Malaysia, Johor: Well prepared to face floods

New Straits Times 11 Oct 13;

ALL READY: Fire and Rescue Department conducts basic boat and jet-ski handling course for firemen and volunteer firemen

MUAR: JOHOR Fire and Rescue Department (JBPM) is fully prepared to face the flood season which is expected to occur anytime from now until March next year.

Its director Datuk Ab Ghani Daud said there was a National Security Council (MKN) state-level meeting recently to discuss the issue.

"The department was informed that although the state receives low rainfall, there is a risk that there could still be floods due the current weather change," he said during the closing ceremony of basic boat and jet-ski handling course here recently.

He said the rainfall is expected to be scattered evenly in the state during the rainy season but a prolonged downpour would result in floods.

Also present were JBPM state operation division deputy director Mohd Rizal Buang and firemen training division deputy director Raja Saiful Iswandy Raja Hassan.

Ghani said although the weather is fine, the department hopes that there will be no big floods like in 2006.

He also said that the training course would be held regularly to prepare firemen in handling the flood situation.

"The training is aimed at equipping firemen as well as volunteer firemen in rescuing flood victims. The course would also test all the communication gadgets.

"This is also aimed at updating the Emergency Action Plan for all agencies," he said.

Ghani said the training would include simulations of rescue operations.

In the tail-end of 2006, Johor was hit by one of the worst flooding in history with the water level reaching 29cm on Dec 19.

Kota Tinggi and Segamat were the worst-hit areas with both towns totally inaccessible by land.

The flood waters inundated homes and damaged most electrical items. Many victims were evacuated.

A second wave of flood came unexpectedly on the third week of January 2007, flooding eight districts of the state. This time around, the worst-hit towns were Kluang and Batu Pahat.

Both calamities caused the government a loss of some RM1.5 billion and were considered the costliest floods in Malaysian history.

Read more: Well prepared to face floods - Johor - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/streets/johor/well-prepared-to-face-floods-1.373070#ixzz2hPL3sbYj


Read more!

Japan via Singapore said bringing misery to rural Indonesia with mercury exports

Nao Hidaka Asahi Shimbun 8 Oct 13;

MINAMATA, Kumamoto Prefecture--In this city that is synonymous with the nation's worst case of industrial pollution, a symposium heard that Japan is causing untold misery with its exports of mercury.

The head of an Indonesian environmental NGO called Oct. 6 on Japan to halt its exports of mercury, saying that portions of shipments to Singapore, in particular, were often smuggled to Indonesia for use in small-scale gold mining operations there.

Yuyun Ismawati, 49, head of Balifokus, noted that mercury contamination in Indonesia is becoming a cause for concern.

According to Ismawati, Japan exported between 100 tons and 150 tons of mercury, mainly to Singapore and Hong Kong, over the past five years. However, she said there is, in fact, little demand for the liquid metal in those destinations.

Ismawati said Singapore is a known intermediary port for smuggling to Indonesia.

In 2010, about 280 tons of mercury were exported from Singapore to Indonesia. However, official Indonesian records show that only 2 tons of mercury were imported from Singapore to Indonesia that year.

Ismawati quoted smugglers as saying that they traded mercury through the black market.

“Mercury is illegally imported to Indonesia from developed countries, such as Japan, through a third country and is used there,” she said.

Small-scale gold miners are active in Asia as well as Africa.

Mercury is used during the refining process. The toxic fumes that result pose a serious health risk to workers. The use of mercury also contaminates the soil and water supply. One of the problems with mercury is that it does not break down in the environment.

According to the global NGO network IPEN and other sources, hair samples of residents in an Indonesian community had three times the mercury concentration as the U.S. environmental standard.

The symposium preceded the Oct. 9 opening of the Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the “Minamata Convention on Mercury.” The conference, which aims to regulate the use of mercury and exports of the substance, is expected to adopt the convention on Oct. 10. However, the use of mercury in small-scale gold mining operations is not prohibited in the convention.

Minamata disease, caused by mercury poisoning, was discovered in the city of the same name in the 1950s. Thousands of people were affected.

The neurological disease was caused by industrial waste from a Chisso Corp. chemical factory, which accumulated in shellfish and fish caught in Minamata Bay.


Read more!

Malaysia: First ever responsible standards give hope to beleaguered farmed seafood in the Coral Triangle

WWF Malaysia 10 Oct 13;

Penang: Fish farmers and fish feed producers from the Coral Triangle region today released a draft of the inaugural fish farming Standards for grouper, snapper, and sea bass also known as barramundi—popular farmed seafood species in dire need of better management.

The draft Standards is the product of a two-day Aquaculture Dialogue, which marked the first of what is deemed to be a series of regional dialogues designed to enable a range of stakeholders to actively participate in the development of best-practice Standards for these farmed species. The goal is to have the Standards in place and utilized by 2015.

