Best of our wild blogs: 17 Feb 10


Dr. John Yong's Guides to mangroves, mistletoes and ferns
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

great billed herons @ big sister's island
video clip from sgbeachbum and swimming anemone and sea hare

The Kings Are Raising Young Now
from Life's Indulgences

Tigers and the Belimbing
from Butterflies of Singapore

Red-breasted Parakeet eats cocoon
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Pasir Ris 的红树林
from PurpleMangrove

Photos from the Battle of Pasir Panjang Anniversary Walk 2010
from Toddycats!

Twelve-year-old on a mission to save Africa's most unusual animal, the okapi an interview with Spencer Tait from Mongabay.com news by Jeremy Hance


Read more!

18 dolphins for Resorts World Sentosa still in the Philippines

Leong Wee Keat, Today Online 17 Feb 10;

Eighteen dolphins - enroute to the Marine Life Park at Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) - are reportedly stranded in the Philippines.

According to the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the bottlenose dolphins are now at the Ocean Adventure marine park at Subic Bay.

The Feb 5 report said that the marine mammals, imported from the Solomon Islands, were to have been sent to Singapore by the end of last year. But they are still in the care of Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, the company contracted to train them.

The delay, according to the report, is because the facilities to house them in Singapore are not finished. When contacted, RWS spokesman Robin Goh told MediaCorp that "construction of the Marine Life Park is on schedule and is slated for an opening after 2010".

Bottlenose dolphins, one of the most common in the world, are listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) and their trade is regulated. Activists have questioned the need to import wild dolphins. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) has posted the Philippine newspaper report on its Facebook page.

Executive officer Deirdre Moss said the society "objects to the keeping of dolphins in captivity, as they are usually caught/kept for the purpose of training to entertain/amuse the public" and in doing so, they are "also forced to adapt to an alternative lifestyle in a man-made structure".

Mr Goh said animals acquired for its Marine Life Park are in accordance with the Cites agreement. "In the meantime, the dolphins are in good hands and being looked after according to international standards," he added.

LEONG WEE KEAT

More background information on Will there be dolphins at Resorts World Sentosa? Part 2 on the wild shores of singapore blog.


Read more!

Bonding over a 'community cat'

Letter from Dr Tan Chek Wee
Today Online 17 Feb 10;
FIVE YEARS ago, when I moved into my block of Housing and Development Board flats, I noticed a tri-coloured cat at the void deck.

She was easily placed into a carrier and taken to the vet for sterilisation.

She was then returned to the void deck bearing a surgical cut on her left ear, a symbol of her neutered status.

Ginger (picture) - as she was affectionately called - became a mascot of the block and is cared for by several families.

One day last week, a Jewish neighbour told me that Mr Ali, a Malay resident on the third storey, was concerned that he had not seen Ginger for the past few weeks.

I went to his flat and we chatted about Ginger and cat-related things. Most importantly, a friendship was forged.

I then went to the second storey and knocked on the door of a Chinese family whom I knew was very fond of Ginger too.

Sure enough, the cat was safe and sound in the flat.

I walked up to convey the good news to Mr Ali who said he would pay a visit to the Chinese family to see our "block cat".

I then took a lift to the 11th storey to inform the Jewish lady.

It is time for Town Councils to stop "automatically" assigning "cat nuisance" to any feedback about cats.

What Ginger does to bring about inter-racial harmony and neighbourliness is akin to what some community events can achieve.

That is why cats like Ginger are aptly called "Community Cats".

This is how people really make friends ...
Letter from Raymond Lee Swee Mun
Today Online 18 Feb 10;

I REFER to "Bonding over a 'community cat' " (Feb 17). The community cats at our Housing and Development Board block in Sengkang have also worked the same magic in creating friendship among some Malay and Chinese families. My family has been feeding them from about three years ago. (Of course, we clean up thereafter.)

Along the way, we got to know a Malay couple who were also taking care of them. We named the cats together and conducted joint sterilisation exercises.

One day, a Chinese woman, unaware of what we were doing, thought we were rounding the cats up for culling and scolded us. But after she realised what we were doing, we became friends.

Another time, while taking one of the cats to the vet, a few Malay women and their children came to talk to us because they were concerned for the animal. They were relieved to hear that we were not sending the cat to be culled. Again, we made friends.

Now all of us are pretty close, but our friendships have expanded beyond the mutual goal of caring for our community cats. We go to each other's homes during festivals and once, to one of their sons' wedding.

Of late, a young Chinese boy has asked to join in our activities. His China national mother has given him the go-ahead because she thinks the boy will learn how to care and love small animals.

Once, an Indian national initiated conversation with us saying that he wanted to befriend us because he thinks we are a bunch of good people.

I hope the town councils and any related government bodies take note of what is happening on the ground - community cats do help people make friends with those from another race. My "new" friendships would never have happened if not for our cats.

We're really a community now...
Letter from Shirley Goh
Today Online 17 Feb 10;

I refer to "Bonding over a 'community cat'" (Feb 17) by Dr Tan Chek Wee.

I have been taking care of the community cats in my neighbourhood for four years and it is through these cats that I get to know many of my neighbours of various races, religions and cultures, whom I may not have got to know otherwise.

Sending greetings and presents to each other during our respective festive seasons and inviting each other to our homes for dinner are just some of the activities that we do. The bonds we forged through a common love and interests for these community cats are really far greater than those from other community events.

Playing with community cats helps relieve tensions
Letter from Lawrence Lee Today Online 18 Feb 10;

I refer to "Bonding over a 'community cat'" (Feb 17) by Dr Tan Chek Wee.

I am a resident of Pasir Ris and the community cats there have added colour and joy to to my life and that of many others. For various reasons, many residents are not able to keep pets of their own. The community cats provide an avenue for me to ease the tensions of the day by stroking and massaging them. In the process, I get to know other residents who are happy to play with the cats. They come from my block and the neighbouring blocks, and I would not have met them if not for the cats. They provide a platform for us to connect with residents of different races, including foreign nationals. The cats are properly cared for by responsible cat carers. In the interest of community bonding and fostering harmony, it would be helpful for the town councils to be mindful of the positive contributions made by the community cats and not overreact to complaint from non-animal lovers who may even exaggerate the nature of complaints in order to get the cats out of the community.

Kindness to animals is an important value to teach children
Letter from Abdul Rashid, Today Online 22 Feb 10;

The intent of this letter is purely to raise our awareness of the general lack of compassion to animals (cats, especially) in our society. Lately, it has been moving to read about the concept of community cats. But here, I hope to bring to the fore the effects of negative behaviour inculcated in our children, through our behaviour.

Here is my observation of things which happen around public places like void decks, coffee shops and even parks - some children's lack of compassion for animals manifested in the way the children treat them. I thought compassion for animals would come naturally with children but I can understand why the forces of nurture can far outnumber nature itself, in children's growing years. I have seen adults in the presence of their children, kicking animals (gently or otherwise,) or throwing things at them. Judging from the adults' behaviours and mannerisms, I can safely say that they were probably brought up seeing such behaviour in their own growing years. They seem to be overly careful about hygiene and disease such that they treat these animals as balls of plagues on four legs.

I was at the vet recently with my kids, to pay our ailing cat Louie a visit. Another cat, Dani, was in a neighbouring cage with obvious bowel control problems. It was such a sorry sight - his fur was wet with urine and we thought Dani had undergone some form of surgery. A tearful elderly lady with her daughter came to visit Dani. After some small talk, we learnt that somebody had brought Dani up to the top floor of a block near the owner's flat and threw Dani off. Dani sustained a fractured spine which rendered him paralysed on his hind limbs with loss of bowel control. Honestly, this note can never paint the horrific picture of what Dani is going through. The situation for Dani is so bad that he may be euthananised.

Getting back to the issue of how this came to be, I have seen for myself the number of times children abuse cats (probably, because they seem to be more ubiquitous in public housing estates) by kicking, spitting, throwing lighted candles at them, shooting them with rubber-bands, etc. Perhaps we can partly blame the media for casting a black shroud on cats. Cats are almost always portrayed as conniving and evil. Such images send sub-conscious negative connotations about cats in general. But how we guide our children remains at the core.

To be fair, I have seen children who are very nice and kind to animals and simply love to see animals at the zoo or some animal shows - but loving animals goes beyond just being entertained by them. Kindness to animals is an important value to teach children and for them to continue to uphold throughout life. In a society bent on achieving A-stars and educational excellence, seeing such cruelty to animals indicates a significant lacking in what we can teach our children at school as well as home. Some people may not like animals, but they can at least learn not to be mean and cruel if there is inculcation of kindness and compassion towards other creatures. Let children grow up to realise how therapeutic animals can be and how good it is to be kind to them. They are after all, a form of life, worthy of respect.


Read more!

Floating lanterns: Fire hazard

Straits Times Forum 17 Feb 10;

'Setting off fireworks is illegal here. Shouldn't these floating lanterns also be declared illegal?'

