Best of our wild blogs: 12 Aug 08


26 Stars of Cyrene adopted!
on the star tracker blog

Star Trackers in the news!
My Paper article on the star tracker blog with some translations on the part 1 on the ashira blog and part 2

Tropical sea stars harvested by the thousands
a partial guide to other fished species on The Echinoblog, shared by Marcus Ng

Colouring madness at Reef Celebrations
more photos on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog and more about those stars and more behind the scenes photos on the teamseagrass blog

BESG’s publications
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Bats!
a new exhibit at the Raffles Museum on the rmbr news blog

Labrador Park and Nature Reserve
on the Seen This Scene That blog


Read more!

Sea stars of Cyrene Reef in the news

Koh Soo May, My Paper 11 Aug 08
translation from the Star Tracker blog

We all have a name and IC!
Two days ago, 24 local seastars were each given a name, becoming unique stars in the ocean.

These seastars, belong to a species commonly as the "Knobbly Seastar" as well as the "Chocolate Chip Seastar", were adopted by the public for a minimum sum of $50 donation at the International Year of the Reef event.

These seastars are not only unique in name but are also unique in the number and arrangement of knobs on the body surface.

Twenty-four knobbly seastars and at least 162 other individuals currently inhabit a local southern reef known as Cyrene Reefs. They can have their own "IC" (Identification Card) due to the hard work of two young men.

Since May this year, Chim Chee Kong (31 years old, research assistant) and Tan Sijie (26 years old, education and outreach officer) have visited Cyrene Reefs six times, took photographs and measurements for each seastar.

They have taken 220 photographs, of which 186 were recognised as individuals, including 55 juveniles.

Most of the seastars have five arms, although a few have only four arms, some of which were due to injury. In addition, the body may be of different colours, which consist of different shades of red, brown, beige etc.

The Knobbly Seastar is a locally endangered animal and the juveniles of this species are rare. This research project is extremely important to Chim Chee Kong and Tan Sijie, as it helps Singaporeans to better understand that we have these "lucky stars".

Two people started "Star Chasing" in May this year

Chim Chee Kong is a research assistant with the Tropical Marine Science Institute and Tan Sijie is a education and outreach officer with the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research. Both have strong interests in marine life.

Chim Chee Kong said "Seastars are charismatic animals, as demonstrated by their presence in many advertisements that promote the tropical island feel. Nonetheless, many do not know that Singapore has seastars, and related research are also few."

Chim Chee Kong and Tan Sijie started "star chasing" in May this year at Terembu Pandan, which is one of the reef of Cyrene Reefs.

Cyrene Reefs have two other smaller reefs.

They said that even though the Knobbly Seastar is also found at local sites such as Pulau Semakau, Chek Jawa and Changi Beach, the number of individuals are not as many as in Cyrene Reefs, and that is the reason why the ecology of the Knobbly Seastar population at Cyrene Reefs is worth investigating. "Although the Knobbly Seastar was classified as endangered in 1994, Cyrene Reefs is inhabitated by a large number of adults as well as juveniles, and is possibly the only sustainable population that remains locally.

Because Cyrene Reefs is submerged by 3m of water during high tides, they can only survey during low tides, with the help of boatmen.

They hope to have a long-term study on individuals regarding their growth rates, movements, ontogenetic change in morphology etc.

Recording, Touching

Recording is often the touching action of people who cares.

Because of the hope not to let things die out by themselves, because of the fear that precious things and feelings be forgotten, thus the need for recording.

We record histories, sceneries, feelings, and daily things that happen around us, they chose to record seastars.

Two young men with a passion for marine life, tirelessly went to our country's southern reef in search of a species of seastar (Knobbly Seastar), took photographs and measurements of each seastar they encounter, provide each with an identification code, such that they are no longer just a population of seastars but are unique individuals.

Links

More about Cyrene Reefs on the wildsingapore website


Read more!

Ex-Changi military camp now available for hotel use

Joyce Teo, Straits Times 12 Aug 08;

PART of the famous Changi military camp has been put up for tender as a hotel - the latest move to transform the sleepy coastal haven into a leisure and lifestyle hot spot.

Two of the six camp buildings in Hendon Road can be leased at a guide rent of $28,500 a month, said the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) yesterday.

The two three-storey buildings and a covered shed sit on 9,666 sq m of land, slightly larger than a football field. The buildings have a gross floor area of 5,097 sq m. The lease is for an initial term of three years and is renewable up to 2018.

A hotel is appropriate for the site given Changi's charm and proximity to the sea, but whoever secures the land must offer a unique concept to differentiate it from nearby competitors, said Knight Frank's director of research and consultancy, Mr Nicholas Mak.

'It has to be seen as a place for people to get away from it all,' he added.

Mr Teo Cher Hian, SLA's director of land operations (private) division, said the hotel will add greater vibrancy to Changi Point, which the Government envisages as a rustic, seaside destination with plenty of recreational diversions.

The Changi Point Boardwalk was completed nearly two years ago and it was announced last year that motor sports will be introduced at the Changi Beach Park.

The kampung-style buildings at nearby Lorong Bekukong were offered under similar conditions as the military camp and are now used as a restaurant.

A site in Turnhouse Road has been taken up but the tenderer has yet to decide on the use, while the old Changi Hospital in Halton Road is being turned into a spa resort. The ground-breaking is next month and the property will be ready by next year.

The SLA also has plans to tender out the remaining four former Changi Camp buildings for short-term use.

It quoted the Singapore Tourism Board (STB), which has fielded inquiries from leading hoteliers about the camp.

'With its lush greenery and historical charm which the old military barracks lend, a hotel development...will provide an ideal alternative to visitors who prefer staying amidst a rustic environment,' said STB's director, travel services and hospitality, Ms Caroline Leong.

The first state property tendered out for hotel use in Singapore is at No. 175A Chin Swee Road. Called Hotel Re!, the 140-room hotel officially opened for business in mid-May.

The tender for the former Changi Camp will close on Aug 27.


Read more!

Malaysia's fight to save rare turtle

BBC News 11 Aug 08;

The BBC's Robin Brant looks at Malaysia's efforts to save one of the world's most endangered marine animals, the hawksbill turtle, from the humans who eat its eggs.

She is only a few centimetres long and she is covered in specks of sand. Her eyes are barely open.

Born in captivity, the next few hours are going to be hectic for this baby hawksbill turtle.

Hatched from ping-pong ball-sized eggs, the turtles break through the sand that covers their nest.

As they scurry around a man from the hatchery plucks them out, counts them, then gently drops them into a white polystyrene box for the short trip to the beach.

He finds a spot, a few metres from where the waves are lapping up on to the sand. Slowly, he turns the box on its side.

Then, with a torch, he uses the light to lure the turtles out towards the waters of the Straits of Melaka off the western Malaysian coast.

