Best of our wild blogs: 4 Aug 08


Changi's crabby clowns
humorous hermits on the budak blog

20 Suggestions for Sustainable Singapore
on the AsiaIsGreen blog

TeamSeagrass at Semakau
monitoring our meadows on the teamseagrass blog with special finds and special corals on the wildfilm blog.

Seagrass species of Singapore
more about our seagrasses on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

Semakau video clips
flathead gone in a flash and seagrass lagoon: a nursery on the sgbeachbum blog

Semakau guides at leisure on Semakau
on the manta blog and tidechaser blog and discovery blog

Pasir Ris mangrove boardwalk
on the Seen This Scene That blog

Javan Mynas anting in a tree
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Paper Bags or Plastic Bags?
Everything You Need to Know on The Green Guy blog


Read more!

Save charm and greenery of Seletar

Letter from Sandra Alison Jayandran (Mdm), Straits Times Forum 4 Aug 08;

I REFER to last Thursday's article, 'Lights out? Not for quaint lamp posts in Seletar', and applaud the JTC Corporation for saving some of the character of the old Seletar airbase. However, saving these 30 lamp posts is only scratching the surface of what can be done.

I feel more can be done to retain the area's charm and greenery. On a recent drive there, I was horrified to see the amount of change already happening, even though the roadworks will not start until next year.

The area I refer to is the plot of land that sits just in front of the temporary offices of the aerospace companies. A lot of greenery has been removed, making the area sterile and lifeless. Is this what we want for this gem of a place that has been untouched by construction for at least 50 years? I urge JTC to try and save as many trees as possible, and confine road construction to the area nearer the airport and leave as much as possible alone.

In the same article, it was mentioned that 204 old black- and-white houses will be saved, for which I am grateful. However, I can't help but feel that, of the remaining 174, more can be saved if creative planning is employed. Can JTC try to keep more of them for use?

I also wish to highlight the other old buildings in the airbase which are not black-and- white houses, that is, the administrative military buildings which have been abandoned for some time. Their architecture is rather unique and worth saving. I hope JTC is looking into keeping these and integrating them with the rest of the planned area.

Please, do as much as possible to save this area. It will be a real shame if, years down the road, we regret this rash act of demolition. It will be too late by then.

Links

Postcards from Seletar
a web resource by residents of Seletar


Read more!

Farm business in chikungunya-hit Kranji Way not affected significantly

Ng Lian Cheong/Wong Siew Ying, Channel NewsAsia 3 Aug 08;

SINGAPORE: The spectre of recent chikungunya infections at Kranji Way does not seem to have cast a shroud over businesses there.

Three chikungunya cases involving two foreign workers and a delivery driver were reported in the area on Saturday.

One farm operator told Channel NewsAsia the number of visitors plunged 50 per cent on Sunday compared to the last weekend.

Teo Khai Seng of Khai Seng Trading & Fish Farm said: "Crowd has thinned by 50 per cent."

But five other farms there said there has been no significant impact on business.

Customers were seen going into the farms.

"The fish here is fresher and cheaper by 30 per cent," said a customer.

"I don't think about it (chikungunya), I believe we are fortunate," said another.

The farm operators said they will continue to work with the authorities to eliminate mosquito-breeding sites.

Mr Teo said: "We make sure there's no stagnant water, the drainage here is also good."

Stall owner Loo Kian Huat said: "We put fishes in the water to get rid of mosquitoes."

The authorities can only declare the chikungunya threat has passed when no new cases are reported in the area in the next 24 days.

- CNA/ir


Read more!

Chikungunya 'not taken root here yet'

Viruses from local infections from three different strains so incidents aren't linked
Lee Hui Chieh, Straits Times 4 Aug 08;

THE number of people infected by chikungunya here continues to climb but, for now, the virus causing the mosquito-borne disease has probably not gained a foothold in Singapore.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) said its tests showed that the viruses that caused the first three incidents of local infection - in Little India, Teachers' Estate off Upper Thomson Road, and Farrer Road - belonged to different strains.

This means that the three incidents were not linked, said Dr Ng Lee Ching, head of the NEA's Environmental Health Institute, which conducted the tests.

Each time, the infection had probably been sparked by someone getting infected overseas bringing one particular strain of the virus here, she added.

And each time, the infection was stamped out so that strain did not spread further.

The institute's scientists established that the first three incidents had occurred separately by mapping the genetic code, or DNA, of the viruses in patients' blood samples. They found that the viruses were related to the one that caused huge outbreaks in islands in the Indian Ocean in 2006, where deaths were reported. But each was of a distinctly different strain.

It was unlikely that the second and third strains had mutated from the first in such a short time, Dr Ng said.

