"Firefly colonies in Malaysia are disappearing even before they are identified"

Keeping the lights on
Sharmilla Ganesa, The Star 16 Feb 10;

Some firefly colonies are disappearing even before they are identified, alongside destruction of their habitats by pollution and riverine development.

THE sight of several thousand fireflies twinkling along a riverbank is a magical experience, one that draws in tourists, both local and foreign. Malaysia is one of the few South-East Asian countries with fireflies that congregate on “display trees” along both sides of mangrove-lined rivers. The insects can even be found congregating up to 100m inland from the riverbank where they breed.

As Malaysia is at the centre of the firefly region that stretches from India to Papua New Guinea, we are fortunate to have a relatively high diversity of the insect. Of the over 20 species of fireflies, Malaysia hosts seven.

Of these, the most familiar would be the Pteroptyx tener, also known as the congregating or synchronous firefly. These fireflies typically congregate in groups along riverbanks and synchronise their flashes, thereby creating the light display that so many people gather to witness.

Places like Kuala Selangor have made firefly-watching a lucrative tourist attraction since the 1980s. What most people don’t know is that many other congregating firefly habitats in Malaysia are slowly being wiped out, both by ignorance and irresponsible development.

The preliminary findings of a six-month study of firefly habitats in peninsular Malaysia by the Malaysian Nature Society (funded by the Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund) paints a rather alarming picture.

While there are still many intact mangrove-lined rivers in Pahang, Terengganu, Perak and Johor that support congregating firefly populations, the localities in Selangor, Kedah, Kelantan, Perlis and Penang have been reduced to just one or two. In the states of Negeri Sembilan and Malacca, most of the fireflies’ habitats have been eliminated, due to the clearing and bunding of rivers.

According to MNS senior conservation officer Sonny Wong, the firefly habitats are primarily threatened by riverbank clearing, strong light sources along the rivers, and pollution of the river itself.

“Riverbank vegetation is often cleared and bunds erected to establish shrimp farms and oil palm plantations,” Wong explains. “Unregulated dumping of chemicals used in these activities often end up in the rivers. Besides that, light pollution along the rivers in the form of spotlights from aquaculture farms, fish farms, sand mining dredges, ports and factories creates additional negative impact, as fireflies are driven away by these strong lights. All these activities threaten the congregating fireflies’ life cycle and survival.”

The riverbanks of Sungai Sitiawan in Perak, which used to be the habitat of fireflies, have been disturbed by the presence of shrimp farms.

Even the healthy rivers that support congregating fireflies in the states mentioned above, however, are not completely safe – they face potential harm from flood mitigation measures that are being implemented by the Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID). This was seen after the floods at Kota Tinggi, Johor, in 2007, when the river was deepened to prevent future flooding.

While well-intended, such measures have already affected several congregating firefly rivers such as Sungai Linggi-Rembau, Sungai Sedili Kecil, Sungai Johor, and parts of Sungai Perak.

“The DID does have guidelines on how to clear rivers. The problem is that the jobs are given to contractors, who perhaps don’t follow these guidelines,” says Wong.

He further explains how the Linggi-Rembau river is one of the most affected ones, with its firefly watching area almost completely destroyed.

The problem is compounded by the fact that very little is known about the life cycle of the firefly itself. It spends the first three months of its life in the larvae stage, and less than a week as an adult, during which time, it will try to mate. For the synchronous fireflies, the mating occurs on the riverbank of mangrove-lined rivers. The mating, however, is a competitive process as the ratio of females is lower.

“The problem is that hardly anyone studies fireflies in this region,” says Wong, who has been surveying firefly populations in Malaysia for more than 10 years. “No one knows the complete life cycle; the Forest Research Institute Malaysia has studied it in the lab, but the details are still disjointed. Without this information, it isn’t easy to restore or restore the populations that have been lost.”

As always, it comes down to a matter of finances, and currently, more funding is needed to carry out these studies.

Wong hopes that the survey he is working on will initiate positive response from the Government.

“The idea behind the study is to find out how many rivers (in Malaysia) have congregating firefly populations. We estimate that there are about 70 sites, of which we have surveyed 20, and plan to do five more. Then, we will compile the information in a directory as future reference for research, education, awareness, and most importantly, for Government action,” says Wong.

MNS plans to approach DID and other relevant Government agencies with the survey’s results, to encourage them to re-examine their methods in executing flood mitigation projects and protect the remaining rivers that support congregating fireflies.

Wong plans to have a preliminary meeting with the various Government agencies later this month and nurses hopes of long-term solutions as well. Among these is the passing of a river reserve act that will prevent irresponsible clearing and polluting of rivers and riverbanks.

“The Government also needs to think again about how to mitigate floods, instead of simply clearing and bunding rivers. The Economic Planning Unit plays an important part too, as it should be convinced that floodplains like these areas should not be developed.”

He also hopes to develop more of the congregating firefly rivers into eco-tourism sites, specifically by getting the locals in the area involved.

