Best of our wild blogs: 25 Jun 09


Net-casting spider and moths of Singapore
New articles on Nature in Singapore on the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research website.

Another victim of abandoned fishing line: Hornbill
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Sea fans overdose at Changi
from wonderful creation

Pulau Jong
from Singapore Nature and wild shores of singapore

Exploring secret shores of East Coast
from wonderful creation

Dredging and Vibrocore Seabed Sampling near Kusu Island
from wild shores of singapore

Death threads
from The annotated budak

Rare Horsfield’s Bronze Cuckoo at Tuas, Singapore
from Glorious Birds

Black-and-yellow Broadbill takes a caterpillar
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Jane Goodall Institute Singapore - Youth Symposium
from teamseagrass

Resurrecting Extinct Species: Can It be Done?
from The Daily Galaxy: News from Planet Earth & Beyond

10% of dragonflies threatened
from Mongabay.com news

Massive deforestation in the past decreased rainfall in Asia
from Mongabay.com news

Visiting the Dump
from Story of Stuff


Read more!

Reusing water cheaper than desalination

Victoria Vaughan, Straits Times 25 Jun 09;

SMART money prefers backing water reuse projects over desalination ones, according to a joint study by Singaporean and foreign consultants.

This is because it is cheaper to purify the outfall from water reclamation plants than to turn seawater into drinking water.

A sneak preview of the findings of the study by home-grown PUB Consultants and Global Water Intelligence (GWI), a leading analyst of the international water industry, bodes well for Singapore's foray into Newater, the product of reclaiming used water.

PUB research associate Wong Xin Wei said: 'Instead of just discharging water from reclamation plants into the sea, you can make the investment to capture it and treat it to a higher level and then reuse it.'

There are buyers for this know-how.

Singapore's water agency PUB has already exported its technology to countries such as Saudi Arabia.

On home ground, the latest Newater factory in Changi will step up recycled water production from 69,000 cubic m a day to 228,000 cubic m a day by the middle of next year.

So how much cheaper is reclaimed water compared to desalinated water?

When the Newater factory in Changi begins treating water next month, Sembcorp will charge the PUB 30 cents for each cubic m of Newater.

This is a steal when compared to the 78 cents for each cubic m of desalinated water coming out of SingSpring Desalination Plant in Tuas.

The PUB-GWI report was put together to list the facilities which are involved in water reuse around the world and to analyse and predict market trends.

The study shows that if the current total of 2,659 plants work at full capacity, they will be able to churn out 93.5 million cubic m of recycled water for domestic use each day.

The Asia-Pacific is capable of producing almost 60 per cent of the global output - 55 million cubic m a day.

If all planned projects between next year and 2019 come onstream, this output will grow by 2.4million cubic m a day during the period.

In the next nine years, the global market is predicted to expand to 13.8 million cubic m a day, particularly in the Americas and the Middle East.

The recycled-water market is expected to grow almost twice as fast as that for desalinated water in the Asia-Pacific - from next year until 2019.

The study is due to be published at the end of August.


Read more!

Professor Gatze Lettinga awarded Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize 2009

Jessica Yeo, Channel NewsAsia 24 Jun 09;

SINGAPORE: Professor Gatze Lettinga was awarded the Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize 2009 by President SR Nathan at the Istana on Wednesday.

This is to recognise the professor's use of anaerobic technology to create an environmentally-sustainable solution for the treatment of used water.

Professor Lettinga beat 38 other international nominations to clinch the award.

His winning concept not only helps purify industrial used water but produces renewable energy, fertilisers and soil conditioners as well.

Professor Lettinga's concept is currently used in close to 3,000 reactors - about 80 per cent of the world's anaerobic used water treatment systems.

- CNA/yb
LKY Water Prize winner honoured at Istana
Straits Times 25 Jun 09;

A DUTCH scientist who developed an energy-saving waste-water treatment reactor was honoured at the Istana yesterday.

Professor Gatze Lettinga's invention is used in more than 3,000 - or 75 per cent - of anaerobic industrial and domestic water treatment systems worldwide.

For his work, Prof Lettinga, 72, was awarded the 2009 Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize by President SR Nathan yesterday.

His system makes use of technology which mimics the way nature breaks down waste in the absence of oxygen.

The technique is considered less energy intensive compared to other treatment methods, as it produces energy in the form of methane gas, which can be reused as fuel, while processing up to 20 times more waste.

On the award, Prof Lettinga said: 'It is a very prestigious and motivating prize to win; a unique kind of acceptance for the field in which I work.'

The award comes with a cash prize of $300,000. Last year's inaugural award was won by Dr Andrew Benedek, a Canadian who was recognised for his pioneering research into membrane filtration.

Earlier yesterday, Prof Lettinga, accompanied by Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Yaacob Ibrahim, called on Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew at the Istana.

Dutch professor wins 2009 Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize
Business Times 25 Jun 09;

PROFESSOR Gatze Lettinga from The Netherlands was awarded the Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize 2009 yesterday for his environmentally- sustainable solution for the treatment of used water.

Speaking at the 2nd Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize Award Ceremony at the Istana last night, Tony Tan, chairman of the Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize Council, said: 'Impactful inventions like Prof Lettinga's embody the spirit of innovation, tenacity and relentless pursuit of improvement that the Water Prize seeks to recognise.'

Prof Lettinga's Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor purifies industrial used water in an energy-efficient and cost-effective manner while producing renewable energy.

'I believe that innovative technologies for treating used water, waste and gas will contribute to more sustainable living, which the world urgently needs,' said Prof Lettinga.

Prof Lettinga also chose not to patent his UASB reactor and as such, many developing countries have access to a low-cost, sustainable used water treatment system.

The Lee Kuan Yew Water Prize comes with a cash prize of $300,000, an award certificate and a gold medallion. The award is sponsored by the Singapore Millennium Foundation, which is supported by Temasek Holdings.

A major part of the prize money will go to the Lettinga Associates Foundation (LeAF), said Prof Lettinga.

LeAF is an independent knowledge centre working on the development and implementation of sustainable environmental protection technologies.


Read more!

Label trees and plants found in streets and parks

Useful knowledge
'Label trees and plants found in streets and parks, especially in the HDB heartland.'
Straits Times Forum 25 Jun 09;

MR KUMAR PILLAY THANGAVALU: 'Singapore is known for its garden city image. However, one drawback is the fact that, unlike our friends from Europe and the United States, we are unable to name or identify almost 90 per cent of our flora and fauna.

It is never too late to educate both young and old, and I suggest that either the town councils or the National Parks Board label trees and plants found in streets and parks, especially in the HDB heartland.'


Read more!

Mindset on recycling needs to change: SEC

Straits Times Forum 25 Jun 09;

I REFER to the article, 'What rubbish' (June 15). It discusses the 'ignorant or inconsiderate' behaviour of people who throw non-recyclable rubbish into recycling bins. This is disheartening as it hinders green efforts, and reflects negatively on the attitudes of those who behave so irresponsibly.

This inconsiderate behaviour is symptomatic of the 'nanny state syndrome', where we have become too accustomed to, almost reliant on, having others do things for us. From constructing our buildings to keeping our homes clean, we hire others to do for us what we perceive as unpleasant or tedious. Even behaviour that is normal in other countries, such as clearing one's tray after a meal, is not the norm in Singapore.

While the hectic pace of life in Singapore explains the need to hire help, we need to remember the importance of being socially responsible and accountable for our actions. Where recycling is concerned, having designated staff who sort through waste does not absolve us of ensuring we place recyclable and non-recyclable rubbish in different bins.

Recycling bins are clearly labelled with the materials that can be placed in them. Pleading ignorance is not a valid excuse. It can only be assumed that the behaviour is a conscious decision to disregard disposal guidelines. This shows a lack of a social and environmental conscience, and apathy to waste collectors who have to separate recyclable and non-recyclable items.

This trend needs to stop. However, further rules and legislation are not the key to effecting positive change. Rather, the Government should continue its efforts to raise awareness of the need to recycle, and provide convenient means to do so. Rather than rules, knowledge and conviction are more effective agents of long- term change.

For their part, the public need to make a diligent effort to separate their waste into recyclables and non-recyclables, and encourage their friends and neighbours to do so too. If they see people putting unsuitable waste in recycling bins, it is important to reprimand them, and direct them to the nearest dustbin.

Lastly, the behaviour of individuals who engage in such practices needs to stop. Apart from reflecting badly on them, it undermines efforts by others to separate their waste. I urge these people to cease such thoughtless actions, as they not only harm the environment but also negate sincere efforts by others to do their bit for environmental conservation.

Howard Shaw
Executive Director
Singapore Environment Council


Read more!

Razor clams at Don Hoi Lot under threat

enews.mcot.net 24 Jun 09;

Razor clams, or Hoi Lot in Thai, have been a source of food and income for local fishermen in the central province of Samut Songkhram for decades. But the razor clam population at the mouth of the Mae Klong river is now under threat. This report takes you to Don Hoi Lot, a habitat of the distinctive shellfish, to find out more.

The complex ecosystem of Don Hoi Lot, registered as an international wetland under the Ramsar Convention in 2001, was once home to a great variety of species.

