tuna is found throughout the North Atlantic and its adjacent seas, particularly the Mediterranean, but also in the Gulf of Mexico and Straits of Florida. It can reach a weight of more than 650 kilos.

France, Italy and Spain account for half of the world's total allowable catch of bluefin tuna. Japan imports some 80 percent of the total catch.

LUXURY TUNA

The tuna currently fetch $200-$300 per kilo, according to a CITES document prepared for the Doha meeting.

"It is a very small part of the overall market of overall trade in tuna. It is the top end of the market, the luxury tuna," Morgan said.

"A great majority goes to Japan because prices are higher there. The Japanese are by far the biggest consumers, they have a key role in trade in these species."

Atlantic bluefin tuna stocks have declined by more than 80 percent since 1970, according to CITES, which estimates current stocks at 3.17 million.

The official quota for 2009 was 19,950 tonnes, set by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, but the true annual catch is estimated at around 50,000 tonnes.

France said on Wednesday it would support a ban on global trade in bluefin tuna, but only after an 18-month delay. [ID:nLDE61217F]

CITES rejected a separate proposal from the United States to impose a ban on international trade in polar bears and their skins due to their shrinking numbers and the threat posed by climate change to their ice platforms in many regions of the Arctic.

"There will be quite a controversy, this is an iconic species and there are lots of pressures from both sides. This has livelihood implications for indigenous people in Canada," said CITES spokesman Juan Carlos Vasquez.

(Editing by Jonathan Lynn and Noah Barkin)