“While there are currently about 14 firefly-watching sites in Malaysia (other than Kuala Selangor), the operators there are not locals, and they aren’t regulars. Therefore, they don’t practice ethical firefly-watching,” says Wong. For example, he explains how many of these operators shine bright lights into the riverbank trees to force the fireflies to come out, which then disrupts the insects’ mating and behaviour patterns.

“From a conservation point of view, it is better to use locals. We (MNS) will teach them the ethics of firefly-watching, and it will provide them with a means of livelihood. They can also feel a sense of ownership over the area, and be the “eyes” of the site, so to speak,” says Wong.


Read more!

Save the tiger: WWF Malaysia campaign

Tan Cheng Li, The Star 16 Feb 10;

The tiger may become the stuff of myths if we don’t act now to preserve the species.

DON’T just celebrate the Year of the Tiger. Act to save this iconic species, whose numbers have plunged in the wild. Tiger experts have warned that the big cat will be extinct across 13 range countries if nothing is done to stop its hunting, loss of habitat and deprivation of prey.

In Malaysia, only some 500 Malayan tigers are believed to roam our forests – down from 3,000 some 50 years ago. For the species to rebound to a sustainable level, tiger conservationists calculated that we have to double the existing tiger population in 10 years.

As part of efforts to boost tiger numbers, World Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF) is kicking off the Tx2 Campaign: Double or Nothing. This is a call to governments to put measures in place as part of a global effort to double the number of wild tigers in 13 range countries. There is an urgency as the global popu­lation of wild tigers is at an all-time low, but given the chance, support and opportunities, tiger numbers can recover.

The Tx2 campaign aims to initiate actions towards having 1,000 wild tigers in penin­sular Malaysia by 2020 through a two-pronged approach: raising public awareness on the tiger’s plight to garner more support for their conservation, and raising funds to increase tiger monitoring and protection efforts in and around the Belum-Temengor forest in Perak.

The WWF Wildlife Monitoring Unit con­­ducts field surveys to determine the conservation status and population trends of tigers and tiger prey in the forest. Ultimately, the group hopes to formulate tiger-friendly manage­­­­ment recommendations for incorporation into relevant forestry policies and management plans.

The WWF Wildlife Protection Unit (WPU) conducts patrols in the Royal Belum State Park and along the East-West Highway (also known as the Gerik-Jeli Highway) to keep poaching and other wildlife crimes at bay. Since the WPU’s establishment in December 2008, the unit has provided intelligence to the Department of Wildlife and National Parks, the police and the army. It has also helped remove 102 snares set by illegal hunters and aided the authorities in arresting 10 illegal hunters and traders.

Tigers are emblematic of environmental health. When wild tigers have the food and shelter they need to survive and thrive, the ecosystems they inhabit remain healthy, and provide numerous benefits to humans and other animals.

To launch the Tx2 campaign, various activities pertaining to tigers are now taking place at the Fo Guang Shan Dong Zen temple in Jenjarom, Selangor:

Exhibition and merchandise booths (Feb 14 to 21) – Visitors can learn more about tiger conservation efforts by WWF and partner orga­­ni­­­­­­­sations the Malaysian Conservation Allian­­­­ce for Tigers (MYCAT) and TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade and monitoring network. They can sym­­bolically adopt tigers to help protect them.

Making The Tiger Mark (Feb 16) – Make a tiger print plaster cast, a method used by wildlife biologists in the earlier days to count tigers in the forest, and bring it home with you.

Tx2 launch (Feb 20) – See 1,000 faces being painted with tiger stripes and colours, to symbolise the goal of achieving 1,000 tigers by the next Year of the Tiger in 2022.

Tiger Trail (Feb 21) – Just like in the Amazing Race, participants will race from one station to another to complete various tasks and get their “tiger report card” stamped. A souvenir awaits those who complete the race.

In April, WWF will start a search for a Tx2 Campaign ambassador, in which the public can vote for their favourite personalities to champion the cause.

For more information, go to wwf.org.my or e-mail tx2campaign@gmail.com

Major threat to big cats
The Star 16 Feb 10;

POACHING and illegal trade are the most urgent threats to tigers, having the greatest potential to cause colossal damage in a short time. With improved surveillance, detection of wildlife crimes has grown in recent years.

Tiger seizures in Malaysia

2008

* Nineteen dead tiger cubs and on another occasion, three dead tiger cubs from Saleng Zoo in Johor.

* Two live tigers in the home of a wanted robber in Sungai Petani, Kedah.

2009

* A snared tiger was rescued in Belum forest in Perak but it did not survive.

* A tiger skin from a man in Pahang.

* Five tiger skins from two Thais at the Bukit Kayu Hitam border crossing in Kedah.

* Three kgs of tiger bones along the East-West Highway.

Tiger seizures in Thailand

2008

* The Navy seized six tigers and five leopards being smuggled across the Thai-Lao border.

* Carcasses of two tigers and a leopard in a truck coming from Sungai Golok on the Malaysia-Thailand border.

2009

* Four tiger carcasses in the central Thai province of Prachuap Kiri Khan.

* Two tiger carcasses in the north-eastern Thai province of Nongkai.

* Of 12 meat samples tested from the seizures in Thailand, five were confirmed to be Malayan tigers.

