NTU students film wildlife documentaries in Tibet

Channel NewsAsia 31 Dec 07;

SINGAPORE:Six undergraduates from Nanyang Technological University (NTU) have just returned from a film-making expedition in Tibet.

The students were picked to go there to film wildlife.

Coupled with freezing weather, it turned out to be an experience they would never forget.

There is nothing glamorous about trekking through the wilderness in south-western China in winter-time but it's an opportunity not to be missed, for some students from NTU’s school of Art, Design and Media.

Under the guidance of experienced conservationists and film-makers, the undergrads captured the black-necked cranes of Shangri-La (formerly called Zhongdian) and the Tibetan mastiffs which are known for its ferocity and loyalty.

And filming their subjects was just one of the many challenges on the ground.

Boo Xinying, a student from NTU’s Art, Design and Media said: "You would think marshes is like wetlands and all, but it was actually iced mud. So as you step on it, it's very unnerving because you actually feel the ice beneath your feet crackling as you step with all your equipment. So me, Kenny and Joseph - we were thinking if we ever fall into the mud, we have to throw our equipment aside, because (we have) to save the equipment first."

Another student, Ellen Tay Wee Ling, said: "There's ice on the road. So there's a couple of moments when the cars (were) sliding along, but we trust the driver and we trust the car. So, in the end, it turned out to be okay. It's really exciting to see that there (are) no railings at the side of the cliff."

Such a first-hand experience was the prize for only six students, who were picked from 30 applicants.

To win themselves the trip to Tibet, the students had to submit an essay as well as footage.

The best six then went on a first-of-its-kind expedition sponsored by Canon Singapore in collaboration with Wildlife Asia and the China Exploration and Research Society (CERS).

The NTU expedition was from 11 to 20 December and was led by Chris Dickinson of Wildlife Asia, and Wong How Man of the China Exploration and Research Society. The participants were six film major undergraduates with Assistant Professor Scott Hessels and Teaching Fellow Jan-Christophe Daniel.

Experts said more film students have the potential to experience a similar adventure.

Chris Dickinson, Executive Director of Wildlife Asia, said: "You do have great film schools, but the industry has to develop more, to ensure that the guys coming out of schools have jobs to go to. But you really have to kind of look long-term, you have to look another five, 10 years down the line."

NTU plans to release documentaries on the expedition, in the first half of 2008 and the production will be submitted to established film festivals around the world. -CNA/vm


Read more!

40 buildings apply for BCA Green Mark Certificate

Channel NewsAsia 31 Dec 07;

SINGAPORE: 40 public and private buildings have applied to receive the energy-saving Green Mark certificate.

So far, 67 of them have been given the certificate for different levels of energy efficiency since the scheme started two years ago.

The figures were given at an international conference on environmentally friendly architecture.

The City Square Mall was the first to receive the highest level of the Building and Construction Authority's Green Mark.

And it is among a rising number of private properties since the beginning of the year to receive the platinum certificate.

Getting the certificate indicates that the property has achieved at least 30 per cent in energy savings.

From the first quarter of next year, new and retrofitted existing buildings must achieve at least 10 per cent in energy efficiency.

The BCA aims for the new buildings to save energy and money.

Jeffery Neng, Deputy Director, Technology Division of the Building and Construction Authority, said: "The new developments versus the existing stock is still a very small proportion. That is the reason why we can only achieve S$180 million in ten years time per year."

The BCA is working with the recently formed Energy Efficiency Programme Office.

For the Green Mark, both new public and private buildings need to be energy and water efficient in their site and project management among others.

And some properties are in line to be the first to renew their three year certificates in a BCA audit.

Six properties - mostly in the city including Republic Plaza have made enquiries to renew their Green Mark certification. The others include Capital Tower and One George Street. The owners of the properties have until 2008 to renew their certificates. -CNA/vm


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 31 Dec 07


Labrador Dive Buoy Action
and inaction by divers, a message from the spirit of Labrador? on the reddot blog

Turtle Terror at Labrador
misguided attempt to release freshwater turtles in the sea on the reddot blog

Last dive for the year, at Pulau Semakau
gorgeous finds despite the silt on the colouful clouds blog

Malaysian food market adventure
fishes and more on the budak blog

The Tahiti Monarch
the rarest bird in the world on the bird ecology blog

Can Dolphins and Whales Sue?
Philippines lawyers are representing cetaceans against oil drilling on the daily galaxy blog

The 'Myth' of Fossil Fuels -The Deep, Hot Biosphere is there an unending supply of hydrocarbons? on the daily galaxy blog

Yong Ding Li, a birder to watch
on the bird ecology blog


Read more!

