Best of our wild blogs: 4 Nov 09


The Boys In Khaki
from Fish, Respect And Protect

New record for Singapore! A sea cucumber at Changi
from wild shores of singapore

Butterfly of the Month - November 2009
from Butterflies of Singapore

We aim to be displeased
from The annotated budak

Baby croc call
from talfryn.net

White-bellied Sea Eagle
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Yellow-vented Bulbul eating terong pipit
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Construction of sea wall at Pulau Ubin, Nov 09 - Jan 10
from wild shores of singapore

How to Measure a Giant Squid Arm
from Tony Wu's Underwater Photography Blog

Green-billed Malkoha foraging on the ground
from Bird Ecology Study Group

International Day of Climate Action
from EcoWalkthetalk


Read more!

All this progress, but is it for the better?

Letter from Ronald Chan, Today Online 3 Nov 09;

I WATCHED with delight the recent advertisements for the Clean and Green campaign, that offer flashbacks into Singapore's past. The short film evokes beautiful memories of my childhood and the stories of my parents' childhood. However, the same film also highlights how quickly our dear Singapore is changing.

Singapore has undoubtedly changed for the better in certain ways. We have a cleaner environment, political and social stability, and economic prosperity. Yet, have these occurred at the expense of what may be more valuable in the long run? We may be becoming more modern and developed by the day, and we are integrating well into the globalised world, but what do sacrifice to gain all this?

Dialects have faded away to the extent that doctors now need to learn dialects from scratch just to communicate with the elderly, and fresh recruits today have no idea what the army slang they so eagerly pick up actually means in its literal form. Even Singlish has come under fire, accused of corrupting the English language and the international image of Singapore.

Is there a need to sacrifice our own mannerisms just to conform to this supposed standard form of the language? Does such a standard truly exist in the first place? Singlish might not be a culture, but it is certainly the peanut sauce to our beloved satay.

Our wet markets, too, could disappear.

What defines a country's soul? Is France memorable for the Eiffel Tower or for the romanticism on the streets of Paris? When you think of Taiwan do you think of Taipei 101 or the vibrant city life? Some emotions cannot be artificially created. No number of Formula 1 races, Singapore Flyers, Barrages or IRs is going to make Singapore more Singaporean than it already is.

Unfortunately, the long-gone National Library at Fort Canning and the Drama Centre have taken away a piece of Singapore with them. At the end of the day, what makes Singapore truly what we know it to be are brands like Tangs and Singapore Airlines that bore the brunt of hardship, the tembusu tree which has formed the backdrop of many a photograph, the pasar malams, the National Day Parades and the local sporting events, just to name a few.

Who really cares about the silver towers or the cash cows at the end of the day?

Change is perfectly fine. In fact, we should all be worried if Singapore hasn't changed since independence. But sometimes, I wonder if we are seeking change for the sake of change. Why import so many new ideas when we have good ones of our own? What happened to the Talentimes and Beauty Worlds of yesteryear? Why begin the teaching of Mandarin songs in class with Jay Chou's songs when we have our own Xinyao to tap on? Why dilute our culture with so many external influences when we can already hold our ground with some of our own?

At the rate we are going, what will Singapore have to call our own?


Read more!

Birds at Changi shot down only as a last resort

Straits Times Forum 4 Nov 09;

I REFER to the letters last Friday by the Nature Society ('Don't gun them down') and Miss Michelle Elizabeth Yin ('Heavy-handed') regarding Changi Airport Group's (CAG) efforts to manage the bird population in the airport vicinity.

The CAG administers a comprehensive bird control programme at Changi Airport. Our priority is to minimise the potential hazard that birds could pose to aircraft. We seek to discourage the presence of birds in the airfield as far as possible, rather than to remove them by shooting.

This programme, formulated through benchmarking with other airports, includes habitat modification and deterrence efforts to make the airfield unattractive to birds.

Environmental control measures include appropriate landscaping, such as keeping grass at appropriate lengths to prevent birds from hiding in it and not planting fruit trees. We also employ techniques to scare birds away such as using a system to emit distress calls of birds.

While these preventive measures do help, they do not keep birds away totally. One factor is the thick foliage in neighbouring properties around the airport that encourages birds to roost and nest. And as Changi Airport is by the sea, some birds do fly across flight paths to reach the sea in search for food.

Hence, the removal of birds is sometimes necessary. This is carried out as a last resort and we continue to take other measures, including working with surrounding property owners to reduce the attraction of their premises to birds.

The safety of passengers is the most important priority for CAG. Bird strikes, while fortunately rare, have occurred at Changi. Where large birds were involved, these resulted in damage to aircraft or their engines. The potential hazard to aircraft operations from bird strikes was exemplified by an incident on Jan 15 when a commercial aircraft experienced engine failure and ditched into New York's Hudson River after striking a flock of birds following take-off from LaGuardia Airport.

The CAG regularly seeks the advice of experts to ensure that its bird control programme remains consistent with international best practice.

We would be pleased to meet council members of the Nature Society to explain our programme and work with them to further reduce the need to remove birds, while continuing to ensure safe aircraft operations.

Yeo Kia Thye
Director (Airport Operations)
Changi Airport Group

Related articles
Gun Club roped in to keep birds out of Changi airport
Changi says move to forestall bird strikes a measure of last resort
Kimberly Spykerman, Straits Times 26 Oct 09;


Read more!

Clean coal/ biomass cogeneration plant on Jurong Island to go ahead

Stalled $2b plant set to steam ahead
Tuas Power gives go-ahead to unit to get a jump on its rivals
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 4 Nov 09;

(SINGAPORE) With the economy healing, China Huaneng - the new owner of Tuas Power - has decided to go ahead with building a $2 billion clean coal/ biomass cogeneration plant on Jurong Island.

BT understands that the project has just been given the green light on strategic grounds. Tuas Power apparently wants to be first-in, ahead of other competitors, at the island's new Tembusu sector to supply utilities such as steam and electricity to incoming petrochemical investors there.

Besides, electricity demand here - which had earlier been hit by the global downturn - has returned to a growth path since July. Latest October electricity demand numbers show a 5 per cent increase over the same month last year.

Another important plus is China Huaneng's financial clout, not to mention its experience with the fuel as China's biggest coal-fuelled power producer. The coal for the Singapore project is, however, expected to be sourced from around this region.

The 2,670-MW-capacity Tuas Power, the third largest generation company here, currently uses piped natural gas from both Natuna and Sumatra to fuel its plant. It had been planning the coal/biomass cogen project since 2006, even before its $4.2 billion sale by Temasek Holdings to China Huaneng in March last year.

But the genco in January this year decided to hold off building the project as potential customers such as Germany's Lanxess postponed investments here.

The brighter outlook now - including the possible resumption of yet another long-delayed project, the US$2 billion Jurong Aromatics Corporation - has clearly pushed China Huaneng into reversing that earlier move.

Sources said that China Huaneng intends to maintain the scale of the earlier planned stand-alone clean coal (80 per cent)/biomass (20 per cent) project.

When operational around 2012, Tuas Power's cogen project, which includes a 20 million gallons per day desalination plant and waste-water treatment facility - will produce mainly steam, at about 900 tonnes per hour.

It will also produce 180MW of electricity, half of which will be for Tuas Power's own consumption, with the remainder to be sold through the islandwide electricity grid.

In September last year, regulator Energy Market Authority (EMA) had already given Tuas Power the go-ahead to import a small quantity of coal for the project. EMA said then that it is banning the use of coal solely for power generation, or on a large scale, to avoid affecting Singapore's planned imports of liquefied natural gas, which will start in 2013.

When it first announced the project in September last year, Tuas Power also said that to address environmental concerns, it will transport the coal in covered barges to the Tembusu cogen plant.

There, the coal will be unloaded through fully enclosed conveyors and stored in covered silos.

The 'top' ash generated will be reused, while 'bottom' ash will be recycled into value-added products such as construction materials.

Meanwhile, the carbon-neutral biomass part of Tuas Power's cogen project will help reduce the CO2 emissions to a level comparable to that of an oil-fired plant.

Besides, the plant will enjoy 70 per cent operational efficiency versus the 50 per cent efficiency level of today's combined cycle gas turbine plants.

This means the Tuas Power plant will use less resources to produce the same unit of electricity, leading to less carbon emission.

China Huaneng has also embarked on a couple of cutting-edge carbon-capture pilot plants back in China, and may apply the technology here in future.


Read more!

