Conservationists unite to restore Britain’s parched wetlands

£2 million a year for restoring bogs and ponds
Lewis Smith, The Times 7 Jul 08;

Thousands of acres of bog and ponds are to be recreated as part of an initiative to restore ancient wetlands to the landscape.

Wetlands, whether sparkly blue water or boot-suckingly squelchy marsh, were once a common feature of the countryside, but most have been drained, dried and developed out of existence. A map showing the extent of prehistoric wetlands has been drawn up by conservationists to help to identify the best places to reestablish them. A second map shows the quantity of wetland habitat surviving today and areas where they can best be recreated over the next 50 years.

Wetlands form an invaluable home for a wide range of animals and plants, many of them rare, and the loss of the habitat has severely squeezed their population numbers. Some, such as the large copper butterfly, have already been wiped out in Britain.

Wetlands also fulfil important roles for human life by soaking up huge quantities of water, dramatically reducing the risk of flooding in surrounding areas, and in offsetting climate change by acting as carbon sinks.

Conservation groups and government agencies have joined forces to develop Wetland Vision, which will map out the potential for restoring lost marshes, fens, ponds and lakes. The partnership, including bodies such as Natural England and The Wildlife Trusts, wants to reverse the loss that has seen the destruction of 90 per cent of the freshwater wetlands that were in England when William the Conqueror invaded.

Previous generations were driven to drain wetlands and to engineer the flow of rivers to provide themselves with extra fields for crops and livestock, and dry land where they could build homes and businesses. Housing and industrial developments caused further fragmentation of wetlands.

Up to £2 million a year will be spent over the next three years by Natural England to bring back bogs and other wetland habitats. The meres and mosses of the West Midlands, the fens of South Lincolnshire, and the peatlands of the Humberhead Levels will be among areas where they will return.

Rare plants to benefit from restoration schemes are expected to be fen violet, fen ragwort and fen orchid, which only survive in a few locations.

Bitterns are among the rare birds likely to carve out new territory with the creation of more wetlands, as are snipe and redshank. Of the threatened species of invertebrates, the great silver diving beetle and marsh fritillary butterfly are likely to enjoy an important boost to their numbers.

Much of the wetland recreation will be based on achievements at the Great Fen Project in Cambridgeshire, which provides a blueprint on how to restore the habitat while balancing the needs and demands of neighbouring interests, notably farms. Work is under way there to form a 3,700-hectare fen between Huntingdon and Peterborough. It incorporates land that boasted the largest lake in England outside Cumbria until it was drained in the 19th century - today it has dried out so much that the land lies 14ft below its level less than a century ago.

Stopping water escaping from former wetland areas by blocking drains and ditches is one of the main tasks when recreating the habitat, along with landscaping and replanting. Before carrying out the work, delicate negotiations have usually to take place to ensure that neighbouring farms and businesses are not adversely affected, such as by having water back up on to their land.

Wetlands can also be created in tandem with quarrying. The biggest reed-bed creation scheme in Europe is part of the Great Ouze Wetland, where the RSPB and Hanson Aggregates are in partnership to create landscaped lakes in a sand and gravel quarry.

Carrie Hume, the Wetland Vision project manager, said the creation of the maps showing the past, present and possible future of wetland areas signalled a “change in ambition” for conservationists anxious to improve the landscape.

“We have created an extremely powerful tool to help restore England’s wetlands, which are among our most useful as well as our most beautiful landscapes,” she said.

Rob Cunningham, of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, added: “We are not looking to turn back the clock, but to establish a place for wetlands at a time when demands on our land are increasing.”


Read more!

The killing fields: Europe's hunting season begins

The Independent 7 Jul 08;

As Brad and Angelina have discovered to their cost, Europe's hills and forests will soon be echoing to the sound of gunfire, as hunting season begins. John Walsh takes aim

It's one of those tiny details that the estate agent or the surveyor omits to tell you, like the fact that there's a ghost in the drawing-room or a septic tank in the next field. For Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, it was worse than either.

The couple and their four children recently moved into a new home in France, to await the arrival of their twins. Their new residence is a 17th-century chateau in Aix-en-Provence, leased from the US millionaire Tom Bove. Since Brad and Ange are keen supporters of environmental causes, they were shocked to learn that the castle's grounds are traditionally used by locals to hunt wild boar every summer. The season starts on 15 August.

Could Hollywood's golden couple do something? Should they risk irritating their new neighbours by trying to ban a traditional French pastime? As they didn't own the land, the moment passed. The president of the boar hunt told France Dimanche that the chateau estate was fair game: "We have a written agreement to hunt on the estate, which doesn't expire until at least 30 August," he said. So the Jolie-Pitts will have to put up with spilt boar-guts in their backyard, along with the other signs of Provence en fĂȘte.

The extent to which such things go on in our European backyard is startling. Home-grown hunters and bloodthirsty tourists wipe out livestock in 20 countries – some very close to home. Deluded hunter-gatherers flock to Scotland every year to take pot-shots at hundreds of thousands of male deer. You don't need a licence to kill them. You can just roll up with your mates. Yes, stag-party stag-hunts have become popular – even if it seems a lot of trouble (and mayhem) to go to, for the sake of a pun. Bear-fanciers visited Romania in droves over the past 15 years for a simple reason: under communist rule, bear-shooting was banned (unless you were a Communist party official). The bear population grew until it was the largest in Europe outside Russia – and after the fall of the USSR, and the rescinding of the ban, the door was open for European hunters to visit, paying €8,000 (£6,000) to hunt bear in the Carpathian mountains.

