Ban Ki-moon: World's economic model is 'environmental suicide'

UN secretary general tells Davos panel that an economic revolution is needed to save the planet as he shifts his focus from climate change to sustainability
Associated Press guardian.co.uk 28 Jan 11;

The world's current economic model is an environmental "global suicide pact" that will result in disaster if it isn't reformed, Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, warned today.

Ban said that political and business leaders need to embrace economic innovation in order to save the planet.

"We need a revolution," he told a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on how best to make the global economy sustainable. "Climate change is also showing us that the old model is more than obsolete."

He called the current economic model a recipe for "national disaster" and said: "We are running out of time. Time to tackle climate change, time to ensure sustainable … growth." The Guardian revealed yesterday that Ban is ending his hands-on efforts to reach a global climate deal through UN negotiations, and move to focus on a broader sustainability agenda.

His words received a mixed reception from other panelists, including Felipe Calderón, Mexico's president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Indonesia's president, Walmart chief executive, Mike Duke, and Microsoft's Bill Gates.

Jim Balsillie, co-chief executive of BlackBerry maker Research in Motion, said technology alone wouldn't solve the problem of how to sustain economic growth while reducing its impact on the environment. "We have to fundamentally rethink economics," he said, suggesting that a new model was needed to hold businesses to account for their impact on the planet.

Yudhoyono, whose country is often labeled a keeper of one of the world's last major rainforests, said Indonesia was trying to plant 1bn trees a year. But he pushed back against the suggestion that developing countries should give up on their aspiration to achieve the same level of wealth as the rich world.

This view was partly shared by Gates, who said that "you cannot have a just world by telling people to use less energy than the average European". One way to cap the world's consumption and carbon emissions would be to invest in family planning said Gates, who has invested much of his fortune in health projects in the developing world.

The annual meeting of business and political leaders in Davos has been accused by some of producing little more than hot air.

The panel moderator, the New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, said he hoped next year participants would return to the Swiss ski resort "and be able to say that a molecule of CO2 was actually affected by what we say and do here".

World Economic Forum: UN Chief Calls for 'Clean Energy Revolution'
Environmental News Service 28 Jan 11;

DAVOS, Switzerland, January 28, 2011 (ENS) - "Revolutionary action" is needed to achieve sustainable development, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today told the government and business leaders at World Economic Forum in Davos. The UN chief issued an urgent warning that the past century's heedless consumption of resources is "a global suicide pact" and time is running out to ensure an economic model for survival.

"Let me highlight the one resource that is scarcest of all: time," he said, in a session on redefining sustainable development. "We are running out of time. Time to tackle climate change. Time to ensure sustainable, climate-resilient green growth. Time to generate a clean energy revolution."

It is time to secure the balanced development that will lift people out of poverty while protecting the planet and ecosystems that support economic growth, he told heads of state and government, international economists, business and industry leaders and civil society.

"Here at Davos - this meeting of the mighty and the powerful, represented by some key countries - it may sound strange to speak of revolution," said the usually mild-mannered Ban. "But that is what we need at this time. We need a revolution. Revolutionary thinking. Revolutionary action. A free market revolution for global sustainability."

Sustainable development is the right growth agenda for the 21st century, said Ban, recounting the mistakes of the past century based on a false belief in the infinite abundance of natural resources.

"We mined our way to growth," he declared. "We burned our way to prosperity. We believed in consumption without consequences. Those days are gone. In the 21st century, supplies are running short and the global thermostat is running high."

"Climate change is also showing us that the old model is more than obsolete. It has rendered it extremely dangerous. Over time, that model is a recipe for national disaster," said Ban. "It is a global suicide pact."

"It is easy to mouth the words 'sustainable development,' but to make it happen we have to be prepared to make major changes - in our lifestyles, our economic models, our social organization, and our political life," he urged.

"We have to connect the dots between climate change and what I might call here, WEF - water, energy and food," Ban said, echoing the acronym for the World Economic Forum.

He called on business leaders present to join the 11-year-old United Nations Global Compact, the world's largest corporate responsibility initiative committing businesses to aligning their operations and strategies with 10 universally accepted principles in the areas of environment, human rights, labor and anti-corruption.

"Together, let us tear down the walls," Ban declared. "The walls between the development agenda and the climate agenda. Between business, government and civil society. Between global security and global sustainability. It is good business, good politics, and good for society."

At a separate event in Davos, Ban launched a new Global Compact initiative called Global Compact LEAD with a group of 54 global companies, labor business and civil society organizations as founding members, who have committed to be at the cutting edge of environmental, social and governance issues, joining forces to translate sustainable development principles into business operations and deepening partnerships with the entire UN system.

Board members include executives of Fuji Xerox, Japan; Beijing Rong Zhi Institute of Corporate Social Responsibility, China; Petrobras, Brazil; Bank of America, United States; Areva, France; Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, Mexico; Deloitte, South Africa; Tata Sons Limited, India; SK Group, South Korea; Emirates Environmental Group; International Chamber of Commerce; and the International Trade Union Confederation.