Source: Malaysian Conservation Alliance for Tigers and Department of Wildlife and National Parks

Do your part
The Star 16 Feb 10;

YOU can ensure that there will still be tigers roaming our forests, and not just in tiny cages in zoos and theme parks, in the next Year of the Tiger in 2022, by:

* Reporting suspected crimes involving tigers and tiger prey to the Wildlife Crime Hotline at 019-356 4194.

* Learning about tigers and tiger prey and sharing this with friends and family.

* Not consuming traditional medicines containing parts of tigers and other endangered species.

* Not eating the meat of tigers, other endangered species and tiger prey (wild deer and wild boar).

* Boycotting wild meat restaurants.

* Supporti ng the protection of forests which are tiger habitats.

* Voicing your opinion on issues like indiscriminate development, illegal logging and poaching.

* Not supporting zoos or theme parks which display illegally acquired or endangered wildlife or which ill-treat wildlife.

* Paying more for wildlife-friendly products.

* Supporting conservation organisations.


Read more!

Plant-A-Tree area included in proposed land development project in Malaysia

Include trees in building plans, developer urged
The Star 16 Feb 10;

WILD Asia has recently heard that a new development project has started at the area near the Kota Damansara Community Forest (KDCF).

We are shocked to learn that the area proposed for development includes a small parcel of land that hundreds of people, including the residents and major media companies joined hands during our 2009 Plant-A-Tree event to plant seedlings on what was barren land.

The 2009 Plant-A-Tree event garnered extensive publicity and was broadcasted on TV, radio, and published in two dailies. The event was jointly organised by Wild Asia, AMP Radio Networks and Friends of Kota Damansara (FOKD), and attended by the Selangor state representative Sivarasa Rasiah.

The tree-planting was done in good faith with the support of the residents to help raise awareness of natural areas and the importance of the community forest.

Individuals and the corporate sector donated the tree saplings and hoped these would grow into mature trees that would extend the forest boundary or form a buffer zone between the forest proper and developed areas in Kota Damansara.

But more importantly, the event was a rare green moment when several hundred people were brought together to do something for the environment.

In the act of planting trees that will grow into a forest, we built a real connection to the environment. That indeed, was the value of the Plant-a-Tree event.

We do not deny the right of the developer to develop the area, but we hope that they will see the trees as an asset to their development rather than a liability.

We think it is worthwhile for the developers to see the wide interest in the area and work with people who have a stake in it.

Wild Asia urges the developer to incorporate those trees into their development plans. We believe that protecting the natural areas will not only be an asset to their development plans but help them establish connection to the community which will be a boost to the company’s corporate social responsibility.

We urge the developer to see this as an opportunity to “stand up for a tree” and create goodwill in the community by joining hands with residents and the community at large.

Dr Reza Azmi
Founder and executive director of
Wild Asia (Malaysia)


Read more!

Palm estate is forest, says Indonesian ministry

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 16 Feb 10;

The Forestry Ministry is drafting a decree to include oil palm plantations in the forest sector to comply with international standards in mitigating climate change.

The ministry said it believed the policy would not lead to massive forest conversion into palm oil plantations as many critics feared.

“By definition, oil palm plantations will be defined as forest, but its management will be under the Agriculture Ministry,” head of research and development at the ministry, Tachrir Fathoni told The Jakarta Post on Monday.

He argued that many countries such as Malaysia, the world’s second biggest palm oil producer after Indonesia, had included oil palm plantations in its forest sector.

“By doing so, Malaysia can reap financial incentives from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of carbon trade,” he said.

He said that the UN only categorized trees with a certain height as forest trees, without identifying their species.

“It is to anticipate the implementation of the REDD scheme,” he said.

Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) allows forestry countries to receive financial benefits by stopping tree lopping.

Indonesia is home to the world’s third largest forest nation after Brazil and the Republic of Congo.

But the deforestation rate in Indonesia is the highest on the planet with more than 1 million hectares cleared per year due to illegal logging and massive forest conversion, including creating oil palm plantations.

Activists have said poor environmental management of oil palm plantations in Indonesia has led to the increase of greenhouse gas emissions.

But the Agriculture Ministry, managing the sector, insisted that the oil palm industry did not relate to deforestation.

It said that palm oil trees covered only 7 million hectares or 6 percent of the country’s total forest area.

Agriculture Minister Suswono earlier claimed that oil palm plantations utilized critical or marginal land into productive land.

The Agriculture Ministry issued a 2009 decree to allow oil palm plantations to be developed in Indonesia’s peat land.

The Greenomics Indonesia urged the Forestry Ministry to focus on its core business including managing industrial forest concessions (HTI) and forest concession holders.

“The ministry’s much-promoted sustainable forest management also remains in question. The Forestry Ministry should focus on its main core business,” Greenomics executive director Elfian Effendi told the Post.

He said that the Forestry Ministry should also resolve its different opinion of plantations to the Environment Ministry.

Greenpeace Indonesia media campaigner Hikmat Soeriatanuwijaya warned that the policy involving converting palm oil plantations into forest could lead to massive forest conversion.


Read more!

