Best of our wild blogs: 15 Feb 09


Some thoughts on bird photographers
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Happy Valentine's Day
how the wild ones do the wild thing on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

strange anemone @ terumbu raya
video clip on the sgbeachbum blog and fanworm and noble volute and star anemone and spooked halfbeak and chequered cardinalfish

Pulau Senang's dark past
on the Urban Forest blog

Butterfly of the Month: The Commander
on the Butterflies of Singapore blog

Egrets aplenty at NUS
on the wonderful creation blog

Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher catches a prawn
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

February in Ubin
on Ubin.sgkopi

Butterfly Park @ Alexandra Hospital
on the Manta Blog

Jelly Fish!
on the Brandon Photography blog

I ssspy
on talfryn.net

Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve quickly
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Seen on STOMP: Fighting fish sleep above water
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Pulau Semakau with TeamSeagrass
on the Nature Spies blog

Changi Beach Park
on the Running with the Wind blog


Read more!

When a forest builds a community

New Straits Times 15 Feb 09;

WHAT enticed Jeffrey Phang to make Kota Damansara his home was its proximity to a green lung that could offer a place for recreation for his family.

Phang was bitterly disappointed when he learned that the forest was to be no more. In the ongoing drama, paved with pathos and politics that have characterised the history of the peninsula's oldest forest reserve, the land was earmarked under the Petaling Jaya Local Draft Plan 2 (RTPJ2) for further development.

Originally gazetted in 1898, just over 320ha of the 1,560ha of the Sungai Buloh Forest Reserve remains today. The rest have been degazetted and converted into commercial and residential development over the years.

Phang and other residents formed Friends of Kota Damansara (FOKD), a coalition of seven residents' associations in the area, to save the forest. Little did he know then that the exercise would eventually evolve into something greater than the cause: the building of a community.

After getting two grants from the Global Environmental Facility-Small Grants Programme (implemented by the United Nations Development Programme), FOKD approached the Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) for technical expertise to establish the country's first urban community forest park.
The first phase of the project involved an inventory survey, community mobilisation as well as public education activities such as bird watching and jungle trekking to draw nature lovers to the Kota Damansara Community Forest Park.

MNS president Datuk Seri Dr Salleh Mohd Nor, who undertook the survey, says that despite being logged over, the forested area was still home to highly-prized trees such as the meranti-keruing as well as the rare Begonia aequelaterali, one of the most critically endangered of the 52 begonia species found in the peninsula and found only in Selangor.

Now that they know what's there, they are able to plan what to do with the resources. He says: "This forest is unique as it is really hard to find such rich biodiversity within a stone's throw away from our city."

Most of the lowland forests have given way to rubber and oil palm plantations and the forest park is one of the few left in the peninsula.

Furthermore, the forest provides critical ecosystem services such as climate regulation and flood control.

"Removing it as suggested by the RTPJ2 is irresponsible. There is only so much population that Petaling Jaya can sustain, beyond which its carrying capacity life will be degraded for all residents," Phang says.

But for FOKD, saving the forest has also been the catalyst that has allowed residents to look beyond narrow self-interest, to find common ground and to build capacity.

"Most residents' associations are formed to tackle mostly security issues. Beyond that, getting residents to participate actively in community development is typically a challenge," he says.

But community development can grow from the belief that the community itself has or is able to develop solutions to the issues it faces.

"Certainly, many of us who bought houses in Kota Damansara because of the forest, felt betrayed when it was later zoned for development. We not only want to be part of this fight, we want to lead it," says Phang.

The "mamak shop sessions", which became the meeting point for the FOKD committee and interested residents, led to discussions, drawing up of plans, addressing teething problems and finding a balance between competing interests.

The community leaders have always tried to stress that the process is as important and meaningful as the results.

"We recognise that our members cannot devote 100 per cent of their time to our activities, thus we practise a rotating leadership much like flying geese, where we are constantly encouraging others to take the lead," Phang explains.

"We have tried to be as inclusive as possible, to cater for the needs of different groups. People should be able to experience nature for themselves.

"Building broad-based support is vital to ensure the long-term success of our efforts. Our aim here is to build a critical mass of people that uses and cares for the forest."

Today, such groups include disabled persons, the Trails Association of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, the Hash House Harriers, students and the elderly, with facilities such as forest trails and camp sites accessible to all.

Phang believes that increased capacity can be judged in part by the focus of the residents today on what they can do for the community, rather than just complaining about what needs to be done. The residents are currently volunteering during the weekends to build a network of trails through the park using materials that they can marshal.

In the next phase of the project, funding will be used primarily to ensure that the park is re-gazetted and to kick off an extensive education and awareness programme with the four schools in the area.

"We are also working with the present state government to push through the necessary legislation so that it is permanently maintained as a state park," Salleh says.

The project has developed a management plan for the forest which covers key conservation aspects and Phang believes this should now be augmented by a long-term framework for community decision-making and action.

"The blueprint must be flexible enough to adapt to the evolving needs of the community. But what is equally important is that the residents should have a voice in the management of the park and that the forest is kept in its natural state," he stresses.

Phang points to a lack of transparency in land use planning, petty corruption and bureaucratic inertia as some of the main challenges they face, but feels that the community can play an important role in promoting representative institutions of governance and acting as citizen watchdogs.

During the last general election, for example, FOKD initiated a green voters' drive as part of its awareness activities to help residents make informed choices about the policy positions of candidates on environmental issues.

FOKD wants to champion a tripartite partnership between the government, the private sector and the community. It hopes to be a first model for local resident expert groups to be involved in conservation of biodiversity in local parks and open spaces elsewhere in Malaysia, says Phang.

Adds Salleh: "The community should have a say in what facilities are provided for in the park, the visitors' policy and what sort of activities should be carried out."

In a society that rewards short-term gains over long-term sustainability, the success of FOKD demonstrates the centrality of engaging capital on the side of conservation in our efforts to revitalise Local Agenda 21 (which provides a framework for implementing sustainable development at the local level) and improve the quality of life in our cities.

Harnessing community stewardship is never easy, but with the right leadership and with patience, it can ingrain in individuals the principles of shared responsibility and common purpose, two essential pillars of nation building.

Community-based accountability and inclusive governance are the way of the future. Ordinary citizens, if empowered, often know what is best for their lives and have the interest and ability to make it happen.

The writer has served in various non-governmental organisations and can be reached at lilei.chow@undp.org


Read more!

Manila Bay whale death points to serious problems

Jose Ma. Lorenzo Tan, Manila Times 15 Feb 09;

NOT all ends well for stranded whales.

The stranded melon-headed whales saved off Bataan were an exception. Just last December, the lifeless body of a baleen whale was found floating beside a passenger ship along Manila Bay’s Pier 13.

Measuring 9.8 meters and weighing almost three tons, the whale was thought to be either a Minke or a Bryde’s whale.

Uncommon as it may seem, the event may not be an isolated occurrence. In August 2007, another baleen whale carcass was found dead at the mouth of Manila Bay.

Baleen whales may be harmed in a number of ways: entanglement in fishing gear, heavy boat traffic leading to ship strikes, pollution and competition with humans for food resources.

Unlike fish, whales do not have a swim bladder. At death, many of them simply sink. The greatest concern in the United States remains the number of dead whales never seen. Humpback whale scar evidence suggests that only 3 per cent to 10 per cent of entanglements are witnessed and reported.

In the Philippines, where our coastline is twice the length of the entire coastline of the continental US, and where our monitoring and response capacities pale in comparison, is it likely that our situation here is any better?