Large-scale illegal wildlife trade in South Asia

Prabal Kr Das, Assam Tribune 30 Dec 07;

GUWAHATI, Dec 30 – Poor protection, proximity to a large market and abysmal implementation of wildlife laws have put in peril a range of wild flora and fauna in large parts of South Asia.

In recent times illegal trade in wildlife has proliferated in North East India, Nepal, and Bhutan creating what could be called a conservation nightmare. Even though no precise figures exist about the illegal trade in wildlife in this region, estimates put it at least more than a billion dollars. After all, in the global context it has been placed in the region of $5 billion.

Renowned conservationist Ashok Kumar of the prestigious Wildlife Trust of India said, ‘Although this illegal trade in South Asia cannot be rendered in money terms because of its covert nature, business is huge and has actually come to threaten or even damage the biodiversity of some areas.’

Underlining the fact that the trade has been going on for several decades, he revealed that the activities have now put pressure on several critically endangered species. ‘The tiger, the rhino, the elephant, the bear have all been targeted …the situation is so bad that inside a protected area in India a population of tigers was wiped out.’

The tiger population in India has been especially hit hard by poachers who have killed them in worrying numbers in and around national parks and sanctuaries. The body parts, after they enter the local market, could bring a fortune to those involved. As soon as the skin and bones become available for international customers they could fetch prices which reach up to $ 10,000.

Another important species that has been affected by the illegal trade has been the Indian one-horned rhino, a large concentration of which is found in North East India’s Kaziranga National Park, a world heritage site. According to Assam Forest Department officials, no less than 16 rhinos have been slaughtered this year alone — a noticeable spurt compared to figures of previous years.

The killings acquire more significance considering the fact that the Indian rhino attracts strong conservation efforts, as it is listed as a Schedule 1 species in the Wildlife Protection Act.

There is, however, another dimension of the illegal trade than just some keystone species being threatened and annihilated. Some other less well known, but equally important species, face a grim prospect with demands for them soaring in the international market.

According to conservation sources the problem is becoming more acute with visitors entering remote areas and carrying out informal trade with local people. Some of them would be too happy to gather small animals and plants for a little amount of money that for them would be a windfall.

National borders and the controls therein offer little deterrence to the network that carries out the illegal trade in South Asia. While the majority of the killings take place in biodiversity rich India, Nepal or Bhutan, a popular point of transhipment is Nepal and to a certain extent Bangladesh and Myanmar.

From these places, the contraband usually enters the international market, a large chunk heading towards China, and the rest into Western Europe and the US. In China a ready market for traditional medicines would absorb a large part of the commodities, while the other markets would attract artfacts, souvenirs and pets.

Some of the artfacts could be quite bizarre like stools made of elephant legs, or erotica intricately carved from ivory. Rhino horns carved in to small pieces to be worn as amulets or ornaments is not uncommon in parts of India, China or Myanmar. Skins of big cats are among the most sough after luxuries among some rich Chinese.

The ever-hungry market for exotic pets also fuels the illegal trade in wildlife. According to WWF India, species like star tortoises have repeatedly been targeted by traders, who have customers in places as far as Perth, Singapore, London and Los Angeles. Falcons, most of them very young, have found their way to parts of the Middle East where they command high prices.

Not surprisingly, the internet has further pushed the limits of the illegal trade as has been revealed by several surveys by conservation groups. The anonymity provided by the medium to the traders has made it difficult for resource-starved forest departments to mount any major countermeasure against them.

In a recent internet search made by this correspondent, the phrase ‘rhino horn for sale’ yielded quite a few results, including one of a Victorian rhino horn that was stated as ‘removed’. Another directory mentioned that a rhino horn was for immediate sale. However, conservationists believe, that the trade is much more active through more discrete channels on the internet.

Dr Asad Rahmani, Director of Bombay Natural History Society, India’s oldest conservation organisation referring to the problem of illegal trade in wildlife emphasized that steps needed to be taken now before irreparable harm was done to a variety of wildlife.

He favoured very specific responses when it came to combating illegal trade of wildlife. ‘When one is dealing with commodities which are made into luxury items, there should be a total ban.’ While stating that India already possesses enough legislation on preventing the trade, he was critical about their implementation, adding ‘their tough implementation is still not the case’.

Dr Rahmani, like some others aware of the issue, would support a two pronged approach: equip police, forest and customs officials with more information and powers, while pushing for better public awareness and education at the grassroots as well as among prospective customers. The strategy, however, is far from being adopted in the region.


Read more!

Dangers of Singapore as petrochemical hub

Striking a balance between the economy and the environment
Letter from Felix Ang Kok Hou, Straits Times Forum 31 Dec 07

I READ with concern your article, 'S'pore enjoys steady flow of billion dollar investments' (ST, Dec 27), on the billion dollar investments made by petroleum companies in Singapore.

