Best of our wild blogs: 16 Apr 09


“The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity”
by Sodhi et al on the Biodiversity crew @ NUS blog

Animals Unrestrained: Sungei Buloh photo competition
on the wild shores of singapore blog

How is charcoal made from mangroves?
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Slimey green giant
on the annotated budak blog and harey and hunter digger

Sunbirds harvesting nectar from Lumnitzera
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Oriental Pied Hornbill Nesting at Changi Village
on the Glorious Birds blog

Smarter than your average spider
on the annotated budak blog

Strange insect spotted at Botanic Gardens
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Malthusian Catastrophe
on the blooooooooooo blog

“Invasive aliens on tropical East Asian islands”
by Richard Corlett on the Biodiversity crew @ NUS blog


Read more!

Live animals sold in supermarkets: It's unhygienic and cruel, says SPCA

Teh Jen Lee, The New Paper 16 Apr 09;

LIVE animals don't belong in supermarkets - for two reasons.

This is the response of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) to recent reports that supermarkets are selling exotic live animals.
It has expressed 'serious concern' over the welfare of such animals like freshwater turtles and bullfrogs that are being sold in Sheng Siong supermarkets.

That is not its only concern, especially in light of the recent fatal food-poisoning saga in Geylang Serai.

These live animals are also carriers of potentially deadly bacteria.

SPCA executive officer Deirdre Moss said: 'Even with the existence of guidelines, how is humane slaughter monitored and guaranteed? Unless a skilled person is carrying it out, the animal is bound to suffer.'

She said the SPCA has been protesting the issue of live slaughter in markets and eating establishments since 2001 as the animals are often kept in cramped conditions before being killed.

She said: 'It's so widely accepted here that most people don't even question it. But think about it, crabs in restaurants are tied up for who knows how long.

'Some may go faster, but some are confined for hours and hours in unnatural conditions. The food may be fresh but it's at the expense of the animals.'

The Singapore Environment Council is also against the selling of live animals in supermarkets.

Its executive director, Mr Howard Shaw, said: 'Although supermarkets boast about freshness, they are not supposed to function as traditional slaughter houses, so there are potential public health risks. There's also the issue of cruelty as animals are kept in confined spaces.

'Just for the sake of seeing something live before you take it home, I think the cons outweigh the pros.'

Introducing livestock into the retail environment could also lead to trade in threatened species, Mr Shaw said.

'I know that AVA (Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority) monitors Singapore's commitment against illegal wildlife trade. But when exotics appear in the mass retail market, it can be difficult to monitor,' he said.

A recent case is the Sheng Siong Supermarket in Commonwealth, which kept turtles in two red plastic containers as seen in photographs taken last week.

'Pitiful'

Ms Christina Kwan, 27, a civil servant who sent the pictures, wrote to the AVA last Thursday to ask them to investigate the supermarket for the 'pitiful' way the animals were being kept.

There were more than 10 turtles in each container, whose length and width were roughly the size of The New Paper when opened up.

Quoting the Animals and Birds Act, which gives AVA the power to enter and search any premises on suspicion of cruelty, she said: 'Cramming them into containers is not acceptable as their welfare is being compromised. The likelihood of (them) not being fed is high.'

AVA replied to Ms Kwan that when its officers visited the outlet on Monday, they did not see any turtles.

They reminded the outlet manager to keep the turtles in clean water and to provide sufficient space.

AVA added it would conduct follow-up visits.

Ms Kwan told The New Paper: 'Hopefully, supermarkets will exercise diligent care in their daily handling of live animals and treat them with due respect and dignity.'

Besides animal cruelty, there are also concerns that selling live animals in such a manner provides a source for the outbreak of potentially deadly diseases.

Ms Moss said: 'If such exotic animals are to be eaten, their slaughter should be in regulated conditions as is the case with other meats for consumption which are sold chilled.

Salmonella bacteria, which live on the skin of reptiles and are also found in the faeces of other animals, can be passed on to humans, causing diarrhoea, fever, vomiting and abdominal cramps.

In response to our queries about animal welfare, Sheng Siong's spokesman said: 'We try to create an environment that is similar to their habitat. Our personnel are trained to handle live animals with swift and precise actions to ensure that they do not suffer.'

As for public health concerns, the spokesman said: 'To prevent transmission of disease, we urge all consumers to exercise good hygiene habits after contact with animal faeces.

'We strive to provide our customers with a clean and safe shopping environment constantly.'

Related article
Singapore supermarkets to offer more live food: Supermarkets go LIVE - Move draws eager customers and chains see a spike in sales, Jessica Lim, Straits Times 11 Apr 09;


Read more!

Email hoax on earthquake, tsunami in Asia on July 22

Tan Yew Guan, Channel NewsAsia 15 Apr 09;

SINGAPORE: An email is going around warning about an impending earthquake and tsunami hitting parts of Asia, including Singapore. It claims that disaster will strike on July 22, the same day as a solar eclipse.

The email says that apart from Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, the giant wave may also hit countries as far as Japan, Australia and India.

But the credibility of the email is questionable. For one, it is riddled with spelling errors, and two, it does not cite any credible source.

While it is true that a solar eclipse will occur on July 22, experts said there is no connection between an eclipse and an earthquake.

Professor Kerry Sieh, director, Earth Observatory of Singapore, said: "In the last 110 years or so, there have been about 85 really big earthquakes – 8 (on the Richter magnitude scale) or greater. And only two of those occurred on the same day as an eclipse. And even those were a partial eclipse, not a total eclipse. They happened in a different place from where the eclipse happened."

While the professor does not think the email holds water, he warns that research does show that parts of Asia facing the Pacific Ocean could be hit by a tsunami. He said the impact on Singapore will be minimal, but not so for cities further up north.

"It turns out that by the time the wave produced by the underwater disturbance got to Singapore, it would be only about a metre high. But in Macau and Hong Kong, it would about 10 to 15 metres high," said Professor Sieh.

He said more work needs to be done to determine if the fault lines along the Pacific Ocean floor will break in such a way that could see a repeat of the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004.

On July 22, those in Singapore can see a partial eclipse, beginning at about 8.40am till about 9.40am.


- CNA/so


Read more!

Dengue cases on the rise

There were 1,526 cases in first 13 weeks of the year; anti-dengue drive launched in Clementi
Leow Si Wan, Straits Times 16 Apr 09;

WITH warmer weather looming, the number of dengue cases is set to rise.

The total number of cases for the first 13 weeks of the year was 1,526, a 22 per cent increase compared to the same period last year.

There are 14 hot spots with two or more infections identified so far, mostly in the West Coast areas.

Most of the cases involve the Den-2 virus, one of the two common types found in Singapore.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) maintains that weekly fluctuations in cases are to be expected in the normal course of the disease.

But with the coming warm weather likely to increase the mosquito population, South West District Mayor Amy Khor has expressed concern over a possible surge in dengue cases in the next few months.

Anticipating this, the South West Community Development Council swung into action, launching an anti- dengue initiative at Clementi Avenue 5 yesterday.

It is working with the NEA, town councils, grassroots organisations and schools.

The main thrust of the initiative is to prevent mosquitoes from finding fertile breeding spots.

Said Dr Khor: 'The period from April to September every year is always very conducive to dengue and mosquito breeding. This year, we are launching the Mcaps Outreach@South West Programme to reduce the probability of mosquito breeding at home.'

The new Mcaps, or Mosquito Caps, cover clothes pole holders and close automatically when the poles are removed from the holders. Each cap costs $3.50.

Clementi was chosen to kick off the South West anti-dengue movement, said an NEA official, because schools in the area were very supportive. In all, 15 were roped in to help distribute the caps to needy residents.

Clementi Avenue 5 is also one of the current dengue clusters.

Student volunteers were briefed and provided with insect repellent. Some 480 of them from five secondary schools in the South-West Green School programme went around the neighbourhood distributing Mcaps to 2,000 needy households yesterday.

One recipient was Madam Soon Ya Li. The 62-year-old housewife said: 'In the past, I often forgot to replace the caps when I removed the bamboo poles. This new cap will make things easier.'

Until September, the schools in the programme will also take turns to scour the neighbourhood for receptacles containing stagnant water. Their job is to flip these containers over and paste 'You Got Flipped!' stickers on them.

They will also distribute guidebooks, mosquito repellent and other materials to spread the anti-dengue message.

Last year, there were 7,032 dengue cases in Singapore. At the height of the last epidemic here in 2005, more than 14,000 people were infected and 25 of them died.

Dengue cases usually follow a six- to seven-year cyclical trend, with each year surpassing the one before. Singapore is in the third year of a cycle that began in 2007.

siwan@sph.com.sg

Top five clusters

A DENGUE cluster is formed by two or more cases occurring within 14 days, and when the victims' homes are less than 150m apart.

A cluster is closed when no new case is reported 14 days after the last one.

The West Coast area has the highest number of dengue cases currently. The first cluster, in West Coast Drive (Blocks 505, 506, 507, 508, 510 and 511), has 13 cases.