Public health officers have gone all out to track patients and destroy mosquito breeding sites. This is to ensure that chikungunya does not become as common here as dengue.

Having both similar diseases entrenched here will complicate diagnosis, treatment and containment.

Singapore is at risk as it hosts many travellers, the virus-transmitting Aedes mosquito flourishes here, and people here have no immunity against chikungunya.

It was spread for the first time in Singapore, when 13 people living or working in Little India contracted it in January.

In June, a retiree and her maid living in Teachers' Estate, and an expatriate housewife living in Farrer Road were infected.

Joining the list of local cases last month: A housewife living in Jalan Jelita off Holland Road, two foreign workers working and living in a site at Kranji Way, and a local delivery driver who went there.

Another 31 people here caught the disease while abroad this year; before that, 13 others had been infected overseas over 2006 to 2007.

The rise in the number of chikungunya cases here, both local and imported, mirrors a global trend, Dr Ng said.

Recently, outbreaks have been reported more often in Malaysia, Indonesia and India, and in previously chikungunya-free areas such as Italy.

The reasons for the upswing in infections are not known. But scientists believe that a contributory factor is the emergence of a certain strain of the chikungunya virus, which has mutated such that it can be carried by another sub-species of the Aedes mosquito - the Aedes albopictus.

Previously, the virus' main vehicle of infection was the Aedes aegypti, which is also behind most dengue cases.

The institute's scientists have yet to study virus samples

from this month's local cases but will be doing so.

Appealing to the public to help eliminate mosquitoes and their breeding sites, Dr Ng said: 'Chikungunya is not endemic here yet, so we still have a chance to keep it out. It is easier to do that than to try to get rid of it when it is established.'


Read more!

Haze returns to region as Sumatra's illegal fires rage

Haze returns to region as Sumatra's illegal fires rage
Despite fire-fighting efforts, visibility just 2km in Riau; air over Malaysia worsens
Teo Cheng Wee , Salim Osman, Straits Times 4 Aug 08;

HAZE shrouded parts of the region yesterday after fires scorched forest and plantation land in Sumatra over the weekend, enveloping the Riau capital of Pekanbaru and parts of Peninsular Malaysia.

The authorities have squarely blamed Indonesian farmers and plantation workers, who are clearing the land using slash-and-burn methods that have been banned since 1999.

The number of hot spots in Sumatra surged from 351 to 531 on Saturday, before dipping to 360 yesterday, according to the Indonesian Meteorology and Geophysics Agency (BMG). This was confirmed by Singapore's National Environment Agency.

BMG analyst Selamat Triyadi told The Straits Times that Riau alone accounted for some 136 hot spots, while Pelalawan and Rokan Hulu had 23 and 22 hot spots respectively.
Haze returns to region as Sumatra's illegal fires rage
He said that the dramatic fall in the number of hot spots could have been partly the result of efforts by the authorities to put out the fires.

But environmentalist Zulfahmi of the Save The Riau Forest Movement cautioned that the drop could be temporary, as more hot spots could appear in the dry season.

Visibility was reduced to just 2km in the Riau capital yesterday. Mr Selamat said that visibility was worse in the early morning and late afternoon.

In Malaysia, the bad air has been exacerbated by a forest fire in Selangor which has been burning since Friday.

About 70 firemen have been fighting to put out the fire, which is burning in a 40ha area that forms part of the Kuala Langat Forest Reserve.

Although the blaze is located near the Kuala Lumpur International Airport, an airport spokesman said that it had not affected operations yet.

Barely a week ago, 90 per cent of Malaysia had an Air Pollutant Index (API) reading in the 'good' range of 0 to 50. The other 10 per cent was in the 'moderate' 51-100 range.

By Saturday, 66 per cent of the country was in the moderate range, with Port Klang registering an 'unhealthy' API reading of 104.

Port Klang's reading fell to 93 yesterday but remains the highest in the country, while 64 per cent of Malaysia was in the moderate range. Kuala Lumpur's reading was 65.

Ms Rosnani Ibrahim, director-general of the environmental department, told AFP she was 'concerned' about the increasing number of hot spots during the annual dry season from June to September.

Singapore has been spared so far, thanks to favourable wind directions, as a result of which smoke has been blown away from its shores.

Its air quality was 30 on the Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) yesterday, which is still in the healthy range.

But forecasted variable winds could just as easily bring back the haze.

Haze has been an annual problem for the region since 1997, when the PSI level in Singapore hit a record high of 226, which is considered very unhealthy.

The problem prompted countries affected by the haze, including Singapore, to set up a task force to combat the problem.chengwee@sph.com.sg

salim@sph.com.sg

ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY TANIA TAN IN SINGAPORE


Read more!