In Ireland, fox hunting with hounds is still perfectly legal, and traditional hunts such as the Galway Blazers, the Black and Tans and the Golden Vale still thunder across meadows in search of their prey. In France, as Brad and Angelina discovered, hunting holidays are organised around chateaux. In the Loire valley, the count and master of hounds dress up their guests (for $5,000/£2,500 to $6,000 per person) in 18th-century livery, with velvet-collared coats and tricorn hats, and ride to battle with fox, stag, roebuck and hare while listening to uniformed flunkeys blowing huge circular hunting horns. In Austria and Switzerland, ibex and chamois deer are slaughtered by annual visitors to the mountains; but there's a contrast between their approaches. Austria offers holidaymakers "big-game hunting" before revealing that the big game in question will be "sub-species of deer, chamois and sheep". Sheep? When were they big game?) Tour operators offer a five-day hunt in a 14,000-hectare game reserve and promises "top world-level trophies" without requiring any documentation from the shooter.

In Switzerland, you must apply a year in advance for a licence to hunt ibex or chamois, pay $2,000 – and there's no guarantee you'll get one. If successful, you're allowed two days to stalk the deer, but you can't use a car; you have to stalk on foot. And they'll steer you towards the older and more clapped-out animals, so you don't shoot the young ones. In Spain, hunting ibex and chamois is allowed on private hunting grounds in national wildlife reserves. Hunters need a licence, a permit, gun clearance and personal insurance. Throwbacks who prefer stalking living animals with a bow and arrow for pleasure, as their Neanderthal ancestors did from necessity, can go on bow hunts, in which red stag, fallow deer, sheep and wild boar are drawn towards "tree stands", "ground blinds" and "productive meadows", to guarantee a clear shot for the humans in the hunting lodges. Depending on season and duration, prices can go up to $200,000.

The Czech Republic became a Mecca for huntsmen after the fall of communism, but hunting was always big in Czechoslovakia: stags, roe deer and wild boar have been bred to be blown away for five centuries, and new species have been introduced – fallow deer, sika deer and mouflon sheep – in the interests of variety. You need a valid hunting licence from your country of origin, before you can apply for a Czech one. The boar season runs from 1 August to 15 January, though the good news is that enthusiasts can blast away at piglets and yearlings all year round.

In Italy, fox hunting has been replaced by drag hunting with hounds – but wild boar hunting is enthusiastically pursued by locals. Foreigners, according to the law, can hunt deer and boar only in private hunting grounds, usually found near major cities, and pay £600 a day. They need a hunting licence, permit and insurance.

And England? Surely, since the fox-hunting ban in 2004, we are exempt from any taint of hunting and blood sports? Nope. It's easy to find websites cheerily offering "Exotic Deers [sic] Hunting in England" and promises a rich haul of carcasses from the "autochthonous" (native) deer population. The organisers explain that, due to the insanely complicated gun laws in the UK, they can't rent you guns – they'll just lend you the things and you pay for the ammunition. The season is September-December, the quarry is muntjac and fallow deer and soay sheep, and they charge a cool £470 per diem. It's still legal to hunt deer with guns in England, you see – but not with bows and arrows or with a pack of hounds.

So there you have it – a veritable blitzkrieg of wildlife right across Europe on every day of the season; some of it goes on all year round. Different countries have different approaches to the subject. Is it perhaps time they were standardised? In October 2006, the European parliament declared that "improved animal protection is a permanent obligation of the Community" and MEPs endorsed a resolution on the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010. It has a dry, bureaucratic, rather hollow ring, and will continue to, until Europe starts to allow its wildlife the most basic welfare protection of all – not having men shoot it for their idle pleasure.


Read more!

Britain declares war on food waste

Andrew Grice, The Independent 7 Jul 08;

The Government is to launch a campaign to stamp out Britain's waste food mountains as part of a global effort to curb spiralling food prices.

Supermarkets will be urged to drop "three for two" deals on food that encourage shoppers into bulk-buying more than they need, often leading to the surpluses being thrown away. The scandal of the vast mountains of food that are thrown away in Britain while other parts of the world starve is revealed in a Cabinet Office report today. It calls for a reduction in food waste: up to 40 per cent of groceries can be lost before they are consumed due to poor processing, storage and transport.

The report says UK households could save an average of £420 per year by not throwing away 4.1 million tonnes of food that could have been eaten.

Gordon Brown said he would make action to tackle the soaring cost of food a priority at the G8 summit starting today in Japan. "If we are to get food prices down, we must do more to deal with unnecessary demand, such as by all of us doing more to cut our food waste which is costing the average household in Britain around £8 per week," he told journalists on board the plane to the summit.

Mr Brown's determination to act follows The Independent's campaign to reduce waste through excessive packaging of food in supermarkets. The Government is to launch a major offensive to encourage supermarkets, restaurants, schools and all public sector bodies as well as householders to try to cut down dramatically on the amount of food they throw away.