The second cluster, in West Coast Drive (Blocks 95 and 113A) and West Coast Lane/West Coast Place, has eight cases.

Two other clusters - Sirat Road/Highland Road and Boon Keng Road - each have six. Clementi Avenue 3 (Blocks 428, 430, 431 and 445) rounds up the top five clusters with four cases.

For updates on dengue clusters, please visit the NEA's dengue website at www.dengue.gov.sg


Read more!

New eco-friendly facility to cut SPH storage costs

Alvin Foo, Straits Times 16 Apr 09;

MULTIMEDIA group Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) unveiled a new $5.5 million eco-friendly warehouse at its print centre in Jurong yesterday.

The facility is set to deliver significant cost-savings to the company.

Situated within the premises of South-east Asia's largest single printing site, it was officially opened by SPH chief executive Alan Chan.

He said: 'Newspapers are the core of SPH's business...at a time when companies are cutting back on investments, SPH is positioning itself for the future.'

The new site will eliminate the need for external storage, resulting in cost-savings of about $80,000 per month from rent and logistics, according to SPH assistant vice-president of production Lim Swee Yeow.

Prior to this, SPH's use of outside storage meant that it incurred additional rental, transportation and handling costs.

Mr Chan said: 'We were subjected to fluctuations in rental charges in land-scarce Singapore, which hindered us from stocking our newsprint at an optimal level.'

SPH previously owned a warehouse at Thomson Road, which made way for the District 11 freehold Sky@eleven condominium in 2006.

With this latest addition able to hold up to 9,000 tonnes of newsprint, the SPH Print Centre now boasts three warehouses with a total storage capacity of 36,000 tonnes - or about four months of newsprint supply.

The new warehouse has been designed with the environment in mind and maximises the use of natural lighting and ventilation, thus removing the need for conventional mechanical ventilation ducts.

Mr Chan said: 'These eco-friendly features will reap us cost-savings in terms of electricity usage and maintenance.'

Its green characteristics will lower electricity and maintenance bills by about $5,000 a month, estimated Mr Lim.

He also noted that the price of newsprint had dropped to about US$500 (S$751) a tonne since hitting a peak of US$860 in the third quarter of last year.

Earlier this week, SPH said it had reduced staff costs - its biggest cost category - by 13.6 per cent to $69.4 million in its second quarter ended Feb 28, compared with the same period last year.

It also disclosed a 12.6 per cent slide in quarterly net profits to $87 million, due to the economic downturn which has resulted in businesses cutting back on advertising spending.

New green warehouse a big boost for SPH

Third warehouse brings cost savings, expands newsprint storage capacity
NIsha Ramchandani, Business Times 16 Apr 09;

SINGAPORE Press Holdings (SPH) expects to enjoy significant savings from its new $5.5 million eco-friendly warehouse.

'At a time when companies are cutting back on investments, SPH is positioning itself for the future,' CEO Alan Chan said at the official opening yesterday.

According to SPH's assistant vice-president of engineering (production department) Lim Swee Yeow, about $80,000 a month will be saved on rent and transport, as SPH will no longer need external storage to complement its two other warehouses.

The company will also save $5,000 a month on electricity and maintenance charges, as the new warehouse is designed to allow maximum natural lighting and ventilation.

The addition of the third warehouse will boost newsprint storage capacity to 36,000 tonnes - about four months' supply - at the SPH Print Centre.

This will give SPH greater flexibility when buying newsprint, the price of which can fluctuate dramatically. It now costs around US$500 a tonne, down about 40 per cent since the third quarter of last year.

'Newspapers are the core of SPH's business,' said Mr Chan. 'Over the years, we have consistently improved our suite of newspapers, launched new ones and invested in printing capabilities.'

With eight press-lines, the SPH Print Centre in Jurong Port Road is the largest single printing site in South-east Asia.


Read more!

Singapore, Nanjing to build new eco-city

Straits Times 16 Apr 09;

HONG KONG: Singapore will embark on another joint eco-city project in China following a ground-breaking ceremony to be held likely late next month in Nanjing city, a China-funded Hong Kong newspaper reported yesterday.

The site of the eco-city project, the second in China involving the Singapore Government, will be an island in the middle of the Yangzi River called Jiangxinzhou to the south-west of Nanjing, the capital of Jiangsu province, said the Ta Kung Pao.

The Nanjing authorities have reached preliminary agreements with the Singapore Government on the construction principles, concept, plan and way of operation for the eco-city, the newspaper quoted Mr Yang Zhongnan, deputy director of the Nanjing Municipal Development and Reform Commission, as saying.

The ground-breaking ceremony is likely to be held some time between May 21 and May 23, said the Ta Kung Pao.

Although a government-led project, the eco-city is also open to private investors, added Mr Yang.

Nanjing mayor Jiang Hongkun had earlier said that the project aims to attract the world's top experts to help make the eco-city a world-class model of its kind.

In November 2007, Singapore and China signed the agreement to build the 30 sq km Tianjin eco-city in northern China.

Following that, Singapore proposed building another eco-city on a smaller scale - about 3 to 5 sq km in area - in Nanjing, said the Ta Kung Pao.


Read more!

Vietnam PM halts controversial hotel in park: govt

Hotel is joint venture with Singapore company
Yahoo News 15 Apr 09;

HANOI (AFP) – Vietnam's prime minister has stopped a 40-million-dollar hotel development at a city park amid fears over possible damage to the capital's "green lung", the government said Wednesday.

The project, known as SAS Hanoi Royal, is a joint venture between Hanoi Tourism Company and SIH Investment Limited of Singapore, the government said on its website.

French-based Accor would manage the completed hotel under its Novotel brand, an Accor spokesman said.

Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung ordered a "suspension" of construction while an alternate site is sought, the government said.

Dung asked relevant authorities "to choose a different location and recommend that to the investor", the government said, adding that public opinion, including that of architects and planning experts, said building the hotel in Thong Nhat park would seriously affect the city's environment.

Sealed off behind a high green fence in one corner of park, the site has been churned up and metal rods inserted into the ground but there was no evidence of active construction when AFP visited.

Plans called for a five-storey, four-star hotel with 376 rooms, the government said.

Evan Lewis, Accor's regional vice-president of communications, said he received media reports of the prime minister's decision but had not been officially informed, and so declined to comment.

Thong Nhat, once known as Lenin Park, contains neatly-laid flower beds, tree-lined pathways, children's rides and a lake. The park is a popular spot for exercising in the heart of an increasingly congested capital.


Read more!

Rising sea levels erode Vietnam’s coastal areas

VOVNews 15 Apr 09;

The northern province of Nam Dinh has suffered extensive damage from erosion as a result of climate change and rising sea levels.

Within the past 10 years, the sea dyke in Hai Trieu commune, Hai Hau district, has broken twice, allowing seawater to flood the commune’s fields. When the water receded, the vegetables were already ruined by the salty water and the foundations of people’s houses were weakened.

But even this was not the worst happening as sea waves continued to encroach on the coastal areas.

“My garden had a total area of 1800m2 before 1987. The overflow of seawater has eroded and salted the garden and has made it shrink by more than a half,” said Bui Thi Hoa, a 57-year-old woman in Hai Trieu commune.

“Now, the garden is not large enough for cultivation to feed our family. We have turned to living mainly by making salt, which earns us only VND7 million ($438) per year,” Ms Hoa said.

Last year, the vegetables planted in her garden died due to the heavily salted land. This year, her garden was treated to remove the salt but there was a drop in vegetable prices. Now, the poor woman puts her hopes in some beds of millet that she has sown.

The case of Ms Hoa is typical of many households along the beach of Nam Dinh province, whose gardens have become increasingly smaller and can accommodate only a modest amount of vegetables and bulbs. Many residents have been forced to relocate to new places deep inland. What’s left of old churches, schools, and villages destroyed by sea waves can be seen along the beach of Nam Dinh.

Statistics by the Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics show an annual rise of 2.15mm in sea level in Nam Dinh, pushing the coastline 10m inwards. Nam Dinh’s own figures indicate that a total of 180ha of land in Hai Trieu commune has been submerged.

“The sea has continuously encroached inland since 1996,” said Bui Van Dung, chairman of the communal people’s committee. “Meanwhile, our dyke, which was not reinforced with concrete, is showing cracks under heavy rains and waves.”

The erosion of Nam Dinh beach is blamed on the increased force of the waves and rising sea levels. To make matters worse, the mangrove forests, which helped prevent the strong waves breaking on the shore and eroding the arable land, have been destroyed and turned into ponds to raise shrimps for export.


Read more!

Catastrophic sea levels 'distinct possibility'

Marlowe Hood Yahoo News 15 Apr 09;

PARIS (AFP) – A breakthrough study of fluctuations in sea levels the last time Earth was between ice ages, as it is now, shows that oceans rose some three meters in only decades due to collapsing ice sheets.

The findings suggest that such an scenario -- which would redraw coastlines worldwide and unleash colossal human misery -- is "now a distinct possibility within the next 100 years," said lead researcher Paul Blanchon, a geoscientist at Mexico's National University.