"When companies like yours drive sustainability issues deeper into your operations and strategy, year after year, you send a powerful signal. Indeed, you change the world," Ban told the Global Compact LEAD meeting today. "In this century far more than the last, we need business to achieve our fundamental purposes at the United Nations.

Speaking at a news conference, Ban said that much of his time in Davos has been spent building momentum to deal with climate change, stressing that agreement among all nations is both necessary and possible. "It may not be easy, but things worth doing seldom are," he said.

UN-sponsored conferences in Copenhagen, Denmark, and Cancun, Mexico, over the past 13 months have narrowed some differences including pledges to help developing countries mitigate the effects of climate change and action to tackle deforestation, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of global warming carbon emissions.

But the major components of an accord to cap the increase in the world's average temperature at two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels still remain unresolved.

Climate Change Adaptation a Hot Issue in Davos

Leaders at the World Economic Forum are embracing the new perspective of the Global Adaptation Institute that puts "adaptation" at the center of world climate policy, says the institute's CEO, Dr. Juan Jose Daboub, a former managing director of the World Bank.

"Some of the world's most prominent private sector leaders have told me privately - and all conversations at Davos are private - that they are 'stunned' by the speed with which a change is taking place on the climate issue, toward adaptation, and they are rushing to re-examine how their businesses will approach climate change, both in terms of corporate social responsibility efforts and as a bottom-line, profit and loss factor for their enterprises," Daboub said.

"Suddenly, taking action to promote food security, water security, access to energy, and effective coastal protection are at the center of the climate issue, in the same space once reserved only for reducing greenhouse gases," said Daboub. "This is a huge shift on an issue that until recently was all carbon, all the time."

Kenneth Hersh, chairman of the Board of the Institute and CEO of NGP Energy Capital Management, said, "One of the big developments we are seeing at Davos this year is that world leaders understand that the climate issue has changed. There is a post-Kyoto, post-Copenhagen, post-Cancun reality. The effects will start to ripple across the world economy in the form of US$150-200 billion a year in adaptation investments."

Burma's Democracy Leader Asks Investors for Environmental Responsibility

Aung San Suu Kyi, general secretary of Burma's National League for Democracy, today addressed participants of the World Economic Forum, saying that "despite an abundance of natural resources, Burma's development has lagged far behind its neighbors."

In a taped audio speech from Burma, also called Myanmar, she called for environmental responsibility, saying, "I would like to request those who have invested or who are thinking of investing in Burma to put a premium on respect for the law, on environmental and social factors, on the rights of workers, on job creation and on the promotion of technological skills.

"We also need to pay close attention to the costs and collateral damage of our development, whether environmental or social, said Suu Kyi. "These however can be contained if we plan ahead responsibly."

In the 1990 general election, Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party won 59 percent of the national votes and 392 of 485 of the seats in Parliament. But she had been detained under house arrest before the elections.

She remained under house arrest for almost 15 of the 21 years from July 20, 1989 until her release on November 13, 2010.

Today, the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize winner urged world leaders gathered in Davos "to use their particular opportunities and skills as far as possible to promote national reconciliation, genuine democratization, human development and economic growth in Burma, that our people may in turn be able make their own contribution towards a safer, happier world."

Russia Seeks Investment for Ski Tourism Development Near Olympics

The North Caucasus Resorts Company, NCRC, the newly-incorporated state enterprise charged by the Russian government with implementing a $15 billion program called Peak 5642 to develop mountain resorts in the Caucasus, presented the first phase of its plans to investors at Davos.

In 2014, Russia will host the Olympic Winter Games at Sochi in the Caucasus mountains near the Black Sea. To capitalize on this event, the government plans massive development of the region. The NCRC has been given a target of five million visitors a year to the region by 2020, up from one million currently.

"Peak 5642 is going to transform the Caucasus," said President Dimitry Medvedev, who delayed his visit to Davos after the bombing at the Moscow's Domodedovo airport. "It will show how we can beat poverty and terrorism with tourism. In 2014 the world will descend on Sochi, and we want the world to keep coming back."

Five new resorts will accommodate up to 150,000 people a day, with hotel rooms for 90,000 people are supposed to be ready to receive first visitors as early as 2014. On of the resorts is planned for Mount Elbrus, the tallest mountain in Europe, where the second highest ski resort in the world will be constructed.

In Davos, Akhmed Bilalov, vice-president of the Russian Olympic Committee, who has been appointed chairman of the NCRC Board, said he is seeking partners in environmental sustainability as well as investment banking, auditing, global marketing, infrastructure and public transportation.

But Russia's development for the Olympic Games already is polluting the entire region, environmentalists complain. In Sochi last week, environmental scientists told visiting experts from the UN Environmental Programme the situation in the Olympic development zone is "an environmental catastrophe."

They presented the UNEP team with a bottle of filthy water from the Dzykhra River, which runs through Sochi National Park. The river was polluted earlier this month by a mudslide from an illegal dump used to pile construction waste from an Olympic road being built through the park.