Contaminants

A US study points out that of the various threats potentially affecting baleen whales, only entanglement in fishing gear and ship strikes may be significant at the population level, and then only in those populations which are already at critically low abundance.

Data on the role of contaminants, habitat degradation or disease are insufficient to permit an informed assessment of these threats.

A Longman’s beaked whale, one of the least studied of all whales, stranded and died on a Davao beach. During its necropsy, the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources team that removed its internal organs found plastic bags from six countries in its stomach.

Over the last two years, the dead carcasses of two baleen whales that we rarely see in the wild these days, were found floating in the area of Manila Bay. Due to new species information about these large filter feeders, no one can say for sure what species they belong to without a proper DNA analysis.

We are not even certain what whales these were. Can anyone estimate how many more whale deaths may have occurred in and around Manila Bay, which we do not even know about?

Bigger questions

Whales and human beings both make an impact on the marine ecosystems we depend on for food and life. We live on a water planet at the apex of the Coral Triangle. More than just saving whales or dolphins, shouldn’t we be thinking about the life and productivity of our oceans and coasts?

Shouldn’t we ask ourselves how to regenerate the forests we have cut down over the last century, leaving bare mountainsides that now spawn the soil erosion that silts our rivers and blankets our reefs in coastal zones of death?

Shouldn’t we think about finding substitutes for the cocktail of persistent toxins that leach from our factories, plantations, offices or homes, and bio-accumulate in the fish our children eat?

Shouldn’t we look for more effective ways to manage and replace the tons of plastic waste that we throw into the sea every day?

We really have to be seriously thinking about a change of lifestyle. Climate change presents hard evidence that maybe, just maybe, human beings do not always have all the best answers. Fossil fuels were not a good idea after all.

The world is changing. Maybe, these dead whales in Manila Bay are delivering a bigger message. Maybe, it is time we think really hard about what each of us is doing to this planet, and make up our minds to do something right.

(Jose Ma. Lorenzo Tan is vice chairman, World Wide Fund for Nature-Philippines.)

More whale shark sightings reported in Philippines waters
Gregg Yan, Manila Times 15 Feb 09;

IT was a clear night. A tiny banca bobbed silently along the Calayo River in Nasugbu, Batangas. Mandoy swung his carbide torch, probing the deep darkness for those elusive swarms of krill known locally as alamang.

Suddenly a giant shadow approached from beneath. “Shark!” thought Mandoy, instinctively grabbing a paddle to defend himself.

With great relief the fisherman realized it was no regular shark, but of the gentle kind locals had seen cruising the coasts of Nasugbu for years. In the river with him, a 15-foot long whale shark was feeding on krill.

What began as just another fishing trip turned out to be the first recorded instance of a butanding entering a freshwater body in the Philippines.

Will wonders never cease?

When we hear of whale sharks, we usually think of donsol in Sorsogon, still the largest known seasonal aggregation of them on earth. Interestingly, more and more sightings are now being reported in Nasugbu and Anilao in Batangas, as well as in other parts of the archipelago.

Discovered by Sir Andrew Smith off South Africa in 1828, the whale shark is the world’s largest fish, growing over 40-feet long. Along with the basking and megamouth, it is one of only three filter-feeding sharks.

Despite its immense size and a mouth wide enough to swallow a five-foot tall person tip to toe, the whale shark is quite harmless to humans.

Locals say that butanding have plied these coasts for generations. But never have they stayed more than a few days in one area.

Here in Hamilo Coast, the butanding stayed for over three weeks–according to local fishermen, the first time they ever did so.

Two-and-a-half hours by boat south of Manila are the 13 sea coves of Hamilo Coast. Once a refuge for blast fishermen, these 13 fingers of land are now a unique eco-tourism project of SM Investments Corp. (SMIC). To help sustain the area’s ecological biocapacity while allowing measured economic development, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) partnered with SMIC to preserve Nasugbu’s natural resource base.

The effects of vigorous coastal resource management efforts, including mangrove reforestation, the installation of giant clams and coral reef protection, are clearly in evidence.

Scores of brightly-colored reef fish, from vividly-hued shoals of fusiliers to herds of ghostly batfish, are gradually returning to the coast’s burgeoning coral reefs.

It’s not just the reef fish. Ten kilometers out, local fishermen are reportedly landing more pelagics: yellowfin tuna, blue and black marlin, trevally (talakitok) and Spanish mackerel (tangigue).

Since this attracts fishing boats from all over, local Bantay Dagat patrols must remain doubly vigilant. Recently a dozen baby manta rays frolicked in three feet of water, not something seen every day.

The presence of large filter feeders such as whale sharks, manta rays and even a beached seven-meter long Bryde’s whale could indicate the return of a strong food base. The creatures are probably attracted to the swarms of krill or plankton that feed on the nutrient-rich runoff from nearby Calayo River.

Nasugbu is at the very mouth of one of the country’s top biodiversity spots–the Verde Passage, once cited as the center of the world’s reef fish biodiversity. Thus it becomes all the more crucial to restore the productivity of this coastline that for decades was degraded by blast and cyanide fishing.

Through World Wide Fund and the local government, Bantay Dagat units were reactivated to purge the coasts of illegal fishers. Awareness campaigns are aimed at fishing communities and do not merely tell illegal fishermen to stop–they explain in simple and blunt detail how destructive practices unravel the marine ecosystems and wipe out their major source of protein.

The return of the butanding, rays and large fish, as well as the forthcoming entry of major tourism investments, have only strengthened the local community’s resolve to stamp out destructive fishing practices. Their efforts are obviously paying off, with fish yields on the rise.

(Gregg Yan is Information, Education and Communications Officer, World Wide Fund for Nature-Philippines)

Bewitched, bothered, bewildered dolphins’ stranding by the hundreds in Bataan an unusual phenomenon
Manila Times 15 Feb 09;

THE stranding of dolphins by the hundreds in Pilar and Abucay, Bataan peninsula on Tuesday was unusual.

About 300 melon-headed whales approached nearly a kilometer towards the beach—and certain death.

Despite the name, they are a type of dolphin that travels in large schools of several hundred and belong to the family of cetaceans that includes whales, dolphins and porpoises.

“This is an unusual phenomenon,” said Director Malcolm Sarmiento of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR).

He said smaller schools of dolphins numbering “in the tens and twenties” had beached themselves elsewhere in the Philippines previously, but this was the first time so many had done so at the same time and place.

Cetus is Latin for “whale” and “large sea animal” and Greek for “whale” or “any huge fish or sea monster.”

Cetaceans have about 90 species, including the Blue Whale, the largest animal that has ever lived; the highly intelligent and communicative dolphins; the tusked narwhals and blind river dolphins and singing humpback whales.

They are common in places as diverse as the Philippines, the Yangtze, Amazon, ParanĂ¡, Indus and Ganges rivers.

There are 26 types of cetaceans in the Philippines, including the bottle-nose dolphins and pygmy blue whales, according to BFAR.

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, the University of the Philippines Institute of Environmental Science and Meteorology (UPIESM) and the Ocean Adventure Marine Park in Subic started the Philippine Marine Mammals Stranding Network (PMMSN) coordinate rescue efforts in strandings or beachings.

The last mass stranding involved 12 sperm whales in Capiz in 1956. This time, dynamite fishing could have damaged their ear drums and disrupted the built-in echo-locators—stranding them in Bataan, according to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

They were lucky to be stranded in a province whose culinary preferences do not include whales and dolphins, unlike in some parts of the Visayas and northern Mindanao.