The study, published by the science journal Nature, will appear in print Thursday.

Rising ocean water marks are seen by many scientists as the most serious likely consequence of global warming.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted in 2007 that sea levels will rise by up to 59 centimeters (23 inches) before 2100 due simply to the expansion of warmer ocean waters.

This relatively modest increase is already enough to render several small island nations uninhabitable, and to disrupt the lives of tens of millions of people living in low-lying deltas, especially in Asia and Africa.

But more recent studies have sounded alarms about the potential impact of crumbling ice sheets in western Antarctica and Greenland, which together contain enough frozen water to boost average global sea levels by at least 13 metres (42 feet).

A rapid three-meter rise would devastate dozens of major cities around the globe, including Shanghai, Calcutta, New Orleans, Miami and Dhaka.

"Scientists have tended to assume that sea level reached a maximum during the last interglacial" -- some 120,000 years ago -- "very slowly, over several millennia," Blanchon told AFP by phone.

"What we are saying is 'no, they didn't'."

The new evidence of sudden jumps in ocean water marks was uncovered almost by accident at a site in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula that had been excavated for a theme park.

Blanchon and three colleagues from the Leibniz Institute of Marine Science in Germany discovered the remains of coral reefs that made it possible to measure with great precision changes in sea level.

Using contiguous reef crests -- the part of the reef closest to the surface of the water -- as benchmarks, the researchers pinpointed a dramatic jump in sea levels that occurred 121,000 years ago.

"We are looking at a three-metre rise in 50 years," Banchon said. "This is the first evidence that we have for rapid change in sea level during that time."

Only collapsing ice sheets could account for such an abrupt increase, he added.

The last interglacial period, when sea levels peaked six metres higher than current levels, was warmer than the world is today.

But as manmade climate change kicks in, scientists worry that rising temperatures could create a similar environment, triggering a runaway disintegration of the continent-sized ice blocks that are already showing signs of distress.

The recent breakaway of the Wilkins Ice Shelf from the Antarctic peninsula, for example, while not adding itself to sea levels, makes it easier for the glaciers that feed it to flow straight out to sea.

It is still unclear whether this and other dramatic changes seen in ice sheets recently are signs of imminent collapse, or natural processes that have not been observed before.

The Yucatan peninsula is one of only a few regions in the world where the virtual absence of seismic activity over the last several hundred thousand years makes accurate measurements of sea level rise during the last interglacial possible.

"What we have to do now is look at other stable areas, such as western Australia, and confirm the same reef back-jumping signature we found in the Yucatan," said Blanchon.

"Once we have done that, we can say our findings are rock solid."

Coral Fossils Suggest That Sea Level Can Rise Rapidly
Andrew C. Revkin, New York Times 15 Apr 09

Evidence from fossil coral reefs in Mexico underlines the potential for a sudden jump in sea levels because of global warming, scientists report in a new study.

The study, published Thursday in the journal Nature, suggests that a sudden rise of 6.5 feet to 10 feet occurred within a span of 50 to 100 years about 121,000 years ago, at the end of the last warm interval between ice ages.

“The potential for sustained rapid ice loss and catastrophic sea-level rise in the near future is confirmed by our discovery of sea-level instability” in that period, the authors write.

Yet other experts on corals and climate are faulting the work, saying that big questions about coastal risks in a warming world remain unresolved.

One of the most momentous and enduring questions related to human-caused global warming is how fast and high seas may rise. Studies of past climate shifts, particularly warm-ups at the ends of ice ages, show that fast-melting ice sheets have sometimes raised sea levels worldwide in bursts of up to several yards in a century.

A question facing scientists is whether such a rise can occur when the world has less polar ice and is already warm, as it is now, and getting warmer.

Citing the evidence from fossil coral reefs, the authors of the new study say with conviction that the answer is yes.

The study focuses on a set of fossil reef remains exposed in excavations for channels at a resort and water park, Xcaret, about 35 miles south of Cancún on the east coast of the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico.

Paul Blanchon, the lead author of the study, said he sought a position as a research scientist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico’s Institute of Marine Sciences in Puerto Morelos so he could focus on the unusual fossil reefs, visible for hundreds of yards where canals were cut into the rocky ground.

“I spent the last four years looking at those cross sections and piecing the story of those reefs together bit by bit like a jigsaw,” he said in a telephone interview.

With three co-authors from Germany, Dr. Blanchon calculated the ages of coral samples by measuring isotopes of thorium in the fossils. The team then confirmed the ages by comparing the Mexican reefs with coral reefs in the Bahamas whose ages had been thoroughly studied.

The team says it found that two Mexican reefs grew during the last “interglacial,” or warm interval between ice ages.

To determine the pace of sea-level rise in that period, Dr. Blanchon charted patterns of coral revealed in excavations at the resort. He said his work revealed a clear point where an existing reef died as the sea rose too quickly for coral organisms to build their foundation up toward the sea surface. Once the sea level stabilized again, the same group of corals grew once more, but farther inshore and up to 10 feet higher in elevation, a process known to geologists as backstepping.

Such an abrupt change from stable coral growth to death and a sudden upward and inshore shift of a reef could happen only because of a sudden change in sea level, he said.

But in interviews and e-mail messages, several researchers who focus on coral and climate said that although such a rapid rise in seas in that era could not be ruled out, the paper did not prove its case.

Daniel R. Muhs, a United States Geological Survey scientist who studies coasts for clues to past sea level, cited a lack of precise dating of the two reef sections. William Thompson, a coral specialist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, agreed, saying that given the importance of the conclusion, Dr. Blanchon interpreted the physical features without enough corroborating evidence.

But Dr. Blanchon maintains that the work will hold up, saying the signs of abrupt change are etched in the rock for everyone to examine.

Fossil Corals Show Catastrophic Sea-Level Rise?
Brian Handwerk, National Geographic News 15 Apr 09;

Fossil coral reefs at a Mexican theme park "confirm" that sea levels rose rapidly about 121,000 years ago, according to a controversial new study.

Previous research on fossil reefs had shown that sea levels surged by 13 to 19 feet (4 to 6 meters) near the end of the last time period between ice ages, known as an interglacial period. But researchers have been unsure whether this sea-level rise happened quickly or gradually.

By mapping the ages and locations of ancient corals at Xcaret, an eco-park in the Yucatán Peninsula, Paul Blanchon of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and colleagues, were able to chart when the reefs died and were replaced by others on higher ground.

Their data suggest that sea levels rose by about 10 feet (3 meters) in 50 years—much faster than the current annual rate of 0.08 to 0.1 inch (2 to 3 millimeters).

Because this event happened during an interglacial period—similar to the one we're in currently—the find boosts the chances that today's melting ice sheets could trigger rapid sea-level rise, the study authors say.

But not all experts on corals and climate are convinced by the new study.

Tad Pfeffer, of the University of Colorado at Boulder, noted that Blanchon's team couldn't directly measure the rate of sea level change around the Mexican corals, because the age estimates aren't accurate enough.

Instead the study authors compared changes seen in Xcaret to those seen in reefs with well-established ages in the Bahamas.

"It's an interesting idea, but one that for me is only suggestive and not compelling," Pfeffer said.

"I'd want to see something more solid than this if I'm going to buy the idea of such rapid sea level rise at the time [of the last interglacial]."

Even if the new study is confirmed, Pfeffer added, more research would be needed to determine if rapid sea-level rise 121,000 years ago provides evidence that similar changes can happen now.

"And of course, when would 'now' be?" he asked.

"'In the next few decades' vs. 'the next few thousand years' are both 'now' on the time scales at which glacial and interglacial periods are defined, but are very different situations in terms of how we determine responses."

Mike Kearney, of the University of Maryland, said it's "within the realm of possibility" that global warming will trigger a sudden collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet, which could lead to a rapid increase in sea levels like that predicted by the new study.

(Related: "PHOTOS: Jamaica-Size Ice Shelf Breaks Free")

"But the big unknown is whether any of the things we think we know about the Antarctic ice sheet prove to be true," Kearney cautioned.

"One camp says [rapid sea-level rise] could happen, another camp says it would take thousands of years. I'm not sure what the conventional wisdom is right now. It depends on who you talk to."

Findings appear in this week's issue of the journal Nature.


Read more!

African lark soon to be extinct

Matt Walker, BBC News 15 Apr 09;

The Sidamo lark could soon be the first bird on mainland Africa to die out since modern records began.

A survey has found that just a few hundred of the larks survive in Ethiopia. Unless action is taken to save it, the bird will disappear.
While it may be the first recorded bird extinction on the continent, it will not be the last, warn conservationists.

The birds inhabit a very small pocket of grassland within the Liben Plain of southern Ethiopia.

"This imminent extinction reflects a wider social and political crisis that is repeated throughout Africa," said zoologist Claire Spottiswoode of the University of Cambridge.

She led a survey of the bird's habitat and published her findings in the journal Animal Conservation.