A quick search on Google and Wikipedia revealed some startling statistics. Singapore has oil refining capacity of about 1.3 million barrels per day. Malaysia has about 0.5m bpd and Indonesia 1.05m bpd. The US, with the world's largest refining capacity, has 16.7m bpd while Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer, has 2.08m bpd.

If we look at the per capita numbers, Singapore would be at 0.295 bpd, Malaysia 0.018 bpd, Indonesia 0.0046 bpd, the US 0.055 bpd and Saudi Arabia 0.084 bpd. What this means is that each Singapore resident is bearing more risks of oil refining than probably the rest of the world.

Taking into account our population density and the proximity of the oil refineries to our main land, we face ongoing risks to our health from daily air pollution emissions to major catastrophes like serious oil spills and terrorist attacks.

And we are going to expand our oil refining and petrochemical production capacities with these new investments. One of the facilities will be producing benzene. Prolonged exposure to benzene is associated with the development of certain types of leukaemia.

The US has not built any major oil refineries in its own country since 1976 due to pressures from environmental groups. But we are encouraging construction of these facilities with open arms. To put it crudely, are we accepting those who are not welcome in their own countries?

Oil prices are hitting new record highs and big petroleum companies are getting more powerful. I believe there are many measures in place now to prevent and mitigate environmental pollution and health risks. But with our increasing reliance on them as investors and employers, are we going to reach a point in many years' time where our national interests may be compromised by their corporate interests? By then, can our environmental laws still be responsive and impartially enforced?

As we continue to support global efforts to combat climate change, should we not be taking more substantive action in our own backyards? Our commitment to the international community would appear hollow if our priorities are always economic and capitalistic in nature. Surely environmental protection is more than simply getting the town councils to plant more trees in our neighbourhoods.


Read more!

Two young Singaporeans bid to tackle climate change

A youthful bid to tackle climate change
Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

TWO young Singaporeans are doing their bit to save the world - or at least, the climate.

As part of the newly formed action group Asian Young Leaders Climate Forum (AYLCF), Shanthan Selvakumar, 27, and Ramanathan Thurairajoo, 25, joined regional youth leaders from 14 countries to present a communique to world leaders at the recent United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bali.

The group was brought together by the British Council with the support of the World Wildlife Fund and the Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Here is their experience.

IT ALL happened in tandem.

As world leaders convened in Bali to address climate change earlier this month, young leaders representing 14 countries in the Asia-Pacific region gathered in Bogor, Indonesia.

Over a week, a group of 35 discussed how the youth of today - who as global leaders of tomorrow would inherit the brunt of climate change - could take the lead at driving solutions.

Then, seven were selected to represent the AYLCF and present a communique on the role of youth in climate security, among them, the two of us.

This, after two weeks of days that started at 6am and stretched into the wee hours, during which we examined each other's strengths, networks and cross-sectoral perspectives on climate change.

We finally came up with a holistic approach to engaging youth for the UN Conference - nothing less than a mind-blowing experience.

We had a 'divide and conquer' strategy and broke up to introduce ourselves to and network with heads of states, political leaders, scientists, world experts and researchers at as many sector-specific conferences as possible.

The highlight?

Meeting renowned economist Sir Nicholas Stern, who authored the Stern Review, the global 'gold standard' reference for direct links between man's activities and climate change.

He spent close to an hour with us in a closed session, listening as we explained project plans for each sectoral engagement.

Sir Nicholas was inquisitive and engaged us in detailed discussions - best of all, he endorsed the AYLCF. He also agreed to be our mentor in our efforts to empower youth to drive climate solutions.

The Bali experience was invaluable. From the exposure and networking, we were able to build a platform to drive solutions from the government, community, corporate, media and education sectors.

We were also able to meet existing 'action-oriented' youth groups to exchange best practices, which will enable us to leverage off existing networks in the Asia-Pacific.

Within such a short time, we have evolved into a dynamic regional network of young people with a concrete road map. More than 300 people have already registered on our website, community.britishcouncil.org/aylcf.

We feel charged with so much positive energy.

Perhaps in a decade or so, the next generation can then look to us and ask how we faced the challenge of addressing climate change, the biggest threat facing mankind.

Shanthan Selvakumar, 27, is a climate solutions regional analyst with AES Corporation while Ramanathan Thurairajoo, 25, is a second-year environmental engineering student at Nanyang Technological University


Read more!

Record number of litterbugs nabbed

NEA has stepped up enforcement, with private firm hired to patrol public areas
Jessica Lim & Tessa Wong, Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

THE number of litterbugs caught this year has hit a record.

