Malaysia: Strong winds and rough seas off Perlis and Kedah until Tuesday

BERNAMA New Straits Times 30 May 16;

KUALA LUMPUR: Strong south-westerly winds between 40 and 50km per hour with high waves of up to 3.5 metres are expected in the waters off Perlis and Kedah until this Tuesday.

The Meterological Department, in a statement today, said thunderstorms were expected to persist in the waters off Perlis, Kedah, Penang and Kelantan until early tomorrow morning.

“Such a (weather) condition can cause strong winds of up to 50km per hour, with waves up to 3.5 metres.

It is dangerous for small boats, and sea recreational and sports activities,” it said.

Meanwhile, strong winds and choppy seas category one alert are also expected to occur in the waters off Phuket until Tuesday.

The statement said the southwesterly winds of between 40 and 50km per hour with waves of up to 3.5 metres were risky to any sea activity in the areas.


Read more!

Malaysia: We love our food – but we’re wasting tons of it daily

SHAHANAAZ HABIB The Star 29 May 16;

IS food in Malaysia so cheap that we take it for granted? When we eat at the mamak shops, at coffee shops, hawker centres, cafes, restaurants or hotels do we ask about the size of the portions?

Do we tell servers to give us less rice or less noodles or less of whatever we don’t want or like so that we don’t waste it?

Do we feel a tad guilty when we look at our unfinished plate of food? Do we think of those in our country who are hungry and might not have eaten for the day? And do we ask ourselves what all that waste is doing to the environment?

Dr Anni Miten does.

The executive director of the South-East Asia Council for Food Security and Fair Trade (Seacon) says she feels sad at the way so many people in this country take food for granted.

“There is no more element of people enjoying food sitting around appreciating the food or even asking where the food has come from.’’

Dr Anni Miten,Executive director of Southeast Asia Council for Food Security and Fair Trade ( Seacon) says she is sad the way people in Malaysia take food for granted.

If you don’t want the bread or potato that comes with your food, just tell them not to give it to you even though the price of your meal is the same. - Dr Anni Miten

She thinks “sharing food is something noble and part of our culture” and is somewhat exasperated at how much food people waste.

When Miten orders lamb at a particular restaurant she frequents she asks for only two pieces instead of the normal portion because that is all that she can eat. She is happy to pay full price for it because she knows she did not waste.

“If you don’t want the bread or potato that comes with your food , just tell them not to give it to you even though the price of your meal is still the same. Or tell them to pack it and take it home with you. Don’t waste.

“This is our responsibility as consumers.’’

Malaysians waste 15,000 tonnes of food daily – piled up, that would come up to about 16 KLCCs!

The Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (Mardi) estimates that of that amount wasted, 3,000 tonnes is actually untouched, edible and should not even have been thrown away.

All this makes Miten question how much of the country’s RM45bil food import bill for last year was really efficiently utilised and how much of it went to waste.

“This is a cost to the country. And the waste has to be treated,” she points out.

This is one reason why she wonders if it is wise for the Government to control the price of some food items, like rice. Because the price of rice is subsidised, it’s a cheap food item and people don’t think twice about leaving it on their plates – throwing it away, in other words.

“If there is no more price control on rice, will it make Malaysians jump?” she wonders.

The United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) policy officer Dr Daneswar Poonyth, however, says the government shouldn’t be blamed.

“The Government is making food affordable – but does it mean that because it is made affordable you waste it? It is going to cost the Government more down the road to manage the waste. And the government never told you to waste food.”

He points out that in 2007, 2008 and 2009 when global food prices went up, globally everyone adjusted and went from buying high quality to low quality. But not in Malaysia, the adjustment was not there.

“People shouted that prices were increasing but they did not adjust their consumption and basket. We say when food prices increase, it will reduce the waste. But here in Malaysia when prices increase, waste increases. Economics fails here,” he says.

At Tuesday’s MySaveFood Forum orga­nised by Mardi, solid waste management company SWCorp said that, according to its findings, Malaysians end up throwing away a quarter of what they buy in a month because the food has expired or gone bad or is wasted during preparation or consumption – see details in graphic on right.

As the figures in the graphic show, this works out to RM2,700 a year – “And that’s a lot of money,” points out Agustina Fithri Kasmaruddin, an SWCorp officer.

Agustina is a working mother and she has come to realise that buying food for a week just doesn’t work. Some days she has to work late, some days she gets stuck in a traffic jam, so on those days her kids buy their food. So nowadays, Agustina buys fresh food every two to three days. That way she doesn’t waste. And any leftover vegetables are fed to the family’s pet rabbit.

FAO’s Daneswar says, individually, people might not feel it so much when they save RM100, but that saving adds up and helps the Government: “If a million Malaysians do that, it reduces the cost of imported food coming into the country.

He says the target is to reduce the amount of food that goes into the bin.

“We can’t deny that Malaysians love food. It is a culture. But if I love something, should I throw it away? I should cherish it.”

Chefs are trained about food safety rules, he says, “So why can’t a similar training be given to them to reduce portion sizes? It would be a gain-gain, for restaurants and consumers.”

In many developed countries, people have to pay for the waste they put out.

Daneswar says in Rome people are given a weight limit of the waste coming out from their house. If they put out an extra plastic bag to be collected, it will be weighed and they will be billed for the excess waste at the end of the month.

Seacon’s Miten says it took South Korea more than 20 years to change people’s attitude to waste.

The Government first got people to separate their waste. Then 15 years later, they banned organic waste in landfills, which meant that people had to manage their own kitchen waste. This made some neighbourhoods get into composting their waste for fertiliser.

Then the Government tightened waste regu­lations even more, Miten says, explaining how the authorities introduced a smart card and weighed whatever came out of the kitchen and charged people accordingly – “So you’d find people even squeezing all the water and liquid out of the waste.’’

Changing behaviour in Malaysia is not going to be easy.

“Once they feel the pinch, they will do it,’’ says Miten.


Of fish bones and carrot peelings
SHAHANAAZ HABIB The Star 29 May 16;

We do love our huge buffet spreads. But they pose a challenge to chefs and hotels when it comes to reducing food waste.

THERE is an art to buffet dining.

You don’t just load everything in sight on your plate and then sit down to eat.

“The art of buffet eating is how many times you go to the buffet line. It is OK to go back 10,000 times but just eat that portion. As simple as that,” says Siti R. Ismail who teaches culinary arts at Taylor’s University.

When Siti is at a buffet, she will go up to take food a minimum of six times! But the portions she takes each time are very small: “I will have my salads first, then my bread and soup, after that my cheeses, then my main course. Usually I eat a very limited main course. Then I will have the desserts.

“Being a chef I feel I need to try every single thing but I try only a bit,” she says.

What about taking a lot of some items, usually cakes and desserts, for the whole table to share?

For Siti, that is a no-no: “Once you are aware of the art of buffet dining, you will never do that,” she says.