Ban calls for a Green Economy to ensure sustainable development
UNEP 29 Jan 11;


UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called for "revolutionary action" to achieve sustainable development, warning that the past century's heedless consumption of resources is "a global suicide pact" with time running out to ensure an economic model for survival.

"Let me highlight the one resource that is scarcest of all: Time," he told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in a session devoted to redefining sustainable development. "We are running out of time. Time to tackle climate change. Time to ensure sustainable, climate-resilient green growth. Time to generate a clean energy revolution."

Calling sustainable development the growth agenda for the 21st century, Mr. Ban recited a litany of development errors based on a false belief in the infinite abundance of natural resources that fuelled the economy in the last century.

"We mined our way to growth," he said. "We burned our way to prosperity. We believed in consumption without consequences. Those days are gone. In the 21st century, supplies are running short and the global thermostat is running high.

All this now needs rethinking to secure the balanced development that will lift people out of poverty while protecting the planet and ecosystems that support economic growth, he told the assembly of heads of State and government, international economists, business and industry leaders and civil society.

"Here at Davos - this meeting of the mighty and the powerful, represented by some key countries - it may sound strange to speak of revolution," he said. "But that is what we need at this time. We need a revolution. Revolutionary thinking. Revolutionary action. A free market revolution for global sustainability.

"It is easy to mouth the words 'sustainable development,' but to make it happen we have to be prepared to make major changes - in our lifestyles, our economic models, our social organization, and our political life. We have to connect the dots between climate change and what I might call here, WEF - water, energy and food." WEF is also the acronym for the Davos World Economic Forum.

"We need you to step up. Spark innovation. Lead by action. Invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy for those who need them most - your future customers. Expand clean energy access in developing countries ? your markets of tomorrow."

He called on business leaders present to join the 11-year-old United Nations Global Compact, the world's largest corporate responsibility initiative committing businesses to aligning their operations and strategies with 10 universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.

And he called on governments both in Davos and around the world to send the right signals to build the green economy. "Together, let us tear down the walls," he declared. "The walls between the development agenda and the climate agenda. Between business, government and civil society. Between global security and global sustainability. It is good business - good politics - and good for society.

"In an odd way, what we are really talking about is going back to the future. The ancients saw no division between themselves and the natural world. They understood how to live in harmony with the world around them. It is time to recover that sense of living harmoniously for our economies and our societies.

"Not to go back to some imagined past, but to leap confidently into the future with cutting-edge technologies, the best science and entrepreneurship has to offer, to build a safer, cleaner, greener and more prosperous world for all. There is no time to waste."

At a separate event, Mr. Ban launched a new Global Compact initiative called Global Compact Lead with a group of 54 global companies as founding members, who have committed to be at the cutting edge of environmental, social and governance issues, joining forces to translate sustainable development principles into business operations and deepening partnerships with the entire UN system.

"When companies like yours drive sustainability issues deeper into your operations and strategy, year after year, you send a powerful signal. Indeed, you change the world," he told the business leaders. "In this century far more than the last, we need business to achieve our fundamental purposes at the United Nations.

"This is why LEAD and the Blueprint for Corporate Sustainability are so important. By working together at the strategic level as well as in concrete partnerships, we can leverage our respective strengths to address some of the toughest problems of our time."

Speaking at a news conference, Mr. Ban noted that he had dedicated much of his time in Davos to building momentum on efforts to deal with climate change, stressing that agreement among all nations is both necessary and possible. "It may not be easy, but things worth doing seldom are," he said.

UN-sponsored conferences in Copenhagen, Denmark, and Cancún, Mexico, over the past 13 months have narrowed some differences including pledges to help developing countries mitigate the effects of climate change and action to tackle deforestation, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of global warming carbon emissions.

But the major components of an accord to cap the increase in the world's average temperature at two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels still remain to be worked out.


Read more!

Japan Says To Work On New Global Climate Framework

Risa Maeda PlanetArk 28 Jan 11;

Japan said it aims to propose an alternative to the Kyoto Protocol in coming months, after criticizing the international climate framework as neither using effective technology nor including major emitters.

Tokyo will come up with a set of proposals to fight global warming beyond 2012, including bilateral agreements between countries on emission offsets generated by the use of clean-energy technology, government officials said on Thursday.

The move underlined Japan's urgent need to regain the trust of developing countries, many of which have blamed Japan's opposition to extending the Kyoto Protocol for causing a major delay in U.N.-led climate talks.

"We are not at all looking backward. We now think we should come up with a Japan proposal," said Ikuro Sugawara, director-general at the trade ministry's industrial science and technology policy and environment bureau.

"We should draw a vision of what the globe should be, use Japan's wisdom (on clean-energy technology) and propose what can be done with the remaining 96 percent of emissions," he said at a meeting of the ministry's climate policy advisory panel.

At the last U.N. meeting in Cancun, Mexico, at the end of 2010, governments put off tough decisions until this year on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

Japan at that time argued that Kyoto is out of date because it covers less than 30 percent of current global emissions, including a 4 percent share for Japan, and fails to provide a solution.