“The need for more responsible farming of grouper, snapper, and barramundi has been identified in recent years by government and non-government agencies and more recently, by a more vocal industry, in response to both environmental and market access issues,” said Carol Phua, WWF-Malaysia’s Marine Programme Head.

While best aquaculture practices for grouper have been previously developed by other regional bodies and have been used to work with farmers to notionally improve farm operations, measurable standards for this suite of species have not previously been discussed and drafted.

“The emphasis of previous programs has been on the management of small-scale farmers and on livelihoods, but the rapid growth in commercial-scale farming and the impacts of these farmed fish species in particular, on the marine environment has necessitated us to look more deeply at measures that can help us address this industry’s poor sustainability record,” added Phua.

High demand, high footprint species

Grouper is one of highest-valued species of economic importance in the world. In the past decade, the global production and output of grouper aquaculture has developed rapidly, especially in China and Southeast Asian countries. At face value, figures suggest an increase in overall production between 2000 and 2010 of more than 700 percent.

“Grouper, snapper, and barramundi farming have significant environmental impacts, and yet no collective efforts have been made to reduce such impacts,” said Dr. Geoffrey Muldoon, WWF Coral Triangle Strategy Leader.

Adverse modifications to natural habitats, harmful impacts of pollution and waste discharge, drug and chemical use leading to poor water quality and fish health, removal of juvenile fish from the wild before being able to replenish fish populations, and heavy dependence on fish feed are just some of the numerous problems plaguing the farming of these species.

“Such unsustainable practices are not only threatening the biodiversity of the Coral Triangle but also the livelihoods dependent on these resources. Implementing measurable and performance-based Standards for responsibly-farmed seafood is of critical importance, not only for Malaysians but for the wellbeing of all in the Coral Triangle,” said Phua.
“The countries of this region see the export of grouper, snapper, and barramundi as continuing to contribute significantly to their respective economies, however the markets into which these products are being sold are increasingly demanding better performance. We see these Standards helping the sector to expand in a responsible way that minimizes environmental and social impacts,” said Dr. Muldoon.

The participants of the dialogue collectively agreed for the standards to address the following issues: natural habitat and local biodiversity conservation; socially-responsible farm operations; sustainability and traceability of feed ingredients; and fish health maintenance, among others.

The long-term goal is to evolve these Standards to the extent that they will be recognized by global certification bodies such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC)—the most credible certification and eco-labelling organization for farmed seafood, and international Standards setting bodies such as ISEAL.

The dialogue was officiated by Dr. Afif Bahardin, Penang Agriculture, Agro-based Industry, Rural Development and Health Committee Chairman.

-ENDS-

Notes to the Editor:
The Coral Triangle—the nursery of the seas—is the world’s center of marine life, encompassing around 6 million sq km of ocean across six countries in Asia-Pacific – Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Solomon Islands, and Timor-Leste.
The initial draft of the Standards for grouper, snapper, and barramundi is the first of many steps, which will involve conducting public consultations, applying revisions, enlisting the participation of more industry players and consumer markets, and eventually establishing an advisory group to oversee the implementation and monitoring of the Standards.

Coral triangle fish farmers agree on grouper, snapper & sea bass farming standards
New Straits Times 11 Oct 13;

KUALA LUMPUR: Fish farmers and fish feed producers from the Coral Triangle region today released a draft of the inaugural fish farming standards for grouper, snapper, and sea bass, also known as barramundi, said WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) Malaysia.

The species are popular farmed fishes for seafood but in dire need of better management, it said in a statement.

The Coral Triangle encompasses around six million sq km of ocean across six countries in the Asia-Pacific – Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste.

WWF-Malaysia said the draft standards were a result of a two-day aquaculture dialogue in Penang, which marked the first of a series of regional dialogues designed to enable a range of stakeholders to actively participate in the development of best-practice standards for these farmed species.

The goal is to have the standards in place for use by 2015, said Carol Phua, WWF-Malaysia’s Marine Programme Head.

Adverse modifications to natural habitats, harmful impacts of pollution and waste discharge, drug and chemical use leading to poor water quality and fish health, removal of juvenile fish from the wild before being able to replenish fish populations, and heavy dependence on fish feed are just some of the numerous problems plaguing the farming of these species.

"Such unsustainable practices are not only threatening the biodiversity of the Coral Triangle but also the livelihoods dependent on these resources.

"Implementing measurable and performance-based Standards for responsibly-farmed seafood is of critical importance, not only for Malaysians but for the wellbeing of all in the Coral Triangle," said Phua.

Grouper is one of highest-valued species of economic importance in the world.

In the past decade, the global production and output of grouper aquaculture has developed rapidly, especially in China and South East Asian countries.

At face value, figures suggest an increase in overall production between 2000 and 2010 of more than 700 per cent, added WWF-Malaysia. -- BERNAMA


Read more!

