Best of our wild blogs: 21 Apr 10


Mysterious leaf insect camouflages itself on plant
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Back To Sentosa Tanjong Rimau
from colourful clouds and wild shores of singapore and special plants

A peek at Singapore's coral nursery
from wild shores of singapore

Acropora coral @ Pulau Hantu
from sgbeachbum

Cuckoo…Cuckoo…Cuckoo…
from My Itchy Fingers

四月华语导游 Mandarin guided walk @ SBWR II
from PurpleMangrove

Red-headed Trogon feeding stick insect to chick
from Bird Ecology Study Group

TUNZA: Avatar - Reaching The Heart (The Biodiversity Issue!)
from NatureScouter Rambles


Read more!

"Save Ulu Muda": a campaign to save a Kedah forest

WWF Malaysia 21 Apr 10;

Visit www.saveulumuda.com to learn how you can help save Ulu Muda.

Petaling Jaya, 20th April 2010 - The Friends of Ulu Muda II (FoUM II), a coalition of 19 NGOs including WWF-Malaysia, have come up with a website: www.saveulumuda.com to raise awareness among the public on the importance of conserving the Ulu Muda forest.

This relatively unexplored expanse of forest in the northeast of Kedah, approximately 160,000ha in size, is a very important water catchment forest for three dams that supply water to Kedah, Penang and Perlis. It is also one of the few remaining large repositories of biodiversity of the country.

In recent years it has made the headlines due to threats of logging which has led to the formation of the Friends of Ulu Muda II coalition (the first coalition was formed in 2003 when there was an earlier logging proposal).

This coalition aims to garner support amongst the public to call for a permanent ban to logging at Ulu Muda and for its gazettement as a state or national park.

Besides feeding one with beautiful imageries of Ulu Muda and its flora and fauna, the site also has an online petition against logging at Ulu Muda. This gives visitors the chance to be an active participant in efforts to protect Ulu Muda.

Adding to that, the website also provides useful information on the Ulu Muda forest, its flora and fauna, the FoUM II coalition, updates on the coalition’s activities as well as press coverage of Ulu Muda.
For more information on Ulu Muda and FoUM II, visit www.saveulumuda.com

- End-

Notes To Editor

Friends of Ulu Muda II consist of the following organisations:

1. Malaysian Nature Society (MNS)
2. Malaysian Karst Society (MKS)
3. Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM)
4. World Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF-Malaysia)
5. Environmental Protection Society of Malaysia (EPSM)
6. Penang Water Watch (PWW)
7. Partners of Community Organizations (PACOS Trust)
8. Treat Every Environment Special (TrEES)
9. Environmental and Research Organization of Malaysia (ENSEARCH)
10. Muafakat Warga Desa Negeri Kedah (Rural Citizens)
11. Kumpulan Bertindak Petani MADA
12. Pergerakan dan Penyelidikan Pembangunan Komuniti (KOMUNITI)
13. Campus Environmental Network (CARE)
14. Gabungan Angkatan Sahabat Alam Sekitar Nasional (GAGASAN)
15. Teras Pengupayaan Melayu (TERAS)
16. Jaringan Bertindak Nelayan Pantai Semenanjung (JARING-Kedah)
17. Suara Rakyat Malaysia [Penang] (SUARAM)
18. Persatuan Kesedaran Sosial dan Kesedaran Malaysia
19. Consumers Association of Penang (CAP)

For further information on Ulu Muda please contact:

Siti Zuraidah Abidin, Officer, Protected Areas, WWF-Malaysia at 03-7809 3772 ext 6413 or email at szuraidah@wwf.org.my

Hymeir Kamaruddin, President, Malaysian Karst Society at 019-4428926 or email at hymeir@gmail.com

Website to save Ulu Muda
The Star 22 Apr 10;

FRIENDS of Ulu Muda II (FoUM II), a coalition of 19 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) including WWF-Malaysia, has come up with a website to raise awareness on the importance of conserving the Ulu Muda forest.

This relatively unexplored 160,000ha forest in the north-east of Kedah is an important water catchment forest for three dams that supply water to Kedah, Penang and Perlis.

It is one of the few remaining large repositories of biodiversity in the country.

In recent years, it made headlines due to threats of logging, and this led to the formation of Friends of Ulu Muda II. The first coalition was formed in 2003 when there was an earlier logging proposal.

This coalition aims to garner public support to call for a permanent ban on logging at Ulu Muda and its gazetting as a state or national park.

The website displays beautiful images of Ulu Muda and its flora and fauna and has an online petition against logging in the area.

