The Philippines losing 6,000 hectares of mangrove a year

Charlie Lagasca PhilStar 13 Dec 08;

TUGUEGARAO CITY, Cagayan – From around 140,000 hectares, the country’s mangrove area may go down to only around 10,000 hectares by 2030 if destruction of remaining mangrove continues to go unabated based on annual decline rate from 1938 to 1993.

According to the government’s Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) here, the total hectare of mangroves in the country has gone down from 450,000 hectares in 1938 to only 138,000 hectares in 1993, or a decline rate of around 7,000 hectares per year.

This would go down to 10,000 hectares if the same annual rate of destruction continues until 2030.

This alarming of decline, BFAR said, was mainly due to overfishing, utilization of banned chemicals and explosives and other environmentally destructive fishing methods as well as household utilization of mangrove areas.

Ironically, the advance in aquaculture has been said to be partly responsible for this important ecological zone which is the home of many endemic endangered species.


Read more!

WWF to Set Up Cameras for Ujung-Kulon Rhino

Tempo 13 Dec 08;

TEMPO Interactive, Ujung Kulon: Environmental Activists from WWF will set up 34 cameras to take the Rhinoceros Sondaicus at the National Park in Ujung Kulon, Pandeglang, Banten.

WWF’s spokesperson Endang Rahayu said that the cameras will be installed when the survey done. “We plan to start using them on December 20,” she said Friday (12/12).

Endang said that the camera can work automatically without an operator, with an infra-red signal. “The camera will automatically record any movement within 20 metres,” she explained.

The cameras which were were made in the US will be installed in strategic places where rhinos usually gather.

Chairman of the National Park, Agus Priambudi, said the cameras will help detect the rhino. “The Java rhino is usually difficult to find,” he said.

Agus said the cameras will record once a month. It will be used to analyze the rhino’s characteristics and habits.

Recent reports mentioned that the number of Java rhinos is only 55 - 60 .

Up to Wednesday (10/12), 75 volunteers and crew have been surveying animals that are almost extinct 100 years ago.

Mabsuti Ibnu Marhas


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 13 Dec 08


Honeymoon on Cyrene Reef
on the wonderful creations blog with sex in the seagrasses on the wild shores of singapore blog and more seagrasses on the teamseagrass blog

A Walk to Remember - Semakau
on the Psychedelic Nature blog and more about a muddy week and nothing to do on the annotated budak blog

Hooded Pitta at Jurong Lake Park
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Luminescent Snail
on the Urban Forest blog

Beta Launch of Zero Waste Singapore
on AsiaIsGreen


Read more!

$25m Punggol makeover: "recapture the old fishing days"

Winning design to revive its heritage by capitalising on maritime setting
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 13 Dec 08;

THINK water and you will have a good idea of the main theme running through the winning design for an ambitious $25 million makeover for Punggol.

The blueprint revealed yesterday aims to revive the coastal town's heritage as a fishing village by capitalising on its maritime setting.
There will be a 10km cycling trail in a rustic setting along the 4.2km waterway and a pedestrian 'kelong-like' bridge to recapture the old fishing days.

The waterway will also boast a coastal promenade and a host of water activities.

At the heart of the waterway in Punggol's town park will be a 'heartwave' wall boasting a mini waterfall.
Visuals on the wall will depict the history and development of Punggol from its early days to a 21st century town.
All this and more was unveiled yesterday by National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan at the HDB Hub, where he announced the winner of the Punggol Waterway Landscape design contest launched in May.

Local firm Surbana International Consultants and its partner, Japanese firm Sen Inc, beat 10 local firms. Merit prizes were awarded to Arc Studio Architecture + Urbanism and Co-Design Architects.

Mr Johnny Wong, HDB's deputy director of building research, said the Housing Board was won over by Surbana's concept of incorporating Punggol's unique identity into the waterway's landscape.

Construction will be completed by 2010.

Mr Mah said the Punggol project is on schedule 'and has been progressing steadily even during this economic downturn'.

Since August last year, the HDB has launched more than 5,000 flats under its build-to-order (BTO) projects in Punggol. BTO developments are built only when a certain demand is met.

The HDB plans to offer about 3,000 flats for sale annually in Punggol, subject to demand. And by the end of 2011, there will be about 23,000 flats completed.

Mr Mah said that even with the slowdown, he expects 'sufficient take-up for these flats' as people are still getting married and young families are being formed.

The HDB is targeting the sale of the first site - a mixed commercial and residential development - to the private sector in mid-2010.

Mr Mah said there will be a demand for such sites by private developers in new towns if there is a critical mass of people living there.

'The main thing is to make sure the town itself is well populated...then the commercial developers will find it worthwhile,' he said.

Mr Mah also said that Punggol flats will remain affordable for all income groups.

About 500 rental units are being built, and about 550 of the 5,000 Punggol flats launched recently were two- and three- room flats, which cater to lower-income families. The rest will be four- and five-room flats.

Mr Mah also launched a separate design competition for Punggol's Waterfront public housing yesterday.

Architects can design a masterplan for a 26.6ha housing district west of Punggol's town centre. Shortlisted firms will go on to design in more detail a 4.9ha site along the Punggol Waterway.

The HDB plans to offer these waterfront homes by mid-2010.

Bustling waterfront living for Punggol
Uma Shankari, Business Times 13 Dec 08;

PUNGGOL, which started out as a sleepy fishing village, will get a new lease of life from 2010 onwards, with thousands of waterfront HDB flats and private homes planned alongside the soon-to-be bustling 4.2km Punggol Waterway.

'HDB plans to offer about 3,000 flats for sale annually in Punggol, subject to demand,' said Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan yesterday. 'By end-2011, there will be about 23,000 flats completed. Our plans to launch the first sale site at the Town Centre for a mixed commercial and private residential development are also on track. We will be launching this waterfront site by 2010/2011.'