Building a Better Reef Fish Trap: Reducing Fish Bycatch With Escape Gaps in Africa

Science Daily 7 Oct 13;

Scientists from the Wildlife Conservation Society and the Kenyan Marine and Fisheries Research Institute have achieved a milestone in Africa: they've helped build a better fish trap, one that keeps valuable fish in while letting undersized juvenile fish and non-target species out.

By modifying conventional African basket traps with escape gaps, the marine researchers have shown that the new traps catch larger fish, allow more undersized and non-target fish to escape, increase profits, and -- most importantly -- minimize the impact of fishing on coastal reef systems. The findings, say researchers, will help fishing communities boost profits while protecting their vital marine resources.

A paper on the experimental study appears in the current edition of Fisheries Research. The authors include E.K. Mbaru of the Coral Reef Conservation Project and the Kenyan Marine and Fisheries Research Institute; and Tim McClanahan of the Wildlife Conservation Society.

"One of the great challenges in coastal fisheries is how to reduce the levels of bycatch for reef systems where these species play important ecological roles," said Dr. Tim McClanahan, co-author of the study and head of WCS's coral reef research and conservation program. "Our modified traps have made a statistically measurable difference in minimizing bycatch for African basket traps. Such innovations can make a big difference in maintaining the ecology of vital coastal resources."

The experimental study was conducted in the fished reef systems near a marine park on the coast of Mombasa, Kenya. Importing the escape gap idea to African waters for the first time, the researchers worked with an experienced trap fisher who built six basket traps -- iron-framed structures with netting and a single, tube-shaped opening leading into the middle of the trap. Half of the traps were constructed with escape gaps measuring 12 inches by an inch and a half. The escape gaps were designed to allow undersized and non-target fish to exit while retaining commercially valuable adult fish.

Once baited, the traps were deployed some 30 meters apart and between 5 and 10 meters in depth and checked once a day between October 2010 and October 2011. After 41 weeks, the researchers captured more than 1,200 fish from 64 species. The fish captured in the experimental traps were on average 31 percent longer and 55 percent heavier than fish in the regular traps without gaps (used for control data). By contrast, the regular traps had smaller fish, including the juvenile and ornamental fish important for maintaining reef ecology. The researchers also reported a 25 percent increase in economic value in the fish captured in the escape-gap traps, mostly valuable rabbitfishes.

The escape-gap traps also allowed smaller non-target fish to escape. Of the fish caught in the escape-gap traps, only 34 individual fish belonging to "bycatch" species (or 2 percent) remained in the traps, as opposed to 110 individuals (or 6 percent of the catch) from non-commercial species in the regular traps.

"These new escape gaps are a game changer for Kenya's coastal fisheries," said Dr. Caleb McClennen, Director for WCS's Marine Programs. "By reducing bycatch, the new basket traps increase fish size, economic return, while limiting the bycatch that can harm entire reef systems. These innovations can also be exported to other coastal fisheries for the benefit of entire regions."

The escape gap design for African basket traps -- created by McClanahan and his WCS colleague Ayana Elizabeth Johnson -- received top prize and $20,000 in support for conservation in the 2012 Solution Search: Turning the Tide for Coastal Fisheries, an award created to bring recognition to innovative community-based conservation projects.

Journal Reference:
E.K. Mbaru, T.R. McClanahan. Escape gaps in African basket traps reduce bycatch while increasing body sizes and incomes in a heavily fished reef lagoon. Fisheries Research, 2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.08.011


Read more!

Indonesia: Reforesting Program Bears Fruit, Wins Hearts

A look at villages in Central Sulawesi shows how a program to stop illegal logging has been embraced by the locals
Dessy Sagita Jakarta Globe 8 Oct 13;

Sigi, Central Sulawesi. Until a few years ago, Kalvin P. Boso was still known as the king of slash-and-burn in his village of Lonca, tucked away in Central Sulawesi’s Sigi district.

Lonca is located just eight kilometers from the district capital, Kulawi, but the road connecting the town to the village is narrow, muddy, with a deep ravine on one side and a rocky mountain on the other, all surrounded by protected forest.

Like most villagers in Lonca, Kalvin learned to cut trees and burn them down to clear the land as a child, unaware of the risks his actions created.

When trees are present, their roots help to prevent erosion by holding the soil together and absorbing water. With the roots gone, soil can slide around a lot more and water is able to build up on the surface, causing flooding and other natural disasters such as mudslides.

The practice also threatens the local water supply by damaging the soil’s ability to retain water.

“My parents were also farmers, and from when I was a student I was taught how to clear the land without understanding the consequences to the environment,” Kalvin, now 44, tells the Jakarta Globe.

Every year, Kalvin said, he cleared at least two square kilometers of forest to grow rice, corn or cassavas.

“Our villagers have been blamed for causing the floods in Palu every year,” says Amos Sumutju, the Lonca village chief referring, to the provincial capital.

