Best of our wild blogs: 6 Feb 12


Latest Green Jobs in Singapore [30 Jan - 5 Feb 2012]
from Green Business Times

Coming up ... first Chek Jawa Boardwalk outing in 2012
from Adventures with the Naked Hermit Crabs

White-bellied Sea Eagle: Early nesting behaviour
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Green Crested Lizard
from Monday Morgue

Bukit Batok Town Park
from Crystal and Bryan in Singapore

Our Southern Islands featured in Singapore magazine!
from wild shores of singapore

Celebrate Earth Hour @ Orchard
from Green Drinks Singapore


Read more!

Heritage society 'disappointed' with Govt's Bukit Brown decision

Grace Chua Straits Times 6 Feb 12;

THE Singapore Heritage Society wants Bukit Brown Cemetery to be fully documented, and its heritage and environmental value taken into account, before any road or housing decisions are made, it said in a position paper.

It added it was 'deeply disappointed' with the Government's decision to continue with a road through part of the historical burial ground, adding it regretted there was no public consultation before zoning and road-building decisions were made.

The position paper, released on Saturday night, comes after a Facebook post on Friday by Minister of State for National Development Tan Chuan-Jin, who described the ongoing work to document some 5,000 of the graves there.

In his post, Mr Tan - who is the Government's de facto point man on Bukit Brown public engagement - said a controversial road through the cemetery would be adjusted to reduce the impact on the graves, based on the documentation exercise.

But the society felt that documentation of all graves should have come before the route setting, rather than the other way around.

The dual four-lane carriageway was announced last year and is meant to ease congestion on Lornie Road. However, it will affect 5 per cent of the area's 100,000 grave sites.

The society said: 'The argument that a road which is not the shortest possible route through the cemetery is sub-optimal is a calculation based upon traffic needs only.

'Unlike standard road-building projects, this one comes at the opportunity cost of a unique historical and valuable natural space in Singapore.'

It added that the society 'regrets there was no consultation prior to the decision, and urges the Government to consider alternatives that would not destroy the heritage value in the cemetery'.

The 223ha cemetery, which is slated for residential use under the Urban Redevelopment Authority's Concept Plan 2001, is the resting place of notable immigrants like businessmen Cheang Hong Lim and Chew Joo Chiat. The society's paper argues that it is not only the graves, but also cultural practices like rituals and offerings, which will be lost should the graves be exhumed for development.

It recommended the cemetery be gazetted as a heritage site and turned into a heritage park, suggestions it had made in its book Spaces Of The Dead: A Case From The Living, which argues for cemeteries to be conserved as open-air museums or parks.

The society also suggested the Government look at best practices of historical cemeteries and heritage parks such as Mount Auburn Cemetery in Massachusetts and Saints Innocents Cemetery in Paris.

'If it is not possible to gazette Bukit Brown in its entirety, large swathes of the cemetery can be designated for legal protection,' the paper said, adding that the decision on which parts to be gazetted can be made based on information gleaned from the full documentation of Bukit Brown's graves.

Cost-benefit analyses, the society added, should be a key part of any heritage-related decision, and take into account a site's physical space, its biodiversity, value as a tourist attraction, and the sense of identity or belonging it promotes among citizens.

Likewise, environmental impact assessments should be done, it said. The lushly forested cemetery slows down stormwater run-off into the Kallang River, wrote Assistant Professor Lim Han She of the National University of Singapore's geography department, in an annex to the position paper.

The hydrologist added that clearing the vegetation would increase surface run-off, straining drainage systems around the Thomson Road area.

Other environment and heritage civic groups have previously taken a similar stance.

The Nature Society (Singapore) last year put out a position paper asking planners to consider the site's uncommon birds and plants, and its value as a carbon dioxide sink and rainfall 'sponge'.

Members of the public have also spoken up. In a December letter published in The Straits Times, Madam Marian Tay wrote that 'already-concretised plots like Turf City are left untouched for years, golf courses are not acquired, and much of western Singapore is still available for development'.

Mr Tan, who is also Minister of State for Manpower, had noted on Friday that Bukit Brown could hold 15,000 homes for around 50,000 residents, and be an extension of Toa Payoh township.

Asked about Bukit Brown's potential for housing, Heritage Society executive committee member Terence Chong, who wrote the paper, said that the society 'understands the nation has housing needs. However, housing at Bukit Brown Cemetery remains a conceptual possibility which must be reassessed with changing times'.

Heritage Society takes issue with handling of plans for Bukit Brown
Esther Ng Today Online 6 Feb 12;

SINGAPORE - The Singapore Heritage Society (SHS) has spoken against what it felt was a lack of "genuine" consultation on the Government's decision to build a road through the Bukit Brown Cemetery.

In a 26-page position paper released over the weekend, the SHS said: "Unfortunately, such consultation processes have, in reality, been used by the Government for two purposes - to inform civil society and relevant stakeholders of the rationale behind government decisions and/or to gather feedback in order to fine-tune such decisions before they are announced to the public."

The SHS claimed that the decision - which it is "deeply disappointed" with - to build the road was relayed privately to a senior member of SHS by the authorities only two weeks before it was publicly announced on Sept 12. A series of meetings was then held between the SHS, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority, where the "primary purpose ... was for the authorities to explain the need for the road".

Urging the Government to reconsider its decision, SHS said it understands the need to provide public housing and relieve traffic congestion. But it does not believe that "enough effort has been invested" in the search for alternative solutions.

The SHS adds that it "strongly recommends" gazetting Bukit Brown as a heritage site, the full documentation of the graves and the conversion of Bukit Brown "into a heritage park for Singaporeans to enjoy".

Starting in April, about 5 per cent of the cemetery's 100,000 or so graves will be exhumed.

On Friday, Minister of State (National Development) Tan Chuan-Jin said on his Facebook page that the road will proceed as planned. But the LTA will "use the findings from the documentation exercise to fine-tune the road alignment so as to reduce the impact on the graves". Esther Ng

The SHS position paper can be viewed at http://tdy.sg/shsbktbrwn.

The Singapore Heritage Society’s Position Paper on Bukit Brown is now available at the society’s
website: http://www.singaporeheritage.org/

Direct download link to the Position Paper on Bukit Brown: http://singaporeheritage.theadventus.com/wp-
content/uploads/2011/11/SHS_BB_Position_Paper.pdf


Residents split over new Bukit Brown road
Those in Sime Road worry about noise, while Lornie residents expect less traffic
Royston Sim & Goh Chin Lian Straits Times 7 Feb 12;

TWO sets of residents have mixed reactions regarding the building of a road through Bukit Brown cemetery.