Indonesia May Open More Forests to Palm Oil

Arti Ekawati, Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

As Indonesia looks for ways to meet its ambitious emissions-reduction targets, the Ministry of Forestry on Monday said it plans to issue a new regulation that would allow commercial forestry companies to plant crops such as palm oil in new concession areas.

The ministry said the “mixed forest” regulation was intended to help companies survive the current low timber prices and would enable them to grow biofuel crops to help alleviate the country’s energy shortage.

Environmental groups warned that the plan would accelerate deforestation, which contributes to global warming.

Hadi Daryanto, director general of forest production at the ministry, said the regulation would be issued soon and would only apply to forestry concessions granted after it took effect.

Indonesia has 36.8 million hectares of commercial forests, with the government holding another 44.3 million hectares available.

The regulation would stipulate that at least 49 percent of forest concessions in question be used for planting commercial forests, while up to 21 percent could be planted in crops. The remaining 30 percent would be set aside for conservation and the use of local communities.

A similar regulation was issued in 1999 but was withdrawn after many forestry companies planted more of their land in palm oil than permitted.

Hadi said he was optimistic that companies would adhere to the rules this time because the ministry had a much more sophisticated monitoring system.

Elfian Effendi, the executive director of Greenomics Indonesia, said the group opposed resurrecting the failed policy.

“The ministry will repeat the failure, since forestry companies will prefer to plant palm oil because it’s more profitable than planting commercial forests,” Elfian said.

Even without such a regulation many forestry companies had illegally planted palm oil in commercial forest areas, he said.


Read more!

Indonesia's Foreign Ministry Fights Corruption Allegations

Nivell Rayda& Ismira Lutfia, Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa on Monday issued an all-out defense against accusations that a number of senior ministry officials, including the man he recently replaced, were allegedly involved in a corruption scam involving inflated travel expenses.

The country’s most prominent antigraft watchdog, Indonesia Corruption Watch, had reported to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) that former Foreign Minister Hassan Wirajuda and current ministry Secretary General Imron Cotan received Rp 1 billion and Rp 2.35 billion ($107,000 and $251,000), respectively, in the graft scheme. The Attorney General’s Office and the KPK are investigating the allegations.

Marty, although admitting to graft within the ministry, claimed that Wirajuda and Imron were named by low-ranking officials to cover their trail. “There are people who abused [high-ranking] ministry officials’ names,” Marty said.

“We have severely sanctioned those who were involved. We have also imposed new methods and taken steps to prevent similar scams from ever occurring again.”

Marty, however, declined to reveal how many ministry officials had been punished.

ICW deputy chairman Emerson Yuntho immediately blasted the ministry’s response, saying its decision to dismiss officials was meant to protect the higher-ups who were involved.

“The case has been handled as though it was merely a case of poor administration,” Emerson said. “This is purely criminal and violated the law on corruption because the state has been defrauded for years.”

Emerson also criticized the speed with which the minister had dismissed the possibility that senior officials might have been involved.

“There was never any internal inquiry against NHW,” he said, referring to Wirajuda by his initials. “How could the ministry come to the a conclusion that he was not involved?” he asked.

Neither Wirajuda nor Imron, a former ambassador to Australia, could be reached for comment on Monday night.

The ministry has launched an internal investigation into the scam, which cost the state an estimated Rp 30 billion per year.

Several ministry officials allegedly collaborated with seven travel agencies appointed by the ministry to inflate the total travel budget by as much as 80 percent.

The majority of the budget mark-up stemmed from diplomats assigned overseas. Foreign service employees have the option of buying their tickets first at approved travel agencies and then applying for reimbursement.

The travel agencies charged the diplomats the true price, but then billed the ministry far above the regular fare or made it appear that more expensive airlines or classes were used. In return, some of the illicit profit was kicked back to the diplomats. The ministry also discovered fictitious travel tickets.

Ministry officials were also accused of inflating the size of the claims the ministry made to the treasury. The ministry’s findings have been submitted to the AGO.

KPK spokesman Johan Budi said it would coordinate with the AGO to avoid any overlaps in their probes. “We will monitor the AGO’s progress.”


Read more!

NGOs seek to scrap Indonesian law on coastal management

Pandaya, Jakarta Post 16 Feb 10;

The 2007 Coastal and Islet Management Law is yet to be functional, but an alliance of activists are already seeking to shoot it down.

An alliance of NGOs have filed for a judicial review with the Constitutional Court to have the law revised or even scrapped as they claim it will see the state surrendering its sovereignty to capitalists.

The group says the law gives business entities the right to manage a particular area and share the profits with the local government, which will effectively rob indigenous po-pulations of their ancestral homes and livelihood.

“The law will only create legal certainty because in some ways the law is in conflict with the Constitution, which gives the right to control natural resources to the state to ensure the well being of the people,” said Taufiqul Mujib from the Indonesian Human Rights Committee for Social Justice.

The law the House of Representatives passed in 2007 is intended as an umbrella for the existing 20 or so lower regulations pertaining to the management of coastal and minor islands.

It also aims to help improve the livelihood of customary communities and islanders who have been living in the area for several generations.