MS ANGELINE NG: 'On Chinese New Year's Eve, at around 9.30pm, I noticed a group of people setting off half a dozen sky lanterns at the end of Lentor Loop in Lentor housing estate.

One of the floating lanterns, kept afloat by a naked flame heating the air in the lantern, landed on a tree about 80m from my house. The others continued flying till they were out of sight.

I can only hope they landed somewhere safe. If these lanterns land on a house, lives and property could be lost. Even if that does not happen, in dry weather, it could cause a fire by igniting bushes and trees nearby. Setting off fireworks is illegal here. Shouldn't these floating lanterns also be declared illegal?'

Related links
Sky lanterns: deliberately released debris on the wild shores of singapore blog.


Read more!

Soon: fill 'er up - with emulsion diesel?

Business Times 16 Feb 10;

SgEF has developed a fuel that's a lot more environment-friendly. Are we ready for it? By Timothy Seow

IF JEREMY Ng - founder and CEO of Singapore Emulsion Fuel Pte Ltd (SgEF) - has his way, all of Singapore's public buses will be powered by his company's very own nano-emulsion diesel in the near future.

SgEF opened Asia's first clear nano-emulsion diesel plant in Tuas two weeks ago. With last December's Copenhagen summit yielding disappointing results, and climate change statistics under much scrutiny recently, eco-enthusiasts could consider this a small plus for Singapore's green drive.

Mr Ng, describing the emulsion diesel, said, 'our team of researchers developed a breakthrough emulsion fuel that significantly lowers the diesel content within biofuels in use in the market today'.

This is done by blending diesel with water and SgEF's biodegradable patent-pending proprietary additive, said Mr Ng.

Formerly in the semiconductor industry, Mr Ng comes across as an optimist - with big plans for a company barely three years old. For example, SgEF's new 40,000 square foot facility is targeted at meeting the needs of both Singapore and the greater Asia-Pacific region.

SgEF already has a partnership with a Malaysian company called Pamuri Green, and is finalising a joint venture with an Indonesian partner. Mr Ng also intends to test the South China and Japan markets by 2011.

Mr Ng is confident about the success of his products. 'Competition for emulsion fuels? I don't see anyone. Biofuels are not even a competitor because of the difference in volume we can provide,' he said.

SgEF currently has the capacity to produce 30,000 litres a day. 'In the next 12 months, we hope to ramp up production to 100,000 litres,' added Mr Ng. SgEF eventually hopes to add an extra digit to this figure, reaching a maximum daily capacity of 300,000 litres.

That is not all. SgEF presently has 13 staff, and Mr Ng is looking to increase this by almost 50 per cent in 2010. 'By the end of this year, we will probably increase to about 20, with additional chemists, technical and sales staff,' he said.

Mr Ng also said he expects revenue this year to be 'in the range of $3-5 million'.

Things were far less rosy when it all began in December 2006. Recalled Mr Ng: 'There were challenges such as getting funds and getting support from the government. For a niche start-up company like us, without a track record, it's not easy.'

To compound matters, SgEF met with the worst financial crisis in more than 70 years less than two years into the venture

Yet, the financial storm clouds had a thick silver lining. 'It is a fact that the recession helped us,' admitted Mr Ng.

'In 2008, a lot of big companies and MNCs began pulling out of Singapore. Only then did the government realise they needed to grow local entrepreneurs. That's when I changed my strategy and decided to look for Spring Singapore,' he continued. 'That made it easier for us to talk to Spring.'

This change of strategy proved to be a winner; in June 2009, Spring SEEDS (Start-up Enterprise Development Scheme) agreed to provide capital.

Mr Ng is also not hesitant to credit other partner government agencies like the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) and the National Environment Agency (NEA), which he said were very supportive.

In fact, it was the NEA that introduced SgEF to Poh Lian Construction. 'Poh Lian was in search of an alternative energy provider to help them manage their carbon footprint in residential areas. They have been using super green diesel to power their machinery ever since,' Mr Ng shared.

Super green diesel, along with eDiesel, are SgEF's flagship products that were released in conjunction with the opening of their production facility.

The former is designed for building and construction machines, while the latter targets the public transport, maritime and port, and industrial sectors.

Currently, in the green energy world, one of the most common forms of biofuel is biodiesel, used widely in Europe. Biodiesels are produced from renewable resources such as vegetable oils and animal fats. It is usually blended with petrodiesel, and most cars can run on a blend of 5 per cent biodiesel and 95 per cent petrodiesel without modification.

Mr Ng says that emulsion diesel is 'totally different' from biodiesel. According to SgEF, its emulsion diesel requires only 60 per cent of petrodiesel, with the other 40 per cent made up of water and their patent-pending additive. SgEF emulsion diesel also does not require any retrofitting or modification of engines.

Mr Ng believes emulsion diesel's advantage is logical. 'Just think about it: when a certain amount of fuel is replaced by water, it is logical that the emissions would have less carbon,' he said.

Mr Ng's claims appear to have stood up to the test. SMRT partnered SgEF in product testing over a period of three months, and the use of SgEF emulsion diesel reduced CO2 emissions 10 per cent and other greenhouse gases almost 50 per cent. Fuel efficiency also improved 9 per cent.

Despite these promising figures, challenges remain. 'The greatest challenge,' he said, 'is making the consumer switch to green technology. They need to understand that protecting the environment is more important than cost-saving.'

While most are cynical about the climate change summit in Copenhagen, Mr Ng is hopeful. 'Even though the outcome of Copenhagen was not quite what we expected, all nations now know how important CO2 reduction is,' he said.

He added, 'prior to this, it wasn't so easy for me to talk to people about this issue. Now, everyone realises that to go into green technology, they need to pay a premium. It makes it easier for me as well.'

And while profit margins may be thin now, Mr Ng is not worried. 'It's basically economy of scale. Eventually, cost will decrease.'

Economy of scale means getting bigger, and when asked whether the domestic transport market was a target, Mr Ng responded with a resolute 'definitely'.

If his optimism is rewarded, it might not be too long before emulsion diesel becomes an integral part of how Singaporeans get from place to place.

Water-blended diesel to fuel green drive
Singapore firm develops emulsion fuel to curb reliance on fossil fuels
Christopher Tan, Straits Times 18 Feb 10;

WATER and oil do not mix, but a Singapore start-up begs to differ.

Singapore Emulsion Fuel (SgEF) has formulated diesel that is one-fifth water, and is marketing it as fuel that is greener and more cost-efficient.

On Feb 5, it opened a $1 million, 40,000 sq ft plant in Tuas that can produce up to 300,000 litres of emulsion fuel a day.

'We are starting with 30,000 litres a day, and shall go to 100,000 litres in a year's time,' said SgEF founder and chief executive Jeremy Ng.

Mr Ng, 55, left a 20-year career in the semiconductor industry for this green pursuit four years ago.

With $300,000 seed money from Spring Singapore's Start-up Enterprise Development Scheme, and about $700,000 shared between partners, he set up SgEF in 2006 'to address the global dependence on fossil fuels and to offer a viable alternative to existing biofuels'.

Mr Ng admits that emulsion fuels are not entirely new, and that the idea goes back a century.

'For the past 10 years or so, city buses in Europe have been using emulsion fuel,' he said.

But he added that SgEF's formula is unique - a patent is pending - in that the water and diesel do not separate when left unused for extended periods.

Ultra-low sulphur diesel is blended with water (20 per cent) and a proprietary binding agent (20 per cent) to make fuel that is clear like conventional diesel, unlike other emulsion diesels.

The fuel can be used in all existing diesel engines and machinery with no need for any modification.

Because of its water content, it is said to reduce black smoke emission by up to 80 per cent, improve fuel efficiency by up to 9 per cent, and reduce exhaust temperature by 20 per cent.

Building contractor Poh Lian Construction tested the emulsion diesel and found positive results.

'We used it for our air compressor and generator sets at two private property developments and the black smoke emission dropped significantly,' said Poh Lian's senior project manager Png Koon Guan.

He said he was trying to convince the management to continue using the fuel.

Construction foundation specialist CSC Holdings tried out the fuel too, but did not obtain any conclusive results.

Its purchasing manager Eileen Wong said: 'We tested it nine months ago, but we are not convinced because we could not quantify any benefits.

'We will embark on a more detailed test after Chinese New Year.'

Transport operator SMRT said it tested the product four years ago and 'did not find it suitable for our use'. It would not elaborate but The Straits Times understands cost was one reason.

Mr Ng said the emulsion fuel 'is generally more expensive than conventional diesel' with a premium of about 5 per cent. 'But increasing environmental awareness is pushing more companies everywhere towards alternatives such as hybrids and biodiesels,' he noted.

Indeed, building contractors with green credentials 'have a higher status, which helps them in future tenders', said Poh Lian's Mr Png.

SgEF, meanwhile, is working to distribute its product to regional markets such as Malaysia and Indonesia.

Mr Ng said the company will also work towards raising the fuel's water content to 30 per cent in future, thus reducing its environmental impact further and cutting Singapore's oil dependence.