Most villagers make it a habit to clear land and move on again the next year because they believed the soil is no longer fertile after a single season. This has placed their own lives in danger of disaster because of the growing expanse of critically degraded land.

Plan of action

The Forestry Ministry says more than 27 million hectares of Indonesia’s forests are now in critical condition due to illegal deforestation.

But land clearing by fire was stopped in Lonca village when the government introduced a program called Strengthening Community-Based Forest and Watershed Management to raise public awareness about illegal logging.

The program was established with the help of the United Nations Development Program, which, along with the Global Environment Facility, donated $7.5 million for the period 2009-2014 to revitalize watershed management in six locations in Indonesia by involving and empowering local inhabitants.

The six locations chosen for the project are in the provinces of North Sumatra, Lampung, Central Java, East Nusa Tenggara, West Nusa Tenggara and Central Sulawesi.

“We first started out by approaching the locals,” says Erus Rusyadirus, the regional facilitator for the program in Central Sulawesi.

“I stayed for at least three days in every village, talked and spent time with the villagers, trying to convince them that slashing and burning trees was bad for their present and future.”

Hearts and minds

“It was very hard at first. A farmer once told me ‘I don’t care if you or the government tell me to stop cutting trees, I will not stop. Who can guarantee my livelihood or if my family can still eat the next day?’” Erus said.

After intensive guidance, many of the farmers, including Kalvin, began to understand that their village was in danger.

“Kalvin, who used to be known as the king of slashing and burning, is now the head of the community-based organization,” Amos said, referring to a group set up under the program.

The CBO receives a small grant for the program, which it can use to fund its activities. Every CBO has different programs, but focuses mainly on empowering the locals to find a new source of livelihood so that the farmers do not have to go back to slashing and burning trees.

Kalvin, for one, says the program has changed his life for the better.

“After listening to Pak Erus’s explanation about how clearing the land with the old method has put many people’s lives in danger, I started to realize how much I loved the environment, and as the leader of the group I feel a deep sense of responsibility to conserve the forest,” he says.

Along with the other CBO members, Kalvin works to raise awareness in his village and urges locals to farm on a permanent plot of land rather than clear new land each year. Most people in Lonca now grow cocoa and vegetables.

The group, with 16 other CBOs in Sigi, has also planted 240,000 tree seedlings.

“If you came to our village a few years ago, you’d see the whole area was brown. But now as you can see, it’s all turning green,” Amos says proudly.

Community empowerment

Residents in Simoro, in Sigi’s Gumbasa subdistrict, have proudly embraced their new livelihood and work enthusiastically to develop various activities improve the economic status of their village.

“Everything started to change in 2004 when our village was flooded and we saw giant logs floating everywhere,” says Herry, the head of the Gumbasa CBO.

Gumbasa was severely affected by flash flooding that year, which swept away several homes.

“At that time, slash-and-burn clearing was still very common. People would clear the land and started farming anywhere they wanted to,” Herry says.

“We even cleared land inside the Lore Lindu National Park.”

Lore Lindu, east of Lonca, is a protected forest area that was designated as part of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s World Network of Biosphere Reserves. It spans 2,180 square kilometers and is home to numerous rare species, including 77 birds endemic to Sulawesi.

CBO groups around it were taught to make the best of their environment by cultivating honeybees, cows and chicken. They also grow vegetables and fruit, as well as producing snacks from the produce to sell in Kulawi.

To be able to join their local CBO, each person has to plant at least 15 trees in a watershed area.

The village has planted nearly 70,000 seedlings along the riverbanks since 2011, and an evaluation shows that more than 60 percent are growing well.

Simoro village has also issued a regulation that farmers can still farm in Lore Lindu as long as they are committed to preserving the environment.

“If they want to use the land inside the national park, they have to plant at least 50 trees and they have to promise they will not cut a single tree inside the protected forest,” Herry says.

The CBO there has done so well that it was named the best CBO in Indonesia during an award ceremony in Bali recently.

Localization

Saeful Rachman, the national program manager of the SCBWFM, says the project was created after a report was published about critically degraded watershed areas in Indonesia.

“Some changes happened because of natural disasters like floods, climate change and landslides, but most were due to illegal logging,” he says.

Saeful says the Forestry Ministry has started replanting trees, but its program is not very successful due to rapid population growth and declining vegetation area.

“Most of the time the watershed areas are degraded because of land conversion,” he explains.

Therefore, he says, the UNDP and the Forestry Ministry proposed the program to increase awareness and empower communities so they can find another source of livelihood that is sustainable.

“Most farmers were very skeptical at first when we introduced the program, but when we asked them to be the main actors and the agents of change instead of the subjects, we saw significant progress,” Saeful says.

“Not only did they stop cutting down trees, but the villagers actively started working on regulations to punish illegal loggers. We are so proud of them.

“The locations were chosen because of their biophysical conditions and the local government’s readiness to implement the program,” he adds.

Persuading the locals to stop slashing and burning was a tall order.