Using boats and clapping their hands in waist-deep waters, fishermen, locals and the Philippine Coast Guard guided the whales back into the deep sea and safety.

Townfolks raised the alarm early Tuesday when they saw a large school of dolphins in shallow water. Three of the dolphins were found dead and authorities feared others would die unless they could guide them into deeper water.

Sarmiento said the whales could be reacting to a “heat wave or disturbance at sea,” adding dolphins, which are mammals, have ears that are sensitive to large changes in pressure underwater, he said.

“If their eardrums are damaged they become disorientated and they float up to the surface,” he added.

Authorities said they had managed to guide most of the dolphins back into deeper water and away from the shore.

Provincial veterinarian Alberto Venturina said samples had been taken from two of the dead dolphins, which had shown they were both female and that one of them was pregnant.

He said he could not say why they beached themselves although he noted that two had water in their lungs, indicating that they had drowned. The pregnant dolphin had been found with its tail tangled in a fishing net, Venturina added.

“It’s possible that they got lost. They came from the north and were headed toward the South China Sea,” he said.

The two animals were identified as melon-headed dolphins, weighing about 250 to 300 kilograms, said Venturina.
--The manila times With AFP report

Military-sonar spooked in Hawaii,spear-gunned in the Visayas, electra dolphins a threatened species
Manila Times 15 Feb 09;

THERE are now only about 50,000 electra dolphins or melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra) worldwide.

They are on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) list of threatened species.

Threats that could cause widespread declines include lack of food due to declining small-fish populations and competition with local fishery as well as high levels of man-made sound, especially military sonar and seismic surveys.

An anomalous movement of melon-headed whales into a bay in Hawaii was associated with military sonar, and the frequency of mass stranding events for this species has increased in the last 30 years.

Although the impact is unclear, global climate change on the marine environment may also be a factor.

Electras and/or melon-headed whales belong to the same cetacean family that also includes porpoises.

They are common in tropical and subtropical oceans such as in Asia, from Bangladesh to the Philippines to Vietnam. They are regularly seen in some areas of its range, such as around Hawaii and archipelagos in the western tropical Pacific as well as parts of the Philippines, such as the eastern Sulu Sea.

Little is known of its diet except that it feeds on squid, shrimp and small fish.

Although no regular, large hunts are known, it is fished occasionally near the island of St. Vincent in the Caribbean, in Taiwan, in the Japanese dolphin fishery and the well-established harpoon fishery for sperm whales near Lamalera, Indonesia.

Small-boat fishermen occasionally harpoon or net melon-headed whales in Sri Lanka and the Philippines. In central and southern Visayas, northern Mindanao and Palawan, they are killed by rubber-powered spear guns for bait or human consumption, mostly during the inter-monsoonal period of February to May.

Throughout the tropics, small numbers are captured in the purse-seine fishery for yellowfin tuna, especially in eastern tropical Pacific countries like the Philippines.

Considering that bycatch is a large and growing problem in Asia, low numbers reported may be misleading.

SOURCE: International Union for Conservation of Nature

Stranded dolphins just visiting apex of Earth’s Coral Triangle
Paul M. Icamina, Manila Times 15 Feb 09;

THE Ubians of Mindanao have so many things in common with the clown triggerfish, green turtle, humpback whale and the manta ray.

They all live in the Philippines, which sits at the apex of the earth’s Coral Triangle.

The Coral Triangle covers 6.5-million square kilometers, or almost half the size of the United States, that is home to 3,000 fish species, including whale sharks (the world’s largest) and the coelacanth that predates dinosaurs—and over 600 reef-building corals, 75 per cent of all species known worldwide.

The Coral Triangle covers the waters of Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste. It is listed by the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) as one of the world’s priority conservation areas.

Most people in the Coral Triangle live on the shores, in cultures in balance with nature, with unrivaled skills in boat building and nautical navigation.

Like the Ubians, a nomadic, seafaring people, depending on the sea for trade and subsistence fishing. They reside on and around islands in Mindanao, as well as around Kudat and Semporna in Sabah, Malaysia.

Often living in houses erected on stilts, Ubians travel by handmade canoes where they also live when they are not in sea cucumber cultivation, boat-making and civil service.

In Mindanao, the Ubians are the largest group of the Bajau, the original Sea Gypsies.

They live on many islands of the Philippines and its seas, as well as sizable minorities living around the towns of Kudat and Semporna in Sabah, Malaysia. They have been driven by conflict to Sabah where they are the second largest ethnic group, and have migrated as far as Sulawesi and Kalimantan in Indonesia.

Wildlife

A myriad of life exists in the rich triangle, like the bottlenose dolphins, relatives of the Electra dolphins stranded in Bataan this week.

Bottlenose dolphins have been trained by military groups for tasks such as locating sea mines or detecting and marking enemy divers. In some areas they cooperate with humans by driving fish towards fishermen and eating the fish that escape the fishermen’s nets.

Bottlenose dolphins can live for more than 40 years but they are hunted for food or killed as a bycatch of tuna fishing.

The clown triggerfish is rare and most commonly found around coral reefs. Because of its attractive colors, it is one of the most highly prized aquarium fish.

Then there is the green turtle, about 100,000 of which are killed in the Indo-Australian archipelago each year. It is threatened by over-harvesting of both eggs and meat, and from accidental mortality in the nets and long-lines of fishing fleets.

The humphead wrasse is one of the largest coral reef fishes. It is highly vulnerable to over-exploitation because of its natural rarity, late maturity, longevity, predictable spawning sites and hermaphroditism (the fish is born as one sex and changes into the other sex later in its life).

Only the male humpback whale produces the long, loud, complex “songs” for which it is famous. Each song typically lasts from 10 to 20 minutes and may be repeated for more than 24 hours.

Humpback whales of the North Atlantic sing the same song, and those of the North Pacific sing a different one. Each population’s song changes slowly over a period of years—never returning to the same sequence of notes.

The manta ray is the largest of the rays, with the largest more than 25 feet across and weighing 2,300 kilograms. To swim better through the ocean, they have a diamond shaped body with pectoral fins as graceful “wings.”

This summer, SeaWorld Orlando will debut its Manta, a flying roller coaster themed to resemble the manta ray.

Then there is the dugong, which is referred to in the Bible by the phrase “sea cow” in several places in Exodus (25:5 & 26:14) and in Numbers. Its hide may have been used in the construction of the Tabernacle, if the dugong indeed corresponds to the Biblical animal tachash.

“Dugong” comes from Tagalog, in turn adopted from the Malay “duyung,” both meaning “lady of the sea.”

In the Philippines, it is mostly found in Palawan, Romblon and Guimaras. It is a large marine mammal hunted for thousands of years, often for its meat and oil, and is close to extinction.

When seen from above, the top half of a dugong appears like that of a woman. Coupled with the tail fin, mariners often mistook it for an aquatic human, probably the origin of the mermaid myth.


Read more!

World Heritage site in Singapore?

One Singaporean thinks so and his campaign has triggered a lively debate
Tan Dawn Wei, Straits Times 15 Feb 09;

Malaysia has three, Thailand has five and Indonesia has seven.

Between the Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Sri Lanka, there are 21.

When it comes to Unesco World Heritage sites, South-east Asia certainly has not fallen off the world map.

But for all of Singapore's World No. 1 recognition - whether for its airport, business-friendly economy or nation branding - this city-state is conspicuously missing from the Unesco list.