The protocol, whose current round ends in 2012, obliges almost 40 rich countries -- except the United States -- to cut emissions or face penalties.

Last week, Prime Minister Naoto Kan made public, albeit with few details, Japan's intention to take the lead in areas of the environment this year.

"In addition to the existing framework for environmental countermeasures ... I would like to put forth a new international initiative addressing Asian environmental challenges in particular," Kan said in a speech on foreign policy.

The internal process to come up with such a proposal in Japan will have little to do with a split parliament, which makes it difficult to pass bills related to next fiscal year's budget as well as those for policy measures on domestic emission cuts.

(Editing by Jane Baird)


Read more!

Arctic Current Warmer Than For 2,000 Years: Study

Alister Doyle PlanetArk 28 Jan 11;

A North Atlantic current flowing into the Arctic Ocean is warmer than for at least 2,000 years in a sign that global warming is likely to bring ice-free seas around the North Pole in summers, a study showed.

Scientists said that waters at the northern end of the Gulf Stream, between Greenland and the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, averaged 6 degrees Celsius (42.80F) in recent summers, warmer than at natural peaks during Roman or Medieval times.

"The temperature is unprecedented in the past 2,000 years," lead author Robert Spielhagen of the Academy of Sciences, Humanities and Literature in Mainz, Germany, told Reuters of the study in Friday's edition of the journal Science.

The summer water temperatures, reconstructed from the makeup of tiny organisms buried in sediments in the Fram strait, have risen from an average 5.2 degrees Celsius (41.36F) from 1890-2007 and about 3.4C (38.12F) in the previous 1,900 years.

The findings were a new sign that human activities were stoking modern warming since temperatures are above past warm periods linked to swings in the sun's output that enabled, for instance, the Vikings to farm in Greenland in Medieval times.

"We found that modern Fram Strait water temperatures are well outside the natural bounds," Thomas Marchitto, of the University of Colorado at Boulder, one of the authors, said in a statement.

The Fram strait is the main carrier of ocean heat to the Arctic.

ICE-FREE OCEAN

The authors wrote that the warming temperatures "are presumably linked to the Arctic amplification of global warming" and that the warming "is most likely another key element in the transition to a future ice-free Arctic Ocean."

Ice on the Arctic Ocean shrank to its lowest on record in 2007 and many experts expect the ocean will be ice-free in summers in coming decades, a threat to the hunting livelihoods of indigenous peoples and to creatures such as polar bears.

The Arctic is heating up twice as fast as the global average as part of a trend the U.N. panel of climate scientists blames on a build-up of greenhouse gases from mankind's use of fossil fuels in power plants, factories and cars.

The shrinking of reflective ice and snow in the Arctic region exposes water or ground which are darker colored and so soak up more heat from the sun, amplifying warming.

(Editing by Ralph Boulton)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 28 Jan 11


Green Drinking in January
from spotlight's on nature

Mystery row of 'drums' off Pasir Ris
from wild shores of singapore

Year of the Rarebit
from The annotated budak


Read more!

Farming for young blood

Esther Ng Today Online 28 Jan 11;

SINGAPORE - They have big dreams for Singapore's agriculture and have even unveiled a 10-year plan to increase land productivity, food security and promote tourism in the north-western part of Singapore. However, all their efforts could come to naught if the 28 farmers from the Kranji Countryside Association (KCA) cannot draw young people to the farming industry. After all, farming is hard work.

"You have to get up early in the morning and work doesn't stop - even in a storm - especially in the case of fish farming," said Metropolitan Fishery Group chief executive Malcolm Ong, 48.

Young Singaporeans who become farmers do so because they want to continue their family business and have a "passion" for farming but their numbers are low. The industry has also "never tried attracting young people", Mr Ong pointed out.

This is set to change with more educational tours to farms in the offing and "farm executives" will be hired to share the workload of conducting tours. "We have to show young Singaporeans that farming can be fun," said second-generation farmer Kenny Ong, 36, from GardenAsia.

The Singapore Environment Council's executive director, Mr Howard Shaw, also noted that the young generation have "become rather detached from nature and where we grow our food". He said: "We have to find a connection back to our roots."

Ground-Up Initiative, a non-profit organisation, is doing exactly that. Every weekend, it organises farming activities on its premises in Yishun. Its founder, Mr Tay Lai Hock, told MediaCorp he has had no problems attracting young people to participate in GUI's activities because they make its programmes fun.

However, it will be some time before young Singaporeans consider farming a "noble profession", partly because of the low pay. It would help if the Government gave it a push as it did with the cleaning industry, said Mr Tay. Still, he said: "We've got to make people understand why farming is important."

Indeed, Ms Alicious Goh, 21, who is studying banking and finance at SIM University, did an internship at GardenAsia doing events management. She told MediaCorp that, had it not been for the internship, working on a farm would not have crossed her mind.

With tours to her frog farm, JFF, increasing, "frogologist" Chelsea Wan, 27, told MediaCorp that she is looking to hire one full-time employee. But her efforts have been hampered by a lack of public transport to the area.

