Indonesia: Locals feel left out of environmental programs

Benget Besalicto Tnb., Jakarta Post 15 Jun 10;

The old villager dispensed with the usual introductory formalities and niceties that normally kick off meetings between locals, government officials, NGOs and private companies, when addressing the crowd at the opening ceremony of an orangutan seminar in remote Central Kalimantan.

"My name is Janas. But first, I would like to remind you that you forgot to mention the name of our village, which is hosting our meeting today," said Acoi Janas, the 62-year old Dayak, jokingly.

His audience included his fellow villagers, as well as representatives of NGOs like Borneo Orangutan Survival (BOS), Orangutan Foundation International (OFI), World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Orangutan Conservation Services Program (OCSP), the Natural Resources Conservation Center (BKSDA), and palm oil company Agro Group.

The meeting, held on May 17, marked the start of a two-day orangutan seminar in Janas' village, which is also home to 32,000 orangutans, or more than 60 percent of the island's total population of the only great ape family in Asia.

Apparently the master of ceremony had mentioned in his speech the names of all the villages whose residents were invited to attend the meeting, except Janas'.

Before directing his eyes toward the stage, where all of the ceremony's prominent figures sat, Janas look around for a moment, as if he was wishing the trees surrounding the ceremony venue would inch closer to protect him from the blazing sun.

"BOS has been operating here for more than 10 years," he started. "But I think you haven't been paying enough attention to the local people. You have set up a special clinic for orangutans, but none of you care about our welfare."

According to Janas, NGOs should help empower locals by prioritizing them as potential workers, and think of them as partners who can provide goods and services for their programs. Foreign NGOs currently run the world's largest orangutan rehabilitation center in Nyaru Menteng, Central Kalimantan.

Another woman, who did not wished to be named, concurred with Janas. "We noticed that only *BOS* staff members are given the opportunity to supply goods and services needed by the orangutan rehabilitation center, not local people," she noted.

Rawan, a teacher at Senior High School VI, who lives in Tumbang Tahai village, complained environmental conservation programs sometimes worsened the plight of locals.

"We've noticed Sebangau National Park is being developed near where we live. But that development goes against our interests as locals. Its spatial planning is not clear yet," he said.

The forests of Sebangau were finally declared protected areas in 2004, after being logged unsustainably for years under forestry concessions handed out during president Soeharto's regime.

Consisting of 95 percent peat soil and spreading over an area of 569,000 hectares across several regencies - Katingan, Pulang Pisau and the city of Palangkaraya, the park is a combination of swampy forests, transitional forests, lowland canopy forests and granite forests, which are rich in various kinds of species, including birds, mammals, and primates.

Many locals who planted their crops in certain zones for generations, found they had to hand over their plots of land as those were now part of the Sebangau National Park, Rawan went on.

"Many of the locals had to surrender their land to the park management without receiving any compensation. We're worried we'll have the same experience," he said, adding that locals needed their land to make a living.

Guris, a villager who lives near the Tangkiling Hill forest sanctuary, expressed similar concerns, saying members of his community were worried they would lose their properties because of the Tangkiling sanctuary project.

As the only mountain in the low-land of Central Kalimantan, Tangkiling Hill is considered a treasure that should be conserved at all costs because of its rich and unique ecosystem.

"Many locals are afraid to grow crops on their land as they fear the government will seize their property. But we have to make a living from the land. So, please make sure that the sanctuary's spatial planning does not disadvantage locals," he said.

During the rest of the meeting, several other locals echoed more or less similar concerns resulting from a number of environmental conservation programs.

Representatives from local administrations, NGOs, and private companies operating in the area, took the opportunity presented by the meeting to defend their position.

To address Janas' complaint, Togu Manurung, the chairman of BOS, said locals should differentiate between NGOs, the government, and private companies.

"They are different in terms of functions. Our job as an NGO is to rehabilitate orangutans. That's our main task. So, it's not our job to improve people's health or empower locals. That's the government's job. Here, we're partnering with the government to help conserve orangutans," he said, "But we will take on board some of your feedback on prioritizing locals to source goods and services."

Anung Setiadi, the head of Central Kalimantan's forestry agency, who represented Governor Agustin Teras Narang during the meeting, reiterated that all conservation programs should be pursued with the interests of local people in mind.

"We'll urge them to do the best they can to empower locals while operating here," he said.

Janas only hoped all the promises made during the meeting would be held.

"They've paid serious attention to preserving the environment. They are spending billions of rupiah each month to save orangutans. But what about us, the locals? Our situation is also difficult. We hope we won't continue to be ignored."


Read more!

Indonesia must learn from its environmental history to avert catastrophe

Jonathan Wootliff Jakarta Post 29 Jun 10;

It’s ironical that the United States President’s postponed visit to Indonesia — as a result of the grotesque oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico — has delayed the signing of important environmental protection agreements.

Norway’s recent commitment to give Indonesia a billion dollars in return for introducing a moratorium on new forestry concessions, raised people’s expectations a similar deal would be forged between Presidents Barack Obama and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono during their discussions in Jakarta scheduled for last month.

Indonesia’s unenviable ranking as the world’s fourth largest greenhouse gas emitter is mainly a result of the poor state of the country’s forests which urgently require improved management.

Funds are badly needed if the government is to have any chance of tackling illegal logging, uncontrolled land clearance, fires and other threats to Indonesia’s rainforests.

Dramatic images of the millions of barrels of spewing crude from BP’s failed Macondo oil installation is certainly a good reason for President Obama to stay at home. The American people rightly demand their government ensures that everything is done to resolve this terrible crisis.

When catastrophe strikes, we want our leaders to act with decisiveness. However unrealistic, we expect government to come to the rescue with an immediate fix.

Unfortunately for the people and wildlife of the states of Louisiana, Alabama and Florida, even the world’s most powerful man is unable to stop the relentless of flow of oil.

Sadly, human-induced environmental disasters are not new. And, in spite of the hideous manifestations of the BP blowout, which occurred just two days before Earth Day, this is not the worst man-made calamity to have beset our fragile planet.

Bhopal and Chernobyl provide just two dreadful examples of the unthinkable impacts of industrial accidents. A thousand five hundred innocent lives were lost in 1984 when a US-owned factory in India leaked deadly chemicals into the atmosphere, and just two years later explosions at a Ukrainian nuclear power plant resulted in the deaths of more than 40,000 people.