Yet recent a research carried out by Chulalongkorn University in cooperation with the area’s local community reported the density of razor clams had decreased sharply from five per square metre in 2004 to just one this year.

"In the past the area had a high density razor clam population. But the number of clams is now in crisis and they are nearly extinct. Ten years ago each fisherman harvested at least 10-kilogrammes of clams a day while today around three-kilogrammes of clams is the largest amount we can catch, said a razor clam collector.

Panuwatra Kongraksa, a leading member of the local Don Hoi Lot biodiversity conservation committee, explains why razor clams are rare.

"The number of razor clams has sharply dropped because of improper clam harvesting, and other fishing which affects the clams’ way of living. Also changes in the environmental condition around the wetland including the mangrove forest, wind and tides, are factors," said Panuwatra.

Panuwatra said the 22-member committee, officially set up a few months ago, worked together with the Bangchakreng Sub-district Organisation, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and the Thailand Research Fund.

The committee aimed to preserve the overall ecosystem at Don Hoi Lot. But with only 22 volunteers, the group was now seeking the participation of more villagers.

Panuwat said an initial plan to save the clam population was being drafted.

"We’ll use a quota system for razor clam collection and ask local fishermen to catch 4.5 centimetre-long clams instead of smaller sizes. As Don Hoi Lot is an open site, we are planning to restrict the number of tourists and some activities which might harm the ecosystem, said Panuwatra.

The preservation plan has raised some hope the deteriorating situation for the razor clam will be salvaged and its dwindling numbers will not see it become extinct. (TNA)


Read more!

Letters: Coral reefs restoration

Jakarta Post 25 Jun 09;

An article titled "Warming causes bleaching" (The Jakarta Post, June 22) makes many completely incorrect statements. The fact that warming causes coral bleaching has been well-established since I developed the HotSpot method for predicting coral bleaching in advance from satellite sea surface temperature data with Raymond Hayes 20 years ago.

For mass coral bleaching, ocean surface temperatures around 1 degree Celsius above the average temperature for the warmest month are needed for a one month period. Those conditions took place over much of southern Indonesia in 1998, including Sumatra, Java, Bali and Lombok, staying well above the threshold temperature for months, and very severe coral mortality took place that year in many places.

In sharp contrast, this year the temperature only barely approached the threshold temperatures for about a week or two, not long enough to cause mass bleaching. Only mild and very localized bleaching took place in some places in Lombok and Bali in April, where poor water circulation caused locally warmer temperatures, but only a small proportion of corals were affected in a few locations, and these quickly recovered when water temperatures cooled. There was no mass bleaching and little or no mortality this year because it simply did not get hot enough for long enough. Similarly the claim in the article that high bleaching was seen on the world's largest coral reef restoration project, the Biorock Karang Lestari Reef Restoration Project at Pemuteran, Bali, is completely untrue.

Almost no bleaching took place there in April. The report in the Post, in fact, refers to a single Biorock Reef structure (out of around 60) with light-colored corals. However, the corals on that structure were not in fact bleached at all. On that particular structure, we are propagating very rapidly growing corals of a single very unusually pale coral that looks almost white.

However, that is the normal color of this particular variety, it has looked as if it were "bleached" year round for years, and is, in fact, not bleached at all. Whoever told this to your reporter did not know how to properly identify bleached corals, and did not bother to check with those running the project. The report also confuses snails that eat coral with bleaching, but this is not bleaching at all, the coral that appears white is because the snail has eaten all the tissue, exposing the white skeleton, whereas in bleaching, the coral tissue is alive but turns transparent, allowing the skeleton to be seen through the tissue.

In actual fact, Biorock reefs, while not preventing bleaching under severe high temperatures, do prevent death of the corals under these conditions. In the 2000 International Coral Reef Symposium in Bali we reported that Biorock reefs in the Maldives had 16 to 50 times higher survival of corals than surrounding reefs.

Thomas J. Goreau
Cambridge

Letters: Save coral reefs
Jakarta Post 29 Jun 09;

Three weeks ago, Reef Check Foundation Indonesia received a lot of reports from fisherman, dive operators and colleagues about the "white" coral around Bali. This prompted us to do a rapid survey, the result of which was posted in this article. The survey was done early June 2009.

Our survey focused on measuring the extent of the bleaching, so we did not measure the white/predatory scars from Drupella snails or other predators as part of our survey. To the trained eye, this is not something difficult to distinguish. I agree that predatory scars result in dead coral, unlike bleaching.

The last bleaching recorded in Bali was in 2003 on the Ngurah Rai reef. At that time, rapid surveys on other places in Bali and our network found no bleaching in other places, so it was likely to have been localized bleaching.

From our survey this year however, we found it covered quite a large area: from Pemuteran (not on the Biorock Reef but the reef adjacent to it, and the data we had revealed 10 percent bleaching) up to Amed. Prior to this, we also had reports from Raja Ampat of slight bleaching in April. Recently, we received reports from Bali Barat National Park, Padang Bay, and even Karimun Jawa and Aceh, so we don't think this is localized bleaching.

Lots of institutions will work hand in hand to measure the extent and severity and the recovery from this event. Most of us will be using one of the methods that Jamie Oliver, Paul Marshall and Lara Hansen wrote with me (the global bleaching monitoring protocol) for rapid assessment (the extent and severity) and using the IUCN resilience method to measure the recovery.

The NOAA HotSpot satellite imagery available online for public use is set on a resolution of 50 by 50 km. which is why some of bleaching cannot be detected, like in 2003 and this year's bleaching. However, the timing of the bleaching is happening at the "right time". In the NOAA annual temperature chart, May and June are, in fact, one of the warmest times of the year, the other time being in November and December, but the rainy season helps to "cool" the temperature then.

Naneng Setiasih
Denpasar


Read more!

Return of the royal Barbary lion

Matt Walker, BBC News 23 Jun 09;

A royal stud book could help return the majestic Barbary lion to the wild.

Conservationists have created a stud book detailing every descendant of a group of lions once owned by the Sultan of Morocco.

These blue-blooded royal lions, all captive, are suspected to be the last Barbary lions in existence.

The stud book will help establish a breeding programme, and could also settle a controversy over whether the Barbary lion was a unique subspecies.

The Barbary lion is one of the most enigmatic of all large predators, both due to its impressive appearance and uncertainty over its fate.

Once numerous across north Africa, the Barbary lion was the most physically distinctive type of lion, including those living elsewhere in Africa and Asia.



It had an extensive mane, and differences in the shape of its head included a more pointed crown and narrow muzzle. People at the time also talked of it being larger, with different coloured eyes to other lions, though it is unclear whether either difference was real.

"Historical records suggest that certain behaviours in Barbary lions were also distinctive, for example, they tended to live in pairs or small family groups rather than the prides familiar in Africa," says Simon Black, of the Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology at the University of Kent in Canterbury, UK.

The last firm record of a Barbary lion is an animal shot in Morocco in 1927, though there is circumstantial evidence that Barbary lions may have survived in the wild in the Atlas Mountains till 1942.

However, even by 1899, the lions were becoming rare in the wild, with those seen most often belonging to the Sultan of Morocco.

In 1912, these lions were moved from an original captive location near the Atlas Mountains to a lion garden at the Royal Palace in Rabat.

When the last Sultan was forced to abdicate in 1953, the lions were moved to two zoos, but on his return in 1955, 17 were returned to the Palace.

In 1973, their descendants were moved to Rabat zoo at Temara. Later, further examinations suggested that these zoo lions shared the characteristics of Barbary lions.

"There is strong circumstantial evidence, therefore, that the animals at Rabat zoo were a relic from the original Barbary lions collected from the wild," says Black.

However, the possibility that some Barbary lions survive, and they may be the last remnants of a lost subspecies of lion, has become an extremely marketable concept.

"It is not uncommon for zoos to advertise [that they possess a Barbary lion] when there is little or no evidence to back up the fact," Black says.

Worse, those lions that are true descendants of the original Moroccan royal lions are in danger of dying out.

Breeding exchanges

To prevent this, Black and colleagues Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Adrian Harland and Jim Groombridge have created a Barbary lion stud book, that identifies the surviving individuals, their locations, their interrelatedness and their line of descent from the original captive Moroccan population as far back as records are known.

The researchers based the stud book on a review of the handwritten zoo records in Rabat kept from 1969 to 1998, plus a detailed review of breeding records across zoos worldwide kept from 1974 onwards.

Alongside details of the stud book, published in the European Journal of Wildlife Research, Black's team also calls for a managed and co-ordinated breeding approach to optimise the overall captive population of Moroccan royal Lions.

"Now that we have this information, zoos can come together and plan breeding exchanges to avoid inbreeding, ensure genetic diversity is maintained and with it animal health and population viability," says Black.

"In this way, if the opportunity exists to re-establish the population in the future, it is not lost by the lions dying out in captivity now," he says.

"Several zoos are still keen to continue breeding the animals. They deserve the constructive support of the scientific community."

Also that will allow time to perform genetic tests on the lions and "buy time" for scientists to further examine evidence to support whether or not these animals are true representatives of the now extinct subspecies, he says.


Read more!

Scientists find tiny new bat species: Geneva museum

Yahoo News 24 Jun 09;

GENEVA (AFP) – Scientists have identified a new species of bat weighing just five grammes in the Comoros island archipelago off eastern Africa, the Natural History Museum in Geneva said on Wednesday.