Right now, there are about 17,000 HDB flats in Punggol. Since August last year, HDB has launched over 5,000 flats under seven Build-To-Order (BTO) projects in the town.

Some of the new flats will be located right next to the Punggol Waterway, which will be developed according to the vision of Singapore's Surbana International Consultants and its Japan-based partner Sen Inc.

The two firms beat 10 other entries to win a competition held to design a masterplan for the waterway's landscape. Mr Mah announced the winners yesterday.

Surbana and Sen's masterplan includes features such as a bio-pond that will be a repository of floral and fauna; a recreation zone with water-based play spaces for children and families; and a pedestrian 'kelong-like' bridge built to recapture the idyllic mood of old Punggol with its fishing villages. The bridge will lead to a heritage trail, which will follow the alignment of the existing Punggol Road.

Construction on the $25 million project to revamp the waterway will begin next year and be completed by 2010, HDB said.

After that, plans for special housing designs that will capitalise on the views along the waterway will be developed, Mr Mah said. The idea, he said, is to bring the waterway closer to residents. 'With the waterway landscape proposals completed, we can focus on another important milestone in our Punggol journey: shaping the housing along the Punggol Waterway.'

With this in mind, HDB yesterday launched a new design competition for Punggol's Waterfront public housing. Competing firms will have to come up with a masterplan for some 6,000 HDB flats during the first stage. Five finalists will be chosen to proceed to the second stage, where they will have to come up with a more detailed plan for a smaller plot of land, with an estimated 1,300 units, within the bigger site.


Read more!

WildAid wants shark fin soup ban

UPI 11 Dec 08;

SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 11 (UPI) -- The U.S. conservation group WildAid is calling for an international ban on shark fin soup.

Peter Knights, director of WildAid, said nearly 100 million sharks are killed each year to meet demand for the Asian delicacy, CNN reported Tuesday.

The fins sell for about $500 a pound.

Knights said the reduction of sharks is disrupting the ocean's equilibrium. "These are ecosystems that have evolved over millions and millions of years," he told CNN. "As soon as you start to take out an important part of it, it's like a brick wall, you take out bricks (and) eventually it's going to collapse."

The soup, which is considered a delicacy in China, Taiwan and Singapore, has become more popular as China's middle class has increased.

Shark fins for soup? Unfortunately, if you want them, they're easy to buy
LA Times 12 Dec 08;

News item: Conservation group WildAid, on CNN's "Planet in Peril" series, calls for an international ban on shark-fin soup, citing the brutal slaughter by finning of nearly 100 million sharks each year. Most of the fins go to Asian countries, where the dish is considered a delicacy.

Reaction: Such a ban, if one ever becomes a reality, is not likely to be effective, unfortunately. Shark populations will continue to be decimated and the marine ecosystem will continue to suffer because of it.

A doom-and-gloom response? Sorry, but all previous attempts to prevent the wanton slaughter of slow-reproducing sharks have failed and as long as there's demand the slaughter will continue. And there is a huge demand.

All you have to do is visit the China-based Alibaba.com website, enter "shark fins" and you'll discover that vendors in most Third World nations and many industrialized nations -- including the United States -- sell them.

Salted, unsalted, dried ... If you want 'em, you can have them shipped by the kilo, as many as you want.

I checked on Alibaba this morning and found several pages of companies selling shark fins. On the first page alone there were companies based in the Maldives (three), Singapore (four), Indonesia (two), Bangladesh, Cameroon, Thailand, Vietnam, Ecuador, Spain, United Arab Emirates, and elsewhere.

One company, World Wide Trading, is based in Monrovia, Calif. It also specializes in scrap metal. Another company, Alfonso Lopez and Partners, is based in Homestead, Fla. It claims to sell shark fins from Ecuador and whole sharks caught in the U.S. A photo above the company profile shows dead sharks scattered on what looks like a warehouse floor.

Perhaps the conservation groups, aside from calling for a ban on shark-fin soup, ought to also go after Alibaba and demand that the global-marketplace website stop allowing the sale of shark fins.

That'd at least make them a little harder to obtain.

--Pete Thomas


Read more!

Experts say koalas will die out without urgent action

Julie Shingleton Yahoo News 11 Dec 08;

SYDNEY (AFP) – Australia's iconic koala will become extinct in some areas of the country if the federal government does not take urgent action, conservationists have warned.

A group of Australian scientists will meet with government officials in Canberra on Friday in a bid to hammer out a national koala conservation strategy to keep key populations of the animals from dying out.

Less than 100,000 koalas are left in the country, compared to millions before they were heavily hunted for fur in the 1920s, said Deborah Tabart from the Australian Koala Foundation.

"The population of koalas in southeast Queensland has decreased from 10,000 to less than 4,000 in a decade," Tabart said.

The population in the southeast Queensland area known as the Koala Coast has fallen by at least 26 percent to 4,611 animals since a 1996-1999 survey as development encroached on their natural habitats, she said.

"We know that there are even less now, in the order of 3,800," Tabart said.

Kat Miller of the World Wildlife Fund also warned that koalas could be on their way to extinction along with several other Australian species.

"There are more than 1,700 federally-listed threatened populations of animals in Australia. There is an extinction crisis in Australia. The koala may well be the next one to go downhill."

The Australian Koala Foundation is urging Environment Minister Peter Garrett to declare the southeast Queensland koala population as critically endangered under law in a bid to protect their habitats from further developments.

"This is the most important thing Minister Garrett and his department can do right now to show he is serious about saving the koala," said Tabart.

"These declines just cannot continue if we still want to see our beautiful icon here."

Climate change has also played in the decline as it altered the nutritional make-up of their staple food, gumtree leaves, Tabart said.