The straits and the Indian Ocean beyond await them. But most will die young. The survival rate is atrocious - only 1 in 1,000 will make it from egg to adulthood.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

The baby hawksbill turtles are released on the beach

"The outlook...particularly with Malaysia, with regard to the lack of conservation efforts, is not good at all," says Mark Aluyia from the illegal trade monitoring group Traffic. "There is a distinct decline to be observed."

Prized shell

The hawksbill turtle is critically endangered. For decades it has been hunted for its prized shell.

Golden or dark brown, it is used for jewellery and other decoration in what is known as the Beko trade.

But there is a more serious threat to this animal long before it reaches the ocean - human beings who eat its eggs.

For centuries locals have consumed the eggs as a delicacy, or simply as a source of protein.

The Fisheries Department said it still happened in this part of Malaysia, but that it was rare.

"Of course there are maybe one or two...but it is getting less now," said Robert Leong of the department.

But that is not what those working on the conservation effort say.

An expert at an organisation working in Malaysia said that it estimated one in three eggs were stolen from nests for consumption. It used to be as high as one in two.

"I think it's a big problem because traditions are protected in these countries in South East Asia. It's very difficult to find alternatives... which have the same value as a turtle egg," said Traffic's Mark Aluyia.

At the beach a long trail left by a hawksbill turtle which had ploughed upwards to make its nest close to a tree was clearly visible.

The indentations made by the flippers stretched back about 50 metres to the water's edge.

A nest patrol was also present - a team of men who scoured the beach armed with torches and radios looking for poachers.

But critics say these are rare. At some landing sites, it is claimed, they visit only once a month.

Open market

Enforcement of laws which protect the hawksbill turtle is non-existent.

Notice boards by the beach detail the law and what punishment will be dealt out to those who steal eggs or kills turtles; a RM500 fine (equivalent to US$150) or three months in jail.

But Mr Leong said he had never heard of anyone in the state being locked up for breaking the law.

"We have to have the soft approach because we cannot offend the local elders here," he explained, stressing their focus is on raising awareness of the problem.

While it is illegal to possess the eggs, let alone trade them, they are available on the open market.

It is thought most are consumed by locals living near the beaches.

The hawksbill turtle is regarded as one of the most beautiful turtles to grace the ocean.

Adults can grow to almost a metre in length. They are a majestic site.

Malaysia hopes to increase the number of baby hawksbills hatched in captivity but overall the species is in distinct decline.

They have been coming to this corner of Malaysia to lay their eggs for centuries.

A notice board a few paces back from the edge of the beach in Melaka says: "Welcome Home Hawksbill Turtles".

But home is where they are most in danger, from human development and human consumption.


Read more!

Mysterious Jellyfish Swarms Seen in Europe, U.S.

Kimberly Johnson, National Geographic News 11 Aug 08;

The recent dramatic increases in jellyfish swarms along Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts highlight the need for more research into the life cycles of these stinging invertebrates, experts say.

Jellyfish are found along most coasts worldwide. The animals reproduce quickly, though populations typically recede during fall and winter months.

Recent news reports point to sharp increases in jellyfish blooms along New Jersey's Atlantic Coast and in the Mediterranean Sea.

The phenomenon points to just how little is known about jellyfish, scientists say.

"Data do not exist to say if it's a long-term trend," said Monty Graham, a marine biologist at Alabama's Dauphin Island Sea Lab.

Empirical evidence is scattered and tricky to interpret, Graham wrote in a recent commentary in the journal Marine Scientist.

"Yet there is enough cumulative evidence to suggest real long-term increases in jellyfish have occurred in a number of ecosystems."

Making Headlines

A lack of hard data can skew the impact of seasonal blooms, experts warn.

While recent local news reports say that jellyfish are pushing their way inland into New Jersey bays and rivers, one expert said it's not a pronounced problem.

"We as an agency don't have any ongoing studies or data to support that there is an increase in the jellyfish population," said Elaine Makatura, spokesperson for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Other experts agree the phenomenon is business as usual.

Jellies are seasonal by nature, said Anja Schulze, a marine biologist and assistant professor at Texas A&M University at Galveston.

"Having these blooms at certain times of the year is normal," she said. For example, ocean currents can have effects on populations.

"If the wind is toward the beach, they will end up on the beach," she said.

Voracious Predators

Surges in jellyfish populations are generally only studied after they make a huge impact, Dauphin Island's Graham said.

In 1999, for example, an estimated 50 truckloads-worth of jellyfish filled waters near the Philippines, nearly sparking a political incident.

The swarm clogged water intake vents at a power plant, causing a massive power outage and prompting some locals to fear the country was under a coup d'etat.

Jellyfish explosions can also potentially wreck havoc on ecosystems.

In the 1980s, comb jellyfish invaded the Black Sea and eventually crowded out the native fish population.

"The [comb jellyfish have] become a real problem," Schulze, of Texas A&M, said.

"They are voracious predators. They interfere with the fisheries and clog up the nets. They definitely compete with plankton-eating fish and take over the environment there," she said.

Overharvesting of fish near the shore creates more hospitable environments for the stinging creatures by removing competition for food, such as phytoplankton and zooplankton.

Altering coastal zones with structures, such as bridges or oil platforms, can also create new habitats.

Jellyfish grow fast, are incredibly adaptive, and seem to benefit from warmer waters, which lead to longer growing seasons and more rapidly appearing blooms, Graham added.

Blistering Mystery

While almost 2,000 species of jellyfish exist, marine biologists know only a handful of them well—mostly because few scientists study jellyfish, said Claudia Mills, a scientist at the University of Washington's Friday Harbor Laboratories.

Natural cycles, however, may be blown out of proportion by news reports that make the situation seem catastrophic, said Mills, who has studied jellyfish for more than 30 years.

"They're all moving and [being] pulsed by nature," she said.

And jellyfish aren't spiking everywhere, she added. In Puget Sound off Washington State, for example, populations of more than 60 species of jellies have decreased during the past 20 years, Mills said.

Ocean currents can skew the perception of population concentrations by making jellies appear closer together, Mills explained.

"The currents change your impression of what's going on," she said.

"The total memory of [jellyfish spikes] is very anecdotal," Mills said. "Presumably it's the availability of food, and [it] might be because of warming temperatures, although there's no scientific evidence to prove that's true."


Read more!

Quarter of world's whales and dolphins face extinction

Paul Eccleston, The Telegraph 12 Aug 08;

Almost a quarter of the world's whales and dolphins are now threatened and moving towards extinction, the latest survey reveals.

And more than 10 per cent of these - nine species - are now officially listed as either Endangered or Critically Endangered - the highest category of threat.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) which draws up the Red List of Threatened Species, says the situation is probably even worse because more than half of cetaceans - 44 species - are classed as Data Deficient which means that not enough is known about them to make an assessment.

It is the smaller coastal cetaceans who are facing the greatest threat, mainly from fishing boats.

The Irrawaddy dolphin (Orcaella brevirostris), the finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides) and the South American franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei), are now all listed as Vulnerable, meaning they are threatened with extinction.