In 1997, raging fires in Indonesia pumped caustic smoke into the air that enveloped much of South East Asia, reaching as far north as southern Thailand and the Philippines, with Malaysia and Singapore also badly affected.

An estimated area of 51,100-square kilometers was completely devastated. The lives and health of 70 million Indonesians were jeopardized and species already endangered, such as orangutans, rhinos, and tigers, were pushed closer to extinction.

These were among the worst blazes the world had ever seen and attracted widespread attention from news media, environmental organizations, and governments.

For over three months, dense, choking haze billowed from Indonesia’s forests. The international concern generated by the fires and haze brought massive global assistance, but little could be done to extinguish such overwhelming fire.

Forestry experts attributed negligence to the cause of Indonesia’s 1997 Armageddon, which cost an estimated US$4.5 billion.

They were left in no doubt that had the forests been properly managed with weak enforcement of environmental laws blamed for unbridled forest conversion, the catastrophe would have been avoided.

Attention was also drawn to the immense human and environmental costs borne by Indonesia and its neighbors, which came on top of economic hardship already being suffered because of the prevailing Asian financial crisis.

Environmental organizations concerned with Indonesia’s forests fear that memories are short and the events of more than a decade ago could quite easily reoccur. WHALI, Greenpeace and the Worldwide Fund for Nature are just three of many such groups highlighting a further deterioration of the state of the nation’s forests which has significantly increased the fire hazard.

They say that it is only a matter of time before the forests, made combustible because of unfettered conversion, will catch fire again, and this time on a far more devastating scale.

In spite of popular cries from ordinary American people for government to plug the oil-billowing hole on the more-than-a-kilometer-deep seabed in the Gulf of Mexico, in reality it is only the private sector that has the necessary wherewithal and expertise.

Arguably, we expect too much of government. It is often companies that have far more resources and skills to fix, but perhaps more importantly to avert such environmental calamities.

Indonesian oil palm as well as pulp and paper companies have a clear business interest in preventing fire.

Some of the major forestry operators claim to deploy sustainable practices that actively help to protect the forests.

While government is all-too-often impotent when it comes to conservation, large commercial players say that they provide the only feasible solutions to prevent the release of carbon dioxide and other climate-changing gases.

These companies state that unmanaged forests only accelerate the degradation and risk of fire, citing their on-the-round management techniques as key to curbing such destructive behavior as illegal logging and poor land conversion practices commonly undertaken by local people.

Savvy forestry businesses are coming out in support of effective and constructive regulation, target setting and guidance on acceptable operating practices.

They believe the UN’s program for Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Rainforest Degradation (REDD) can help to improve the state of Indonesia’s forests. And they welcome a deal between the Presidents of Indonesia and the US to help this happen.

In spite of the tensions between environmental organizations and the forestry industry, there is growing recognition that Indonesia needs a strong private sector to help overcome the massive challenges and ensure a sustainable future for one of the country’s most critical natural resources.

There is much room for improvement from commercial players in Indonesia’s forests.

But they can provide viable remedies. Business has the money and manpower to support the government’s ambitions to protect the forests from out-of-control destruction.

Companies can provide community development programs to provide good, alternative livelihoods to otherwise-illegal loggers.

Companies can provide aerial equipment to seek out hotspots and ensure rapid prevention resources to stamp out forest fires; and can provide education to farmers to dissuade them from slash and burn practices.

Companies can work with government to identify only areas with no important environmental values for commercial development; and can actively protect areas found to be of so-called High Conservation Values for ongoing conservation.

Companies have a clear business case for doing all of this.

Environmental advocacy and activist groups need to be working more closely with the private sector.

With more collaboration and less confrontation, there is surely an increased chance of securing the future of Indonesia’s forests. And government must play an active role in facilitating productive partnerships between all forest stakeholders

This country must learn from its environmental history.

The ravaging fires of the late nineties were Indonesia’s Deep Water Horizon.

Without increased effort to protect the nation’s forests, Indonesia could face an environmental catastrophe that would make the events in the Gulf of Mexico look like a spit in the ocean.



Jonathan Wootliff leads the Corporate Accountability practice at the consulting firm, Reputation Partners. He specializes in sustainable development and in building productive relationships between companies and NGOs. He can be contacted at jonathan@reputationpartners.com.


Read more!

Indonesian coal mining damages forests

The Jakarta Post 29 Jun 10;

Indonesia has been the world’s largest exporter of seaborne thermal coal since 2005, enjoying the advantages of low production costs as most of its estimated 95 billion tons of reserves allow for open-cast mining, its coals produce low emission of sulphur, and the country is geographically part of Asia, the world’s coal largest market.

However, this coal-mining boom seemed to have inflicted severe damages to our forests due to reckless issuance of mining rights by regional administrations and weak enforcement of the forestry, environmental, spatial and mining laws.

Last Wednesday’s discovery by a central government team of extensive forest damages inflicted by coal mining operations in Kalimantan only confirmed our fear of the excesses of the launching of the regional autonomy in 2001.

The regional autonomy devolved the authority of licensing general mining operations (outside oil and natural gas) to regional administrations which is further reaffirmed by the 2009 mining law. But this has made mining as the second biggest destroyer of forests, in addition to illegal logging and slash-and-burn farming.

The team of Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan, Environment Minister Gusti Muhammad Hatta and members of the President’s anti-judicial mafia taskforce observed during its aerial survey of East Kalimantan that hundreds of thousands of forested areas have been damaged by greedy legal and illegal miners.

The team saw from the air hundreds of huge black holes abandoned by open-pit coal miners. These holes are supposed to be reclaimed with reforestation by the mining concessionaires.

We find it mind-boggling to understand why the government had not anticipated such environmental damages because mining operations not only are complex but also transcend the jurisdictions of many other ministries — beside the mining and energy ministries — such as the ministries forestry, environment and health.

Mining has been playing an important role in the country’s economy as the country holds major deposits of oil, gas, copper, gold, nickel, coal, silver, diamonds and base metals.

But the central government should have regulated how the various ministries and the different levels of government execute their respective functions and responsibilities as regards mining operations and the supervision of environmental, health and safety aspects as well the rights of the local people around mining areas.

But what the team learnt at a meeting with East Kalimantan Governor Awang Faroek in Samarinda was an acute lack of apprehension of the division of authorities between provincial and regency administrations with regards to the awarding of coal mining rights.

Governor Faroek, instead of accepting responsibility for the weak supervision of coal mining operations in his province, asked for special authority from the central government to enable him to order regents to rein on coal mining rights.