The key findings of the 10-month review are that:

*Global food prices have risen significantly in recent years due to a combination of poor harvests in some exporting countries; higher costs for energy, fertiliser and transport; the diversion of some commodities to biofuel; and a long-term rise in demand for grain to feed a growing global population;

*The average UK household now devotes about 9 per cent of its expenditure to food, down from 16 per cent in 1984. But the poorest 10 per cent of households in the UK saw 15 per cent of their expenditure go on food in 2005-06; the richest 10 per cent just 7 per cent. And low-income households also spend proportionately more on staples such as milk, eggs and bread – products that have seen some of the biggest price rises in recent months;

*The increase in global food prices has hit developing countries the hardest, with food accounting for 50 to 80 per cent of household expenditure of the poorest. Price rises have contributed to social unrest in a number of countries.

At his first G8 summit as Prime Minister, Mr Brown will argue that the world's richest nations must do more to tackle the food price crisis. He will urge them to halt the decline in funding for agricultural projects in Africa, so the continent can boost farm production by 6 per cent a year.

He will call for a rethink over the use of biofuels so they are used more selectively. A separate study to be published by the Department for Transport today will admit they have contributed to the rise in food prices because land has been switched from food production to plant-derived alternatives to petrol and diesel.

Mr Brown hopes the G8 leaders can unblock the stalled world trade talks, which could collapse in the next few weeks.

The Cabinet Office study concludes that urgent action is needed on the supply of and demand for food. "The solution lies in raising the potential of food production in the developing world," it says. "If yields in Africa and elsewhere reached their potential, global food output would be much higher, far fewer people would go hungry and social instability around the world would decrease."

Oxfam accused G8 leaders of an "inadequate and hypocritical" response to the food crisis. Phil Bloomer, its spokesman, said: "World leaders ... must reiterate their promises to increase aid ... and make the necessary reforms including increasing investment in agriculture in poor countries."

Cut waste to help environment, lower food prices: Britain
Yahoo News 7 Jul 08;

Cutting back on the amount of food that Britons buy but throw away uneaten could help cut rising global prices and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, a government-commissioned report said Monday.

The Cabinet Office study said British consumers spend an average 420 pounds (528 euros, 826 dollars) per household each year on food that goes into the bin -- the equivalent to 4.1 million tonnes or 10 billion pounds.

"Eliminating household food waste would deliver major benefits, including a reduction in GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions equivalent to taking one in five cars off UK roads," it added.

Researchers estimated that 60 percent of the food thrown away could generate enough renewable energy to power all the homes in the Scottish cities of Glasgow and Edinburgh, where more than one million people live, it said.

Helping to reduce food costs would also aid low-income households, the poorest 10 percent of which spent 15 percent of their income on food in 2005-6, compared to about nine percent by the average British household.

Internationally, a world response to tackling high food prices could ease the pressure on the developing world, where many people can spend as much as 50 to 80 percent of their income on food.

The advice comes as Prime Minister Gordon Brown attends the G8 summit in Japan, where spiralling food prices and the downturn in the world economy are high on the agenda.

Brown commissioned the study of food policy last September. Separate research on the impact of biofuels on food production and supply and prices is to be published later Monday.

Other recommendations included increasing world food output, particularly of cereals and meat, plus cutting waste in the developing world, where up to 40 percent of food harvested can be lost due to storage and distribution problems.

It also called for cuts in emissions from agriculture through changes in fertiliser use and animal feed, and initiatives to encourage British consumers to eat healthier, more environmentally-sustainable food.

About 18 percent of Britain's greenhouse gas emissions are related to food consumption and production, particularly through packaging, the report said.

In a statement, Brown said Britain could not act alone, and pushed for an international effort to tackle higher prices and helping developing countries "reach their potential" in food production.


Read more!

Can city dwellers be more self-sufficient in food?

The Times 28 Jun 08;

Anna Shepard asks whether city dwellers can become more self-sufficient in food production

We may dream of quitting the rat race and moving to the countryside, but the reality is that we are overwhelmingly an urban population. In the UK more than 80 per cent of us live in urban areas. Globally, it's the same story, with the UN estimating that, by the end of this year, more than half the world's population will be living in towns and cities.

The question of how we will feed these growing cities is an urgent one. According to Sustain, the food and farming alliance, the greatest challenge of modern agriculture is how to produce affordable food for everyone.

“Growing Food for London”, a one-day conference that takes place on Monday at City Hall, focuses on urban food production in the capital. By drawing on efforts to develop agriculture within cities - from roof gardens in New York to community gardens in Havana - it is hoping to change the way that urban land is perceived.

“There's a lot of space in our towns and cities that is just green desert. It's there to look at,” says Ben Reynolds, one of the author's of Sustain's recent report, Edible Cities. “There are multiple benefits from making our cities more self-sufficient. The obvious one is security. The nearer food is, the easier it is to get at in times of crisis.”

We can also combat climate change by reducing how far food has to travel to get to consumers. When the WWF calculated an average personal carbon footprint in Britain, it found that food production and its transport accounted for our greatest use of carbon - 23 per cent of each person's total, ahead of personal transport and home energy.

There are already signs that we would like to become more self-sufficient. Half a million families - 2 per cent of households in the UK - keep hens, waiting lists for allotments have never been longer and, for the first time since the Second World War, vegetable seeds are outselling flower seeds.