'Singapore uses between 6 million and 10 million litres of diesel a day, so even if we can reduce that by 1 per cent, it is significant,' he said.


Read more!

Leopard found mutilated in Malaysia

Evangeline Majawat, New Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

KUALA LUMPUR: It was a gruesome start to the Chinese New Year for wildlife officers who found the mutilated carcass of a leopard on Sunday.

The animal, which had been trapped in a snare, had been skinned and all its limbs had been chopped off.

But the full extent of the horror did not hit them till yesterday when they found more animals -- a clouded leopard and five wild boars -- snared in the same vicinity.

All the animals were either dead or dying.

Pahang Wildlife and National Parks Department (Perhilitan) officials had rushed to Persimpangan Hutan Persit near a Sungai Yu tributary in Pahang late Sunday evening after a tip-off from an Orang Asli.

State Perhilitan director Khairiah Mohd Shariff believed that the leopard, known locally as harimau kumbang, and other animals had strayed into wire snares meant for tigers.

"When we first got the information, we thought it was a tiger. Thankfully, it wasn't. But it's still a horrible act."

The leopard, which is the second largest cat in Malaysia, was reclassified in 2008 as "Near Endangered" in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species.

Khairiah said officers who made the grisly discovery estimated that the animals had been dead for at least three days.

Perhilitan officers cleared a total of 17 snares within the perimeter where the initial carcass was found.

"Wire snares, whether in small or large quantities, are dangerous," she said.

Although no arrests were made, Khairiah suspected locals were acting as middlemen in the wildlife trade.

"We believe the poachers had set the snares to trap tigers," she said.

"But since a leopard was caught, I think they didn't want to waste it. So it was butchered and skinned.

"It's a sad start to the new year."


Read more!

Mycat: Most wildlife culprits in Malaysia roaming free

The Star 17 Feb 10;

PETALING JAYA: A conservation group wants the Attorney-General’s Chambers to treat cases of cruelty to wildlife with importance and urgency.

The Malaysian Conservation Alliance for Tigers (Mycat) noted that perpetrators of previous cases involving cruelty to animal had walked away free after paying paltry fines.

“This includes a man who was found guilty of illegal possession of a dead tiger five years ago. The tiger had been butchered and stored in his freezer,” said Mycat programme coordinator Loretta Shepherd.

“For that offence, he paid a fine of RM7,000 and walked out a free man.

“Compare this to the case involving the theft of 11 cans of Tiger beer and Guinness Stout worth RM70 in January this year, where a man was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.

“Clearly our values are misplaced.”

Seven orang asli are currently being investigated for brutally killing a male tiger in the Bukit Tapah Forest Reserve in Perak two weeks ago.

While the incident has angered many Malaysians, Shepherd voiced concerns that they too might only receive a slap on the wrist.

The Protection of Wild Life Act 1972 provides for a maximum sentence of five years’ jail and a RM15,000 fine for killing a tiger.


Read more!

Johor to ration water if dry spell continues

New Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

KLUANG: Johor is bracing for the possibility of water rationing in the next few months if the current dry spell continues.

Kluang is already hit as levels at water catchments and processing plants in Sungai Sembrong Timur and Barat are fast dropping.

As of yesterday, the water supply at Sungai Sembrong Timur reached the critical level of 10 millilitres per day (mlpd), down from the normal level of 20mlpd.

The larger Sungai Sembrong Barat plant is still being maintained at 60mlpd, but in light of the dry spell, the water supply authorities fear that it will also not last.

Johor's water management company, SAJ Holdings Sdn Bhd, is hoping for rain to ease the situation.

The authorities will be monitoring the levels at the Bekok dam in Yong Peng and the Congok dam in Mersing.

If the dry spell in Johor continues, the two dams may face water depletion and it will affect supply to Batu Pahat and Muar.

A check by the New Straits Times showed that much of the green lung here had turned brown due to lack of rain. The main Sungai Mengkibol that cuts through the town was dry with only patches of water.

SAJ Holdings corporate communications head Jamaluddin Jamil said the Kluang district, which has about 25,000 residents, had been experiencing low water supply since Chinese New Year's eve.

"The festive season will see Kluang's population swell to more than 50,000 people as many will come back to visit family and relatives.

"We will make do with the month-long water rationing exercise. Water tanks will be mobilised to areas which are badly hit."

Jamaluddin said the same problem was experienced five years ago.

"If the drought continues, we may have to shut down the Sembrong Timur water processing plant," he said, adding that the dry spell was part of the El Nino phenomenon.

Water crisis making dams in Johor save every drop
Nelson Benjamin, The Star 20 Feb 10;

KLUANG: Johor water authorities have been directed not to release water from dams, especially those used for flood mitigation, and to conserve water where possible.

State International Trade, Industry, Energy, Water, Communication and Environment Committee chairman Tan Kok Hong said the dams would normally release water whenever it rained heavily and reached a certain level.

“Over the past few months, they have been trying to store as much water as possible, even above the usual level as part of our preparation for the dry spell,” Tan said yesterday.

“At the moment, taking care of the needs of the people supercedes the need to provide water for other purposes.”

There are 11 dams in the state.

Tan added the state government was hoping for assistance from the Federal Government to provide funds for marking boundaries properly and fencing up dams to prevent encroachment.

He said the funds, amounting to millions of ringgit which were previously requested, were not allocated under the Ninth Malaysia Plan and the request had been resubmitted under the 10th Malaysia Plan.

State Drainage and Irrigation Department director Chong Chee Han said the department had requested RM5mil to carry out the survey and to gazette the area within the dams managed by the department.

Asked about the findings of the 2008 Auditor-General’s report on encroachments and the need for reservoirs to be better protected, including from illegal farming, he said this could be done after the survey and gazetting had been carried out.

The director of Johor’s water regulatory body Bakaj, Mohd Idris Kaparawi, added that it was important to ensure the dams were protected from encroachment for water quality to be maintained.

“If oil palm plantations are set up too close to the dams, they can absorb too much water or even cause soil erosion,” he said.

On the water crisis in Kluang, SAJ corporate communications chief Jamaluddin Jamal said showers on Thursday had caused the water level in rivers to rise slightly, but the level still needed to be above 0.5m before water supply could be fully restored.


Read more!

WWF condemns ‘slaughter’ of whale shark off Batangas shores, Philippines

gmanews.com 17 Feb 10;

An international group seeking the protection of endangered species condemned the attack on a whale shark (locally called the butanding) found off the shores of Tingloy Island in Batangas province last Monday.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the World Wildlife Fund voiced concern over the possible slaughter of the shark, whose fins were sliced off.

"WWF condemns the perpetrators of this illegal act. This is a real eye opener, for it proves that the slaughter of endangered species – even one as big as a butanding – can still take place if we let our guards down," said WWF Philippines Conservation Programs vice president Joel Palma.

Divers found the shark last Monday. It was later taken near the Caban Cove where volunteers from Bantay Dagat, a civilian fisheries patrol in the country’s coastal areas, tried to attend to the shark.

"Sadly, its wounds were too great – and the shark, nicknamed Tingloy Baby, died the next day (Tuesday)… and was laid to rest in Caban Cove," the World Wildlife Fund said.

BFAR probe

The statement quoted Bantay Dagat members as saying that police and the Bantay Dagat recently found fishing vessels with strobe lights operating on Mabini town’s shores and asked them to leave.

The fishermen left but transferred to Tingloy town. The incident prompted WWF and Bantay Dagat to allege that local fishermen could be the possible culprits of the incident.

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources director Malcolm Sarmiento also said the agency would investigate the possible slaughter of the whale shark.

In the Philippines, whale sharks have been hunted in the waters off Bohol, Misamis Oriental and Sorsogon, the WWF said.

"Shark fins and meat are usually exported to China, Hongkong and Taiwan. Whale shark flesh, called ‘Tofu meat’ sells for roughly $8 (P360) per kilogram, while dried shark fins are valued a hundred times more – approximately $800 (P36,000) per kilogram," it said.

Citing BFAR data, the WWF said about 200 whale sharks were slaughtered in 1997 alone, prompting the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the BFAR to call for legal action to protect the whale shark.

Republic Act No. 8550 or the Fisheries Administrative Order prohibits the possession or slaughter of whale sharks. Violators are punished with four years in jail, a maximum fine of P10,000 and the cancellation of the violator’s fishing license. - with Sophia Dedace/RSJ, GMANews.TV

Prosecute butchers of butanding - WWF
Katherine Adraneda The Philippine Star 18 Feb 10;

MANILA, Philippines - An international conservation group is calling for the prosecution of people responsible for the “butchery” of an 18-foot butanding (whale shark) on the shores of Tingloy town in Batangas, with the marine animal’s dorsal and pectoral fins cut off.

The World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF-Philippines) believes poachers from a nearby town could be responsible for the illegal act and urged all sectors concerned to step up enforcement efforts across the country to prevent a repeat of the incident.

Based on the documentation of WWF-Philippines, the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) was fighting for its life when it was found floating belly up in the rough waters of Bahay Kambing, a sheltered cove in Tingloy town.