Post mortems of around 700 koalas in southeast Queensland have found that most were "wasted" when they died.

"The impact of climate change on the nutritional value of eucalyptus leaves has been proven to affect koalas," she said.

Garrett has said he had charged Australia's Threatened Species Scientific Committee with assessing the risk to the koala but warned that he needed to await the committee's report before he could act.

"This is a clear indication of how seriously the Australian government is considering reports from the Australian Koala Foundation and others on diminishing koala numbers in some regions," the minister said.


Read more!

Another fisheries commission throws the science overboard

WWF 12 Dec 08;

Pusan, South Korea - The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) today over-rode the advice of its science committee and rejected the recommendations of its chair in choosing only minor reductions in catch for bigeye and yellowfin tuna and watering down or deferring most measures for achieving reduced catches.

The decision comes just a fortnight after the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) both also rejected their own scientists pleas for significant cuts to catches in the face of collapsing or falling tuna populations.

Measures adopted by the WCPFC will see a catch reduction of less than seven per cent for 2009 on WWF estimations, well down on a recommendation of a 30 percent cut which it was conceded would still not have eliminated overfishing. Among the discarded, delayed or reduced measures were high seas fishing closures, restrictions on gear types, and important initiatives to better record and verify catches and crack down on rampant illegal fishing.

It is an especially galling rebuff for WCPFC chair Glenn Hurry, who earlier this year chaired the independent review of ICCAT that found that body’s management of the Mediterranean bluefin tuna fishery “an international disgrace”. WWF commends Mr Hurry, also Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, for his efforts worldwide to promote scientifically based fisheries management.

“Disappearing, collapsing and declining bluefin tuna fisheries world wide for the high value sushi market are increasing demand for bigeye and yellowfin tuna,” said WWF’S Peter Trott, who attended the Pusan meeting.

“What we are seeing now is an international tragedy where the failure of one fishery adds to the pressure on others, while some fisheries nations use their weight to subvert virtually the entire international system for long term sustainable fisheries management.”

WCPFC’s failures will have severe impacts on Pacific island states where foreign fishing fleets are having catastrophic impacts on the viability of their fishers and coastal communities, a point underlined at the meeting when Papua New Guinea announced its intention of denying access to its waters for fishing vessels from nations not subscribing to high seas closures.

“In the equatorial Pacific we can see the crash coming and a block of major fishing nations seem determined to fish their way into it,” said Trott. “The implications are disastrous for the small island communities in the region , where millions of people depend on healthy tuna stocks for food and livelihoods.”

Commission agrees to cut tuna catches in Pacific
Michael Casey, Ap Environmental Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

BANGKOK, Thailand – A commercial fishing commission agreed Friday to cut the catches of bigeye tuna in parts of the Pacific Ocean, a small step in an effort to save a threatened species that is a favorite among sushi lovers.

But environmentalists lambasted the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission's decision to reduce catches by only 10 percent in each of the next three years. They had sought an immediate 30 percent reduction that scientists advising the body had recommended.

"Commissions charged with protecting tuna populations are proving completely ineffective and inadequate," said Mark Stevens, senior program officer at the World Wildlife Fund. "If they are willing to ignore the advice of their own scientists, then we can have little faith in their ability to prevent the demise of this species."

Stevens warned that allowing the bigeye population to dip any lower could be disastrous, though he said the lack of accurate catch data from fishing nations made it difficult to set a time frame when it might go extinct.

The monitoring and verifying system agreed to by the commission's 34 member countries and territories to ensure the cuts is effectively voluntary. Fleets have the option to have observers on boats or to report their catch to their home country.

The WWF's Peter Trott criticized the system, saying plans to put monitors on boats would cover as little as 5 percent of the fishing fleets for all but two months of the year. It will make it almost impossible to prevent countries from underreporting their catches, he said.

The commission is responsible for regulating commercial fishing in the region, which stretches from Hawaii to Asia and as far south as Australia.

Commission Chairman Glen Hurry said the agreement reached Friday in Busan, South Korea, was not perfect but was a "step in the right direction."

"I get 30 percent over three years. I am OK with that," Hurry said regarding the plan that requires reductions of 10 percent in 2009 with similar cuts planned for 2010 and 2011.

Hurry said the measures adopted would be reviewed next year and possibly toughened based on scientific evidence "if these don't seem to be delivering the right result."

The commission also agreed to ban huge floating or sunken platforms known as fish aggregating devices for two months in 2009 and three months in 2010. It also voted to bar fishing fleets from two high seas areas near Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands that are currently not under the jurisdiction of any country.

These measures would likely help bigeye as well as yellowfin tuna populations because they swim together as juveniles.

The reductions are probably the most far-reaching announced by any of the several bodies tasked with regulating tuna fishing around the world.

But since each commission comes up with its own set of rules and they often conflict, conservation of a globe-trotting species like tuna is made even more difficult. The Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, for example, failed to agree last month on any measures to conserve depleted yellowfin and bigeye tuna in the Eastern Pacific.

Anouk Ride, a spokeswoman for the Pacific Island Forum Fisheries Agency, which represents 17 countries and territories including Australia and New Zealand, said the final agreement reached Friday was a good compromise.

Ride said the commission had a "difficult battle" with the United States, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the European Union, which fought against many of the measures.

"But at the end of the day, cooperation was reached," she said. "It will definitely make a difference in efforts to reduce fishing and result in commitments to manage the fishery better."

The Western and Central Pacific region accounts for 55 percent of the world's tuna production with a value of $4 billion to $5 billion. But tuna stocks in the region have fallen since the 1960s, driven down by increasing numbers of industrial fishing fleets.


Read more!