The study says the vaquita (Phocoena sinus), a porpoise in the Gulf of California, Mexico is likely to be the next cetacean species to go extinct. Already listed as Critically Endangered, an estimated 15 per cent of its dwindling population is killed in gillnets every year, leaving only about 150 alive in the wild.

The Yangtze River dolphin or baiji (Lipotes vexillifer) was classified as Critically Endangered, Possibly Extinct on last year's IUCN Red List and it is feared that the vaquita will follow the same path.

Randall Reeves, chair of the Cetacean Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, who led the Red List assessment, said: "Too many of these small coastal cetaceans end up as bycatch in fisheries. This remains the main threat to them and it is only going to get worse."

And Jean-Christophe Vié, deputy head of IUCN's Species Programme, said: "River dolphins are one of the most threatened cetacean categories, mainly because they are locked in competition with humans for dwindling freshwater resources."

But there is better news for at least some of the larger species. The humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) has moved from Vulnerable to Least Concern, meaning it is at low risk of extinction, although two subpopulations are Endangered. And the southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) has also moved to Least Concern.

"Humpbacks and southern right whales are making a comeback in much of their range mainly because they have been protected from commercial hunting. This is a great conservation success and clearly shows what needs to be done to ensure these ocean giants survive," said Reeves.

The blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus), fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) and sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis) all remain listed as Endangered, pending more evidence of recovery.

The study says whales are under threat in many areas from ship strikes, entanglement in fishing gear, habitat deterioration, declining prey and noise disturbance.

With the decline in whale hunting over the last few decades, accidental killing in fishing gear has become the main threat to cetaceans.

Besides the vaquita, the Black Sea harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena relicta), which moved from Vulnerable to Endangered, the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) and the western gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), already listed as Endangered and Critically Endangered respectively, are among the cetaceans most at risk from this threat.

"Disentanglement programmes to release whales captured in fishing gear, already carried out in the United States, New Zealand and Australia, help some individuals survive," says Bill Perrin, chair of the IUCN Cetacean Red List Authority.

"However, areas of critical habitat need to be closed to certain types of fishing, at least seasonally, to ensure the survival of some species."

The IUCN said increasing use of military sonar also posed a severe threat to whales and particularly deep-diving beaked whales and other cetaceans like the melon-headed whale. Mass strandings of these species have occurred more often in the last 30 years.

"Large parts of the oceans are now filled with human-generated noise, not only from military sonar but also from seismic surveys and shipping. This noise undoubtedly affects many cetaceans, in some cases leading to their death," says Jan Schipper, Conservation International and IUCN global mammal assessment director.

"It may not always kill whales and dolphins, but it affects their ability to communicate and it can drive them away, at least temporarily, from their feeding grounds."

Climate change was also beginning to affect whales because it was bringing exposure to new diseases, inter-species competition and changes in prey populations. As an example the Antarctic great whales were dependent on krill for food but this was alongside rising water temperatures.

Julia Marton-Lefèvre, IUCN director general, said: "To save whales for future generations, we need to work closely with the fishing industry, the military and offshore enterprises including shippers and oil developers - and we need to fight climate change."

The humpback whale is back: hunting ban saves giant of the deep from threat of extinction

Lewis Smith, Times Online 12 Aug 08;

Forty years ago conservationists feared that humpback whales were being hunted to extinction. Now numbers have returned to such a level that they have been taken off the danger list.

The latest count stands at 40,000 mature individuals, meaning that, for now at least, the humpback is safe from the threat of extinction.

Several other whales, such as the blue whale, the biggest animal on earth, and the sei and southern right whales, are also growing in number after similar scares.

The populations of several smaller species of whales and other cetaceans are still falling, however, and it is feared that some may be close to disappearing, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature .

The vaquita, Phocoena sinus, a porpoise found in the Gulf of California, Mexico, is now thought to be down to the last 150 individuals and has been named by the union as the cetacean mostly likely to become extinct next.

The resurgence of the humpback, Megaptera novaeangliae, has nevertheless heartened conservationists. Whalers, especially the Soviet Union’s Antarctic whaling fleet, had caused devastation to the humpback population until hunting was halted in the Sixties.

The humpback had been described by the union as vulnerable to extinction, but it has now been reclassified as being of “least concern” – the lowest rating. Southern right whales, Eubalaena australis, have also been taken off the critical list after their population doubled from 7,500 in 1995. They, too, get a “least concern” rating in the union’s latest update of its Red List of threatened animals.

Researchers assessing the number of blue, sei and and fin whales concluded that their populations were also rising, but not enough for their endangered listing to be lifted.

Randall Reeves, a cetacean specialist for the union, believes that the improvement in the population of the bigger species of whales is mostly attributable to bans on hunting.

“Humpbacks and southern right whales are making a comeback in much of their range mainly because they have been protected from commercial hunting,” he said.

“This is a great conservation success and clearly shows what needs to be done to ensure these ocean giants survive. So long as commercial whaling isn’t happening, the increase should continue.”

The recovery has been going on for at least 20 years, he said, but it is a slow process because the large whales breed slowly.

He said that bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, found in the eastern Arctic, had taken a century to increase from the few hundred left by whalers to the 7,000 today. Bowheads can live for between 100 and 200 years, but do not breed until they are in their twenties and have one calf every three years.

Mr Reeves gave warning, however, that climate change could put an end to the resurgence by changing the availability of food, especially krill. Other species are still in decline, especially coastal and freshwater varieties.

Accidental death in fishing gear is now the most serious threat to cetaceans. Apart from the vaquita, those worst affected include the Black Sea harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena relicta, the North Atlantic right whale, Eubalaena glacialis, and the western grey whale, Eschrichtius robustus.

Bill Perrin, the chairman of the union’s Cetacean Red List Authority, said: “Disentanglement programmes to release whales captured in fishing gear help some individuals to survive. But areas of critical habitat need to be closed to certain types of fishing to ensure the survival of some species.”

Blowing bubbles, singing love songs

— Humpbacks blow bubbles to catch fish. By creating curtains of bubbles in the water they can trap shoals, which they then snap up

— Males sing for hours at a time and individual songs can last 20 minutes. It is believed to be mating behaviour Humpbacks have landed on small boats when breaching (soaring out of the water)

— They can swim 10,000 miles from their cold-water feeding grounds to tropical breeding territories

— Humpbacks grow to up to 16m and can weigh 40 tonnes. Calves are born more than 4m long and up to two tonnes in weight. They can live 50 years

— The whales usually dive for three to fifteen minutes. They can reach depths of about 150m

— Southern right whales got their name from whalers who considered them “the right whale” to hunt – slow, with large amounts of blubber, they floated when killed

— Tens of thousands were killed before the first world ban in 1937.