Indonesian forest fires spark haze fears in Malaysia

Yahoo News 3 Aug 08;

The growing number of forest fires in Indonesia's Sumatra island has triggered warning bells that hazy skies could return to neighbouring Malaysia, environmental officials said Sunday.

Forest fires from Indonesia caused by traditional farming methods have been blamed for the choking haze, which shrouds the region annually.

Malaysia was drafting plans to ensure no open-burning activities were carried out during the dry season, although there were no reports of haze, said Rosnani Ibrahim, director-general of the environmental department.

"There is no indicator that we are going to have it yet, but we are concerned with the increasing number of hotspots," or illegal fires, Rosnani told AFP.

"We are doing our best to avoid any open burning here in the country."

The number of hotspots in Sumatra rose from 351 to 531 within 24 hours on Saturday, according to meteorological department forecasters.

Rosnani said the annual dry season from June until the end of September is "usually when the haze sets it," but it also depended on the strength and direction of the wind.

The air pollutant index (API) on Sunday recorded a reading of 93 in Port Klang, which faces Sumatra, slightly better than the level of 104 on Saturday evening.

An API reading of between 101 to 200 is considered unhealthy.

Most areas in the country have recorded moderate levels, the department said.

Jakarta has said it was confident of reducing the number of illegal fires this year.


Read more!

China and India sift fiction from fact in food myths

Deep K Datta-Ray, Straits Times 4 Aug 08;

FROM the ashes of the failed World Trade Organisation (WTO) talks has risen a new arena for Sino-Indian cooperation.

For the second time in recent history - the first was over the issue of global warming - India and China, which once fought a brief war against each other, have defied the West and forged a common stance on a vital issue: food.

They refused to accept a series of food myths disseminated by industrial-scale Western agri-businesses intent on undercutting the world's poorest farmers.

India scuppered their plans during the talks and inadvertently became the target of Western, especially American, fury. In the ensuing spate of emotional recriminations China matched India's stand and the official Chinese news agency Xinhua lambasted the 'selfishness and short-sighted behaviour' of wealthy nations.

At the centre of the collapse were two hypocrisies. First, it is not just the poor who protect their markets. The rich do so as well. Africa continues to demand that US subsidies to its cotton farmers be removed but this was not even discussed.

Second, while maintaining their own subsidies, Western countries demand that the global south drop trade barriers on food - especially cereal - products.

But doing so would mean that a billion subsistence farmers who cultivate, by hand, tiny plots and sell locally would have to compete with mechanised, subsidised and global Western companies.

The effects of Western agri- businesses exporting cereals to the global south would be catastrophic. Industrially produced grain would undercut subsistence farmers. Poor consumers would buy cheaper Western grain. It would put subsistence farmers out of business and destroy their only source of livelihood.

As an incensed Kamal Nath, India's lead negotiator, said: 'The most important thing was livelihood security, the vulnerability of poor farmers, which could not be traded off against the commercial interests of the developed countries.'

Another unacknowledged benefit of the south's barriers is that they help protect the environment. The West wants the global south to lower its food barriers because there are large profits to be made. But making them would entail shipping vast amounts of grain. This would translate into a huge increase in sea-borne traffic and pollution.

Meanwhile, free traders suggest that it is commonsensical for cheap, subsidised and mechanised Western grain to be shipped around the world as an antidote to rising food prices. After all, the West undercutting subsistence farmers would subsidise the world, they claim.

The idea rests on another myth - that food price rises are due to newly prosperous Asia's insatiable appetite for meat. It has supposedly led to an explosion in livestock farming and a corresponding increase in demand for feed which ultimately drives up grain prices.

In fact, India's demand for wheat is growing by just 2 per cent a year and China will require the same amount of wheat next year as it did three years ago.

Rising food prices have little to do with Sino-Indian prosperity. The European Commission (EC) reported in April that the price of food products was increasing disproportionately to the rise in the price of the commodities used to manufacture them. Bread, for example, costs 10 per cent more now though the price of wheat increased by just 3 per cent.

The EC says that though energy, transport and labour costs have risen, 'it is possible that somewhere along the food chain someone may be doing well out of this. We are not drawing conclusions; we are just presenting facts'.

The EC's careful wording avoids assigning blame for what its own data suggests is profiteering. That itself might indicate the power of the profiteers.

However, it is self-evident that the target of the EU's report are the agri-businesses which organise the West's food supply and now want to extend their control to the rest of the world.

Combined efforts by India and China can stop it. The world's food supply is too important to be controlled by the producers, processors and distributors who make up the main players of Western agri-business.