Green hits red light with cash-strapped consumers

Nichola Groom and Peter Henderson, Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

LOS ANGELES/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - U.S. consumers' enthusiasm for all things clean and green is being overshadowed by their urgent need for a different kind of green -- the one that pays the mortgage and puts food on the table.

From hybrid cars to solar panels, products that promise to reduce consumption of polluting fossil fuels are not selling as quickly as they were before access to credit dried up and gas prices plummeted from historic highs.

"I'm the only one that's upset when gas prices go down. Environmentalists feel the same way, but our customer base is not environmentalists," said Tacee Webb, chief executive of Lovecraft Biofuels, a company with locations in Portland and Los Angeles that retrofits cars to run on biodiesel and vegetable oil. "It is hard on us when gas prices go down."

For the most part, products with a green halo command higher prices than their traditional counterparts. Hybrid cars typically carry a premium of $3,000 to $5,000, an investment that takes several years to recoup.

With gas prices now below $2 a gallon, that payback looks much farther off than when prices soared to more than $4 a gallon last summer. Sales of hybrid cars and trucks fell 53 percent in November, according to Autodata Corp, a sharper drop than the 37 percent decline seen industrywide. Toyota Motor Corp's Prius made up more than half of total hybrid sales, though Prius sales were also down by nearly half.

Underscoring consumers' hesitance on hybrids, Toyota recently leased 23 acres of space at Southern California's Long Beach port to store thousands of cars, including Prius hybrids, that dealerships have not been able to take on.

Consumers are also balking at efforts to green their homes, even in cases where that investment will help save on their utility bills down the line.

"It's easy to say, 'I care about the environment, I want to do good for planet Earth.' But when they actually have to write a check and spend money, they need to really be shown some kind of payback," said Alan Finkel, chief executive of Green Life Guru, a Santa Monica, California-based company that helps homeowners reduce their energy usage.

Solar panels are a particularly hard sell, Finkel said, because of the hefty upfront investment that can run into the tens of thousands of dollars.

The world's largest maker of solar cells, Germany's Q-Cells, stunned markets this week by abruptly cutting its outlook for this year due to "a flood" of requests from customers to postpone deliveries.

Small solar players are also feeling the pain. Buehl Solar, a Los Angeles-area solar panel installer, has tripled its monthly advertising budget to $1,500 to keep sales steady.

"If we hadn't done that we would definitely have a drop, maybe by two-thirds," Ulrich Buelhoff, the company's owner, said in an interview.

The lack of available financing for big-ticket home improvements is a major obstacle for consumers who want to install solar panels or do other kinds of green building projects, said one lender.

"There is almost no solar financing in the world today," said Jeff Bricmont, co-founder of Modern Earth Finance, a mortgage broker that specializes in clients who are building green. "Lenders are not lending money based on the green improvement of a home."

The lack of green building activity has hit retailers like Livingreen, which has three home furnishing and building supply stores in Southern California.

"Traffic is dramatically down. Some days you just don't see people at all," Ellen Strickland, co-owner of Livingreen, said of her Los Angeles store. "We've taken a hit like everybody."

Rebuilding efforts following a recent wildfire near Santa Barbara, California, have helped Livingreen's business there, but Strickland said the company is nevertheless moving its Santa Barbara store to a smaller space next year.

Businesses are also getting creative with their pricing. Strictly Business Energy, a Princeton, New Jersey, company that performs home energy audits, is about to launch a $49.95 service through which a customer can input information about his home on the company's website and receive a list of recommendations about reducing energy usage.

Ira Eisenstein, owner of Strictly Business, hopes the new service will help drum up business with homeowners who can't pay the $400 he charges for a home visit.

"If I say to somebody I'm going to spend three hours in your house and it's going to cost you $400, people are like 'Let me check with my husband,' and then you never hear from them again," Eisenstein said.

(Editing by John Wallace)


Read more!

Al Gore rouses U.N. climate talks to more action

Gerard Wynn and Gabriela Baczynska, Reuters 12 Dec 08;

POZNAN, Poland (Reuters) - Former Vice President Al Gore urged weary climate delegates to agree a new climate treaty next year and drew loud cheers on the last day of difficult two-week U.N. climate talks on Friday.

The talks were on course to meet a minimum goal, to sign off on a fund to help poor nations prepare for global warming, but they were likely to delay any decision on climate targets.

Gore urged 145 environment ministers gathered in the western Polish city of Poznan to put aside climate blame squabbles which have marred the talks for years and agree a climate treaty in Copenhagen next December.

"The struggle is palpable here in Poznan," he said.

"It can be done, it must be done," said the 2000 presidential candidate, climate crusader and 2007 Nobel Peace Prize winner.

"We now face a crisis that makes it abundantly clear that increased CO2 emissions anywhere are a threat to the integrity of this planet's climate balance everywhere."

"As a result the old divide between the North and South, between developed and developing countries is a divide that must become obsolete."

He said the world's two biggest carbon emitters China and the United States were both ready to lead the fight against climate change. The U.N. talks are meant to push a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which limits neither country.

Gore said the inspiration of U.S. President elect Barack Obama could push the talks over the finish-line in Copenhagen.

"I would like to relay to you a message that I've heard from the people of the United States of America this year, that I think is very relevant to the task the world is facing over this next year -- 'Yes we can'," he said.

Obama swept to victory last month on a promise of bringing about change in the United States, pushing an upbeat slogan of 'Yes, we can'.

U.N. talks have stumbled on splits between the rich and poor, oil producers and small island states vulnerable to rising seas. Red tape and complex jargon has also got in the way.

Gore said recession was no reason for inaction and urged a "Green New Deal," a program of massive investments, which U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon endorsed on Thursday.

Famous for his "Inconvenient Truth" film charting evidence for climate change, Gore won the loudest cheers for supporting a tougher limit on levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than a widespread aim of 450 parts per million or more.