While those who live along Sime Road are upset that they will have to put up with noise and pollution once the dual four-lane road to run behind their homes is operational, those residing along Lornie Road will have some reason to cheer.

They can expect less traffic on the busy carriageway after it is reduced to a dual two-lane road when the Bukit Brown road is completed in 2016.

Work on the estimated 2km new road - which will start from Lornie Road, cut through Bukit Brown and join Adam Road before the Pan-Island Expressway exits - is expected to begin early next year.

There are 19 bungalows and semi-detached houses along Sime Road. Besides citing noise and pollution concerns, residents like Mr Daniel Goh, 63, also expressed concern that the new road would cut off their access to Kheam Hock Road.

Now, Sime Road leads to Kheam Hock Road, which in turn connects to Dunearn or Bukit Timah road.

The residents will no longer have that direct access after the new road is built. Mr Goh said that during a meeting last October, Land Transport Authority (LTA) officials said an underpass would be created off Lornie Road so residents could use that instead to access Kheam Hock Road.

Besides the inconvenience of a longer drive to use the proposed underpass, Mr Goh fears an accident on the new road could divert traffic back to Lornie Road and clog up that carriageway too. 'We are very worried. They are going to choke off our entrance and exit,' said the retiree, who has lived in Sime Road since 1987.

Traffic along Lornie Road is not that bad except during peak hours, he added, so he feels it is 'mind-boggling' that the LTA would want to create a new road with eight lanes instead of just expanding Lornie Road, which has seven lanes in both directions.

Another Sime Road resident, who wanted to be known only as Ms Tay, said it would definitely be a lot noisier with the new road behind her home. 'Urbanisation is good, but you have to retain... what makes Singapore beautiful,' said the 25-year-old student.

Grassroots leader Michael Ng said about 30 residents turned up at the LTA meeting last October. They live in semi-detached houses and bungalows along Lornie Road and Sime Road, and represented about half of the 50 to 60 households that grassroots leaders had informed about the meeting.

Mr Ng, chairman of the Dunearn Neighbourhood Committee for the area, recalled that the LTA had shown a map of the proposed road then.

He said it could not confirm the alignment of the road at the meeting as it had to take into account the position of the graves, which he was told had not yet been documented.

'The residents know the road will come out from Adam Road, but how near to or how far from their homes, they don't know,' he added.

No further meetings with the LTA have been scheduled.

Even so, there are those who are glad that the new road will divert traffic away from Lornie Road.

Counselling psychologist Georgina Chin, who is in her mid-40s and lives in Wallace Way, said it would be easier to turn out to Lornie Road. It can be difficult now because of heavy traffic and cars speeding towards Adam Road. She added: 'The noise is awful. I genuinely look forward to the noise level going down.'

Others opposed to the new road include heritage groups.

In a position paper released last Saturday, the Singapore Heritage Society said it was 'deeply disappointed' with the Government's decision to go ahead with plans to build the road - as mentioned in a Facebook post by Minister of State for National Development Tan Chuan-Jin last Friday.

It expressed regret that the Government did not hold consultations prior to the decision and urged the authorities to consider 'alternatives that would not destroy the heritage value in the cemetery'.

The LTA has said that the road would affect just 5 per cent - or about 5,000 - of the 100,000 graves there.

Bukit Brown has been earmarked by the Urban Redevelopment Authority for long-term residential use.


Read more!

Using 'celebrity' animals to push for conservation doesn't work

Straits Times Forum 6 Feb 12;

DR LEE Wei Ling ('Confessions of an embarrassed omnivore'; Jan 29) offered an intriguing angle to the issue of keeping dolphins in captivity, which has sparked a knee-jerk reaction from netizens.

What has not been considered is the importance of a studied, ecosystem-based approach to conservation.

In any ecosystem, organisms are intertwined in a series of complex interactions. In the marine ecosystem, top predators like whales, dolphins and sharks play an important role as key regulators, keeping in check the population of the animals lower down in the food chain.

Quite coincidentally, these top predators are also the animals that numerous conservation groups have been using to champion their cause.

The focus of local marine conservation efforts, in particular, has been largely skewed towards such 'celebrity' animals.

At a recent local symposium, an expert panel was asked about its views on using these animals to promote conservation. It highlighted that drawing attention to the plight of animals the public can relate to should, ideally, generate interest in the conservation of the entire ecosystem.

In reality, this model may not be working as well as it should.

Marine biologists often find it hard to convince the public about the importance of coral reefs, sea grass and inter-tidal habitats, bearing in mind that these habitats are the foundation on which turtles, dugongs, dolphins and sharks exist.

Taking corals as an example, few Singaporeans know with certainty whether they are animals, plants or rocks, or where they can find coral reefs here.

Conservation should begin with the provision of basic knowledge to educate the public, tapping the expertise of the scientific community and the active collaboration with the relevant government agencies and stakeholders.

Attempts to rush into the conservation of a single, isolated organism without due consideration and understanding of the entire ecosystem can be potentially abrasive and misleading.

Toh Tai Chong


Read more!

Singapore the right climate for green groups

More global bodies being drawn here by resources, govt support and prospect of generous funding
Grace Chua Straits Times 6 Feb 12;

A HOST of international non-governmental organisations, whose work involves the environment, are setting up shop here.

More of these NGOs are moving to town, drawn by the space, resources and prospect of generous funding available.

In the coming months, conservation groups BirdLife International and Fauna & Flora International will be opening offices here.

Others, like the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Conservation International (CI) and Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) have already done so.

But challenges remain, namely raising environmental awareness - and therefore funding - among Singapore residents and Asian companies. Still, one major factor in bringing NGOs here has been government support.

In 2007, the Government started a formal programme to attract international organisations, setting up the International Organisations Programme Office at the Economic Development Board (EDB) to inform non-profit organisations of opportunities here, said Mr Quek Swee Kuan, the board's assistant managing director.

Environment non-profit organisations, he added, do not typically think of Singapore as a base for work, as most of their beneficiaries are elsewhere. Five years ago, for example, the only big name in town was the WWF.

International NGOs say they have received various government grants, tax incentives and help.

For instance, the WWF, which set up an office here in 2006, received tax incentives and help getting registered as a charity.

Tanglin International Centre, located at the former Ministry of Education grounds in Kay Siang Road, opened last year as a dedicated space for non-profit groups.

WWF and WCS are located at the centre, while the Singapore Environment Council (SEC) and Fauna & Flora International are expected to move in later this year.