The WWF-Philippines said the whale shark’s twin pairs of dorsal and pectoral fins were neatly sliced off, as knife marks were evident all over its tail.

Linda Reyes-Romualdez, owner of the Casita Isabel Resort, said scuba divers from Mabini’s Acacia Resort first discovered the mutilated shark last Monday morning.

She recounted that the shark was then towed to the nearby Caban Cove, where waters were more placid.

Together with Bantay Dagat members, volunteers splinted the shark by flanking it with bamboo poles and installing a net underneath to minimize further injuries and ease the marine animal’s pain.

“Sadly, its wounds were too great – and the shark, nicknamed ‘Tingloy Baby,’ died the next day,” said Gregg Yan, information, education and communications officer of WWF-Philippines. The butanding was buried in Caban Cove on Tuesday morning.

This tragic incident came as some 50 countries vowed to protect seven shark species, including the butanding, following the approval of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that is deemed the first international cooperation for the conservation of shark populations in the Indo-Pacific region.

According to WWF-Philippines, Bantay Dagat units from Mabini reported that for several days, fishing vessels equipped with powerful strobe lights have been operating in Mabini waters, sometimes as close as 300 meters from shore.

Responding to complaints from local resorts, the Bantay Dagat and local police asked the fishermen – who were reportedly from Lemery town – to leave the area.

The group said the fishermen left, but returned several nights later, this time in adjoining Tingloy town.

WWF-Philippines said Mabini authorities were not able to respond directly because the area was under Tingloy’s jurisdiction. And so, the group said, the fishing went on until concerned divers informed Mabini officials of their grisly discovery.

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) director Malcolm Sarmiento said a full investigation would be conducted to track down and prosecute the culprits.

Sarmiento committed BFAR’s support until a better enforcement strategy can be developed between the towns of Mabini and Tingloy.

“This is a real eye-opener, for it proves that the slaughter of endangered species – even one as big as a butanding – can still take place if we let our guard down. The public and private sectors must come together to refine and polish current conservation mechanisms,” said Joel Palma, vice president of WWF-Philippines Conservation Programs.

WWF-Philippines said Filipinos have hunted whale sharks for decades. The waters of Bohol, Misamis Oriental and Sorsogon were once fishing grounds for butanding hunters.


Read more!

Plantation inclusion will ‘kill forests’ in Indonesia

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 17 Feb 10;

Environmental activists have condemned the government’s plan to classify oil palm plantations as forests, calling it a ploy to legalize forest conversions.

Activists from Forest Watch Indonesia (FWI), Telapak Indonesia and the Indonesian Forum for the Environment (Walhi) called on the Forestry Ministry to rescind the plan if the government was serious in efforts to safeguard the country’s already threatened forests.

FWI executive director Wirendro Sumargo said the plan would increase the threat to forests because it would allow local authorities to easily reallocate forest use to increase their budgets.

“It would not be surprising that under the new decree, natural forests can be easily converted for business uses,” Wirendro told The Jakarta Post on Tuesday.

“It also seems the plan is aimed at legalizing illegal oil palm plantations currently operating in forests.”

He insisted the ministry take legal action against illegal oil palm companies operating in forests not allocated for business use.

With the decree, the Forestry Ministry is aping several countries such as Malaysia. Coincidentally, Indonesia and Malaysia are the world’s largest producers of palm oil.

The ministry claims the decree would not lead to massive forest conversions.

The program coordinator at Bogor-based Telapak Indonesia, Hap-soro, accused the ministry of not committing to protect forests.

“The concept of calling an oil palm plantation a forest has no basis in fact. It is merely a cover to allow investors to convert forests,” he told the Post.

“Even without the decree, the government has failed to control the growth of illegal oil palm plantations.”

Currently, oil palm plantations cover 7 million hectares of land, with 3 million hectares belonging to individuals, another 3 million to private companies and 1 million to state-owned plantation company PTPN.

Environmentalists claim some plantations were developed in forests not designated for agriculture.

National Forestry Council member Hariadi Kartodiharjo said development of the palm oil industry should be focused on idle forest land.

“I don’t believe the decree will be used to convert natural forests,” he said.

He said that in the past, Indonesia had rejected proposals by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to link oil palm plantations to forests. These proposals were eventually implemented in Malaysia.
“Oil palm plantations would seriously threaten biodiversity,” he said.

Walhi climate campaigner Teguh Surya said the decree would not only accelerate forest damage, but would legalize deforestation across the archipelago.

“Don’t expect the next generation to still have forests in the future. The decree will also kill the nation’s character,” he said.

He said President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono should intervene or else the government would never meet its pledged emission target cut of 26 percent by 2020.


Read more!

Big business leaves big forest footprints

Andrew Mitchell, BBC Green Room 16 Feb 10;

Consumers around the globe are not aware that they are "eating" rainforests, says Andrew Mitchell. In this week's Green Room, he explains how many every-day purchases are driving the destruction of the vital tropical ecosystems.

When was the last time you had a "rainforest picnic"? Or even, perhaps, an "all-day Amazon breakfast"?

Next time you are in a supermarket picking up a chicken sandwich for lunch, or fancy tucking in to a hearty breakfast of eggs, sausage and bacon before setting off for work, spare a thought for the Amazon.

A new report by Forest Footprint Disclosure reveals for the first time how global business is driving rainforests to destruction in order to provide things for you and me to eat.

But it does also reveal what companies are doing to try to lighten their forest footprint. Sadly, however, the answer is: not much, at least not yet.

Consumers "eat" rainforests each day - in the form of beef-burgers, bacon and beauty products - but without knowing it.

The delivery mechanism is a global supply chain with its feet in the forests and its hands in the till.

Because of growing demand for beef, soy and palm oil, which are in much of what we consume, as well as timber and biofuels, rainforests are worth more cut down than standing up.

Supermarket sweep

Governments, which claim to own 70% of them, create prosperity for their nations through this process, but poor forest communities need their forests for energy and food.

The report shows that the EU is the largest importer of soy in the world, much of it coming from Brazil.

It also shows that after China, the EU is the biggest importer of palm oil in the world.

Soy provides cheap food to fatten our pigs and chickens, while palm oil is in everything from cakes and cookies, to that fine moisturiser you gently rubbed into your cheeks this morning.

I have become a bit of a bore in supermarkets, challenging my kids to hunt for soy lecithin or palm oil (often disguised as vegetable oil) on product labels. You should try it! The stuff is everywhere.

The gargantuan farms of Brazil's Mato Grosso State can boast 50 combines abreast at harvest time, marching across monoculture prairies where once the most diverse ecosystem on Earth stood, albeit in some cases many years ago.

Further north, thousands of square miles of rainforest natural capital is going up in smoke each year, often illegally, to provide pastureland for just one cow per hectare to supply beef hungry Brazilians or more prosperous mouths in China and India.

Many of the hides from these cattle then go into the designer trainers, handbags or luxury car upholstery that wealthy markets have such an appetite for.

Few Europeans know that their fine steak au poivre or choice after dinner mints might have an added expense on the other side of the world that unknown to them, is altering life on Earth.

None of this would matter but for three things. Firstly, evolution is being changed forever. Most of us, sadly, can live with that.

Secondly, burning tropical forests drives global warming faster than the world's entire transport sector; there will be no solution to climate change without stopping deforestation.

Finally, losing forests may undermine food, energy and climate security. Yet saving them could, according to UN special adviser Pavan Sukhdev's forthcoming review on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), reduce environmental costs by $3-5 trillion per year.

Oh yes, let us not forget the 1.4bn people, many of them the world's poorest, who depend on these forests for their survival and who cannot afford to lose them, even if we can.

Full disclosure?

So what can be done? The first thing is to encourage business to mind its "forest footprint".

The impact global business has on deforestation will be a key factor in halting deforestation in the future. No amount of hand-wringing in the UN climate talks will alter action on the ground unless the drivers of global deforestation are also tackled.

Whilst poverty is possibly the largest of these drivers, so is the way in which business drives the conversion of cheap forest land to feed their global commodity supply chains - all the way to you and me.

This is why we launched the Forest Footprint Disclosure project last year: to invite companies to first recognise their impact on forests and then disclose what they were doing about it.

Such a request might be ignored by giant businesses if it were not for the fact that investment managers, with at least $3.5 trillion of assets, also wanted to know and backed our disclosure request with their names.

Why? Because it is their money that may be at risk if the companies do not clean up their act.

In 2009, Amigos da Terra's report Time to Pay the Bill, and Greenpeace's Slaughtering the Amazon highlighted the cattle industry as a driver of climate change responsible for the bulk of Brazil's greenhouse gases through deforestation and methane emissions from 180 million cows.

This resulted in the withdrawal of a $60m loan from the World Bank's International Finance Corporation to Bertin, Brazil's largest exporter of beef.

In June 2009, Brazil's major supermarkets - Pao de Acucar, Wal-mart, and Carrefour - all announced they would no longer accept beef from ranches involved in deforestation.

In July, sportswear manufacturer Nike said it would not accept leather in its products from Brazil if it came from deforested areas.