"We will soon need to toughen that goal to 350," he said.

Gore's tough message to leaders
Richard Black, BBC News 13 Dec 08;

Leaders will have to embrace tougher targets on reducing emissions if they want to prevent dangerous climate change, according to Al Gore.

Speaking here at the UN climate conference, the former US presidential candidate said the "sclerotic" politics of today had to change.

His speech was met with rapturous applause by thousands of delegates.

But environmental groups here criticised the EU's climate and energy package, agreed earlier in Brussels.

EU leadership is widely seen as vital in clinching a global deal at the next UN conference in Copenhagen in a year's time; and campaigners say European governments have concluded a weak agreement.

But Mr Gore, who won last year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change, said he saw more reasons for optimism than pessimism.

"To those who say it's too difficult to conclude a deal by Copenhagen, I say it can be done, it will be done, let's finish this process."

Celebrity complex

One of the reasons Mr Gore gave for his optimism was that a number of developing countries have come forward with firm pledges on restraining the rise in greenhouse gas emissions.

He cited China's plan to improve energy efficiency, Brazil's intention of reducing deforestation and Mexico's adoption of emissions targets.

"Today, no-one is saying that China is standing in the way," he said.

But he said the science mandated moving from a target of keeping atmospheric greenhouse gas levels below 450 parts per million (ppm) - a level that is regarded by many countries as a threshold above which climate impacts are likely to become severe - to 350ppm, which would be much harder to achieve.

Capacity for reducing emissions and for adapting to climate impacts needed to be improved in developing countries - but political capacity also needed to be increased, he said, in the west.

"Political systems in the developed world have become sclerotic. We have to overcome the paralysis that has taken over politics in these countries, rather than spending so much time on OJ Simpson and Paris Hilton and Anna Nicole Smith."

Mr Gore highlighted the Himalayas as an area of the Earth that is feeling climate impacts.

The mountain range acts as a natural reservoir, feeding water into major rivers such as the Brahmaputra, Ganges and Salween.

The potential of climate change to disturb the freshwater supply to more than a billion people makes it, he said, a moral and spiritual issue.

"It is wrong for this generation to destroy the habitability of our planet and ruin the prospects of every future generation."

Some of his other examples of climate impacts, such as the shrinking of Lake Chad, were more contentious.

While climatic factors are believed to play a role in the diminishing amounts of water flowing into the lake, its shrinkage is believed to be more down to local factors such as over-extraction and over-grazing.

But his speech won praise in the corridors afterwards.

Nepal's environment minister Ganesh Shah told BBC News: "What he said was very encouraging in terms of describing climate change in humanitarian terms and as something of great urgency."

"As a minister of Nepal, it is very heart-touching, and I think global attention will now be on the Himalayas."

Twin vision

The UN conference is supposed to conclude on Friday evening here in Poznan, but there are signs that the final sessions may continue through the night - something of a tradition in recent years.

Delegates have been keeping one eye on the EU talks in Brussels, where heads of state from member countries reached agreement on their energy and climate "package", although it has yet to be ratified by the European Parliament.

UN officials describe the EU decision to retain a target of cutting emissions by 20% from 1990 levels by 2020 as a success.

"This is a sign of developed countries' resolve and courage that the world has been waiting for in Poznan," said Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN climate convention.

"This will contribute to propelling the world towards a strong, ambitious and ratifiable outcome in Copenhagen in 2009."

Environment groups, though, were dismayed about a number of concessions offered to industry.

"At present, the offer they have made on cutting their own emissions is woefully inadequate," said Ruth Davis, head of the climate team with the UK's RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds).

Mr Gore's words, though - and those of US Senator John Kerry on Thursday - may have begun to convince delegates that if EU leadership on climate is faltering, the US under Barack Obama is poised to take over.

Global climate deal? Yes we can, Gore says
Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

POZNAN, Poland (AFP) – The way is "now clear" to sign a global climate agreement in 2009, helped greatly by the election of Barack Obama as US president, Nobel-winning green activist Al Gore said on Friday.

"I would like to relay a message that I heard from the people of the United States of America this year that I think is very relevant to the task the world is facing over this next year: 'Yes we can.'," Gore said to a standing ovation on the final day of UN climate talks in Poznan, Poland.

Gore said that before coming to Poznan he had held a meeting with Obama in Chicago at which the president-elect had assured him that climate change would be a "top priority of his administration."

Obama "emphasised that once he is president the United States will once again engage in these negotiations and help lead toward a successful conclusion," Gore said.

He read out several public statements on climate change from Obama and said: "Do not discount these words."

Delegates in Poznan are hoping that Obama, who takes office on January 20, will be a breath of fresh air when it comes to international climate talks after eight years of the outgoing president George W. Bush.

Obama has said he wants the United States to commit to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and by 80 percent in 2050, mainly through a 150-billion dollar, 10-year programme to develop renewable forms of energy.

Some 11,000 participants from more than 190 countries have gathered in Poznan to lay the groundwork for a treaty agreement to sharply reduce the emission of greenhouse gases that drive global warming.

The deal is to be signed and sealed in Copenhagen by the end of 2009, but progress has been excruciatingly slow, in part because the United States under Bush turned it back on the Kyoto Protocol.

"I think the road to Copenhagen is now clear," Gore said.

The former US vice president said that reaching an accord was a matter of survival for the planet.

"Our home, Earth, is in danger. What is at risk of being destroyed is of course not the planet itself, but the conditions that have made it hospitable for human beings," he said.

Halting global warming was not just a political imperative, he added, but a moral issue, and world leaders must step up over the coming year and play a more active role.

"It is time, between now and the gathering in Copenhagen, for heads of state to become personally involved in meeting several times," he said.