But just how self-sufficient can our towns and cities ever be? Jeanette Longfield, a co-ordinator at Sustain, says: “They will never rival rural areas in terms of production - there never will be wheat fields and large-scale livestock production - but we could produce a lot more fruit and vegetables.”

At present 80 per cent of London's food comes from abroad. The rest arrives from other parts of the UK with only a fraction being produced within the city. Jenny Jones, a Green Party London Assembly member, says that the capital could produce as much as 25 per cent of its food, an ambitious target until you hear that there is 24 times the size of Richmond Park in flat roofs, ready to be turned green.

If all this sounds familiar, it's because we've done it before. At the height of the Dig for Victory campaign in 1943, 1,400,000 allotments around the UK produced 1.3million tonnes of food, half the nation's fruit and vegetables needs.

Today, as the examples below show, we're doing it again. What stands out about each project is how it has captured people's imagination, demonstrating that urban communities can respond to a food crisis and eke out productivity from unlikely places.

www.sustainweb.org

On the roof

On his lunch hour, Dave Richards leaves his desk, walks up to the roof of his office and grazes in a 200sqm garden. Once he's picked a few garlic chives or salad leaves to add to his sandwich, he finds a quiet spot and settles down.

Perched above the centre of Reading, he describes the urban oasis as “a beautiful space that you can eat”. It contains 180 varieties of plants, most of which are edible. “We eat the garden from the first nettles and wild garlic of early spring to the medlars, a spicy fruit, in October,” he says. It provides food for the cafĂ© in the building below, as well as for staff and volunteers. “My daughters (aged 7 and 10) seem to eat most of it,” he says. “They come and strip it bare.”

It all started six years ago with a leaky roof. It was going to have to be redone, so Richards and other staff working for RISC (Reading International Solidarity Centre), the development education charity, decided they might as well ask for funding and do something different.

To prevent tree roots doing structural damage, a waterproofing and root-proofing layer was laid on top of the flat roof. Then a drainage layer, followed by thick fleece and, finally, a foot of soil. With a £50,000 grant from the Big Lottery Fund, they also put up a wind turbine and solar panels to provide electricity to pump the water collected from surrounding roofs and held in a vast 2,000-litre tank.

The emphasis was not so much on providing food for the town, but on showing how you can produce diverse crops in a low-maintenance way in the middle of a city. It is based on the forest garden concept, a productive and self-maintaining approach to gardening, founded by Robert Hart in the late Sixties. Fruit trees offer shade to crops that require it; other plants, such as strawberries, are planted strategically to suppress weeds, and the whole garden takes only a few hours a week to maintain.

Richards points out that rooftop gardens are also an essential part of “sustainable urban drainage” as they act as a sponge for rainwater.

He believes that all new-build offices and public buildings should have a roof garden. “The best thing is that it's an extra room, an edible boardroom,” he says. “In a crowded environment it provides more space, so instead of everyone bundling into parks on a sunny day, they can go up and find a peaceful bit of green.”

www.risc.org.uk

Vertical farms

Imagine a high-rise building in the heart of a city with floor after floor of vegetables and grains. There might be poultry and fish too, maybe even a shrimp farm, providing every food that a city dweller might want. This is the idea behind vertical farms, sometimes called farmscrapers, and several cities have confirmed their ambitions to make them a reality, including the eco-city planned for Abu Dhabi and Incheon, in South Korea.

You grow in a controlled, small-scale way on a vertical farm, so need less fossil fuel than the fertiliser and farm machinery-dependent methods of modern agriculture. Plus, as its creator, Professor Dickson Despommier, of Columbia University, New York, points out, it's a way of getting around the farmer's number one enemy: the weather. According to Despommier's plans, one vertical farm, rising up to 30 storeys, could provide enough food for 10,000 people.

Plants could be grown hydroponically with their roots submerged in water. This reduces the weight on the building's floors as the volume of water needed is less than the volume of soil. Chickens could be reared organically, although they would never be free-range.

If it all sounds too much like factory farming, city-style, remember, says Despommier, that producing food in urban areas enables us to give land back to nature. “Instead of farms taking up our open spaces, we can go back to having forests soaking up CO2 and reverse deforestation.”

The building's carbon footprint would be kept down with LED low-energy lighting, an irrigation system that recycles grey water, and lots of daylight, maximised by it being made entirely of glass. Renewable resources would be used for energy, depending on what is available: it might be solar in a sunny city, geothermal elsewhere.

“You'd have to be clever about the design, putting plants that tolerate shade in the building's internal space and those that need more light on the outside,” Despommier says. “The first one might not be perfect, but we'd improve things each time.”

Neglected urban space

For inner-city productivity, nothing beats the fruits of a project called Vacant Lot, pioneered by two architects keen to promote the use of neglected urban space. On a run-down square of concrete, hidden between several housing estates in East London, there is now a thriving patchwork of vegetables, salads, fruits and flowers.

All this growing takes place in 70 half-tonne building bags filled with soil and compost. Made from drainage-friendly fibres, they make ideal, if unlikely, planting containers, with plenty of room for root development. Each is tended by a local resident, except for a few that are planted by Ulrike Steven and Gareth Morris, the project's founders.

It is one of several schemes established by What If, their organisation funded by the Arts Council and Shoreditch Trust, to highlight how many city spaces could be used for growing. Steven says that she has found 27 other “vacant lots”, in this corner of East London. She admits there is also a need for affordable housing, but green space is needed to accompany it.

