Best of our wild blogs: 7 Dec 09


Hantu Dive
from Pulau Hantu with more photos and yet more photos

Fist time encounter with this Star on Semakau
from Where Discovery Begins

First time to Ubin's other shores
from wonderful creation

A Family Gathering
from Flying Fish Friends

Beesy bodies
from The annotated budak

Rare bird comes to Bukit Batok kopitiam
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Eurasian Tree Sparrow on ixora plants
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Asian Koel takes a noni fruit
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Monday Morgue: 7th December 2009
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Fri 11 Dec 2009 @ TMSI (ridge): Gary Dickinson on "A wound-healing model for barnacle adhesion" from ecotax at Yahoo! Groups


Read more!

Haphazard tree planting poses problems

Straits Times Forum 7 Dec 09;

WE REFER to last Saturday's letter by Dr Praema Raghavan-Gilbert, 'Are only VIP trees protected?', on residents' efforts to nurture trees in Marsiling estate.

Sembawang Town Council supports planting and gardening activities in the common area. We advise residents to keep their potted plants in a neat manner in front of their units. This is to maintain a neat and clean environment, and also to avoid causing obstruction to their neighbours.

We do not allow haphazard in-ground planting as it may lead to mosquito breeding, soil erosion and other environmental and maintenance problems. Residents who are keen on in-ground planting are encouraged to participate in the community garden, which was constructed near Block 116, Marsiling Rise, in 2006.

We agree that existing mature and healthy trees that do not pose any maintenance or other environmental issues should be retained. In addition, the town council will plant more fruit trees in the vicinity, to be adopted and cared for by residents. They are welcome to suggest the type of fruit trees they would like to see in their community.

Sembawang Town Council has discussed with the Marsiling Zone 2 Residents' Committee to arrange a meeting with the residents. We will share with them the proposed plan by the residents' committee and town council, and we welcome feedback from them.

Dr Raghavan-Gilbert said the community garden is not accessible. All members of the Community Garden Club are given keys to the garden and are able to carry out their gardening activities as and when they are free. Dr Raghavan-Gilbert and other residents who are keen on gardening are encouraged to join the club, to share their gardening interest and experience with their fellow residents.

The town council is of the view that this is a more balanced approach to catering to residents' interests in gardening, maintaining a pleasant and safe environment and, at the same time, helping to enhance community bonding.

Soon Min Sin
General Manager
Sembawang Town Council


Read more!

More Singapore couples choose eco-friendly weddings

Zhao Quan Yin/Evelyn Choo, Channel NewsAsia 6 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE: The evening glow is just right at the Garden of Seasons for newlyweds Kevin Tan and Claire Chua.

They are among 150 couples who have chosen to get married in parks this year. They are also going eco-friendly on the use of materials.

"Our wedding flavours are tea infusions and we included rose hip flowers in it. So it is very much in line with the garden theme and it is something people can use over and over again," said the couple.

This new colourful theme garden at HortPark is designed to host intimate events in a romantic setting.

Going greener, NParks is encouraging couples to have environmentally-friendly weddings.

"Weddings generally generate quite a lot of waste, so we are trying to use this occasion to remind people that environmental-consciousness is actually a very important part of our lives," said Yvonne Cheng, manager, Marketing and Promotions, National Parks Board.

A gown has been created out of recycled materials - such as fabric covers of used wedding albums, and crystals and beads from damaged jewellery. And couples can learn more about such initiatives at the Garden Wedding Fair at HortPark on December 12.

The fair will feature more than ten lush gardens and parks, where couples can tie the knot.

- CNA/sc

Say 'I do' to green weddings
More options now for couples to help save the environment while pledging their love
Victoria Vaughan, Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

This wedding gown by WhiteLink is made of plastic wrapper, fabric scraps and other recycled materials. -- ST PHOTO: SAMUEL HE

GO GREEN for your big day and save on the cost of the wedding venue.

The National Parks Board (NParks) announced the 20 per cent discount offer at the opening of its latest wedding venue, known as the Garden of Seasons, at the HortPark off Alexandra Road.

For now, the discount applies only to the non-air-conditioned venues at HortPark, which charge between $85 and $260 an hour. NParks has not decided if the offer will be extended to its other six parks, where weddings are also held.

To qualify for the discount, the couple have to show NParks they have taken at least eight environmentally friendly measures for their wedding. These include using recycled paper for the invitations and using a hybrid bridal car.

NParks' director of parks Kong Yit San hopes the scheme will 'inspire more people to do their part in saving the environment and reducing the large amounts of waste that weddings usually generate'.

There has been an increase in the number of couples tying the knot in parks, although it is not clear if this is due to the novelty factor of having an outdoor wedding, or that people are becoming more environmentally conscious. So far this year, there have been 150 weddings held in the parks, compared with 130 last year, and there are already 90 bookings for next year.

However, these numbers still represent only less than 1 per cent of the total number of weddings. A vast majority of the 24,000 couples who got married last year did so indoors in venues such as hotels or places of worship.

However, some wedding planners said that environmental awareness is on the rise among couples.

Spellbound Weddings' Anna Lim tries to talk couples into reducing waste by using recycled paper or opting for china instead of disposable plates.

'This can add a further $3 to $4 to the price per guest, but about 90 per cent of couples are willing to pay the extra fee as china looks nicer,' she said.

'I believe that as the popularity of green weddings rises, catering companies will start doing this and may absorb the cost.'

Caterers such as ISS Catering Services are also offering biodegradable ware for wedding functions. Said its marketing manager Josephine Lin: 'We're being asked about these options a lot more by couples.'