Australian, Madagascan, Swiss and US scientists were documenting bats in the former French colony when they came across the new species, which originates from nearby Madagascar, the museum said in a statement.

The mammal has been named "Miniopterus aelleni" in honour of the late Villy Aellen, a former head of the Geneva museum and a major bat specialist.

Some 10 new species of mammal have been identified every year since 2000, the museum said.


Read more!

Third of open ocean sharks face extinction: study

Yahoo News 24 Jun 09;

PARIS (AFP) – A third of the world's open water sharks -- including the great white and hammerhead -- face extinction, according to a major conservation survey.

Species hunted on the high seas are particularly at risk, with more than half in danger of dying out, reported the Shark Specialist Group at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

The main culprit is overfishing. Sharks are prized for their meat, and in Asia especially for their fins, a prestige food thought to convey health benefits.

The survey of 64 species of open water, or pelagic, sharks -- the most comprehensive ever done -- comes days before an international meeting on high-seas tuna fisheries that could potentially play a role in shark conservation.

For decades, significant numbers of sharks -- including blue and mako -- have perished as "by-catch" in commercial tuna and swordfish operations.

More recently, the soaring value of shark meat has prompted some of these fisheries to target sharks as a lucrative sideline, said Sonja Forham, Policy Director for the Shark Alliance, and co-author of the study.

The Spanish fleet of so-called surface longline fishing boats ostensibly targets swordfish, but 70 percent of its catch, by weight, from 2000 to 2004 were pelagic sharks.

"There are currently no restrictions on the number of sharks that these fisheries can harvest," Fordham told AFP by phone. "Despite mounting threats, sharks remain virtually unprotected on the high seas."

Sharks are especially vulnerable to overfishing because most species take many years to mature and have relatively few young.

Scientists are also set to meet in Denmark to issue recommendations on the Atlantic porbeagle which, despite dwindling numbers, failed to earn protection at the last meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), in 2007.

Canada led the charge to block the protective measure, supported by Argentina, New Zealand and some Asian countries.

Europe is the fastest growing market for meat from the porbeagle and another species, the spiny dogfish.

The demand for shark fins, a traditional Chinese delicacy, has soared along with income levels in China over the last decade. Shark carcasses are often tossed back into the sea by fishermen after the fins are cut off.

Despite bans in international waters, this practice -- known as "finning" -- is largely unregulated, experts say.

The report identified the great hammerhead and scalloped hammerhead sharks, as well as giant devil rays as globally endangered.

The smooth hammerhead, great white, basking, and oceanic whitetip sharks are listed as globally vulnerable to extinction, along with two species of makos and three types of threshers.

Some 100 million sharks are caught in commercial and sports fishing every year, and several species have declined by more than 80 percent in the past decade alone, according the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW).

The IUCN issues the Red List of Threatened Species, the most comprehensive and authoritative conservation inventory of the world?s plants and animals species.

One third of sharks and rays 'threatened with extinction'
The Telegraph 25 Jun 09;

Almost a third of sharks and rays found in the open ocean are threatened with extinction - largely as a result of overfishing, conservationists have warned.

The first assessment of the global fortunes of 64 species of pelagic, or open ocean, sharks and rays found 32 per cent were under threat.

And more than half (52 per cent) the species which are caught in high seas fisheries are at risk of dying out, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) warned.

Many sharks are caught in high seas tuna and swordfish fisheries, some as accidental "by-catch" of those industries, but increasingly targeted themselves to supply growing demand for shark meat and fins.

The valuable fins are used for shark fin soup - a delicacy in Asia.

To supply the market the wasteful process of "finning" often takes place, in which the fins are cut off the shark and the rest of the body is thrown back into the sea.

Bans on the practice have been introduced in most international waters, but are ineffective and not being properly monitored, conservation group Shark Alliance said.

Despite the threats they face, sharks are "virtually unprotected" on the high seas, according to Sonja Fordham, deputy chairwoman of the IUCN shark specialist group and policy director for Shark Alliance.

"The vulnerability and lengthy migrations of most open ocean sharks calls for co-ordinated, international conservation plans," she urged.

The IUCN shark specialist group is calling on governments to set catch limits for sharks and rays based on scientific advice, protect critically endangered and endangered species and ensure better monitoring of fisheries and an end to finning.

Sharks including the great hammerhead and the scalloped hammerhead, along with great devil rays, are all classified as endangered under the IUCN's assessment.

The great white shark, basking shark and oceanic whitetip are all classed as vulnerable to extinction.

So too is the porbeagle shark - but in the Northeast Atlantic it is critically endangered and in the Northwest Atlantic it is endangered.

Almost a quarter (24 per cent) of the species assessed were classed as "near-threatened", the lowest level of risk, while there was insufficient information to assess another quarter.

According to the IUCN, sharks are particularly sensitive to overfishing because they generally take many years to mature and have relatively few young.

Many sharks 'facing extinction'
Victoria Gill, BBC News 24 Jun 09;

Many species of open ocean shark are under serious threat, according to an assessment by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

The Red list gives the status of 64 types of shark and ray, over 30% of which are threatened with extinction.

The authors, IUCN's Shark Specialist Group, say a main cause is overfishing.

Listed as endangered are two species of hammerhead shark, often subject to "finning" - a practice of removing the fins and throwing away the body.

This is the first time that IUCN Red List criteria, considered the world's most comprehensive inventory of the conservation status of plants and animals, have been used to classify open ocean, or pelagic, sharks and rays.

The list is part of an ongoing international scientific project to monitor the animals.

The authors classified a further 24% of the examined species as Near Threatened.

Sharks are "profoundly vulnerable" to overfishing, they say. This is principally because many species take several years to mature and have relatively few young.

"[But] despite mounting threats, sharks remain virtually unprotected on the high seas," said Sonja Fordham, deputy chair of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group and one of the editors of the report.

"[We have] documented serious overfishing of these species, in national and international waters. This demonstrates a clear need for immediate action on a global scale."

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization recognised the potential threat to sharks over a decade ago, when it launched its "International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks" in 1999.

But the "requested improvements fisheries data from member states... have been painfully slow and simply inadequate", according to this report by the IUCN.

Many pelagic sharks are caught in high seas tuna and swordfish fisheries.

Although some are accidentally caught in nets meant for these other fish, they are increasingly targeted for their meat, teeth and liver oil, and because of high demand, particularly in Asia, for their fins.

Discarded bodies

"The hammerheads are special because they have very high quality fins but quite low quality meat," explained Ms Fordham. "They often fall victim to finning."

She told BBC News that, although finning is widely banned, this ban is not always well enforced.

"The EU finning ban is one of the weakest in the world," she said.

"The best, most sure-fire way to enforce a ban is to prohibit the removal of fins at sea.

"But in the EU, you can remove them, providing the fins you bring ashore weigh less than 5% of the weight of the bodies."

This rule was designed to prevent finning, but it provided "wiggle room", said Ms Fordham.

"The IUCN has estimated that, under these rules, you could fin and discard two to three sharks for every shark you keep, " she explained.

'No fishing'

Species listed as Vulnerable included the smooth hammerhead shark, the porbeagle shark and the common, bigeye and pelagic thresher sharks.

Fisheries have fought to keep their right to fish porbeagle sharks because their meat is so valuable, according to Ms Fordham.

"Yet we've already had recommendations from scientists that there should be no fishing of these sharks."

For certain species - that are considered particularly vulnerable - the authors have recommended their complete protection.

"The big-eyed thresher shark, for example, is very slow growing," explained Ms Fordham.

"Fishermen can very easily identify it, because it has a very big eye. So if they catch it accidentally, they can throw it back.

"These sharks tend to survive well when they're thrown back."

By the end of this year, the Shark Specialist Group will publish a complete report, outlining the status of all 400 species of shark, and closely-related skates and rays.

Endangered sharks unprotected on high seas: report
Reuters 24 Jun 09;

GENEVA (Reuters) - Sharks, among the most endangered species of fish, are effectively unprotected in the world's oceans, the IUCN environmental organization said on Thursday.

Its report urges governments to halt shark "finning," the slicing of fins from captured sharks which are then tipped back into the sea to die, which it says is a growing industry providing ingredients for the Asian delicacy, shark fin soup.

Although finning bans have been declared in most global waters, little effort is made to enforce them, said the IUCN.

A third of shark species and their evolutionary cousins, the rays, are at risk of extinction due to overfishing, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature said.

The body's experts say sharks are especially sensitive to over-fishing because they take many years to mature and have relatively few young. It is vital for governments boost monitoring of boats catching them, they said.

"Sharks remain virtually unprotected on the high seas," IUCN shark specialist Sonja Fordham said in a statement.

Its report, "The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays", says that some of the best-known sharks -- the Great Hammerhead, the Great White and the Basking -- as well the Giant Ray are either endangered or vulnerable to extinction.

The study was released on the eve of a conference in Madrid of managers responsible for high seas tuna fisheries. In these operations, as in swordfish catching, sharks are taken without limit, said the IUCN, based near Geneva.