The writer, an analyst of Indian affairs, is a doctoral candidate at the University of Sussex.


Read more!

Vietnam illegal wildlife trade eats away at biodiversity: reports

Frank Zeller Yahoo News 3 Aug 08;

Vietnam's appetite for illegal wildlife meat and demand for traditional medicine is devastating animal and plant species within and beyond its borders, experts warn in two new reports.

Vietnam has been one of Southeast Asia's most biodiverse countries, but some species may be lost before they are known to science due to an illegal global trade believed to be trailing only drugs and gunrunning.

Two new reports spell out that, despite Vietnam's international commitments to combat the trade, the smuggling of tigers, monkeys, snakes, pangolins and other animals to and through Vietnam is booming.

"Vietnam's illegal trade in wildlife continues unabated and affects neighbouring countries," wrote Nguyen Van Song of the Hanoi Agricultural University in the Journal of Environment and Development.

"Wildlife in Vietnam has become very scarce."

The study estimated that up to 4,000 tonnes of live animals or meat, skins, ground bones and other illegal products are trafficked into and out of Vietnam per year, generating more than 67 million dollars in revenues.

Species are mostly sourced from Vietnam's national parks and neighbouring Laos and Cambodia, to be consumed in Vietnam, China, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, according to the study based on hundreds of interviews.

The largest volume of illegal wildlife goods is smuggled across the Vietnam-China border, with an estimated 2,500 to 3,500 kilogrammes (5,500 to 7,700 pounds) flowing daily through the two major border gates, it said.

There have been high-profile crackdowns. In a case last week, Vietnamese police seized more than two tonnes of live snakes and 770 kilogrammes of tortoises from Laos en route to China.

But the report estimated that the total value of confiscated wildlife accounts for only three percent of the illegal trade, and that authorities are at a disadvantage when a forest ranger polices an average of 1,400 hectares (3,500 acres) of forest at a monthly wage of about 50 dollars.

Smugglers connected to "influential people" -- shorthand for gangsters -- bribe or threaten officials and hide their contraband in trucks, ambulances, wedding and funeral cars and prison vans, the report said.

The capital Hanoi is Vietnam's largest market for illegal wildlife meat, with revenues of over 12,000 dollars a day, the report said.

"Hanoi is the cultural and political centre of Vietnam where wildlife protection and conservation policies are issued and implemented," said the report.

"This suggests that the gap between policies and implementation of wildlife protection is still big."

The most popular species served in Hanoi were snakes, palm civets, monitor lizards, porcupines, leopards, pangolins, monkeys, forest pigs, hardshell turtles, soft-shell turtles, civets, boas and birds.

The other market fuelling the trade is traditional Vietnamese and Chinese medicine, said a report by the wildlife monitoring network TRAFFIC.

Surveys found that "many high-profile animals of global conservation concern (such as tigers, bears or rhinos) can still be bought on the market, provided prior notice is given and that the price negotiated is high enough."

Informants had told TRAFFIC that live tiger cubs, tiger skeletons, raw materials and processed medicinal products were brought from Cambodia, Laos and as far as Malaysia to supply the Vietnamese market.

Traders in Ninh Hiep commune near Hanoi had offered to supply investigators with "any type of medicinal animal if ordered sufficiently in advance" -- including a frozen tiger, rhino horn and wild bear gall bladder.

The shop-owners who offered the illicit goods, the TRAFFIC report found, were "well organised, each claiming that they were shielded from investigations through protection by enforcement personnel."


Read more!

Stinging Tentacles Offer Hint of Oceans’ Decline

Elisabeth Rosenthal, New York Times 3 Aug 08;

BARCELONA, Spain — Blue patrol boats crisscross the swimming areas of beaches here with their huge nets skimming the water’s surface. The yellow flags that urge caution and the red flags that prohibit swimming because of risky currents are sometimes topped now with blue ones warning of a new danger: swarms of jellyfish.

In a period of hours during a day a couple of weeks ago, 300 people on Barcelona’s bustling beaches were treated for stings, and 11 were taken to hospitals.

From Spain to New York, to Australia, Japan and Hawaii, jellyfish are becoming more numerous and more widespread, and they are showing up in places where they have rarely been seen before, scientists say. The faceless marauders are stinging children blithely bathing on summer vacations, forcing beaches to close and clogging fishing nets.

But while jellyfish invasions are a nuisance to tourists and a hardship to fishermen, for scientists they are a source of more profound alarm, a signal of the declining health of the world’s oceans.

“These jellyfish near shore are a message the sea is sending us saying, ‘Look how badly you are treating me,’ ” said Dr. Josep-María Gili, a leading jellyfish expert, who has studied them at the Institute of Marine Sciences of the Spanish National Research Council in Barcelona for more than 20 years.