Ancestral link

The Sidamo lark ( Heteromirafra sidamoensis ) is an enigmatic species, and one of the most ancient types of lark known anywhere.

Discovered by scientists in 1968, the bird was only seen once in the following 25 years.

"If we lose this species then we lose an important ancestral link in the evolution of the entire radiation of lark species," said Dr Spottiswoode.



This area of highland savannah used to be maintained by fire and by the grazing of large herbivores, such as elephants, antelopes and gazelles.

Borana pastoralists also traditionally walked their cattle across the plain as they migrated between different wet and dry season grasslands.

For millennia, both the wild animals and pastoralists kept the grasslands in good condition.

This habitat is now being destroyed.

Wild animals are too few to stop shrubs regrowing, while intensively reared livestock and agriculture are increasingly damaging the grasslands.

Unique habitat

Dr Spottiswoode surveyed the Liben Plain with colleagues from the Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society, Birdlife International and the University of East Anglia.

They found that the Sidamo lark lives within a single patch of grassland of just 35 square kilometres.

That compares to a range of 760 square kilometres estimated by Birdlife International just last year, though that was a rough guess based on the best information available at the time.

"The Liben Plain has recently much diminished in size owing to bush encroachment and crop planting. Much of the remaining grassland is too degraded for the species to exist in it," said Dr Spottiswoode.

Worse, the survey revealed that a maximum of 358 Sidamo Larks remain.

More likely, between 90 and 250 of the birds survive. "Even the lower value might be optimistic," wrote the authors of the study.

They have recommended to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that it upgrades to the bird's status to "critically endangered".

Action needed

"The roots of the problem are incredibly difficult to address," says Dr Spottiswoode.

For example, the conflict in neighbouring Somalia means that armed nomads often cross the border and move into the region to graze their cattle.

Increasing droughts and climate change also threaten the bird's habitat.

"But there are urgent short-term measures which might make all the difference to the bird surviving the next few years," said Dr Spottiswoode.

One step would be to create small plots in which cattle could graze. That would stop damage to the grassland and maintain the grass cover required by breeding females.

Shrubs should also be removed, while a limit should be placed on crops expanding further into the bird's range.

Saving the bird in the long term will require the return of the nomadic Borana pastoralists, said Dr Spottiswoode.

They could better manage the grasslands that make up the bird's unique habitat.

"Mitigation measures would benefit both. Perhaps a rare instance of human and conservation interests coinciding," she added.

Under threat

Southern Ethiopia has a suite of bird species that occur nowhere else in the world, many of them threatened.

The IUCN lists the white-tailed swallow as "vulnerable", while another endangered endemic species is the Ethiopian bush-crow, which occurs in a small area of savannah about 100 kilometres to the west of the Sidamo lark's territory.

It lives in complex and fascinating social groups, and its closest relatives live far away in the deserts of central Asia.

Like the Sidamo lark, the bush-crow has been severely impacted by bush encroachment and a shift from pastoralism to crop-planting, and has recently been given "endangered" status by the IUCN.


Read more!

Big brood of rotund rare parrots

Kim Griggs, BBC News 15 Apr 09;

One of the world's rarest birds, New Zealand's kakapo, is now not quite so rare thanks to the arrival of 34 kakapo chicks.
Those chicks, born over the past few months, take the world population of the flightless nocturnal parrot (Strigops habroptilus) to 125. In 1995, kakapo numbers had dwindled to just 51.

"It's critically endangered but it's in a healthier position than it was a decade ago," says Nyia Strachan, a communications officer at New Zealand's Department of Conservation.

The prolific - by kakapo standards - breeding season was a combination of a group of females being mature enough to breed, and the prospect of a favourite kakapo food, rimu fruit.

Those factors prompted the usually solitary kakapo to perform their unusual courtship ceremony, where the male makes a particular low boom from the top of a hill.

It is a system of breeding known as "lek" and peculiar, in parrots, to the kakapo.

Fruit shortage

It was clearly successful. But so many chicks were born that there was not enough ripe rimu fruit on the birds' island home, which is known as both Whenua Hou and Codfish Island.

Twenty-one of the chicks are now being hand-reared in the nearby city of Invercargill.

"If we hadn't taken the chicks off the island to hand raise them, a lot of them would have died," says Ms Strachan.

Hand-rearing demands around-the-clock care from the kakapo team and many feeds.

The younger chicks need at least 10 feeds a day while the older ones are fed about five times a day.

For Don Merton, the renowned New Zealand conservationist who discovered the remnants of the kakapo population back in the 1970s and was intimately involved with their care for more than 30 years, the milestone of a population of 100 birds was "fantastic".

"It could never have happened without lots and lots of people over decades giving it their everything," says Mr Merton.

Long life

Until 1973, when 18 males were found in the rugged Fiordland area of New Zealand no one knew if the once-common kakapo still existed.

Finding a small population which included females on Stewart Island, an island off the southern coast of the South Island of New Zealand, gave conservationists hope.

Then, after years of painstaking effort, a large number of females born in 2002 helped ensure this year's crop of chicks.

"Once they came on stream, once they matured, we knew we were going to have a very strong breeding lobby," says Mr Merton. "And it's all happened this year."

The next milestone, Ms Strachan says, is to have 100 of the long-lived bird that the kakapo team knows the age of.

"At the moment we have about 48 birds that we don't know the age of," she says. "It would be great to have a strong, healthy population that we know the ages of."

Mr Merton's dream is for the kakapo population to reach 500 - and to be independent of the human help they now need to survive.

"They'll need a lot of support for a long time yet," says Mr Merton, "but they are on the way."


Read more!

£20m of ivory seized as poachers return to their prey

The Independent 15 Apr 09;

The decision to allow a sale of ivory to China and Japan could be fuelling a rise in smuggling, reports Cahal Milmo

Investigators have seized £20m worth of illegal ivory in south-east Asia in the past six weeks, including the third largest haul of elephant tusks on record, The Independent has learnt.

Customs officials in Vietnam last month discovered 1,200 sections of tusks from up to 900 elephants, weighing 6.23 tonnes, hidden inside a consignment of waste plastic which had been sent from the Tanzanian port of Dar es Salaam.

Conservation bodies said that poaching in countries from Kenya and Tanzania to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sudan is reaching levels not seen since a global ban on ivory sales was imposed in 1989 and was placing the remaining wild elephant population in danger of extinction.

The seizure, which was accompanied by the interception in Thailand of a tonne of raw ivory from DRC, follows a controversial decision last October by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites), to approve the sale to China and Japan of 108 tonnes of tusks from four southern African countries with sustainable elephant populations. The British Government, which is a key signatory to the convention, voted to support the sale.

Conservationists yesterday claimed that the ivory confiscations and increase in poaching were proof that fears expressed at the time of the sale that it would fuel renewed demand for illegal tusks have come true.

An authoritative American study warned that poaching deaths are on a par with the late 1980s and the remaining large groups of elephants outside protected reserves could be extinct by 2020 without improved enforcement.

Campaigners believe the legal trade is being used as a disguise to smuggle ivory to China, where there is burgeoning demand for name seals, carvings and polished tusks and concern that newly introduced counter-trafficking measures are inadequate. Vietnamese officials said last week they believed the consignment seized in Hai Phong port from a Malaysian vessel was destined for China.

It is estimated that about 37,000 African elephants are killed by poachers each year. Figures obtained by The Independent show that in Kenya alone, the number of poached elephants has doubled in the past 12 months while officials in Tanzania are also investigating a reported large increase in poaching in the country's protected game parks. The elephant population in DRC is estimated to have fallen by a third in the past five years.

Michael Wamithi, director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw) elephant programme, said: "These alarmingly successive incidents are an indication that there is an escalation in elephant poaching in African range states, and an upsurge in illegal trade of ivory in the Far East markets. Although investigations are still ongoing, we suspect that the 6.2-tonne ivory haul in Vietnam was headed for larger markets in China, where legal ivory markets could provide cover for illegal trade. Vietnam has a small market unlikely to be able to absorb or demand such quantities."

The ban on the sale of ivory has been credited with halting a catastrophic decline in Africa's elephant population throughout the 1980s, when 70,000 elephants a year were being slaughtered by poachers. Elephant numbers across the continent are estimated to have fallen from 1.3 million to 625,000 before the prohibition was introduced in 1989.

Cites denied a link between the sale of ivory from South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe last October, which was accompanied by a 10-year moratorium on further sales, and any increase in poaching or smuggling. The organisation's exhaustive Elephant Trade Information System (Etis) suggests that smuggling went down in the wake of the last sanctioned ivory sale in 1999, although the amount seized each year has now been increasing since 2005.

But Traffic, the wildlife trade monitoring organisation, reported in February that illegal ivory prices had risen to $1,500 (£1,000) per kilogram. The figure is disputed by Cites, which points out that the average price during the sale of legal ivory was $162 per kilogram and suggests that such a black market price is unsustainable. But campaigners say there is ample evidence that poaching is becoming increasingly rampant, with hunters and dealers targeting and decimating specific herds in the face of inadequate enforcement by host countries.