(Full text of the report)

(Editing by Laura MacInnis)

Third of open ocean sharks threatened with extinction
IUCN 25 Jun 09;

The first study to determine the global conservation status of 64 species of open ocean (pelagic) sharks and rays reveals that 32 percent are threatened with extinction, primarily due to overfishing, according to the IUCN Shark Specialist Group.

The percentage of open ocean shark species threatened with extinction is higher for the sharks taken in high-seas fisheries (52 percent), than for the group as a whole.

“Despite mounting threats, sharks remain virtually unprotected on the high seas,” says Sonja Fordham, Deputy Chair of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group and Policy Director for the Shark Alliance. “The vulnerability and lengthy migrations of most open ocean sharks mean they need coordinated, international conservation plans. Our report documents serious overfishing of these species, in national and international waters, and demonstrates a clear need for immediate action on a global scale.”

The report comes days before Spain hosts an international summit of fishery managers responsible for high seas tuna fisheries in which sharks are taken without limit. It also coincides with an international group of scientists meeting in Denmark to formulate management advice for Atlantic porbeagle sharks.

IUCN experts classify the Great Hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and Scalloped Hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) sharks, as well as Giant Devil Rays (Mobula mobular), as globally Endangered. Smooth Hammerheads (Sphyrna zygaena), Great White (Carcharodon carcharias), Basking (Cetorhinus maximus) and Oceanic Whitetip (Carcharhinus longimanus) sharks are classed as globally Vulnerable to extinction, along with two species of Makos (Isurus spp.) and three species of Threshers (Alopias spp.).

Porbeagle Sharks (Lamna nasus) are classified as globally Vulnerable, but Critically Endangered and Endangered in the Northeast and Northwest Atlantic, respectively. The Blue Shark (Prionace glauca), the world’s most abundant and heavily fished open ocean shark, is classified as Near Threatened.

Many open ocean sharks are taken mainly in high seas tuna and swordfish fisheries. Once considered only incidental “bycatch”, these species are increasingly targeted due to new markets for shark meat and high demand for their valuable fins, used in the Asian delicacy shark fin soup. To source this demand, the fins are often cut off sharks and the rest of the body is thrown back in the water, a process known as “finning”. Finning bans have been adopted for most international waters, but lenient enforcement standards hamper their effectiveness.

Sharks are particularly sensitive to overfishing due to their tendency to take many years to mature and have relatively few young. In most cases, pelagic shark catches are unregulated or unsustainable. Twenty-four percent of the species examined are categorized as Near Threatened, while information is insufficient to assess another 25 percent.

The report is based partially on an IUCN Shark Specialist Group workshop funded by the Lenfest Ocean Program. Fifteen experts from government agencies, universities, non-governmental organizations, and institutions around the world took part. This and other regional workshops have contributed to the development of the Shark Specialist Group’s Global Shark Red List Assessment, supported by Conservation International and the New Hampshire Charitable Foundation.

“The completion of this global assessment of pelagic sharks and rays will provide an important baseline for monitoring the status of these keystone species in our oceans,” says Roger McManus, Vice-President for Marine Programs at Conservation International.

The IUCN Shark Specialist Group calls on governments to set catch limits for sharks and rays based on scientific advice and the precautionary approach. It further urges governments to fully protect Critically Endangered and Endangered species of sharks and rays, ensure an end to shark finning and improve the monitoring of fisheries taking sharks and rays.

Governments should invest in shark and ray research and population assessment, minimize incidental bycatch of sharks and rays, employ wildlife treaties to complement fisheries management and facilitate cooperation among countries to conserve shared populations, according to the group.

Notes to editors

* The full report, The Conservation Status of Pelagic Sharks and Rays: Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop, can be downloaded here http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/ssg_pelagic_report_final.pdf. It was compiled and edited by Merry Camhi, Sarah Valenti, Sonja Fordham, Sarah Fowler and Claudine Gibson.
* This week, scientists from the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) are meeting in Copenhagen to assess all Atlantic porbeagle populations and formulate recommendations for fishery managers.
* Next week, San Sebastian, Spain will be the site of the second Joint Meeting of the five Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs) for tuna.


Read more!

Australia pledges big funds for small whale conservation

WWF 24 Jun 09;

Madeira, Portugal – Australia’s top environmental official on Wednesday pledged AU$500,000 (€284,927) to help save the world’s small whales as part of a major contribution to the International Whaling Commission.

Peter Garrett, Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts committed to using the funds to protect small whales, dolphins and porpoises during an appearance at the 61st meeting of IWC member countries, taking place this week in Madeira, Portugal. The money will be dedicated to the IWC’s Small Cetacean Fund.

Garrett’s announcement coincided with the release by WWF of a new report entitled Small Cetaceans: The Forgotten Whales, which was unveiled simultaneously with the Australian funding commitment.

Small whales are disappearing from the world’s oceans and waterways as they fall victim to fishing gear, pollution, and habitat loss – compounded by a lack of conservation measures such as those developed for great whales, according to the report.

The report states that while great whales are now protected (to an extent) by the international commercial whaling moratorium, in effect since 1986, small cetacean hunts continue around the globe, largely unmanaged and unchecked by the international community.

“For many small cetaceans the scientific information available is so limited that we are unable to make informed decisions on their conservation status,” Garrett said.

The contribution is part of a larger AU$1.5 million (€854,900) commitment to support IWC activities in three key areas: the Southern Ocean Research Partnership; conservation management plans; and small cetacean conservation research.

“It’s time that someone stood up for the underrepresented whales, dolphins and porpoises,” said Dr. Susan Lieberman, Director of the Species Programme for WWF-International. “Australia’s commitment is a step in the right direction and we call upon other governments to follow suit.”

Meanwhile, the IWC Commissioner of Belgium, Alexandre de Lichtervelde, called for a review of work on conservation and management for small cetaceans to take place before IWC 62 in 2010. Belgium will produce a collaborative paper as a contribution to the discussions on the future of the IWC.

IWC 61 runs June 22 to 26 in Madeira, Portugal.


Read more!

Whaling commission to extend negotiations for a year

Yahoo News 24 Jun 09;

FUNCHAL, Portugal (AFP) – International Whaling Commission members agreed Wednesday to extend negotiations over the disputed hunting of the marine mammals for a year, avoiding a disastrous split in the group.

Spokeswoman Jemma Miller said the IWC, which regulates world whaling between hunters and conservationists, recognised that it "is at a crossroads beset by fundamental disagreements as to its nature and purpose."

By consensus the 85-nation IWC agreed to reconstitute a working group set up last year which would "intensify its efforts to conclude a package or packages" by the 2010 IWC conference "at the latest," Miller said at the meeting held on the Portuguese island of Madeira.

IWC chairman William Hogarth supported the call for more consultations.

"There is a will, now we have to find the way. If in 2010 we haven't had any progress, set a course and made some changes, there will be no more delays," he said.

Whales are protected by a moratorium on hunting dating back to 1986 with some exceptions limited by quota.

Regardless of the moratorium, almost 40,000 whales have been killed worldwide since 1985 by countries which refuse to sign up to the IWC treaty, or use loopholes allowing scientific or "lethal" research, or maintaining "aboriginal" or subsistence hunting.

However, some members voiced reservations about more talks, warning that "we're not writing a blank cheque for endless consultations," said Australian Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, a key opponent of the scientific whale hunting practiced by Japan.

The main stumbling block in the negotiations is a proposal to let Japan resume commercial whaling off its coast in exchange for a cut in its scientific whaling in the Antarctic.

Japan, which says whaling is part of its culture, kills more than 1,000 whales a year through a loophole in the treaty that allows the ocean giants to be killed for research, although the meat still ends up on dinner tables.

The Japanese delegate to the conference defended his nation's position.

"We are not asking other countries to eat whale, but to agree to disagree," said Yoshimasa Hayashi.

A delegate from New Zealand warned that unless an agreement is reached by 2010 the whaling organisation is in trouble. "If we fail, the IWC will die," he told the meeting.

Iceland, looking to join the European Union, has significantly raised its self-imposed quotas for this year in a move condemned by countries including Britain, France, Germany and the United States.

Denmark on Tuesday officially requested permission from the IWC to resume hunting humpback whales off Greenland, with a quota of 10 per year for the 2010-2012 period, in a move that has angered environmentalists.

The hunting would be carried out under so-called "aboriginal" or subsistence hunting to support local communities, but opponents say it is unnecessary.

Conservationists also were sceptical about another round of IWC negotiations.

"There has been a year of talking already and no evidence from the new proposal that there will be anything more than talking for another year," said Sara Holden, Greenpeace International's whales campaign coordinator.

Meanwhile, a Norwegian fisheries organisation said Wednesday that Norway's whalers had suspended their hunt mid-season this year with less than half a government quota of 885 whales killed because demand was saturated.

Whaling peace talks 'to continue'
Richard Black, BBC News 23 Jun 09;

Peace talks on whales and whaling are to continue for a further year.

Delegates to the International Whaling Commission (IWC) annual meeting here agreed it was worth extending reform talks that began a year ago.

Pro- and anti-whaling countries emphasised that fundamental differences remain between the two blocs.

Earlier, animal welfare groups released a new report arguing that whaling countries would gain economically by switching to whale-watching.

They calculate that whale-watching
around the world, dwarfing income from whaling, which is measured in tens of millions of dollars.