It is not the only country in South-east Asia that does not have an internationally recognised heritage site: Brunei, Myanmar and Timor Leste have also not made nominations to the world body for this prestigious title.

But does Singapore have what it takes? Is the Raffles Hotel worthy of being mentioned in the same breath as India's Taj Mahal or China's Great Wall?

One Singaporean thinks so. Having been to more than 200 Unesco World Heritage sites, university lecturer Tan Wee Cheng is convinced that this island has something to offer.

A month ago, he started a group on social networking website Facebook to campaign for Singapore to get itself on the coveted list. It has since attracted 200 members and a lively online discussion.

'It occurred to me during my years of travelling that this status is like an ISO for historical monuments. For a long time, people have said Singapore is a cultural desert. I want to tell people out there this is not true,' said the 39-year-old former investment banker. He is an adjunct associate professor at the National University of Singapore, teaching accounting.

Most of the 878 cultural and natural heritage sites on the list are nowhere as famous or impressive as the Taj, Great Wall or Petra in Jordan; in fact, many are little-known sites, said Mr Tan. If they can be on the list, surely Singapore has a shot, he argued.

His picks: the Botanic Gardens, Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Bukit Timah Nature Reserve and the civic district.

'Increasingly, those listed in the last five to 10 years are groups of sites within a country or a city. Penang's George Town and Malacca are listed as a single entry. In Singapore's case, the civic district and ethnic quarters can be grouped as a historical centre. Another could be one that incorporates the Botanic Gardens and Sungei Buloh,' suggested the heritage buff.

To get on the list, a site - whether a complex, city or forest - needs to be deemed as having outstanding cultural or natural importance to humanity.

Since 1972, when the programme was launched with the Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage, properties in 145 countries have been inscribed. Italy leads the pack with 43 sites listed.

There is no reason why Singapore cannot be on the list, said Dr Kevin Tan, president of the Singapore Heritage Society.

He cites Tiong Bahru as a candidate for being 'one of the very few remaining Art Deco-style public housing schemes that still exist'.

The precinct had sprung up because of the mass housing movement in Europe. While it had its roots there, it was adapted to Singapore's tropical climate, which distinguished it from other Art Deco buildings. Five-foot ways are one such unique feature, explained Dr Tan, an adjunct professor of law.

Architecture restoration specialist Ho Weng Hin also believes the old estate has a shot at Unesco stardom.

'Taken as a whole, the estate is like an open-air museum of how architects and planners thought about how the urban man could live,' said Mr Ho, who does consultancy work on conservation projects.

Another crucial factor that makes Tiong Bahru a viable candidate is that it is still very much a living community - although the buildings were designed in the 1930s, the place is still relevant today and features a good mix of communal amenities, he argued.

'The unique thing about Singapore is how its public housing programme is the only successful example compared to where it originated. In the United States and Britain, they have degenerated into slums,' said Mr Ho.

Another front runner mooted by heritage experts is the Botanic Gardens, home to important botanical studies - not least of all, rubber.

Founded in 1859 by the Agri-Horticultural Society on the current site, the Gardens embarked on botanical research after the colonial government took over its administration and launched a scientific journal.

Last year, the Gardens was awarded a Michelin three-star rating, putting it in the ranks of Paris' Eiffel Tower and New York's Empire State Building.

It was also named by Time magazine as Asia's Best Urban Jungle, with a collection of more than 10,000 types of plants, including the region's most significant living collection of documented palms, orchids, cycads and gingers.

Associate Professor Johannes Widodo, a jury member of the Unesco Asia-Pacific Heritage Awards for Culture Heritage Conservation, thinks the Gardens is Singapore's only hope given that most of the country's built heritage has been lost to urbanisation and development.

'World Heritage sites must have a universal value. Buildings such as those in the civic district - Raffles Hotel, City Hall, St Andrew's Cathedral - are probably valuable for Singapore, but not so much meaningful beyond this particular context,' said the lecturer at the National University of Singapore's Department of Architecture.

'Sites like Botanic Gardens have strong connections with the history of the colonial economy in the past, and ecological value in the present - which has become our global concern.'

Since rejoining the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation in 2007, Singapore has been familiarising itself with the various conventions under the world organisation, according to the secretariat for Singapore's Sub-Commission on Culture and Information for Unesco.

The sub-commission, led by the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts, advises the Singapore National Commission on Unesco on issues related to culture and communication.

In a statement to The Sunday Times, it said it is working with relevant government agencies to study the feasibility of nominating 'various cultural landmarks and districts of historical significance for a World Heritage site listing'.

As part of the study, it will look into Unesco's assessment criteria, the benefits and costs of a listing.

A cost benefits analysis that Britain's Department for Culture, Media and Sport commissioned in 2007 showed that a World Heritage site listing has benefited tourism and attracted additional funding, education and civic pride, among other things.

The value of a World Heritage status also means stronger protection of a particular site, since it is subjected to international preservation standards, said Prof Widodo.


Heritage sites in Asia

Cambodia

# Angkor (1992)

# Temple of Preah Vihear (2008)

Indonesia

# Borobudur Temple Compounds (1991)

# Komodo National Park (1991)

# Prambanan Temple Compounds (1991)

# Ujung Kulon National Park (1991)

# Sangiran Early Man Site (1996)

# Lorentz National Park (1999)

# Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (2004)

Laos

# Town of Luang Prabang (1995)

# Vat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape (2001)

Malaysia

# Gunung Mulu National Park (2000)

# Kinabalu Park (2000)

# Malacca and George Town, Historic Cities of the Strait of Malacca (2008)

The Philippines

# Baroque Churches of the Philippines (1993)

# Tubbataha Reef Marine Park (1993)

# Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (1995)

# Historic Town of Vigan (1999)

# Puerto-Princesa Subterranean River National Park (1999)

Sri Lanka

# Ancient City of Polonnaruwa (1982)

# Ancient City of Sigiriya (1982)

# Sacred City of Anuradhapura (1982)

# Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications (1988)

# Sacred City of Kandy (1988)

# Sinharaja Forest Reserve (1988)

# Golden Temple of Dambulla (1991)

Thailand

# Historic City of Ayutthaya (1991)

# Historic Town of Sukhothai and Associated Historic Towns (1991)

# Thungyai-Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries (1991)

# Ban Chiang Archaeological Site (1992)

# Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex (2005)

Vietnam

# Complex of Hue Monuments (1993)

# Ha Long Bay (1994, 2000)

# Hoi An Ancient Town (1999)

# My Son Sanctuary (1999)

# Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park (2003)


Read more!

66 rats killed in blitz at Skate Park

Shuli Sudderuddin, Straits Times 15 Feb 09;

You could say the rodents were cornered like rats - all 66 of them.

The casualty count - after a blitz by the National Environment Agency (NEA) over the last two weeks at Somerset Skate Park - was 66 rats killed.

The attack was launched after a Jan 25 Sunday Times article about rats in Orchard Road, especially in the area near the Skate Park.

NEA officers carry out routine sanitation and hygiene checks daily at different parts of Orchard Road.

A spokesman said complaints about rodents in the area are generally rare and form 'less than 1 per cent of the feedback'.

The blitz on rodents was in addition to the daily checks.

A three-pronged approach was taken to win the battle at the rat-prone Skate Park.

'First, we reduced the availability of food sources. Second, we identified and eliminated living

areas like rodent burrows. Finally, we controlled the population directly by culling,' said the spokesman.

Culling entails killing rats by trapping, baiting or poisoning them.