In Omu village, also in Gumbasa, the program had to deal with an indigenous tribe that had been living inside a protected forest for generations.

Aris Pasasa, the leader of the local CBO, says that when the project first started there were 13 families from the indigenous tribe living inside the forest.

“They had been living inside the protected forest since the 1960s, and every year they moved to a new location and cleared land,” Aris says.

“Approaching them was a difficult thing to do, not only because they did not speak Indonesian, but also because they would hide every time they saw someone who was not from their tribe.”

With much effort and the help of a translator, the CBO finally managed to persuade the families to move out of the forest. Aris even lent his land to the families to build huts and got other residents to hire them to work on their land.

“Now we worry less about flash floods or polluted and damaged water sources,” Aris says.

Additional goals

Saeful says the main objective of the program is not only to improve the condition of the watershed area, but also to push for the government to give its support and encourage local officials to come up with regulations that help the environment.

Aside from community empowerment to stop people from cutting down trees, the program also asks the communities to restore the critically degraded areas to pristine condition.

“Every year we plant 450,000 to 600,000 seedlings provided by the government, but the really special thing is that sometimes the villagers themselves are even willing to spend their own money to buy the seedlings and plant them, and that’s a very good sign,” he says.


Read more!

Asian officials look at valuing nature in economic decision making

Thin Lei Win Thomson Reuters Foundation 9 Oct 13;

BANGKOK (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Over 80 statisticians, economists, ecologists and senior policy makers across Asia began a three-day workshop at the United Nations in Bangkok on Tuesday to look at ways of valuing natural resources so they can be better protected.

Current national accounting systems, used since 1950, produce numbers such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to measure the value of goods and services produced in a national economy. But such measures rarely value assets such as mangroves, wetlands, coral reefs or clean air and water, leading to decisions that degrade them and undermine poverty alleviation goals.

“The development process is very rapacious in its demand for natural capital because it's out there for the taking,” Sir Partha Dasgupta, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Cambridge, told Thomson Reuters Foundation on Tuesday.

“When mangroves are destroyed in order to create fish farms, the national accounts don’t look at the loss. It only looks at the increase in income coming out of the fish,” said the environmental economist, who has long pointed to links between sustainability and economics.

A good accounting system should include the costs as well as the benefits of replacing mangroves with aquaculture, he added.

But how does one value mangroves? By looking at the services they provide, such as a place for the spawning of fish, protection against storm surges and provision of wood, Dasgupta said.

VALUE OF MANGROVES

A 2012 report by World Bank calculated just that. Coastal mangrove forests in Thailand are currently worth about $955 a hectare, the value of their wood and non-wood products, it found. That is a paltry sum compared to the potential $10,949 per hectare that can be earned from the same land from farming shrimp.

But if the value of mangrove forests in protecting vulnerable communities from coastal flooding is taken into account, a hectare’s worth of standing mangroves in Thailand has a value of $18,641, the report found.

“If the mangroves’ ability to store carbon as well as their role as a nursery and breeding habitat for offshore fisheries are considered, the value further increases to as much as $21,456 per hectare,” it said.

RETHINKING NUMBERS

Effectively valuing natural capital requires a new mindset too, of focusing on broader ranges of benefits rather than exact numbers.

Gupta said he hopes one of the outcomes of this week’s workshop will be for national accounts to begin incorporating ranges instead of a specific numbers – something they should already be doing anyway, he said.

For instance, national statistics might report that exports for a given year amounted to 10 percent of GDP. But such exact numbers fail to take into account black markets and other hidden effects on the formal economy, and as such do not reflect the true output of the economy.

Working instead with broader range of outcomes would be more honest, and make Natural Capital Accounting easier to incorporate.

Right now, “I think we're so used to point estimates that the moment you have something difficult to measure, you say, ‘You can't do that,’” he said.

Dasgupta is aware that getting decision-makers in finance ministries and economic planning agencies – let alone the general public and media – to start accepting ambiguity in economic figures would be a tall order, but insists it needs to happen.

“We don't like ranges so we ignore them. We know the value is positive but since we can't pin it down, we're going to assume it's zero. Now, does that look rational? It doesn't look rational at all,” he argued.

"We're used to ambiguity in our lives. Why on earth do we feel that in the public domain we have to give a number?” he asked.

LINK TO POVERTY ALLEVIATION

Pushpam Kumar from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), a co-organiser of the workshop, said the time is now right to move beyond just GDP as the measure of an economy.

Countries in Asia such as India, Indonesia and the Philippines have started to incorporate Natural Capital Accounting into their process, he said, adding that Vietnam, Laos, Bhutan and Bangladesh also have green growth strategies with similar goals.

Kumar also pointed to the Rio+20 sustainability conference last year, where governments expressed support for the valuation of natural capital.

“In the past it would have been economists and statisticians talking, but this time the interest is coming from politicians,” partly because protecting natural resources is key to poverty alleviation, which remains a key goal for policymakers, he said.