One of the main problem, we think, lies in the long delay in the enforcement of the 2009 mining law that already clearly regulates the division of authority in the licensing of mining ventures between the central government and provincial and regency administrations, the delineation of areas opened to mining contractors or reserved for strategic mining area under direct jurisdiction of the central government.

But we cannot understand why the government has yet to issue all regulations needed to implement the mining law more than one year after its enactment.

Without sweeping realignment in the issuance of mining licenses/rights and strong enforcement of the new mining law, as well as the forestry and environmental laws, Indonesia’s two-year moratorium on clearing natural forests President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono declared at a climate-change conference in Oslo late last month could become a joke.


Read more!

China to move tens of thousands for huge water scheme

Reuters 29 Jun 10;

BEIJING (Reuters) - China will move 345,000 people, mostly poor villagers, within about two years to make way for a vast scheme to draw on rivers in the south to supply the increasingly dry north, an official newspaper said on Tuesday.

The forced resettlement for the South-to-North Water Transfer Project will be the biggest China has undertaken since building the Three Gorges Dam, the world's biggest hydroelectric scheme, said the People's Daily.

The project involves an eastern route to take water from the lower reaches of the Yangtze River and a central route to tap rivers flowing into the Danjiangkou Dam in central China.

The scheme has been troubled by delays, cost increases, pollution and the burden of resettling displaced farmers.

Zhang Jiyao, the official in charge of the project, said the mass move for the central route could be more demanding than the Three Gorges Dam move, which sparked years of contention with displaced residents unhappy with compensation and conditions.

"The intensity of the resettlement will surpass that of the Three Gorges Dam Project, because that involved a million migrants over about 10 years, and the resettlement for the South-to-North Water Transfer Project must be completed in over two years," the paper quoted Zhang as saying.

Big dams and hydro projects have featured among China's engineering trophies symbolizing its growing wealth, but are also a lightning rod for persistent discontent.

The South-North Project is the latest among such efforts and the drive to finish resettlement for the rising Danjiangkou Dam by 2013 has already stirred complaints from farmers, who say they are being moved to poorer land with dim job prospects.

The dam is being raised to store more water, which will then be drawn along 1,421 km (883 miles) of canals and tunnels to Beijing, the nearby port city of Tianjin and surrounding areas.

North China has about half the country's population but 19 percent of its fresh water resources. Industrial and urban growth have strained the nation's rivers and underground reserves, according to official estimates.

The planned completion for the first stage of the central route was pushed back to 2014 after it became clear that earlier deadlines of 2010 and 2008 could not be met.

Many of the displaced farmers are residents of Xichuan county in Henan province, which lies on one side of the Danjiangkou Dam. They will be resettled in crowded Henan, the country's most populous province with nearly 100 million people.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley; Editing by Paul Tait)


Read more!

Nature's Wrath in 2009 Tallied by Country

Jeanna Bryner livescience.com 28 Jun 10;

Asia took the brunt of natural disasters in 2009, experiencing more than 40 percent of Mother Nature's havoc, with the Americas coming in second, according to a new report.

The Philippines, China and the United States were the countries most often hit by notable natural disasters last year.

Overall in 2009, 335 natural disasters were reported worldwide, killing 10,655 people and affecting more than 119 million others. The economic damages from these events exceeded $41.3 billion in U.S. dollars. The number of disasters is actually down compared with the 2000-2008 annual average of 392, mostly because there were fewer storms and other meteorological disasters last year.

While there weren't any so-called mega-disasters, residents did feel the Earth shaking and burping scorching magma. The highest number of reported deaths was due to the earthquake in Sumatra, Indonesia on Sept. 30, which left 1,117 dead and more than 2.5 million others affected. The floods in July in Southern and Central China impacted the most individuals (39.4 million people).

The new report, called the Annual Disaster Statistical Review and compiled by the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, reveals the unequal distribution of the burden from natural disasters. For instance, from the 111 countries affected by natural disasters last year, 18 accounted for more than 75 percent of the overall reported number of deaths, victims (number killed and affected) and economic damages.
The top 10 countries by number of notable natural disasters experienced in 2009 were:
Philippines: 25 disaster events

* China People's Republic: 24 events
* United States: 16 events
* India: 15 events
* Indonesia: 12 events
* Brazil: 9 events
* Mexico: 7 events
* Australia: 6 events
* Bangladesh: 6 events
* Viet Nam: 6 events

The number of events doesn't tell the whole story, though, since disaster type and intensity as well as the country's infrastructure can play a role in determining the number of human victims.

Here are the top 10 countries by natural-disaster-caused mortality in 2009:

* India: 1,806 deaths
* Indonesia: 1,407
* Philippines: 1,334
* Taiwan: 630
* China: 591
* Australia: 535
* Peru: 419
* Viet Nam: 356
* Italy: 335
* El Salvador: 275

Nature's most destructive disasters

Hydrological disasters, such as floods, remained the most common disasters in 2009, accounting for 53.7 percent of total reported natural disasters. This was followed by meteorological disasters (storms such as hurricanes), accounting for 25.4 percent of disasters; geophysical disasters (earthquakes, volcanoes) accounted for 2.7 percent of total disasters.

The 10 most destructive disasters regarding mortality included:

* Earthquake in September, which killed 1,117 individuals in Indonesia
* Flood from July-September, which killed 992 individuals in India
* Ketsana tropical storm Ondoy from September-October killed 716 individuals in the Philippines, Viet Nam, Cambodia and Lao People's Democratic Republic
* Typhoon Morakot in August killed 664 individuals in Taiwan, the Philippines and China
* Typhoon Pepeng in October killed 542 individuals in the Philippines and China
* Heat wave from January-February killed 347 individuals in Australia
* Flood from September-October killed 300 in India
* Cyclone Aila in May killed 298 individuals in Bangladesh, India and Bhutan
* Earthquake in April killed 295 individuals in Italy
* Hurricane Ida in November killed 281 individuals in El Salvador, the United States, Mexico and Nicaragua

And already Mother Nature has delivered a blow in 2010, from the catastrophic Haiti and Chilean earthquakes to the U.S. blizzard that descended on Washington, D.C., in February. In fact 2010 is already proving above average in terms of natural-disaster casualties.


Read more!

International Law Failing to Protect Coral Reefs and Tropical Fish, Experts Argue

ScienceDaily 28 Jun 10;

International law has failed to protect coral reefs and tropical fish from being decimated by a growing collectors market, but U.S. reforms can lead the way towards making the trade more responsible, ecologically sustainable and humane.