Even though the law allows public participation in developing and managing the coast and islands, it requires bureaucratic procedures that only powerful capitalists can afford.

The concession holders are entrusted with a high degree of autonomy to manage and profit from the project. The activists agree that it is good that businesses are required to fulfill various obligations in relation to environmental protection, but argue that experience has shown that such contracts usually end up with bureaucrats bowing to the will of capitalists.

The government has given concessions to tourism businesspeople to develop and manage such places in Jakarta, Bali and a Tukangbesi Islands in Southeast Sulawesi.

Although the government is yet to make regulations and implement the law, activists warn that conflict between locals and businesspeople has already been brewing in many areas.

In Southeast Sulawesi, a simmering conflict has erupted between a pearl company and fishery communities who lost their fishing areas, which are now controlled by entrepreneurs.

Similar conflicts are also common along the coast between Surabaya and Banyuwangi in East Java, Taufiqul said.

In Togian Islands, Central Sulawesi, and Tukangbesi Islands, the economic welfare of fishermen has been on the decline after local administrations granted concessions to tourism operators, the NGOs noted.

In Tukangbesi, the indigenous popoulation has been barred from catching fish from coral reefs — something they have done all their life — after the tourism investor claimed the territory as theirs, said M. Riza Damanik, the secretary-general of Kiara (the People’s Coalition for Justice in Fishery).

“As compensation for the lost fishing area, the businessman set aside Rp 5 million a month for the locals and Rp 50 million for the local administration a year from its estimated Rp 5 billion in annual income,” Riza said.

In Ancol, a famed beach resort in North Jakarta, he said that no fisherman could even pass the area without putting up sails provided by the Ancol tourism management as a candid way of promoting the spot and the beach that is closed to the non-paying public.


Read more!

Indonesia ‘Working to Reopen’ Closed Mine

Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

The government is trying to resolve a land-permit problem that has resulted in the closure of a coal mine in Kalimantan owned by Thai coal miner Banpu.

Last week, police temporarily closed the Jorong coal mine in South Kalimantan because it does not have a valid permit.

“We are holding talks at the Coordinating Ministry for the Economy on how to settle this issue,” Bambang Setiawan, director general of coal, minerals and geothermal at the Energy Ministry, said on Monday.

Bambang said the owners of the Jorong mine had already put in a request to the Forestry Ministry to extend its permit, but one had not yet been issued.

“Because of a need to continue production, the producer went on operating without the extension permit,” he added.

Banpu confirmed in a statement last Thursday that operations at the mine had been shut but said it would only have a slight impact on production at its Indonesian unit — PT Indo Tambangraya Mega.

“The stoppage was [caused] mainly by the overlapping of related regulations from different ministries,” Indo Tambangraya said last week.

Indo Tambangraya has six coal mining concessions in Indonesia, including Jorong.

Another official at the Energy Ministry said problems like this over land permits could hit mining output by increasing investor uncertainty regarding the industry in Indonesia.

“Indonesia needs more coal to supply coal-fired power plants, especially in Java from this year,” said the official, who declined to be identified.

“If there are many of these type of problems in the sector then it will cut coal production in future,” the official said.

The Jorong mine produces sub-bituminous coal, which is supplied to local power plants as well as being exported.

According to estimates from Indo Tambangraya, the Jorong mine produced 2.85 million tons of coal in 2009, with 2.3 million tons targeted at the overseas market.

The company said it did not know when it would be able to resume operations.

Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan said on Jan. 10 the ministry had revoked the land use permits for 23 mining and other firms operating in forested areas.

Zulkifli said at the time the ministry might crack down further as it took a tougher stance on environmental protection.

However, the government has also pledged to resolve bottlenecks and other bureaucratic obstacles that frequently hamper investment projects and have discouraged foreign investment in the country’s mining sector. Reuters


Read more!

Controversial dam Hatgyi in Myanmar will go ahead

Watcharapong Thongrung, Chularat Saengpassa, The Nation 16 Feb 10;

The Energy Ministry will proceed with the construction of the Hatgyi dam and hydropower plant in Burma, despite a local requirement to enhance the environmental impact assessment and information disclosure for greater transparency.

"There will be more studies. Although this may lead to a delay, the project is not scrapped," Energy Permanent Secretary Pornchai Rujiprapa said yesterday.

Most of the electricity from the 1.36 gigawatt plant will be supplied to Thailand.

Pornchai, as chairman of the subcommittee on power cooperation with neighbouring countries, said the Energy Ministry is ready to heed the advice of the committee led by PM's Office Minister Sathit Wongnongtoey. Sathit's committee said the environmental impact assessment be extended while information disclosure must be improved.

The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, as the representative of Thailand and the dam operator, will take care of the two issues.

The committee last month submitted the list of recommendations to Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, in a bid to make the investment project more transparent. The committee was set up following the National Human Rights Commission's complaints that the project would directly impact dozens of Karen villages and the villages may have to be relocated from the dam's floodplain.

Thousands more will suffer abuses from the Burmese army's attempts to secure the site, which have resulted in several military offensives and a large build-up of troops in the area.