Between January and last month, 19,252 were caught, a huge jump from the 6,002 culprits booked in the same period last year.

The leap in the number of offenders points to an ugly truth: The decades of anti-littering campaigns and stiffer fines have not rid Singaporeans of this uncivilised habit.

But the National Environment Agency (NEA) has a warning for those who blithely drop their trash wherever they please: You are more likely to be caught nowadays because a private company has been hired to step up enforcement.

And here is something else that might give potential offenders reason for pause: Members of the anti-litter force are in plain clothes, so you can never be sure no one is watching.

Officers from security management company Aetos, who have been patrolling public areas, have been behind the jump in the number of litterbugs caught.

The NEA decided it was time to step up enforcement after seeing no satisfactory improvement to the problem, its spokesman said.

A study done in April identified bus terminals, hawker centres, neighbourhood centres and coffee shops as the filthiest places.

The most common items cleaners pick up in these high-

traffic areas include cigarette butts, tissue paper and sweet wrappers.

Mr Howard Shaw, executive director of the Singapore Environment Council, puts the continuing problem down to a dynamic population and changing lifestyles.

He said: 'There are newer generations of Singaporeans, and there has been a lot of immigration into the country. There are also more people hanging out in public malls, atriums and out in the open.'

And although rubbish bins dot the landscape, people still litter, and Mr Shaw thinks this is because it is just plain convenient to do so.

Cleaning up after litterbugs is costly. The NEA spent $34 million this year just cleaning up roads and pavements; the Jurong Town Council's annual clean-up bill comes to $4 million.

A Straits Times poll of 110 people last year found that most did not feel the need to pick up after themselves.

Nearly one in five, or 21, said it was 'too inconvenient' to dispose of their litter properly, or that they were 'too lazy' to bother.

Another 19 expected someone else to pick up after them; others griped that there were not enough rubbish bins.

Such lackadaisical attitudes, combined with the number of litterbugs caught this year, underscore what Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources Amy Khor said this year: Singapore's reputation for cleanliness is down to an army of cleaners and maids, not good habits among the population.

In the past two months, this newspaper has run five letters from readers about the littering problem and calling for stricter enforcement.

In a straw poll last week, 15 self-confessed litterbugs were asked whether a fine starting at $200 would be enough to deter them. Ten said yes as 'giving away money hurts'.

But junior college student Timothy Chan, 17, is nonchalant. He said: 'I am not afraid of being caught as I have never seen any officers patrolling at all.'

He admitted that he is careless 'once in a while' and does not pick up the tissue paper he drops.

Mr Shaw said offenders often feel they can get away with it, especially with small items such as cigarette butts.

'They know it is illegal, but they also think nobody is going to see what they do, so there definitely is a correlation between increasing enforcement and reducing litter.'

Litter bugs the island
Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

MORE than 19,000 people have been caught littering this year - the highest in recent memory.

But the threat of fines and corrective work orders has yet to work, going by a Straits Times check and Stomp contributions.

Whether in housing estates, public parks or even right smack in the middle of town, litter is conspicious.

But apart from being antisocial, mounds of discarded items can be a hazard. Just earlier this month, a fire broke out in a Dover Road housing block after trash left on the third floor lift landing ignited.

There have been a welter of complaints on The Straits Times' interactive portal as well as letters to the Forum on the issue.

And on the eve of some of the biggest street parties of the year, environmentalist group ECO Singapore has this plea, from its head Wilson Ang: 'I know it's a celebration, but I hope you will throw your rubbish into a bin and not wherever you like.'


Read more!

They're still feeding the monkeys

NParks may up fine and rope in security firms to nab culprits
Arti Mulchand, Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

THERE are fines, heaps of signs, and numerous reports about monkeys attacking feeders and picnicking families for food.

Yet many park-goers are oblivious, and seem to think the National Parks Board (NParks) is monkeying around when it tells them not to feed the primates that call the reserves around MacRitchie and Peirce reservoirs home.

Yesterday, barely five metres from a sign asking visitors to 'Stop feeding the monkeys... Fine $250' at Lower Peirce Reservoir, engineer Joseph Ng hung out with his sister, young niece and nephew, and maid, armed with a bag of bananas and small mandarin oranges.

Within seconds, he was surrounded by at least 15 feisty long-tailed macaques, demanding to be fed, with yet more bounding over.

This, just a day after this newspaper reported that monkey-feeders were to blame for a horde of monkeys attacking a food-bearing pregnant woman and her toddler.

'It's just a way to entertain the kids... It's only natural for us to feed them,' Mr Ng said, adding that he did not know feeding the monkeys was an offence. The sign he thought, was just a poster, and the 'fine is too small to read'.