When UNEP looked at the value of ecosystems and biodiversity in three countries – Indonesia, Brazil and India – it found that 10 to 21 percent of the country’s value, in terms of natural systems, was missing in existing national accounts, Kumar said.

Because so many rural people in Indonesia, in particular, rely on natural systems for their income, “that (missing) 10 percent constitutes 90 percent of the poor people’s income,” Kumar said.

As a result, any policy based “on wrong microeconomic indicators like the current GDP is bound to be a failure in the goal of alleviation of poverty,” he added.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 10 Oct 13



Love MacRitchie Walks for NUS – three 2-hour Saturday morning walks from 19 Oct 2013
from Otterman speaks

More than 1,500kg of trash cleared at Kranji East mangrove – data, blog posts and photo albums from ICCS 2013
from News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore

Red Junglefowl Roundup Part IV (1)
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Butterflies Galore! : Malay Baron
from Butterflies of Singapore

Making the Past Present
from Raffles Museum News

Some of my research students blog
from Otterman speaks


Read more!

First ‘green’ SEA Games here in 2015?

Jose Raymond, Today Online, 8 Oct 13;

Major sporting events have an enormous ecological footprint. This is one of the reasons why the environment was introduced as a pillar of Olympism in 1994. The world’s first “green” Games were held in Sydney in 2000.

Mr Franz Beckenbauer, who led the organising committee of the 2006 football World Cup in Germany, saw the challenge of incorporating environmental protection into the organisation of the event — but he also recognised the opportunities, which is why the world was introduced to the “Green Goal” in Germany 2006. Waste, energy, water and mobility were four key areas looked into.

More recently, one of the most memorable programmes administered at last year’s London Olympic Games was its “zero waste to landfills” policy which called upon all participants and spectators to recycle whatever waste they generated.

In less than two years’ time, Singapore will host the Southeast Asian Games in June 2015. It will be the first time that it has hosted the biennial regional event since 1993, although we did play host to the first Asian Youth Games in 2009 and the inaugural Youth Olympic Games in 2010.

Over the last few months, the organising committee has announced various updates about plans for the SEA Games. What is still lacking, though, is a plan for a sustainably organised event that would also pay careful attention to environmental protection. For a start, the Singapore Environment Council would like the organisers to consider the following.

Firstly, they should ensure that all athletes and officials are transported only in buses which are of Euro 5 standards — or even better, only buses which are hybrids or electricity-driven.

Organisers should also work with the major public transport operators and provide spectators with “season passes”, giving them relatively easy mobility to all venues via public transport.

At the World Cup in 2006, ticket holders were given free rides on public buses and trains. Doing so here would avoid unnecessary traffic jams that lead to greater emissions.

Secondly, Singapore’s landfill space at Pulau Semakau is not infinite. The organisers should look into ensuring a “zero waste to landfill” policy. To achieve this, it would be essential for all venues to be equipped with recycling bins.

All spectators should be reminded of their responsibility to clean up after themselves and to show the world that Singapore is not a “cleaned” city but one where people are socially gracious. All food waste in catering for the contingents should also be recycled.

Thirdly, there should be a policy that any hotel or venue which accommodates the Games’ guests, athletes and officials must adopt strict environmental policies. This means that all air conditioning in the rooms should be set at 25°C. They should also have existing environmental policies in place.

If they do not, then they should not be eligible to tender for any of the contracts which will be up for grabs for the Games. The organising committee has a responsibility to be stewards of the environment, and they should take this huge opportunity to drive the right behaviour among businesses.

Finally, if there is any venue which will need to be upgraded or built, the organisers should ensure that the materials are procured from sustainable sources. This can include construction materials and paint, right down to paper and display materials.

These measures are just the barest minimum the organisers could consider for the SEA Games 2015.

Singapore has often been seen as leaders in the region, especially in our environmental policies which have kept our city clean and green for decades. A green Games would further cement our reputation, and help demonstrate how the region can step up to protect the environment.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Jose Raymond is Executive Director of the Singapore Environment Council.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 9 Oct 13



“Forget not our Living Forest” – botanist Joseph Lai unveils an entourage of enthralling forest denizens! Thu 17 Oct 2013: 6.30pm @ NUS LT25
from Otterman speaks

White-bellied sea eagle: grey heron interaction
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Coral Relocation and Oil Slick Response
from Pulau Hantu

Mandai happenings.
from thelivingfossil and What the horseshoe has eaten

Butterflies Galore! : Great Orange Awlet
from Butterflies of Singapore

Hornet nest at Mandai Kechil (thanks Germaine!)
from Otterman speaks

The ASEAN Haze monitoring system & another transboundary problem
from sgbeachbum

WWF risking Sumatran rhinos by releasing camera trap images, says scientist
from Mongabay.com news by Jeremy Hance


Read more!