It gives visitors the chance to be active in efforts to protect Ulu Muda.

The website also provides information on the forest and its flora and fauna.

The FoUM II coalition also gives updates on its activities and press coverage on Ulu Muda.

For more information, visit www.saveulumuda.com


Read more!

Ocean Park eyes deal leading to dolphin imports from Solomons

Solomon Star 21 Apr 10;

HONG KONG (South China Morning Post) – In a move that is angering conservationists, Ocean Park will fund research by the government of the Solomon Islands into dolphin numbers as part of an arrangement that may lead to up to 30 bottlenose dolphins being imported to the theme park.

Representatives from Ocean Park have been in talks with the government of the country, east of Papua New Guinea, to pay for a survey seen as critical to allowing the controversial trade in dolphins to continue.

In return, the theme park is expected to get an option to buy dolphins to bring to Hong Kong.

A Solomon Islands government adviser told the South China Morning Post yesterday the representatives met two government ministers and are expected to sign a memorandum of understanding under which "between 24 and 30" dolphins would be sent to Hong Kong.

Ocean Park chairman Allan Zeman insisted the talks were at a "very preliminary stage" and no dolphins would be imported to Hong Kong unless it was clear that the marine mammals' population in the Solomon Islands was not at risk.

"If the dolphins there are not sustainable, we would go somewhere else," he said. "There are a lot of dolphins around, of different species."

Zeman said no decision had been taken as to how many dolphins Ocean Park should import. The park currently has 16.

The theme park keeps a stock of bottlenose dolphins for performances as well as interactive programmes that allow limited touching of the animals by visitors.

The park used to buy fresh stocks of dolphins as needed.

The last time it did so is believed to have been in 1998, when some were bought from Indonesia.

In 2001, it became the world's first aquarium to breed the dolphins by artificial insemination, and more than half its present stock came from captive-breeding programmes and artificial insemination, thus reducing the need for capture in the wild.

To improve genetic diversity and avoid inbreeding that might result in genetic weaknesses in the marine mammals, the park has also exchanged dolphin semen with overseas aquariums.

A spokeswoman for the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department said it had not received any applications from Ocean Park for dolphin imports.

As dolphins are a listed species under the protection of endangered-species provisions in the Animals and Plants Ordinance, imports require both an export permit issued by the country of origin and a licence issued by the department in advance.

Any arrangement with the Solomon Islands is likely to stir controversy, with some conservationists claiming the country's dolphin stocks may not be sustainable and arguing that all dolphin exports from it should be halted.

Dr Suzanne Gendron and Grant Abel from Ocean Park visited the country late last month.

Dr Baddley Anita, an adviser to the minister of fisheries in the Solomon Islands, said the pair met the fisheries and environment ministers.

Ocean Park had agreed to fund an "abundance survey" of dolphins - which Anita described as a way of getting overseas parties interested in importing dolphins to give something to the Solomon Islands in return.

"I have heard that Hong Kong wants between 24 and 30 animals to improve their genetic stocks ... " Anita said.

"They are in the stages of having an MOU done between Ocean Park and scientific and management authorities here in the Solomon Islands.

"The Solomon Islands does not have the money to carry out scientific research, so we have asked people who want to import to put their money where their mouth is."

The research would "give us an idea of the dolphin stocks and abundance in this area", he said, pointing out that the sea area around the Solomon Islands was about the size of Europe, with the case study area alone covering 20,000 to 30,000 square kilometres.

Arguing in favour of a continuation of the overseas trade in dolphins, Anita said it would help stop the killing of the animals by dolphin harvesting communities in the Solomon Islands for food and to meet school fees and buy fishing gear.

"You can sell 50 animals and have the quota divided between the dolphin harvesting communities rather than have them kill a total of 2,000 to 3,000 animals a year," he said.

A report last year by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) raised concerns over the dolphin population in the Solomon Islands, which is currently able to sell 50 of the animals a year overseas, and said the trade should be halted pending a detailed survey.

The Hong Kong Dolphin Conservation Society criticised Ocean Park for funding a government survey that it argued would not be impartial and would seek to continue the lucrative trade in dolphins.

In 2003, 28 live dolphins were sold to Mexico by the island country for HK$585,000 each, according to the IUCN report, which said such exports should be stopped unless the population was properly assessed and shown to be sustainable.

It said that if the international standard, under which only 1-2 per cent of a population of a species should be removed, was applied to the Solomon Islands, the population of bottlenose dolphins would need to be at least 5,000.