'I didn't see it,' he declared, adamant.

So far this year, 151 people have been caught red-handed and fined. NParks may also up its fine, and rope in security companies to nab more culprits.

Mr Ng was one of the braver feeders - other park-goers were spotted throwing everything from fruit and potato chips to empty crisp packets to the scores of monkeys waiting by the roadside from the safety of their cars.

But just as Mr Ng stated that he knew of the danger - and was therefore more watchful of the primates - a cheeky long-tailed individual jumped up, twice ripping the red plastic bag he was clutching to free the rest of the treats.

According to the experts, feeding the monkeys changes their dietary habits and makes them aggressive when they are denied food.

They search for food outside the forest, recognise vehicles and plastic bags as potential food containers, and often end up invading homes around the nature reserves.

Illegal feedings continue to be the monkey on the back of NParks, sparking problems across the island.

Yesterday, over at MacRitchie Reservoir, one cheeky monkey made off with a packet of Milo drink from a family's picnic spread, and scurried up a tree to quench his thirst.

And then, as Bulgarian violin teacher Veneta Zlatinova, 42, settled down for her picnic with her husband and sons, she was also in for a rude shock.

A long-tailed macaque jumped up on the bench where her son sat and worked through two bags to find a homemade roti prata - filled with cheese no less.

Shocked that the monkeys were so 'fearless', she said perhaps the answer would be for people to simply not take food to the parks at all - whether as feeders, or as visitors.

'First of all people should stop feeding the monkeys... And also, this is their forest, we are in their territory.

'And when they see us eating, they expect the food is theirs too. I have always told my sons not to feed the monkeys, but perhaps we should not be eating in front of them too,' she concluded.

RELATED ARTICLE

Monkey mayhem at MacRitchie Reservoir

Monkey feeders to blame, says NParks
15 primates grabbed food from picnicking mum and toddler
Tracy Sua, Straits Times 29 Dec 07;


Read more!

South Korea powers up its quest for clean energy

Lee Tee Jong, Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

SEOUL - SOUTH KOREA is turning to alternative energy sources such as nuclear power in the face of record oil prices and global concerns over climate change.

It is also investing in other forms of clean energy, including solar and hydro power.

With 20 reactors in the country, nuclear energy accounts for 40 per cent of total power output. That figure is expected to hit 60 per cent in 2035.

South Korea is the world's sixth-largest nuclear power-generating country, and it is building eight more nuclear plants.

'Increasing the use of nuclear energy is necessary to prevent rising oil prices from undermining our economic growth,' Mr Jung Jae Woo, a manager at Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power (KHNP), told visiting Asean journalists earlier this month.

Asia's third-largest economy imports almost all its oil, prices of which have been edging closer to US$100 (S$145) per barrel.

South Korea's nuclear energy programme was started during the oil crisis in the 1970s, and has contributed substantially to the country's industrial growth.

The aim now is to slash dependence on oil from the current 44 per cent to 35 per cent by 2030 through the increased use of nuclear energy.

From 2010, public organisations will be assigned an unspecified fixed amount of fossil fuels, and there will be a cap on the yearly increase in its usage.

'Nuclear energy is the clearest choice for a country completely lacking in natural resources but rich in technological expertise,' said KHNP president and chief executive officer Kim Jong Shin.

While there has been some opposition to the construction of nuclear plants because of concerns over safety, South Korea has been able to persuade most people to accept it.

Mr Jung said: 'There has been no major accident over three decades due to stringent safeguards on treating and storing radioactive waste.

'Residents near the plants have also been compensated adequately.'

Another factor in its favour is that nuclear energy emits little greenhouse gases, a key concern related to climate change.

South Korea is obliged under the Kyoto Protocol to start reducing greenhouse gases in 2013.

The country is the world's sixth-largest producer of greenhouse gases, discharging 591 million tons of carbon dioxide in 2005 - almost twice as much as in 1990.

The production rate is the fastest among countries in the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a bloc of the world's 30 most developed countries.

The air quality in Seoul and its surrounding province - home to almost half the country's 49 million people - was the worst among the capitals of OECD countries last year.

'We view this as a serious problem and have taken steps to find a solution,' said a Seoul city government spokesman.

From next month, owners of diesel-powered trucks must install emission control devices or face fines.

Earlier this month, a high-level committee chaired by Prime Minister Han Duck Soo came up with measures to reduce greenhouse gases.

The government will introduce a carbon dioxide market - details of which have not been disclosed - in which companies must buy rights to emit carbon dioxide.

Seoul wants to reduce private companies' production of carbon dioxide by 1.8 million tons by 2012.

