Best of our wild blogs: 14 Jan 09


Mauve tips
a rare anemone seen on Semakau on the annotated budak blog

Pacific Reef Egret: A fish too large to handle
on Cyrene Reef on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Diving with Gracie the Dugong announced
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Soft sediment creatures of Pasir Ris
on the wonderful creation blog and wild shores of singapore blog

Butterfly Species at Punggol Wasteland
on the Beauty of Fauna and Flora in Nature blog

It's in the armpits
on the annotated budak blog

Peregrine Falcon preying on a Javan Myna
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Get that monkey off my back!
on the Straits Times Blogs by Jeanette Wang

The Labrador kopi shops are no more
on Otterman speaks

Malayan Sun Bear Rescued from Trader
on the Bornean Sun Bear Conservation blog

Whale shark at Dubai Atlantis: still in captivity
on the wild shores of singapore blogs


Read more!

Rescued dugong at Underwater World celebrates 12th birthday

Imelda Saad, Channel NewsAsia 13 Jan 09;

SINGAPORE: Twelve years after Gracie the sea cow was rescued off the shores of Singapore, she is now thriving at Underwater World Sentosa (UWS) and ushering in the new Chinese Zodiac Year of the Ox.

For the first time, visitors will be able to interact with Gracie in a meet-and-greet session to celebrate her birthday and the Lunar New Year.ST PHOTO: JOYCE FANG

The series of month-long activities include cake parties and dive sessions with Gracie.

Gracie was found in 1998 beside her drowned mother and was relocated to Underwater World Sentosa with the approval of Singapore authorities.

The sea cow, also known as the dugong, is a highly-endangered species similar in shape and size to the dolphin.

Strictly herbivorous, dugongs forage along coastal waters of the tropical Indo-Pacific region and feed by grazing on the beds of sea grass.

Dr Jeffrey Mahon, curatorial director, UWS, said: "Dugongs are a highly endangered species and instances of successful rehabilitation of orphaned dugongs are pretty rare worldwide.

"We are one of a handful of aquariums in the world to showcase a dugong and we worked really hard over the years to make sure Gracie is healthy and feels at home here. We want to share that joy with everyone on her birthday." - CNA/vm

Growing older is a piece of cake
Straits Times 14 Jan 09;

How do sea cows celebrate their birthdays? Why, with cake, of course, albeit with sea grass. The Underwater World Singapore (USW) yesterday marked Gracie's 12th year there with a cake for the dugong. Gracie, orphaned at a young age and rescued by UWS, is one of the world's few successful cases of the endangered species thriving under human care.

From today until Feb 9, UWS visitors can witness cake parties and dive with Gracie at discounted prices.


Read more!

Electric scooter may zip Singapore's way

LTA gives initial nod to new E-Max bike, which importer says will bring big fuel savings
Tessa Wong, Straits Times 14 Jan 09;

THE Land Transport Authority (LTA) has given initial approval for a new electric scooter to be brought to Singapore by five-month-old local company Zeco Scooters, The Straits Times understands.

The scooter costs nearly twice as much as regular machines available here, but promises fuel savings of up to $1,300 a year because its 50cc-equivalent engine runs on electricity.

The bikes can be charged from any electrical outlet, and a full charge will take between three and eight hours, depending on the model. The maximum distance such a bike can cover after charging ranges from 45km to 90km.

Though the LTA has given initial approval, the scooter still needs the go-ahead from other government agencies before it can hit the streets.

Nevertheless, Zeco's managing director Jan Croeni, a German, has already ordered his first shipment of about 20 E-Max bikes from their German manufacturer. The scooters - which will retail for between $6,999 and $7,399 each - are due here in March.

Zeco hopes business will be brisk after the official launch of the machine at its Outram Road showroom tomorrow.

Mr Croeni said he chose to roll out the scooters in Singapore because of its 'self-contained' nature. 'There is not much urban sprawl, it has limited range, so it's ideal to promote this vehicle,' he said.

'The scooter is cost-efficient, totally new and has zero emissions,' he added.

But although electric scooters have already proven popular in China and Taiwan, experts are doubtful that they will take off here, at least for now.

For one thing, finding a place to charge the scooter may be difficult. Zeco plans to build 'plug-and-charge' stations across the island, if the scooter takes off.

But until it does, the company hopes users can charge their machines at public outlets. In return, Zeco plans to return power to the grid by eventually building solar panels to generate electricity.

Zeco will also have to overcome Singaporeans' slowness to embrace green technology.