While there is a bus service - SMRT Service 925 - the farthest it plies from the Woodlands Interchange is Kranji Reservoir Park B, after which it heads towards Sungei Kadut and the Choa Chu Kang Interchange. There are no public buses plying along Neo Tiew Road and other roads leading to the farms. The KCA plans to work with the authorities to improve public transport to the area.


Read more!

Not sure about recycling? Look to bins for info

NUS group will help put up details on recyclables to reduce contamination
Grace Chua Straits Times 28 Jan 11;

A PLASTIC drink bottle, a styrofoam food carton and an old pair of shoes: One of these is recyclable, another is reusable, while one does not fall into either category. Which is which?

Most people cannot tell the difference - and a student group from the National University of Singapore (NUS) would like to help.

Students Against Violation of the Earth (Save) are putting detailed illustrations and information on some recycling bins in Yew Tee, with the help of the NUS Office of Environmental Sustainability and two residents' committees (RC) from the Choa Chu Kang neighbourhood.

NUS sustainability executive Marcus Tay, 29, explained that even though posters, leaflets and the Internet do inform people which materials can be recycled, such information is not available when most-needed - when people are about to tip bags full of recyclables into bins.

Up to a fifth of all the waste collected from recycling bins does not belong there, the National Environment Agency has said in previous reports.

The students plan to put recycling information on the bins, and eventually provide waste bins next to recycling bins, so people can throw away non-recyclable items such as styrofoam food boxes.

That is because some people just need to get rid of the trash in their hand - whether it can be recycled or not - Mr Tay said. If there is no waste bin in sight, they will pop it into the nearest recycling bin.

NUS will be putting the information on bins in Yew Tee Zone 8 - around Choa Chu Kang Streets 53 and 54 - but not on those in Zone 4, at Choa Chu Kang Street 51, to compare the two zones to measure effectiveness.

In both zones, the students are weighing recycling bins and checking how contaminated the contents are. They are also conducting door-to-door surveys of some of the zones' 2,800 households, to find out their attitudes towards recycling.

By April, they will find out how successful the scheme has been.

A similar project at NUS from October 2008 to March 2009 succeeded in cutting recycling-bin contamination almost completely.

At the project's launch last weekend, Yew Tee Zone 8 RC chairman Eric Lim said: 'I don't think people understand what recycling is, so I hope this exercise is successful.'

Several letters to The Straits Times Forum page this month reflected a need for more guidance.

'It is not surprising that the rubbish chute is seen as the answer to getting rid of unwanted items,' wrote reader Roy Koo, who added that many Singaporeans do want to recycle but, lacking enough information, opt to throw things away instead.

By the way, the plastic drink bottle can be recycled into new plastic items after it is cleaned, the styrofoam carton cannot be recycled, and the shoes can be donated to charity and reused if they are in good condition.

Can these items be recycled?
A guide to some of the items that can and cannot be put into your neighbourhood recycling bin
Straits Times 28 Jan 11;

YES

# Paper: Cardboard tubes for paper towels, cleaned and flattened cereal and drink boxes, envelopes, red packets, brochures, books, magazines, newspapers, telephone books
# Plastic: Rinsed plastic cups and bottles, clean bread wrappers and bread packet tags, clean plastic bags, plastic packaging from magazines, video and audio cassettes with the tape ribbon removed
# Metal: Clean metal food tins, beverage powder tins, biscuit tins, empty drink cans, clean aluminium foil and trays
# Glass: Empty, rinsed drink bottles (like wine or beer bottles), jam jars, food containers and glass cups

NO

# Paper: Used tissue paper
# Plastic: Styrofoam cups and packaging
# Metal: dirty metal tins, cans and trays
# Glass: Window glass, fluorescent light bulbs, mirrors
# Others: Batteries

Electronics can be recycled through manufacturers' schemes, or those that still work can be donated to charities. Stuffed toys, shoes and eyeglasses can also be donated.

SOURCE: www.zerowastesg.com/our-initiatives/can-recycle/ and the National Environment Agency


Read more!

Pushing hard for Singapore eateries to think green

Cert scheme boosts eco-friendly approach but getting tenants to adopt measures still a struggle
Grace Chua & Goh Kai Shi Straits Times 28 Jan 11;

SINGAPORE'S foodcourts, hawker centres and coffee shops are being offered the chance to get themselves certified eco-friendly - but will they bite?

Last week, the Singapore Environment Council launched a certification scheme for communal-dining establishments that manage waste and energy well.

To get the certificate, they must have eco-friendly measures in place - including water-saving devices on taps, recycling bins in staff areas, and sustainable takeaway boxes.

Council executive director Howard Shaw wants a hundred outlets certified by the end of this year. Right now, two are: Kopitiam foodcourt at City Square Mall in Little India, and The Deck foodcourt at the National University of Singapore.

But beyond saving the earth, it may not be clear what incentive there is for communal-dining establishments to get the stamp of environmental approval.

Even if they adopt measures like food-waste recycling and use biodegradable takeaway boxes, getting tenants to put them into practice may be an uphill task.