R&D critical to energy sector, says Iswaran

Singapore also intends to be industry's thought leader
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 4 Nov 09;

SINGAPORE, which is already a major regional oil hub, intends to identify new growth opportunities to capitalise on the shift of the global energy market's centre of gravity to Asia, said S Iswaran.

By 2030, China and India alone are expected to consume almost a third of the world's energy, and Singapore must take a multi-pronged approach to enhance its position as Asia's premier energy centre, the Senior Minister of State (Trade & Industry and Education) told the Asia-Pacific Petroleum Conference yesterday evening.

This includes continued strengthening of the republic's trade infrastructure to better facilitate the oil trading hub here. Over 100 leading energy companies are already here, and the government will continue to build on existing trading platforms such as the TradeXchange and AsiaClear.

To respond to the fast-changing market place, Singapore also expects the oil refining sector here to upgrade and handle crude oil from more diverse sources and move into more complex and higher value products, Mr Iswaran added.

Jurong Island, with its integrated refineries and petrochemicals plants, is already a global chemical and energy hub, and the government will continue to diversify the range of activities there, he said.

Cutting-edge research, development and demonstration (RD&D) will also be critical, Mr Iswaran stressed.

'We are encouraging the development of higher value products and partnering research institutes in areas such as process optimisation, catalyst development, as well as marine and offshore engineering innovation.'

'We will enter fast-growing overseas markets, foster new partnerships, and build new capabilities in design and engineering,' he added.

Singapore also intends to be a thought leader in the energy arena by hosting events, such as the Apec conference and the annual Singapore International Energy Week, which offer forums for industry players to meet and discuss energy issues and strategies of the day.

Companies here must also start looking at opportunities in a carbon-constrained world, Mr Iswaran said. To achieve sustainable growth, the oil and gas sector must make energy-efficient design second nature, and begin to integrate carbon mitigation technologies into processes.

Here, the government will play an important complementary role in facilitating these changes, whether through the creation of a sound regulatory environment or directly supporting energy RD&D, he said.


Read more!

EMA: Saving energy for a brighter future

Business Times 4 Nov 09;

WHEN Singapore's Energy Market Authority (EMA) first flagged plans two years ago to let households choose the service provider they wanted to buy electricity from, there were not a few raised eyebrows as to how this vision could materialise. Would it mean more hassle for the consumer? Might it not end up being 'too high tech' for the older folk to understand?

It's a radical idea for Singaporeans long used to buying power at a regulated price from just one supplier. Yet EMA is compelled to explore such possibilities - and more - in its pursuit of energy efficiency, a major strategy to combat climate change and to create a sustainable future.

Among the various government agencies given the task of advancing Singapore's energy efficiency agenda, 'the thrust of EMA's efforts is aimed at promoting competitive energy markets', David Tan, deputy chief executive officer (energy planning and development) of EMA, said in an e-mail interview.

'We have gone a long way in restructuring and liberalising our electricity and gas markets. Energy, whether electricity or petrol, is priced properly and not subsidised. This ensures the right incentives to avoid over-consumption, and to economise on the use of energy,' he added. Industrial and commercial customers have been able to exercise choice in buying electricity since 2003.

Now, EMA is exploring how to fully open up the remaining 25 per cent of the retail electricity market - which comprises mainly households - through the use of new technologies including smart meters, said Mr Tan.

In countries such as Britain, households already enjoy such power purchasing freedom.

'Our aim is to allow consumers to purchase electricity from a range of retail packages offered by different suppliers. Consumers will then be in a better position to monitor, manage and optimise their electricity consumption,' Mr Tan said.

He added that consumers could, for instance, shift their non-essential electricity usage to off-peak periods when the electricity price is likely to be lower.

'This would help to level out the fluctuation of electricity demand throughout the day, and thereby improve the overall efficiency of the power system.'

Significant strides have already been made with the nation's power generators switching out of carbon-intensive oil-fired steam plants to cleaner technology such as natural gas- fired units.

Between 1990 and 2005, Singapore's energy intensity - which is a proxy for energy efficiency - improved by 15 per cent due to the adoption of better technology in power generation and the more productive use of energy in other sectors, according to the National Environment Agency.

Yet more can be done. EMA chief Lawrence Wong is expected to reveal some of the major efforts underway to initiate Smart Grids in Singapore, at a conference during the Singapore International Energy Week in November.

Smart Grids, which governments around the world, including the United States, are eager to set up, are touted as a more intelligent distribution of electricity to homes and businesses.

One feature of the high-tech system is, meters would become more responsive, allowing families to monitor consumption and hence cut their power bills. Also, alternative sources of energy - such as the unused power of electric cars, which EMA is test-bedding and hoping to see on the roads from 2010 - could be fed into the grid. The bottom line: Energy-saving and cost- saving.

The beginnings of a microgrid system with power-generating sources like solar, wind, and biomass could be implemented first on Pulau Ubin, a 1,020-hectare island just off the mainland. EMA is currently reviewing a consultancy's concept plan for the development and implementation of clean, renewable energy solutions for the rural island, said Mr Tan.

He added the agency was also seeking industry feedback to gauge the level of interest to participate in the Pulau Ubin project. 'We should be ready to announce more details towards the end of the year,' he said.

These developments are on top of EMA's efforts to set off more sparks in green research circles. Last year, EMA launched a $25 million Energy Research Development Fund, to be spent over five years, to facilitate the deployment of innovative energy solutions here, including in clean energy.

In 2007, the country's Research, Innovation and Enterprise Council announced that $170 million would be set aside to groom the clean energy sector as a key growth industry for Singapore.


Read more!

Clean power expo comes to Singapore

Business Times 4 Nov 09;

It is the first-ever gathering under one roof of leaders from the technology, services, finance and government sectors

CORPORATE honchos, renowned research names and policymakers will convene in Singapore this month for a three-day meeting on developments in Asia's renewables and energy efficiency scene. Nearly 4,000 participants are expected at the inaugural Clean Energy Expo Asia from Nov 18-20 at the Shangri-La Hotel.

What sets this event apart from similar-themed trade fairs and conferences in the region is that this is the first-ever gathering under one roof of leaders from the technology, services, finance and government sectors.

'This is the only conference that provides a holistic view of clean and renewable issues, from technological innovation, energy efficiency in manufacturing, buildings, transport, to clean energy projects, policies and financing,' said Michael Dreyer, vice-president for Asia-Pacific at Koelnmesse, an organiser of trade fairs worldwide.

Koelnmesse is joint organiser of the expo with the Sustainable Energy Association of Singapore. Mr Dreyer said that despite the financial crisis and economic slowdown, interest in the event has been high. Over 20 countries will be represented at the expo, which comprises a conference, trade fair, career fair and 'TechTalks' by various exhibitors.

Already, the exchange of ideas and networking opportunities look set to be intense, as a wide- ranging slew of other related, high-profile events will be taking place at the same time under the umbrella of the Singapore International Energy Week (SIEW).

The SIEW, which is into its second year and will run from Nov 16-20, is jointly organised by the Energy Market Authority and the Energy Studies Institute.

The events are taking place in the run-up to the highly-anticipated world climate change convention in Copenhagen, Denmark next month. The United Nations (UN) meeting aims to sew up a replacement for the soon-to-expire Kyoto protocol on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Success, unfortunately, seems increasingly elusive, as several key countries, including the United States, have thus far been unable to agree internally on how far they would go to cut their own emissions. But the 'green' dialogue shows no signs of letting up.

Said Mr Dreyer: 'The Policies and Finance tracks (of the conference) are seeing the most enquiries to date, particularly discussions on clean energy investments funds in Asia, as well as financing for clean energy projects.'

The conference will hear from some 70 international pundits. Notable speakers include Peter du Pont, chief of party of the USAID ECO-Asia Clean Development and Climate Program; Armin Sandhoevel, chief executive officer of Allianz Climate Solutions; and Michael Liebreich, chairman and chief executive officer of New Energy Finance.

Day 1 of the conference programme will focus on clean energy technologies, followed by energy efficiency across various business sectors on Day 2.

Day 3 will cover policies, projects and financing issues within the industry globally. Delegates will also be able to check out what's new in the marketplace for green solutions. Over 60 exhibitors and some 3,000 visitors are expected at the trade fair.

There will be eight country pavilions: Australia, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea and Singapore. Each will showcase their latest clean energy technologies, services and financing solutions in solar energy, energy efficiency, biomass and geothermal. The largest pavilion will be from Singapore, with about 20 exhibitors.

In Asia and Oceania, new investments in clean energy surged by a compounded annual growth rate of 42 per cent from 2006 to 2008, hitting US$24.2 billion last year, according to Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2009, an authoritative report by the UN Environment Programme and industry research firm New Energy Finance.