Poached ivory is currently sold for about $38 per kilogram in Kenya, where hunters have recently targeted the famous Amboseli elephants, killing 15 in the past year. With adult male elephant tusks weighing up to 50kg, the death of a single elephant can represent a year's income for a farmer or hunter. The result is a growing trade which is funnelling poached ivory from across Africa to criminal gangs with export links to the Far East. Traffic, which provides smuggling data to Cites, said the latest seizure in Vietnam proved there were sophisticated middle-men based across eastern Africa capable of amassing large quantities of ivory and smuggling it across the Indian Ocean.

Mary Rice, executive director at the Environmental Investigation Agency which provided much of the evidence that led to the original ivory ban, said: "There is an increase in poaching in many areas and we have an increase in seizures in Asia. These are not one-off opportunistic shipments, they are obviously consistent and organised."


Read more!

EU cuts Mediterranean tuna fishing

Yahoo News 15 Apr 09;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – The Mediterranean tuna fishing season will be 15 days shorter this year with quotas and fleets also cut, EU sources said Wednesday: but environmentalists complained it was too little, too late.

The bluefin fishing season begins officially on Thursday and will end on June 15, two weeks earlier than the scheduled 2008 season.

At the same time the European Commission has reduced allowed quotas by 27 percent overall. It has also negotiated a cut in fishing capacity for the industrial fishing 'purse seiners' which use huge cylindrical nets to scoop up their catch.

Last year's season was cut short when in mid-June the European Commission ordered a halt to industrial fishing of bluefin tuna two weeks early because quotas for 2008 had already been reached.

Both France and Italy opposed that decision, questioning the commission's figures and saying that their fishing industries had not reached even half their quotas.

The biggest fishing fleet reductions have been agreed by the biggest tuna fishing nations in the EU, with Italy scrapping 19 boats to leave a total of 68 and France getting rid of eight to leave a fleet of 36 purse seiners.

Of the other European Union members only Spain and Malta retain smaller tuna fleets, which will remain unchanged, while Greece has recently scrapped the last of its tuna ships.

The EU has also decided to freeze the capacity of tuna farms, mainly in Malta, and to boost inspections at sea to avoid the kind of fraud whereby fishing ships sell their wares to the farms before coming into port.

"It's the last chance" to avoid the end of Mediterranean bluefin tuna, which has been heavily overfished in the past, an EU official said.

However he estimated that "scrapping another 10 vessels would help to eliminate overfishing."

The lobby group Oceana saw the problem as much more serious, calling for "the immediate closure of the fishery, as stocks are condemned to collapse even if the fleet complies with 100 percent of the agreed quotas and management measures."

"Over-exploitation, illegal fishing and the irresponsibility of the member states that reap the benefits from this fishery have taken this species to the brink of commercial collapse," said Xavier Pastor, executive director of Oceana in Europe.

"Under the leadership of the EU, a new recovery plan has been implemented in 2009 that once again ignores scientific recommendations," he added.

Close watch kept on EU bluefin tuna fleets
Jeremy Smith, Reuters 15 Apr 09;

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Aircraft and patrol boats will be deployed to prevent over-trawling by European Union fleets when the fishing season for the endangered bluefin tuna opens Thursday.

Prized by sushi lovers but chronically overfished for years, bluefin tuna commands sky-high prices in Asia, particularly in Japan where a single fish can fetch up to $100,000.

Conservation group WWF said Tuesday overfishing would wipe out the breeding population of Atlantic bluefin tuna within three years and it was "inexcusable" to allow fishing when stocks were collapsing.

Europe's two-month season opens at midnight for the six EU states fishing in Mediterranean and east Atlantic waters: Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Malta and Spain.

Last year, the European Commission banned bluefin tuna trawling after countries quickly filled their allotted quotas. The EU executive also accused France and Italy, the two nations most involved, of quota-busting and under-reporting catches.

This year, the Commission says it is determined to ensure the EU's overall catch quota for 2009, agreed in international negotiations, is not exceeded. France and Italy have agreed to reduce fleet numbers, it says. "Stocks are considered to be in a critical situation," one Commission official said. "The fishing season will be closed on June 15, it will have reduced quotas and increased inspections.

"We have to limit the scope for those operators who want to avoid the rules."

This year, the EU will increase surveillance using aircraft, high seas and coastal patrol vessels as well as port inspection teams to check bluefin tuna landings, the official said.

Industrial vessels that use a "purse seine" net, which floats the top of a long wall of netting on the surface while its bottom is weighted under the water, are the main problem.

France and Italy have pledged to reduce numbers of bluefin purse seine trawlers by more than 20 percent and nearly 30 percent respectively this fishing season, the Commission says.

Some 85 percent of the fish are caught in June, and commission experts say the EU's fishing capacity is so large and bluefin trawling activity so concentrated in one month that the EU quota can be exhausted in just two days of fishing.

"Economic concerns suggest that there will be problems," the official said. "But we will be able to avoid overfishing if everyone respects the rules. The forecasts for this year are much more optimistic than for 2007/08."

Bluefin tuna are known for their huge size, power and speed, with maximum weights recorded in excess of 600 kg.

(Editing by Robert Woodward)


Read more!

Most green products make some false claims: report

Reuters 15 Apr 09;

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Just 2 percent of the growing number of self-proclaimed green products on store shelves make completely legitimate claims on their labels, a report by consulting firm TerraChoice Environmental Marketing said on Wednesday.

The remainder commit "greenwashing" sins, that is they mislead consumers about the environmental benefits of a product or the practices of a company, said TerraChoice, which runs the Canadian government's eco-labeling program and counts companies as diverse as Canon and Husky Energy among its customers.

The number of green products available in stores surveyed by TerraChoice increased dramatically between 2007 and 2009, the report said, and marketing claims became more creative.

TerraChoice increased its list of greenwashing sins this year to seven from six, adding "worship of false labels" for marketers who mimic third-party environmental certifications on their products to entice consumers.

Other sins in the report include lack of proof, vagueness, irrelevance and outright lying. Products that make environmental claims and are sold in big box stores in the United States, Canada, Britain, and Australia were surveyed.

TerraChoice researchers recorded product details, claims, supporting information, and manufacturers' offers of more information or support.

They then tested the claims against best practice guidelines provided by the Canadian Competition Bureau, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission, and the standard for environmental labeling set by the International Organization for Standardization.

"The good news is that the growing availability of green products shows that consumers are demanding more environmentally responsible choices and that marketers and manufacturers are listening", said TerraChoice Chief Executive Scott McDougall.

"The bad news is that TerraChoice's survey of 2,219 consumer products in Canada and the U.S. shows that 98 percent committed at least one sin of greenwashing and that some marketers are exploiting consumers' demand for third-party certification by creating fake labels or false suggestions of third-party endorsement."

(Reporting by Susan Taylor; editing by Peter Galloway)


Read more!

Positive signs seen on new climate pact

Rob Taylor, Reuters 15 Apr 09;

CANBERRA (Reuters) - There are positive signs a climate summit in December will forge a broader pact between rich and poorer nations to fight global warming, a top Australian official and an influential Chinese expert said on Wednesday.

But the "wasteful and luxurious" lifestyles of rich nations could yet alienate poorer nations, with developed countries like the United States and Australia needing to curb energy use and first set an example, China climate expert Pan Jiahua said.

Australia's center-left government Wednesday began sparring with key Green rivals over its plan to slash carbon emissions between 5 and 15 percent by 2020, with the Greens demanding much deeper cuts as the price of support in parliament.

"Like in the United States, there is huge waste of energy here. I think that China must say (at Copenhagen in December) the Australians could do a little bit more," Pan told a climate forum in Canberra ahead of the government's planned talks.

"The more you take actions to reduce, the deeper cuts you are willing to do ... the Chinese may be more likely to engage in exchange," Pan, of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said.

Delegates from nearly 200 countries are trying to agree by December in Copenhagen on a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, the United Nations' main weapon in fighting climate change.

A key aim of the post-Kyoto deal is to find a formula that leads to big developing nations such as China and India to sign up to emissions curbs from 2013. China is the world's top greenhouse gas emitter after the United States. India is ranked fourth.

But recent U.N. climate talks in Bonn, Germany, broke up with little progress and fears of a widening split between developed and developing nations on a course forward, with poorer countries demanding more support. Kyoto only commits rich nations to emissions curbs up to 2012.

Hopes among developing countries were dashed that the meeting would set a range of emissions reduction targets for industrialized nations as a whole. The Bonn talks are one of a number of rounds of negotiations this year ahead of Copenhagen.

The final round in December, Pan said, would likely see a broad political agreement struck, but with little detail and leaving efforts to fight climate change to move forward in small, incremental steps lasting possibly for years.

"It would be step forward. So now we would see that as a success," he added.

SENSE OF URGENCY

Australia's senior climate negotiator Robert Owen-Jones said he was optimistic because the new Obama administration had helped re-energize talks ahead of Copenhagen.