The EDB aims to get 150 international non-profit organisations from all sectors here by 2015, and create 2,500 jobs in the process.

Some NGOs are drawn here by the availability of specific technical skills. For example, WCS managing director Colin Poole said it sought veterinary, animal husbandry and genetics expertise.

But the biggest challenge, all of them said, has been getting Asian firms to be more sustainable, and help fund environment groups.

Dr Kashyap Choksi, managing director of CI, said: 'Corporates... will give money to a charity or marathon, but on sustainability and greening the supply chain, this region has not got the message yet.'

Given the challenging funding climate, what will happen when government grants run dry?

The WWF is a charity and Institution of a Public Character (IPC), so it can collect donations from the public. But CI and WCS are not set up to do so here, and rely on corporate partnerships or foundations. CI's million-dollar grant, matched by its own funding, will cease later this year.

Dr Choksi acknowledged this is a challenge, but said companies' perception of sustainability is changing. 'It's slowly dawning on them that unless they change... they may not exist as a business in the next 20, 30, 40 years.'

WCS' Mr Poole explained that costs here are minimal, and that staff who are based here but manage regional projects can tap funds earmarked for those projects.

So far, international environment groups have not lobbied the Singapore Government like some might in the West. This is simply not their mission here, they say.

Mr Poole said: 'We're not an advocacy organisation, we're not Greenpeace, we don't mount campaigns. We gather data, document what's going on, partner governments. It's about wildlife, ecosystems, forests. It's not about politics and it never has been.'

Local NGOs agree. SEC executive director Jose Raymond said international NGOs typically focus on work outside Singapore.

He said their work, like curbing deforestation in Indonesia, was a vital contribution to Singapore as it helped mitigate the transboundary haze; this was as important as domestic political advocacy would be.

What is more, he added, outspoken environmental advocacy by local NGOs has been on the rise in the past few years. He did not specify any, but issues such as conserving the Bukit Brown cemetery and dolphins in captivity have made headlines in recent years.

Local groups, initially, were concerned that slices of the already small funding pie would get thinner, said Nature Society (Singapore) president Shawn Lum.

But that has not been the case. Instead, local and global groups have complemented each other.

'The pie itself has gotten bigger, the environment community is bigger, and there's more buzz and awareness.'


Read more!

Philippines: Marine Life Decline Costs $3.5B

Melody M. Aguiba Manila Bulletin 6 Feb 12;

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines must now aggressively arrest marine degradation so as to sustain $3.5 billion economic value annually, or it will spend for a more costly restoration of degraded biological reef while losing its benefits.

The country derives an economic benefit of $1.35 billion from fisheries, tourism, and coastal protection in coral reefs; $84 million from fishery and wood harvest in mangroves; $1.25 billion from municipal and commercial fisheries; and $830 million from aquaculture.

This is based on White and Cruz Trinidad 1998 study as reported by Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Parks and Wildlife Bureau’s (DENR-PAWB) Theresa Mundita S. Lim in a briefing paper at the United Nations Environment Program’s (UNEP) Land Ocean Connection Global Conference.

As fish catch has been consistently dropping since the 1980s arising from destructive human activities, a massive die-off of coral reefs will happen, much as how this is the trend globally.

“Over-zealous and destructive fishing practices are threatening both the diversity and abundance of fish populations that live in the reefs. Some of these practices are over-fishing, cyanide poisoning, and the use of dynamite, which permanently damage the reefs,” reported Lim.

Fish catch per unit of effort was noted to have consistently declined from 1980 at two metric tons (MT) per hectare for small pelagic fish to an estimated 1.8 MT per hectare in 1990, further down to one MT per hectare in 1995, and finally to a lower 0.5 MT per hectare in 2000.

Correspondingly, mangrove area in the country has been declining from 288,000 hectares in 1970 to 175,000 hectares in 1980, 140,000 hectare in 1998, and 138,000 hectares in 1993.

Given this direction, it is projected that there will be less than 100,000 hectares of mangrove forests left by 2030 if the decline continues.

The Philippines is one of nine countries with high to very high exposure to coral reef threats, according to the World Resource Institute. And it has low to medium adaptive capacity to counter such threats.

The establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPA) is seen to help arrest marine degradation. It is also less costly.

While the cost of restoring a damaged biological reef is between $2,000 to $13,000 per hectare, the cost of managing a 40-hectare MPA is placed at only P40,000 or just P1,000 per hectare.

“The cost of restoring a damaged coral reef is high compared to the rather affordable cost of effectively managing an MPA,” according to the DENR.

MPAs are areas where fish catching is banned and limitation on entry is imposed.

Amid marine destruction, DENR claims government has already issued Executive Order (EO) 533 which adopts integrated coastal management (ICM) as a strategy in sustaining marine and coastal resources. ICM is being instituted in Cagayan, Zambales, Quezon, Romblon, Masbate, Iloilo, Cebu and Siquijor Zamboanga, and Davao.

But despite the presence of laws, the intensified involvement of local government units should be harnessed for a more effective marine conservation.

“Local initiative and involvement is the most effective method for the protection of coral reef and other ecosystems,” according to Lim.

With this, the Fisheries Code should be implemented where LGUs are mandated to allot at least 15 percent of their municipal waters for fish sanctuaries.

The Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) is also carrying out the Sustainable Development Strategy for the Seas of East Asia (SDS). This includes support to zoning of Manila Bay, one of Philippines most important but critically damaged coastal resource.

DENR reported that the ICM has so far rehabilitated 2,129 hectares of understocked natural mangrove forests and established new plantation on 856 hectares.

But there is a need to carry out more rehabilitation. DENR has initially identified 2,000 hectares for rehabilitation under the Upland Development Program and another 7,500 hectares under the DENR’s General Plan of Action which supports integrated watershed management.

The government is also formulating a management plan for a total of 21,434-hectare coral reef area and 10,351-hectare seagrass beds, DENR reported.

Integrated into an MPA management plan are 30 MPAs nationwide including the Tubbataha and Apo reefs. There is also coral transplantation including coral farming in Marigondon in Mactan Island and Camotes Island around Cebu, Bolinao, Pangasinan and Duka Bay, Misamis Oriental.

These rehabilitation programs involve preventing destructive fishing, pollution, and sedimentation.

In a coral reef conservation, villagers are educated on the importance of coral reefs, community-managed fish sanctuaries (no fishing zone), and community-benefiting ecotourism activities are established.


Read more!

Insurance to cost more in areas hit by natural disasters

Jasmine Ng The Business Times AsiaOne 5 Feb 12;

SINGAPORE - Commercial insurance rates in Asia are expected to climb in regions affected by natural disasters following record insurance losses last year.