Should growth in clean technology circles remain robust in the years ahead as anticipated, manpower needs for the industry would get more pressing.

This is why the Clean Energy Expo Asia will feature a career fair showcasing the educational and training options available, as well as employment trends in the sector. There will also be matching of human resource needs with job seekers.

Currently, the clean energy industry employs about 2.3 million people worldwide - and counting, as several governments have recently pledged to pump billions of dollars to advance the green agenda.

'Employment needs, whether in the East or West, run parallel to the specific clean energy sectors that are more prevalent in the region and tend to match the level of investment by the government and private sectors,' said Mr Dreyer.


Read more!

Special label for firms using green methods of production

Straits Times 4 Nov 09;

A 'GREEN' labelling programme has been unveiled to brand qualifying Singapore-made products as environmentally sustainable.

The label will be awarded only to firms that embrace sustainable manufacturing - for example, by reducing product wastage or improving energy efficiency - and can show that they have attained set minimum standards.

Firms that want to earn the 'green' label offered by the Singapore Manufacturers' Federation (SMa) with the support of Spring Singapore will have to be audited and certified by the Singapore Environment Council.

SMa president Renny Yeo said yesterday that it was increasingly important for manufacturers to adopt green practices to boost their corporate social responsibility profile and gain a competitive edge, given the growing number of environmentally conscious consumers.

Having a label that indicates a company has gone through some form of third-party verification that its products are green-certified and that it has sustainable procedures in place will come in handy when exporting to environmentally friendly markets such as those in Europe, he said.

'The economic downturn might have slowed down the progress and the adoption rate of sustainable manufacturing.

'Nonetheless, the importance and benefits of embarking on sustainable manufacturing still outweigh the inertia,' Mr Yeo added.

Spring Singapore deputy chief executive Ted Tan said that Singapore companies must be quick to identify and capture the growth opportunities that the environmental sector has created for local environmental technology services and manufacturing companies.


Read more!

Water levels down in Johor dams

The Star 4 Nov 09;

Two dams are managed by Singapore’s Public Utilities Board and another private company in Masai.

JOHOR BARU: The hot spell in recent months has caused water levels in dams in the state to recede.

Although the situation is not critical, this is the first time in four years that the levels have dropped in many parts of the state.

State Drainage and Irrigation Department director Chong Chee Han, who urged people to conserve water, said the levels at the four dams managed by the department have been dropping since May.

The dams are at Bekok, Sembrong, Macap and Labong in Mersing. Syarikat Air Johor Holdings Sdn Bhd (SAJ) manages the three dams in Juaseh in Labis, Congok in Mersing and Lebam in Kota Tinggi.

Two other dams are managed by Singapore’s Public Utilities Board and another private company in Masai.

Chong said the water level of the Sembrong dam was 7.74m now, compared with 9m in June. As for the Bekok dam, the level was 14m in early May but 10.41m now.

“We have not had this problem since the severe drought in 2005,” he said, adding that more rain was expected this month.

SAJ corporate communications head Ja-maluddin Jamil said the Sembrong dam’s level had dipped the most among the dams managed by the concessionaire.

The company had contingency plans in case the situation worsened. For more information, contact 1800-88-7474 or SMS to 019-772 7474 or email to customer.care@saj.com.my.


Read more!

Plastic bags to be banned as Myanmar government acts on pollution

Ye Lwin, Myanmar Times 2 Nov 09;

THE cheapest and most common type of plastic bags will be banned in Yangon Division from December 1 for environmental reasons, officials announced last month.

Businesses will be banned from manufacturing, importing, trading or distributing high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic bags from the end of this month, the Yangon Division Peace and Development Council said in an October 21 announcement.

However, two other kinds of plastic bags currently in use – low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP) will not be banned, traders said.

“The ban is just for HDPE plastic bags which are commonly used in Yangon. But there is no affect on the other types of plastic bags – PE and PP,” said U Ohn Than, who runs a plastic factory in Yangon’s Hlaing township that employs about 10 people.

The higher density of HDPE bags means they take longer to break down than both PE and PP, which generally disintegrate within 90 days if placed in landfill.

“It takes about 100 years for HDPE bags to break down, due to their high density. It is a major cause of environmental pollution,” U Ohn Than said.

Yangon will be the third city in Myanmar to introduce such a ban, after Mandalay and Nay Pyi Taw.

Globally, many cities and countries have introduced regulations governing the use of plastic bags, from outright bans to taxes and levies. Several of Myanmar’s neighbours, including Thai-land and China, have also introduced laws restricting the use of HDPE plastic bags.

Last month’s announcement, which was also distributed to manufacturers, was welcomed by many residents in downtown Yangon, who often have to suffer severe flooding in rainy season because drains are blocked with discarded plastic bags.

“We welcome this action as it will help to reduce pollution in the city and greenhouse gas emissions to some extent,” said U Ko Maung, 40, from Kyauktada township.

Local environmental groups have lobbied for several years for the introduction of such a ban. Dr Phone Win, from Mingalar Myanmar, an NGO that runs several environmental projects, said the campaign’s success depended on providing a viable alternative to HDPE.

“There are pros and cons when it comes to using plastic bags.

From the consumer’s point of view, they are handy for carrying things. From the environmental point of view, they cause environmental pollution and contribute to global warming,” Dr Phone Win said.

“We need to take into consideration consumers; we have to replace HDPE bags with another convenient form of packaging that they can use,” he said. “Only when people participate actively will the program be successful.”

While many in the manufacturing industry acknowledge HDPE bags are an environmental problem, U Ohn Than said it would have “serious repercussions” for the sector.

“This is a good decision from an environmental point of view. But there will be serious repercussions for HDPE manufacturers and employees will bear the brunt of this decision,” he said.

Manufacturers range in size from workshops with five to 10 workers to large factories with up to 100 employees. The majority, perhaps 70 percent, of workers are women.

The machines that produce HDPE bags cannot be converted to produce more environmentally friendly alternatives. Each machine costs from K4 million to K10 million and the larger factories employ up to 20 machines.

There will also be ramifications in the retail sector, as low density polyethylene bags are significantly more expensive. In other countries, this cost is normally passed on to the consumer through a bag “tax” or charge.

The government has touted natural alternatives to plastic, such as bags made from banana leaves, lotus leaves, paper or reeds. Some retailers have already made attempts to wean consumers off HDPE plastic, with varying success. In January 2008, Orange super-market, which has branches in Yangon and Mandalay, introduced “Go Green Bags”, made from spunbond, a durable, nonwoven polyester material, at a cost of K1500 each.

A spokesperson from City Mart Holding, the largest retailer in Myanmar, said that since August 2009 the super-market chain has introduced bags made of cloth and paper as an alternative to HDPE bags.

However, customers have to pay about K500 for the bags, which are reusable and washable. The spokesperson would not comment on the impact of the new rules.

In response to the ban introduced in Mandalay in June, some supermarkets started to use paper bags but the K500 fee was not popular with customers.

“I think most consumers are not prepared to pay additional fees to the supermarket just for a bag to carry their shopping,” said Daw Sein Sein from Mandalay.

U Ohn Than agreed it could take some time for consumers to get used to the changes.

“Using HDPE plastic bags is deeply rooted in our society, we have been using them for many decades. We will find something effective to replace them sooner or later but for the time being, local authorities are suggesting to use banana leaves or the broad leaves of the inn tree,” U Ohn Than said.

While it isn’t clear what action will be taken against anyone who defies the ban, the authorities said no import licenses for HDPE raw materials will be issued from December 1.


Read more!

Forest Protection Hinges On 10-Word Phrase

Stacy Feldman, PlanetArk 4 Nov 09;

BARCELONA - Developing nations could end up being paid billions of dollars to raze rainforests and build palm oil plantations in their place if the current text of the Copenhagen climate treaty sticks, a group of advocates warned at the United Nations climate talks on Tuesday.

It's not set in stone. Negotiators could still reinsert a 10-word phrase that was sliced from the treaty language, but that would have to happen by Friday, the last day of the U.N. talks in Barcelona.

Barcelona is the last stop for global warming delegates before the Copenhagen summit starts on December 7. After that, negotiators must whittle down the bloated text, not add to it, as instructed by the U.N. Secretariat.

"There is enormous pressure to reduce down," Andrea Johnson of the non-governmental Environmental Investigation Agency told SolveClimate. "And safeguards have been discussed already more than anything else since August."

The 10-word provision - "safeguards against the conversion of natural forests to forest plantations" - was part of the proposal on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation, known as REDD. The words were enclosed in brackets. Meaning, they were still up for negotiation.