Nature group says humpback whales recovering
Bradley S. Klapper, Associated Press Yahoo News 12 Aug 08;

The humpback whale, nearly hunted into history four decades ago, is now on the "road to recovery" and is no longer considered at high risk of extinction, an environmental group said Tuesday.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature — the producer each year of a Red List of threatened species — also upgraded the status of the southern "right" whale from vulnerable. The right whale gets its name from whalers who deemed it a particularly good species to hunt, because it floats after being killed.

"Humpbacks and southern right whales are making a comeback in much of their range mainly because they have been protected from commercial hunting," said Randall Reeves, an expert on marine mammals for the conservation organization.

"This is a great conservation success and clearly shows what needs to be done to ensure these ocean giants survive," he said in a statement.

Bill Perrin, another expert at the group known by its acronym IUCN, said the humpback whale population dropped to the "low thousands" when it was finally banned from commercial hunts in 1966. Its numbers have since risen to at least 60,000, Perrin said, adding that the population is growing at a healthy rate of 5 percent each year in the North Pacific.

While the right whales that hug the southern coasts of Argentina, South Africa and Australia are also recuperating, their cousins in the north are struggling.

There may be only 300 North Atlantic right whales along the Eastern Seaboard, Perrin said. While hunting them is illegal, many continue to be wounded or killed in collisions with ships or entanglements with fishing gear, he added.

The Switzerland-based IUCN said a number of other large sea animals were moving closer to extinction. Overall, nearly a quarter of all such species are threatened and over a 10th are listed as endangered or critically endangered, representing the greatest threat of extinction.

The Irrawaddy dolphin of southeast Asia, the finless porpoise that swims from the Persian Gulf to the coast of north Japan and South America's franciscana dolphin are all considered vulnerable — largely because they are often a bycatch in fisheries.

In Mexico's Gulf of California, the vaquita porpoise will probably be the next animal of this type to become extinct. Already critically endangered, about 15 percent of those remaining are killed each year in gill nets, the organization said. It estimated that only 150 are left in the wild.

Noting the decline in hunts of whales and other sea mammals over the last few decades, the IUCN said accidental killing in fishing gear was now the "main threat" to these species.

The Red List includes around 41,000 species and subspecies around the globe. IUCN, which is made up of more than 1,000 government and non-governmental organizations, says it has almost 11,000 volunteer scientists in more than 160 countries.

Some big whales recovering since 1980s hunt ban
Alister Doyle, Reuters 12 Aug 08;

OSLO (Reuters) - Some large whale species such as the humpback, minke and southern right whale are recovering from a threat of extinction, helped by curbs on hunts since the 1980s, the world's largest conservation network said on Tuesday.

A review of cetaceans -- about 80 types of whales, dolphins and porpoises -- showed almost a quarter were in danger, mostly small species. Entanglement in fishing gear was the main threat, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) said.

"For the large whales the picture looks guardedly optimistic," Randall Reeves, chair of the cetacean specialist group of the IUCN, told Reuters of the assessment of marine mammals for the IUCN's "Red List" of endangered species.

"The large whales, the commercially important ones, have for the most part responded well under protection," he said. The IUCN groups governments, scientists and conservationists.

The world imposed a moratorium on all hunts in 1986 after many species were driven towards extinction by decades of exploitation for meat, oil and whalebone. Japan, Norway and Iceland still hunt minke whales, arguing they are plentiful.

The humpback whale, which grows up to 50 feet and is found in all the world's oceans, was moved to "least concern" from "vulnerable" in the new Red List.

The southern right whale, found in the southern hemisphere, and the common minke whale, living in the North Pacific and North Atlantic, were shifted down to the "least concern" category from the "lower risk" grouping.

ANTARCTICA

A related species, the Antarctic minke whale which is caught by Japan, was moved to a category of "data deficient", meaning that too little is known to judge how many there are.

Norway expressed hopes that the report would help Oslo's argument that there are at least 100,000 minke whales in the north Atlantic and that the International Whaling Commission (IWC) should relax the blanket ban on whaling.

"We would hope that some of the decisions might be reconsidered," Halvard Johansen, deputy director general at the Norwegian Fisheries Ministry, told Reuters of the IWC. "We will continue hunting minke whales."

Japan declined to comment directly on the IUCN's review given that it is not a member of the network, but said debate within the International Whaling Commission (IWC) should take into account data on stocks. The IWC oversees the 1986 ban.

"There have been many moments at the IWC this year when debate was not directly linked to stocks," Shigeki Takaya, assistant director of far seas fisheries at Japan's Fisheries Agency told Reuters.

Norway has a quota of 1,052 minke whales and Iceland 40 in the north Atlantic in 2008. Japan caught 551 minke whales off Antarctica in the past season. Hunts used to be far bigger.

"This strengthens our opposition to whaling," said Frode Pleym of Greenpeace of the IUCN report. "While some species have started to recover, none of them are back to the levels they had before industrial whaling started."

The IUCN said many species were still in trouble. The blue whale, the largest creature ever to have lived on earth, remained "endangered" along with the fin whale and sei whale.

"Overall, nearly a quarter of cetacean species are considered threatened...nine species are listed as 'endangered' or 'critically endangered'," the highest levels of threat, the IUCN said in a statement.

Among those most at risk were the vaquita, a porpoise in the Gulf of California off Mexico, with only about 150 left in the wild. Reeves praised Mexico for a recent conservation drive.

(Additional reporting by Takanori Isshiki in Tokyo; Editing by David Fogarty)


Read more!

Extinction 'by man not climate'

BBC News 11 Aug 08;

The extinction of many ancient species may be due to humans rather than climate change, experts say.

Large prehistoric animals in Tasmania may have been wiped out by human hunting and not temperature changes, a team of international scientists argue.

This pattern may have been repeated around the globe on islands such as Great Britain, the scientists say.

The findings were published in the American scientific journal - Proceedings of the National Academy.

Giant kangaroos

For many years, scientists have been arguing about the causes of widespread extinctions of vast numbers of species at the end of the last Ice Age.

What has caused the most debate has been the fate of megafauna - large bodied creatures in Australia that included three-metre tall giant kangaroos and marsupial lions.



Humans arrived in Tasmania about 43,000 years ago, when the island became temporarily connected by a land bridge to mainland Australia.

It had been thought that many megafauna were already extinct by this stage.

But using the latest radiocarbon and luminescence dating techniques, the British and Australian scientists say they were able to determine the age of the fossilised remains of the megafauna more accurately than ever before.

They discovered that some of the giant animals survived for 2,000 years after humans arrived, and at a time when the climate was not changing dramatically.

The researchers concluded that these species were driven to extinction by hunting.

Human blame?

Professor Chris Turney, from the University of Exeter, the lead author on the research paper, said that 150 years after the publication of Charles Darwin's seminal work The Origin of Species, the argument for climate change being the cause of this mass extinction had been seriously undermined.

"It is sad to know that our ancestors played such a major role in the extinction of these species - and sadder still when we consider that this trend continues today," he said.