"Is there a sense of urgency? I think there is. There's a new tone, partly because the United States came back in reinvigorated," Owen-Jones told the forum alongside Pan.

Australia's Climate Change Minister Penny Wong met on Wednesday with Greens lawmakers, who hold the balance-of-power in Senate, to discuss toughening the government's carbon emissions trading scheme.

The meeting was clouded by evidence from three government climate scientists to a Senate panel that Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's greenhouse emission cut targets would not have any impact, even if they passed parliament later this year.

"Even if every nation on Earth adopts and succeeds in meeting Australian targets, global emissions would still be above a pathway consistent with long-term climate protection," the three scientists told the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper.

Wong, in a conciliatory offering ahead of meeting Greens Deputy Leader Christine Milne, said the government was flexible on its longer-term emissions reduction target of 60 percent by 2050 over 2000 levels.

But Milne said there was no point having an emissions trading scheme if it would not prevent "climate catastrophe."

"The emperor of the Rudd Government's emissions target clearly has no clothes," Milne said. "It is very embarrassing for the Rudd Government that Australia's leading climate scientists are telling them that their targets are weak."

(Editing by David Fogarty)


Read more!

New Zealand expected to exceed Kyoto target

Reuters 14 Apr 09;

WELLINGTON (Reuters) - New Zealand will better its target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol because of drought and reassessment of its forests, a government report said on Wednesday.

The country was now expected to produce around 9.6 million tons less of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than allowed in the protocol's first commitment period of 2008-2012.

Under the Protocol, the U.N.'s main weapon in the fight against climate change, New Zealand is meant to show no increase from 1990 levels between 2008-2012.

That compared with an estimate last year that New Zealand would have a greenhouse gas deficit of around 21.7 million tons.

"It is good news that we may exceed our Kyoto target but we need to be cautious of these projections given their volatility," Climate Change Minister Nick Smith said in a statement.

The surplus would be worth NZ$241 million ($140 million) against last year's liability of NZ$546 million. The costs were based on a price of NZ$25.31 a ton of carbon set by the Treasury.

The data is a net estimate of how much New Zealand would exceed or fall short of its Kyoto target, balancing emissions against offsets such as carbon-absorbing forests.

The turnaround was put down to drought in 2007-08 cutting animal emissions, forests absorbing more carbon pollution and more accurate data on nitrous oxide emissions.

Around half of New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions come from agriculture. Methane and nitrous oxide, produced during agricultural production, are powerful greenhouse gases.

The recession, though, had resulted in only a small reduction in national energy, transport and industrial emissions.

"These figures do not signal any progress in abating New Zealand's gross greenhouse gas emissions, which are 23 percent above 1990 levels," Smith said.

"We are just fortunate that more than 600,000 hectares (1.5 million acres) of new forests were planted in the 1990s that are growing strongly and offsetting our continued growth in energy and transport emissions."

New Zealand's emissions trading scheme, brought in by the previous Labor-led government last year, is currently being reviewed by the new National-led administration.

A revised scheme is expected to be unveiled later in the year and launched next year, although the scheme is already going ahead for the forestry sector. Pollution permits will be released to forestry owners in coming months for the 2008 compliance period.

($1 = NZ$1.72)

(Reporting by Gyles Beckford; Editing by David Fogarty)


Read more!

The environment is too important to be left to the green movement

Will Hutton, The Observer 12 Apr 09;

The green movement as it stands should receive the last rites. Its only hope is for a complete overhaul. Its mystic, utopian view of nature and its attachment to meaningless notions such as sustainable development or the precautionary principle should be done away with. It is time to move on.

Or so says Professor Anthony Giddens in his new book, The Politics of Climate Change. It is not that Giddens disputes that mankind is dangerously warming up the planet. The scientific evidence is overwhelming; the risk of a global calamity all too real.

It is just that he has the chutzpah to acknowledge what is obvious. Despite the threat, and the mounting evidence, there is no hope of mobilising western governments and the public into action by appeals to green utopianism or impossible demands to give up our current standard of living. There needs to be a new language, a focus on climate change alone, because that is what counts and is a practical route forward that makes sense to the mass of people. Otherwise, we really are lost.

Giddens curiously and paradoxically overlaps with Nigel Lawson's recent polemics against environmentalists. Yet Giddens is not a global-warming sceptic like Lawson, who disputes even the evidence of science. But he does understand Lawson's impatience with some of the daffy thinking that surrounds the environmental debate and tries to replace it with some tougher ideas.

How, he asks, are we ever to mobilise public opinion about distant threats that inevitably feel not very real? By the time it is proven that the scientists were right, it will be too late to do anything. The inhabitants of Easter Island who destroyed their own ecosystem are a warning. Human beings are myopic. Now the same myopia is evident globally. We have to do better, not least to see off the siren-like arguments of the Nigel Lawsons.

The first problem is that the green movement is shot through with contradictory impulses. Prince Charles and the G20 protesters cannot realistically muster under the same intellectual and political banner. Charles has the conservatives' reverential attitude towards the enduring and natural forces of nature. His love of nature is genuine, but it segues seamlessly into his view that monarchy is as much part of the natural order as the seasons. Nobody is trying to keep global temperature growth to below 2 degrees centigrade to save the Windsors.

On the other wing of the green movement, the G20 protesters interpret climate change as proof positive of the evils of capitalism and the capitalist state. They believe there needs to be a return to the local and a new radical left politics. The state should be broken down. Capitalism should be superseded by local co-operative enterprise and local political decision-making. Food should be organic. Trade should be constrained. Air travel and car use radically reduced. And so on.

The vast majority are unmoved. Worse, many mainstream environmental intellectuals drop rigour when it comes to the environment, climate change and risk. Under the precautionary principle, almost nothing should be done that endangers the climate, just in case the worst scientific warnings are right. The aim should be sustainable development - to grow economically in a way that passes the globe on to the next generation in the same condition in which we found it.

Giddens joins Lawson in dismissing this thinking as wretchedly woolly. Are we really going to risk nothing? This is a refutation of our very risk-taking humanity. In any case, there is little chance of building a consensus over which risks matter and to what degree. Instead, the percentage principle should rule - taking risks in proportion to the probable good and bad outcomes. Moreover, sustainable and development should not be used together so loosely. Development is a dynamic concept that necessarily depletes resources. Poor countries such as China or India can only develop unsustainably. They must burn coal. To ask the entire world to commit to sustainable development is to damn the less developed world to poverty. Those countries will never agree.

The dead end of the current debate is revealed in a sequence in the new film The Age of Stupid. Middle-class lobbyists are filmed successfully resisting planning permission for a wind farm, acknowledging as they do so that there does need to be action on global warming.

But similar middle-class lobbyists could have been filmed resisting planning permission for Heathrow's third runway, this time using the same green arguments. The common thread is that home-owners don't want development near them and deploy any useful argument to hand. Sometimes they are right, sometimes wrong.

For example, there are powerful arguments for a third runway; Heathrow's capacity is pivotal to the vibrant knowledge economy in west London, Surrey, Hampshire, Berkshire and Oxfordshire. With the collapse of financial services, this is Britain's economic future. Certainly, hundreds of thousands of residents in west London will suffer more flights, if from quieter aircraft, yet their interests must be offset by the interests of many more millions.

Climate change cannot be a political game, to be played as and when it suits particular protesters - G20ers or middle-class nimbys. The country needs to develop a vision of where it wants to be in, say, 2025, in terms of carbon emissions, energy independence and wider economic structures. Then it needs to "back-cast" to today and make sure what it does is part of a wider plan that builds, step by step, towards that vision. So if the government wants to build a third Heathrow runway, it must show how it intends to compensate for higher air traffic with radically lower carbon emissions elsewhere. It is called planning. It needs to come back into fashion - fast.

The best arguments to kill the "so-what" factor over climate change are not scary tales from a far-distant future. It is to argue for investment in energy efficiency because it saves cash and makes strategic sense. Tidal and wind power along with nuclear energy emit less carbon, but they also free Britain and the west from dependence on Russia and radical Islamicist oil producing states.

Cars powered by electricity or hydrogen are cheaper. The less-developed world will only follow suit if the west picks up the bill. But to persuade western publics to make sacrifices requires more than trying to terrify them. It requires laying out concrete actions that collectively make sense now.

Greens and environmentalists will challenge Giddens's book. It is true that as a result of their campaigning the culture is changing; but far too slowly. The danger is far too serious to be co-opted by the left, nimbyists, G20 protesters, princes or utopian conservationists. There needs to be a visionary plan that spells out where we want to be, and in which a series of feasible and justifiable actions is delivered by the state which can then be backed by mainstream opinion. Otherwise our civilisation will go the same way as that of Easter Island.


Read more!

Consumption dwarfs population as main environmental threat

A small portion of the world's people use up most of the earth's resources and produce most of its greenhouse gas emissions, writes Fred Pearce.
From Yale Environment 360, part of Guardian Environment Network
guardian.co.uk 15 Apr 09;

It's the great taboo, I hear many environmentalists say. Population growth is the driving force behind our wrecking of the planet, but we are afraid to discuss it.