The phrase vanished completely on the last day of UN climate talks in Bangkok in October.

The cut came from the European Union, with support from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and several other Congo Basin countries.

Afterwards, the European Commission's chief negotiator called the word change "an unfortunate mishap." Twenty countries are said to be in favor of restoring the phrase. Two days into talks in Barcelona, however, that hasn't happened.

Many developing nations, including the United States, have remained silent on the issue.

"The protection of intact natural forests should be a core element of REDD, but so far it is still not in any text proposals," said Peg Putt of The Wilderness Society. "Barcelona may be the last chance for forests, and we need Parties to step up and say so."

Hope remains. Before Barcelona, reports surfaced that the UK would push to undo the so-called Bangkok mistake. Brazil's climate negotiator Thelma Krug told SolveClimate, "I am 100 percent confident it is going to be there" by Friday.

If it isn't, the implications could be huge.

Forests are carbon sinks, sucking up carbon from the atmosphere and using it to grow. Deforestation has the opposite effect, releasing CO2 back into the atmosphere.

Today, more than 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions come from deforestation.

A study by the World Agroforestry Center, in collaboration with the Indonesian Palm Oil Commission, found that palm oil plantations store an average of 40 tons of carbon per hectare. That compares with untouched "temperate moist forests," which store an average of 377 tons of carbon per hectare, according to a study published in July in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Tropical rainforests store 171 tons of carbon per hectare.

REDD is seen as a relatively cheap way to stop the practice and cut CO2 emissions quickly. Its underlying premise is to reward developing countries with billions of dollars in "carbon credits" for conserving their tropical forests. But for REDD to be successful, primary forests must be protected over vested palm oil interests.

"Maintaining primary forests must be REDD's top priority, as these forests store the most carbon and improve permanence through greater resiliency than degraded forests," a new report by British-based Global Witness explains.

Palm oil plantations have very little carbon-storage capacity and bring severe biodiversity loss. Without the safeguard provision, REDD would create a perverse economic incentive to clear forests to plant a polluting cash crop, environmentalists warn.

In recent years, there's been a palm oil explosion. The growth stems from increasing demand in cooking oil, but an increasing chunk of new plantations are being used to meet biofuel mandates in wealthy nations.

Indonesia and Malaysia have the most existing plantations. Large swathes of forests in both countries have been cleared to fuel the boom. Newer markets in Latin America are beginning to balloon, with signs of massive growth on the horizon.

With out the safeguards in the Copenhagen text, REDD dollars could end up funding the expansion.


Read more!

Taiwan coral reefs need 100 years to recover: scientists

Yahoo News 3 Nov 09;

TAIPEI (AFP) – Coral reefs off Taiwan will need up to 100 years to recover from Typhoon Morakot, which lashed the island in early August killing more than 600 people, a scientist said Tuesday.

Latest research shows the reefs, near volcanic Orchid Island southeast of Taiwan, have sustained even worse damage than initially feared, according to Academia Sinica, a Taipei-based scientific institution.

"Some of the shallow-water coral reefs look as if they've been crushed by road rollers," said Chen Chaolun, a researcher at the institution. "They will need up to 100 years to recover."

The live coral coverage near Orchid Island has tumbled from 68 percent to less than 18 percent, he said.

The reefs, popular with diving enthusiasts, were damaged by driftwood thrust into the sea by the typhoon and mudflows crashing into the ocean from coastal areas.

Chen warned that his 100-year estimate is based on the assumption that overfishing, pollution and aggressive development in coastal areas is stopped.

Typhoon Morakot unleashed a record three metres (10 feet) of rain, triggering widespread flooding and massive deadly landslides.

Lanyu coral reefs will take 100 years to recover
Central News Agency, Taiwan News 3 Nov 09;

It may take at least a century for the coral reefs in waters surrounding the outlying island of Lanyu, also known as Orchid Island, to recover from the damage wrought by Typhoon Morakot, a researcher said yesterday.

"Morakot not only wreaked havoc on land in Taiwan but also on the corals on the seabed, " said Chen Chao-lun, an associate research fellow at the Biodiversity Center of Academia Sinica, Taiwan's most prestigious academic institution.

"The seabed off Lanyu is littered with coral wreckage in the wakeof the storm, " Chen said, adding that the coral looks like it has been "shredded by a fruit slicer."

An avid amateur diver, Chen joined 55 other volunteers enlisted by two local environmental protection organizations to check the state of the coral reefs at 16 sites off the coasts of Taiwan proper and its outlying islands, between May and September.

"The live coral coverage in Lanyu waters used to exceed 50 percent, but the latest survey conducted after Typhoon Morakot showed that it has declined to 18 percent, " Chen said. "This is a steep drop from the 69 percent recorded in 2004."

In what seemed to be a demonstration of the power of nature, Chen said, the storm uprooted from the seabed a six-meter-high coral that weighed nearly two tons and flung it across over a 10-meter-wide road onto the roof of the Lanyu Farmers Association, where it left a large hole.

In addition to natural disasters, overfishing is also a major threat to the survival of coral reefs in Lanyu waters, according to Chen. A number of reef fish and shell species, including groupers, parrotfish and wrasse fish, have been almost depleted, he noted.

Overfishing has disrupted the marine food chain, a phenomenon that has made the Lanyu coral reef environment even more vulnerable to natural disasters, he added.

"A coral reef is like a community. When its fish and other living organisms are all poached or stolen, it becomes like a community without protection and may collapse easily because it is so fragile," Chen explained.

According to Chen's estimate, it will take at least 100 years for the Lanyu coral reefs to regain full health and beauty, but only if overfishing and excessive and abusive development of coastal regions are halted.

The volunteers recruited by the Taiwan Environmental Information Association and the Taiwan Marine Environmental Education Association also surveyed the health of coral reefs at 15 other locations, including waters off Taiwan's northeastern coast and Taitung's Shanyuan beach as well as the outlying islands of Siaoliuciou, Green Island and Penghu's Dongyuping.

Chen, who has been studying and conserving Taiwan's coral reef ecosystems for more than 20 years, said he was pained by the post-Morakot situation.

"The Waters off Shanyuan were filled with large pieces of driftwood that relentlessly battered the coral reefs, while silt and mud from the Bainan Stream flowed into the sea day and night, exacerbating the situation," Chen said.

The latest survey has found that live coral coverage at 12 of the 15 sites under study has fallen to below 25 percent, Chen said. "The Siaoliuciou situation is even worse, " Chen said. Overfishing, pollution and tourism have brought about irreversible.


Read more!

Orissa bans fishing for seven months to protect rare Olive Ridely turtles

Nageshwar Patnaik, The Economic Times 2 Nov 09;

BHUBANESWAR: Orissa government on Sunday imposed a seven-month-long ban on fishing activity along the entire 20 km stretch of Dhamra-Barunei
mouth within Gahirmatha marine sanctuary in the wake of aribada [mass nesting] of endangered Olive Ridley sea turtles.

This move will affect around 25,000 traditional marine fishermen in coastal Kendrapara and Jagatsinghpur districts, who eke out their living by fishing only.

The ban is in accordance with Sections 2, 7 and 4 of Orissa Marine Fishing Regulation Act (OMFRA), 1982 and provisions of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, Rajnagar Mangrove (Wildlife) Forest Division, Divisional Forest Officer, Prasanna Kumar Behera said.

As many as 212 marine fishermen were arrested and 84 sea-worthy trawlers and vessels were seized during ban clamped last year as vessels defied the OMFRA provisions and indulged in fishing along the prohibited water zones.

In view of drop in marine fish catch and subsequent loss of avocation, the fishermen have been demanding for temporary permits for fishing activity on once-a-week basis for their sustenance. In fact, the state government had announced Rs 2,700 a month for full time fishermen and Rs 1,350 for part time fishermen, but it was never implemented causing anguish among the traditional fishermen

Though last year the government had assured to provide temporary permits, it cid not keep its words pushing the marine fishermen to pecuniary, said a spokesman of the local traditional marine fishermen association.

According to the marine fishermen of these areas, the conservation
of endangered Riddley is of paramount importance but it should not be at the cost of livelihood of thousands of fishermen, who cause no harm to these species.

Most traditional fishermen fish in the 5 km stretch with their indigenous kani or net which do not harm turtles. But breeding turtles get killed by the trawlers, which use mono-filament nets that lead to entangling of the turtles.