According to global insurance broker and risk adviser Marsh, Thailand alone is forecast to cost the insurance and reinsurance industry more than US$10 billion. The insurance market is reacting to the Thai flood disaster in September last year by severely restricting flood coverage on property insurance policies, Marsh says.

It anticipates rate increases of at least 20 per cent across the board on all property and business interruption programmes in Thailand with sub-limited flood cover or no flood cover, plus higher deductibles.

Underwriters are starting to label certain regions and countries as 'nat cat' (natural catastrophe) zones, whereas they were not previously considered as such, says Marsh.

Some are even pulling out of geographies or lines of business altogether to stabilise their portfolios and address profitability issues, Marsh adds.

Market conditions in Singapore are expected to remain soft and competitive as underwriters see Singapore as free from natural catastrophe exposures.

Most insurance premiums are on the decrease, except for companies that have regional insurance programmes with exposures to markets with catastrophe risks.

Marsh says financial lines will continue to enjoy abundant new capacity, keeping rates very competitive, with only crime insurance as an exception due to worsening loss trends. Construction-related insurance will also remain soft with market reductions averaging 10 per cent.

In China and Hong Kong, Marsh expects directors' and officers' liability for US-listed Chinese companies to be up 30 per cent on the back of a significant increase in securities class action lawsuits.

Hong Kong will also see substantial rate increases for companies that have exposure to markets with catastrophe risks.

Japan, which was severely hit by the March 11 earthquake and subsequent tsunami, will see an average 25 to 50 per cent increase for earthquake insurance. Insurers also tended not to provide earthquake capacity unless there was enough underwriting information available.

Rates in Malaysia have risen between 20 to 30 per cent in a number of insurance classes, including financial and property.

Premiums for medical malpractice cover will also be up by 20 to 30 per cent due to two recent high profile losses.

Despite this, Marsh says the continued influx of insurance capital into Asia, the demand for protection as the volume of construction projects grows, and the increasing general awareness of insurance and risk management are combining to lessen the direct effects in the primary insurance market.

'At best, rates are stabilising, with some areas such as natural catastrophe insurance increasing significantly while others are still enjoying capacity and competition,' Marsh said. It adds that this fragmented and choppy market is likely to continue throughout the first six months of 2012.


This article was first published in The Business Times.


Read more!

Environment agency becomes crunch issue in Rio talks

Richard Ingham (AFP) Google News 5 Feb 12;

PARIS — The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) is emerging as a hot issue in preparations for June's Rio conference, styled as a once-in-a-generation chance to restore a sick planet to good health.

The US is fighting a proposal, backed according to France by least 100 countries, for transforming UNEP from a poorly noticed, second-string unit into a planetary super-agency.

Environmentalists have long complained that Nairobi-based UNEP, set up in 1972 as an office of the UN and with a membership of only 58 nations, lacks clout to deal with the globe's worsening ills.

These range from climate change, water stress and over-fishing to species loss, deforestation and ozone-layer depletion.

But the environmental mess also coincides with the crisis of capitalism, which greens say is blind to the cost for Nature in its relentless quest for growth.

The fateful intertwining of these problems points to a unique chance of a solution at the June 20-22 "Rio+20" conference, they argue.

With possibly scores of leaders in attendance, the 20-year follow-up to the famous Earth Summit has the declared aim of making growth both greener and sustainable.

"The new capitalism which emerges from the crisis has to be environmental, or it won't be new," French Ecology Minister Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet said on Tuesday.

The key vehicle would be UNEP, which according to the vaguely-worded French proposal would be changed into the World Environment Organisation.

It would become the UN's 16th "specialised" agency alongside the World Health Organisation (WHO), Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and so on.

To the outsider, this may sound at best like a bit of terminological tinkering -- at worst, just another bureaucracy-breeding machine.

Experts, though, say status change could be surprisingly far-reaching.

Specialised UN agencies have high degrees of autonomy, enabling them to set agendas, frame international norms, stir up interest in dormant issues and sometimes poke their noses into areas of national sovereignty.

At its most ambitious, a World Environment Organisation would embrace not just the member-states which fund it but also business, green and social groups, becoming a very loud voice indeed.

It could intrude into sensitive areas such as trans-border use of water resources, fishery quotas and habitat use -- and even monitor environmental standards for trade in goods and services.

According to Kosciusko-Morizet's ministry, more than 30 European countries back the French proposal, along with 54 countries in Africa, plus Thailand, Malaysia, Nepal, Chile, Uruguay and others.

But in a US presidential election year where green issues -- especially foreign ones -- are easily trumped by domestic politics, Washington has set down a marker.

"We do not believe that international efforts on the environment and sustainable development would be improved by creating a new specialised agency on the environment," a State Department official told AFP.

"We prefer to work towards a strengthened role for UNEP, as well as better coordination across the UN system in integrating environment into development, and in working towards sustainable development."

Canada, like the US, says it prefers a smarter, better-connected UNEP.

Tensions over this are now emerging at preparatory talks on the "zero draft," a document that will be finessed into June's all-important summit communique.

"The Americans have come out guns blazing," said Farooq Ullah, head of policy and advocacy at a London-based NGO called Stakeholder Forum.

"The risk, of course, is not necessarily that they would veto it (a super-UNEP) but that they would pull out their funding for it. A big part of UNEP's funding comes from the Americans, so it would be a major blow," he stressed.

Could the dispute rip Rio apart? Or could it doom it to dismal compromise, as many view the outcome of 2009 Copenhagen climate summit?

"The biggest risk with these things that have a lot of interest is that if you push too far too quickly and it becomes too contentious, it will just be negotiated out," warned Ullah.

Lucien Chabason of a French thinktank, the Institute of Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI), said the outcome did not have to be dramatic.

"One can imagine a mixture of the two ideas, in which Rio adopts a position in principle to beef up UNEP and launch a negotiation process," he said.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 5 Feb 12


Life History of the Blue Glassy Tiger
from Butterflies of Singapore

Calophyllum pulcherrimum: Additions to the Flora of Keppel Island
from Flying Fish Friends

Smilax mass flowering
from Urban Forest

Year of the Dragon: Seamoths
from Lazy Lizard's Tales

brown-throated sunbird @ pasir ris - Jan2012
from sgbeachbum and a coppersmith barbet @ bukit brown - Jan2012 and the last starling @ bukit brown - Jan2012

Mangrove celebrations at Sungei Buloh
from wild shores of singapore

Indonesia to create the world's largest palm oil and rubber company
from Mongabay.com news by Rhett Butler


Read more!