When the organisers sent flyers about Vacant Lot around the nearby tower blocks, take-up was slow. A year on, there are barbecues and parties on the plot in the summer. There is also a waiting list, and the only trouble has been from a couple of teenagers frustrated that their bag was given to someone else after they moved away.

A diverse mix of people, some English, others immigrants from Poland, Turkey and Ghana, have become involved, growing everything from maize and sprouting broccoli to strawberries and spinach.

“People from different countries use different planting methods,” Steven says. She points to a bag containing a haphazard tumble of flowers and vegetables that belongs to Grace, 60, from Ghana. By contrast, a neighbouring bag, owned by an English man, is ordered, with wellbehaved rows of beetroot and salad leaves.

www.what-if.info

City parks

You'd expect to see geraniums and dahlias growing in a city park, but courgettes and cabbages? Last year, in Middlesbrough, parkland was identified as an ideal location for growing vegetables. As part of a council-run urban farming project, ornamental flowers were replaced by lettuces, tomatoes, strawberries and sprouts in two of the city's green spaces, Stewart Park and Albert Park.

It may have been the first time that park space has been treated like an allotment in the UK, but it has been going on since 2005 in Chicago's Grant Park. A similar project replaced a formal bedding area with more than 150 varieties of vegetables, herbs and edible flowers, which were distributed to community projects and soup kitchens.

Back in Middlesbrough, ploughing up parks is only one aspect of its attempt to create fertile growing zones. Grass verges and community centre gardens also have been turned over, along with school playing fields and residential backyards; in total, 264 growing sites across the city involving 1,000 people.

“One concern was vandalism, but we only had two episodes of that, one of which involved vegetables being pulled up and replaced with cannabis plants,” says Ian Collingwood, a regeneration consultant at Middlesbrough council.

The produce was used last year for a series of local meals, which culminated in a town meal. The outdoor event attracted 8,500 people, 2,500 of whom were fed. “One of the best things was seeing how people were encouraged to experiment with cooking the produce, to find what goes with what.”

With double the numbers involved this year and even more growing space being annexed, the future for the city's ornamental plants looks uncertain.

www.dott07.com/go/food/urban-farming

How to be self-sufficient at home

A paved garden can still be productive if you lay out a couple of growbags in a sunny spot. Instead of lugging them home, get a delivery from crocus.co.uk (£7.99).

Don't like the way plastic growbags look? Then buy a grow box from this recycling project (recyclingwood.org.uk (from £40). It comes with a frame so is ideal for plants that need support, such as tomatoes and beans.

You can still produce home-grown bounty, even if you haven't got a garden. Try a mushroom growing kit, which will yield edible fungi at any time of year (gardeningexpress.co.uk ; £12.95), or a window box of salads and vegetables (rocketgardens.co.uk ; £24.99).

Fancy fresh eggs for breakfast? An eglu hen house keeps up to four chickens safe (omlet.co.uk ; £395, includes two chickens, plus feed).

Autumn is the right time to plant fruit trees. Gooseberry bushes are low in maintenance and will give you a constant supply of fruit for crumbles and fools (organiccatalog.com ; £10.40 for one bush).


Read more!

Extinct plant found in Australia: minister

Yahoo News 6 Jul 08;

A plant thought to have been extinct for more than 100 years has been discovered in eastern Australia, an official said Sunday.

New South Wales Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald said the plant, a member of the foxglove family known as the Euphrasia Arguta, was found by a forest worker in Nundle State Forest, in the state's north-west.

The plant's last recorded sighting was in June 1904.

"In botanical terms, this really is a blast from the past," he said.

"This discovery is central to our aim of ensuring that we look after the flora and fauna in our forests."

Officials are developing a conservation plan for the plant, which was discovered last summer.


Read more!

Mexico plants 8 million trees in latest green project

Reuters 5 Jul 08;

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexicans went out and planted more than 8 million trees across the country on Saturday as part of a government push to shed its reputation for environmental mismanagement and rampant illegal logging.

Packs of volunteers, including oil workers and schoolchildren, trekked into fields and forests up and down Mexico wielding shovels and wheelbarrows full of government-supplied saplings. They planted a 8.3 million trees, the environment ministry said.

"We are repairing just a little of the enormous damage that we are doing" to the environment, President Felipe Calderon said at a tree planting event just north of the capital.

Illegal logging destroys some 64,000 acres (26,000 hectares) of Mexican forest each year, the government says, putting Mexico near the top of a U.N. list of nations losing primary forest fastest.

Environmental activists say the figure is much higher.

"Everybody needs to help out a little to keep the world green," said volunteer Marcela Lopez as she patted down soil around a sapling on the west side of Mexico City.

Environmental group Greenpeace called the government-led effort a publicity stunt, saying a better way to keep forests healthy would be to cut back on logging, which is often controlled by the country's powerful organized crime gangs.

"This program is a fraud. Only 10 percent of what is planted survives, which means they are throwing the federal budget for reforestation straight into the garbage," the group said in a statement.

Calderon regularly speaks out against global warming, and the leftwing Mexico City mayor has launched a number of green initiatives to curb rampant pollution in the city, where government fuel subsidies and a lack of public transport mean the roads are permanently choked with cars.