And in October, JBS Friboi, Bertin, Mafrig and Minerva - the largest players in Brazil's cattle industry - all agreed to similar action.

Daniel Azeredo, a Federal Public Prosecutor in Para State, has recently filed legal actions totalling $1bn against 22 ranches and 13 meat-packing plants for non-compliance with federal laws governing deforestation.

'Extraordinary time'

The effects are rippling all the way up the supply chain - well, to you and me again.

Consumers and businesses can play their part by demanding that their suppliers know where their "Forest Risk Commodities" come from. But will they?

Evidence from certification schemes shows that consumers care but not enough to get their wallets out.

If business cannot secure a premium for the extra costs of producing the good stuff, why should they bother?

I believe, however, that we are at an extraordinary time in human history when all that could be about to change.

What all this is evidence of is a quickening step in a remarkable journey that will result in nothing less than the transformation of the 21st Century economy.

Curbing emissions from deforestation, which was the outsider in the UN negotiations just two years ago, has moved to become the front-runner. It is now widely recognised that forests offer the quickest, most cost-effective and largest means of curbing global emissions between now and 2030.

So, are we at a tipping point in history where this could actually happen?

Conservation will never out-compete commerce with a global population rising toward nine billion.

Feeding and fuelling our growing world is one of the greatest opportunities of the 21st century, but sending natural capital up in smoke and squandering ecosystems that support wealth creation in the process will, ultimately, be counterproductive.

Businesses that understand this will be the rising stars of the future. Our report provides some of the first insights into who the potential winners and losers may be, and which business are setting the pace today.

Investors will want to spot them.

Andrew Mitchell is Chairman of the Forest Footprint Disclosure project and Executive Director of the Global Canopy Programme

The Green Room is a series of opinion articles on environmental topics running weekly on the BBC News website


Read more!

Diversity of corals, algae in warm Indian Ocean suggests resilience to future global warming

Penn State, EurekAlert 15 Feb 10;

Penn State researchers and their international collaborators have discovered a diversity of corals harboring unusual species of symbiotic algae in the warm waters of the Andaman Sea in the northeastern Indian Ocean.

"The existence of so many novel coral symbioses thriving in a place that is too warm for most corals gives us hope that coral reefs and the ecosystems they support may persist -- at least in some places -- in the face of global warming," said the team's leader, Penn State Assistant Professor of Biology Todd LaJeunesse.

According to LaJeunesse, the comprehensiveness of the team's survey, which also included analysis of the corals and symbiotic algae living in the cooler western Indian Ocean and Great Barrier Reef area of Australia, is unparalleled by any other study. The team's findings will be published during the week ending 20 February 2010 in an early online issue of the Journal of Biogeography.

Corals are colonies of tiny animals that derive nutrients and energy from golden-brown, photosynthetic algae that live inside the corals' cells. "This symbiotic relationship is sensitive to changes in the environment," said LaJeunesse. "For example, because the algae are photosynthetic, they are very sensitive to changes in light. They are also sensitive to temperature," he said. "An increase in sea-surface temperature of just a few degrees Fahrenheit for a period of several months can cause many of the coral-algal symbioses to break down and the algae to be expelled. This process is known as bleaching because it leaves behind the clear animal tissue and the white skeleton underneath. When bleaching is severe, due to either high temperatures or low light availability, corals soon die without their symbiotic partners."

LaJeunesse said that continued global warming eventually may cause the demise of coral-reef ecosystems, which would have major impacts on the tourism and food-fisheries industries. According to team member Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, a professor at the University of Queensland in Australia, coral-dominated reefs may become scarce within the next 30 to 50 years, given the increase in the number of bleaching events that recently have taken place.

"The fact that the Andaman Sea and other regions around Southeast Asia are home to such a high diversity of corals is surprising because the water there is so warm and sometimes murky," said LaJeunesse. "The inshore locations we surveyed are not the sort of places where you would expect to see thriving coral communities. Not only is the water warm and murky, but the tidal flux is so great that many of the corals can spend hours out of water, exposed to the harsh sun and dry air."

The team identified the species of algae that associate with corals, as well as giant clams, sea anemones, zoanthids, and other reef-dwelling animals that form close symbiotic relationships with the single-celled algae that are referred to as zooxanthellae. In the Andaman Sea, the scientists found a variety of seemingly thermally tolerant algae species, with one species being particularly abundant. Called Symbiodinium trenchi, the species is a generalist organism -- one that is able to associate with a variety of hosts. Corals harboring this symbiont appear to be tolerant of high heat. LaJeunesse found the same species in the Caribbean Ocean during a bleaching event that took place in 2005. "Symbiodinium trenchi, which normally occurs in very low numbers in the Caribbean, was able to take advantage of the warming event and become more prolific because of its apparent tolerance of high temperatures," he said. "The species appears to have saved certain colonies of coral from the damaging effects of unusually warm water."

In contrast, the scientists found very few thermally tolerant algae species in the cooler western Indian Ocean and Great Barrier Reef area. According to LaJeunesse, the Andaman Sea is on average three or four degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the western Indian Ocean and the Great Barrier Reef area. "Symbiodinium trenchi and other related symbiont species can tolerate this warm water, but if global warming causes the water to warm further, even these species might not be able to deal with it," he said. "However, if the water warms by three or four degrees Fahrenheit in the cooler western Indian Ocean or Great Barrier Reef area, Symbiodinium trenchi easily could persist. The problem is that Symbiodinium trenchi occurs in very low numbers in these cooler areas and, so far, has not proliferated during bleaching events as it has in the Caribbean."

LaJeunesse said that some scientists have suggested that reefs suffering from high water temperatures might be "seeded" with the thermally tolerant Symbiodinium trenchi; however, he is not sure the approach will work. "Symbiodinium trenchi forms symbiotic associations only with corals and other animals that acquire their symbionts from the environment," he said. "Other species of coral are born with algae already in their cells. If Symbiodinium trenchi were introduced into a new environment, it may be able to 'rescue' some species that acquire their symbionts from the environment, but it would not be able to 'rescue' species that are born with algae already in their cells because these species have evolved special relationships with their algae."

Not only is LaJeunesse concerned that "seeding" reefs with algae, like Symbiodinium trenchi, will fail to "rescue" animals that are born with algae already in their cells, but he also is concerned about possible negative repercussions. "You never know what the effects might be of introducing an organism into an ecosystem in which it is not well established," he said.

LaJeunesse explained that the diversity of species the team found in the Andaman Sea likely is the result of the dramatic changes in the ocean environment that the region has experienced since the beginning of the Pleistocene Epoch. Typically, during times of environmental change, generalist species of algae that are able to associate with a variety of animal hosts are more successful than specialist species of algae that can associate only with particular hosts because the generalists can spread to many hosts, thus forming new combinations that might be better suited to the new environment. Once the environmental change has stabilized, some of the generalist species form special associations with new hosts and, as a result, become new specialist species.

LaJeunesse said that one of the team's most important findings is that coral-algal symbioses are much more ecologically and evolutionarily responsive to environmental changes than previously was believed. "The responsiveness of these symbioses to historical climate change gives us hope that some species may survive in some places in the face of future warming," he said. "Yet, even though these symbiotic relationships have persisted through historical climate changes, they never have experienced the rapid rate of warming that we are seeing today. So, while we shouldn't underestimate life and its ability to respond to change, we also should do everything in our power not to test its resilience."

###

This research was funded by the World Bank, Penn State University, Florida International University, and the U.S. National Science Foundation.


Read more!

UN wildlife conference enhances intergovernmental cooperation to safeguard sharks

Governments combat the overexploitation of sharks as their commercial value increases
UNEP 12 Feb 10;

Bonn/Manila, 12 February 2010 - A new landmark agreement to counteract the alarming decline of sharks was concluded on Friday under the auspices of the UNEP administered Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Government representatives meeting in Manila, Philippines, agreed on the text of a Memorandum of Understanding on the conservation of migratory sharks.

At the meeting, delegates agreed to include all seven shark species in the CMS appendices under this agreement: the Great White, Basking, Whale, Porbeagle, Spiny Dogfish, Shortfin and Longfin Mako Sharks. They are to benefit from better international protection by fishing nations through reduction of threats, in particular illegal fishing and trade, by enforcing existing laws.

CMS Executive Secretary Elizabeth Maruma Mrema said: "This first global CMS instrument on commercially exploited species is a decisive step forward in international shark conservation. Wildlife Conventions, UN Agencies and international fisheries need to work together to prevent these creatures that roam the world's oceans from becoming extinct."

The goal of the CMS agreement is the restoration and long term viability of populations of migratory sharks covered by the instrument. A conservation and management plan was thoroughly discussed as a first step towards international cooperation on the protection of sharks. By signing this agreement, countries have expressed their willingness to conserve the endangered shark species covered under this agreement.

According to the IUCN Red List 2010, 17% of 1,044 shark species are threatened. At present, our knowledge of about 47% of shark species is too limited to even assess if they are threatened.