Shop, eat, save the Earth

Concerns about the environment are influencing consumers in their shopping habits and lifestyle choices
Kimberly Spykerman and Natasha Ann Zachariah Straits Times 5 Feb 12;

Talk about a sea change. At weddings 15 years ago, senior marketing manager Low Mei Lin and her husband were the only ones leaving their bowls of shark's fin soup untouched. But not now.

At recent weddings she attended, more than half of the bowls of the traditional delicacy remained unconsumed on the banquet tables, shunned by those worried about its association with animal cruelty.

This is a turnaround for a dish that for generations has been a part of Chinese culture. Some young couples are now doing away with it entirely at their wedding celebrations.

The slippery slide of the gelatinous soup from treat to travesty is the fin edge of the wedge marking the rise of the ethical consumer in Singapore.

The trend hit headlines recently when NTUC FairPrice, the largest supermarket chain here, said it will stop selling shark's fin products from April, following a public outcry.

But the trend is not just concentrated on shark's fin.

Singaporeans from all walks of life are increasingly buying organic and fair trade products, wearing eco-friendly clothes, becoming vegetarian and doing their bit for the environment in general, going by growing sales of such items and the rise in businesses catering to these conscientious consumers, a check by LifeStyle has found.

Fuelling the green-is-good message is social media, which provides a platform for activists, and the fact that celebrities are making it hip to hug Mother Earth.

For example, popular entertainers such as Nikita star Maggie Q and Hong Kong singer Karen Mok have always been outspoken about their stance against wearing clothing made of fur.

A recent episode of celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay's travelogue, Gordon's Great Escape, was a hot topic on Facebook for its focus on how sharks are slaughtered for soup. In the show, he also went to restaurants to implore diners not to consume the dish.

Mr Louis Ng, founder and executive director of local animal advocacy group Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres), said: 'Once people become aware of the issues, they will take action, so businesses need to be socially responsible if they want to win the consumer dollar.'

Noting that Singaporeans are becoming more aware and taking action, he added that Acres has 20,000 supporters on its database who volunteer to help with road shows and its undercover investigations into the illegal sale of exotic animal parts.

This is a far cry from when he started out 10 years ago and was considered a maverick of sorts. Back then, he had only a staff of nine including himself.

The warm fuzzies about furkids has been noted by Hong Kong-based Peta Asia Pacific, an affiliate of United States-based advocacy group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta).

Singapore is one of the top countries that request information about animal welfare issues, such as how to make the transition to a vegetarian diet and where to buy cosmetics that are not tested on animals, said Peta.

As for shunning shark's fin, other supermarkets making the move besides FairPrice are Carrefour and Cold Storage.

Luxury hotels have joined the non-feeding frenzy, including Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts group, which announced last month that it would cease to offer shark's fin as well as overfished species such as bluefin tuna and Chilean sea bass.

The list of hotels includes Fairmont Hotel Singapore, The Fullerton Hotel and Capella on Sentosa. Capella even gives incentives such as one night's accommodation to bridal couples who eschew shark's fin for alternatives such as fish maw soup.

Even Chinese restaurants such as Taste Paradise have noted more requests to swop shark's fin soup in set menus. Owner Eldwin Chua said this trend started about two years ago and his staff usually accommodate such requests.

But saving animals is just one of many social causes Singaporean consumers are embracing.

Others hand over their dollar only if they are certain that the items they eat or use are organic and have not harmed the environment or that fair trade practices, where farmers are paid equitable amounts for their produce, have been observed.

Mr Jared Tham, for example, has been buying fair trade products such as tea, cookies and chocolate for more than five years. The 33-year-old, who does research and events for the Lien Centre for Social Innovation, said he was introduced to the concept of fair trade by his friends.

He pays a premium of 10 to 15 per cent on these products but says he does not mind because fair trade addresses important issues such as environmental protection and equitable wages.

'I'm willing to pay more because fair trade reflects my values and I'm happy to do my part. Singapore is a nation of shoppers, so there is the potential for shopping to make a big difference,' he added.

As for those keen to go organic, it is easy to find such produce at supermarkets here these days.

FairPrice's range of organic products, which includes fresh produce, groceries and household items, has ballooned to more than 800 varieties from fewer than 200 in 1998.

Organic food is known to be more eco- friendly as fewer harmful pesticides are used in the farming process, while organic products such as shampoo do not contain synthetic chemicals that harm, for example, the water supply.

Sales of organic products at FairPrice's selected supermarkets also soared by 35 per cent last year compared to the previous year, said Mr Tng Ah Yiam, the supermarket chain's managing director of group purchasing, merchandising and international trading.

'We have observed organic products gaining popularity among our customers in recent years, as they place greater importance on sustainable and ethical consumption and are also increasingly healthconscious and concerned about food safety and quality,' he said.

Indeed, organic produce stores are now a more common sight in heartland areas and organic farms in Singapore have been doing brisk business, despite the fact that organic produce comes with higher prices. There are at least four organic farms and easily more than 20 organic grocers and retailers here.

For example, Quan Fa Organic Farm has seen sales increase by between 10 and 20 per cent every year since it started in 1999, said Mr Liao Junjie, 24, who helps his father run the place. This is despite the fact that a 250g packet of vegetables can cost $2, almost double the price of non-organic ones.

Mr Loh Teik Beng, who is in his 40s and runs a two-month-old organic grocery store called Country Farm Organics in the Jurong neighbourhood, said business at his outlet has been good.

'Customers are already very aware and knowledgeable about organic products,' he said, noting that most of them are Singaporeans aged between 30 and 50. The brand also has outlets in other heartland areas including Ang Mo Kio, Yishun and Marine Parade.

And the responsibility revenue stream does not stop at food.

Four-year-old cosmetics store Bud, which specialises in organic make-up as well as hair and body products, has enjoyed a spurt in sales of between 15 and 20 per cent each year. Mr Eric Chew, the owner of the stores which are located at Mandarin Gallery and Square 2, said that people are starting to wise up to the health benefits of organic products.

Guardian Pharmacy told LifeStyle that it has been bringing in popular organic brands of skincare, hair and body products, as well as supplements to meet increasing customer demand.

British-based department store brand Marks & Spencer reported that sales here of its fair trade products, such as coffee, tea, and sugar, have grown over the years, though it declined to reveal exact figures.

Even eco-fashion is cottoning on in Singapore.

Some fashion lovers are donning clothes made of bamboo - a material that is highly renewable because it is naturally pest-resistant, grows fast and can help rebuild eroded soil.