Malaysians are such lovers of food that we delight in huge buffet spreads at hotels or restaurants – the bigger, the better! Call it greed or being kiasu, or over-ambitious, it is common to see people heap food onto their plates and then leave half of it uneaten to be thrown away.

The Dorsett Putrajaya is a new hotel that has yet to have its official opening but already about 30kg-50kg of food goes to waste every day, says chief steward Husairi Ali.

He knows all about the wastage that happens at hotels: at a hotel resort he worked at a few years ago, the food waste was a whopping 800kg a day.

He says there is a lack of awareness among consumers when it comes to wasting food and what happens to the food.

“They pay a lot of money and want to consume a lot. When it is not according to their taste or they can’t finish it, they just leave it on the table. During peak periods, food wasted at resorts can come up to more than one tonne a day,” he says – enough to feed 300 to 400 people if it was converted to rice!

Siti says many hotels have started to put out smaller portions in buffets these days to prevent wastage. Desserts, for instance, sometimes come in bite sizes, and there are also food stations where you get food cooked on the spot.

“In the mornings, there would be chefs doing eggs at the egg station even though there is already scrambled eggs in the buffet. A lot of customers like the personalised service. They prefer to see their food being cooked.

“This is a win-win situation because the customer wants it fresh and hotels can reduce wastage,” says Siti who is the deputy dean in the department of Culinary Arts and Food Service Management at Taylor’s University.

Siti says reducing wastage and, hence, food costs is knowledge that professional chefs need: “It is part of the business mindset. The bosses will check how you reduce costs. So you would need to know how to use your creativity to get full use from ingredients.

“If you do not utilise all parts of the salmon, what are you going to do about it? Can you make a fish stock with the bones? When you peel the carrots, can you use the peel for something else?’’

All this is part of the culinary arts syllabus and during exams, the examiner will actually check the student chefs’ garbage to see how much is being wasted – because it all affects cost.

Dorsett’s Husairi adds that food wastage is not confined to the kitchen and prepared food that is not eaten. Waste starts from the very beginning, at the delivery stage, he points out.

“We have a problem with suppliers. We expect the food to come in proper containers and packaging but some suppliers don’t have a proper policy for hygiene and sanitation. So goods sometimes come in dirty containers and boxes that make it easy for the food to spoil.”

When it comes to food that goes off easily, like meat and chicken, there is also the need to check if the supplier is using a chiller or refrigerated truck to deliver the goods to the hotel.

As for leftover food from the buffet, Husairi says it has to be thrown away even if it’s untouched and still looks fresh. It cannot be donated to the homeless or the needy or even given to hotel staff, as regulations do not allow it.

“Those are the regulations from the Health Ministry and Jakim (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia). When we do charity, we cook fresh new food to give away.”

As for Taylor’s University, they do a bit of cooking for charity, too.

Siti says when some of the food they have in the department’s kitchen is about to expire but is still good, the students look at how they can use up those ingredients.

Last Sunday morning, for instance, they had tomatoes and meat that was about to expire, so they made and packed spaghetti Bolognese for 300 people and an NGO they work with distributed the food to the needy that day for lunch.

“We have been doing this since 2007. The students understand the need to pay it forward and give back to society.

“As a chef, these are the easiest things that we can do. It doesn’t take much because the ingredients are all right there at the school. Students get to volunteer, engage with organisations and cook for kids or whoever needs it.”


The Lost Food Project: Getting food where it’s needed
The Star 29 May 16;

EVERY Tuesday and Thursday a few volunteers from the Lost Food Project get in their cars and head to the side entrance of Bangsar Shopping Complex in Kuala Lumpur to pick up bread, fresh fruits and surplus food donated by Jason’s Hall supermarket for the needy.

The volunteers sort the food based on the needs of the five organisations they are working with – Lighthouse Orphanage, Kechara Soup Kitchen, Women’s Aid Organisation, Malaysian Social Research Institute and the Alliance of Chin Refugees – then deliver the food that very evening or, at the latest, the next morning.

“Most people think that food nearing its expiry date has gone off or doesn’t taste very good. That is a complete misconception. Some of the food is of very good quality and it is a real sin that it is thrown away,” said Suzanne Mooney, founder of the Lost Food Project who was at Tuesday’s MySaveFood Forum organised by Mardi (the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute).

“What we do is collect surplus food from the supermarkets and different manufacturers and simply redistribute these foods to those in need. So in effect we are actually a logistics organisation,” she said.

The group’s focus is to address food waste issues.

“We feed people. We feed them a very nutritious diet. Almost half of the food that is thrown away is fruits and vegetables. These are most often the foods that go off. And this is the kind of food that many of the organisations that we are giving food to lack. It is nutrition as well as feeding people,” Mooney said.

The project’s efforts are expanding rapidly since they began in February. Their main donors currently are Jason’s and Campbells; they have started working with Sime Darby and are looking to work with Cold Storage and other supermarkets and hypermarkets in the near future.

In fact, they are already talking about needing warehousing space to store donations while sorting and arranging delivery. The two refrigerated trucks they recently received will also help with that.

“We know there is a lot of food out there. People are approaching us now and we have to logistically organise it so that the food goes to those in need,” she said.

One of the reasons the Lost Food Project works well is because it has watertight contracts drawn up that protect the supermarkets and manu­facturers that provide the surplus food.

“We believe hotels, supermarkets, shops and restaurants are very concerned about giving away food for various reasons. They are worried about the health issues and the whole issue of logistics and the economics of it.

“This way, they know that they are not going to be sued because we are doing this. We are following legal standards to the highest degree. They are not going to get in trouble with anybody.”

Mooney also said the Lost Food Project has professional food safety officers on board.

“Our SOP is very important to us so that there are no problems, issues and sicknesses because we store everything following professional standards.”

She hopes eventually there will be similar efforts nationwide.

“That is what happens in other countries and I don’t see why it can’t happen here.

“We are reducing waste, cutting down the environmental bill and feeding people who need it. It makes sense.”


Not the time to waste food
SHAHANAAZ HABIB The Star 29 May 16;

KUALA LUMPUR : During the fasting month Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki is “definitely not” going to be hosting any Ramadan buffets at a hotel.

The deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department who is in charge of Islamic affairs expressed concern that the spirit of Ramadan is being distorted by putting a lot of emphasis on “food-related activity” such as the Ramadan buffets and the bazaars.

He said people were going overboard by spending extravagantly on food, buying too much, over-eating and wasting.

“Sometimes people have a misleading perspective of Ramadan as if it is a ‘Festival of Food’. It should be a ‘Festival of Ibadah’ (worship) and a test period. It is the month of rituals to enhance your spritual attachment to God and it is a platform to train your lust and desire.

“It helps make one’s personality better when people go through the whole month of Ramadan with moderation and a clear understanding of the philosophy, principles and spiritual dimension of the holy month, they would step up their good moral behaviour to other fellow human beings.