Given Tasmania's history as an island, the research findings should help to disentangle the role of humans and climate change in other island environments, such as Britain, the scientists said.

Previous research had found that on mainland Australia some 90% of megafauna disappeared about 46,000 years ago - soon after humans first settled on the continent.

Prehistoric giant animals killed by man, not climate: study
Madeleine Coorey, Yahoo News 12 Aug 08;

The chance discovery of the remains of a prehistoric giant kangaroo has cast doubts on the long-held view that climate change drove it and other mega-fauna to extinction, a new study reveals.

The research, published this week in the US-based journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, argues that man likely hunted to death the giant kangaroo and other very large animals on the southern island of Tasmania.

The debate centres on the skull of a giant kangaroo found in a cave in the thick rainforest of the rugged northwest of Tasmania in 2000.

Scientists dated the find at 41,000 years old, some 2,000 years after humans first began to live in the area.

"Up until now, people thought that the Tasmanian mega-fauna had actually gone extinct before people arrived on the island," a member of the British and Australian study, Professor Richard Roberts, told AFP Tuesday.

He said that it was likely that hunting killed off Tasmania's mega-fauna -- including the long-muzzled, 120 kilogram (264 pound) giant kangaroo, a rhinoceros-sized wombat and marsupial 'lions' which resembled leopards.

Roberts, from the University of Wollongong south of Sydney, said the idea that climate change could account for the death of the animals was disputed by the fact the area had a very stable climate in the critical time period.

"Things were very climatically stable in that part of Australia and yet the mega-fauna still managed to go extinct," he said. "So it's down to humans of one sort or another."

Roberts said because the large animals were slow breeders, it would not have required an aggressive campaign to see them quickly die out.

"A lot of people still have in their minds an axe-wielding, spear-wielding people, bloodthirsty, out there slaughtering all over the place -- it wasn't like that at all," he said.

"It was basically just one joey (baby kangaroo) in the pot for Christmas. And that's all you've got to go to do to drive slow-breeding species to extinction."

Roberts said the Tasmanian results back up the theory that man was responsible for the death of the mega-fauna on mainland Australia, estimated by some to have occurred shortly after human occupation about 46,000 years ago.

The reasons behind the mass extinction of giant animals, which took place around the world towards the end of the last ice age, has been hotly contested with theories ranging from climate change to human and extraterrestrial impacts.

The finding of the latest study has already been contested, with Judith Field of the University of Sydney saying the idea that humans killed the giant creatures was "in the realms of speculative fantasy".

"Humans cannot even be placed at the scene," she told the Sydney Morning Herald.


Read more!

Global warming has its own language

For our children's sake, we have to start speaking it

Thomas Friedman, The Observer The Guardian 10 Aug 08;

Sometimes you just wish you were a photographer. I simply do not have the words to describe the awesome majesty of Greenland's Kangia glacier, shedding massive icebergs the size of skyscrapers and slowly pushing them down the Ilulissat fjord until they crash into the ocean off the island's west coast. There, these natural ice sculptures float and bob around the glassy waters near here. You can sail between them in a fishing boat, listening to these white ice monsters crackle and break, heave and sigh, as if they were noisily protesting their fate.

You are entirely alone here amid the giant icebergs, save for the solitary halibut fisherman who floats by. Our Greenlandic boat skipper sidles up to the tiny fishing craft, where my hosts buy a few halibut right out of his nets, slice open the tender cheeks and cut me the freshest halibut sushi I've ever tasted. 'Greenland fast food,' quips Kim Kielsen, Greenland's minister of the environment.

We wash it down with Scotch cooled by a 5,000-year-old ice cube chipped off one of the floating glacier bits. Some countries have vintage whisky. Some have vintage wine. Greenland has vintage ice.

Alas, though, I do not work for National Geographic. This is an opinion piece. And my trip with Denmark's minister of climate and energy, Connie Hedegaard, to see the effects of climate change on Greenland's ice sheet leaves me with a very strong opinion: our kids are going to be so angry with us one day. We've charged their future on our Visa cards. We've added so many greenhouse gases to the atmosphere for our generation's growth that our kids are likely going to spend a good part of their adulthood, maybe all of it, just dealing with the climate implications of our profligacy. And now our leaders are telling them the way out is 'offshore drilling' for more climate-changing fossil fuels. Madness. Sheer madness.

Most people assume that the effects of climate change are going to be felt through another big disaster, like Hurricane Katrina. Not necessarily, says Minik Thorleif Rosing, a top geologist at Denmark's National History Museum and one of my travelling companions. 'Most people will actually feel climate change delivered to them by the postman,' he explains. It will come in the form of higher water bills, because of increased droughts in some areas; higher energy bills, because the use of fossil fuels becomes prohibitive; and higher insurance and mortgage rates, because of much more violently unpredictable weather. Remember: climate change means 'global weirding' not just global warming.

Greenland is one of the best places to observe the effects of climate change. Because the world's biggest island has just 55,000 people and no industry, the condition of its huge ice sheet - as well as its temperature, precipitation and winds - is influenced by the global atmospheric and ocean currents that converge here. Whatever happens in China or Brazil is felt here. And because Greenlanders live close to nature, they are walking barometers of climate change. That's how I learnt a new language: Climate-Speak.

It's easy to learn. There are only three phrases. The first is: 'Just a few years ago...'

Just a few years ago you could dogsled in winter from Greenland, across a 40-mile ice bank, to Disko Island. But for the past few years, the rising winter temperatures in Greenland have melted that link. Now Disko is cut off. Put away the dogsled.

The second phrase is: 'I've never seen that before...' It rained in December and January in Ilulissat. This is well above the Arctic Circle. It's not supposed to rain here in winter.

Steffen said: 'Twenty years ago, if I had told the people of Ilulissat it would rain at Christmas 2007, they would have just laughed at me. Today it is a reality.'

The third phrase is: 'Well usually... but now I don't know any more.' The river that was always there is now dry. The glacier that always covered that hill has disappeared. The reindeer that were always there when the hunting season opened on 1 August didn't show up. No wonder everyone here speaks climate now - your kids will, too, and sooner than they think.


Read more!

Feeling the heat of food security

Peter Baker, BBC Green Room 11 Aug 08;

Reforming the economics of food production and supply would be beneficial for a number of environmental and social problems, argues Peter Baker. A key issue, he says, is understanding the energy involved in putting food on your plate.

Global development, global debt, global warming, food miles, food security, food riots, peak oil, peak water…

What's this got to do with small farmers and global food chains?

The answer is that all the issues mentioned above intersect over small farmers.

If we can't quite get a grip on what is happening to the world, we won't be able to do a good job for them, and we'll waste a lot of resources in the process.

It's perfectly reasonable to want to assist farmers to build a better life by adding value.

It's also perfectly reasonable to expect their produce to be fresh and non-toxic. And it's only natural to want to facilitate this process through aid, technical assistance, capacity building and the like.