Candy Floriculture, a wholesaler of plants and flowers, offers potted plants instead of cut flowers for decorations, which helps cut down on waste. Said its director Sharon Goh: 'We rent the plants out...It's cheaper and they create a nice environment for the wedding.'

Couples are also going for 'greener' bridal gowns, which cost about 20 to 30 per cent less than normal ones. For example, bridal boutique WhiteLink has three gowns, which cost between $300 and $1,200 to rent, made from recycled material as part of their green efforts.

The designers use fabric from older gowns, floral decorations from wedding cars, fabric covers of used wedding albums and crystals from damaged jewellery to create the dresses.These gowns will be displayed at the Garden Wedding Fair on Saturday at HortPark, the first such fair organised by NParks to offer tips on green weddings.

Mr Andrew Ong, 31, a project manager for a non-governmental organisation, will hold his wedding next March at Fort Canning, chosen so his guests can get there by public transport.

The couple will use fans instead of air-conditioners, recycled paper for the invitations and a hybrid bridal car. The caterer will use biodegradable ware, and shark's fin soup will not be served.

'We'll be going against certain norms, but it's important that we understand how we contribute to a negative effect on the Earth,' he said.

8 ways to love the Earth
Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

TO ENCOURAGE couples to hold environmentally friendly weddings, the National Parks Board is rolling out a 'Green Wedding Special', in which a couple will receive a 20 per cent discount off the venue's rental at HortPark if their wedding incorporates at least eight 'green' practices.

1. Invitation: Go paperless and use e-mail invitations, or use recycled paper.

2. Stationery: For menus and place cards, print limited copies using recycled paper or reusable materials such as chalk boards.

3. Attire: Rent the gowns and suits. Chose gowns made from recycled materials.

4. Venue: Use a non-air-conditioned venue such as the Garden of Seasons at HortPark. There are also six other parks here where you can hold outdoor weddings. These are: Bedok Reservoir Park, East Coast Park, Fort Canning Park, Labrador Nature Reserve, Pasir Ris Park and Sengkang Riverside Park. Couples can also tie the knot at the Singapore Garden Festival in July next year at Suntec City.

5. Transportation: Rent a bus to ferry your guests about during the day, or encourage them to carpool. For your own bridal vehicle, use a hybrid car.

6. Decorations and bridal bouquet: Use potted plants instead of cut flowers. You can also get your florist to wrap a small potted plant for your bridal bouquet.

7. Catering set-up: Use biodegradable ware or other environmentally friendly alternatives such as banana leaves or china.

8. Wedding favours: Give out wedding favours made of eco-friendly or recycled materials.

A dream green wedding
Today Online 7 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE - Saving the environment can now go hand in hand with saving costs for your dream wedding.

Couples can avail of a 20-per-cent discount at the National Park Board's (NParks) green wedding venues at the HortPark in Alexandra Road (picture), if they can prove that they will take at least eight environmentally-friendly measures for their big day.

The measures may include using a hybrid car for the big day, printing invitations on recycled paper and using bio-degradable cutlery.

"Weddings generally generate quite a lot of waste, so we're trying to use this occasion to remind people that environmental-consciousness is actually a very important part of our lives," said Ms Yvonne Cheng, Manager for Marketing and Promotions of NParks.

Charges for the venues in HortPark are between $85 and $190 per hour, depending on their location. A team there will assess whether couples who want to apply for the discount under the "Green Wedding Special" meet the criteria.

NParks said it is still considering whether to extend the offer to its six other parks.

Yesterday, it also launched a new wedding venue at HortPark called the "Garden of Seasons".

Newlyweds Kevin Tan and Claire Chua said they were inspired to include several green elements in their wedding there.

"Our wedding favours are tea infusions and we include rose hip flowers in it, so it's very much in line with the garden theme and it's something people can use over and over again."

NParks said the design of the new venue will be changed every three months to reflect the four seasons.

Couples can learn more about the green initiatives at the Garden Wedding Fair at HortPark this Saturday.The first wedding fair organised by NParks will also feature more than ten lush gardens and parks where couples can tie the knot.

This year, there has been an increase in the number of couples who held their weddings in parks, according to NParks.

From January to November, there were more than 150 such weddings plus about 30 bookings this month, compared to more than 130 weddings last year.


Read more!

Festive turkey dinners could cost the Earth

Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

DREAMING OF A GREEN CHRISTMAS is a three-part weekly series leading up to Christmas which looks at how environmentally friendly some of the festive traditions are. This week, we look at the prevalence of turkeys at Christmas lunches and dinners. Next Monday, we look at how green Christmas trees are.
By Kimberly Spykerman & Grace Chua

TURKEY is a festive season must-have at hotel Christmas buffets and family dinners, with demand shooting up every November and December.

The frozen birds are flown in from as far away as Brazil and the United States, and their carbon footprint - a measure of the greenhouse gases caused by a product - could be substantial.

Dr Matthias Roth, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore's geography department, said: 'Meat consumption relies on the meat production industry or factory farms which produce meat for the consumer at very high rates.

'It is generally accepted that a meat-heavy diet has a significant impact on pollution, water scarcity and land degradation. All these sectors produce significant contributions to man-made greenhouse gas emissions.'

A British study estimated in 2007 that all the turkey dinners consumed in Britain each year were responsible for 51,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions - equivalent to driving around the world 6,000 times.

That figure was for traditional meals for eight, including the turkey and stuffing, roast potatoes and vegetables, bread sauce, cranberry sauce and other dishes, and assumed one-third of the population was tucking into such a meal.

In Singapore, the amount of turkey imported shoots up in September and October, as wholesalers stock up for the American Thanksgiving celebrations in November and Christmas in December.

The time lag is because it takes four to six weeks for the birds to be shipped here from as far away as the US, Brazil and Chile.