The rodents in the area are mainly Norway Rats which are prolific breeders, with each female capable of producing six to eight litters a year.

Each litter comprises seven to 12 mice.

At Skate Park, the operation, carried out by Star Pest Control, started at about 11pm every two days over the two weeks.

The company's general manager, Mr Bernard Chan, said: 'We looked for signs of rodents like burrows, trails and droppings.'

Burrows were dusted with poisonous powder that rats picked up as they entered.

When they groomed themselves in their burrows, they ingested the poison and were killed, along with their families.

The burrows were then sealed with soil.

The company had another weapon: pieces of cardboard with rat glue on top.

Bits of grilled coconut or cuttlefish were placed in the middle of the boards which were left in drains.

'The rats came to eat the food and got stuck in the glue. We collected and disposed of them the next day,' said Mr Chan.

The company also dropped blocks of grains mixed with rodenticide into the burrows.

The extermination efforts were sustained for about two weeks and no rats were caught on the last occasion.

While rats breed quickly, Mr Nicck Yeong, sales and technical manager for pest control company Rentokil, said the success rate of a typical operation with baiting, trapping and sealing of burrows is about 95 per cent.

The rat population can be minimised through keeping areas clean and free of refuse, and storing food in sealed containers and hard-to-reach places.

Littering is a problem in the Skate Park as park users often leave behind food.

A spokesman for the National Youth Council and *scape, which own and manage the Skate Park, said that a pest control operator has been engaged to tackle problems at the Youth Park and Skate Park.


Read more!

Climate change could be even worse than feared

Mira Oberman Yahoo News 15 Feb 09;

CHICAGO (AFP) – It seems the dire warnings about future devastation sparked by global warming have not been dire enough, top climate scientists warned Saturday.

It has been just over a year since the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published a landmark report warning of rising sea levels, expanding deserts, more intense storms and the extinction of up to 30 percent of plant and animal species.

But recent climate studies suggest that report significantly underestimates the potential severity of global warming over the next 100 years, a senior member of the panel warned.

"We are basically looking now at a future climate that is beyond anything that we've considered seriously in climate policy," said Chris Field, who was a coordinating lead author of the report.

"Without effective action, climate change is going to be larger and more difficult to deal with than we thought."

Fresh data has shown that greenhouse gas emissions have grown by an average of 3.5 percent a year from 2000 to 2007, Field told reporters at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

That's "far more rapid than we expected" and more than three times the 0.9 growth rate in the 1990's, he said.

While increased economic activity could have contributed to the growth in emissions, Field said it appears as though the bulk of the growth is "because developing countries like China and India saw a huge upsurge in electric power generation, almost all of it based on coal."

Further complicating the problem is that higher temperatures could thaw the Arctic tundra and ignite tropical forests, potentially releasing billions of tons of carbon dioxide that has been stored for thousands of years.

That could raise temperatures even more and create "a vicious cycle that could spiral out of control by the end of the century."

"We don't want to cross a critical threshold where this massive release of carbon starts to run on autopilot," said Field, a professor of biology and of environmental Earth system science at Stanford University.

The amount of carbon that could be released is staggering.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution an estimated 350 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) have been released through the burning of fossil fuels.

The new estimate of the amount of carbon stored in the Arctic's permafrost soils is around 1,000 billion tonnes. And the Arctic is warming faster than any other part of the globe.

Several recent climate models have estimated that the loss of tropical rainforests to wildfires, deforestation and other causes could increase the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from 10 to 100 parts per million by the end of the century.

The current level is about 380 parts per million.

"Tropical forests are essentially inflammable," Field said. "You couldn't get a fire to burn there if you tried. But if they dry out just a little bit, the result can be very large and destructive wildfires."

Recent studies have also shown that global warming is reducing the ocean's ability to absorb carbon by altering wind patterns in the Southern Ocean. Faster winds blow surface out of the way, causing water with higher concentrations of carbon dioxide to rise to the surface.

Sea levels are also rising faster than previously estimated as ocean temperatures warm and melting ice in mountain glaciers and at the poles flows into the ocean, warned Anny Cazenave, of France's Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales.

Fresh analysis using satellite imaging has shown that in the past 16 years, average sea levels have risen at a rate that is twice as fast as the last century: more than three millimeters a year.

Some regions have seen levels rise as much as one centimeter a year, Cazenave told reporters.

The expanding use of biofuels could also contribute to global warming because farmers are cutting down and burning down tropical forests to plant crops, said Holly Gibbs of Stanford University.

"If we run our cars on biofuels produced in the tropics, chances will be good that we are effectively burning rainforests in our gas tanks," she warned.

Global warming seen worse than predicted
Julie Steenhuysen Reuters 15 Feb 09;

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The climate is heating up far faster than scientists had predicted, spurred by sharp increases in greenhouse gas emissions from developing countries like China and India, a top climate scientist said on Saturday.

"The consequence of that is we are basically looking now at a future climate that is beyond anything that we've considered seriously," Chris Field, a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, told the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Chicago.

Field said "the actual trajectory of climate change is more serious" than any of the climate predictions in the IPCC's fourth assessment report called "Climate Change 2007."

He said recent climate studies suggested the continued warming of the planet from greenhouse gas emissions could touch off large, destructive wildfires in tropical rain forests and melt permafrost in the Arctic tundra, releasing billions of tons of greenhouse gasses that could raise global temperatures even more.

"There is a real risk that human-caused climate change will accelerate the release of carbon dioxide from forest and tundra ecosystems, which have been storing a lot of carbon for thousands of years," Field, of Stanford University and the Carnegie Institution for Science, said in a statement.

He pointed to recent studies showing the fourth assessment report underestimated the potential severity of global warming over the next 100 years.

"We now have data showing that from 2000 to 2007, greenhouse gas emissions increased far more rapidly than we expected, primarily because developing countries, like China and India, saw a huge surge in electric power generation, almost all of it based on coal," Field said.

He said that trend was likely to continue if more countries turned to coal and other carbon-intensive fuels to meet their energy needs. If so, he said the impact of climate change would be "more serious and diverse" than the IPCC's most recent predictions.

(Editing by Peter Cooney)

Climate warming gases rising faster than expected
Randolph E. Schmid, Associated Press Yahoo News 14 Feb 09;

CHICAGO – Despite widespread concern over global warming, humans are adding carbon to the atmosphere even faster than in the 1990s, researchers warned Saturday.

Carbon dioxide and other gases added to the air by industrial and other activities have been blamed for rising temperatures, increasing worries about possible major changes in weather and climate.

Carbon emissions have been growing at 3.5 percent per year since 2000, up sharply from the 0.9 percent per year in the 1990s, Christopher Field of the Carnegie Institution for Science told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

"It is now outside the entire envelope of possibilities" considered in the 2007 report of the International Panel on Climate Change, he said. The IPCC and former vice president Al Gore received the Nobel Prize for drawing attention to the dangers of climate change.

The largest factor in this increase is the widespread adoption of coal as an energy source, Field said, "and without aggressive attention societies will continue to focus on the energy sources that are cheapest, and that means coal."

Past projections for declines in the emissions of greenhouse gases were too optimistic, he added. No part of the world had a decline in emissions from 2000 to 2008.

Anny Cazenave of France's National Center for Space Studies told the meeting that improved satellite measurements show that sea levels are rising faster than had been expected.

Rising oceans can pose a threat to low level areas such as South Florida, New York and other coastal areas as the ocean warms and expands and as water is added from melting ice sheets.