The prohibition in past years has resulted in a drastic drop in marine fish production and economy regulated by fishing sector. Ancillary sectors like ice-factories, net making units, etc in areas like Dhamra, Jamboo, Kharinasi, Ramnagar, Sandhakuda, Ambiki, Erasama and Paradipgada have been closed down.

Skilled boat-makers from these areas are slowly heading to Digha and Vishakhapatnam due to bleak business.

Fishing ban breather for turtles
The Telegraph India 3 Nov 09;

Environmentalists protest death of Olive Ridley turtles in Gahirmatha last year

Cuttack, Nov. 3: The state government has banned fishing in and around Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary to protect the Olive Ridley sea turtles, which migrate to the Orissa coast every winter.

Sources said the forest department had imposed the ban from November 1 in view of the mating and nesting season of the endangered sea turtles. The restriction will continue till May 31, 2010.

Gahirmatha beach, which forms the eastern boundary of Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, some 90km from here, supports the largest known nesting beach of Olive Ridley sea turtles in the world. Nearly half-a-million Olive Ridleys nest every year at Gahirmatha. Besides, the coastal waters off Gahirmatha are a major mating area for the turtles before nesting.

The ban is being enforced under the Orissa Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1982, and the Orissa Marine Fishing Rules, 1983.

The divisional forest officer of Rajnagar mangrove forest (wildlife) division, P.K. Behera, said fishing had been banned around 20km of the Gahirmatha seashore.

Steps were also underway to set up onshore and offshore camps to keep a watch on illegal entry of trawlers to the sanctuary area during the seven-month ban period, he said.

The forest officials plan to step up night-patrolling with the help of coast guard personnel and marine police after the Olive Ridleys are sighted.

“We have sought help from coast guard, marine police and Defence Research Development Organisation personnel to step up surveillance in and around Gahirmatha coast during nesting,” Behera said.

The DRDO personnel are expected to initiate steps to mask defence-lighting system at the nearby Wheeler Island during mass nesting to prevent the turtles getting disoriented on the beach.


Read more!

China seeks laws to protect polluted lakes: state media

Yahoo News 3 Nov 09;

BEIJING (AFP) – Officials in China have called for special laws to halt pollution of the nation's thousands of lakes, which are drying up at a rate of about 20 per year, state media reported.

Chen Zhili, one of China's top legislators, urged the establishment of special lake protection regulations and stricter supervision of industrial, agricultural and household waste, the official Xinhua news agency said.

Speaking at the 13th World Lake Conference in the central city of Wuhan late Monday, she also called for the eradication of outdated production methods that led to massive waste, Xinhua reported.

China, which has long suffered from severe water pollution, has invested billions of dollars in cleaning up its waterways, but according to Xinhua, 20 of its 24,800 lakes are disappearing each year.

In addition, nearly 90 percent of China's lakes have eutrophic water rich in nutrients -- often linked to pollution -- that cause excessive growth of aquatic plants, reducing oxygen and often killing off animals.

Taihu Lake in the eastern province of Jiangsu, for example, has been massively polluted by dumping of sewage as well as industrial and agricultural waste, and is now plagued with algae.

In another example, two major algae blooms in Erhai Lake in the southwestern province of Yunnan between 1996 and 2003 triggered problems with drinking water supplies, according to Xinhua.

China has in the past jailed environmentalists who led outspoken campaigns against the nation's persistent pollution problems.

Wu Lihong, who fought for years to end the chronic industrial pollution of Taihu Lake, was jailed for three years in August 2007 for blackmail and fraud.

Wu insisted at the time the charges were trumped up, alleging the local government was trying to silence his accusations that the lake's pollution was largely the fault of officials who had colluded with local businesses.

China's minister of water resources, Chen Lei, called at the conference in Wuhan for "strict supervision and punishment over illegal activities", the report said.


Read more!

'Whitewash' could slow global warming: Peruvian scientist

Yahoo News 4 Nov 09;

LIMA (AFP) – A Peruvian scientist has called on his country to help slow the melting of Andean glaciers by daubing white paint on the rock and earth left behind by receding ice so they will absorb less heat.

Eduardo Gold, president of non-governmental organization Glaciers of Peru, made the suggestion in a presentation Tuesday to the country's parliamentary commission on climate change.

His idea has already attracted interest from the World Bank, and is among a series of projects to counter climate change that the organization is considering, Gold told AFP.

"Little by little the glaciers are turning brown. The brown areas and rocks absorb more heat, speeding up the process of glacial melting. Our suggestion is to recreate the original white color and the conditions needed for recovery," Gold recently told official news agency Andina.

The phenomenon is known as "positive feedback": the more the glaciers disappear, the more earth there is to absorb radiant heat and reinforce global warming.

Gold says the paint that would be used is environmentally friendly and made from a base of lime, without chemical components.

It could be made by local residents and could create some 15,000 jobs over five years, he added.

The idea of using white paint to combat climate change is not new. It has been proposed by US Energy Secretary and Nobel Physics Prize winner Steven Chu, as a way to use "geo-engineering" to lessen global warming.

While the idea has already been implemented in some places, including in New York, where some roofs have been painted white, Gold is the first person to propose applying the idea to something on the scale of glaciers.

The glaciers of the tropical Andes are particularly vulnerable to climate change and have lost at least 30 percent of their surface over 30 years, according to some scientists. Others put the figure much higher.

Gold was invited to address Peruvian lawmakers after he was chosen as a finalist in a contest financed by the World Bank. The winner of the competition will be announced before the end of 2009.


Read more!

Green beliefs win legal protection

Landmark ruling means employees can sue for unfair dismissal
Robert Verkaik and Michael McCarthy, The Independent 4 Nov 09;

Employees who raise concerns about their company's environmental practices won the right to legal redress yesterday after a judge ruled that green beliefs deserved the same protection in the workplace as religious convictions.

In a landmark ruling which legal experts said could open the floodgates to thousands of claims Mr Justice Burton ruled that environmental views should be protected under the employment equality laws.

The appeal judge's decision means that workers who are victimised for their strong environmental views such as how a company should deal with cutting carbon emissions, managing waste or using aviation to travel to meetings, can bring compensation claims against employers.

Employment lawyers said that a payout under the new interpretation of the law could be unlimited.

In yesterday's case Tim Nicholson, a former executive of the giant property company Grainger, claimed his redundancy last year was a direct result of his green opinions – which put him at odds with other senior executives within the firm. Mr Nicholson is taking the company, Britain's largest residential landlord, to an employment tribunal to seek compensation for his dismissal, and asked the court to allow him to use special legislation which protects people's rights to hold religious and philosophical beliefs at work – the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations, 2003. He claims that his concern about the environment in general, and climate change in particular, amounts to a philosophical belief under the meaning of the regulations. Yesterday the judge confirmed the view of an employment judge at a pre-hearing review in March – revealed in The Independent – that it does.

Grainger had appealed against the earlier judgment, claiming that Mr Nicholson's views were not the same as religious or philosophical beliefs.

But Judge Burton, sitting at the Employment Appeal Tribunal, said yesterday: "If a person can establish that he holds a philosophical belief which is based on science as opposed, for example, to religion, then there is no reason to disqualify it from protection."

The decision means that Mr Nicholson, 42, who now works for a green medical charity in Oxford, can go ahead and use the regulations to bring his case against his former employers. He said: "I am grateful that Mr Justice Burton understood that deeply and genuinely held views about catastrophic climate change and the need to change our ways to protect the human race are philosophical views that are worthy of protection. Such views are more and more relevant to our planet's survival."

Arpita Dutt, a partner in employment law at Russell Jones and Walker, said that the case would be of great benefit to many employees. "For claimants in this country there is no doubt that this is a very good judgment... But they will have to be able to show that they acted in good faith and not for any financial advantage." She said that the legal argument on this point could be eventually heard in the Court of Appeal or even the Supreme Court.

Michael Burd, joint head of the employment group at Lewis Silkin, said that the ruling was important but the test as to what constitutes environmental belief worthy of protection was a high one. He said: "It was established in a judgment in 2007 that a belief has to have sufficient cogency and cohesion worthy of respect within a democratic society. Not all cases will meet this test."

Peter Mooney, who is head of consultancy at Employment Law Advisory Services, said: "The ramifications of Tim Nicholson winning this test case are massive. In essence victory will put employees who hold strong environmental beliefs in the same category – and with the same protection – as workers who hold strong religious beliefs."

He added: "Consequently he could be in line for unlimited damages. This would open the floodgates for others who believe their employers have victimised them simply because of their views on the environment and how business deals with pressing environmental issues such as climate change and reducing our carbon emissions."