In the September and October peak months, more than 150 tonnes of the frozen meat are imported on average each month, compared with less than 40 tonnes in a typical month.

Supermarkets and butchers say that there is little demand for the meat for the most part of the year, but that orders start pouring in towards the end of November.

Ms Kellie Webster, communications and office manager of The Butcher, a butchery near Holland Road, said: 'We've got turkeys coming out our ears at Christmas and Thanksgiving.' She added that they sell about 300 turkeys in the two-month period, compared with the usual 20 in a month.

Most major supermarkets such as FairPrice, Cold Storage and Sheng Siong offer turkey only during the festive season. Demand for the meat at the supermarkets usually jumps between 10 per cent and 30 per cent during this period.

The year-end turkey overload is to be found at hotels too. For instance, the InterContinental Singapore orders eight more turkeys a day than its usual three, while the Shangri-La Hotel uses 1,800kg to 2,200kg of turkey, compared with virtually none during the rest of the year.

It is not just the turkey that adds to the footprint, but also the trimmings associated with it. Bagged stuffing mix, cranberries, brussels sprouts and potatoes all have to be imported as well.

In the British turkey-dinner assessment, most of the food, including the turkey, was produced within Britain. Only the cranberry sauce was imported from the US - and it contributed to half the carbon budget for transport.

But do not go substituting turkey for roast beef either: Beef production consumes more energy and produces more carbon dioxide than poultry. By some reckoning, it contributes 78 per cent to carbon emissions from livestock farming, versus 8 per cent from poultry.

If you want to go green this Christmas, the best way is probably to 'eat local' so that meats and produce do not need to be flown from the other side of the world to land on your plate.

This reduces the carbon emissions from transport, but consumers must ensure the food production methods - such as the use of feed and fertilisers - do not generate more greenhouse gases than production methods overseas.

For instance, tomatoes grown in sunny Spain result in less carbon dioxide than out-of-season tomatoes grown in heated British greenhouses.

So, instead of turkey, have chicken. Or pair the turkey with local veggies instead of imported ones.

Or - the unthinkable, perhaps - have a vegetarian Christmas dinner.

A diet of greens does not mean that carbon dioxide emissions are not produced - the amount is simply reduced as it takes more fossil fuel energy to produce and transport meat than to deliver equivalent amounts of protein from plants.

And Singapore has to import most of its food.

'Researchers have found that the difference between a red meat diet and a vegan diet in terms of greenhouse gas emissions is similar to the difference between driving a sedan and driving an SUV,' said Dr Roth.

So, tuck into a black pepper steak - made entirely of flour and soya beans.

That is what animal lover Louis Ng does when his family digs into ham and beef for Christmas dinner - things he enjoyed before he became a vegetarian 10 years ago.

'Everybody says it tastes the same as the real thing...I've even cooked it for my grandmother and she couldn't tell the difference,' said Mr Ng, who is the executive director of the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society, an animal welfare group.

In the US, more options for vegetarians to enjoy a 'turkey dinner' have been sprouting. These meat substitutes, usually made of wheat protein and tofu, even come packaged with all the trimmings, like stuffing made with mushrooms, apples and butternut squash.

Unfortunately, supermarkets such as FairPrice and Sheng Siong say they do not carry such products.


Read more!

D is for dirty pet stores

Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

Pet store owners have been told to attend courses to brush up standards. Kimberly Spykerman and Lester Kok check out the worst of the shops.

ONE tank with brightly coloured fish had a dead frog floating in it. Another tank had water so murky that the fish could barely be seen. Empty tanks were stained with algae, and muddy water was puddled everywhere on the floor.

DPS Fashion Enterprise, an aquarium in Serangoon Central, had its D grading tacked carelessly on the store's wall - the lowest ranking given by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) to pet stores in Singapore. This year, it has handed out four Ds.

The stores were guilty of selling sick or underage animals, overcrowding and/or maintaining poor conditions.

The grading system, introduced in 2007, is meant to raise retail standards, and to ensure that the animals housed in pet stores are properly cared for. No store was graded D in the first year. One D surfaced last year.

The good news is that more stores have received A and B grades - shops that made it into these categories formed about 85 per cent of the 256 pet stores rated this year.

Last week, all pet shop owners in Singapore were told they had to go back to school to take a course on pet management, a move that industry veterans have said is unnecessary.

Still, the AVA wants to avoid having to hand out any more D grades.

At Teck Whye Aquarium in Choa Chu Kang, 46 cages were lined 12m across and piled 2m high at the front of the store.

About 20 to 30 birds were crammed into every cage, each of which was about 1m in length. AVA regulations state that in a cage of that size, any more than 10 small birds is considered overcrowding.

Keeping too many animals in a cage increases the risk of disease, said veterinarian Cathy Chan.

Cramped quarters also help spread parasites and gastro-intestinal diseases through the faeces of the animals.

'All these diseases can be prevented by good animal husbandry,' Dr Chan said.

Long Hu Pets Enterprise had rows of fish tanks squeezed into narrow aisles, wet floors and equipment strewn all over.

During two visits made by The Straits Times, barely any customers went into the shop. The few who did left empty- handed, but seemed unfazed by the store's D rating.

Said one customer who declined to be named: 'It doesn't make a difference to me...It looks like any typical aquarium.'

According to the husband-and-wife team who have run the aquarium for the past 12 years, business has dropped to less than half of what it used to be a year ago.

They now rely on their small base of regulars, who drop by once or twice a month. They do two or three sales a day.

Pet Stop in Upper Serangoon had three certified staff members carrying out pet grooming, and handling sales of pet products and dogs.