That's the view of 18 experts, including Washington State University marine ecologist Brian Tissot, writing in the journal Marine Policy.

"Our actions have a big impact on what happens in these coral reef ecosystems, which are already hit hard by other forces like global warming, ocean acidification and overfishing," said Tissot, lead author and professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at WSU Vancouver.

Using data from the United Nation's conservation monitoring program, the authors say trade in coral and coral reef species is substantial and growing, removing 30 million fish and 1.5 million live stony corals a year. The aquarium industry alone targets some 1,500 species of reef fishes. Many die in transit, leading collectors to gather even more animals to compensate for their losses.

The result is some species have gone "virtually extinct," said Tissot. The Banggai cardinalfish, which is unique to a remote Indonesian archipelago, has had its numbers reduced and even eliminated through much of its range after it became a popular aquarium fish in the late 1990s.

The Marine Policy paper grows out of a meeting of more than 40 scientists, NGOs and policy experts during the 2009 International Marine Conservation Congress. Their concerns grew even more pressing after the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, or CITES, did not take action on key groups of corals this March. Authors include experts from the U.S. Agency for International Development, the National Marine Fisheries Service, Humane Society International, the Pew Environment Group and the Environmental Defense Fund.

With U.S. buyers accounting for more than half the trade in live coral, reef fish and invertebrates, the authors recommend leveraging U.S. market power to reduce the trade's environmental effects. They suggest laws to protect a wider variety of species, better enforcement that includes tracking a product's chain of custody, and reforms in source countries. They also recommend changes in marketing to promote sales of species certified as being humane and sustainable.

"The U.S.," say the authors, "should assume its role as an international leader in coral reef conservation and take steps to reform the international trade it drives."


Read more!

Thailand fights addiction to plastic bags

Bangkok is holding a 'No Bag, No Baht' campaign to reduce the 600,000 plastic bags the Thai capital consumes every day
Lynette Lee Corporal for IPS, part of the Guardian Environment Network
guardian.co.uk 28 Jun 10;

Buy a hairpin and the sales clerk has a microscopic plastic bag for it. A soda purchase from a corner store may end up having the liquid poured into a plastic bag, and then topped off with a plastic straw. There is no plastic bag yet that could fit a car, but if there was one country that could come up with one, Thailand would probably be it.

But here in the capital, local authorities have restarted a campaign to wean the residents of the Thai capital from their plastic bag 'addiction'.

For the second year in a row, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) is holding its 45-day 'No Bag, No Baht' project, which offers consumers a one-baht (three U.S. cents) discount for every 100 baht (nearly three dollars) purchase if they use their own cloth bags when shopping in several local markets. Meanwhile, each plastic bag will cost them one baht.

This year's BMA campaign was launched on Jun. 5, World Environment Day. Last year, the campaign targeted a cutback of 4.4 million plastic bags among Bangkok consumers. This year, BMA authorities want a cutback that is three times that figure.

BMA figures show that every day, more than 600,000 plastic bags are used in this city of nine million people.

Their annual disposal cost reaches more than 600 million baht (18.4 million dollars), city officials have said. Local media have quoted BMA deputy governor Porntep Techapaibul as saying that of the city's daily 10,000 tonnes of trash, about 1,800 tonnes are plastic bags, a number projected to increase by about 20 percent each year.

By now, many Bangkok residents have heard of the health and environmental hazards posed by plastic bags. Made from a non-renewable natural resource, petroleum, the bags have for their main ingredient polyethylene — or polythene — which is said to take 1,000 years to decompose on land and 450 years in water.

But even green-minded residents have problems avoiding the use of plastic bags. Thai Fund Foundation coordinator Chomphu Rammuang says that although she brings a big cloth bag to the supermarket and a lunch pack to work, she can still wind up with a plastic bag in hand by day's end.

Thailand, after all, is a major manufacturer of plastic. That could help explain why even micro-entrepreneurs here think nothing of shoving their merchandise in plastic bags.

For instance, Yakult health drink vendor Suprathit says that a 100-piece pack of small plastic bags costs her only five baht (15 cents). Pusadee, who sells office lunches in clear plastic bags, also says she buys a kilo of these for 70 baht (two dollars). She says a kilo's supply lasts her two days.

Thailand produces other plastic products. According to Greenpeace South- east Asia-Thailand country representative Tara Buakamsri, the country is among South-east Asia's biggest manufacturers of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), which is the third most widely produced plastic after polythylene and polypropylene.

Cheap, durable and easy to assemble, it is often used to make pipes, water bottles, credit cards. It is also non-biodegradable.

In April, the English-language daily 'Bangkok Post' reported that domestic demand for PVC is about 450,000 tonnes per year.

A study presented in 2009 by Wuthichai Wongthatsanekorn at the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology in Dubai, says that the recovery rate of plastic waste in Thailand in 2000 was only 23 percent.

It also says that only about 35 percent of the solid wastes collected from parts of Thailand outside of Bangkok are properly managed, while the rest of the waste products are "piled up in open dumping areas waiting to be dissolved."

For a campaign to be effective, Tara says, consumers have to be aware of the importance and the long-term effect of the scheme.

"We need to study what economic mechanism will work if plastic bags are banned in Thailand," he says. "What would be the reaction of the huge plastic industry in the country? What will be the economic incentive for people to follow this campaign?"

The good news, though, is that many establishments like supermarket chain Tesco Lotus and furniture store Home Pro are open to taking part in the BMA project. In fact, even before the 'No Bag, No Baht' project was relaunched, Tesco Lotus already had its very own 'Green Bag Green Point' campaign. For each bag saved, a customer can earn one Green Clubcard point.

Tesco Lotus senior corporate affairs manager Saofang Ekaluckrujee told IPS in an email interview, "We are very pleased to see policymakers such as the BMA making this issue a national priority. Our Green Bag Green Point scheme's initial target is to reduce plastic bag usage by 9.8 million bags in 2010." Other huge shopping malls like Siam Paragon and Central also give incentives like bonus shopper points for not using their bags – plastic or paper ones for that matter – or a 5 percent discount at certain times of the month.

Even small businesses are joining in. During the BMA campaign's soft relaunch in May, than 5,000 stores in Bangkok's famous Chatuchak weekend market participated.