And the rise is uneven, with the fastest rising areas at about 1 centimeter — 0.39 inch — per year in parts of the North Atlantic, western Pacific and the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica, she said.

Also, highly promoted efforts to curb carbon emissions through the use of biofuels may even backfire, other researchers said.

Demand for biologically based fuels has led to the growing of more corn in the United States, but that means fields were switched from soybeans to corn, explained Michael Coe of the Woods Hole Research Center.

But there was no decline in the demand for soy, he said, meaning other countries, such as Brazil, increased their soy crops to make up for the deficit.

In turn, Brazil created more soy fields by destroying tropical forests, which tend to soak up carbon dioxide. Instead the forests were burned, releasing the gasses into the air.

The increased emissions from Brazil swamp any declines recorded by the United States, he said.

Holly Gibbs of Stanford University said that if crops like sugar and oil palm are planted after tropical forests are burned, the extra carbon released may be balanced by lower emissions from biofuel in 40 to 120 years, but for crops such as corn and cassava it can take hundreds of years to break equal.

"If we run our cars on biofuels produced in the tropics, chances will be good that we are effectively burning rainforests in our gas tanks," she said.

However, there could be benefits from planting crops for biofuels on degraded land, such as fields that are not offering low productivity due to salinity, soil erosion or nutrient leaching.

"In a sense that would be restoring land to a higher potential," she said. But there would be costs in fertilizer and improved farming practices.

In some cases simply allowing the degraded land to return to forest might be the best answer, she said.


Read more!

US 'sea change' on climate talks: EU, UN

Patrice Novotny Yahoo News 13 Feb 09;

TOKYO (AFP) – Top UN and EU climate officials said Friday they saw a "sea change" in the United States under President Barack Obama, saying it showed a willingness to engage on global warming in their first meeting.

Representatives of 22 nations held two days of informal talks in Tokyo this week to pave the way for a December meeting in Copenhagen, which is supposed to approve a new post-Kyoto international climate treaty.

"It has been a night and day change in terms of the US position on this topic," Yvo de Boer, the UN climate chief, told a news conference.

"President Obama's stance on climate change represents a sea change in the position of the US. President Obama has indicated that he will seriously address this issue."

His remarks were echoed by Artur Runge-Metzger, the top EU negotiator on climate change.

He said the Tokyo meeting was his first contact with US climate officials since Obama's inauguration last month, although no new political appointees attended the talks.

"I assure you that there is a sea change in the tone of the new US administration," Runge-Metzger said.

"There is a willingness to engage on the issue of climate change and to show leadership and the best sign was that many of the senior positions on climate change have already been filled in the Obama administration," he said.

The administration has appointed as its climate negotiator Todd Stern, a veteran of the talks that led to the landmark Kyoto Protocol which for the first time required nations to cut carbon emissions blamed for global warming.

Former US president George W. Bush snubbed the Kyoto treaty in 2001 as one of his first acts in office, saying it was too costly for the world's largest economy.

Obama has also made a sharp change of gear by signing measures to encourage production of fuel-efficient cars and vowing US leadership in the fight against global warming.

The Copenhagen meeting is meant to set commitments for the period after 2012, when Kyoto's obligations expire.

"I have the impression that discussions are beginning to develop in a way that we can now picture the type of progress that can be achieved in Copenhagen," said a Japanese official who attended the closed-door talks.

Under Bush, the United States resisted calls to set more binding targets for emission reductions.

Obama has pressed ahead with plans to address climate change despite a worsening global economic slowdown.

De Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said the world should be more creative in generating revenue.

"Under the current economic circumstances, it's difficult for any finance minister in any country to come and say, 'Please, give me more money against international climate change'," he said.

One idea, said de Boer, was that nations could agree to use part of the revenue from the growing trade in carbon emission rights to fund international cooperation.

In a system set up under the Kyoto Protocol, nations or companies that emit too much carbon can buy credits from others that have brought their levels down, therefore creating an economic incentive to fight global warming.


Read more!

Biofuels boom could fuel rainforest destruction, Stanford researcher warns

EurekAlert 14 Feb 09;

Farmers across the tropics might raze forests to plant biofuel crops, according to new research by Holly Gibbs, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford's Woods Institute for the Environment.

"If we run our cars on biofuels produced in the tropics, chances will be good that we are effectively burning rainforests in our gas tanks," she warned.

Policies favoring biofuel crop production may inadvertently contribute to, not slow, the process of climate change, Gibbs said. Such an environmental disaster could be "just around the corner without more thoughtful energy policies that consider potential ripple effects on tropical forests," she added.

Gibbs' predictions are based on her new study, in which she analyzed detailed satellite images collected between 1980 and 2000. The study is the first to do such a detailed characterization of the pathways of agricultural expansion throughout the entire tropical region. Gibbs hopes that this new knowledge will contribute to making prudent decisions about future biofuel policies and subsidies.

Gibbs will present her findings in Chicago on Saturday, Feb. 14, during a symposium that begins at 1:30 p.m. CT at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The symposium is titled "Biofuels, Tropical Deforestation, and Climate Policy: Key Challenges and Opportunities." She will participate in a press conference at 12 p.m. CT on the same day.

With climates ideal for growing biofuel crops and an abundance of arable land, tropical countries such as Brazil, Indonesia and Malaysia have already responded to growing demand for food, feed and fuel from crops such sugarcane, soy and oil palm by increasing their production, Gibbs said.

For example, the area of cropland dedicated to soybean production in Brazil has increased at a rate of nearly 15 percent per year since 1990, and Indonesia's oil palm production tripled during the 1990's and then doubled again from 2000 to 2007, said Gibbs.

These increases are due in part to soaring global demand for food and feed. However, scientists have reason to suspect that biofuels also are playing a significant role in recent cropland expansion. "Biofuels have caused alarm because of how quickly production has been growing: Global ethanol production increased by four times and biodiesel by 10 times between 2000 and 2007," Gibbs said. "Moreover, agricultural subsidies in Indonesia and in the United States are providing added incentives to increase production of these crops."

"The crops that are most prized as current-generation biofuels, such as oil palm and sugarcane, also are those crops most suited to tropical countries," she added.

Land expansion controversy

Before Gibbs' study, few had focused on the question of the origin of new croplands—a question that has been a source of heated debate among scientists and policymakers alike over the past few years.

"Biofuel producers typically indicate that they are establishing new soy fields or oil palm plantations on degraded or already cleared lands," Gibbs said, "while environmental groups and some scientists point to Amazonian rainforests or Southeast Asian peat swamps as the land sources."

Gibbs was one of the first to approach the question by quantifying the types of land—pristine forest, disturbed forest, woody savannas, grasslands, plantations or agricultural land—that are being cleared to make space for the new cropland.

"If biofuels are grown in place of forests, we're actually going to end up emitting a huge amount of carbon. When trees are cut down to make room for new farmland, they are usually burned, sending their stored carbon to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. That creates what's called a carbon debt," Gibbs said. "This is because the carbon lost from deforestation is much greater than the carbon saved from using the current-generation biofuels."

Indeed, tropical forests are the world's most efficient storehouses for carbon, harboring more than 340 billion tons, according to Gibbs' research. This is equivalent to more than 40 years worth of global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels.

Gibbs' previous findings asserted that the carbon debt incurred from cutting down a tropical forest could take several centuries or even millennia to repay through carbon savings produced from the resultant biofuels.