But the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Maintaining order

I had originally planned to call this article Supermarkets, Smallholders and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

The Second Law is about order; the Universe is inexorably heading to increased randomness and disorder.

For practical purposes, this does not have to be a problem because we can increase order locally by hard work, by expending energy. But in the process we create greater disorder (heat and waste) elsewhere.

If there is plenty of energy and plenty of "elsewhere", then we don't have to worry.

Indeed, for our whole existence, we largely haven't worried; in fact the whole world order, built on trade and economics, hasn't worried.

Biological systems know all about thermodynamics. All living things are highly ordered assemblies of molecules continuously battling against disorder.

Commodity chains must also obey the Second Law; in a sense, they are living things, creating highly ordered products and emitting significant waste and heat in the process.

For example, a recent study looking at Nicaraguan coffee production and processing showed that the total energy embodied in coffee exported to several countries - though not all - was not compensated by the dollar price paid for that energy.

Essentially, the conclusion was that the country is exporting subsidised energy.

It could well be that coffee is still the best way for farmers to earn a living and that the available energy could not readily be put to a better purpose. But it should at least make a country's decision-makers wonder about the long term policy, the true value of exported products and how sustainable a country's commodity chains will be in an energetically expensive future.

Look too at a modern high value vegetable chain. The orderliness required to plant, grow, harvest, process, pack, store, monitor, administer, transport, display and sell the produce in a supermarket is simply staggering, and the expended energy intense.

As an example, tomato production in the US consumes four times as many calories as the calorific value of the tomatoes created.

The point of this article may now be apparent. We are intervening, politically and normatively, in very complex systems that we only partially understand.

Waste of energy

This is not a tirade about supermarkets; no one is forcing farmers into these chains. Indeed, the retail sector has only done its job: ordering and quantifying according to its own criteria, to a state of near optimal efficiency.

It's just that the rest of us have not been able to match its brilliance.

And it's not about food miles. The argument about the cost to the environment versus the gains to poor rural farmers has its pros and cons.

Instead, it's about different sorts of sustainability and the clash of very different interests.

The economic argument, revealed through agribusiness plans, may well be very strong. But these are inevitably rather short-term positions, and the funds invested may be hedged for exchange rate changes, freight costs and other risks.

When these are just stand-alone business operations then we could leave it at that - they invest their money and take their chances.

But it's no longer a matter of a few agribusiness operations in a few developing countries. With the EU's Economic Partnership Agreements now being signed, for instance, countries in the Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group are on course to completely open their borders to food trade, and will be encouraged to export whatever products they can to the EU.

Foreign investment will descend on certain countries and will look for good deals on infrastructure. Politicians there may feel obliged to provide subsidised water, road and other infrastructure to secure new export initiatives, and they in turn will look for donor support to carry them through.

Trade departments of development banks and other donors will examine the short-to-medium-term economic argument, but may not adequately determine whether this is sustainable into the long term.

Hence, before significant public funds are assigned to this end, we must do our utmost to ensure they are well spent.

Thinking locally

Getting back to the Second Law; agribusiness operations in under-developed countries are highly ordered physical and information entities producing products with high embodied energy.

They exist in a landscape of increasing disorder caused by growing populations and a degrading environment.

Trucks carrying away the produce along bumpy rural roads sometimes pass food aid trucks coming in the opposite direction. For example, some $45m (£22.5m) of food aid came from the US to Kenya last year.

Even before its sea voyage, the calorific value of US wheat is only twice the amount of calories expended to produce it. Compare this with cassava production in Tanzania where 23 times the calorific value is gained for each calorie of human energy input.

Is it energetically sound, socially advisable and economically sensible in the long term to encourage and sustain such long two-way supply chains that evolved in a low-cost energy era?

CARE International has recently declined the food aid it gets for Kenya, suggesting that it is distorting local agriculture. Are they right? How can they and donors make the right decisions?

Could it be more sustainable and cost effective for donors to pay farmers a "fair" price to develop food production for local markets - based on costs of fuel, importing food, the risk of the supply chain collapsing or moving to another country, and so on?

There are many possibilities and a large number of variables, but the most important is to find out how close to the margins of impossibility any business plan might approach.

Surely at some point, let's say between $50 and $500 per barrel of oil, it no longer makes any sense to simultaneously export and import food high in embodied energy.

But we simply lack the user-friendly models and metrics that decision-makers need to calculate such figures and project them into the future.

So private standards are fine; but there should be public standards too, or at least a set of criteria based on the most fundamental laws of physics and biology, before significant public funds are spent.

Dr Peter Baker is a commodities development specialist at CABI, a not-for-profit agricultural research organisation

The Green Room is a series of opinion articles on environmental topics running weekly on the BBC News website


Read more!

Costa Rica bids to go carbon neutral

Claire Marshall, BBC News 12 Aug 08;

In February 2008 , Norway, New Zealand, Iceland and Costa Rica made a commitment to go carbon neutral.

The tiny Central American country is the only developing country to have made the tough pledge to turn its economy green.

It has also set itself the hardest target with the government saying it will go carbon neutral by 2021.

"If any country can do it, it's Costa Rica," said Sergio Musmanni, who is helping to lead the government's new national climate change strategy.

"We have been at the forefront of the climate change issue for years. A large percentage of our electricity... already comes from renewable energy sources. And we are in the tropics. We don't have problems heating up our homes and buildings during the winter."

Some sectors are getting behind the idea.

At a plantation on the country's Caribbean coast, bunches of bananas, Costa Rica's biggest export, are encased in plastic while growing to protect them from insects and disease.

Rudy Amador, from the Dole food company, looks up at the pale blue cocoons being cut down with machetes.

"The first thing is measuring what the emissions actually are. Then we're looking at ways that we can do our agricultural practices better to reduce the emissions. In addition to production, we are also involved in transportation, so we are also looking at ways of being more fuel efficient," he said.

'Incredible growth'

One of the keys to all attempts to go carbon neutral is to find ways to off-set emissions.

The Costa Rican government is attempting to do this through reforestation.

The government planted what it says is a world record five million trees last year, and is aiming for a new record of seven million this year.

The theory is that if enough trees are planted, they will absorb enough carbon dioxide to cancel out the country's emissions of greenhouse gases.

Many of the seedlings come from the Earth University, 80km (50 miles) east of the capital, San Jose.

The private, not-for-profit institution is in more than 3,000 hectares (7,400 acres) of breathtakingly rich and fertile land.

Professor Ricardo Russo is in charge of the reforestation programme. He gestures over a wide area of cleared land, where vivid green four-month old saplings are thrusting in to the sky.

"You can see the growth here in the tropics. It's incredible. In four months, they can grow 50 to 60cm."

Professor Russo believes that planting trees is a good way to stop the planet heating up.

"The tree starts absorbing carbon dioxide from when it's a seedling. Especially during the first 10 to 15 years, it's a very efficient way of absorbing carbon from the atmosphere".