The explosion of jellyfish populations, scientists say, reflects a combination of severe overfishing of natural predators, like tuna, sharks and swordfish; rising sea temperatures caused in part by global warming; and pollution that has depleted oxygen levels in coastal shallows.

These problems are pronounced in the Mediterranean, a sea bounded by more than a dozen countries that rely on it for business and pleasure. Left unchecked in the Mediterranean and elsewhere, these problems could make the swarms of jellyfish menacing coastlines a grim vision of seas to come.

“The problem on the beach is a social problem,” said Dr. Gili, who talks with admiration of the “beauty” of the globular jellyfish. “We need to take care of it for our tourism industry. But the big problem is not on the beach. It’s what’s happening in the seas.”

Jellyfish, relatives of the sea anemone and coral that for the most part are relatively harmless, in fact are the cockroaches of the open waters, the ultimate maritime survivors who thrive in damaged environments, and that is what they are doing.

Within the past year, there have been beach closings because of jellyfish swarms on the Côte d’Azur in France, the Great Barrier Reef of Australia, and at Waikiki and Virginia Beach in the United States.

In Australia, more than 30,000 people were treated for stings last year, double the number in 2005. The rare but deadly Irukandji jellyfish is expanding its range in Australia’s warming waters, marine scientists say.

While no good global database exists on jellyfish populations, the increasing reports from around the world have convinced scientists that the trend is real, serious and climate-related, although they caution that jellyfish populations in any one place undergo year-to-year variation.

“Human-caused stresses, including global warming and overfishing, are encouraging jellyfish surpluses in many tourist destinations and productive fisheries,” according to the National Science Foundation, which is issuing a report on the phenomenon this fall and lists as problem areas Australia, the Gulf of Mexico, Hawaii, the Black Sea, Namibia, Britain, the Mediterranean, the Sea of Japan and the Yangtze estuary.

In Barcelona, one of Spain’s most vibrant tourist destinations, city officials and the Catalan Water Agency have started fighting back, trying desperately to ensure that it is safe for swimmers to go back in the water.

Each morning, with the help of Dr. Gili’s team, boats monitor offshore jellyfish swarms, winds and currents to see if beaches are threatened and if closings are needed. They also check if jellyfish collection in the waters near the beaches is needed. Nearly 100 boats stand ready to help in an emergency, said Xavier Duran of the water agency. The constant squeal of Dr. Gili’s cellphone reflected his de facto role as Spain’s jellyfish control and command center. Calls came from all over.

Officials in Santander and the Basque country were concerned about frequent sightings this year on the Atlantic coast of the Portuguese man-of-war, a sometimes lethal warm-water species not previously seen regularly in those regions.

Farther south, a fishing boat from the Murcia region called to report an off-shore swarm of Pelagia noctiluca — an iridescent purplish jellyfish that issues a nasty sting — more than a mile long. A chef, presumably trying to find some advantage in the declining oceans, wanted to know if the local species were safe to eat if cooked. Much is unknown about the jellyfish, and Dr. Gili was unsure.

In previous decades there were jellyfish problems for only a couple of days every few years; now the threat of jellyfish is a daily headache for local officials and is featured on the evening news. “In the past few years the dynamic has changed completely — the temperature is a little warmer,” Dr. Gili said.

Though the stuff of horror B- movies, jellyfish are hardly aggressors. They float haplessly with the currents. They discharge their venom automatically when they bump into something warm — a human body, for example — from poison-containing stingers on mantles, arms or long, threadlike tendrils, which can grow to be yards long.

Some, like the Portuguese man-of-war or the giant box jellyfish, can be deadly on contact. Pelagia noctiluca, common in the Mediterranean, delivers a painful sting producing a wound that lasts weeks, months or years, depending on the person and the amount of contact.

In the Mediterranean, overfishing of both large and small fish has left jellyfish with little competition for plankton, their food, and fewer predators. Unlike in Asia, where some jellyfish are eaten by people, here they have no economic or epicurean value.

The warmer seas and drier climate caused by global warming work to the jellyfish’s advantage, since nearly all jellyfish breed better and faster in warmer waters, according to Dr. Jennifer Purcell, a jellyfish expert at the Shannon Point Marine Center of Western Washington University.

Global warming has also reduced rainfall in temperate zones, researchers say, allowing the jellyfish to better approach the beaches. Rain runoff from land would normally slightly decrease the salinity of coastal waters, “creating a natural barrier that keeps the jellies from the coast,” Dr. Gili said.