Only take what you need for rubbish disposal

Shirley Chua, Today Online Voices, 9 Oct 13;

The Singapore Environment Council thanks Ms Caslin Lee and Mr Goh Kian Huat for their feedback on our position paper on plastic bags in Singapore.

We share Ms Lee’s concern, in “Free plastic bags from supermarkets do not go to waste” (Oct 5), about hygienic waste disposal. This is why we do not seek to impose a daily charge on plastic bags, nor ban them from being given out at supermarkets.

Our recommendations, based on extensive research, are targeted at reducing wastage arising from taking small bags with low potential for secondary use, or people taking more bags than they need for rubbish disposal, simply because they forgot to bring their own bags.

In scenarios where individuals plan their grocery shopping only on weekends, we agree that it would be difficult to acquire the necessary plastic bags to store rubbish.

A solution could be for consumers to estimate the number needed for rubbish disposal and only take as many free plastic bags and use reusable bags for remaining purchases.

To offset any additional costs, we will work with retailers to provide more incentives to shoppers who bring their own bags for some or all of their purchases.

To address Mr Goh’s concerns, in “Find biodegradable alternatives, but we still need disposable bags” (Oct 7), our recommendations state that supermarkets should not profit from plastic bag charges.

The money would go into a fund to support initiatives by community groups, young entrepreneurs and food and beverage vendors to develop ideas to minimise plastic waste in Singapore, and offer rebates to customers who avoid plastic takeaway containers and bags.

Our recommendation for second-hand reusable bags near cashier counters emphasises that cashiers should offer this option explicitly for non-food items, such as household cleaners and toilet paper.

The use of biodegradable plastic may generate more waste, as it cannot be recycled, unlike high density polyethylene bags. Paper or cloth bags cannot be successfully used as bin liners and would not be a suitable replacement for plastic bags, either.

We will take Ms Lee’s and Mr Goh’s feedback into account for our campaign on this issue.

While the SEC has made every effort to ensure that our recommendations are not too inconvenient to implement, we also believe that everyone can put in small efforts to ensure a clean, safe and sustainable world for future generations.

We welcome feedback via the #lessplasticsg hashtag on Twitter and Facebook and we invite all interested parties to read the entire position paper on sec.org.sg

Shirley Chua
Director of Communications and Outreach,
Singapore Environment Council


The true price of disposable plastic bags
Jonathan Banks, Today Online Voices, 9 Oct 13;

I read with dismay the letter, “Find biodegradable alternatives, but we still need disposable bags” (Oct 7).

Large swathes of our planet are blanketed in plastic, non-degradable rubbish, much of it in the form of plastic bags. The oceans are slowly clogging up with the stuff. In parts of the Pacific Ocean, plastic particles outnumber plankton by 6:1. The damage to marine life is well documented, while ingestion of plastic bags kills an estimated one in two camels in the United Arab Emirates and roughly 100 cattle a day in Uttar Pradesh, India.

There is no need to use plastic bags. I have done without them since 2001. Is it that difficult to remember to carry a bag? People remember to take their keys and wallets when they go shopping.

In Wales, a 10-cent levy on plastic bags reduced their use at supermarkets by up to 96 per cent, and the money went to charity. A growing number of countries have banned them for environmental reasons.

The letter writer thinks that “we should not discourage their usage in the name of the environment while causing inconvenience to ourselves”.

Perhaps those who allowed their plastic bags to find a way into the ocean, resulting in the death last year of a young sperm whale in the Aegean Sea with 100 plastic bags in its stomach, also felt that it was too inconvenient to not use plastic bags.


Read more!

Powerful evidence Hong Kong officials just don't care about pollution

Although the mainland could be blamed for the periodic smogs, the city's government has failed in its measures to improve air quality
Tom Holland, South China Morning Post, 9 Oct 13;

Jumping into a taxi outside the South China Morning Post's Causeway Bay offices the other day, Monitor was struck by a wry observation from the cab driver.

Glancing at a crowd of shoppers crossing the road, many trundling suitcases behind them, he intoned: "Look at all the tourists. All the tourists, enjoying our pollution."

He had a point.



The Post's office is sited on one of the busiest road junctions in Causeway Bay. With heavy traffic constantly roaring past, tall buildings and an adjacent overpass blocking any breeze, the level of pollution has to be tasted to be believed.

I don't know why harassed sub-editors popping outside for a smoke bother taking their cigarettes. They could achieve the same effect just by standing on the corner and inhaling.

The government insists it is tackling the problem.

In January 2007, then chief executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen pledged to improve air quality within five years.

Assessing the government's performance can be tricky. The problem is that much of the atmospheric pollution that plagues the city rolls down from the mainland, especially at this time of year when the prevailing winds turn northerly.

Even if the government were to prohibit the burning of coal in the city's power stations (it hasn't) or ban ships in local waters from using dirty bunker fuel (it hasn't), it would still be unable to prevent us from being periodically blanketed with the clouds of smog emitted by the great industrial concentrations of the Pearl River Delta.