“Your stomach shouldn’t be full at night because that will make it difficult to perform all the rituals. And there are additional rituals like the terawih prayers performed only during Ramadan.” he said.

Dr Asyraf said whether or not it is the fasting month, the basic principle in Islam is not to get your stomach full.

“The Holy Prophet always kept his stomach one third empty. That’s why the philosophy behind eating in Islam is that you eat only when you are hungry and and stop before you are full.”

For him, the spirit of Ramadan is being distorted by marketing and the promotion of Ramadan buffets.

“This needs to be rectified because the culture we have at the moment leads to negative behaviour such as the wastage of food,” he said.

He feels very sad when he sees people piling up so much food on their plates during the Ramadan buffets but not being able to finish even half of it.

“It is as if we are not really concerned about our fellow brothers who are poor and needy. We have already lost our humanity and we are not performing what God prescribed upon us. We shouldn’t waste food like that. It gives a misleading image of Islam and is not what the religion taught us!

“The Quran tells us not to act in an extravagant manner. The throwing away of food and wastage is not condoned by the religion.”

Dr Asyraf advised Muslims not to waste their money on buffets. And if they do go for one, they should be modest and moderate in whatever they consume.

“Whenever you want to spend hundreds of ringgit for a Ramadan buffet , always think about the other people who are poor and in need and who would cherish RM1 of your money. That can buy something precious to them.

“This is actually how Ramadan trains you to be humane, not just to be a good Muslim that worships Allah but a good Muslim who takes care of other people and those in need,” he said.


Research shows Malaysians waste enough to feed millions daily
DANIAL ALBAKRI The Star 31 May 16;

PETALING JAYA: Every year, an average Malaysian household throws away more than one month’s salary on food they don’t eat, research by Solid Waste Corporation Management (SWCorp) concluded.

The food that Malaysians waste not only affects their pockets, but it is estimated to be enough to feed millions daily.

The research found that about a quarter of the food is wasted by Malaysians during preparation, production and consumption.

“In one study conducted by SWCorp, a household with five people spends an average of RM900 on food alone.

“If we take into account the fact that a quarter of food is wasted during preparation, production and consumption, the value of food thrown into the trash can every month is equivalent to RM225,” said SWCorp Technology Research Division environmental control officer Agustina Fithri Kasmaruddin.

This would total a whopping RM2,700 a year, which is more than RM2,400, the mean monthly salary for an individual in an urban area, according to the Department of Statistics’ Salaries & Wages Survey Report 2014.

Another study conducted by SWCorp showed that Malaysians generated 38,000 tonnes of solid waste daily in 2016, of which 15,000 tonnes was food waste.

It found that 20%, or 3,000 tonnes, of this food waste was avoidable.

Avoidable food waste, Agustina explained, was food that could still be eaten when it was thrown, adding that “people rarely finish the food on their plates.”

“Based on SWCorp’s study, the average weight of an individual’s meal is 0.45kg a meal.

“15,000 tonnes of food waste can feed 11 million people with three meals a day,” said Agustina.

Avoidable food waste, using the same logic, could feed 2.2 million people three full meals a day of perfectly edible food.

“It’s very worrying. Looking at the economy right now, people are suffering. Some can’t even afford to eat,” said Agustina.

The issues of food loss and food waste are becoming more and more prevalent as key matters for leaders to address as Malaysia’s food security becomes increasingly a national concern.

Food loss here means the loss of food between the farms and the retailers, in the case of the produce damaged during harvesting and transportation.

Food waste, on the other hand, is the food that is discarded by retailers and consumers, for instance unsold food that is destroyed by a supermarket after they pass their expiry date as well as uneaten food at hotel buffets.

“The issue of food waste is relatively new in the Malaysian context. It was very recently that the FAO said that food waste was important to food security.

“If we can reduce food waste, we can improve the food security situation. After post-harvest losses, the main issue in food security is food waste,” said Mardi’s Economic and Social Science Research Centre director Dr Rozhan Abu Dardak.

But what can the average Malaysian do to reduce food waste?

According Dr Ainu Husna M S Suhaimi, head secretariat of the MYSaveFood Initiative, it is all about proper planning and awareness.

“It all starts with planning, if you plan your shopping well, you can reduce food waste.

“Use a basket instead of a trolley, use cash instead of credit card.

Dr Ainu also said that overeating was itself a form of food waste and that reduced portions were encouraged.

“Malaysians believe it is better to cook more than being insufficient, but it should be the other way round,” she added. Leftovers should be frozen for later consumption and whatever that remains can be composted or fed to pets.

Passing this information on was part of the MYSaveFood initiative agenda, she explained.

“The MYSaveFood initiative gathers a network of government agencies, private companies and NGOs and informs everyone that everyone wastes,” she said.

They do this mainly through awareness programmes and forums such as the forum that was held last week in conjunction with the Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry.

Initiatives by other agencies have also helped to bring food waste into the forefront, including the Lost Food Project that was recently launched.

The project introduced a food surplus collection service in partnership with Jasons Food Hall that pools together products and delivers to five charities twice a week.

“Everyone can do our own bit. Food waste is definitely a change of attitude and mindset, while food loss is more about technology,” said Dr Ainu.


Read more!

Indonesia: Sea turtle nesting season gets underway in Yogyakarta

Antara 28 May 16;

Bantul, Yogyakarta (ANTARA News) - Sea turtle nesting season has begun at the southern coast of Yogyakarta this month and will last till this year-end, an observer said here Saturday.

"It has been more than a week that sea turtles are coming to nest," a volunteer of sea turtle conservation of Goa Cemara Beach of Bantul, Subaya, disclosed here on Saturday.

The volunteers have so far found two sea turtle nests, one containing 95 eggs, while the other had 110 eggs.

Those eggs are predicted to hatch in the next 50 days.

However, the number of sea turtle nests found at the Goa Cemara Beach has been diminishing in recent years.

"Last year, we only found 10 nests. In fact, earlier the number used to reach 13 to 28 nests," Subaya pointed out.

The abrasion on the southern coast of Yogyakarta might be the reason behind the diminishing sea turtle nests since some beaches have a steep 45 degree slope, making it difficult for the sea turtle to climb the beach sand to nest.

The hatching season which will last until the end of the year will be a critical time when people can help preserve sea turtles and hatchlings, he observed.


Read more!

'Huge wake up call': Third of central, northern Great Barrier Reef corals dead

Peter Hannam Sydney Morning Herald 30 May 16;

More than one-third of the coral reefs of the central and northern regions of the Great Barrier Reef have died in the huge bleaching event earlier this year, Queensland researchers said.

Corals to the north of Cairns – covering about two-thirds of the Great Barrier Reef – were found to have an average mortality rate of 35 per cent, rising to more than half in areas around Cooktown.