"Ocean Park has a population of resident dolphins, and they claim they breed them quite well and maintain the population, so why do they need to capture more wild dolphins?" Dolphin Conservation Society chairman Samuel Hung Ka-yiu said.

"To go to the Solomon Islands is quite controversial. The Solomon Islands have exported dolphins to facilities all over the world, including Dubai, Mexico and Singapore.

"The conclusion of the IUCN report was that the bottlenose population in the Solomon Island was quite small and that this catch was unsustainable. Basically, it recommended no further catch until a proper population assessment."

Hung said funding research by the Solomon Islands government was just "buying by another name and in a way that makes Ocean Park look good. If Ocean Park wants to fund a study on dolphins, it should be giving the money to independent scientists, not the government of the Solomon Islands. Any report by the Solomon Islands government is bound to come out in a way that is favourable to the government's view."

But Zeman said he did not believe the survey findings would be biased.

"I find it hard to believe they would slant something like that," he said. Ocean Park would accept nothing other than a fair, impartial study.

According to the IUCN report, each dolphin exported earns the Solomon Islands government about US$7,500, or 10 per cent of the selling price, in taxes.

No statistics exist on the current population, but conservation groups say populations of bottlenose dolphins tend to be small, often only in the hundreds, except in areas off the western coast of Australia and the Arabian Gulf.

Related article
Hong Kong theme park denies capturing dolphins Yahoo News 19 Apr 10;


Read more!

Elephants scare villagers in Riau

Antara 20 Apr 10;

Bengkalis, Riau Province (ANTARA News) - A herd of elephants has scared residents of Petani village, Mandau sub district, Bengkalis District, Riau Province.

Almost every night, tens of elephants encroached on residential areas and damage crops in hundreds of hectares of plantation as the animals still considered the village within their home range, Petani Village Head Rianto, said here, Tuesday.

"As the consequence, until now, the local people feel still being terrorized by the herd of the elephant, which could attack any time," Rianto said.

Most of the local villagers chose to reduce their activities in their oil palm plantations where the elephants often encroached.

"I ask the government to help free us from the elephants` threat, as there are many victims of elephants` amok every year," he said.

Head of Riau`s Natural Resources Conservation Agency Trisnu Danisworo earlier promised to mobilize his personnel in prone areas to prevent conflict between elephants and human beings.

The Sumatran elephant, the smallest of the Asian elephants, is facing serious pressures arising from illegal logging and associated habitat loss and fragmentation in Indonesia.

The island`s elephant population has come under increasing threat from rapid forest conversion to plantations.

As forests shrink, elephants are increasingly closer to fields and cultivated land, generating conflict with humans that often result in the death of the elephants by poisoning or capture, as well as economic losses to humans.

The population of the Sumatran elephants is about 2,440 to 3,350 individuals. The Sumatran elephant, the smallest of the Asian elephants, is facing serious pressures arising from illegal logging and associated habitat loss and fragmentation in Indonesia.

In the meantime, according to World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in the January-March 2010 period four Sumatera elephants (elephas maximus sumatranus) were dead in Riau causing the further dwindling of their population.

From 2006 to March 2010 a total of 48 Sumatera elephants were found dead, with many of them only their bones remained. (f001/HAJM)


Read more!

Shrimp from Mexico Caught Up in Environmental Restrictions

Emilio Godoy, IPS News 20 Apr 10;

MEXICO CITY, Apr 20, 2010 (IPS) - By the time the shrimp season opens again in the fall, Mexico's fleet hopes to have regained certification to export shrimp harvested on the open sea to the United States, which it lost Tuesday. To do so, shrimpers will have to prove they meet sea turtle protection standards.

The U.S. government announced in late March that it would withdraw the certification because the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service determined that Mexico's turtle excluder devices (TEDs) no longer lived up to U.S. standards.

"Enforcement is important and the additional pressure to conform to international norms is likely to be helpful," Todd Steiner, head of the Turtle Island Restoration Network (TIRN), told IPS.

The California-based international marine conservation organisation is one of the groups behind the pressure to get Washington to apply non-trade sanctions due to the harm caused to several species of sea turtles by industrial shrimp fishing in open ocean off the coast of Mexico, where the shrimp season ended this month.

TIRN, which also has offices in Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea, filed a lawsuit in November against the U. S. State Department for violations of the Endangered Species Act for allowing shrimp caught using methods that are deadly to sea turtles to be sold in the United States, the world's largest single market for shrimp.