Chomphu also reports that her monthly visits to the Chatuchak weekend market have become a pleasant experience, plastic bag-wise. "The vegetarian store near Chatuchak that I go to is actively participating in the project," she says. "Buyers are encouraged to bring their own bags."


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 28 Jun 10


Kallang Riverside megatrash
from sgbeachbum

Bleaching at Hantu
from wonderful creation and wild shores of singapore and Singapore Nature

Depressing Reef Survey Dive @ Pulau Hantu
from colourful clouds

Longhorn Beetle (Xylorhiza adusta)
from Creatures Big & Small

Clothes hanger and crow’s nest
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Tiger farming and traditional Chinese medicine
from Mongabay.com news


Read more!

PM: Don't expect flood-free Singapore

Preventing widespread floods more realistic, he says
Jeremy Au Yong, Straits Times 28 Jun 10;

GIVEN Singapore's tropical climate, it will be very costly to keep the country flood-free, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.

Speaking for the first time on the two flash floods this month, he noted that any attempt to wipe out flooding here would require plenty of money and land.

'If you are going to do that, you will need huge tracts of land put aside for huge monsoon drains, which will be empty most of the time, (and) the infrastructure will cost a lot of money and it is not worth it,' he said.

A more realistic objective, he added, is to prevent widespread and prolonged flooding, and limit the risk to lives and damage to property.

Mr Lee made the point while assuring Singaporeans that the Government 'will continue to implement new drainage works, to improve the design of the drainage systems and deal with more intense storms'.

'But I don't think it is possible in Singapore to expect the place to be completely free of floods,' he said, as heavy downpours are very much part of the climate for an 'island in the tropics'.

PM Lee was speaking at the opening of new facilities at Lower Seletar Reservoir that include a Rower's Bay for competitive rowing and a 170m bridge that gives panoramic views of the reservoir.

They were built under a programme known as ABC Waters (Active, Beautiful, Clean), to freshen up Singapore's reservoirs and rivers and turn them into recreation spaces.

The Prime Minister, in his speech, also stressed the need to have contingency plans for unusually heavy rain to ensure swift response in pinpointing the problem areas, dealing with them and 'putting them right'.

He was keen to make sure the recent floods that caused chaos and disruption in Orchard Road, Thomson Road, Bukit Timah and Tanjong Katong would not happen again.

'We have to learn from these episodes, do post-mortems, find out what happened, and upgrade our infrastructure and systems,' he said.

The flood that submerged parts of Orchard Road two weeks ago was the worst to hit the area in more than two decades.

It caused traffic chaos and millions in losses as several shops on the shopping belt were inundated with waist-high water.

The flood was blamed on a clogged drain in the area and record rainfall - 60 per cent of what normally falls in the entire month of June poured down in one morning.

A similar storm landed a week later, and this time it was areas such as Thomson Road, Bukit Timah and Tanjong Katong that saw rising waters which, however, subsided in 30 minutes.

The two incidents had many Singaporeans chiding national water agency, PUB .

Yesterday, PM Lee defended the agency's work, noting that floods were relatively rare occurrences in Singapore.

'PUB has ongoing drainage improvement programmes which, over the years, have made floods much rarer, and much less severe so much so that when it does happen, we are sometimes taken by surprise and we scramble to see how we can deal with those remaining problems,' he said.

PUB had admitted to being caught off-guard by the Orchard Road floods and has since taken several measures.

They include installing new gratings on drains upstream of Orchard Road to trap debris such as leaves and plastic bags and having its contractors clean big drains monthly instead of quarterly.

But ultimately, it is not just the PUB that has to take flood prevention measures, said Mr Lee.

'We all have parts to play, to keep our public places and our waterways clean.

'We must prevent litter from choking up our drains. Otherwise, the litter will find its ways into the canals, into the drains, into the reservoirs and pollute our water supply,' he said.

Singapore must learn from recent flooding episodes: PM Lee
Jeremy Koh Channel NewsAsia 27 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE: Singapore must learn from the recent flooding episodes and upgrade its infrastructure and systems, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

However, he added, it is also not realistic to expect the country to be completely free of floods.

And, individuals need to also take responsibility.

Mr Lee said this at the opening of the PUB's Active, Beautiful, Clean or ABC Waters project at Lower Seletar Reservoir.

After a S$10 million facelift under the ABC Waters programme, Lower Seletar Reservoir now has new facilities, among them, a 170m bridge which extends from the banks of the reservoir, allowing residents to venture over the water.

Children can also have fun at the new water play area and wading stream.

The ABC Waters programme is a long-term masterplan to transform Singapore's waterways and reservoirs into vibrant community spaces.

Visiting the revamped area on Sunday, Prime Minister Lee reminded Singaporeans to be responsible for the facilities even as they enjoy them.

He said: "We all have parts to play to keep public places and our waterways clean. We must prevent the litter from choking up our drains, otherwise the litter will find its way into the drains, into the canals, into the reservoirs and pollute our water supply."

Turning to the recent floods, Mr Lee said Singapore must learn from the episodes and upgrade its infrastructure and systems.

He said: "We will continue to implement new drainage works, improve the design of the drainage systems and to deal with more intense storms. But I don't think it's possible in Singapore to expect the place to be completely free of floods. Because if you're going to do that, you'll have to have huge tracts of land put aside for huge monsoon drains which will be empty most of the time, the land is tied up, the infrastructure will cost a lot of money."

So, Mr Lee said a more realistic objective is to prevent widespread and prolonged flooding and limit the risk to lives and damage to properties.

He added that contingency plans should be in place to ensure that if there's heavier rain than usual, the relevant agencies are able to respond quickly to deal with the problems.

- CNA/ir


PM: not realistic to expect Singapore to be flood-free
Business Times 28 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE must learn from the recent flooding episodes and upgrade its infrastructure and systems, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.

However, it is also not realistic to expect the country to be completely free of floods, he said at the opening of the PUB's ABC Waters project at Lower Seletar Reservoir.

According to a ChannelNewsAsia report, he said: 'We will continue to implement new drainage works, improve the design of the drainage systems and to deal with more intense storms.

'But I don't think it's possible in Singapore to expect the place to be completely free of floods. Because if you're going to do that, you'll have to have huge tracts of land put aside for huge monsoon drains which will be empty most of the time, the land is tied up, the infrastructure will cost a lot of money.'

So, a more realistic objective is to prevent widespread and prolonged flooding and limit the risk to lives and damage to property, said PM Lee. He added that contingency plans should be in place to ensure that if there is heavier rain than usual, the relevant agencies are able to respond quickly to deal with the problems.