On the other hand, planting biofuel croplands on degraded land—land that has been previously cultivated but is now providing very low productivity due to salinity, soil erosion, nutrient leaching, etc.—could have an overall positive environmental impact, Gibbs said.

"In a sense that would be restoring the land to a higher potential to provide environmental services for people," she added.

Both Brazil and Indonesia contain significant areas of degraded land—in Brazil, the total area may be as large as California—that could be replanted with crops, thereby decreasing the burden on forested land. "But this is challenging without new policies or economic incentives to encourage establishing crops on these lands," Gibbs said.

This is because farmers who convert degraded land to cropland must shoulder the costs of fertilizer and learn improved soil management practices to make the lands productive, whereas farmers who clear forested land often avoid these burdens.

"Government subsidies, environmental certification schemes or carbon markets could provide incentives to grow crops on degraded rather than forest lands," Gibbs said.

However, in some cases, allowing the degraded land to be returned to its natural, forested state might be the wisest use of the land, absorbing more carbon and providing ecological services such as flood mitigation, rainwater recycling and habitat for endangered species, Gibbs said.

"There are tradeoffs in all these decisions that need to be made on a case-by-case basis," she said. "We need to keep in mind that more cropland will be needed to meet the global demands for food, feed and fuel, so the best options will likely vary by circumstance."

Analyzing changing lands

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) maintains a database of detailed satellite images taken over the last 20 years through the Global Forest Resources Assessment, an initiative that dates back to 1946. The FAO releases a new global assessment every 10 years.

Working closely with the FAO, Gibbs analyzed satellite data for more than 100 randomly selected sites across the tropics. By comparing satellite images taken of each specific site in 1980, 1990 and 2000, Gibbs was able to clearly see whether croplands were expanding, and if so, what they were replacing.

She examined more than 600 satellite images from the FAO and other organizations, and noticed a clear trend: "What we found was that indeed forests were the primary source for new croplands as they expanded across the tropics during the 1980s and 1990s. So cropland expansion, whether it's for fuel, feed or food, has undoubtedly led to more deforestation, and evidence is mounting that this trend will continue."

For example, Gibbs' data show that between 1980 and 2000, more than half of new cropland came from intact rainforests and another 30 percent from disturbed forests, "This is contrary to what some biofuel proponents have suggested is occurring today," she said.

"This is a major concern for the global environment," Gibbs said. "As we look toward biofuels to help reduce climate change we must consider the rainforests and savannas that may lie in the pathway of expanding biofuel cropland."

The FAO is in the process of collecting and interpreting the data for the current decade. "This will be important to provide more recent information about expansion of croplands occurring in the midst of the biofuels boom," Gibbs said.

Although Gibbs recognizes that biofuels have certain drawbacks, including those documented in her study, she is not opposed to their regulated use. "I think that biofuels may have a critical place in our future energy plan," she said. "But the way that we're currently going about producing biofuels could have a lot of unintended consequences."

"The new administration should carefully consider the full consequences of any energy plan to make sure we protect the carbon stored in rainforests as well as reduce our fossil fuel emissions," she said.

Biofuels may speed up, not slow global warming: study
Mira Oberman Yahoo News 14 Feb 09;

CHICAGO (AFP) – The use of crop-based biofuels could speed up rather than slow down global warming by fueling the destruction of rainforests, scientists warned Saturday.

Once heralded as the answer to oil, biofuels have become increasingly controversial because of their impact on food prices and the amount of energy it takes to produce them.

They could also be responsible for pumping far more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than they could possibly save as a replacement for fossil fuels, according to a study released Saturday.

"If we run our cars on biofuels produced in the tropics, chances will be good that we are effectively burning rainforests in our gas tanks," warned Holly Gibbs, of Stanford's Woods Institute for the Environment.

Gibbs studied satellite photos of the tropics from 1980 to 2000 and found that half of new cropland came from intact rainforests and another 30 percent from disturbed forests.

"When trees are cut down to make room for new farmland, they are usually burned, sending their stored carbon to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide," Gibbs said.

For high-yield crops like sugar cane it would take 40 to 120 years to pay back this carbon debt.

For lower yield crops like corn or soybeans it would take 300 to 1,500 years, she told reporters at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

"Biofuels have caused alarm because of how quickly production has been growing: Global ethanol production increased by four times and biodiesel by 10 times between 2000 and 2007," Gibbs said.

"Moreover, agricultural subsidies in Indonesia and in the United States are providing added incentives to increase production of these crops."

Gibbs estimates that anywhere from a third to two thirds of recent deforestation could be as a result of the increased demand for biofuels, but said an increased demand for food and feed also play a major role.

What is certain is that much of the expansion of cropland in response to growing demand and rising prices is occurring in the tropics where there is an abundance of arable land and climates ideal for growing biofuel crops like sugar cane, soy and oil palm.

Simply growing the biofuel crops in the United States or other non-tropical countries will not solve the problem, said Michael Coe of the Woods Hole Research Center.

Recent legislation mandating increased use of ethanol has already prompted US farmers to switch from soy to corn production. But since soy demand remains high, farmers in Brazil have responded by cutting down forests to expand soy production.

"Emissions from deforestation in Brazil -- even under our best scenarios -- still swamp any decrease in greenhouse gasses in the United States," Coe told reporters.

"We can't find a way that it makes greenhouse gas sense to grow ethanol in the United States."

These findings do not mean that biofuels cannot be an important part of energy policy, Gibbs added.

Growing biofuel crops on marginal lands can have an overall positive environmental impact and there are enormous tracks of degraded land in the tropics.

But since fighting soil erosion or reversing nutrient leeching with fertilizers costs more than cutting down forests, farmers must be offered economic incentives to do so, Gibbs said.

And policy makers must also decide if the climate would be better served by returning degraded land to its natural forested state so it could act as a carbon sink and provide ecological services such as rainwater recycling, flood mitigation and habitat for endangered species.

"There are tradeoffs in all these decisions that need to be made on a case-by-case basis," she said. "We need to keep in mind that more cropland will be needed to meet the global demands for food, feed and fuel, so the best options will likely vary by circumstance."


Read more!

US clings to coal energy but wants it clean

Germain Moyon Yahoo News 14 Feb 09;

HOUSTON, Texas (AFP) – Wedded to its mining industry, the United States is counting on carbon-dioxide capture technology to make coal-generated electricity production less polluting, but the process remains in infancy and is still controversial.

Half of the 4,000 gigawatt electrical capacity in the world's largest economy is produced from coal, the most environmentally destructive form of power generation.

"We're going to be burning coal for many years," Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, said Thursday at an annual conference sponsored by research firm Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) in Houston, Texas.

The new US energy secretary, Steven Chu, said last month that "it is imperative that we figure out a way to use coal as cleanly as possible," an idea promoted by President Barack Obama during his election campaign.

Desire to find a way to make clean coal-generated power is hardly new.

The massive US conglomerate General Electric, with government support, set up a test plant in the early 1980s but it "didn't prove to be quite effective and was not competitive," Jim Suciu, head of sales for GE subsidiary GE Energy, told AFP.

But improved technology has improved the efficiency of clean coal power.

Krupp, the environmentalist, said that technology to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) to reduce harmful emissions to zero "provides a future for coal."

The French company Alstom built the first industrial-scale US coal-generated power plant using the CO2-capture technology, a modest 30-megawatt unit in Western Virginia.

The plant is expected to begin power generation this year and will serve as a real test of carbon-dioxide capture, until now only tried in even smaller plants.

A similar-sized power plant was opened in Germany in September by Swedish firm Vattenfall.