Over-fishing, fisheries by-catch, illegal trade, habitat destruction, depletion of prey species, pollution with a high risk of mercury intoxication, boat strikes and the impact of climate change on the marine environment seriously threaten sharks. Sharks have slow growth with a gestation period of up to 22 months. They might reach maturity only after 20 years years and produce relatively few young. Being top predators, their natural mortality is low. Sharks have high life-expectancy: Whales Sharks can live up to 100 years. Some shark species are highly migratory, which makes it difficult to protect the species and its habitat across a global range. These biological characteristics make sharks particularly vulnerable with little chance to recover if overfished.

Some species such as Mako Sharks are targeted for sports fishing, trophy hunting, and as cure in traditional medicine. According to the IUCN Red List of the World Conservation Union, 14 shark species are "critically endangered" and face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.

Sharks suffer from overexploitation as both target and non target catch. According to the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), up to 900,000 metric tons of sharks have been caught every year for the last two decades. However, taking into account illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and missing data , the catch figure is expected to be at least twice as high.

Since the late 1980s Whale Shark meat has been increasingly considered as a high-grade product and gained acceptance by consumers as an exotic food, and prices began to skyrocket. TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, reported 2000 kg of Whale Shark meat sold in Taiwan for USD 7,000 (€ 4,500).

Total catches in global shark fisheries are still increasing, while some populations have already crashed. Studies reveal that shark populations collapsed in the Northwest Atlantic by 75% within 15 years, and both in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Mediterranean Sea by 90%. Valuable fish and crustacean fisheries such as high sea long-line and driftnet fleets that target tuna, sword fish, sail fish and marlin claim an unsustainably high death toll on sharks.

Although a shark finning ban was adopted as of mid 2007 by 19 countries, the European Union and 9 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations for fishing vessels in their waters, sharks continue to be hunted. High demand and price of shark fins have triggered increased hunting activities. While the finless bodies are dumped into the sea, fins can be easily stored on board of fishing vessels without competing for storage space with more valuable fish species. This gives a considerable incentive for finning and exacerbates the problem of overexploitation.

A growing number of commercially exploited sharks have been listed on the appendices of CMS and CITES. The Spiny Dogfish and the Porbeagle Shark are being proposed by governments for inclusion on CITES Appendix II to avoid overexploitation by imposing controls in trade.

Short and long-finned Mako Sharks, the Porbeagle Shark and the Spiny Dogfish continue to be seriously threatened by over-fishing despite their indispensable role in the oceans' ecosystems. Their listing on CMS Appendix II encourages range states to conclude international agreements.

The first global instrument on sharks is expected to complement existing international wildlife conservation agreements, fisheries agreements and regional fisheries management organizations. CMS Appendix I lists migratory sharks that are threatened with extinction. Member states to the Convention shall prohibit their hunting, fishing and deliberate killing and implement comprehensive conservation activities. In the view of overall declining marine biodiversity and overfishing of top predators in particular, the CMS Sharks agreement renews efforts during the International Year of Biodiversity to counteract the global loss of biodiversity.

113 Governments Agree to Conserve Endangered Sharks
Environmental News Service 17 Feb 10;

MANILA, Philippines, February 17, 2010 (ENS) - A landmark agreement to protect shark species threatened with extinction was reached Friday as 113 countries signed up to a United Nations-backed wildlife treaty to conserve migratory sharks.

Government representatives signed the shark protection agreement in Manila at a meeting of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, CMS, a treaty administered by the UN Environment Programme.

They agreed to include seven shark species in the agreement - the great white, basking, whale, porbeagle, spiny dogfish, shortfin and longfin mako sharks.

The sharks are to benefit from better international protection by fishing nations by reduction of illegal fishing and trade through the enforcement of existing laws.

"This first global CMS instrument on commercially exploited species is a decisive step forward in international shark conservation," said UNEP/CMS Executive Secretary Elizabeth Mrema.

"Wildlife conventions, UN agencies and international fisheries need to work together to prevent these creatures that roam the world's oceans from becoming extinct," she said.

According to the 2010 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 17 percent of world's 1,044 shark species are threatened with extinction. At present, human knowledge of about 47 percent of shark species is too limited to even assess if they are threatened.

UNEP cites studies showing that shark populations collapsed in both in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Mediterranean Sea by 90 percent, and by 75 percent in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean within the past 15 years.

The human appetite for shark fin soup and shark meat has led to the collapse of shark populations.

By signing the agreement, the delegates recognized that sharks are at risk of over-fishing, fisheries by-catch, illegal trade, habitat destruction, depletion of prey species, pollution with a high risk of mercury poisoning, boat strikes and the impact of climate change on the marine environment.

Delegates discussed a conservation and management plan that would serve as a first step towards international cooperation on shark protection.

Sharks are particularly vulnerable because they grow slowly and live as long as 100 years. Their relatively low reproductive rates and low natural mortality give sharks little chance to recover if over-fished.

In addition, whale shark meat has been increasingly considered as a high-grade, exotic product since the late 1980s. Prices have risen to $7,000 for 2,000 kilograms in Taiwan, according to the WWF/IUCN wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC.

The UN Food and Agricultural Organization says up to 900,000 tons of sharks have been caught every year for the last two decades, and calculating for illegal, unreported, unregulated fishing and missing data, the actual catch figure is estimated to be at least twice as high.

Nevertheless, Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett says his government will not adhere to the protection of the porbeagle, longfin mako and shortfin mako species under the CMS treaty, but instead would pass a law to remove these sharks from the country's list of protected species.

Garrett said there is a "lack of evidence suggesting that Australian populations of these shark species face the same threats as other parts of the world."

"The government will ensure that recreational fishers, including charter boat operations, are not unfairly impacted by this international decision, which was driven primarily by concern about northern hemisphere populations of these sharks," Garrett said.

Garrett acknowledged that it is a requirement of Australia's national environment law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, that species listed internationally under the Convention on Migratory Species are automatically included on Australia's national list of migratory species to be protected.

But he said, the law was passed by the previous administration under Prime Minister John Howard, and a recently completed review of the legislation by the current Rudd Government identified "the inflexibility" of the EPBC Act when it comes to the listing of species under the international convention as "an issue needing correction."

Until a new law is passed, Garrett said, catch and release fishing of these species is unlikely to be subject to enforcement action.

Shark conservationists are worried about Australia's new shark policy.

"Australia is a longstanding signatory of the Convention for Conservation of Migratory Species and has committed to protect listed species with Australian legislation - applying the EPBC act to those species as they migrate through our waters," said Glenn Sant, who serves as Global Marine Programme leader of TRAFFIC and a vice-chair of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group.

"We are deeply concerned that the Australian Government has decided not to offer these species any increased protection despite the fact that they have been internationally listed under the CMS and recognized as globally Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List."

Sant says changing the EPBC Act could potentially remove protection from other migratory species that pass through Australian waters. "The Government must explain clearly to Australians what the implications of any such change would be," he said. "This is no trivial matter."


Read more!

Europe's eel stocks 'under threat' from export fishing

Conservationists fear France's supplies to China may jeopardise restocking plan
Michael McCarthy, The Independent 17 Feb 10;

A campaign to save the eel, the continent's most threatened common freshwater fish, may be breaking down because French fishermen are exporting too many baby eels to China, British conservationists fear.

France holds up to 90 per cent of Europe's eels, and French supplies are crucial for restocking rivers and lakes in other countries from which they are rapidly disappearing.

But in the current fishing season, which runs for another two months, French fishermen plan to export a massive 14.5 tonnes of baby eels – elvers or "glass eels" – to China, where they can fetch the remarkable price of €800 per kilo. And in doing so, they may not be able to meet the restocking commitments which they have entered into under an EU rescue plan for the species.

Across Europe, populations of Anguilla anguilla are plummeting and, according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, the species is now critically endangered. Catches are down more than 75 per cent over the past 40 years and "recruitment" – the number of baby eels joining the stock – has dropped by more than 95 per cent compared with levels before 1980.

Once one of Europe's most familiar fish, in some places eels have gone completely. Only last month, the Zoological Society of London revealed that over the past five years, catches of eels in the River Thames – once an iconic staple of Cockney cuisine, as jellied eels or served in eel pies – had dropped by 98 per cent; fewer than 50 were caught in the river in 2009.

No one really knows why a creature which was once so common is now becoming so rare. The losses may be linked to its remarkable reproductive cycle, which involves the adults spawning on the far side of the Atlantic, but there are also many potential threats in home rivers, ranging from over-harvesting and pollution to the construction of dams making passage upstream impossible.

In response to the decline, the EU has brought in an eel recovery plan which takes effect this year, and one of its key components is that all countries which fish for eels are obliged to hold back a significant proportion of their catch to be used in restocking. This season the amount is 35 per cent, and this will rise annually until it reaches 60 per cent in 2015.

However, there is disquiet about the French fishery, the largest, from the wide range of British conservation interests concerned with saving the eel, who come together in the Sustainable Eel Group. They fear that the substantial amount of eels the French are exporting to Asia this year will not allow them to meet their restocking commitments – which will be vital for the rest of Europe – and the recovery plan will start to break down.