Heavy rainfall on June 16 caused massive floods at Orchard Road and millions of dollars of damage, while flash floods also hit Singapore last Friday and caused chaos on some roads. National water agency PUB had said that the Orchard Road flood and the impact and disruption to people, traffic and business was 'unacceptable'.

PM: We can't be flood-free but can limit impact
Jeremy Koh Today Online 28 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE - Singapore must learn from the recent flooding episodes and upgrade its infrastructure and systems, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

However, he added, it's also not realistic to expect the country to be completely free of floods. To do so would require huge tracts of land to be put aside for huge monsoon drains which will be empty most of the time.

"The land is tied up, the infrastructure will cost a lot of money, and it's not worth it," he said.

It is more realistic to prevent widespread and prolonged flooding, and limit the risk to lives and damage to property, he said.

"We have to have contingency plans so that if we have heavier rain than usual", the relevant agencies would be able to respond quickly to deal with the problems, Mr Lee said.

"PUB has an ongoing drainage improvement programme which over the years has made floods much rarer and much less severe," he said. "So much so that when it does happen, we're sometimes taken by surprise and we scramble to see how we can deal with those remaining problems."

Two weeks ago, a flash flood in Orchard Road - caused by a blocked canal that overflowed - caused millions of dollars in damages to shops, as traffic along the shopping belt came to a halt in knee-deep water.

Last Friday, heavy rain brought about flash floods in several areas again. Just like on June 16, 100mm of rain - 60 per cent of June's average rainfall - fell in a short span of time.

Singaporeans can do their part in keeping the waterways free, said PM Lee at the opening of the PUB's Active, Beautiful, Clean or ABC Waters project at Lower Seletar Reservoir yesterday.

"We all have parts to play to keep public places and our waterways clean. We must prevent the litter from choking up our drains, otherwise the litter will find its way into the drains, into the canals, into the reservoirs and pollute our water supply," he said.

After a $10-million facelift under the ABC Waters programme, Lower Seletar Reservoir now has new facilities, among them, a 170m bridge which extends from the banks of the reservoir, allowing residents to venture over the water.

The ABC Waters programme is a long-term plan to transform Singapore's waterways and reservoirs into vibrant community spaces. Jeremy Koh


Read more!

Orchard Road did not flood

Richard Hartung Today Online 28 Jun 10;

The real news last Friday was that Orchard Road did not flood. Even as headlines focused on floods in Bishan or Chai Chee and a fallen tree on the Central Expressway, what's really remarkable was that water flowed smoothly in the drains along Orchard Road.

It is not that the rain was not torrential. PUB said that once again this past week, just like the week before, 100mm of rain fell within about one hour. The big difference was that shops along Orchard Road stayed dry this time and shops in other parts of the island flooded.

What's also different is that there had been a sudden flurry of activity around the Orchard Road area over the past week.

After the Orchard Road flood, PUB chief executive Khoo Teng Chye said his agency would take action to prevent a recurrence and PUB got to work right away. A photo on Thursday showed gratings being installed in drains along Holland Road as part of improvements from there to the drains behind Tanglin Shopping Centre. Small bulldozers were used to clear debris, too.

After the Orchard floods, PUB's Mr Khoo also told the media that "we were, frankly, a little bit caught off-guard by what happened at Stamford Canal. But, of course, now that becomes a new hot spot."

Unfortunately, there are still more new hot spots now. Along with Bishan and Chai Chee, shops and roads flooded in Changi Road, Toh Tuck and other locations around the island. The Singapore Civil Defence Force even had to rescue children from a childcare centre in Telok Kurau.

The damage just from the two recent floods is tremendous. Losses were estimated at more than $6 million along Orchard Road on June 16 and at nearly $1 million or more on June 25, excluding the cost of rescue efforts and commuters' time traversing around the floods.

It is hard to estimate the cost of Singapore's tarnished reputation for efficiency and preparedness.

The key issue is what to do next.

The short-term solution seems easy. Since shops along Orchard Road did not get flooded again, cleaning drains and installing grates seems like a quick fix to handle massive amounts of water.

An immediate priority could be to focus on detecting similar problems and preventing them island-wide. Every day, Mr Khoo said, more than 360 contractors spread out across the island to maintain the drains.

Along with this regular maintenance, an urgent inspection of the drains would enable contractors to check flood-prone areas quickly, clean out clogged drains and install grates.

The floods seem to be more than a short-term problem though, and flood-prone areas may have expanded beyond the "only about 66 hectares" that the PUB currently estimates. More frequent heavy rain seems likely - though hopefully not every week - so developing a longer-term strategy seems better than simply jumping from one hot spot to the next.

Although PUB has not talked much about new longer term plans so far, planning in other countries provides constructive examples of what could be considered.

While the Netherlands has a bigger problem with water than Singapore, it provides one model. A Delta Committee undertook a detailed study, presented its findings in 2008 and said "its recommendations must be future-proof". The Netherlands plans to spend up to €1.6 billion ($2.7 billion) per year to strengthen dykes and prevent flooding.

Hong Kong, which gets 2.2m of rain per year, offers another example. It has a dedicated Drainage Services Department (DSD), with a budget of more than HK$1.8 billion ($322 million), that is tasked with providing "world-class wastewater and storm water drainage services". It regularly develops and improves its Drainage Master Plan and Flood Control Strategy Studies.

While Committees and Studies won't solve everything, convening experts to analyse current practices and developing a longer-term strategic plan could be prudent.

And even though Singapore's smaller size and not yet needing to build dykes means that it does not need a Netherlands-sized budget, reviewing the annual budgets here of $23 million for maintenance and $150 million for drainage improvement could be beneficial.

After one large flood along Bukit Timah last year and two big floods around the island already this year, doing more than business-as-usual could be appropriate.



The writer is a consultant who has lived in Singapore since 1992


Read more!

Experts in town to discuss liveable cities, water solutions

Ministers and mayors here for World Cities Summit, Water Week
Robin Chan Straits Times 28 Jun 10;

INTELLECTUALS, businessmen, scientists and bureaucrats will descend on Singapore this week with sustainability, water and urban solutions on their minds.

The second World Cities Summit (WCS) and Expo and third Singapore International Water Week kick off today at Suntec City.

For the first time, there will be a WCS Mayors' Forum, which has attracted some 25 ministers and 45 mayors and governors from 20 countries around the world, including mayors from Tangshan, Melbourne and Freiburg as speakers.