The study, of 84 reefs along the reef, found corals south of Cairns had escaped the worst of the bleaching and were now largely recovering any colour that had been lost.

Professor Terry Hughes, director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University, said he was "gobsmacked" by the scale of the coral bleaching which far exceeded the two previous events in 1998 and 2002.

"It is fair to say we were all caught by surprise," Professor Hughes said. "It's a huge wake up call because we all thought that coral bleaching was something that happened in the Pacific or the Caribbean which are closer to the epicentre of El Nino events."

The El Nino of 2015-16 was among the three strongest on record but the starting point was about 0.5 degrees warmer than the previous monster of 1997-98 as rising greenhouse gas emissions lifted background temperatures. Reefs in many regions, such as Fiji and the Maldives, have also been hit hard.

Bleaching occurs when abnormal conditions, such as warm seas, cause corals to expel tiny photosynthetic algae, called zooxanthellae. Corals turn white without these algae and may die if the zooxanthellae do not recolonise them.

The northern end of the Great Barrier Reef was home to many 50- to 100-year-old corals that had died and may struggle to rebuild before future El Ninos push tolerance beyond thresholds.

"How likely is it that they will fully recover before we get a fourth or a fifth bleaching event?" Professor Hughes said.

The health of the reef has been a contentious political issue, with Environment Minister Greg Hunt pledging more funds in the May budget to improve water quality – one aspect affecting coral health.

But Mr Hunt has also had to explain why his department instructed the UN to cut out a section on Australia from a report that dealt with the threat of climate change to World Heritage sites including the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu.

'10 cyclones holding hands'

Professor Hughes said tropical cyclones can cut a 50km-wide swatch of destruction of corals, but this year's bleaching event was like "10 cyclones holding hands and marching across the northern third of the Great Barrier Reef".

But cyclones can also help. The category-five Cyclone Winston that slammed into Fiji in February, brought widespread rains over parts of Queensland as a tropical depression, helping to lower sea temperatures by two degrees and sparing much of the southern corals from severe bleaching, Professor Hughes said.

Even so, those southern reefs are still likely to have had their reproduction and growth rates slowed by the unusually warm seas. The scientists said the bleaching event showed how important it was to continue to bolster resilience of the reef, such as through programs to limit run-off from farms and towns bringing in excessive nutrients and pollution.

"The reef is no longer as resilient as it once was, and it's struggling to cope with three bleaching events in just 18 years," Professor John Pandolfi, from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at The University of Queensland, said. "Many coastal reefs in particular are now severely degraded."

(Use the slider on image below to see mature staghorn coral at Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef. The corals bleached in February 2016 and were overgrown with algae by April.)


Professor Hughes said he did not advocate the reef being put on the "in danger" list by the World Heritage Committee, but it was time governments reconsidered their approval for massive new coal mines in Queensland's Galilee Basin and elsewhere.

"The key threat to the Great Barrier Reef is climate change – the government has recognised that many times," he said.

"[But] there is a disconnect in the policy round governments issuing permits for 60 years for new coal mines and how that might impact on the Great Barrier Reef and reefs more generally."


Most coral dead in central section of Great Barrier Reef, surveys reveal
As mass bleaching sweeps the world heritage site, scientists also find an average of 35% of coral dead or dying in the northern and central sections of the reef
Michael Slezak The Guardian 29 May 16;

The majority of coral is now dead on many reefs in the central section of the Great Barrier Reef, according to an underwater survey of 84 reefs, in the worst mass bleaching event to hit the world heritage site.

An average of 35% of coral was now dead or dying in the northern and central sections, according to the surveys led by the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.

But in good news for tourists and the tourism industry, only 5% of coral has died on reefs south of Cairns.

The in-water mortality studies followed earlier aerial surveys, which found that 93% of the Great Barrier Reef had been affected by bleaching.

Coral bleaches when it gets too hot for too long. The water temperature stresses the coral and it expels the colourful algae it relies on to give it energy. If warm conditions persist, the coral dies and can get taken over by seaweed.

But if the water returns quickly to temperatures that are no longer stressful, the coral can recover, regaining its symbiotic algae. That is what researchers expect to happen to most of the bleached coral south of Cairns.

“Fortunately, on reefs south of Cairns, our underwater surveys are also revealing that more than 95% of the corals have survived, and we expect these more mildly bleached corals to regain their normal colour over the next few months,” said Mia Hoogenboom from James Cook University.

The conditions that led to the bleaching event were estimated to have been virtually impossible if it were not for the greenhouse gases humans have released into the atmosphere. Models showed they would be average conditions within 20 years.

Terry Hughes from James Cook University, who led the survey work, said: “This year is the third time in 18 years that the Great Barrier Reef has experienced mass bleaching due to global warming, and the current event is much more extreme than we’ve measured before.

“These three events have all occurred while global temperatures have risen by just 1C above the pre-industrial period. We’re rapidly running out of time to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”


Great Barrier Reef bleaching made 175 times likelier by human-caused climate change, say scientists
Read more
John Pandolfi from the University of Queensland said the reef was already struggling to cope with the regularity of the bleaching events.

He said the reef was no longer as resilient as it once was. “It is critically important now to bolster the resilience of the reef, and to maximise its natural capacity to recover,” said Pandolfi.

The reef’s ability to recover from the increasingly regular bleaching events is being hampered by water pollution.

A recent study suggested $10bn investment was needed to adequately reduce pollution levels and improve the reef’s resilience.

The bleaching hitting the Great Barrier Reef is part of a global bleaching event, partly driven by a massive El NiƱo and climate change. By February this year, the event was already the longest-running global bleaching event in history, and it is expected to continue into the coming months.


Bleaching May Have Killed Half the Coral on the Northern Great Barrier Reef, Scientists Say
MICHELLE INNIS New York Times 29 May 16;

SYDNEY, Australia — Mass bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef in the past three months has killed as much as half of the coral in the north but left large parts of the southern reaches with only minor damage, scientists in Australia said on Sunday.

The current bleaching is the third to strike the roughly 1,400-mile-long reef in 18 years and the most extreme scientists have recorded.

“In the north, the mortality rates are off the scale,” said Prof. Terry Hughes, the director of the ARC Center of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, based at James Cook University in Townsville, Queensland. “There, the coral mortality rates are approaching 50 percent, and the impact of the bleaching is still unfolding.”

But from Cairns, in tropical north Queensland, southward down the east coast of the state, about 95 percent of the coral has survived, Professor Hughes said. Mildly bleached coral should regain its color over the next few months, although the stress from bleaching is likely to slow the area’s reproduction and growth, he said.

Bleaching occurs when water temperatures rise as little as 1 degree Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The coral then expels tiny, colorful algae, causing it to turn white. The coral can recover if the water temperature drops and the algae, known as zooxanthellae, recolonize it. Otherwise, it may die.