This inability gives our officials a convenient smokescreen to hide behind, because although it can't do much about pollution from the mainland, the government is far from powerless when it comes to tackling the homemade sort.

It hasn't even tried. We can tell this by looking at the figures for roadside pollution.

This is the really nasty stuff. Pollution concentrations are inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the source. So although a factory 80 kilometres away in Dongguan might emit 100,000 times as much pollutants as that bus roaring past you in the street, the bus is doing twice as much damage to your health.

Yet government efforts to reduce roadside emissions range from the farcical to absurd. It has told drivers of parked cars to turn off their engines, a rule even the police ignore. And it has banned smoking at bus stops; perhaps to ensure those waiting are poisoned more effectively by antique bus diesel engines.

As a result, roadside pollution continues to get worse.

The first chart above shows the number of hours each quarter street-level pollution - averaged across the three roadside monitoring stations - is classified as "low" or "medium", compared with the number of hours it is "high", "very high" or "severe".

Despite the government's claims of action, the number of hours pollution levels are acceptable - that is low or medium - is falling, while the amount of time pollution is at harmful levels - high, very high or severe - is on the increase.

The government can't blame the rise on pollution rolling down from the north.

The second chart compares roadside pollution levels with atmospheric readings at nearby stations. The red line shows the number of hours that roadside pollution is at harmful levels while atmospheric pollution is acceptable.

In other words, this chart measures hazardous pollution that we can be sure is homemade. As you can see, nearly seven years after Tsang's pledge to improve air quality, pollution is still getting worse.

At best, we must conclude government policy has been utterly ineffective. At worst, we might conjecture that officials actually like pollution.

Perhaps it recalls the comforting miasma of bureaucratic flatulence that pervades their hermetically sealed offices.

tom.holland@scmp.com


Read more!

Energy security must benefit Asia's people and the planet

Noeleen Heyzer says Asia can't sacrifice sustainability for equitable access
Noeleen Heyzer, South China Morning Post, 9 Oct 13;

The world is at a critical juncture. Energy consumption is rising dramatically; total primary energy demand in the Asia-Pacific region alone is expected to nearly double between 2010 and 2030.

How will the region meet this demand? How will we grow in a sustainable way? How can universal energy access be achieved? These are some of the key questions being addressed at the World Energy Congress in Daegu, South Korea, this month.

The world today faces two main energy challenges: providing enough light, warmth and power for every household, while shifting to cleaner energy sources.

Ensuring sustainable energy for all is additionally challenging in Asia and the Pacific - there are still 628 million people in the region without access to electricity, and 1.8 billion still use traditional fuels such as wood, charcoal, agricultural residues and animal waste.

Widespread energy poverty condemns billions to darkness, ill-health and missed opportunities. We must end this inequality, but we need to do so in a way that is smart and sustainable, utilising natural resources, while preserving the integrity of the ecosystems on which we depend.

The Asia-Pacific region also has some of the highest levels of carbon intensity. Our primary energy intensity is among the highest in the world, despite significant reductions in recent decades. This limits national and regional competitiveness - jeopardising employment opportunities and income levels.

The region has some of the largest exporters and importers of fossil fuels, as well as the highest rates of fossil fuel subsidies. The increasing dependency on fossil fuel imports exposes our region to the risks of oil price volatility, and the impacts of climate change.

Rebalancing our energy mix is therefore critical. The countries of our region have one of the fastest growing rates of investment in renewable energy, taking advantage of our ample supplies of solar, hydro, wind, biomass, geothermal and ocean energies. Still, the current energy mix remains mostly fossil fuel-based, especially coal, with renewable resources accounting for only 16 per cent of total electricity production.

A comprehensive, long-term understanding of "enhanced energy security" is evolving in the region. This concept moves beyond calculations of supply and demand alone, towards a consideration of multiple aspects, including access, efficiency, renewables, economics, trade and investment, and connectivity.

As early as 2008, member states of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (Escap) were developing a regional framework to address these challenges. In a lecture last year in Singapore, I proposed that the region should explore the creation of a game-changing Asian Energy Highway - an integrated regional "smart grid".

These discussions culminated in May. Supported by the Russian Federation, 34 countries met in Vladivostok and adopted a groundbreaking framework that included a five-year plan of action on regional co-operation for enhanced energy security and the sustainable use of energy.

One key area is to develop common infrastructure, and to promote energy policies which accelerate regional economic integration. Energy connectivity is not new to the region; the Asean Power Grid, for example, is one several subregional initiatives that could be linked and expanded under a common vision.

The lesson of this and other initiatives is that co-operation works best when it is based on such a common vision. Our region is committed to shaping the regional energy future we want: one of equity, efficiency and resilience, to benefit our people and our planet.

Dr Noeleen Heyzer is the UN undersecretary general and Escap executive secretary


Read more!