Mr Nicholson claims his beliefs affect his whole life. He no longer travels in aeroplanes, has renovated his home to be more eco-friendly and says he fears for the future of the human race.

He accused Grainger's chief executive, Rupert Dickinson, of showing "contempt" for his concerns and claimed he once flew a member of staff to Ireland to deliver his BlackBerry which he had left in London.

Mr Nicholson was selected for redundancy from Grainger and stopped working for the firm as head of sustainability in July last year.

Grainger corporate affairs director Dave Butler said: "Grainger absolutely maintains, as it has done from the very outset of these proceedings, that Mr Nicholson's redundancy was driven solely by the operational needs of the company during a period of extraordinary market turbulence, which also required other structural changes to be made within the company."

He added: "Grainger rejects outright any suggestion that there was any other motivation relating to Mr Nicholson's beliefs or otherwise. Grainger has a long-held commitment to acting as a responsible landlord, employer and member of the business community."


Former sustainability boss wins right to tribunal over climate change views
Judge allows case for unfair dismissal to go ahead by ruling that strong environmental conviction is akin to religious belief
Karen McVeigh, guardian.co.uk 3 Nov 09;

A man who claims his quasi-religious environmental beliefs led to his sacking won his fight to take his former employer to a tribunal yesterday.

Tim Nicholson, 42, former head of sustainability at Grainger, one of the UK's largest property companies, claims his views on climate change were so serious it led to clashes with other senior staff.

Nicholson, from Oxford, accused Grainger's chief executive, Rupert Dickinson, of showing "contempt" for his concerns, and claimed he once flew a member of staff to Ireland to deliver his BlackBerry which he had left in London.

His case can now go ahead after an employment appeal judge ruled in his favour, based on a ruling that such a strong environmental conviction is akin to a religious belief.

His solicitor, Shah Qureshi, said: "Essentially what the judgment says is that a belief in man-made climate change and the alleged resulting moral imperative is capable of being a philosophical belief and is therefore protected by the 2003 religion or belief regulations."

Nicholson, who claimed he was unfairly dismissed due to his "philosophical belief about climate change and the environment", said that his opinions affect his whole lifestyle. He does not travel by plane and has renovated his home to be more eco-friendly.

In a witness statement to a previous hearing, he said: "I have a strongly held philosophical belief about climate change and the environment. I believe we must urgently cut carbon emissions to avoid catastrophic climate change."

"This affects how I live my life ... I encourage others to cut their carbon emissions and I fear for the future of the human race."

In March, the employment judge David Neath gave him permission to take the firm to tribunal over his treatment, but the ruling was challenged by Grainger on the ground that green views are not the same as religious or philosophical beliefs.

The firm maintained that environmental views are political and a "lifestyle choice" which cannot be compared to religion or philosophy. Tim Nicholson now runs the health care section of the 10:10 climate change campaign.


Read more!

Taiwan's green expo showcases innovations to promote green living

Christina Lo Channel NewsAsia 4 Nov 09;

TAIPEI : Inventors in Taiwan are showing how green living can be possible, without giving up daily conveniences.

They have come up with a washing machine that doesn't use water, and a cooking stove that doesn't need gas.

These and other innovations are on display at Taiwan's first Green Industry Expo which runs from October 21-24.

The water-powered stove - a world's first - saves both energy and money, making it hugely popular among catering companies in Taiwan.

"Water produces hydrogen and oxygen. The stove consumes 1000 cc of water per hour, costing 10 cents. Traditionally, we use gas costing US$7.5 per hour. But now with the stove, we need another 10 cents to power the process. So it's much cheaper," said Henry Lin, GM of Green Energy Division at Wonten Tech Company.

Over 150 manufacturers are showing off their latest energy-saving technologies at the Green Expo.

Most are appliances that can be used in daily living, like the water-less washing machine. Instead of detergent and water, it uses liquefied carbon dioxide for cleaning.

This Taiwanese invention has already been adopted by a number of laundry factories in Europe and the US.

"We use CO2 to replace water and detergent. It's eco-friendly. Over 95 per cent of carbon dioxide can be used again... It saves water and electricity use, and there's no pollution," said Dr Chiu Yung-Ho, Taiwan Supercritical Technology Company.

Other eye-catching innovations include a water-free urinal, electric bicycles and a solar-powered yacht.

The Taiwanese government has just approved to impose green taxes on energy and carbon-dioxide emission. Although the time frame has yet to be set, the public is already concern about the rising oil price.

On the other hand, the green industry is seeing more opportunities.

"Traditionally, one degree of electricity uses up lots of coal and fuel, or you need certain amount of wind and solar light to generate power. We don't need that now," said Dr Chong Kuo-Cheng from A. Solares High Tech. Company.

Taiwan is already seen as a world leader in products that save energy and reduce pollution.

Analysts said that by 2015, the island's green industry will generate up to US$47 billion in revenue. - CNA /ls


Read more!

Minimising nuclear risks in Southeast Asia

Mark Fitzpatrick, Straits Times 4 Nov 09;

SOUTH-EAST Asia is on the cusp of joining the nuclear renaissance. Three countries in this region have announced plans for nuclear power, two others are deciding on the option and two more have expressed an interest in it. Meanwhile, Myanmar plans to build a small research reactor and is the focus of rumours about clandestine nuclear cooperation with North Korea. Myanmar's unclear intentions give rise to proliferation worries, while elsewhere in the region, the major concerns pertain to safety and environmental considerations.

The rationale for nuclear power in South-east Asia is largely the same as elsewhere: as a way to help meet rising electricity demands and to ensure energy security, energy autonomy and diversification of supply. Even in countries blessed with oil and gas deposits, governments are acutely aware that these are finite and depleting resources, and many are reluctant to be dependent on potentially unreliable external suppliers.

Commentators with an incomplete understanding of what it takes to build nuclear weapons often assume that the acquisition of nuclear energy could be an easy stepping stone to nuclear weapons. There are ways that nuclear power programmes can contribute to weapons development, but nuclear power technology alone cannot be put to use to develop nuclear weapons without either uranium enrichment or plutonium reprocessing. None of the Asean countries has any plan to introduce these sensitive technologies.

Concerns have been raised about the safety of nuclear power in a region that is prone to seismic disasters and bureaucratic corruption, and that has also experienced home-grown terrorist activity and, in some places, an insufficient safety culture. In addition to energy security, the threat of nuclear accidents, nuclear theft and nuclear terrorism should be key security considerations. The controversial environmental and political risks posed by nuclear waste must also be taken into account. In addition, states that introduce nuclear power will need eventually to find a solution for the safe disposal of spent fuel.

By acting responsibly and cooperatively, Asean members can harness the atom for peaceful uses in a manner that is safe, secure and non-threatening. Among other policy choices, accepting full transparency measures, making use of market- based fuel-cycle services backed by international guarantees, and working towards a regional solution to spent-fuel storage would obviate any need for sensitive dual-use technologies that could spark proliferation concerns.

Regional cooperation in the field of nuclear energy can provide strong benefits. To date, the regional institutions that might be expected to play a greater role in promoting nuclear safety, security and non-proliferation have been underutilised and in some cases ignored. This is due in part to disagreement among member states as to whether regional or global bodies dealing with these issues better serve respective national interests. There is also an inclination to avoid troublesome issues and interference in their neighbours' business. In addition, some of the institutions are too young to have established a track record.

The question of whether there should be a region-wide approach to nuclear energy issues has in some sense been answered in the affirmative through adoption of the Bangkok Treaty with its respective articles covering basic undertakings and information exchange, and through the 2007 decision by the Asean leaders to establish a regional nuclear safety regime. However, cooperation to date has been insufficient.

At a minimum, it would make sense for Asean members to share information about nuclear development plans, as would seem to be required by Article II of the Bangkok Treaty, which calls for each state to report on 'any significant event within its territory... affecting the implementation of this Treaty'. Myanmar's nuclear agreement with Russia and any strategic discussions with North Korea, for example, would appear to fall under this obligation to report.

If Asean is to evolve into more of a European Union-type community, its members will need to share some level of national control over selective economic sectors. Just as Euratom was an initial plank in the construction of the EU, so a regional approach to nuclear energy development and regulation could be a stepping stone to South-east Asia's regional integration.

In contrast to many other regions, South-east Asia enjoys a commitment to regional cooperation, a stable security environment and sustained economic growth. The region can benefit by working together on nuclear energy issues, sharing experiences and being open about mistakes.

On the problem of nuclear waste, one alternative is for Asean members to create a partnership to jointly manage waste disposal on a regional basis, including by interim storage for 50-100 years, while technology evolves to make recycling or other options more practical. By banding together, countries could minimise the costs and optimise non-proliferation, safety and security objectives.