Scientists diving on the reef in March and April recorded an average death rate of 35 percent for bleached coral in the north and central parts of the reef. Mass bleaching reduces the disparity between corals that might survive and those that are more vulnerable, resulting in higher death rates across the reef, Professor Hughes said.

Another scientist, Verena Schoepf from the University of Western Australia, said portions of the reef off the Kimberley coast had suffered severe but patchy bleaching and death rates of about 15 percent so far in the current bleaching event. The Kimberley region is across the far north of the state of Western Australia.

“We are seeing these events occur so close together, due to global warming, that coral does not have time to recover,” Professor Hughes said. “Some of the large, 50- to 100-year-old corals we saw on the very northern parts of the reef are now dead. We won’t see them there again.”


Read more!

Thermal stress impacts corals in Indian waters

K. S. SUDHI The Hindu 28 May 16;

During the last couple of months, an increase in sea surface temperatures was observed in these
Coral ecosystem thriving in the Indian waters has come under severe stress with instances of coral bleaching being reported from islands of Lakshadweep and some parts of Andaman.

It is the thermal stress in the form of increase in Sea Surface Temperature (SST) during April that has proved disastrous for the corals.

While bleaching has been widely reported in the coral islands of Lakshadweep, some isolated incidents were reported from Andaman. Joint observations carried out by the National Institute of Ocean Technology, Chennai, and the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS), Hyderabad, confirmed the developments, said Satheesh Shenoi, director of the INCOIS.

Sea surface temperature

During the last couple of months, an increase in the Sea Surface Temperature was observed in the waters around the Andaman Islands, the Gulf of Mannar, and the Lakshadweep Islands. Following the observations, warning was sounded in these areas for coral bleaching. The in-situ observations carried out at North Bay, South Andaman revealed the primary signs of bleaching, according to a communication from the INCOIS.

“Coral bleaching takes place when the symbiotic relationship between algae (zooxanthellae) and their host corals breaks down under certain environmental stresses. This results in the host expelling their zooxanthellae. In the absence of symbiotic algae, the corals expose their white underlying calcium carbonate coral skeleton and the affected coral colony becomes pale in colour. Coral bleaching can be activated and persist during varied environmental stresses,” explains a scientific document released by the Centre.

The SST was in the range of 32 degree Celsius when in situ temperature observations were made during the last week of April in Andaman coast. However, the rain following the development of a depression in the Bay of Bengal has brought down the SST thereby averting the massive incidents of bleaching, Dr. Shenoi explained.

There existed a strong trend for bleaching but not to an alarming level and only a few species were found to be vulnerable to the trend, he explained.

In Lakshadweep, bleaching was reported in the water around the islands of Kavarathy, Agathy and Bangaram. The damage to the coral ecosystem was reported as deep as 30 metres, according to Idrees Babu, a scientist of the Department of Science and Technology, Lakshadweep.

The SST in the Lakshadweep waters rose to 32 degree Celsius against the normal temperature of 25 degree Celsius. There has not been much rain in region except the scattered showers, said Mr. Babu.

The Lakshadweep region witnessed a massive destruction of corals in 1997 when around 85 per cent of the coral reef was destructed.

Coral regeneration
Amidst growing concern about the impact of coral bleaching, scientists have also brought out some good news from the ocean depths of Andaman. The branching corals that were destructed during the 2004 South Asian tsunami have started regenerating in the region. The impact of bleaching would be different in different species and some may take 10 years or longer to regenerate, Dr. Shenoi pointed out.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 28 May 16



The 2016 Ocean Trash Index – what 800,000 volunteers in 92 countries generated during ICCS2015!
News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore

Night Walk At Venus Drive (27 May 2016)
Beetles@SG BLOG

Morning Walk At Kranji Marshes (27 May 2016)
Beetles@SG BLOG

Drama on the Straits of Johor
The Long and Winding Road


Read more!

Unanswered questions, uncertain future for Kranji farmers

Justin Ong Channel NewsAsia 28 May 16;

SINGAPORE: With around a year to go before the relocation of 62 farms in the Kranji area, some of their owners said earlier this week that a lack of clarity from the authorities has left them concerned about their future.

The farms - part of a roughly 400-hectare, 100-strong cluster at the northwestern tip of Singapore - were first informed in 2014 that their land leases would not be renewed upon expiry in June 2017. They will make way for the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), which needs to replace training land used to develop the upcoming Tengah New Town. The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) will then open up new, albeit smaller, farm sites in nearby Sungei Tengah and Lim Chu Kang areas for public tender.

But as quail farmer William Ho, 50, explained, much uncertainty remains. “In the first place, the tender is no longer about just being the highest bidder, because AVA said they will also assess certain criteria like experience and development plans. But it’s still not entirely clear.

“Now it’s going to be (next) June and there still has been no exact allocation of which part of the land we are going to; no exact size of the land up for bidding; no exact benchmark of how much rental will cost, and so on,” he said.

Added Mr Ho: “AVA also said they won’t chase us out in June 2017 - but then when? One day later? One week later? One month later?”

Having a clearer idea of the long-term vision for the agriculture industry would also help the farmers plan their future, said Mr Kenny Eng, 42, president of the Kranji Countryside Association (KCA), a non-profit group of 40 member farms.

“Just like how you can have a Singapore masterplan for 30 years, you can have one for the agriculture industry,” he stated. “We understand that land is scarce, thus we’ve already made it clear to the Government that we are not just after land. We are after certainty.”

“When we engage and can’t get feedback, it makes us very jittery. It means you are not sure what’s in store for us,” Mr Eng continued.

In response to queries from Channel NewsAsia, AVA and the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) issued a joint statement on Friday (May 27) indicating “the Government is mindful that farmers will require time to move from their current sites to the new sites should they bid successfully for land”.

“We communicated as early as we could so that farmers have ample time to make business plans,” said the two statutory boards. “AVA is also in the midst of preparing (the) new sites… and will inform interested parties when the sites are ready for tender. Farmers can take this opportunity to revamp their model of farming and make longer term investment plans to improve production yields.”

Meanwhile Member of Parliament (MP) Yee Chia Hsing of Chua Chu Kang Group Representation Constituency (GRC), whose Nanyang ward covers the Kranji farms, told Channel NewsAsia: “If more time is needed for (the farms) to make alternative arrangements, whether the appeal comes through me or directly to AVA or SLA, I am sure the authorities will consider each case carefully and to help if possible.”

‘ALL WILL BE LOST’

Even as the affected farmers called for more light to be shed on their big shift, it was also clear that the information they have already received has caused some concern.

One particular issue was the length of the 10-year lease for the new sites, with the possibility of a 10-year extension if the land is not required for development, and if the farm “meets prevailing minimum production level and other criteria”, said AVA in 2015.