Officials are also looking into regulating the greenhouse gas emissions of vehicles and aircraft as well as restricting the use of fossil fuels by industry.

They will also plant an additional 1.1 million ha of forest to absorb carbon dioxide.

The quest for clean energy has led South Korea to pump resources into solar and hydro power as well.

The 261 solar power facilities being built will produce enough power for 50,000 homes.

In May, local company Dongyang Engineering & Construction broke ground for the world's largest solar power plant, which is being built in Sinan, 400km south of Seoul.

Nine hydropower plants in the country now produce 1,950 gigawatt-hours of energy, equivalent to about 3.2 million barrels of crude oil.

This is 8 per cent of the country's total power output, and the plan is to raise it to 10 per cent by 2010.

'Hydropower is clean and enables us to do our part to address the problems caused by climate change,' said Korea Water Resources Corp manager Cha Kee Uk. 'It requires minimal resources to operate, compared with other energy types.'

South Korea is also exploring another energy source: Biomass, which involves the conversion of wood and agricultural wastes into gas that can be used as fuel.

Every year, there are about 3.2 million tonnes of wood and wood waste from forests and industry that can be used to produce biomass.

This is equal to 1.4 million tonnes of oil, and the country can save about 520 billion won (S$805 million) per year in crude oil imports by using biomass fuel.

Seoul has just announced plans to spend about 20 billion won by 2010 to obtain technologies to produce synthetic crude oil from biomass.

leeteejong@yahoo.com

The writer was invited to attend the Asean-Republic of Korea media exchange on sustainable energy in South Korea.


Read more!

More companies warming up offices to cool off energy usage

Kua Zhen Yang, Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

OFFICE workers in Singapore may soon be shedding some of those thick layers of clothing, as more firms raise the workplace mercury in an attempt to conserve energy.

Some office buildings are currently chilled at 21 deg C, a hefty 11 degrees cooler than the average outdoor temperature.

That means many office workers tend to don sweaters and jackets while in the office to stop shivering despite the tropical climate.

This, however, is set to change, as companies become more eco-friendly and aware of their carbon footprints.

Raising the thermostat level is both simple and effective at cutting energy use and saving money.

According to the National Environment Agency (NEA), air-conditioning currently accounts for 40 per cent to 50 per cent of the electricity bills in commercial buildings.

If they raise the temperature by just 1 deg C, companies can shave up to 3 per cent off their air-conditioning bills. This translates into $20 million to $26 million in annual savings if all companies in Singapore raise their office temperatures by 1 deg C - enough to pay for the yearly electricity bills of 33,000 four-room HDB flats.

One company which has been quick to adopt this practice is property developer City Developments (CDL). Tenants of 11 of its buildings, including Republic Plaza and Fuji Xerox Towers, have been encouraged to set their thermostats at 24 deg C in its '1 Degree Up' campaign.

The programme is strictly voluntary, but the take-up rate has been very encouraging, with up to 90 per cent of the tenants in some buildings agreeing to warm things up.

'Globally, the increasing levels of carbon emissions have become a major concern. Thus, as responsible corporate citizens, we wanted to find ways we could reduce carbon emissions in our operations,' said a CDL spokesman.

CDL aims to make a big difference with this small step by cutting carbon emissions by 1.5 million kg a year. It takes 6,000 trees to absorb this much carbon dioxide - one of the main greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) has also joined the effort by raising the temperature at its offices from 22 deg C to 25 deg C.

SPH senior manager of properties Wong Chi Meng cited rising electricity bills as one of the motivating factors for this change. 'The electricity bill is going up tremendously,' he said.

Also, office workers did not take well to the chilly 22 deg C.

'Most of the people find that it gets cold when you stay in the office too long... It's a waste of energy to keep temperatures at 22 deg C,' said Mr Wong.

Raising the thermostat keeps workers happy while cutting both energy usage and carbon emissions, he said.

Office guidelines set by the Building Construction Authority put the ideal temperature of an office at between 22.5 deg C and 25.5 deg C.

'We recommend setting indoor temperatures at the higher end of this range to avoid overcooling and wastage of energy,' said the NEA spokesman.

In fact, a 2004 study by Cornell University in the United States showed that warmer workers worked better. When the temperature was raised from 19 deg C to 25 deg C, typing errors fell by 44 per cent and output jumped by 150 per cent.

Raising temperatures is not an original idea.

Japan, through its 'Cool Biz' campaign, has been setting government office temperatures in summer at a sweltering 28 deg C for the past two years.

Workers are urged to shed their bulky coats and ties and come to work in short-sleeved shirts.

The prime minister at the time, Mr Junichiro Koizumi, took the lead - by appearing in public decked in cheery Hawaiian shirts.