On Thursday, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in Poznan that he was considering convening a summit on climate change during the next UN General Assembly session that begins in September 2009.

Negotiations among the 192-member UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are mid-way through a two-year "roadmap" set down on the Indonesian island of Bali last year.

The envisioned Copenhagen treaty will amount to an action plan for curbing greenhouse gases and channelling help for vulnerable countries beyond 2012, when current provisions expire under the Kyoto Protocol.


Read more!

UN talks set programme to landmark climate pact in '09

Richard Ingham Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

POZNAN, Poland (AFP) – The world's forum for tackling climate change on Friday agreed a programme designed to culminate in a treaty that would expunge the darkening threat to mankind from greenhouse gases.

The 192-member UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) set a schedule of work in 2009 designed to conclude with an historic pact in Copenhagen next December.

Taking effect after 2012, the envisioned deal will set down unprecedented measures for curbing emissions of heat-trapping carbon gases and helping poor countries in the firing line of climate change.

UNFCCC members will submit proposals for the treaty's text in the early months of 2009.

By June, these will then be condensed from what is likely to be a massive document into a blueprint for negotiations.

Further decisions were awaited Friday by members of the UNFCCC's Kyoto Protocol -- the first global deal for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions -- that would complement the work programme.

Friday's agreement sets the stage for a year-long process revolving around two big issues: who should make the biggest sacrifices on curbing greenhouse gases, and how to beef up support for poor countries exposed to climate change.

The December 1-12 talks in Poznan, Poland ended with a two-day ministerial-level gathering that failed to make any big advance on these core issues.

But the arduous process was given a boost in morale by the adoption at a European Union summit in Brussels of a deal to slash EU emissions by 20 percent by 2020.

Delegates in Poznan had held their breath, fearful that backsliding by the EU would fatally sap momentum in the UN track.

The final day of the Poznan talks was powerfully spurred by green guru Al Gore, 2007 co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, and by US Senator John Kerry, acting as pointman for President-elect Barack Obama, who has vowed to root out the heart of George W. Bush's policies on climate change.

"Our home, Earth, is in danger," Gore told a packed hall.

"We are moving towards several tipping points that could within less than 10 years make it impossible to avoid irretrievable damage to the planet's habitability for human civilisation -- unless we act quickly."

But, said Gore, momentum was at last building -- in the United States, Europe, China, Brazil and elsewhere -- towards a treaty in Copenhagen that could roll back the threat.

"Yes, we can!" Gore said to a standing ovation, borrowing Obama's campaign slogan.

The EU's so-called "20-20-20" deal seeks to decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent by 2020, make 20 percent energy savings and bring renewable energy sources up to 20 percent of total energy use.

It is the most ambitious scheme of any major economy for dealing with climate change and energy use.

It throws down the gauntlet to the United States, Japan and other rich countries to follow suit in next year's negotiations.

Scientists point the finger for climate change at human influence, especially the burning of fossil fuels in power stations, factories and by cars, as well as through deforestation and agriculture.

Gigatonnes of greenhouse gases spew each year into the Earth's atmosphere, acting like an invisible blanket that stores solar heat and changes the climate system. By century's end, sea levels will rise, deserts will grow and storms floods and droughts could become more frequent.

Even though the peril now seems clear, addressing its source carries an economic cost, because it implies a switch away from fossil fuels that remain the backbone of the world's energy supply.

This is why the negotiations in 2009 are likely to be tense.

Rich countries acknowledge their historic role in the problem but say emerging powers like China and India must also slow their surging carbon pollution.

Developing nations argue that the industrialised world should lead by example, and foot the bill for clean-energy technology and coping with the impact of global warming.

FACTBOX: Results of U.N. December 1-12 climate talks
Reuters 12 Dec 08;

(Reuters) - A 189-nation U.N. climate meeting in Poznan, Poland, has been reviewing progress toward a new U.N. pact meant to be agreed at the end of 2009.

The following are among sticking points and decisions at the December 1-12 talks. The meeting is meant to end later on Friday but delegates say it might be extended into Saturday:

"POZNAN SOLIDARITY PARTNERSHIP"

Host Poland suggested that the outcomes should be called the "Poznan Solidarity Partnership." But many delegates said progress was too scant to deserve a grand title.

FUND TO HELP ADAPTATION

The meeting was split over how to allow developing nations to get cash from a fund to help them adapt to the impacts of climate change such as more floods, droughts and rising seas. The Pacific island state of Tuvalu accused rich nations of tying up the Adaptation Fund in "red tape" and another developing country delegate said they were being treated "like thieves." Rich nations say there must be safeguards to ensure cash will be properly used. U.N. estimates are that the fund will total $300 million a year by 2012 but that costs of adapting to warming will run to tens of billions of dollars a year by 2030.

CARBON MARKETS

The meeting was also divided about whether to allow investments in power plants in developing nations to earn carbon credits if they fitted equipment to trap greenhouse gases and pump them underground.

Climate negotiators drafted measures to speed up U.N. approval of carbon offset projects in poor nations, under the Clean Development Mechanism. The meeting delayed until 2009 a decision on whether to allow new projects to sell carbon offsets from destroying potent greenhouse gas called HFCs.

TIMETABLES

The talks agreed to work out by June a first draft text of the climate pact to be agreed in Copenhagen. They also agreed to hold a meeting in March 29-April 8 in Bonn, Germany, another in Bonn from June 1-12 and a third in August/September at a venue yet to be decided. The new climate treaty will be adopted in Copenhagen at a meeting from November 30-December 11, 2009.

An 84-page list of the main proposals for the new climate pact -- compiled from thousands of pages of documentation -- swelled to more than 100. It would be cut in coming months.