The shop went from a B grade a year ago to a D grade this year because the place had a strong dog smell and because it had housed two clients' dogs overnight, which pet shops are not allowed to do.

Mr Eric Cheong, who set up the shop 10 years ago, said he was just doing the customers a favour.

'They have been our customers for years, and they trust us to handle their dogs,' the 30-year-old said.

DPS Fashion Enterprise and Teck Whye Aquarium displayed their D certificates, but Long Hu did not. As for Pet Stop, it was still displaying its old B grade.

An AVA spokesman said stores risk being fined if they fail to display their grades, though no one has been fined yet.

Stores rated D have to send their staff for remedial training by AVA, and they risk being shut down if they consistently receive the same grade.

This year, there were 80 complaints made against the 277 pet stores operating in Singapore; about 30 were fined. The complaints were mostly about the sale of unhealthy or underage animals, overcrowding and unsanitary conditions.

Stores that do not comply with the rules can be taken to court. The most recent case was in 2006.

Mr Cheong at Pet Stop said he no longer takes in customers' dogs. Instead, he refers them to pet hotels.

'Last month, I engaged a cleaner, so the odour has also been reduced,' he said.

In contrast, the boss of Long Hu Pets Enterprise, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan, said he did not care what grade he got.

'If they want to give a D, then they give a D. It is up to them,' he said in Mandarin.

'AVA said I have to rearrange my shop and clean it up to improve.'

He said that business has been especially poor this year, as fewer people care to spend money on ornamental fish in bad times.

But he is not willing to improve the layout or come up with incentives to attract more customers.

'Even if I give discounts, if no one comes to buy, what is the point?'


D IS FOR 'DON'T CARE'

'If they want to give a D, then they give a D. It is up to them. The AVA said I have to rearrange my shop and to clean it up to improve.'

Long Hu Pets Enterprise's boss, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan

Report card for pet shop owners

# April 2007 (when grades were given only for shops selling dogs, cats and small mammals such as hamsters): 31 As, 68 Bs and 11 Cs.

# May 2008 (when grades were given for all kinds of pet shops): 42 As, 150 Bs and 54 Cs.

# December 2008: 45 As, 172 Bs, 53 Cs and 1 D.

# November 2009: 71 As, 148 Bs, 33 Cs and 4 Ds.

Want pet shop licence? Take course first
Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

ALL pet shop owners and their staff will have to go back to school.

If they want to keep their licences or get one to sell pets, they will need to sit through 16 hours of lectures, eight hours of practical workshops, and take a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test at the end of it.

Dog farm operators, who breed and import dogs and supply them to pet shops, will also have to take the pet care management course conducted by Temasek Polytechnic (TP), said the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA).

The cost of the course has not been finalised, but the AVA said that the participants will be able to get a 90 per cent subsidy under the Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience, or Spur.

The course will cover the regulations of the industry, how to handle and care for animals, how to give health checks to animals and how to determine the sex of pets.

It will be split into three components - companion pets (dogs, cats and small mammals), fishes and birds.

The first workshop, to be held in March next year, will be for the pet retailers who deal with companion pets. In all, there are about 120 shops that do so.

Fish and bird retailers will be taught in later phases.

TP also offers a diploma in veterinary technology.

Dr Diana Chan, the course manager for the diploma and the pet care management course, said: 'There will be hands-on training where the lecturer will demonstrate how to handle the pets in a safe and responsible way.'

Dr Chan will conduct the course with three other veterinarians.

The MCQ test will be on what participants have learnt in the course. 'We don't want to make it so stressful,' she said.

Mr George Tan, 37, owner of Joy Doggy, said the course would be useful for new pet shop operators, but less so for seasoned retailers. 'The lecturers may not go in depth on how to protect our own dogs from getting sick,' said the pet shop operator of 13 years.

But the executive director of Pet Mart, Mr Benjamin Wee, feels that the course would update his knowledge of new developments in the industry. 'It is always good to improve,' the 34-year-old said.

LESTER KOK


Read more!

Indonesia uses love and war to rein in wild elephants

Trainers deploy the Flying Squad, a tamed herd, to face off or mate with aggressive pachyderms as a way to keep them from straying and rampaging beyond the confines of their forest sanctuary.

John M. Glionna Los Angeles Times 2 Dec 09;

Reporting from Tesso Nilo National Park, Indonesia - The wild bull elephant stood menacingly in the clearing, trumpeting in annoyance and anger, its brain racing with a chemical that unleashes a throbbing and unceasing headache.

It was the heart of mating season, and the bull was desperately seeking a mate.

Was this really a good moment to be sitting on top of another elephant just a few hundred feet away?

But Syamsuardi, a native of the wild Sumatran forest, had his strategy ready: He would pit his own elephant against the amorous stranger.

The compact 37-year-old, who like many Indonesians goes by one name, manages the Flying Squad, a herd of tamed elephants that patrols the more than 200,000-acre park like jungle Guardian Angels.

In many nations, dwindling forests have brought deadly conflict between man and animal. In Sumatra, rampaging elephants that have wandered out of parks and into populated areas have long been shot or poisoned by officials or vengeful property owners.

Syamsuardi's team is the local brainchild of the World Wildlife Fund, which borrowed the idea from India. The goal: persuade the intruders to simply get lost, to return to their sanctuary, where lethal run-ins with humans are far less likely.

With the Flying Squad, brute force isn't the only option.

The team sometimes dispatches a female to mate with the aggressor, a tactic that has not only defused tension but also produced two offspring from the wild elephants: Tesso and Nella.

But confronting the angry bull, Syamsuardi sensed this showdown wouldn't end so easily.