In 2007 the eel was added to Appendix Two of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, which meant that its export trade was restricted. Britain immediately announced a voluntary export ban but French fishermen, some of whom depend on the catch for their livelihood, have negotiated an export quota of 14.5 tonnes – with each tonne representing some three to four million glass eels. Early estimates of the total French harvest this year suggest that the export quota will be much more than the amount which would allow the agreed percentage for restocking.

"It is highly likely that the 14.5 tonnes will absorb all the remaining catch in France, and short-term profit will triumph over sustainability," said Andrew Kerr, the Sustainable Eel Group chairman.

"The ultimate effect of this plundering will be to slow the recovery of the eel, by losing them from their natural European environment. French fishermen are being permitted to make large short-term profit through exports to China in priority over meeting their EU obligation to make 35 per cent of the catch available for restocking.

"Should France continue with these exports and fail to put aside the 35 per cent they could be subjected to EU infraction proceedings."

A spokesman for the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries said last night that France was confident of meeting its 35 per cent restocking quota, adding: "The French plan is a very responsible plan, in which conservation of eels is the utmost priority. We are aware that, thanks to our management, we are now the only country in Europe with significant stocks of eels, and we hope that our quota of restocking will be able to contribute to a wider European restocking."


Read more!

Danube countries agree to protect 'Amazon of Europe'

Yahoo News 16 Feb 10;

VIENNA (AFP) – Ministers from the 14 countries of the Danube basin adopted here Tuesday a plan to clean up and protect the historic river seen by green groups as Europe's lifeline and the "Amazon of Europe".

Environmental groups welcomed the plan, but called for additional action against the potentially destructive effects of hydroelectric power stations and man-made changes to the river to make it more navigable for shipping.

"The Danube waters are shared by us all and therefore we also share the responsibility," said Mitja Bricelj, president of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) who hosted the meeting.

"We meet to ensure that the resources of the Danube Basin are managed in an environmentally sustainable manner."

The Danube is Europe's second-longest river, running 2,860 kilometres (1,777 miles) from the Black Forest in Germany to the Black Sea in Romania.

Ministers and high-level representatives from 14 countries, including Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Romania and Ukraine as well as the European Commission attended the meeting.

The ministers adopted the so-called Danube River Basin Management Plan drawn up to "improve the environmental condition of the Danube and its tributaries."

The plan includes a series of measures to be implemented over the next five years, including concrete efforts to reduce pollution and minimise the negative effects of man-made changes to the river.

It also includes re-naturalization of wetlands, creation of natural flood barriers, upgrading of dykes and improvement of alarm and forecasting systems.

Environmental groups, such as the World Wildlife Fund and BUND, the German arm of Friends of the Earth, welcomed the plan.

"Overall, we welcome it, but we do see some critical points," said Irene Lucius, senior policy coordinator of the WWF's Danube-Carpathian programme.

BUND president Hubert Weiger cited pressure to construct new hydropower plants as a particular threat to the Danube.

"While providing a renewable source of energy, hydropower plants of all sizes, including small ones, can easily upset the fragile systems."

In particular, environmental groups were campaigning against river regulation work in the Upper Danube between Straubing and Vilshofen in Germany, involving the construction of a dam and a canal.

That would "destroy the last remaining free flowing section of the Danube in Germany with severe impacts on biodiversity," Weiger said.

Another criticism stems from efforts to make the river more navigable for ships, Weiger said.

"We should fit the ships to the river, not the river to the ships," he said.

The Danube "is not just a traffic route, but part of Europe's natural and cultural heritage."

The river is Europe's "lifeline. It's the Amazon of Europe," he said.


Read more!

Deadly Bat Fungus Spreading in U.S.

White-nose syndrome confirmed farther south and west
Ker Than, National Geographic News 16 Feb 10;

A deadly fungus responsible for tens of thousands of bat deaths in the eastern United States is on the move, according to recent tests that confirmed the killer's presence in Tennessee.

White-nose syndrome, which appears in hibernating bats, has been linked to a cold-loving fungus found on the wings, ears, and muzzles of infected bats. Until now, the disease has appeared only in caves along the northeastern seaboard from Vermont to Virginia.

But today the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency announced that two tricolored bats—commonly known as pips—have been found with white-nose syndrome in Worley's Cave in Sullivan County.

"I think this will be furthest south that white-nose syndrome has been detected in the United States, and it may be the furthest west as well," said Gina Hancock, a spokesperson for the nonprofit Nature Conservancy, which has been tracking the disease.

The cave where the two infected bats were found is only about 65 miles (105 kilometers) from a confirmed infection site in Virginia—well within flying range for the pips.

"There's nothing extraordinary about the jump from Virginia to the Tennessee site, except we're disappointed to see it happen," said Alan Hicks, a bat expert at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation who was not involved in the Tennessee tests.

But if white-nose syndrome spreads through Tennessee, the disease could wreak havoc on several bat populations and may even wipe out two endangered bat species, scientists say.

"The eastern caves don't have many large hibernating colonies," Hancock said. But Tennessee "has up to one hundred thousand or more bats in one cave. With a 95-percent mortality rate, the loss is going to be massive."

Rare Bats at Risk in Tennessee

First identified in 2007, white-nose syndrome is still something of a mystery. It's unclear how the fungus kills or whether it is even the main cause of death in afflicted animals.

Scientists think the disease spreads when bats gather in colonies to hibernate.

The ailment causes bats to wake up during hibernation, which means the animals use up their fat reserves too fast. Sick bats fly out of their caves during winter in a desperate attempt to find food. Because the insects they eat are also seasonally dormant, the bats soon die of starvation.

(Related: "'Drunk' Bats Fly Right—Discovery Surprises Scientists.")

Pips don't generally cluster when they hibernate, so the occurrence of white-nose syndrome in Tennessee may still be relatively isolated. But scientists are concerned that the condition could jump to gray bats and Indiana bats, which are endangered.

The sick pips' cave, for example, is also a gray bat summer nesting ground.

"Gray bats hibernate in very large numbers in very few caves," said Cory Holliday, the Nature Conservancy's cave and karst manager.

"If gray bats are infected, it will probably be a matter of just a couple of years before the global population of gray bats is in severe danger."

Bats: Key Public Servants

People can help control spread of the disease by keeping away from known infection sites and decontaminating any gear used for recreational caving.

"It's not a far-reaching conclusion to think that people can get dirt or fungal spores on their boots and walk into a cave two states away and spread the disease," Holliday said.

White-nose syndrome isn't a direct health risk for humans, he added. But the loss of thousands of bats would have a huge impact on people. (Related: "Bat Bonanza: 100 Species Found in 5 Acres of Jungle.")

Since many bat species primarily eat insects, "bats provide a tremendous public service in terms of pest control," Richard Kirk, the Tennessee wildlife agency's nongame and endangered species coordinator, said in a statement.

"If we lose 500,000 bats, we'll lose the benefits from that service, and millions of pounds of insects will still be flying around our neighborhoods, agricultural fields, and forests."


Read more!

Danish biotech firm launches new fuel enzyme

Yahoo News 16 Feb 10;

COPENHAGEN (AFP) – A Danish biotechnology company on Tuesday launched a new enzyme which it said will make it possible to turn agricultural waste into biofuel at a competitive price.

The breakthrough will allow the biofuel industry to produce cellulosic ethanol for less than two US dollars per gallon (around 37 euro cents per litre), Novozymes said in a statement.

This cost would put the fuel on a par with petrol and conventional ethanol, the company said.

Novozymes said the new enzyme, known as Cellic CTec2, breaks down cellulose in agricultural waste into sugars that can be fermented into ethanol, and could convert corn cobs and stalks, wheat straw and woodchips into fuel.

"We have been working on this for the past 10 years and promised our customers and the market to be ready by 2010," Novozymes' chief executive Steen Riisgaard said in a statement.

Riisgaard said he expected cellulosic ethanol to become even cheaper over time.

"Our partners expect production costs to fall below two dollars per gallon once their first commercial-scale plants are fully operational, and the cost will continue to drop in the future," he said in the statement.

Tuesday's announcement prompted Novozymes' share price to rise 4.8 percent on the Danish stock market, to stand at 567 Danish kroner (76.2 euros, 104 dollars).

Novozymes said the new enzyme was developed with the help of 29.3 million dollars from the US Department of Energy.

Large-scale commercial production of cellulosic ethanol is scheduled to start in 2011, and the company said the industry could create 1.2 million jobs in the United States alone by 2022.


Read more!

Obama unveils plans to build new nuclear power plants

Yahoo News 17 Feb 10;

LANHAM, Maryland (AFP) – President Barack Obama Tuesday laid an eight billion dollar bet on nuclear power, unveiling loan guarantees to spur construction on the first new US plant since a notorious accident 30 years ago.

Obama said nuclear power, despite concerns among some environmentalists over safety, must play a key role in an energy policy designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and wean the United States off foreign oil from volatile regions.