And although hawker centres are eligible for the scheme, the National Environment Agency (NEA) - which runs most of them - has not yet signed up. The agency did not say whether it would start using the scheme at its 106 hawker centres in future. It said it works with various organisations and businesses to help minimise waste, save energy and recycle.

The Kopitiam foodcourt chain has yet to commit to certifying more outlets, said spokesman Goh Wee Ling. She said it is easier to implement measures right from the start at new outlets than ask tenants at existing ones to start doing it.

The push for greater sustainability comes from Kopitiam rather than from customers or tenants, Mrs Goh added. However, being more sustainable can allow tenants to cut operating costs by 15 per cent to 20 per cent - by using less energy and water.

Kopitiam customers The Straits Times spoke to felt the green scheme was a good thing, but said it would not affect their decision to eat there. Administrative executive Shannon Tan, 29, said the quality of the food was more important.

Koufu spokesman Lena Ong said only its Marina Bay Sands foodcourt, Rasapura Masters, uses energy-saving measures and eco-friendly packaging. It plans to introduce similar measures in new outlets opening later in the year.

But even if foodcourts and hawker centres bring in ways to recycle food and other waste, it can be hard to get tenants to actually use them. Biogas firm IUT Global, which turns organic waste into gas burned for energy, conducted an ill-fated food-waste recycling experiment with five hawker centres. It could barely get busy hawkers and cleaners to sort food waste properly, particularly at peak periods.

'At the end of 10 months, we just gave up,' said IUT Global CEO Edwin Khew.

Hawkers are often held back from recycling by practical concerns such as space. Casting a glance at her cramped sugarcane-juice stall, Bukit Timah Food Centre stall helper Jasmine Chua, 48, said: 'If they ask us to separate our food waste, where are we to put it?'

At Yuhua Village Market and Food Centre, a pneumatic food-waste collection system goes unused because stallholders worry it could slow down service and increase the cost of maintenance and electricity, Lianhe Zaobao reported earlier this month.

The NEA, which piloted the system with Jurong Town Council, said the council had briefed stallholders on its use and advantages on Monday.

About the scheme
Straits Times 28 Jan 11;

WHO IS ELIGIBLE?

Any food and drinks establishment that features multiple vendors and a common area for self-service dining.

WHAT DO THEY NEED TO HAVE?

# An environmental management system.
# Water-saving devices at water points.
# Recycling bins with waste segregation.
# Sustainable takeaway containers only.
# Re-usable crockery, cutlery and cups.
# Green Label-marked cleaning products.
# Energy audit, natural light and ventilation, energy-efficient appliances.
# At least a stall offering vegetarian food.
# Environmental messages in foodcourt.

HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?
$2,000 for first certification (including audit fee), valid for one year. Subsequent renewals are $1,000 a year.


Read more!

Malaysia: Conduct EIA study before starting any development project

The Star 28 Jan 11;

THE increasing number of wildlife killed on our roads is an issue that Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) is finding difficult to ignore.

The most recent tragic case was the death of a female jumbo killed by a cement tanker while crossing the road from a jungle along the East-West Highway.

It is about time the Malaysian Highway Authority and the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry take a real hard look at the situation where endangered wildlife, amphibians and reptiles have become victims of motorised vehicles.

Urban areas across the country are also similarly afflicted, with thousands of domestic animals killed.

In wildlife areas, road construction fragments habitat, disrupts migration corridors and exposes sensitive species to a deadly array of hazards. Higher vehicle speeds, heavier traffic, and wider roads definitely make crossings more treacherous.

More often than not, road kills peak where wildlife corridors such as riparian zones or strips of forest intersect with roads. Not only animals but humans are injured in the collisions as well.

Wildlife that are injured and orphaned often suffer long, painful deaths.

For rare or isolated populations, vehicle collisions can cause death not just at the individual level but also for the entire species. Road kills can be considered a major threat to wildlife.

Despite the length of time animals have shared environments with humans, they are still baffled by the noise, lights and motion of vehicles. Animals must cross roads to gather food, find mates or return home from their forays.

Sometimes animals are also attracted to the warm surface of the roads.

Highway planners, land managers, biologists and engineers are oblivious to all these as they continue to lay asphalt corridors across forested habitats, cutting across animal migrating paths.

Placing animal crossing signages along roadways may not work as few people pay attention to such signs. While crossing structures are slowly being incorporated into road plans, yet virtually nothing is known on the true effectiveness between overpasses and underpasses.

Wildlife crossing structures come in many sizes and shapes and their features will ultimately depend on the needs of the myriad of species that inhabit the area of consideration.

Nothing will completely eradicate animal deaths, but the authorities can construct better and safer roads for everyone.

We need to make people aware that roadkill is a serious problem, and driver education courses should encourage drivers to watch for animals in or near roads.

In any road development project that is likely to have an impact on native fauna, an Environmental Impact Assessment study must be carried out and advice sought from the wildlife authorities.

Involving the news media through radio and television announcements and billboards will do well to alert drivers.