Perched atop Rachman, the Flying Squad leader, he and the other mahouts, or handlers, positioned two males and two females side by side, never taking their eyes off the intruder. Then they moved slowly forward, a multi-ton battering ram, with each handler atop his elephant, awaiting the big bull's charge.

Syamsuardi recalled the terror of knowing he'd be exposed to piercing tusks and the collisions of gigantic bodies. Caught in the middle, he would be crushed like an insect.

"It's tense, but you must be calm and stay quiet," he said. "I have to be ready to think quickly because when the time comes, my elephants are waiting for my command."

Elephants are losing the battle over the vanishing jungle.

The forests that once covered Sumatra's Riau province -- home to the largest elephant population in Indonesia -- are disappearing.

In the last 20 years alone, the paper and palm oil industries have cut down 60% of the pachyderm habitat. Now just 10% of the remaining forest is suitable for elephants. Since 1985, the province's elephant population has plummeted to 350 from 1,600. About 80 elephants live within Tesso Nilo National Park.

At least once a month, wild herds from the park attack one of the nearby settlements, activists say. Since 2007, 13 elephants and several residents have been killed in Riau province alone.

"If given a choice, elephants would prefer never to see humans," Syamsuardi said. "But the problem is that humans continue to invade their territory. There's not enough jungle left."

In 2004, after a rash of animal rampages, Syamsuardi began his monumental task: shape a team of wild animals into an obedient police force.

Then a World Wildlife Fund outreach worker, he knew little about elephants. So he began reading up on the animals and working with them in the field.

Now he and his staff of eight handlers foster a bond with their elephant wards. For mahouts such Adrianto, 26, it means a soothing voice interspersed with strict commands.

One day, Adrianto took the 26-year-old Ria and her 2-year-old calf, Tesso, for a bath in a forest watering hole. Ria trudged though the jungle, grabbing leaves with her trunk, her feet leaving large craters in the soft dirt.

At the murky pond, she waded into the water like a four-legged sumo wrestler, with Adrianto on her back. As the animals luxuriated in the cool water, their trunks shooting quick bursts of water, Adrianto scrubbed their backs, talking softly in Indonesian.

"Don't be naughty," he told Tesso, who nudged him with a forehead sprouting unruly black hairs. Then he pushed the baby's head underwater and scrubbed behind its ears.

"Ria is an actress," he said later, perched comfortably on her neck as though riding a big movable easy chair. "She pouts unless she gets what she wants."

The mahouts treat obedient animals to brownies. But there are sticks that come with such carrots. When Ria resists, Adrianto whacks her hard on the head with a small stick with a metal end that he uses for discipline. Tesso gets a stick shoved into his ear when he gets too frisky.

Before a routine patrol, Syamsuardi showered affection on Ria, rubbing her cheek and neck. He has grown to love these big animals and fears for their future.

"They're incredibly loyal," he said. "When a mahout falls during a fight with a wild bull, the herd will surround him in protection."

They are also immensely powerful. An elephant can topple a pickup truck with one nudge of its forehead. In villages, the animals are referred to as datu, or mister, a term of respect given no other jungle creature.

Syamsuardi has seen the results of their fury. Every few weeks, they rampage through settlements for food and out of anger or frustration.

"The male pierces victims with its tusks and then throws them with its trunk. If they are still moving, he'll stomp them," he said. "Females mostly kick. Either way, it's a tragic way to die."

Syamsuardi uses elephant face-offs as a last resort. And his methods have worked: So far, none of the mahouts have been hurt.

The team first tries to scare aggressive herds by setting off carbide cannons to scare them away. At night, rangers use car lights and blasts of the horn.

If the mating option is used, the team finds a secure spot for the ritual, which can last a week. (The mahouts then get lost, to give the animals a little privacy.)

If the team decides that it's better to make war, not love, fights between the Flying Squad and aggressors can last for hours.

As the bull stomped in warning, the Flying Squad approached. The lineup, designed to confuse the invader so it can't tell which elephant is pack leader, came within a few feet.

Finally, the bull lunged at Rachman. Tusks flashing, the two animals collided. Syamsuardi hung on as the other elephants closed in around the intruder, like a gang tackle on the football field.

The fight lasted a tense and sweaty 35 minutes, during which the big animals swung their heads, bearing their tusks like swords, their bodies like battering rams. Finally, the bull moved off into the brush.

For now, Syamsuardi knew, the big animal was safe.

"I was so satisfied. We didn't have to kill that bull," he said. "We just gave him a message: Go back to the forest with your own kind. You'll live longer that way."


Read more!

Reforestation the right path to take

Michael Richardson, For The Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

WHERE does South- east Asia rank in greenhouse gas emissions?

The short answer is that the region is an important source of worldwide emissions, mainly from deforestation. And it is expected to become a bigger source in future.

Asean countries are also vulnerable to the predicted effects of climate change, including rising sea levels and extreme weather. They cannot afford to be passive bystanders in Copenhagen.

In April, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) published a report saying South-east Asia contributed 12 per cent of the carbon dioxide, methane and other global warming gases from human activity in 2000. This was almost certainly an underestimate, since the survey covered only five Asean countries (Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam).

The ADB found that cutting or burning of forests to convert the land to plantations and other uses was by far the biggest source of South-east Asia's emissions, contributing 75 per cent of the region's total. The energy sector contributed 15 per cent, and agriculture 8 per cent, mainly methane from growing rice in water-saturated fields.

The ADB based its calculation on statistics that were nine years old. However, the report noted that Southeast Asia's total greenhouse gas emissions were rising at a faster rate than the global average because the region's economic growth was higher.

Checking emissions is a far-from- exact science, particularly when information from many developing countries is scant. The profile also changes from year to year. While Singapore and Malaysia have significantly reduced emissions of carbon dioxide by switching to gas in generating electricity, other Asean countries have intensified their use of more carbon-intensive coal in power generation.