Further down the road, the introduction of an extra-national fuel cycle facility serving South-east Asia could have benefits far beyond spent fuel management and the non-proliferation of sensitive technologies. It could also create a useful model for emulation elsewhere and bring closer to realisation the vision of making all sensitive nuclear facilities international - and thus bring closer as well the vision of a stable nuclear weapons-free world.

The writer is director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Programme at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and editor of Preventing Nuclear Dangers In South-east Asia And Australasia, from which this article is excerpted.


Read more!

Where is Asia's place in the sun?

Business Times 4 Nov 09;

OVERVIEW

IT'S been a somewhat gloomy year for solar power players. Hurt by a financing squeeze and a demand slump amid the recession, the industry winced even more when Spain's once-glorious photovoltaic (PV) market crashed as the government retracted its generous subsidies.

Still, prospects for the industry remain bright, said panellists of a roundtable organised by The Business Times. This is thanks in large part to multibillion-dollar plans by governments for clean energy. In fact, leaders of the United States and China recently declared they each want to lead in the clean energy race, a major part of which is solar power. Where is Asia's place in the sun?

Panellists:

# ArminGAberle, Deputy CEO, Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS)

# Carol Tan, Head of Project Finance, Epuron

# Christophe Inglin, Managing Director, Phoenix Solar, Singapore

# David Tan, Deputy CEO, Energy Market Authority, Singapore

Q: Among the renewable energy sources, how big do you think solar generation will become over the next 10 years?

Armin Aberle: I am convinced that over the next 10 years, the solar electricity market will increase by more than a factor of five.

Carol Tan: We expect a distinct and substantial growth in solar generation starting from 2010 for the following reasons: Dwindling supply of fossil fuels; price decrease in solar modules; and an increasing trend to move into renewable industry by major economies.

David Tan: At the global level, the International Energy Agency has estimated that solar energy (both solar photovoltaic and solar thermal) contributed just 0.02 per cent of the electricity produced worldwide in 2006. This is expected to increase to one per cent by 2030. For Singapore, we expect solar PV to contribute to only a very small fraction (probably less than one per cent) of our electricity demand over the next decade.

Christophe Inglin: Assuming approximately 8GWp of solar PV modules installed globally this year, and anticipating a compound annual growth rate of 30 per cent in the coming years, it would mean that in 2019 around 110GWp would be installed. That is equivalent to around 18 one-GW-size nuclear or coal-fired power plants. But 30 per cent growth is conservative by the standards of recent years. I believe 50 per cent compound average growth rate is more likely, in which case 460GWp gets installed in 2019, equivalent to nearly 80 nuclear plants. That would be enough to supply Singapore's current electricity consumption 15 times over.

If you add cumulative installations in prior years, then PV will contribute 1-3 per cent of global electricity by 2019. Many sceptics find such growth rates improbable, but they overlook the tremendous growth that will ensue when PV systems cross grid parity, which means they will compete against conventional power plants without any subsidies. The above calculations do not consider additional capacity from concentrating solar thermal (CSP) power plants. These will be located in deserts and use concentrated solar heat rays to heat up a fluid and drive conventional steam turbines.

Q: Where do you think Asia stands right now in what obviously has become a global race to lead clean-energy technology, including in the area of solar power?

Armin Aberle: Asia is increasingly becoming the global manufacturing hub for solar technologies. It already manufactures more than half of the world's solar cells and modules, and this fraction will increase further in the coming decade.

Carol Tan: The ongoing price war resulting from the current buyers' market situation presents a window of opportunity for renewable energy to become a mainstream technology. This can potentially be a breakthrough that gives rise to market opportunities for companies supplying components or services to this sector (including solar power). The stimulus packages and incentives towards renewable energy generation from the Asian economies will further spur the growth in this sector.

Specifically, markets such as Korea, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia have already or are currently putting in place financial (in the form of feed-in tariffs) and tax incentives in support of power plants utilising various forms of renewable energy technologies. We believe and are optimistic that Asia is on the right track towards becoming a global player in this industry.

Christophe Inglin: Japan is Asia's current PV technology leader, followed closely by China and Taiwan. But China is moving into overdrive. Already, China manufactures more than 50 per cent of the world's PV modules, and is helping to drive down costs faster. Whereas the Chinese until last year preferred to manufacture for export to the West, their government is now moving remarkably fast to encourage local installations. In a few years from now, China could well become the biggest PV market. By manufacturing and installing PV modules in their own country, you can be sure that the Chinese will also leverage their own research and development (R&D).

India also promises to become a large manufacturer and consumer of PV and CSP. Plenty of investment and technical knowhow will come to India from its diaspora in Silicon Valley. But initially at least, progress in India is likely to be a little more chaotic than in China.

Apart from Taiwan and Korea, there's not much action in the rest of Asia. Malaysia and Singapore have both attracted some large foreign manufacturers, who make modules for export, and Singapore has made a big commitment to R&D by establishing the Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS). But neither country has a home-grown industry like those that flourish in China, Japan, Taiwan, Korea and soon in India.

David Tan: Like other parts of the world, Asia recognises the opportunities in clean energy technology and potential for such technology to address the challenges of energy security and climate change. This is why many Asian countries are ramping up their efforts to grow and develop their clean-energy sector. Singapore is no exception. At the whole-of-government level, we have set aside S$350 million to build R&D capabilities in clean energy. We believe that we have some competitive advantages due to our existing electronics, chemicals and engineering industry clusters from which we can transfer knowledge to the solar energy sector quite quickly.

We are strategically located in the Asian sunbelt where the market potential is significant in the medium to long term. We are also moving quickly to build deep expertise in solar energy applied to an urbanised, tropical environment. One major initiative is the recent establishment of SERIS led by renowned solar energy expert Professor Joachim Luther. Overall, these initiatives play to the strengths of Singapore as we position ourselves as a 'living lab' for companies to create, develop and demonstrate innovative clean energy solutions.

Q: Making solar power affordable is an oft-touted obstacle to this energy source's take-off. How long before the technology gets cheap enough?

Armin Aberle: The cost of solar electricity is coming down rapidly. It has come down a factor of 100 in the last 30 years, and in sunny countries with high electricity prices we already have grid parity today, at least during several hours of the day. For the end user, this means the cost of solar electricity is the same as the price of coal-fired electricity. As prices of solar electricity continue to fall, the global belt where PV electricity is cost-effective will widen. It starts in countries like Spain and Italy and will eventually apply to many countries with moderate climate, including Germany and the United States. Solar electricity gets more competitive by the day, and I am convinced that in 30 years a large fraction of the world's energy demand is covered by solar electricity.

Carol Tan: This question centres on whether a full-cost approach, taking into account the repair cost of environmental damage, has been considered when calculating the cost of energy production. In addition, many governments provide heavy subsidies on fossil fuels which creates further confusion in terms of comparing cost of power production. Notwithstanding this, we see that technology improvements, falling raw material cost and economies of scale will result in a convergence to grid parity which some say will happen by 2015. In fact, in some European countries it is already coming very close.

Christophe Inglin: Grid parity is where solar electricity is commercially on par with conventionally generated electricity. Installed costs for PV are falling rapidly, but reaching grid parity depends also on prevailing sunshine intensity, interest rates (to fund investments in solar power plants) and the cost of conventional electricity (linked to global oil prices). In places with high sunshine and relatively high daytime electricity tariffs, like Italy and California, grid parity is one or two years away. Most of Asia (except Japan) has much lower electricity tariffs. In Singapore, we can expect grid parity by 2014 or sooner.

David Tan: There is no definite answer to this as there are two major uncertainties: The price of fossil fuel and the cost of solar PV. The cost of fossil fuel-derived electricity will trend upwards with rising fuel prices, while the cost of solar PV-derived electricity will trend downwards, with the improvements in manufacturing processes, system integration and construction methods. The cost of solar PV has historically been falling by about 4 per cent a year. At this rate, we estimate that solar PV may be competitive over the next 10 years.

Q: Many entrepreneurs and businesses have been jumping on the bandwagon of solar energy. What will be the winning business model?

Armin Aberle: Solar can be de-centralised and centralised, so there will not be a single winning business model. Solar involves manufacturing of components and systems, but also planning and financing of large solar power plants. The cake is so big and the technologies and market segments so diverse that there will be a range of business models that will make money.

Carol Tan: Apart from the usual focus on improving the technological efficiency, and finding ways of lowering manufacturing and raw material costs, there is a need to focus on quality control - the products must meet high quality standards and be supported by professional service providers. We are looking at the deployment of equipment that is expected to be used for over 20 years and it is of paramount importance that it is made to last!