They will discuss best practices and solutions to building liveable and sustainable cities.

The forum on Wednesday will explore the role of good governance in urban development, and look at how cities can develop in a more environmentally responsible way.

This week will also see the presentation of the first Lee Kuan Yew World City Prize to Bilbao City Hall, which was named as the winner last month for its success in transforming the Spanish city.

The Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize, won by China's Yellow River Conservancy Commission this year, will also be presented.

And at the WCS Expo, displays from various student groups will be showcased for the first time.

These include architectural and planning designs, as well as digital games on sustainable development and environmental awareness.

Key highlights of the expo, which has attracted over 50 participating companies and agencies, will include exhibits by the Housing Board, the Urban Redevelopment Authority and the city of Bilbao.

A robot that does household chores will be a highlight at the Agency for Science, Technology and Research's expo booth.

The WCS will also feature a ministerial dialogue with 10 ministers from emerging countries and cities to discuss their priorities after surviving the economic crisis, and their vision for a liveable and vibrant city.

Some of the highlights of Water Week, which ends on Friday, one day after WCS, include a forum with water ministers, as well as a first ever river basin and delta management workshop.

The PUB also spells out its long-term water plans for the next 50 years today.

Throughout the four days of the summit, there will also be a series of 'learning journeys' when international delegations will be taken to see some of Singapore's latest urban achievements including Marina Bay Sands, the Southern Ridges, Pinnacle@Duxton and Chek Jawa Wetlands at Pulau Ubin.

Mr Andrew Tan, co-chairman of the WCS and the director of the Centre for Liveable Cities, said: 'There is currently no platform like this where you can have practitioners gathering to address these issues and not only look at it from a policy perspective, but also look for solutions.

'I think Singapore can provide that niche, in this platform, where we are in a way, almost like a test bed and almost a living laboratory of some of these things that we have done here.

'It may not be relevant in other parts of the world, but at least the lessons that we have learnt, both the good and the bad, can be shared with others just as we learn from the others.'


Read more!

Man For Beast: The monday interview with Louis Ng

Animal activist Louis Ng wants to help the creatures and get people to be animal-friendly too
akshita nanda Straits Times 28 Jun 10;

He works against the illegal wildlife trade, saves tiny sea creatures from oil spills and even volunteers to get large, lost monitor lizards out of people's bathrooms for free.

But surrounded by students and staff sporting identical T-shirts and jeans, Mr Louis Ng of the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) at first glance looks more like a camp counsellor or school adviser.

At Jalan Lekar near Choa Chu Kang, the headquarters of the animal group he founded is a hive of youthful activity. Students from Anglo-Chinese Junior College are clipping the grass, interns from overseas institutes are cleaning the common area and more young people from Singapore Polytechnic are straggling up the 1km walk from Sungei Tengah Road to prepare for a talk they are giving schoolchildren on animal conservation.

The 31-year-old executive director of Acres beams proudly at the industrious youth as he shows this reporter around the society's one-year-old animal rescue centre.

'We couldn't do any of this without our donors and volunteers,' he says, pointing out the public education hall sponsored by the Lee Foundation and decorated with murals designed by students from Admiralty Secondary School.

Dogged by four canine pets belonging to Acres' staff, we walk past the administration building and the volunteer housing with five bedrooms and a lounge to let visitors spend more time at the centre.

The only place off-limits is the quarantine block, which houses more than 20 recently rescued animals, including an iguana missing its lower jaw. All are being treated before they can be returned to their native countries or habitats.

Mr Ng sits down at the outdoor staff area, his pet Pomeranian Penny at his feet. Rescued from a puppy farm, she has a deformed hind leg, walks with a limp and is still shy with strangers.

Her owner gets up to shoo away a pigeon that keeps flying in to roost on the sofa next to his chair. 'Winkle knows it's not supposed to come here,' he says, clamming up when asked about the animal's history. 'I really don't want to talk about it,' he repeats several times.

It appears to be a painful story, one of many sad experiences he has had in Acres' nine years of trying to help animals injured by accident or the illegal wildlife trade.

He has watched a starving bear die in Laos and coaxed a wild monkey out of the trauma of captivity in Singapore. Tales such as these come out in poignant bursts as he speaks about the non-profit charity's activities, which range from raising awareness on animal issues to going undercover to survey the business of selling endangered animal species for pets or parts.

He and other members at Acres are on call 24 hours a day. They baulk at nothing, whether it is taking a trapped python out of a construction site as they did two weeks ago or working from dawn to dusk last month to rescue sea creatures from the oil spill that hit Changi Beach.

On the day we chat, Mr Ng's wife, Britain-born zoologist Amy Corrigan, 32, is on a 'sensitive' undercover operation somewhere in Asia and he refuses to reveal further details. A mutual passion for wildlife is what brought them together five years ago, while he was at a rescue centre in Thailand. Ironically, this shared concern often keeps them apart.

Acres' animal protection programme, especially rescuing wildlife locally, takes up most of the between $500,000 and $600,000 the society needs a year. It is mainly funded by donations and qualifies as an institute of public character, so donations to it are tax-exempt. Statements of account are available at its website.

Its 11 full-time staff work for salaries starting from $500 a month. Mr Ng, who has a biology degree from the National University of Singapore (NUS) and a master's in primate conservation from Oxford Brookes University in Britain, earns $1,600 monthly; his wife, $300 less as director of education and cruelty free living. They live 'a simple life' in an HDB flat in Jurong West and 'don't go out drinking or clubbing'.

Grants and donations keep the rescue centre in operation and Mr Ng feels that support has been growing, even though some months are tight. 'The bulk of our donations is the $5 or $20 from the man on the street,' he says.

The society's supporter database has more than 14,000 people and most are responsive to requests for funds and help. Acres' sole van, used to transport animals and equipment, broke down on the day of our meeting and an e-mail to supporters netted almost $2,000 in individual donations within hours.

People also contribute in other ways.

In the first few months of this year alone, hundreds of new volunteers, many from local schools, have spent more than 3,000 hours helping the society spread awareness on animal issues and maintain its premises, among other things.

Acres' 24-hour rescue hotline now also receives calls almost daily to free wild animals that wander into homes - calls that might otherwise be directed to pest control agencies or exterminators.

A day before our chat, Mr Ng helped a monitor lizard out of a house in Holland Road. The woman who called for help was terrified of the beast but did not want it to be killed. 'She even gave us a donation for coming down,' he says, smiling.