Energy conservation and efficiency measures of the kind announced last week by Singapore would reduce the rate of emissions growth if they were applied across the region. However, for South-east Asia, the greatest potential for cutting emissions is in forestry. The panel of scientists and officials advising the United Nations climate change summit estimates that in 2004, deforestation was responsible for just over 17 per cent of the world's greenhouse emissions.

A study published last month by scientists affiliated to the Global Carbon Project concluded that this figure fell to 12 per cent last year, down from 20 per cent in the 1990s, probably because wet conditions limited forest fires in South-east Asia, where Indonesia has been the main source of emissions.

Researchers have said that in some drought years, when forest fires raged out of control and peat swamps dried out and caught fire, Indonesia was the world's third largest greenhouse gas emitter, after China and the United States.

One way to prevent the emissions level from rising again would be for negotiators to agree on a proposed scheme that would pay Indonesia and other tropical forest nations not just to halt logging, but also to re-plant degraded forests and plant new ones.

The scheme being discussed in Copenhagen, known as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (Redd), still faces serious problems. But it is among the issues that appear to have achieved the most progress in the negotiations.

'That is because we are looking at a huge global emissions source,' said Mr Paul Winn, forest and climate campaigner for Greenpeace Australia. 'There is also the recognition that it is a relatively cheap, easy form of emission reductions.'

Some rich countries, such as the US and Australia, want Redd to be structured so that their energy-intensive companies can offset emissions at home by paying for forest conservation and expansion in developing countries.

While corruption, illegal logging and mismanagement of forests will be big obstacles in implementing any agreed Redd scheme, the potential for expanding forests is huge. Last month, the Global Partnership on Forest Restoration announced that new satellite surveys had shown that more than a billion hectares of former forest land and degraded forest could be restored to healthy forests. That is the equivalent of around 6 per cent of the planet's total land area. Many of the most promising forest restoration opportunities identified by the satellite mapping are in South-east Asia.

Forests once covered more than half of the world's land area. Today, that figure is below 30 per cent and each year a further seven million hectares of forest are lost.

Halting and then reversing this loss will not be easy. But if developed countries are prepared to underwrite a global reforestation programme, it could help both the climate and the rural poor.

The writer is a visiting senior research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Read more!

‘Time is Running Out’ for Sumatra’s Rainforest as Demand for Palm Oil Soars

Arwa Damon, Jakarta Globe 6 Dec 09;

Driving through Indonesia's central Sumatra, it appears that all life on earth has been obliterated, like a scene from some apocalyptic movie.

The land is tinted a sick gray. Some parts still smolder. Twisted hulks of tree trunks take on abnormal shapes. It is nearly impossible to imagine that this was once lush tropical rainforest.

Nearby the rolling hills are covered in a sea of emerald green. But it is not a natural forest — it is a palm plantation.

In supermarkets worldwide products containing palm oil — soaps, chocolates, margarine and cosmetics — fly off the shelves. Most consumers have no idea these products contain palm oil, often labeled as vegetable oil, and even less of a clue that conservationists are singling it out as being one of the main driving forces behind deforestation.

Clearing forests for agriculture isn’t exactly new, but palm is quickly becoming the crop of choice. It is fast growing with high yields, global demand now tops 40 million tons a year, and it’s central to the economies of Malaysia and Indonesia.

But the rate at which Indonesia’s natural forests are being torn down has made this tropical nation one of the world’s largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Already, 85 percent of Sumatra’s forests are gone and what is left is disappearing at an alarming rate.

“We are running out of time here. We are at the end of the tunnel,” Peter Pratje, of the Frankfurt Zoological Society, said at an orangutan sanctuary in the heart of Sumatra. Sumatran orangutans are expected to be the first great ape to go extinct — due to the loss of their natural habitat.

“The problem is there is no second chance,” Pratje adds. “If you shut down an ecosystem that is hundreds of years old you can’t regrow it.”

It is a reality that even the largest buyers and producers of palm oil acknowledge. Consumer products giant Unilever spearheaded a movement towards sustainable palm oil cultivation — the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil — which gathered palm producers, manufacturers and green groups to seek out a sustainable way to cultivate palm.

“If agriculture cannot be made sustainable then we as a food and home and personal care company are in trouble,” Unilever Jan Kees Vis explained.

But critics like Greenpeace fault the RSPO’s standards for being too weak and say that they cannot control their members.

“If a company is doing deforestation and peat land destruction, we cannot say the company is sustainable,” said Greenpeace activist Bustar Maitar.

At the moment, only 3 percent to 4 percent of globally produced palm oil is certified by the RSPO. It is a drop in the bucket now, but the RSPO expects the volume to double in the next year.

But that probably will not be enough to save Sumatra’s forests. Conservationists say that it is time for companies to control their desire for more money, governments to start seriously enforcing forest protection laws and individuals consumers to take on responsibility and make lifestyle changes.

For Sumatra, it might already be too late.

Arwa Damon is an international correspondent for CNN.

Reporter's notebook: Palm oil production devastating Sumatran forests
Arwa Damon, CNN 11 Dec 09;


Read more!

Sumatra rainforests turned into smoldering ruins

Arwa Damon, CNN 6 Dec 09;

Sumatra, Indonesia (CNN) -- The land still smolders, tinted with a depressing gray. Twisted hulks of tree trunks take on abnormal shapes. A dark black canal cuts through the wasted landscape.

It looks like a scene from an apocalyptic movie where an unknown force has obliterated all life. But this is the reality of Sumatra, Indonesia's largest island.