Dr Michael Li, transport economist from Nanyang Technological University's business school, feels that only a 'small percentage' of professionals - one of Zeco's target markets - would be green-minded enough to buy a scooter.

'This would be an additional cost and extra hassle, considering the number of rainy days in Singapore. The market is not mature enough,' said Dr Li.

The scooter's relatively low maximum speed of 60kmh could also cause safety issues, particularly when navigating Singapore's high-speed roads and when overtaking vehicles.

'It will be a fairly small niche market here until Singapore's roads are made safer for low-speed vehicles, perhaps by lowering speeds on certain roads or through better reinforcement of speed limits,' said urban transport policy expert Paul Barter.

Scooter rider Laremy Lee agrees with this, adding that he already has a cost-efficient ride out of his Vespa.

'But I'm always for greener alternatives. If the technology improves and faster electric scooters with better mileage are produced, then I think it's more viable,' said the 25-year-old teacher.


Read more!

Memo from Bangkok: She gives elephants a taste of freedom

Owner of Thai sanctuary nurses injured and abused elephants back to health
Nirmal Ghosh, The Straits Times 14 Jan 09;

SITTING in the shade of a tree by the river in the verdant Mae Taeng Valley north of Chiang Mai, Ms Sangduen 'Lek' Chailert, surrounded by her elephants and gambolling dogs, shares some horror stories.

Take for instance the female elephant Mae Mai, which drags its hind leg in the distance. Its leg was broken in a logging accident. But its owner, greedy for money, decided he wanted a calf from it. So when Mae Mai came into oestrus (breeding readiness), he shackled the female elephant to a tree and let a bull elephant have its way repeatedly, injuring Mae Mai's back.

The state of elephants is a sad reflection of the Thai symbol today. Often, private owners - mostly in tourism and trekking companies that use the elephants in 'shows' or make them work - want to get rid of an elephant because it is too old or sick and becomes too expensive to maintain.

Sometimes, the owner wants to get rid of the elephant because he is afraid he will be killed by the animal - a real possibility when elephants are so brutally treated.

This is where Ms Chailert steps in.

Single-handedly, the 47-year-old has saved the lives of scores of elephants, raised many from when they were newborn calves, and turned this rambling 60ha site into Thailand's best-known sanctuary for injured and abused elephants. The Elephant Nature Park was possible, thanks to funds from a benefactor from Texas.

Ms Chailert's affiliation with elephants started when her father, a Khmo hill tribe medicine man, received one as a gift from a local chief of the Karen tribe whom he had cured.

Ms Chailert - who was already fond of animals and given to rescuing and treating sick and injured wildlife brought back from the jungle by her father - had her epiphany when she met the elephant, which was named Thongkhum (Golden One).

'When Thongkhum arrived, I ran and got a banana and offered it. Our very first touch was beautiful,' says Ms Chailert, who was nicknamed 'little doctor'.

'I was 16,' recalls Ms Chailert, as her eyes look into the distant hills. 'I was already helping missionaries talk to the Karen, and I had seen logging elephants, many of them suffering, many of them dying. It was a very different picture from our happy elephant.'

Ms Chailert fishes out a set of pictures from an envelope, showing another elephant she is trying to acquire from a private owner.

The elephant has suppurating sores all over its body, from injuries inflicted by its handlers.

Ms Chailert's nickname may mean 'small' in Thai, but the heart of the diminutive woman is legendary, and her iron will formidable. In setting up the sanctuary, she had to overcome opposition from the locals who claimed they were worried that the elephants would damage their crops.

But, as Ms Chailert found out later, they were really more worried that she would find out they were using dynamite and cyanide to kill fish in the river.

The Elephant Nature Park is a sanctuary with a difference. The elephants there do not dance, paint or play music to entertain visitors. Guests do not even get to ride on them. 'I don't want to train the elephants at all, to be honest,' she says.

'Many of the rescued elephants have not only physical problems, but also psychological problems from the abuse they had suffered. Most have spent their entire lives in chains, decade after decade, never having experienced freedom. Sometimes when we take the chains off, the elephant does not know what to do.'

Ms Chailert has personally recorded five cases of female elephants killing their own calves - highly unusual behaviour for a species that is as caring as any human towards family members.

Following up on each case, she found that in all of them, the female had been chained to a tree or post by its owner who had then allowed a bull elephant to inseminate it in order to gain a calf to work or sell.

'We are like a mental hospital here; you have to be patient,' explains Ms Chailert to visitors who wonder why, unlike in other places, the elephants are not more closely trained or made to work.