Then there is pollution, which reduces oxygen levels and visibility in coastal waters. While other fish die in or avoid waters with low oxygen levels, many jellyfish can thrive in them. And while most fish have to see to catch their food, jellyfish, which filter food passively from the water, can dine in total darkness, according to Dr. Purcell’s research.

Residents in Barcelona have forged a prickly coexistence with their new neighbors.

Last month, Mirela Gómez, 8, ran out of the water crying with her first jellyfish sting, clutching a leg that had suddenly become painful and itchy. Her grandparents rushed her to a nearby Red Cross stand. “I’m a little afraid to go back in the water,” she said, displaying a row of angry red welts on her shin.

Francisco Antonio Padrós, a 77-year-old fisherman, swore mightily as he unloaded his catch one morning last weekend, pulling off dozens of jellyfish clinging to his nets and tossing them onto a dock. Removing a few shrimp, he said his nets were often “filled with more jellyfish than fish.”

By the end of the exercise his calloused hands were bright red and swollen to twice their normal size. “Right now I can’t tell if I have hands or not — they hurt, they’re numb, they itch,” he said.

Dr. Santiago Nogué, head of the toxicology unit at the largest hospital here, said that although 90 percent of stings healed in a week or two, many people’s still hurt and itched for months. He said he was now seeing 20 patients a year whose symptoms did not respond to any treatment at all, sometimes requiring surgery to remove the affected area.

The sea, however, has long been central to life in Barcelona, and that is unlikely to change. Recently when the beaches were closed, children on a breakwater collected jellyfish in a bucket. The next day, Antonio López, a diver, emerged from the water. “There are more every year — we saw hundreds offshore today,” he said. “You just have to learn how to handle the stings.”


Read more!

Artificial Reefs: Boon For Fisheries Sector

Tuan Sharifah Shahaini Tuan Dagang, Bernama 4 Aug 08;

KUANTAN, Aug 4 (Bernama) -- Since 30 years ago, the Malaysian fisheries authorities have conducted various research to find ways to boost the nation's fish supply.

Among these early initiatives was the artificial reefs project, the first of which was implemented in 1975.

WHAT IS A REEF?

A reef is basically a chain or range of rocks lying at or near the surface of the water, which act as a nursery for the fish fry, apart from beeing a breeding ground for various marine life.

Ever since a long time ago, fishermen have discovered that they could find an abundance of fish around shipwrecks and other underwater debris.

Since then, various materials have been used to create artificial reefs, ranging from the discarded tyres, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), wreckages of boats and concrete.

WHY CREATE ARTIFICIAL REEFS?

Realising the importance of reefs as ideal breeding grounds for marine life, Malaysia's fisheries authorities have embarked on a programme to boost the nation's fisheries sector by creating artificial reefs.

The first artificial reef was lowered into the waters off Pulau Telur near Yan, Kedah in 1975.

The artificial reef programme was later expanded to Pulau Ekor Tebu in the waters of Sarawak in June 1979 and later to Pulau Satang (December 1982) and Pulau Gaya, Sabah in October 1982.

Fisheries Department Director-General Datuk Junaidi Che Ayub, said that via the Ninth Malaysia Plan (9MP), the government has allocated some RM9.4 million for the development of artificial reefs as part of the efforts to boost the nation's marine resources.

CONCRETE REEFS

The allocation is to meet the government's objective to produce two million tonnes of fish a year.

This comprises the 500,000 tonnes contribution from the deep-sea sector, 600,000 tonnes from aquaculture and 900,000 tonnes from off shore activities.

Artificial reefs made of various materials have been used, the latest of which is concrete turned into various shape.

Most of these reefs are shaped either like tetrapods (three-legged) or cuboids (four-legged), depending on the ocean floors topography.

They make good breeding grounds and promulgate the growth of coral.

TOURISM ATTRACTIONS

Three months after the concrete structures were lowered to the sea bed, these artificial reefs would be suitable for activities like scuba diving, squid jigging and fishing.

"The fishermen earn additional income by conducting recreational fishing activities, like leasing out their boats and ferrying anglers," said Junaidi.

He also said studies conducted by the Fisheries Department revealed that the vicinity of the artificial reefs are rich in diversiy of fish species.

TRAWLER INTRUSIONS

Meanwhile, the Fisheries Department has allocated RM400,000 for the construction of concrete tetrapods to be used as artificial reefs for the waters off Kuantan and Pekan.

The move is to replace previous reefs which have been destroyed by the choppy seas and winds from the monsoon of the South China Sea as well as from illegal trawling activities.

Two years ago, the department had installed concrete reefs off the Cherating coast that turned out to be among the favourite fishing grounds for local fishermen while RM500,000 was spent on developing recreational reefs in the waters of Rompin.