Potential benefits

In recent years this has become one of a battery of arguments the anti-whaling camp has assembled against the industry.

But with attempts to end hunting in Iceland, Japan and Norway showing little sign of success, anti-whaling countries led by the US embarked last year on talks with Japan and its pro-hunting allies aimed at finding a compromise that everyone could live with.

For the anti-whaling side, potential gains include a possible reduction in the total number of whales being killed each year, greater oversight of hunting, and reform of the IWC's scientific whaling clause under which any country can set its own catch quotas irrespective of the 1982 global moratorium on commercial hunting.

Whaling nations, particularly Japan, see political benefits in making a deal that would reduce the barrage of criticism they receive from whaling's opponents.

Japan also wants to secure quasi-commercial quotas for four coastal communities with a history of whaling.

Divided rules

The talks were supposed to conclude a package deal at this week's meeting, but it became clear last month that this was not going to happen.

Most member nations wanted to continue for another year, but some delegates said before this meeting began that the process could collapse - which, in some people's eyes, would have meant the end of the IWC.

Of the six countries involved in small group talks aimed at developing the compromise "package", Australia has been the most hawkish.

Environment minister Peter Garrett laid out his government's condition for the talks - that they must bring an end to scientific "special permit" whaling as it is currently practiced.

"I do not believe it will be possible to reach any package predicated solely on reductions in the size of certain special permit programmes," he said.

"While Australia certainly wishes to see fewer whales killed under special permit programmes, reductions in catch cannot solve the fundamental problem."

Japan has agreed to refrain from including humpback and fin whales in its annual Antarctic hunt and reduce the number of minke whales targeted from 935 to 600.

However, it is adamant that at this stage it will not concede on the principle, enshrined in the 1946 whaling convention, that each country can set its own quotas for special permit catches.

Japan's whaling commissioner Akira Nakamae responded that his country had made the running so far.

"In the last year during the small working group meetings, Japan declared to make the major concessions including a reduction in the sample size of scientific whaling," he said.

"Even though we disagree with the principle, we could also agree to including a South Atlantic whale sanctuary (a key demand of Latin American countries) as part of the package.

"But we cannot accept that some contracting parties... continue to demand the phase-out of scientific whaling."

The gulf between Australia and Japan may prove hard to bridge over the coming year.

Although on the surface Australia has the backing of its traditional allies - New Zealand, the EU and the US - in private, some members of this bloc are concerned that successive Canberra governments have made whaling into such an emotive public issue that Australia now has no room for diplomatic manoeuvre.


Read more!

Swine flu puts porpoise on brink

Richard Black, BBC News 24 Jun 09;

Mexico's twin crises - swine flu and the economy - may derail a plan to save the world's most endangered cetacean.

Only about 150 vaquita are left, and about 30 are dying each year through becoming entangled in fishing nets.

The government has cut funding aimed at taking fishing boats out of service or adopting vaquita-friendly equipment.

The vaquita, which is also the world's smallest cetacean, is emblematic of the plight of other dolphins and porpoises around the world, say campaigners.

As government delegates, scientists, whale-hunters and environmentalists discuss the large ocean-traversing cetaceans at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting here, green group WWF's new report, The Forgotten Whales, concludes that some of the leviathans' smaller brethren are more at risk.

Earlier this year the baiji or Yangtse River Dolphin was declared probably extinct, and the Critically Endangered vaquita ( Phocoena sinus ) - another species restricted to a small, specific habitat - will follow suit without swift action, conservationists believe.

"The estimated mortality comes to more than 30 animals per year, and having a population that is only 150 - you can imagine that the population will not survive if nothing is done," said Lorenzo Rojas-Bracho, Mexico's IWC commissioner and the head of the national marine mammal research and conservation programme.

"The situation is so critical, you can't kill more than one vaquita per year of you want to save it for future generations."

After years of successive Mexican governments denying the problem, the current administration recently put $18m into a fund aimed at removing vaquita-threatening gillnets from the waters in the north of the Gulf of California, which is its only habitat.

Dr Rojas-Bracho said the programme had removed about 500 illegal fishing vessels from the area, while about 400 legal ones had taken funding either to leave the industry or to adopt other types of gear.

Another tranche of similar size had been due, he said, but had been cut by about 60% because of the country's other problems.

"Our environment minister has insisted it's a priority for the government, so we're happy with that - but it won't be easy," he told BBC News.

Other countries including Sweden and the US had contributed, he said, and the work had been supported by WWF and the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw).

But other conservation organisations that complained about the vaquita's plight had not been so quick to contribute funding, he said.

With full funding, he added, it might have been possible to bring vaquita deaths from fishing nets down to zero - which is probably needed to save the species - but now that might not be possible.

Responsible urge

The vaquita and the baiji head a list of eight small cetaceans that WWF says are under threat.

Others include the river dolphins of the Indus and Ganges, Hector's dolphin of New Zealand, the Atlantic humpbacked dolphin that lives off the West African coast, and the boto or Amazon dolphin.

Pollution, loss of habitat and shipping are among the factors reducing their populations.

WWF points out that of 69 small cetacean species, 40 are categorised as Data Deficient by the Red List of Threatened Species, meaning there is not enough evidence to know whether their populations are declining or not.

Many environment groups would like the IWC's remit to include conservation of these small cetaceans.

"It is time for the IWC and its members to take full responsibility for the conservation future of all whales great and small," said Heather Sohl, species policy officer with WWF UK.


Read more!

Burmese pythons slithering their way north in the US?

Alysia Patterson, Associated Press Yahoo News 24 Jun 09;

AIKEN, S.C. – One by one, seven slithering Burmese pythons were dumped into a snake pit surrounded by 400 feet of reinforced fence at the Savannah River Ecology Lab in South Carolina.

As they were released last week by a handful of scientists, some of the serpents hissed and lunged, baring their fangs. Others coiled up under the brush. Two slid into a pond in the center of the pit, disappearing in a snaking trail of bubbles. Some were more than 10 feet long and thicker than a forearm. And for the next year all of them will call this snake pit — an enclosed area of tangled brush and trees — home.

Ecologists will track the exotic pythons, all captured in Florida, to determine if they can survive in climates a few hundred miles to the north. Using implanted radio transmitters and data recorders, the scientists will monitor the pythons' body temperature and physical condition.

The test could show whether the giant imported snakes, which can grow up to lengths of 25 feet, are able to spread throughout the Southeast.

The fast-growing population of snakes has been invading southern Florida's ecosystem since 1992, when scientists speculate a bevy of Burmese pythons was released into the wild after Hurricane Andrew shattered many pet shop terrariums.

Now scientists fear this invasive species is silently slithering northward.

"They of course have an impact on native species," said herpetologist Whit Gibbons, a professor of ecology at the University of Georgia and a member of the python project. "If you have a big old python eating five times as much as another species that eats the same prey, it's a competitive thing." The pythons compete with alligators, among other top predators.

Gibbons said a human is "just another prey item" to a python — especially a small human. Pythons are constrictor snakes and have been known to eat people in their native areas of Southeast Asia, he added.

"A 20-foot python, if it grabbed one of us, would bite us and then within just — instantly — seconds, it would be wrapped all the way around you and squeezing the life out of you," Gibbons said.

While pythons don't make a habit of attacking people and most aren't large enough to eat a person, Gibbons called the possibility a "nightmare."

"What about the first kitty cat they eat? Or the first little poodle? They'd love poodles, I imagine," he said.

Mike Dorcas, a professor at Davidson College in North Carolina, has sliced open pythons in Florida to find the remains of white-tailed deer, bobcats and large birds.

Dorcas is leading the experiment at the Savannah River Ecology Lab as part of a collaboration between the U.S. Geological Service, the National Park Service and the University of Florida.

He was prompted by a study released last year showing that the native habitat of Burmese pythons in Asia is a climate match for much of the southeastern U.S.

"The question is really, well, can they survive in a place like South Carolina or North Carolina or Arkansas or Tennessee?" Dorcas said.

One day before releasing the pythons into the pit, Dorcas snapped on latex gloves and surgically implanted radio transmitters into all seven. The transmitters enable scientists to keep track of the pythons' location and allow them to hunt down any that manage to escape.

What are the chances of escape? "We never want to say never. We've made the enclosure as snake-proof as possible but we've taken some other precautions," Dorcas said, noting that all of the pythons are males, so they wouldn't be able to reproduce.

The ecologists also inserted micro data loggers into each snake to record the internal temperature of the python every hour. After a year, Dorcas will remove the chips and download the information into a computer to discover how the snakes thermoregulate in a cooler climate.

Pythons are masters of disguise — slippery and quick — and all but one of the serpents was invisible within minutes of being deposited into the pit.

So counting pythons in the wild is a daunting task. Scientists don't have an accurate estimate of how many pythons are in Florida.

"It's certainly in the thousands, or tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands," said Gibbons.

Fugitive pythons terrorise Florida
Burmese snakes that escaped from pet shop 17 years ago threaten Everglades' unique eco-system
Guy Adams, The Independent 15 Jul 09;

The alligators of the Florida Everglades are struggling to hang on to their status atop the famous swamp's food chain because of an invasion of Burmese pythons that first escaped from local pet shops 17 years ago.