According to the suit, filed in a California district court, the State Department has failed to properly evaluate and prevent harm to sea turtles from overseas fleets that export shrimp to the U.S. under the ESA’s Turtle-Shrimp Law, which certified in May 2009 that 15 nations (including Mexico) had adopted programmes to reduce the incidental capture of sea turtles in their shrimp fisheries.

But the government of Barack Obama decided to withdraw Mexico's certification after carrying out inspections of TEDs used by shrimpers in this country.

"The embargo is the result of a badly designed fishing policy; it comes from an overly lenient policy on the part of the government that allows this kind of activity," Alejandro Olivera, coordinator of Greenpeace's oceans and coasts campaign in Mexico, told IPS.

TEDs are a gear modification used on shrimp trawls that enables sea turtles to escape from the nets.

Mexico exported some 44,000 tons of shrimp to the United States in 2009, for an estimated 330 million dollars. The ban applies to around 38 million dollars worth of wild-harvested shrimp, a sector in which Mexico competes with Thailand, China, Vietnam and other nations.

Most of Mexico's shrimp is harvested in shallow coastal waters or farmed, and the ban will apply to only 20 percent of the country's annual shrimp production, according to Mexico's National Aquaculture and Fishing Commission (CONAPESCA), which announced that it would work with experts from the United States to get the country's fleets recertified through new inspections, most likely by the start of the shrimp season in September.

At the daily press briefing in Washington Monday, U.S. State Department Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Philip J. Crowley said that although the withdrawal of certification of Mexico's TED programme "has trade ramifications, this is primarily an environmental compliance issue aimed at preserving endangered sea turtles."

He added that "both governments are engaged to ensure renewal of Mexican certification within the shortest period of time consistent with the requirements of U.S. law."

Wild shrimp is generally caught in trawl nets which catch everything in their path. Shrimp trawling has an especially high unintentional capture or bycatch of other species: for every kilo of shrimp netted, up to 10 kilos of other marine life is thrown back into the sea, dead or dying, according to Greenpeace's International Seafood Red List.

Six species of sea turtle are native to Mexico, where "most species remain extremely endangered, especially leatherback, greens and loggerheads on the Pacific coast," Steiner said.

Today there are as few as 2,000 adult female leatherback turtles in the Pacific Ocean.

A report on fishing in Mexico carried out in 2009 by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), titled "Estudio social de la pesca en México", found an excessive number of boats and harvesting of juveniles, a failure to respect seasonal fishing bans, and a lack of work opportunities and access to loans.

Some 1,350 shrimp trawlers operate in Mexico, where there are at least 10 species of shrimp.

In 1988, FAO and the World Bank recommended that Mexico cut its Pacific shrimp fleet by 29 to 49 percent and the Gulf of Mexico fleet by 50 to 60 percent.

As a result of the U.S. withdrawal of certification, which critics say is questionable because it is a non-trade sanction against foreign products, CONAPESCA and PROFEPA - Mexico's federal environmental prosecutor - carried out 1,219 inspections of shrimp boats.

As a result, 40 boats were seized, and shrimping equipment was confiscated from 40 trawlers, along with more than 33,500 kilos of catch. In addition, 106 boats were fined for violating regulations on the use of TEDs.

Between 2005 and 2009, CONAPESCA revoked 305 commercial fishing licenses and 95 concessions, involving 400 shrimpers. The goal is to add another 92 boats to that total this year.

"Embargos work, but inspection and monitoring is needed. There are many unregulated boats and illegal fishing is a big problem," said Olivera, who suggested the creation of marine reserves where fishing is banned.

The threat of a ban on shrimp exports from Mexico had been hanging in the air for several years. In 2008, the New York-based Natural Resources Defence Council (NRDC) called for a ban to protect the vaquita marina, a highly endangered small porpoise that lives only in Mexico's Upper Gulf of California.

The vaquita marina is considered the world’s most endangered small cetacean species, with just 150 individuals left.

That year, the NRDC, the fishing industry and the Mexican government signed an agreement for a programme to protect the vaquita marina, which periodically drowns in shrimp nets.

Mexico was subjected to a similar ban in 1990, when the U.S. government banned tuna imports from Mexico, Venezuela, Panama, Ecuador, and the tiny Pacific island of Vanuatu in order to protect dolphins.

That measure was lifted in 2000, but since 2006 only tuna certified as dolphin safe can be sold in the U.S.

"I am hopeful that enforcement of the use of turtle excluder devices will improve and the embargo will be lifted," Steiner said. (END)


Read more!