The Kampar Peninsula was once virgin rainforest, some of the most biodiverse in the world. The region has now been transformed into a lifeless plain, soon to be replanted with monocultures.

Environmental groups describe the degradation as rampant pillaging -- the work of multibillion dollar paper, pulp and palm oil conglomerates.

Already 85 percent of Sumatra's forests are gone. What is left is vanishing at an alarming rate -- an area the size of 50 football fields disappears every hour, according to Greenpeace and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Caught in the crosshairs are small villages like Teluk Meranti.

The village lies on Sumatra's Kampar River. As dawn breaks, fishermen set out into the morning haze. The riverbanks slowly come to life as residents bathe and brush their teeth in its waters. The morning calm is broken by children's shrieks as they lather their bodies before jumping in.

"The communities here recognize how important the forest is to them. They use the wood to make their homes, their fishing boats," says Bustar Maitar, a Greenpeace campaigner. "If the forest is gone, it means their livelihood is gone."

What is at stake is much more than that, environmental groups say. The peat soil of the Kampar Peninsula holds more carbon than anywhere else in the world. Greenpeace estimates that if this whole peninsula, some 1.7 million acres (700,000 hectares), is taken over by plantations, the carbon dioxide released would be the equivalent of 1.6 billion transatlantic flights.

In the middle of this complex struggle between preservation and destruction are the villagers.

A man named Yusuf says his family has been here for four generations and survived without big companies and their big promises.

One such company is Asia Pacific Resources, one of the world's biggest pulp and paper companies.

In June, community leaders wrote to Asia Pacific Resources, asking that the land be left alone for the sake of their grandchildren.

The company says it's bringing 20,000 jobs and sustainable development to the area. According to Neil Franklin, the company's sustainability director, Asia Pacific's intention is to use the Kampar region as a model for sustainable development.

"Plantations aren't developed on all those areas which are given to us by the government. A very careful mapping process goes on before we start any developments at all," Franklin said. "Kampar Peninsula is an area where these high conservation values are most threatened and we most certainly are aware of that. The key is how do you manage and maintain those values."

He said the model that Asia Pacific is offering is based on a balance of economic, social and environmental concerns. Solutions, the company says, will minimize carbon dioxide emissions and maximize the benefit to adjacent communities.

The promise of a more financially fruitful life is a powerful lure for some of the most poor villagers. Yusuf admits that more and more villagers, especially the younger generations, are being tempted by the companies.

"We can't do anything. We don't have power, we don't have an education, we don't have money. They have divided us."

The confrontation is so tense that Syamsuar, a school teacher who sided with the companies, agreed to talk with CNN, only away from prying eyes.

"The company has committed to developing plantations for us, for our future," he said. "They will build the public facilities that we need. For example, a mosque. They will create new job opportunities for us."

Still he said, he wants international nonprofit organizations to be closely involved, in case the companies don't fulfill their promises.

Greenpeace's Bustar says the companies promise, only to deceive.

"I am very sad to hear that conversation," Bustar said of the school teacher's comments. "Why? Because I believe this person is already influenced by the company. I try to give them examples of other villages where there is no deal until now -- there is no delivery of the company promises, but the company already cut down the forest."

For Bustar, it's personal. He is from the Indonesian province of Papua, where he grew up watching his people lose their land to big companies, he said.

"Some people, they die to protect their land," he said. "That gives me the spirit to continue this fight."

Indonesia does have strong laws governing deforestation, but environmental groups say they aren't enforced nearly enough. Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono recently pledged to reduce emissions, and Indonesia could benefit from the growing market in carbon credits if it preserves its forests.

Greenpeace is among many environmental groups calling on the government to issue a moratorium on the plantation concessions, before it's too late.

If the forests aren't protected, "we will fail to protect our future," Bustar said. "It means we will fail to protect our Earth where we are living. It means disaster is coming to us."


Read more!

Four New Species of King Crabs Discovered

LiveScience Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

Kings crabs are among the ocean's largest crustaceans, so you'd think scientists might know quite a bit about them.

As with much in the sea, however, there is much to learn.

In fact today researchers announced they'd found four new species of king crabs, brining the total known to 113.


The image shows Lithodes galapagensis, the only king crab species yet recorded from the seas around the Galapagos Islands. Credit: NOCS

Importantly, one of the new species lives around the Galapagos Islands, in warm water. King crabs had once been thought to be confined to chilly climes.

"We are only now beginning to understand the incredible diversity of animals living in the deep sea," said Sally Hall, a doctoral student at the University of Southampton and the discoverer of the new species.

"King crabs include some of the largest crustaceans currently inhabiting Earth," Hall said.

The new species are Paralomis nivosa from the Philippines, P. makarovi from the Bering Sea, P. alcockiana from South Carolina, and Lithodes galapagensis from the Galapagos archipelago.

It is now clear that species of deep-sea king crab live in most areas of the world's oceans, but many more species remain to be discovered.

"The oceans off eastern Africa, the Indian Ocean and the Southern Ocean are all particularly poorly sampled," said Hall: "We need to know which king crab species live where before we can fully understand their ecology and evolutionary success."


Read more!

Wolf recovery at crossroads in the Southwest

Susan Montoya Bryan, Associated Press Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – A decade has passed since the federal government began returning endangered Mexican wolves to their historic range in the Southwest. It hasn't worked out — for the wolves, for ranchers, for conservationists or for federal biologists.

And that has resulted in frustration and resentment by many involved in the reintroduction program along the Arizona-New Mexico border, a landscape of sprawling pine and spruce forests, cold-water lakes and clear streams.