Running the Elephant Nature Park costs her around 1 million to 1.5 million baht (S$64,000) a month. She employs Burmese mahouts (elephant drivers) - whose traditional skill, handed down from generation to generation, is all but gone.

She gets by with donations that pour in from all over the world. Volunteers also come and live in the park to help out with daily chores. Some even end up staying there for years.

Ms Chailert has received several accolades, including the Earth Day Award in 2006, and she was named one of 'Asia's Heroes' by Time magazine in 2005. But she is not stopping there. She is planning to expand the park and is negotiating for two more plots of land nearby, both bigger than the current one at Mae Taeng.

As we talk, a young male elephant ambles up. Ms Chailert has raised it since the time it reached only her waist in height, but now it towers over her. She feeds it slices of bread and it lovingly wraps its trunk around her head and neck until she squeals.

The rolling green hills around us, the fresh river water streaming by, the minimal handling and, above all, perhaps the love and care shown by Ms Chailert and others at the park, are therapy for these elephants.

Sitting on the grass again, Ms Chailert says: 'Eventually, I would like them all to be free, never to be touched by humans.'

nirmal@sph.com.sg


Read more!

Cold snap hits Thailand

At least five deaths reported as temperatures in the north plunge to 2 deg C
Straits Times 14 Jan 09;

BANGKOK: An unusually severe cold spell has hit tropical Thailand, with temperatures falling to as low as 2 deg C in northern parts of the country.

At least five people have died as a result of exposure to the unusually cold conditions in northern areas such as Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai, which have prompted the authorities to declare an emergency zone across more than half of the country yesterday.

While cold weather is not unusual in Thailand, especially between November and February - with temperatures dropping to 8 deg C in the north and 18 deg C in Bangkok - this year's weather has been exceptionally cold.

In Bangkok, the temperature fell to 15 deg C on Monday, which saw many residents and commuters leaving their homes clad in cardigans and jackets.

While this is cold for the Thai capital, the temperature is far off its record low of 11 deg C recorded in 1974, according to the Meteorological Department.

The department attributed the cold spell to intense cold air blowing in from China.

'Because the high pressure from China keeps coming, the cold weather will stay in Bangkok at least until this weekend,' a meteorological official said.

The cold snap has hit the northern parts of Thailand especially hard. Strong winds coupled with the cold snap brought temperatures in most parts of the north and north-east below 14 deg C, with one mountain recording 2 deg C on Sunday morning.

Temperatures in central Thailand dropped to 13 to 15 deg C, while the south remained a little warmer, at 17 to 23 deg C.

Government officials said that 42 of Thailand's 76 provinces, mostly in the north and north-east, will get a special budget to provide blankets and warm clothing.

The Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation had last month warned northern residents about plunging temperatures and started declaring some northern provinces as cold-spell disaster zones.

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, BERNAMA


Read more!

Strong Winds Cause Disasters in Indonesia

Tempo 13 Jan 09;

TEMPO Interactive, Jakarta:Natural disasters caused by strong winds have been happening in some areas in Indonesia for the last few days. In Jakarta, some coastal areas have been inundated by high tide from the Bay of Jakarta.

Water level reached a height of one half to one meter in Penjaringan, North Jakarta. In Ancol, waters reached knee-high, flooding the main entrance of a popular tourist site. Similar floodings can be seen in Utama Beach, West Java.

Continuous rain over Poso regency, Central Sulawesi, from Sunday until yesterday made the Poso River overflow, flooding hundreds of homes in Bonesompe village. So far, there has been no reports of victims.

Still in Poso, tornado also struck many homes in Pandayora, South Pamona. A team led by Poso deputy regent Abdul Muthalib Rimi which monitored the situation on the site donated food supplies and cooking utensils for the victims.

West Sulawesi governor Anwar Adnan Saleh yesterday surveyed conditions on land and from the air following flooding and landslides in Majene and Polewali Mandar last Saturday. According to the governor, his department cannot yet estimate the financial losses caused by the disaster which has claimed 10 people. “We are still calculating the cost,” he said.

Certainly, Anwar said, the flood has damaged most of the infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, agricultural lands and plantations, as well as sources of clean water. In the area of Polewali Mandar, 3.859 homes were reportedly damaged.

In Bali, the Badung regency administration could not as yet list the losses caused by flooding in Kuta and Legian last Sunday. “We are giving priority to the victims first,” said Badung regent, Anak Agung Gde Agung.


Read more!