All of the dams planned on the Salween River will greatly disrupt the riverine ecosystem and destroy the livelihoods of those peoples living along the river.

Sathit said in a telephone interview that the hold-up of the project should not cause diplomatic displeasure with Burma. He also referred to the cool response from Egat towards the proposals.

"The committee's concern was the repercussions on Burma, not the impacts on Egat's investment," he said. Next week, the committee will convene to monitor Egat's reactions to the suggestions. It will also work on the structure of the information disclosure unit, as well as its scope of responsibility.

Montree Chantawong, coordinator of Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (Terra), was pleased with the Sathit committee's resolutions, which should create a more transparent disclosure channel.

Egat has so far refrained from releasing the full EIA, claiming that it needed Burma's consent to submit the full report, he said. The civic groups received only a brief summary in English.

The civic groups actually want the government to terminate the investment outright, he said. While people in the Karen State would be saved, Egat does not need power from Burma. However, the construction will fuel fighting and suppression of the minority tribe.

He also urged the government to ask for parliamentary approval for the project's EIA, if it continues to support the project. Since the dam will lead to alterations in river flows, which could change Thai territory in Tak's Sob Moei district, the contract needs parliamentary approval under Article 190 of the Constitution, he said.

"The Human Rights Commission earlier even urged Egat to conduct a separate EIA on the Thai border, for a clearer impact," he said.

The Burma Rivers Network, comprising organisations representing various dam-affected communities in Burma, said on its website that "large development projects in Burma bring an expanded Burma army presence and the increased use of forced labour. Villagers living downstream from the dams will also face difficulties."

Energy Minister Wannarat Charnnukul insisted that Abhisit has not yet ordered a delay of Hatgyi Dam.

Pornchai stressed that Thailand has followed international human rights and environmental accords. The Energy Ministry has worked closely with the Foreign Ministry on the project. Once the negotiations are completed, the issue would be submitted to Parliament under the Constitution, he said.

Pornchai, as chairman of Egat, said Egat's board of directors recently approved the investment with Sinohydro from China.

A joint venture is being set up. Sinohydro will hold a bigger stake than Egat, as it is in charge of securing the loan, while the Burmese government will be a minority partner, he said.

The hydropower plant was expected to start commercial operations and export power to Thailand in 2015 or 2016. However, due to controversies, the project has been stalled and has not yet been included in the Power Development Plan.

On July 14, 1997, Thailand signed a framework agreement for 1.5GW from Burma by 2010. The first project was My-Kok Dam, with Italian-Thai Development and partners as the developer.

The lignite-fuelled dam, with 405MW capacity, is located in Shan State, 80 kilometres from Chiang Rai. It is scheduled to start feeding power to Thailand in January 2016. The power rate throughout the 25-year purchase contract averages Bt2.3 per unit, at the exchange rate of Bt34 to the US dollar.


Read more!

Whale shark found "without its fins and tail" in the Philippines

Whale shark dies along Batangas shores

Marrah Erika Lesaba, Inquirer Southern Luzon 16 Feb 10;

BATANGAS CITY – A Bantay Dagat (sea patrol) team buried Tuesday morning a whale shark, which was found without its fins and tail along the shores of the village of Maricaban in Tingloy Island here on Monday morning, said a team official of the Bantay-Dagat.

Rey Manalo, Bantay-Dagat head in Tingloy, 44 kilometers away from the city, said he received information about the whale shark at around 9:30 a.m. Monday.

A group of foreign and local divers from Mabini town found the whale shark along the shores of Maricaban.

“The whale shark was very weak when we left it at 5 p.m.,” he said.

Manalo believes the whale shark was accidentally trapped in a net of fishermen who were at the area at the time.

The whale shark could not have been removed from the net by the fishers’ bare hands so they needed to have its fins cut, said Manalo.

He added that the whale shark’s tail was gone.

Manalo said the group of fishermen might be from nearby places or from the island itself.

The whale shark was placed in waters with cool temperature with the Bantay-Dagat people watching but it died on Monday night, said Manalo.

Divers find whale shark with fins, tail sliced off
Marrah Erika Lesaba, Alcuin Papa Philippine Daily Inquirer 17 Feb 10;

BATANGAS CITY—A dead whale shark without fins and a tail was buried on the shores of Tingloy Island on Tuesday morning, inscribing a sad epilogue to a Manila conference of 50 nations for the protection of the endangered fish species.

Locally known as “butanding,” the juvenile whale shark (Rhincodon typus) was found at 9:30 a.m. on Monday by a group of foreign and local divers in Barangay Maricaban on the island, 44 kilometers from this city.

It was still alive but “very weak” when the group left it at 5 p.m., said Rey Manalo, head of the Bantay-Dagat (sea patrol) in Tingloy.

Manalo said the whale shark, measuring 18 feet, could have gotten accidentally entangled in a net laid out by a group of island fishermen who were catching fish nearby.

They must have tried to rescue the creature with their bare hands but could not do so without cutting its fins and tail, he said.

Since it could no longer swim, the hapless giant fish was placed in cool waters with Bantay-Dagat personnel watching over it, Manalo said. Unfortunately, it died on Monday night and was buried on the shore the next morning, he said.