Hong Kong, taking a leaf out of Japan's book, has also launched its own 'Dress Down in Summer' campaign to reduce air-conditioner usage during the hottest season of the year.

Government offices in Malaysia have also been encouraged to set office temperatures 1 deg C higher to lower energy usage.

In the light of rising electricity costs - Singapore Power recently announced a 6 per cent rise in tariffs - will it be Singapore's turn soon?

A spokesman says although there is no concrete plan for campaigns like Japan's and Hong Kong's, the NEA is 'strongly recommending that temperatures in offices be raised' in order to save energy.


Read more!

Singapore year in review: Business of going green burns bright

Straits Times 31 Dec 07;

As climate change moved from being a fringe issue to a mainstream concern, 2007 will be remembered as the year of the environment. With the green business becoming the world's fastest-growing industry, JESSICA CHEAM looks at the milestones in Singapore for the year

Clean energy blueprint

IN MARCH, Singapore heralded its entry into the clean energy race as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced a $170 million research fund for the industry.

The Economic Development Board (EDB) soon unveiled a more detailed $350 million blueprint - for research and development, testing and pilot projects in clean energy.

The aim: To create a major industry worth $1.7 billion which will employ 7,000 people by 2015.

Singapore's foray into clean energy - that is, energy generated from renewable sources such as the sun and wind - comes just as the global clean energy market is enjoying massive growth.

Leading research house Clean Edge has reported revenues in the industry climbing from US$40 billion (S$58 billion) in 2005 to US$55 billion last year. This is projected to hit US$226 billion by 2016.

Mega green investments

IN OCTOBER, Singapore was propelled into global limelight when Norwegian solar firm Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) announced that it will set up the world's biggest solar equipment manufacturing plant here, worth $6.3 billion.

This was the fruit of 'nine months of intense courtship' between EDB and REC. Singapore trumped more than 200 locations to emerge with the prize, said EDB managing director Ko Kheng Hwa.

The Tuas plant, which will begin operations in 2010, is expected to employ up to 3,000 staff - with an initial 1,500 selected to be hired next year. A good number of these will be sent to Norway for extensive training.

Earlier this month, oil giant Neste Oil said that it would build the world's biggest biodiesel facility in Singapore at a cost of 550 million euros (S$1.17 billion).

The plant, ideally located near Indonesia and Malaysia - the world's two largest palm oil producers - will convert the feedstock into fuel for vehicles. The investment will create 100 jobs and boost the Republic's goal of expanding its environmentally-friendly industries.

Environmentally-friendly policies

TO REALISE Singapore's ambition of becoming a major clean energy player, a Clean Energy Programme Office (Cepo) was announced in March to drive the growth of the sector.

Cepo comprises six government agencies, including the EDB, the National Environment Agency (NEA) and the Building and Construction Authority (BCA).

Its first initiative was to set aside a $17 million kitty for the Clean Energy Research and Testbedding (Cert) programme, which will provide sites for foreign and local companies to test all kinds of clean technology.

In October, Cepo launched a $50 million research fund for the next five years to accelerate the industry's research and development efforts. This was soon followed by a $25 million scholarship programme to groom a workforce to serve this industry. Cepo plans to award master's or PhD scholarships to about 130 students over the next five years.

The NEA also launched an Energy Efficiency Programme Office (E2PO) to coordinate nationwide efforts to streamline Singapore's major sectors of energy use, namely in power generation, industry, transportation, buildings and households.

A world-class research centre that will focus on environmental issues - the first of its kind in Singapore - is also likely to be set up soon. It will likely to be called the Singapore-ETH Centre for Global Environmental Sustainability.

The research house will be a partnership between the National Research Foundation in Singapore and a top European group of research and teaching institutes from Switzerland, ETH Domain.

Carbon: a new commodity

WITH the Kyoto Protocol creating a new market commodity in carbon, Singapore is positioning itself to become the region's carbon trading hub given its standing as a financial services capital.

A local company - Asia Carbon Group - said last month that it was working with the Singapore Exchange to launch a potentially lucrative carbon credit trading facility.

Catalist-listed ecoWise Holdings, a local environmental solutions company, also signed a deal this year with Japanese firm Kansai Electric Power to sell up to 95,000 carbon credits over five years - making it likely to be the first company in Singapore to sell carbon credits under the United Nations' Clean Development Mechanism.

The trading carbon credits is designed to limit industry carbon dioxide emissions, widely blamed as a contributor to global warming.

Solar: Option with most potential

THE solar industry has been the rising star of Singapore's burgeoning clean energy sector this year - and looks set to remain so in the near term.

The Government has singled out solar as the clean energy with the most potential for Singapore due to its existing strength in the similar semiconductor industry, and its strategic location among the sun-belt countries.