"On an issue which affects our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, we cannot continue to be mired in the same old debates between left and right, between environmentalists and entrepreneurs," Obama said.

"We?ll have to build a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in America," he told journalists on a visit to a training center focusing on clean energy and low carbon energy technologies outside Washington.

"We are announcing roughly eight billion dollars in loan guarantees to break ground on the first new nuclear plant in our country in nearly three decades."

The loan guarantees will go towards the construction of two new 1,100 megawatt nuclear reactors at an existing nuclear facility in Burke, Georgia, the White House said.

At a time of economic blight when the administration is trying to create a new generation of clean energy jobs, Obama said the investment in nuclear power would pay off in employment opportunities in years to come.

"It's a plant that will create thousands of construction jobs in the next few years and some 800 permanent jobs, well-paying permanent jobs, in the years to come. And this is only the beginning," Obama said.

The president also warned that America's competitors were beating it to the punch on nuclear energy, specifically mentioning long-term investments by Japan and France in the industry.

He said of 56 nuclear reactors being built around the world, 21 are in China, six in South Korea, and five in India -- some of the key economies he most often mentions as trailblazing rivals to the United States.

"To meet our growing energy needs and prevent the worst consequences of climate change, we'll need to increase our supply the nuclear power. It's that simple.

"Make no mistake: whether it is nuclear energy, or solar or wind energy, if we fail to invest in these technologies today, we?ll be importing them tomorrow."

Obama's move uses a 2005 law that authorizes the Energy Department to guarantee loans to projects that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

There are two broad areas of opposition to Obama's bet on nuclear power -- first among taxpayer watchdog groups who oppose the spending on terms of scale and likely impact.

Secondly, some environmentalists oppose the idea of expanding nuclear power on safety grounds and on principle, arguing that funds should be transferred to other sources of alternative energy.

The campaign group Beyond Nuclear criticized Obama's decision as "utterly irresponsible" and warned of safety concerns over the two new reactors, adding that they were vulnerable to hurricanes or tornados or terror attacks.

Obama has also raised hackles among some in his Democratic Party by signaling a willingness to look at expanding offshore oil and gas drilling -- a key rallying point for Republicans.

There have been no new nuclear power plants built in the United States since the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in the northeastern state of Pennsylvania.

Currently only 20 percent of the country's energy needs are met by nuclear power.

The operation will result in some 3,000 construction jobs, and eventually some 850 permanent jobs, officials say, citing company figures.

Obama said the plant would reduce carbon pollution by 16 million tons each year when compared to a similar coal plant -- the equivalent of taking 3.5 million cars off the road.

When the new nuclear reactors come on line, they will be capable of providing the power needs for 550,000 homes or 1.4 million people, officials said.

The president's 2011 budget unveiled earlier this month contains authority for 36 billion dollars in new loan authority for the construction of new nuclear power plants in addition to 18 billion dollars already authorized.

"We do expect to be making more announcements," US Energy Secretary Steven Chu told reporters, cautioning however that the process of commissioning new reactors took time and was highly complicated.

Obama Steps Up Nuclear Investment
Jeff Mason, PlanetArk 17 Feb 10;

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama announced $8.3 billion in loan guarantees on Tuesday to build the first U.S. nuclear power plant in nearly three decades in a move designed to help advance climate legislation in Congress.

Obama, a Democrat who is trying to win Republican support for a bill to overhaul U.S. energy practices, said the United States needed to increase its supply of nuclear power to meet its energy needs and fight climate change.

The government backing, in the form of a loan guarantee, will go to help Southern Co. build two reactors at a plant in Georgia state.

"Even though we've not broken ground on a ... new nuclear power plant in 30 years, nuclear energy remains our largest source of fuel that produces no carbon emissions," Obama said after touring a union education center in Lanham, Maryland.

"To meet our growing energy needs and prevent the worst consequences of climate change, we'll need to increase our supply of nuclear power. It's that simple," he said.

Obama is pushing for a law that would cap greenhouse gas emissions from industry and expand the use of renewable fuel sources such as wind and solar.

The administration hopes that by reaching out to Republicans on the nuclear issue -- a top priority for key opposition lawmakers such as former presidential candidate John McCain -- support for the stalled bill will grow.

That hope may not come to fruition.

Republicans are eager to expand nuclear power and offshore drilling but are resistant to Obama's proposal for a greenhouse gas emissions trading system similar to the European Union's.

Obama said the climate bill, which contains a cap-and-trade system, would help create incentives for cleaner fuels such as nuclear. He said his administration would work to develop what he saw as common ground on the bill with Republicans.

"We're not going to achieve a big boost in nuclear capacity unless we also create a system of incentives to make clean energy profitable," Obama said.

"As long as producing carbon pollution carries no cost, traditional plants that use fossil fuels will be more cost-effective than plants that use nuclear fuel."

EPA FIGHT, BOOST FOR SOUTHERN

Obama's Democrats and opposition Republicans are at odds over several aspects of how to fight climate change.

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is spearheading legislation that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency having the power to regulate greenhouse gases -- an option Obama is preserving if Congress does not act.

As well some entities, such as Texas, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Iron and Steel Institute, are initiating legal challenges to stop the EPA from acting unilaterally on greenhouse emissions.

Carol Browner, the president's top energy and climate advisor, said the White House would oppose any move to limit the EPA's regulatory authority.

"We will work against that. We do not want to see that passed," she told Reuters Insider in an interview.

Expanding nuclear energy is one area Obama and Republicans have embraced as a way to generate power and create jobs.

Atlanta-based Southern, a leading U.S. producer of electricity, welcomed the nuclear announcement. Its shares rose 1.6 percent. The administration said the project would generate 3,500 construction jobs and 800 permanent positions once the reactors go into operation.

"It's an important endorsement in the role nuclear power must play in diversifying our nation's energy mix and helping to curb greenhouse gas emissions," Southern Chief Executive David Ratcliffe said in a statement.

Supporters of nuclear power argue more reactors will be needed for the United States to tackle global warming effectively because nuclear is a much cleaner energy source than coal-fired power plants, which spew greenhouse gases.

Nuclear power is controversial, however, because of its radioactive waste, which is now stored on site at reactor locations around the country. Remembering the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania, many Americans still harbor concerns about nuclear power's safety.

Obama said a commission with Republican and Democratic leaders and nuclear experts was examining the waste issue.

The two reactors, which some experts estimate will cost $8.8 billion to build, could be in service in 2016 and 2017.

Southern has one of the largest fleets of coal-fired power plants in the nation and would suffer if Washington were to institute restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions.

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said the department plans to offer loan guarantees to at least half a dozen projects but declined to lay out a timeframe for further announcements.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)


Read more!

Global collective action is the key to solving climate change

We cannot accept a 'climate apartheid', where the rich can buy their way out of the problem
John Sauven, The Guardian 16 Feb 10;

Ian Katz says "it is hard to see where the political leadership for a global [climate] deal will come from" (The case for climate action must be remade from the ground upwards, 9 February). With climate science under siege and climate politics in disarray he's absolutely right that "anyone who cares about this issue must fight to keep it alive". I believe that pressure will need to come from a new and much broader global grassroots movement. It will need cross-party political support and must engage the business community.

With Copenhagen behind us, it's time for a new discourse, one which acknowledges the majority view on climate science, accepts uncertainties, and encourages debate among scientists over their observations of the world. A debate framed in the language of risk and uncertainty in which economics and societal values will play a central role.

We have to recognise that a global climate deal will be unlike any other previous international agreement. What we are seeking is a radical transformation of the global economy. If we view it as just another agreement that can be achieved with a bit of lobbying and mass mobilisation it won't work. The world generally needs to be shown that the transition to a low-carbon economy can really happen. And to achieve that requires real leadership from politicians and an unprecedented engagement with the public.

Katz suggests that the consequences (and causes) of the Copenhagen failings may take some time to divine. But it's clear that the policies presented by governments in Copenhagen failed to transcend short-term national interests for the greater global good.

In a carbon-constrained world it is going to be necessary to decouple human development from climate pollution. At Copenhagen world leaders could have signed an agreement that would have meant, in short, a radical transformation in the way we provide transport, energy, food, shelter, and other basic needs for all of the world's population. The opponents of action to tackle climate change talk about the costs. If we are to engage the public in the transition to a new economy we need to talk about the benefits, which will always outweigh the costs because of the catastrophic nature of climate change.

Katz says "there is a strong case for more radical reforms", but adds: "Those who want action on climate change will meanwhile have to accept a more incremental approach." Maybe. But we cannot accept a "climate apartheid", where only the rich can buy their way out of the problem. Gandhi taught us that peaceful movements can win, but you need a common cause and mass mobilisation. Climate change is a global public "bad". To solve it requires global collective action.

Perhaps a more global conscience is a distant dream. But dream we must. We have no alternative but to build a global grassroots movement, move politicians forward, and force large corporations and banks to change direction. Civil society needs to sharpen its teeth if it is to win the battle to save the climate.


Read more!