Mexican Environment Minister Juan Rafael Elvira said the point of the tree planting was to raise environmental consciousness in Mexico, which ecologists also criticize for allowing the oil industry to contaminate many rural states.

"We don't just want a green country. We want to plant trees to nurture environmental conscience," he said.

(Reporting by Mariano Castillo, Rodolfo Pena and Jason Lange, editing by Todd Eastham)

Mexico plants nine million trees in one day: minister
Yahoo News 7 Jul 08;

More than nine million trees were planted in Mexico as part of a day-long campaign against deforestation, the environment minister said Monday.

The day of tree-planting took place on Saturday and aimed to compensate for the 316,000 hectares (780,000 acres) of forest that are lost annually to illegal exploitation, Environment Minister Juan Elvira said.

Mexicans were able to "plant 9,345,000 trees of various types," said Elvira, adding that 507,000 citizens had participated across the country.

Mexico is the fifth leading country in the world in terms of deforestation.

The government launched an ambitious reforestation project in 2007, when 250 million trees were planted, with a goal of 280 million for 2008.

The environmental group Greenpeace has criticized the government, saying it has done little to prevent illegal logging and that deforestation was likely to continue.


Read more!

Climate change may cut South Africa corn crop sharply

Lucy Hornby, Reuters 6 Jul 08;

SAPPORO, Japan (Reuters) - Climate change could cut South Africa's maize crop by 20 percent within 15 to 20 years as the west of the country dries out while the east is afflicted with increasingly severe storms, its environment minister said on Sunday.

"For a developing country that's major, and major bad news," Marthinus van Schalkwyk told reporters after arriving in northern Japan, where the Group of Eight rich nations' leaders are gathering for a summit this week.

"For us it's not something far in the future, it's already happening."

Climate change and rising global food prices are at the top of the G8's agenda this year. Van Schalkwyk called on developed countries to slash emissions by 80 to 95 percent by 2050 compared with 1990, to achieve meaningful progress in fighting climate change.

Developing countries like South Africa, which holds most of the continent's coal reserves and is expanding output, will need technology transfers to slow their growth in emissions, he said.

Otherwise, increasing dryness in the west would be matched by cyclones and heavy rain in the east, fanning the spread of malaria and destroying infrastructure that wasn't built to withstand strong winds and heavy rains.

As its western regions dry out, South Africa would have to turn to more drought-resistant strains of maize, or corn, giving a greater role to genetically modified strains, he said. GMO corn is already legal in South Africa.

South Africa consumes about 8 million tonnes a year of corn. It produced 7.125 million tonnes in the 2007 harvest, but this year's harvest topped 11 million tonnes following better rains.

In December, the country specifically excluded maize from the materials that could be used to make biofuels, despite protests from a grain-growing lobby that fears drops in prices when output is high.

Van Schalkwyk called for an international framework to set policy on biofuels, which by diverting excess grain supply helped push corn futures in Chicago to an all-time high last month.

"We believe that is the responsible approach. We were criticized then, but now we are proven right," he said.

(Editing by Hugh Lawson)


Read more!

Australian climate report like 'disaster novel': minister

Yahoo News 6 Jul 08;

Heatwaves, less rain and increased drought are the likely prospect for Australia, according to a new report on climate change which the agriculture minister said read like a "disaster novel".

The report, by the Bureau of Meteorology and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, found that the world's driest inhabited continent is likely to suffer more extreme temperatures due to climate change.

It said that exceptionally hot years, which once occurred every 20 to 25 years, were more likely to hit every one or two years. And the hotter weather could begin as soon as 2010.

Agriculture Minister Tony Burke said the assessment indicated that the risk of drought would double, as would the area of Australia declared to be in drought.

"Parts of these high level projections read more like a disaster novel than a scientific report," he told reporters.

"What's clear is that the cycle of drought is going to be more regular and deeper than ever."

The report is part of a government review of drought policy.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the report, which found that the area of Australia having an exceptionally hot year could increase from just under five percent to as much as 95 percent, was "very disturbing".

"The analysis shows that the extent and frequency of exceptionally hot years have been increasing rapidly over recent decades and this trend is expected to continue," the report concluded.

Rainfall, which has been falling since the 1950s -- partly due to climate change -- is also likely to decline with southern Australia and the southern island of Tasmania among the worst affected, it said.

Australia faces worse, more frequent droughts-study
Reuters 6 Jul 08;

PERTH (Reuters) - Australia could experience more severe droughts and they could become more frequent in the future because of climate change, a government-commissioned report said on Sunday.

Droughts could hit the country twice as often as now, cover an area twice as big and be more severe in key agricultural production areas, the Bureau of Meteorology and Australia's top science organization, the CSIRO, said in a joint report.

The study also found that temperatures currently defined as "exceptional" were likely to occur, on average, once in every two years in many key agricultural production areas within the next 20 to 30 years, while spells of low rainfall would almost double in frequency from current figures.

Australia, suffering its worst drought in 100 years, has seen its wheat exports tumble in the past two years.

The Pacific nation is normally the second-largest wheat exporter in the world, but the harvest has been decimated to just 13 million tonnes last year because of drought.

The report, commissioned by the left-leaning Labor Party government as part of a review of national drought policy, said about 50 percent of the rainfall decrease in south-western Australia since the 1950s was likely due to emissions of greenhouse gases.