Transport challenge

Costa Rica already has some progressive environmental policies. More than 30% of the country has been given over to national parks, and the country pioneered the concept of eco-tourism in the region.

However, some voice doubts over the tough time limit that the country has set itself.



"Costa Rica has been the only country in Central America ahead of everyone else, in terms of protecting the environment," said Jose Vasquez, from the World Wildlife Fund.

"I believe this is the first step to mitigate even more the impact they have on climate change. The only thing I see is a little bit problematic is by 2021. It's a huge target."

There is one overwhelming issue that needs to be addressed, particularly for a developing country.

"The real challenge for Costa Rica is transportation. Most of our emissions come from this sector. We really have to start making changes in how Costa Ricans are moving, but as the economy grows, if more people want to have their own cars, we have to take that in to account," said Mr Musmanni.

There is one example from private industry. Four years ago, Nature Air began moves to become a carbon neutral airline.

Sitting back in one of the company's Twin Otter planes, chief executive Alex Khajavi looks down fondly at the Pacific coastline, the emerald hills folding down to long white strips of beach.

"We are in the right position in this country to be the crucible for the changes that the rest of the world is looking for. We cannot let it fail. We need to get everyone on our side to make this small experiment in something very radical but very necessary, to work," he said.

"We need to be an example to the rest of the world".

The Costa Rican government has given itself just 13 years to turn its economy green and become that example.


Read more!

Brazilian agriculture faces huge losses from climate change

Yahoo News 12 Aug 08;

Global warming will cause heavy financial losses to Brazil's agricultural sector over the next decade, a government study said Monday.

The losses will grow to five billion dollars by 2020 and 14 billion by 2070, according to the joint study by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Center and the University of Campinas.

A team of 19 researchers evaluated the impact of rising temperatures on the cultivation of cotton, rice, black beans, coffee, sugar cane, sunflowers, cassava, corn and soybeans.

They found that higher temperatures and changes in rainfall patterns, along with an increase in storms, will cause these crops to migrate to places with a more hospitable climate.

Soybeans will be most affected by the climate change because they require consistent rain. The least affected will be sugar cane, which will gain ground as other crops shrink, the researchers said at a conference in Sao Paulo.

"This is what will happen if nothing is done," said Eduardo Delgado Assad, head of the research center. He proposed "massive investments in science and technology" to stop the crops from migrating to other geographic zones.

To slow global warming, he said, carbon emissions caused by deforestation must be reduced.

Silveira Pinto, a Campinas researcher, said the investment must be rapid to help the threatened crops adapt to climate change, a process that could take up to 10 years.


Read more!

'Big Dry' claims River Murray lakes

After seven years of drought, flooding with seawater may be river system's only hope
Barbara McMahon, The Observer 10 Aug 08;

Australia's epic drought is tightening its grip as a deepening ecological crisis unfolds in the south of the country. After seven years of the Big Dry, water levels in lakes at the mouth of the mighty Murray river have fallen by up to 50cm below sea level and environmental damage is spreading on a massive scale, according to conservationists.

At Bottle Bend Lagoon, drought and over-use of water by farmers for irrigation has left swaths of riverbed exposed, producing a toxic chemical reaction that is spreading. The banks are lined with poisonous aluminium and manganese salts and the water is dun-coloured, smells like rotten eggs and is as corrosive as battery acid. Fish have died in their thousands and red gum trees and plants are also dying.

The same environmental disaster is happening in nearby Lakes Albert and Alexandrina, internationally recognised wetlands that are home to a wide range of migratory birds. Australia's water minister, Penny Wong, has said the lakes may be beyond salvation. But she dismissed calls for more fresh water to be allowed to flow down the Murray - the river is controlled by dams, weirs and locks - saying dwindling supplies were needed for essential human demands.

Now, a controversial option of flooding the area with seawater is being considered. Professor Tim Flannery, Australia's best-known climate-change commentator, said that the action would be 'risky and probably unpopular', but that it could help save the dying eco-system by preventing the exposed lake bed from turning irreversibly acidic and toxic. A weir would be constructed to prevent salt or acidic water contaminating Adelaide's drinking water supply.

Peter Cosier, of the pressure group Concerned Scientists, is leading the opposition to the plan, saying it would alter the ecosystem beyond recognition. 'The advice I have is that, once the salt water's in there, it's next to impossible to get out,' he said.

The Murray Darling Basin Commission manages the vast river system that provides water to Australia's 'food bowl', a vast expanse of land that runs down the continent's eastern coast. It is studying options for the endangered lakes and is due to report to ministers on the seawater plan by October.

The crisis has come about because Australia is in the grip of the worst drought in a century. Years of scant rainfall have left vast areas parched and last month it was predicted that up to a million people could face a shortage of drinking water if the drought continues. The report from government officials warned that there could be problems supplying drinking water from the Murray Darling in 2008-2009 unless there is significant rainfall soon.

Another report by scientists predicted that Australasia would experience a tenfold increase in heatwaves as a result of climate change. Exceptionally hot years, which used to occur once every 22 years, would come every one or two years, making drought a part of the landscape. Water in public storage in the basin is at only 21 per cent capacity.

Arlene Buchan, director of the Australian Conservation Foundation, said the lakes need 300 to 400 gigalitres of water - a gigalitre is equivalent to 1,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools - before the year's end. 'Unless we get that water, we are facing an ecological disaster.'


Read more!

Plants move up mountain as temps rise, study shows

Alicia Chang, Associated Press Yahoo News 11 Aug 08;

Striking new research in the Southern California mountains suggests recent warming is behind a massive die-off and rapid migration to higher ground by nine different plants — from desert shrubs to white firs.

Within 30 years, most had moved to elevations 200 feet above their previous growth range. The findings provide a glimpse of what could happen to the world's vegetation as the Earth faces inevitable global warming.

Scientists have long warned that human-caused climate change threatens to turn plants into refugees as they migrate to higher, cooler spots to survive. The latest study is the first to physically measure changes in plants' locations in connection with regional warming — whether man-made or part of a normal cycle — over the past three decades.

"The speed (of the plant movement) is alarming," said ecologist Travis Huxman of the University of Arizona in Tucson, who did not participate in the study. "It means that we'll likely see vegetation shift a lot faster than we might think."

However, at least one expert suggested that prolonged drought — not climate change — could be the cause of the die-off and migration.

Researchers from the University of California, Irvine in 2006 studied the 10 most common plant species in the Santa Rosa Mountains east of Los Angeles at different elevations. With a measuring tape, they recorded the type of plant every 400 feet from sea level to over 8,000 feet, and compared the distribution to a survey that was done in the same area in 1977.

The Santa Rosa Mountains host diverse habitats, including conifer forest, chaparral, woodland and desert scrub. Since the 1970s, the region has seen average temperatures rise 2 degrees as well as extended periods of drought.