With dwindling and damaged habitat, animals are losing ground in humanity’s broader war against wildlife. Even if we do nothing, the rate of roadkill will decline – from lack of wildlife, not from lack of cars or roads.

S.M. MOHD IDRIS,
President,
Sahabat Alam Malaysia.


Read more!

Asean meet to discuss sharing of nuclear energy

Senior energy officials will attend inaugural meeting in S'pore next month
Ronnie Lim Business Times 28 Jan 11;

AN inaugural meeting on Asean nuclear energy cooperation in Singapore next month could see the region potentially moving towards some sharing of nuclear power in the longer term.

An energy player here, for instance, had earlier suggested that cooperation could take the form of Singapore building a nuclear plant with its neighbours.

But it is still early days, as the coming Feb 18 meeting of the Asean Nuclear Energy Cooperation Sub Sector Network is its first since the body was endorsed by the Asean Energy Ministers meeting in Vietnam last July. The meeting involves the grouping's senior energy officials at this stage.

Currently, the region already has an Asean emergency petroleum sharing scheme for crude oil and products in times of both shortages and surplus, and has activated this once. And it is also working towards building an integrated Asean power grid as well as a trans-Asean gas pipeline.

The coming meeting on nuclear energy cooperation, hosted by Singapore's Energy Market Authority, is timely given the spate of announcements in the last two months by regional countries to build such plants.

Asean had also earlier set up a nuclear energy safety sub-sector network to study safety issues.

Last November, Vietnam signed a US$5.6 billion deal with Russia to build the country's first nuclear power plant, expected to be operational around 2020.

Indonesia also disclosed plans to build two nuclear plants on Pulau Bangka, a large island to the south-east of Batam.

Just last month, Malaysia also said that it wanted to build two nuclear plants that will generate 1,000 megawatts each, with the first ready for operation in 2021.

Meanwhile, Singapore has started studying the feasibility of having a nuclear power plant, although Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has stressed that safety was a major concern because of the Republic's high urban density. He also said that it would be a long time before any decision is made on nuclear energy here.

Edwin Khew, chairman of the Sustainable Energy Association of Singapore, suggested that a nuclear reactor - which would be clean and efficient, and have a low carbon footprint - could perhaps be built on a Tekong-size island accessible to Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia.

'If you look at the fact that they're talking about an Asean (power) grid, this will be a perfect project to put on a common island.'


Read more!

Death Of Yellowstone Bison Sparks Conservation Debate

Laura Zuckerman PlanetArk 27 Jan 11;

Less than a week after 25 wild buffalo from the nation's last purebred herd were permitted to roam into Montana, officials have shot and killed one bison and were debating the fate of 14 others.

Government wildlife managers on January 19 drove a trial band of buffalo, or bison, from Yellowstone National Park into nearby Gallatin National Forest in Montana to use winter grazing grounds for the first time in more than a century.

The plan represented a hard-won agreement among federal and state governments, ranchers and conservation groups over an animal that symbolizes the American West.

Until now, any of the 3,900 buffalo escaping the deep snows of Yellowstone to forage in Montana's lowlands were chased back into the park, quarantined or killed to stop them from infecting cattle with brucellosis, a disease that causes cows to abort.

The 25 buffalo pushed by officials on horseback and on all-terrain vehicles onto forest lands in Montana were meant to stay until spring, when biologists hoped they would migrate back to the park.

But officials say 15 of the brucellosis-free band repeatedly crossed to private ground on the east side of the Yellowstone River, where they are not tolerated.

Seven government wranglers spent most of Sunday and Monday trying to drive a bison cow back to public lands before Montana Department of Livestock agents decided to shoot and kill the animal for acting aggressive.

"They couldn't get her turned around so they had to lethally remove her," said agency spokesman Steve Merritt.

Pat Flowers, regional supervisor for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, said shooting the bison was a last resort.

'LIKE LITTLE KIDS'

"The good news is that 10 of the bison have found habitat on the forest," he said.

Officials on Tuesday were still searching for a buffalo yearling that wandered off earlier this week and weighing options for the remaining 13 bison that will not stay put.

Hunting of buffalo west of the Mississippi river cut their numbers from tens of millions to the fewer than 50 in the early 20th century. That small band took refuge in Yellowstone, which stretches across parts of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.

Millions of visitors flock to the park every year to view wildlife such as bison, which have a high rate of exposure to brucellosis. About half the Yellowstone herd has been exposed to the bacteria and an estimated 25 percent infected.

Those rates alarm Montana's billion-dollar cattle industry, with producers fearing disease-bearing bison will jeopardize the state's brucellosis-free status. That U.S. Department of Agriculture designation means Montana livestock can be shipped across state lines without testing and maintain market value.

Ken McDonald, Montana's chief of wildlife, said it is possible managers will change out the uncooperative bison with others quarantined on the edge of the park.

"They're like little kids, they do just the opposite of what you tell them," he said. "A bison has a mind of its own at times."

The outcome of this year's experiment will shape the plan over the next several years to establish a 100-strong herd permitted to migrate annually between from Yellowstone.