It added current policies defining areas eligible for government drought assistance were out-of-date and more areas needed to be included for drought support.

"We've already seen farmers walking off the land and rural communities struggling to stay afloat in the face of widespread stress and depression," Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Tony Burke said in a statement.

"Yet this report suggests this rare event could occur much more often due to climate change. We need to act now to ensure we are better prepared for climate change in the future."

(Reporting by Fayen Wong; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 6 Jul 08


How to derive Google Maps links from NParks' new website
on the habitatnews blog

Encounter with juvenile bee-eater in an earth cavity from Bird Ecology Study Group blog

The Life History of the Hieroglyphic Flat
on the butterflies of singapore blog

Stars at Changi
on the discovery blog

Knobbly at Changi
on the tidechaser blog


Read more!

Mango tree goes but bears fruit -friendship

The New Paper 6 Jul 08;

A SMALL stump was all that was left of the 17-year-old mango tree outside

Mr Gabriel Tan's shop last evening.

That, and a few mangoes that Mr Tan took as a last offering from the tree he tried to save.

It marked the end of a long-running fight between the Simpang Bedok shopkeeper and the management committee (MC) of Bedok Shopping Complex, which run the estate.

Mr Tan, 52, wanted to save the tree but the MC wanted to cut it after a complaint from a nearby private house owner that the tree's leaves were falling into his backyard.

For about six weeks, there was tension between the parties, and the police had to be called in more than once to try to mediate.

Mr Tan's stand was that the MC - made up of owners elected at the annual general meeting - had not given a good reason to cut the tree.

But after three unsuccessful attempts to fell the tree, the MC was back to get the job done the fourth time.

Around 2.30pm yesterday, a contractor arrived with four workers. Immediately, Mr Tan and his faithful supporter Mr Kwek Khan Che, 53, who owns a drink stall in the area, stepped past the barricades, which had reportedly been erected on Wednesday night, and stood beneath the tree side by side.

They held determined looks on their faces that indicated that they were not budging.

But the work began, despite their presence.

A worker climbed up the tree and began sawing the higher branches, which tumbled in all directions around Mr Tan and Mr Kwek.

Almost immediately, the home owner who had complained about the falling leaves - retiree Peter Syddall, 73 - came out to stand under the tree as well.

Mr Syddall, a resident there for four years, did not want the tree cut, and said he was worried about how the cutting was being done.

He said: 'The branches are near the power line. What happens if the branches fall on my roof or the power lines?' he asked.

Seeing the three men under the tree, the estate's managing agent known only as Mr Samy, who had appeared shortly after the workers started work, was visibly upset.

Mr Samy, who declined to speak to The New Paper, repeatedly demanded that the men step outside the barricades.

He warned them that he would not be liable for anything that may happen to them while they were below the tree.

Even as the worker was sawing away, Mr Tan was still trying to defend the tree by asking for the minutes of the MC meeting during which the cutting of the tree was decided.

He called the police when his request was ignored.

At 2.45pm, three police officers arrived and the cutting stopped for a while. They managed to coax the men to leave the foot of the tree.

Mr Syddall went home, but was looking out from his second-floor window.

Acting as mediators, the policemen listened to what Mr Samy and Mr Tan had to say.

Mr Samy showed Mr Tan some documents and told him not to challenge the management on technicalities. Shortly after, he walked away and Mr Tan turned to a policeman and said: 'He has not given me the proper answers'.

To that, Mr Samy said: 'His (Mr Tan's) intention is not to cooperate with us.'

Then, as parts of the tree came down in loud heavy thuds, tenants, customers and domestic helpers from the neighbouring homes started searching through the fallen leaves and branches for fruit. There were enough mangoes on the ground to fill a supermarket basket.

A few people were spotted leaving with an armful of mangoes. The workers kept some for themselves, and Mr Tan was given a few.

'These are the last fruits of the tree,' Mr Tan said. 'I feel like I have lost something. I was expecting the tree to come down, but I was hoping for a miracle'.

By 5.30pm, the trunk crashed to the ground.

Although the dispute over the tree was a bitter one, one good thing came out of it.

Mr Tan said: 'Before this, I didn't know Mr Kwek; I just recognised him by face. Because of this incident, I got to make new friends who shared a common cause.'

Mr Syddall agreed: 'Before this incident, I didn't know anyone here.'

- By Shila Naidu, newsroom intern


Read more!

Plastic turtles will do no one any good

Letter from Avin Tan, Today Online 5 Jul 08;

I REFER to “Greenback turtle power toSt Pat’s aid” (July 4).

When I read the first line, I thought “Wow, I did not know that Katong was named after a turtle”. So, naturally, I thought this was an article aboutSt Patrick’s School and the environment.

It was indeed about St Pat’s and the environment, but it was about exploiting it, not helping it.

This Saturday, 5,700 plastic toys will be dumped into a canal. What if some of these toys sink and float into open waters, or, get stuck in the canal, causing pollution?

According to the report, “the choice of the turtle — an endangered species — helps to generate awareness of its plight and at the same time raise awareness of the environment”.

How does wasting 5,700 plastic toys help to raise awareness about the environment? Plastic is a non-biodegradable by-product of petroleum, which when burned or buried, causes harm to our volatile environment.