Apart from playing the crucial role as fish breeding grounds, these artificial reefs also prevent the intrusions by trawler boats, including foreign-based vessels.

Junaidi said, "The department receives some 1,000 reports on trawler intrusions, nationwide".

There were also 30 reports on intrusions by foreign-based fishing trawlers in the first six months of this year, he said.

According to Junaidi, there were two reasons why the fisheries authorities had created the concrete reefs.

"First, the move is to boost the nation's fish resources, and secondly, to prevent intrusions by the trawler fishermen particularly during the monsoon season".

To this date, some 40 countries have subscribed to the development of the artificial reefs to enhance their marine resources apart from developing their off-shore recreational attractions.

-- BERNAMA


Read more!

Gill nets decimate reef fish

Fishers complain lack of enforcement responsible for depletion of 75% of stocks
Leanne Ta, The Honolulu Advertiser 3 Aug 08;

Seventy-five percent of Hawai'i's reef fish are depleted or in critical condition, and unregulated lay gill net fishing could be the primary culprit, local fishing enthusiasts say.

The state Department of Land and Natural Resources implemented rules regarding lay nets last year, but some who say they have witnessed frequent violations complain the rules are not being properly enforced.

Colin Takashima, who said he has been fishing on O'ahu's southern shores for more than 25 years, believes that illegal lay net fishing is responsible for Hawai'i's depleting reef fish stocks."Some guys go and lay a couple hundred yards of nets across the reefs — whole schools of fish can get caught in that before they have the chance to reproduce," said Takashima, a medical representative for an insurance company. "If an entire school of mature, reproducing fish are harvested by one setting of a lay net, how is it supposed to recover?"

The steep decline of reef fish populations in recent years has called attention to the damaging effects of lay-netting.

A recent National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration report showed that of 55 reef fish species studied in the main Hawaiian Islands, 42 percent were in critical condition and 33 percent were depleted.

The study compared fish populations around the main Hawaiian Islands with those around the relatively unfished Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, which was used as a baseline.

Populations of important native food fishes in the main Hawaiian Islands, such as moi, kumu, ulua and 'o'io, have declined 75 percent or more over the past century, according to the International Coral Reef Initiative, organizers of the International Year of the Reef.

Overfishing is one of the main causes behind the declining fish populations, said Alan Friedlander, one of the NOAA study's lead authors. Other factors contributing to a decline are growing human populations and coastal development, which have disrupted reef habitats, he said.

Friedlander said that irresponsible use of gill nets is an especially destructive fishing practice because the nets are "indiscriminate," meaning that all types of fish could get caught in them.

"Illegal gill-netting activity certainly contributes to overfishing," Friedlander said. "There probably are some sustainable uses of lay nets but there is a lot of abuse of the system."

The NOAA report calls for "additional restrictions on overly efficient gear types such as gill nets and SCUBA fishing, bag limits and larger area closures" in order to preserve fish populations.

John Randall, a Bishop Museum senior ichthyologist, said that unregulated lay net fishing is "definitely a problem."

"The existing rules are clearly not being effectively enforced," said Randall, who co-authored a 2006 study, "The Case Against Lay Gill Nets," which argued for a complete ban on gill nets in Hawai'i.

The nets not only contribute to overfishing, but also create marine debris and damage fish habitat, the report states.
114 officers employed

DLNR officials say they are doing everything they can to stop illegal lay-netting.

The department employs 114 enforcement officers statewide — 43 on O'ahu — who are in charge of protecting Hawai'i's natural area reserves, public lands, waters, forests and other resources. In addition to daily field patrols, enforcement officers are in charge of responding to 50 to 100 calls per day from people reporting violations of conservation rules, according to Guy Chang, supervisor for the Department of Conservation and Resource Enforcement.

Efforts have been made to increase the number of enforcement officers in recent months, Chang said. Five additional enforcement officers are undergoing training and will soon join the O'ahu staff.

"We're doing our best to handle every case," Chang said. "There are no calls that go unanswered. There might be a little time lapse, but all cases need to be answered," he said.

There are 2,200 registered lay nets in the state, 550 of which are on O'ahu. To date, eight stolen lay nets have been recorded, according to DLNR public information officer Deborah Ward.

Chang said that enforcement officers have retrieved a few abandoned lay gill nets in the past few months. However, because the nets are unregistered, there is no way to track them back to the people who laid them, he said.

In recent years, Takashima has reported five to seven incidents of illegal lay net fishing. Gill nets must have at least two surface buoys — each with registration numbers and reflective tape — placed at both ends of the float line.