FORESTRY

The talks made little progress on proposals to include tropical forests in a new treaty. Forests soak up heat-trapping carbon dioxide as they grow. A Poznan text added a mention of a "need to promote the full and effective participation of indigenous people and local communities." But indigenous peoples objected that it stopped short of talking about their "rights" to land. Environmentalists also said the text did not clearly rule out replacing old forests with faster-growing plantations.

KYOTO NATIONS

Backers of the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol, the current U.N. plan for fighting global warming until 2012, agreed that a new period beyond 2012 should focus on deeper cuts in emissions -- rather than, for instance, other yardsticks such as the amount of carbon emitted per dollar of economic output.

The group reiterated a 2007 statement that rich nations would have to cut emissions on average by 25 to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 to avoid the worst impacts of global warming under scenarios by the U.N. Climate Panel. Almost no countries are considering such deep cuts.

(Compiled by Alister Doyle and Gerard Wynn)


Read more!

EU breakthrough boosts UN climate talks

Simon Sturdee Yahoo News 13 Dec 08;

POZNAN, Poland (AFP) – A marathon UN climate conference entered its final stages on Friday with a spring in its step after the European Union salvaged its environmental credentials with a landmark new pact.

"The EU today said, 'yes, we can and here's how,' and that's pretty good," said US Senator John Kerry, president-elect Barack Obama's point man at the talks in Poznan, Poland.

The European pact, agreed unanimously by a 27-nation summit in Brussels, is "very exciting," Kerry told AFP during the talks, tasked with advancing towards a global treaty on climate change in Copenhagen a year from now.

"It represents an enormous act of leadership which will have an impact on Poznan, it will have an impact on Copenhagen," Kerry said.

The European Union saved the Kyoto Protocol on reducing rich countries' carbon emissions after US President George W. Bush refused to ratify it in 2001.

Its new pact, setting down a 20-percent reduction in EU greenhouse-gas emissions by 2020 over 1990 levels, was a test of whether it could still lead the way or flail in the face of the world's financial crisis.

French president and summit chairman Nicolas Sarkozy denied that the targets had been weakened in the face of fears that they would drive up the cost of energy and savage jobs amid a deep recession.

China's chief negotiator in Poznan, Su Wei, told AFP that the Brussels deal was a "positive step... though maybe some of the positions have been watered down, compared to 2007."

"It is important that the EU continue to take the lead in the international cooperation to address climate change," Su said.

Yvo de Boer, shepherding the Poznan talks as head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), brimmed with optimism.

"This is a sign of developed countries' resolve and courage that the world has been waiting for in Poznan... This will contribute to propelling the world towards a strong, ambitious and ratifiable outcome in Copenhagen," he said.

Activists however were unimpressed, complaining that the EU package had been diluted and the UN talks appeared to be going nowhere fast.

"This was a moment in time when real leaders would have stepped up and taken the positions that would combat the economic and climate crisis at the same time," said Kim Carstensen of the nature conservancy group WWF.

"Instead, industrialised countries preached sermons about the importance of climate protection in the Poznan plenary while lacking or attacking policies to make it happen at home -- a serious sign of climate hypocrisy."

Nobel laureate Al Gore breathed fire into the UN talks, warning of imminent danger for the planet but also declaring that a political shift was in the wind, in the United States and elsewhere.

"We are moving towards several tipping points that could within less than 10 years make it impossible to avoid irretrievable damage to the planet's habitability for human civilisation -- unless we act quickly," said Gore.

The Poznan talks were tasked with clearing some of the technical undergrowth blocking the way to Copenhagen.

They went into overtime late Friday amid discord over operations of a planned fund to help poor countries to cope with the impact of climate change.

But delegates were confident this problem would be overcome and not block the main decision of launching a work programme towards Copenhagen.

Ministers were expected to decide that a mountain of proposals for the treaty's content be honed down to a negotiation blueprint by next June.

If all goes well, the treaty will take effect from the end of 2012, when the Kyoto Protocol's current roster of commitments runs out.

But a minefield lies ahead in 2009, especially the key question of who should cut their emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, by how much and when.

Scientists are clamouring for deep cuts, both in the medium term, to 2020, and by mid-century.

With urgent action, by century's end, sea levels will rise, deserts will grow and storms, floods and droughts could become more frequent.

FACTBOX: Final EU carbon emissions deal
Reuters 12 Dec 08;

(Reuters) - European Union leaders agreed on a climate and energy package on Friday.

Some high-polluting power plants and factories will get carbon emissions permits for free under the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS).

Regarding emissions outside that scheme, some countries will be able to offset more of their emissions by funding cuts in developing countries.

Below are details of the final compromise.

POWER PLANTS

Default

* Pay for all carbon permits called EU Allowances (EUAs) from 2013

Opt-out power plants

* In states where more than a third of power is produced from coal and income per capita is less than half EU average

* Get free EUAs equal to up to 70 percent of their average annual emissions from 2005-2007, and none free by 2020 * The quota of EUAs will take into account efficiency

* State aid for new super-efficient coal plants from 2013-16 that are ready for carbon capture technology

FACTORIES

Default

* Get 80 percent of their permits for free in 2013 and 30 percent free by 2020, with free permits phased out by 2027

Opt-out manufacturers

* Which are vulnerable to international competition

* Get 100 percent of their EUAs for free from 2013-2020 if they reach a technology benchmark

AID TO EASE COSTS OF CURBING CO2 EMISSIONS

EUA auction revenues will be allocated as follows

* 88 percent to member states as planned, according to their emissions

* 10 percent to member states according to per capita income and renewable energy production

* 2 percent to eastern European states

Extra EUAs to Lithuania to help balance increased carbon emissions following closure of Ignalina nuclear power plant