Mercury in gold mining: a Third World toxic threat

Michael Casey, Associated Press International Herald Tribune 10 Jan 09;

KERENGPANGI, Indonesia: A gold miner stands waist-deep in a polluted pond, dumps a capful of mercury into a bucket of ore and mixes it in with his bare hands.

The darting liquid metal wraps itself around the gold to form a silver pellet the size of a marble.

The use of mercury in gold mining is illegal in Indonesia because it is toxic to both human health and the environment. But the price of gold has tripled since 2001, and mercury is the easiest way to extract it.

"Of course I'm worried," said miner Handoko, 23, a grim man in a baseball hat who goes by one name. "But this is the job."

Tens of thousands of remote mining sites have sprung up mostly in Asia, Latin America and Africa, using as much as 1,000 tons of mercury each year. The mercury ravages the nervous system of miners and their families. It also travels thousands of miles in the atmosphere, settling in oceans and river beds in Europe and North America and moving up the food chain into fish.

Small-scale gold mining is the second-worst source of mercury pollution in the world, after the burning of fossil fuels. And Indonesia ranks behind only China in the use of mercury in gold mining.

Mercury's impact is evident in mining regions like Central Kalimantan, on the island of Borneo. Acres of tropical forest are now virtual desert. Villagers say fish populations have dropped by 70 percent. The Galangan gold mining site stretches several miles, stripped of trees and dotted with mercury-laced ponds.

"This area is finished," said Fauzi Achmad, a gold shop owner, as he drove past the moonscape-like dunes and abandoned mine sites.

Despite the hazards, buying mercury at gold mining sites is as easy as purchasing toothpaste. The international trade in mercury is largely unregulated. And most of the 55 countries where small-scale gold mining is rife lack the political will or capacity to prevent the toxic metal from falling into the hands of 10 to 15 million poor miners.

"The continued use of mercury in gold mining threatens millions of people all over the world, since mercury is a global air pollutant," said Michael Bender, a coordinator for the Zero Mercury Working Group, a coalition of 40 groups worldwide that campaigns to reduce mercury use. "We're talking about a neurotoxin that science clearly shows threatens pregnant women, their fetus and those who eat large amounts of fish."

___

The use of mercury in gold mining goes back thousands of years. The Romans forced slaves and criminals to extract gold and silver with mercury.

By the 20th century, mining companies had abandoned mercury in favor of chemicals like cyanide. But small-scale miners like it because it's easy to use, fast, cheap and leaves the gold cleaner than traditional panning.

"The miner cannot be separated from the mercury," said Achmad, the gold shop owner, who has campaigned to persuade miners to use less mercury. "With mercury, it makes the work fast."

Traders once relied on mercury from Spain, Algeria, China and Kyrgyzstan, but most mines are now shut and China only supplies its own market. So mercury comes from the leftover stockpiles of shuttered mines or the dozens of companies in Europe and the United States that recycle the metal from old light bulbs, batteries or industrial waste, according to the U.N. and the Zero Mercury Working Group.

Flasks of mercury worth hundreds of dollars are sold into an opaque and largely unregulated network of brokers who crisscross the globe, according to Peter Maxson, a Brussels-based expert on the trade. They divert mercury supplied for legal purposes to the gold mines instead, where it can fetch prices 10 times higher than on the global market, he said.

"Countries import several hundred times the mercury they need for dental and other legal uses," said Pablo Huidobro, project manager for the U.N. Industrial Development Organization's Global Mercury Project. "The excess makes its way to the miners through the black market."

Maxson and other experts said it can be almost impossible to track the liquid metal as it passes through brokers and even criminal gangs on its way to a gold mine. A flask of mercury can originate in Spain, be sold to brokers in India, go on to popular transit points like Singapore or Vietnam and then get dumped in Indonesia.

The United States alone exported nearly 498 tons of mercury in 2007, up from 378 tons in 2006. It mostly was sent to Canada, Suriname, Hong Kong and Mexico, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

"The whole trade has gone underground in the last five to 10 years. It's very secretive," Maxson said. "The companies dealing mercury won't tell you who their customers or even who the end users are."

Experts in the trade say D.F.G. Mercury Corp. and Bethlehem Apparatus are among the top suppliers of mercury worldwide. Robert Goldsmith, president of D.F.G. Mercury Corp. of Evanston, Ill., said he sells his mercury domestically but acknowledged it can be difficult to determine what happens to it. Bruce Lawrence, president of Bethlehem Apparatus in Hellertown, Pa., declined to discuss the trade. On its Web site, Bethlehem describes itself as a global supplier of prime virgin and high purity mercury.