To scientists' surprise, they found scores of dead trees and shrubs at lower altitudes, but flourishing plants uphill. The habitats of nine of the 10 plant species studied crept an average 213 feet up the mountain face, the study found.

"The plant death was striking, and occurred in most species," said study co-author Michael Goulden of UC Irvine. "The occurrence of plant death was obvious to everyone living in that area."

The results appear in Monday's issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The findings counter the idea that fast-growing grasses are more flighty than large woody trees since the various plant species edged a similar distance upward in the study, scientists say.

U.S. Geological Survey research scientist Jon Keeley said the study provides convincing evidence of plant migration. But he said another factor, prolonged drought, rather than rising temperatures may be the driver behind the move.

"Drought certainly stands out as a real likely explanation. It is an extremely severe event" that could wipe out plants at lower elevations, he said.

Goulden of UC Irvine concurred that the 1999-02 severe drought can be partly blamed for killing plants, but he said drought alone cannot explain the uphill movement.

The researchers ruled out air pollution as a potential cause since they could not find signs of ozone damage to the plants. They also ruled out wildfire since the last major blaze to sweep through occurred more than a half century ago.

Though the researchers could not determine if the hotter temperatures in the region were due to greenhouse gas emissions or part of a natural warming cycle, they say the widespread plant death and migration observed is similar to global warming predictions.

Plants and Animals Move as Climate Warms
Andrea Thompson, LiveScience.com Yahoo News 12 Aug 08;

Climate change has shifted the boundaries of plant and animal habitats, with some birds in the United States extending their boundaries northward and trees moving farther up mountains, new studies show.

Between 2000 and 2005, New York state's Department of Environmental Conservation had thousands of volunteers all over the state observe and report the birds they could identify, creating a Breeding Bird Atlas of the various species' breeding ranges.

Researchers at the State University of New York (SUNY) compared this atlas to another one conducted between 1980 and 1985 for 83 species of birds that traditionally have bred in New York and found that many had extended their range boundaries northward, some by as many as 40 miles (64 kilometers).

"But the real signal came out with some of the northerly species that are more common in Canada and the northern part of the U.S.," said Benjamin Zuckerberg, a Ph.D. student at SUNY. "Their southern range boundaries are actually moving northward as well, at a much faster clip."

Some of the species making this southern boundary shift are the Nashville warbler, a little bird with a yellow belly; the pine siskin, a common finch that resembles a sparrow; and the red-bellied woodpecker, considered the most common woodpecker in the Southeast.

The shifts, announced today, are occurring in a relatively short amount of time, the researchers also pointed out, happening in a matter of decades. These changes are also consistent with the predictions of regional warming, they added.

Warming is also forcing some mountain plant species to adapt by moving to higher altitudes as it kills them in their traditional ranges. In Southern California, for example, warming temperatures and longer dry spells have killed thousands of tree and plants, while pushing their habitats an average of 213 feet up the Santa Rosa Mountains over the past 30 years, according to a new study detailed in the Aug. 11 issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Previous studies have also catalogued the ways that climate change is knocking the nature out of whack: birds are migrating earlier in the season; reptiles and amphibians are also heading for the hills to reach cooler climes; and the timing of plant blooms is shifting as the Earth heats up.


Read more!

Meltdown in the Arctic is speeding up

Scientists warn that the North Pole could be free of ice in just five years' time instead of 60

Robin McKie,The Observer The Guardian 10 Aug 08;

Ice at the North Pole melted at an unprecedented rate last week, with leading scientists warning that the Arctic could be ice-free in summer by 2013.

Satellite images show that ice caps started to disintegrate dramatically several days ago as storms over Alaska's Beaufort Sea began sucking streams of warm air into the Arctic.

As a result, scientists say that the disappearance of sea ice at the North Pole could exceed last year's record loss. More than a million square kilometres melted over the summer of 2007 as global warming tightened its grip on the Arctic. But such destruction could now be matched, or even topped, this year.

'It is a neck-and-neck race between 2007 and this year over the issue of ice loss,' said Mark Serreze, of the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Boulder, Colorado. 'We thought Arctic ice cover might recover after last year's unprecedented melting - and indeed the picture didn't look too bad last month. Cover was significantly below normal, but at least it was up on last year.

'But the Beaufort Sea storms triggered steep ice losses and it now looks as if it will be a very close call indeed whether 2007 or 2008 is the worst year on record for ice cover over the Arctic. We will only find out when the cover reaches its minimum in mid-September.'

This startling loss of Arctic sea ice has major meteorological, environmental and ecological implications. The region acts like a giant refrigerator that has a strong effect on the northern hemisphere's meteorology. Without its cooling influence, weather patterns will be badly disrupted, including storms set to sweep over Britain.

At the same time, creatures such as polar bears and seals - which use sea ice for hunting and resting - face major threats. Similarly, coastlines will no longer be insulated by ice from wave damage and will suffer erosion, as is already happening in Alaska.

Other environmental changes are likely to follow. Without sea ice to bolster them, land ice - including glaciers - could topple into the ocean and raise global sea levels, threatening many low-lying areas, including Bangladesh and scores of Pacific islands. In addition, the disappearance of reflective ice over the Arctic means that solar radiation would no longer be bounced back into space, thus heating the planet even further.

On top of these issues, there are fears that water released by the melting caps will disrupt the Gulf Stream, while an ice-free Arctic in summer offers new opportunities for oil and gas drilling there - and for political disputes over territorial rights.

What really unsettles scientists, however, is their inability to forecast precisely what is happening in the Arctic, the part of the world most vulnerable to the effects of global warming. 'When we did the first climate change computer models, we thought the Arctic's summer ice cover would last until around 2070,' said Professor Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University. 'It is now clear we did not understand how thin the ice cap had already become - for Arctic ice cover has since been disappearing at ever increasing rates. Every few years we have to revise our estimates downwards. Now the most detailed computer models suggest the Arctic's summer ice is going to last for only a few more years - and given what we have seen happen last week, I think they are probably correct.'

The most important of these computer studies of ice cover was carried out a few months ago by Professor Wieslaw Maslowski of the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. Using US navy supercomputers, his team produced a forecast which indicated that by 2013 there will be no ice in the Arctic - other than a few outcrops on islands near Greenland and Canada - between mid-July and mid-September.

'It does not really matter whether 2007 or 2008 is the worst year on record for Arctic ice,' Maslowski said. 'The crucial point is that ice is clearly not building up enough over winter to restore cover and that when you combine current estimates of ice thickness with the extent of the ice cap, you get a very clear indication that the Arctic is going to be ice-free in summer in five years. And when that happens, there will be consequences.'

This point was backed by Serreze. 'The trouble is that sea ice is now disappearing from the Arctic faster than our ability to develop new computer models and to understand what is happening there. We always knew it would be the first region on Earth to feel the impact of climate change, but not at anything like this speed. What is happening now indicates that global warming is occurring far earlier than any of us expected.'


Read more!