The enormous snakes have thrived in the vast, humid national park and now number more than 100,000, severely threatening its unique eco-system, according to scientists who want to organise a massive python hunt there this winter.

"They are threatening endangered wildlife there and Lord forbid a visitor in the Everglades ever encounters one," said Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat, in a letter to Barack Obama's Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar. "There's only one way to [stop] this: kill the snakes."

Last week, a 17ft python broke out of its tank at a home in Orlando, and strangled a two-year-old child sleeping in her cot. Other specimens, who have escaped from homes, have been blamed for denting the population of wading birds, raccoons, and even deer.

Mr Nelson recently introduced a bill to ban imports of the creatures, describing it as "a matter of time" before a tourist is killed by one. "They have become such a problem in the park, you could spend the next 10 years setting traps," said his spokesman.

Dozens of the creatures, whose natural habitat is the tropical jungles and swamps of Burma, first escaped from pet shops during Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Their breeding population has since been supplemented by escapees from private homes.

Mr Salazar, the US government's top wildlife official, now supports population control, despite stiff lobbying from the animal rights organisation Peta, which claimed yesterday that the alien invaders "ended up in Florida through no fault of their own".

Confusion now reigns over how to actually go about killing 100,000 large and potentially deadly snakes. The animals are tough to find during the summer, but frequently emerge in winter months to sun themselves in open areas, where they could be stalked by licensed hunters. Other options include trapping and shooting.

One expert hunter, Tom Rahill, told the Fort Lauderdale Sun Sentinel that he stalks the big snakes at night, wearing animal-handling gloves and snake-proof boots. His preferred method of capture involves using a pole with a loop at the end, to seize the snake by the head. "It explodes with activity and generally wraps around the catch pole," he said. "You take a catch bag, like a laundry bag, and wrestle the bag around the snake and close the bag. It's amazing the power these snakes have. I grabbed one and it dragged me into the water."


Read more!

Rare fish 'pummelled to death' during dam water release

Brisbane Times 25 Jun 09;

Up to 50 rare lungfish were killed when tonnes of water was released from a southeast Queensland dam this week.

Water was released from North Pine Dam from Monday morning to Tuesday night as a safety measure, as heavy rain threatened to overfill the dam.

Its managers, SEQWater, say up to 100 native fish went with the release, including around 12 lungfish, a species listed as vulnerable.

But Wide Bay Burnett Conservation Council spokesman Roger Currie said conservationists on the scene had found up to 50 lungfish, either killed or maimed by the force of the water.

"Some were found caught in trees yesterday and last night," Mr Currie said.

"They've just been pummelled by the sheer force of it."

Mr Currie said some of the rare fish were up to one metre long, suggesting they could be 100 years old.

The conservation council has lobbied against the Paradise Dam and the proposed Traveston Crossing Dam, claiming that both pose serious threats to the lungfish and other species.

Mr Currie said his group would document the event and advise federal Environment Peter Garrett, who was now considering the Traveston Dam, proposed for an area near Gympie.

SEQWater spokesman Mike Foster said staff were on the scene at every dam release to check for "fish kills".

Mr Foster said a handful of lungfish had been rescued from pools, but staff would return on Thursday to see if more could be done.

"We are very, very mindful of the ecological importance of the lungfish," he said.

Last month, when North Pine's gates were opened for the first time in many years, up to 150 lungfish were rescued and returned to the dam.

The Wide Bay Burnett Conservation Council has called for a study into lungfish numbers in North Pine Dam, and measures to protect them when water is released.

AAP


Read more!

Cancer Kills Wild Animals Too

livescience.com 24 Jun 09;

Cancer accounts for about 10 percent of all human deaths. If you think that sets us apart, scientists have news for you: Wild animals die of cancer at about the same rate, and it threatens some species with extinction.

"Cancer is one of the leading health concerns for humans," Dr. Denise McAloose, a pathologist for the Wildlife Conservation Society, said in a statement. "But we now understand that cancer can kill wild animals at similar rates."

McAloose and her colleagues compiled information on cancer in wildlife and concluded that cancer poses a conservation threat to certain species. The team called for greater protection of animals and people through increased health monitoring. They published their research in the July edition of the journal Nature Reviews Cancer.

Cancer threatens the survival of entire species, McAloose said. For instance, the Tasmanian devil, the world's largest carnivorous marsupial, faces extinction from a cancer known as devil facial tumor disease. This contagious cancer spreads among devils usually through fighting and biting. To save the species, conservationists are relocating cancer-free Tasmanian devils to geographically isolated areas or zoos.

The study suggests links between wildlife cancers and human pollutants, as well. For example, beluga whales in the St. Lawrence River system have an extraordinarily high rate of intestinal cancer - it is their second leading cause of death. One kind of pollutant in the waters, called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, is known to cause cancer in humans. The compounds are suspected carcinogens for beluga whales as well. Fish in other polluted waterways, including brown bullhead catfish and English sole, also exhibit high levels of cancer.

Viruses are another culprit. In some animals, viruses can induce cancers that interfere with reproduction. Genital tumors in California sea lions occur at much higher rates than previously documented, the paper shows. Dolphins, such as the dusky dolphin and Burmeister's porpoise, found off South American coasts, are also showing higher rates of genital tumors.

Other virus-induced cancers can affect an animal's eyesight or its ability to feed. Green sea turtles suffer from fibropapillomatosis, a disease that causes tumors to grow on the skin and internal organs. A virus is suspected to cause these tumors.

Monitoring the health of wildlife can illuminate the causes of cancer in animal populations and better safeguard us and them against diseases, McAloose said.

Wildlife Faces Cancer Threat
ScienceDaily 24 Jun 09;

While cancer touches the lives of many humans, it is also a major threat to wild animal populations as well, according to a recent study by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS).

A newly published paper in the July edition of Nature Reviews Cancer compiles information on cancer in wildlife and suggests that cancer poses a conservation threat to certain species. The WCS authors highlight the critical need to protect both animals and people through increased health monitoring.

"Cancer is one of the leading health concerns for humans, accounting for more than 10 percent of human deaths," said Dr. Denise McAloose, lead author and Chief Pathologist for WCS's Global Health program. "But we now understand that cancer can kill wild animals at similar rates."

In certain situations, cancer threatens the survival of entire species. The Tasmanian devil, the world's largest carnivorous marsupial, is at risk of extinction due to a cancer known as devil facial tumor disease. This form of contagious cancer spreads between individual Tasmanian devils through direct contact (primarily fighting and biting). To save the species from this fatal disease, conservationists are relocating cancer-free Tasmanian devils to geographically isolated areas or zoos.

Many species living within polluted aquatic environments suffer high rates of cancerous tumors, and studies strongly suggest links between wildlife cancers and human pollutants. For example, the study cites the case of beluga whales in the St. Lawrence River system. These whales have an extraordinarily high rate of intestinal cancer, which is their second leading cause of death. One type of pollutant in these waters—polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (or PAHs)—is a well-known carcinogen in humans, and PAHs are suspected carcinogens for beluga whales as well. Fish in other industrialized waterways, including brown bullhead catfish and English sole, also exhibit high levels of cancer.

Virus-induced cancers can affect the ability of some wildlife populations to reproduce. Genital tumors in California sea lions on North America's western coast occur at much higher rates than previously documented. Oceanic dolphin species, such as the dusky dolphin and Burmeister's porpoise (both found in the coastal waters of South America), are also showing higher rates of genital carcinomas.

Other virus-induced cancers can affect the feeding ability or eyesight of wildlife. Green sea turtles—a migratory species in oceans across the globe—suffer from fibropapillomatosis, a disease that causes skin and internal organ tumors. A virus is suspected as the cause these tumors, and environmental factors such as human-manufactured carcinogens might exacerbate their severity or prevalence.

Monitoring the health of wildlife can illuminate the causes of cancer in animal populations; thereby, better safeguarding animals and humans against possible disease. Evaluating cancer threats in wildlife populations requires the collaborative efforts of biologists, veterinarians, and pathologists as well as the earnest engagement of governments and international agencies. The paper concludes that more resources are necessary to support wildlife health monitoring.

"Examining the impact of cancer in wildlife, in particular those instances when human activities are identified as the cause, can contribute to more effective conservation and fits within the One World–One Health approach of reducing threats to both human and animal health," said Dr. William Karesh, Vice President and Director of WCS's Global Health Program.

Adapted from materials provided by Wildlife Conservation Society, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.


Read more!

Where giant plants dare to grow

Matt Walker, BBC News 24 Jun 09;

Tropical plants like to grow tall, while temperate zone plants are dwarfs in comparison.

This global pattern to plant height has been discovered for the first time, after scientists reviewed the size and locations of more than 7000 species. Species growing at the equator are around 30 times taller on average than those at high latitudes, they found.

Their analysis also shows that rainfall has a bigger influence on plant height than temperature or soil fertility.

Finding such a clear global trend in plant height surprised the researchers who conducted the analysis.

"It might seem obvious that plants are taller in the tropics, after all tropical rainforests are clearly taller than Arctic tundra," says Angela Moles of The University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, who led the review.

"However, there are plenty of tropical ecosystems that are dominated by short plants, such as savannas, and plenty of high-latitude ecosystems that are dominated by very tall plants, such as boreal forests."