Mercury traders say it's unfair to blame them for what happens at gold mining sites.

"If people don't want mercury to be used in artisanal gold mining areas, particularly in China, Indonesia and South America, then they should stop importing it," said Howard Masters, the managing director of Lambert Metals International, a British company that sells 25,000 to 30,000 flasks of mercury yearly worldwide.

"It is up to the governments themselves, as all imports into these countries are only allowable under license," he said. "But don't stop genuine consumption of mercury around the world, where it has very good uses and is not an environmental problem when used correctly."

Marc Claushuis, director of the Dutch firm Claushuis Metals, which sells 200 tons of mercury each year to Latin America, Africa and Europe, expressed frustration over his inability to control its use.

"Of course, I feel unhappy ... You send your end product to countries where you know it gets a lot of pollution," he said. "There is not so much you can do."

Once in Indonesia, mercury is trafficked through chemical shops in big cities like Surabaya or Jakarta and transported to mine sites in energy drink and vitamin bottles to avoid detection. It ends up behind the counters of gold shops in Central Kalimantan, Papua and North Sulawesi.

Indonesia periodically tears down illegal gold mining camps and slapped a ban on mercury use in mining three years ago, but mercury prices then doubled. Irwanto Thomas, a government environmental official in Central Kalimantan, acknowledged that mercury is widely used and will remain so until miners have better opportunities.

"They ask what job we can provide them," Thomas said. "Until now, the government has not provided them with an answer."

___

The dusty main street of the Indonesian gold mining town of Kerengpangi is lined with dozens of gold shops. It takes only a gentle inquiry to send a shop owner scurrying to a back room for the mercury.

"Sometimes, I sell mercury to the miners or just give it to them for free," said gold shop owner Rachmadi, who also trades gold for mercury.

Mercury is easily found at most mining sites worldwide. In Africa, miners buy it in small plastic bags stored in Tupperware containers or Vitamin C tubes. In Peru, it is sold in dental shops.

In gold mines, as much as one to three grams of mercury are lost for every gram of gold produced. But mercury is a slow and silent killer, so miners scoff at health concerns. They recall how they breathed mercury fumes or handled the toxic liquid for years with no problems. Some Indonesian miners have even smeared mercury on their skin in the belief it will make them stronger, according to a U.N. report.

"Sometimes the gold and mercury gets into my mouth," said Sumardianto, a jovial 36-year-old miner who has dug for gold in Central Kalimantan since 1996 and lives in a tented camp with his wife. "I'm OK. I don't have any illnesses. I don't worry about using mercury."

Numbers of people killed or disabled by mercury are impossible to nail down, experts say. But tests on miners in Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, Guyana, Zimbabwe, Tanzania and Brazil found mercury levels up to 50 times above World Health Organization limits, according to a 2006 U.N. report. Symptoms such as reduced motor skills, fatigue and weight loss are routine at mining sites, the U.N. said. Gold shop owners also breathe the mercury vapor they burn off.

The U.N. has spent $7 million in six countries, including Indonesia, to educate miners and gold shops about mercury. The European Union agreed earlier this year to ban mercury exports from 2011. And President George W. Bush signed a bill in October sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, now president-elect, that bans all elemental mercury exports by 2013.

Mercury recyclers argued that bans would promote the mining of more mercury and shift the export trade from Western countries to developing nations like India.

Already, 83 percent of mercury in the U.S. is believed to come from abroad, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and 44 states have issued health advisories about eating contaminated fish.

"What is motivating governments at the highest level is a strong recognition that mercury is a global pollutant," said Kevin Telmer, an expert on small-scale mining at the University of Victoria in Canada. "It's clear that small-scale mining is adding to the global mercury problem."

___

Associated Press writers Irwan Firdaus in Jakarta, Jorge Sainz in Madrid and Rukmini Callimachi in Dakar, Senegal, contributed to this report.


Read more!

EU Assembly Votes To Ban Toxic Pesticides

Jeremy Smith, PlanetArk 14 Jan 09;

BRUSSELS - European Parliament members voted on Tuesday to ban some of the most toxic and dangerous pesticides to human health.

The move, likely to be endorsed by EU ministers in the next weeks, would let groups of countries with similar geography and climate decide whether farmers may use specific products.

A list of EU-approved "active substances" will be drawn up, with certain highly toxic chemicals to be banned unless their effect can be shown to be negligible -- such as pesticides classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction.