It sounds like a no-brainer. More people must inevitably be bad for the environment, taking more resources and causing more pollution, driving the planet ever farther beyond its carrying capacity. But hold on. This is a terribly convenient argument — "over-consumers" in rich countries can blame "over-breeders" in distant lands for the state of the planet. But what are the facts?

The world's population quadrupled to six billion people during the 20th century. It is still rising and may reach 9 billion by 2050. Yet for at least the past century, rising per-capita incomes have outstripped the rising head count several times over. And while incomes don't translate precisely into increased resource use and pollution, the correlation is distressingly strong.

Moreover, most of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long since given up adding substantial numbers to their population.

By almost any measure, a small proportion of the world's people take the majority of the world's resources and produce the majority of its pollution. Take carbon dioxide emissions — a measure of our impact on climate but also a surrogate for fossil fuel consumption. Stephen Pacala, director of the Princeton Environment Institute, calculates that the world's richest half-billion people — that's about 7 percent of the global population — are responsible for 50 percent of the world's carbon dioxide emissions. Meanwhile the poorest 50 percent are responsible for just 7 percent of emissions.

Although overconsumption has a profound effect on greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of our high standard of living extend beyond turning up the temperature of the planet. For a wider perspective of humanity's effects on the planet's life support systems, the best available measure is the "ecological footprint," which estimates the area of land required to provide each of us with food, clothing, and other resources, as well as to soak up our pollution. This analysis has its methodological problems, but its comparisons between nations are firm enough to be useful.

They show that sustaining the lifestyle of the average American takes 9.5 hectares, while Australians and Canadians require 7.8 and 7.1 hectares respectively; Britons, 5.3 hectares; Germans, 4.2; and the Japanese, 4.9. The world average is 2.7 hectares. China is still below that figure at 2.1, while India and most of Africa (where the majority of future world population growth will take place) are at or below 1.0.

The United States always gets singled out. But for good reason: It is the world's largest consumer. Americans take the greatest share of most of the world's major commodities: corn, coffee, copper, lead, zinc, aluminum, rubber, oil seeds, oil, and natural gas. For many others, Americans are the largest per-capita consumers. In "super-size-me" land, Americans gobble up more than 120 kilograms of meat a year per person, compared to just 6 kilos in India, for instance.

I do not deny that fast-rising populations can create serious local environmental crises through overgrazing, destructive farming and fishing, and deforestation. My argument here is that viewed at the global scale, it is overconsumption that has been driving humanity's impacts on the planet's vital life-support systems during at least the past century. But what of the future?

We cannot be sure how the global economic downturn will play out. But let us assume that Jeffrey Sachs, in his book Common Wealth, is right to predict a 600 percent increase in global economic output by 2050. Most projections put world population then at no more than 40 percent above today's level, so its contribution to future growth in economic activity will be small.

Of course, economic activity is not the same as ecological impact. So let's go back to carbon dioxide emissions. Virtually all of the extra 2 billion or so people expected on this planet in the coming 40 years will be in the poor half of the world. They will raise the population of the poor world from approaching 3.5 billion to about 5.5 billion, making them the poor two-thirds.

Sounds nasty, but based on Pacala's calculations — and if we assume for the purposes of the argument that per-capita emissions in every country stay roughly the same as today — those extra two billion people would raise the share of emissions contributed by the poor world from 7 percent to 11 percent.

Look at it another way. Just five countries are likely to produce most of the world's population growth in the coming decades: India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Ethiopia. The carbon emissions of one American today are equivalent to those of around four Chinese, 20 Indians, 30 Pakistanis, 40 Nigerians, or 250 Ethiopians.

Even if we could today achieve zero population growth, that would barely touch the climate problem — where we need to cut emissions by 50 to 80 percent by mid-century. Given existing income inequalities, it is inescapable that overconsumption by the rich few is the key problem, rather than overpopulation of the poor many.

But, you ask, what about future generations? All those big families in Africa begetting yet-bigger families. They may not consume much today, but they soon will.

Well, first let's be clear about the scale of the difference involved. A woman in rural Ethiopia can have ten children and her family will still do less damage, and consume fewer resources, than the family of the average soccer mom in Minnesota or Munich. In the unlikely event that her ten children live to adulthood and have ten children of their own, the entire clan of more than a hundred will still be emitting less carbon dioxide than you or I.

And second, it won't happen. Wherever most kids survive to adulthood, women stop having so many. That is the main reason why the number of children born to an average woman around the world has been in decline for half a century now. After peaking at between 5 and 6 per woman, it is now down to 2.6.

This is getting close to the "replacement fertility level" which, after allowing for a natural excess of boys born and women who don't reach adulthood, is about 2.3. The UN expects global fertility to fall to 1.85 children per woman by mid-century. While a demographic "bulge" of women of child-bearing age keeps the world's population rising for now, continuing declines in fertility will cause the world's population to stabilize by mid-century and then probably to begin falling.

Far from ballooning, each generation will be smaller than the last. So the ecological footprint of future generations could diminish. That means we can have a shot at estimating the long-term impact of children from different countries down the generations.

The best analysis of this phenomenon I have seen is by Paul Murtaugh, a statistician at Oregon State University. He recently calculated the climatic "intergenerational legacy" of today's children. He assumed current per-capita emissions and UN fertility projections. He found that an extra child in the United States today will, down the generations, produce an eventual carbon footprint seven times that of an extra Chinese child, 46 times that of a Pakistan child, 55 times that of an Indian child, and 86 times that of a Nigerian child.

Of course those assumptions may not pan out. I have some confidence in the population projections, but per-capita emissions of carbon dioxide will likely rise in poor countries for some time yet, even in optimistic scenarios. But that is an issue of consumption, not population.

In any event, it strikes me as the height of hubris to downgrade the culpability of the rich world's environmental footprint because generations of poor people not yet born might one day get to be as rich and destructive as us. Overpopulation is not driving environmental destruction at the global level; overconsumption is. Every time we talk about too many babies in Africa or India, we are denying that simple fact.

At root this is an ethical issue. Back in 1974, the famous environmental scientist Garret Hardin proposed something he called "lifeboat ethics". In the modern, resource-constrained world, he said, "each rich nation can be seen as a lifeboat full of comparatively rich people. In the ocean outside each lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in." But there were, he said, not enough places to go around. If any were let on board, there would be chaos and all would drown. The people in the lifeboat had a duty to their species to be selfish – to keep the poor out.

Hardin's metaphor had a certain ruthless logic. What he omitted to mention was that each of the people in the lifeboat was occupying ten places, whereas the people in the water only wanted one each. I think that changes the argument somewhat.


Read more!

To breed or not to breed

Attenborough is probably right about population growth. But, as so often, we'll deal with it later
Zoe Williams, The Guardian 15 Apr 09;

David Attenborough has assumed his position as a patron of the Optimum Population Trust with some strict remarks about population growth. "There are three times as many people in the world as when I started making television programmes only a mere 56 years ago," he said. "It is frightening. We can't go on as we have been. We are seeing the consequences in terms of ecology, atmospheric pollution and in terms of the space and food production."

Like so many areas of green debate, this is an interesting question whose terms and parameters depend on the context in which it is discussed. In a conversation about the environment, it is taken as a self-evident truth that population has to slow.

James Lovelock has been saying it for years. Jonathon Porritt made a brilliant case for family planning as a key weapon against global warming earlier this year, and the main dissenters were people who accused him of being a communist.

And yet, all debate about population policy outside an environmental context centres on very traditional concerns about what happens when the birthrate is low: dependency ratios scupper the welfare system; pensions have crises; longevity can't be paid for. When the UN publishes on the subject, it is with a worried eye on Italy and Japan, with their very low population growth and looming welfare disasters. When the EU published projections for 2050, in September last year, it was predicting rather sunnily that the UK would be in a good position thanks to its high immigration. This breezy notion brooked no caveat that the climate might have changed greatly by 2050, and we will possibly not be offering even the lukewarm welcome to migrants in the UK that we do today.

The government hasn't so far revised its most recent statement, in July 2006, when Tony Blair told a Commons liaison committee that the government had no policy on population. This isn't to say thinktanks aren't working on it - but again, priorities are traditional: how do we keep up replacement levels of fertility? It is never asked, at a policy level, how we should keep population down.

So the mainstream - thoughtful people, researchers, philosophers, academics, not just politicians - seems to be holding two warring views at once. In a conversation or policy document about long-term welfare and immigration, we absolutely have to breed more; in a conversation about climate change and diminishing resources, we absolutely have to stop breeding.

We sustain these points of view with a plucky, Orphan Annie, totally strange reliance on the wisdom of the future: right now, we can continue to worry about breeding in the traditional way. And at some unspecified time in the future, priorities will change in a clear, pressing, yet manageable fashion. And that generation will have time to reverse the juggernaut that is population growth and send it off in the "right direction".