Ms Kim Rose Allen, 29, who runs a clothing shop at hipster hangout Haji Lane, said that a growing number of Singaporeans now patronise her store, compared to when she first started two years ago and saw mainly Caucasian customers.

'They like the designs as well as the philosophy behind them. While the clothes may be more expensive than the usual cotton types, it is a small price to pay to be environmentally friendly,' she said. The clothes in her shop range from $35 for a camisole or sleeveless tank to $139 for a dress.

Some jewellery designers here are also using their creativity to make pieces out of natural materials that would otherwise have gone to waste, such as wood shavings and leaves. Others, such as Goya Design, make bags out of recycled paper.

And one cafe group, Food For Thought, is providing a clever way to raise awareness about the environment. It does not charge for water but encourages customers to put money in a 'water jar'. The funds collected will go to well-building projects in other countries.

It also shares mission statements about poverty, hunger and environmental issues on the cafe walls. A percentage of the cafe's profits also goes to charities such as WorldVision.

The group started in 2007 with a small cafe in North Bridge Road that seats about 20. It closed that outlet and in December, opened a larger one at the Botanic Gardens that seats 300. It has another branch in Queen Street. Both are usually packed to the gills.

Ms Kuik Shiao-Yin, 35, one of the cafe's directors, said: 'We primarily wanted a place that offered good food and served up good values on the side, and we are very happy and encouraged about how people are responding to that.'

Eco-Educator
Straits Times 5 Feb 12;

Her conversion to a more earth-aware lifestyle started with her going vegetarian in 2009. Then, in 2010, she started using hair and body products, even toothpaste, that were chemical-free.

But last year, teacher Grace Wee decided to go a step further and started riding a bicycle to work so that she could reduce her carbon footprint.

The 27-year-old leaves her home in Toa Payoh almost every day at 6.30am when the roads are less crowded and cycles to the School of the Arts in Dhoby Ghaut, where she teaches dance. The trip takes about 20 minutes.

'It's a good lifestyle change. I get exercise and fresh air,' she tells LifeStyle.

Ms Wee, who is single, says her environmental 'awakening' started in 2004, when she was studying dance in Melbourne and then later in New Zealand.

'There's a lot of greenery and land there and I appreciated how people took care of it. Here in Singapore, I realised we are not very conscious of the environment and how polluted it is,' she says.

'It's about being aware of the products that you eat and use. I felt guilty for contributing to the problem.'

Her next step is to try and eradicate the consumption of palm oil from her lifestyle. She wants to do this because of heavy deforestation to make way for oil palm plantations, but she admits her plan might be difficult because many products contain palm oil, such as biscuits and baked goods.

Educating others around her about protecting the environment is important, she emphasises, but it is essential not to be 'overbearing'.

She does this in small steps, such as reminding her parents and younger sister to switch off the lights in the house and taking her own mug to work rather than using takeaway styrofoam or plastic cups.

'Whenever there is an opportunity, I will explain to people. You can't just tell them what to do,' she says.

But she admits that it is hard to be eco-friendly all the time. One of her pet peeves is how paper is wasted when she has to print consent forms or reports for her students.

'Of course I feel guilty. But this can't be avoided,' she says.

Kimberly Spykerman

Green campaigner
Straits Times 5 Feb 12;

Cosmetic and skincare companies, beware. Green advocate Olivia Choong is coming for you.

The 33-year-old is on a mission to get Singapore consumers to read the labels of what they put on their faces, starting with The Safer Skin Campaign this month.

She has started the online awareness campaign in the hope that people will read the labels of what goes into their skincare products and demand non-toxic consumer products from the industry.

She says: 'The beauty industry is big business but no one in Singapore is pushing for them to use and make products that are safe for our skin and the environment. Consumers have to put pressure on these companies as they are the ones using the products.'

The campaign is one of many green projects she has been involved in since her teenage years.

Ironically, it was a punishment that started her on the road to eco-awareness, arising from an incident during her boarding-school days in Perth, Australia.

She was caught eating in the dormitory with a room-mate one night and the guilty pair were made to empty milk cartons for recycling out of the trash.

By the time she returned to Singapore in 2004, she had become a consumer with a conscience, but she admits she did not examine the issue in any depth then.

'I just did it because it was the social norm. I didn't ask questions because it was just what people in Australia did. It was their duty to keep the environment clean.'

It was only in 2007, after watching the Live Earth benefit concerts, where celebrities sent out public service announcements about critical environment issues, that she dug more deeply.

'There were so many other pressing issues about the environment, such as global warming and animal rights. It got me thinking that we're heading for a brick wall and we're not doing anything about it.'

She started Green Drinks Singapore that same year. The local chapter of a global non-profit movement aims to connect businesses, the Government, people in education and non-governmental organisations and other environmentalists to share their green knowledge and collaborate.

Today, the group boasts about 1,400 members on Facebook, aged between 18 and 60, from all walks of life. Every month, about 80 turn up at locations around town for discussions on the environment or documentary screenings in support of the movement.

She also runs a public relations agency, Sustainable PR, which helps companies with their green efforts.

In addition, she has joined advocate organisations for issues such as those surrounding the conservation of Bukit Brown cemetery and the Rail Corridor at the old KTM railway track.

She has been a pescatarian since last year, eating fish but not meat, after 21/2 years of being a vegetarian. She had to change her diet for health reasons.

As far as walking the talk goes, she sticks to public transport and has no plans to own a car.

'Now I consider myself an environmental activist. I'm taking action and I want to push for more awareness. People have to see that conservation is important.'

Natasha Ann Zachariah

Vegan family
Straits Times 5 Feb 12;

Quek Xufeng is five years old and, rarely for kids these days, he has never tasted a hamburger.

Just like his parents, he is a vegan and does not eat anything that is of animal origin. This rules out meat, fish, eggs and milk products, although he does sometimes consume products such as a gelatinous dessert made of sea algae and sugar.

The first time he asked if he could have a burger, his mother, property agent Hong Meishan, 34, posed this question to him: 'If I cut your flesh and ate it, would you feel pain? Then how do you think the animal will feel?'

Little surprise then, that Xufeng has not asked for a hamburger since.

Madam Hong, who became a vegan about eight years ago for animal welfare reasons, says she hopes raising her only son this way will help him develop compassion for animals and a desire to contribute to saving the Earth.

She has not been without her detractors. Her parents did not share her beliefs and felt that Xufeng needed meat in his diet to be healthy. But she insists that he is no less healthier than his peers who eat meat.

The boy eats tofu, nuts and beans for protein and she also feeds him herbal supplements.