“When they asked me if I can halve the size of my two-hectare farm, I said ‘No problem, I can go multi-storey’,” said goat farmer John Hay, 61. “But investing in three to four storeys will cost me about S$1 million, and in 10 years you think I can make back the money? For farming, you need at least 30 years. That’s why some of us farmers have said that if the new lease is 10 years, we might not accept it.”

Vegetable farmer Alan Toh, on the other hand, expressed more concern over the limited time he would have to grapple with the farming feasibility of the new site.

“I’m worried about the land near Kranji Marshes being reclaimed and non-arable, which will compromise the quality of my crops,” said the 52-year-old, whose four-hectare Yili farm counts the Fairprice and Sheng Siong supermarkets as clients.

“Vegetable farms need forward, long-term planning up to 30 years - about five to six years to invest in infrastructure and make adjustments before producing proper output. Very quickly it’ll be seven to eight years, and then we cannot invest any further with the lease ending in 10,” said Mr Ho in Mandarin.

He further pointed out that moving his vegetable farm was not the same as moving a house or a factory and its machines, explaining: “You plant something, move it - it gets damaged.”

A handful of farms said they may not even opt to make the move. Their businesses are not categorised under food staples, unlike the egg and vegetable produce of Mr Ho and Mr Toh, who have been allocated pieces of land and can bid for as many plots as they want.

AVA and SLA noted it was “critical to prioritise agricultural land for strategic food farms producing leafy vegetables, food fish and eggs”.

This has resulted in eight non-food staple farms having to wrangle over just two assigned plots of land, according to goat farmer Mr Hay, who insisted: “I will never step in because you are making us fight one another.”

Jurong Frog Farm director Chelsea Wan, 33, said the same. “We decided we’re not going to bid. We shouldn’t be going against each other. We are all friends and now they want us to do this. Just close lah, don’t do anymore,” she laughed.

FAMILY LIVELIHOODS AT STAKE

Some of the farms told Channel NewsAsia that they are already preparing for the curtain to fall on a decades-long family business.

“If there’s no land for me, I will clear out,” said Mr Hay, who added that he might set up shop in Malaysia. “But I’m more worried for my son, who’s nearly 40 and wants to take over the farm. As a parent, I’m very happy because you can’t find youngsters keen on farming these days - it’s dirty, 24 hours, 365 days a year work. What will my son do now?”

Said Ms Wan, who holds a social sciences degree from the National University of Singapore: “Farming has been my first and only job for 10 years. I’m already past 30. If I were to look for a job, I don’t know where my expertise is besides running around.”

“Younger generations like us have to be told,” said Mr Eng, who is also a director at Nyee Phoe group, the oldest garden nursery in Singapore at 105. His farm is not part of the 62, but its lease expires at the end of 2017 with no word on an extension so far.

“Can you imagine all the young farmers who will be structurally unemployed? Who is going to look at graduates with farming portfolios and employ you for other purposes?”

“We’ve put (it) across to the ministries. What we need is really just clarity. Even if you say agriculture is not important, I will accept it - but you let me know soon because then we will stop our family business and just do trading, manufacturing or go into another industry altogether,” said Ms Wan. “Just tell us. Don’t keep us uncertain.”

In response, AVA and SLA said they “have been taking steps to minimise the impact of this development on our local agricultural sector”.

FARMING INDUSTRY SHOULD BE NURTURED

In spite of their misgivings, the farms were unanimous in arguing for their industry’s continued relevance on both practical and intangible levels.

“Even though farming doesn’t contribute much to KPIs or GDP - and we also lose out to our neighbours whose produce is definitely cheaper than ours - in crises we play a little part, like how we survived SARS and the bird flu by having our own farms,” said Mr Ho.

AVA and SLA agreed, stating that the local agricultural sector, “though small, plays an important role in Singapore’s food security as it helps to buffer against sudden supply disruptions”.

“Farms can help to achieve greater food security when they operate sustainably for higher agricultural yields,” the agencies said. “Technology can be a game-changer in achieving greater food security for us. We envisage our future farms to be highly productive, while maximising land use and resources, and operate on minimal manpower.”

Added the area’s MP, Mr Yee: “We hope to increase production of farm produce by allocating land to farmers who are willing and able to commit to producing a certain quantity of food. This will help to reduce our dependency on imported sources of food.”

On the other hand, Ms Chai Sheau Shi of organic vegetable farm Fire Flies noted: “It’s sad when you ask children where vegetables come from, and they say NTUC, or when you ask them where chickens come from and they say the fridge. Is there space for small niches in Singapore where we are not always referring to textbooks for knowledge, where we can see and touch something and be informed that way?”

“We are opening up a place where children and their families can come enjoy nature,” added Mr Ho. “I dream that one day we can partner the Government, for them to (provide) seed funding for our farms. If they want, they can come up with guidelines for us to not squander their money.

“But above all, them having a stake in us will show that farming is important. And it is important.”


Kranji's young farmers rally to keep the family business thriving
Susanna Kulatissa and Poh Kok Ing Channel NewsAsia 29 May 16;

SINGAPORE: When Ms Chelsea Wan says she has to roll up her sleeves and get her hands dirty to run her father’s business, she means exactly that.

The 33-year-old “frog princess”, as she is affectionately known in the farming community, does everything from packing meat to conducting farm tours and researching new products on her famer’s Jurong Frog Farm.

The 1.1-hectare plot - the only frog breeding farm in Singapore - is home to 20,000 American bullfrogs. Her father started the farm in 1981 and moved it to Lim Chu Kang in 1997. The family live right next to it, in a house her father built.

“In the early 1990s, when I first visited this farm, the whole area was just grassland,” said Ms Wan. “I saw my dad really building on this plot, brick by brick.”

About 20,000 farms once took up a quarter of Singapore’s land area, back in the 1960s. Most have since made way for homes and factories, and today, just 200 land-based farms remain on less than 1 per cent of the land.

Of these, about 180 are tucked away in Lim Chu Kang and Choa Chu Kang, or the Kranji countryside as it’s known. Some face an uncertain future with the expiry of their land-leases in the next few years.

A recent episode of current affairs programme On The Red Dot profiled this community and the younger generation’s worry for their future.

OVER S$1M IN REVENUE

Ms Wan joined the family business in 2006 after graduating from the National University of Singapore, where she majored in Sociology.

“I didn’t want to be on a payroll just doing existing work,” she said. “Product development was something I was very keen to explore. I saw that there was a lot of potential yet to be marketed because my father was busy with the day-to-day work … He doesn’t have time to explore all that.”

She set about expanding products and services. For instance, the farm had been selling dried hashima - made from the oviducts of female frogs, and said to be good for the skin – since 1999. Ms Wan turned it into a bottled ready-to-drink brew.

And just last year, she set up The Royal Frog online shop, delivering their products island-wide. Today, the farm supplies restaurants and supermarkets with about 30,000 frogs a month, raking in more than S$1 million in revenue.

FIRE IN HER BELLY

Also in the Kranji backwater, her friend 25-year-old Stella Tan is helping to give her family’s unique traditional business a new breath of life.