The upshot of this cognitive dissonance is that we can all understand the issues at stake perfectly well - none of it is terrifically complicated - but we cannot apply them on a personal level. To think pragmatically about any of this would mean we'd have to desist from fannying about and decide between Stop and Go.

The smart money, along with Attenborough, is almost certainly on Stop. Stop the population growth, and worry about the welfare crisis like we worry about every other financial crisis, ie when it's too late to do anything about it. But, like a lovely new lawn, it's a long-way from growing in, this green orthodoxy. At the moment, when people claim to be limiting their families to two for environmental reasons, I just think: "Yeah, you and me both, chum. Environmental reasons like: 'I only have two hands. And I want to watch telly.'"


Read more!

UK biofuels target creating more emissions, environmentalists claim

The government's scheme to introduce biofuels to cut CO2 on roads has actually increased carbon emissions through deforestation, study finds
Alok Jha, guardian.co.uk 15 Apr 09;

The government's scheme to introduce biofuels as a way to cut carbon emissions from road transport has led to extra emissions equivalent to putting 500,000 more cars on UK roads, according to environmentalists.

A new study shows that producing the amount of biofuels required to meet the government's targets in the past year could have inadvertently doubled the overall emissions of CO2 compared with the standard fossil fuels they have replaced. The extra emissions come from forest destruction tied indirectly to growing energy crops.

Biofuels are, in theory, carbon neutral because they only release the carbon dioxide absorbed from the atmosphere by a plant as it grows. But many recent studies have suggested that the indirect effects of producing biofuels can have a negative overall impact.

In several parts of the world, for example, growing biofuel crops such as soy competes for land with food crops, which are then often displaced on to land that has been cleared of forests. A new analysis, carried out for Friends of the Earth (FoE) by environmental consultants Scott Wilson, has estimated the amount of CO2 emitted as a result of this deforestation.

The researchers calculated that the overall carbon cost of clearing forests for biofuels was equivalent to an extra 1.3m tonnes of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere since April last year. That was when the government's Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) was introduced, which mandated fuel suppliers to include at least 2.5% biofuel in their petrol or diesel. Today that requirement rises to 3.3%.

"Until ministers can do their sums properly and can prove that biofuels are actually saving emissions, they do need to put them on hold," said Nick Davies, a biofuels campaigner at FoE.

Soy crops from the US, Argentina and Brazil are used in the most common UK biodiesels and all contribute to the deforestation problem. The FoE study assumed that 10% of the food crops displaced by biofuels would be pushed on to land created by clearing forests.

The researchers allocated this additional land to various agricultural uses and calculated the resulting amount of extra emissions using established models. For example, clearing one hectare of the Amazonian rainforest can release up to 1,000 tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, according to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The FoE's concerns were also raised in a government-sponsored review of biofuels published by Ed Gallagher last year. In the study, he recommended that the introduction of biofuels to the UK should be slowed until more effective controls were in place to prevent the inadvertent rise in greenhouse gas emissions caused if, for example, forests are cleared to make way for biofuel production.

Gallagher's report said that if these displacements are left unchecked, current targets for biofuel production could cause a global rise in greenhouse gas emissions and an increase in poverty in the poorest countries by 2020.

His main recommendation, accepted by the government at the time, was to slow down the introduction of the RTFO so that, starting from a base of 2.5% biofuel mixed into petrol and diesel in 2008-09, manufacturers had to increase the proportion by only 0.5% per year. He further added that anything beyond 5% biofuel after 2013-14 should only be agreed by governments if the fuels are demonstrated as sustainable, including avoiding indirect effects such as change in land use.

"Gallagher has slowed down the rate of increase but we don't think that's an adequate response," said Davies. "He raised some serious concerns and, at the moment, they're not being addressed."

A spokeswoman for the Department for Transport acknowledged that the evidence around biofuels was still evolving. "What is not in dispute is the need to develop new, cleaner fuels and break our dependence on oil if we are to tackle climate change," she said.

"Some biofuels have the potential to help us achieve this. So whilst there is no case for pushing forward indiscriminately on those that may do more harm than good, it would be foolish to ignore any potential they do have.

"We have always been clear that biofuels can only make a useful contribution to mitigating climate change if they are sustainably produced. That is why we commissioned an independent review and following its recommendation we agreed to continue to proceed but to do so more cautiously until we are clearer about their wider effects on the environment.

"We believe this strikes a balanced approach based on the best possible science and evidence as it currently stands."

Davies said that, instead of focusing on ramping up biofuels, the government should encourage more proven methods to reduce transport emissions. "They should be investing in first-class public transport systems and smarter cars that actually save on fuel, and more provision for cyclists and pedestrians.

"They are proven to work and don't have the negative side-effects in terms of raising food prices and chopping down the rainforest. We need to put the biofuels obligation on hold until they can show biofuels are actually saving emissions."


Read more!

The emissions reductions gospel is failing – we need something more

NGOs who oppose geo-engineering are running the risk of climatic catastrophe
Peter Read, guardian.co.uk 15 Apr 09;

Interviewed last week, John Holdren, President Obama's chief scientific adviser, said that drastic measures should not be "off the table" in discussions on how best to tackle climate change and that geo-engineering could not be ruled out. Making clear these were his personal views, he said: "It's got to be looked at. We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table."

He's right. We don't have that luxury – not only because the Kyoto protocol's first phase, running to 2012, is manifestly failing, but because the emissions reduction approach that it embodies cannot succeed.

It is manifestly failing because emissions are going ahead faster than even the worst scenarios considered by the IPCC, which provides scientific assessments to the UN Climate Convention and because many rich countries are on course to fall short of their emissions reductions commitments.

Research since the IPCC's last assessment reveals that the threat of climatic disaster is more serious than previously supposed. Several threats exist but the most imminent is probably a collapse of substantial areas of land-based ice into the oceans, as studies of ancient climates show happened in previous warming phases. This seems likely to be due to the lubrication of Greenland's ice floes by water that accumulates year after year, with warmer summers melting the surface and rivers of melt-water flowing down crevasses to the bedrock, making the underside of the ice increasingly mushy and prone to slip down towards the ocean. Reports from Greenland, of increased frequency of "ice-quakes", suggest that areas of the ice cover have slipped and bumped into other areas that are still stuck. When the last bit gives way there may be an unstoppable rush of ice into the ocean, as with ancient warming phases, raising ocean levels by several metres over a few decades.

"Probably"? "Likely"? "Suggest"? "Maybe"? Yes, all is uncertain and the models are inadequate. But you don't drive full-speed down a twisty lane on a foggy winter's night hoping there's no ice round the next bend. A measure of the threat is the accumulation of warmth from successive summers, which is making the glaciers' undersides increasingly mushy. Even a deeply implausible reduction of emissions to zero in 25 years sees that measure treble over the next half-century with no end in sight.

So something more than emissions reductions is needed. We must take CO2 out of the atmosphere or prevent some of the sun's radiation from reaching the surface. But geo-engineering is usually thought of as shielding the earth from solar radiation by whitening clouds and by putting reflectors in space between earth and sun. The latter seems difficult to reverse and perhaps a very last resort. But whitening clouds can be quickly halted. It involves putting sulphur aerosols into the clouds in amounts that are trivial compared with the effects of either volcanic eruptions or coal burning worldwide. Or injecting saltwater micro-particles into ocean clouds which, whitened, then rain slightly salty water back into the oceans.

Amazing though it may seem, these apparently hopeful options are opposed by NGOs that seem more willing to run the risk of climatic catastrophe than deviate from the emissions reductions gospel. Their concern seems to be that geo-engineering will result in relaxed pressure to reduce emissions, which neglects the reality that more ambitious commitments will obviously go with increased capability to mitigate. They even oppose research, unlike Holdren's "it's got to be looked at".

The British researcher Tim Lenton uses the term geo-engineering to mean any way of cooling the earth that is not emissions reductions (even growing trees, which is included under the Kyoto protocol). His definition puts me – somewhat to my surprise – among the ranks of geo-engineers, as I have long advocated widespread tree-planting programmes, such as those initiated by the Nobel Peace laureate Wangari Muta Maathai, founder of the Green Belt Movement, which has planted more than 30m trees across Kenya.

Growing trees is one way of stocking carbon out of the linked ocean-atmosphere system. Others advocate fuelling power stations with energy crops and capturing CO2 from flue gases and piping them into deep saline aquifers. A third option is biochar, current darling of the policy community, which promises not only to store carbon in the soil but to provide rural energy supplies and raise soil productivity as the basis for sustainable rural development. Yet even this win-win-win prospect is rejected by 129 NGOs who have declared "Biochar – a new big threat to people land and ecosystems". I would rather listen to the 1,500 poor subsistence farmers in Kumba, south-west Cameroon, who are already experiencing its benefits and who deny rich-country NGO claims that civil society in the developing world rejects biochar.

• Peter Read is an honorary research fellow at the Centre for Energy Research, Massey University, New Zealand


Read more!