What's more, she points out, the tallest plants in the world do not grow in the tropics.

"The tallest plant species on earth is the coast redwood, from California, which grows over 100m tall and the tallest flowering plant is mountain ash, which grows in southern Australia."

Moles explains that until now, no-one had quantified the differences in plant height around the world.

"The lack of information is kind of surprising," she says. "Plant height is such an important trait."

In particular, the differences in the heights of plants in each ecosystem affects the variety and type of animal living there.

So to evaluate any trend, Moles and colleagues from Australia and the US collated data on 7084 plant species, including their locations and maximum height reached, from research already published in databases and scientific journals. In all, the team collated over 32,000 records of plant height around the globe.

They found that plant species at the equator are, on average, 29 times taller than those growing between a latitude of 60 degrees and 70 degrees North, and 31 times taller than those between a latitude of 45 and 60 degrees North. Plants within each region grew an average of 7.8m, and 27cm and 25cm respectively.

However, the researchers were surprised to find that there is not a smooth decrease in plant height moving further from the tropics.

"There is a zone at the edge of the tropics where plant height suddenly drops," says Moles. This two-fold decrease in height suggests plants switch growing strategies in temperate zones.

"We're not sure why. But it may be to do with the deserts around this latitude," Moles explains.

They were also surprised to discover that the best predictor of plant height was not net primary productivity, a measure of how much plants grow in a given location, which is affected by temperature, rainfall and soil quality.

Nor did low temperatures, which can limit the growth of large trees by freezing the water inside their trunks, have a strong influence.

Instead, the single best predictor of plant height was how much it rained during the wettest month of the year.

The final surprise related to short rather than tall plants.

"We thought that very cold or very dry ecosystems would lack tall plants, but there would be short plants just about everywhere," says Moles.

"Instead there turns out to be a remarkable scarcity of very short plants in very warm, wet, productive environments like rainforests."

"We hadn't predicted this, but in hindsight, it seems likely that in these highly productive ecosystems it is just so dark at ground level that there aren't many species that can actually make a living on the forest floor."


Read more!

Evolution faster when it's warmer

Victoria Gill, BBC News 24 Jun 09;

Climate could have a direct effect on the speed of "molecular evolution" in mammals, according to a study.

Researchers have found that, among pairs of mammals of the same species, the DNA of those living in warmer climates changes at a faster rate.

These mutations - where one letter of the DNA code is substituted for another - are a first step in evolution.

The study, reported in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, could help explain why the tropics are so species-rich.

DNA can mutate and change imperceptibly every time a cell divides and makes a copy of itself.

But when one of these mutations causes a change that is advantageous for the animal - for example, rendering it resistant to a particular disease - it is often "selected for", or passed down to the next few generations of that same species.

Such changes, which create differences within a population but do not give rise to new species, are known as "microevolution".

The idea that microevolution happens faster in warmer environments is not new. But this is the first time the effect has been shown in mammals, which regulate their own body temperature.

"The result was unexpected," said Len Gillman from Auckland University of Technology, who led the study.

"We have previously found a similar result for plant species and other groups have seen it in marine animals. But since these are 'ectotherms' - their body temperature is controlled directly by the environment - everyone assumed that the effect was caused by climate altering their metabolic rate."

Scientists believe that this link between temperature and metabolic rate means that, in warmer climates, the germ cells that eventually develop into sperm and eggs divide more frequently.

"An increase in cell division provides more opportunities for mutations in the population over a given time," explained Dr Gillman.

"This increases the probability of advantageous mutations that are selected for within the species."

'Sister species'

"We suspected the same effect might be happening in mammals, because seasonal changes affect the animals' activity," Dr Gillman told BBC News.

He and his team compared the DNA of 130 pairs of mammals, looking at genetically similar "sister species" - where each of the pair lived at a different latitude or elevation.

They tracked changes in one gene that codes for a protein known as cytochrome b, comparing the same gene in each of the pair of mammals to a "reference" gene in a common ancestor.

By looking for mutations in the DNA code for this gene - each point where one letter in the code was substituted for another - the researchers were able to see which of the two mammals had "microevolved" faster.

Animals living in environments where the climate was warmer, had about 1.5 times more of these substitutions than the animals living in cooler environments.

Dr Gillman explained that, at higher latitudes where environments are colder and less productive, animals often conserve their energy - hibernating or resting to reduce their metabolic activity.

"In warmer climates annual metabolic activity is likely to be greater, so this will lead to more total cell divisions per year in the germline."

These results support the idea that high tropical biodiversity is caused by faster rates of evolution in warmer climates.


Read more!

Amazon bill controversy in Brazil

Gary Duffy, BBC News 23 Jun 09;

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is due this week to make one of the most keenly awaited decisions about land ownership in the Amazon rainforest.

The president has to decide by 25 June whether to veto parts of a bill that is due to transfer an area of public land - estimated to be around 670,000 square kilometres (259,000 square miles) - into private hands.

The government originally introduced what is called "Provisional Measure 458" as a way of bringing security to small farm owners in the Amazon region.

But critics say the proposal amounts to an amnesty for land-grabbers, and that the original measure has been altered by Congress in a way that will only serve to encourage deforestation.

Uncertainty over land ownership has long been a cause of violent conflict in the Amazon region, and presented an enormous obstacle for the authorities in their efforts to prevent illegal deforestation.

It was in order to tackle this issue the government introduced the proposal to transfer a vast area of land, roughly the size of France, into private hands.

'Huge pressure'

The so-called "provisional measure" was meant to settle the question of ownership of hundreds of thousands of properties where those who occupied the land before 2004 had never been formally granted legal title. The smallest areas, of less than 100 hectares (247 acres), would be handed over for free; medium-sized territory would be sold for a symbolic value, while larger estates of up to 1,500 hectares (3,707 acres) would be auctioned at market prices, but with 20 years allowed to make a repayment.

However, changes to the law mean the largest areas could then be sold on after a period of three years instead of 10, and critics fear this will lead to further exploitation of the rainforest.

Environmental groups have also complained that the law may allow lands to be registered by companies or by frontmen acting on behalf of large landowners. Greenpeace says it was expecting the decision last week, but the fact that it did not come is a sign of division within government, and an indication of the huge pressure on President Lula, who it says is receiving thousands of phonecalls and e-mails on the issue.

"We know that within his government there is a lot of tension between the ministries of agriculture and environment, land reform and strategic studies," Marcelo Furtado, executive director of Greenpeace in Brazil, told the BBC News website.

"If he did not decide on any of the vetoes last week, our reading is that it is a bad indication that eventually the big landowners are actually having an impact on his approach."

"We are extremely concerned."

Mr Furtado says the bill, as it was originally presented, was already deeply flawed "in terms of the areas that would be privatised, in terms of who would have access to the land, in terms of lack of verification from any government authority on the status of the land".

"The problem is what we are finding in the Amazon is either the attitude of 'I am not going do anything because I am sure we will win this fight and change the law and make all the deforestation I have legal'," he said.

"Or the other attitude is that because there is so little governance here, because the government is so absent the truth is that we can just keep cutting down the forest and nothing will happen to us."

"This bill will be a major signal indicating to the people who enjoy impunity that it is worth committing a crime in the Amazon."

Divided society

Not surprisingly, supporters of the measure dispute this assessment, and point as well to other initiatives that are under way in the Amazon.

On Friday, the Brazilian government announced its so-called "Green Arch" proposal in which it will pay small farmers up to $51 (£31) per month to reforest degraded lands in 43 municipal areas where deforestation is a major issue.

The government has also set a target to reduce deforestation by some 70% by 2018, and says the indications from recent months are that it will be at its lowest level in two decades, due in part to an increase in policing measures.

President Lula says non-governmental organisations are "not telling the truth" when they say that the provisional measure will encourage land grabbers.

"What we exactly want to do is to guarantee that people have ownership of land, to see if we can end the violence in this country," he said last week.

"This is what we want to do, and this is what we are going to do," the president insisted.

There is a consensus that the issue of land ownership badly needs to be sorted out in the Amazon - but it seems this bill has not built on that common ground.

The heated debate over the measure has once again highlighted the divide in Brazilian society between a strong agricultural lobby keen to promote development, and environmental groups who fear for the future of the Amazon.

Whatever decision President Lula takes, it is unlikely to be free from controversy.


Read more!

A £180m weeding job: The lake that has shrunk to half its original size

Andrew Buncombe, The Independent 24 Jun 09;

Kashmir's Dal Lake is dying, choked by algae that thrives on pollution. But a plan to clean it up threatens the livelihoods of local people

Every day, amid the early morning mists that sit low over the water of Dal Lake, a remarkable piece of theatre is played out. Emerging from the islands and the alleyways of reeds, men paddle traditional wooden boats to an area of the lake that is heavy with weeds. There, using nets fixed atop willow branches, they haul the weeds into their boats. With their vessels partially submerged by the weight, they then paddle slowly away, to use their bounty as fertiliser for crops.

On Kashmir's Dal Lake – whose tranquillity has lured everyone from Mughal emperors to George Harrison and Ravi Shankar – there is no shortage of boatmen and no shortage of weeds. Indeed, despite more than a decade of efforts to arrest its spread, the clogging, spinach-green algae appears to be everywhere.