People can report illegal use of gill nets to the DLNR's Division of Conservation and Resource Enforcement. Callers can leave their name and phone number with an enforcement officer to receive a follow-up report.

Although the division documents all complaints, the number of complaints regarding gill net violations was not readily available, Ward said.

Takashima is disappointed with the responses he has gotten after reporting violations.

"There is a 50-50 chance that an officer will come" to take care of the problem, he said. "I've waited for easily two, three or four hours. They did show up a couple times, but most of the time no one shows up," he said.

"It's frustrating to try to do something good and get it under control when there's no response," he added.
Mesh nets with floats

Lay gill net fishing is a method of capture using rectangular monofilament mesh nets with floats on the top and weights on the bottom. Gill nets are often set in one location and left unattended as fish get caught in them.

The effectiveness of lay gill net fishing has prompted strict rules regarding their use, which were signed into law last year. Nets must be registered with the DLNR, and cannot exceed 125 feet in length and 7 feet in height. They must not be set for more than four hours at a time or left unattended for more than 30 minutes, according to state law.

Lay gill nets have been banned entirely on Maui, in West Hawai'i, and selected areas on O'ahu, including Portlock Point to Keahi Point, Kailua Bay and Kane'ohe Bay.

Violators can face fines of up to $3,000.

Still, commercial and recreational fishermen are laying unregistered nets in areas where lay-netting is banned after the sun goes down, witnesses say.

"They do it on off hours, normally during the night. I came across one of the guys who lays nets, and he told me that he goes when it's really stormy," said Robert Balala, an O'ahu programmer who has been fishing twice a week for more than four years.

"These guys are laying nets where theyre not supposed to be. On top of that they leave it in for more than the allotted amount of time."

Takashima is most concerned about popular game species such as 'o'io and papio, but notes that lay nets affect all species because there is no way of targeting what gets caught.

Balala and Takashima's experiences highlight the challenges that the state's conservation enforcement division faces, especially in tough economic times when resources are limited.

Mark Fox, director of external affairs for the Nature Conservancy and a supporter of gill net restrictions, understands that "there can't be an enforcement officer on every mile, every point throughout the day."

"We'd all like to see more and better enforcement.," he said. "As with any resource rule, there seems to be pretty universal agreement that conservation regulation needs to be coupled with strong enforcement."

Fox is involved with Fair Catch, a campaign by the Nature Conservancy, Malama Hawai'i and SeaWeb to restore Hawai'i's reefs.

While campaign supporters agree that the state has made great strides in implementing "good rules," more needs to be done to stop illegal lay net fishing, Fox said.


Read more!

Australian farmed fish production 'set to double'

The Sydney Morning Herald 3 Aug 08;

Fish farmers will push to double Australia's aquaculture output by 2015 to meet growing international demand for quality seafood, an industry leader says.

Craig Foster, chairman of the National Aquaculture Council, said regional areas would stand to benefit from the industry's expansion though increased investment and jobs.

The industry will begin its bi-annual forum of the Asia-Pacific aquaculture industry in Brisbane.

Mr Foster said the planned doubling of production came after a decade of investment in research and the environmental sustainability of aquaculture.

"We believe it's readily achievable and we're well on the way to getting there," he said.

"While most of Australian aquaculture's $793 million value is produced in South Australia and Tasmania now, opportunities are clear for Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory where access to suitable farming sites is available," Mr Foster said.

Species which will drive this increase in fish production include Tasmanian salmon, yellowtail kingfish, barramundi and southern bluefin tuna. New performers mulloway and cobia are also establishing quickly.

Mr Foster said targets of 100,000 tonnes of fish production by 2015, set by industry were realistic and achievable.

He said Tasmanian salmon production would need to double, yellowtail kingfish to increase its output five-fold and barramundi to triple to meet these targets.

The produce of aquaculture is varied and also includes the staples of prawns and oysters. Prawn growers in Queensland are also gearing for major expansion in the next five years.

"Apart from our own local market, it is the Asian, European and American markets which are hungry for quality Australian seafood," Mr Foster said.

"Aquaculture will play a major role in meeting this demand."

He said aquaculture was necessary to ease pressure on wild-catch fisheries which were increasingly depleted, particularly in Europe and Asia.

"The wild-catch sector cannot meet demand for this premium product so farmed product will step up to fill the gap.

"Farming fish can also be done year-round and so is not restricted to seasonal cycles, as in the wild."

Mr Foster said Tasmanian salmon was a good example of solid business growth in that it had gone from being worth nothing in the early 1980s to more than $272 million per annum today.

Federal Fisheries Minister Tony Burke will open the conference at Brisbane's Convention and Exhibition Centre at 9am (AEST) Monday


Read more!