Big players such as Norway's REC, German solar firm Conergy, United States-based SolarWorld have been courted to set up manufacuturing facilities or regional offices in Singapore; while local companies such as Solar Energy Power made history by becoming the first Singapore company to manufacture solar cells this year.

Cepo has also called for proposals from firms to test a range of solar technologies at selected sites.

BCA last month unveiled a $10 million zero-energy building - Singapore's first - which will also have such test facilities.

The complex will have a net zero energy consumption over a typical year, made possible by a massive array of solar panels covering about 1,300 sq m - the biggest in Singapore - which will be integrated on the roof of one of the buildings.

BCA expects different generations of solar technology to be tested here, paving the way for further innovations and adoptions of solar energy in Singapore.

The greening of corporate S'pore

THIS year, chief executives have found that environmental issues, once an afterthought, are now key to any corporate strategy.

Firms, foreign and local alike, have been jumping on the green bandwagon, initiating numerous 'corporate social responsibility' practices from funding environmental groups to streamlining their operations.

Those with genuine intentions have often found recognition for their efforts.

In April, for example, property firm City Developments (CDL) became the first private developer to be awarded BCA's Green Mark Platinum - the highest accolade for green buildings - for its Oceanfront@Sentosa Cove project.

CDL's reputation and experience as a green developer also in some way led to its clinching of a 3.5ha prestigious site at Beach Road from the Urban Redevelopment Authority in September, which features an eco- friendly mega mixed development.

The number of local companies joining the race for environmental solutions have also swelled, with more diversifying into the green business.

For retail investors, 2007 is also the year green investment funds went mainstream.

Former US vice-president and environmental crusader Al Gore, who came to Singapore in August for the Global Brand Forum, gave a separate talk on the growing range of green investments in the market that could give high returns and urged investors to 'put your money where your values are'.


Read more!

Indonesia plant trees to save orangutans

Ian Wood, The Telegraph 28 Dec 07;

At the Bali climate summit, Indonesia announced a new scheme aimed at protecting its orangutan population.

The plight of the orangutan, driven out because of deforestation and degradation of its rainforest home, has become a potent symbol of the battle to save the forests.

Fleeing from fires, dehydrated and denied access to clean water, they have in the past been driven to snatch cans of Coca-Cola from tourists.

The most recent survey of wild orangutans estimates that there are about 7000 remaining in Sumatra, and about 55,000 in Borneo. However the combined pressures of palm oil, logging and forest fires are having a catastrophic effect on many areas.

Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said at the launch of the project: "In the last 35 years about 50,000 orangutans are estimated to have been lost as their habitats shrank. If this continues, this majestic creature will likely face extinction by 2050. The fate of the orangutan is a subject that goes to the heart of sustainable forests... to save the orangutan we have to save the forest."

For anyone with an interest in protecting Indonesian rainforests these have to be welcome words.

The action plan has taken nearly three years to develop and has included various NGO's and the Indonesian forestry ministry. The American group The Nature Conservancy has represented the coalition of NGO's and has also pledged $1 million to support the plan. The bold target of the project is to save huge areas of forest scheduled for conversion to palm oil.

"One million hectares of planned forest conversion projects are in orangutan habitat," said Rili Djohani, director of The Nature Conservancy's Indonesia program.

"Setting aside these forests is an important step for Indonesia to sustainably manage and protect its natural resources. It benefits both local people and wildlife while making a major contribution towards reducing global carbon emissions."

Indonesia has made some progress in enforcing forest laws over the last few years and if this plan can be implemented it would be a landmark in Indonesian forest protection.

Dr. Erik Meijaard, a senior scientist with The Nature Conservancy, said:"It could lead to 9,800 orangutan being saved and prevent 700 million tons of carbon from being released."

Although Indonesia has already destroyed huge swathes of rainforest, it still has over 100 million acres left. Both scientists and Indonesian officials hope that the emerging carbon market could provide funds to protect important areas.

"Forest conservation can provide economic benefits for a very long time," said Dr. Meijaard. "If payments for avoided deforestation become an official mechanism in global climate agreements, then carbon buyers will likely compensate Indonesia for its forest protection. Protecting the orangutan will then lead to increased economic development in the country. Such a triple-win situation is not a dream. With some political will, it can soon be reality."

The other target of the project is to return orangutan housed in rehabilitation centres to the forest by 2015. There are currently over 1000 orangutan housed in care centres with more arriving on a regular basis. The majority are ready to be returned to the wild now but there are simply not enough suitable release sites. If carbon trading could achieve the aims of this plan, then these great apes could return to the forests where they belong.


Read more!