Christophe Inglin: I wish I knew the magic answer! As in any industry, hard work and quick thinking will be essential to develop new opportunities. There are opportunities throughout the value chain, from manufacturing, R&D, to installation, including project development, financing, consulting and academia. Who would have imagined just 15 years ago how the IT and telecoms sectors would turn out today? They have completely transformed themselves from being dominated by stodgy state telco monopolies to tremendously diverse and innovative industries. The power sector will likewise experience huge technical and business upheaval over the coming decades. Renewable energy and storage technology will be two sources of upheaval. Another will be smart grid technology, where Singapore is well positioned to play a leading role.

Q: The governments of Asian countries including China have become more aggressive in pushing the solar power agenda. What's your assessment of their efforts? What's the most effective approach government should take?

Armin Aberle: Their efforts are excellent and timely. The global energy sector is not a level playing field, and hence solar technologies need some form of subsidy during the next 10 years or so to establish themselves. It is important to have a balanced approach which supports the manufacturing sector and simultaneously creates a local market for solar systems. You shouldn't walk barefoot when you are a shoemaker; likewise, Asian countries need to establish conditions that create a local market for solar systems.

There is a range of possible support schemes, but the easiest and by far best-performing approach is the German feed-in tariff scheme. This scheme pays a subsidy for each unit of solar electricity generated, ensuring that the systems are carefully selected, installed and maintained. The German government loves the scheme too, as it does not involve government money - the subsidy is paid by the electricity users in Germany.

Carol Tan: Like many Asian markets, China, which is one of the largest carbon emitters, has realised that solar power can be a key contributor towards addressing its rising energy demand and at the same time, a significant driver to its national economy. This is the reason why China has surged ahead in campaigning the solar power agenda. The approach by the government should be to propose tariffs, incentives and other support mechanisms that work towards the reduction of environmental damage and the cost of repairing such damage. At the same time, these measures should encourage an open economy with globalised trade. Ultimately, the consumer should be given the choice to select the equipment and service providers, to analyse the costs and benefits, and to decide on the most attractive and sustainable solution over the long term.

Christophe Inglin: To become an excellent cook, you can start by reading some cookery books, taking courses and watching shows. You can also test bed your new recipes on trusted friends. But you will not progress far without ample practice and regular feedback from people who eat your cuisine. The Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Indian governments are making sure there is plenty of healthy appetite to consume their cooks' output. The rest are just beginning to read the recipe books.

Q: Do you sense rising protectionism in the global race to own and produce solar energy? China, for instance, requires that 75 per cent of the content of government-purchased solar panels be Chinese-made.

Armin Aberle: Protectionism is short-sighted and does not help. Countries like China have a big export surplus, and hence it is inappropriate for the Chinese to protect their market from foreign products. Most people will agree that the world as a whole benefits from free trade, and hence I don't think that protectionism will surge.

An increasingly protectionist solar market would slow down the rate of innovation and cost reduction in the solar market, and thus slow down the growth rate of the solar business. Solar is not only about manufacturing of the solar cells and panels - the panels need to be shipped to the point of use, the solar system needs to be designed, planned, financed, installed and maintained. These are all local jobs, so countries should not be worried if a large fraction of the solar modules comes from Asia. Today, we buy most of our oil from a few countries, and nobody seems to have major problems with this fact.

Christophe Inglin: Protectionism is seldom good for an industry, and I do not believe the Chinese government will try it for long, for fear of retaliation in their export markets, which are currently much bigger than their domestic market. Consider also that the biggest announced project MOU in China came from US manufacturer First Solar, to install over 2GW of modules in phases from 2010 to 2019.

David Tan: We are not in a position to comment on the trade policies of other countries.

Q: With the US and China both wanting to dominate the solar scene, do other countries have a fighting chance to be among the top players?

Armin Aberle: China is a manufacturing powerhouse, USA is not. Standard solar panels will become a commodity like TV sets and personal computers, and thus it will be very difficult to compete with the Chinese in the field of standard products. Industrialised countries like USA or Germany need to concentrate on high-end products such as high-efficiency PV panels or highest-performance solar cells for concentrator systems. It is a bit like with cars: You can manufacture a Mercedes in Germany, but not the Tata Nano.

Christophe Inglin: I am not yet convinced of US determination to dominate the solar scene. The US is certainly not a top player today - they are well behind Japan, Germany, China and even Taiwan. I also doubt one or two countries can dominate the world market. As component costs come down, freight costs will become more significant, giving local production an advantage over imports from remote places.

Singapore stands an excellent chance of regional leadership because our higher electricity tariffs mean we should achieve grid parity before our neighbours, and therefore grow our own market ahead of other countries. Having SERIS here also gives us a regional headstart in adapting the technology to tropical conditions. But as with the cooking analogy, we need to quickly grow beyond contrived test bedding to make real progress.

David Tan: While the US and China are currently major players in the solar energy sector, the continued development and expansion of the clean-energy industry (including solar) will likely bring about growing opportunities which other countries/players can also seize upon by leveraging on their unique strengths and niche capabilities.


Read more!

Solar Companies Focus On Nuts And Bolts To Cut Costs

Laura Isensee, PlanetArk 4 Nov 09;

LOS ANGELES - Even as solar companies cook up high tech ways to cut costs, the next push to make the renewable energy source more economical could come from workers who bolt panels onto rooftops and mount them across empty fields.

So far, panels -- a system's most expensive piece -- account for the biggest drop in the total cost, falling more than 50 percent from about $4.20 a watt in 2008.

Most U.S. and European makers are now selling panels near $2 per watt, while some low-cost Chinese players sell panels at about $1.85, said J.P. Morgan research analyst Christopher Blansett, while thin film maker First Solar Inc is the cost leader at about $1.50 or $1.55 per watt.

That decline has put a spotlight on installation, which now makes up a greater share of the total cost, and has prompted installers, developers and even panel makers to look for low-tech tricks, like quick fasteners and predrilled holes.

"There's no rocket science. It's literally doing things better and more efficiently," Blansett said.

After the shiny blue and black solar panels leave the factory, technicians have to bolt the panels into steel or aluminum frames, mount them to rooftops or across fields, connect them to inverters and string the wiring to feed electricity to homes, businesses or a power grid.

The big challenge for installers is that "there is no single item that moves the needle," said Lyndon Rive, chief executive at SolarCity. The privately held company designs, installs and finances systems for homes and businesses in California, Arizona and Oregon.

"It's doing one thousand little things better," Rive said, such as managing inventory so crews don't make extra trips to a hardware store.

INSTALL COSTS TO DROP

The U.S. solar market is on track to grow 35 to 45 percent in 2009 and reach about 460 to 500 megawatts, said Alfonso Velosa, a research director at Gartner.

Residential systems are expected to remain about a third of the total U.S. market this year, Velosa added.

While companies like SunPower Corp and Suntech Power Holdings Co Ltd are working on cutting-edge technology to make more efficient solar cells, Velosa said they are "starting to hit the limits of what the materials can do."

The solar sector leans on government incentives to compete with traditional power sources, but industry experts believe it will be economically viable in the near future.

Toward that goal, installation costs could drop 5 to 15 percent next year, executives from Suntech, Solon and other companies said at the Solar Power International conference last week in Anaheim, California.

Akeena Solar Inc sees even more promise, with its roadmap to cut installation costs by more than half in 2010.

Akeena's new Andalay branded panels have built-in micro-inverters to convert the direct current electricity produced by solar panels into alternating current rather than requiring a separate unit, as most systems do.

Heavyweight panel makers have also gone back to the drawing board to design products so more work that used to happen at the construction site is done in the factory.

Solon and Suntech both recently launched new systems for the U.S. utility market that the companies say shave time and money off the installation costs.

U.S. based SunPower Corp and Energy Conversion Devices have also introduced new products to make rooftop work easier.

"If you have to have to weld something or construct something (in the field), it's quite expensive," said Olaf Koester, chief executive at Solon's U.S. unit.

Koester cited Solon's new Velocity system, which uses built-in rails instead of a frame, as an example of a design that streamlines the installation work.

Companies that install solar systems are also moving to more standard systems instead of customizing each site, which takes time and money and can create new problems every time.

"We almost used to pride ourselves on all the custom work we did. But it's too expensive. We need to be able to compete with the retail price of electricity," said Mike Hall, chief executive at privately held Borrego Solar Systems Inc.

(Editing by Gary Hill)


Read more!