That list will provide the basis for national EU governments to license each pesticide.

Pesticides already approved will remain available until their 10-year authorization expires, so there should be no sudden large-scale withdrawal of products from the market.

Tuesday's vote was made smoother by a deal struck last month by parliament, the EU's executive commission and the bloc's 27 national governments to hammer out the remaining political difficulties for a final agreement on the new pesticide rules.

EU states will be able to approve pesticides nationally or via mutual recognition within 120 days, with countries divided into three zones -- north, center and south -- so pesticides can be approved for a region rather than a single country.

At present, approvals apply only for individual countries and there is no deadline set for mutual recognition approvals.

Crucially, EU countries will be allowed to ban a product, because of specific environment or agricultural circumstances.

Aerial crop-spraying will mostly be banned, with strict conditions placed on pesticides used near aquatic environments and drinking water supplies. Buffer zones will be set up around water and protected areas along roads and railways.

The changes agreed will make EU rules primarily a hazard-based, not risk-based, approach since they treat products in three categories: whether they are proven or suspected carcinogens, or whether there has been some observation -- but no actual evidence -- of carcinogenic behavior.

The classifications, known as cut-off criteria, have annoyed Europe's pesticides industry, which says the new law will remove products from the market that have been used safely for years.

"The banning criteria are of major concern to industry and the whole European food chain. European farmers have already lost 60 percent of the substances previously available in 1991," the European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) said.

ECPA is an umbrella organization that represents Europe's major pesticides companies. Bayer AG, BASF AND Syngenta AG are among those which would be affected by new EU rules.

Many EU scientists, for example -- backed by countries like Britain -- have been fighting this approach and say fewer available pesticides will lead to resistance problems since pests that are regularly treated with a single product type, not a range of products, will develop tolerance.

This would damage agricultural productivity and make farming of certain crops in Europe uncompetitive, such as wheat and barley, cotton, potatoes and a range of fruits and vegetables, since yields would be reduced, they say.

EU parliament votes by sweeping majority to ban farm pesticides
British government strongly opposed to EU measures which, say critics, may put winter vegetables such as carrots at risk
Ian Traynor, guardian.co.uk 13 Jan 09;

European parliament today voted by a sweeping majority to tighten the use of pesticides in agriculture and to ban 22 treatments, a decision that critics say could wipe out British carrots.

The British government and the Conservatives are against the legislation, but the ban and restrictions were carried by a vote of 577 to 61, putting pressure on the 27 EU member states to support the decision.

Greens celebrated the vote as a victory for environmentalism. But the farming lobby warned that the restrictions were pointless, would wipe out harvests of winter vegetables, and push up food prices during a European recession and worsening unemployment.

The proposed legislation places tight curbs on crop-spraying, bans the use of pesticides near schools and hospitals, and proscribes 22 chemicals, some said to be carcinogenic.

The Green MEP for the south-east, Caroline Lucas, hailed it as "a new milestone for environment and health protection".

"This regulation, the first of its kind in the world, will bring clear health benefits and improve both food and water quality in the EU," she said.

Critics argued that the benefits are unproven and that the harm ascribed to the banned or restricted substances was also not based on evidence. Rather, the draft legislation was based on the "what-if" or precautionary principle.

Labour, Conservative and SNP MEPs were all against the decision which still has to be agreed by the 27 governments of the EU member states to become law. The British government is expected to oppose the ban.

Ministers still have the last say. Britian's environment secretary, Hilary Benn, said: "These regulations could hit agricultural production in the UK for no recognisable benefit to human health, and we are being asked to agree to something here when nobody knows what the impact will be. While we have managed to secure some improvements surrounding the use of certain pesticides, the UK does not support these proposals."

Robert Sturdy, a Conservative MEP on the EU parliament's environment committee, said yields of carrots, cereals, potatoes, onions and parsnips would decline. "The parliament's overzealous approach will take a vast number of products off the market," said

"This law will drive up the cost of the weekly food shop at the worst time for British families."

The National Farmers' Union, which fought the proposals, denounced the bans and curbs as damaging for British agriculture and a threat to food production at a time of potential food shortages and rising prices. The Soil Association ridiculed arguments that the pesticides were needed to maintain crop yields.

If turned into law, the tighter rules would be phased in from next year with the aim of halving toxic substances on plants by 2013.

Labour and the Conservatives are both calling for an impact assessment of the measures before the bans become law, amid claims that the legislation could see British food production fall by a quarter.


Read more!