To make matters worse, the money raised is not going back to the environment, but to further destroy it by increasing energy consumption with an air conditioned hall and refurbishing the school field with synthetic turf.

The latter is yet more plastic that also does not contribute to the environment.

Greenback turtle power to St Pat’s aid
Ooi Boon Keong, Today Online 4 Jul 08;

DID you know that Katong is named after an exotic species of sea turtle?

The species may now be extinct but, tomorrow, the canal next toSt Patrick’s school will be brimming with green “turtles”, to celebrate the history of the area and the school.

The event will see some 5,700 plastic greenback turtles racing to cross the finish line of the 150-m-long stretch of water in a contest that is part of a day-long carnival held in conjunction with the school’s 75th anniversary.

The choice of the turtle — an endangered species — helps to generate awareness of its plight and at the same time raise awareness of the environment.

Prior to the race, students and staff were each issued five “turtle adoption” certificates to sell at $10 a piece.

Many of them ended up selling more than what they were given because of overwhelming response from families, friends and old boys of the school. Souvenir turtles — priced at $10 each — were also sold, but these will not be floating down the canal.

The owner of the winning turtle will pocket $3,000 in cash, while second and third place finishers will walk away with $2,000 in cash and a 32” Samsung LCD TV respectively.

Despite the hard work involved, many of the students found the sales exercise fulfilling as it allowed them to do something for their alma mater. So far, a total of $116,000 has been raised.

The money will go towards the maintenance and upgrading of the school’s facilities, in particular, the installation of air-conditioning in the hall and refurbishing the school field with synthetic turf.

But for old boys like Mr Derek Scully, who attended St Patrick’s in the mid-70s, the dollars and cents do not matter as much as having the opportunity to meet up again with fellow schoolmates of yesteryear.


Read more!

Saving planet earth, one species at a time

Today Online 5 Jul 08;

I HAD an experience recently that, to quote the motto of this newspaper, really set me thinking.

My son, Tejas, and I went on an eight-day bird-watching trip to Bolivia, and what we experienced there gave me an insight into how the world is changing, and showed me something we can do to save our planet — one species at a time.

We had been to South America five times before and we wanted to try somewhere new.

We thought: “What about Bolivia?” I typed “Bolivia + bird watching” into Google, and, among other sites, I found Bird Bolivia. I knew nothing about the species, but we had arranged bird-watching trips via the Internet before, so I sent them an email.

Very quickly, I got a reply from Bennett Hennessy, a Canadian who set up Bird Bolivia with his Bolivian wife, Ruth Alipaz. You might be thinking, so what? People do this all the time. How is this changing the world? But wait; there’s more to come.

Ruth was born in a village in the Amazon (yes, the Amazon drainage basin is so huge that part of the Amazon extends into northern Bolivia). She was born in a village that, up to this day, has no roads to the outside world, no electricity and no telephones.

She is an example of a new kind of entrepreneur, someone from a remote, almost subsistence communitywho has become a modern businessperson through the power and reach of the Internet.

Ruth and Bennett arranged for us to spend three nights at the Red-Fronted Macaw Lodge on the bank of a river north of Santa Cruz, in Eastern Bolivia. There we could see, among many other species ranging from condors to hummingbirds, the (no extra points for guessing this right) Red-Fronted Macaw. Macaws are the largest parrots on earth, and they are spectacular birds.

For some reason that nobody knows, the Red-Fronted Macaw breeds only in the cliffs along the banks of this one river in Bolivia, so it is what scientists call an “endemic species”.

Because the range of this bird is so small, it is extremely vulnerable to extinction. Macaws are also very sociable and conspicuous, which makes them vulnerable to trapping.

The Red-Fronted Macaw was also something of a pest to the local people, invading their farms and eating their crops, so farmers would kill the macaws when they could.

So, what are Ruth and Bennett doing to save our planet — one species at a time? They bought a section of the river where the macaws breed and set up the Red-Fronted Macaw Lodge. They recruited local people from the village that is pestered by the birds, and trained them to run the lodge. Ruth organised cooking classes for some of the teenage girls, and the food they prepared for Tejas and me was as good as the food we have eaten in five-star lodges elsewhere.

So, now the local people are making money from the steady stream of birdwatchers who come to stay at the lodge. You see, bird-watchers (me included) are a weird group. We like to keep something called our “life list”. It is a list of all the species of birds we have seen in our life, all over the world.

However, if I want to add a “new tick” to my list, and I want it to be the Red-Fronted Macaw, then I have to go to the Red-Fronted Macaw Lodge to see it. And there are enough people like me to guarantee the success of the lodge.

Now, how is this relevant to us here in Singapore?

It seems to me that if Ruth and Bennett, in a poor country like Bolivia, can find the money to buy the land and build the infrastructure to save a rare endemic species, then here in a very rich country like Singapore we should be able to find the money to save some of the rare endemic species in our region.

I would like to see us working, through already existing organisations like the Singapore International Foundation, to identify places where we could help to buy land that would preserve the ecosystem for a species of animal — or plant — that is endemic to South-east Asia, and help to set up nature lodges that can employ local people from subsistence communities and give them a reason to protect animals and plants and preserve the ecosystem.

If you think this is a good idea, too, then ask yourself who you can work with to help save our planet — one species at a time.

The writer runs a training company.


Read more!