In their backyard lies a 36m-long, fire-breathing “dragon” with a lineage that goes back 2,000 years in China. This pottery-making technology was brought to Singapore by immigrants, and while there were as many as 20 dragon kilns here in the 1970s, today only two remain.

Ms Tan’s grandfather took over the pottery centre in 1965, and his five children helped to keep it going. They made cups for rubber plantation use, water jars for storing bathwater, and later orchid pots.

As for Ms Tan herself, after a short stint as a pastry chef, she decided to return to her roots at Thow Kwang Pottery Jungle two years ago – the only one in the third-generation of Tans still working in the family business.

“I saw (my aunts and uncles) working so hard. And they’re all getting old,” she said. “Thow Kwang is the one and only family-run dragon kiln. So it’s a very unique trade, and it’s important to let the future generations know about us.”

These days Thow Kwang mainly imports and sells ceramics from China, a business which brings in revenue of over S$1 million a year.

But it continues to keep the tradition alive by holding pottery workshops, which start from S$28 a child and draw at least 300 pupils a month. This is now Thow Kwang’s second biggest moneymaker.

And, two or three times a year, the dragon still comes alive - breathing life into the works of art of a community of potters that has rallied around the kiln.

Said artist Tan Tuan Yong: “I think that’s a good thing that we preserve those (kilns), rather than demolishing it or putting it in a museum. We are still producing works from the old kiln, and people are enjoying and appreciating it.”

COMING TOGETHER TO PRESERVE THE LEGACY

Faced with an uncertain future, Ms Wan and Ms Tan decided to join hands with others to increase awareness of farming among younger Singaporeans and reconnect them to the countryside.

Singapore Young Farmers was started in May 2015 as the youth wing to the Kranji Countryside Association. Ms Wan talks about how close-knit the group is: “We know how important it is to preserve the legacy of what our parents and grandparents have started.”

She feels it is important for Singaporeans to understand and appreciate their food sources. “I grew up on a farm and I saw how hard my father worked,” she said. “I know that for a frog to grow to market size, it takes nine months. Few people know that.”

The young farmers want to give young Singaporeans an insider’s peek into agriculture by taking them to farms not otherwise open to the public. They are doing that with the help of a small but dedicated group of volunteers.

One of them, Darren Ho, said: “As much as we can rely a lot on other countries, we still have to find ways to feed ourselves so that we are not at the mercy of other countries.”

‘THIS IS WHERE OUR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS ARE'

Visitor Lili Lim was surprised to discover how young the new generation of farmers was. “They are very different from what I perceived - educated, vibrant. They’ve made a very big sacrifice. I mean they could have worked in an office, a cosy environment. But they’ve continued the family business which, I think, is awesome.”

Indeed, despite her youth, Ms Wan has become an integral part of the Kranji community. Neighbouring farmers rallied when she got married two years ago – loaning tables and chairs, for instance, for the solemnisation held on the farm.

And when she gave birth to a baby boy a year ago, Hay Dairies owner John Hay, whom she fondly calls “Uncle Goat”, sent her a weekly supply of fresh goat’s milk for free.

Said Mr Hay: “I’m impressed with her, because she’s a young girl who’s working in a farm. You can’t find a girl who likes to work in a farm. That’s why I treat her like my own daughter.”

But life will soon change drastically for Ms Wan. In 2014, 62 farms – among them, her frog farm - were told that their leases will not be renewed when they expire between 2017 and 2021.

The farm sites will be given to the military to replace the land the Defence Ministry gave up for the building of 55,000 homes in Tengah New Town. The Government is preparing new farmland that the farmers can tender for in Lim Chu Kang and Sungei Tengah.

Ms Wan says her family has received offers from Singaporeans who own land overseas to relocate their operations to places like the Philippines, Indonesia, China or even Turkey. But she is choosing to stay.

“Singapore is where our heart is. This is where all our families and friends are. This is where we have really put in effort to develop the business over the last three decades. So I can’t see ourselves uprooting to bring the business to a foreign land,” she said.


Read more!

Malaysia: Johor water rationing continues until next month

Johor residents affected by water supply
The Star 28 May 16;

JOHOR BARU: Despite the consistent rainfall in the past few weeks, some 66,675 residents in some parts of Mersing and Kota Tinggi are still affected by scheduled water supply, which is expected to last until next month.

SAJ Holdings Sdn Bhd corporate communications head Jamaluddin Jamil said the water level at Sungai Mersing was at 12.41m, just 0.7m above the critical level of 11.70m.


Read more!

Malaysia: Foreign tugboat and barge carrying sand to Singapore detained

The Star 28 May 16;

KOTA TINGGI: Maritime authorities detained a tugboat and a barge filled with sand in Pengerang waters here.

Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) Tanjung Sedili enforcement chief Captain Amran Daud said the tugboat and its barge were spotted by its officials at about 3.4 nautical miles south of Teluk Ramunia.

He said a team on routine sea patrol spotted them at around 10.15am and upon checking discovered that the foreign registered tugboat with a barge was carrying about 145 metric tonnes of sand and was coming from Kuantan to Singapore.

Checks on the Batam-registered tugboat named TB Buana Superior and its barge Buana Ocean 05 also found a total of eight Indonesian crewmen including its captain aged between 21 and 38 years.

The crewmen have been taken to the MMEA Tanjung Sedili headquarters for further investigations, he said.

Capt Amran added that the case would be investigated under Section 135(1)(e) of the Customs Act 1967 for smuggling taxable goods which carries a fine up to 10 times the value of the goods upon conviction.

He said the case would also be investigated for other offences including under the Lands and Mines Act.

This is our first case recorded for this year after two of such cases recorded in November last year.

The agency will continue to step up efforts to ensure that vessels and ships abide by the Malaysian maritime laws while in our waters, he said, adding that he hoped the public could continue to be their eyes and ears so that they could uncover more of such activities.


Read more!

Indonesia: Sumatran tiger rescued from wild boar snare in west sumatra

Antara 27 May 16;

Painan, W Sumatra (ANTARA News) - A Sumatran tiger, which was trapped in wild boar snare in a hilly forest of Nagari Mandeh Village, West Sumatra, was rescued and evacuated by the local Natural Resource Conservation Agencys (BKSDAs) rescue team.

The team arrived in the area at 11:30 a.m. local time and managed to rescue the tiger, which had been trapped since Tuesday (May 24), after making the big cat unconscious by shooting a tranquilizer dart, Head of Area III Conservation of West Sumatra BKSDA Surajiya stated here on Friday.

The tiger would be brought to the Wildlife Cultural Kinantan Park in Bukittinggi District for rehabilitation.

"After undergoing rehabilitation, we will observe the tigers recovery. If possible, we would return the tiger to its habitat," Surajiya affirmed.