She also keeps up with dietary research and maintains a strict 'colour code' when it comes to whipping up her son's meals.

The colours of vegetables are an indication that they are good for certain parts of the body, she says. For example, vegetables that have a red hue are good for the heart, while greens are good for the liver.

Madam Hong also substitutes cow's milk with oat, barley, sesame and brown rice milk. And the bread the family eats is baked by her and contains no milk or butter. She uses olive oil as a substitute.

In keeping with eco-friendly living, she buys vegetables from an organic farm rather than at the market. She spends about $500 just on vegetables for her family of three every month.

She also recycles plastics and metals and converts reusable items such as cartons and toilet paper rolls into playthings for her son.

She also does not use leather, in keeping with her belief of kindness to animals.

But it is not easy to live green, she admits. She and her husband, Mr Quek Sio Hua, 46, who runs his own transportation logistics firm, both own cars - a necessity as their jobs require them to get around a lot.

'I do what I can. The Earth is sick. If everybody can do a little bit, it will really help,' she says.

Kimberly Spykerman

Vegan factory owners
Straits Times 5 Feb 12;

So you want to do something for the environment. You avoid shark's fin soup, eat organic food or 'like' an eco-page on Facebook. But a Singaporean couple have gone a whole lot further than that.

Mr Desmond Tan, 52, and his wife, Vivien, 50, sold their house to set up a vegan food-processing factory.

They made the decision in 2009, with their two children, after having a family meeting about it.

They then sold their Eunos terrace house - and moved into another terrace house which they owned and had previously rented out - and used the proceeds of $200,000 to set up a food factory, Olive & Green, in Admiralty's FoodXchange hub.

Mrs Tan, who, with her husband, used to work on a production line of an electronics firm, says: 'The earth is experiencing global warming. By going vegan, we are doing our part to save the planet. The plus side is that it is healthy and you won't have so many people falling ill from junk or poorly cooked food.'

Their beef with food today is the inhumane ways in which meat is farmed from animals and how artificially produced ingredients such as trans fats make food unhealthy.

What started as a way for the family to lose weight has turned into a green love affair. Sixteen years ago, Mrs Tan put the family, including their children, on a raw food diet. They never ate out or cooked their food. They later became vegans after Mrs Tan felt that veganism was a healthier alternative.

A vegan diet excludes meat, eggs, dairy products and all other animal-derived ingredients.

It was easy converting their children then as they were still young, says Mrs Tan.

'I would fill their lunch boxes with celery, salads and carrots. With no pocket money, they had to just eat what I gave them for recess. They had no choice.'

She saw the benefits of the diet as her children became fitter and did not fall sick easily.

On her parents' unusual dietary regiment when she and her brother were children, daughter Pinru, 21, says: 'I didn't think that the food tasted bad and after eating it for so long, we just got used to it.'

Today, the Tans' son, Qin Shen, 22, studies business management at the National University of Singapore and helps out at the factory when he is not at school, while Pinru works with her parents full time.

Their factory operates seven days a week and supplies food to organic and vegan food shops as well as customers who order online.

Mrs Tan runs the baking and production side with her daughter, while Mr Tan is in charge of creating new recipes, sourcing for new importers to work with and making deliveries.

The company churns out more than 12 different types of organic vegan breads such as sprouted quinoa olive oil buns, wholemeal olive oil bread and banana olive oil bread.

It also sells organic honey and oils such as Salmiana Agave nectar and Hippocrates Organic Extra Virgin Olive Oil and uses only distilled water in its cooked food products.

Products are sourced from countries such as New Zealand, the Philippines and Cyprus, which can be expensive. For example, a box of organic cherries from New Zealand costs $45 a kilogram, while ginger from Australia costs $38 a kilogram. The prices of their organic goods are 20 to 30 per cent higher than non-organic produce.

Mr Tan says that the factory is only starting to break even after two years of pumping in $10,000 of his own money monthly. The factory needs about twice that amount every month to pay the bills, including the $3,500 rent.

Even then, the company gives away some products for free to spread the word about the benefits of the vegan lifestyle. Every last Sunday of the month, it holds a dinner-cum-lecture at the factory. About 50 to 60 people turn up each time. There are often new faces amid family and friends.

Mr Tan says: 'People come because they want to learn health tips from us and find out how to change their diet as well as ask questions about why certain food is bad for us.'

He quips: 'In the past, people would just turn up during dinner time for the free food and leave after that.'

While it might seem like a lot of work for their beliefs, the Tans are not content with being pamphlet-pushers.

Mrs Tan says: 'Handing out information alone doesn't do anything. You just read it but nothing has changed. I've seen videos of how animals are slaughtered or reared inhumanely. By setting up this factory, I'm doing my part and I can spread the message.'

To make veganism more appealing to meat-lovers, Mr Tan experiments regularly with recipes he finds on the Internet to see what he can make with the ingredients he has. Every month, he tries to develop two new products.

He says: 'We want to set the example by leading this lifestyle. And now that we have done it for so long, we can help other people who want to try it as well.'

Natasha Ann Zachariah


Read more!

RWS dolphins can still be returned to the wild

Sunday Times 5 Feb 12;

My children and I are encouraged that an influential person like Dr Lee Wei Ling has expressed sympathy for the captive dolphins at Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) ('Confessions of an embarrassed omnivore'; last Sunday).

We agree that the treatment of farm animals is often cruel and ought to be improved, but it is not unnatural for humans to eat meat.

It is, however, completely unnecessary to incarcerate wild animals for human entertainment.

Dr Lee expressed her reservations over calls to release the dolphins. Her concerns are not misplaced. Returning captive animals to the wild is not easy. But two wrongs do not make a right.

The capture of 27 dolphins near the Solomon Islands that resulted in the subsequent death of two of the dolphins, not to mention the unaccounted number of orphaned calves, is wrong. Keeping the dolphins captive indefinitely for fear of exposing them to the dangers of their natural home does not make up for the first error.

It does not absolve RWS from doing the right thing: to rehabilitate and return these animals to the wild in a scientifically sound manner. There is a large body of evidence on good practice guidelines for re-introducing captive animals, including cetaceans, to the wild.

We believe RWS has the resources to achieve these goals.

Associate Professor Umapathi Thirugnanam

25 dolphins doing well under RWS' care
Straits Times 12 Feb 12;

The letter by Associate Professor Umapathi Thirugnanam ('RWS dolphins can still be returned to the wild'; last Sunday) warrants clarification on certain misperceptions.