Clean coal offers advantages: the United States, like China and Australia, has abundant coal resources estimated at nearly 500 billion tonnes. According to the US Department of Energy, the world's coal resources in 2004 were equivalent to 160 years of production.

Clean coal also would support the US mining industry while at the same time responding to authorities' dual objective of reducing pollution and the country's dependence on foreign oil imports.

The technology used in the United States -- chemical separation of carbon dioxide from the emissions produced by coal burning -- has the added benefit of being adaptible to existing coal power plants.

However, the technology remains immature and its adaptation to power production on a grand scale would take several years, experts say.

Then there is the storage question. Ideas include injecting captured carbon dioxide into spent gas fields or rocky formations underground.

Companies face the problem of a legal vacuum about how to use the technology.

And it is expensive: Alstom estimates that carbon-capture technology eats up 10 percent to 20 percent of the production costs of a power plant.

"The question today, is not if it works, but at what price and whether governments will move swiftly enough to establish legislation that will allow it to work in a legal context that is satisfactory for everyone," said Philippe Joubert, vice president of Alstom and head of its Power Systems Sector.

"I very much doubt the large-scale application of carbon caption will be in the US," said David Hobbs, research director at CERA.

Insufficient government financing will hold the country back, Hobbs said, predicting the first giant power plants will open in Canada or Saudi Arabia, which invest more than the US in renewable energy.

"The breakthrough may happen outside of the US, but when it happens, it will be the wake-up call, like the Sputnik," when the US realized the Soviet Union was first in space, he said.


Read more!

Biotechnology's potential barely exploited: scientists

Jean-louis Santini Yahoo News 15 Feb 09;

CHICAGO (AFP) – New research tools will bring a boom in biotechnology that will unlock the enormous potential of using synthetic life to cure disease and develop environmentally friendly fuels, scientists say.

"If you look at all the things biology can do with technology, we have not yet scratched the surface," said Drew Endy, assistant professor of bioengineering at Stanford University.

The past 35 years of biotech development have introduced a number of "tremendous applications," particularly in the area of bioengineered drugs, Endy said at the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science here.

Research is now moving ahead at a rapid clip, with "geometric improvements" in tools used to construct DNA from scratch, he said.

And in the area of gene sequencing, it took researchers just six years to go from reading a simple bacteria genome to being able to sequence a human genome.

Last year, researchers at the Venter Institute built a bacteria genome from scratch, he noted.

"I bet we will be able to construct a human chromosome, and the yeast genome," Endy said, offering a six-year forecast. "It sounds a little bit crazy because it's an exponential improvement in the tools."

There is both public and private interest in making these basic tools more relevant.

"We are advocating now a national initiative in synthetic biology that would include in part a route map for getting better in building genetic material, constructing DNA from scratch and assembling it into genes and genomes," Endy said.

An open technology platform "where the genetic componentry is available for anybody who might want to start a biotechnology company" is critical to advancing the field.

"In the next month we will announce a public agreement as a new legal framework for sharing standard biological parts," Endy added.

An open platform could significantly reduce the amount of time and money it takes to develop new drugs, said Jay Keasling, professor of biochemical engineering at the University of California at Berkeley.

Keasling is using a microbe to produce a lower cost anti-malaria drug to replace Artemisinin, a plant-based drug to which resistance is growing and which faces expected supply shortages.

"We anticipate in one or two years that the optimization process will be completed and that production of the drug will commence and have it in the hands of people in Africa shortly thereafter," Keasling said.

Meanwhile, Christina Smolke, assistant professor of bioengineering at Stanford University spoke about her efforts to design molecules that go into the cell and analyze the cellular state before delivering a therapeutic effect.

"Our goal is to make more effective therapies by taking advantage of the natural capabilities of our immune system and introducing slight modifications in cases where it is not doing what we would like it to do," she said.

Smolke said she hoped to translate her technologies into intelligent cellular therapeutics for glaucoma cancer patients in the next five years.

"That's a very optimistic view... but so far things are moving quickly," she said.


Read more!

Spain's Adria unveils food of tomorrow

Gilles Campion Yahoo News 12 Feb 09;

TOKYO (AFP) – Spanish chef Ferran Adria, the father of so-called molecular gastronomy, has always been ahead of his time and this week he was the undisputed star of the Tokyo Taste "world summit of gastronomy".

Around 20 of the world's top chefs converged on the Japanese capital for the summit, organised by the Hattori culinary school, which drew massive crowds of Japanese foodies.

The Spaniard showed off his latest creation -- a machine that can for the first time make a caviar egg with olive oil inside.

The chef at El Bulli near Barcelona -- dubbed by Britain's Restaurant magazine as the world's greatest table -- pioneered molecular gastronomy which delves into the science behind the food.

Adria's other creations include powdered foie gras, a caramel made of Modena vinegar and a Chinese-style preserved egg with a liquid yolk.

In a technique he calls "spherification," Adria uses a gelling agent to create foods that combine different textures or temperatures.

He showed a mango ravioli and a half-frozen grapefruit, crusty on the outside but juicy on the inside.

He also presented the "caviar egg" machine designed in his laboratory. Using the contraption and some drops of olive oil, he produced small eggs which are solid on the teeth but have a soft interior like caviar.

"Perhaps in 10, 15 or 20 years we can make caviar with this," Adria said.

He said that such inventions should not be seen as science fiction, adding that he could not believe his eyes when in 1992 he saw his first induction cooktop, which heats the pot rather than the plate for more efficient cooking.

"I'm convinced that in 10 years, these machines will become routine," he said, predicting that Spain "is going to remain at the forefront of cuisine for years to come".

But not everyone is convinced.

Another top Spanish chef, Santi Santamaria, caused a stir recently by saying Adria "fills up plates with gelling agents and emulsifiers from the laboratory" which could pose a "public health problem".

The use of additives is strictly controlled in the food industry but not in restaurants.

France's Joel Robuchon, whose restaurants in eight cities routinely gather Michelin stars, expressed awe for the Spaniard's creativity, but also said his methods set a potentially risky example for less-talented chefs.

"Ferran is someone I admire a lot and I consider him to be perhaps the greatest chef in the world," Robuchon said.

"But all of the additives that he puts in -- when he's the one doing it, I don't have any doubt, but when it's done by others, it's risky," he said.

Robuchon showed off his own methods that are completely free of additives -- cryoconcentration, which uses cold to store aroma, and compression, which takes the air out of fruits and vegetables to stop them rotting.

"What we're researching is to put as much natural aroma in the food as possible," Robuchon said. "Nowadays people use a lot of additives but you can do the same thing without using lecithin, for example."

He demonstrated how to make a granite of Japanese sake while preserving the alcohol and aroma. First he places it in an ice-cream maker and then in a cold strainer to remove the water from the ice crystals.

Robuchon said the same method could even be used to make cotton candy out of alcohol without using any additives.

French chef Pierre Gagnaire gave credit to Adria but said the media should not "obsess" over his techniques.

"Molecular food isn't my thing," Gagnaire said. "Some people do it well but others don't do it well."

"This is the new 'new cuisine' and it's going to lead to major things. But if this becomes too intellectual, it will get unbearable."

But Juan Mari Arzak, whose restaurant in Spain's Basque country has earned the Michelin guide's coveted three stars, rose to Adria's defence.

"You should leave Ferran alone," he said. "He's a genius. He has the greatest imagination that cuisine has ever or will ever see.

"One ought to watch what he does and see what you can take from it for yourself."


Read more!