SHARKS III

Last week, representatives of some 50 countries attended the third meeting of the International Cooperation on Migratory Sharks (SHARKS III) hosted by the Philippines in Manila. Eleven of them signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) pledging to protect the whale sharks.

The participants also agreed to advance the protection of seven shark species that needed protection—the Basking Shark, Great White Shark, Whale Shark, Spiny Dogfish Shark, Porbeagle Shark, and Shortfin and Longfin Mako Sharks.

SHARKS III falls under the Convention on Migratory Species and Wild Animals (CMS), otherwise known as the Bonn Convention.

“The memorandum of understanding on the butanding is a breakthrough since this is the first international cooperation that would ensure the protection and conservation of the sharks all over the world,” said Dr. Mundita Lim, chief of the Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau and conference chair.

The document was signed by the Philippines, China, United States, Costa Rica, Palau, Congo, Senegal, Republic of Guinea, Togo, Liberia, Kenya and Ghana. At least 10 signatories are needed to make it enforceable, Lim said

Conservation plan

Lim said the forging of the memorandum of understanding was important in crafting a conservation plan that included strengthening the policies of countries on shark conservation, possible funding for shark protection, and the enforcement of transboundary regulations to ensure the welfare of migratory sharks.

The plan will cover a ban on “shark finning,” or the practice of simply harvesting the fins of sharks with the still-alive marine creatures thrown back into the sea, she said.

Studies have identified “shark finning” as one of the reasons for the rapid decline in shark population worldwide. It is estimated that 100 to 200 million sharks are killed annually for their fins—the prime ingredients for the shark-fin soup delicacy.

Lim said that the international conservation plan would be finalized in the next meeting of member-signatories to the Bonn Convention.

No coordination

“The sharks can freely swim across waters of any country. That’s why this cooperation is very important to sustain efforts for their conservation. It is important for countries to come together toward the goal of ensuring the safety of the migratory sharks that may pass by their waters,” the official said.

In Batangas, Lea Villanueva, provincial chief of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, said the most common reasons for the death of whale sharks “are climate change and people who use illegal means to kill and earn from marine mammals.”

Villanueva said the City Environment and Natural Resources Office did not coordinate with her office about the latest butanding death.

She said she did not even see the fish before it was buried and that those who found it must have at least gathered basic information, such as length, size and width.


Read more!

Pollution creating acid oceans

The world's oceans are becoming acidic at a faster rate than at any time in the last 65 million years, threatening marine life and food supplies across the globe, according to a new study.
Louise Gray, The Telegraph 15 Feb 10;

Researchers from the University of Bristol looked at how levels of acid in the ocean have changed over history.

They found that as ocean acidification accelerated it caused mass extinctions at the bottom of the food chain that could threaten whole ecosystems in the future.

The rapid acidification today is being caused by the massive amount of carbon dioxide being pumped out by cars and factories every year, which is absorbed by the water. Since the industrial revolution acidity in the seas have increased by 30 per cent.

The last time such a fast change occurred is thought to be 65 million years ago, when some natural event caused ocean acidification and the dinosaurs died out.

The study looked at sediments from around 55 million years ago, when temperature rose by up to 6C and acidification was occurring at a similar rate as today.

It found widespread extinction of tiny organisms that live on the bottom of the ocean. Ocean acidification can dissolve the carbonate shells of marine organisms and cause muscle wastage and dwarfism in other species.

Andy Ridgwell, lead author of the paper published in Nature Geoscience, said it could mean problems for humans in the future.

"Unlike surface plankton dwelling in a variable habitat, organisms living deep down on the ocean floor are adapted to much more stable conditions. A rapid and severe geochemical change in their environment would make their survival precarious.

"The widespread extinction of these ocean floor organisms during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse warming and acidification event tells us that similar extinctions in the future are possible," he said.

Dr Ridgwell said acidification is actually occurring much faster today than in the examples they looked at from the past therefore "exceeding the rate plankton can adapt" and theatening the basis of much of marine life. This would mean fish and other creatures further up the food chain that human beings eat may be affected as soon as the end of this century.

"There is lots of concern about major disruption to ecosystems. Certainly coral reefs will be eroded, that has an impact on other species. We could see marine ecosystems affected this century," he said.

:: A separate study published in Geoscience found that the glaciers on Greenland are melting much faster than expected because of ocean currents bringing warm water into the area. If the warming continues it could cause sea levels to rise by 3ft, three times as much as previous estimates, by 2100.

Oceans' acidity rate is soaring, claims study
Steve Connor, The Independent 15 Feb 10;

The rate at which the oceans are becoming more acidic is greater today than at any time in tens of millions of years, according to a new study.

Rapidly rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere mean that the rate of ocean acidification is the fastest since the age of the dinosaurs, which became extinct 65m years ago, scientists believe.

The oceans are likely to become so acidic in coming centuries that they will become uninhabitable for vast swathes of life, especially the little-studied organisms on the deep-sea floor which are a vital link in the marine food chain.