As we have stated before, the collection of our dolphins for our Marine Life Park was done in accordance with regulations stipulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. We took a responsible stand on the size, age and status of each dolphin, ensuring that none of them was a young calf or lactating mother.

After a year in our care, two of our animals succumbed to a water-borne bacterial infection called melioidosis, a disease that afflicts dolphins, both in facilities and in the wild.

The park is conducting field research on melioidosis in Singapore. This is one of many ways that we will contribute to the advancement of marine science and the conservation of bottlenose dolphins.

Today, records show that mortality rates of bottlenose dolphins in facilities compare very favourably against those of their species living in the wild. Many established marine parks also have bred bottlenose dolphins, a sign that they can thrive under human care. Our 25 dolphins have been in our care for more than three years now, and are doing well.

Well-run zoological facilities can play a significant role in motivating communities of people to care more about animal life. We look forward to taking our visitors on an inspiring and learning journey when they visit our park, which is scheduled to open this year.

Krist Boo (Ms)
Senior Vice-President
Communications
Resorts World Sentosa


Read more!

Malaysia: Army and Police called to stop illegal logger in wildlife sanctuary

Heavy firepower
Zora Chan The Star 5 Feb 12;

KUCHING: Illegal loggers, particularly those alleged to have connection to shady underworld dealings, have been a bane of the Sarawak Forestry Corporation’s (SFC) existence for years.

Well, not anymore if Santubong MP Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar’s game-changing proposal is thrashed out, and executed.

He wants SFC to call for back-up from the army and the boys in blue to help stem the perennial problem of encroachment where shadowy figures have been known to log timber in the Samunsam Wildfire Sanctuary in Lundu District.

The sanctuary covers an area of about 16,700ha and is some 100km from here.

Wan Junaidi says he has lodged reports on such activities to the police and SFC some time ago after learning that Samunsam, the state’s oldest wildlife sanctuary, had been encroached on and logged for its timber in recent years.

“The law is there to protect the area but enforcement must be carried out. SFC needs to get the army and police to assist it to stop the encroachment and harvesting of timber and other wildlife in Samunsam.

“If the army and police are afraid of gangsters, I don’t know who else can govern the country. That should not be an excuse,” he told The Star here recently.

Wan Junaidi, a former policeman, said the army and police had fought the communists and protected the country from grave danger in the 1960s and therefore, was confident that they could combat gangsterism.

“In the past, we chased after communists in the jungles, but now the gangsters are there — they are not hiding. I can’t accept the excuse that because of gangsterism, we can’t enforce the law.

“So what else next? Are we to allow gangsters to rule the country because they are gangsters?” he pointed out.

He added that the present timber industry needed to play its part in stopping illegal logging by going for high value-added products instead of high volume of raw timber.

Wan Junaidi said while he understood the concerns of local conservationists on the plan to build the 23km road cutting across the sanctuary to connect Telok Melano and Telok Serabang from Kampung Pueh in Sematan Sub-District, the infrastructure was pivotal for the well-being of the villagers.

“In every positive thing we do, there will be negative impacts. We build roads, there will be accidents. So are we to stop building roads? Are we to stop people from buying and driving cars and motorcycles?”

He conceded that the proposed road would give easier access to poachers and illegal loggers to Samunsam than now but with stringent enforcement, the sanctuary would be protected.

“Even now without the road, Samunsam is being disturbed. That’s why enforcement is important. The law is there and it must be observed and enforced, otherwise it is useless,” he reiterated.

Presently, to reach Telok Melano, located near the tip of the state in Tanjong Datu, one has to take an hour’s boat ride.

The proposed road would also eventually bring electricity supply and treated water to the fishing village which also provided homestays for visitors, said Wan Junaidi.

It would be a boon to the tourism industry in the area, known for its pristine beaches between Lundu and Sematan, he said.

He had spoken to Special Functions Minister and Tanjong Datu assemblyman Tan Sri Adenan Satem recently that the project had been approved by the state government and now awaiting funding from the Federal Government for implementation.

“I was told verbally that the Chief Minister has also given the green light for the road to cut across Samunsam,” he said, stating that Samunsam’s status as a protected area was one of the reasons the project took a long time for approval.

Last year, the Malaysian Nature Society, through its Kuching branch, had voiced its concern on the proposed project as the road would provide easy access to poachers, which would be detrimental to wildlife conservation in the sanctuary.

The society had said if the proposed project was deemed essential, it strongly urged the relevant authorities to ensure that a detailed environmental impact assessment (EIA) be done prior to giving the final approval.

It also urged the state government to make the draft of this detailed EIA available for public review and that steps would be taken to ensure consultation with all the relevant stakeholders, including SFC and State Forest Department, local communities, and concerned NGOs, to explore other viable options that would not be detrimental to an already beleaguered sanctuary.

The last known operation against illegal loggers was in 2006 when 15 SFC officers, assisted by General Operations Force personnel, investigated two areas in Samunsam — Sungai Limo and Kampung Serabang on April 17.

They found traces of illegal logging, and having determined the modus operandi of the culprits, continued their probe the following day but at nearby Ulu Sungai Samunsam Buta.

This time, the team chanced upon two men in the act of cutting down trees.

They were subsequently nabbed and two chainsaws, a machete and a homemade shotgun were confiscated.

General manager Wilfred Landong was quoted on SFC’s website as saying the exercise was just one of the successful implementation of a holistic protection plan to ensure a more effective protection of the state’s biodiversity and forest resources, particularly in totally protected areas.


Read more!

Indonesia: Wild bull population in Ujung Kulon believed flourishing

Antara 4 Feb 12;

Labuan, Banten (ANTARA News) - The exact population of the wild bull (Bos Javanicus Javanicus) in the Ujung Kulon National Park (TMNUK) is still unknown but park officials believe it is flourishing.

"We have so far not conducted a head count but based on sightings made through video traps we believe their number is quite large," Hendra Purnam, a TNUK officer in charge of valuations and data collecting, said here Friday.

The bull population was believed to be flourishing because the animals had access to plenty of natural food and were being carefully protected.

The wild bull was living in a 30,000-hectare forest area in the park together with other rare species such as the one-horn Javanese rhinoceros, tiger, eagle and owa (a primate).

The wild bull was to be found only in Indonesia and Burma. In Indonesia, their habitats were located in Kalimantan and Java.

The TNUJK management was tightly protecting the rare animals, especially from illegal hunting activity, he said. The only enemies of the wild bull were tigers and forest dogs.

Hendra also said the park management had also observed the one-horn rhinoceros population through video traps and now estimated there were 35 of them in the park. (*)

Editor: Aditia Maruli


Read more!