Meanwhile, Chief of the Nagari Mandeh Village of Koto XI Tarusan Sub-district Jasril Rajo Basah expected the tiger to be returned to its habitat near the village since the wild cat had not disturbed the day-to-day life of the villagers.

In fact, the village chief and local people acknowledged that the tiger had several times helped the local people who had lost their way in the forest.

Moreover, the tiger had become a natural predator of wild boars, which ravaged the peoples agricultural areas.

"We live side by side with the tiger, therefore we hope the big cat will be returned here soon," Basah added.(*)


Read more!

Indonesia: Piracy is a myth, illegal fishing more pressing concern -- Official

Anggi M. Lubis The Jakarta Post 28 May 16;

Piracy in Southeast Asia is a myth that overlooks the real threats that haunt regional waters, an Indonesian bureaucrat has claimed. The real threats are illegal fishing and organized crime.

The perception that Southeast Asia is a pirate-invested region is shaped by, among other things, reports compiled by the International Maritime Bureau ( IMB ) on robberies or robbery attempts from vessels plying the region’s waters, says Arif Havas Oegroseno, a deputy for maritime sovereignty at the Office of the Coordinating Maritime Affairs Minister.

Sea-related cases reported to the IMB — a Singapore-based unit of the International Chamber of Commerce ( ICC ) — are marked as piracy without relying on proper and specific definitions set by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ), Havas said during a recent conference held by policy think tank the Habibie
Center.

By doing so, IMB confuses maritime awareness and that benefits insurance companies selling premiums to shipping companies operating in ASEAN waters, he said.

“IMB has been playing a dangerous game in floating international laws,” he said, adding that the government had been trying to discuss the issue with IMB, but to no avail.

UNCLOS defines piracy as “illegal acts of violence or detention for private ends by crew or passengers of private ships/aircraft directed against another ship/aircraft on the high seas or outside the jurisdiction of any state”. The region, however, only contains “high seas” at certain parts around the Indian and Pacific ocean and this in effect brings down the number of piracy cases to zero.

This contradicts IMB reports that have included — as an example — an engine-part robbery of an anchored ship on Central Java’s north coast, Havas said.

IMB, in it its 2015 annual report, lists Southeast Asia as the region with the most piracy cases, with 147 cases out of 246 cases worldwide. Indonesia contributed 147 cases.

These myths, Havas said, give cover to the real threats facing the region, such as illegal fishing and organized crime. The issue of illegal fishing also involves other types of crime such as human trafficking, slavery, gun-running and drug smuggling, he added.

“Perception is very important because perceptions dictate policy responses and how we should work on that,” Havas said.

“All these different criminal activities are immune from countermeasures because we do not have enough resources to get this guys.”

Joint patrols are conducted between Indonesia and other countries in the region such as Malaysia, Singapore and India, and while these patrols can address robbery issues, it is difficult to bring legal actions against sophisticated cases such as what happened in the Benjina slavery case that took place last year.

The case surprised the international community after an American news agency discovered a fishing company operating in Indonesian waters had enslaved hundreds of trafficked people — mostly from Myanmar. The firm was a joint venture that involved a company from the British Virgin Islands — known to host special purpose vehicle companies from other countries — thus making the case difficult to track down.

Havas said there was lack of cooperation in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing ( IUUF ) in the region. Illegal practices and overfishing may lead to the extinction of a number of fish species and billions of dollars in losses, he added.

Arie Afriansyah, an expert in maritime law from University of Indonesia, said the region should work together more closely to enhance cooperation in maritime security.

There are a number of challenges, but there are also opportunities that the countries in the region could benefit from, he claimed.

“If this bilateral cooperation works, it could serve as a network and it might lead to multilateral cooperation,” he said.


Read more!

Indonesia: Whale sharks rescued from captivity in Maluku

The Jakarta Post 28 May 16;

Officials from the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Ministry and environmentalists have rescued whale sharks being kept in a floating cage in Maluku by a Singapore-based businessman, who allegedly intended to sell them to China.

Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Minister Susi Pudjiastuti said in Jakarta on Friday that the fish were immediately released into the open sea after they were discovered in a floating fish cage owned by Hendrik, who was not present when the site was raided.

The whale shark is listed as vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Susi said.

The rescue operation was jointly conducted by ministry officials and Wildlife Conservation Society ( WCS ) activists. The case is under police investigation and no suspects have been named.

Under the Fisheries Law, anyone caught mistreating protected animals could face six years’ imprisonment and a Rp 1.5 billion ( US$110,000 ) fine.

The WCS has reported 22 cases of marine wildlife crimes since 2014, country director Noviar Andayani said.

She said the whale shark population continued to fall because of poaching.


Traffickers Busted in Indonesia, Whale Sharks Released Back to the Wild
Posted by Wildlife Conservation Society in Ocean Views on May 29, 2016
National Geographic

Two whale sharks, shown here swimming in a netted pool, were recovered as part of an operation to prevent the illegal trade of large marine animals. Photo ©Paul Hilton for WCS.

Kasumba Island, Indonesia

Indonesian government agencies, supported by the Wildlife Crimes Unit (WCU) of the Wildlife Conservation Society, this week confiscated two illegally caught whale sharks from a major supplier of large marine megafauna to the international wildlife trade.

The whale sharks were being kept in submerged pens. Once the animals were discovered by officials on May 26, Indonesian authorities arrested the suspected traffickers and the sharks were released back into the wild unharmed.

The bust followed an 18-month investigation into a sophisticated operation that the WCU was first alerted to in late 2014. The ongoing investigation is being led by Indonesia’s Ministry for Marine Affairs and Fisheries and includes the Ambon and Labuan Lombok’s Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Monitoring Taskforce and the Maritime Patrol from the Maluku Police.

WCU investigations over the last few months have suggested that the suspects illegally caught large marine megafauna (whale sharks, manta rays, cetaceans) for sale to facilities being built in China and elsewhere in SE Asia.

The whale shark (Rhincodon typus) is listed as “Vulnerable” by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). International trade of whale sharks is regulated under CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species).

The arrest is testament to the dedication of the Indonesian government, the work of the WCU, and the partnerships that the we have been building across Indonesia to combat illegal trade in Indonesia’s threatened marine megafauna. This year alone WCU has supported 7 marine cases involving manta plates, sea shells, sea turtles, and whale sharks.

While we are grateful for the success, these cases remind us that we must continue to be vigilant.

In this instance, the suspects had recommendation letters from government authorities that allowed them to collect and breed ornamental fish. They were applying for permits to be a conservation institution that will allow them to capture, breed, and export whale sharks, dolphin, and manta but this had not yet been granted.

Under Indonesian law and regulations, whale sharks are a protected species and are not classified as ornamental fish. Indonesia Fisheries Minister Decree No. 18/2013 designates the whale shark as a protected species throughout the country’s nearly 6 million square kilometer exclusive economic zone (EEZ).


Read more!