Scientists have concluded, in a study published today in the journal Nature Genetics, that the current rate of ocean acidification is up to 10 times faster than 55m years ago – the last time the deep oceans became so acidic.

This is because of the speed at which carbon-dioxide concentrations are rising in the atmosphere. This carbon dioxide dissolves in seawater at the sea surface to form carbonic acid. The increased acidity of the water affects the amount of dissolved carbonate minerals that are available for marine organisms to use in forming their shells and hard skeletons.

When the oceans became acidified in a similar way about 55m years ago, it resulted in a mass extinction of deep-sea marine organisms, especially those living in the sediments of the sea floor, which can be studied geologically through changes to rock formations, said Dr Andy Ridgwell of the University of Bristol.

"Unlike surface plankton dwelling in a variable habitat, organisms living deep down on the ocean floor are adapted to much more stable conditions. A rapid and severe geochemical change in their environment would make their survival precarious," he said.

Studies also suggest that temperatures of the surface ocean rose, and carbon-dioxide levels increased over a period of a few thousand years.

The latest study compared these changes with predicted changes to ocean acidity resulting from continuing increases in concentrations of man-made carbon dioxide expected this century.


Read more!

Seeds of discontent: the 'miracle' crop that has failed to deliver

A new 'ethical' biofuel is damaging the impoverished people it was supposed to help
Cahal Milmo and Andrew Wasley, The Independent 15 Feb 10;

A "miracle" plant, once thought to be as the answer to producing renewable biofuels on a vast scale, is driving thousands of farmers in the developing world into food poverty, a damning report concludes today.

Five years ago jatropha was hailed by investors and scientists as a breakthrough in the battle to find a biofuel alternative to fossil fuels that would not further impoverish developing countries by diverting resources away from food production.

Jatropha was said to be resistant to drought and pests and able could grow on land that was unsuitable for food production. But researchers have found that it has increased poverty in countries including India and Tanzania.

Millions of the plants have been grown in anticipation of rich returns, only for growers to be hit by poor yields, conflict over land and a lack of infrastructure to process the oil-rich seeds.

Oil giant BP, which planned to spend almost £32m on a joint venture to set up jatropha plantations, has now pulled out and the charity ActionAid today warns that jatropha needs to be cultivated on prime food-growing land to produce significant yields.

According to one estimate, up to one million hectares of jatropha – an area equivalent to Devon and Cornwall combined – are being cultivated around the globe, despite little evidence that it can produce enough oil to make the crop commercially sustainable.

Meredith Alexander, head of trade at Actionaid and co-author of its "Meals per Gallon" report, said: "Jatropha is a real gold-rush crop, and the same amount of common sense that applies in a gold rush has been applied to the jatropha rush.

"Jatropha was the subject of an explosion of fabulous propaganda. But this was an untried crop at commercial levels and the many thousands of marginal farmers who have gone into production have been experimented on with disastrous results. They are simply not getting the income they were promised and now cannot afford food for their families," she said.

A native of central America, Jatropha curcus was brought to Europe in the 16th century and subsequently spread across Africa and Asia. Until recently, its few uses included a malaria treatment and an indigestion remedy.

But despite jatropha's much-lauded ability to grow where food crops cannot flourish, campaigners say there is evidence that commercially viable yields can only be obtained in fertile soil.

In India, forecasted annual yields of three to five tonnes of seeds per hectare have been scaled back to 1.8 to two tonnes. The Overseas Development Institute, a leading international development think-tank, has stated that "as the mainstay of people's livelihoods, jatropha looks distinctly marginal".

ActionAid said its researchers found repeated cases of farmers being left with jatropha crops they could not sell and land previously used to grow food crops being taken over by sub-contractors who then employed locals on wages that could not compete with rises in the price of foodstuffs partially caused by biofuel production.

Raju Sona, a farmer in north-east India who gave up land that usually produces vegetables to grow jatropha, said: "No one will buy jatropha. People said if you have a plantation then surely you have a good market. But we didn't see such a market. I threw the seeds away."

A number of British companies are continuing to market jatropha as a "highly ethical and green" investment. One fund offers investors three packages for prices ranging from £7,500 to £15,600 in a brochure entitled "Money really does grow on trees". That company says it has funded the planting of 32 million jatropha shrubs worldwide through a London-based provider called Carbon Credited Farming (CCF) Plc.

Jeff Reeves, head of global operations for CCF, which estimates it will have 300 million jatropha shrubs planted on 120,000 acres worldwide by the end of 2010, admitted that there had been problems establishing the crop.

He told The Ecologist magazine: "In many cases it is government policy and people that are to blame, rather than jatropha itself. Well-managed, jatropha ... can work. But there have been countries where poor management has meant this is not the case."

D1 Oils, a London-based biofuels company which has invested heavily in jatropha, said insisted it was too early to write off the crop as a long-term biofuel source. But its former co-investor, BP, disagreed. A spokesman said: "As other [renewable fuel] technologies came up, we looked again at whether jatropha was going to be the best biofuel source that could be scaled up. There were problems with it. We have decided to look elsewhere."

* Some of this research appeared in the Ecologist


Read more!