This week, in what might underline a new determination to try to rescue the lake, the Indian government announced £180m to fund a new clean-up of the Dal and another of the state's iconic lakes, the Wular, one of the largest freshwater bodies in Asia. "This conservation effort is the first serious fully-funded effort," announced the Environment Minister, Jairam Ramesh.

The slow death of Dal Lake, which less than 30 years ago measured at least double its current size, is a story of tawdry neglect that has played out against the backdrop of Kashmir's separatist insurgency. Once a favoured spot for both the elite of the British Raj and backpacking hippies who escaped the crushing heat of India's plains by relaxing on the lake's famous houseboats, the Dal is now polluted with litter, rubbish and thousands of tonnes of sewage that are pumped into it untreated. The increased nitrogen in the water gives rise to the growth in algae and weeds which choke the lake's aquatic life.

Yet for all that, the lake's majesty is still obvious and the tragedy of its decline all the more sad.

Pushing off his wooden shikhara from a shoreline shaded by huge chinar trees and alive with the song of wakening birds, boatman Lassa Dar gave a tour of his world. His paddle angled in the weed-filled water, he remembered the days when the water used to be much cleaner and people swam in it. "The weeds have got much worse," he said. "It is all the run-off that enters the lake."

On the east of the lake boatmen were hauling out weeds on behalf of the local authorities. On this side, however, the boatmen gathering the dark-green algae were farmers collecting it for their own use. Mr Dar, 62, who has been working as a boatman for 50 years, paddled to one of the lake's numerous floating gardens where, on a buoyant "field" made of reeds and composted weeds, the farmers raise a variety of crops.

"I grow tomatoes, melons, cucumbers and marrows," said Gulam Hassan, who was gathering weeds, leaning with all his weight on the supple willow pole to lever his dripping green haul from the water.

It is estimated that there are around 40,000 farmers such as Mr Hassan living on islands dotted around the lake who make their living in this way. As part of the plan for the Dal drawn up by the state and federal authorities, all will be forced to relocate to new homes in Srinagar, the state's summer capital that sprawls around the southern end of the lake. Many of these farmers are angry about the plan, saying it will mean an end to their livelihoods.

Although the new money to clean up the Dal has come from Delhi, much of the energy behind the effort belongs to Jammu and Kashmir's youthful Chief Minister, Omar Abdullah. He has made restoring the lake one of the top policy priorities. In an interview, the Chief Minister said that for decades people had considered the Dal a refuse dump where sewage could be pumped. "We did not wake up to the fact that it was going to fill up and catch up with us. A very concerted effort is now needed to clean it up," he added. "I am sure that we can rescue it. Without the Dal, Srinagar is just another town in the hills."

In addition to the shifting of the lake's residents, the two-year clean-up plan involves the building of new treatment works, a halt to deforestation and the purchase of heavy-duty de-weeding machines from Finland. Houseboat owners will also be required to fit septic tanks.

Some observers have expressed the hope that now the militant violence that has killed at least 70,000 people appears to have paused, more focus can be put on the Dal. Yet the authorities may also wish to consider the need for greater oversight. Talk of corruption abounds in Srinagar. Earlier this year it was reported that 50 officials with the government's Lakes and Waterways Development Authority had been cited by the state's top anti-corruption body.

Though such allegations might breed a degree of cynicism among the people of Kashmir, the public desire to save and restore the Dal is overwhelming. Earlier this year, Kashmir's most famous playwright, Mohammed Amin Bhat, produced a play, April Fool, to highlight the plight of the lake. It was performed to enthusiastic reviews. "For us, it's not just a water body," said Bhat. "It's a symbol of our culture and our heritage. That is why we are so possessive of it."


Read more!

U.S. pulp-maker pioneers new biofuel

Jason Szep, Reuters 24 Jun 09;

OLD TOWN, Maine (Reuters) - From the outside, the rustic red-brick mill on a bend in Maine's Penobscot River resembles any other struggling American pulp and paper mill.

But along with its usual business of pulp-making, the century-old mill is doing something unprecedented: Developing technology to produce bio-butanol, a jet fuel, from parts of trees that would otherwise go to waste, one of the world's first to do so.

Production is still two years away, but the reinvention of Maine's Old Town Fuel & Fiber mill is already drawing interest as a potential model for a new wave of biofuel companies that could slash dependence on oil, create jobs and reduce the emissions that lead to global warming.

Loggers, a fading way of life in rugged northern United States and Canada, see the mill as a lifeline for their crippled industry. Environmentalists see it as a test of the Obama administration's push for a big expansion in biofuels.

And chemical and oil companies are waiting to see if the mill can do what none has done before by extracting sugars from wood chips into a biofuel that many regard as more efficient than corn-based ethanol as a possible substitute for gasoline.

"There has been a lot of interested parties in what we are doing here," said Old Town's president, Dick Arnold. "There have been several oil companies that have been interested in our extract and production of biofuels. There has been a number of chemical companies that have expressed the same desire."

Like its once-mighty peers, Old Maine's mill has suffered in recent years from declining pulp prices and loss of market share to Chinese and Latin American rivals. Georgia-Pacific Llc, the maker of Quilted Northern bathroom tissue, shut it in May 2006, laying off all 400 workers. A group of investors known as Red Shield bought it a few months later.

Red Shield won a $30 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy to work with the nearby University of Maine on a pilot ethanol production plant, but they ran out of cash and filed for bankruptcy last year, shutting the plant again.

Enter Lynn Tilton, a New York venture capitalist who owns one of the nation's largest helicopter makers. Tilton's Patriarch Partners bought the mill in November, invested about $40 million and shifted its focus to cellulosic bio-butanol.

ALTERNATIVE TO ETHANOL

Tilton can use bio-butanol in her own helicopter and aircraft businesses but is eyeing a potentially huge market after Congress decreed that the United States must use 21 billion gallons of "advanced" biofuels such as cellulosic ethanols, bio-butanol and "green gasoline" a year by 2022.

Whether the technology takes off comes down to cost -- and to corn. For much of the last decade, federal officials have touted the potential of corn ethanol as the best substitute for gasoline, but critics question that assumption, noting it corrodes pipelines and raises food prices.

Bio-butanol, a relative of ethanol, is less corrosive and easier to mix with gasoline. Unlike ethanol, it can be transported by pipeline. And its energy content is about 30 percent higher than ethanol's. If regulations allow, it could be pumped into a fuel tank with no changes to a car engine.

Butanol is also sometimes used as a petrochemical in brake fluids, paint thinners and plastics. Its supporters include chemicals maker DuPont Co and oil giant BP Plc, which have formed a joint venture to make bio-butanol.

"It's really comparable to gasoline," said Mark Bunger, a biofuels analyst at Lux Research, a Boston consulting firm specializing in emerging technologies. "The issue has been that ethanol is easier to make, it's just not easier to use. Butanol doesn't have those same restrictions.

"For a lot of chemical reasons, it's a good alternative. If you're a venture capital company and you said you are going to be making ethanol, I would say, 'Do you have another idea?'. But if they are really focusing on butanol, that is a smart move."

He cautioned, however, that it remains unclear if bio-butanol can compete on cost with oil or substitutes like ethanol without government subsidies. "A lot more research and technical development is needed to make it cost competitive."

OBAMA FACTOR

Other companies are trying, such as startups Tetravitae Bioscience in Chicago and Cobalt Biofuels in Mountain View, California. But Old Town is the first to do so with a fully functioning timber mill that already generates cash flow by selling traditional pulp to paper companies.

Bio-butanol will be derived from wood that would have gone to waste in pulp production, or have been left on the forest floor as unusable by loggers.

"I wouldn't go deep into a hole without the ability to generate cash flow on what we do now," Tilton said. "That is the beauty of this. We are not building a start up facility to create ethanol where you are out $300 million before you start creating any kind of cash flow."

Already the plant has put in place a system for extracting sugars from the wood and expect by year end to start construction of a biorefinery to turn it into butanol. She expects the mill will need another $75 million to meet its target of producing butanol in two years.

"Some of that will come from the Department of Energy and some we will invest. And how that return on investment will be garnered will be deeply dependent on government demands, pricing for the product as well as our ability to take this technology and roll it out across other platforms."

A big factor, she said, is the Obama administration's push for renewable energy through tax breaks, loan guarantees and millions of dollars in grants, with more support expected in upcoming energy bills.

"If one believed that ultimately this would peter out and green energy would become less of a focus going forward, this would be a very risky investment because truthfully pricing will be dependent on supply and demand. If it is not forced as a mandate, then I think the pricing won't be there," she said.

To that end, the mill is on track, said Arnold. Two towering vessels, each 100-feet (30-metres) high, extract sugar from wood chips that will eventually make butanol, while also maintaining the traditional process of extracting fiber from wood to create sheets of dried pulp to sell.

"That $30 million award from the government will help us finance the building of the balance of the biorefinery," he said. "We believe that in the next two years we will have an operating biorefinery at the mill."

Initial volumes will be small, about 1.5 million gallons of bio-butanol a year produced from 80 dry tons of wood. "But we believe this technology can be replicated. And there are a lot of assets out there in terms of pulp and paper mills that are suffering that could be used for expansion," Arnold said.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)


Read more!