Some conservationists argue that wild buffalo should never have been captured, tested and collared for the experiment in the first place. And they say wildlife experts should have known bison would roam.

"They thought the buffalo would stay in this little magic area designated for them and buffalo don't tend to do that," said Dan Brister, head of Buffalo Field Campaign.

More than 3,500 Yellowstone bison have been killed by the government or by public hunting since 2000.

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Greg McCune)


Read more!

Bulgaria sets first annual bear hunting quota

Yahoo News 27 Jan 11;

SOFIA (AFP) – Bulgaria's environment ministry set an annual brown bear hunting quota for the first time on Thursday, following a decades-long ban on killing the protected animals.

The ministry said in a statement it would allow the hunting of 17 animals this year, with dispensations distributed among seven bear-populated regions.

The quota was determined based on three recent tallies of the bear population, which found that some 540 to 560 bears roam Bulgaria's mountains.

Seven of the dispensations were granted to the Smolyan region, in the southern Rhodope mountains, where a brown bear killed a villager in July 2010, the first such accident in decades.

The killing and a number of attacks on flocks and beehives in the region sparked angry cries for a cull and eventually prompted parliament in end-2010 to open between three and eight percent of the bear population for hunting.

Environmentalists immediately slammed the changes as catering to the interests of hunting lobbies, under the guise of attempting to curb poaching.

"We had to obey the law," ministry expert Ruslan Serbezov told AFP, noting however that the government had set the quota at the lowest three-percent end of the scale, while Bulgaria's bear habitats were by no means overpopulated.

Bears are a protected species in Bulgaria and their killing was strictly banned for more than 20 years, except in cases of accidents and with special permits distributed on a case-by-case basis.

The move comes as the European Commission launched legal action against Sweden on Thursday for allowing hunters to shoot 20 wolves this year even though the species is threatened with extinction.

The European Union's executive arm raised concerns about Sweden's wolf policy, including the licensed hunting of a protected species and the "arbitrary ceiling" of 210 wolves that was set for the animal's population.

Swedish Environment Minister Andreas Carlgren said Sweden alone could decide whether or not to allow the hunt.


Read more!

Two-thirds of UK biofuel fails green standard, figures show

Just 31% of the biofuel supplied under the government's initiative to tackle climate change met its own green standards, the Renewable Fuels Agency reports
Sylvia Rowley guardian.co.uk 27 Jan 11;

Less than one-third of the biofuel used on UK roads meets government environmental standards intended to protect water supplies, soil quality and carbon stocks, according to new figures.

The Renewable Fuels Agency says that just 31% of the biofuel supplied under the government's initiative to use fuel from plants to help tackle climate change met its green standard. For the remaining 69% of the biofuel, suppliers could not say where it came from, or could not prove it was produced in a sustainable way, the figures show.

In April 2008, suppliers began mixing biofuel into all petrol and diesel supplies under the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), and by 2009-10 – the time period to which these latest figures relate – biofuels accounted for 3.3% of UK transport fuels. Suppliers were supposed to ensure that 50% of biofuel met government environmental standards, but the target is not mandatory and was not met.

Several suppliers, including BP, Total, Morgan Stanley and Chevron, also failed to meet targets on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and providing data on the source of their biofuels.

The Renewable Fuels Agency's chief executive Nick Goodall said: "We've seen some progress from suppliers in meeting the challenge of sourcing their biofuels responsibly, but in many cases it has been disappointingly slow. Too many are lagging behind and dragging overall performance down. With mandatory sustainability criteria due to be introduced with the [European] Renewable Energy Directive, companies currently missing all three targets need to make a step change in performance."

Scientists and campaigners have warned that biofuels could cause more problems than they solve, with concerns over the destruction of tropical forests and impact on global food supplies.

As a whole, suppliers exceeded the target of 45% reduction in greenhouse gases compared to petrol and diesel fuels – achieving 51% savings. However, these figures do not include carbon emissions from indirect changes in land use, such as forests and grasslands being turned over to cropland, which experts have warned could cancel out the environmental benefits of biofuels and even accelerate climate change.

The majority of UK biofuel is imported. Biodiesel from soy was the single biggest source (31%) in 2009/10, with a large increase in Argentinian soy compared to the previous year, something that Friends of the Earth biofuels campaigner Kenneth Richter calls a "huge cause for concern".

"This report shows us that current biofuels policies are unsustainable " he says. "Additional demand for crops like soy and palm oil only creates extra pressure for agricultural expansion in producer countries, which in many cases leads to rainforest being cut down to make way for plantations."

There are also concerns about the impact of biofuels on food prices. The United Nations has singled out biofuel demand as a major factor in what it estimates will be as much as a 40% increase in food prices over the coming decade.

The Renewables Fuel Agency published the Gallagher review into biofuels in 2008, which recommended that the government slow the introduction of biofuels until more was known about the possible negative impacts.

Ministers responded by reducing the rate at which the RTFO's biofuel targets will increase, so that the total biofuel content in petrol and diesel will reach 5% in 2013-14. A separate EU plan aims to include 10% biofuel in transport fuel by 2020.


Read more!