AID TO RENEWABLES AND CARBON CAPTURE

* 300 million tons of EUAs will be sold on the EU ETS carbon market to raise funds to test carbon capture and storage technology and support renewable energy 2. CARBON OFFSETTING OUTSIDE THE EU ETS

Default

* Member states can offset 3 percent of their emissions, which EU sources say is equivalent to about 50 percent of total emissions-cutting effort under the EU goal to cut greenhouse gases by one fifth compared with 1990 levels by 2020 Opt-out

* Twelve member states can offset 4 percent of 2005 emissions, which EU sources say is equivalent to about 90 percent of total emissions-cutting effort under the 2020 climate plan

* Defined as states producing more carbon emissions in their transport sector, or which produce a lot of renewable energy

(Compiled by Gerard Wynn, reporting by Pete Harrison and Darren Ennis; Editing by Sue Thomas)

EU leaders agree on climate change deal
Constant Brand, Associated Press Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

BRUSSELS, Belgium – European leaders agreed Friday to stick to an ambitious plan to fight global warming through emissions cuts and renewable energy, and on ways to share the hefty costs of setting a global example.

The plan includes concessions to heavy industry and countries in Eastern Europe worried that the cost of curbing pollution would impede economic growth. The expense of the plan had caused uproar among many countries as the continent grapples with economic downturn.

The plan, agreed at an EU summit, lays out how the 27 member countries will cut carbon emissions by 20 percent by 2020.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who holds the bloc's rotating leadership, called the agreement historic and urged global partners to follow Europe's example at U.N. climate change talks in Poznan, Poland.

The French president says the 27-nation bloc has "now delivered" and it was "now the time" for others, including the United States and China, to follow suit.

"People will not follow Europe unless we set the example," he said.

EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called the plans "the most ambitious proposals anywhere in the world."

"Europe has passed its credibility test," he said.

An EU deal could breathe new life into the U.N. climate talks, which were expected to wrap up Friday with a work plan for talks over the next year on a new global warming treaty. But that plan needs worldwide support.

The eyes of Europe's economic rivals were on the EU talks to see how the bloc manages to balance economic growth while keeping intact promises to rein in emissions.

"The overall political message that we have sent to the rest of the world is that Europe is taking the lead," Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said at a news conference after the talks, confirming that the leaders agreed on the climate package.

European diplomats haggled through the night on complex plans to fulfill promises made last year to meet so-called 20-20-20 targets: reducing greenhouse emissions by 20 percent and ensuring that 20 percent of energy comes from wind, sun and other renewable sources by 2020.

Desperate to get a deal, France backed several opt-outs to the strict reductions it wants industries to make. The opt-outs are aimed at heavy industry that might flee abroad to regions with looser environmental rules.

France also proposed leeway for countries very dependent on coal and oil for power generation — but the EU plan that this must be temporary.

The leaders also agreed on a euro200 billion ($258 billion) Europe-wide economic stimulus package to ease the effects of a recession. The downturn overshadowed talks on the costly climate deal.

EU leaders reach new climate deal
BBC News 12 Dec 08;

European Union leaders have reached a deal on a package of measures to fight global warming.

The plan, agreed at a Brussels summit, sets out how 27 member-countries will cut carbon emissions by 20% by 2020, compared with 1990 levels.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the summit chairman, said something "quite historic" had happened in Brussels.

But critics said concessions made to some nations and sectors would lessen the package's long-term impact.

Scientists say carbon dioxide emissions need to be cut by 25-40% by 2020 for there to be a reasonable chance of avoiding dangerous climate change.

In other developments:

• EU leaders agreed an economic recovery package worth 200bn euros (£180bn) to ease the economic downturn

• A deal was reached on concessions enabling the Irish Republic to hold a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, which aims to streamline EU decision-making

'Credibility test'

EU leaders have been discussing the so-called "20/20/20" package to tackle climate change and concessions to limit its impact on struggling industries.

The measures, which also require approval by the European Parliament to become law, commit the EU to cutting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 20% by 2020.

It must also raise renewable sources to 20% of total energy use and achieve a 20% cut in energy use.

EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called the plans "the most ambitious proposals anywhere in the world".

"Europe has today passed its credibility test. We mean business when we talk about climate," he said, appealing to US President-elect Barack Obama to follow Europe's lead.

But critics said the package - which includes concessions to heavy industry and Eastern European countries worried that pollution cuts will harm their economic growth - did not go far enough.

"This is a flagship EU policy with no captain, a mutinous crew and several gaping holes in it," said Sanjeev Kumar of WWF.

'Act of leadership'

Delegates at a UN conference in the Polish city of Poznan have meanwhile been trying to find a way forward in their attempts to reach a global climate change deal by the end of next year in Copenhagen.

Al Gore won the biggest applause of the gathering with a speech predicting a far more active US climate change policy under President-elect Barack Obama.

The former US vice-president also said he was optimistic that a climate change accord could be agreed despite the financial crisis.

"To those who say it's too difficult to conclude a deal by Copenhagen, I say it can be done, it will be done, let's finish this process," he said.

One of the reasons Mr Gore gave for his optimism was that a number of developing countries have come forward with firm pledges on restraining the rise in greenhouse gas emissions, including China, Brazil and Mexico.

But he said the science mandated moving from a target of keeping atmospheric greenhouse gas levels below 450 parts per million (ppm) - a level that is regarded by many countries as a threshold above which climate impacts are likely to become severe - to 350ppm, which would be much harder to achieve.

Capacity for reducing emissions and for adapting to climate impacts needed to be improved in developing countries - but the "sclerotic" politics of today also had to change, he added.

UN officials at the conference said the EU's climate deal was a success and would contribute towards an agreement in Copenhagen, although environmental groups said they were dismayed about a number of concessions it offered to industry.


Read more!