The public is also keeping an eye out for signs of illegal wildlife trade, such as the sale of bear and tiger organs used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).

According to a June 3 Straits Times report, 'Probe into illegal sale of bear parts', for example, a tip-off to Acres led the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) to investigate a trader at the Singapore Food Expo who was allegedly selling bear gall bladders.

'We are not just trying to help animals but also start a movement,' says Mr Ng, who does not want people to love animals as much as to recognise that some practices involving them are inhumane.

He has his detractors, with people calling the Acres hotline to defend their use of illegal animal parts or having unknown elements splash his door with red paint last year. 'That only tells me I'm doing something right,' he says.

But he is keen to stress that he believes in 'partnership, not confrontation'.

In 2007, Acres signed a deal with the Singapore TCM Organisations Committee to launch a scheme to help end trade in products from endangered species. TCM shops committed to not selling such items get a special label for their shop windows.

He also takes a large stuffed bear in a cage on roadshows to the heartlands for an in-the-face demonstration of the inhumanity of keeping Asiatic bears in tiny cages and milking them for their bile.

This sort of drive is what has gained him the respect of animal welfare workers, including Ms Deirdre Moss of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

'He's very passionate. I think Singapore needs more young people to step forward and fight animal cruelty,' says the executive officer of Singapore's oldest animal charity, who has been working for animals for 26 years. 'He's achieved a lot in a short time. He's faced a lot of odds, which has strengthened his resolve.'

Chimpanzee changed his life Obstacles or opposition rarely faze Mr Ng for long, says Ms Anbarasi Boopal, 27, who runs Acres' Wildlife Crime Unit. 'All of us (Acres' staff) see him to solve problems immediately,' she adds.

Two years ago, she learnt that a neighbour was keeping a hornbill and an Indian star tortoise illegally. After getting in touch with Acres, she was so moved by its work, she left her job at another non-profit group to join it full-time. She lives on the premises, as do two other staff members, and earns about $1,000 a month.

'It's not that bad, as we provide board,' Mr Ng jokes. But neither he nor his staff are in it for the money, a fact that gave his parents a few tough moments when he first told them his career plans. He is the younger of two children and his sister is a dentist.

His father, sales manager Robert Ng, is fully behind his son, though he worries about the younger man's future. 'I always tell him he cannot live on such things,' says the 62-year-old, who often urges friends to donate to Acres.

He is content that his son is doing what he enjoys most and is somewhat reassured by the fact that 'Louis is not the only one' and there are other people committed to animals for little pay.

His wife, retired civil servant Angela Quek, 61, says their son has loved animals from a young age, was passionately devoted to his pet hamster and even wanted to be a vet when younger. Still, his decision to do biology and then devote himself to animals came as a surprise.

Like her husband, she decided to leave it to him. 'He should be able to pursue his passion, that makes us parents happy.'

She adds: 'I'm also quite proud of him. He could easily earn more than what he is getting but it is rare to find somebody who will make sacrifices for animals.'

Her son recalls that this same willingness to make sacrifices caused his mother some uneasy moments when he was in his early teens.

After watching the 1988 movie Gorillas In The Mist, about the life and work of the late primate scientist Dian Fossey, he told her that he 'wanted to grow up to be like Dian'. 'My mum freaked out because at the end of the movie, Dian was murdered,' he says with a chuckle.

His resolve to work for animals was strengthened at age 14, when he watched a documentary on turtles. That year, he gave up turtle soup and then 'a meat a year' until turning totally vegetarian at age 21.

While studying at NUS, he volunteered as a photographer at the Singapore Zoo and met the animal that would change his life: Young chimpanzee Rhamba had been separated from her family to pose for photographs with visitors and was reportedly treated roughly by her human caretakers. A tip-off to The Straits Times resulted in a successful campaign for the ape to be returned to her family.

The heartwarming sight of baby Rhamba reuniting with her mother left him determined to do more for wild animals. He and eight friends set up Acres in 2001, writing to organisations including the Lee Foundation for money.

In the years since, Acres has rescued a rare South African vervet monkey and found it a home in Zambia; started undercover operations that have helped the AVA clamp down on the illegal trade in bear and tiger parts; and, of course, opened its animal rescue centre.

A cyan simian is now part of its logo, in memory of past triumphs. But there have been many defeats. 'In all honesty, there are days we want to just give up,' he says, citing the problems that dogged the opening of the animal rescue centre.

Set to open in 2007, it was delayed by funding woes and then faced a catastrophe last year. Several new animal enclosures had to be torn down when it turned out that developer error had polluted the ground and rendered the buildings unstable. 'I was in tears,' he recalls.

The court has since awarded damages to Acres but he refuses to discuss details. He does reveal, however, that a figure of a pig with wings hung at the shelter for months to remind him that 'this pig would fly' in spite of every indication that it would not.

Another touchstone is a photograph of Rhamba on his work table. She died in 2004 but remains a symbol of why he entered this line of work. 'Every time we rescue an animal, that keeps us going,' he says. 'I may never be a millionaire but yesterday we released a monitor lizard - that was a million-dollar moment.'

He has also recently begun spending one week a month in Boten, Laos, to set up a shelter for bears that were being farmed illegally for their bile. He receives offers to work overseas but his home and heart are in Singapore and this is where he intends to keep working for animals.

He draws strength from his family and the students who visit Acres and tell him how their eyes have been opened to the plight of animals. He hopes that everyone in Singapore would eventually act for animal welfare and adopt animal-friendly lifestyles.

He says his dream sounds far-fetched but points out everything that people have helped the society achieve thus far. 'If it was easy, someone else would have done it long ago. The key thing with Acres is that we have shown that the impossible is possible in Singapore.'

akshitan@sph.com.sg

my life so far

'I don't make much money, but I come to work every day knowing that this is what I want to do'

Acres founder Louis Ng

'Put a human in a cage and he will spit at you but an animal wants affection'

On what moves him about animals

'Everybody says people who use illegal animal parts are cruel but I don't think they are. I think they are ignorant. If you let them see what a bear is really like in the wild, there will be some awareness... We don't need everyone in Singapore to love animals but we need to build a sense of the injustice'

On raising awareness to reduce illegal trade in wild animal parts

'Believe it or not, I'm a very shy person. During university, I spent a lot of time alone at Kent Ridge Park'

On being the public face of Acres

'We went to see animals in the wild. It's like a recharge. We see all these sad animals here but we want to see happy animals in the wild where they belong'


Read more!