"I believe in being a good steward of the land and preserving it for generations to come, but this is ridiculous," said Ed Wehrheim, who heads the county commission in Catron County, in the heart of wolf country. "I've had ranchers' wives come to me just bawling because everything they and their parents have worked for is going down the drain."

Four ranches have gone out of business since the wolf reintroduction began and another four are expected to do the same before next summer, Wehrheim said.

The region has been hit by drought and cattle prices aren't what they used to be, but Wehrheim said pressure from environmentalists and hundreds of livestock kills by Mexican gray wolves over the past decade have only made things worse.

Environmentalists argue that grazing practices are part of the problem and the wolf reintroduction program has failed because of mismanagement by the federal government.

In the middle stands Bud Fazio, coordinator of the Mexican gray wolf reintroduction program.

The program is at a crossroads and Fazio said he hopes to bring everyone back to the table to find a way to move forward, quell concerns of critical environmentalists and gain the confidence of wary ranchers.

"One thing about wolves is they bring out extreme emotions and feelings and attitudes, so it is an extra challenge," he said. "There is some middle ground. There is some balance, but my sense is that so far we haven't found that in the Southwest and we need to."

A subspecies of the gray wolf, the Mexican wolf was exterminated in the wild by the 1930s. The government began reintroducing wolves in 1998 along the Arizona-New Mexico line, in a territory of more than 4 million acres interspersed with forests, private land and towns.

There are about 50 wolves in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico, but that's half of what biologists had hoped to have by now.

Federal, state and other officials involved in wolf recovery are scheduled to meet next week in Albuquerque for the first of many "frank discussions" about the future of the program, Fazio said.

Part of the reason for the talks is a recent settlement with environmentalists that called for an end to a three-strikes rule that allowed wildlife managers to trap or shoot wolves that had killed at least three head of livestock within a year.

The settlement also made clear that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has control over the program, rather than a committee formed in 2003 to bring other agencies into the recovery effort.

The original rule that established the reintroduction program still allows managers to remove problem wolves, but Fazio said officials will now consider many factors — such as the wolf's genetic value to the program and its reproductive success — before making decisions on keeping an animal in the wild.

"Everything remains on the table in terms of an option for managing wolves and that does include removal of live animals or lethal removal," Fazio said. "What is different is that a whole suite of things, broader than before, will be taken into account."

Wehrheim and the New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association maintain the settlement changes nothing because the wolf program had already started to leave wolves with more than three strikes in the wild. They pointed to the Middle Fork pack, which was blamed for 10 livestock kills in two months.

The pack includes four pups and two adults, both of which are missing their front left paws.

Federal biologists say the pack is now hunting elk and relying less on strategically placed food caches.

Ranchers say that leaving the maimed wolves in the wild encourages them to go after easy prey such as calves.

"It's a problem of the program, not a problem of the wolf," Catron County Manager Bill Aymar said.

The Center for Biological Diversity also has been critical of the program, but the group believes the wolves should be left in the wild and critical habitat declared for the species to recover.

Wehrheim told New Mexico legislators in Santa Fe this week that ranchers in southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona can't afford to live with the wolves if the program remains unchanged and the federal government's plan for compensating livestock losses goes unfunded.

"It's very, very serious for Catron County and all of the wolf recovery area," he said. "We don't see any ranching existing with the wolf. We don't see any hunting existing with the wolf. We're talking tens of millions of dollars of loss."

He gave the example of a third-generation ranch that harvested about 200 calves annually before going out of business earlier this year. The operation was capable of bringing in more than $1 million in tax and other revenues to the county.

Tod Stevenson, director of the New Mexico Game and Fish Department, testified that his agency and the state want to make sure Catron County and its ranchers can survive on the landscape.

"That's the best way that we can continue to manage wildlife, is to have them as partners out there on the ground," he said. "It's critical that we come up with a balance to achieve that."


Read more!

Species survival counts too

University of Queensland Science Alert 7 Dec 09;

Queensland researchers have unveiled a new strategy for saving the world's forests on the eve of crucial climate change talks in Copenhagen.

Published today in leading journal Science, the research suggests wealthy countries participate in a carbon payment system to encourage developing countries to keep their forests to avert a looming extinction crisis, in addition to avoiding dangerous climate change.

Experts from the University of Queensland and James Cook University assessed the ability to slow down species extinctions using both carbon-focused and biodiversity-focused strategies.

“We found that, dollar for dollar, a carbon-focused approach will contribute little to slowing biodiversity loss and save far fewer species than will a biodiversity-focused strategy that targets the most imperilled forests,” said lead author and the University of Queensland researcher Oscar Venter.

The study reveals if carbon payments focus narrowly on carbon and ignore threatened biodiversity, carbon-trading alone won't be enough to stave off large-scale extinctions of tropical species, according to co-author Dr Kerrie Wilson from the University of Queensland.

“The problem is that the Amazon basin in South America, where there's still quite a lot of surviving forest, is the cheapest place to reduce emissions, but threatened species are concentrated in countries like Madagascar and the Philippines, where only a few scraps of forest remain,” said co-author Professor William Laurance from James Cook University.

Fortunately, the authors found that a compromise is possible.

“If you tweak things a little, putting some carbon funds into countries that are good value for carbon but also biodiversity-rich, like Cameroon and the Philippines, you can save twice as many threatened species and still do a great deal to combat global warming,” said co-author and director of the University of Queensland's Ecology Centre Professor Hugh Possingham.

Mr Venter said billions of dollars will be spent on forest carbon initiatives in the next decade, and these could hold huge benefits for vanishing ecosystems and wildlife if engineered in the right way.

The team's findings are expected to draw much attention at the forthcoming climate negotiations in Copenhagen, where international leaders are hoping to hammer out a final strategy for combating global warming.


Read more!